in

Pricing externalities and moral behaviour

  • 1.

    Falk, A. & Szech, N. Morals and markets. Science 340, 707–711 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Bartling, B., Weber, R. A. & Yao, L. Do markets erode social responsibility? Q. J. Econ. 130, 219–266 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Kirchler, M., Huber, J., Stefan, M. & Sutter, M. Market design and moral behavior. Manag. Sci. 62, 2615–2625 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Sutter, M., Huber, J., Kirchler, M., Stefan, M. & Walzl, M. Where to look for the morals in markets? Exp. Econ. 23, 30–52 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Page, E. A. Cashing in on climate change: political theory and global emissions trading. Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Polit. Philos. 14, 259–279 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Sandel, M. J. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets (Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2012).

  • 7.

    Ostrom, E. Coping with tragedies of the commons. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 2, 493–535 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Duranton, G. & Turner, M. A. The fundamental law of road congestion: evidence from US cities. Am. Econ. Rev. 101, 2616–2652 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Friesen, L. & Gangadharan, L. Environmental markets: what do we learn from the lab? J. Econ. Surv. 27, 515–535 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Plott, C. R. Externalities and corrective policies in experimental markets. Econ. J. 93, 106–127 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Sapci, O., Wood, A. D., Shogren, J. F. & Green, J. F. Can verifiable information cut through the noise about climate protection? An experimental auction test. Climatic Change 134, 87–99 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Jakob, M., Kübler, D., Steckel, J. C. & van Veldhuizen, R. Clean up your own mess: an experimental study of moral responsibility and efficiency. J. Public Econ. 155, 138–146 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Löschel, A., Sturm, B. & Vogt, C. The demand for climate protection—empirical evidence from Germany. Econ. Lett. 118, 415–418 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Diederich, J. & Goeschl, T. Willingness to pay for voluntary climate action and its determinants: field-experimental evidence. Environ. Resour. Econ. 57, 405–429 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Diederich, J. & Goeschl, T. To mitigate or not to mitigate: the price elasticity of pro-environmental behavior. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 84, 209–222 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Löschel, A., Sturm, B. & Uehleke, R. Revealed preferences for voluntary climate change mitigation when the purely individual perspective is relaxed – evidence from a framed field experiment. J. Behav. Exp. Econ. 67, 149–160 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 17.

    Lohse, J., Goeschl, T. & Diederich, J. H. Giving is a question of time: Response times and contributions to an environmental public good. Environ. Resour. Econ. 67, 455–477 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Pigou, A. C. The Economics of Welfare (Macmillan, 1920).

  • 19.

    Coase, R. H. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 3, 1–44 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Stavins, R. N. in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 2nd edn (eds Durlauf, S. & Blume, L. E.) 1778–1788 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

  • 21.

    Klenert, D. et al. Making carbon pricing work for citizens. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 669–677 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Goulder, L. H. & Schein, A. R. Carbon taxes versus cap and trade: a critical review. Clim. Change Econ. 04, 1350011–1350028 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Chichilnisky, G. & Heal, G. Who should abate carbon emissions? An international viewpoint. Econ. Lett. 44, 443–449 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    Weitzman, M. L. Prices vs. quantities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41, 477–491 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Fuss, S. et al. A framework for assessing the performance of cap-and-trade systems: insights from the european union emissions trading system. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 12, 220–241 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    MacKay, D., Cramton, P., Ockenfels, A. & Stoft, S. Price carbon — I will if you will. Nature 526, 315–316 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Weitzman, M. L. in Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation (eds Cramton, P. et al.) Ch. 8 (MIT Press, 2017).

  • 28.

    Cramton, P., Ockenfels, A. & Tirole, J. Policy brief—translating the collective climate goal into a common climate commitment. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 11, 165–171 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Kornek, U. & Edenhofer, O. The strategic dimension of financing global public goods. Eur. Econ. Rev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103423 (2020).

  • 30.

    Nordhaus, W. D. To tax or not to tax: alternative approaches to slowing global warming. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 1, 26–44 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Cramton, P., Ockenfels, A. & Stoft, S. in Global Carbon Pricing: The Path to Climate Cooperation (eds Cramton, P. et al.) Ch. 12 (MIT Press, 2017).

  • 32.

    Stavins, R. N. The Future of U.S. Carbon-Pricing Policy. Environ. Energy Policy Econ. 1, 8–64 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Krishna, V. Auction Theory (Elsevier, 2002).

  • 34.

    Becker, G. M., Degroot, M. H. & Marschak, J. Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behav. Sci. 9, 226–232 (1964).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Fehr, E. & Schmidt, K. M. A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Q. J. Econ. 114, 817–868 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Bolton, G. E. & Ockenfels, A. ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition. Am. Econ. Rev. 90, 166–193 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Gollier, C. & Tirole, J. Negotiating effective institutions against climate change. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 4, 5–28 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Groundwater level observations in 250,000 coastal US wells reveal scope of potential seawater intrusion

    The biodiversity leader who is fighting for nature amid a pandemic