in

Human-like maternal left-cradling bias in monkeys is altered by social pressure

  • 1.

    Packheiser, J., Schmitz, J., Berretz, G., Papadatou-Pastou, M. & Ocklenburg, S. Handedness and sex effects on lateral biases in human cradling: three meta-analyses. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 104, 30–42 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 2.

    Malatesta, G., Marzoli, D., Rapino, M. & Tommasi, L. The left-cradling bias and its relationship with empathy and depression. Sci. Rep. 9, 6141 (2019).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 3.

    Todd, B. K. & Banerjee, R. Lateralization of infant holding by mothers: a longitudinal evaluation of variations over the first 12 weeks. Laterality 21, 12–33 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 4.

    Almerigi, J. B., Carbary, T. J. & Harris, L. J. Most adults show opposite-side biases in the imagined holding of infants and objects. Brain Cogn. 48, 258–263 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 5.

    Forrester, G. S., Davis, R., Mareschal, D., Malatesta, G. & Todd, B. K. The left cradling bias: an evolutionary facilitator of social cognition?. Cortex 118, 116–131 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 6.

    Harris, L. J., Almerigi, J. B. & Kirsch, E. A. Side preference in adults for holding infants: contributions of sex and handedness in a test of imagination. Brain Cogn. 43, 246–252 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 7.

    Vauclair, J. & Donnot, J. Infant holding biases and their relations to hemispheric specializations for perceiving facial emotions. Neuropsychologia 43, 564–571 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 8.

    Salk, L. The effects of the normal heartbeat sound on the behavior of the new-born infant: implications for mental health. World Mental Health 12, 168–175 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • 9.

    Salk, L. The role of the heartbeat in the relations between mother and infant. Sci. Am. 228, 24–29 (1973).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 10.

    Todd, B. & Butterworth, G. Her heart is in the right place: an investigation of the ‘heartbeat hypothesis’ as an explanation of the left side cradling preference in a mother with dextrocardia. Early Dev. Parent. 7, 229–233 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • 11.

    Richards, J. L. & Finger, S. Mother-child holding patterns: a crosscultural photographic survey. Child Dev. 46, 1001–1004 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • 12.

    Bundy, R. S. Effects of infant head position on sides preference in adult handling. Infant Behav. Dev. 2, 355–358 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • 13.

    Tomaszycki, M., Cline, C., Griffin, B., Maestripieri, D. & Hopkins, W. D. Maternal cradling and infant nipple preferences in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Dev. Psychobiol. 32, 305–312 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 14.

    Hopkins, W. D. Laterality in maternal cradling and infant positional biases: implications for the development and evolution of hand preferences in nonhuman primates. Int. J. Primatol. 25, 1243–1265 (2004).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 15.

    Manning, J. T. & Chamberlain, A. T. Left-side cradling and brain lateralization. Ethol. Sociobiol. 12, 237–244 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • 16.

    Bryden, M. P. & Levy, R. G. in Neuropsychology of Human Emotion (eds Heilman, K.M. & Satz, P.) (Guilford Press, New York, 1983).

  • 17.

    Best, C. T., Womer, J. S. & Queen, H. F. Hemispheric asymmetries in adults’ perception of infant emotional expressions. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 20, 751–765 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 18.

    Gainotti, G. Emotions and the right hemisphere: can new data clarify old models?. Neuroscientist 25, 258–270 (2019).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 19.

    Prete, G., Capotosto, P., Zappasodi, F. & Tommasi, L. Contrasting hemispheric asymmetries for emotional processing from event- related potentials and behavioral responses. Neuropsychology 32, 317–328 (2018).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 20.

    Sackeim, H. A., Gur, R. C. & Saucy, M. Emotions are expressed more intensely on the left side of the face. Science 202, 434–436 (1978).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 21.

    Lindell, A. Lateralization of the expression of facial emotion in humans. Progr. Brain Res. 238, 249–270 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  • 22.

    Langlois, J. H., Ritter, J. M., Roggman, L. A. & Vaughn, L. S. Facial diversity and infant preferences for attractive faces. Dev. Psychol. 27, 79–84 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • 23.

    Malatesta, G., Marzoli, D. & Tommasi, L. Keep a left profile, baby! the left-cradling bias is associated with a preference for left-facing profiles of human babies. Symmetry 12, 911 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  • 24.

    de Château, P. Left-side preference for holding and carrying newborn infants: parental holding and carrying during the first week of life. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 171, 241–245 (1983).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 25.

    Vauclair, J. & Scola, C. Infant-holding biases in mothers and affective symptoms during pregnancy and after delivery. Infant Child Dev. 18, 106–121 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 26.

    Sieratzki, J. S. & Woll, B. Neuropsychological and neuropsychiatric perspectives on maternal cradling preferences. Epidemiol. Psychiatr. Soc. 11, 170–176 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • 27.

    Weatherill, R. P. et al. Is maternal depression related to side of infant holding?. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 28, 421–427 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  • 28.

    Reissland, N., Hopkins, B., Helms, P. & Williams, B. Maternal stress and depression and the lateralization of infant cradling. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatr. 50, 263–269 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • 29.

    Suter, S. E., Huggenberger, H. J. & Schächinger, H. Cold pressor stress reduces left cradling preference in nulliparous human females. Stress 10, 45–51 (2007).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 30.

    Karenina, K., Giljov, A., Ingram, J., Rowntree, V. J. & Malashichev, Y. Lateralization of mother–infant interactions in a diverse range of mammal species. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0030 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  • 31.

    Manning, J. T. & Chamberlain, A. The left-side cradling preference in great apes. Anim. Behav. 39, 1224–1227 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • 32.

    Manning, J. T., Heaton, R. & Chamberlain, A. T. Left-side cradling: similarities and differences between apes and humans. J. Hum. Evol. 26, 77–83 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  • 33.

    Bourne, V. J. & Todd, B. K. When left means right: an explanation of the left cradling bias in terms of right hemisphere specializations. Dev. Sci. 7, 19–24 (2004).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 34.

    Aureli, F., Van Panthaleon Van Eck, C. J. & Veenema, H. C. Long-tailed macaques avoid conflicts during short-term crowding. Aggress. Behav. 21, 113–122 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • 35.

    Campbell, C. J. Lethal intragroup aggression by adult male spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Am. J. Primatol. 68, 1197–1201 (2006).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 36.

    Morris, R. D. & Hopkins, W. D. Perception of human chimeric faces by chimpanzees: evidence for a right hemisphere advantage. Brain Cogn. 21, 111–122 (1993).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 37.

    Guo, K., Meints, K., Hall, C., Hall, S. & Mills, D. Left gaze bias in humans, rhesus monkeys and domestic dogs. Anim. Cogn. 12, 409–418 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 38.

    Wallez, C. & Vauclair, J. Right hemisphere dominance for emotion processing in baboons. Brain Cogn. 75, 164–169 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 39.

    Hendriks, A. W., van Rijswijk, M. & Omtzigt, D. Holding-side influences on infant’s view of mother’s face. Laterality 16, 641–655 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 40.

    Vervloed, M. P. J., Hendriks, A. W. & van den Eijnde, E. The effects of mothers’ past infant-holding preferences on their adult children’s face processing lateralisation. Brain Cogn. 75, 248–254 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 41.

    Malatesta, G., Marzoli, D., Piccioni, C. & Tommasi, L. The relationship between the left-cradling bias and attachment to parents and partner. Evol. Psychol. 17, 147470491984811 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  • 42.

    Pileggi, L.-A., Malcolm-Smith, S. & Solms, M. Investigating the role of social-affective attachment processes in cradling bias: the absence of cradling bias in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Laterality 20, 154–170 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 43.

    Fleva, E. & Khan, A. An examination of the leftward cradling bias among typically developing adults high on autistic traits. Laterality 20, 711–722 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 44.

    Malatesta, G., Marzoli, D. & Tommasi, L. The association between received maternal cradling and neurodevelopment: is left better?. Med. Hypotheses 134, 109442 (2020).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 45.

    Malatesta, G. et al. Received cradling bias during the first year of life: a retrospective study on children with typical and atypical development. Front. Psychiatry 11, 91 (2020).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • 46.

    Johnson, J. A. Dominance rank in juvenile olive baboons, Papio anubis: the influence of gender, size, maternal rank and orphaning. Anim. Behav. 35, 1694–1708 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • 47.

    Vallortigara, G. & Rogers, L. J. Survival with an asymmetrical brain: advantages and disadvantages of cerebral lateralization. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 575–633 (2005).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 48.

    Meguerditchian, A., Molesti, S. & Vauclair, J. Right-handedness predominance in 162 baboons (Papio anubis) for gestural communication: consistency across time and groups. Behav. Neurosci. 125, 653–660 (2011).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • 49.

    Meguerditchian, A., Vauclair, J. & Hopkins, W. D. On the origins of human handedness and language: a comparative review of hand preferences for bimanual coordinated actions and gestural communication in nonhuman primates: on the origins of human handedness and language. Dev. Psychobiol. 55, 637–650 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 


  • Source: Ecology - nature.com

    Solarizing networks

    Light limitation regulates the response of autumn terrestrial carbon uptake to warming