The effectiveness of national biodiversity investments to protect the wealth of nature

Huwyler, F., Kappeli, J., Serafimova, K., Swanson, E. & Tobin, J. Conservation Finance: Moving Beyond Donor Funding Toward an Investor-driven Approach (WWF, Credit Suisse and McKinsey & Company, 2014); http://go.nature.com/2Ka5Y2u

Deutz, A. et al. Financing Nature: Closing the Global Biodiversity Financing Gap: Full Report (Paulson Institute, Nature Conservancy and Cornell Atkinson Center for Sustainability, 2020).

Halpern, B. et al. Gaps and mismatches between global conservation priorities and spending. Conserv. Biol. 20, 56–64 (2006).

Article  Google Scholar 

James, A., Gaston, K. J. & BalmfordA. Can we afford to conserve biodiversity? BioScience 51, 43–52 (2001).

Article  Google Scholar 

McCarthy, D. et al. Financial costs of meeting global biodiversity conservation targets: current spending and unmet needs. Science 338, 946–949 (2012).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Nature’s Dangerous Decline ‘Unprecedented’; Species Extinction Rates ‘Accelerating’ (IPBES, 2019); http://go.nature.com/2V4ZBN9

The Global Risks Report 2020 (WEF, 2020); https://go.nature.com/3ahNfg8

IUCN Views on the Preparation, Scope and Content of the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework (IUCN, 2018); https://go.nature.com/2WlW3ti

Biodiversity: Finance and the Economic and Business Case for Action (OECD, 2019); https://go.nature.com/3h0F9Kc

Parker, C. & Cranford, M. The Little Biodiversity Finance Book. A Guide to Proactive Investment in Natural Capital (Global Canopy Program, 2010); https://go.nature.com/3mwyxUJ

Coad, L. et al. Widespread shortfalls in protected area resourcing undermine efforts to conserve biodiversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 259–264 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Kearney, S. G. et al. Estimating the benefit of well-managed protected areas for threatened species conservation. ORYX 54, 276–284 (2020).

Article  Google Scholar 

Waldron, A. et al. Protecting 30% of the Planet for Nature: Costs, Benefits and Economic Implications (IIASA, 2020); https://go.nature.com/387GkDq

Stepping, K. M. K. & Meijer, K. S. The challenges of assessing the effectiveness of biodiversity-related development aid. Trop. Conserv. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940082918770995 (2018).

Waldron, A. et al. Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12144–12148 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Gallo-Cajiao, E. et al. Crowdfunding biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 32, 1426–1435 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Parker, C., Cranford, M., Oakes, N. & Leggett, M. The Little Biodiversity Finance Book 3rd edn (Global Canopy Programme, 2012).

Arlaud, M. et al. in Towards a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Principles, Challenges and Perspectives (eds Filho, W. L. et al.) Ch. 5 (Springer, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_5

Rawat, U. S. & Agarwal, N. K. Biodiversity: concept, threats and conservation. Environ. Conserv. J. 16, 19–28 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Gorobets, A. Wild fauna conservation: IUCN-CITES match is required. Ecol. Indic. 112, 106091 (2020).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rodrigues, A. S. L. et al. The value of the IUCN Red List for conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 71–76 (2006).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rao, M., Naro-Maciel, E. & Sterling, E. Protected Areas and Biodiversity Conservation II: Management and Effectiveness (Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners, 2009).

Adams, V. M., Iacona, G. D. & Possingham, H. P. Weighing the benefits of expanding protected areas versus managing existing ones. Nat. Sustain. 2, 404–411 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

BIOFIN The Biodiversity Finance Initiative Workbook 2018 (United Nations Development Programme, 2018).

Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Costanza, R. et al. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Change 26, 152–158 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar 

Naidoo, R. et al. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 9495–9500 (2008).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Turner, W. et al. Global conservation of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BioScience 57, 868–873 (2007).

Article  Google Scholar 

Balmford, A. et al. Economic reasons for conserving wild nature. Science 297, 950–953 (2002).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Hily, E. et al. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a biodiversity conservation policy: a bio-econometric analysis of Natura 2000 contracts in forests. Ecol. Econ. 119, 197-208 (2015).

Ferraro, P. J., McIntosh, C. & Ospina, M. The effectiveness of the US endangered special act: an econometric analysis using matching methods. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 54, 245–261 (2007).

Article  Google Scholar 

Waldron, A. et al. Targeting global conservation funding to limit immediate biodiversity declines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12144–12148 (2013).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Waldron, A. et al. Reductions in global biodiversity loss predicted from conservation spending. Nature 551, 364–367 (2017).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Richerzhagen, C. et al. Why We Need More and Better Biodiversity Aid Briefing Paper 13 (German Development Institute, 2016); https://go.nature.com/2K0S9Dz

Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).

Karousakis, K. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Policy Instruments for Biodiversity: Impact Evaluation, Cost-effectiveness Analysis and Other Approaches Environment Working Paper No.141 (OECD, 2018).

Isaza, C., Bofill, W. & Cabrera, H. Cost-effective species conservation: an application to Huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) in Chile. Environ. Dev. Econ. 12, 535–551 (2007).

Article  Google Scholar 

Alix-Garcia, J. M., Shapiro, E. N. & Sims, K. R. Forest conservation and slippage: evidence from Mexico’s national payments for ecosystem services program. Land Econ. 88, 613–638 (2012).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bare, M. Assessing the impact of international conservation aid on deforestation in sub-Saharan Africa. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 125010 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Ferraro, P. J. et al. More strictly protected areas are not necessarily more protective: evidence from Bolivia, Costa Rica, Indonesia, and Thailand. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 025011 (2013).

Article  Google Scholar 

Lindsey, P. A. et al. More than $1 billion needed annually to secure Africa’s protected areas with lions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E10788–E10796 (2018).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Bonham, C. et al. Conservation trust funds, protected area management effectiveness and conservation outcomes: lessons from the global conservation fund. Parks 20, 89–100 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar 

Hein, Lars et al. Progress in natural capital accounting for ecosystems. Science 367, 514–515 (2020).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Natural Capital Accounting and Valuing Ecosystem Services Project (UN, 2019); http://go.nature.com/2K2jsxn

Ecosystem Valuation and Natural Capital Accounting (Gaborone Declaration for Sustainability in Africa, 2012); http://www.gaboronedeclaration.com/nca

Climate Public Expenditure and Institutional Review (CPEIR) (UNDP, 2015); https://go.nature.com/2K0C7tp

BIOFIN Workbook: Mobilising Resources for Biodiversity and Sustainable Development (UND, 2016); https://go.nature.com/3p1PDMb

Shieh, G. Effect size, statistical power, and sample size for assessing interactions between categorical and continuous variables. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 72, 136–154 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Leon, A. C. & Heo, M. Sample sizes required to detect interactions between two binary fixed-effects in a mixed-effects linear regression model. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 53, 603–608 (2009).

Article  Google Scholar 

Marques, A. et al. Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 628–637 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Tilman, D. et al. Future threats to biodiversity and pathways to their prevention. Nature 546, 73–81 (2017).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Luther, D. A. et al. Determinants of bird conservation—action implementation and associated population trends of threatened species. Conserv. Biol. 30, 1338–1346 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Hoffmann, M. et al. The impact of conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science 330, 1503–1509 (2010).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Brooks, T. M. et al. Analysing biodiversity and conservation knowledge products to support regional environmental assessments. Sci. Data 3, I60007 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Keith, D. A. et al. Scientific foundations for an IUCN Red List of ecosystems. PLoS ONE 8, e62111 (2013).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. & Mastruzzi, M. The worldwide governance indicators: methodology and analytical issues. Hague J. Rule Law 3, 220–246 (2011).

Article  Google Scholar 

Akaike, H. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle (Academiai Kiado, 1973).

Bozdogan, H. Model selection and Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC): the general theory and its analytical extensions. Psychometrika 52, 345–370 (1987).

Article  Google Scholar 

Angrist, J. D. & Pischke, J.-S. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion (Princeton Univ. Press, 2009); http://go.nature.com/3r5t6zA

Wooldridge, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data 2nd edn (MIT Press, 2010).