in

Past and future potential range changes in one of the last large vertebrates of the Australian continent, the emu Dromaius novaehollandiae

[adace-ad id="91168"]
  • 1.

    Hewitt, G. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405, 907 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Graham, C. H., Moritz, C. & Williams, S. E. Habitat history improves prediction of biodiversity in rainforest fauna. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 632–636 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Latinne, A. et al. Influence of past and future climate changes on the distribution of three Southeast Asian murine rodents. J. Biogeogr. 42, 1714–1726 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Davis, A. J., Jenkinson, L. S., Lawton, J. H., Shorrocks, B. & Wood, S. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391, 783 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Knick, S. T. & Rotenberry, J. T. Ghosts of habitats past: Contribution of landscape change to current habitats used by shrubland birds. Ecology 81, 220–227 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Enright, N. J. & Thomas, I. Pre-European fire regimes in Australian ecosystems. Geogr. Compass 2, 979–1011 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Bowman, D. M. The impact of Aboriginal landscape burning on the Australian biota. N. Phytolog. 140, 385–410 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Rule, S. et al. The aftermath of megafaunal extinction: Ecosystem transformation in Pleistocene Australia. Science 335, 1483–1486 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Gillespie, R., Brook, B. W. & Baynes, A. Short overlap of humans and megafauna in Pleistocene Australia. Alcheringa Aust. J Palaeontol. 30, 163–186 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Roberts, R. G. et al. New ages for the last Australian megafauna: Continent-wide extinction about 46,000 years ago. Science 292, 1888–1892 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Miller, G. H. et al. Ecosystem collapse in Pleistocene Australia and a human role in megafaunal extinction. Science 309, 287–290 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Woinarski, J. C. Z., Burbidge, A. A. & Harrison, P. L. Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: Decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 112, 4531–4540 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Guimarães, P. R. Jr., Galetti, M. & Jordano, P. Seed dispersal anachronisms: Rethinking the fruits extinct megafauna ate. PLoS One 3, e1745 (2008).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Bradshaw, C. J. Little left to lose: Deforestation and forest degradation in Australia since European colonization. J. Plant Ecol. 5, 109–120 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Dunstan, H., Florentine, S. K., Calviño-Cancela, M., Westbrooke, M. E. & Palmer, G. C. Dietary characteristics of Emus (Dromaius novaehollandiae) in semi-arid New South Wales, Australia, and dispersal and germination of ingested seeds. Emu 113, 168–176 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Rogers, R. Dispersal of germinable seeds by emus in semi-arid Queensland. Emu 94, 132–134 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Bradford, M. G. & Westcott, D. A. Consequences of Southern Cassowary (Casuarius casuarius, L) gut passage and deposition pattern on the germination of rainforest seeds. Austral. Ecol. 35, 325–333 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Dawson, T., Read, D., Russell, E. & Herd, R. Seasonal variation in daily activity patterns, water relations and diet of emus. Emu 84, 93–102 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Quin, B. Diet and habitat of Emus Dromaius novaehollandiae in the Grampians Ranges, south-western Victoria. Emu 96, 114–122 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Higgins, S., Nathan, R. & Cain, M. Are long-distance dispersal events in plants usually caused by nonstandard means of dispersal?. Ecology 84, 1945–1956 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Calviño-Cancela, M., Dunn, R. R., Van Etten, E. J. & Lamont, B. Emus as non-standard seed dispersers and their potential for long-distance dispersal. Ecography 29, 632–640 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Calviño-Cancela, M., He, T. & Lamont, B. B. Distribution of myrmecochorous species over the landscape and their potential long-distance dispersal by emus and kangaroos. Divers. Distrib. 14, 11–17 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    McGrath, R. & Bass, D. Seed dispersal by emus on the New South Wales north-east coast. Emu 99, 248–252 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Cain, M. L., Milligan, B. G. & Strand, A. E. Long-distance seed dispersal in plant populations. Am. J. Bot. 87, 1217–1227 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Vidal, M. M., Pires, M. M. & Guimarães, P. R. Jr. Large vertebrates as the missing components of seed-dispersal networks. Biol. Cons. 163, 42–48 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Ruxton, G. D. & Schaefer, H. M. The conservation physiology of seed dispersal. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 367, 1708–1718 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Johnson, C. N. Ecological consequences of Late Quaternary extinctions of megafauna. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 2509–2519 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Miller, G. H. & Fogel, M. L. Calibrating δ18O in Dromaius novaehollandiae (emu) eggshell calcite as a paleo-aridity proxy for the Quaternary of Australia. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 193, 1–13 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Breckwoldt, R. Wildlife in the home paddock. Nat. Conserv. Farm. 20, 20 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Le Souëf, D. Extinct Tasmanian Emu. Emu Austral. Ornithol. 3, 229–231 (1904).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Thomson, V. A. et al. Genetic diversity and drivers of dwarfism in extinct island emu populations. Biol. Lett. 14, 20 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Department of Planning, Industry and Environment (DPIE) (2002). Emu population in the New South Wales North Coast Bioregion and Port Stephens local government area. NSW Sci. Determ. 20, 20 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Franklin, J. Moving beyond static species distribution models in support of conservation biogeography. Divers. Distrib. 16, 321–330 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Colles, A., Liow, L. H. & Prinzing, A. Are specialists at risk under environmental change? Neoecological, paleoecological and phylogenetic approaches. Ecol. Lett. 12, 849–863 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Glazier, D. S. & Eckert, S. E. Competitive ability, body size and geographical range size in small mammals. J. Biogeogr. 29, 81–92 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Gaston, K. J. How large is a species’ geographic range?. Oikos 20, 434–438 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Devictor, V., Julliard, R. & Jiguet, F. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos 117, 507–514 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Futuyma, D. J. & Moreno, G. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19, 207–233 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Östergård, H. & Ehrlén, J. Among population variation in specialist and generalist seed predation—the importance of host plant distribution, alternative hosts and environmental variation. Oikos 111, 39–46 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Kassen, R. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 173–190 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Thuiller, W., Araújo, M. B. & Lavorel, S. Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe?. J. Biogeogr. 31, 353–361 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Rahbek, C. & Graves, G. R. Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 4534–4539 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Davies, S. J. J. F., Beck, M. W. R. & Kruiskamp, J. P. Results of banding 154 emus in Western Australia. Wildl. Res. 16, 77–79 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Pople, A., Cairns, S. & Grigg, G. Distribution and abundance of emus Dromaius novaehollandiae in relation to the environment in the South Australian pastoral zone. Emu 91, 222–229 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Davies, S. Aspects of a study of emus in semi-arid Western Australia. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 3, 160–166 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Coddington, C. L. & Cockburn, A. The mating system of free-living emus. Aust. J. Zool. 43, 365–372 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Taylor, E. L., Blache, D., Groth, D., Wetherall, J. D. & Martin, G. B. Genetic evidence for mixed parentage in nests of the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 47, 359–364 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Bradford, M. G., Dennis, A. J. & Westcott, D. A. Diet and dietary preferences of the southern cassowary (Casuarius casuarius) in North Queensland, Australia. Biotropica 40, 338–343 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Moore, L. Population ecology of the southern cassowary Casuarius casuarius johnsonii, Mission Beach north Queensland. J. Ornithol. 148, 357–366 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 50.

    Fourcade, Y., Besnard, A. G. & Secondi, J. Paintings predict the distribution of species, or the challenge of selecting environmental predictors and evaluation statistics. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 245–256 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 51.

    Grice, D., Caughley, G. & Short, J. Density and distribution of emus. Wildl. Res. 12, 69–73 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 52.

    Nield, A. P., Enright, N. J. & Ladd, P. G. Study of seed dispersal by Emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae) in the Jarrah (Eucalyptus marginata) forests of south-western Australia through satellite telemetry. Emu 115, 29–34 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 53.

    Davies, S. The food of emus. Aust. J. Ecol. 3, 411–422 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 54.

    Osborne, W. & Green, K. Seasonal changes in composition, abundance and foraging behavior of birds in the snowy mountains. Emu 92, 93–105 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 55.

    Guisan, A. & Thuiller, W. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 8, 993–1009 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 56.

    Mackey, B. G. & Lindenmayer, D. B. Towards a hierarchical framework for modelling the spatial distribution of animals. J. Biogeogr. 28, 1147–1166 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 57.

    Pearson, R. G. & Dawson, T. P. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful?. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 361–371 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 58.

    Warren, M. et al. Rapid responses of British butterflies to opposing forces of climate and habitat change. Nature 414, 65 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 59.

    Thomas, C. D. Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 267, 139–145 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 60.

    Quigley, M. C., Horton, T., Hellstrom, J. C., Cupper, M. L. & Sandiford, M. Holocene climate change in arid Australia from speleothem and alluvial records. Holocene 20, 1093–1104 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 61.

    Shulmeister, J. & Lees, B. G. Pollen evidence from tropical Australia for the onset of an ENSO-dominated climate at c. 4000 BP. Holocene 5, 10–18 (1995).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 62.

    Weber, L. C., VanDerWal, J., Schmidt, S., McDonald, W. J. & Shoo, L. P. Patterns of rain forest plant endemism in subtropical Australia relate to stable mesic refugia and species dispersal limitations. J. Biogeogr. 41, 222–238 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 63.

    Avilés, J. M., Soler, J. J. & Pérez-Contreras, T. Dark nests and egg colour in birds: A possible functional role of ultraviolet reflectance in egg detectability. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 273, 2821–2829 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • 64.

    Lahti, D. C. & Ardia, D. R. Shedding light on bird egg color: Pigment as parasol and the dark car effect. Am. Nat. 187, 547–563 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 65.

    Magige, F. J., Moe, B. & Røskaft, E. The white colour of the Ostrich (Struthio camelus) egg is a trade-off between predation and overheating. J. Ornithol. 149, 323–328 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 66.

    Elith, J., Kearney, M. & Phillips, S. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 330–342 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 67.

    Maloney, S. & Dawson, T. Thermoregulation in a large bird, the emu (Dromaius novaehollandiae). J. Comp. Physiol. B. 164, 464–472 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 68.

    Dawson, T., Herd, R. & Skadhauge, E. Water turnover and body water distribution during dehydration in a large arid-zone bird, the emu, Dromaius novaehollandiae. J. Comp. Physiol. 153, 235–240 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 69.

    McKinney, M. L. Extinction vulnerability and selectivity: Combining ecological and paleontological views. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 495–516 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 70.

    Crandall, K. A., Bininda-Emonds, O. R., Mace, G. M. & Wayne, R. K. Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 290–295 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 71.

    Dickman, C. R. Impact of exotic generalist predators on the native fauna of Australia. Wildl. Biol. 2, 185–195 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 72.

    Elith, J. & Leathwick, J. R. Species distribution models: Ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 677–697 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 73.

    Araújo, M. B., Pearson, R. G., Thuiller, W. & Erhard, M. Validation of species—climate impact models under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1504–1513 (2005).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 74.

    Thuiller, W. et al. Large-scale environmental correlates of forest tree distributions in Catalonia (NE Spain). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 313–325 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 75.

    Pfennigwerth, S. “The mighty cassowary”: The discovery and demise of the King Island emu. Arch. Nat. Hist. 37, 74–90 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 76.

    Heupink, T. H., Huynen, L. & Lambert, D. M. Ancient DNA suggests Dwarf and ‘Giant’Emu are conspecific. PLoS One 6, e18728 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 77.

    Zizka, A. et al. CoordinateCleaner: Standardized cleaning of occurrence records from biological collection databases. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 744–751 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 78.

    RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com (2020).

  • 79.

    Phillips, S. J. et al. Sample selection bias and presence-only distribution models: Implications for background and pseudo-absence data. Ecol. Appl. 19, 181–197 (2009).

    PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 80.

    Fithian, W., Elith, J., Hastie, T. & Keith, D. A. Bias correction in species distribution models: Pooling survey and collection data for multiple species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 424–438 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 81.

    Molloy, S. W., Davis, R. A., Dunlop, J. A. & van Etten, E. Applying surrogate species presences to correct sample bias in species distribution models: A case study using the Pilbara population of the Northern Quoll. Nat. Conserv. 18, 27–46 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 82.

    Baddeley, A., Rubak, E. & Turner, R. Spatial Point Patterns: Methodology and Applications with R (Chapman and Hall, London, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • 83.

    Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. A J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 84.

    Rabus, B., Eineder, M., Roth, A. & Bamler, R. The shuttle radar topography mission—a new class of digital elevation models acquired by spaceborne radar. ISPRS J. Photogramme. Remote Sens. 57, 241–262 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 85.

    Werner, M. Shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM) mission overview. Frequenz 55, 75–79 (2001).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 86.

    ESRI, ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands: Environmental Systems Research Institute (2011).

  • 87.

    Hill, M. J., Lesslie, R., Barry, A. & Barry, S. A simple, portable, spatial multi-criteria analysis shell–MCAS-S. In MODSIM 2005 International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. 12–15 (2005).

  • 88.

    Australian Government Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (ABARES), Australian Fire Frequency (1988–2015), Australian Government. http://www.agriculture.gov.au/abares/aclump/land-use/alum-classification (2016).

  • 89.

    Australian Government Department of Environmen and Energy, Australian Vegetation Attribute Manual: National Vegetation Information System, Version 6.0, Canberra (2018).

  • 90.

    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center. Gridded Population of the World v4 (2017).

  • 91.

    Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), and Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). Last of the Wild Project, Version 2: Global Human Footprint Dataset (Geographic). NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC). Columbia University. Palisades, NY (2005).

  • 92.

    Dormann, C. F. et al. Collinearity: A review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36, 27–46 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 93.

    Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. A. Jr. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography 36, 1058–1069 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 94.

    Guisan, A., Edwards, T. C. Jr. & Hastie, T. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: Setting the scene. Ecol. Model. 157, 89–100 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 95.

    Marquaridt, D. W. Generalized inverses, ridge regression, biased linear estimation, and nonlinear estimation. Technometrics 12, 591–612 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 96.

    Thuiller, W., Lafourcade, B., Engler, R. & Araújo, M. B. BIOMOD—a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. Ecography 32, 369–373 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 97.

    Araújo, M. B., Whittaker, R. J., Ladle, R. J. & Erhard, M. Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 529–538 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 98.

    Anderson, R. P. & Gonzalez, I. Jr. Species-specific tuning increases robustness to sampling bias in models of species distributions: An implementation with Maxent. Ecol. Model. 222, 2796–2811 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 99.

    Fielding, A. H. & Bell, J. F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 24, 38–49 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 100.

    Allouche, O., Tsoar, A. & Kadmon, R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: Prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 1223–1232 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 101.

    Hegel, T. M., Cushman, S. A., Evans, J. & Huettmann, F. Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation 273–311 (Springer, Tokoyo, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • 102.

    Pearce, J. L. & Boyce, M. S. Modelling distribution and abundance with presence-only data. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 405–412 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 103.

    Hirzel, A. H., Le Lay, G., Helfer, V., Randin, C. & Guisan, A. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. Ecol. Model. 199, 142–152 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 104.

    Otto-Bliesner, B. L. et al. Last glacial maximum and Holocene climate in CCSM3. J. Clim. 19, 2526–2544 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 105.

    Bi, D. et al. The ACCESS coupled model: Description, control climate and evaluation. Aust. Meteorol. Oceanogr. J. 63, 41–64 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 106.

    Cooper, A. et al. Complete mitochondrial genome sequences of two extinct moas clarify ratite evolution. Nature 409, 704–707 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 107.

    Yonezawa, T. et al. Phylogenomics and morphology of extinct paleognaths reveal the origin and evolution of the ratites. Curr. Biol. 27, 68–77 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 108.

    Guillera-Arroita, G. et al. Is my species distribution model fit for purpose? Matching data and models to applications. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 276–292 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 109.

    Hijmans, R. J., Phillips, S., Leathwick, J., & Elith, J. dismo: Species distribution modeling. R package v1.1-4 (2017).


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Stoichiometric niche, nutrient partitioning and resource allocation in a solitary bee are sex-specific and phosphorous is allocated mainly to the cocoon

    Professor Emeritus Peter Eagleson, pioneering hydrologist, dies at 92