Ecology

Chakraborty, A. & Jones, T. E. in Natural Heritage of Japan Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism (Conservation and Management Series) (eds Chakraborty, A. et al.) Ch. 16 (Springer, 2018).Nakamura, K. Possible nascent trench along the eastern Japan Sea as the convergent boundary between Eurasian and North American plates (in Japanese). Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. 58, 711–722 (1983).
Google Scholar 
Seno, T. Is northern Honshu a microplate? Tectonophysics 115, 177–196 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ogawa, Y., Takami, Y. & Takazawa, S. in Formation and Applications of the Sedimentary Record in Arc Collision Zones Vol. 436 (eds Draut, A. E. at al.) 155–170 (Geological Society of America, 2008).Tsuya, H. & Morimoto, R. Types of volcanic eruptions in Japan (in Japanese). Bull. Volcanol. 26, 209–222 (1963).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Aoki, Y., Tsunematsu, K. & Yoshimoto, M. Recent progress of geophysical and geological studies of Mt. Fuji Volcano, Japan. Earth Sci. Rev. 194, 264–282 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tsuchi, R. Geology and groundwater of Mt. Fuji, Japan (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 126, 33–42 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vittecoq, B., Reninger, P.-A., Lacquement, F., Martelet, G. & Violette, S. Hydrogeological conceptual model of andesitic watersheds revealed by high-resolution heliborne geophysics. Hydrol. Earth Sys. Sci. 23, 2321–2338 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, S. Hydrologic study of volcano Fuji and its adjacent areas (in Japanese). Geogr. Rev. Jpn 43, 267–184 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, T. & Nakada, S. in Volcanic Hazards, Risks, and Disasters (eds Shroder, J. F. & Papale, P.) 355–376 (Elsevier, 2015).Hasegawa, A. et al. Plate subduction, and generation of earthquakes and magmas in Japan as inferred from seismic observations: an overview. Gondwana Res. 16, 370–400 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kashiwagi, H. & Nakajima, J. Three‐dimensional seismic attenuation structure of central Japan and deep sources of arc magmatism. Geophys. Res. Lett. 46, 13746–13755 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Obrochta, S. P. et al. Mt. Fuji Holocene eruption history reconstructed from proximal lake sediments and high-density radiocarbon dating. Quat. Sci. Rev. 200, 395–405 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tosaki, Y. & Asai, K. Groundwater ages in Mt. Fuji (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 126, 89–104 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Imtiaz, M. et al. Vanadium, recent advancements and research prospects: a review. Environ. Int. 80, 79–88 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Koshimizu, S., & Tomura, K. (2000). Geochemical behavior of trace vanadium in the spring, groundwater and lake water at the foot of Mt. Fuji, Central Japan. In K. Sato & Y. Iwasa (Eds.), Groundwater Updates. Springer, Tokyo. 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-68442-8_29Ono, M. et al. Regional groundwater flow system in a stratovolcano adjacent to a coastal area: a case study of Mt. Fuji and Suruga Bay, Japan. Hydrogeol. J. 27, 717–730 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
UNESCO Fujisan, Sacred Place and Source of Artistic Inspiration (World Heritage Convention, 2013); https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1418Nationally Designated Cultural Properties Database (in Japanese) (Agency of Cultural Affairs Japan, 2020); https://kunishitei.bunka.go.jp/bsys/indexShowa’s 100 Famous Waters of Japan (Ministry of the Environment Japan (MOEJ), 1985); https://www.env.go.jp/water/meisui/Heisei’s 100 Famous Waters of Japan (MOEJ, 2009): https://www.env.go.jp/water/meisui/An Overview of the Bottled Water Market in Japan (Frost & Sullivan, 2016).Fujiyoshida Mineral Water Conservation Association FMWCA Regulations (in Japanese) (Mt. Fuji Springs Inc., 2016); http://fujiyoshida-hozen.org/aboutwater/Adachi, Y. et al. The physiological effects of the undercurrent water from Mt. Fuji on type 2 diabetic KK-Ay mice. Biomed. Res. Trace Elem. 15, 76–78 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Isogai, A., Kanada, R., Iawata, H. & Sudo, S. The influence of vanadium on the components of hineka (in Japanese). J. Brew. Soc. Jpn 107, 443–450 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamada, Y., Tokui, M., Yamashita, N., Kubodera, T. & Akashi, T. Analyzing the relationship between the inorganic element profile of sake dilution water and dimethyl trisulfide formation using multi-element profiling. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 127, 710–713 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
London Sake Challenge 2018: Awarded Sake (Sake Somelier Association (SSA), 2018); https://londonsakechallenge.com/awarded-sake-2019/London Sake Challenge 2019: Awarded Sake (SSA, 2019); https://londonsakechallenge.com/awarded-sake-2019/Yasuhara, M., Hayashi, T. & Asai, K. Overview of the special issue “Groundwater in Mt. Fuji”. J. Geogr. 126, 25–27 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yasuhara, M., Hayashi, T., Asai, K., Uchiyama, M. & Nakamura, T. Overview of the special issue “Groundwater in Mt. Fuji (Part 2)”. J. Geogr. 129, 657–660 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gmati, S., Tase, N., Tsujimura, M. & Tosaki, Y. Aquifers interaction in the southwestern foot of Mt. Fuji, Japan, examined through hydrochemistry and statistical analyses. Hydrol. Res. Lett. 5, 58–63 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ikeda, K. Water-sediments interaction of salinized groundwater, and its chemical compositions in coastal areas (in Japanese). Jpn. J. Limnol. 46, 303–314 (1985).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kato, K. et al. Unveiled groundwater flushing from the deep seafloor in Suruga Bay. Limnology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10201-014-0445-0 (2015).Segawa, T. et al. Microbes in groundwater of a volcanic mountain, Mt. Fuji; 16S rDNA phylogenetic analysis as a possible indicator for the transport routes of groundwater. Geomicrobiol. J. 32, 677–688 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sugiyama, A., Masuda, S., Nagaosa, K., Tsujimura, M. & Kato, K. Tracking the direct impact of rainfall on groundwater at Mt. Fuji by multiple analyses including microbial DNA. Biogeosciences 15, 721–732 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yasuhara, M., Kazahaya, K. & Marui, A. in Fuji Volcano (eds Aramaki, S. et al.) 389–405 (Yamanashi Institute of Environmental Sciences, 2007).Tsuchi, R. in Fuji Volcano (eds Aramaki, S. et al.) 375–387 (Yamanashi Institute of Environmental Sciences, 2007).Takada, A., Yamamoto, T., Ishizuka, Y. & Nakano, S. in Miscellaneous Map Series No. 12, 56 (Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 2016).Uchiyama, T. Hydrogeological structure and hydrological characterization in the northern foot area of Fuji volcano, central Japan (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 129, 697–724 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ikawa, R. et al. in S-5: Seamless Geoinformation of Coastal Zone “Northern Coastal Zone of Suruga Bay” (GSJ, AIST, 2016).AIST 2014 Marine Geological and Environmental Survey Confirmation Technology Development Results Report (in Japanese) (AIST, 2015).AIST 2015 Marine Geological and Environmental Survey Confirmation Technology Development Results Report (in Japanese) (AIST, 2016).Lin, A., Iida, K. & Tanaka, H. On-land active thrust faults of the Nankai–Suruga subduction zone: the Fujikawa-kako Fault Zone, central Japan. Tectonophysics 601, 1–19 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fujita, E. et al. Stress field change around the Mount Fuji volcano magma system caused by the Tohoku megathrust earthquake, Japan. Bull. Volcanol. 75, 679 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kano, K.-I., Odawara, K., Yamamoto, G. & Ito, T. Tectonics of the Fujikawa-kako Fault Zone around the Hoshiyama Hills, central Japan, since 1 Ma. Geosci. Rep. Shizuoka Univ. 46, 19–49 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Schilling, O. S., Cook, P. G. & Brunner, P. Beyond classical observations in hydrogeology: the advantages of including exchange flux, temperature, tracer concentration, residence time and soil moisture observations in groundwater model calibration. Rev. Geophys. 57, 146–182 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schilling, O. S. et al. Quantifying groundwater recharge dynamics and unsaturated zone processes in snow-dominated catchments via on-site dissolved gas analysis. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR028479 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
National Hydrological Environment Database of Japan (GSJ, AIST, 2020).Hayashi, T. Understanding the groundwater flow system at the northern part of Mt. Fuji: current issues and prospects (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 129, 677–695 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yasuhara, M., Marui, A., & Kazahaya, K. (1997). Stable isotopic composition of groundwater from Mt. Yatsugatake and Mt. Fuji, Japan. Proceedings of the Rabat Symposium. Rabat Symposium, April 1997, Wallingford, UK.Jasechko, S. Global isotope hydrogeology—review. Rev. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018RG000627 (2019).Yaguchi, M., Muramatsu, Y., Chiba, H., Okumura, F. & Ohba, T. The origin and hydrochemistry of deep well waters from the northern foot of Mt. Fuji, central Japan. Geochem. J. 50, 227–239 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Aizawa, K. et al. Gas pathways and remotely triggered earthquakes beneath Mount Fuji, Japan. Geology 44, 127–130 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kipfer, R. et al. Injection of mantle type helium into Lake Van (Turkey): the clue for quantifying deep water renewal. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 125, 357–370 (1994).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kipfer, R., Aeschbach-Hertig, W., Peeters, F. & Stute, M. in Noble Gases in Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Vol. 47 (eds Porcelli, D. et al.) Ch. 14 (De Gruyter, 2002).Sano, Y. & Fischer, T. P. in The Noble Gases as Geochemical Tracers: Advances in isotope geochemistry (ed. Burnard, O.) Ch. 10 (Springer, 2013).Sano, Y. & Wakita, H. Distribution of 3He/4He ratios and its implications for geotectonic structure of the Japanese Islands. J. Geophys. Res. 90, 8729–8741 (1985).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tomonaga, Y. et al. Fluid dynamics along the Nankai Trough: He isotopes reveal direct seafloor mantle-fluid emission in the Kumano Basin (Southwest Japan). ACS Earth Space Chem. 4, 2015–2112 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, A. et al. Mantle fluids associated with crustal-scale faulting in a continental subduction setting, Taiwan. Sci Rep. 9, 10805 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Crossey, L. J. et al. Continental smokers couple mantle degassing and distinctive microbiology within continents. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 435, 22–30 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crossey, L. J. et al. Degassing of mantle-derived CO2 and He from springs in the southern Colorado Plateau region—neotectonic connections and implications for groundwater systems. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 121, 1034–1053 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kusuda, C., Iwamori, H., Nakamura, H., Kazahaya, K. & Morikawa, N. Arima hot spring waters as a deep-seated brine from subducting slab. Earth Planets Space 66, 119 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sano, Y., Kameda, A., Takahata, N., Yamamoto, J. & Nakajima, J. Tracing extinct spreading center in SW Japan by helium-3 emanation. Chem. Geol. 266, 50–56 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sano, Y. et al. Groundwater helium anomaly reflects strain change during the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in Southwest Japan. Sci. Rep. 6, 37939 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Peeters, F. et al. Improving noble gas based paleoclimate reconstruction and groundwater dating using 20Ne/22Ne ratios. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 587–600 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reimann, C. & de Caritat, P. Chemical Elements in the Environment 398 (Springer, 1998).Hamada, T. in Vanadium in the Environment. Part 1: Chemistry and Biochemistry Advances in Environmental Sciences and Technology Vol. 10 (ed. Nriagu, J. O.) 97–123 (Wiley & Sons, 1998).Koshimizu, S. & Kyotani, T. Geochemical behaviors of multi-elements in water samples from the Fuji and Sagami Rivers, Central Japan, using vanadium as an effective indicator. Jpn J. Limnol. 63, 113–124 (2002).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sohrin, R. in Green Science and Technology (eds Park, E. Y. et al.) Ch. 7 (CRC, 2019).Wehrli, B. & Stumm, W. Oxygenation of vanadyl(IV). Effect of coordinated surface hydroxyl groups and hydroxide ion. Langmuir 4, 753–758 (1988).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wright, M. T. & Belitz, K. Factors controlling the regional distribution of vanadium in groundwater. Ground Water 48, 515–525 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Deverel, S. J., Goldberg, S. & Fujii, R. in Agricultural salinity assessment and management (eds W.W. Wallender & K.K. Tanji) 89–137 (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2012).Wehrli, B. & Stumm, W. Vanadyl in natural waters: adsorption and hydrolysis promote oxygenation. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 53, 69–77 (1989).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, G. & Liu, H. Understanding the reduction kinetics of aqueous vanadium(V) and transformation products using rotating ring-disk electrodes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 11643–11651 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Telfeyan, K., Johannesson, K. H., Mohajerin, T. J. & Palmore, C. D. Vanadium geochemistry along groundwater flow paths in contrasting aquifers of the United States: Carrizo Sand (Texas) and Oasis Valley (Nevada) aquifers. Chem. Geol. 410, 63–78 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kan, K. et al. Archaea in Yellowstone Lake. ISME J. 5, 1784–1795 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wong, H. L. et al. Dynamics of archaea at fine spatial scales in Shark Bay mat microbiomes. Sci. Rep. 7, 46160 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ikeda, K. A study on chemical characteristics of ground water in Fuji area (in Japanese). J. Groundw. Hydrol. 24, 77–93 (1982).
Google Scholar 
Aizawa, K. et al. Hydrothermal system beneath Mt. Fuji volcano inferred from magnetotellurics and electric self-potential. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 235, 343–355 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, T., Takada, A., Ishizuka, Y., Miyaji, N. & Tajima, Y. Basaltic pyroclastic flows of Fuji volcano, Japan: characteristics of the deposits and their origin. Bull. Volcanol. 67, 622–633 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, T., Takada, A., Ishizuka, Y. & Nakano, S. Chronology of the products of Fuji volcano based on new radiometoric carbon ages (in Japanese). Bull. Volcanol. 50, 53–70 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Aizawa, K., Yoshimura, R. & Oshiman, N. Splitting of the Philippine Sea Plate and a magma chamber beneath Mt. Fuji. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L09603 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nakamura, H., Iwamori, H. & Kimura, J.-I. Geochemical evidence for enhanced fluid flux due to overlapping subducting plates. Nat. Geosci. 1, 380–384 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kaneko, T., Yasuda, A., Fujii, T. & Yoshimoto, M. Crypto-magma chambers beneath Mt. Fuji. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 193, 161–170 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tsuya, H., Machida, H., & Shimozuru, D. (1988). Geology of volcano Mt. Fuji. Explanatory text of the geologic map of Mt. Fuji (scale 1:50,000; second printing). Geological Survey of Japan (GSJ), Tsukuba, Japan.Yoshimoto, M. et al. Evolution of Mount Fuji, Japan: inference from drilling into the subaerial oldest volcano, pre-Komitake. Isl. Arc. 19, 470–488 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shikazono, N., Arakawa, T. & Nakano, T. Groundwater quality, flow, and nitrogen pollution at the southern foot of Mt. Fuji (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 123, 323–342 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tosaki, Y., Tase, N., Sasa, K., Takahashi, T. & Nagashima, Y. Estimation of groundwater residence time using the 36Cl bomb pulse. Groundwater 49, 891–902 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, T. Geology of the Southwestern Part of Fuji Volcano (in Japanese) 27 (GSJ, AIST, 2014).Tsuya, H. Geology of volcano Mt. Fuji. Explanatory text of the geologic map of Mt. Fuji (scale 1:50,000). Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan. (1968).Tomiyama, S., Ii, H., Miyaike, S., Hattori, R. & Ito, Y. Estimation of the sources and flow system of groundwater in Fuji-Gotenba area by stable isotopic analysis and groundwater flow simulation (in Japanese). Bunseki Kagaku 58, 865–872 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Oguchi, T. & Oguchi, C. T. in Geomorphological Landscapes of the World (ed. Migoń, P.) Ch. 31 (Springer, 2010).Mean Annual Precipitation from 1981-2010 Recorded at the Four Mt. Fuji Observatories (Mishima, Fuji, Furuseki, Yamanaka) (Japan Meteorological Agency, 2015).Schilling, O. S., Park, Y.-J., Therrien, R. & Nagare, R. M. Integrated surface and subsurface hydrological modeling with snowmelt and pore water freeze-thaw. Groundwater 57, 63–74 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sakio, H. & Masuzawa, T. Advancing timberline on Mt. Fuji between 1978 and 2018. Plants 9, 1537 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Asai, K. & Koshimizu, S. 3H/3He-based groundwater ages for springs located at the foot of Mt. Fuji (in Japanese). J. Groundw. Hydrol. 61, 291–298 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sakai, Y., Shita, K., Koshimizu, S. & Tomura, K. Geochemical study of trace vanadium in water by preconcentrational neutron activation analysis. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 216, 203–212 (1997).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nahar, S. & Zhang, J. Concentration and distribution of organic and inorganic water pollutants in eastern Shizuoka, Japan. Toxicol. Environ. Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2011.610498 (2011).Kamitani, T., Watanabe, M., Muranaka, Y., Shin, K.-C. & Nakano, T. Geographical characteristics and sources of dissolved ions in groundwater at the southern part of Mt. Fuji (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 126, 43–71 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kawagucci, S. et al. Disturbance of deep-sea environments induced by the M9.0 Tohoku earthquake. Sci Rep. 2, 270 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uchida, N. & Bürgmann, R. A decade of lessons learned from the 2011 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Rev. Geophys. 59, e2020RG000713 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mahara, Y., Igarashi, T. & Tanaka, Y. Groundwater ages of confined aquifer in Mishima lava flow, Shizuoka (in Japanese). J. Groundw. Hydrol. 35, 201–215 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nakamura, T. et al. Sources of water and nitrate in springs at the northern foot of Mt. Fuji and nitrate loading in the Katsuragawa River (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 126, 73–88 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Notsu, K., Mori, T., Sumino, H. & Ohno, M. in Fuji Volcano (eds Aramaki, S. et al.) 173–182 (Yamanashi Institute of Environmental Sciences, 2007).Ogata, M. & Kobayashi, H. Hydrologic Science Research for the Management and Utilization of Ground Water Resources in the Northern Piedmont Area of Mt. Fuji: Fluorine Ion and Vanadium Contained in Ground Water at the Northern Foot of Mt. Fuji (Yamanashi Industrial Technology Center, 2015).Ogata, M., Kobayashi, H. & Koshimizu, S. Concentration of fluorine in groundwater and groundwater table at the northern foot of Mt. Fuji (in Japanese). J. Groundw. Hydrol. 56, 35–51 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ohno, M., Sumino, H., Hernandez, P. A., Sato, T. & Nagao, K. Helium isotopes in the Izu Peninsula, Japan: relation of magma and crustal activity. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 199, 118–126 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Okabe, S., Shibasaki, M., Oikawa, T., Kawaguchi, Y. & Nihongi, H. Geochemical studies of spring and lake waters on and around Mt. Fuji (in Japanese). J. Sch. Mar. Sci. Technol. Tokai Univ. 14, 81–105 (1981).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ono, M., Ikawa, R., Machida, H. & Marui, A. Distribution of radon concentration in groundwater at the southwestern foot of Mt. Fuji (in Japanese). Radioisotopes 65, 431–439 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tosaki, Y. Estimation of Groundwater Residence Time Using Bomb-Produced Chlorine-36. PhD thesis, Univ. Tsukuba (2008).Umeda, K., Asamori, K. & Kusano, T. Release of mantle and crustal helium from a fault following an inland earthquake. Appl. Geochem. 37, 134–141 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, C. Estimation of Groundwater Flow System Using Multi-tracer Techniques in Mt. Fuji, Japan. (in Japanese) PhD thesis, Univ. Tsukuba (2016).Yamamoto, S. & Nakamura, T. Visit to valuable water springs (129) valuable water at the northern foot of Mount Fuji (Fuji-Kawaguchiko Town) (in Japanese). J. Groundw. Hydrol. 62, 329–336 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, S. et al. Water sources of lake bottom springs in Lake Kawaguchi, northern foot of Mount Fuji, Japan (in Japanese). J. Geogr. 129, 665–676 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, S., Nakamura, T. & Uchiyama, T. Newly discovered lake bottom springs from Lake Kawaguchi, the northern foot of Mount Fuji, Japan (in Japanese). J. Jpn Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. 47, 49–59 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Yamamoto, S., Nakamura, T., Koishikawa, H. & Uchiyama, T. Water quality of shallow groundwater in the southern coast area of Lake Kawaguchi at the northern foot of Mt. Fuji, Yamanashi, Japan (in Japanese). Mt Fuji Res. 11, 1–9 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Coplen, T. B. Reporting of stable hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen isotopic abundances. Geothermics 66, 273–276 (1994).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nimz, G. J. in Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology (eds Kendall, C. & McDonnell, J. J.) Ch. 8 (Elsevier, 1998).Bullen, T. D. & Kendall, C. in Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology (eds Kendall, C. & McDonnell, J. J.) Ch. 18 (Elsevier, 1998).Vanadium Pentoxide and Other Inorganic Vanadium Compounds Vol. 29 (WHO, 2001).Nagai, T., Takahashi, M., Hirahara, Y. & Shuto, K. Sr-Nd isotopic compositions of volcanic rocks from Fuji, Komitake and Ashitaka Volcanoes, Central Japan (in Japanese). Proc. Inst. Nat. Sci. Nihon Univ. 39, 205–215 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hogan, J. F. & Blum, J. D. Tracing hydrologic flow paths in a small forested watershed using variations in 87Sr/86Sr, [Ca]/[Sr], [Ba]/[Sr] and δ18O. Water Resour. Res. 39, 1282 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koshikawa, M. K. et al. Using isotopes to determine the contribution of volcanic ash to Sr and Ca in stream waters and plants in a granite watershed, Mt. Tsukuba, central Japan. Environ. Earth Sci. 75, 501 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Graustein, W. C. in Stable Isotopes in Ecological Research Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis) (eds Rundel, JP.W. et al.) Ch. 28 (Springer, 1989).Cook, P. G. & Böhlke, J.-K. in Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology (eds Cook, P. G. & Herczeg, A. L.) Ch. 1 (Springer, 2000).Aeschbach-Hertig, W. & Solomon, D. K. in The Noble Gases as Geochemical Tracers (ed. Burnard, P.) Ch. 5 (Springer, 2013).Popp, A. L. et al. A framework for untangling transient groundwater mixing and travel times. Water Resour. Res. 57, e2020WR028362 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schilling, O. S. et al. Advancing physically-based flow simulations of alluvial systems through observations of 222Rn, 3H/3He, atmospheric noble gases and the novel 37Ar tracer method. Water Resour. Res. 53, 10465–10490 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomonaga, Y. et al. Using noble-gas and stable-isotope data to determine groundwater origin and flow regimes: applicatoin to the Ceneri Base Tunnel (Switzerland). J. Hydrol. 545, 395–409 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Niu, Y. et al. Noble gas signatures in the island of Maui, Hawaii – characterizing groundwater sources in fractured systems. Water Resour. Res. 53, 3599–3614 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Warrier, R. B., Castro, M. C. & Hall, C. M. Recharge and source-water insights from the Galapagos Islands using noble gases and stable isotopes. Water Resour. Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010954 (2012).Schilling, O. S. et al. Buried paleo-channel detection with a groundwater model, tracer-based observations, and spatially varying, preferred anisotropy pilot point calibration. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL098944 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brennwald, M. S., Schmidt, M., Oser, J. & Kipfer, R. A portable and autonomous mass spectrometric system for on-site environmental gas analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 13455–12463 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tomonaga, Y. et al. On-line monitoring of the gas composition in the full-scale emplacement experiment at Mont Terri (Switzerland). Appl. Geochem. 100, 234–243 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Brennwald, M. S., Tomonaga, Y. & Kipfer, R. Deconvolution and compensation of mass spectrometric overlap interferences with the miniRUEDI portable mass spectrometer. MethodsX 7, 101038 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Van Rossum, G. & Drake, F. L. Python 3 Reference Manual (CreateSpace, 2009).Beyerle, U. et al. A mass spectrometric system for the analysis of noble gases and tritium from water samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 2042–2050 (2000).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clarke, W. B., Jenkins, W. J. & Top, Z. Determination of tritium by mass spectrometric measurement of 3He. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes 27, 515–522 (1976).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bucci, A., Petrella, E., Celivo, F. & Naclerio, G. Use of molecular approaches in hydrogeological studies: the case of carbonate aquifers in southern Italy. Hydrogeol. J. 25, 1017–1031 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Proctor, C. R. et al. Phylogenetic clustering of small low nucleic acid-content bacteria across diverse freshwater ecosystems. ISME J. 12, 1344–1359 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pronk, M., Goldscheider, N. & Zopfi, J. Microbial communities in karst groundwater and their potential use for biomonitoring. Hydrogeol. J. 17, 37–48 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miller, J. B., Frisbee, M. D., Hamilton, T. L. & Murugapiran, S. K. Recharge from glacial meltwater is critical for alpine springs and their microbiomes. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 064012 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ginn, T. R. et al. in Encyclopedia of Hydrological Sciences (ed. Anderson, M.G.) Ch. 105 (John Wiley & Sons, 2005).Tufenkji, N. & Emelko, M. B. in Encyclopedia of Environmental Health (ed. Nriagu, J.O.) Vol. 2, 715–726 (Elsevier, 2011).Nevecherya, I. K., Shestakov, V. M., Mazaev, V. T. & Shlepnina, T. G. Survival rate of pathogenic bacteria and viruses in groundwater. Water Res. 32, 209–214 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Franzosa, E. A. et al. Sequencing and beyond: integrating molecular ‘omics’ for microbial community profiling. Nature Rev. Microbiol. 13, 360–372 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kimura, H., Ishibashi, J. I., Masuda, H., Kato, K. & Hanada, S. Selective phylogenetic analysis targeting 16S rRNA genes of hyperthermophilic archaea in the deep-subsurface hot biosphere. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 2110–2117 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Somerville, C. C., Knight, I. T., Straube, W. L. & Colwell, R. R. Simple, rapid method for direct isolation of nucleic-acids from aquatic environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 548–554 (1989).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, S., Tomita, J., Nishioka, K., Hisada, T. & Nishijima, M. Development of a prokaryotic universal primer for simultaneous analysis of bacteria and archaea using next-generation sequencing. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105592 (2014).Wasimuddin et al. Evaluation of primer pairs for microbiome profiling from soils to humans within the One Health framework. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 1558–1571 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Suzuki, Y., Shimizu, H., Kuroda, T., Takada, Y. & Nukazawa, K. Plant debris are hotbeds for pathogenic bacteria on recreational sandy beaches. Sci Rep. 11, 11496 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high- throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McDonald, D. et al. An improved Greengenes taxonomy with explicit ranks for ecological and evolutionary analyses of bacteria and archaea. ISME J. 6, 610–618 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
DeSantis, T. Z. et al. Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5069–5072 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing v.3.6.2 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).Porter, K. G. & Feig, Y. S. The use of DAPI for identifying and counting aquatic microflora. Limnol. Oceanogr. 25, 943–948 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schilling, O. S. et al. Mt. Fuji hydrogeochemical and microbiological dataset. HydroShare https://doi.org/10.4211/hs.4eac370d12e142b5aa718e5deb57da39 (2022).Gotelli, N. J. & Chao, A. in Encyclopedia of Biodiversity Vol. 5 (ed. Levin, S. A.) 195–211 (Academic, 2013).World Imagery (Esri, 2021); https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=10df2279f9684e4a9f6a7f08febac2a9Elevation Tile Map of Japan (DEM5A; Resolution: 5m) (Geospatial Information Authority of Japan (GSI), 2021).Chiba, T., Kaneta, S. & Suzuki, Y. in The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Vol. XXXVII Ch. B2 (Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 2008).Air Asia Survey Co. Ltd Red Relief Image Map of Japan (RRIM 10_2016) (GSI, 2016).Active Fault Database of Japan April 26 2019 edn Disclosure database DB095 (AIST, 2019).Bird, P. An updated digital model of plate boundaries. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GC000252 (2003).Van Horne, A., Sato, H. & Ishiyama, T. Evolution of the Sea of Japan back-arc and some unsolved issues. Tectonophysics 710–711, 6–20 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379–423 (1948).Article 

Google Scholar 
2019 Coastal Disposal System Evaluation Confirmation Technology Results Report (in Japanese) (AIST, 2019). More

Simberloff, D. et al. (eds) Invasive Species in a Globalized World (University of Chicago Press, 2015).
Google Scholar 
Gippet, J. M., Liebhold, A. M., Fenn-Moltu, G. & Bertelsmeier, C. Human-mediated dispersal in insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 35, 96–102 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hall, C. M. Biological invasion, biosecurity, tourism, and globalisation. In Handbook of Globalisation and Tourism (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Bertelsmeier, C. Globalization and the anthropogenic spread of invasive social insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2021.01.006 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simberloff, D. How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts?. Biol. Invasions 13, 1255–1268 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hayes, K. R. & Barry, S. C. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success?. Biol. Invasions 10, 483–506 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Catford, J. A., Vesk, P. A., Richardson, D. M. & Pyšek, P. Quantifying levels of biological invasion: Towards the objective classification of invaded and invasible ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 44–62 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Arim, M., Abades, S. R., Neill, P. E., Lima, M. & Marquet, P. A. Spread dynamics of invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 374–378 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kamenova, S. et al. Invasions toolkit: Current methods for tracking the spread and impact of invasive species. Adv. Ecol. Res. 56, 85–182 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hulme, P. E. Trade, transport and trouble: Managing invasive species pathways in an era of globalization. J. Appl. Ecol. 46, 10–18 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Banks, N. C., Paini, D. R., Bayliss, K. L. & Hodda, M. The role of global trade and transport network topology in the human-mediated dispersal of alien species. Ecol. Lett. 18, 188–199 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Crooks, J. A. & Rilov, G. The establishment of invasive species. In Biological Invasions in Marine Ecosystems 173–175 (Springer, 2009).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Lockwood, J. L., Cassey, P. & Blackburn, T. M. The more you introduce the more you get: The role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers. Distrib. 15, 904–910 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sakai, A. K. et al. The population biology of invasive species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 32, 305–332 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Reilly-Nugent, A. et al. Landscape effects on the spread of invasive species. Curr. Landsc. Ecol. Rep. 1, 107–114 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simberloff, D. We can eliminate invasions or live with them. Successful management projects. In Ecological Impacts of Non-native Invertebrates and Fungi on Terrestrial Ecosystems 149–157 (Springer, 2008).
Google Scholar 
Gutierrez, A. P. & Ponti, L. Eradication of invasive species: Why the biology matters. Environ. Entomol. 42, 395–411 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
McLaughlin, G. M. & Dearden, P. K. Invasive insects: Management methods explored. J. Insect Sci. 19, 17 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Han, J. M. et al. Lycorma delicatula (hemiptera: Auchenorrhyncha: Fulgoridae: Aphaeninae) finally, but suddenly arrived in Korea. Entomol. Res. 38, 281–286 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Park, J.-D. et al. Biological characteristics of lycorma delicatula and the control effects of some insecticides. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 48, 53–57 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shin, Y.-H., Moon, S.-R., Yoon, C.-M., Ahn, K.-S. & Kim, G.-H. Insecticidal activity of 26 insectcides against eggs and nymphs of Lycorma delicatula (hemiptera: Fulgoridae). Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 14, 157–163 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Dara, S. K., Barringer, L. & Arthurs, S. P. Lycorma delicatula (hemiptera: Fulgoridae): A new invasive pest in the United States. J. Integr. Pest Manag. 6, 20 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Urban, J. M. Perspective: Shedding light on spotted lanternfly impacts in the USA. Pest Manag. Sci. 76, 10–17 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, G. Some extracts from the history of entomology in china. Psyche 46, 23–28 (1939).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barringer, L. E., Donovall, L. R., Spichiger, S.-E., Lynch, D. & Henry, D. The first new world record of Lycorma delicatula (insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoridae). Entomol. News 125, 20–23 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parra, G., Moylett, H. & Bulluck, R. Technical Working Group Summary Report: Spotted Lanternfly, Lycorma Delicatula (White, 1845). (2018).Harper, J. K., Stone, W., Kelsey, T. W. & Kime, L. F. Potential Economic Impact of the Spotted Lanternfly on Agriculture and Forestry in Pennsylvania 1–84 (The Center for Rural Pennsylvania, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Kim, J. G., Lee, E.-H., Seo, Y.-M. & Kim, N.-Y. Cyclic behavior of Lycorma delicatula (insecta: Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) on host plants. J. Insect Behav. 24, 423–435 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Albright, T. A. et al. Pennsylvania forests 2014. Resour. Bull. 111, 1–140 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Liu, H. Oviposition substrate selection, egg mass characteristics, host preference, and life history of the spotted lanternfly (hemiptera: Fulgoridae) in North America. Environ. Entomol. 48, 1452–1468 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Barringer, L. & Ciafré, C. M. Worldwide feeding host plants of spotted lanternfly, with significant additions from North America. Environ. Entomol. 49, 999–1011 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murman, K. et al. Distribution, survival, and development of spotted lanternfly on host plants found in North America. Environ. Entomol. 49, 1270–1281 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huron, N. A., Behm, J. E. & Helmus, M. R. Paninvasion severity assessment of a us grape pest to disrupt the global wine market. bioRxiv (2021).Dara, S. K. Update on the Spotted Lanternfly.Jung, J.-M., Jung, S., Byeon, D.-H. & Lee, W.-H. Model-based prediction of potential distribution of the invasive insect pest, spotted lanternfly Lycorma delicatula (hemiptera: Fulgoridae), by using climex. J. Asia-Pac. Biodivers. 10, 532–538 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Namgung, H., Kim, M.-J., Baek, S., Lee, J.-H. & Kim, H. Predicting potential current distribution of Lycorma delicatula (hemiptera: Fulgoridae) using maxent model in south korea. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 23, 291–297 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wakie, T. T., Neven, L. G., Yee, W. L. & Lu, Z. The establishment risk of Lycorma delicatula (hemiptera: Fulgoridae) in the United States and globally. J. Econ. Entomol. 113, 306–314 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Grimm, V. et al. A standard protocol for describing individual-based and agent-based models. Ecol. Model. 198, 115–126 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
DeAngelis, D. L. Individual-Based Models and Approaches in Ecology: Populations, Communities and Ecosystems (CRC Press, 2018).Book 

Google Scholar 
Łomnicki, A. Individual-based models and the individual-based approach to population ecology. Ecol. Model. 115, 191–198 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grimm, V. & Railsback, S. F. A conceptual framework for designing individual-based models. In Individual-Based Modeling and Ecology 71–121 (Princeton University Press, 2005).Chapter 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Smith, N. R. et al. Agent-based models of malaria transmission: A systematic review. Malar. J. 17, 1–16 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Venkatramanan, S. et al. Using data-driven agent-based models for forecasting emerging infectious diseases. Epidemics 22, 43–49 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, C. M., Park, K. J., Atkinson, R., Edwards, C. & Travis, J. Invasive species control: Incorporating demographic data and seed dispersal into a management model for rhododendron ponticum. Ecol. Inform. 4, 226–233 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gallien, L., Münkemüller, T., Albert, C. H., Boulangeat, I. & Thuiller, W. Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: Where to go from here?. Divers. Distrib. 16, 331–342 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rebaudo, F., Crespo-Pérez, V., Silvain, J.-F. & Dangles, O. Agent-based modeling of human-induced spread of invasive species in agricultural landscapes: Insights from the potato moth in ecuador. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 14, 7 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Day, C. C., Landguth, E. L., Bearlin, A., Holden, Z. A. & Whiteley, A. R. Using simulation modeling to inform management of invasive species: A case study of eastern brook trout suppression and eradication. Biol. Conserv. 221, 10–22 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, S. J., Dudı’k, M. & Schapire, R. E. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In Proceedings of the Twenty-first International Conference on Machine Learning 83 (2004).Phillips, S. J. et al. A brief tutorial on maxent. AT&T Res. 190, 231–259 (2005).
Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).
Google Scholar 
Urbanek, S. RJava: Low-Level R to Java Interface. (2020).Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J., Elith, J. & Hijmans, M. R. J. Package ‘dismo’. Circles 9, 1–68 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Elith, J. et al. A statistical explanation of maxent for ecologists. Divers. Distrib. 17, 43–57 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lane, M. A. & Edwards, J. L. The global biodiversity information facility (gbif). Syst. Assoc. Spec. 73, 1 (2007).
Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, M. S. & Ignizio, D. A. Bioclimatic predictors for supporting ecological applications in the conterminous united states. US Geol. Surv. Data Ser. 691, 4–9 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. Raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. (2020).Venter, O. et al. Last of the wild project, version 3 (lwp-3): 2009 human footprint, 2018 release. NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) 10, H46T40JQ44 (2018).Park, M. Overwintering ecology and population genetics of Lycorma delicatula (hemiptera: Fulgoridae) in Korea. Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea Doctoral Thesis (2015).Pearson, K. I. Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. VII. On the correlation of characters not quantitatively measurable. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A 195, 1–47 (1900).ADS 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Warmerdam, F. The geospatial data abstraction library. In Open Source Approaches in Spatial Data Handling 87–104 (Springer, 2008).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Greenberg, J. A., Mattiuzzi, M. & SystemRequirements, G. Package ‘gdalUtils’. (2020).Domingue, M. J. & Baker, T. C. Orientation of flight for physically disturbed spotted lanternflies, Lycorma delicatula, (Hemiptera, fulgoridae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 22, 117–120 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Myrick, A. J. & Baker, T. C. Analysis of anemotactic flight tendencies of the spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) during the 2017 mass dispersal flights in pennsylvania. J. Insect Behav. 32, 11–23 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolfin, M. S., Myrick, A. J. & Baker, T. C. Flight duration capabilities of dispersing adult spotted lanternflies, Lycorma delicatula. J. Insect Behav. 33, 125–137 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strömbom, D. & Pandey, S. Modeling the life cycle of the spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) with management implications. Math. Biosci. 340, 108670 (2021).Article 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Wellington, W. G. Conditions governing the distribution of insects in the free atmosphere. Can. Entomol. 77, 7–15 (1945).Article 

Google Scholar 
DeLong, D. M. The bionomics of leafhoppers. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 16, 179–210 (1971).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baker, T. et al. Progression of seasonal activities of adults of the spotted lanternfly, Lycorma delicatula, during the 2017 season of mass flight dispersal behavior in eastern Pennsylvania. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 22, 705–713 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leach, H. & Leach, A. Seasonal phenology and activity of spotted lanternfly (Lycorma delicatula) in eastern us vineyards. J. Pest Sci. 93, 1215–1224 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goutte, C. & Gaussier, E. A probabilistic interpretation of precision, recall and f-score, with implication for evaluation. In European Conference on Information Retrieval 345–359 (Springer, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tukey, J. Multiple comparisons. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 48, 624–625 (1953).
Google Scholar 
Mendiburu, F. de & Mendiburu, M. F. de. Package ‘agricolae’. R Package, Version 1-2 (2019).McAvoy, T. J., Snyder, A. L., Johnson, N., Salom, S. M. & Kok, L. T. Road survey of the invasive tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) in Virginia. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag. 5, 506–512 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Casella, F. & Vurro, M. Ailanthus altissima (tree of heaven): Spread and harmfulness in a case-study urban area. Arboricult. J. 35, 172–181 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, D. & Park, Y.-S. Spatial heterogeneities of human-mediated dispersal vectors accelerate the range expansion of invaders with source–destination-mediated dispersal. Sci. Rep. 10, 1–9 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meijer, J. R., Huijbregts, M. A., Schotten, K. C. & Schipper, A. M. Global patterns of current and future road infrastructure. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064006 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Turner, R. M. et al. Worldwide border interceptions provide a window into human-mediated global insect movement. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02412 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ricciardi, A. Are modern biological invasions an unprecedented form of global change?. Conserv. Biol. 21, 329–336 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, J. R., Dormontt, E. E., Prentis, P. J., Lowe, A. J. & Richardson, D. M. Something in the way you move: Dispersal pathways affect invasion success. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 136–144 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Auffret, A. G., Berg, J. & Cousins, S. A. The geography of human-mediated dispersal. Divers. Distrib. 20, 1450–1456 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koch, F. H., Yemshanov, D., Magarey, R. D. & Smith, W. D. Dispersal of invasive forest insects via recreational firewood: A quantitative analysis. J. Econ. Entomol. 105, 438–450 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eyer, P.-A. et al. Extensive human-mediated jump dispersal within and across the native and introduced ranges of the invasive termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Mol. Ecol. 30, 3948–3964 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Petrice, T. R. & Haack, R. A. Effects of cutting date, outdoor storage conditions, and splitting on survival of Agrilus planipennis (coleoptera: Buprestidae) in firewood logs. J. Econ. Entomol. 99, 790–796 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Petrice, T. R. & Haack, R. A. Can emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis (coleoptera: Buprestidae), emerge from logs two summers after infested trees are cut?. Great Lakes Entomol. 40, 92–95 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Muirhead, J. R. et al. Modelling local and long-distance dispersal of invasive emerald ash borer Agrilus planipennis (coleoptera) in North America. Divers. Distrib. 12, 71–79 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Güneralp, B., Reba, M., Hales, B. U., Wentz, E. A. & Seto, K. C. Trends in urban land expansion, density, and land transitions from 1970 to 2010: A global synthesis. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 044015 (2020).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hulme, P. E. Unwelcome exchange: International trade as a direct and indirect driver of biological invasions worldwide. One Earth 4, 666–679 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar  More

Watson, J. E. M. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Potapov, P. et al. The last frontiers of wilderness: tracking loss of intact forest landscapes from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1600821 (2017).Matricardi, E. A. T. et al. Long-term forest degradation surpasses deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 369, 1378–1382 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Grantham, H. S. et al. The emerging threat of extractives sector to intact forest landscapes. Front. For. Glob. Change https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.692338 (2021).IPBES: Summary for Policymakers. In The Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (eds Díaz, S. et al.) (IPBES, 2019).Qin, Y. et al. Carbon loss from forest degradation exceeds that from deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01026-5 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maxwell, S. L. et al. Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626%. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax2546 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Betts, M. G. et al. Global forest loss disproportionately erodes biodiversity in intact landscapes. Nature 547, 441–444 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Venter, O. et al. Targeting global protected area expansion for imperiled biodiversity. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001891 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laurance, W. F. et al. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 489, 290–294 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Coad, L. et al. Measuring impact of protected area management interventions: current and future use of the global database of protected area management effectiveness. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 370, 20140281 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonan, G. B. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ehbrecht, M. et al. Global patterns and climatic controls of forest structural complexity. Nat. Commun. 12, 519 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, J., Nielsen, S. E., Mao, L., Chen, S. & Svenning, J. C. Regional and historical factors supplement current climate in shaping global forest canopy height. J. Ecol. 104, 469–478 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellis, E. C. et al. People have shaped most of terrestrial nature for at least 12,000 years. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023483118 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knight, C. A. et al. Land management explains major trends in forest structure and composition over the last millennium in California’s Klamath Mountains. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2116264119 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stephens, L. et al. Archaeological assessment reveals Earth’s early transformation through land use. Science 365, 897–902 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Asner, G. P., Llactayo, W., Tupayachi, R. & Luna, E. R. Elevated rates of gold mining in the Amazon revealed through high-resolution monitoring. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 18454–18459 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hoang, N. T. & Kanemoto, K. Mapping the deforestation footprint of nations reveals growing threat to tropical forests. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 845–853 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lim, C. L., Prescott, G. W., De Alban, J. D. T., Ziegler, A. D. & Webb, E. L. Untangling the proximate causes and underlying drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Myanmar. Conserv. Biol. 31, 1362–1372 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sandel, B. & Svenning, J. C. Human impacts drive a global topographic signature in tree cover. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3474 (2013).Potapov, P. et al. Mapping the world’s intact forest landscapes by remote sensing. Ecol. Soc. 13, 51 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang, H. et al. A global assessment of the impact of individual protected areas on preventing forest loss. Sci. Total Environ. 777, 145995 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jones, K. R. et al. One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 360, 788–791 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clerici, N. et al. Deforestation in Colombian protected areas increased during post-conflict periods. Sci. Rep. 10, 4971 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Heino, M. et al. Forest loss in protected areas and intact forest landscapes: a global analysis. PLoS ONE 10, e0138918 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leberger, R., Rosa, I. M. D., Guerra, C. A., Wolf, F. & Pereira, H. M. Global patterns of forest loss across IUCN categories of protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108299 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wade, C. M. et al. What is threatening forests in protected areas? A global assessment of deforestation in protected areas, 2001–2018. Forests 11, 539 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN DESA, 2016).Burleson, E. Paris Agreement and consensus to address climate challenge. ASIL Insight 20, 8 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Quegan, S. et al. The European Space Agency BIOMASS mission: measuring forest above-ground biomass from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 227, 44–60 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Simard, M., Pinto, N., Fisher, J. B. & Baccini, A. Mapping forest canopy height globally with spaceborne lidar. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JG001708 (2011).Potapov, P. et al. Mapping global forest canopy height through integration of GEDI and Landsat data. Remote Sens. Environ. 253, 112165 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Atkins, J. W., Fahey, R. T., Hardiman, B. S. & Gough, C. M. Forest canopy structural complexity and light absorption relationships at the subcontinental scale. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 123, 1387–1405 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scarth, P., Armston, J., Lucas, R. & Bunting, P. A structural classification of Australian vegetation using ICESat/GLAS, ALOS PALSAR, and Landsat sensor data. Remote Sens. 11, 147 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dubayah, R. et al. The global ecosystem dynamics investigation: high-resolution laser ranging of the Earth’s forests and topography. Sci. Remote Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lang, N. et al. Global canopy height regression and uncertainty estimation from GEDI LIDAR waveforms with deep ensembles. Remote Sens. Environ. 268, 112760 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marselis, S. M., Keil, P., Chase, J. M. & Dubayah, R. The use of GEDI canopy structure for explaining variation in tree species richness in natural forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 045003 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
MacArthur, R. H. & MacArthur, J. W. On bird species diversity. Ecology 42, 594–598 (1961).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walter, J. A., Stovall, A. E. L. & Atkins, J. W. Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecosphere 12, e03390 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Camps-Valls, G. et al. A unified vegetation index for quantifying the terrestrial biosphere. Sci. Adv. 7, eabc7447 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kennedy, C. M., Oakleaf, J. R., Theobald, D. M., Baruch-Mordo, S. & Kiesecker, J. Managing the middle: a shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 811–826 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weiss, D. J. et al. A global map of travel time to cities to assess inequalities in accessibility in 2015. Nature 553, 333–336 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chazdon, R. L. et al. A policy‐driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conserv. Lett. 10, 125–132 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Skidmore, A. K. et al. Priority list of biodiversity metrics to observe from space. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 896–906 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schneider, F. D. et al. Mapping functional diversity from remotely sensed morphological and physiological forest traits. Nat. Commun. 8, 1441 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grantham, H. S. et al. Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity. Nat. Commun. 11, 5978 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ponta, N. et al. Drivers of transgression: what pushes people to enter protected areas. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109121 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pack, S. M. et al. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) in the Amazon. Biol. Conserv. 197, 32–39 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tollefson, J. Illegal mining in the Amazon hits record high amid Indigenous protests. Nature 598, 15–16 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Thies, C., Rosoman, G., Cotter, J. & Meaden, S. Intact Forest Landscapes. Why It Is Crucial to Protect Them from Industrial Exploitation Technical Note Bd 5 (Greenpeace, 2011).Chazdon, R. L. Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science 320, 1458–1460 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lindenmayer, D. B. et al. New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conserv. Lett. 7, 61–69 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dave, R. et al. Second Bonn Challenge Progress Report: Application of the Barometer in 2018 (IUCN, 2018).Tang, H. & Armston, J. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) for GEDI L2B Footprint Canopy Cover and Vertical Profile Metrics (Goddard Space Flight Center, 2019).Adam, M., Urbazaev, M., Dubois, C. & Schmullius, C. Accuracy assessment of GEDI terrain elevation and canopy height estimates in European temperate forests: influence of environmental and acquisition parameters. Remote Sens. 12, 3948 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dorado-Roda, I. et al. Assessing the accuracy of GEDI data for canopy height and aboveground biomass estimates in Mediterranean forests. Remote Sens. 13, 2279 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Duncanson, L. et al. Aboveground biomass density models for NASA’s Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) lidar mission. Remote Sens. Environ. 270, 112845 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hofton, M., Blair, J. B., Story, S. & Yi, D. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (ATBD) (NASA, 2020).Dubayah, R. et al. GEDI L3 Gridded Land Surface Metrics v.2 (ORNL DAAC, 2021).Roy, D. P., Kashongwe, H. B. & Armston, J. The impact of geolocation uncertainty on GEDI tropical forest canopy height estimation and change monitoring. Sci. Remote Sens. 4, 100024 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Potapov, P., Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V., Loveland, T. R. & Pittman, K. Combining MODIS and Landsat imagery to estimate and map boreal forest cover loss. Remote Sens. Environ. 112, 3708–3719 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Silva, C. A. et al. rGEDI: NASA’s global ecosystem ynamics investigation (GEDI) data visualization and processing. R package version 0.1.2. (2020).The R Project for Statistical Computing (The R Foundation, 2014); https://www.R-project.org/Fischer, B., Smith, M., Pau, G., Morgan, M. & van Twisk, D. rhdf5: R interface to HDF5. R package version 2.40.0 (2022).Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giglio, L., Loboda, T., Roy, D. P., Quayle, B. & Justice, C. O. An active-fire based burned area mapping algorithm for the MODIS sensor. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 408–420 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hengl, T. & Wheeler, I. Soil organic carbon content in x 5 g/kg at 6 standard depths (0, 10, 30, 60, 100 and 200 cm) at 250 m resolution. Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1475458 (2018).Farr, T. The shuttle radar topography mission. Rev. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000183 (2007).James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. An Introduction to Statistical Learning Vol. 112 (Springer, 2013).Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bivand, R. et al. Package ‘spdep’: spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics version 1.2-7 (The Comprehensive R Archive Network, 2015).Bivand, R., Yu, D., Nakaya, T., Garcia-Lopez, M.-A. & Bivand, M. R. Package ‘spgwr’: geographically eighted regression. R package version 0.6-35 (2020).Fotheringham, A. S., Brunsdon, C. & Charlton, M. Geographically Weighted Regression: The Analysis of Spatially Varying Relationships (Wiley, 2003). More

Choat, B. et al. Triggers of tree mortality under drought. Nature 558, 531–539 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
DeSoto, L. et al. Low growth resilience to drought is related to future mortality risk in trees. Nat. Commun. 11, 545 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Allen, C. D., Breshears, D. D. & McDowell, N. G. On underestimation of global vulnerability to tree mortality and forest die-off from hotter drought in the Anthropocene. Ecosphere 6, 1–55 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schwalm, C. R. et al. Global patterns of drought recovery. Nature 548, 202–205 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).Gazol, A. et al. Forest resilience to drought varies across biomes. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 2143–2158 (2018).Wu, X. et al. Differentiating drought legacy effects on vegetation growth over the temperate Northern Hemisphere. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 504–516 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon cycle models. Science 349, 528–532 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, X. et al. Temporal trade-off between gymnosperm resistance and resilience increases forest sensitivity to extreme drought. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1075–1083 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kannenberg, S. A. et al. Drought legacies are dependent on water table depth, wood anatomy and drought timing across the eastern US. Ecol. Lett. 22, 119–127 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lian, X. et al. Summer soil drying exacerbated by earlier spring greening of northern vegetation. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax0255 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1922–1940 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bastos, A. et al. Direct and seasonal legacy effects of the 2018 heat wave and drought on European ecosystem productivity. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba2724 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buermann, W. et al. Widespread seasonal compensation effects of spring warming on northern plant productivity. Nature 562, 110–114 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lian, X. et al. Seasonal biological carryover dominates northern vegetation growth. Nat. Commun. 12, 983 (2021).Myneni, R. B. et al. Increased plant growth in the northern high latitudes from 1981 to 1991. Nature 386, 698–702 (1997).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jeong, S. J. et al. Application of satellite solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence to understanding large-scale variations in vegetation phenology and function over northern high latitude forests. Remote Sens. Environ. 190, 178–187 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zeng, Z. et al. Legacy effects of spring phenology on vegetation growth under preseason meteorological drought in the Northern Hemisphere. Agric. Meteorol. 310, 108630 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kelsey, K. C. et al. Winter snow and spring temperature have differential effects on vegetation phenology and productivity across Arctic plant communities. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 1572–1586 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. Disentangling the mechanisms behind winter snow impact on vegetation activity in northern ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 1651–1662 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).Pinzon, J. E. & Tucker, C. J. A non-stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g time series. Remote Sens. 6, 6929–6960 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Magney, T. S. et al. Mechanistic evidence for tracking the seasonality of photosynthesis with solar-induced fluorescence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 11640–11645 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. Large and projected strengthening moisture limitation on end-of-season photosynthesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 9216–9222 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Y. Y. et al. Global long-term passive microwave satellite-based retrievals of vegetation optical depth. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, L18402 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beguería, S. et al. Standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) revisited: parameter fitting, evapotranspiration models, tools, datasets and drought monitoring. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 3001–3023 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolf, S. et al. Warm spring reduced carbon cycle impact of the 2012 US summer drought. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 5880–5885 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
D’Andrea, E. et al. Unravelling resilience mechanisms in forests: role of non-structural carbohydrates in responding to extreme weather events. Tree Physiol. 41, 1808–1818 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yun, J. et al. Influence of winter precipitation on spring phenology in boreal forests. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 5176–5187 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Xie, J. et al. Spring temperature and snow cover climatology drive the advanced springtime phenology (1991–2014) in the European Alps. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG006150 (2021).Xie, J. et al. Altitude-dependent influence of snow cover on alpine land surface phenology. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 1107–1122 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peng, S. et al. Change in winter snow depth and its impacts on vegetation in China. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 3004–3013 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Wu, X. et al. Uneven winter snow influence on tree growth across temperate China. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 144–154 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Angert, A. et al. Drier summers cancel out the CO2 uptake enhancement induced by warmer springs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10823–10827 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Musselman, K. N. et al. Winter melt trends portend widespread declines in snow water resources. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 418–424 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kreyling, J. Winter climate change: a critical factor for temperate vegetation performance. Ecology 91, 1939–1948 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bose, A. K. et al. Growth and resilience responses of Scots pine to extreme droughts across Europe depend on predrought growth conditions. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4521–4537 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martinez-Vilalta, J. et al. Hydraulic adjustment of Scots pine across Europe. New Phytol. 184, 353–364 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Klein, T. et al. Drought stress, growth and nonstructural carbohydrate dynamics of pine trees in a semi-arid forest. Tree Physiol. 34, 981–992 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kannenberg, S. A. & Phillips, R. P. Non-structural carbohydrate pools not linked to hydraulic strategies or carbon supply in tree saplings during severe drought and subsequent recovery. Tree Physiol. 40, 259–271 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Karst, J. et al. Stress differentially causes roots of tree seedlings to exude carbon. Tree Physiol. 37, 154–164 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chitra-Tarak, R. et al. Hydraulically-vulnerable trees survive on deep-water access during droughts in a tropical forest. New Phytol. 231, 1798–1813 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiao, W. et al. Observed increasing water constraint on vegetation growth over the last three decades. Nat. Commun. 12, 3777 (2021).Wu, X. et al. Higher temperature variability reduces temperature sensitivity of vegetation growth in Northern Hemisphere. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 6173–6181 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderegg, W. R. L. et al. Widespread drought-induced tree mortality at dry range edges indicates that climate stress exceeds species’ compensating mechanisms. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3793–3802 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin-Benito, D. & Pederson, N. Convergence in drought stress, but a divergence of climatic drivers across a latitudinal gradient in a temperate broadleaf forest. J. Biogeogr. 42, 925–937 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tucker, C. J. et al. An extended AVHRR 8-km NDVI dataset compatible with MODIS and SPOT vegetation NDVI data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26, 4485–4498 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vicente-Serrano, S. M. et al. Response of vegetation to drought time-scales across global land biomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 52–57 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, W. et al. Divergent response of vegetation growth to soil water availability in dry and wet periods over Central Asia. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG005912 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. D. et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Characteristics, drivers and feedbacks of global greening. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liang, W. et al. Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of net primary production and their climate controls in China from 1982 to 2010. Agric. For. Meteorol. 204, 22–36 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. A global spatially contiguous solar-induced fluorescence (CSIF) dataset using neural networks. Biogeosciences 15, 5779–5800 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jones, M. O. et al. Satellite passive microwave remote sensing for monitoring global land surface phenology. Remote Sens. Environ. 115, 1102–1114 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Konings, A. G. et al. Interannual variations of vegetation optical depth are due to both water stress and biomass changes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 48, e2021GL095267 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Du, J. et al. A global satellite environmental data record derived from AMSR-E and AMSR2 microwave Earth observations. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 9, 791–808 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, I. et al. Updated high-resolution grids of monthly climatic observations—the CRU TS3.10 Dataset. Int. J. Climatol. 34, 623–642 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barichivich, J. et al. Temperature and snow-mediated moisture controls of summer photosynthetic activity in northern terrestrial ecosystems between 1982 and 2011. Remote Sens. 6, 1390–1431 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Begueria, S. & Lopez-Moreno, J. I. A multiscalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Clim. 23, 1696–1718 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wieder, W. R. et al. Regridded Harmonized World Soil Database v1.2 (ORNL DAAC, 2014); https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1247Kottek, M. et al. World map of the Koppen–Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 15, 259–263 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jakubauskas, M. E., Legates, D. R. & Kastens, J. H. Harmonic analysis of time-series AVHRR NDVI data. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 67, 461–470 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Liu, Q. et al. Temperature, precipitation, and insolation effects on autumn vegetation phenology in temperate China. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 644–655 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Recent spring phenology shifts in western Central Europe based on multiscale observations. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1255–1263 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, P. et al. Enhanced growth after extreme wetness compensates for post-drought carbon loss in dry forests. Nat. Commun. 10, 195 (2019).Delgado-Baquerizo, M. et al. Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 7, 10541 (2016).Pham, L. T. H. & Brabyn, L. Monitoring mangrove biomass change in Vietnam using SPOT images and an object-based approach combined with machine learning algorithms. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 128, 86–97 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y. Code for ‘Widespread spring phenology effects on drought recovery of Northern Hemisphere ecosystems’. GitHub https://github.com/leeyang1991/phenology-effects-on-drought-recovery (2022). More

Duke, N. C. et al. Mar. Freshw. Res. 68, 1816–1829 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, W. et al. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-01020-5 (2023).Article 

Google Scholar 
Potapov, P. et al. Ecol. Soc. 13, 51 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hancock, S. et al. Earth Space Sci. 6, 294–310 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wade, C. M. et al. Forests 11, 539 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abhilash, P. C. Land 10, 201 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Biermann, F., Kanie, N. & Kim, R. E. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 26–27, 26–31 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
den Elzen, M. et al. Energy Policy 126, 238–250 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Betts, M. G. et al. Nature 547, 441–444 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Watson, J. E. M. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0490-x (2018).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Mishra, A. K. & Singh, V. P. J. Hydrol. 391, 202–216 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiao, W. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 3777 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gampe, D. et al. Nat. Clim. Change 11, 772–779 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
IPCC Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).Schwalm, C. R. et al. Nature 548, 202–205 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y. et al. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01584-2 (2023).Fourth National Climate Assessment: Volume II—Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States (US Global Change Research Program, 2018).Daryanto, S., Wang, L. & Jacinthe, P. A. PLoS ONE 11, e0156362 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiao, W. et al. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 127, e2021JG006431 (2022).Augspurger, C. K. Oecologia 156, 281–286 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lian, X. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 983 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buermann, W. et al. Nature 562, 110–114 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lian, X. et al. Sci. Adv. 6, eaax0255 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiao, W., Wang, L. & McCabe, M. F. Rem. Sens. Environ. 256, 112313 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Sampling and incubationFour rock samples were collected from the 3.7 km-deep Auka vent field in the Southern Pescadero Basin (23.956094N, 108.86192W)20,23. Sample NA091.008 was collected in 2017 on cruise NA091 with the Eexploration vessle Nautilus and incubated as described previously34. Samples 12,019 (S0200-R1), 11,719 (S0193-R2) and 11,868 (S0197-PC1), the latter representing a lithified nodule recovered from a sediment push core, were collected with Remotely operated vehicle SuBastian and Research vessel Falkor on cruise FK181031 in November 2018. These samples were processed shipboard and stored under anoxic conditions at 4 °C for subsequent incubation in the laboratory. In the laboratory, rock samples 12,019 and 11,719 were broken into smaller pieces under sterile conditions, immersed in N2-sparged sterilized artificial sea water and incubated under anoxic conditions with methane, as described previously for NA091.008 (ref. 34). Additional sampling information can be found in Supplementary Table 1. Mineralogical analysis by X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRD) identified barite in several of these samples, collected from two locations in the Auka vent field, including on the western side of the Matterhorn vent (11,719, NA091.008), and one oil-saturated sample (12,019) recovered from the sedimented flanks from the southern side of Z vent. Our analysis also includes metagenomic data from two sediment cores from the Auka vent field (DR750-PC67 and DR750-PC80) collected in April 2015 with the ROV Doc Ricketts and R/V Western Flyer (MBARI2015), previously published (ref. 23).Fluorescence in situ hybridizationSamples were fixed shipboard using freshly prepared paraformaldehyde (2 vol% in 3× Phosphate Buffer Solution (PBS), EMS15713) at 4 °C overnight, rinsed twice using 3× PBS, and stored in ethanol (50% in 1× PBS) at −20 °C until processing. Small pieces ( More

Identification of Elovl genes from E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinumTotally, we successfully identified 9 Elovl genes, including elovl1a, elovl1b, elovl4a, elovl4b, elovl5, elovl6, elovl6l, elovl7a, and elovl8b, both from E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum genome (Table 2). In E. rhadinum, the shortest and the longest putative CDS length among all Elovl genes was 810 bp and 2019 bp, respectively. Their encoded protein size ranged from 269 amino acids to 672 amino acids. The theoretical molecular weight of Elovl proteins varied from 31061.48 to 75051.42 Da, with the theoretical isoelectric points (pI) ranging from 7.86 to 9.59. Most of the Elovl proteins were characterized as stable and hydrophilic proteins. Signal peptide prediction analysis showed that the elovl1b, elovl5, and elovl6 contained signal peptide sequences. In addition to elovl8b, all Elovl proteins contained transmembrane domains ranging from 5 to 7. Almost all Elovl proteins were predicted to be endoplasmic reticulum-located except elovl8b, predominantly localized in the nucleus.Table 2 Basic information for the Elovl gene family members.Full size tableIn E. tetradactylum, the putative CDS length of Elovl genes ranged from 810 to 1824 bp, and their encoded protein size ranged from 269 amino acids to 409 amino acids. The molecular weight of Elovl proteins varied from 31049.42 to 68750.14 Da, with the pI ranging from 8.72 to 9.64. Like Elovl proteins in E. rhadinum, most elovl proteins were predicted to be stable and hydrophilic. Signal peptide prediction analysis revealed that elovl1a, elovl5, and elovl6 had signal peptide sequence, which was different from E. rhadinum that elovl1b contained signal peptide sequence, but elovl1a did not. In addition, seven members showed the same number of transmembrane structures with E. rhadinum, while the elovl8b contained three and elovl4b contained seven transmembrane structures in contrast to E. rhadinum. The elovl8b was predicted to be localized in nuclear, while other members were localized in the endoplasmic reticulum, similar to E. rhadinum.Evolution of divergence and conservation of Elovl genesDivergence and conservation accompany the process of species evolution. To elucidate the phylogenetic relationship of Elovl genes among different species, a maximum like-hood tree was constructed on the basis of 18 Elovl genes in E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum and 106 publicly available Elovl protein sequences. As shown in Fig. 1, these Elovl genes can be divided into eight subfamilies, including elovl1a/1b, elovl2, elovl3, elovl4a, elovl5, elovl6/6 l, elovl7a/7b, elovl8a/8b. However, 6 subfamilies were presented in the Eleutheronema genus, and there was only one subtype for elovl7 (elovl7a) and elovl8 (elovl8b) in E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum. The elovl3 was mainly identified in mammalians such as Homo sapiens and Mus musculus, while a recent study reported a full repertoire of Elovl genes in the Colossoma macropomum genome, including elovl330. The loss of elovl2 occurred in the vast majority of marine fish lineages, which was only presented in a few fish species, such as C. carpio, D. rerio, S. salar, and S. grahami.Figure 1Phylogenetic tree for 18 Elovl proteins from E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum, and 106 publicly available Elovl proteins from other species. All these proteins were aligned using ClustalW and then subjected to MEGAX for phylogenetic tree construction using the maximum like-hood method with 1000 replicates.Full size imageWe further performed the gene structure analysis to visualize the exon–intron structure of each gene, and the results revealed that the elovl8b had the largest intron number, while the elovl6/6 l subfamily genes contained three introns (Fig. 2a). Except for elovl8, Elovl genes belonging to the same subfamily shared a similar gene structure. Additionally, we identified ten motifs in Elovl genes, and the conversed motif types, numbers, and distributions in Elovl proteins were much more similar except for the elovl8b (Fig. 2b, TableS1). Two conserved motifs were found in the Elovl gene family except for elovl8b in E. rhadinum, which were related to the ELO domain via SMART evaluation analysis (Fig. 2c and d). Gene structural variation is important for gene evolution. In E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum, Elovl genes showed similar gene structure, and the proteins shared similar motif compositions, indicating that the Elovl genes were highly conserved in the Eleutheronema genus.Figure 2Gene structure and conserved motifs diagram of Elovl genes. (a) Gene structure of Elovl genes. Exons were represented by pink boxes and introns by black lines; (b) Conserved motifs of Elovl proteins; (c and d) Logo representations of the ELO domains, motifs 1 and 2, respectively.Full size imageIn the process of evolution via natural selection, adaptation to certain environmental conditions likely drove the changes in endogenous capacity for LC-PUFA biosynthesis between marine and freshwater fishes31. The Elovl gene family has been functionally studied and characterized in a variety of fish species, and the member of the Elovl gene family of each species varied greatly. In the present study, for a comprehensive analysis of Elovl genes in the Eleutheronema genus, the Elovl gene ortholog clusters of mammals and various teleosts with different ecological niches and habitats were collected. The results showed that only seven Elovl genes (one gene for each subtype) were observed in mammals; however, more members were variably presented in teleosts, which might be related to the teleost-specific duplication. A previous study revealed that Sinocyclocheilus graham and C. carpio possessed the highest number of Elovl genes, containing 21 members of subtypes, resulting from an extra independent 4th whole-genome duplication event32, 33. Interestingly, only 9 Elovl genes were observed in Eleutheronema genus, the same as T. rubripes, possibly due to gene loss and the asymmetric acceleration of the evolutionary rate in one of the paralogs following the whole-genome duplication in some teleost fishes34. Additionally, the elovl2 and elovl3 were absent, but a novel subtype, elovl8, was present in most marine fishes. The elovl8, the most recently identified and novel active member of the Elovl protein family member, has been proposed to be a fish-specific elongase with two gene paralogs (elovl8a and elovl8b) described in teleost35. In Eleutheronema, we also found that the elovl8b was presented in E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum, indicating the important roles in the LC-PUFAs biosynthesis of Eleutheronema fish. Similar results were also observed in rabbitfish and zebrafish20. The Elovl gene family member number in Eleutheronema genus is the same as T. rubripes, but less than I. punctatus (10), Gadus morhua (10), D. rerio (14), S. salar (18), and C. carpio (21), which might be due to the differential expansion events during the evolutions of fish species.Predicting the protein structure is a fundamental prerequisite for understanding the function and possible interactions of a protein. In the present study, the secondary structures as well as three-dimensional structures of Elovl proteins in both E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum were predicted using the SOPMA and Phyre2 programs, respectively. The protein structures of all the candidate Elovl proteins were modeled at  > 90% confidence. The secondary structures of these proteins in E. tetradactylum revealed 40.86–50.30% alpha helixes, 28.10–28.10% random coil, 13.75–20.67% extended strand and 2.38–4.47% beta turn, while these ratios were predicted to be 47.55–53.27, 30.00–36.01, 6.99–18.12 and 2.38–4.75%, respectively, in E. rhadinum (Table 3). High ratio of alpha helixes and random coil in the Elovl protein structure might play important roles in fatty acids biosynthesis in fish, in accordance with the literature for the order Perciformes in Perca fluviatilis36. Additionally, the secondary structure pattern of Elovl proteins in the candidate E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum species were highly similar (Fig. 3), indicating the probable similar biological functions as well as highly evolutionarily conserved Elovl genes in Eleutheronema species.Table 3 Properties of the secondary structures of Elovl proteins.Full size tableFigure 3The secondary structure pattern, including alpha helix (blue color), random coil (purple color), extended strand (red color), and beta turn (green color), of Elovl proteins in E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum.Full size imageThe 3D model results showed that all predicted Elovl proteins had complex 3D structures, composing of multiple secondary structures including alpha-helices, random coils, and others (Fig. 4). The Elovl proteins of different subfamilies showed different 3D configurations. The 3D structures of Elovl proteins also revealed the presence of the conserved domain in each Elovl protein, which showed a typical three-dimensional frame comprising of various parallel alpha-helixes. To assay the quality and accuracy of the predicted 3D model for the candidate Elovl proteins, the Ramachandran plot analysis was employed (Figure S1). In model validation, the qualities of the Elovl proteins model varied from 90 to 98% based on the Ramachandran plot analysis, suggesting the reasonably good quality and reliability of the predicted 3D models. These results indicated that the predicted 3D model of Elovl proteins could provide valuable information for the further comprehensive studies of molecular function in the fatty acids biosynthesis in Eleutheronema species. Additionally, the comparisons between these structures in E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum suggested that the Elovl proteins encompassed the conserved structures. In addition, gene duplication resulted in obvious 3D structural variation in the duplicated genes, such as Elovl4 (elovl4a and elovl4b), Elovl6 (elovl6 and elovl6l). The ascertained variations were revealed in duplicated Elovl proteins, and the diversities in these proteins structure may reflect their different obligations in the fatty acid biosynthesis and other biological processes.Figure 4Three-dimensional modeling of Elovl proteins in E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum. All models have confidence levels above 90%.Full size imageTo explore the functional selection pressures acting on Elovl gene family, Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks ratios were calculated for each gene. Generally, Ka/Ks  1 indicates positive selection. In this study, we found that all the Ka/Ks ratios for each gene were less than 0.5, suggesting that they were subjected to strong purifying selection during evolution, and their functions might be evolutionarily conserved (Fig. 5). Therefore, theoretically, the Elovl genes in the Eleutheronema genus had eliminated deleterious mutations in the population through purification selection. Similar results were also observed in Elovl gene family of Gymnocypris przewalskii that no positive selection trace was detected in most members except elovl211. Moreover, elovl6l and elovl8b showed a higher average Ka/Ks ratio than the other seven members, indicating that the evolution of elovl6l and elovl8b might be much less conservative and thereby could provide more variants for natural selection in Eleutheronema species.Figure 5The evolutionary rates of the Elovl genes in (a) E. tetradactylum and (b) E. rhadinum. The Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks values were demonstrated in boxplots with error lines.Full size imageChromosomal location, collinearity, and protein–protein interaction network analysis of Elovl genesAs shown in Fig. 6a and b, Elovl genes were randomly and unevenly distributed on seven chromosomes in both E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum, including Chr5, Chr6, Chr8, Chr10, Chr11, Chr13, and Chr25. The Chr5 and Chr6 harbored two Elovl genes (elovl1b and elovl8b in Chr5, elovl5 and elovl6l in Chr6), while other chromosomes each carried a single Elovl gene. Collinearity relationship analysis was performed to further investigate the gene duplication events within the Elovl gene family. The results revealed that a pair of segmental duplication genes (elovl4a/4b) showed collinear relationships. A chromosome-wide collinearity analysis also showed that the chromosomes were highly homologous between E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum, including the Elovl gene family (Figure S2). To infer the protein interaction within Elovl gene family, we constructed the protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the Elovl proteins based on the interaction relationship of the homologous Elovl proteins in zebrafish. The results showed that Elovl genes had close interaction with other members except for the elovl4a/4b and elovl8b (Fig. 6c), which suggested that they might participate in diverse functions by interacting with other proteins. Thus far, elovl4a and elovl4b were widely identified in most fish, which could effectively elongate PUFA substrates37. In addition, the elovl4a/4b were identified to be homologous proteins of zebrafish, indicating that the elovl4 subtype was highly conserved during evolution and played important roles in the biosynthesis of LC-PUFA in Eleutheronema.Figure 6Chromosomal location and collinearity analysis of Elovl gene family in (a) E. tetradactylum and (b) E. rhadinum. Colored boxes represented chromosomes. Segmental duplication genes are connected with grey lines; (c) a protein–protein interaction network for Elovl genes based on their orthologs in zebrafish.Full size imageExpression patterns of ELOVL genes in different tissuesIn the present study, we aimed to determine the expression patterns and gained insights into the potential functions of Elovl genes in the brain, eye, gill, heart, kidney, liver, muscle, stomach, and intestine. The expression patterns of Elovl genes in different tissues and species were distinct, suggesting the diverse roles during fish development (Fig. 7a and b). In our present study, the elovl1a and elvovl1b were expressed in a relatively narrow range of tissues, including the liver, stomach, and intestine. Some Elovl genes had much higher relative expression rates, e.g., elovl1a and elovl7a. The elovl4a was primarily distributed in the brain and eye, slightly expressed in gills while hardly detectable in other tissues, consistent with previous studies37, 38, which might play an important role in endogenous biosynthesis of LC-PUFA in the neural system of fish. In contrast to elovl4a, elovl4b was ubiquitously, instead of tissue-specific, expressed in most tissues while hardly examined in the heart and kidney. The elovl4a and elovl4b were two commonly paralogues in evolutionarily diverged fish species, and the striking difference in expression patterns between elovl4a and elovl4b might be due to the potential functional divergence of these two paralogues. In addition, elovl8b, the novel active member of the Elovl protein family, was expressed in several tissues, suggesting the essential roles in LC-PUFAs biosynthesis of teleost as indicated by a previous study20. Moreover, the differences in expression patterns among different Elovl genes indicated that these genes might possibly undergo functional divergence during evolution in the Eleutheronema genus. Overall, our present study firstly provided the preliminary organ-specific expression data of the Elovl gene family in E. tetradactylum and E. rhadinum, which could provide the foundation for further clarifying the function of these genes in the evolutionary development of the Eleutheronema genus.Figure 7qPCR assessment of tissue distribution of elovl1a, elovl1b, elovl4a, elovl4b, elovl5, elovl6, elovl6l, elovl7a, and elovl8b gene expression in (a) E. tetradactylum and (b) E. rhadinum for various tissues including the brain, eye, gill, heart, kidney, liver, muscle, stomach, and intestine.Full size image More