Ecology

1.
Vandenkoornhuyse, P., Quaiser, A., Duhamel, M., Le Van, A. & Dufresne, A. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytol. 206, 1196–1206 (2015).
PubMed  Google Scholar 
2.
Lundberg, D. S. et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86–90 (2012). This is one of the first studies to use high-throughput sequencing to profile the plant-associated microbiota, suggesting compartment-specific assembly of microbial communities.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3.
Vorholt, J. A. Microbial life in the phyllosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 828–840 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4.
Peiffer, J. A. et al. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6548–6553 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5.
Ofek-Lalzar, M. et al. Niche and host-associated functional signatures of the root surface microbiome. Nat. Commun. 5, 4950 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6.
Bulgarelli, D. et al. Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley. Cell Host Microbe 17, 392–403 (2015). In this study, shotgun metagenome analysis was used to elucidate the microbial traits involved in the bacterium–bacteriophage, interbacterial and host–bacterium interactions that govern plant colonization.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

7.
Edwards, J. et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E911–E920 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.
Zarraonaindia, I. et al. The soil microbiome influences grapevine-associated microbiota. mBio 6, e02527–14 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

9.
Coleman-Derr, D. et al. Plant compartment and biogeography affect microbiome composition in cultivated and native Agave species. New Phytol. 209, 798–811 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.
De Souza, R. S. C. et al. Unlocking the bacterial and fungal communities assemblages of sugarcane microbiome. Sci. Rep. 6, 28774 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

11.
Fonseca-García, C. et al. The cacti microbiome: interplay between habitat-filtering and host-specificity. Front. Microbiol. 7, 150 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

12.
Fitzpatrick, C. R. et al. Assembly and ecological function of the root microbiome across angiosperm plant species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E1157–E1165 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13.
Hamonts, K. et al. Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 124–140 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14.
Niu, B., Paulson, J. N., Zheng, X. & Kolter, R. Simplified and representative bacterial community of maize roots. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E2450–E2459 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15.
Xu, J. et al. The structure and function of the global citrus rhizosphere microbiome. Nat. Commun. 9, 4894 (2018). This study presents one of the most comprehensive investigations on the structure and functional features of the microbiome associated with a particular plant species, identifying the core microbiota and functions that are persistently present at a global scale.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

16.
Bergelson, J., Mittelstrass, J. & Horton, M. W. Characterizing both bacteria and fungi improves understanding of the Arabidopsis root microbiome. Sci. Rep. 9, 24 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

17.
Wagner, M. R. et al. Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat. Commun. 7, 12151 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

18.
Roman-Reyn, V. et al. The rice leaf microbiome has a conserved community structure controlled by complex host-microbe. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/615278 (2019).

19.
Cregger, M. A. et al. The Populus holobiont: dissecting the effects of plant niches and genotype on the microbiome. Microbiome 6, 31 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

20.
Lemanceau, P., Blouin, M., Muller, D. & Moënne-Loccoz, Y. Let the core microbiota be functional. Trends Plant Sci. 22, 583–595 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21.
Mendes, R., Garbeva, P. & Raaijmakers, J. M. The rhizosphere microbiome: significance of plant beneficial, plant pathogenic, and human pathogenic microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 37, 634–663 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22.
Leach, J. E., Triplett, L. R., Argueso, C. T. & Trivedi, P. Communication in the phytobiome. Cell 169, 587–596 (2018).
Google Scholar 

23.
Levy, A. et al. Genomic features of bacterial adaptation to plants. Nat. Genet. 50, 138–150 (2018). In this study, comparative genomics is used to identify the genes involved in bacterial adaptation to plants, including genes associated with plant colonization, microorganism–microorganism competition and host–microorganism interactions.
CAS  Google Scholar 

24.
Delmotte, N. et al. Community proteogenomics reveals insights into the physiology of phyllosphere bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 16428–16433 (2009).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

25.
Liu, Z. et al. A genome-wide screen identifies genes in rhizosphere-associated Pseudomonas required to evade plant defenses. mBio 9, e00433-–18 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

26.
Cole, B. J. et al. Genome-wide identification of bacterial plant colonization genes. PLoS Biol. 15, e2002860 (2018).
Google Scholar 

27.
Richardson, A. E. & Simpson, R. J. Soil microorganisms mediating phosphorus availability update on microbial phosphorus. Plant Physiol. 156, 989–996 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

28.
Pieterse, C. M. et al. Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 52, 347–375 (2014).
CAS  Google Scholar 

29.
Trivedi, P., Trivedi, C., Grinyer, J., Anderson, I. C. & Singh, B. K. Harnessing host-vector microbiome for sustainable plant disease management of phloem-limited bacteria. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1423 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30.
Backer, R. et al. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria: context, mechanisms of action, and roadmap to commercialization of biostimulants for sustainable agriculture. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1473 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

31.
Gouda, S. et al. Revitalization of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for sustainable development in agriculture. Microbiol. Res. 206, 131–140 (2018).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

32.
Mendes, R. et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332, 1097–1100 (2011). This study identifies vital bacterial groups and functional traits that are involved in building disease-suppressive soils, thus demonstrating that selective enrichment of microbial groups in response to pathogen attack protects plants against infections.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33.
Santhanam, R., Weinhold, A., Goldberg, J., Oh, Y. & Baldwin, I. T. Native root-associated bacteria rescue a plant from a sudden-wilt disease that emerged during continuous cropping. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E5013–E5020 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

34.
Trivedi, P. et al. Keystone microbial taxa regulate the invasion of a fungal pathogen in agro-ecosystems. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 111, 10–14 (2017).
CAS  Google Scholar 

35.
Ravanbakhsh, M., Kowalchuk, G. A. & Jousset, A. Root-associated microorganisms reprogram plant life history along the growth–stress resistance tradeoff. ISME J. 13, 3093–3101 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36.
Xue, C. et al. Manipulating the banana rhizosphere microbiome for biological control of Panama disease. Sci. Rep. 5, 11124 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

37.
Castrillo, G. et al. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature 543, 513–518 (2017). In this study, a synthetic microbial community is used to define the molecular interactions that activate a microbiome-mediated response under nutrient-deficient conditions while repressing host immune output, allowing selective microbial colonization.
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

38.
Zhang, J. et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684 (2019). This study demonstrates that slight variation in single plant genes can result in differential recruitment and enrichment of selected microbial groups and functions that correlate with higher nitrogen use efficiency of indica than of japonica varieties of rice.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

39.
Durán, P. et al. Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival. Cell 175, 973–983 (2018). This study demonstrates that biocontrol traits of root-associated bacteria modulate interkingdom interactions between bacterial and filamentous eukaryotic microorganisms, resulting in a balanced plant–microbiome interaction that favours plant growth and survival against root-derived fungi and/or oomycetes.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

40.
Carlström, C. I. et al. Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the Arabidopsis phyllosphere. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1445–1454 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41.
Maignien, L., DeForce, E. A., Chafee, M. E., Eren, A. M. & Simmons, S. L. Ecological succession and stochastic variation in the assembly of Arabidopsis thaliana phyllosphere communities. mBio 5, e00682-13 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

42.
Bai, Y. et al. Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528, 364–369 (2015). This study demonstrates a significant overlap between bacterial isolates from plant environments and their representation in culture-independent surveys, suggesting that a substantial proportion of the plant-associated microbiota is culturable.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

43.
Edwards, J. A. et al. Compositional shifts in root-associated bacterial and archaeal microbiota track the plant life cycle in field-grown rice. PLoS Biol. 16, e2003862 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44.
Morella, N. M. et al. Successive passaging of a plant-associated microbiome reveals robust habitat and host genotype-dependent selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 1148–1159 (2019).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

45.
Moissl-Eichinger, C. et al. Archaea are interactive components of complex microbiomes. Trends Microbiol. 26, 70–85 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

46.
Taffner, J. et al. What is the role of Archaea in plants? New insights from the vegetation of alpine bogs. MSphere 3, e00122-–18 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

47.
Taffner, J., Cernava, T., Erlacher, A. & Berg, G. Novel insights into plant-associated archaea and their functioning in arugula (Eruca sativa Mill.). J. Adv. Res. 19, 39–48 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Pratama, A. A. & van Elsas, J. D. The ‘neglected’ soil virome — potential role and impact. Trends Microbiol. 26, 649–662 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

49.
Trubl, G. et al. Soil viruses are underexplored players in ecosystem carbon processing. mSystems 3, e00076-18 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

50.
Morella, N. M., Gomez, A. L., Wang, G., Leung, M. S. & Koskella, B. The impact of bacteriophages on phyllosphere bacterial abundance and composition. Mol. Ecol. 27, 2025–2038 (2018).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

51.
Castillo, J. D., Vivanco, J. M. & Manter, D. K. Bacterial microbiome and nematode occurrence in different potato agricultural soils. Microb. Ecol. 74, 888–900 (2017).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

52.
Elhady, A. et al. Microbiomes associated with infective stages of root-knot and lesion nematodes in soil. PLoS ONE 12, e0177145 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

53.
Treonis, A. M. et al. Characterization of soil nematode communities in three cropping systems through morphological and DNA metabarcoding approaches. Sci. Rep. 8, 2004 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Gao, Z., Karlsson, I., Geisen, S., Kowalchuk, G. & Jousset, A. Protists: puppet masters of the rhizosphere microbiome. Trends Plant Sci. 24, 165–176 (2018).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

55.
Larousse, M. & Galiana, E. Microbial partnerships of pathogenic oomycetes. PLoS Pathog. 13, e1006028 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56.
Ploch, S. & Thines, M. Obligate biotrophic pathogens of the genus Albugo are widespread as asymptomatic endophytes in natural populations of Brassicaceae. Mol. Ecol. 20, 3692–3699 (2015).
Google Scholar 

57.
Benhamou, N. et al. Pythium oligandrum: an example of opportunistic success. Microbiol 158, 2679–2694 (2012).
CAS  Google Scholar 

58.
Sapp, M., Ploch, S., Fiore-Donno, A. M., Bonkowski, M. & Rose, L. E. Protists are an integral part of the Arabidopsis thaliana microbiome. Environ. Microbiol. 20, 30–43 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

59.
Astudillo-García, C. et al. Evaluating the core microbiota in complex communities: a systematic investigation. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 1450–1462 (2017).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

60.
Yeoh, Y. K. et al. Evolutionary conservation of a core root microbiome across plant phyla along a tropical soil chronosequence. Nat. Commun. 8, 215 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

61.
Garrido-Oter, R. et al. Modular traits of the rhizobiales root microbiota and their evolutionary relationship with symbiotic rhizobia. Cell Host Microbe 24, 155–167 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

62.
Agler, M. T. et al. Microbial hub taxa link host and abiotic factors to plant microbiome variation. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002352 (2016). This study demonstrates the presence of highly interconnected ‘hub species’ in microbial networks that act as mediators between a host and its associated microbiome.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

63.
Muller, E. E. et al. Using metabolic networks to resolve ecological properties of microbiomes. Curr. Opin. Sys. Biol. 8, 73–80 (2018).
Google Scholar 

64.
Röttjers, L. & Faust, K. From hairballs to hypotheses — biological insights from microbial networks. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 42, 761–780 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

65.
Shade, A., Jacques, M. A. & Barret, M. Ecological patterns of seed microbiome diversity, transmission, and assembly. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 37, 15–22 (2017).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

66.
Gloria, T. C. et al. Functional microbial features driving community assembly during seed germination and emergence. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 902 (2018).
Google Scholar 

67.
Wei, Z. et al. Initial soil microbiome composition and functioning predetermine future plant health. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw0759 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

68.
Tian, B. et al. Beneficial traits of bacterial endophytes belonging to the core communities of the tomato root microbiome. Agric. Ecosys. Env. 247, 149–156 (2017).
Google Scholar 

69.
Lau, J. A. & Lennon, J. T. Rapid responses of soil microorganisms improve plant fitness in novel environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 109, 14058–14062 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

70.
Gehring, C. A., Sthultz, C. M., Flores-Rentería, L., Whipple, A. V. & Whitham, T. G. Tree genetics defines fungal partner communities that may confer drought tolerance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11169–11174 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

71.
Zhang, Y. et al. Huanglongbing impairs the rhizosphere-to-rhizoplane enrichment process of the citrus root-associated microbiome. Microbiome 5, 97 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

72.
Knief, C. et al. Metaproteogenomic analysis of microbial communities in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of rice. ISME J. 6, 1378–1390 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

73.
Jiménez Bremont, J. F. et al. Physiological and molecular implications of plant polyamine metabolism during biotic interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 95 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

74.
Busk, P. K. & Lange, L. Classification of fungal and bacterial lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases. BMC Genomics 16, 368 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

75.
Trivedi, P., Anderson, I. C. & Singh, B. K. Microbial modulators of soil carbon storage: integrating genomic and metabolic knowledge for global prediction. Trends Microbiol. 21, 641–651 (2013).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

76.
Jiang, X. et al. Impact of spatial organization on a novel auxotrophic interaction among soil microbes. ISME J. 12, 1443–1456 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

77.
Blair, P. M. et al. Exploration of the biosynthetic potential of the Populus microbiome. mSystems 3, e00045–18 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

78.
Sessitsch, A. et al. Functional characteristics of an endophyte community colonizing rice roots as revealed by metagenomic analysis. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 25, 28–36 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

79.
Han, G. Z. Origin and evolution of the plant immune system. New Phytol. 222, 70–83 (2019).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

80.
Eitas, T. K. & Dangl, J. L. NB-LRR proteins: pairs, pieces, perception, partners, and pathways. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 13, 472–477 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

81.
Hardoim, P. R. et al. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 293–320 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

82.
McCann, H. C. et al. Origin and evolution of the kiwifruit canker pandemic. Genome Biol. Evol. 9, 932–944 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

83.
Berendsen, R. L. et al. Disease-induced assemblage of a plant-beneficial bacterial consortium. ISME J. 12, 1496–1507 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

84.
Kwak, M. J. et al. Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1100–1109 (2018). This study demonstrates that the disease resistance traits of plant varieties are conferred by selective assembly of a native microbiota to rescue a plant from fungal invasion.
CAS  Google Scholar 

85.
Mendes, L. W., Raaijmakers, J. M., de Hollander, M., Mendes, R. & Tsai, S. M. Influence of resistance breeding in common bean on rhizosphere microbiome composition and function. ISME J. 12, 212–224 (2019).
Google Scholar 

86.
Carrión, V. J. et al. Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Science 366, 606–612 (2019). This study demonstrates a microbiome-mediated, multitiered defence system against fungal pathogens, in which the first defence layer is formed by the rhizosphere microbiota; any subsequent attempt to colonize the plant root activates a second layer of defence through plant endophytes that produce antifungal compounds, including effectors, enzymes and antibiotics.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

87.
Helfrich, E. J. et al. Bipartite interactions, antibiotic production and biosynthetic potential of the Arabidopsis leaf microbiome. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 909–919 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

88.
Rutherford, S. T. & Bassler, B. L. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a012427 (2012).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

89.
Hartmann, A. & Schikora, A. Plant responses to bacterial quorum sensing molecules. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 643 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

90.
Mousa, W. K. et al. Root-hair endophyte stacking in finger millet creates a physicochemical barrier to trap the fungal pathogen Fusarium graminearum. Nat. Microbiol. 1, 16167 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

91.
Trivedi, P., Spann, T. & Wang, N. Isolation and characterization of beneficial bacteria associated with citrus roots in Florida. Microb. Ecol. 62, 324–336 (2011).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

92.
Chagas, F. O. et al. Chemical signaling involved in plant–microbe interactions. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47, 1652–1704 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

93.
Schmidt, R. et al. Fungal volatile compounds induce production of the secondary metabolite Sodorifen in Serratia plymuthica PRI-2C. Sci. Rep. 7, 862 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

94.
Korenblum, E. et al. Rhizosphere microbiome mediates systemic root metabolite exudation by root-to-root signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3874–3883 (2020).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

95.
Russell, A. B., Peterson, S. B. & Mougous, J. D. Type VI secretion system effectors: poisons with a purpose. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 137–148 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

96.
Bernal, P., Llamas, M. A., Filloux, A. & Type, V. I. Secretion systems in plant-associated bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 201, 15–72 (2018).
Google Scholar 

97.
Speare, L. et al. Bacterial symbionts use a type VI secretion system to eliminate competitors in their natural host. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E8528–E8537 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

98.
Vorholt, J. A., Vogel, C., Carlström, C. I. & Mueller, D. B. Establishing causality: opportunities of synthetic communities for plant microbiome research. Cell Host Microbe 22, 142–155 (2019).
Google Scholar 

99.
Cordovez, V., Dini-Andreote, F., Carrión, V. J. & Raaijmakers, J. M. Ecology and evolution of plant microbiomes. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 73, 69–88 (2019).
CAS  Google Scholar 

100.
Hestrin, R., Hammer, E. C., Mueller, C. W. & Lehmann, J. Synergies between mycorrhizal fungi and soil microbial communities increase plant nitrogen acquisition. Commun. Biol. 2, 233 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

101.
Averill, C., Bhatnagar, J. M., Pearse, W. D. & Kivlin, S. N. Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23163–23168 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

102.
Lu, T. et al. Rhizosphere microorganisms can influence the timing of plant flowering. Microbiome 6, 231 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

103.
Bodenhausen, K. et al. Petunia- and Arabidopsis-specific root microbiota responses to phosphate supplementation. Phytobiomes J. 3, 112–124 (2019).
Google Scholar 

104.
Almario, J. et al. Root-associated fungal microbiota of nonmycorrhizal Arabis alpina and its contribution to plant phosphorus nutrition. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E9403–E9412 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

105.
Hacquard, S. et al. Survival trade-offs in plant roots during colonization by closely related beneficial and pathogenic fungi. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–13 (2016).
Google Scholar 

106.
Voges, M. J., Bai, Y., Schulze-Lefert, P. & Sattely, E. S. Plant-derived coumarins shape the composition of an Arabidopsis synthetic root microbiome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12558–12565 (2019). This study demonstrates that the production of secondary metabolites produced by plants under stress conditions acts as a signalling mechanism to sculpt the rhizosphere microbiome.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

107.
Stringlis, I. A. et al. MYB72-dependent coumarin exudation shapes root microbiome assembly to promote plant health. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E5213–E5222 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

108.
Martínez-Medina, A., Van Wees, S. C. & Pieterse, C. M. Airborne signals from Trichoderma fungi stimulate iron uptake responses in roots resulting in priming of jasmonic acid-dependent defenses in shoots of Arabidopsis thaliana and Solanum lycopersicum. Plant Cell Env. 40, 2691–2705 (2017).
Google Scholar 

109.
Penton, C. R. et al. Fungal community structure in disease suppressive soils assessed by 28S LSU gene sequencing. PLoS ONE 9, e93893 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

110.
Cha, J. Y. et al. Microbial and biochemical basis of a Fusarium wilt-suppressive soil. ISME J. 10, 119–129 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

111.
Hol, W. G. et al. Non-random species loss in bacterial communities reduces antifungal volatile production. Ecology 96, 2042–2048 (2015).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

112.
Carrión, V. J. et al. Involvement of Burkholderiaceae and sulfurous volatiles in disease-suppressive soils. ISME J. 12, 2307–2321 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

113.
Chialva, M. et al. Native soils with their microbiotas elicit a state of alert in tomato plants. New Phytol. 220, 1296–1308 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

114.
Peralta, A. L., Sun, Y., McDaniel, M. D. & Lennon, J. T. Crop rotational diversity increases disease suppressive capacity of soil microbiomes. Ecosphere 9, e02235 (2018).
Google Scholar 

115.
Kesten, C. et al. Pathogen-induced pH changes regulate the growth–defense balance of plants. EMBO J. 16, e101822550491 (2019).
Google Scholar 

116.
Yuan, J. et al. Root exudates drive the soil-borne legacy of aboveground pathogen infection. Microbiome 6, 56 (2018).
Google Scholar 

117.
Hu, L. et al. Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat. Commun. 9, 2738 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

118.
Kong, H. G., Song, G. C. & Ryu, C. M. Inheritance of seed and rhizosphere microbial communities through plant–soil feedback and soil memory. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 11, 479–486 (2019).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

119.
Fitzpatrick, C. R., Mustafa, Z. & Viliunas, J. Soil microbes alter plant fitness under competition and drought. J. Evol. Biol. 32, 438–450 (2019).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

120.
Eida, A. A. et al. Desert plant bacteria reveal host influence and beneficial plant growth properties. PLoS ONE 13, e0208223 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

121.
Naylor, D. & Coleman-Derr, D. Drought stress and root-associated bacterial communities. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2223 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

122.
Xu, L. et al. Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E4284–E4293 (2018). Using a multi-‘omics’ approach, this study demonstrates selective enrichment of monoderms (bacteria with a thick cell wall) that possess transporters connected with specialized metabolites produced by plants under drought stress.
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

123.
Timm, C. M. et al. Abiotic stresses shift belowground Populus-associated bacteria toward a core stress microbiome. mSystems 3, e00070-17 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

124.
Wagner, M. R. et al. Natural soil microbes alter flowering phenology and the intensity of selection on flowering time in a wild Arabidopsis relative. Ecol. Lett. 17, 717–726 (2014).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

125.
Ravanbakhsh, M., Sasidharan, R., Voesenek, L. A., Kowalchuk, G. A. & Jousset, A. Microbial modulation of plant ethylene signaling: ecological and evolutionary consequences. Microbiome 6, 52 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

126.
Giauque, H., Connor, E. W. & Hawkes, C. V. Endophyte traits relevant to stress tolerance, resource use and habitat of origin predict effects on host plants. New Phytol. 221, 2239–2249 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

127.
Kudjordjie, E. N., Sapkota, R., Steffensen, S. K., Fomsgaard, I. S. & Nicolaisen, M. Maize synthesized benzoxazinoids affect the host associated microbiome. Microbiome 7, 59 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

128.
Zhalnina, K. et al. Dynamic root exudate chemistry and microbial substrate preferences drive patterns in rhizosphere microbial community assembly. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 470 (2018).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

129.
Huang, A. C. et al. A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science 364, eaau6389 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

130.
McCann, H. C., Nahal, H., Thakur, S. & Guttman, D. S. Identification of innate immunity elicitors using molecular signatures of natural selection. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4215–4220 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

131.
Hacquard, S., Spaepen, S., Garrido-Oter, R. & Schulze-Lefert, P. Interplay between innate immunity and the plant microbiota. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 55, 565–589 (2017).
CAS  Google Scholar 

132.
Chen, H. et al. One-time nitrogen fertilization shifts switchgrass soil microbiomes within a context of larger spatial and temporal variation. PLoS ONE 14, e0211310 (2019).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

133.
Trivedi, P. et al. Soil aggregation and associated microbial communities modify the impact of agricultural management on carbon content. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 3070–3086 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

134.
Hartman, K. et al. Cropping practices manipulate abundance patterns of root and soil microbiome members paving the way to smart farming. Microbiome 6, 14 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

135.
Banerjee, S. et al. Agricultural intensification reduces microbial network complexity and the abundance of keystone taxa in roots. ISME J. 13, 1722–1736 (2019).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar  More