Dean, B. et al. Behavioural mapping of a pelagic seabird: combining multiple sensors and a hidden Markov model reveals the distribution of at-sea behaviour. J. R. Soc. 10, 20120570–20120570 (2013).
Daniel Kissling, W., Pattemore, D. E. & Hagen, M. Challenges and prospects in the telemetry of insects. Biol. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12065 (2014).
Williams, H. J. et al. Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research. J. Anim. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13094 (2019).
Bowlin, M. S., Cochran, W. W. & Wikelski, M. C. Biotelemetry of New World thrushes during migration: Physiology, energetics and orientation in the wild. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45, 295–304 (2005).
Shoji, A. et al. Foraging behaviour of sympatric razorbills and puffins. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 520, 257–267 (2015).
Guilford, T. et al. Migration and stopover in a small pelagic seabird, the Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus: Insights from machine learning. Proc. Biol. Sci. 276, 1215–1223 (2009).
Handcock, R. N. et al. Monitoring animal behaviour and environmental interactions using wireless sensor networks, GPS collars and satellite remote sensing. Sensors 9, 3586–3603 (2009).
Padget, O. et al. In situ clock shift reveals that the sun compass contributes to orientation in a pelagic seabird. Curr. Biol. 28, 275-279.e2 (2018).
Votier, S. C., Bicknell, A., Cox, S. L., Scales, K. L. & Patrick, S. C. A bird’s eye view of discard reforms: Bird-borne cameras reveal seabird/fishery interactions. PLoS ONE 8, e57376 (2013).
Barron, D. G., Brawn, J. D. & Weatherhead, P. J. Meta-analysis of transmitter effects on avian behaviour and ecology. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 180–187 (2010).
Bodey, T. W. et al. A phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis of biologging device effects on birds: Deleterious effects and a call for more standardized reporting of study data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 946–955 (2018).
Aldridge, H. D. J. N. & Brigham, R. M. Load carrying and maneuverability in an insectivorous bat: A test of the 5% ‘rule’ of radio-telemetry. J. Mammal. https://doi.org/10.2307/1381393 (1988).
Hammerschlag, N., Gallagher, A. J. & Lazarre, D. M. A review of shark satellite tagging studies. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.12.012 (2011).
Irvine, A. B., Wells, R. S. & Scott, M. D. An evaluation of techniques for tagging small odontocete cetaceans. Fish. Bull. (1982).
van der Hoop, J. M. et al. Bottlenose dolphins modify behavior to reduce metabolic effect of tag attachment. J. Exp. Biol. 217, 4229–4236 (2014).
Putaala, A., Oksa, J., Rintamaki, H. & Hissa, R. Effects of hand-rearing and radiotransmitters on flight of gray partridge. J. Wildl. Manage. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802136 (1997).
Jepsen, N., Thorstad, E. B., Havn, T. & Lucas, M. C. The use of external electronic tags on fish: An evaluation of tag retention and tagging effects. Anim. Biotelemetry https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-015-0086-z (2015).
Vandenabeele, S. P. et al. Are bio-telemetric devices a drag? Effects of external tags on the diving behaviour of great cormorants. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 519, 239–249 (2015).
Puehringer-Sturmayr, V. et al. Effects of bio-loggers on behaviour and corticosterone metabolites of Northern Bald Ibises (Geronticus eremita) in the field and in captivity. Anim. Biotelemetry https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-019-0191-5 (2020).
Booms, T. L., Schempf, P. F. & Fuller, M. R. Preening behavior of adult gyrfalcons tagged with backpack transmitters. J. Raptor Res. https://doi.org/10.3356/jrr-10-115.1 (2011).
Wilson, R. P. & Wilson, M. T. A peck activity record for birds fitted with devices. J. F. Ornithol. (1989).
Robert, M., Drolet, B. & Savard, J.-P.L. Effects of backpack radio-transmitters on female Barrow’s goldeneyes. Waterbirds https://doi.org/10.1675/1524-4695(2006)29[115:eobrof]2.0.co;2 (2006).
Pouliquen, O., Leishman, M. & Redhead, T. D. Effects of radio collars on wild mice, Mus domesticus. Can. J. Zool. https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-239 (1990).
Wilson, C. D., Arnott, G., Reid, N. & Roberts, D. The pitfall with PIT tags: Marking freshwater bivalves for translocation induces short-term behavioural costs. Anim. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.10.003 (2011).
Kooyman, G. L. et al. Heart rates and swim speeds of emperor penguins diving under sea ice. J. Exp. Biol. 165, 161–180 (1992).
Harris, M. P., Bogdanova, M. I., Daunt, F. & Wanless, S. Using GPS technology to assess feeding areas of Atlantic Puffins Fratercula arctica. Ringing Migr. https://doi.org/10.1080/03078698.2012.691247 (2012).
Wanless, S., Harris, M. P. & Morris, J. A. Behavior of alcids with tail-mounted radio transmitters. Colon. Waterbirds 158–163, https://doi.org/10.2307/1521336 (1989).
Arlt, D., Low, M. & Pärt, T. Effect of geolocators on migration and subsequent breeding performance of a long-distance passerine migrant. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082316 (2013).
Rodríguez, A., Negro, J. J., Fox, J. W. & Afanasyev, V. Effects of geolocator attachments on breeding parameters of Lesser Kestrels. J. F. Ornithol. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1557-9263.2009.00247.x (2009).
Scandolara, C. et al. Impact of miniaturized geolocators on barn swallow Hirundo rustica fitness traits. J. Avian Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/jav.00412 (2014).
Whidden, S. E., Williams, C. T., Breton, A. R. & Buck, C. L. Effects of transmitters on the reproductive success of Tufted Puffins. J. F. Ornithol. 78, 206–212 (2007).
Griffioen, M., Iserbyt, A. & Muller, W. Handicapping males does not affect their rate of parental provisioning, but impinges on their partners’ turn taking behavior. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1–7 (2019).
Ratz, T., Nichol, T. W. & Smiseth, P. T. Parental responses to increasing levels of handicapping in a burying beetle. Behav. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz157 (2019).
Wiebe, K. L. Negotiation of parental care when the stakes are high: Experimental handicapping of one partner during incubation leads to short-term generosity. J. Anim. Ecol. 79, 63–70 (2010).
Cantarero, A., López-Arrabé, J., Palma, A., Redondo, A. J. & Moreno, J. Males respond to female begging signals of need: A handicapping experiment in the pied flycatcher, Ficedula hypoleuca. Anim. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.05.002 (2014).
Saraux, C. et al. Reliability of flipper-banded penguins as indicators of climate change. Nature 469, 203–208 (2011).
Beaulieu, M. et al. Can a handicapped parent rely on its partner? An experimental study within Adélie penguin pairs. Anim. Behav. 78, 313–320 (2009).
Paredes, R., Jones, I. L. & Boness, D. J. Reduced parental care, compensatory behaviour and reproductive costs of thick-billed murres equipped with data loggers. Anim. Behav. 69, 197–208 (2005).
Dean, B. et al. Simultaneous multi-colony tracking of a pelagic seabird reveals cross-colony utilization of a shared foraging area. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 538, 239–248 (2015).
Guilford, T. C. et al. GPS tracking of the foraging movements of Manx Shearwaters Puffinus puffinus breeding on Skomer Island, Wales. Ibis (Lond. 1859). 150, 462–473 (2008).
Shoji, A. et al. Dual foraging and pair-coordination during chick provisioning by Manx shearwaters: empirical evidence supported by a simple model. J. Exp. Biol. 218, 2116–2123 (2015).
Adams, J. et al. Effects of geolocation archival tags on reproduction and adult body mass of sooty shearwaters (Puffinus griseus). N. Z. J. Zool. 36, 355–366 (2009).
Phillips, R. A., Xavier, J. C., Croxall, J. P., Xavier, J. C. & Croxall, J. P. Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. Auk 120, 1082–1090 (2003).
Pennycuick, C. J., Fast, P. L. F., Ballerstädt, N. & Rattenborg, N. The effect of an external transmitter on the drag coefficient of a bird’s body, and hence on migration range, and energy reserves after migration. J. Ornithol. 153, 633–644 (2012).
Hazekamp, A. A. H., Mayer, R. & Osinga, N. Flow simulation along a seal: The impact of an external device. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 56, 131–140 (2010).
Wilson, R. P. Antennae on transmitters on penguins: balancing energy budgets on the high wire. J. Exp. Biol. 207, 2649–2662 (2004).
Watson, K. P. & Granger, R. A. Hydrodynamic effect of a satellite transmitter on a juvenile green turtle (Chelonia mydas). J. Exp. Biol. 201, 2497–2505 (1998).
Hull, C. L. The effect of carrying devices on breeding royal penguins. Condor 99, 530–534 (1997).
Elliott, K. H. et al. Age-related variation in energy expenditure in a long-lived bird within the envelope of an energy ceiling. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 136–146 (2014).
Kelly, K. G., Diamond, A. W., Holberton, R. L. & Bowser, A. K. Researcher handling of incubating Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica has no effect on reproductive success. Mar. Ornithol. (2015).
Müller, M. S., Vyssotski, A. L., Yamamoto, M. & Yoda, K. Individual differences in heart rate reveal a broad range of autonomic phenotypes in a free-living seabird population. J. Exp. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.182758 (2018).
Weimerskirch, H. et al. Heart rate and energy expenditure of incubating wandering albatrosses: Basal levels, natural variation, and the effects of human disturbance. J. Exp. Biol. (2002).
Fayet, A. L. et al. Lower foraging efficiency in immatures drives spatial segregation with breeding adults in a long-lived pelagic seabird. Anim. Behav. 110, 79–89 (2015).
Kosztolányi, A., Cuthill, I. C. & Székely, T. Negotiation between parents over care: Reversible compensation during incubation. Behav. Ecol. 20, 446–452 (2009).
Suzuki, S. & Nagano, M. To compensate or not? Caring parents respond differentially to mate removal and mate handicapping in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus quadripunctatus. Ethology https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2008.01598.x (2009).
Wright, J. & Cuthill, I. Biparental care: Short-term manipulation of partner contribution and brood size in the starling, Sturnus vulgaris. Behav. Ecol. 1, 116–124 (1990).
Bijleveld, A. I. & Mullers, R. H. E. E. Reproductive effort in biparental care: An experimental study in long-lived Cape gannets. Behav. Ecol. 20, 736–744 (2009).
Dearborn, D. C. Body condition and retaliation in the parental effort decisions of incubating great frigatebirds (Fregata minor). Behav. Ecol. 12, 200–206 (2001).
Navarro, J. & González-Solís, J. Experimental increase of flying costs in a pelagic seabird: Effects on foraging strategies, nutritional state and chick condition. Oecologia 151, 150–160 (2007).
Brooke, M. The Manx Shearwater. (A & C Black Publishers Ltd, 1990).
Heggøy, O., Christensen-Dalsgaard, S., Ranke, P. S., Chastel, O. & Bech, C. GPS-loggers influence behaviour and physiology in the black-legged kittiwake Rissa tridactyla. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11140 (2015).
Fayet, A. L. et al. Carry-over effects on the annual cycle of a migratory seabird: An experimental study. J. Anim. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12580 (2016).
Shoji, A. et al. Breeding phenology and winter activity predict subsequent breeding success in a trans-global migratory seabird. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150671 (2015).
Boersma, P. & Davies, E. Sexing monomorphic birds by vent measurements. Auk 104, 779–783 (1987).
Guilford, T. et al. Geolocators reveal migration and pre-breeding behaviour of the critically endangered balearic shearwater Puffinus mauretanicus. PLoS ONE 7, e33753 (2012).
Benaglia, T., Chauveau, D., Hunter, D. R. & Young, D. S. Mixtools: An R package for analyzing finite mixture models. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v032.i06 (2009).
Fayet, A. L. et al. Drivers and fitness consequences of dispersive migration in a pelagic seabird. Behav. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw013 (2016).
Core Team, R. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Found. Stat. Comput., Vienna, 2018).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 (2015).
Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. Package ‘emmeans’. Mran.Microsoft.Com https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1980.10483031%3e.License (2018).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
