Ecology

1.
Moberg, F. & Folke, C. Ecological goods and services of coral reef ecosystems. Ecol. Econ. 29, 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00009-9 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Lai, S., Loke, L. H. L., Hilton, M. J., Bouma, T. J. & Todd, P. A. The effects of urbanisation on coastal habitats and the potential for ecological engineering: a Singapore case study. Ocean Coast Manage. 103, 78–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.11.006 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Ng, C. S. L., Toh, T. C. & Chou, L. M. Current status of coral reef restoration in Singapore. in Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Sustainability, Energy & the Environment, 546–558 (2013).

4.
Ng, C. S. L., Chen, D. & Chou, L. M. Hard coral assemblages on seawalls in Singapore. In Contributions to Marine Science (ed. Tan, K. S.) 75–79 (Tropical Marine Science Institute, Singapore, 2012).
Google Scholar 

5.
Horoszowski-Fridman, Y. B. & Rinkevich, B. Restoration of the animal forests: harnessing silviculture biodiversity concepts for coral transplantation. In Marine Animal Forests (ed. Rossi, S.) 1313–1335 (Springer, Cham, 2016).
Google Scholar 

6.
Ng, C. S. L. et al. Enhancing the biodiversity of coastal defence structures: transplantation of nursery-reared reef biota onto intertidal seawalls. Ecol. Eng. 82, 480–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.05.016 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Karlson, R. H. Dynamics of Coral Communities (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002).
Google Scholar 

8.
Glynn, P. W. & Enochs, I. C. Invertebrates and their roles in coral reef ecosystems. In Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition (eds Dubinsky, Z. & Stambler, N.) 273–325 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010).
Google Scholar 

9.
Fong, P. & Paul, J. V. Coral reef algae: the good, the bad, and the ugly. In Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition (eds Dubinsky, Z. & Stambler, N.) (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010).
Google Scholar 

10.
Swierts, T. & Vermeij, M. J. A. Competitive interactions between corals and turf algae depend on coral colony form. PeerJ 4, e1984. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1984 (2016).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

11.
Lang, J. C. & Chornesky, E. A. Competition between scleractinian reef corals—a review of mechanisms and effects. In Ecosystems of the World (ed. Dubinsky, Z.) 133–206 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990).
Google Scholar 

12.
Tanner, J. E. Interspecific competition reduces fitness in scleractinian corals. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 214, 19–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(97)00024-5 (1997).
Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Birrell, C. L., McCook, L. J., Willis, B. L. & Diaz-Pulido, G. A. Effects of benthic algae on the replenishment of corals and the implications for the resilience of coral reefs. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 46, 25–63 (2008).
Google Scholar 

14.
Connell, J. H. et al. A long-term study of competition and diversity of corals. Ecol. Monogr. 74, 179–210. https://doi.org/10.1890/02-4043 (2004).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Paine, R. T. Ecological determinism in the competition for space: the Robert H. MacArthur award lecture. Ecology 65, 1339–1348. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939114 (1984).
Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Buss, L. W. Competition and community organization on hard surfaces in the sea. In Community Ecology (eds Diamond, J. & Case, T. J.) (Harper and Row, New York, 1986).
Google Scholar 

17.
Chadwick, N. E. Spatial distribution and the effects of competition on some temperate scleractinia and coralliomorpharia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 70, 39–48 (1991).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Romano, S. L. Long-term effects of interspecific aggression on growth of the reef-building corals Cyphastrea ocellina (Dana) and Pocilloporu damicornis (Linnaeus). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 140, 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(90)90087-S (1990).
Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Rinkevich, B. & Loya, Y. Intraspecific competition in a reef coral: effects on growth and reproduction. Oecologia 66, 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00378559 (1985).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

20.
Chadwick, N. E. & Morrow, K. M. Competition among sessile organisms on coral reefs. In Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition (eds Dubinsky, Z. & Stambler, N.) 347–371 (Springer, Dordrecht, 2011).
Google Scholar 

21.
Rinkevich, B. & Loya, Y. Intraspecific competitive networks in the Red Sea coral Stylophora pistillata. Coral Reefs 1, 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00571193 (1983).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Leslie, P. H. On the use of matrices in certain population mathematics. Biometrika 33, 183–212 (1945).
MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Connell, J. H. On the prevalence and relative importance of interspecific competition: evidence from field experiments. Am. Nat. 122, 661–669. https://doi.org/10.1086/284165 (1983).
Article  Google Scholar 

24.
Schoener, T. W. Field experiments on interspecific competition. Am. Nat. 122, 240–285. https://doi.org/10.1086/284133 (1983).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Barnes, R. S. K. & Hughes, R. N. An Introduction to Marine Ecology (Blackwell Scientific, Hoboken, 1988).
Google Scholar 

26.
Abelson, A. & Loya, Y. Interspecific aggression among stony corals in Eilat, Red Sea: a hierarchy of aggression ability and related parameters. Br. Mar. Sci. 65, 851–860 (1999).
Google Scholar 

27.
Tylianakis, J. M., Didham, R. K., Bascompte, J. & Wardle, D. A. Global change and species interactions in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1351–1363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01250.x (2008).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

28.
Breeuwer, A., Heijmans, M. P. D., Robroek, B. J. M. & Berendse, F. The effect of temperature on growth and competition between Sphagnum species. Oecologia 156, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-0963-8 (2008).
ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

29.
Edmunds, P. J. et al. Persistence and change in community composition of reef corals through present, past, and future climates. PLoS ONE 9, e107525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0107525 (2014).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30.
Hidaka, M. & Yamazato, K. Intraspecific interactions in a scleractinian coral, Galaxea fascicularis: induced formation of sweeper tentacles. Coral Reefs 3, 77–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00263757 (1984).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

31.
Lapid, E. D., Wielgus, J. & Chadwick-Furman, N. E. Sweeper tentacles of the brain coral Platygyra daedalea: induced development and effects on competitors. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 282, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps282161 (2004).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Bak, R. P. M., Termaat, R. M. & Dekker, R. Complexity of coral interactions: influence of time, location of interaction and epifauna. Mar. Biol. 69, 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396901 (1982).
Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Lapid, E. D. & Chadwick, N. E. Long-term effects of competition on coral growth and sweeper tentacle development. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 313, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps313115 (2006).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

34.
Millar, K. J. The Platygyra species complex: implications for coral taxonomy and evolution. Dissertation, James Cook University of North Queensland (1994).

35.
Dai, C. F. Interspecific competition in Taiwanese corals with special reference to interactions between alcyonaceans and scleractinians. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 60, 291–297 (1990).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

36.
Forsman, Z. H., Page, C. A., Toonen, R. J. & Vaughan, D. Growing coral larger and faster: micro-colony-fusion as a strategy for accelerating coral cover. PeerJ 3, e1313. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1313 (2015).
CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

37.
Colinvaux, P. A. Introduction to Ecology (Wiley, New York, 1973).
Google Scholar 

38.
Lang, J. C. Interspecific aggression by scleractinian corals. II. Why the race is not always to the swift. Bull. Mar. Sci. 23, 260–279 (1973).
Google Scholar 

39.
Rinkevich, B. & Loya, Y. Oriented translocation of energy in grafted reef corals. Coral Reefs 1, 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00304422 (1983).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Chornesky, E. A. The ties that bind: inter-clonal cooperation may help a fragile coral dominate shallow high-energy reefs. Mar. Biol. 109, 41–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01320230 (1991).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Rejmanek, M. Intraspecific aggregation and species coexistence. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 209–210 (2002).
Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Karlson, R. H., Cornell, H. V. & Hughes, T. P. Aggregation influences coral species richness at multiple spatial scales. Ecology 88, 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[170:AICSRA]2.0.CO;2 (2007).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

43.
Idjadi, J. A. & Karlson, R. H. Spatial arrangement of competitors influences coexistence of reef-building corals. Ecology 88, 2449–2454. https://doi.org/10.1890/06-2031.1 (2007).
Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

44.
Edmunds, P. J. & Davies, P. S. An energy budget for Porites porites (Scleractinia). Mar. Biol. 92, 339–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00392674 (1986).
Article  Google Scholar 

45.
Vollmer, S. V. & Edmunds, P. J. Allometric scaling in small colonies of the scleractinian coral Siderastrea siderea (Ellis and Solander). Biol. Bull. 199, 21–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542703 (2000).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

46.
Buss, L. W. Bryozoan overgrowth interactions—the interdependence of competition for space and food. Nature 281, 475–477. https://doi.org/10.1038/281475a0 (1979).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Thongtham, N. & Chansang, H. Transplantation of Porites lutea to rehabilitate degraded coral reef at Maiton Island, Phuket, Thailand. in Proceedings of the 11th International Coral Reef Symposium, 1271–1274 (2009).

48.
dela Cruz, D. W., Rinkevich, B., Gomez, E. D. & Yap, H. T. Assessing an abridged nursery phase for slow growing corals used in coral restoration. Ecol. Eng. 84, 408–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.042 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Forrester, G. E., Ferguson, M. A., O’Connell-Rodwell, C. E. & Jarecki, L. L. Long-term survival and colony growth of Acropora palmata fragments transplanted by volunteers for restoration. Aquat. Conserv. 24, 81–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2374 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Edwards, A. J. & Clark, S. Coral transplantation: a useful management tool or misguided meddling?. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 37, 474–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(99)00145-9 (1999).
Article  Google Scholar 

51.
Harrison, P. L. & Wallace, C. C. Reproduction, dispersal and recruitment of scleractinian corals. In Coral Reefs. Ecosystems of the World (ed. Dubinski, Z.) 133–206 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990).
Google Scholar 

52.
Koh, E. G. L. & Sweatman, H. Chemical warfare among scleractinians: bioactive natural products from Tubastrea faulkneri Wells kill larvae of potential competitors. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 251, 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00222-7 (2000).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

53.
Van Veghel, M. L. J., Cleary, D. F. R. & Bak, R. P. M. Interspecific interactions and the competitive ability of the polymorphic reef-building coral Montastraea annularis. Bull. Mar. Sci. 58, 792–803 (1996).
Google Scholar 

54.
Edwards, A. J. et al. Evaluating costs of restoration. In Reef Restoration Manual (ed. Edwards, A. J.) 113–128 (Coral Reef Targeted Research & Capacity Building for Management Program, St Lucia, 2010).
Google Scholar 

55.
Huang, D. W., Tun, K. P. P., Chou, L. M. & Todd, P. A. An inventory of zooxanthellate scleractinian corals in Singapore, including 33 new records. Raffles B Zool. 22, 69–80 (2009).
CAS  Google Scholar 

56.
Forsman, Z. H., Rinkevich, B. & Hubter, C. L. Investigating fragment size for culturing reef-building corals (Porites lobata and P. compressa) in ex situ nurseries. Aquaculture 261, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2006.06.040 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar  More