Ecology

Holland, D., Hatib, K. & Bar-Ya’akov, I. Pomegranate: Botany, horticulture and breeding. In Horticultural Reviews Vol. 35 (ed. Janick, J.) 127–191 (Wiley, 2009).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Fayek, M. A., Mohamed, A. E. & Rashedy, A. A. Responses of five pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) cultivars to contrasting water availability: Leaf morphophysiological and anatomical adaptation. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 20, 967–978 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Naeini, M. R., Khoshgoftarmanesh, A. H., Lessani, H. & Fallahi, E. Effects of sodium chloride-induced salinity on mineral nutrients and soluble sugars in three commercial cultivars of pomegranate. J. Plant Nutr. 27(8), 1319–1326 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sun, Y., Niu, G., Masabni, J. G. & Ganjegunte, G. Relative salt tolerance of 22 pomegranate (Punica granatum) cultivars. HortScience 53(10), 1513–1519 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lansky, E. P. & Newman, R. A. Review: Punica granatum (pomegranate) and its potential for prevention and treatment of inflammation and cancer. J. Ethnopharmacol. 109(2), 177–206 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Khedr, E. H. Application of different coating treatments to enhance storability and fruit quality of pomegranate (Punica granatum L., cv. Wonderful) during prolonged storage. Rev. Braz. Fruitc. 44(2), 1–13 (2022).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
FAO (Food and Agriculture organization). Extent and causes of salt-affected soils in participating countries. Global network on integrated soil management for sustainable use of salt-affected soils. FAO-AGL website. Available in https://xueshu.baidu.com/usercenter/paper/show?paperid=9e5044cfc974c52d785834bbd8438017 (2000).Mehanna, H. T., Fayed, T. A. & Rashedy, A. A. Response of two grape rootstocks to some salt tolerance treatments under saline water conditions. J. Hortic. Sci. Ornam. Plants 2(2), 93–106 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Rady, M. M., Elrys, A. S., Abo El-Maati, M. F. & Desoky, E. M. Interplaying roles of silicon and proline effectively improve salt and cadmium stress tolerance in Phaseolus vulgaris plant. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 139, 558–568 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
El-Khawaga, A. S., Zaeneldeen, E. M. A. & Yossef, M. A. Response of three pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) to salinity stress. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 1(1), 64–75 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Khaled, H. & Fawy, H. A. Effect of different levels of humic acids on the nutrient content, plant growth, and soil properties under conditions of salinity. Soil Water Res. 6(1), 21–29 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jahromi, A. A. & Khankahdani, H. H. Effect of humic acid on some vegetative traits and ion concentrations of Mexican Lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle) seedlings under salt stress. Int. J. Hortic. Sci. Technol. 3(2), 255–264 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hatami, E., Shokouhian, A. A., Ghanbari, A. R. & Naseri, L. A. Alleviating salt stress in almond rootstocks using of humic acid. Sci. Hortic. 237, 296–302 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shalaby, O. A. E. & El-Messairy, M. M. Humic acid and boron treatment to mitigate salt stress on the melon plant. Acta Agric. Slov. 111(2), 349–356 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kavi Kishor, P. B. et al. Regulation of proline biosynthesis, degradation, uptake and transport in higher plants: Its implications in plant growth and abiotic stress tolerance. Curr. Sci. 88(3), 424–438 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Mahmoudi, M. & Aryaee, P. Study the effects of fulvic acid on physiological traits of citrus unshu under salt stress. Int. J. Chem. Environ. Biol. Sci. 3(3), 198–200 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Kaya, C., AKram, N. A., Ashraf, M. & Sonmez, O. Exogenous application of humic acid mitigates salinity stress in maize (Zea mays L.) plants by improving some key physico-biochemical attributes. Curr. Sci. 46, 67–78 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hayat, S. et al. Role of proline under changing environments. Plant Signal. Behav. 7(11), 1456–1466 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meena, M. et al. Regulation of L-proline biosynthesis, signal transduction, transport, accumulation and its vital role in plants during variable environmental conditions. Heliyon 5, e02952 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Semida, W. M., Abdelkhalik, A., Rady, M. O. A., Marey, R. A. & Abd El-Mageed, T. A. Exogenously applied proline enhances growth and productivity of drought stressed onion by improving photosynthetic efficiency, water use efficiency and up-regulating osmoprotectants. Sci. Hortic. 272, 109580 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abo-ogiala, A. Crop production of pomegranate cv. wonderful via foliar application of ascorbic acid, proline and glycinbetaine under environmental stresses. Int. J. Environ. 7(3), 95–103 (2018).
Google Scholar 
El Moukhtari, A., Cabassa-Hourton, C., Farissi, M. & Savoure, A. How does proline treatment promote salt stress tolerance during crop plant development?. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1127 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Orlov, S. N., Aksentsev, S. L. & Kotelevtsev, S. V. Extracellular calcium is required for the maintenance of plasma membrane integrity in nucleated cells. Cell Calcium 38(1), 53–57 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wu, G. Q. & Wang, S. M. Calcium regulates K+/Na+ homeostasis in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under saline conditions. Plant Soil Environ. 58(3), 121–127 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, X., Zhang, X., Yu, L. & Xu, H. Calcium signaling in membrane repair. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 45, 24–31 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, P. et al. J. Na+/Ca2+ exchanger-like protein (AtNCL) involved in salt stress in Arabidopsis. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 44062–44070 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, P. H., Zhang, G. Y., Gonzales, N., Guo, Y. Q., Hu, H. H., Park, S. & Zhao, J.  Ca2+-regulated and diurnal rhythm-regulated Na+/Ca2+ exchanger AtNCL affects flowering time and auxin signalling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 377–392 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paiva, E. A. S. Are calcium oxalate crystals a dynamic calcium store in plants?. New Phytol. 223, 1707–1711 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. & Teare, I. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39, 205–207 (1973).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herbert, D., Phipps, P. J. & Strange, R. E. Chemical analysis of microbial cells. J. Microbiol. Methods 5, 209–344 (1971).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, G. S., Johnston, C. M. & Cornforth, I. S. Comparison of nutrient solutions for growth of plants in sand culture. New Phytol. 94(4), 537–548 (1983).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mastrogiannidou, E., Chatzissavvidis, C., Antonopoulou, C., Tsabardoukas, V., Giannakoula, A. & Therios, I. Response of pomegranate cv. wonderful plants to salinity. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 16(3), 621–636 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Temminghoff, E. E. J. M. & Houba, V. J. G. Plant Analysis Procedures. Second Edition Analysis 94–96 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2976-9.Book 

Google Scholar 
Jones, J. B. Jr. Kjeldahl Method for Nitrogen Determination (Micro-Macro Publishing, 1991).
Google Scholar 
Association of Official Analytical Chemists—A. O. A. C. Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of the Analytical Chemists 17th edn, 2200 (AOAC International, 2000).
Google Scholar 
Snedecor, W. & Cochran, W. G. Statistical Methods 8th edn, 503 (Iowa State University Press, 1989).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Ennab, H. A. Effect of humic acid on growth and productivity of egyptian lime trees (Citrus aurantifolia swingle) under salt stress conditions. J. Agric. Res. (Kafr El-Shaikh Univ.) 42(4), 494–505 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Genaidy, E. A. E., Merwad, M. A. & Haggag, L. F. Effect of algae, humic acid and waste organic material in culture media on growth performance of “Picual” olive seedlings. Int. J. Chemtech Res. 8(11), 43–50 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Fekry, W. M. E., Rashad, M. A. & Alalaf, A. H. Attempts to improve the growth and fruiting of barhi date palms under salinity stress. Asian J. Plant Sci. 19, 146–151 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abdelhamid, M. T., Rady, M. M., Osman, A. S. H. & Abdalla, M. A. Exogenous application of proline alleviates saltinduced oxidative stress in Phaseolus vulgaris L. plants. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 88(4), 439–446 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wani, A. S., Ahmad, A., Hayat, S. & Tahir, I. Epibrassinolide and proline alleviate the photosynthetic and yield inhibition under salt stress by acting on antioxidant system in mustard. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 135, 385–394 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben Mahmoud, O. M. et al. Auxin and proline producing rhizobacteria mitigate salt-induced growth inhibition of barley plants by enhancing water and nutrient status. S. Afr. J. Bot. 128, 209–217 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nakhaie, A., Habibi, G. & Vaziri, A. Exogenous proline enhances salt tolerance in acclimated Aloe vera by modulating photosystem II efficiency and antioxidant defense. S. Afr. J. Bot. 147, 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Hasanuzzaman, M. et al. Exogenous proline and glycine betaine mediated upregulation of antioxidant defense and glyoxalase systems provides better protection against salt-induced oxidative stress in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 1–17 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Shahid, M. A. et al. Exogenous proline and proline-enriched Lolium perenne leaf extract protects against phytotoxic effects of nickel and salinity in Pisum sativum by altering polyamine metabolism in leaves. Turk. J. Bot. 38, 914–926 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lima-Costa, M.E., Ferreira, S., Duarte, A. & Ferreira, A. L. Alleviation of salt stress using exogenous proline on a citrus cell line. Acta Hortic. 868, 109–112 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Alotaibi, S., Ali, E., Darwesh, H., Ahmed, A. & Al-Thubaiti, E. Effect of proline on growth and nutrient uptake of Simmondsia chinensis (link) schneider under salinity stress. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 22(9), 412–418 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
AlKahtani, M. D. F. et al. Evaluation of silicon and proline application on the oxidative machinery in drought-stressed sugar beet. Antioxidants 10(3), 398 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahmad, P. et al. Exogenous application of calcium to 24-epibrassinosteroid pretreated tomato seedlings mitigates NaCl toxicity by modifying ascorbate–glutathione cycle and secondary metabolites. Sci. Rep. 8, 13515 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jasim, A. M., Abbas, M. F. & Shareef, H. J. Calcium application mitigates salt stress in Date Palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) offshoots cultivars of Berhi and Sayer. Acta Agric. Slov. 107(1), 103–112 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, L., Lan, W., Jiang, Y., Fang, W. & Luan, S. Calcium-dependent protein kinase interacts with and activates a calcium channel to regulate pollen tube growth. Mol. Plant 7(2), 369–376 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zou, J. J. et al. Arabidopsis calcium-dependent protein kinse8 and catalase3 function in abscisic acid-mediated signaling and H2O2 homeostasis in stomatal guard cells under drought stress. Plant Cell 27(5), 1445–1460 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
El-Beltagi, H. S. & Mohamed, H. I. Alleviation of cadmium toxicity in Pisum sativum L. seedlings by calcium chloride. Not. Bot. Horti. Agrobot. Cluj Napoca 41, 157–168 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
White, P. J. Calcium channels in higher plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Biomembr. 1465(1–2), 171–189 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Salahshoor, F. & Kazemi, F. Effect of calcium on reducing salt stress in seed germination and early growth stage of Festuca ovina. Plant Soil Environ. 62, 460–467 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tzortzakis, N. G. Potassium and calcium enrichment alleviate salinity-induced stress in hydroponically grown endives. Sci. Rep. 8, 13515 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Cha-um, S., Singh, H. P., Samphumphuang, T. & Kirdmanee, C. Calcium-alleviated salt tolerance in indica rice (Oryza sativa L. spp. indica): Physiological and morphological changes. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 6(1), 176–182 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Murillo-Amador, B. et al. Influence of calcium silicate on growth, physiological parameters and mineral nutrition in two legume species under salt stress. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 193(6), 413–421 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zaman, B., Niazi, B.H., Athar, M. & Ahmad, M. Response of wheat plants to sodium and calcium ion interaction under saline environment. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2, 7–12 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Akladious, S. A. & Mohamed, H. I. Ameliorative effects of calcium nitrate and humic acid on the growth, yield component and biochemical attribute of pepper (Capsicum annuum) plants grown under salt stress. Sci. Hortic. 236, 244–250 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wójcik, P., Filipczak, J. & Wójcik, M. Effects of prebloom sprays of tryptophan and zinc on calcium nutrition, yielding and fruit quality of ‘Elstar’ apple trees. Sci. Hortic. 246, 212–216 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hagagg, L. F., Abd-Alhamid, N. & Maklad, M. F. Effect of kaolin and calcium carbonate on vegetative growth, leaf pigments and mineral content of kalamata and manzanillo olive trees. Middle East J. Agric. Res. 8(1), 298–310 (2019).
Google Scholar 
El-Hoseiny, H. M., Helaly, M. N., Elsheery, N. I. & Alam-Eldein, S. M. Quality of mango trees humic acid and boron to minimize the incidence of alternate bearing and improve the productivity and fruit quality of mango trees. HortScience 55, 1026–1037 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Masoud, A. A. B., Khodair, O. A. & Gouda, F. E. M. Effect of gibberellic acid, naphthalenacetic acid, calcium and zinc spraying on fruiting of manfalouty pomegranate trees. Assiut J. Agric. Sci. 50(2), 219–228 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Russo, R. O. & Berlyn, G. P. The use of organic biostimulants to help low input sustainable agriculture. J. Sustain. Agric. 1(2), 19–42 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, Y. & Aviad, T. Effects of humic substances on plant growth. In Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Science: Selected Readings (ed. Maccarthy, P.) 161–186 (CSSA and ASA, 1990).
Google Scholar 
El Sayed, O. M., El Gammal, O. H. M. & Salama, A. S. M. Effect of proline and tryptophan amino acids on yield and fruit quality of Manfalouty pomegranate variety. Sci. Hortic. 69, 1–5 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mattioli, R., Palombi, N., Funck, D. & Trovato, M. Proline accumulation in pollen grains as potential target for improved yield stability under salt stress. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 582877 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Badran, M. A. Benefits of calcium carbonate sprays on yield and fruit quality of samany and zaghloul date palm under new reclaimed soils. Assiut J. Agric. Sci. 46(5), 48–57 (2015).
Google Scholar  More

Site descriptionThe study site (about 1 ha) is within a coastal dune ecosystem (35° 32′ 26.0″ N, 134° 12′ 27.5″ E) located at the Arid Land Research Center of Tottori University, Tottori, Japan. The mean annual temperature is 15.2 °C, and the mean total precipitation is 1931 mm, based on records collected from 1991 to 2020 at the Tottori observation station of the Japan Meteorological Agency. Dominant plant species around the measurement plot were Vitex rotundifolia and Artemisia capillaris. Carex kobomugi and Ischaemum anthephoroides were also scattered around the coastal side of the study site, and planted Pinus thunbergii trees cover the inland side.Experimental designIn May 2020, we established four measurement plots at the study site (Fig. 9). Plot 1 was a gap area surrounded by V. rotundifolia seedlings. Plot 2 consisted of clusters of V. rotundifolia seedlings and was adjacent to plot 1. Within plots 1 and 2, C. kobomugi and I. anthephoroides were also scattered. Plot 3 was in a mixed area of V. rotundifolia and A. capillaris; this plot was in the center of the study site. Plot 4 was located in front of P. thunbergii trees and was in the most inland area of the study site. On 10 June 2020, we set an environmental measurement system at the center of the study site adjacent to plot 3, and we then obtained continuous data for soil temperature and soil moisture. In each plot (main plot), we set 10 plastic (polypropylene) collars (n = 10) before the start of the Rs measurement. We measured Rs every 2 weeks from 15 June to 2 December 2020 in the main plots. Vitex rotundifolia and C. kobomugi invaded a part of plot 1 in late June and early July, after the first Rs measurement on 15 June. Therefore, we set new measurement points for plot 1 in early July (Fig. 9), and flux calculations for plot 1 were conducted after removing data from the invaded area measured on June 15.Figure 9Diagram and photos of measurement plots in the focal coastal dune ecosystem. Vitex rotundifolia and C. kobomugi invaded a part of plot 1 in late June to early July, after the first Rs measurement on 15 June. Therefore, we set new measurement points for plot 1 in early July.Full size imageEnvironmental measurement systemThe environmental measurement system was composed of a data logger (CR1000, Campbell Scientific Inc., Logan, UT, USA), battery (SC dry battery, Kind Techno Structure Co. Ltd, Saitama, Japan), solar panel (RNG-50D-SS, RENOGY International Inc., Ontario, CA, USA), charge controller (Solar Amp mini, CSA-MN05-8, DENRYO, Tokyo, Japan), thermocouples (E type), and soil moisture sensors (CS616, Campbell Scientific Inc.). The data logger, battery, and charge controller were kept in a plastic box to avoid exposure to rainfall and sand. Each end of the thermocouple was inserted into a copper tube (4-mm inner diameter, 5-cm length) and affixed with glue. To measure the reference soil temperature at different depths, copper tubes enclosing E-type thermocouples were buried horizontally in the sand at depths of 5, 10, 30, and 50 cm (n = 1 for each depth) at the center of plot 3 as reference soil temperature (the data was recorded every 30 min). In addition, we set stand-alone soil temperature sensors (Thermochron SL type, KN Laboratories, Inc. Osaka, Japan) at the center of plots 1 and 4 at depths of 5, 10, and 30 cm (n = 1 for each plot, each depth), and they recorded soil temperature data every 30 min. Reference soil temperature at the depth of 5, 10, and 30 cm was used for gap-filling for soil temperature measured by stand-alone sensors at each depth and plot. Soil moisture sensors were buried horizontally in the sand at a depth of 30 cm in the center of plots 1, 3, and 4 (n = 1 for each plot) and recorded data every 30 min. Raw values of soil moisture sensors were converted to volumetric soil moisture (%) using a calibration line from 0 to 15% measured in the laboratory using dune sand and three sensors (CS616) referring to the procedure of Bongiovanni et al.53. Data for precipitation at the local meteorological observatory in Tottori was downloaded from the home page of the Japan Meteorological Agency (https://www.data.jma.go.jp/gmd/risk/obsdl/index.php).
R
s measurement in the main plotsPolypropylene collars (30-cm inner diameter, 5-cm depth, n = 10) were set in each measurement plot in late May 2020. The first Rs measurement was conducted on 15 June 2020. However, V. rotundifolia and C. kobomugi then invaded about half of the gap area of plot 1, so on 1 July we set 5 new polypropylene collars for plot 1 to replace the 5 invaded measurement points (Fig. 9). The second Rs measurement was conducted on 2 July, and all polypropylene collars then remained in the same position until the end of the measurement period.Rs was measured using an automated closed dynamic chamber system54 composed of two cylindrical aluminum chambers (30 cm diameter, 30 cm height) equipped with thermistor temperature sensors (44006, Omega Engineering, Stanford, CA, USA) for measuring air temperature inside the chamber during Rs measurement. Those chambers were connected to a control box equipped with a pump, data logger (CR1000, Campbell Scientific Inc.), CO2 analyzer (Gascard NG infrared gas sensor, Edinburgh Sensors, Lancashire, UK), and thermometer (MHP, Omega Engineering). The composition of the control box is basically the same as used in previous studies54,55. The measurement period for each point was 3 min, and the CO2 concentration and air temperature inside the chamber were recorded every 5 s. During the measurement, another chamber was set on the next polypropylene collar with the lid opened, and the next measurement was started at that moment of finishing the previous measurement by automatically closing the chamber lid on the next polypropylene collar in the same plot. Soil temperature at a depth of 0–5 cm was recorded simultaneously by inserting the rod of the thermometer vertically into the soil surface near the polypropylene collar (about 1–2 m from the collar).Rs was calculated by using the following equation:$$R_{{text{s}}} = frac{{PV}}{{RS(T_{{{text{air}}}} + 273.15)}}frac{{partial C}}{{partial t}},$$
(1)
where P is the air pressure (Pa), V is the effective chamber volume (m3), R is the ideal gas constant (8.314 Pa m3 K−1 mol−1), S is the soil surface area (m2), Tair is the air temperature inside the chamber (°C). ∂C/∂t is the rate of change of the CO2 mole fraction (μmol mol−1 s−1), which was calculated using least-squares regression of the CO2 changes inside the chamber12. For the flux calculation, we removed data for the first 35 s (dead band) of each measurement as an outlier.Trench treatment and soil CO2 efflux (F
c) measurement in subplotsIn November 2020, we conducted root-cut treatment (trench treatment) in subplots using polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubes to estimate the contribution of Ra to Rs in the soil layer above 50 cm in each plot (Ra_50/Rs). Small PVC collars (10.7 cm inner diameter, 5 cm depth, n = 10 for each plot), with the upper ends about 1–2 cm above the soil surface, were set in subplots adjacent to the main plots on 23 October 2020. Rs was measured in subplots using two cylindrical mini PVC chambers (11.8 cm inner diameter at the bottom, 30 cm height, equipped with the same thermistors as cylindrical aluminum chambers for air temperature measurement) connected to the same control box as used for Rs measurement in the main plots. The measurement period was 3 min, and the measurement procedure and the flux calculation were the same as the main plot. Rs was first measured in subplots on 3 November to examine the spatial variation of Rs before trench treatment. Using the data, we selected subplots to conduct trench treatment and control plots for comparison, while aiming to achieve a minimal difference in the average Rs between control and pre-trenched plots. On 4 November, we inserted PVC tubes (10.7 cm inner diameter, 50 cm length) into about half (n = 3–5) of the subplots (the same position as PVC collars were set on 23 October) by using a hammer and aluminum lid until the upper end of each PVC tube was 1–2 cm above the soil surface to exclude roots to a depth of about 50 cm. On 19 November, after 15 days of trench treatment, respiration was measured in the same subplots.The Ra_50/Rs was calculated as follows:$$R_{{{text{a}}_{5}0}} /R_{{text{s}}} = (F_{{{text{c}}_{text{control}}}} -F_{{{text{c}}_{text{trenched}}}}) /F_{{{text{c}}_{text{control}}}} ,$$
(2)
where Fc_trenched and Fc_control (= Rs) are the Fc values in trenched and control plots on 19 November, respectively.In late December 2020, all the belowground plant biomass (BPB) in subplots (control and trenched plots) to a depth of 50 cm was collected for biomass analysis, about 2 months after trench treatment. In the laboratory, all the collected plant materials were washed and oven-dried for 72 h at 70 °C, and then the dry weight of the BPB samples was measured.Biomass measurementWe conducted BPB analysis from 18 May to 8 June 2021 in each plot (n = 1). At that time, 100 cm × 100 cm sampling plots near the CO2 measurement plots (100 cm × 100 cm for plots 2–4 and 50 cm × 50 cm in plot 1 because of the narrow gap area) were dug to a depth of 100–220 cm, according to the root distribution in each plot, and all plant materials were collected by passing the soil through 5- to 7-mm sieves. Once we reached a depth where no roots were visible, no more digging was conducted. In plots 2 and 3, stolons of V. rotundifolia were difficult to distinguish from roots if underground. Therefore, we defined plant material as BPB if it was underground. In the laboratory, all of the collected plant materials were washed and air-dried at room temperature for 0–6 days depending on the biomass. After that, samples were oven-dried for 15–25 h at 70–80 °C, and the dry weight of those samples was then measured.Soil organic carbon and nitrogenOn 21 October 2020, soil pits were dug to a depth of 50 cm near each plot (n = 3), and soil core samples were collected. Cylindrical stainless core samplers (5 cm diameter, 5 cm height, 100 cc) were horizontally inserted into the soil pit at depths of 0–5, 5–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm. In the laboratory, soil core samples were weighed and oven-dried at 105 °C for 48 h, and the dry weight was measured. Oven-dried soil samples were sieved with a 2-mm-pore stainless wire mesh screen, and visible fungal mycelia in soil samples from plot 4 were removed as well as possible. Sieved samples were ground with an agate mortar. Samples (fine powder) were oven-dried for 24 h at 105 °C and weighed before SOC and nitrogen analysis. About 1.5 g of powdered samples were used for the analysis. Organic carbon content (combustion at 400 °C) and total nitrogen in samples were analyzed using a Soli TOC cube (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany) by the combustion method.Microbial abundanceOn 21 October 2020, soil samples for microbial analysis were collected at the same time as soil core sampling for SOC and nitrogen analysis. Soil samples were collected at depths of 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm using a stainless spatula and placed individually in a polyethylene bag. The bags were kept in a cooler box with ice in the field and then placed in a freezer (− 30 °C) in the laboratory soon after sampling.DNA was extracted from 0.5 g of the fresh soils using NucleoSpin Soil (Takara Bio, Inc., Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (SL1 buffer), and the extracts were stored at − 20 °C until further analysis. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA and fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene were targeted to investigate the microbial abundance. Bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA (V4 region) and fungal ITS were determined using the universal primer sets 515F/806R and ITS1F_KYO2/ITS2_KYO2, respectively56,57.For qPCR, samples were prepared with 10 μL of the KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), 0.8 μL of forward primer, 0.8 μL of reverse primer, and 3 μL of 1–50 × diluted soil DNA. Nuclease-free water was added to make up to a final volume of 20 μL. Cycling conditions of 16S rRNA were 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. Cycling conditions of ITS were 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 1 min, and 72 °C for 1 min. A melting curve analysis was performed in a final cycle of 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 1 min, and 95 °C for 15 s. High amplification efficiencies of 99% for bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes and 101% for the fungal ITS were obtained based on the standard curves.Data analysisTo examine the environmental response (soil temperature and soil moisture) of Rs, nonlinear and quadratic regression models were applied. We conducted F-tests by comparing the regression model to a constant model whose value is the mean of the observations (significance set at p  More

Beillouin, D., Ben-Ari, T., Malezieux, E., Seufert, V. & Makowski, D. Positive but variable effects of crop diversification on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 4697–4710 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ditzler, L. et al. Current research on the ecosystem service potential of legume inclusive cropping systems in Europe. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41, 26 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Snapp, S. S., Blackie, M. J., Gilbert, R. A., Bezner-Kerr, R. & Kanyama-Phiri, G. Y. Biodiversity can support a greener revolution in Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 20840–20845 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Renard, D. & Tilman, D. National food production stabilized by crop diversity. Nature 571, 257–260 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rodriguez, C., Mårtensson, L.-M. D., Jensen, E. S. & Carlsson, G. Combining crop diversification practices can benefit cereal production in temperate climates. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41, 48 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zeng, Z. H. et al. in Crop Rotations: Farming Practices, Monitoring and Environmental Benefits (ed. Ma, B. L.) Ch. 1, 51–70 (Nova Science Publishers, 2016).Cusworth, G., Garnett, T. & Lorimer, J. Legume dreams: the contested futures of sustainable plant-based food systems in Europe. Glob. Environ. Change 69, 102321 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reckling, M. et al. Grain legume yields are as stable as other spring crops in long-term experiments across northern Europe. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38, 63 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Snapp, S. S., Cox, C. M. & Peter, B. G. Multipurpose legumes for smallholders in sub-Saharan Africa: identification of promising ‘scale out’ options. Glob. Food Secur-Agr. 23, 22–32 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hegewald, H., Wensch-Dorendorf, M., Sieling, K. & Christen, O. Impacts of break crops and crop rotations on oilseed rape productivity: a review. Eur. J. Agron. 101, 63–77 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Angus, J. F. et al. Break crops and rotations for wheat. Crop . Sci. 66, 523–552 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Franke, A. C., van den Brand, G. J., Vanlauwe, B. & Giller, K. E. Sustainable intensification through rotations with grain legumes in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 261, 172–185 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Preissel, S., Reckling, M., Schlaefke, N. & Zander, P. Magnitude and farm-economic value of grain legume pre-crop benefits in Europe: a review. Field Crops Res. 175, 64–79 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, J. et al. Does crop rotation yield more in China? A meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 245, 107659 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tamburini, G. et al. Agricultural diversification promotes multiple ecosystem services without compromising yield. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba1715 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cernay, C., Makowski, D. & Pelzer, E. Preceding cultivation of grain legumes increases cereal yields under low nitrogen input conditions. Environ. Chem. Lett. 16, 631–636 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Peoples, M. B. et al. The contributions of nitrogen-fixing crop legumes to the productivity of agricultural systems. Symbiosis 48, 1–17 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Watson, C. A. et al. Grain legume production and use in European agricultural systems. Adv. Agron. 144, 235–303 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bennett, A. J., Bending, G. D., Chandler, D., Hilton, S. & Mills, P. Meeting the demand for crop production:The challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations. Biol. Rev. 87, 52–71 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Drinkwater, L. E., Wagoner, P. & Sarrantonio, M. Legume-based cropping systems have reduced carbon and nitrogen losses. Nature 396, 262–265 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, C. J. & Chalk, P. M. Grain legumes in crop rotations under low and variable rainfall: are observed short-term N benefits sustainable? Plant Soil 453, 271–279 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pullens, J. W. M., Sorensen, P., Melander, B. & Olesen, J. E. Legacy effects of soil fertility management on cereal dry matter and nitrogen grain yield of organic arable cropping systems. Eur. J. Agron. 122, 126169 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tognetti, P. M. et al. Negative effects of nitrogen override positive effects of phosphorus on grassland legumes worldwide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, 28 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirkegaard, J., Christen, O., Krupinsky, J. & Layzell, D. Break crop benefits in temperate wheat production. Field Crops Res. 107, 185–195 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brisson, N. et al. Why are wheat yields stagnating in Europe? A comprehensive data analysis for France. Field Crops Res. 119, 201–212 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, R. L. Synergism: a rotation effect of improved growth efficiency. Adv. Agron. 112, 205–226 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bonilla-Cedrez, C., Chamberlin, J. & Hijmans, R. Fertilizer and grain prices constrain food production in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat. Food 2, 766–772 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Seufert, V., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 485, 229–232 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barbieri, P., Pellerin, S., Seufert, V. & Nesme, T. Changes in crop rotations would impact food production in an organically farmed world. Nat. Sustain. 2, 378–385 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barbieri, P. et al. Global option space for organic agriculture is delimited by nitrogen availability. Nat. Food 2, 363–372 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Muller, A. et al. Strategies for feeding the world more sustainably with organic agriculture. Nat. Commun. 8, 1290 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Nowak, B., Nesme, T., David, C. & Pellerin, S. Disentangling the drivers of fertilising material inflows in organic farming. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 96, 79–91 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bender, S. F., Wagg, C. & van der Heijden, M. G. A. An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 440–452 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mariotte, P. et al. Plant-soil feedback: Bridging natural and agricultural sciences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 129–142 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Everwand, G., Cass, S., Dauber, J., Williams, M. & Stout, J. Legume crops and biodiversity. Legumes in Cropping Systems, 4, 55–69 (2017).Peoples, M. B., Giller, K. E., Jensen, E. S. & Herridge, D. F. Quantifying country-to-global scale nitrogen fixation for grain legumes: I. Reliance on nitrogen fixation of soybean, groundnut and pulses. Plant Soil 469, 1–14 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Abalos, D., van Groenigen, J. W., Philippot, L., Lubbers, I. M. & De Deyn, G. B. Plant trait-based approaches to improve nitrogen cycling in agroecosystems. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 2454–2466 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garland, G. et al. Crop cover is more important than rotational diversity for soil multifunctionality and cereal yields in European cropping systems. Nat. Food 2, 28–37 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pandey, A., Li, F., Askegaard, M., Rasmussen, I. A. & Olesen, J. E. Nitrogen balances in organic and conventional arable crop rotations and their relations to nitrogen yield and nitrate leaching losses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 265, 350–362 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cook, R. J. Toward cropping systems that enhance productivity and sustainability. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 18389–18394 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gan, Y. T. et al. Improving farming practices reduces the carbon footprint of spring wheat production. Nat. Commun. 5, 13 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Hufnagel, J., Reckling, M. & Ewert, F. Diverse approaches to crop diversification in agricultural research. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 40, 14 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ma, B. L. & Wu, W. in Crop Rotations: Farming Practices, Monitoring and Environmental Benefits (ed Ma B. L.) Ch. 1, 1–35 (Nova Science Publishers, 2016).Seymour, M., Kirkegaard, J. A., Peoples, M. B., White, P. F. & French, R. J. Break-crop benefits to wheat in Western Australia – insights from over three decades of research. Crop. Sci. 63, 1–16 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Sileshi, G., Akinnifesi, F. K., Ajayi, O. C. & Place, F. Meta-analysis of maize yield response to woody and herbaceous legumes in sub-Saharan Africa. Plant Soil 307, 1–19 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bullock, D. G. Crop rotation. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 11, 309–326 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Danga, B. O., Ouma, J. P., Wakindiki, I. I. C. & Bar-Tal, A. Legume-wheat ration effects on residual soil moisture, nitrogen and wheat yield in tropical regions. Adv. Agron. 101, 315–349 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ghosh, P. K. et al. Legume effect for enhancing productivity and nutrient use-efficiency in major cropping systems – An Indian perspective: a review. J. Sustain. Agric. 30, 59–86 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Karlen, D. L., Varvel, G. E., Bullock, D. G. & Cruse, R. M. Crop rotation for the 21st century. Adv. Agron. 53, 1–45 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, G. et al. Role of ley pastures in tomorrow’s cropping systems. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 40, 17 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ruisi, P. et al. Agro-ecological benefits of faba bean for rainfed Mediterranean cropping systems. Ital. J. Agron. 12, 233–245 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Ryan, J., Singh, M. & Pala, M. Long-term cereal-based rotation trials in the Mediterranean region: Implications for cropping sustainability. Adv. Agron. 97, 273–319 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Grp, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 62, 1006–1012 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517, 365–368 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: new 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wieder, W. R., Boehnert, J., Bonan, G. B. & Langseth, M. Regridded Harmonized World Soil Database v1.2. ORNL DAAC. https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1247 (2014).Soil Survey Staff. Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. (1999).FAO. World Programme of the Census of Agriculture 2020. Vol. 1 (2015).Tiemann, L. K., Grandy, A. S., Atkinson, E. E., Marin-Spiotta, E. & McDaniel, M. D. Crop rotational diversity enhances belowground communities and functions in an agroecosystem. Ecol. Lett. 18, 761–771 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D. et al. The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes. Science 277, 1300–1302 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yates, F. The analysis of experiments containing different crop rotations. Biometrics 10, 324–346 (1954).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, J. et al. Dataset for evaluating global yield advantage and its drivers of legume-based rotations. Figshare, https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20290923 (2022).Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Adams, D. C., Gurevitch, J. & Rosenberg, M. S. Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology 78, 1277–1283 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Lissa, C. MetaForest: Exploring Heterogeneity in Meta-analysis Using Random Forests. (2017).Terrer, C. et al. A trade-off between plant and soil carbon storage under elevated CO2. Nature 591, 599–CO603 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuhn, M. Building predictive models in R using the caret package. J. Stat. Softw. 28, 1–26 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rosenberg, M. S. The file-drawer problem revisited: a general weighted method for calculating fail-safe numbers in meta-analysis. Evolution 59, 464–468 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing v.4.0.3 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2021). More

Fodrie, F. J. et al. Measuring individuality in habitat use across complex landscapes: Approaches, constraints, and implications for assessing resource specialization. Oecologia 178, 75–87 (2015).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bacheler, N. M., Michelot, T., Cheshire, R. T. & Shertzer, K. W. Fine-scale movement patterns and behavioral states of gray triggerfish Balistes capriscus determined from acoustic telemetry and hidden Markov models. Fish. Res. 215, 76–89 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Furey, N. B., Dance, M. A. & Rooker, J. R. Fine-scale movements and habitat use of juvenile southern flounder Paralichthys lethostigma in an estuarine seascape. J. Fish Biol. 82, 1469–1483 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Froehlich, C. Y. M., Garcia, A. & Kline, R. J. Daily movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) on a large artificial reef. Fish. Res. 209, 49–57 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams-Grove, L. J. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Acoustic positioning and movement patterns of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 553, 233–251 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Secor, D. H., Zhang, F., O’Brien, M. H. P. & Li, M. Ocean destratification and fish evacuation caused by a Mid-Atlantic tropical storm. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76, 573–584 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bacheler, N. M., Shertzer, K. W., Cheshire, R. T. & MacMahan, J. H. Tropical storms influence the movement behavior of a demersal oceanic fish species. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K., Walters, S., Bickford, J., Cooper, W. & Muller, R. Site fidelity and reproductive timing at a spotted seatrout spawning aggregation site: Individual versus population scale behavior. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 481, 181–197 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Espinoza, M., Farrugia, T. J., Webber, D. M., Smith, F. & Lowe, C. G. Testing a new acoustic telemetry technique to quantify long-term, fine-scale movements of aquatic animals. Fish. Res. 108, 364–371 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Roy, R. et al. Testing the VEMCO positioning system: Spatial distribution of the probability of location and the positioning error in a reservoir. Anim. Biotelemetry 2, 1 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guzzo, M. M. et al. Field testing a novel high residence positioning system for monitoring the fine-scale movements of aquatic organisms. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1478–1488 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smedbol, S., Smith, F., Webber, D., Vallée, R. & King, T. Using underwater coded acoustic telemetry for fine scale positioning of aquatic animals. In 20th Symposium of the International Society on Biotelemetry Proceedings, 9–11 (2014).Dean, M. J., Hoffman, W. S., Zemeckis, D. R. & Armstrong, M. P. Fine-scale diel and gender-based patterns in behaviour of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) on a spawning ground in the western Gulf of Maine. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 71, 1474–1489 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarnecki, J. H. & Patterson, W. F. A mini ROV-based method for recovering marine instruments at depth. PLoS One 15, 1–9 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ellis, R. D. et al. Acoustic telemetry array evolution: From species- and project-specific designs to large-scale, multispecies, cooperative networks. Fish. Res. 209, 186–195 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Friess, C. et al. Regional-scale variability in the movement ecology of marine fishes revealed by an integrative acoustic tracking network. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 663, 157–177 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Walters, C. J. & Juanes, F. Recruitment limitation as a consequence of natural selection for use of restricted feeding habitats and predation risk taking by juvenile fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 50, 2058–2070 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahrens, R. N. M., Walters, C. J. & Christensen, V. Foraging arena theory. Fish Fish. 13, 41–59 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schwartzkopf, B. D., Langland, T. A. & Cowan, J. H. Habitat selection important for red snapper feeding ecology in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish. 9, 373–387 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wells, R. J. D., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Fry, B. Feeding ecology of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 361, 213–225 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Goldman, S. F., Glasgow, D. M. & Falk, M. M. Feeding habits of 2 reef-associated fishes, red porgy (Pagrus pagrus) and gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus), off the Southeastern United States. Fish. Bull. 114, 317–329 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Villegas-Ríos, D., Réale, D., Freitas, C., Moland, E. & Olsen, E. M. Personalities influence spatial responses to environmental fluctuations in wild fish. J. Anim. Ecol. 87, 1309–1319 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rooker, J. R. et al. Seascape connectivity and the influence of predation risk on the movement of fishes inhabiting a back-reef ecosystem. Ecosphere 9, e02200 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Forman, R. T. T. & Godron, M. Patches and structural components for a landscape ecology. Bioscience 31, 733–740 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dahl, K. A. & Patterson, W. F. Movement, home range, and depredation of invasive lionfish revealed by fine-scale acoustic telemetry in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Biol. 167, 1–22 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schoener, T. W. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185, 27–39 (1974).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moulton, D. L. et al. Habitat partitioning and seasonal movement of red drum and spotted seatrout. Estuaries Coasts 40, 905–916 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hammerschlag, N., Luo, J., Irschick, D. J. & Ault, J. S. A Comparison of spatial and movement patterns between sympatric predators: bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) and Atlantic tarpon (Megalops atlanticus). PLoS ONE 7, e45958 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Novak, A. J. et al. Scale of biotelemetry data influences ecological interpretations of space and habitat use in yellowtail snapper. Mar. Coast. Fish. 12, 364–377 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lima, S. L. & Dill, L. M. Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: A review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68, 619–640 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Werner, E. E. & Gilliam, J. F. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15, 393–425 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reale, D. et al. Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 4051–4063 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sih, A., Bell, A. & Johnson, J. C. Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 372–378 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huntingford, F. A. The relationship between anti-predator behavior and aggression among conspecifics in the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus. Anim. Behav. 24, 245–260 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, D. S., Clark, A. B., Coleman, K. & Dearstyne, T. Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 442–446 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harrison, P. M. et al. Personality-dependent spatial ecology occurs independently from dispersal in wild burbot (Lota lota). Behav. Ecol. 26, 483–492 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gosling, S. D. From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?. Psychol. Bull. 127, 45–86 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hussey, N. E. et al. Aquatic animal telemetry: A panoramic window into the underwater world. Science 348, 1255642–1255642 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lowerre-Barbieri, S. K., Kays, R., Thorson, J. T. & Wikelski, M. The ocean’s movescape: Fisheries management in the bio-logging decade (2018–2028). ICES J. Mar. Sci. 76, 477–488 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
National Marine Fisheries Service. Fisheries Economics of the United State 2016. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-187a. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/document/fisheries-economics-united-states-report-2016 (2018). Accessed 08 January 2018.Patterson, W. F. III, Tarnecki, J., Addis, D. T. & Barbieri, L. R. Reef fish community structure at natural versus artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. In Proc. 66th Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 4–8 (2014).Streich, M. K. et al. Effects of a new artificial reef complex on red snapper and the associated fish community: An evaluation using a before–after control–impact approach. Mar. Coast. Fish. 9, 404–418 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dance, M. A., Patterson, W. F. III. & Addis, D. T. Fish community and trophic structure at artificial reef sites in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 87, 301–324 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cowan, J. H. Red snapper in the Gulf of Mexico and the U.S. South Atlantic: data, doubt, and debate. Fisheries 36, 319–331 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Addis, D. T., Patterson, W. F. III. & Dance, M. A. The potential for unreported artificial reefs to serve as refuges from fishing mortality for reef fishes. N. Am. J. Fish. Manag. 36, 131–139 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCawley, J. R., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Shipp, R. L. Feeding periodicity and prey habitat preference of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus (Poey, 1860), on Alabama artificial reefs. Gulf Mex. Sci. 24, 14–27 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Glenn, H. D., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Powers, J. E. A comparison of red snapper reproductive potential in the northwestern Gulf of Mexico: Natural versus artificial habitats. Mar. Coast. Fish. 9, 139–148 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kulaw, D. H., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Jackson, M. W. Temporal and spatial comparisons of the reproductive biology of northern Gulf of Mexico (USA) red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) collected a decade apart. PLoS One 12, e0172360 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Vose, F. E. & Nelson, W. G. Gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus Gmelin) feeding from artificial and natural substrate in shallow Atlantic waters of Florida. Bull. Mar. Sci. 55, 1316–1323 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Herbig, J. L. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Movement patterns of gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 23, 418–427 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Szedlmayer, S. T. & Schroepfer, R. L. Long-term residence of red snapper on artificial reefs in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 134, 315–325 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watterson, J. C. III., Patterson, W. F. I. I. I., Shipp, R. L. & Cowan, J. H. Jr. Movement of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, in the north central Gulf of Mexico: Potential effects of hurricanes. Gulf Mex. Sci. 16, 92–104 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Ingram, G. W. Jr. & Patterson, W. F. I. I. I. Movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus), greater amberjack (Seriola dumerili), and gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus) in the Gulf of Mexico and the utility of marine reserves as management tools. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 52, 686–699 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Strelcheck, A. J., Cowan, J. H. Jr. & Patterson, W. F. III. Site fidelity, movement, and growth of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus: implications for artificial reef management. In Red Snapper Ecology and Fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society Symposium 60 (eds. Patterson, W. F. III, Cowan, J. H. Jr., Nieland, D. A. & Fitzhugh, G. R.), 147–162 (2007).Addis, D. T., Patterson, W. F. I. I. I., Dance, M. A. & Ingram, G. W. Jr. Implications of reef fish movement from unreported artificial reef sites in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Res. 147, 349–358 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Topping, D. T. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Site fidelity, residence time and movements of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus estimated with long-term acoustic monitoring. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 437, 183–200 (2011).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Everett, A. G., Szedlmayer, S. T. & Gallaway, B. J. Movement patterns of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus based on acoustic telemetry around oil and gas platforms in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 649, 155–173 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarnecki, J. H. & Patterson, W. F. I. I. I. Changes in red snapper diet and trophic ecology following the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill. Mar. Coast. Fish. 7, 135–147 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
McCawley, J. R. & Cowan, J. H. Jr. Seasonal and size specific diet and prey demand of Red Snapper on Alabama artificial reefs. In Red Snapper Ecology and Fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society Symposium 60 (eds. Patterson, W. F. III., Cowan, J. H. Jr., Fitzhugh, G. R. & Nieland, D. L.), 77–104 (2007).Piraino, M. N. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Fine-scale movements and home ranges of red snapper around artificial reefs in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 143, 988–998 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williams-Grove, L. J. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Depth preferences and three-dimensional movements of red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, on an artificial reef in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Fish. Res. 190, 61–70 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Topping, D. T. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Home range and movement patterns of red snapper (Lutjanus campechanus) on artificial reefs. Fish. Res. 112, 77–84 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Baker, M. S. J. & Wilson, C. A. Use of bomb radiocarbon to validate otolith section ages of red snapper Lutjanus campechanus from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 1819–1824 (2001).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Allman, R. J., Fioramonti, C. L., Patterson, W. F. III. & Pacicco, A. E. Validation of annual growth-zone formation in gray triggerfish Balistes capriscus dorsal spines, fin rays, and vertebrae. Gulf Mex. Sci. 33, 68–76 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Frazer, T. K., Lindberg, W. J. & Stanton, G. R. Predation on sand dollars by gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 48, 159–164 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Delorenzo, D. M., Bethea, D. M. & Carlson, J. K. An assessment of the diet and trophic level of Atlantic sharpnose shark Rhizoprionodon terraenovae. J. Fish Biol. 86, 385–391 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Aines, A. C., Carlson, J. K., Boustany, A., Mathers, A. & Kohler, N. E. Feeding habits of the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, in the northwest Atlantic Ocean and Gulf of Mexico. Environ. Biol. Fish. 101, 403–415 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Castro, J. I. The Sharks of North America (Oxford University Press, 2011).
Google Scholar 
Springer, S. A collection of fishes from the stomachs of sharks taken off Salerno, Florida. Copeia 3, 174–175 (1946).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bohaboy, E. C., Guttridge, T. L., Hammerschlag, N., Van Zinnicq Bergmann, M. P. M. & Patterson, W. F. III. Application of three-dimensional acoustic telemetry to assess the effects of rapid recompression on reef fish discard mortality. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 77, 83–96 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drymon, J. M., Powers, S. P., Dindo, J., Dzwonkowski, B. & Henwood, T. Distributions of sharks across a continental shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish. Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci. 2, 440–450 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ajemian, M. J. et al. Movement patterns and habitat use of tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) across ontogeny in the Gulf of Mexico. PLoS One 15, 1–24 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ouzts, A. C. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Diel feeding patterns of Red Snapper on artificial reefs in the north-central Gulf of Mexico. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 132, 1186–1193 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
White, D. B. & Palmer, S. M. Age, growth, and reproduction of the red snapper, Lutjanus campechanus, from the Atlantic waters of the Southeastern US. Bull. Mar. Sci. 75, 335–360 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Fitzhugh, G. R., Lyon, H. M. & Barnett, B. K. Reproductive parameters of gray triggerfish (Balistes capriscus) from the Gulf of Mexico: Sex ratio, maturity and spawning fraction. SEDAR43-WP-03. (2015). http://sedarweb.org/sedar-82-rd14-sedar43-wp-03reproductive-parameters-gray-triggerfish-balistes-capriscus-gulf-mexico. Accessed 12 April 2021.Kelly-Stormer, A. et al. Gray Triggerfish reproductive biology, age, and growth off the Atlantic coast of the Southeastern USA. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 146, 523–538 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Porch, C. E., Fitzhugh, G. R., Lang, E. T., Lyon, H. M. & Linton, B. C. Estimating the dependence of spawning frequency on size and age in Gulf of Mexico red snapper. Mar. Coast. Fish. 7, 233–245 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lang, E. T. & Fitzhugh, G. R. Oogenesis and fecundity type of gray triggerfish in the Gulf of Mexico. Mar. Coast. Fish. Dyn. Manag. Ecosyst. Sci. 7, 338–348 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Woods, M. K. et al. Size and age at maturity of female red snapper Lutjanus campechanus in the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 54, 526–537 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Simmons, C. M. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Territoriality, reproductive behavior, and parental care in gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, from the Northern Gulf of Mexico. Bull. Mar. Sci. 88, 197–209 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mackichan, C. A. & Szedlmayer, S. T. Reproductive behavior of the gray triggerfish, Balistes capriscus, in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Proc. Gulf Caribb. Fish. Inst. 59, 213–218 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Diamond, S. L. et al. Movers and stayers: Individual variability in site fidelity and movements of red snapper off Texas. In Red Snapper Ecology and Fisheries in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. American Fisheries Society Symposium 60 (eds. Patterson, W. F. III, Cowan, J. H. Jr., Nieland, D. A. & Fitzhugh, G. R.), 163–187 (2007).Spiegel, O., Leu, S. T., Bull, C. M. & Sih, A. What’s your move? Movement as a link between personality and spatial dynamics in animal populations. Ecol. Lett. 20, 3–18 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, F. Understanding HPE in the VEMCO Positioning System (VPS). (2013).US Department of Defense. Global Positioning System Standard Positioning Service Performance Standard. http://www.gps.gov/technical/ps/2008-SPS-performance-standard.pdf (2008). Accessed 08 July 2020.Heupel, M. R., Reiss, K. L., Yeiser, B. G. & Simpfendorfer, C. A. Effects of biofouling on performance of moored data logging acoustic receivers. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 6, 327–335 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration & National Weather Service. National Data Buoy Center: Station 42012—Orange Beach. http://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42012 (2017). Accessed 07 November 2017.National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration & National Weather Service. National Data Buoy Center: Station 42040- Luke Offshore Test Platform. https://www.ndbc.noaa.gov/station_page.php?station=42040 (2019). Accessed 07 January 2019.Lazaridis, E. R Package ‘lunar’: lunar phase & distance, seasons and other environmental factors. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lunar/lunar.pdf (2015). Accessed 12 August 2019.Thieurmel, B. & Elmarhraoui, A. R Package ‘suncalc’: compute sun position, sunlight phases, moon position and lunar phase. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/suncalc/suncalc.pdf (2019). Accessed 22 June 2019.National Geophysical Data Center. U.S. Coastal Relief Model—Central Gulf of Mexico. https://doi.org/10.7289/V54Q7RW0 (2001).Cox, D. R. & Oakes, D. Analysis of Survival Data (Chapman and Hall, 1984).Benhamou, S. Dynamic approach to space and habitat use based on biased random bridges. PLoS One 6, e14592 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Horne, J. S., Garton, E. O., Krone, S. M. & Lewis, J. S. Analyzing animal movements using Brownian bridges. Ecology 88, 2354–2363 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tracey, J. A. et al. Movement-based estimation and visualization of space use in 3D for wildlife ecology and conservation. PLoS One 9, e101205 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tracey, J. A. et al. R Package ‘mkde’: 2D and 3D movement-based kernel density estimates (MKDEs). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=mkde (2014). Accessed 17 June 2019.Worton, B. J. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies. Ecology 70, 164–168 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Package ‘mgcv’: Mixed GAM computation vehicle with automatic smoothness estimation. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315370279 (2019). More

Wilson, E. O. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Harvard Univ. Press, 1975).Diamond, J. M. & Ordunio, D. Guns, Germs, and Steel (Books on Tape, 1999).Couzin, I. D. et al. Self-organization and collective behavior in vertebrates. Adv. Study Behav. 32, 1–75 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Keller, L. Adaptation and the genetics of social behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 364, 3209–3216 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Kay, T., Keller, L. & Lehmann, L. The evolution of altruism and the serial rediscovery of the role of relatedness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 28894–28898 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cryan, J. F. & Dinan, T. G. Mind-altering microorganisms: the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 701–712 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, K. V. A. & Foster, K. R. Why does the microbiome affect behaviour? Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 647–655 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sherwin, E., Bordenstein, S. R., Quinn, J. L., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota and the social brain. Science 366, eaar2016 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Desbonnet, L., Clarke, G., Shanahan, F., Dinan, T. G. & Cryan, J. F. Microbiota is essential for social development in the mouse. Mol. Psychiatry 19, 146–148 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sharon, G. et al. Human gut microbiota from autism spectrum disorder promote behavioral symptoms in mice. Cell 177, 1600–1618 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, M. et al. A quasi-paired cohort strategy reveals the impaired detoxifying function of microbes in the gut of autistic children. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba3760 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu, W.-L. et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature 595, 409–414 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vuong, H. E., Yano, J. M., Fung, T. C. & Hsiao, E. Y. The microbiome and host behavior. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 40, 21–49 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Douglas, A. E. Simple animal models for microbiome research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 17, 764–775 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schretter, C. E. Links between the gut microbiota, metabolism, and host behavior. Gut Microbes 11, 245–248 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liberti, J. & Engel, P. The gut microbiota–brain axis of insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 39, 6–13 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, M. P., Fox, B. W., Chao, P.-H., Schroeder, F. C. & Sengupta, P. A neurotransmitter produced by gut bacteria modulates host sensory behaviour. Nature 583, 415–420 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, E. O. The Insect Societies (Harvard Univ. Press, 1971).Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants (Harvard Univ. Press, 1990).Teseo, S. et al. The scent of symbiosis: gut bacteria may affect social interactions in leaf-cutting ants. Anim. Behav. 150, 239–254 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Vernier, C. L. et al. The gut microbiome defines social group membership in honey bee colonies. Sci. Adv. 6, eabd3431 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, L. et al. Gut microbiome drives individual memory variation in bumblebees. Nat. Commun. 12, 6588 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Choi, S. H. et al. Individual variations lead to universal and cross-species patterns of social behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31754–31759 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Geffre, A. C. et al. Honey bee virus causes context-dependent changes in host social behavior. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10406–10413 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kwong, W. K. & Moran, N. A. Gut microbial communities of social bees. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 14, 374–384 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bonilla-Rosso, G. & Engel, P. Functional roles and metabolic niches in the honey bee gut microbiota. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 43, 69–76 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Raymann, K. & Moran, N. A. The role of the gut microbiome in health and disease of adult honey bee workers. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 26, 97–104 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zheng, H., Powell, J. E., Steele, M. I., Dietrich, C. & Moran, N. A. Honeybee gut microbiota promotes host weight gain via bacterial metabolism and hormonal signaling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 4775–4780 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kešnerová, L. et al. Disentangling metabolic functions of bacteria in the honey bee gut. PLoS Biol. 15, e2003467 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kešnerová, L. et al. Gut microbiota structure differs between honeybees in winter and summer. ISME J. 14, 801–814 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mersch, D. P., Crespi, A. & Keller, L. Tracking individuals shows spatial fidelity is a key regulator of ant social organization. Science 340, 1090–1093 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stroeymeyt, N. et al. Social network plasticity decreases disease transmission in a eusocial insect. Science 362, 941–945 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kao, A. B. & Couzin, I. D. Modular structure within groups causes information loss but can improve decision accuracy. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 374, 20180378 (2019).
Google Scholar 
de Groot, A. P. Protein and amino acid requirements of the honeybee (Apis mellifica L.). Physiol. Comp. Oecol. 3, 197–285 (1953).
Google Scholar 
Billard, J.-M. d-Amino acids in brain neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity. Amino Acids 43, 1851–1860 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marcaggi, P. & Attwell, D. Role of glial amino acid transporters in synaptic transmission and brain energetics. Glia 47, 217–225 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gage, S. L., Calle, S., Jacobson, N., Carroll, M. & DeGrandi-Hoffman, G. Pollen alters amino acid levels in the honey bee brain and this relationship changes with age and parasitic stress. Front. Neurosci. 14, 231 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kawase, T. et al. Gut microbiota of mice putatively modifies amino acid metabolism in the host brain. Br. J. Nutr. 117, 775–783 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Socha, E., Koba, M. & Koslinski, P. Amino acid profiling as a method of discovering biomarkers for diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. Amino Acids 51, 367–371 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tarlungeanu, D. C. et al. Impaired amino acid transport at the blood brain barrier is a cause of autism spectrum disorder. Cell 167, 1481–1494 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maynard, T. M. & Manzini, M. C. Balancing act: maintaining amino acid levels in the autistic brain. Neuron 93, 476–479 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kurochkin, I. et al. Metabolome signature of autism in the human prefrontal cortex. Commun. Biol. 2, 234 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van der Velpen, V. et al. Systemic and central nervous system metabolic alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Res. Ther. 11, 93 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Aldana, B. I. et al. Glutamate–glutamine homeostasis is perturbed in neurons and astrocytes derived from patient iPSC models of frontotemporal dementia. Mol. Brain 13, 125 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Galizia, C. G., Eisenhardt, D. & Giurfa M. (eds) Honeybee Neurobiology and Behavior: A Tribute to Randolf Menzel (Springer Science & Business Media, 2011).Menzel, R. The honeybee as a model for understanding the basis of cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 758–768 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ellegaard, K. M. & Engel, P. Genomic diversity landscape of the honey bee gut microbiota. Nat. Commun. 10, 446 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bruno, F., Angilica, A., Cosco, F., Luchi, M. L. & Muzzupappa, M. Mixed prototyping environment with different video tracking techniques. In IMProVe 2011 International Conference on Innovative Methods in Product Design (eds Concheri, G. et al.) 105–113 (Libreria Internazionale Cortina Padova, 2011).R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Anderson, K. E., Rodrigues, P. A. P., Mott, B. M., Maes, P. & Corby-Harris, V. Ecological succession in the honey bee gut: shift in Lactobacillus strain dominance during early adult development. Microb. Ecol. 71, 1008–1019 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Almasri, H., Liberti, J., Brunet, J. L., Engel, P. & Belzunces, L. P. Mild chronic exposure to pesticides alters physiological markers of honey bee health without perturbing the core gut microbiota. Sci. Rep. 12, 4281 (2022).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pfaffl, M. W. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 29, e45 (2001).Gallup, J. M. in PCR Troubleshooting and Optimization: The Essential Guide (eds Kennedy, S. & Oswald, N.) 23–65 (Caister Academic Press, 2011).Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Davis, N. M., Proctor, D. M., Holmes, S. P., Relman, D. A. & Callahan, B. J. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome 6, 1–14 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Patassini, S. et al. Identification of elevated urea as a severe, ubiquitous metabolic defect in the brain of patients with Huntington’s disease. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 468, 161–166 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gonzalez-Riano, C., Garcia, A. & Barbas, C. Metabolomics studies in brain tissue: a review. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 130, 141–168 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Belle, J. E. L., Harris, N. G., Williams, S. R. & Bhakoo, K. K. A comparison of cell and tissue extraction techniques using high-resolution 1H-NMR spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 15, 37–44 (2002).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wanichthanarak, K., Jeamsripong, S., Pornputtapong, N. & Khoomrung, S. Accounting for biological variation with linear mixed-effects modelling improves the quality of clinical metabolomics data. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 17, 611–618 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wallberg, A. et al. A hybrid de novo genome assembly of the honeybee, Apis mellifera, with chromosome-length scaffolds. BMC Genomics 20, 275 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ritchie, M. E. et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, e47 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Durinck, S., Spellman, P. T., Birney, E. & Huber, W. Mapping identifiers for the integration of genomic datasets with the R/Bioconductor package biomaRt. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1184–1191 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Falcon, S. & Gentleman, R. Using GOstats to test gene lists for GO term association. Bioinformatics 23, 257–258 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reijnders, M. J. & Waterhouse, R. M. Summary visualisations of gene ontology terms with GO-Figure! Front. Bioinform. 1, 638255 (2021).
Google Scholar  More

Flombaum, P. et al. Present and future global distributions of the marine Cyanobacteria Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus. PNAS 110, 9824–9829 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Honda, D. & Yokota, A. Detection of seven major evolutionary lineages in cyanobacteria based on the 165 rRNA gene sequence analysis with new sequences of five marine Synechococcus strains. J Mol Evol 48, 723–739 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Robertson, B. R., Tezuka, N. & Watanabe, M. M. Phylogenetic analyses of Synechococcus strains (cyanobacteria) using sequences of 16S rDNA and part of the phycocyanin operon reveal multiple evolutionary lines and reflect phycobilin content. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 51, 861–871 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stomp, M. et al. Adaptive divergence in pigment composition promotes phytoplankton biodiversity. Nature 432, 104–107 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Albrecht, M., Pröschold, T. & Schumann, R. Identification of Cyanobacteria in a eutrophic coastal lagoon on the Southern Baltic Coast. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1–16 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bertos-Fortis, M. et al. Unscrambling cyanobacteria community dynamics related to environmental factors. Front. Microbiol. 7, 625 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guidi, L. et al. Plankton networks driving carbon export in the oligotrophic ocean. Nature 532, 465–470 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunter-Cevera, K. R. et al. Seasons of syn. Limnol. Oceanogr. 65, 1–18 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Kuosa, H. Picoplanktonic algae in the northern Baltic Sea: Seasonal dynamics and flagellate grazing. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 73, 269–276 (1991).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sathicq, M. B., Unrein, F. & Gómez, N. Recurrent pattern of picophytoplankton dynamics in estuaries around the world: The case of Río de la Plata. Mar. Environ. Res. 161, 105136 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rajaneesh, K. M. & Mitbavkar, S. Factors controlling the temporal and spatial variations in Synechococcus abundance in a monsoonal estuary. Mar. Environ. Res. 92, 133–143 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Crosbie, N. D., Pöckl, M. & Weisse, T. Dispersal and phylogenetic diversity of nonmarine picocyanobacteria, inferred from 16S rRNA gene and cpcBA-intergenic spacer sequence analyses. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 5716–5721 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ernst, A., Becker, S., Wollenzien, U. I. A. & Postius, C. Ecosystem-dependent adaptive radiations ofpicocyanobacteria inferred from 16S rRNA and ITS-1 sequence analysis. Microbiology 149, 217–228 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sánchez-Baracaldo, P., Handley, B. A. & Hayest, P. K. Picocyanobacterial community structure of freshwater lakes and the Baltic Sea revealed by phylogenetic analyses and clade-specific quantitative PCR. Microbiology 154, 3347–3357 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hu, Y. O. O., Karlson, B., Charvet, S. & Andersson, A. F. Diversity of pico- to mesoplankton along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. Front. Microbiol. 7, 679 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Larsson, J. et al. Picocyanobacteria containing a novel pigment gene cluster dominate the brackish water Baltic Sea. ISME J. 8, 1892–1903 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Celepli, N. et al. Meta-omic analyses of Baltic Sea cyanobacteria: Diversity, community structure and salt acclimation. Environ. Microbiol. 19, 673–686 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Flombaum, P., Wang, W. L., Primeau, F. W. & Martiny, A. C. Global picophytoplankton niche partitioning predicts overall positive response to ocean warming. Nat. Geosci. 13, 116–120 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bopp, L. et al. Multiple stressors of ocean ecosystems in the 21st century: Projections with CMIP5 models. Biogeosciences 10, 6225–6245 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cabré, A., Marinov, I. & Leung, S. Consistent global responses of marine ecosystems to future climate change across the IPCC AR5 earth system models. Clim. Dyn. 45, 1253–1280 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, T., Chen, X., Qin, S. & Li, J. Phylogenetic and phenogenetic diversity of Synechococcus along a yellow sea section reveal its environmental dependent distribution and co-occurrence microbial pattern. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 9, 1018 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tai, V. & Palenik, B. Temporal variation of Synechococcus clades at a coastal Pacific Ocean monitoring site. ISME J. 3, 903–915 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ahlgren, N. A. & Rocap, G. Diversity and distribution of marine Synechococcus: Multiple gene phylogenies for consensus classification and development of qPCR assays for sensitive measurement of clades in the ocean. Front. Microbiol. 3, 1–24 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rajaneesh, K. M., Mitbavkar, S., Anil, A. C. & Sawant, S. S. Synechococcus as an indicator of trophic status in the Cochin backwaters, west coast of India. Ecol. Indic. 55, 118–130 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, L. & Carpenter, E. J. Characterization of phycoerythrin-containing Synechococcus spp. populations by immunofluorescence. J. Plankton Res. 9, 1167–1181 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stomp, M. et al. Colourful coexistence of red and green picocyanobacteria in lakes and seas. Ecol. Lett. 10, 290–298 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Callieri, C. & Stockner, J. G. Freshwater autotrophic picoplankton: A review. J. Limnol. 61, 1–14 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, H., Jing, H., Wong, T. H. C. & Chen, B. Co-occurrence of phycocyanin- and phycoerythrin-rich Synechococcus in subtropical estuarine and coastal waters of Hong Kong. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 6, 90–99 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haverkamp, T. et al. Diversity and phylogeny of Baltic Sea picocyanobacteria inferred from their ITS and phycobiliprotein operons. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 174–188 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Otero-Ferrer, J. L. et al. Factors controlling the community structure of picoplankton in contrasting marine environments. Biogeosciences 15, 6199–6220 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ploug, H. et al. Carbon, nitrogen and O2 fluxes associated with the cyanobacterium Nodularia spumigena in the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1549–1558 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ohlendieck, U., Stuhr, A. & Siegmund, H. Nitrogen fixation by diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea and transfer of the newly fixed nitrogen to picoplankton organisms. J. Mar. Syst. 25, 213–219 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Klawonn, I. et al. Untangling hidden nutrient dynamics: Rapid ammonium cycling and single-cell ammonium assimilation in marine plankton communities. ISME J. 13, 1960–1974 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lin, Y., Wang, L., Xu, K., Huang, H. & Ren, H. Algae biofilm reduces microbe-derived dissolved organic nitrogen discharges: Performance and mechanisms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 55, 6227–6238 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berthelot, H., Bonnet, S., Camps, M., Grosso, O. & Moutin, T. Assessment of the dinitrogen released as ammonium and dissolved organic nitrogen by unicellular and filamentous marine diazotrophic cyanobacteria grown in culture. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00080 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loick-Wilde, N. et al. De novo amino acid synthesis and turnover during N2 fixation. Limnol. Ocean. 63, 1076–1092 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Glibert, P. M. & Bronk, D. A. Release of dissolved organic nitrogen by marine diazotrophic cyanobacteria Trichodesmium spp.. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3996–4000 (1994).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kuo, J. et al. Picoplankton dynamics and picoeukaryote diversity in a hyper-eutrophic subtropical lagoon. J. Environ. Sci. Heal. 4, 521–523 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Grébert, T. et al. Light color acclimation is a key process in the global ocean distribution of Synechococcus cyanobacteria. PNAS 115, E2010–E2019 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Urbach, E., Scanlan, D., Distel, D., Waterbury, J. & Chisholm, S. Rapid diversification of marine picophytoplankton with dissimilar light-harvesting structures inferred from sequences of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus (cyanobacteria). J. Mol. Biol. 46, 188–201 (1998).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Farrant, G. K. et al. Delineating ecologically significant taxonomic units from global patterns of marine picocyanobacteria. PNAS 113, E3365–E3374 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rocap, G., Distel, D. L., Waterbury, J. B. & Chisholm, S. W. Resolution of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus ecotypes by using 16S–23S ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 1180–1191 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazard, S., Ostrowski, M., Partensky, F. & Scanlan, D. J. Multi-locus sequence analysis, taxonomic resolution and biogeography of marine Synechococcus. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 372–386 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huang, S. et al. Novel lineages of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus in the global oceans. ISME J. 6, 285–297 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Choi, D. H. & Noh, J. H. Phylogenetic diversity of Synechococcus strains isolated from the East China Sea and the East Sea. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 69, 439–448 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lee, M. D. et al. Marine Synechococcus isolates representing globally abundant genomic lineages demonstrate a unique evolutionary path of genome reduction without a decrease in GC content. Environ. Microbiol. 21, 1677–1686 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Paerl, R., Foster, R., Jenkins, B., Montoya, J. & Zehr, J. Phylogenetic diversity of cyanobacterial narB genes from various marine habitats. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 3377–3387 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Fuller, N. et al. Clade-specific 16S ribosomal DNA oligonucleotides reveal the predominance of a single marine Synechococcus clade throughout a stratified water column in the Red sea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2430–2443 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Scanlan, D. J. et al. Ecological genomics of marine Picocyanobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 73, 249–299 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mazard, S., Wilson, W. H. & Scanlan, D. J. Dissecting the physiological response to phosphorus stress in marine Synechococcus isolates (cyanophyceae). J. Phycol. 48, 94–105 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, J. et al. Synechococcus bloom in the Pearl River Estuary and adjacent coastal area –With special focus on flooding during wet seasons. Sci. Total Environ. 692, 769–783 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zwirglmaier, K. et al. Global phylogeography of marine Synechococcus and Prochlorococcus reveals a distinct partitioning of lineages among oceanic biomes. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 147–161 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sohm, J. A. et al. Co-occurring Synechococcus ecotypes occupy four major oceanic regimes defined by temperature, macronutrients and iron. ISME J. 10, 333–345 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bunse, C. et al. High frequency multi-year variability in Baltic Sea microbial plankton stocks and activities. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1–18 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alegria Zufia, J., Farnelid, H. & Legrand, C. Seasonality of coastal picophytoplankton growth, nutrient limitation and biomass contribution. Front. Microbiol. 12, 1–13 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Granéli, E., Wallström, K., Larsson, U., Granéli, W. & Elmgren, R. Nutrient limitation of primary production in the Baltic Sea Area. Ambio 19, 142–151 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Mazur-Marzec, H. et al. Occurrence of cyanobacteria and cyanotoxin in the Southern Baltic Proper. Filamentous cyanobacteria versus single-celled picocyanobacteria. Hydrobiologia 701, 235–252 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stal, L. et al. BASIC: Baltic Sea cyanobacteria. An investigation of the structure and dynamics of water blooms of cyanobacteria in the Baltic Sea—Responses to a changing environment. Cont. Shelf Res. 23, 1695–1714 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herlemann, D. P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hugerth, L. W. et al. Metagenome-assembled genomes uncover a global brackish microbiome. Genome Biol. 16, 1–18 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Walve, J. & Larsson, U. Seasonal changes in Baltic Sea seston stoichiometry: The influence of diazotrophic cyanobacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 407, 13–25 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Huber, P. et al. Primer design for an accurate view of picocyanobacterial community structure by using high-throughput sequencing. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 85, 1–17 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, T. et al. Temporal and spatial variations of abundance of phycocyanin- and phycoerythrin-rich Synechococcus in Pearl River Estuary and adjacent coastal area. J. Ocean Univ. China 15, 897–904 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, S. et al. Unexpected predominance of photosynthetic picoeukaryotes in shallow eutrophic lakes. J. Plankton Res. 38, 830–842 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Collos, Y. et al. Oligotrophication and emergence of picocyanobacteria and a toxic dinoflagellate in Thau lagoon, southern France. J. Sea Res. 61, 68–75 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bec, B., Husseini-Ratrema, J., Collos, Y., Souchu, P. & Vaquer, A. Phytoplankton seasonal dynamics in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon: Emphasis on the picoeukaryote community. J. Plankton Res. 27, 881–894 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunter-Cevera, K. R. et al. Physiological and ecological drivers of early spring blooms of coastal phytoplankter. Science 354, 326–329 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Albertano, P., Di Somma, D. & Capucci, E. Cyanobacterial picoplankton from the central Baltic Sea: Cell size classification by image analyzed fluorescence microscopy. J. Plankton Res. 19, 1405–1416 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
Paulsen, M. L. et al. Synechococcus in the Atlantic gateway to the Arctic Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2016.00191 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Felföldi, T. et al. Diversity and seasonal dynamics of the photoautotrophic picoplankton in Lake Balaton (Hungary). Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 63, 273–287 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Grinienė, E., Šulčius, S. & Kuosa, H. Size-selective microzooplankton grazing on the phytoplankton in the Curonian Lagoon (SE Baltic Sea). Oceanologia 58, 292–301 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tsai, A. Y., Gong, G. C., Huang, Y. W. & Chao, C. F. Estimates of bacterioplankton and Synechococcus spp. mortality from nanoflagellate grazing and viral lysis in the subtropical Danshui River estuary. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 153, 54–61 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Camacho, A., Miracle, M. R. & Vicente, E. Which factors determine the abundance and distribution of picocyanobacteria in inland waters? A comparison among different types of lakes and ponds. Arch. Hydrobiol. 157(321), 338 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Berry, D. L. et al. Shifts in cyanobacterial strain dominance during the onset of harmful algal blooms in Florida Bay, USA. Microb. Ecol. 70, 361–371 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zborowsky, S. & Lindell, D. Resistance in marine cyanobacteria differs against specialist and generalist cyanophages. PNAS 116, 16899–16908 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wall, C. C., Rodgers, B. S., Gobler, C. J. & Peterson, B. J. Responses of loggerhead sponges Spechiospongia vesparium during harmful cyanobacterial blooms in a sub-tropical lagoon. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 451, 31–43 (2012).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Glibert, P. M. et al. Pluses and minuses of ammonium and nitrate uptake and assimilation by phytoplankton and implications for productivity and community composition, with emphasis on nitrogen-enriched conditions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 61, 165–197 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Herbert, R. A. Nitrogen cycling in coastal marine ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23, 563–590 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cai, J., Hodoki, Y. & Nakano, S. I. Phylogenetic diversity of the picocyanobacterial community from a novel winter bloom in Lake Biwa. Limnology 22, 161–167 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Guyet, U. et al. Synergic effects of temperature and irradiance on the physiology of the marine Synechococcus strain WH7803. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1707 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Meier, H. E. M. et al. Ensemble modeling of the Baltic Sea ecosystem to provide scenarios for management. Ambio 43, 37–48 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, T. et al. Extremes of temperature, oxygen and blooms in the baltic sea in a changing climate. Ambio 41, 574–585 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Andersson, A. et al. Projected future climate change and Baltic Sea ecosystem management. Ambio 44, 345–356 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, K. et al. Increasing picocyanobacteria success in shelf waters contributes to long-term food web degradation. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5574–5587 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Legrand, C. et al. Interannual variability of phyto-bacterioplankton biomass and production in coastal and offshore waters of the Baltic Sea. Ambio 44, 427–438 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Capuzzo, E. et al. A decline in primary production in the North Sea over 25 years, associated with reductions in zooplankton abundance and fish stock recruitment. Glob. Change Biol. 24, e352–e364 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Valderrama, J. C. Methods of nutrient analysis. In Manual on Harmful Marine Microalgae (eds Hallagraeff, G. M. et al.) 251–268 (IOC Manuals and Guides, 1995).
Google Scholar 
Jespersen, A. M. & Christoffersen, K. Measurements of chlorophyll-a from phytoplankton using ethanol as extraction solvent. Arch. Hydrobiol. 109, 445–454 (1987).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Edler, L. Recommendations on methods for marine biological studies in the Baltic Sea. Phytoplankton and chlorophyll (Baltic Marine Biologists BMB (Sweden), 1979).HELCOM Phytoplankton Expert Group. Phytoplankton biovolume and carbon content. https://www.ices.dk/data/Documents/ENV/PEG_BVOL.zip (2013).Mostböck, S. FCSalyzer (2021).Gregory Caporaso, J. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Callahan, B. et al. DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. I. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: A novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Crosbie, N. D., Pöckl, M. & Weisse, T. Rapid establishment of clonal isolates of freshwater autotrophic picoplankton by single-cell and single-colony sorting. J. Microbiol. Methods 55, 361–370 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Silva, C. S. P., Genuário, D. B., Vaz, M. G. M. V. & Fiore, M. F. Phylogeny of culturable cyanobacteria from Brazilian mangroves. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 37, 100–112 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Marsan, D., Wommack, K. E. & Ravel, J. Draft genome sequence of Synechococcus sp. strain CB0101, isolated from the Chesapeake Bay estuary. Genome Announc. 2, e01111 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. R version 3.5.1. https://www.r-project.org/ (2019).Oksanen, J. et al. Package ‘vegan’ (2020).Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2016) (ISBN 978-3-319-24277-4).MATH 
Book 

Google Scholar 
Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gill, A. E. Atmosphere-Ocean Dynamics (Academic Press, USA, 1982).
Google Scholar 
Li, X., Wang, Y., Li, J. & Lei, B. Physical and socioeconomic driving forces of land-use and land-cover changes: A Case Study of Wuhan City, China. Discret Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2016 (2016).Paliy, O. & Shankar, V. Application of multivariate statistical techniques in microbial ecology. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1032–1057 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.This is a summary of: Lu, N. et al. Biophysical and economic constraints on China’s natural climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01432-3 (2022). More

Appel, M., Lahn, F., Buytaert, W. & Pebesma, E. Open and scalable analytics of large earth observation datasets: From scenes to multidimensional arrays using SCIDB and GDAL. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 138, 47–56 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Audebert, N., Saux, B. L. & Lefvre, S. Beyond RGB: Very high resolution urban remote sensing with multimodal deep networks. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 140, 20–32 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Ball J. E., Anderson D. T., & Chan C. S. Comprehensive survey of deep learning in remote sensing: Theories, tools, and challenges for the community. J. Appl. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.042609 (2017).Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. Vol. 282. 20141657 (2015).Velázquez, E., Paine, C. T., May, F. & Wiegand, T. Linking trait similarity to interspecific spatial associations in a moist tropical forest. J. Veg. Sci. 26, 1068–1079 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ben-Said, M. Spatial point-pattern analysis as a powerful tool in identifying pattern-process relationships in plant ecology: an updated review. Ecol. Process. 10, 1–23 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watt, A. S. Pattern and process in the plant community. J. Ecol. 35, 1–22 (1947).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pielou, E.C. Mathematical Ecology; Number 574.50151 P613 1977. (Wiley, 1977).Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brown, C., Law, R., Illian, J. B. & Burslem, D. F. Linking ecological processes with spatial and non-spatial patterns in plant communities. J. Ecol. 99, 1402–1414 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Detto, M. & Muller-Landau, H. C. Fitting ecological process models to spatial patterns using scalewise variances and moment equations. Am. Nat. 181, E68–E82 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
May, F., Huth, A., & Wiegand, T. Moving beyond abundance distributions: neutral theory and spatial patterns in a tropical forest. Proceedings. Biological sciences 282(1802), 20141657. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1657 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kerr, J. T. & Ostrovsky, M. From space to species: Ecological applications for remote sensing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 299–305 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillespie, T. W., Foody, G. M., Rocchini, D., Giorgi, A. P. & Saatchi, S. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 32, 203–221 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
He, J., Zhang, L., Wang, Q. & Li, Z. Using diffusion geometric coordinates for hyperspectral imagery representation. IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett. 6(4), 767–771 (2009).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lechner, A.M., Foody, G.M., & Boyd, D.S. Applications in remote sensing to forest ecology and management. One Earth 2.5, 405–412 (2020).Arévalo, P., Olofsson, P. & Woodcock, C. E. Continuous monitoring of land change activities and post-disturbance dynamics from Landsat time series: A test methodology for REDD+ reporting. Remote Sens. Environ. 238, 111051 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gillespie, T.W. et al. Measuring and modelling biodiversity from space. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 32.2, 203–221 (2008).Lausch, A., Erasmi, S., King, D. J., Magdon, P. & Heurich, M. Understanding forest health with remote sensing-part II—A review of approaches and data models. Remote Sens. 9(2), 129 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rouse, J.W., Haas, R.H., Schell, J.A., Deering, D.W., et al. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. in NASA Special Publication. Vol. 351. 309 (1974).Chen, J. M. & Black, T. Defining leaf area index for non-flat leaves. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 421–429 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zha, Y., Gao, J. & Ni, S. Use of normalized difference built-up index in automatically mapping urban areas from TM imagery. Int. J. Remote Sens. 24, 583–594 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, S. et al. Remote detection of bare soil moisture using a surface-temperature-based soil evaporation transfer coefficient. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 12, 351–358 (2010).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Gao, B. C. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sens. Environ. 58, 257–266 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wan, Z. & Dozier, J. A generalized split-window algorithm for retrieving land-surface temperature from space. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 34, 892–905 (1996).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, H., Wang, Y., Guan, H., Shi, T. & Hu, X. Detecting ecological changes with a remote sensing based ecological index (RSEI) produced time series and change vector analysis. Remote Sensing 11, 2345 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
List of Top 10 Sources of Free Remote Sensing Data (2017).USGS Earth Explorer: Download Free Landsat Imagery (2021).Blaschke, T. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote. Sens. 65, 2–16 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, M., Zang, S., Zhang, B., Li, S. & Wu, C. A review of remote sensing image classification techniques: The role of spatio-contextual information. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 47, 389–411 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gómez-Chova, L., Tuia, D., Moser, G. & Camps-Valls, G. Multimodal classification of remote sensing images: A review and future directions. Proc. IEEE 103, 1560–1584 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alajlan, N., Bazi, Y., Melgani, F. & Yager, R. R. Fusion of supervised and unsupervised learning for improved classification of hyperspectral images. Inf. Sci. 217, 39–55 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Csillik, O. Fast segmentation and classification of very high resolution remote sensing data using SLIC superpixels. Remote Sens. 9, 243 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thanh Noi, P. & Kappas, M. Comparison of random forest, k-nearest neighbor, and support vector machine classifiers for land cover classification using Sentinel-2 imagery. Sensors 18, 18 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Jiang, S., Zhao, H., Wu, W., & Tan, Q. A novel framework for remote sensing image scene classification. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci. 2018, 42 (2018).Baddeley, A. Spatial Point Process Modelling and Its Applications. Vol. 20. (Publicacions de la Universitat Jaume I, 2004).Vasudevan, K., Eckel, S., Fleischer, F., Schmidt, V. & Cook, F. Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns on deep seismic reflection data: A preliminary test. Geophys. J. Int. 171, 823–840 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, Y. & Luo, J. Statistical analysis of metastable pitting events on carbon steel. Br. Corros. J. 35, 125–130 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Velázquez, E., Martínez, I., Getzin, S., Moloney, K. A. & Wiegand, T. An evaluation of the state of spatial point pattern analysis in ecology. Ecography 39, 1042–1055 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, P. J. & Evans, F. C. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35, 445–453 (1954).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoyan, D., & Penttinen, A. Recent applications of point process methods in forestry statistics. Stat. Sci. 2000, 61–78 (2000).Illian, J., Penttinen, A., Stoyan, H., & Stoyan, D. Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. Vol. 70. (Wiley, 2008).Brodrick, P. G., Davies, A. B. & Asner, G. P. Uncovering ecological patterns with convolutional neural networks. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 734–745 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, S., Luo, H., Tu, Y., He, Z., & Li, J. Wide contextual residual network with active learning for remote sensing image classification. in IGARSS 2018–2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. 7145–7148 (IEEE, 2018).Lee, H. & Kwon, H. Going deeper with contextual CNN for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 4843–4855 (2017).ADS 
MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cheng, G., Xie, X., Han, J., Guo, L. & Xia, G. S. Remote sensing image scene classification meets deep learning: Challenges, methods, benchmarks, and opportunities. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 13, 3735–3756 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewy, D., & Mandziuk, J. An overview of mixing augmentation methods and augmentation strategies. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.09887 (2021).Cubuk, E.D., Zoph, B., Mane, D., Vasudevan, V., & Le, Q.V. Autoaugment: Learning augmentation policies from data. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.09501 (2018).Naveed, H. Survey: Image mixing and deleting for data augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.07085 (2021).Freeman, I., Roese-Koerner, L. & Kummert, A. Effnet: An efficient structure for convolutional neural networks. 25th IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP). IEEE 2018, 6–10 (2018).
Google Scholar 
LeCun, Y. et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput. 1, 541–551 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Raeisi, M., Bonneu, F. & Gabriel, E. A spatio-temporal multi-scale model for Geyer saturation point process: Application to forest fire occurrences. Spatial Stat. 41, 100492 (2021).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Baddeley, A. Analysing spatial point patterns in R. in Workshop Notes Version. Vol. 3 (2008). More