Philippa Kaur

Study areaWith an area of about 2.33 × 105 km2, the Western Sichuan Plateau (27.11°–34.31°N and 97.36°–104.62°E) is located in the transition zone between the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the Sichuan Basin, including all of Garze Prefecture and Aba Prefecture, and parts of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture28 (Fig. 1). With an altitude of 780–7556 m, this area is dominated by mountain and ravine areas and high mountain and plateau areas, and the terrain is high in the west and low in the east. The climate belongs to the subtropical plateau monsoon climate, with large temperature difference between day and night and abundant sunshine. The annual average temperature is about 9.01–10.5 °C, and the precipitation is about 556.8–730 mm28. The study area is rich in water resources, including the Yalong River, Minjiang River and other important river systems in the upper reaches of the Yangtze River, and the Baihe River, Heihe river and other river systems of the Yellow River. The main types of soil are plateau meadow soil dark brown soil, brown soil, cold frozen soil and cinnamon soil, and the main vegetation types are alpine meadow and scrub. With rich and diverse soil vegetation types and distinctive vertical zonal distribution characteristics, it is one of the global biodiversity conservation hotspots29.Figure 1Location of the study area. The map is created in the support of ArcGIS 10.2 (ESRI). The China map and Western Sichuan Plateau boundary data were collected from Resources and Environmental Science and Data Center (http://www.resdc.cn/). The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau boundary data were collected from the Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository (http://www.geodoi.ac.cn/WebCn/Default.aspx).Full size imageData source and processingMultisource archival data were used in this study (Table 1). The land use remote sensing monitoring data, administrative boundary data and geological disaster vector data were obtained from Resources and Environmental Science and Data Center. The spatial resolution of land use remote sensing monitoring data is 30 × 30 m, including 6 first-level classification and 26s-level classification. The first-level classification includes cropland, woodland, grassland, water body, built-up land, and unused land. The accuracy of remote sensing classification is not less than 95% for cropland and built-up land, not less than 90% for grassland, woodland, and water body, and not less than 85% for unused land, which meets the need of the research. Landsat remote sensing monitoring data is used as the main information resources, among which Landsat-TM/ETM remote sensing monitoring data is used in 2000, 2005, 2010 and Landsat 8 remote sensing monitoring data is used in 2015 and 2020. In light of actual conditions and the implementation of policies and philosophies including the natural forest protection project, return of farmland to forest, land remediation, ecological civilization, the period from 2000 to 2020 is selected as the study period, and the land use data of each period is cropped using ArcGIS 10.2 to reclassify the 26 secondary classifications into cropland, woodland, grassland, water body, built-up land and unused land.Table 1 Characteristics of data used for the study.Full size tableThe DEM data were obtained from SRTM (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission) of Resources and Environmental Science and Data Center, the spatial resolution of 30 × 30 m, absolute horizontal accuracy ± 20 m, absolute elevation accuracy ± 16 m, elevation and slope are extracted from the downloaded DEM. The Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau boundary data were collected from the Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository. Data of carbon density of different land types were obtained from Chinese Ecosystem Research Network Data Center (http://www.nesdc.org.cn/).A total of 29,284 evaluation units were collected for spatial grid processing of the Western Sichuan Plateau according to 3 km × 3 km by ArcGIS 10.2. The impact factors obtained in this study include grid data per kilometer of GDP spatial distribution, grid data per kilometer of population spatial distribution, annual mean temperature spatial interpolation data, annual mean rainfall spatial interpolation data, long-term normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) comes from Resources and Environmental Science and Data Center with a resolution of 1 km × 1 km. The Human Active Index (HAI), with a resolution of 30 m × 30 m, can be calculated by formula30,31, and the factors are discretized into the data type required for the geodetector by the natural breakpoint method.MethodsThe InVEST modelThe InVEST model was developed by Stanford University, the University of Minnesota, the Nature Conservancy and the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). The model’s terrestrial ecosystem services assessment includes four modules: soil conservation, water retention, carbon storage and biodiversity assessment, and provides an overall measurement of regional ecosystem services32. The carbon storage model of the InVEST model divides the carbon storage of the ecosystem into 4 basic carbon pools, namely above-ground carbon, underground carbon, soil carbon, dead organic matter carbon7.The calculation formula of total carbon storage in the Western Sichuan Plateau is as follows7:$$C_{total} = C_{above} + C_{below} + C_{soil} + C_{dead}$$
(1)
In formula (1), Ctotal is the total carbon storage; Cabove is the above-ground carbon storage; Cbelow is the underground carbon storage; Csoil is the soil carbon storage, and Cdead is the dead organic matter carbon storage.Based on the carbon density and land use data of different land use type, the carbon storage of each land use type in the Western Sichuan Plateau is calculated by the formula7:$$C_{{text{total}}i} = (C_{{text{above}}i} + C_{{text{below}}i} + C_{{text{soil}}i} + C_{{text{dead}}i}) times A_{i}$$
(2)
In formula (2), i is the average carbon density of each land use, and Ai is the area of this land used.The carbon density data of different land use types in this study were obtained from the shared date of the National Ecological Science Data Center and some documents33,34,35,36,37. Since the carbon density data were collected from the results of studies in different parts of China, the selected documents should be close to or similar to the study area as far as possible to avoid excessive data gap. At the same time, the carbon density varies with climate, soil properties and land use38, so the carbon density should be modified according to the climate characteristics and land use types of the Western Sichuan Plateau. Existing research results show that the carbon density is positively correlated with annual precipitation and weakly correlated with annual average temperature. The quantitative expression of the relationship between carbon density and temperature and precipitation is as follows39,40,41,42:$$C_{SP} = 3.3968 times P + 3996.1;;left( {{text{R}}^{{2}} = 0.{11}} right)$$
(3)
$$C_{BP} = 6.7981e^{0.00541p};;;left( {{text{R}}^{{2}} = 0.{7}0} right)$$
(4)
$$C_{BT} = 28 times {text{T}} + 398;;left( {{text{R}}^{{2}} = 0.{47,};{text{P}} < 0.0{1}} right)$$ (5) In these formula, CSP is the soil carbon density (kg m−2) based on the annual precipitation; CBP is the biomass carbon density (kg m−2) based on the annual precipitation; CBT is the biomass carbon density (kg m−2) based on annual average temperature; P is the average annual precipitation (mm), and T is the annual average temperature (°C). According to the data of China Meteorological Data Service Centre (http://data.cma.cn/), in the past 20 years, the average annual temperature of China and the Western Sichuan Plateau was 9.0 °C and 6.3 °C, and the average annual precipitation was 643.50 mm and 812.65 mm respectively.The modified formula of carbon density in the Western Sichuan Plateau is as follows7:$$K_{BP} = frac{C^{prime}{_{BP}}}{{C^{primeprime}{_{BP}}}}$$ (6) $$K_{BT} = frac{C^{prime}{_{BT}}}{{C^{primeprime}{_{BT}}}}$$ (7) $$C_{BT} = 28 times T + 398;;left( {{text{R}}^{{2}} = 0.{47,};{text{P}} < 0.0{1}} right)$$ (8) $$K_{S} = frac{C^{prime}{_{SP}}}{{C^{primeprime}{_{SP}}}}$$ (9) In these formula, KBP is the modified indices of precipitation factor in biomass carbon density; KBT is the modified indices of temperature factor; C'BP and C''BP are the biomass carbon density obtained from annual precipitation in the Western Sichuan Plateau and the whole country respectively. C'BT and C''BT are the biomass carbon density obtained from annual average temperature; C'SP and C''SP are the soil carbon density data obtained from annual average temperature; KB and KS are the biomass carbon density modified indices and soil carbon density modified indices respectively. The carbon density values of each land use type after modified in the Western Sichuan Plateau are shown in Table 2.Table 2 Carbon density values of different land use types in the Western Sichuan plateau (t hm−2).Full size tableExploratory spatial analysis methodGlobal spatial autocorrelationGlobal Moran’s I was used to describe the spatial differentiation characteristics of carbon storage in the study area, and the expression formula is as follows43:$$I = frac{{nsumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{n} {w_{i,j} left( {x_{i} - overline{x} } right)left( {x_{j} - overline{x} } right)} } }}{{sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{n} {omega_{ij} } } sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {left( {x_{i} - overline{x} } right)^{2} } }}$$ (10) wij is the spatial weight; x is the attribute mean; xi and xj are the attribute values of elements i, j, respectively; n is the number of cells, and the correlation is considered significant when |Z|  > 1.96.Local indications of spatial association (LISA)LISA reveals the local cluster characteristics of spatial unit attributes by analyzing the difference and significance between spatial units and surrounding units, and the expression formula is as follows42:$$I_{i} (d) = frac{{n(x_{i} – overline{x} )sumnolimits_{j = 1}^{n} {w_{ij} (x_{j} – overline{x} )} }}{{sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {(x_{j} – overline{x} )^{2} } }}$$
(11)
Correlation analysisIn order to evaluate the influence of natural factors and socioeconomic factors on carbon storage in the study area, the correlation coefficients of temperature, rainfall, NDVI, GDP, population density (PD), HAI and carbon storage were calculated according to the Pearson correlation coefficient method. The calculation formula is as follows44:$$r_{xy} = frac{{sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {(M_{i} – overline{x} )(y_{i} – overline{y} )} }}{{sqrt {sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {(M_{i} – overline{x} )^{2} sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {(y_{i} – overline{y} )} } } }}$$
(12)
rxy represents the correlation coefficient between x and y; Mi represents the carbon storage in the ith year; yi represents the value of the impact factor Y in the ith year, and ({overline{text{x}}}) and ({overline{text{y}}}) respectively represents the average value of carbon storage and impact factor in the research period over several years.Human influence index analysis methodLand use is significantly spatially clustered in the study area31, and LUCC changes will have a certain impact on the structure and process of the ecosystem. HAI has the characteristics of spatial variability, which can reflect the impact of human activities on land use and landscape composition changes. In this study, Human Influence Index Analysis Method (HAI) index was used to analyze the correlation between carbon storage and human interference intensity in the Western Sichuan Plateau. The calculation formula is as follows30,$$HAI = sumlimits_{i = 1}^{n} {left( {A_{i} P_{i} /TA} right)}$$
(13)
HAI is Human Active Index; Ai is the total area of the ith land use type; Pi The intensity parameter of human impact reflected by type i land use type; TA is the total final surface area of land use type in evaluation unit; n is the number of land use types. Combined with the land use type of this study, Pi is assigned by Delphi method, in which cropland is 0.67, woodland is 0.13, grassland is 0.12, water body is 0.10, built-up land is 0.96, and unused land is 0.0530,45.GeodetectorGeodetector is an algorithm that uses spatial heterogeneity principle to detect driving factors of carbon storage, which can quantitatively detect the influence of impact factors on carbon storage and explore the interaction between driving factors. Geodetector includes factor detection, risk detection, interaction detection and ecological detection46.Differentiation and factor detection: the influence factors were discretized, and then the significance test of the difference in the mean values of the impact factors was conducted to detect the relative importance among the factors. The statistical quantity q is used to measure the explanatory power of impact factors on the carbon storage spatial differentiation and the value range of q is between 0 and 1. The larger the value, the stronger the explanatory power of the factor47.$$q = 1{ – }frac{{sumnolimits_{h = 1}^{L} {N_{h} sigma_{h}^{2} } }}{{Nsigma^{2} }}$$
(14)
In this formula, h = 1, 2…, L is the classification or partition of variable (Y) or factor (X); Nh and N are layer h and regional number units respectively; and (sigma_{h}^{2}) and (sigma_{{}}^{2}) are the variance of the layer h and regional value Y respectively.The variance of the regional value Y is calculated as follows,$$sigma^{2} = frac{{sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{n} {(Y_{i} – overline{Y} )^{2} } }}{N – 1}$$
(15)
where, Yi and (overline{Y}) are the mean value of sample j and the region Y, respectively.$$sigma^{2} = frac{{sumnolimits_{i = 1}^{{n_{h} }} {(Y_{h,i} – overline{{Y_{h} }} )^{2} } }}{{N_{h} – 1}}$$
(16)
where, Y and (overline{Y}) are the value and mean value of sample i in layer h, respectively.Interaction detection: it is used to identify the interaction between different impact factors Xs, that is, to evaluate whether the combined action of X1 and X2 will increase or weaken the explanatory power of vegetation coverage Y, or the influence of these factors on Y is independent of each other. The evaluation method is to first calculate the value q of the two factors X1 and X2 for Y respectively: q(X1) and q(X2), and calculate the value q of their interaction (the new polygon distribution formed by the tangent of the two layers of the superimposed variables X1 and X2) : q(X1 ∩ X2) and compare q(X1) and q(X2) with q(X1 ∩ X2)46. More

Dargie, G. C. et al. Age, extent and carbon storage of the central Congo Basin peatland complex. Nature 542, 86–90 (2017). This study describes the large extent and huge carbon stocks of the Congo Basin peatlands.Article 

Google Scholar 
Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O. & Banks, C. J. Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 798–818 (2011). This is a comprehensive assessment of the extent, volume and carbon stocks of peatlands across the tropics, highlighting their importance in the global carbon cycle and key uncertainties.Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, Z., Loisel, J., Brosseau, D. P., Beilman, D. W. & Hunt, S. J. Global peatland dynamics since the Last Glacial Maximum. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37, L13402 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Gumbricht, T. et al. An expert system model for mapping tropical wetlands and peatlands reveals South America as the largest contributor. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3581–3599 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olsson, L. et al. Climate change and land (eds Shukla, P. R. et al.) 345–436 (IPCC, 2019).Leifeld, J. & Menichetti, L. The underappreciated potential of peatlands in global climate change mitigation strategies. Nat. Commun. 9, 1071 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, P. et al. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O. et al.) 811–922 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).Goldstein, A. et al. Protecting irrecoverable carbon in Earth’s ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 287–295 (2020). This study evaluates ecosystems on the basis of the size of carbon stocks that are vulnerable to release upon land-use conversion and not recoverable on timescales relevant to avoiding dangerous climate impacts; it emphasizes the high density of irrecoverable carbon in tropical peatlands.Article 

Google Scholar 
Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leifeld, J., Wüst-Galley, C. & Page, S. Intact and managed peatland soils as a source and sink of GHGs from 1850 to 2100. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 945–947 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate change and land (IPCC, 2019).Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Page, S., Wüst, R. & Banks, C. Past and present carbon accumulation and loss in Southeast Asian peatlands. PAGES News 18, 25–27 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Page, S. E. et al. A record of Late Pleistocene and Holocene carbon accumulation and climate change from an equatorial peat bog (Kalimantan, Indonesia): implications for past, present and future carbon dynamics. J. Quat. Sci. 19, 625–635 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dommain, R., Couwenberg, J. & Joosten, H. Development and carbon sequestration of tropical peat domes in south-east Asia: links to post-glacial sea-level changes and Holocene climate variability. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 999–1010 (2011). This is a comprehensive assessment of peatland development in Southeast Asia, exploring regional differences in rates of peat formation and carbon accumulation.Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruwaimana, M., Anshari, G. Z., Silva, L. C. R. & Gavin, D. G. The oldest extant tropical peatland in the world: a major carbon reservoir for at least 47,000 years. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 114027 (2020). This study compares the development of coastal and inland peatlands in West Kalimantan, Indonesia, and provides a description of the oldest known peat deposit in Southeast Asia.Article 

Google Scholar 
Anshari, G., Kershaw, A. P., Kaars, S. V. D. & Jacobsen, G. Environmental change and peatland forest dynamics in the Lake Sentarum area, West Kalimantan, Indonesia. J. Quat. Sci. 19, 637–655 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dommain, R., Couwenberg, J. & Joosten, H. Hydrological self-regulation of domed peatlands in south-east Asia and consequences for conservation and restoration Mires Peat 6, 1–17 2010).
Google Scholar 
Jones, M. B. & Muthuri, F. M. Standing biomass and carbon distribution in a papyrus (Cyperus papyrus L.) swamp on Lake Naivasha, Kenya. J. Trop. Ecol. 13, 347–356 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saunders, M. J., Jones, M. B. & Kansiime, F. Carbon and water cycles in tropical papyrus wetlands. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 15, 489–498 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burrough, S. L., Thomas, D. S. G., Orijemie, E. A. & Willis, K. J. Landscape sensitivity and ecological change in western Zambia: the long-term perspective from dambo cut-and-fill sediments. J. Quat. Sci. 30, 44–58 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davenport, I. J. et al. First evidence of peat domes in the Congo Basin using LiDAR from a fixed-wing drone. Remote Sens. 12, 2196 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alsdorf, D. et al. Opportunities for hydrologic research in the Congo Basin. Rev. Geophys. 54, 378–409 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Biddulph, G. E. et al. Current knowledge on the Cuvette Centrale peatland complex and future research directions. Bois For. Trop. 350, 3–14 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lähteenoja, O. et al. The large Amazonian peatland carbon sink in the subsiding Pastaza–Marañón foreland basin, Peru. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 164–178 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kelly, T. J. et al. The vegetation history of an Amazonian domed peatland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 468, 129–141 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Draper, F. C. et al. The distribution and amount of carbon in the largest peatland complex in Amazonia. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 124017 (2014). Using a combination of remote sensing and field data, this study provides an assessment of the distribution of above- and belowground peatland carbon stocks in the Pastaza–Marañon foreland basin in Peruvian Amazonia.Article 

Google Scholar 
Phillips, S., Rouse, G. E. & Bustin, R. M. Vegetation zones and diagnostic pollen profiles of a coastal peat swamp, Bocas del Toro, Panamá. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 128, 301–338 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sjögersten, S. et al. Coastal wetland ecosystems deliver large carbon stocks in tropical Mexico. Geoderma 403, 115173 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Joosten, H. in Tropical Peatland Ecosystems (eds Osaki, M. & Tsuji, N.) 33–48 (Springer, 2016).Anderson, J. A. R. in Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor: Regional Studies (ed. Gore, A. J. P.) 191–199 (Elsevier, 1983).Draper, F. C. et al. Peatland forests are the least diverse tree communities documented in Amazonia, but contribute to high regional beta-diversity. Ecography 41, 1256–1269 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, J. A. R. Ecology and Forest Types of The Peat Swamp Forests of Sarawak and Brunei in Relation to their Silviculture. Thesis, Univ. Edinburgh (1961).Freund, C. A., Harsanto, F. A., Purwanto, A., Takahashi, H. & Harrison, M. E. Microtopographic specialization and flexibility in tropical peat swamp forest tree species. Biotropica 50, 208–214 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lampela, M. et al. Ground surface microtopography and vegetation patterns in a tropical peat swamp forest. CATENA 139, 127–136 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miyamoto, K. et al. Habitat differentiation among tree species with small-scale variation of humus depth and topography in a tropical heath forest of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. J. Trop. Ecol. 19, 43–54 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miettinen, J., Shi, C. & Liew, S. C. Land cover distribution in the peatlands of peninsular Malaysia, Sumatra and Borneo in 2015 with changes since 1990. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 6, 67–78 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wijedasa, L. S. et al. Carbon emissions from South-East Asian peatlands will increase despite emission-reduction schemes. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 4598–4613 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Page, S. E. & Hooijer, A. In the line of fire: the peatlands of Southeast Asia. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150176.(2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hergoualc’h, K., Gutiérrez-Vélez, V. H., Menton, M. & Verchot, L. V. Characterizing degradation of palm swamp peatlands from space and on the ground: an exploratory study in the Peruvian Amazon. For. Ecol. Manag. 393, 63–73 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Horn, C. M., Vargas Paredes, V. H., Gilmore, M. P. & Endress, B. A. Spatio-temporal patterns of Mauritia flexuosa fruit extraction in the Peruvian Amazon: implications for conservation and sustainability. Appl. Geogr. 97, 98–108 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dargie, G. C. et al. Congo Basin peatlands: threats and conservation priorities. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 24, 669–686 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grundling, P.-L. & Grootjans, A. P. in The Wetland Book. II: Distribution, Description, and Conservation (eds Finlayson, M., Milton, G., Prentice, R. & Davidson, N.) (Springer, 2018).Roucoux, K. H. et al. Threats to intact tropical peatlands and opportunities for their conservation. Conserv. Biol. 31, 1283–1292 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baird, A. J. et al. High permeability explains the vulnerability of the carbon store in drained tropical peatlands. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 1333–1339 (2017). This study finds that the permeability of ombrotrophic tropical peat is higher than expected, resulting in deep water tables in ditched tropical peatlands and associated high rates of peat oxidation.Article 

Google Scholar 
Kelly, T. J. et al. The high hydraulic conductivity of three wooded tropical peat swamps in northeast Peru: measurements and implications for hydrological function. Hydrol. Process. 28, 3373–3387 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tonks, A. J. et al. Impacts of conversion of tropical peat swamp forest to oil palm plantation on peat organic chemistry, physical properties and carbon stocks. Geoderma 289, 36–45 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mezbahuddin, M., Grant, R. F. & Hirano, T. How hydrology determines seasonal and interannual variations in water table depth, surface energy exchange, and water stress in a tropical peatland: modeling versus measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 2132–2157 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laurén, A. et al. Nutrient balance as a tool for maintaining yield and mitigating environmental impacts of Acacia plantation in drained tropical peatland — description of plantation simulator. Forests 12, 312 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hooijer, A. et al. Subsidence and carbon loss in drained tropical peatlands. Biogeosciences 9, 1053–1071 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anshari, G. Z., Gusmayanti, E. & Novita, N. The use of subsidence to estimate carbon loss from deforested and drained tropical peatlands in Indonesia. Forests 12, 732 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, C. D. et al. A novel low-cost, high-resolution camera system for measuring peat subsidence and water table dynamics. Front. Environ. Sci. 9, 33 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Evans, C. D. et al. Rates and spatial variability of peat subsidence in Acacia plantation and forest landscapes in Sumatra, Indonesia. Geoderma 338, 410–421 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoyt, A. M., Chaussard, E., Seppalainen, S. S. & Harvey, C. F. Widespread subsidence and carbon emissions across Southeast Asian peatlands. Nat. Geosci. 13, 435–440 (2020). Using remote sensing, this study quantifies the rate of peat subsidence and carbon loss across peatlands in Southeast Asia.Article 

Google Scholar 
Cobb, A. R., Dommain, R., Tan, F., Heng, N. H. E. & Harvey, C. F. Carbon storage capacity of tropical peatlands in natural and artificial drainage networks. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 114009 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ritzema, H., Limin, S., Kusin, K., Jauhiainen, J. & Wösten, H. Canal blocking strategies for hydrological restoration of degraded tropical peatlands in central Kalimantan, Indonesia. CATENA 114, 11–20 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hooijer, A., Vernimmen, R., Visser, M. & Mawdsley, N. Flooding projections from elevation and subsidence models for oil palm plantations in the Rajang Delta peatlands, Sarawak, Malaysia (Deltares, 2015).Sumarga, E., Hein, L., Hooijer, A. & Vernimmen, R. Hydrological and economic effects of oil palm cultivation in Indonesian peatlands. Ecol. Soc. 21, 52 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evers, S., Yule, C. M., Padfield, R., O’Reilly, P. & Varkkey, H. Keep wetlands wet: the myth of sustainable development of tropical peatlands — implications for policies and management. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 534–549 (2017). This study reviews the ecosystem services provided by Southeast Asian peatlands and discusses key policy challenges for peatland management.Article 

Google Scholar 
Tan, Z. D., Lupascu, M. & Wijedasa, L. S. Paludiculture as a sustainable land use alternative for tropical peatlands: a review. Sci. Total Environ. 753, 142111 (2021). This study evaluates the current understanding of and opportunities for paludiculture in the context of tropical peatlands, emphasizing that tropical paludiculture will be heavily influenced by socioeconomic considerations.Article 

Google Scholar 
Haraguchi, A. in Tropical Peatland Ecosystems (Osaki, M. & Tsuji, N.) 297–311 (Springer, 2016).Wösten, J. H. M., Ismail, A. B. & van Wijk, A. L. M. Peat subsidence and its practical implications: a case study in Malaysia. Geoderma 78, 25–36 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grealish, G. J. & Fitzpatrick, R. W. Acid sulphate soil characterization in Negara Brunei Darussalam: a case study to inform management decisions. Soil. Use Manag. 29, 432–444 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klepper, O., Chairuddin, G. T., Iriansyah & Rijksen, H. D. Water quality and the distribution of some fishes in an area of acid sulphate soils, Kalimantan, Indonesia. Hydrobiol. Bull. 25, 217–224 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shamshuddin, J. & Muhrizal, S. Chemical pollution in acid sulfate soils. Proc. Geol. Soc. Malaysia Annu. Geol.Conf. 2000, 231–234 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Suwardi. Utilization and improvement of marginal soils for agricultural development in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 383, 012047 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hirano, T., Jauhiainen, J., Inoue, T. & Takahashi, H. Controls on the carbon balance of tropical peatlands. Ecosystems 12, 873–887 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stumm, W. & Morgan, J. J. Aquatic Chemistry: Chemical Equilibria and Rates in Natural Waters (Wiley, 1996).Billett, M. F., Garnett, M. H. & Dinsmore, K. J. Should aquatic CO evasion be included in contemporary carbon budgets for peatland ecosystems? Ecosystems 18, 471–480 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chimner, R. A. & Ewel, K. C. A tropical freshwater wetland: II. Production, decomposition, and peat formation. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 13, 671–684 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoyos-Santillan, J. et al. Getting to the root of the problem: litter decomposition and peat formation in lowland neotropical peatlands. Biogeochemistry 126, 115–129 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Könönen, M. et al. Land use increases the recalcitrance of tropical peat. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 24, 717–731 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sangok, F. E., Maie, N., Melling, L. & Watanabe, A. Evaluation on the decomposability of tropical forest peat soils after conversion to an oil palm plantation. Sci. Total Environ. 587–588, 381–388 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yule, C. M., Lim, Y. Y. & Lim, T. Y. Degradation of tropical Malaysian peatlands decreases levels of phenolics in soil and in leaves of Macaranga pruinosa. Front. Earth Sci. 4, 1–9 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, Z. et al. Peatlands and their role in the global carbon cycle. Eos 92, 97–98 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lähteenoja, O., Ruokolainen, K., Schulman, L. & Oinonen, M. Amazonian peatlands: an ignored C sink and potential source. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 2311–2320 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garneau, M. et al. Holocene carbon dynamics of boreal and subarctic peatlands from Québec, Canada. Holocene 24, 1043–1053 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gorham, E. Northern peatlands: role in the carbon cycle and probable responses to climatic warming. Ecol. Appl. 1, 182–195 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Turunen, J., Roulet, N. T., Moore, T. R. & Richard, P. J. H. Nitrogen deposition and increased carbon accumulation in ombrotrophic peatlands in eastern Canada. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 18, GB3002 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, Z. C. Northern peatland carbon stocks and dynamics: a review. Biogeosciences 9, 4071–4085 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Poulter, B. et al. in Wetland Carbon And Environmental Management (eds Krauss, K. W., Zhu, Z. & Stagg, C. L.) 1–20 (American Geophysical Union, 2021).Honorio Coronado, E. et al. Intensive field sampling increases the known extent of carbon-rich Amazonian peatland pole forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 074048 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sjögersten, S. et al. Tropical wetlands: a missing link in the global carbon cycle? Carbon cycling in tropical wetlands. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 28, 1371–1386 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Griffis, T. J. et al. Hydrometeorological sensitivities of net ecosystem carbon dioxide and methane exchange of an Amazonian palm swamp peatland. Agric. For. Meteorol. 295, 108167 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kiew, F. et al. CO2 balance of a secondary tropical peat swamp forest in Sarawak, Malaysia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 248, 494–501 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hirano, T. et al. Effects of disturbances on the carbon balance of tropical peat swamp forests. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 3410–3422 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tang, A. C. I. et al. A Bornean peat swamp forest is a net source of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6931–6944 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Deshmukh, C. S. et al. Conservation slows down emission increase from a tropical peatland in Indonesia. Nat. Geosci. 14, 484–490 (2021). This study presented measurements of CO2 and CH4 fluxes obtained using the eddy covariance method from both intact and degraded peat swamp forest in Sumatra, Indonesia, during the 2019 ENSO drought.Article 

Google Scholar 
Kiew, F. et al. Carbon dioxide balance of an oil palm plantation established on tropical peat. Agric. For. Meteorol. 295, 108189 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCalmont, J. et al. Short- and long-term carbon emissions from oil palm plantations converted from logged tropical peat swamp forest. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2361–2376 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Germer, J. & Sauerborn, J. Estimation of the impact of oil palm plantation establishment on greenhouse gas balance. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 10, 697–716 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewis, K. et al. An assessment of oil palm plantation aboveground biomass stocks on tropical peat using destructive and non-destructive methods. Sci. Rep. 10, 2230 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wijedasa, L. S. Peat Swamp Forest Conservation in Southeast Asia. Thesis, National Univ. Singapore (2019).Moore, S. et al. Deep instability of deforested tropical peatlands revealed by fluvial organic carbon fluxes. Nature 493, 660–663 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cook, S. et al. Fluvial organic carbon fluxes from oil palm plantations on tropical peatland. Biogeosciences 15, 7435–7450 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Waldron, S. et al. C mobilisation in disturbed tropical peat swamps: old DOC can fuel the fluvial efflux of old carbon dioxide, but site recovery can occur. Sci. Rep. 9, 11429 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brady, M. A. Organic Matter Dynamics of Coastal Peat Deposits in Sumatra, Indonesia. Thesis, Univ. British Columbia (1997).Jauhiainen, J., Limin, S., Silvennoinen, H. & Vasander, H. Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes in drained tropical peat before and after hhydrological restoration. Ecology 89, 3503–3514 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jauhiainen, J., Takahashi, H., Heikkinen, J. E. P., Martikainen, P. J. & Vasander, H. Carbon fluxes from a tropical peat swamp forest floor. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1788–1797 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yule, C. M. & Gomez, L. N. Leaf litter decomposition in a tropical peat swamp forest in peninsular Malaysia. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 17, 231–241 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Swails, E., Hertanti, D., Hergoualc’h, K., Verchot, L. & Lawrence, D. The response of soil respiration to climatic drivers in undrained forest and drained oil palm plantations in an Indonesian peatland. Biogeochemistry 142, 37–51 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ishikura, K. et al. Carbon dioxide and methane emissions from peat soil in an undrained tropical peat swamp forest. Ecosystems 22, 1852–1868 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Melling, L., Tan, C. Y., Goh, K. J. & Hatano, R. Soil microbial and root respirations from three ecosystems in tropical peatland of Sarawak, Malaysia. J. Oil Palm. Res. 25, 44–57 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Cooper, H. V. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions resulting from conversion of peat swamp forest to oil palm plantation. Nat. Commun. 11, 407 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Girkin, N. T., Turner, B. L., Ostle, N. & Sjögersten, S. Root-derived CO2 flux from a tropical peatland. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 26, 985–991 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dhandapani, S., Ritz, K., Evers, S., Yule, C. M. & Sjögersten, S. Are secondary forests second-rate? Comparing peatland greenhouse gas emissions, chemical and microbial community properties between primary and secondary forests in peninsular Malaysia. Sci. Total Environ. 655, 220–231 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dhandapani, S. et al. Land-use changes associated with oil palm plantations impact PLFA microbial phenotypic community structure throughout the depth of tropical peats. Wetlands 40, 2351–2366 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mishra, S. et al. Microbial and metabolic profiling reveal strong influence of water table and land-use patterns on classification of degraded tropical peatlands. Biogeosciences 11, 1727–1741 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mishra, S. et al. Degradation of Southeast Asian tropical peatlands and integrated strategies for their better management and restoration. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 1370–1387 (2021). This paper reviews current understanding of intact and degraded peatlands in Southeast Asia and proposes an approach for peatland management and restoration involving explicit consideration of interacting ecological factors and the involvement of local communities.Article 

Google Scholar 
Carlson, K. M., Goodman, L. K. & May-Tobin, C. C. Modeling relationships between water table depth and peat soil carbon loss in Southeast Asian plantations. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 074006 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carlson, K. M. et al. Committed carbon emissions, deforestation, and community land conversion from oil palm plantation expansion in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 7559–7564 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Couwenberg, J., Dommain, R. & Joosten, H. Greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical peatlands in south-east Asia. Glob. Change Biol. 16, 1715–1732 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Evans, C. D. et al. Overriding water table control on managed peatland greenhouse gas emissions. Nature 593, 548–552 (2021). Using data for CO2 and CH4 fluxes from all major peatland biomes, this paper demonstrates that greenhouse gas emissions from drained agricultural peatlands could be greatly reduced by raising water levels closer to the peat surface while maintaining productive agricultural use.
Google Scholar 
Hooijer, A. et al. Current and future CO2 emissions from drained peatlands in Southeast Asia. Biogeosciences 7, 1505–1514 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hiraishi, T. et al. (eds) 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: wetlands (IPCC, 2014).Jauhiainen, J., Kerojoki, O., Silvennoinen, H., Limin, S. & Vasander, H. Heterotrophic respiration in drained tropical peat is greatly affected by temperature — a passive ecosystem cooling experiment. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105013 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manning, F. C., Kho, L. K., Hill, T. C., Cornulier, T. & Teh, Y. A. Carbon emissions from oil palm plantations on peat soil. Front. For. Glob. Change https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2019.00037 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Deshmukh, C. S. et al. Impact of forest plantation on methane emissions from tropical peatland. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2477–2495 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wong, G. X. et al. How do land use practices affect methane emissions from tropical peat ecosystems? Agric. For. Meteorol. 282–283, 107869 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pangala, S. R. et al. Large emissions from floodplain trees close the Amazon methane budget. Nature 552, 230–234 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pangala, S. R., Moore, S., Hornibrook, E. R. C. & Gauci, V. Trees are major conduits for methane egress from tropical forested wetlands. N. Phytol. 197, 524–531 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hergoualc’h, K. et al. Spatial and temporal variability of soil N2O and CH4 fluxes along a degradation gradient in a palm swamp peat forest in the Peruvian Amazon. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 7198–7216 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Teh, Y. A., Murphy, W. A., Berrio, J.-C., Boom, A. & Page, S. E. Seasonal variability in methane and nitrous oxide fluxes from tropical peatlands in the western Amazon basin. Biogeosciences 14, 3669–3683 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoyos-Santillan, J. et al. Evaluation of vegetation communities, water table, and peat composition as drivers of greenhouse gas emissions in lowland tropical peatlands. Sci. Total Environ. 688, 1193–1204 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Haren, J. et al. A versatile gas flux chamber reveals high tree stem CH4 emissions in Amazonian peatland. Agric. For. Meteorol. 307, 108504 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sjögersten, S. et al. Temperature response of ex-situ greenhouse gas emissions from tropical peatlands: interactions between forest type and peat moisture conditions. Geoderma 324, 47–55 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Girkin, N. T. et al. Spatial variability of organic matter properties determines methane fluxes in a tropical forested peatland. Biogeochemistry 142, 231–245 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Girkin, N. T., Turner, B. L., Ostle, N. & Sjögersten, S. Composition and concentration of root exudate analogues regulate greenhouse gas fluxes from tropical peat. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 127, 280–285 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Girkin, N. T., Vane, C. H., Turner, B. L., Ostle, N. J. & Sjögersten, S. Root oxygen mitigates methane fluxes in tropical peatlands. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 064013 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jauhiainen, J., Silvennoinen, H., Könönen, M., Limin, S. & Vasander, H. Management driven changes in carbon mineralization dynamics of tropical peat. Biogeochemistry 129, 115–132 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, E. L. et al. Contribution of subsurface peat to CO2 and CH fluxes in a neotropical peatland. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2867–2881 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Prananto, J. A., Minasny, B., Comeau, L., Rudiyanto, R. & Grace, P. Drainage increases CO2 and N2O emissions from tropical peat soils. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4583–4600 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peacock, M. et al. Global importance of methane emissions from drainage ditches and canals. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 044010 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chuang, P.-C. et al. Methane fluxes from tropical coastal lagoons surrounded by mangroves, Yucatán, Mexico. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 122, 1156–1174 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jauhiainen, J. & Silvennoinen, H. Diffusion GHG fluxes at tropical peatland drainage canal water surfaces. Suoseura 63, 93–105 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Yupi, H. M., Inoue, T. & Bathgate, J. Concentrations, loads and yields of organic carbon from two tropical peat swamp forest streams in Riau Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Mires Peat 18, 1–15 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Zhou, Y., Evans, C. D., Chen, Y., Chang, K. Y. W. & Martin, P. Extensive remineralization of peatland-derived dissolved organic carbon and ocean acidification in the Sunda Shelf Sea, Southeast Asia. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 126, e2021JC017292 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Alkhatib, M., Jennerjahn, T. C. & Samiaji, J. Biogeochemistry of the Dumai River estuary, Sumatra, Indonesia, a tropical black-water river. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 2410–2417 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gandois, L. et al. From canals to the coast: dissolved organic matter and trace metal composition in rivers draining degraded tropical peatlands in Indonesia. Biogeosciences 17, 1897–1909 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rixen, T. et al. The Siak, a tropical black water river in central Sumatra on the verge of anoxia. Biogeochemistry 90, 129–140 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Miettinen, J., Hooijer, A., Vernimmen, R., Liew, S. C. & Page, S. E. From carbon sink to carbon source: extensive peat oxidation in insular Southeast Asia since 1990. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 024014 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loisel, J. et al. Expert assessment of future vulnerability of the global peatland carbon sink. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 70–77 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Boysen, L. R. et al. Global and regional effects of land-use change on climate in 21st century simulations with interactive carbon cycle. Earth Syst. Dyn. 5, 309–319 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sitch, S. et al. Recent trends and drivers of regional sources and sinks of carbon dioxide. Biogeosciences 12, 653–679 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchard, E. T. A. The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559, 527–534 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Naidu, D. G. T. & Bagchi, S. Greening of the Earth does not compensate for rising soil heterotrophic respiration under climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2029–2038 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, W. et al. Future precipitation changes and their implications for tropical peatlands. Geophys. Res. Lett. 34, 01403 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barichivich, J. et al. Recent intensification of Amazon flooding extremes driven by strengthened Walker circulation. Sci. Adv. 4, eaat8785 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marengo, J. A. et al. Changes in climate and land use over the Amazon region: current and future variability and trends. Front. Earth Sci. 6, 228 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cobb, A. R. et al. How temporal patterns in rainfall determine the geomorphology and carbon fluxes of tropical peatlands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114, E5187–E5196 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, W. et al. Increased variability of eastern Pacific El Niño under greenhouse warming. Nature 564, 201–206 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rifai, S. W., Li, S. & Malhi, Y. Coupling of El Niño events and long-term warming leads to pervasive climate extremes in the terrestrial tropics. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 105002 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Girkin, N. T. et al. Interactions between labile carbon, temperature and land use regulate carbon dioxide and methane production in tropical peat. Biogeochemistry 147, 87–97 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cole, L. E. S., Bhagwat, S. A. & Willis, K. J. Long-term disturbance dynamics and resilience of tropical peat swamp forests. J. Ecol. 103, 16–30 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weiss, D. et al. The geochemistry of major and selected trace elements in a forested peat bog, Kalimantan, SE Asia, and its implications for past atmospheric dust deposition. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 66, 2307–2323 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lähteenoja, O. & Page, S. High diversity of tropical peatland ecosystem types in the Pastaza-Marañón basin, Peruvian Amazonia. J. Geophys. Res. 116, G02025 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Roucoux, K. H. et al. Vegetation development in an Amazonian peatland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 374, 242–255 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lampela, M., Jauhiainen, J. & Vasander, H. Surface peat structure and chemistry in a tropical peat swamp forest. Plant. Soil. 382, 329–347 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O., Shotyk, Ø. W. & Weiss, D. Interdependence of peat and vegetation in a tropical peat swamp forest. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 354, 1885–1897 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sjögersten, S., Cheesman, A. W., Lopez, O. & Turner, B. L. Biogeochemical processes along a nutrient gradient in a tropical ombrotrophic peatland. Biogeochemistry 104, 147–163 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yule, C. M. Loss of biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in Indo-Malayan peat swamp forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 393–409 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Basilier, K. Moss-associated nitrogen fixation in some mire and coniferous forest environments around Uppsala, Sweden. Lindbergia 5, 84–88 (1979).
Google Scholar 
Ong, C. S. P., Juan, J. C. & Yule, C. M. Litterfall production and chemistry of Koompassia malaccensis and Shorea uliginosa in a tropical peat swamp forest: plant nutrient regulation and climate relationships. Trees 29, 527–537 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wüst, R. A. J. & Bustin, R. M. Opaline and Al–Si phytoliths from a tropical mire system of West Malaysia: abundance, habit, elemental composition, preservation and significance. Chem. Geol. 200, 267–292 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Neuzil, S. G., Cecil, C. B., Kane, J. S. & Soedjono, K. in Modern and Ancient Coal-Forming Environments Vol. 286 (Geological Society of America, 1993).Too, C. C., Keller, A., Sickel, W., Lee, S. M. & Yule, C. M. Microbial community structure in a Malaysian tropical peat swamp forest: the influence of tree species and depth. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2859 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sulistiyanto, Y. Nutrient Dynamics in Different Sub-types of Peat Swamp Forest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. Thesis, Univ. Nottingham (2005).Hoyos Santillán, J. Controls of Carbon Turnover in Tropical Peatlands. Thesis, Univ. Nottingham (2014).Damman, A. W. H. Distribution and movement of elements in ombrotrophic peat bogs. Oikos 30, 480–495 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
Laiho, R. & Laine, J. Nitrogen and phosphorus stores in peatlands drained for forestry in Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 9, 251–260 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, M., Moore, T. R., Talbot, J. & Riley, J. L. The stoichiometry of carbon and nutrients in peat formation. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29, 113–121 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hodgkins, S. B. et al. Tropical peatland carbon storage linked to global latitudinal trends in peat recalcitrance. Nat. Commun. 9, 3640 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jackson, C. R., Liew, K. C. & Yule, C. M. Structural and functional changes with depth in microbial communities in a tropical Malaysian peat swamp forest. Microb. Ecol. 57, 402–412 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kolb, S. & Horn, M. A. Microbial CH4 and NO consumption in acidic wetlands. Front. Microbiol. 3, 78 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Golovchenko, A. V., Tikhonova, E. Y. & Zvyagintsev, D. G. Abundance, biomass, structure, and activity of the microbial complexes of minerotrophic and ombrotrophic peatlands. Microbiology 76, 630–637 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martikainen, P. J., Nykänen, H., Crill, P. & Silvola, J. Effect of a lowered water table on nitrous oxide fluxes from northern peatlands. Nature 366, 51–53 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davidson, E. A., Keller, M., Erickson, H. E., Verchot, L. V. & Veldkamp, E. Testing a conceptual model of soil emissions of nitrous and nitric oxides. Bioscience 50, 667 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rubol, S., Silver, W. L. & Bellin, A. Hydrologic control on redox and nitrogen dynamics in a peatland soil. Sci. Total Environ. 432, 37–46 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jauhiainen, J. et al. Nitrous oxide fluxes from tropical peat with different disturbance history and management. Biogeosciences 9, 1337–1350 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Könönen, M., Jauhiainen, J., Laiho, R., Kusin, K. & Vasander, H. Physical and chemical properties of tropical peat under stabilised land uses. Mires Peat 16, 1–13 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Chotimah, H., Jaya, A., Suparto, H., Saraswati, D. & Nawansyah, W. Utilizing organic fertilizers on two types of soil to improve growth and yield of Bawang Dayak (Eleutherine americana Merr). Agrivita J. Agric. Sci. 43, 164–173 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Mohidin, H. et al. Optimum levels of N, P, and K nutrition for oil palm seedlings grown in tropical peat soil. J. Plant. Nutr. 42, 1461–1471 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mutert, E., Fairhurst, T. H. & Von Uexküll, H. R. Agronomic management of oil palms on deep peat. Better. Crop. Int. 13, 22–27 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Hashim, S. A., Teh, C. B. S. & Ahmed, O. H. Influence of water table depths, nutrients leaching losses, subsidence of tropical peat soil and oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) seedling growth. Malays. J. Soil. Sci. 23, 13–30 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Oktarita, S., Hergoualc’h, K., Anwar, S. & Verchot, L. V. Substantial N2O emissions from peat decomposition and N fertilization in an oil palm plantation exacerbated by hotspots. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 104007 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoyos-Santillan, J. et al. Root oxygen loss from Raphia taedigera palms mediates greenhouse gas emissions in lowland neotropical peatlands. Plant. Soil. 404, 47–60 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hatano, R. Impact of land use change on greenhouse gases emissions in peatland: a review. Int. Agrophys. 33, 167–173 (2019). This study reviews the impacts of changes in water-table level and nitrogen inputs on greenhouse gas emissions in tropical and northern peatlands and evaluates the optimal water-table level for minimizing emissions.Article 

Google Scholar 
Zawawi, N. Z. et al. The effect of nitrogen fertiliser on nitrous oxide emission in oil palm plantation. Proc. 15th Int. Peat Congress 355, 515–518 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Turetsky, M. R. et al. Global vulnerability of peatlands to fire and carbon loss. Nat. Geosci. 8, 11–14 (2015). This paper reviews peatland vulnerability to burning, fire-driven carbon emissions and current and future risks of peatland fires.Article 

Google Scholar 
Hu, Y. et al. Review of emissions from smouldering peat fires and their contribution to regional haze episodes. Int. J. Wildland Fire 27, 293–312 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Huijnen, V. et al. Fire carbon emissions over maritime southeast Asia in 2015 largest since 1997. Sci. Rep. 6, 26886 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, T. E. L., Evers, S., Yule, C. M. & Gan, J. Y. In situ tropical peatland fire emission factors and their variability, as determined by field measurements in peninsula Malaysia. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 18–31 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stockwell, C. E. et al. Field measurements of trace gases and aerosols emitted by peat fires in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, during the 2015 El Niño. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 16, 11711–11732 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Betha, R. et al. Chemical speciation of trace metals emitted from Indonesian peat fires for health risk assessment. Atmos. Res. 122, 571–578 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Breulmann, G. et al. Heavy metals in emergent trees and pioneers from tropical forest with special reference to forest fires and local pollution sources in Sarawak, Malaysia. Sci. Total Environ. 285, 107–115 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Othman, M. & Latif, M. T. Dust and gas emissions from small-scale peat combustion. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 13, 1045–1059 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
See, S. W., Balasubramanian, R. & Wang, W. A study of the physical, chemical, and optical properties of ambient aerosol particles in Southeast Asia during hazy and nonhazy days. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D10S08 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Nikonovas, T., Spessa, A., Doerr, S. H., Clay, G. D. & Mezbahuddin, S. Near-complete loss of fire-resistant primary tropical forest cover in Sumatra and Kalimantan. Commun. Earth Env. 1, 65 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Field, R. D., van der Werf, G. R. & Shen, S. S. P. Human amplification of drought-induced biomass burning in Indonesia since 1960. Nat. Geosci. 2, 185–188 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Astiani, D., Taherzadeh, M. J., Gusmayanti, E., Widiastuti, T. & Burhanuddin, B. Local knowledge on landscape sustainable-hydrological management reduces soil CO2 emission, fire risk and biomass loss in west Kalimantan peatland, Indonesia. Biodiversiitas J. Biol. Divers. 20, 725–731 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cattau, M. E. et al. Sources of anthropogenic fire ignitions on the peat-swamp landscape in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Glob. Environ. Change 39, 205–219 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Edwards, R. B., Naylor, R. L., Higgins, M. M. & Falcon, W. P. Causes of Indonesia’s forest fires. World Dev. 127, 104717 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Field, R. D. & Shen, S. S. P. Predictability of carbon emissions from biomass burning in Indonesia from 1997 to 2006. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 113, G04024 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sloan, S., Locatelli, B., Wooster, M. J. & Gaveau, D. L. A. Fire activity in Borneo driven by industrial land conversion and drought during El Niño periods, 1982–2010. Glob. Environ. Change 47, 95–109 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Page, S. E. et al. The amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997. Nature 420, 61–65 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
World Bank. The cost of fire: an economic analysis of Indonesia’s 2015 fire crisis (World Bank, 2016).Tacconi, L. Preventing fires and haze in Southeast Asia. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 640–643 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lupascu, M., Akhtar, H., Smith, T. E. L. & Sukri, R. S. Post-fire carbon dynamics in the tropical peat swamp forests of Brunei reveal long-term elevated CH4 flux. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5125–5145 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Milner, L. E. Influence of Fire on Peat Organic Matter from Indonesian Tropical Peatlands. Thesis, Univ. Leicester (2013).Saharjo, B. H. & Nurhayati, A. D. Changes in chemical and physical properties of hemic peat under fire-based shifting cultivation. Tropics 14, 263–269 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dhandapani, S. & Evers, S. Oil palm ‘slash-and-burn’ practice increases post-fire greenhouse gas emissions and nutrient concentrations in burnt regions of an agricultural tropical peatland. Sci. Total Environ. 742, 140648 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Konecny, K. et al. Variable carbon losses from recurrent fires in drained tropical peatlands. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 1469–1480 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Akhtar, H. et al. Significant sedge-mediated methane emissions from degraded tropical peatlands. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 014002 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Rein, G. in Fire Phenomena and the Earth System (ed. Belcher, C. M.) 15–33 (Wiley, 2013).Graham, L. L. B. & Page, S. E. A limited seed bank in both natural and degraded tropical peat swamp forest: the implications for restoration. Mires Peat 22, 02 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Graham, E. B. et al. Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Front. Microbiol. 7, 214 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Page, S. et al. Restoration ecology of lowland tropical peatlands in Southeast Asia: current knowledge and future research directions. Ecosystems 12, 888–905 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sazawa, K. et al. Impact of peat fire on the soil and export of dissolved organic carbon in tropical peat soil, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2, 692–701 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dove, N. C. & Hart, S. C. Fire reduces fungal species richness and in situ mycorrhizal colonization: a meta-analysis. Fire Ecol. 13, 37–65 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Veldkamp, E., Schmidt, M., Powers, J. S. & Corre, M. D. Deforestation and reforestation impacts on soils in the tropics. Nat. Rev. Earth Env. 1, 590–605 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Qie, L. et al. Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects. Nat. Commun. 8, 1966 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giesen, W. & Sari, E. N. N. Tropical peatland restoration report: the Indonesian case. MCA Indonesia https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.30049.40808 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dohong, A., Abdul Aziz, A. & Dargusch, P. A review of techniques for effective tropical peatland restoration. Wetlands 38, 275–292 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shell. Redd+ Katingan Mentaya, Indonesia. Shell https://www.shell.co.uk/motorist/make-the-change-drive-carbon-neutral/redd-plus-katingan-mentaya-indonesia.html (2021).Uda, S. K., Hein, L. & Sumarga, E. Towards sustainable management of Indonesian tropical peatlands. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 25, 683–701 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wichtmann, W., Tanneberger, F., Wichmann, S. & Joosten, H. Paludiculture is paludifuture: climate, biodiversity and economic benefits from agriculture and forestry on rewetted peatland. Peatl. Int. 1, 48–51 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Giesen, W. in Tropical Peatland Eco-Management (eds Osaki, M., Tsuji, N., Foead, N. & Rieley, J.) 411–441 (Springer, 2021).Shurpali, N. J. et al. Atmospheric impact of bioenergy based on perennial crop (reed canary grass, Phalaris arundinaceae, L.) cultivation on a drained boreal organic soil. GCB Bioenergy 2, 130–138 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Lawson, I. T. et al. Improving estimates of tropical peatland area, carbon storage, and greenhouse gas fluxes. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 23, 327–346 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anda, M. et al. Revisiting tropical peatlands in Indonesia: semi-detailed mapping, extent and depth distribution assessment. Geoderma 402, 115235 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Saxon, E. C., Neuzil, S. G., Biladi, D. B. C., Kinser, J. & Sheppard, S. M. 3D mapping of lowland coastal peat domes in Indonesia. Mires Peat 27, 1–18 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Silvestri, S. et al. Quantification of peat thickness and stored carbon at the landscape scale in tropical peatlands: a comparison of airborne geophysics and an empirical topographic method. J. Geophys. Res. Earth Surf. 124, 3107–3123 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vernimmen, R. et al. Mapping deep peat carbon stock from a LiDAR based DTM and field measurements, with application to eastern Sumatra. Carbon Balance Manag. 15, 4 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersen, R., Chapman, S. J. & Artz, R. R. E. Microbial communities in natural and disturbed peatlands: a review. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 57, 979–994 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morrison, E. S. et al. Characterization of bacterial and fungal communities reveals novel consortia in tropical oligotrophic peatlands. Microb. Ecol. 82, 188–201 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Finn, D. R. et al. Methanogens and methanotrophs show nutrient-dependent community assemblage patterns across tropical peatlands of the Pastaza–Marañón Basin, Peruvian Amazonia. Front. Microbiol. 11, 746 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Troxler, T. G. et al. Patterns of soil bacteria and canopy community structure related to tropical peatland development. Wetlands 32, 769–782 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tripathi, B. M. et al. Distinctive tropical forest variants have unique soil microbial communities, but not always low microbial diversity. Front. Microbiol. 7, 376 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kwon, M. J., Haraguchi, A. & Kang, H. Long-term water regime differentiates changes in decomposition and microbial properties in tropical peat soils exposed to the short-term drought. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 60, 33–44 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hadi, A. et al. Effects of land-use change in tropical peat soil on the microbial population and emission of greenhouse gases. Microbes Env. 16, 79–86 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kusai, N. A., Ayob, Z., Maidin, M. S. T., Safari, S. & Ahmad Ali, S. R. Characterization of fungi from different ecosystems of tropical peat in Sarawak, Malaysia. Rendiconti Lincei Sci. Fis. E 29, 469–482 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shuhada, S. N., Salim, S., Nobilly, F., Zubaid, A. & Azhar, B. Logged peat swamp forest supports greater macrofungal biodiversity than large-scale oil palm plantations and smallholdings. Ecol. Evol. 7, 7187–7200 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, B. et al. The microbial diversity and structure in peatland forest in Indonesia. Soil. Use Manag. 36, 123–138 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moyersoen, B., Becker, P. & Alexander, I. J. Are ectomycorrhizas more abundant than arbuscular mycorrhizas in tropical heath forests? N. Phytol. 150, 591–599 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Muliyani, R. B., Sastrahidayat, I. R., Abdai, A. L. & Djauhari, S. Exploring ectomycorrhiza in peat swamp forest of Nyaru Menteng Palangka Raya Central Borneo. J. Biodivers. Environ. Sci. 5, 133–145 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Turjaman, M. et al. Improvement of early growth of two tropical peat-swamp forest tree species Ploiarium alternifolium and Calophyllum hosei by two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under greenhouse conditions. New Forests 36, 1–12 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tawaraya, K. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of tree species grown in peat swamp forests of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. For. Ecol. Manag. 182, 381–386 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fenner, N. & Freeman, C. Drought-induced carbon loss in peatlands. Nat. Geosci. 4, 895–900 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yuwati, T. W. & Putri, W. S. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhiza spores under Shorea balangeran (Korth.) Burck. plantation as bioindicator for the revegetation success. J. Galam 1, 15–26 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Graham, L. L. B., Turjaman, M. & Page, S. E. Shorea balangeran and Dyera polyphylla (syn. Dyera lowii) as tropical peat swamp forest restoration transplant species: effects of mycorrhizae and level of disturbance. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 21, 307–321 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Sol, D., Bacher, S., Reader, S. M. & Lefebvre, L. Brain size predicts the success of mammal species introduced into novel environments. Am. Nat. 172(Suppl. 1), S63–S71 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
González-Lagos, C., Sol, D. & Reader, S. M. Large-brained mammals live longer. J. Evol. Biol. 23, 1064–1074 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gonda, A., Herczeg, G. & Merilä, J. Evolutionary ecology of intraspecific brain size variation: A review. Ecol. Evol. 3(8), 2751–2764 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Benson-Amram, S., Dantzer, B., Stricker, G., Swanson, E. M. & Holekamp, K. E. Brain size predicts problem-solving ability in mammalian carnivores. PNAS 113(9), 2532–2537 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Näslund, J., Aarestrup, K., Thomassen, S. T. & Johnsson, J. I. Early enrichment effects on brain development in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): No evidence for a critical period. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 69(9), 1481–1490 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Logan, C. J., Kruuk, L. E. B., Stanley, R., Thompson, A. M. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Endocranial volume is heritable and is associated with longevity and fitness in a wild mammal. R. Soc. Open Sci. 3(12), 160622 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A. C., Gilissen, E. & MacDonald, D. W. Brain size of the lion (Panthera leo) and the tiger (P. tigris): Implications for intrageneric phylogeny, intraspecific differences and the effects of captivity. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 98, 85–93 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Turschwell, M. P. & White, C. R. The effects of laboratory housing and spatial enrichment on brain size and metabolic rate in the eastern mosquitofish Gambusia holbrooki. Biol. Open. 5(3), 205–210 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Welniak-Kaminska, M. et al. Volumes of brain structures in captive wild-type and laboratory rats: 7T magnetic resonance in vivo automatic atlas-based study. PLoS ONE 14(4), e0215348 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guay, P. J., Parrott, M. & Selwood, L. Captive breeding does not alter brain volume in a marsupial over a few generations. Zoo Biol. 31, 82–86 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Isler, K. et al. Endocranial volumes of primate species: Scaling analyses using a comprehensive and reliable data set. J. Hum. Evol. 55(6), 967–978 (2008).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Burns, J. G., Saravanan, A. & Rodd, F. H. Rearing environment affects the brain size of guppies: Lab-reared guppies have smaller brains than wild-caught guppies. Ethol. 115(2), 122–133 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kruska, D. On the evolutionary significance of encephalization in some eutherian mammals: Effects of adaptive radiation, domestication, and feralization. Brain Behav. Evol. 65(2), 73–108 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Logan, C. J. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Validating methods for estimating endocranial volume in individual red deer (Cervus elaphus). Behav. Processes. 92, 143–146 (2013).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Colby, A. E., Kimock, C. M. & Higham, J. P. Endocranial volume is variable and heritable, but not related to fitness, in a free-ranging primate. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–11 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stuermer, I. W. & Wetzel, W. Early experience and domestication affect auditory discrimination learning, open field behaviour and brain size in wild Mongolian gerbils and domesticated Laboratory gerbils (Meriones unguiculatus forma domestica). Behav. Brain Res. 173, 11–21 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Agnvall, B., Bélteky, J. & Jensen, P. Brain size is reduced by selection for tameness in red junglefowl-correlated effects in vital organs. Sci. Rep. 7(3306), 1–7 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Röhrs, M. & Ebinger, P. Wild is not really wild: Brain weight of wild and domestic mammals. Berl. Munch. Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 112(6–7), 234–238 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Smith, B. P., Lucas, T. A., Norris, R. M. & Henneberg, M. Brain size/body weight in the dingo (Canis dingo): Comparisons with domestic and wild canids. Aust. J. Zool. 65(5), 292–301 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, T., McGreevy, P. & Valenzuela, M. Human induced rotation and reorganization of the brain of domestic dogs. PLoS ONE 5(7), e11946 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pollen, A. A. et al. Environmental complexity and social organization sculpt the brain in Lake Tanganyikan cichlid fish. Brain Behav. Evol. 70, 21–39 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kihslinger, R. L., Lema, S. C. & Nevitt, G. A. Environmental rearing conditions produce forebrain differences in wild Chinook salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 145(2), 145–151 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guay, P. J. & Iwaniuk, A. N. Captive breeding reduces brain volume in waterfowl (Anseriformes). Condor 110(2), 276–284 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Diamond, M. C., Ingham, C. A., Johnson, R. E., Bennett, E. L. & Rosenzweig, M. R. Effects of environment on morphology of rat cerebral cortex and hippocampus. J. Neurobiol. 7, 75–85 (1976).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Courtney Jones, S. K., Munn, A. J. & Byrne, P. G. Effect of captivity on morphology: Negligible changes in external morphology mask significant changes in internal morphology. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5(5), 1–13 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kruska, D. & Röhrs, M. Comparative-quantitative investigations on brains of feral pigs from the Galapagos Islands and of European domestic pigs. Z. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch. 144(1), 61–73 (1974).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kruska, D. Changes of brain size in Tylopoda during phylogeny and caused by domestication. Verh. Dtsch. Zool. Ges. 75, 173–183 (1982).
Google Scholar 
Groves, C. P. Skull-changes due to captivity in certain Equidae. Z. Säugetierkd. 31, 44–46 (1966).
Google Scholar 
Groves, C. P. The skulls of Asian rhinoceroses: Wild and captive. Zoo Biol. 1, 251–261 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hollister, N. Some effects of environment and habit on captive lions. Proc. US. Natl. Mus. 53, 177–193 (1917).Article 

Google Scholar 
Price, E. O. Behavioral development in animals undergoing domestication. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 65(3), 245–271 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolff, J. Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen (A. Hirchwild, 1892).
Google Scholar 
Herring, S. W. Formation of the vertebrate face: Epigenetic and functional influences. Am. Zool. 33, 472–483 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wroe, S. & Milne, N. Convergence and remarkably consistent constraint in the evolution of carnivore skull shape. Evol. 61(5), 1251–1260 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Damasceno, E. M., Hingst-Zaher, E. & Astúa, D. Bite force and encephalization in the Canidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). J. Zool. 290(4), 246–254 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Valkenburgh, B. Deja vu: the evolution of feeding morphologies in the Carnivora. Integr. Comp. Biol. 47, 147–163 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Valkenburgh, B. Carnivore dental adaptations and diet: A study of trophic diversity within guilds in Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution (ed. Gittleman, J. L.) 410–436 (Springer Science & Business Media, 1989).Slater, G. J., Dumont, E. R. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Implications of predatory specialization for cranial form and function in canids. J. Zool. 278(3), 181–188 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Michaud, M., Veron, G. & Fabre, A. C. Phenotypic integration in feliform carnivores: Covariation patterns and disparity in hypercarnivores versus generalists. Evol. 74(12), 2681–2702 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Regan, H. J. & Kitchener, A. C. The effects of captivity on the morphology of captive, domesticated and feral mammals. Mamm. Rev. 35, 215–230 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kapoor, V., Antonelli, T., Parkinson, J. A. & Hartstone-Rose, A. Oral health correlates of captivity. Res. Vet. Sci. 107, 213–219 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell, D. R., Wroe, S., Ravosa, M. J. & Menegaz, R. A. More challenging diets sustain feeding performance: Applications toward the captive rearing of wildlife. Integr. Org. Biol. 3, 1–13 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Curtis, A. A., Orke, M., Tetradis, S. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Diet-related differences in craniodental morphology between captive-reared and wild coyotes, Canis latrans (Carnivora: Canidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 123(3), 677–693 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Siciliano-Martina, L., Light, J. E. & Lawing, A. M. Cranial morphology of captive mammals: A meta-analysis. Front. Zool. 18(4), 1–13 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Corruccini, R. S. & Beecher, R. M. Occlusal variation related to soft diet in a nonhuman primate. Science 218, 74–75 (1982).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramirez Rozzi, F. V., González-José, R. & Pucciarelli, H. M. Cranial growth in normal and low-protein-fed Saimiri An environmental heterochrony. J. Hum. Evol. 49(4), 515–535 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Taylor, A. B. & van Schaik, C. P. Variation in brain size and ecology in Pongo. J. Hum. Evol. 52, 59–71 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
AZA Canid TAG. Large Canid (Canidae) Care Manual. (Association of Zoos and Aquariums, 2012).Mexican Wolf Species Survival Plan. Mexican Gray Wolf Husbandry Manual: Guidelines for Captive Management (2009 edition). (Mexican Wolf Species Survival Plan and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2009).Carrera, R. et al. Comparison of Mexican wolf and coyote diets in Arizona and New Mexico. The J. Wildl. Manag. 72(2), 376–381 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reed, J. E. et al. Diets of free-ranging Mexican gray wolves in Arizona and New Mexico. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 34(4), 1127–1133 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kazimierska, K., Biel, W. & Witkowicz, R. Mineral composition of cereal and cereal-free dry dog foods versus nutritional guidelines. Molecules 25(21), 1–24 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pezzali, J. G. & Aldrich, C. G. Effect of ancient grains and grain-free carbohydrate sources on extrusion parameters and nutrient utilization by dogs. J. Anim. Sci. 98(2), 3758–3767 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hartstone-Rose, A., Selvey, H., Villari, J. R., Atwell, M. & Schmidt, T. The three-dimensional morphological effects of captivity. PLoS ONE 9(11), 1–15 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Siciliano-Martina, L., Light, J. E. & Lawing, A. M. Changes in canid cranial morphology induced by captivity and conservation implications. Biol. Conserv. 257, 109143 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hedrick, P. W. & Fredrickson, R. Genetic rescue guidelines with examples from Mexican wolves and Florida panthers. Conserv. Genet. 11(2), 615–626 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Greely, S. E. Mexican Wolf, Canis lupus baileyi, International Studbook 2018. Palm Desert, California. (2018).Kalinowski, S. T., Hedrick, P. W. & Miller, P. S. No inbreeding depression observed in Mexican and red wolf captive breeding programs. Conserv. Biol. 13(6), 1371–1377 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sakai, S. T., Whitt, B., Arsznov, B. M. & Lundrigan, B. L. Endocranial development in the coyote (Canis latrans) and gray wolf (Canis lupus): A computed tomographic study. Brain Behav. Evol. 91(2), 1–18 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Valkenburgh, B. Skeletal and dental predictors of body mass in carnivores in Body size in mammalian paleobiology: estimation and biological implications (eds. Damuth, J. & MacFadden, B. J.) (Cambridge University Press, 1990).Rohlf, F. J. TPSDig2: a program for landmark development and analysis (2001).Siciliano-Martina, L., Light, J. E., Riley, D. G. & Lawing, A. M. One of these wolves is not like the other: morphological effects and conservation implications of captivity in Mexican wolves. Anim. Conserv. 25, 77–90 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zelditch, M. L., Donald, L., Swiderski, H., Sheets, D. & Fink, W. L. Geometric morphometrics for biologists: a primer. (Elsevier Academic Press, 2004).Coster, A. pedigree: Pedigree functions. R package version 1.4 (2013).Traylor-Holzer, K. (ed.). PMx user’s manual. Version 1.0. Apple Valley, MN: IUCN SSC Conservation Breeding Specialist Group. (2011).Thomason, J. J. Cranial strength in relation to estimated biting forces in some Mammals. Can. J. Zool. 69, 2326–2333 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods. 9(7), 676–682 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (2020).Cofran, Z. Brain size growth in wild and captive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Am. J. Primat. 80(7), 1–8 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Witzenberger, K. A. & Hochkirch, A. Ex situ conservation genetics: A review of molecular studies on the genetic consequences of captive breeding programmes for endangered animal species. Biodivers. Conserv. 20(9), 1843–1861 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez-Sánchez, D. et al. On the path to extinction: Inbreeding and admixture in a declining grey wolf population. Mole. Ecol. 27(18), 3599–3612 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elbroch, M. Animal skulls: a guide to North American species. (Stackpole Books, 2006).Conde, D. A., Flesness, N., Colchero, F., Jones, O. R. & Scheuerlein, A. An emerging role of zoos to conserve biodiversity. Science 331, 1390–1391 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Prado, E. L. & Dewey, K. G. Nutrition and brain development in early life. Nutr. Rev. 72(4), 267–284 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hecht, E. E. et al. Neuromorphological changes following selection for tameness and aggression in the Russian farm-fox experiment. J. Neurosci. 41(28), 6144–6156 (2021).CAS 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, E. L., Rosenzweig, M. R. & Diamond, M. C. Rat brain: Effects of environmental enrichment on wet and dry weights. Science 163(3869), 825–826 (1969).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cummins, R. A., Walsh, R. N., Budtz-Olsen, O. E., Konstantinos, T. & Horsfall, C. R. Environmentally-induced changes in the brains of elderly rats. Nature 243(5409), 516–518 (1973).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Welch, B. L., Brown, D. G., Welch, A. S. & Lin, D. C. Isolation, restrictive confinement or crowding of rats for one year. I. Weight, nucleic acids and protein of brain regions. Brain Res. 75, 71–84 (1974).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Dobson, A., Lafferty, K. D., Kuris, A. M., Hechinger, R. F. & Jetz, W. Homage to Linnaeus: How many parasites? How many hosts?. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 11482–11489 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuris, A. M. et al. Ecosystem energetic implications of parasite and free-living biomass in three estuaries. Nature 454, 515–518 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Seabloom, E. W. et al. The community ecology of pathogens: Coinfection, coexistence and community composition. Ecol. Lett. 18, 401–415 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
French, R. K. & Holmes, E. C. An ecosystems perspective on virus evolution and emergence. Trends Microbiol. 28, 165–175 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hudson, P. J., Dobson, A. P. & Lafferty, K. D. Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 381–385 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raffel, T. R., Martin, L. B. & Rohr, J. R. Parasites as predators: Unifying natural enemy ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 610–618 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, P. T. J. et al. When parasites become prey: Ecological and epidemiological significance of eating parasites. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 362–371 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frainer, A., McKie, B. G., Amundsen, P. A., Knudsen, R. & Lafferty, K. D. parasitism and the biodiversity-functioning relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 260–268 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jephcott, T. G., Sime-Ngando, T., Gleason, F. H. & Macarthur, D. J. Host-parasite interactions in food webs: Diversity, stability, and coevolution. Food Webs 6, 1–8 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rohr, J. R. et al. Towards common ground in the biodiversity–disease debate. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 24–33 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, P. T. J., De Roode, J. C. & Fenton, A. Why infectious disease research needs community ecology. Science 349, 1259504 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marcogliese, D. J. & Cone, D. K. Food webs: A plea for parasites. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 320–325 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, H.-W. et al. Network position of hosts in food webs and their parasite diversity. Oikos 117, 1847–1855 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lafferty, K. D., Dobson, A. P. & Kuris, A. M. Parasites dominate food web links. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 11211–11216 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lafferty, K. D. et al. Parasites in food webs: The ultimate missing links. Ecol. Lett. 11, 533–546 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dunne, J. A. The network structure of food webs. In Ecological Networks: Linking Structure to Dynamics (eds Pascual, M. & Dunne, J. A.) 27–28 (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Google Scholar 
Dunne, J. A., Williams, R. J. & Martinez, N. D. Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance. Ecol. Lett. 5, 558–567 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hudson, P. J., Rizzoli, A., Grenfell, B. T., Heesterbeek, H. & Dobson, A. P. The Ecology of Wildlife Diseases. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Anderson, R. M. & May, R. M. Infectious Diseases of Humans: Dynamics and Control (Oxford University Press, 1992).
Google Scholar 
McCallum, H. & Dobson, A. Detecting disease and parasite threats to endangered species and ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 190–194 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Castro, F. & Bolker, B. M. Parasite establishment and host extinction in model communities. Oikos 111, 501–513 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
McQuaid, C. F. & Britton, N. F. Parasite species richness and its effect on persistence in food webs. J. Theor. Biol. 364, 377–382 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Holt, R. D., Dobson, A. P., Begon, M., Bowers, R. G. & Schauber, E. M. Parasite establishment in host communities. Ecol. Lett. 6, 837–842 (2003).
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hatcher, M. J. & Dunn, A. M. Parasites in Ecological Communities: From Interactions to Ecosystems (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Book 

Google Scholar 
Dobson, A. Population dynamics of pathogens with multiple host species. Am. Nat. 164, S64–S78 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCann, K., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G. R. Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395, 794–798 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Neutel, A. M., Heesterbeek, J. A. P. & de Ruiter, P. C. Stability in real food webs: Weak links in long loops. Science 296, 1120–1123 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. & Cohen, J. E. Transient dynamics and food–web complexity in the Lotka–Volterra cascade model. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 268, 869–877 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
May, R. M. Stability in multispecies community models. Math. Biosci. 12, 59–79 (1971).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
May, R. M. Will a large complex system be stable?. Nature 238, 413–414 (1972).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hilker, F. M. & Schmitz, K. Disease-induced stabilization of predator-prey oscillations. J. Theor. Biol. 255, 299–306 (2008).ADS 
MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hethcote, H. W., Wang, W., Han, L. & Ma, Z. A predator–prey model with infected prey. Theor. Popul. Biol. 66, 259–268 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kooi, B. W., van Voorn, G. A. K. & Das, K. P. Stabilization and complex dynamics in a predator-prey model with predator suffering from an infectious disease. Ecol. Complex. 8, 113–122 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Winemiller, K. O. Spatial and temporal variation in tropical fish trophic networks. Ecol. Monogr. 60, 331–367 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paine, R. T. Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength. Nature 355, 73–75 (1992).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wootton, J. T. Estimates and tests of per capita interaction strength: Diet, abundance, and impact of intertidally foraging birds. Ecol. Monogr. 67, 45–64 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cohen, J. E., Briand, F. & Newman, C. M. Community Food Webs: Data and Theory (Springer, 1990).Book 

Google Scholar 
Mougi, A. Diversity of biological rhythm and food web stability. Biol. Lett. 17, 20200673 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript. More

Baker, R. W. Membrane Technology and Applications. 3rd edn. ISBN 9780470743720. (Wiley, 2012).Wang, L. K., Chen, J. P., Hung, Y.-T., Shammas, N. K. Membrane and Desalination Technologies. ISBN 978-1-58829-940-6. (Humana Press, 2011).Mahmoudi, E. et al. Enhancing morphology and separation performance of polyamide 6,6 membranes by minimal incorporation of silver decorated graphene oxide nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 9, 1216. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-38060-x (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Penkova, A. V., Dmitrenko, M. E., Ermakov, S. S., Toikka, A. M. & Roizard, D. Novel green PVA-fullerenol mixed matrix supported membranes for separating water-THF mixtures by pervaporation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25, 20354–20362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9063-9 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Atlaskin, A. A. et al. Comprehensive experimental study of membrane cascades type of “continuous membrane column” for gases high-purification. J. Membr. Sci. 572, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2018.10.079 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Koyuncu, I., Sengur, R., Turken, T., Guclu, S., & Pasaoglu, M.E. Advances in water treatment by microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and nanofiltration. in Advances in Membrane Technologies for Water Treatment (eds. Basile, A., Cassano, A., Rastogi, N. K.). 83–128. (Elsevier, 2015).Van der Bruggen, B. Microfiltration, ultrafiltration, nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and forward osmosis in Fundamental Modelling of Membrane Systems, Membrane and Process Performance (ed. Luis, P.). 25–70. (Elsevier, 2018).Al Aani, S., Mustafa, T. N. & Hilal, N. Ultrafiltration membranes for wastewater and water process engineering: A comprehensive statistical review over the past decade. J. Water Process Eng. 35, 101241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101241 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Polotskaya, G. A., Goikhman, M. Y., Podeshvo, I. V., Polotsky, A. E. & Cherkasov, A. N. Polybenzoxazinoneimides and their prepolymers as promising membrane materials. Desalination 200, 46–48 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ulbricht, M. Advanced functional polymer membranes. Polymer 47, 2217–2262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2006.01.084 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Siagian, U. W. R. et al. High-performance ultrafiltration membrane: Recent progress and its application for wastewater treatment. Curr. Pollut. Rep. 7, 448–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-021-00204-5 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Polotskaya, G. A., Meleshko, T. K., Gofman, I. V., Polotsky, A. E. & Cherkasov, A. N. Polyimide ultrafiltration membranes with high thermal stability and chemical durability. Sep. Sci. Technol. 44, 3814–3831. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390903256166 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ohya, H., Kudryavtsev, V. V., & Semenova, S. I. Polyimide Membranes. Vol. 314. (Gordon & Breach Publishers, 1996).Liu, R., Qiao, X. & Chung, T.-S. The development of high performance P84 co-polyimide hollow fibers for pervaporation dehydration of isopropanol. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60, 6674–6686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2005.05.066 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yang, C. et al. Preparation and characterization of acid and solvent resistant polyimide ultrafiltration membrane. Appl. Surf. Sci. 483, 278–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.03.226 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulyalina, AYu., Polotskaya, G. A. & Toikka, A. M. Membrane materials based on polyheteroarylenes and their application for pervaporation. Russ. Chem. Rev. 85(1), 81–98 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Volgin, I. V. et al. Transport properties of thermoplastic R-BAPB polyimide: Molecular dynamics simulations and experiment. Polymers 11, 1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111775 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pulyalina, A. et al. Preparation and characterization of methanol selective membranes based on polyheteroarylene–Cu(I) complexes for purification of methyl tertiary butyl ether. Polym. Int. 66(12), 1873–1882. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5463 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulyalina, A. et al. Sorption and transport of aqueous isopropanol solutions in polyimide-poly(aniline-co-anthranilic acid) composites. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 84(5), 840–846. https://doi.org/10.1134/S107042721105017X (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulyalina, A. et al. Novel approach to determination of sorption in pervaporation process: A case study of isopropanol dehydration by polyamidoimide urea membranes. Sci. Rep. 7, 8415. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08420-0 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Helali, N., Shamaei, L., Rastgar, M. & Sadrzadeh, M. Development of layer-by-layer assembled polyamide-imide membranes for oil sands produced water treatment. Sci. Rep. 11, 8098. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87601-4 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Polotskaya, G. et al. Asymmetric membranes based on copolyheteroarylenes with imide, biquinoline, and oxazinone units: Formation and characterization. Polymers 11(10), 1542. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11101542 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Volgin, I. V. Transport properties of thermoplastic R-BAPB polyimide: Molecular dynamics simulations and experiment. Polymers 11(11), 1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11111775 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
White, L. S. Transport properties of a polyimide solvent resistant nanofiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 205, 191–202 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barsema, J. N., Kapantaidakis, G. C., van der Vegt, N. F. A., Koops, G. H. & Wessling, M. Preparation and characterization of highly selective dense and hollow fiber asymmetric membranes based on BTDA-TDI/MDI co-polyimide. J. Membr. Sci. 216, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(03)00071-1 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulyalina, A., Polotskaya, G., Rostovtseva, V., Pientka, Z. & Toikka, A. Improved hydrogen separation using hybrid membrane composed of nanodiamonds and P84 copolyimide. Polymers 10, 828. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym10080828 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Qiao, X. & Chung, T.-S. Fundamental characteristics of sorption, swelling, and permeation of P84 co-polyimide membranes for pervaporation dehydration of alcohols. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 44, 8938–8943. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050836g (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mangindaan, D. W., Shi, G. M. & Chung, T.-S. Pervaporation dehydration of acetone using P84 co-polyimide flat sheet membranes modified by vapor phase crosslinking. J. Membr. Sci. 458, 76–85 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hua, D., Ong, Y. K., Wang, Y., Yang, T. & Chung, T.-S. ZIF-90/P84 mixed matrix membranes for pervaporation dehydration of isopropanol. J. Membr. Sci. 453, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.059 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pulyalina, AYu., Putintseva, M. N., Polotskaya, G. A., Rostovtseva, V. A. & Toikka, A. M. Pervaporation purification of oxygenate from an ethyl tert-butyl ether/ethanol azeotropic mixture. Membr. Membr. Technol. 1(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2517751619020082 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ren, J. & Li, Z. Development of asymmetric BTDA-TDI/MDI (P84) copolyimide flat sheet and hollow fiber membranes for ultrafiltration: Morphology transition and membrane performance. Desalination 285, 336–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.024 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ren, J., Li, Z., Wong, F.-S. & Li, D. Development of asymmetric BTDA-TDI/MDI (P84) co-polyimide hollow fiber membranes for ultrafiltration: The influence of shear rate and approaching ratio on membrane morphology and performance. J. Membr. Sci. 248, 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2004.09.031 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yusoff, I. I. et al. Durable pressure filtration membranes based on polyaniline-polyimide P84 blends. Polym. Eng. Sci. 5(S1), E82–E92 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grosso, V. et al. Polymeric and mixed matrix polyimide membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 132, 684–696 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Renner, R. Ionic liquids: An industrial cleanup solution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 410a–413a (2001).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wanga, H. H. A novel green solvent alternative for polymeric membrane preparation via nonsolvent-induced phase separation (NIPS). J. Membr. Sci. 574, 44–54 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lessan, F. & Foudazi, R. Effect of [EMIM][BF4] ionic liquid on the properties of ultrafiltration membranes. Polymer 210, 122977 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xing, D. Y., Peng, N. & Chung, T.-S. Formation of cellulose acetate membranes via phase inversion using ionic liquid, [BMIM]SCN, as the solvent. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 8761–8769 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Durmaz, E. N. & Çulfaz-Emecen, P. Z. Cellulose-based membranes via phase inversion using [EMIM]OAc-DMSO mixtures as solvent. Chem. Eng. Sci. 178, 93–103 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Grekov, K. B. Electronic Waste and Safety Problems (in Rus.). ISBN 9785891601796. (SUT, 2018).Svittsov, A. A. & Abylgaziev, TZh. Micellarly enhanced (reagent) ultrafiltration. Russ. Chem. Rev. 60(11), 1280–1283 (1991).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Petrov, S. & Stoichev, P. A. Reagent ultrafiltration purification of water contaminated with reactive dyes. Filtr. Sep. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-1882(02)80229-4 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leonard, M. A. & West, T. S. Chelating reactions of 1,2-dihydroxyanthraquinon-3-ylmethyl-amine-NN-diacetic acid with metal cations in aqueous media. J. Chem. Soc. 866, 4477–4486. https://doi.org/10.1039/jr9600004477 (1960).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marczenko, Z., & Balcerzak, M. Fluorine. in Separation, Preconcentration and Spectrophotometry in Inorganic Analysis (ed. Kloczko, E.). 189–197. (Elsevier, 2000).Chai, J.-D. & Head-Gordon, M. Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom–atom dispersion corrections. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 10, 6615–6620. https://doi.org/10.1039/B810189B (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Frisch, M. J. et al. Gaussian 09, Revision C.01. (Gaussian, Inc., 2010).Ochterski, J. W. Thermochemistry in Gaussian. https://gaussian.com/thermo/ (2000).Cherkasov, A. N. A rapid analysis of ultrafiltration membrane structure. Sep. Sci. Tech. 40, 2775–2801. https://doi.org/10.1080/01496390500333111 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, Q.-Z. The relationship between porosity and kinetics parameter of membrane formation in PSF ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 286, 7–11 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barton, A. F. M. CRC Handbook of Solubility Parameter. Vol. 768. (CRC Press, 1991).Tan, X. & Rodrigue, D. A review on porous polymeric membrane preparation. Part I: Production techniques with polysulfone and poly (vinylidene fluoride). Polymers 11, 1160 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mulder, M. H. V. Phase Inversion Membranes. Membrane Preparation. Vol. 3331. (Academic Press, 2000).Quijada-Maldonado, E. Pilot plant study on the extractive distillation of toluene–methylcyclohexane mixtures using NMP and the ionic liquid [hmim][TCB] as solvents. Sep. Purif. Technol. 166, 196–204 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Polotskaya, G. A. et al. Aromatic copolyamides with anthrazoline units in the backbone: Synthesis, characterization, pervaporation application. Polymers 8(10), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym8100362 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mao, J. X. Interactions in 1-ethyl-3-methyl imidazolium tetracyanoborate ion pair: Spectroscopic and density functional study. J. Mol. Struct. 1038, 12–18 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Bowman, D. M. J. S. et al. Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 500–515 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andela, N. et al. A human-driven decline in global burned area. Science 356, 1356–1362 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
United Nations Environment Programme. Spreading like Wildfire–The Rising Threat of Extraordinary Landscape Fires. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. (United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, 2022).Williams, A. P. et al. Observed impacts of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire in California. Earth’s Future 7, 892–910 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abatzoglou, J. T. & Williams, A. P. Impact of anthropogenic climate change on wildfire across western US forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11770–11775 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dennison, P. E., Brewer, S. C., Arnold, J. D. & Moritz, M. A. Large wildfire trends in the western United States, 1984–2011. Geophys. Res. Lett. 41, 2928–2933 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Westerling, A. L. Increasing western US forest wildfire activity: sensitivity to changes in the timing of spring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 371, 20150178 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pyne, S. J. Fire in America: A Cultural History of Wildland and Rural Fire. (University of Washington Press, 2017).Fire and Resource Assessment Program. Fire Perimeters. Available: https://frap.fire.ca.gov/frap-projects/fire-perimeters/. (California Department of Forestry & Fire Protection, 2018).Westerling, A. L., Hidalgo, H. G., Cayan, D. R. & Swetnam, T. W. Warming and earlier spring increase Western U.S. forest wildfire activity. Science 313, 940–943 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Starrs, C. F., Butsic, V., Stephens, C. & Stewart, W. The impact of land ownership, firefighting, and reserve status on fire probability in California. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 034025 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lydersen, J. M. et al. Evidence of fuels management and fire weather influencing fire severity in an extreme fire event. Ecol. Appl. 27, 2013–2030 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Parsons, D. J. & DeBenedetti, S. H. Impact of fire suppression on a mixed-conifer forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 2, 21–33 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vose, R., Easterling, D. R., Kunkel, K. & Wehner, M. Temperature Changes in the United States. (NASA, 2017).Balch, J. K. et al. Human-started wildfires expand the fire niche across the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2946–2951 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stephens, S. L., Martin, R. E. & Clinton, N. E. Prehistoric fire area and emissions from California’s forests, woodlands, shrublands, and grasslands. For. Ecol. Manag. 251, 205–216 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sugihara, N. G., Van Wagtendonk, J. W., Fites-Kaufman, J., Shaffer, K. E. & Thode, A. E. Fire in California’s Ecosystems. (University of California Press, 2006).Jin, Y. et al. Identification of two distinct fire regimes in Southern California: implications for economic impact and future change. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 094005 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trollope, W. in Ecological Effects of Fire In South African Ecosystems. 199–217 (Springer, 1984).Byram, G. M. in Forest Fire: Control and Use (ed. Davis, K. P.) 155–182 (McGraw-Hill, 1959).McLauchlan, K. K. et al. Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers. J. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13403 (2020).Brando, P. M. et al. Abrupt increases in Amazonian tree mortality due to drought–fire interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6347–6352 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schroeder, W., Oliva, P., Giglio, L. & Csiszar, I. A. The New VIIRS 375m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment. Remote Sens. Environ. 143, 85–96 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rothermel, R. C. A Mathematical Model for Predicting Fire Spread in Wildland Fuels (USFS, 1972).Hood, S. M., Varner, J. M., van Mantgem, P. & Cansler, C. A. Fire and tree death: understanding and improving modeling of fire-induced tree mortality. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 113004 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cattau, M. E., Wessman, C., Mahood, A., Balch, J. K. & Poulter, B. Anthropogenic and lightning‐started fires are becoming larger and more frequent over a longer season length in the USA. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 668–681 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abatzoglou, J. T., Balch, J. K., Bradley, B. A. & Kolden, C. A. Human-related ignitions concurrent with high winds promote large wildfires across the USA. Int. J. Wildland Fire 27, 377–386 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fried, J. S. et al. Predicting the effect of climate change on wildfire behavior and initial attack success. Clim. Change 87, 251–264 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Wagtendonk, J. W. The history and evolution of wildland fire use. Fire Ecol. 3, 3–17 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sullivan, A. L. Wildland surface fire spread modelling, 1990–2007. 2: Empirical and quasi-empirical models. Int. J. Wildland Fire 18, 369–386 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. Projected changes in fire size from daily spread potential in Canada over the 21st century. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 104048 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Parks, S. A. et al. High-severity fire: evaluating its key drivers and mapping its probability across western US forests. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 044037 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hantson, S. et al. The status and challenge of global fire modelling. Biogeosciences 13, 3359–3375 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reinhardt, E. D. First Order Fire Effects Model: FOFEM 4.0, User’s Guide. (Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Forest Service, US …, 1997).Jolly, W. M. et al. Climate-induced variations in global wildfire danger from 1979 to 2013. Nat. Commun. 6, 1–11 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pateiro-Lopez, B. & Rodriguez-Casal, A. alphahull: Generalization of the Convex Hull of a Sample of Points in the Plane v. R package version 2.2 (2019).Edelsbrunner, H., Kirkpatrick, D. & Seidel, R. On the shape of a set of points in the plane. IEEE Trans. Inf. theory 29, 551–559 (1983).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodríguez Casal, A. & Pateiro López, B. Generalizing the Convex Hull of A Sample: the R Package alphahull. (2010).Bell, D. M. et al. Multiscale divergence between Landsat-and lidar-based biomass mapping is related to regional variation in canopy cover and composition. Carbon Balance Manag. 13, 15 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abatzoglou, J. T. Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and modelling. Int. J. Climatol. 33, 121–131 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
MTBS. Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity Data Access: Fire Level Geospatial Data. (MTBS). (2018).Miller, J. D. et al. Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Remote Sens. Environ. 113, 645–656 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Homer, C. et al. Completion of the 2011 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States–representing a decade of land cover change information. Photogrammetric Eng. Remote Sens. 81, 345–354 (2015).
Google Scholar  More

Ehrlich, P. R. & Raven, P. H. Butterflies and plants: A study in coevolution. Evolution 18, 586 (1964).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raguso, R. A. et al. The raison d’être of chemical ecology. Ecology 96, 617–630 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kariyat, R. R. & Portman, S. L. Plant–herbivore interactions: Thinking beyond larval growth and mortality. Am. J. Bot. 103, 789–791 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Raubenheimer, D. & Simpson, S. J. Nutritional ecology and foraging theory. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 27, 38–45 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goehring, L. & Oberhauser, K. S. Effects of photoperiod, temperature, and host plant age on induction of reproductive diapause and development time in Danaus plexippus. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 674–685 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hahn, D. A. Larval nutrition affects lipid storage and growth, but not protein or carbohydrate storage in newly eclosed adults of the grasshopper Schistocerca americana. J. Insect Physiol. 51, 1210–1219 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Portman, S. L., Kariyat, R. R., Johnston, M. A., Stephenson, A. G. & Marden, J. H. Cascading effects of host plant inbreeding on the larval growth, muscle molecular composition, and flight capacity of an adult herbivorous insect. Funct. Ecol. 29, 328–337 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, C. G. Physiological factors in insect migration by flight. Nature 198, 423–427 (1963).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harrison, R. G. Dispersal polymorphisms in insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 11, 95–118 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zera, A. J. & Denno, R. F. Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 207–231 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marden, J. H. et al. Weight and nutrition affect pre-mRNA splicing of a muscle gene associated with performance, energetics and life history. J. Exp. Biol. 211, 3653–3660 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Raguso, R. A., Ojeda-Avila, T., Desai, S., Jurkiewicz, M. A. & Arthur Woods, H. The influence of larval diet on adult feeding behaviour in the tobacco hornworm moth, Manduca sexta. J. Insect Physiol. 53, 923–932 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cease, A. J. et al. Nutritional imbalance suppresses migratory phenotypes of the Mongolian locust (Oedaleus asiaticus). R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.161039 (2017).Reichstein, T., Von Euw, J., Parsons, J. A. & Rothschild, M. Heart poisons in the monarch butterfly. Science 161, 861–866 (1968).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brower, L. P., Ryerson, W. N., Coppinger, L. L. & Glazier, S. C. Ecological chemistry and the palatability spectrum. Science 161, 1349–1351 (1968).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Young, A. M. An evolutionary-ecological model of the evolution of migratory behavior in the Monarch Butterfly, and its absence in the Queen Butterfly. Acta Biotheor. 31, 219–237 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Agrawal, A. A. Monarchs and Milkweed: A Migrating Butterfly, a Poisonous Plant, and Their Remarkable Story of Coevolution. (Princeton University Press, 2017).Batalden, R. V. & Oberhauser, K. S. Potential changes in eastern north American monarch migration in response to an introduced Milkweed, Asclepias curassavica. in Monarchs in a Changing World: Biology and Conservation of an Iconic Butterfly 215–224 (2015).Tyler Flockhart, D. T. et al. Tracking multi-generational colonization of the breeding grounds by monarch butterflies in eastern North America. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 280, 20131087 (2013).Saunders, S. P., Ries, L., Oberhauser, K. S., Thogmartin, W. E. & Zipkin, E. F. Local and cross-seasonal associations of climate and land use with abundance of monarch butterflies Danaus plexippus. Ecography. 41, 278–290 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pleasants, J. M. & Oberhauser, K. S. Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: Effect on the monarch butterfly population. Insect Conserv. Divers. 6, 135–144 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borders, B. & Lee-Mäder, B. B. Project milkweed. in Monarchs in a Changing World: Biology and Conservation of an Iconic Butterfly. pp.190-196 (Cornell University press, 2015).Agrawal, A. A., Petschenka, G., Bingham, R. A., Weber, M. G. & Rasmann, S. Toxic cardenolides: Chemical ecology and coevolution of specialized plant-herbivore interactions. N. Phytologist 194, 28–45 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Malcolm, S. B. Milkweeds, monarch butterflies and the ecological significance of cardenolides. Chemoecology 5–6, 101–117 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pocius, V. M., Debinski, D. M., Bidne, K. G., Hellmich, R. L. & Hunter, F. K. Performance of early Instar Monarch Butterflies (Danaus plexippus L.) on nine Milkweed species native to Iowa. J. Lepid. Soc. 71, 153–161 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Ali, J. G. & Agrawal, A. A. Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 293–302 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zalucki, M. P., Brower, L. P. & Alonso-M, A. Detrimental effects of latex and cardiac glycosides on survival and growth of first-instar monarch butterfly larvae Danaus plexippus feeding on the sandhill milkweed Asclepias humistrata. Ecol. Entomol. 26, 212–224 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Agrawal, A. A., Hastings, A. P., Patrick, E. T. & Knight, A. C. Specificity of herbivore-induced hormonal signaling and defensive traits in five closely related milkweeds (Asclepias spp.). J. Chem. Ecol. 40, 717–729 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Agrawal, A. A., Ali, J. G., Rasmann, S. & Fishbein, M. Macroevolutionary trends in the defense of milkweeds against monarchs. Monarch. a Chang. World Biol. Conserv. Iconic Insect. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. pp. 47–59 (2011).Pocius, V. M. et al. Milkweed matters: Monarch butterfly (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) survival and development on nine midwestern milkweed species. Environ. Entomol. 46, 1098–1105 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Petschenka, G. et al. Stepwise evolution of resistance to toxic cardenolides via genetic substitutions in the na+/k+-atpase of milkweed butterflies (lepidoptera: Danaini). Evolution (N. Y). 67, 2753–2761 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Agrawal, A. A. et al. Cardenolides, toxicity, and the costs of sequestration in the coevolutionary interaction between monarchs and milkweeds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2024463118 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marden, J. H. Variability in the size, composition, and function of insect flight muscles. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 62, 157–178 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bicudo, J. E. P. W., Buttemer, W. A., Chappell, M. A., Pearson, J. T. & Bech, C. Ecological and Environmental Physiology of Birds. Ecological and Environmental Physiology of Birds 3 (Oxford University Press, 2010).Bailey, E. Biochemistry of Insect Flight. in Insect Biochemistry and Function. pp. 89–176 (Springer, 1975).Dudley, R. The biomechanics of insect flight: form, function, evolution. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 93 (Princeton University Press, 2000).Solensky, M. J. Overview of monarch migration. in The Monarch Butterfly: Biology and Conservation 79–83 (2004).Urquhart, F. A. & Urquhart, N. R. Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus L.) overwintering population in Mexico (Lep. Danaidae). Atalanta 7, 56–61 (1976).
Google Scholar 
Brower, L. P. Understanding and misunderstanding the migration of the monarch butterfly (Nymphalidae) in North America: 1857–1995. J. – Lepid. Soc. 49, 304–385 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Fisher, K. E., Adelman, J. S. & Bradbury, S. P. Employing Very High Frequency (VHF) radio telemetry to recreate monarch butterfly flight paths. Environ. Entomol. 49, 312–323 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reppert, S. M. & de Roode, J. C. Demystifying monarch butterfly migration. Curr. Biol. 28, R1009–R1022 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhu, H., Gegear, R. J., Casselman, A., Kanginakudru, S. & Reppert, S. M. Defining behavioral and molecular differences between summer and migratory monarch butterflies. BMC Biol. 7, 1–14 (2009).Heinze, S. & Reppert, S. M. Anatomical basis of sun compass navigation I: The general layout of the monarch butterfly brain. J. Comp. Neurol. 520, 1599–1628 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhan, S. et al. The genetics of monarch butterfly migration and warning colouration. Nature 514, 317–321 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Soule, A. J., Decker, L. E. & Hunter, M. D. Effects of diet and temperature on monarch butterfly wing morphology and flight ability. J. Insect Conserv. 24, 961–975 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Decker, L. E., Soule, A. J., de Roode, J. C. & Hunter, M. D. Phytochemical changes in milkweed induced by elevated CO2 alter wing morphology but not toxin sequestration in monarch butterflies. Funct. Ecol. 33, 411–421 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heinrich, B. Temperature regulation of the sphinx moth, Manduca sexta. I. Flight energetics and body temperature during free and tethered flight. J. Exp. Biol. 54, 141–152 (1971).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nicolson, S. W. & Louw, G. N. Simultaneous measurement of evaporative water loss, oxygen consumption, and thoracic temperature during flight in a carpenter bee. J. Exp. Zool. 222, 287–296 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rothe, U. & Nachtigall, W. Flight of the honey bee IV. J. Comp. Physiol. B 158, 711–718 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nachtigall, W., Hanauer-Thieser, U. & Mörz, M. Flight of the honey bee VII: Metabolic power versus flight speed relation. J. Comp. Physiol. B 165, 484–489 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Niven, J. E. & Scharlemann, J. P. W. Do insect metabolic rates at rest and during flight scale with body mass? Biol. Lett. 1, 346–349 (2005).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zalucki, M. P., Parry, H. R. & Zalucki, J. M. Movement and egg laying in Monarchs: To move or not to move, that is the equation. Austral. Ecol. 41, 154–167 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marden, J. H. & Chai, Peng Aerial predation and butterfly design: How palatability, mimicry, and the need for evasive flight constrain mass allocation. Am. Nat. 138, 15–36 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Levin, E., Lopez-Martinez, G., Fane, B. & Davidowitz, G. Hawkmoths use nectar sugar to reduce oxidative damage from flight. Science 355, 733–735 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Petschenka, G. & Agrawal, A. A. Milkweed butterfly resistance to plant toxins is linked to sequestration, not coping with a toxic diet. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20151865 (2015).Petschenka, G. & Agrawal, A. A. How herbivores coopt plant defenses: Natural selection, specialization, and sequestration. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 14, 17–24 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tan, W. H., Tao, L., Hoang, K. M., Hunter, M. D. & de Roode, J. C. The effects of milkweed induced defense on parasite resistance in monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus. J. Chem. Ecol. 44, 1040–1044 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Brower, L. P. & Glazier, S. C. Localization of heart poisons in the monarch butterfly. Science 188, 19–25 (1975).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zalucki, M. P. et al. It’s the first bites that count: Survival of first-instar monarchs on milkweeds. Austral. Ecol. 26, 547–555 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zalucki, M. P., Malcolm, S. B., Hanlon, C. C. & Paine, T. D. First-instar monarch larval growth and survival on milkweeds in Southern California: Effects of latex, leaf hairs and cardenolides. Chemoecology 22, 75–88 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ziegler, R. & Van Antwerpen, R. Lipid uptake by insect oocytes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 36, 264–272 (2006).Beenakkers, A. M. T., Van der Horst, D. J. & Van Marrewijk, W. J. A. Insect flight muscle metabolism. Insect Biochem. 14, 243–260 (1984).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Beall, G. The fat content of a butterfly, Danaus Plexippus Linn., as affected by migration. Ecology 29, 80–94 (1948).Article 

Google Scholar 
James, D. G. Phenology of weight, moisture and energy reserves of Australian monarch butterflies, Danaus plexippus. Ecol. Entomol. 9, 421–428 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Briegel, H. Metabolic relationship between female body size, reserves, and fecundity of Aedes aegypti. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 165–172 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hines, W. J. W. & Smith, M. J. H. Some aspects of intermediary metabolism in the desert locust (Schistocerca gregaria Forskål). J. Insect Physiol. 9, 463–468 (1963).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Inagaki, S. & Yamashita, O. Metabolic shift from lipogenesis to glycogenesis in the last instar larval fat body of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem. 16, 327–331 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Venkatesh, K. & Morrison, P. E. Studies of weight changes and amount of food ingested by the stable fly, stomoxys calcitrans (Diptera: Muscidae). Can. Entomol. 112, 141–149 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Arrese, E. L. & Soulages, J. L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 207–225 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mevi-Schütz, J. & Erhardt, A. Larval nutrition affects female nectar amino acid preference in the map butterfly (Araschnia levana). Ecology 84, 2788–2794 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wassenaar, L. I. & Hobson, K. A. Natal origins of migratory monarch butterflies at wintering colonies in Mexico: New isotopic evidence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 95, 15436–15439 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Majewska, A. A. & Altizer, S. Exposure to Non-Native Tropical Milkweed Promotes Reproductive Development in Migratory Monarch Butterflies. Insects 10, 253 (2019).Howard, E., Aschen, H. & Davis, A. K. Citizen science observations of monarch butterfly overwintering in the Southern United States. Psyche: A Journal of Entomology 2010, https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/689301 (2010).Satterfield, D. A., Maerz, J. C. & Altizer, S. Loss of migratory behaviour increases infection risk for a butterfly host. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20141734 (2015).Petschenka, G. et al. Relative selectivity of plant cardenolides for Na+/K+-ATPases from the monarch butterfly and non-resistant insects. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1424 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, P. L., Petschenka, G., Flacht, L. & Agrawal, A. A. Cardenolide intake, sequestration, and excretion by the monarch butterfly along gradients of plant toxicity and larval ontogeny. J. Chem. Ecol. 45, 264–277 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tao, L., Hoang, K. M., Hunter, M. D. & de Roode, J. C. Fitness costs of animal medication: antiparasitic plant chemicals reduce fitness of monarch butterfly hosts. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 1246–1254 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lederhouse, R. C. The effect of female mating frequency on egg fertility in the black swallowtail, Papilio polyxenes asterius (Papilionidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 35, 266–277 (1981).
Google Scholar 
Jones, R. E., Hart, J. R. & Bull, G. D. Temperature, size and egg production in the Cabbage Butterfly, Pieris rapae L. Aust. J. Zool. 30, 159–168 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haukioja, E. & Neuvonen, S. The relationship between size and reproductive potential in male and female Epirrita autumnata (Lep., Geometridae). Ecol. Entomol. 10, 267–270 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Altizer, S. M., Oberhauser, K. S. & Brower, L. P. Associations between host migration and the prevalence of a protozoan parasite in natural populations of adult monarch butterflies. Ecol. Entomol. 25, 125–139 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Masters, A. R., Malcolm, S. B. & Brower, L. P. Monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) thermoregulatory behavior and adaptations for overwintering in Mexico. Ecology 69, 458–467 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kammer, A. E. Thoracic temperature, shivering, and flight in the monarch butterfly, Danaus plexippus (L.). Z. Vgl. Physiol. 68, 334–344 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pendar, H. & Socha, J. J. Estimation of instantaneous gas exchange in flow-through respirometry systems: A modern revision of bartholomew’s ztransform method. PLoS One 10, e0139508 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lighton, J. R. B. Measuring Metabolic Rates: A Manual for Scientists. (Oxford University Press, 2008).Alonso-Mejía, A., Rendon-Salinas, E., Montesinos-Patiño, E. & Brower, L. P. Use of lipid reserves by monarch butterflies overwintering in Mexico: Implications for conservation. Ecol. Appl. 7, 934–947 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Diaz, R., Overholt, W. A., Hahn, D. & Samayoa, A. C. Diapause induction in Gratiana boliviana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), a biological control agent of tropical soda apple in Florida. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 104, 1319–1326 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tschinkel, W. R. Sociometry and sociogenesis of colonies of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta during one annual cycle. Ecol. Monogr. 63, 425–457 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fink, L. S. & Brower, L. P. Birds can overcome the cardenolide defence of monarch butterflies in Mexico. Nature 291, 67–70 (1981).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ali, J. G. & Agrawal, A. A. Trade-offs and tritrophic consequences of host shifts in specialized root herbivores. Funct. Ecol. 31, 153–160 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woodson, R. E. The North American Species of Asclepias L. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 41, 1 (1954).Article 

Google Scholar 
NRCS USDA. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Center. http://plants.usda.gov (2006).Agrawal, A. A., Salminen, J. P. & Fishbein, M. Phylogenetic trends in phenolic metabolism of milkweeds (Asclepias): Evidence for escalation. Evolution (N. Y). 63, 663–673 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pocius, V. M. et al. Monarch butterflies show differential utilization of nine midwestern milkweed species. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 169 (2018).Pocius, V. M., Debinski, D. M., Pleasants, J. M., Bidne, K. G. & Hellmich, R. L. Monarch butterflies do not place all of their eggs in one basket: Oviposition on nine Midwestern milkweed species. Ecosphere 9, e02064 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ladner, D. T. & Altizer, S. Oviposition preference and larval performance of North American monarch butterflies on four Asclepias species. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 116, 9–20 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borders, B. A guide to the native milkweeds of Oregon. Xerces Soc. Invertebr. Conserv. www.xerces.org, 5, 12-23 (2012). More