in

Reallocation of water resources according to social, economic, and environmental parameters

  • 1.

    Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H. & Blöschl, G. Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrol. Process. 26(8), 1270–1276 (2012).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Babel, M. S., Das Gupta, A. & Nayak, D. K. A model for optimal allocation of water to competing demands. Water Resour. Manag. 19(6), 693–712 (2005).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Banihabib, M. E., Zahraei, A. & Eslamian, S. An integrated optimisation model of reservoir and irrigation system applying uniform deficit irrigation. Int. J. Hydrol. Sci. Technol. 5(4), 372–385 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Ghahreman, B. & Sepaskhah, A. R. Optimal water allocation of water from a single reservoir to an irrigation project with pre-determined multiple cropping patterns. Irrig. Sci. 21(3), 127–137 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Xevi, E. & Khan, S. A multi-objective optimisation approach to water management. J. Environ. Manag. 77(4), 269–277 (2005).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Divakar, L., Babel, M. S., Perret, S. R. & Das Gupta, A. Optimal allocation of bulk water supplies to competing use sectors based on economic criterion—An application to the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand. J. Hydrol. 401(1–2), 22–35 (2011).

    ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Roozbahani, R., Abbasi, B., Schreider, S. & Ardakani, A. A multi-objective approach for transboundary river water allocation. Water Resour. Manag. 28(15), 5447–5463 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Schnegg, M. & Kiaka, R. D. The economic value of water: The contradictions and consequences of a prominent development model in Namibia. Econ. Anthropol. 6(2), 264–276 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Langarudi, S. P., Maxwell, C. M., Bai, Y., Hanson, A. & Fernald, A. Does socioeconomic feedback matter for water models?. Ecol. Econ. 159, 35–45 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Keshavarz, M., Karami, E. & Vanclay, F. The social experience of drought in rural Iran. Land Use Policy 30(1), 120–129 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Dean, A. J., Fielding, K. S., Lindsay, J., Newton, F. J. & Ross, H. How social capital influences community support for alternative water sources. Sustain. Cities Soc. 27, 457–466 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Scanlon, T. et al. The role of social actors in water access in Sub-Saharan Africa: Evidence from Malawi and Zambia. Water Resour. Rural Dev. 8, 25–36 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Popovic, T., Kraslawski, A., Heiduschke, R. & Repke. J. Indicators of social sustainability for wastewater treatment processes. In Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, Vol. 723(28) (2014).

  • 14.

    El-Gafy, I. K. E. D. The water poverty index as an assistant tool for drawing strategies of the Egyptian water sector. Ain Shams Eng. J. 9(2), 173–186 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Bui, N. T. et al. Social sustainability assessment of groundwater resources: A case study of Hanoi, Vietnam. Ecol. Indic. 93, 1034–1042 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Li, C. et al. Three decades of changes in water environment of a large freshwater lake and its relationship with socio-economic indicators. J. Environ. Sci. 77, 156–166 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Ahmadi, A., Karamouz, M., Moridi, A. & Han, D. Integrated planning of land use and water allocation on a watershed scale considering social and water quality issues. J. Water Resour. Plan. Manag. 138(6), 671–681 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Tu, Y. et al. Administrative and market-based allocation mechanism for regional water resources planning. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 95, 156–173 (2015).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Kelly, R. A. et al. Selecting among five common modelling approaches for integrated environmental assessment and management. Environ. Model. Softw. 47, 159–181 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Wang, K., Davies, E. G. & Liu, J. Integrated water resources management and modeling: A case study of Bow river basin, Canada. J. Clean. Prod. 240, 118242 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Zhao, D. et al. Quantifying economic-social-environmental trade-offs and synergies of water-supply constraints: An application to the capital region of China. Water Res. 195, 116986 (2021).

    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Navarro-Ramírez, V., Ramírez-Hernandez, J., Gil-Samaniego, M. & Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E. Methodological frameworks to assess sustainable water resources management in industry: A review. Ecol. Indic. 119, 106819 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Iran Environment Organization. https://www.doe.ir/portal/home (2013).

  • 24.

    Madani, K. & Mariño, M. A. System dynamics analysis for managing Iran’s Zayandeh-Rud river basin. Water Resour. Manag. 23(11), 2163–2187 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Ahmad, S. & Simonovic, S. P. System dynamics modeling of reservoir operations for flood management. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 14(3), 190–198 (2000).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Ahmad, S. & Simonovic, S. P. Spatial system dynamics: New approach for simulation of water resources systems. J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 18(4), 331–340 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Ahmad, S. & Simonovic, S. P. An intelligent decision support system for management of floods. Water Resour. Manag. 20(3), 391–410 (2006).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Dong, Q., Zhang, X., Chen, Y. & Fang, D. Dynamic management of a water resources-socioeconomic-environmental system based on feedbacks using system dynamics. Water Resour. Manag. 33(6), 2093–2108 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    National Statistical Center of Iran. Summary of Industrial Workshop Statistics by Activity. http://www.amar.org.ir (2013).

  • 30.

    Rezaee, A., Bozorg-Haddad, O. & Singh, V. P. Water and society. in Economical, Political, and Social Issues in Water Resources, 257–271 (Elsevier, 2021).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Ministry of Energy, Water and Wastewater Macro Planning Office. Studies on Updating the Country’s Comprehensive Water Plan in Aras, Urmia, Talesh-Anzali Wetland, Sefidrood-Haraz, Haraz-Qarasu, Gorganrood and Atrak Watersheds (Consumption and Needs of Industrial and Mining Water and Production Wastewater in the Base Year (2006)) in the Catchment Area of Urmia), Vol. 8 (2013).

  • 32.

    Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. in Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems (Springer, 1981).

    Chapter 

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Zeyaeyan, S., Fattahi, E., Ranjbar, A. & Vazifedoust, M. Classification of rainfall warnings based on the TOPSIS method. Climate 5(2), 33 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Zolghadr-Asli, B., Bozorg-Haddad, O., Enayati, M. & Goharian, E. Developing a robust multi-attribute decision-making framework to evaluate performance of water system design and planning under climate change. Water Resour. Manag. 35(1), 279–298 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Opricovic, S. & Tzeng, G. H. Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 445–455 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(3), 379–423 (1948).

    MathSciNet 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Making the case for hydrogen in a zero-carbon economy

    Flight performance and the factors affecting the flight behaviour of Philaenus spumarius the main vector of Xylella fastidiosa in Europe