Predatory functional responses under increasing temperatures of two life stages of an invasive gecko

Hellmann, J. J., Byers, J. E., Bierwagen, B. G. & Dukes, J. S. Five potential consequences of climate change for invasive species. Cons. bio. 22, 534–543, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00951.x (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Meyerson, L. A., Carlton, J. T., Simberloff, D. & Lodge, D. M. The growing peril of biological invasions. Front Ecol Environ. 17, 191–191, https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2036 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rahel, F. J., Bierwagen, B. & Taniguchi, Y. Managing aquatic species of conservation concern in the face of climate change and invasive species. Cons Bio. 22, 551–561 (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Mooney, H. A. & Cleland, E. E. The evolutionary impact of invasive species. P Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 5446–5451, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.091093398 (2001).

ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Rahel, F. J. & Olden, J. D. (2008). Assessing the effects of climate change on aquatic invasive species. Cons Bio. 22, 521–533,https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00950.x (2001).

Laverty, C. et al. Temperature rise and parasitic infection interact to increase the impact of an invasive species. INT J Parasitol. 47, 291–296 (2017).

Article  Google Scholar 

Dick, J. et al. Invader Relative Impact Potential: a new metric to understand and predict the ecological impacts of existing, emerging and future invasive alien species. J Appl Ecol. 54, 1259–1267 (2017).

Article  Google Scholar 

Englund, G., Öhlund, G., Hein, C. L. & Diehl, S. Temperature dependence of the functional response. Ecol. Lett. 14, 914–921 (2011).

Article  Google Scholar 

Khosa, D. et al. Temperature regime drives differential predatory performance in Largemouth Bass and Florida Bass. Environ. Biol. Fishes. 103, 67–76 (2020).

Article  Google Scholar 

Human, K. G. & Gordon, D. M. Exploitation and interference competition between the invasive Argentine ant, Linepithema humile, and native ant species. Oecologia. 105, 405–412, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328744 (1996).

ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holway et al. The causes and consequences of ant invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol. 33, 181–233, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150444 (2002).

Article  Google Scholar 

Cioni, A. & Gherardi, F. Agonism and interference competition in freshwater decapods. Behaviour 141, 1297–1324, https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539042729702 (2004).

Article  Google Scholar 

Gherardi, F. & Daniels, W. H. Agonism and shelter competition between invasive and indigenous crayfish species. Can. J. Zool. 82, 1923–1932, https://doi.org/10.1139/z04-185 (2004).

Article  Google Scholar 

Case, T. J. & Gilpin, M. E. Interference competition and niche theory. P Natl Acad Sci USA 71, 3073–3077, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.71.8.3073 (1974).

ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Langkilde, T. & Shine, R. Competing for crevices: interspecific conflict influences retreat-site selection in montane lizards. Oecologia 140, 684–691, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1640-1 (2004).

ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rowles, A. D. & O’Dowd, D. J. Interference competition by Argentine ants displaces native ants: implications for biotic resistance to invasion. Biol. Invasions 9, 73–85, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-006-9009-5 (2007).

Article  Google Scholar 

Corlett, R. T. Impacts of warming on tropical lowland rainforests. Trends Ecol Evol. 26, 606–613, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.015 (2011).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barrios‐O’Neill, D. et al. Predator‐free space, functional responses and biological invasions. Funct. Ecol. 29, 377–384, https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12347 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Sih, A., Englund, G. & Wooster, D. Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol. 13, 350–355, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(98)01437-2 (1998).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finke, D. L. & Snyder, W. E. Conserving the benefits of predator biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 143, 2260–2269, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.03.022 (2010).

Article  Google Scholar 

Griffin, J. N. & Silliman, B. R. Resource partitioning and why it matters. Nature Education Knowledge 3, 49 (2011).

Google Scholar 

Andrews, R. M. & Pough, F. H. Metabolism of squamate reptiles: allometric and ecological relationships. Physiological Zoology 58, 214–231 (1985).

Article  Google Scholar 

Kraus, F. Alien reptiles and amphibians: a scientific compendium and analysis (Vol. 4). Springer, Netherlands, p. 562 (2009).

Gibbons, J. W. et al. The global decline of reptiles, déjà vu amphibians. BioScience 50, 653–666, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0653:TGDORD]2.0.CO;2 (2000).

Article  Google Scholar 

Kraus, F. Impacts from invasive reptiles and amphibians. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S. 46, 75–97, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054450 (2015).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bomford, M., Kraus, F., Braysher, M., Walter, L. & Brown, L. Risk assessment model for the import and keeping of exotic reptiles and amphibians. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences for The Department of Environment and Heritage, p. 110, Available at, http://www.brs.gov.au (Accessed: 17 September 2019).

Kopecký, O., Kalous, L. & Patoka, J. (2013). Establishment risk from pet trade freshwater turtles in the European Union. KNOWL MANAG AQUAT EC. 410, p. 11; https://doi.org/10.1051/kmae/2013057 (2005).

Kopecký, O., Patoka, J. & Kalous, L. Establishment risk and potential invasiveness of the selected exotic amphibians from pet trade in the European Union. J. Nat. Conserv. 31, 22–28, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2016.02.007 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Wilgen, N. J. & Richardson, D. M. The roles of climate, phylogenetic relatedness, introduction effort, and reproductive traits in the establishment of non‐native reptiles and amphibians. Cons Bio. 26, 267–277, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01804.x (2012).

Article  Google Scholar 

Popescu, V. D., Rozylowicz, L., Cogălniceanu, D., Niculae, I. M. & Cucu, A. L. Moving into protected areas? Setting conservation priorities for Romanian reptiles and amphibians at risk from climate change. PLoS ONE 8, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079330 (2013).

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Fitzsimons, J. Southward range expansion of the Mourning Gecko Lepidodactylus lugubris on mainland Australia and nearshore islands. Aust. J. Zool. 35, 619–621, https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2011.013 (2011).

Article  Google Scholar 

Hoogmoed, M. S. & Avila-Pires, T. C. Lepidodactylus lugubris (Duméril & Bibron 1836) (Reptilia: Gekkonidae), an introduced lizard new for Brazil, with remarks on and correction of its distribution in the New World. Zootaxa 4000, 90–110, https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4000.1.4 (2015).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Griffing, A. H., Sanger, T. J., Matamoros, I. C., Nielsen, S. V. & Gamble, T. Protocols for husbandry and embryo collection of a parthenogenetic gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris (Squamata: Gekkonidae). Herpetol. Rev. 49, 230–235 (2018).

Google Scholar 

Seufer, H. G Artenbeschreibung und Haltung, Pflege und Zucht der bekanntesten Gecko-Arten. Albrecht Philler Verlag, Minden, pp. 112 (1985).

Nietzke, G. Die Terrarientiere 2. Ulmer, Germany, p. 322 (1998).

Werner, Y. L. Do gravid females of oviparous gekkonid lizards maintain elevated body temperatures? Hemidactylus frenatus and Lepidodactylus lugubris on Oahu. Amphibia-Reptilia 11, 200–204, https://doi.org/10.1163/156853890X00627 (1990).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bolger, D. T. & Case, T. J. Divergent ecology of sympatric clones of the asexual gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris. Oecologia 100, 397–405, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317861 (1994).

ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huey, R. B., Niewiarowski, P. H., Kaufmann, J. & Herron, J. C. Thermal biology of nocturnal ectotherms: is sprint performance of geckos maximal at low body temperatures?. Physiol. Zool. 62, 488–504, https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/physzool.62.2.30156181 (1989).

IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Stocker, T.F. et al. (eds.)] Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA, 1535 pp (2013).

Nowak, E. M., Theimer, T. C. & Schuett, G. W. Functional and numerical responses of predators: where do vipers fit in the traditional paradigms? BIOL REV. 83, 601–620 (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Holling, C. S. Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can Entomol. 91, 385–398 (1959).

Article  Google Scholar 

Hassell, M. P. The dynamics of arthropod predator-prey systems. Princeton University Press (1978).

Dick, J. T. et al. Advancing impact prediction and hypothesis testing in invasion ecology using a comparative functional response approach. Biol. Invasions. 16, 735–753, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0550-8 (2014).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bollache, L., Dick, J. T., Farnsworth, K. D. & Montgomery, W. I. Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods. Biol. Lett. 4, 166–169, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2007.0554 (2007).

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dick, J. T. et al. Ecological impacts of an invasive predator explained and predicted by comparative functional responses. Biol. Invasions 15, 837–846, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0332-8 (2013).

Article  Google Scholar 

South, J., Dick, J. T., McCard, M., Barrios-O’Neill, D. & Anton, A. Predicting predatory impact of juvenile invasive lionfish (Pterois volitans) on a crustacean prey using functional response analysis: effects of temperature, habitat complexity and light regimes. Environ. Biol. Fishes. 100, 1155–1165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-017-0633-y (2017).

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang, X. et al. Diets structure of a common lizard Eremias argus and their effects on grasshoppers: Implications for a potential biological agent. J Asia-Pacentomol. 19, 133–138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2015.12.013 (2016).

Article  Google Scholar 

Witz, B. W. The functional response of Cnemidophorus sexlineatus: laboratory versus field measurements. J. Herpetol. 18, 498–506, https://doi.org/10.2307/1565692 (1996).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rödder, D., Solé, M. & Böhme, W. Predicting the potential distributions of two alien invasive House geckos (Gekkonidae: Hemidactylus frenatus, Hemidactylus mabouia). North-West J Zool. 4, 236–246 (2008).

Google Scholar 

Rödder, D. & Weinsheimer, F. Will future anthropogenic climate change increase the potential distribution of the alien invasive Cuban treefrog (Anura: Hylidae)? J. Nat. Hist. 43, 1207–1217, https://doi.org/10.1080/00222930902783752 (2009).

Article  Google Scholar 

Brown, S. G. & Duffy, P. K. The effects of egg-laying site, temperature, and salt water on incubation time and hatching success in the gecko Lepidodactylus lugubris. J. Herpetol. 26, 510–513, https://doi.org/10.2307/1565135 (1992).

Article  Google Scholar 

Dangles, O., Carpio, C., Barragan, A. R., Zeddam, J. L. & Silvain, J. F. Temperature as a key driver of ecological sorting among invasive pest species in the tropical Andes. ECOL APPL. 18, 1795–1809, https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1638.1 (2008).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cuthbert, R. N., Dickey, J. W., Coughlan, N. E., Joyce, P. W., & Dick, J. T. The Functional Response Ratio (FRR): advancing comparative metrics for predicting the ecological impacts of invasive alien species. Biol. Invasions 1–5 (2019).

Rall, B. C. et al. Universal temperature and body-mass scaling of feeding rates. Philos T R Soc B. 367, 2923–2934 (2012).

Article  Google Scholar 

Artacho, P., Jouanneau, I. & Le Galliard, J. F. Interindividual variation in thermal sensitivity of maximal sprint speed, thermal behavior, and resting metabolic rate in a lizard. Physiol Biochem Zool. 86, 458–469 (2013).

Article  Google Scholar 

Dick, J. T. et al. Functional responses can unify invasion ecology. Biol. invasions 19, 1667–1672, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1355-3 (2017).

Article  Google Scholar 

Veselý, L. et al. Temperature and prey density jointly influence trophic and non‐trophic interactions in multiple predator communities. Freshw. Biol. 00, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13387 (2019).

Article  Google Scholar 

Dickey, J. W. E. et al. On the RIP: using Relative Impact Potential to assess the ecological impacts of invasive alien species. NeoBiota 55, 27–60 (2020).

Article  Google Scholar 

Perry, G. & Ritter, M. Lepidodactylus lugubris (mourning gecko): nectivory and daytime activity. Herpetol. Rev. 30, 166–167 (1999).

Google Scholar 

Ineich, I. & Ota, H. Additional remarks on the unisexual-bisexual complex of the gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris, in Takapoto Atoll, French Polynesia. Bulletin of the College of Science 53, 31–39, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12000/5439 (1992).

Grismer, L. L. Lizards of Peninsular Malaysia, Singapore, and their adjacent archipelagos. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, p. 728 (2011)

Salvidio, S. & Delaugerre, M. Population dynamics of the European leaf-toed gecko (Euleptes europaea) in NW Italy: implications for conservation. HERPETOL J. 13, 81–88 (2003).

Google Scholar 

Short, K. H. & Petren, K. Boldness underlies foraging success of invasive Lepidodactylus lugubris geckos in the human landscape. Anim. Behav. 76, 429–437, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.04.008 (2008).

Article  Google Scholar 

Manthey, U. & Grossmann, W. Amphibien & Reptilien Südostasiens. Natur und Tier-Verlag, Münster, Germany, p. 512 (1997)

Röll, B. Lepidodactylus lugubris (Duméril & Bibron). Sauria 24, 545–550 (2002).

Google Scholar 

Bomford, M., Kraus, F., Barry, S. C. & Lawrence, E. Predicting establishment success for exogenous reptiles and amphibians: a role for climate matching. Biol. Invasions 11, 713–724, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-008-9285-3 (2009).

Article  Google Scholar 

Linzmaier, S. M., & Jeschke, J. M. Towards a mechanistic understanding of individual‐level functional responses: Invasive crayfish as model organisms. Freshw. Biology 65, https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13456 (2019).

Petren, K. & Case, T. J. An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77, 118–132, https://doi.org/10.2307/2265661 (1996).

Article  Google Scholar 

Ota, H. Female reproductive cycles in the northernmost populations of the two gekkonid lizards, Hemidactylus frenatus and Lepidodactylus lugubris. Ecol. Res. 9, 121–130, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347487 (1994).

Article  Google Scholar 

Boissinot, S., Ineich, I., Thaler, L. & Guillaume, C. P. Hybrid origin and clonal diversity in the parthenogenetic gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris in French Polynesia. J. Herpetol. 295–298, https://doi.org/10.2307/1565401 (1997).

Hanley, K. A., Bolger, D. T. & Case, T. J. Comparative ecology of sexual and asexual gecko species (Lepidodactylus) in French Polynesia. EVOL ECOL RES. 8, 438–454 (1994).

Article  Google Scholar 

Yamashiro, S., Toda, M. & Ota, H. Clonal composition of the parthenogenetic gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris, at the northernmost extremity of its range. ZOOL SCI. 17, 1013–1020, https://doi.org/10.2108/zsj.17.1013 (2000).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rösler, H. G der Welt. Alle Gattungen. Urania, Leipzig, 236 pp (1995).

Umeya, K. & Kato, T. Studies on the comparative ecology of bean weevils V. distribution of eggs and larvae of Acanthoscelides obtectus in relation to its oviposition and boring behaviour. POPUL ECOL. 12, 35–50, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02511080 (1970).

Article  Google Scholar 

Thakur, D. R. Taxonomy, distribution and pest status of Indian biotypes of Acanthoscelides obtectus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Bruchinae) – A new record. PAK J ZOOL. 44, 189–195 (2012).

Google Scholar 

Leroi, B. Feeding, longevity and reproduction of adults of Acanthoscelides obtectus Say in laboratory conditions. In: The ecology of Bruchids attacking legumes (Pulses). Springer, Dordrecht, pp. 101–111 (1981).

Messenger, K. Behaviour of Lepidodactylus lugubris on Heron Island, Great Barrier Reef, and a record of Gehyra dubia from that island. Herpetofauna 35, 37–39 (2005).

Google Scholar 

Limpus, C. J., Limpus, D. J. & Goldizen, A. Recent colonisation of Heron Island, southern Great Barrier Reef, by the mourning gecko, Lepidodactylus lugubris. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum, 43, 777–781, https://trove.nla.gov.au/version/234176520 (1999).

Alexander, M. E., Dick, J. T., Weyl, O. L., Robinson, T. B., & Richardson, D. M. Existing and emerging high impact invasive species are characterized by higher functional responses than natives. Biol. Lett. 10, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0946 (2014).

Zuur, A., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer, New York, USA, p. 574 (2009).

Juliano, S. A. Non-linear curve fitting: predation and functional response curve. Design and analysis of ecological experiment, 178–196 (2001).

Rogers, D. Random search and insect population models. J Anim Ecol. 41, 369–83, https://doi.org/10.2307/3474 (1972).

Article  Google Scholar 

Rosenbaum, B. & Rall, B. C. Fitting functional responses: Direct parameter estimation by simulating differential equations. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 2076–2090 (2018).

Article  Google Scholar 

Bolker, B. M. Ecological Models and Data in R. Princeton University Press, Princeton, USA and Oxford, United Kingdom, pp 408 (2008).

Bolker, B. M. emdbook: Ecological Models and Data in R; R package version 1.3.11 (2019).