Porter, T. M. & Hajibabaei, M. Scaling up: A guide to high‐throughput genomic approaches for biodiversity analysis. Mol. Ecol. 27, 313–338, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14478 (2018).
Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C. & Willerslev, E. Towards next‐generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2045–2050, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05470.x (2012).
Taberlet, P., Bonin, A., Coissac, E. & Zinger, L. Environmental DNA: For Biodiversity Research And Monitoring. (Oxford University Press (2018).
Park, S.-C. & Won, S. Evaluation of 16S rRNA databases for taxonomic assignments using mock community. Genomics Inform. 16, e24, https://doi.org/10.5808/GI.2018.16.4.e24 (2018).
Richardson, R. T., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Gardiner, M. M. & Johnson, R. M. A reference cytochrome c oxidase subunit I database curated for hierarchical classification of arthropod metabarcoding data. PeerJ 6, e5126, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5126 (2018).
Decelle, J. et al. Phyto REF: a reference database of the plastidial 16S rRNA gene of photosynthetic eukaryotes with curated taxonomy. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 1435–1445, https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12401 (2015).
Nilsson, R. H. et al. The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D259–D264, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1022 (2019).
Weigand, H. et al. DNA barcode reference libraries for the monitoring of aquatic biota in Europe: Gap-analysis and recommendations for future work. Sci. Total Environ. 678, 499–524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.247 (2019).
Carew, M. E. et al. A DNA barcode database of Australia’s freshwater macroinvertebrate fauna. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 68, 1788–1802, https://doi.org/10.1071/MF16304 (2017).
Leray, M. & Knowlton, N. Censusing marine eukaryotic diversity in the twenty-first century. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 371 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0331 (2016).
Bik, H. M., Halanych, K. M., Sharma, J. & Thomas, W. K. Dramatic shifts in benthic microbial eukaryote communities following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. PloS one 7, e38550, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038550 (2012).
Berry, O. et al. Comparison of morphological and DNA metabarcoding analyses of diets in exploited marine fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 540, 167–181, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11524 (2015).
Hardy, N. et al. Assessing the trophic ecology of top predators across a recolonisation frontier using DNA metabarcoding of diets. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 573, 237–254, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps12165 (2017).
von Ammon, U. et al. Linking environmental DNA and RNA for improved detection of the marine invasive fanworm Sabella spallanzanii. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 621, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2019.00621 (2019).
Bourlat, S. J. et al. Genomics in marine monitoring: new opportunities for assessing marine health status. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 74, 19–31, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.05.042 (2013).
Andújar, C., Arribas, P., Yu, D. W., Vogler, A. P. & Emerson, B. C. Why the COI barcode should be the community DNA metabarcode for the metazoa. Mol. Ecol. 27, 3968–3975, https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14844 (2018).
Porter, T. M. & Hajibabaei, M. Over 2.5 million COI sequences in GenBank and growing. PloS one 13, e0200177, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200177 (2018).
Ratnasingham, S. & Hebert, P. D. N. BOLD: The Barcode of Life Data System. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 355–364, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01678.x (2007).
Wangensteen, O. S. & Turon, X. Metabarcoding Techniques for Assessing Biodiversity of Marine Animal Forests in Marine Animal Forests: The Ecology of Benthic Biodiversity Hotspots (eds Sergio Rossi, Lorenzo Bramanti, Andrea Gori, & Covadonga Orejas Saco del Valle) 1-29 (Springer International Publishing (2015).
NCBI Resource Coordinators. Database Resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D12–D17, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1071 (2016).
Meiklejohn, K. A., Damaso, N. & Robertson, J. M. Assessment of BOLD and GenBank – Their accuracy and reliability for the identification of biological materials. PloS one 14, e0217084, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217084 (2019).
Leray, M., Knowlton, N., Ho, S.-L., Nguyen, B. N. & Machida, R. J. GenBank is a reliable resource for 21st century biodiversity research. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22651–22656, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911714116 (2019).
Macher, J. N., Macher, T. H. & Leese, F. Combining NCBI and BOLD databases for OTU assignment in metabarcoding and metagenomic datasets: The BOLD_NCBI _Merger. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 1, e22262, https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.1.22262 (2017).
Huson, D. H. et al. MEGAN Community edition – Interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004957, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004957 (2016).
Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0 (2019).
WoRMS Editorial Board. World Register of Marine Species https://doi.org/10.14284/170. (2019).
Guiry, M. D. & Guiry, G. M. AlgaeBase https://www.algaebase.org. (2019).
Chamberlain, S. bold: Interface to Bold Systems API https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=bold (2019).
R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. v. 3.6.1 http://www.R-project.org (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (2019).
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584, https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2584 (2016).
Federhen, S. The NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D136–D143, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1178 (2011).
McIntyre, A. B. et al. Comprehensive benchmarking and ensemble approaches for metagenomic classifiers. Genome Biol. 18, 182, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1299-7 (2017).
Boyer, F. et al. obitools: A unix‐inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 176–182, https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12428 (2016).
Leonard, G. guyleonard/taxdump_edit v. 1.1 Zenodo https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3701276 (2020).
Leray, M. et al. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Front. Zool. 10, 34, https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-10-34 (2013).
Derycke, S., Vanaverbeke, J., Rigaux, A., Backeljau, T. & Moens, T. Exploring the use of cytochrome oxidase c subunit 1 (COI) for DNA barcoding of free-living marine nematodes. PloS one 5, e13716, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013716 (2010).
Krehenwinkel, H. et al. Nanopore sequencing of long ribosomal DNA amplicons enables portable and simple biodiversity assessments with high phylogenetic resolution across broad taxonomic scale. GigaScience 8, giz006, https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giz006 (2019).
Arranz, V., Pearman, W. S., Aguirre, J. D. & Liggins, L. MARES Custom Metabarcoding Database. Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/8rdqk (2019).
Wangensteen, O. & Turon, X. db_COI_MBPK. GitHub http://github.com/metabarpark/Reference-databases (2016).
Curd, E. E. et al. Anacapa Toolkit: An environmental DNA toolkit for processing multilocus metabarcode datasets. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1469–1475, https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13214 (2019).
Curd, E. E. et al. CRUX-CO1. Dryad Digital Repository, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.mf0126f/1 (2019).
Ficetola, G. F. et al. An in silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes. BMC Genomics 11, 434, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-11-434 (2010).
Machida, R. J. Data from: Metazoan mitochondrial gene sequence reference datasets for taxonomic assignment of environmental samples. Dryad, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2v00t (2018).
Machida, R. J., Leray, M., Ho, S.-L. & Knowlton, N. Metazoan mitochondrial gene sequence reference datasets for taxonomic assignment of environmental samples. Sci. Data 4, 170027, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.27 (2017).
Macheriotou, L. et al. Metabarcoding free‐living marine nematodes using curated 18S and CO1 reference sequence databases for species‐level taxonomic assignments. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1211–1226, https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4814 (2019).
Whittaker, R. H. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30, 279–338, https://doi.org/10.2307/1943563 (1960).
Baselga, A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 134–143, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00490.x (2010).
Baselga, A. & Orme, C. D. L. betapart: an R package for the study of beta diversity. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 808–812, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00224.x (2012).
Sonet, G. et al. Utility of GenBank and the Barcode of Life Data Systems (BOLD) for the identification of forensically important Diptera from Belgium and France. ZooKeys, 307, https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.6027 (2013).
Chamberlain, S. A. & Szöcs, E. taxize: taxonomic search and retrieval in R. F1000Research, 2 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-191.v2 (2013).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
