Adams, D. C. & Nistri, A. Ontogenetic convergence and evolution of foot morphology in european cave salamanders (Family: Plethodontidae). BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 216 (2010).
Baken, E. K., Mellenthin, L. E. & Adams, D. C. Macroevolution of desiccation-related morphology in plethodontid salamanders as inferred from a novel surface area to volume ratio estimation approach. Evolution 74, 476–486 (2020).
Martinez, P. A. et al. The contribution of neutral evolution and adaptive processes in driving phenotypic divergence in a model mammalian species, the andean fox Lycalopex culpaeus. J. Biogeogr. 45, 1114–1125 (2018).
Vidal-García, M., Byrne, P. G., Roberts, J. D. & Keogh, J. S. The role of phylogeny and ecology in shaping morphology in 21 genera and 127 species of australo-papuan myobatrachid frogs. J. Evol. Biol. 27, 181–192 (2014).
Adams, D. C. Parallel evolution of character displacement driven by competitive selection in terrestrial salamanders. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 72 (2010).
Losos, J. B. Ecological character displacement and the study of adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97, 5693–5695 (2000).
Moen, D. S., Irschick, D. J. & Wiens, J. J. Evolutionary conservatism and convergence both lead to striking similarity in ecology, morphology and performance across continents in frogs. Proc. R. Soc. B. 280, 20132156 (2013).
Amado, T. F., Bidau, C. J. & Olalla-Tárraga, M. Á. Geographic variation of body size in new world anurans: energy and water in a balance. Ecography 42, 456–466 (2019).
Gouveia, S. F. et al. Biophysical modeling of water economy can explain geographic gradient of body size in anurans. Am. Nat. 193, 51–58 (2019).
Olalla-Tárraga, M. Á., Diniz-Filho, J. A. F., Bastos, R. P. & Rodríguez, M. Á. Geographic body size gradients in tropical regions: water deficit and anuran body size in the brazilian cerrado. Ecography 32, 581–590 (2009).
Cooney, C. R. et al. Ecology and allometry predict the evolution of avian developmental durations. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–9 (2020).
Kriegman, S., Cheney, N. & Bongard, J. How morphological development can guide evolution. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–10 (2018).
Moczek, A. P. Re-evaluating the environment in developmental evolution. Front. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1–8 (2015).
Richter-Boix, A., Tejedo, M. & Rezende, E. L. Evolution and plasticity of anuran larval development in response to desiccation. a comparative analysis. Ecol. Evol. 1, 15–25 (2011).
Castro, K. M. S. A., do Santos, M. P., Brito, M. F. G., Bidau, C. J. & Martinez, P. A. Ontogenetic allometry conservatism across five teleost orders. J. Fish Biol. 93, 745–749 (2018).
Skúlason, S. et al. A way forward with eco evo devo: an extended theory of resource polymorphism with postglacial fishes as model systems. Biol. Rev. 94, 1786–1808 (2019).
Porter, W. P. & Gates, D. M. Thermodynamic equilibria of animals with environment. Ecol. Monogr. 39, 227–244 (1969).
Thompson, D. A. On Growth and Form (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1917).
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984).
Amado, T. F., Pinto, M. G. M. & Olalla-Tárraga, M. Á. Anuran 3d models reveal the relationship between surface area-to-volume ratio and climate. J. Biogeogr. 46, 1429–1437 (2019).
Ashton, K. G. Do amphibians follow bergmann’s rule?. Can. J. Zool. 80, 708–716 (2002).
Glazier, D. Effects of contingency versus constraints on the body-mass scaling of metabolic rate. Challenges 9, 4 (2018).
Gouveia, S. F. & Correia, I. Geographical clines of body size in terrestrial amphibians: water conservation hypothesis revisited. J. Biogeogr. 43, 2075–2084 (2016).
Lindsey, C. C. Body sizes of poikilotherm vertebrates at different latitudes. Evolution 20, 456–465 (1966).
Bergmannn, C. Über die verhältnisse der wärmeökonomie der thiere zu ihrer grösse. Göttinger Stud. 1, 595–708 (1847).
Nevo, E. Adaptive variation in size of cricket frogs. Ecology 54, 1271–1281 (1973).
Tracy, C. R., Christian, K. A. & Tracy, C. R. Not just small, wet, and cold : effects of body size and skin resistance on thermoregulation and arboreality of frogs. Ecology 91, 1477–1484 (2010).
Wells, K. D. The Ecology and Behavior of Amphibians (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2007).
Perez, D., Sheehy, C. M. & Lillywhite, H. B. Variation of organ position in snakes. J. Morphol. 280, 1798–1807 (2019).
Amiel, J. J., Chua, B., Wassersug, R. J. & Jones, D. R. Temperature-dependent regulation of blood distribution in snakes. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1458–1462 (2011).
Canals, M. Thermal ecology of small animals. Biol Res 31, 367–374 (1998).
Tracy, C. R. A model of the dynamic exchanges of water and energy between a terrestrial amphibian and its environment. Ecol. Monogr. 46, 293–326 (1976).
Gould, S. J. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41, 587–640 (1966).
Klingenberg, C. P. Heterochrony and allometry: the analysis of evolutionary change in ontogeny. Biol. Rev. 73, 79–123 (1998).
Klingenberg, C. P. Size, shape, and form: concepts of allometry in geometric morphometrics. Dev. Genes Evol. 226, 113–137 (2016).
Voje, K. L., Hansen, T. F., Egset, C. K., Bolstad, G. H. & Pélabon, C. Allometric constraints and the evolution of allometry. Evolution 68, 866–885 (2014).
Pélabon, C. et al. Evolution of morphological allometry. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1320, 58–75 (2014).
Duellman, W. E., Marion, A. B. & Hedges, S. B. Phylogenetics, classification, and biogeography of the treefrogs (amphibia: anura: arboranae). Zootaxa 4104, 001–109 (2016).
Kamilar, J. M. & Cooper, N. Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B. 368, 20120341 (2013).
Landis, M. J. & Schraiber, J. G. Pulsed evolution shaped modern vertebrate body sizes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 114, 13224–13229 (2017).
Levy, D. L. & Heald, R. Biological scaling problems and solutions in amphibians. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 8, a019166 (2015).
Boutilier, R. G., Stiffler, D. F. & Toews, D. Exchange of respiratory gases, ions, and water in amphibious and aquatic amphibians. In Environmental Physiology of Amphibians (eds Feder, M. E. & Burggren, W. W.) 81–124 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992).
Spotila, J. R., O’connor, M. P. & Bakken, G. S. Biophysics of heat and mass transfer. In Environmental Physiology of the Amphibians (eds Feder, M. E. & Burggren, W. W.) 59–80 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992).
Sanger, T. J. et al. Convergent evolution of sexual dimorphism in skull shape using distinct developmental strategies. Evolution 67, 2180–2193 (2013).
Navas, C. A., Antoniazzi, M. M. & Jared, C. A preliminary assessment of anuran physiological and morphological adaptation to the caatinga, a brazilian semi-arid environment. Int. Congr. Ser. 1275, 298–305 (2004).
Wiley, D. F. et al. Evolutionary Morphing Minneapolis, MN, USA Minneapolis, MN, USA (IEEE Computer Society, Minneapolis, 2005).
Klingenberg, C. P. & Gidaszewski, N. A. Testing and quantifying phylogenetic signals and homoplasy in morphometric data. Syst. Biol. 59, 245–261 (2010).
Dryden, I. L. & Mardia, K. V. Statistical Shape Analysis (Wiley, Hoboken, 1998).
Adams, D. C. A generalized k statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimenstional multivariate data. Syst. Biol. 63(5), 685–697 (2014).
Jetz, W. & Pyron, R. A. The interplay of past diversification and evolutionary isolation with present imperilment across the amphibian tree of life. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 850–858 (2018).
Adams, D. C. & Otárola-Castillo, E. Geomorph: an r package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 393–399 (2013).
Fox, J. & Hong, J. Effect displays in r for multinomial and proportional-odds logit models: extensions to the effects package. J. Stat. Softw. 32, 1–24 (2009).
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2016).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
