Ecology

Schilling, A.-M. & Rössner, G. E. The (sleeping) beauty in the beast—a review on the water deer, Hydropotes inermis. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 28, 121–133 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Geist, V. Deer of the World: Their Evolution, Behaviour and Ecology (Stackpole Books, Pennsylvania, 1998).
Google Scholar 
Cooke, A. Muntjac and Water Deer: Natural History, Environmental Impact and Management (Pelagic Publishing Ltd, UK, 2019).Book 

Google Scholar 
Kim, B. J., Lee, B. K. & Kim, Y. J. Korean water deer (National Institute of Ecology, South Korea, 2016).
Google Scholar 
Belyaev, D. A. & Jo, Y.-S. Northernmost finding and further information on water deer Hydropotes inermis in Primorskiy Krai, Russia. Mammalia 85, 71–73 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harris, R. B. & Duckworth, J. W. Hydropotes inermis. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, e.T10329A22163569 (2015).National Institute of Biological Resources. Harmful wildlife. https://species.nibr.go.kr/home/mainHome.do?cont_link=011&subMenu=011016&contCd=011016001 (2015).Hofmann, R. R. Evolutionary steps of ecophysiological adaptation and diversification of ruminants: a comparative view of their digestive system. Oecologia 78, 443–457 (1989).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Guo, G. & Zhang, E. Diet of the Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis) in Zhoushan Archipelago, China. Acta Theriol. Sin. 25, 122–130 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Kim, B. J., Lee, N. S. & Lee, S. D. Feeding diets of the Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) based on a 202 bp rbcL sequence analysis. Conserv. Genet. 12, 851–856 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Park, J.-E., Kim, B.-J., Oh, D.-H., Lee, H. & Lee, S.-D. Feeding habit analysis of the Korean water deer. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 25, 836–845 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Kim, J., Joo, S. & Park, S. Diet composition of Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) from the Han River Estuary Wetland in Korea using fecal DNA. Mammalia 85, 487–493 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hofmann, R., Kock, R. A., Ludwig, J. & Axmacher, H. Seasonal changes in rumen papillary development and body condition in free ranging Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis). J. Zool. 216, 103–117 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nielsen, J. M., Clare, E. L., Hayden, B., Brett, M. T. & Kratina, P. Diet tracing in ecology: Method comparison and selection. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 278–291 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Birnie-Gauvin, K., Peiman, K. S., Raubenheimer, D. & Cooke, S. J. Nutritional physiology and ecology of wildlife in a changing world. Conserv. Physiol. 5, cox030 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taberlet, P., Coissac, E., Pompanon, F., Brochmann, C. & Willerslev, E. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. 21, 2045–2050 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Glenn, T. C. Field guide to next-generation DNA sequencers. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 11, 759–769 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nichols, R. V., Åkesson, M. & Kjellander, P. Diet assessment based on rumen contents: A comparison between DNA metabarcoding and macroscopy. PLoS ONE 11, e0157977 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pompanon, F. et al. Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1931–1950 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kumari, P. et al. DNA metabarcoding-based diet survey for the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra): Development of a Eurasian otter-specific blocking oligonucleotide for 12S rRNA gene sequencing for vertebrates. PLoS ONE 14, e0226253 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Iwanowicz, D. D. et al. Metabarcoding of fecal samples to determine herbivore diets: A case study of the endangered Pacific pocket mouse. PLoS ONE 11, e0165366 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berry, T. E. et al. DNA metabarcoding for diet analysis and biodiversity: A case study using the endangered Australian sea lion (Neophoca cinerea). Ecol. Evol. 7, 5435–5453 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ford, M. J. et al. Estimation of a killer whale (Orcinus orca) population’s diet using sequencing analysis of DNA from feces. PLoS ONE 11, e0144956 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ando, H. et al. Diet analysis by next-generation sequencing indicates the frequent consumption of introduced plants by the critically endangered red-headed wood pigeon (Columba janthina nitens) in oceanic island habitats. Ecol. Evol. 3, 4057–4069 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, E.-K. Behavioral ecology, habitat evaluation and genetic characteristics of water deer (Hydropotes inermis) in Korea. Ph.D. thesis. Kangwon National University (2011).Park, J.-E., Kim, B.-J. & Lee, S.-D. A study of potential of diet analysis in the Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) using polymerase chain reaction-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE). Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 24, 318–324 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Hollingsworth, P. M. Refining the DNA barcode for land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19451–19452 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, D.-Z. et al. Comparative analysis of a large dataset indicates that internal transcribed spacer (ITS) should be incorporated into the core barcode for seed plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 19641–19646 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Park, E. & Nam, M. Changes in land cover and the cultivation area of ginseng in the Civilian Control Zone -Paju City and Yeoncheon County-. Korean J. Environ. Ecol. 27, 507–515 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Cheng, T. et al. Barcoding the kingdom Plantae: new PCR primers for ITS regions of plants with improved universality and specificity. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 138–149 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ankenbrand, M. J., Keller, A., Wolf, M., Schultz, J. & Förster, F. ITS2 database V: Twice as much. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 3030–3032 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sickel, W. et al. Increased efficiency in identifying mixed pollen samples by meta-barcoding with a dual-indexing approach. BMC Ecol. 15, 20 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. Accuracy of taxonomy prediction for 16S rRNA and fungal ITS sequences. PeerJ 6, e4652 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community ecology package v 2.5–7 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria, 2020).
Google Scholar 
Hsieh, T., Ma, K. & Chao, A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity (Hill numbers). Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 1451–1456 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, M. J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46 (2001).
Google Scholar 
De Cáceres, M. & Legendre, P. Associations between species and groups of sites: indices and statistical inference. Ecology 90, 3566–3574 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Yan, L. ggvenn: Draw venn diagram by ‘ggplot2’ v. 0.1.8 (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria, 2021).Choi, D.-Y. et al. Flora of province Gyonggi-do. Bull. Seoul Nat’l Univ. Arbor. 21, 25–76 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Ko, S. & Shin, Y. Flora of middle part in Gyeonggi Province. Korean J. Plant Res. 22, 49–70 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Lee, S.-K., Ryu, Y. & Lee, E. J. Endozoochorous seed dispersal by Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) in Taehwa Research Forest, South Korea. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 40, e02325 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, K.-H. & Kang, S.-H. Flora of western civilian control zone (CCZ) in Korea. Korean J. Plant Res. 32, 565–588 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Gyeonggi Tourism Organization. Pyeonghwa-Nuri Trail ecological resource survey. (Paju City, Gyeonggi Province, Korea, 2018).Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis 2nd edn. (Springer, New York, 2016).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation, Vienna, Austria, 2020).Pertoldi, C. et al. Comparing DNA metabarcoding with faecal analysis for diet determination of the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) in Vejlerne. Denmark. Mammal. Res. 66, 115–122 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, B. Morphological, ecological and DNA taxonomic characteristics of Chinese water deer (Hydropotes inermis Swinhoe). Ph.D. thesis. Chungbuk National University (2003).Wilmshurst, J. F., Fryxell, J. M. & Hudsonb, R. J. Forage quality and patch choice by wapiti (Cervus elaphus). Behav. Ecol. 6, 209–217 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Langvatn, R. & Hanley, T. A. Feeding-patch choice by red deer in relation to foraging efficiency. Oecologia 95, 164–170 (1993).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gray, P. B. & Servello, F. A. Energy intake relationships for white-tailed deer on winter browse diets. J. Wildl. Manag. 59, 147–152 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, D. T. & Doucet, G. J. Temporal changes in winter diet selection by white-tailed deer in a northern deer yard. J. Wildl. Manag. 55, 361–376 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, H. & Kaji, K. Fallen leaves and unpalatable plants as alternative foods for sika deer under food limitation. Ecol. Res. 16, 257–262 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bee, J. N. et al. Spatio-temporal feeding selection of red deer in a mountainous landscape. Austral Ecol. 35, 752–764 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gebert, C. & Verheyden-Tixier, H. Variations of diet composition of red deer (Cervus elaphus L.) in Europe. Mammal. Rev. 31, 189–201 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cornelis, J., Casaer, J. & Hermy, M. Impact of season, habitat and research techniques on diet composition of roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a review. J. Zool. 248, 195–207 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, B. J. & Lee, S.-D. Home range study of the Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis agyropus) using radio and GPS tracking in South Korea: Comparison of daily and seasonal habitat use pattern. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 34, 365–370 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Beier, P. Sex differences in quality of white-tailed deer diets. J. Mammal. 68, 323–329 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Staines, B. W., Crisp, J. M. & Parish, T. Differences in the quality of food eaten by red deer (Cervus elaphus) stags and hinds in winter. J. Appl. Ecol. 19, 65–77 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koga, T. & Ono, Y. Sexual differences in foraging behavior of sika deer, Cervus nippon. J. Mammal. 75, 129–135 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Han, S.-H., Lee, S.-S., Cho, I.-C., Oh, M.-Y. & Oh, H.-S. Species identification and sex determination of Korean water deer (Hydropotes inermis argyropus) by duplex PCR. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 35, 61–66 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
You, Z. et al. Seasonal variations in the composition and diversity of gut microbiota in white-lipped deer (Cervus albirostris). PeerJ 10, e13753 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, W. et al. Metagenomics analysis of the gut microbiome in healthy and bacterial pneumonia forest musk deer. Gene Genom. 43, 43–53 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Amato, K. R. et al. Gut microbiome, diet, and conservation of endangered langurs in Sri Lanka. Biotropica 52, 981–990 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stumpf, R. M. et al. Microbiomes, metagenomics, and primate conservation: New strategies, tools, and applications. Biol. Conserv. 199, 56–66 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Redford, K. H., Segre, J. A., Salafsky, N., del Rio, C. M. & McAloose, D. Conservation and the microbiome. Conserv. Biol. 26, 195–197 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Deagle, B. E. et al. Counting with DNA in metabarcoding studies: How should we convert sequence reads to dietary data?. Mol. Ecol. 28, 391–406 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Corse, E. et al. A from-benchtop-to-desktop workflow for validating HTS data and for taxonomic identification in diet metabarcoding studies. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17, e146–e159 (2017).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Alberdi, A. et al. Promises and pitfalls of using high-throughput sequencing for diet analysis. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 327–348 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nakahara, F. et al. The applicability of DNA barcoding for dietary analysis of sika deer. DNA Barcodes 3, 200–206 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomas, A. C., Jarman, S. N., Haman, K. H., Trites, A. W. & Deagle, B. E. Improving accuracy of DNA diet estimates using food tissue control materials and an evaluation of proxies for digestion bias. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3706–3718 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Deagle, B. E., Eveson, J. P. & Jarman, S. N. Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples–a case study on DNA in faeces. Front. Zool. 3, 11 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coissac, E., Riaz, T. & Puillandre, N. Bioinformatic challenges for DNA metabarcoding of plants and animals. Mol. Ecol. 21, 1834–1847 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Estes, J. A. et al. Trophic downgrading of planet Earth. Science 333, 301–306 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Clare, E. L. Molecular detection of trophic interactions: emerging trends, distinct advantages, significant considerations and conservation applications. Evol. Appl. 7, 1144–1157 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ramirez, R., Quintanilla, J. & Aranda, J. White-tailed deer food habits in northeastern Mexico. Small Rumin. Res. 25, 141–146 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anouk Simard, M., Côté, S. D., Weladji, R. B. & Huot, J. Feedback effects of chronic browsing on life-history traits of a large herbivore. J. Anim. Ecol. 77, 678–686 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Putman, R. J. & Staines, B. W. Supplementary winter feeding of wild red deer Cervus elaphus in Europe and North America: justifications, feeding practice and effectiveness. Mammal Rev. 34, 285–306 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Milner, J. M., Van Beest, F. M., Schmidt, K. T., Brook, R. K. & Storaas, T. To feed or not to feed? Evidence of the intended and unintended effects of feeding wild ungulates. J. Wildl. Manag. 78, 1322–1334 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carpio, A. J., Apollonio, M. & Acevedo, P. Wild ungulate overabundance in Europe: contexts, causes, monitoring and management recommendations. Mammal Rev. 51, 95–108 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cappa, F., Lombardini, M. & Meriggi, A. Influence of seasonality, environmental and anthropic factors on crop damage by wild boar Sus scrofa. Folia Zool. 68, 261–268 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Stokland, J. N., Siitonen, J. & Jonsson, B. G. Biodiversity in Dead Wood (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).Turetsky, M. R. et al. Nat. Geosci. 8, 11–14 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wenger, S. J., Subalusky, A. L. & Freeman, M. C. Food Webs 18, e00106 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomatsuri, M. & Kon, K. Hydrobiologia 790, 225–232 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Henry, L. A. & Roberts, J. M. in Marine Animal Forests (eds Rossi, S. et al.) 235–256 (Springer, 2017).Walton, M. E. M. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 820, 153191 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wolfe, K., Kenyon, T. M. & Mumby, P. J. Coral Reefs 40, 1769–1806 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kim, H. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 28, 6180–6193 (2022).Jackson, R. B. et al. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 48, 419–445 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pan, Y. et al. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hedges, J. I., Keil, R. G. & Benner, R. Org. Geochem. 27, 195–212 (1997).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lønborg, C. et al. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 466 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harden, J. W. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 6, 174–184 (2000).Davidson, E. A. & Janssens, I. A. Nature 440, 165–173 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hugelius, G. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 20438–20446 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hennige, S. J. et al. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00668 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wolfram, U. et al. Sci. Rep. 12, 8052 (2022).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, J. M., Wheeler, A. J. & Freiwald, A. Science 312, 543–547 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mortensen, P. B. & Fosså, J. H. Species diversity and spatial distribution of invertebrates on deep-water Lophelia reefs in Norway. In Proc. 10th Int. Coral Reef Symp. 1849–1868 (ICRS, 2006).Maier, S. R. et al. Deep Sea Res. I 175, 103574 (2021).. More

Johannesson, K., Smolarz, K., Grahn, M. & André, C. The future of baltic sea populations: Local extinction or evolutionary rescue?. Ambio 40, 179–190 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Reusch, T. B. H. et al. The Baltic Sea as a time machine for the future coastal ocean. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar8195 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Kahru, M. & Elmgren, R. Multidecadal time series of satellite-detected accumulations of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea. Biogeosciences 11, 3619–3633 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Kahru, M., Elmgren, R. & Savchuk, O. P. Changing seasonality of the Baltic Sea. Biogeosciences 13, 1009–1018 (2016).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hjerne, O., Hajdu, S., Larsson, U., Downing, A. S. & Winder, M. Climate driven changes in timing, composition and magnitude of the Baltic Sea phytoplankton spring bloom. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 482 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bianchi, T. S. et al. Cyanobacterial blooms in the Baltic Sea: Natural or human-induced?. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 716–726 (2000).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Poutanen, E.-L. & Nikkilä, K. Carotenoid pigments as tracers of cyanobacterial blooms in recent and post-glacial sediments of the Baltic Sea. Ambio 30, 179–183 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, A., Höglander, H., Karlsson, C. & Huseby, S. Key role of phosphorus and nitrogen in regulating cyanobacterial community composition in the northern Baltic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 164, 161–171 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Olofsson, M., Suikkanen, S., Kobos, J., Wasmund, N. & Karlson, B. Basin-specific changes in filamentous cyanobacteria community composition across four decades in the Baltic Sea. Harmful Algae 91, 101685 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rolff, C. & Elfwing, T. Increasing nitrogen limitation in the Bothnian Sea, potentially caused by inflow of phosphate-rich water from the Baltic Proper. Ambio 44, 601–611 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Eriksson Wiklund, A.-K., Dahlgren, K., Sundelin, B. & Andersson, A. Effects of warming and shifts of pelagic food web structure on benthic productivity in a coastal marine system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 396, 13–25 (2009).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wikner, J. & Andersson, A. Increased freshwater discharge shifts the trophic balance in the coastal zone of the northern Baltic Sea. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2509–2519 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gulati, R. D. & Demott, W. R. The role of food quality for zooplankton: remarks on the state-of-the-art, perspectives and priorities. Freshw. Biol. 38, 16 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin-Creuzburg, D., von Elert, E. & Hoffmann, K. H. Nutritional constraints at the cyanobacteria- Daphnia magna interface: The role of sterols. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 456–468 (2008).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hedberg, P., Albert, S., Nascimento, F. J. A. & Winder, M. Effects of changing phytoplankton species composition on carbon and nitrogen uptake in benthic invertebrates. Limnol. Oceanogr. 66, 469–480 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gorokhova, E. Toxic cyanobacteria Nodularia spumigena in the diet of Baltic mysids: Evidence from molecular diet analysis. Harmful Algae 8, 264–272 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, A. M. L., Gorokhova, E. & Elmgren, R. Nitrogen fixed by cyanobacteria is utilized by deposit-feeders. PLoS ONE 9, e104460 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, A. M. L. et al. Nitrogen fixation by cyanobacteria stimulates production in Baltic food webs. Ambio 44, 413–426 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lesutienė, J., Bukaveckas, P. A., Gasiūnaitė, Z. R., Pilkaitytė, R. & Razinkovas-Baziukas, A. Tracing the isotopic signal of a cyanobacteria bloom through the food web of a Baltic Sea coastal lagoon. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 138, 47–56 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Rolff, C. Seasonal variation in d13C and d15N of size-fractionated plankton at a coastal station in the northern Baltic proper. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 203, 47–65 (2000).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Koski, M., Engström, J. & Viitasalo, M. Reproduction and survival of the calanoid copepod Eurytemora affinis fed with toxic and non-toxic cyanobacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 186, 187–197 (1999).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Koski, M. et al. Calanoid copepods feed and produce eggs in the presence of toxic cyanobacteria Nodularia spumigena. Limnol. Oceanogr. 47, 878–885 (2002).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, K. & Jónasdóttir, S. Nutritional quality of two cyanobacteria: How rich is ‘poor’ food?. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 151, 1–10 (1997).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Kankaanpää, H., Vuorinen, P. J., Sipiä, V. & Keinänen, M. Acute effects and bioaccumulation of nodularin in sea trout (Salmo trutta m. trutta L.) exposed orally to Nodularia spumigena under laboratory conditions. Aquat. Toxicol. 61, 155–168 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Persson, K.-J., Bergström, K., Mazur-Marzec, H. & Legrand, C. Differential tolerance to cyanobacterial exposure between geographically distinct populations of Perca fluviatilis. Toxicon 76, 178–186 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Monserrat, J. M., Yunes, J. O. S. & Bianchini, A. Effects of Anabaena Spiroides (cyanobacteria) aqueous extracts on the acetylcholinesteraseactivity of aquatic species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20, 1228–1235 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lehtonen, K. K. et al. Accumulation of nodularin-like compounds from the cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena and changes in acetylcholinesterase activity in the clam Macoma balthica during short-term laboratory exposure. Aquat. Toxicol. 64, 461–476 (2003).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fulton, M. H. & Key, P. B. Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in esturai fish and invertebrates as an indicator of organophoshorus insecticide exposure and effects. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 20, 37–45 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
DeMott, W. R., Zhang, Q.-X. & Carmichael, W. W. Effects of toxic cyanobacteria and purified toxins on the survival and feeding of a copepod and three species of Daphnia. Limnol. Oceanogr. 36, 1346–1357 (1991).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hogfors, H. et al. Bloom-forming cyanobacteria support copepod reproduction and development in the Baltic Sea. PLoS ONE 9, e112692 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Motwani, N. H., Duberg, J., Svedén, J. B. & Gorokhova, E. Grazing on cyanobacteria and transfer of diazotrophic nitrogen to zooplankton in the Baltic Sea: Cyanobacteria blooms support zooplankton growth. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 672–686 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gorokhova, E., El-Shehawy, R., Lehtiniemi, M. & Garbaras, A. How copepods can eat toxins without getting sick: Gut bacteria help zooplankton to feed in cyanobacteria blooms. Front. Microbiol. 11, 589816 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elmgren, R. Structure and dynamics of Baltic benthos communities, with particular reference to the relationship between macro- and meiofauna. Kieler Meeresforsch. Sonderh. 4, 1–22 (1978).
Google Scholar 
Laine, A. O. Distribution of soft-bottom macrofauna in the deep open Baltic Sea in relation to environmental variability. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 57, 87–97 (2003).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hill, C., Quigley, M. A., Cavaletto, J. F. & Gordon, W. Seasonal changes in lipid content and composition in the benthic amphipods Monoporeia afinis and Pontoporeia femorata. Limnol. Oceanogr. 37, 1280–1289 (1992).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lehtonen, K. K. Ecophysiology of the benthic amphipod Monoporeia affinis in an open-sea area of the northern Baltic Sea: Seasonal variations in body composition, with bioenergetic considerations. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 143, 87–98 (1996).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, A. M. L., Nascimento, F. J. A. & Elmgren, R. Incorporation and burial of carbon from settling cyanobacterial blooms by deposit-feeding macrofauna. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 2754–2758 (2008).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, A. M. L. & Mozūraitis, R. Deposit-feeders accumulate the cyanobacterial toxin nodularin. Harmful Algae 12, 77–81 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Savage, C. Tracing the influence of sewage nitrogen in a coastal ecosystem using stable nitrogen isotopes. Ambio 34, 145–150 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Newsome, S. D., Del Rio, C. M., Bearhop, S. & Phillips, D. L. A niche for isotopic ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 429–436 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Layman, C. A., Arrington, D. A., Montaña, C. G. & Post, D. M. Can stable isotope ratio provide for community-wide mesures of trophic structure?. Ecology 88, 42–48 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jackson, A. L., Inger, R., Parnell, A. C. & Bearhop, S. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER—Stable isotope Bayesian ellipses in R: Bayesian isotopic niche metrics. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 595–602 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Blomqvist, S. & Lundgren, L. A benthic sled for sampling soft bottoms. Helgol. Meeresunters. 50, 453–456 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, A. M. L., Nascimento, F. J. A., Näslund, J. & Elmgren, R. Higher diversity of deposit-feeding macrofauna enhances phytodetritus processing. Ecology 91, 1414–1423 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazur-Marzec, H., Tymińska, A., Szafranek, J. & Pliński, M. Accumulation of nodularin in sediments, mussels, and fish from the Gulf of Gdańsk, southern Baltic Sea. Environ. Toxicol. 22, 101–111 (2007).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
van de Bund, W., Ólafsson, E., Modig, H. & Elmgren, R. Effects of the coexisting Baltic amphipods Monoporeia affinis and Pontoporeia femorata on the fate of a simulated spring diatom bloom. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 212, 107–115 (2001).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Larsson, U., Hobro, R. & Wulff, F. Dynamics of a Phytoplankton Spring Bloom in a Coastal Area of the Northern Baltic Proper (University of Stockholm, 1986).
Google Scholar 
Heiskanen, A.-S. Factors Governing Sedimentation and Pelagic Nutrient Cycles in the Northern Baltic Sea: = Sedimentaatioon ja Ravinteiden Kiertoon Vaikuttavat Tekijät Pohjoisen Ltämeren Ulapaekosysteemissä (Finnish Environment Institute, 1998).
Google Scholar 
Nadon, M.-O. & Himmelman, J. H. Stable isotopes in subtidal food webs: Have enriched carbon ratios in benthic consumers been misinterpreted?. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2828–2836 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gorokhova, E. Shifts in rotifer life history in response to stable isotope enrichment: Testing theories of isotope effects on organismal growth. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 269–277 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, A. M. L., Reutgard, M., Garbaras, A. & Gorokhova, E. Isotopic niche reflects stress-induced variability in physiological status. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171398 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
del Rio, C. M., Wolf, N., Carleton, S. A. & Gannes, L. Z. Isotopic ecology 10 years after a call for more laboratory experiments. Biol. Rev. 84, 91–111 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ledesma, M., Gorokhova, E., Holmstrand, H., Garbaras, A. & Karlson, A. M. L. Nitrogen isotope composition of amino acids reveals trophic partitioning in two sympatric amphipods. Ecol. Evol. 10, 10773–10784 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bocquené, G. & Galgani, F. Biological Effects of Contaminants: Cholinesterase Inhibitation by Organophosphate and Carbamate Compounds (ICES Techniques in Marine Environmental Science (TIMES). Report., 1998). https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.5048.
Book 

Google Scholar 
Ellman, G. L., Courtney, K. D., Andres, V. & Featherstone, R. M. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 7, 88–95 (1961).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jarek, S. mvnormtest: Normality test for multivariate variables. (2012). R package version 0.1-9. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mvnormtestR Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (2021).Nascimento, F. J. A., Karlson, A. M. L., Näslund, J. & Gorokhova, E. Settling cyanobacterial blooms do not improve growth conditions for soft bottom meiofauna. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 368, 138–146 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roche-Mayzaud, O., Mayzaud, P. & Biggs, D. Medium-term acclimation of feeding and of digestive and metabolic enzyme activity in the neritic copepod Acartia clause. I. Evidence from laboratory experiments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 69, 25–40 (1991).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stuart, V., Head, E. J. H. & Mann, K. H. Seasonal changes in the digestive enzyme levels of the amphipod Corophium volutator (Pallas) in relation to diet. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 88, 243–256 (1985).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schwarzenberger, A., Ilić, M. & Von Elert, E. Daphnia populations are similar but not identical in tolerance to different protease inhibitors. Harmful Algae 106, 102062 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schwarzenberger, A. & Fink, P. Gene expression and activity of digestive enzymes of Daphnia pulex in response to food quality differences. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 218, 23–29 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sipiä, V. O. et al. Bioaccumulation and detoxication of nodularin in tissues of flounder (Platichthys flesus), mussels (Mytilus edulis, Dreissena polymorpha), and clams (Macoma balthica) from the Northern Baltic Sea. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 53, 305–311 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bolnick, D. I. et al. The ecology of individuals: Incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161, 1–28 (2003).Article 
MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
MacArthur, R. H. & Pianka, E. R. On optimal use of a patchy environment. Am. Nat. 100, 603–609 (1966).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wiklund, A.-K.E., Sundelin, B. & Rosa, R. Population decline of amphipod Monoporeia affinis in Northern Europe: Consequence of food shortage and competition?. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 367, 81–90 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leonardsson, K., Sörlin, T., Samberg, H. & Sorlin, T. Does Pontoporeia affinis (Amphipoda) optimize age at reproduction in the Gulf of Bothnia?. Oikos 52, 328 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eriksson Wiklund, A.-K. & Andersson, A. Benthic competition and population dynamics of Monoporeia affinis and Marenzelleria sp. in the northern Baltic Sea. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 144, 46–53 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Karlson, A. M. L. et al. Linking consumer physiological status to food-web structure and prey food value in the Baltic Sea. Ambio 49, 391–406 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Olofsson, M. Nitrogen fixation estimates for the Baltic Sea indicate high rates for the previously overlooked Bothnian Sea. Ambio https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01331-x (2021).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Aerial imagesWe use publicly available aerial images of Rwanda at 0.25 × 0.25 m2 resolution, collected in June–August of 2008 and 2009. The images were acquired from 3,000 m altitude above ground level, originally with a mean ground resolution of 0.22 × 0.22 m2 pixel size then resampled to 0.25 × 0.25 m2, using a Vexcel UltraCam-X aerial digital photography camera34. The images exhibit a red, green and blue band stored under 8 bit unsigned integer format. The aerial images cover 96% of the country and the remaining 4% was filled with satellite images from WorldView-2, Ikonos, Spot and QuickBird satellite sensors which are part of the publicly available dataset.Environmental dataWe use locally available climate data: mean annual rainfall, mean annual temperature and elevation data (10 × 10 m2 resolution) to assess relationships between tree density, crown cover and environmental gradients. We also use land cover data to extract the spatial extent of plantations, forest, farmland, and urban and built-up areas for our landscape stratification. Climate data were obtained from the Rwanda Meteorological Agency as daily records from 1971 to 2017. The national forest map was manually created in 2012 using on-screen digitizing techniques over the 2008 aerial images35. A forest was defined as ‘a group of trees higher than 7 m and a tree cover of more than 10% or trees able to reach these thresholds in situ on a land of about 0.25 ha or more’51. A shrub was defined as ‘a group of perennial trees smaller than 7 m at maturity and a canopy cover of more than 10% on a land of about 0.25 ha or more’. The forest dataset was composed of 105,690 forest polygons, classified as either natural forest (closed natural forest, degraded natural forest, bamboo stand, wooded savanna and shrubland) or ‘forest plantations’ (Eucalyptus spp., eucalyptus; Pinus spp., pine; Callitris spp., callitris; Cupressus spp., cypress; Acacia mearnsii, black wattle; Acacia melanoxylon, melanoxylon; Grevillea robusta, grevillea; Maesopsis eminii, maesopsis; Alnus acuminata, alnus; Jacaranda mimosifolia, jacaranda; mixed species, mixed; and others) (Extended Data Fig. 7i). We separate shrubland from natural forest and merged it with savanna into the class ‘savannas and shrublands’. We further separated tree plantations and grouped them into Eucalyptus and non-Eucalyptus plantations. Then, a farmland map was acquired from the Rwanda Land Management and Use Authority (RLMUA)52 and overlaid with the 2012 forest cover map as a reference to clean the overlapping parts, under an assumption that the overlap is due to land use dynamics. Finally, a layer marking urban and built-up areas was acquired from RLMUA as well and the same preprocessing step as done for farmlands was applied. The combination of the land cover datasets resulted in our stratification scheme with six classes: natural forests, savannas and shrublands, Eucalyptus plantations, non-Eucalyptus plantations, farmland and urban and built-up.Mapping of individual trees using deep learningWe used the open-source framework developed by ref. 17 to map individual tree crowns. The framework uses a deep neural network based on the U-Net architecture53,54. We trained the network using 97,574 manually delineated tree crowns spread over 103 areas/bounding boxes representing the full range of biogeographical conditions found across Rwanda. To cope with the challenge of separating touching tree crowns, we used a higher weight for boundary areas between crowns, as suggested in refs. 17,53. Crown sizes in the predictions were found to be 27% smaller as compared to the manual delineations within the 103 training areas, due to the applied boundary weight that emphasizes gaps between tree crowns. Therefore, to calculate the real canopy cover, we extended each predicted tree crown by 27% and dissolved the touching crowns into continuous features. We counted single tree crowns for each hectare presented here as tree density and the percentage of each hectare covered by the extended tree crowns as canopy cover.We developed a postprocessing method that separates clumped tree crowns and fills any gap inside a single crown (Extended Data Fig. 2). Our postprocessing method, which we refer to as detect centre and relabel (DCR), determines the crown centres in the model predictions assuming that tree crowns have a round shape and then relabels the model predictions on the basis of weighted distances to the identified crown centres. First, DCR performs a distance transform, computing for each pixel the Euclidean distance to the nearest pixel predicted as background. Let the transformed image be distance-transformed (DT). Then an m × m maximum filter is applied to DT, where m depends on the size of the smallest object to be separated. We store all pixels for which the original DT value is the same before and after max-filtering. These pixels are the instance centres as they are furthest away from the boundary and have the highest distance values within the area defined by m. In the case of several connected instance centres in regions where multiple connected pixels have the same distance from the background, only a single instance centre is kept. Finally, each pixel x predicted as a crown in the original image is assigned to its nearest instance centre, where the distance function penalizes background pixels on the connecting line between the instance centre and x.Allometry for biomass and carbon stock estimationGenerally, allometric equations define a statistical relationship between structural properties of a tree and its biomass55,56. In our case, we assume a relationship between the crown area and aboveground biomass (AGB), which varies between biomes36. Since destructive AGB measurements are rare, we established biome-specific relationships between crown diameter (CD) derived from the crown area (CD = 2√(crown area/π)) and stem diameter at breast height (DBH) (equations (3) and (6)). DBH has been shown to be highly correlated with AGB36,37,38,39,40. We then used established relationships from literature to derive AGB from DBH for savannas and shrublands (equation (4)), tree plantations (equation (5)) and natural forests (equation (7)). AGB was predicted for each tree and summed for 1 ha grids to derive AGB in the unit Mg per ha. Values were multiplied by 0.47 (refs. 57,58) to derive aboveground carbon (AGC). Summed numbers over land cover classes are considered as carbon stocks. The bias as reported here was calculated following the approach from ref. 36 reporting the relative systematic error in per cent:$$mathrm {bias} = frac{1}{N}mathop {sum}limits_{i = 1}^N {frac{{(Y_{mathrm {obs}} – Y_{mathrm {pred}})}}{{Y_{mathrm {obs}}}}}times 100$$
(1)
The error for the evaluation with NFI data was defined by:$$mathrm{bias} = frac{{left| {mathop {sum}nolimits_N {(Y_{mathrm{obs}} – Y_{mathrm{pred}})} } right|}}{{left| {mathop {sum}nolimits_N {Y_{mathrm{obs}}} } right|}}$$
(2)
For trees outside natural forests, we used the database from ref. 36 including 10,591 field-measured trees from woodlands and savanna plus 952 samples from agroforestry landscapes in Kenya37 to establish a linear relationship between CD and DBH (Extended Data Fig. 3a). The Kenyan dataset is compatible with the trees in Rwanda. To ensure compatibility, the Kenya data contained open-grown trees most of which are of the same families or genus as in Rwanda grown under the same conditions, the latter factor shown to be important for generalizing37.A major axis regression (average of four runs each 50% of the data) led to equation (3):$${{{mathrm{DBH}}}}_{{{{mathrm{predicted}}}}},{{{mathrm{in}}}},{{{mathrm{cm}}}} = – 4.665 + 5.102 times {{{mathrm{CD}}}}$$
(3)
Equation (3) showed a reasonable performance with a very low bias (average of four runs on the 50% not used to establish the equation (3)): r² = 0.71; slope = 0.95; root mean square error (RMSE) = 6.2 cm; relative RMSE (rRMSE) = 42%; bias = 1%). We tested equation (3) on an independent dataset from Kenya consisting of 93 trees where AGB was destructively measured (Fig. 3b). The Kenyan database provides an uncommon opportunity to use destructive samples in which the carbon mass is not estimated indirectly and the relationship between crown area and carbon is direct: we do not need to invoke a second allometry to derive the dependent variable. All trees were open-grown trees in the same growing conditions as the agricultural areas of Rwanda. On these 93 trees, DBH can be predicted reasonably well from CD using equation (3) (r² = 0.84; slope = 0.86; RMSE = 8 cm; rRMSE = 25%; bias = 6%). We then applied an allometric equation from literature37 established for non-forest trees in East Africa to estimate AGB from DBHpredicted and compared the predicted AGB with the destructively measured AGB (r² = 0.81; RMSE = 511 kg; rRMSE = 55%; bias = 25%) showing an acceptable performance (Extended Data Fig. 3c) but indicating a systematic bias, which will be further tested with biome-specific field data (next section). We apply equation (4) to estimate AGB for trees outside forests in Rwanda in savannas and shrublands:$${{{mathrm{AGB}}}}_{{{{mathrm{predicted}}}}},{{{mathrm{in}}}},{{{mathrm{kg}}}} = 0.091 times {{mathrm{DBH}}_{{mathrm{predicted}}}}^{2.472}$$
(4)
Given the different structure of trees in farmlands, urban and built-up areas and plantations as compared to trees in natural forests and in natural non-forest areas, we used a different equation for trees in these areas. It was established in Rwanda using destructive samples from tree plantations39:$${{{mathrm{AGB}}}}_{{{{mathrm{predicted}}}}},{{{mathrm{in}}}},{{{mathrm{kg}}}} = 0.202 times {{mathrm{DBH}}_{{mathrm{predicted}}}}^{2.447}$$
(5)
A different CD–DBH relationship was established for natural forests. Here, we conducted a field campaign in December 2021 sampling 793 overstory trees in Rwanda’s protected natural forest. We measured both CD and DBH and established a logarithmic major axis regression model with a Baskerville correction59 between the two variables to predict DBH from CD (Extended Data Fig. 3d). We did four runs each using 50% of the data to establish equation (6) (average of the four runs) and the other 50% to test the performance also averaged over the four runs (r² = 0.71; slope = 0.99; RMSE = 13 cm; rRMSE = 45%; bias = 19%). Note that CD is extended by 27% to account for underestimations of touching crowns in dense forests (see previous section):$$begin{array}{l}{mathrm{DBH}}_{{mathrm{predicted}}},{mathrm{in}},{mathrm{cm}} = left({mathrm{exp}}left(1.154 + 1.248 times {mathrm{ln}}({mathrm{CD}} times 1.27) right)right.\left. times left({mathrm{exp}}(0.3315^2/2) right) right)end{array}$$
(6)
We then used a state-of-the-art allometric equation established for tropical forests38 to predict AGB from DBH for natural forests in Rwanda:$$begin{array}{l}{{{mathrm{AGB}}}}_{{{{mathrm{predicted}}}}},{{{mathrm{in}}}},{{{mathrm{kg}}}} = {{{mathrm{exp}}}}Big[ {1.803 – 0.976{{{E}}} + 0.976,{{{mathrm{ln}}}}left( rho right)}\+ 2.673;{{{mathrm{ln}}}}left( {{{{mathrm{DBH}}}}} right) – 0.0299left[ {{{{mathrm{ln}}}}left( {{{mathrm{DBH}}}} right)} right]^2 Big]end{array}$$
(7)
where E measures the environmental stress38 (a gridded layer is accessible via https://chave.ups-tlse.fr/pantropical_allometry.htm) and ρ is the wood density. Here, we used a fixed number (0.54), which is the average wood density for 6,161 trees from ref. 40, weighted according to the abundance of the species in the plots. The relative error was calculated by the quadratic mean of the intraplot and interplot variations, which is 18.2% (Extended Data Table 1b). No destructive AGB measurements were found that showed a similar CD–DBH relationship as we measured during the field trip in Rwanda’s forest. We could thus not evaluate the performance for natural forests at tree level but had to rely on plot-level comparisons (next section).Evaluation and uncertainties of the allometryBiomass estimations without direct measurements of height or DBH inevitably include a relatively high level of uncertainty at tree level38,60. Uncertainty does not only originate from the CD to DBH conversion but also the equation converting DBH to AGB. As shown in the previous section, no strong systematic bias could be detected for the CD to DBH conversion but the evaluation of the CD-based AGB prediction with an independent dataset from destructively measured AGB revealed a bias of 25%. However, this comparison (Extended Data Fig. 3c) may not be representative for an entire country having a variety of landscapes and tree species, so a systematic propagation is unlikely. We also did not have sufficient field data to evaluate the conversions in natural forests. Here, we used data from 15 natural forest plots with 6,161 trees published by ref. 40 and ref. 41 and directly compared the summed biomass of the trees we predicted over their plots. The median measured biomass for the plots is 121 MgC ha−1 and we predict a median biomass of 81 MgC ha−1 (plot-based rRMSE = 54%; bias = 11%; bias on summed plots = 26%). The overall underestimation by our prediction is not necessarily a model bias but may be partly explained by the contribution of the understory trees, which cannot be captured by aerial images. Interestingly, our C stock estimates are in the same range of magnitude as global biomass products43,44,45,61 (Extended Data Fig. 4), indicating that overstory tree-level carbon stock assessments are possible from optical very high resolution images, even in tropical forests. Several global products overestimated biomass for non-forest areas like savannas or croplands, which is probably because they are calibrated in denser forests. The most recent products of ref. 42 and ref. 61 are much closer to the estimates from our results and the NFI. This is also seen in the grid-based correlation matrix where ref. 42 correlates best with our map, followed by ref. 61.We further use NFI data from 2014 to measure the uncertainty of the final carbon stock estimates and evaluate if systematic differences between AGB predictions and field assessments can be found for different land cover classes (Extended Data Table 1). For the NFI data, a total of 373 plots with 2,415 trees were measured and species-specific allometric equations applied62. To identify systematic errors at landscape scale, we extracted averaged values for areas around the plots from our predictions and calculated statistics on averages over all plots. Interestingly, our predictions for farmlands only show a bias of 5.9%: we estimate on average 2.46 MgC ha−1 and the inventories measure 2.37 MgC ha−1 on their 150 plots. For savanna and shrublands, we estimate 4.16 MgC ha−1 while inventories measure 3.31 MgC ha−1 (bias = 18.9%). For plantations, we estimate lower values (8.16 compared to 16.79 MgC ha−1; bias = 52.6%). To calculate the total uncertainty on country-wide C stock estimates, we weighted the bias from the different classes according to their relative area. We estimate a total uncertainty on the carbon stock predictions of 16.9% at the national scale (Extended Data Table 1).We found a very low bias for estimated C density in farmlands (5.9% bias) which make up most of the areas outside natural forests in Rwanda (Extended Data Table 1, Extended Data Fig. 6). The high bias for plantations can be explained by three factors: large bare areas considered part of plantations by the manual delineation of plantation areas (Extended Data Fig. 1); regular harvesting and continual thinning which keep many plantation trees young and small; and the fact that our aerial images are from 2008 while plantation trees have grown until 2014 with a few new NFI plots initiated after 2008. The bias in savannas and shrublands can be explained by the following factors: the presence of multistemed trees with large crowns such as Acacia spp. and Ficus spp. among others; the fact that a crown-based method overestimates C stocks of shrubs with a small height; and presence of shrub trees with both small height and small (multiple) stems. If tree-level based carbon stock assessments derived from crown diameter as presented here should become standard to complement national inventories, a database with sufficient samples to evaluate for systematic errors needs to be established for each biome and inventory and satellite/aerial image-based methods need to be further harmonized.To further quantify the error propagation of the CD to DBH conversion for our application, we established four equations each randomly using 50% of the dataset and predicted the carbon stock for each tree in Rwanda with each equation. We did this separately for natural forests and trees outside natural forests. We calculated the rRMSE between the aggregated carbon stocks for each hectare. We averaged the rRMSE for each land cover class and show that the uncertainty for all classes does not exceed 5% (Extended Data Table 2a).Evaluation and uncertainties of tree crown mappingWe created an independent test dataset, which was never seen during training and was also not used to optimize hyperparameters. The test set consists of 6,591 manually labelled trees located in 15 random 1 ha plots (Extended Data Fig. 5). Thanks to the size of the country, the plots represent all rainfall zones and three major landscapes of the country. The plot-level comparison yielded very high correlations between the predictions and the labels and is shown in Extended Data Fig. 5. We also calculated a confusion matrix showing an overall per pixel accuracy of 96.2%, a true positive rate of 79.6% and a false positive rate of 6.8% (Extended Data Table 2b). Trees outside natural forests are easy to spot and count for the human eye, so we have confidence in the plot-based evaluation. However, it is often challenging in natural forests. Here, we used again the field measurements from 15 plots with 6,161 trees40,41. We find that we underestimate the total tree count by 22.6%, which may, at least partly, be explained by understory trees hidden by overstory trees and which are, therefore, not visible in our images. New field campaigns are needed to better understand and calibrate our results and possibly correct for systematic bias.Application and evaluation beyond RwandaWe acquired 83 Skysat scenes at 80 cm for Tanzania, Burundi, Uganda, Rwanda and Kenya. The model trained on the 25 cm resolution aerial images of Rwanda from 2008 was directly applied on the Skysat images. Forest and non-forest areas were manually delineated to decide which allometric equation to use for the carbon stock conversion. We randomly selected 150 1 × 1 km2 patches and aggregated the predicted carbon density per patch and compared the results with previously published maps42,43,44,45. Results show that the model can directly be applied to comparable landscapes on different datasets. Note, however, that accurate carbon stock predictions need local adjustments with field data. We then tested the tree crown model transferability on aerial images from California (NAIP; 60 cm) and France (20 cm) and found that the model delivers realistic results without any local training or calibration (Extended Data Figure 8).Reporting summaryFurther information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.Study siteThe laboratory experiments on regeneration and wash resistance were conducted at the KCMUCo-PAMVERC Insecticide Testing Facility; while experimental hut study was carried out at Harusini, the facility’s field site located at Mabogini village (S03˚22.764’ E03˚720.793’), adjacent to Lower Moshi rice irrigation scheme in north-eastern Tanzania. The dominant vector at this site is An. arabiensis with moderate level of resistance to pyrethroids conferred by both oxidase and esterase activities32. In this study, pyrethroid-resistant laboratory reared An. gambiae Muleba-Kis mosquitoes were released into the huts for the release-recapture experiment.Test systemsNon-blood fed, 2–5 day old females of susceptible An. gambiae s.s. Kisumu strain and pyrethroid resistant An. gambiae s.s Muleba-Kis strain were used for the evaluation of efficacy in the laboratory (phase I). The Muleba-Kis strain has been colonized for more than 8 years and it is resistant to permethrin with fixed L1014S kdr frequency and metabolic resistance through increased oxidase activity has also been reported21. Only An. gambiae s.s Muleba-Kis were used in release-recapture experiments. The Kisumu strain is fully susceptible to insecticides and free of any detectable insecticide resistance mechanisms. The strain originated from Kisumu, Kenya and has been colonized for many years in laboratory. At the KCMUCo-PAMVERC Moshi insectary, the adult Kisumu strain mosquitoes are reared at a temperature of 24–27 °C, 75 ± 10% relative humidity (RH) and maintained under a dark:light regime of 12:12 h. The Muleba-Kis mosquitoes used for the release-recapture experiments were reared in the field insectary under ambient temperature and relative humidity and treated as previously explained21. The susceptibility status of these colonies is checked every three months using WHO susceptibility test33 and, CDC bottle bioassay test34. The colonies are regularly genotyped for kdr mutations using TaqMan assays35. To maintain the resistance of Muleba-Kis, larvae are frequently selected with alpha-cypermethrin.Regeneration timeTo determine the regeneration time of the insecticide-treated blankets, blankets were cut into 25 × 25 cm pieces and tested before washing and then washed and dried three times consecutively following WHO recommended procedures for LLINs36. The pieces were then re-tested after one, two, three, six and seven days post-washing using WHO cylinders against susceptible An. gambiae s.s (Kisumu).Graphs for 24-h mortality and 60 min knock down (KD) correlating to insecticide bioavailability, as measured by 3 min exposure in cylinder bioassays, were established before and after washing blanket pieces three times consecutively in a day, and tested within a maximum of seven days post-washing. The time in days required to reach initial mortality or 60 min KD plateau is the period required for full regeneration of insecticide-treated blanket.Wash resistanceWHO cylinder bioassays36 were used to assess the wash resistance for the blanket pieces washed 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 times at the intervals equivalent to the regeneration time. Four pieces cut from 4 permethrin and 4 untreated blankets were used as positive and negative control respectively, against 4 pieces cut from 4 PBO–permethrin blankets.Bioassay proceduresFive, non-blood fed, 2–5 day old An. gambiae Kisumu or An. gambiae Muleba-Kis mosquitoes were exposed for 3 min or 30 min to blanket pieces in WHO cylinder. Bioassays were carried out at 27 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 10% RH. Knock-down was scored after 60 min post-exposure and mortality after 24 h. Fifty mosquitoes (5 mosquitoes per cylinder) were used on each 25 × 25 cm piece of blanket sample. After exposure, the mosquitoes were held for 24 h with access to 10% glucose solution in the paper cups covered with a net material. Mosquitoes exposed to untreated blanket were referred as a negative control.WHO tunnel test methodBlanket pieces which recorded ≤ 80% mortality in cylinder bioassay were tested in the tunnel assay using WHO guidelines. The tunnel was made of an acrylic square cylinder (25 cm in height, 25 cm in width, and 60 cm in length) divided into two sections using a blanket-covered frame fitted into a slot across the tunnel. During the assays a guinea pig was held in a small wooden cage (as a bait) in one of the sections and 50, non-blood fed, female An. gambiae Kisumu or An. gambiae Muleba-Kis aged 5–8 days were released in the other section at dusk and left overnight (13 h) for experimentation at 27 ± 2 °C and 75 ± 10% RH. The blanket surface was deliberately holed (nine 1-cm holes) to allow mosquitoes to contact the blanket material and penetrate to the baited chamber. Treated blankets were tested concurrently together with an untreated blanket. Scoring for the numbers of mosquitoes found alive or dead, fed or unfed, in each section were done in the morning. Mosquitoes found alive were removed and held in paper cups with labels corresponding to each tunnel sections under controlled conditions (25–27 °C and 75–85% RH) and fed on 10% glucose solution to monitor for delayed mortality post exposurely. Outcomes recorded were: mosquito penetration, blood feeding and mortality.Washing of blankets and whole nets for hut trialBlankets and whole nets were separately washed following WHOPES guidelines. In brief, each blanket/net was washed in Savon de Marseilles soap solution (2 g/L) for 10 min: 3 min stirring, 4 min soaking, then another 3 min stirring. This was followed by 2 rinse cycles of the same duration with water only. The water pH was 6 for all washes. The mean water hardness was within the WHOPES limit of ≤ 89 ppm. All nets used in the experimental hut study were cut with holes (4 cm × 4 cm) to simulate the conditions of a torn net. While nets were washed 20 times as per guidelines, blankets were only washed 10 times. To simulate a situation in emergence situations where washing is less frequent due to water scarcity30,31.Experimental hut trial:experimental hut designExperimental hut study was done in Lower Moshi using typical East African experimental huts design as described in the WHOPES35. Huts were constructed with brick walls and featured with cement plaster on the inside and a ceiling board, a metal iron sheet roof, open eaves with window and veranda traps on each side and window traps. Slight modifications from the original structure were made by installing metal eave baffles on two sides. The baffles allow mosquito entry but prevent exits. The window traps were used to collect mosquitoes that tend to exit the huts.Test item labelling, washing and perforatingBoth blankets and LLINs for the trial were distinctively labelled with fabric labels that withstand washes. For wash resistance, the blankets and nets were separately washed according to a protocol adapted from the standard WHO washing procedure36 at the interval equivalent to the regeneration time established in the laboratory for blanket and LLIN respectively. Before testing in the experimental huts, all nets were deliberately holed i.e. 30 holes measuring 4 × 4 cm were made in each net, 9 holes in each of the long side panels, and 6 holes at each short side (head- and foot-side panels) to enhance blood-feeding on the control arm.Test items packagingEach blanket and net were sealed in a plastic bag and then packed in the large plastic container. Each container was labelled for a single treatment to avoid cross contamination between test items.Experimental hut decontaminationA cone assay with 10 susceptible mosquitoes was performed on one wall per hut to rule out any contamination of the wall surface. Only huts with 24 h mortality of susceptible mosquitoes  More

La Sorte, F. A., Johnston, A. & Ault, T. R. Global trends in the frequency and duration of temperature extremes. Clim. Change 166, 1–2 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lo, K. & Medina-Elizade, M. Global temperature change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103(39), 14288–14293 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Borchert, R., Robertson, K., Schwartz, M. D. & Williams-Linera, G. Phenology of temperate trees in tropical climates. Int. J. Biometeorol. 50, 57–65 (2005).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Misra, G., Sarah, A. & Menzel, A. Ground and satellite phenology in alpine forests are becoming more heterogeneous across higher elevations with warming. Agric. For. Meteorol. 303, 108383 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zuo, Z., Xiao, D. & Qiong, H. Role of the warming trend in global land surface air temperature variations. Sci. China Earth Sci. 6, 866–871 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ling, Y. et al. Assessing the accuracy of forest phenological extraction from sentinel-1 C-band backscatter measurements in deciduous and coniferous forests. Remote Sens. 14(3), 674 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, H., Yuan, W., Liu, S., Dong, W. & Fu, Y. Sensitivity of flowering phenology to changing temperature in China. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120(8), 1658–1665 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cho, J. G. et al. Apple phenology occurs earlier across South Korea with higher temperatures and increased precipitation. Int. J. Biometeorol. 65, 265–276 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, C. et al. Response of vegetation phenology to the interaction of temperature and precipitation changes in Qilian mountains. Remote Sens. 14(5), 1248 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Berra, E. F. & Gaulton, R. Remote sensing of temperate and boreal forest phenology: A review of progress, challenges and opportunities in the intercomparison of in-situ and satellite phenological metrics. For. Ecol. Manage. 480, 118663 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. & Li, M. A new method for monitoring start of season (SOS) of forest based on multisource remote sensing. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 104, 102556 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sens. Environ. 84(3), 471–475 (2003).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Thapa, S., Garcia Millan, V. E. & Eklundh, L. Assessing forest phenology: A multi-scale comparison of near-surface (UAV, spectral reflectance sensor, PhenoCam) and Satellite (MODIS, Sentinel-2) remote sensing. Remote Sens. 13, 1597 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bórnez, K., Descals, A., Verger, A. & Peñuelas, J. Land surface phenology from VEGETATION and PROBA-V data: Assessment over deciduous forests. Int. J. Appl. Earth Observ. Geoinf. 84, 101974 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Yu, L., Yan, Z. & Zhang, S. Forest phenology shifts in response to climate change over China–Mongolia–Russia international economic corridor. Forests 11, 757 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lara, C. et al. Climatic regulation of vegetation phenology in protected areas along Western South America. Remote Sens. 13, 2590 (2021).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Silveira, E. M. O. et al. Forest phenoclusters for Argentina based on vegetation phenology and climate. Ecol. Appl. 32, 2526 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tatalovich, Z., Wilson, J. P. & Cockburn, M. A comparison of thiessen polygon, kriging, and spline models of potential UV exposure. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 33, 217–231 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choubin, B. et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics assessment of snow cover to infer snowline elevation mobility in the mountainous regions. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 167, 102870 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rojas, R., Flexas, J. & Coopman, R. E. Particularities of the highest elevation treeline in the world: Polylepis tarapacana Phil. as a model to study ecophysiological adaptations to extreme environments. Flora 292, 152076 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Du, J. et al. Interacting effects of temperature and precipitation on climatic sensitivity of spring vegetation green-up in arid mountains of China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 269–270, 71–77 (2019).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Du, J. et al. Daily minimum temperature and precipitation control on spring phenology in arid-mountain ecosystems in China. Int. J. Climatol. 40, 2568–2579 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, Z. et al. Impacts of recent climate extremes on spring phenology in arid-mountain ecosystems in China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 260–261, 31–40 (2018).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
He, Z. et al. Assessing temperature sensitivity of subalpine shrub phenology in semi-arid mountain regions of China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 213, 42–52 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Mu, C., Lu, H., Wang, B., Bao, X. & Cui, W. Short-term effects of harvesting on carbon storage of boreal Larix gmelinii–Carex schmidtii forested wetlands in Daxing’anling, northeast China. For. Ecol. Manage. 293, 140–148 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hu, T. et al. Effects of fire on soil respiration and its components in a Dahurian larch (Larix gmelinii) forest in northeast China: Implications for forest ecosystem carbon cycling. Geoderma 402, 115273 (2021).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nyikadzino, B., Chitakira, M. & Muchuru, S. Rainfall and runoff trend analysis in the Limpopo river basin using the Mann Kendall statistic. Phys. Chem. Earth 117, 102870 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gocic, M. & Trajkovic, S. Analysis of changes in meteorological variables using Mann-Kendall and Sen’s slope estimator statistical tests in Serbia. Glob. Planet. Change 100, 172–182 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Fang, Y. et al. Changing contribution rate of heavy rainfall to the rainy season precipitation in Northeast China and its possible causes. Atmos. Res. 197, 437–445 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Changes in satellite-derived vegetation growth trend in temperate and boreal Eurasia from 1982 to 2006. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 3228–3239 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ahas, R., Aasa, A., Menzel, A., Fedotova, V. G. & Scheifinger, H. Changes in European spring phenology. Int. J. Climatol. 22, 1727–1738 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liang, L., Henebry, G. M., Liu, L., Zhang, X. & Hsu, L. C. Trends in land surface phenology across the conterminous United States (1982–2016) analyzed by NEON domains. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02323 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Decreasing control of precipitation on grassland spring phenology in temperate China. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 30, 490–499 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Aze, T. Unraveling ecological signals from a global warming event of the past. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2201495119 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Menzel, A., Estrella, N. & Testka, A. Temperature response rates from long-term phenological records. Climate Res. 30, 21–28 (2005).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, H., Liu, D., Lin, H., Montenegro, A. & Zhu, X. NDVI and vegetation phenology dynamics under the influence of sunshine duration on the Tibetan plateau. Int. J. Climatol. 35, 687–698 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lesica, P. & Kittelson, P. M. Precipitation and temperature are associated with advanced flowering phenology in a semi-arid grassland. J. Arid Environ. 74, 1013–1017 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Shen, M., Piao, S., Cong, N., Zhang, G. & Jassens, I. A. Precipitation impacts on vegetation spring phenology on the Tibetan Plateau. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3647–3656 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Li, Z. et al. Spatio-temporal responses of cropland phenophases to climate change in Northeast China. J. Geog. Sci. 22, 29–45 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Badeck, F. W. et al. Responses of spring phenolgy to climate change. New Phytol. 162, 295–309 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peng, H., Xia, H., Chen, H., Zhi, P. & Xu, Z. Spatial variation characteristics of vegetation phenology and its influencing factors in the subtropical monsoon climate region of southern China. PLoS ONE 16, e0250825 (2021).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. et al. NIRv and SIF better estimate phenology than NDVI and EVI: Effects of spring and autumn phenology on ecosystem production of planted forests. Agric. For. Meteorol. 315, 108819 (2022).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Yu, X., Zhuang, D., Hou, X. & Chen, H. Forest phenological patterns of Northeast China inferred from MODIS data. J. Geog. Sci. 15, 239–246 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. & Xu, L. Phenological responses of Ulmus pumila (Siberian Elm) to climate change in the temperate zone of China. Int. J. Biometeorol. 56, 695–706 (2012).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ma, X., Bai, H., He, Y. & Li, S. The vegetation RSP of Qinling Mountains based on the NDVI and the response of temperature to it. Appl. Mech. Mater. 700, 394–399 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Richard, E., Said, S., Hamann, J. L. & Gaillard, J. M. Daily, seasonal and annual variations in individual home range overlap of two sympatric spacies of deer. Can. J. Zool. 92, 853–859 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sorensen, A. A., Stenhouse, G. B., Bourbonnais, M. L. & Nelson, T. A. Effects of habitat quality and anthropogenic disturbance on grizzly bear (Ursus arctos horribilis) home-range fidelity. Can. J. Zool. 93, 857–865 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Beest, F. M., Rivrud, I. M., Loe, L. E., Milner, J. M. & Mysterud, A. What determines variation in home range size across spatiotemporal scales in a large browsing herbivore?. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 771–785 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Naidoo, R., Du, P., Weaver, G. S. L. C., Jago, M. & Wegmann, M. Factors affecting intraspecific variation in home range size of a large African herbivore. Landsc. Ecol. 27, 1523–1534 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bose, S. et al. Implications of fidelity and philopatry for the population structure of female black-tailed deer. Behav. Ecol. 28, 983–990 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Northrup, J. M., Anderson, C. R. Jr. & Wittemyer, G. Environmental dynamics and anthropogenic development alter philopatry and space-use in a North American cervid. Divers. Distrib. 22, 547–557 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Passadore, C., Möller, L., Diaz-aguirre, F. & Parra, G. J. High site fidelity and restricted ranging patterns in southern Australian bottlenose dolphins. Ecol. Evol. 8, 242–256 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morales, J. M. et al. Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2289–2301 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shaw, A. K. Causes and consequences of individual variation in animal movement. Mov. Ecol. 8, 1–12 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morrison, T. A. et al. Drivers of site fidelity in ungulates. J. Anim. Ecol. 00, 1–12 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Abrahms, B. et al. Emerging perspectives on resource tracking and animal movement ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 308–320 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barraquand, F. & Benhamou, S. Animal movements in heterogeneous landscapes: Identifying profitable places and homogeneous movement bouts. Ecology 89, 3336–3348 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mueller, T. & Fagan, W. F. Search and navigation in dynamic environments: From individual behaviors to population distributions. Oikos 117, 654–664 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sawyer, H., Merkle, J. A., Middleton, A. D., Dwinnell, S. P. H. & Monteith, K. L. Migratory plasticity is not ubiquitous among large herbivores. J. Anim. Ecol. 88, 450–460 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Shakeri, Y. N., White, K. S. & Waite, J. N. Staying close to home: Ecological constraints on space use and range fidelity in a mountain ungulate. Ecol. Evol. 11, 11051–11064 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Damuth, J. Home range, home range overlap, and species energy use among herbivorous mammals. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 15, 185–193 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lindstedt, S. L., Miller, B. J. & Buskirk, S. W. Home range, time, and body size in mammals. Ecol. Soc. Am. 67, 413–418 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Ofstad, E. G., Herfindal, I., Solberg, E. J. & Sæther, B. E. Home ranges, habitat and body mass: Simple correlates of home range size in ungulates. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 283, 20161234 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gehr, B. et al. Stay home, stay safe—Site familiarity reduces predation risk in a large herbivore in two contrasting study sites. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 1329–1339 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sach, F., Dierenfeld, E. S., Langley-Evans, S. C., Watts, M. J. & Yon, L. African savanna elephants (Loxodonta africana) as an example of a herbivore making movement choices based on nutritional needs. PeerJ 7, 1–27 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pretorius, Y. et al. Diet selection of African elephant over time shows changing optimization currency. Oikos 121, 2110–2120 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chamaillé-Jammes, S., Valeix, M. & Fritz, H. Managing heterogeneity in elephant distribution: Interactions between elephant population density and surface-water availability. J. Appl. Ecol. 44, 625–633 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Purdon, A. & van Aarde, R. J. Water provisioning in Kruger National Park alters elephant spatial utilisation patterns. J. Arid Environ. 141, 45–51 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Shannon, G., Matthews, W. S., Page, B. R., Parker, G. E. & Smith, R. J. The affects of artificial water availability on large herbivore ranging patterns in savanna habitats: A new approach based on modelling elephant path distributions. Divers. Distrib. 15, 776–783 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kos, M. et al. Seasonal diet changes in elephant and impala in mopane woodland. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 58, 279–287 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shannon, G., Mackey, R. L. & Slotow, R. Diet selection and seasonal dietary switch of a large sexually dimorphic herbivore. Acta Oecologica 46, 48–55 (2013).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Loarie, S. R., van Aarde, R. J. & Pimm, S. L. Elephant seasonal vegetation preferences across dry and wet savannas. Biol. Conserv. 142, 3099–3107 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scogings, P. F. et al. Seasonal variations in nutrients and secondary metabolites in semi-arid savannas depend on year and species. J. Arid Environ. 114, 54–61 (2015).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Birkett, P. J., Vanak, A. T., Muggeo, V. M. R., Ferreira, S. M. & Slotow, R. Animal perception of seasonal thresholds: Changes in elephant movement in relation to rainfall patterns. PLoS ONE 7, 1–8 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cushman, S. A., Chase, M. & Griffin, C. Elephants in space and time. Oikos 109, 331–341 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bohrer, G., Beck, P. S., Ngene, S. M., Skidmore, A. K. & Douglas-Hamilton, I. Elephant movement closely tracks precipitation-driven vegetation dynamics in a Kenyan forest-savanna landscape. Mov. Ecol. 2, 1–12 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Purdon, A., Mole, M. A., Chase, M. J. & van Aarde, R. J. Partial migration in savanna elephant populations distributed across southern Africa. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–11 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shannon, G., Page, B. R., Duffy, K. J. & Slotow, R. The ranging behaviour of a large sexually dimorphic herbivore in response to seasonal and annual environmental variation. Austral Ecol. 35, 731–742 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tsalyuk, M., Kilian, W., Reineking, B. & Getz, W. M. Temporal variation in resource selection of African elephants follows long-term variability in resource availability. Ecol. Monogr. 89, 1–19 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thaker, M., Prins, H. H. T., Slotow, R., Vanak, A. T. & Gupte, P. R. Fine-scale tracking of ambient temperature and movement reveals shuttling behavior of elephants to water. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 1–12 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Govender, N., Trollope, W. S. W. & Van Wilgen, B. W. The effect of fire season, fire frequency, rainfall and management on fire intensity in savanna vegetation in South Africa. J. Appl. Ecol. 43, 748–758 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
MacFadyen, S., Hui, C., Verburg, P. H. & Van Teeffelen, A. J. A. Spatiotemporal distribution dynamics of elephants in response to density, rainfall, rivers and fire in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Divers. Distrib. 25, 880–894 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Edwards, M. A., Nagy, J. A. & Derocher, A. E. Low site fidelity and home range drift in a wide-ranging, large Arctic omnivore. Anim. Behav. 77, 23–28 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Switzer, P. Site fidelity in predictable and unpredictable habitats. Evol. Ecol. 7, 533–555 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kranstauber, B., Kays, R., Lapoint, S. D., Wikelski, M. & Safi, K. A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 738–746 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kranstauber, B., Smolla, M. & Safi, K. Similarity in spatial utilization distributions measured by the earth mover’s distance. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 155–160 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wartmann, F., Juarez, C. & Fernandez-duque, E. Size, site fidelity, and overlap of home ranges and core areas in the socially monogamous owl monkey (Aotus azarae) of Northern Argentina. Int. J. Primatol. 35, 919–939 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pringle, R. M. Elephants as agents of habitat creation for small vertebrates at the patch scale. Ecology 89, 26–33 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Valeix, M. et al. Elephant-induced structural changes in the vegetation and habitat selection by large herbivores in an African savanna. Biol. Conserv. 144, 902–912 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Coverdale, T. C. et al. Elephants in the understory: opposing direct and indirect effects of consumption and ecosystem engineering by megaherbivores. Ecology 97, 3219–3230 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gertenbach, W. Rainfall patterns in the Kruger National Park. Koedoe 23, 35–43 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venter, F. J., Scholes, R. J. & Eckhardt, H. C. The abiotic template and its associated vegetation pattern. In The Kruger Experience (eds du Toit, J. T. et al.) 83–129 (Island Press, 2003).
Google Scholar 
Young, K. D., Ferreira, S. M. & van Aarde, R. J. The influence of increasing population size and vegetation productivity on elephant distribution in the Kruger National Park. Austral Ecol. 34, 329–342 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ferreira, S. M., Greaver, C. & Simms, C. Elephant population growth in Kruger National Park, South Africa, under a landscape management approach. Koedoe 59, 1–6 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brownrigg, R. Package ‘Maps’: Draw Geographical Maps (2022).Kranstauber, B. & Smolla, M. Move: Visualizing and analyzing animal track data. R package version 2.1.0 (2013).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/ (2017).Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., Krone, S. M. & Lewis, J. S. Analyzing animal movement using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88, 2354–2363 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wato, Y. A. et al. Movement patterns of African elephants (Loxodonta africana) in a semi-arid savanna suggest that they have information on the location of dispersed water sources. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 1–8 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Polansky, L., Kilian, W. & Wittemyer, G. Elucidating the significance of spatial memory on movement decisions by African savannah elephants using state-space models. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 1–7 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Archibald, S. & Scholes, R. J. Leaf green-up in a semi-arid African savanna–separating tree and grass responses to environmental cues. J. Veg. Sci. 18, 583–594 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Majozi, N. P. et al. Analysing surface energy balance closure and partitioning over a semi-arid savanna FLUXNET site in Skukuza, Kruger National Park, South Africa. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 21, 3401–3415 (2017).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dodge, S. et al. The environmental-data automated track annotation (Env-DATA) system: Linking animal tracks with environmental data. Mov. Ecol. 1, 1–14 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Didan, K. MOD13Q1 MODIS/terra vegetation indices 16-day L3 global 250m SIN Grid V006. NASA EOSDIS Land Process. DAAC https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.006 (2015).Redfern, J. V., Grant, C. C., Gaylard, A. & Getz, W. M. Surface water availability and the management of herbivore distributions in an African savanna ecosystem. J. Arid Environ. 63, 406–424 (2005).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Young, K. D., Ferreira, S. M. & van Aarde, R. J. Elephant spatial use in wet and dry savannas of southern Africa. J. Zool. 278, 189–205 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldenberg, S. Z., Douglas-Hamilton, I. & Wittemyer, G. Inter-generational change in African elephant range use is associated with poaching risk, primary productivity and adult mortality. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 285, 1–8 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Woolley, L.-A. et al. Population and individual elephant response to a catastrophic fire in Pilanesberg National Park. PLoS ONE 3, 1–10 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Eby, S. L., Anderson, T. M., Mayemba, E. P. & Ritchie, M. E. The effect of fire on habitat selection of mammalian herbivores: The role of body size and vegetation characteristics. J. Anim. Ecol. 83, 1196–1205 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brooks, M. E. et al. glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9, 378–400 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodal Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Mazerolle, M. J. AICcmodavg: Model Selection and Multimodel Inference Based on (Q)AIC(c) (2020).van Moorter, B. et al. Memory keeps you at home: A mechanistic model for home range emergence. Oikos 118, 641–652 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guldemond, R. A. R., Purdon, A. & van Aarde, R. J. A systematic review of elephant impact across Africa. PLoS ONE 12, 1–12 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Abraham, J. O., Goldberg, E. R., Botha, J. & Staver, A. C. Heterogeneity in African savanna elephant distributions and their impacts on trees in Kruger National Park, South Africa. Ecol. Evol. 11, 5624–5634 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wall, J., Douglas-Hamilton, I. & Vollrath, F. Elephants avoid costly mountaineering. Curr. Biol. 16, 527–529 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Presotto, A., Fayrer-Hosken, R., Curry, C. & Madden, M. Spatial mapping shows that some African elephants use cognitive maps to navigate the core but not the periphery of their home ranges. Anim. Cogn. 22, 251–263 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Landman, M., Schoeman, D. S., Hall-Martin, A. J. & Kerley, G. I. H. Understanding long-term variations in an elephant piosphere effect to manage impacts. PLoS ONE 7, 1–11 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fahrig, L. et al. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 14, 101–112 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hamm, M. & Drossel, B. Habitat heterogeneity hypothesis and edge effects in model metacommunities. J. Theor. Biol. 426, 40–48 (2017).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Katayama, N. et al. Landscape heterogeneity-biodiversity relationship: Effect of range size. PLoS ONE 9, 1–8 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tews, J. et al. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 31, 79–92 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
O’Connor, T. G., Goodman, P. S. & Clegg, B. A functional hypothesis of the threat of local extirpation of woody plant species by elephant in Africa. Biol. Conserv. 136, 329–345 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Codron, J. et al. Elephant (Loxodonta africana) diets in Kruger National Park, South Africa: Spatial and landscape differences. J. Mammal. 87, 27–34 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mduma, S. A. R., Sinclair, A. R. E. & Hilborn, R. Food regulates the Serengeti wildebeest: A 40-year record. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 1101–1122 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ogutu, J. O. & Owen-Smith, N. ENSO, rainfall and temperature influences on extreme population declines among African savanna ungulates. Ecol. Lett. 6, 412–419 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Codron, J. et al. Landscape-scale feeding patterns of African elephant inferred from carbon isotope analysis of feces. Oecologia 165, 89–99 (2011).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Woolley, L.-A., Millspaugh, J. J., Woods, R. J., Page, B. R. & Slotow, R. Intraspecific strategic responses of African elephants to temporal variation in forage quality. J. Wildl. Manag. 73, 827–835 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dube, K. & Nhamo, G. Evidence and impact of climate change on South African national parks. Potential implications for tourism in the Kruger National Park. Environ. Dev. 33, 1–11 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tshipa, A. et al. Partial migration links local surface-water management to large-scale elephant conservation in the world’s largest transfrontier conservation area. Biol. Conserv. 215, 46–50 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nathan, R. et al. Big-data approaches lead to an increased understanding of the ecology of animal movement. Science (80-.) 375, 1–12 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kays, R., Crofoot, M. C., Jetz, W. & Wikelski, M. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet. Science (80-.) 348, 1222–1232 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mpakairi, K. S., Ndaimani, H., Tagwireyi, P., Zvidzai, M. & Madiri, T. H. Futuristic climate change scenario predicts a shrinking habitat for the African elephant (Loxodonta africana): Evidence from Hwange National Park, Zimbabwe. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 66, 1–10 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Staver, A. C., Wigley-Coetsee, C. & Botha, J. Grazer movements exacerbate grass declines during drought in an African savanna. J. Ecol. 107, 1482–1491 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Asner, G. P., Vaughn, N., Smit, I. P. J. & Levick, S. Ecosystem-scale effects of megafauna in African savannas. Ecography (Cop.) 39, 240–252 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shannon, G. et al. Relative impacts of elephant and fire on large trees in a savanna ecosystem. Ecosystems 14, 1372–1381 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mole, M. A., DÁraujo, S. R., van Aarde, R. J., Mitchell, D. & Fuller, A. Coping with heat: Behavioural and physiological responses of savanna elephants in their natural habitat. Conserv. Physiol. 4, 1–11 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ncongwane, K. P., Botai, J. O., Sivakumar, V., Botai, C. M. & Adeola, A. M. Characteristics and long-term trends of heat stress for South Africa. Sustainability 13, 1–20 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lagendijk, G., Mackey, R. L., Page, B. R. & Slotow, R. The effects of herbivory by a mega- and mesoherbivore on tree recruitment in sand forest, South Africa. PLoS ONE 6, 1–9 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wells, H. B. M. et al. Experimental evidence that effects of megaherbivores on mesoherbivore space use are influenced by species’ traits. J. Anim. Ecol. 90, 2510–2522 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thaker, M. et al. Minimizing predation risk in a landscape of multiple predators: Effects on the spatial distribution of African ungulates. Ecology 92, 398–407 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fležar, U. et al. Simulated elephant-induced habitat changes can create dynamic landscapes of fear. Biol. Conserv. 237, 267–279 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brennan, A. et al. Characterizing multispecies connectivity across a transfrontier conservation landscape. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 1700–1710 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roever, C. L., van Aarde, R. J. & Leggett, K. Functional connectivity within conservation networks: Delineating corridors for African elephants. Biol. Conserv. 157, 128–135 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Green, S. E., Davidson, Z., Kaaria, T. & Doncaster, C. P. Do wildlife corridors link or extend habitat? Insights from elephant use of a Kenyan wildlife corridor. Afr. J. Ecol. 56, 860–871 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Jordan, D. S. A classification of fishes including families and genera as far as know. Stanford University Publications. Bio. Sci. 3, 79–243. https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.161386 (1923).Article 

Google Scholar 
Akihito, et al. Evolutionary aspects of gobioid fishes based on an analysis of mitochondrial cytochrome b genes. Gene 259, 5–15 (2000).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, H.-Y., Tsai, M.-P., Dean, J. & Lee, S.-C. Molecular phylogeny of gobioid Wshes (Perciformes: Gobioidei) based on mitochondrial 12S rRNA sequences. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 20, 390–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.05.004 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nelson, J. S., Grande, T. C. & Wilson, M. V. Fishes of the World (Wiley, 2016).Book 

Google Scholar 
Fricke, R., Eschmeyer, W. N. & Van der Laan, R. Eschmeyer’s Catalog of fishes: Genera, Species, references. (http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp) (Accessed 15 June 2022).Guimarães-Costa, A. et al. Molecular evidence of two new species of Eleotris (Gobiiformes: Eleotridae) in the western Atlantic. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 98, 52–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.01.014 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thacker, C. E. & Hardman, M. A. Molecular phylogeny of basal gobioid fishes: Rhyacichthyidae, Odontobutidae, Xenisthmidae, Eleotridae (Teleostei: Perciformes: Gobioidei). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 37, 858–887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2005.05.004 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nordlie, F. G. Life-history characteristics of eleotrid fishes of the western hemisphere, and perils of life in a vanishing environment. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisher. 22(1), 189–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-011-9229-3 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berra, T. M. Freshwater Fish Distribution (Academic Press, 2001).
Google Scholar 
Graham, J. B. Air-Breathing Fishes: Evolution, Diversity, and Adaptation (Academic Press, 1997).Book 

Google Scholar 
Thacker, C. E. Phylogeny of Gobioidea and its placement within Acanthomorpha, with a new classification and investigation of diversification and character evolution. Copeia 1, 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-08-004 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chakrabarty, P., Davis, M. P. & Sparks, J. S. The first record of a trans-oceanic sister-group relationship between obligate vertebrate troglobites. PLoS One 7, e44083. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044083 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Agorreta, A. et al. Molecular phylogenetics of Gobioidei and phylogenetic placement of European gobies. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69, 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.017 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCraney, W. T., Thacker, C. E. & Alfaro, M. E. Supermatrix phylogeny resolves goby lineages and reveals unstable root of Gobiaria. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 151, 106862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106862 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karl, S. A. & Avise, J. C. Balancing selection at allozyme loci in oysters: Implications from nuclear RFLPs. Science 256, 100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1348870 (1992).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hey, J. & Machado, C. A. The study of structured populations—New hope for a difficult and divided science. Nat. Rev. Genet. 4, 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1112 (2003).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Castroviejo-Fisher, S., Guayasamin, J. M., Gonzalez-Voyer, A. & Vilà, C. Neotropical diversification seen through glassfrogs. J. Biogeogr. 41, 66–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12208 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dornburg, A., Townsend, J. P., Friedman, M. & Near, T. J. Phylogenetic informativeness reconciles ray-finned fish molecular divergence times. BMC Evol. Biol. 14, 169. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-014-0169-0 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hundt, P. J., Iglésias, S. P., Hoey, A. S. & Simons, A. M. A multilocus molecular phylogeny of combtooth blennies (Percomorpha: Blennioidei: Blenniidae): Multiple invasions of intertidal habitats. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 70, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2013.09.001 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olave, M., Avila, L. J., Sites, J. W. & Morando, M. Multilocus phylogeny of the widely distributed South American lizard clade Eulaemus (Liolaemini, Liolaemus). Zool. Scr. 43, 323–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12053 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meyer, B. S., Matschiner, M. & Salzburger, W. A tribal level phylogeny of Lake Tanganyika cichlid fishes based on a genomic multi-marker approach. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 83, 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.10.009 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jønsson, K. A. et al. A supermatrix phylogeny of corvoid passerine birds (Aves: Corvides). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 94, 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2015.08.020 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. & Durbin, R. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature 475(7357), 493–496. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10231 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Frantz, R. S. X-efficiency: Theory, Evidence and Applications Vol. 2 (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Bessa-Silva, A. et al. The roles of vicariance and dispersal in the differentiation of two species of the Rhinella marina species complex. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 145, 106723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106723 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Leutenegger, W. Maternal-fetal weight relationships in primates. Folia Primatol. 20(4), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1159/000155580 (1973).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yeh, J. The effect of miniaturized body size on skeletal morphology in frogs. Evolution 56(3), 628–641. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb01372.x (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Daza, J. D. et al. An enigmatic miniaturized and attenuate whole lizard from the Mid-Cretaceous amber of Myanmar. Breviora 563(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3099/MCZ49.1 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hanken, J. & Wake, D. B. Miniaturization of body size: Organismal consequences and evolutionary significance. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 24(1), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.24.110193.002441 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Britz, R. & Conway, K. W. Osteology of Paedocypris, a miniature and highly developmentally truncated fish (Teleostei: Ostariophysi: Cyprinidae). J. Morphol. 270(4), 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10698 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Britz, R., Conway, K. W. & Ruber, L. Spectacular morphological novelty in a miniature cyprinid fish, Danionella dracula n. sp.. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 276(1665), 2179–2186. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.0141 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Weitzman, S. H. & Vari, R. P. Miniaturization in South American freshwater fishes; an overview and discussion. Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 101(2), 444–465 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Toledo-Piza, M., Mattox, G. M. & Britz, R. Priocharax nanus, a new miniature characid from the rio Negro, Amazon basin (Ostariophysi: Characiformes), with an updated list of miniature Neotropical freshwater fishes. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 12(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0224-20130171 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caires, R. A. & Figueiredo, J. L. Review of the genus Microphilypnus Myers, 1927 (Teleostei: Gobioidei: Eleotridae) from the lower Amazon basin, with description of one new species. Zootaxa 3036, 39–57. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3036.1.3 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Caires, R. A. Microphilypnus tapajosensis, a new species of eleotridid from the Tapajós basin, Brazil (Gobioidei: Eleotrididae). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshw. 23, 155–160 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Caires, R. A. & Guimarães-Costa, A. Family Eleotridae. In Field Guide to Amazonian Fishes (eds van Sleen, P. & Albert, J.) 388–391 (Princeton University Press, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Caires, R. A. & Toledo-Piza, M. A New species of miniature fish of the genus Microphilypnus (Gobioidei: Eleotridae) from the upper Rio Negro Basin, Amazonas Brazil. Copeia 106(1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1643/CI-17-634 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roberts, T.R. Leptophilypnion, a new genus with two new species of tiny central Amazonian gobioid fishes (Teleostei, Eleotridae). Aqua (2013).Gould, R. E. & Delevoryas, T. The biology of Glossopteris: Evidence from petrified seed-bearing and pollen-bearing organs. Alcheringa 1(4), 387–399 (1977).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rüber, L., Kottelat, M., Tan, H. H., Ng, P. K. & Britz, R. Evolution of miniaturization and the phylogenetic position of Paedocypris, comprising the world’s smallest vertebrate. BMC Evol. Biol. 7(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-38 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Britz, R., Conway, K. W. & Rüber, L. Miniatures, morphology and molecules: Paedocypris and its phylogenetic position (Teleostei, Cypriniformes). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 172(3), 556–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12184 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bloom, D. D., Kolmann, M., Foster, K. & Watrous, H. Mode of miniaturisation influences body shape evolution in New World anchovies (Engraulidae). J. Fish Biol. 96(1), 194–201 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thacker, C. E. Molecular phylogeny of the gobioid fishes (Teleostei: Perciformes: Gobioidei). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26, 354–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00361-5 (2003).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Birdsong, R. S., Murdy, E. O. & Pezold, F. L. A study of the vertebral column and median fin osteology in gobioid fishes with comments on gobioid relationships. Bull. Mar. Sci. 42(2), 174–214 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Thacker, C. E. Patterns of divergence in fish species separated by the Isthmus of Panama. BMC Evol. Biol. 17(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0957-4 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Galván-Quesada, S. et al. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the amphidromous fish genus Dormitator Gill 1861 (Teleostei: Eleotridae). PLoS One 11(4), e0153538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153538 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lessios, H. A. The great American schism: Divergence of marine organisms after therise of the central American isthmus. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2008(39), 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095815 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lovejoy, N. R., Albert, J. S. & Crampton, W. G. Miocene marine incursions and marine/freshwater transitions: Evidence from Neotropical fishes. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 21, 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2005.07.009 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cooke, G. M., Chao, N. L. & Beheregaray, L. B. Marine incursions, cryptic species and ecological diversification in Amazonia: The biogeographic history of the croaker genus Plagioscion (Sciaenidae). J. Biogeogr. 39, 724–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02635.x (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bloom, D. D. & Lovejoy, N. R. On the origins of marine-derived freshwater fishes in South America. J. Biogeogr. 44(9), 1927–1938. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12954 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Monsch, K. A. Miocene fish faunas from the northwestern Amazonia basin (Colombia, Peru, Brazil) with evidence of marine incursions. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 143, 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(98)00064-9 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoorn, C. Marine incursions and the influence of Andean tectonics on the Miocene depositional history of northwestern Amazonia: Results of a palynostratigraphic study. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 105, 267–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-0182(93)90087-Y (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoorn, C., Guerrero, J., Sarmiento, G. A. & Lorente, M. A. Andean tectonics as a cause for changing drainage patterns in Miocene northern South America. Geology 23, 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023%3C0237:ATAACF%3E2.3.CO;2 (1995).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gingras, M. K., Rasanen, M. E., Pemberton, S. G. & Romero, L. P. Ichnology and sedimentology reveal depositional characteristics of bay-margin parasequences in the Miocene Amazonian foreland basin. J. Sediment. Res. 72, 871–883. https://doi.org/10.1306/052002720871 (2002).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wesselingh, F. P. et al. Lake Pebas: A palaeoecological reconstruction of a Miocene, long-lived lake complex in western Amazonia. Cainoz. Res. 1, 35–81 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Bloom, D. D. & Lovejoy, N. R. Molecular phylogenetics reveals a pattern of biome conservatism in New World anchovies (family Engraulidae). J. Evol. Biol. 25(4), 701–715 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ward, A. B. & Azizi, E. Convergent evolution of the head retraction escape response in elongate fishes and amphibians. Zoology 107(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zool.2004.04.003 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Palumbi, S. R. & Benzie, J. Large mitochondrial DNA differences between morphologically similar penaeid shrimp. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1, 27–34 (1991).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, W. J., Bonillo, C. & Lecointre, G. Repeatability of clades as criterion of reliability: A case study for molecular phylogeny of Acanthomorpha (Teleostei) with larger number of taxa. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 26, 262–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2008.07.016 (2003).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, W. J., Miya, M., Saitoh, K. & Mayden, R. L. Phylogenetic utility of two existing and four novel nuclear gene loci in reconstructing Tree of Life of ray-finned fishes: The order Cypriniformes (Ostariophysi) as a case study. Gene 423, 125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2008.07.016 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S. & Coulson, A. R. DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. PNAS 74(12), 5463–5467. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 (1977).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32(5), 1792–1797. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vaidya, G., Lohman, D. J. & Meier, R. SequenceMatrix: Concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics 27, 171–180 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lanfear, R., Frandsen, P. B., Wright, A. M., Senfeld, T. & Calcott, B. PartitionFinder 2: New methods for selecting partitioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Heled, J. & Drummond, A. J. Bayesian inference of population size history from multiple loci. BMC Evol. Biol. 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-289 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bouckaert, R. et al. BEAST 2: A software platform for bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10(4), e1003537. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003537 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y., Phillips, M. J. & Rambaut, A. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biol. 4(5), e88. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67(5), 901. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Drummond, A. J. & Rambaut, A. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 214. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-214 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rambaut, A. FigTree, a graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees (Version 1.4.3) (2017).Betancur-R, R. et al. Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes. BMC Evol. Biol. 17(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-017-0958-3 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, G. Algorithmic improvements to species delimitation and phylogeny estimation under the multispecies coalescent. J. Math. Biol. 74, 447–467 (2017).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar  More