Müllerová, P. Vietnamese DIASPORA in the Czech Republic. Arch. Orient. 66, 121–126 (1998).
Kleisner, K., Chvátalová, V. & Flegr, J. Perceived intelligence is associated with measured intelligence in men but not women. PLoS ONE 9, e81237 (2014).
Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C. & Kleisner, K. Perceived aggressiveness predicts fighting performance in mixed-martial-arts fighters. Psychol. Sci. 24, 1664–1672 (2013).
Linke, L., Saribay, S. A. & Kleisner, K. Perceived trustworthiness is associated with position in a corporate hierarchy. Pers. Individ. Dif. 99, 22–27 (2016).
Little, A. C., Třebický, V., Havlíček, J., Roberts, S. C. & Kleisner, K. Human perception of fighting ability: Facial cues predict winners and losers in mixed martial arts fights. Behav. Ecol. 1, 089 (2015).
Todorov, A., Olivola, C. Y., Dotsch, R. & Mende-Siedlecki, P. Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Psychology 66, 519 (2015).
Schmälzle, R. et al. Visual cues that predict intuitive risk perception in the case of HIV. PLoS ONE 14, e0211770 (2019).
Asch, S. E. Forming impressions of personality. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 41, 258–290 (1946).
Bar, M., Neta, M. & Linz, H. Very first impressions. Emotion 6, 269–278 (2006).
Willis, J. & Todorov, A. First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face. Psychol. Sci. 17, 592–598 (2006).
Bothwell, R. K., Brigham, J. C. & Malpass, R. S. Cross-racial identification. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 15, 19–25 (1989).
Meissner, C. A. & Brigham, J. C. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychol. Public Policy Law 7, 3 (2001).
Sporer, S. L. Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychol. Public Policy Law 7, 36–97 (2001).
Hugenberg, K., Young, S. G., Bernstein, M. J. & Sacco, D. F. The categorization-individuation model: An integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychol. Rev. 117, 1168–1187 (2010).
Anzures, G. et al. Developmental origins of the other-race effect. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 22, 173–178 (2013).
Suhrke, J. et al. The other-race effect in 3-year-old German and Cameroonian children. Front. Psychol. 5, 198 (2014).
Sangrigoli, S. & de Schonen, S. Effect of visual experience on face processing: A developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. Dev. Sci. 7, 74–87 (2004).
Scott, L. S. & Monesson, A. The origin of biases in face perception. Psychol. Sci. 20, 676–680 (2009).
Ma, F., Xu, F. & Luo, X. Children’s and Adults}’ {Judgments of Facial {Trustworthiness}: The {Relationship} to Facial {Attractiveness}. Percept. Mot. Skills 121, 179–198 (2015).
Tanaka, J. W., Kiefer, M. & Bukach, C. M. A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: Evidence from a cross-cultural study. Cognition 93, 1–9 (2004).
Webster Michael, A. & MacLeod Donald, I. A. Visual adaptation and face perception. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 1702–1725 (2011).
Bukach, C. M., Cottle, J., Ubiwa, J. & Miller, J. Individuation experience predicts other-race effects in holistic processing for both Caucasian and Black participants. Cognition 123, 319–324 (2012).
Třebický, V. et al. Cross-{cultural} evidence for apparent {racial} outgroup {advantage}: Congruence between perceived {facial} aggressiveness and fighting {success}. Sci. Rep. 8, 9767 (2018).
Hebl, M. R., Williams, M. J., Sundermann, J. M., Kell, H. J. & Davies, P. G. Selectively friending: Racial stereotypicality and social rejection. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 48, 1329–1335 (2012).
Cassidy, K. D., Quinn, K. A. & Humphreys, G. W. The influence of ingroup/outgroup categorization on same- and other-race face processing: The moderating role of inter- versus intra-racial context. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 47, 811–817 (2011).
Johnson, K. J. & Fredrickson, B. L. We all look the same to Mepositive emotions eliminate the own-race bias in face recognition. Psychol. Sci. 16, 875–881 (2005).
Bernstein, M. J., Young, S. G. & Hugenberg, K. The cross-category effect: Mere social categorization is sufficient to elicit an own-group bias in face recognition. Psychol. Sci. 18, 706–712 (2007).
Hugenberg, K., Miller, J. & Claypool, H. M. Categorization and individuation in the cross-race recognition deficit: Toward a solution to an insidious problem. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 43, 334–340 (2007).
Little, A. C., Jones, B. C. & DeBruine, L. M. Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary based research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B. 366, 1638–1659 (2011).
Langlois, J. H. et al. Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol. Bull. 126, 390–423 (2000).
Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A. & Trivers, R. Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 355–370 (2004).
Saxton, T. K., Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. & Roberts, S. C. Adolescents’ preferences for sexual dimorphism are influenced by relative exposure to male and female faces. Pers. Individ. Dif. 47, 864–868 (2009).
Badaruddoza, A. A paradox of human mate preferences and natural selection. J. Hum. Ecol. 21, 195–197 (2007).
Coetzee, V., Greeff, J. M., Stephen, I. D. & Perrett, D. I. Cross-cultural agreement in facial attractiveness preferences: The role of ethnicity and gender. PLoS ONE 9, e99629 (2014).
Hulse, F. S. Selection for skin color among the Japanese. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 27, 143–155 (1967).
Kleisner, K. et al. African and European perception of African female attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38, 744–755 (2017).
Kleisner, K., Priplatova, L., Frost, P. & Flegr, J. Trustworthy-looking face meets brown eyes. PLoS ONE 8, e53285 (2013).
Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M. & Lee, H. K. They don’t all look alike: Individual impressions of other racial groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 65, 85 (1993).
Laeng, B., Mathisen, R. & Johnsen, J. A. Why do blue-eyed men prefer women with the same eye color?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 61, 371–384 (2007).
Gründl, M., Knoll, S., Eisenmann-Klein, M. & Prantl, L. The blue-eyes stereotype: Do eye color, pupil diameter, and scleral color affect attractiveness?. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 36, 234–240 (2012).
Langlois, J. H. & Roggman, L. A. Attractive faces are only average. Psychol. Sci. 1, 115–121 (1990).
Rhodes, G. & Tremewan, T. Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychol. Sci. 7, 105–110 (1996).
Rhodes, G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 199–226 (2006).
Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 452–460 (1999).
Rhodes, G. et al. Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-western cultures: In search of biologically based standards of beauty. Perception 30, 611–625 (2001).
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A. & Musselman, L. What is average and what is not average about attractive faces?. Psychol. Sci. 5, 214–220 (1994).
Baudouin, J. Y. & Tiberghien, G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol. 117, 313–332 (2004).
Perrett, D. I., May, K. A. & Yoshikawa, S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 368, 239–242 (1994).
Alley, T. R. & Cunningham, M. R. Averaged faces are attractive, but very attractive faces are not average. Psychol. Sci. 2, 123–125 (1991).
Pittenger, J. B. On the difficulty of averaging faces: Comments on Langlois and Roggman. Psychol. Sci. 2, 351–353 (1991).
Komori, M., Kawamura, S. & Ishihara, S. Averageness or symmetry: Which is more important for facial attractiveness?. Acta Psychol. 131, 136–142 (2009).
Rhodes, G., Sumich, A. & Byatt, G. Are average facial configurations attractive only because of their symmetry?. Psychol. Sci. 10, 52–58 (1999).
Scott, L. S., Tanaka, J. W., Sheinberg, D. L. & Curran, T. The role of category learning in the acquisition and retention of perceptual expertise: A behavioral and neurophysiological study. Brain Res. 1210, 204–215 (2008).
Komori, M., Kawamura, S. & Ishihara, S. Effect of averageness and sexual dimorphism on the judgment of facial attractiveness. Vis. Res. 49, 862–869 (2009).
Jones, D. & Hill, K. Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Hum. Nat. 4, 271–296 (1993).
Little, A. C., Connely, J., Feinberg, D. R., Jones, B. C. & Roberts, S. C. Human preference for masculinity differs according to context in faces, bodies, voices, and smell. Behav. Ecol. 22, 862–868 (2011).
Van den Berghe, P. L. & Frost, P. Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: A case of gene culture co-evolution?*. Ethn. Racial Stud. 9, 87–113 (1986).
Fink, B., Neave, N. & Seydel, H. Male facial appearance signals physical strength to women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19, 82–87 (2007).
Scheib Joanna, E., Gangestad Steven, W. & Randy, T. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 266, 1913–1917 (1999).
Perrett, D. I. et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884–887 (1998).
Penton-Voak, I. S. et al. Menstrual cycle alters face preference [7]. Nature 399, 741–742 (1999).
Rhodes, G., Hickford, C. & Jeffery, L. Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive?. Br. J. Psychol. 91, 125–140 (2000).
Kościński, K. Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences. Anthropol. Rev. 70, 45–79 (2007).
Johnston, V. S., Hagel, R., Franklin, M., Fink, B. & Grammer, K. Male facial attractiveness: Evidence for hormone-mediated adaptive design. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 251–267 (2001).
Scott, I. M. et al. Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409643111 (2014).
Brooks, R. et al. National income inequality predicts women’s preferences for masculinized faces better than health does. Proc. R. Soc. B 278, 810–812 (2011).
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Crawford, J. R. & Welling, L. L. M. Further evidence for regional variation in women’s masculinity preferences. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 278, 813–814 (2011).
Dunson, D. B., Colombo, B. & Baird, D. D. Changes with age in the level and duration of fertility in the menstrual cycle. Hum. Reprod. 17, 1399–1403 (2002).
Hassan, M. A. M. & Killick, S. R. Effect of male age on fertility: Evidence for the decline in male fertility with increasing age. Fertil. Steril. 79, 1520–1527 (2003).
Buss, D. M. Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behav. Brain Sci. 12, 1–14 (1989).
Maestripieri, D., Klimczuk, A. C. E., Traficonte, D. M. & Wilson, M. C. A greater decline in female facial attractiveness during middle age reflects women’s loss of reproductive value. Front. Psychol. 5, 1–6 (2014).
McLellan, B. & McKelvie, S. J. Effects of age and gender on perceived facial attractiveness. Can. J. Behav. Sci. Can. Sci. Comport. 25, 135–142 (1993).
Bovet, J., Barkat-Defradas, M., Durand, V., Faurie, C. & Raymond, M. Women’s attractiveness is linked to expected age at menopause. J. Evol. Biol. 31, 229–238 (2018).
Coetzee, V., Perrett, D. I. & Stephen, I. D. Facial adiposity: A cue to health?. Perception 38, 1700–1711 (2009).
Coetzee, V., Chen, J., Perrett, D. I. & Stephen, I. D. Deciphering faces: Quantifiable visual cues to weight. Perception 39, 51–61 (2010).
Schneider, T. M., Hecht, H. & Carbon, C. C. Judging body weight from faces: The height-weight illusion. Perception 41, 121–124 (2012).
Grillot, R. L., Simmons, Z. L., Lukaszewski, A. W. & Roney, J. R. Hormonal and morphological predictors of women’s body attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 176–183 (2014).
Hume, D. K. & Montgomerie, R. Facial attractiveness signals different aspects of “quality” in women and men. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 93–112 (2001).
Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A. & Mangalparsad, R. Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 443–456 (2006).
Třebický, V., Fialová, J., Kleisner, K. & Havlíček, J. Focal LENGTH AFFECTS DEPICTED SHAPE AND PERCEPTION OF FACIAL IMAGES. PLoS ONE 11, e0149313 (2016).
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1 (2017).
Hothorn, T., Bretz, F. & Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical J. 50, 346–363 (2008).
Rosseel, Y. Lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 37 (2012).
Adams, D. C., Collyer, M. L. & Kaliontzopoulou, A. Geomorph: Software for geometric morphometric analyses. R package version 3.1.0. (2019).
Mitteroecker, P., Windhager, S., Müller, G. B. & Schaefer, K. The morphometrics of “masculinity” in human faces. PLoS ONE 10, e0118374 (2015).
Valenzano, D. R., Mennucci, A., Tartarelli, G. & Cellerino, A. Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness. Vis. Res. 46, 1282–1291 (2006).
De Haan, M., Pascalis, O. & Johnson, M. H. Specialization of neural mechanisms underlying face recognition in human infants. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 199–209 (2002).
Kelly, D. J. et al. Development of the other-race effect during infancy: Evidence toward universality?. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 104, 105–114 (2009).
Krasotkina, A., Götz, A., Höhle, B. & Schwarzer, G. Perceptual narrowing in speech and face recognition: Evidence for intra-individual cross-domain relations. Front. Psychol. 9, 1711 (2018).
Kelly, D. J. et al. Cross-race preferences for same-race. Infancy 11, 87–95 (2007).
Kleisner, K. et al. How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world.. Infancy https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7vdmb (2020).
Hopper, W. J., Finklea, K. M., Winkielman, P. & Huber, D. E. Measuring sexual dimorphism with a race-gender face space. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 40, 1779–1788 (2014).
Tan, K. W., Tiddeman, B. & Stephen, I. D. Skin texture and colour predict perceived health in Asian faces. Evol. Hum. Behav. 39, 320–335 (2018).
Source: Ecology - nature.com
