in

The multifaceted challenge of evaluating protected area effectiveness

  • 1.

    IUCN. 50 Years of Working for Protected Areas: A brief history of IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas. (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, 2010).

  • 2.

    SCBD. The CBD Programme of Work on Protected Areas. http://www.cbd.int/protected/ (2004).

  • 3.

    SCBD. In COP 10 Decision X/2: Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2010).

  • 4.

    SCBD. Zero Draft of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. https://www.cbd.int/doc/c/efb0/1f84/a892b98d2982a829962b6371/wg2020-02-03-en.pdf (2020).

  • 5.

    UNEP-WCMC, IUCN & NGS. Protected Planet Live Report 2020 (August update) https://livereport.protectedplanet.net/ (2020).

  • 6.

    IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020.2 (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2020).

  • 7.

    Coad, L. et al. Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 259–264 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Gaston, K. J., Jackson, S. F., Cantú-Salazar, L. & Cruz-Piñón, G. The ecological performance of protected areas. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evolution Syst. 39, 93–113 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Geldmann, J., Manica, A., Burgess, N. D., Coad, L. & Balmford, A. A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23209–23215 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Andam, K. S., Ferraro, P. J., Pfaff, A., Sanchez-Azofeifa, G. A. & Robalino, J. A. Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16089–16094 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Gray, C. L. et al. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat. Commun. 7, 12306 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Cazalis, V., Belghali, S. & Rodrigues, A. S. L. Using a Large-scale Biodiversity Monitoring Dataset to Test the Effectiveness of Protected Areas at Conserving North-American Breeding Birds. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/433037 (2019).

  • 13.

    Hiley, J. R., Bradbury, R. B. & Thomas, C. D. Impacts of habitat change and protected areas on alpha and beta diversity of Mexican birds. Diversity Distrib. 22, 1245–1254 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Cazalis, V. et al. Effectiveness of protected areas in conserving tropical forest birds. Nat. Commun. 11, 4461 (2020).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Mascia, M. B. & Pailler, S. Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications. Conserv. Lett. 4, 9–20 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs. Recognising and Reporting Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, 2019).

  • 17.

    Visconti, P. et al. Protected area targets post-2020. Science 364, 239–241 (2019).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Hockings, M., Stolton, S., Dudley, N. & Phillips, A. Evaluating Effectiveness – A Framework for Assessing the Management of Protected Areas (IUCN – The World Conservation Union, 2000).

  • 19.

    UNEP-WCMC. Global Database on Protected Area Management Effectiveness (August update) https://pame.protectedplanet.net/ (2020).

  • 20.

    Joppa, L. N. & Pfaff, A. High and far: biases in the location of protected areas. PLoS ONE 4, e8273 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Rodrigues, A. S. L. et al. Global gap analysis: priority regions for expanding the global protected-area network. BioScience 54, 1092–1100 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Ferraro, P. J. Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. N. Dir. Eval. 2009, 75–84 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Gill, D. A. et al. Capacity shortfalls hinder the performance of marine protected areas globally. Nature 543, 665–669 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Hillebrand, H. et al. Biodiversity change is uncoupled from species richness trends: consequences for conservation and monitoring. J. Appl. Ecol. 55, 169–184 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Geldmann, J. et al. A global analysis of management capacity and ecological outcomes in terrestrial protected areas. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12434 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Individual species provide multifaceted contributions to the stability of ecosystems

    Superconductor technology for smaller, sooner fusion