More stories

  • in

    Invasion stages help resolve Darwin’s naturalization conundrum

    Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.This is a summary of: Omer, A. et al. The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion. Nat. Plants https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-022-01216-9 (2022). More

  • in

    Large carnivores and naturalness affect forest recreational value

    Nash, R. Wilderness and the American Mind (Yale University Press, 1982).
    Google Scholar 
    Kirchhoff, T. & Vicenzotti, V. A historical and systematic survey of European perceptions of wilderness. Environ. Values 23, 443–464 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Aplet, G., Thomson, J. & Wilbert, M. Indicators of wildness: Using attributes of the land to assess the context of wilderness in Wilderness Science in a Time of Change (eds. McCool, S.F., Cole, D.N., Borrie, W.T., O’Loughlin, J.) 89–98 (USDA Forest Service, RMRS-P-15-Vol-2, 2000).Watson, J. E. et al. Catastrophic declines in wilderness areas undermine global environment targets. Curr. Biol. 26, 2929–2934 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Watson, J. E. et al. Protect the last of the wild. Nature 563, 27–30 (2018).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hayward, M. W. et al. Reintroducing rewilding to restoration: Rejecting the search for novelty. Biol. Conserv. 233, 255–259 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Perino, A. et al. Rewilding complex ecosystems. Science 364, eaav5570 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Soulé, M. & Noss, R. Rewilding and biodiversity: Complementary goals for continental conservation. Wild Earth 8, 18–28 (1998).
    Google Scholar 
    Torres, A. et al. Measuring rewilding progress. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 373, 20170433 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).ADS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fish, R., Church, A. & Winter, M. Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst. Serv. 21B, 208–217 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nilsson, K. et al. Forests, Trees and Human Health (Springer, 2011).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Cheesbrough, A. E., Garvin, T. & Nykiforuk, C. I. J. Everyday wild: Urban natural areas, health, and well-being. Health Place 56, 43–52 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Child, M. F. Wildness, infinity and freedom. Ecol. Econ. 186, 107055 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lev, E., Kahn, P. H. Jr., Chen, H. & Esperum, G. Relatively wild urban parks can promote human resilience and flourishing: A case study of Discovery Park, Seattle, Wasshington. Front. Sustain. Cities 2, 2 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Watson, J. E. et al. The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 599–610 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., Żylicz, T. & Angelstam, P. Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecol. Econ. 119, 8–23 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sabatini, F. M. et al. Where are Europe’s last primary forests?. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1426–1439 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kirby, K. & Watkins, C. Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. CABI (2015).Schirpke, U., Meisch, C. & Tappeiner, U. Symbolic species as a cultural ecosystem service in the European Alps: Insights and open issues. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 711–730 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bruskotter, J. T. & Wilson, R. S. Determining where the wild things will be: Using psychological theory to find tolerance for large carnivores. Conserv. Lett. 7, 158–165 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chapron, G. et al. Recovery of large carnivores in Europe’s modern human-dominated landscapes. Science 346, 1517–1519 (2014).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cimatti, M. et al. Large carnivore expansion in Europe is associated with human population density and land cover changes. Divers. Distrib. 27, 602–617 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Røskaft, E., Händel, B., Bjerke, T. & Kaltenborn, B. P. Human attitudes towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildl. Biol. 13, 172–186 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arbieu, U. et al. Attitudes towards returning wolves (Canis lupus) in Germany: Exposure, information sources and trust matter. Biol. Conserv. 234, 202–210 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gundersen, V. S. & Frivold, L. H. Public preferences for forest structures: A review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban For. Urban Green. 7, 241–258 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Filyushkina, A., Agimass, F., Lundhede, T., Strange, N. & Jacobsen, J. B. Preferences for variation in forest characteristics: Does diversity between stands matter?. Ecol. Econ. 140, 22–29 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lozano, J. et al. Human-carnivore relations: A systematic review. Biol. Conserv. 237, 480–492 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rode, J., Flinzberger, L., Karutz, R., Berghöfer, A. & Schröter-Schlaack, C. Why so negative? Exploring the socio-economic impacts of large carnivores from a European perspective. Biol. Conserv. 255, 108918 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gren, M., Häggmark-Svensson, T., Elofsson, K. & Engelmann, M. Economics of wildlife management—An overview. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 64, 1–6 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wilson, E. O. Biophilia and the conservation ethic in The Biophilia Hypothesis (eds. Kellert, S.R. & Wilson, E.O.) 31–41 (Island Press, 1993).Thompson, S. C. G. & Barton, M. A. Ecocentric and anthropocentric attitudes toward the environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 14, 149–157 (1994).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kaltenborn, B. P. & Bjerke, T. Associations between environmental value orientations and landscape preferences. Landsc. Urban Plan. 59, 1–11 (2002).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bjerke, T. & Kaltenborn, B. P. The relationship of ecocentric and anthropocentric motives to attitudes toward large carnivores. J. Environ. Psychol. 19, 415–421 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Johansson, M., Ferreira, I. A., Støen, O. G., Frank, J. & Flykt, A. Targeting human fear of large carnivores—Many ideas but few known effects. Biol. Conserv. 201, 261–269 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bauer, N., Wallner, A. & Hunziker, M. The change of European landscapes: Human–nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 2910–2920 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arts, K., Fischer, A. & Van der Wal, R. The promise of wilderness between paradise and hell: A cultural-historical exploration of a Dutch National Park. Landsc. Res. 37, 239–256 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    De Groot, W. T. & van den Born, R. J. G. Visions of nature and landscape preferences:an exploration in the Netherlands. Landsc. Urban Plan. 63, 127–138 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bombieri, G. et al. Brown bear attacks on humans: A worldwide perspective. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–10 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Johansson, M., Sjöström, M., Karlsson, J. & Brännlund, R. Is human fear affecting public willingness to pay for the management and conservation of large carnivores?. Soc. Nat. Resour. 25, 610–620 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dressel, S., Sandström, C. & Ericsson, G. A meta-analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976–2012. Conserv. Biol. 29, 565–574 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Trajçe, A. et al. All carnivores are not equal in the rural people’s view. Should we develop conservation plans for functional guilds or individual species in the face of conflicts?. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 19, e00677 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Eriksson, M., Sandström, C. & Ericsson, G. Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves. Wildl. Biol. 21, 131–137 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Methorst, J., Arbieu, U., Bonn, A., Böhning-Gaese, K. & Müller, T. Non-material contributions of wildlife to human well-being: A systematic review. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 093005 (2020).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Russell, R. et al. Humans and nature: How knowing and experiencing nature affect well-being. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 473–502 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Maller, C., Mumaw, L. & Cooke, B. Health and social benefits of living with ‘wild’ nature in Rewilding (eds. Pettorelli, N., Durant, S. M. & du Toit, J. T.) 165–181 (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Nevin, O. T., Swain, P. & Convery, I. Bears, place-making, and authenticity in British Columbia. Nat. Areas J. 34, 216–221 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schnitzler, A. Towards a new European wilderness: Embracing unmanaged forest growth and the decolonisation of nature. Landsc. Urban Plan. 126, 74–80 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hensher, D., Rose, J. & Greene, D. Applied Choice Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2005).MATH 
    Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Johnston, R. J. et al. Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 4, 319–405 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Riera, P. et al. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: Good practice guidelines. J. For. Econ. 18, 259–270 (2012).
    Google Scholar 
    Larsen, J. B. & Nielsen, A. B. Nature-based forest management: Where are we going? Elaborating forest development types in and with practice. For. Ecol. Manag. 238, 107–117 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ferrini, S. & Scarpa, R. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: A Monte Carlo study. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 53, 342–363 (2007).MATH 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    McFadden, D. The measurement of urban travel demand. J. Public Econ. 3, 303–328 (1974).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Train, K. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation (Cambridge University Press, 2009).MATH 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    The role of phylogenetic relatedness on alien plant success depends on the stage of invasion

    Richardson, D. M. et al. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: concepts and definitions. Divers. Distrib. 6, 93–107 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Kleunen, M. et al. Global exchange and accumulation of non-native plants. Nature 525, 100–103 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Capinha, C., Essl, F., Seebens, H., Moser, D. & Pereira, H. M. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348, 1248–1251 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vilà, M. & Hulme, P. E. in Impact of Biological Invasions on Ecosystem Services Vol. 12 Invading Nature – Springer Series in Invasion Ecology (eds Vilà, M. & Hulme, P. E.) 1–14 (Springer, 2017).Pyšek, P. et al. A global assessment of invasive plant impacts on resident species, communities and ecosystems: the interaction of impact measures, invading species’ traits and environment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 1725–1737 (2012).PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pyšek, P. et al. Scientists’ warning on invasive alien species. Biol. Rev. 95, 1511–1534 (2020).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bacher, S. et al. Socio-economic impact classification of alien taxa (SEICAT). Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 159–168 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seebens, H. et al. No saturation in the accumulation of alien species worldwide. Nat. Commun. 8, 14435 (2017).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seebens, H. et al. Projecting the continental accumulation of alien species through to 2050. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 970–982 (2021).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kriticos, D. J., Sutherst, R. W., Brown, J. R., Adkins, S. W. & Maywald, G. F. Climate change and the potential distribution of an invasive alien plant: Acacia nilotica ssp. indica in Australia. J. Appl. Ecol. 40, 111–124 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thuiller, W., Richardson, D. M. & Midgley, G. F. in Biological Invasions (ed. Nentwig, W.) 197–211 (Springer, 2007).Hobbs, R. J. in Invasive Species in a Changing World (eds Mooney, H. A. & Hobbs, R. J.) 55–64 (Island Press, 2000).Seebens, H. et al. Global trade will accelerate plant invasions in emerging economies under climate change. Glob. Chang. Biol. 21, 4128–4140 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Razanajatovo, M. et al. Plants capable of selfing are more likely to become naturalized. Nat. Commun. 7, 13313 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bucharova, A. & van Kleunen, M. Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe. J. Ecol. 97, 230–238 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ordonez, A., Wright, I. J. & Olff, H. Functional differences between native and alien species: a global-scale comparison. Funct. Ecol. 24, 1353–1361 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Kleunen, M., Weber, E. & Fischer, M. A meta-analysis of trait differences between invasive and non-invasive plant species. Ecol. Lett. 13, 235–245 (2010).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Kleunen, M., Dawson, W. & Maurel, N. Characteristics of successful alien plants. Mol. Ecol. 24, 1954–1968 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Essl, F. et al. Drivers of the relative richness of naturalized and invasive plant species on Earth. AoB Plants 11, plz051 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Winkler, D. E., Gremer, J. R., Chapin, K. J., Kao, M. & Huxman, T. E. Rapid alignment of functional trait variation with locality across the invaded range of Sahara mustard (Brassica tournefortii). Am. J. Bot. 105, 1188–1197 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Divíšek, J. et al. Similarity of introduced plant species to native ones facilitates naturalization, but differences enhance invasion success. Nat. Commun. 9, 4631 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Banerjee, A. K., Prajapati, J., Bhowmick, A. R., Huang, Y. & Mukherjee, A. Different factors influence naturalization and invasion processes – a case study of Indian alien flora provides management insights. J. Environ. Manag. 294, 113054 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ni, M. et al. Invasion success and impacts depend on different characteristics in non-native plants. Divers. Distrib. 27, 1194–1207 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fristoe, T. S. et al. Dimensions of invasiveness: links between local abundance, geographic range size, and habitat breadth in Europe’s alien and native floras. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2021173118 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Omer, A. et al. Characteristics of the naturalized flora of Southern Africa largely reflect the non-random introduction of alien species for cultivation. Ecography 44, 1812–1825 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pyšek, P. et al. Naturalization of central European plants in North America: species traits, habitats, propagule pressure, residence time. Ecology 96, 762–774 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Omer, A., Kordofani, M., Gibreel, H. H., Pyšek, P. & van Kleunen, M. The alien flora of Sudan and South Sudan: taxonomic and biogeographical composition. Biol. Invasions 23, 2033–2045 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Duncan, R. P. & Williams, P. A. Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis challenged. Nature 417, 608–609 (2002).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Daehler, C. C. Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis revisited. Am. Nat. 158, 324–330 (2001).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pyšek, P. Is there a taxonomic pattern to plant invasions? Oikos 82, 282–294 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tan, J., Pu, Z., Ryberg, W. A. & Jiang, L. Resident–invader phylogenetic relatedness, not resident phylogenetic diversity, controls community invasibility. Am. Nat. 186, 59–71 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thuiller, W. et al. Resolving Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: a quest for evidence. Divers. Distrib. 16, 461–475 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Loiola, P. P. et al. Invaders among locals: alien species decrease phylogenetic and functional diversity while increasing dissimilarity among native community members. J. Ecol. 106, 2230–2241 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lososová, Z. et al. Alien plants invade more phylogenetically clustered community types and cause even stronger clustering. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 786–794 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Marx, H. E., Giblin, D. E., Dunwiddie, P. W. & Tank, D. C. Deconstructing Darwin’s naturalization conundrum in the San Juan Islands using community phylogenetics and functional traits. Divers. Distrib. 22, 318–331 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life (John Murray, 1859).Procheş, Ş., Wilson, J. R. U., Richardson, D. M. & Rejmánek, M. Searching for phylogenetic pattern in biological invasions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 5–10 (2008).
    Google Scholar 
    Diez, J. M., Sullivan, J. J., Hulme, P. E., Edwards, G. & Duncan, R. P. Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: dissecting taxonomic patterns of species invasions. Ecol. Lett. 11, 674–681 (2008).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cadotte, M. W., Campbell, S. E., Li, S. P., Sodhi, D. S. & Mandrak, N. E. Preadaptation and naturalization of nonnative species: Darwin’s two fundamental insights into species invasion. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 69, 661–684 (2018).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Kleunen, M., Bossdorf, O. & Dawson, W. The ecology and evolution of alien plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 25–47 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Park, D. S., Feng, X., Maitner, B. S., Ernst, K. C. & Enquist, B. J. Darwin’s naturalization conundrum can be explained by spatial scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10904–10910 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Diez, J. M. et al. Learning from failures: testing broad taxonomic hypotheses about plant naturalization. Ecol. Lett. 12, 1174–1183 (2009).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Malecore, E. M., Dawson, W., Kempel, A., Müller, G. & van Kleunen, M. Nonlinear effects of phylogenetic distance on early-stage establishment of experimentally introduced plants in grassland communities. J. Ecol. 107, 781–793 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schaefer, H., Hardy, O. J., Silva, L., Barraclough, T. G. & Savolainen, V. Testing Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis in the Azores. Ecol. Lett. 14, 389–396 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Strauss, S. Y., Webb, C. O. & Salamin, N. Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 5841–5845 (2006).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li, S.-p. et al. The effects of phylogenetic relatedness on invasion success and impact: deconstructing Darwin’s naturalisation conundrum. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1285–1292 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pellock, S., Thompson, A., He, K., Mecklin, C. & Yang, J. Validity of Darwin’s naturalization hypothesis relates to the stages of invasion. Community Ecol. 14, 172–179 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Blackburn, T. M. et al. A proposed unified framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 333–339 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Kleunen, M. et al. Economic use of plants is key to their naturalization success. Nat. Commun. 11, 3201 (2020).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Broennimann, O. et al. Distance to native climatic niche margins explains establishment success of alien mammals. Nat. Commun. 12, 2353 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carboni, M. et al. What it takes to invade grassland ecosystems: traits, introduction history and filtering processes. Ecol. Lett. 19, 219–229 (2016).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Milbau, A. & Stout, J. C. Factors associated with alien plants transitioning from casual, to naturalized, to invasive. Conserv. Biol. 22, 308–317 (2008).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dawson, W., Burslem, D. F. R. P. & Hulme, P. E. Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion. J. Ecol. 97, 657–665 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rejmánek, M. in Invasive Species and Biodiversity Management (eds Schei, P. J. & Vilken, A.) 79–102 (Kluwer Academic, 1998).Rejmánek, M. A theory of seed plant invasiveness: the first sketch. Biol. Conserv. 78, 171–181 (1996).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Maurel, N., Hanspach, J., Kuhn, I., Pysek, P. & van Kleunen, M. Introduction bias affects relationships between the characteristics of ornamental alien plants and their naturalization success. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1500–1509 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Glen, H. F. Cultivated Plants of Southern Africa: Botanical Names, Common Names, Origins, Literature (National Botanical Institute, 2002).Reichard, S. H. & White, P. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51, 103–113 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Faulkner, K. T., Robertson, M. P., Rouget, M. & Wilson, J. R. U. Understanding and managing the introduction pathways of alien taxa: South Africa as a case study. Biol. Invasions 18, 73–87 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dodd, A. J., Burgman, M. A., McCarthy, M. A. & Ainsworth, N. The changing patterns of plant naturalization in Australia. Divers. Distrib. 21, 1038–1050 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lambdon, P.-W. et al. Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. Preslia 80, 101–149 (2008).
    Google Scholar 
    Bennett, B. M. Naturalising Australian trees in South Africa: climate, exotics and experimentation. J. South. Afr. Stud. 37, 265–280 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Richardson, D. M. et al. in Biological Invasions in South Africa (eds van Wilgen, B. W. et al.) 67–96 (Springer, 2020).Li, S.-p. et al. Contrasting effects of phylogenetic relatedness on plant invader success in experimental grassland communities. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 89–99 (2015).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Duarte, M., Verdú, M., Cavieres, L. A. & Bustamante, R. O. Plant–plant facilitation increases with reduced phylogenetic relatedness along an elevation gradient. Oikos 130, 248–259 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Verdú, M., Rey, P. J., Alcántara, J. M., Siles, G. & Valiente-Banuet, A. Phylogenetic signatures of facilitation and competition in successional communities. J. Ecol. 97, 1171–1180 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Valiente-Banuet, A. & Verdu, M. Plant facilitation and phylogenetics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 347–366 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anacker, B. L. & Strauss, S. Y. Ecological similarity is related to phylogenetic distance between species in a cross-niche field transplant experiment. Ecology 97, 1807–1818 (2016).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dostál, P. Plant competitive interactions and invasiveness: searching for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness and origin on competition intensity. Am. Nat. 177, 655–667 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Levin, S. C., Crandall, R. M., Pokoski, T., Stein, C. & Knight, T. M. Phylogenetic and functional distinctiveness explain alien plant population responses to competition. Proc. R. Soc. B 287, 20201070 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Williams, E. W., Zeldin, J., Semski, W. R., Hipp, A. L. & Larkin, D. J. Phylogenetic distance and resource availability mediate direction and strength of plant interactions in a competition experiment. Oecologia 197, 459–469 (2021).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bezeng, S. B., Davies, J. T., Yessoufou, K., Maurin, O. & Van der Bank, M. Revisiting Darwin’s naturalization conundrum: explaining invasion success of non-native trees and shrubs in Southern Africa. J. Ecol. 103, 871–879 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Trotta, L. B., Siders, Z. A., Sessa, E. B. & Baiser, B. The role of phylogenetic scale in Darwin’s naturalization conundrum in the critically imperilled pine rockland ecosystem. Divers. Distrib. 27, 618–631 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sol, D. et al. A test of Darwin’s naturalization conundrum in birds reveals enhanced invasion success in the presence of close relatives. Ecol. Lett. 25, 661–672 (2022).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302–314 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Henderson, L. Comparisons of invasive plants in Southern Africa originating from southern temperate, northern temperate and tropical regions. Bothalia 36, 201–222 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cayuela, L., Stein, A. & Oksanen, J. Taxonstand: Taxonomic Standardization of Plant Species Names. R package version 2.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Taxonstand (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, 2019).Weigelt, P., König, C. & Kreft, H. GIFT – A Global Inventory of Floras and Traits for macroecology and biogeography. J. Biogeogr. 47, 16–43 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Kleunen, M. et al. The Global Naturalized Alien Flora (GloNAF) database. Ecology 100, e02542 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zengeya, T. A. & Wilson, J. R. (eds) The Status of Biological Invasions and Their Management in South Africa in 2019 (South African National Biodiversity Institute and DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology, 2021).Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing v.3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N. J., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R Vol. 574 (Springer, 2009).Schielzeth, H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 103–113 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nagelkerke, N. J. D. A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika 78, 691–692 (1991).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    rcompanion: Functions to support extension education program evaluation v. 2.4.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021).Tung Ho, L. S. & Ané, C. A linear-time algorithm for Gaussian and non-Gaussian trait evolution models. Syst. Biol. 63, 397–408 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Accurate phenology analyses require bud traits and energy budgets

    Peñuelas, J. & Filella, I. Phenology. Responses to a warming world. Science 294, 793–795 (2001).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peñuelas, J., Rutishauser, T. & Filella, I. Ecology. Phenology feedbacks on climate change. Science 324, 887–888 (2009).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Moisset de Espanés, P., Franco-Cisterna, M., Petanidou, T. & Vázquez, D. P. Phenology determines the robustness of plant-pollinator networks. Sci. Rep. 8, 14873 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Chuine, I. Why does phenology drive species distribution? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 3149–3160 (2010).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chmielewski, F.-M. in Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science 2nd edn (ed. Schwartz M. D.) 539–561 (Springer, 2013).Morellato, L. P. C. et al. Linking plant phenology to conservation biology. Biol. Conserv. 195, 60–72 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Katelaris, C. H. & Beggs, P. J. Climate change: allergens and allergic diseases. Intern. Med. J. 48, 129–134 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schwartz, M. D. (ed.) Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science 2nd edn (Springer, 2013).Cleland, E. E., Chuine, I., Menzel, A., Mooney, H. A. & Schwartz, M. D. Shifting plant phenology in response to global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 357–365 (2007).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fu, Y. H. et al. Recent spring phenology shifts in western Central Europe based on multiscale observations. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 1255–1263 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jeong, S.-J., Ho, C.-H., Gim, H.-J. & Brown, M. E. Phenology shifts at start vs. end of growing season in temperate vegetation over the Northern Hemisphere for the period 1982-2008. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2385–2399 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, Q. et al. Delayed autumn phenology in the Northern Hemisphere is related to change in both climate and spring phenology. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3702–3711 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vitasse, Y. et al. Leaf phenology sensitivity to temperature in European trees: do within-species populations exhibit similar responses. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 735–744 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wang, S. et al. Temporal trends and spatial variability of vegetation phenology over the Northern Hemisphere during 1982-2012. PLoS ONE 11, e0157134 (2016).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Fu, Y. H. et al. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 526, 104–107 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Huang, M. et al. Velocity of change in vegetation productivity over northern high latitudes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 1649–1654 (2017).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peaucelle, M. et al. Spatial variance of spring phenology in temperate deciduous forests is constrained by background climatic conditions. Nat. Commun. 10, 5388 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Zohner, C. M., Mo, L., Pugh, T. A. M., Bastin, J.-F. & Crowther, T. W. Interactive climate factors restrict future increases in spring productivity of temperate and boreal trees. Glob. Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15098 (2020).Montgomery, R. A., Rice, K. E., Stefanski, A., Rich, R. L. & Reich, P. B. Phenological responses of temperate and boreal trees to warming depend on ambient spring temperatures, leaf habit, and geographic range. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 10397–10405 (2020).Zohner, C. M., Benito, B. M., Svenning, J.-C. & Renner, S. S. Day length unlikely to constrain climate-driven shifts in leaf-out times of northern woody plants. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1120–1123 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Peñuelas, J. et al. Complex spatiotemporal phenological shifts as a response to rainfall changes. New Phytol. 161, 837–846 (2004).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Papagiannopoulou, C. et al. Vegetation anomalies caused by antecedent precipitation in most of the world. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 74016 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Delpierre, N. et al. Modelling interannual and spatial variability of leaf senescence for three deciduous tree species in France. Agric. For. Meteorol. 149, 938–948 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fu, Y. H. et al. Nutrient availability alters the correlation between spring leaf-out and autumn leaf senescence dates. Tree Physiol. 39, 1277–1284 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seyednasrollah, B., Swenson, J. J., Domec, J.-C. & Clark, J. S. Leaf phenology paradox: why warming matters most where it is already warm. Remote Sens. Environ. 209, 446–455 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chuine, I., Morin, X. & Bugmann, H. Warming, photoperiods, and tree phenology. Science 329, 277–278 (2010).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vitasse, Y. & Basler, D. What role for photoperiod in the bud burst phenology of European beech. Eur. J. For. Res 132, 1–8 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Way, D. A. & Montgomery, R. A. Photoperiod constraints on tree phenology, performance and migration in a warming world. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 1725–1736 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Caffarra, A., Donnelly, A. & Chuine, I. Modelling the timing of Betula pubescens budburst. II. Integrating complex effects of photoperiod into process-based models. Clim. Res. 46, 159–170 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Körner, C. & Basler, D. Plant science. Phenology under global warming. Science 327, 1461–1462 (2010).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fu, Y. H. et al. Daylength helps temperate deciduous trees to leaf-out at the optimal time. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 2410–2418 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Singh, R. K., Svystun, T., AlDahmash, B., Jönsson, A. M. & Bhalerao, R. P. Photoperiod- and temperature-mediated control of phenology in trees – a molecular perspective. New Phytol. 213, 511–524 (2017).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Flynn, D. F. B. & Wolkovich, E. M. Temperature and photoperiod drive spring phenology across all species in a temperate forest community. New Phytol. 219, 1353–1362 (2018).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brelsford, C. C., Nybakken, L., Kotilainen, T. K. & Robson, T. M. The influence of spectral composition on spring and autumn phenology in trees. Tree Physiol. 39, 925–950 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Strømme, C. B. et al. UV-B and temperature enhancement affect spring and autumn phenology in Populus tremula. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 867–877 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fu, Y. H. et al. Increased heat requirement for leaf flushing in temperate woody species over 1980-2012: effects of chilling, precipitation and insolation. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 2687–2697 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Huang, Y., Jiang, N., Shen, M. & Guo, L. Effect of preseason diurnal temperature range on the start of vegetation growing season in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecol. Indic. 112, 106161 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meng, F. et al. Opposite effects of winter day and night temperature changes on early phenophases. Ecology 100, e02775 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang, S., Isabel, N., Huang, J.-G., Ren, H. & Rossi, S. Responses of bud-break phenology to daily-asymmetric warming: daytime warming intensifies the advancement of bud break. Int. J. Biometeorol. 63, 1631–1640 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meng, L. et al. Divergent responses of spring phenology to daytime and nighttime warming. Agric. For. Meteorol. 281, 107832 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bigler, C. & Vitasse, Y. Daily maximum temperatures induce lagged effects on leaf unfolding in temperate woody species across large elevational gradients. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 398 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fu, Y. H. et al. Three times greater weight of daytime than of night-time temperature on leaf unfolding phenology in temperate trees. New Phytol. 212, 590–597 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Piao, S. et al. Leaf onset in the northern hemisphere triggered by daytime temperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 6911 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vitasse, Y. et al. Impact of microclimatic conditions and resource availability on spring and autumn phenology of temperate tree seedlings. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17606 (2021).Azeez, A. et al. EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 and EARLY BUD-BREAK 3 control resumption of poplar growth after winter dormancy. Nat. Commun. 12, 1123 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hamer, P. The heat balance of apple buds and blossoms. Part I. Heat transfer in the outdoor environment. Agric. For. Meteorol. 35, 339–352 (1985).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Landsberg, J. J., Butler, D. R. & Thorpe, M. R. Apple bud and blossom temperatures. J. Horticultural Sci. 49, 227–239 (1974).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Grace, J. The temperature of buds may be higher than you thought. N. Phytol. 170, 1–3 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Muir, C. D. tealeaves: an R package for modelling leaf temperature using energy budgets. AoB Plants 11, plz054 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Knohl, A., Schulze, E.-D., Kolle, O. & Buchmann, N. Large carbon uptake by an unmanaged 250-year-old deciduous forest in Central Germany. Agric. For. Meteorol. 118, 151–167 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zellweger, F. et al. Forest microclimate dynamics drive plant responses to warming. Science 368, 772–775 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bailey, B. N., Stoll, R., Pardyjak, E. R. & Miller, N. E. A new three-dimensional energy balance model for complex plant canopy geometries: Model development and improved validation strategies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 218-219, 146–160 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Michaletz, S. T. & Johnson, E. A. A heat transfer model of crown scorch in forest fires. Can. J. For. Res. 36, 2839–2851 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sanchez‐Lorenzo, A. et al. Reassessment and update of long‐term trends in downward surface shortwave radiation over Europe (1939–2012). J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120, 9555–9569 (2015).Pfeifroth, U., Sanchez‐Lorenzo, A., Manara, V., Trentmann, J. & Hollmann, R. Trends and variability of surface solar radiation in Europe based on surface‐ and satellite-based data records. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 1735–1754 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Richardson, A. D. et al. Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 566–584 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Liu, Q. et al. Extension of the growing season increases vegetation exposure to frost. Nat. Commun. 9, 426 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Ma, Q., Huang, J.-G., Hänninen, H. & Berninger, F. Divergent trends in the risk of spring frost damage to trees in Europe with recent warming. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 351–360 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zohner, C. M. et al. Late-spring frost risk between 1959 and 2017 decreased in North America but increased in Europe and Asia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920816117 (2020).Xiao, L. et al. Estimating spring frost and its impact on yield across winter wheat in China. Agric. For. Meteorol. 260–261, 154–164 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Unterberger, C. et al. Spring frost risk for regional apple production under a warmer climate. PLoS ONE 13, e0200201 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Leolini, L. et al. Late spring frost impacts on future grapevine distribution in Europe. Field Crops Res. 222, 197–208 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Greco, S. et al. Late spring frost in mediterranean beech forests: extended crown dieback and short-term effects on moth communities. Forests 9, 388 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Augspurger, C. K. Spring 2007 warmth and frost: phenology, damage and refoliation in a temperate deciduous forest. Funct. Ecol. 23, 1031–1039 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Dong, N., Prentice, I. C., Harrison, S. P., Song, Q. H. & Zhang, Y. P. Biophysical homoeostasis of leaf temperature: a neglected process for vegetation and land-surface modelling. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 26, 998–1007 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jones, H. G. Plants and Microclimate. A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).University Of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) & Harris, I. C. CRU JRA v1.1: a forcings dataset of gridded land surface blend of Climatic Research Unit (CRU) and Japanese reanalysis (JRA) data; Jan.1901–Dec.2017, 2019; https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/13f3635174794bb98cf8ac4b0ee8f4edDupleix, A., Sousa Meneses, D., de, Hughes, M. & Marchal, R. Mid-infrared absorption properties of green wood. Wood Sci. Technol. 47, 1231–1241 (2013).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Howard, R. & Stull, R. IR radiation from trees to a ski run: a case study. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 52, 1525–1539 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Monteith, J. L. & Unsworth, M. H. Principles of Environmental Physics. Plants, Animals, and the Atmosphere 4th edn (Elsevier/Academic Press, 2013).Bergman, T. L., Incropera, F. P. & Lavine, A. S. Fundamentals of Heat and Mass Transfer (J. Wiley & Sons, 2011).Jacobs, A., Heusinkveld, B. G. & Kessel, G. Simulating of leaf wetness duration within a potato canopy. NJAS Wagening. J. Life Sci. 53, 151–166 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gerlein-Safdi, C. et al. Dew deposition suppresses transpiration and carbon uptake in leaves. Agric. For. Meteorol. 259, 305–316 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Muñoz Sabater, J. Copernicus Climate Change Service: ERA5-Land hourly data from 1981 to present, 2019; https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-landKusch, E. & Davy, R. KrigR – A tool for downloading and statistically downscaling climate reanalysis data. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 024005 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018); https://www.R-project.org/ More

  • in

    Low phosphorus levels limit carbon capture by Amazonian forests

    Pan, Y. et al. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bonan, G. B. Science 320, 1444–1449 (2008).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Craine, J. M. et al. Nature Ecol. Evol. 2, 1735–1744 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cunha, H. F. V. et al. Nature 608, 558–562 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vitousek, P. M. & Sanford, R. L. Jr Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17, 137–167 (1986).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hedin, L. O., Brookshire, E. N. J., Menge, D. N. L. & Barron, A. R. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 613–635 (2009).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ostertag, R. & DiManno, N. M. Front. Earth Sci. 4, 23 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wright, S. J. Ecol. Monogr. 89, e01382 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lugli, L. F. et al. New Phytol. 230, 116–128 (2021).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Muller-Landau, H. C. et al. New Phytol. 229, 3065–3087 (2021).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    He, X. et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5831–5846 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Elser, J. J. et al. Ecol. Lett. 10, 1135–1142 (2007).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    LeBauer, D. S. & Treseder, K. K. Ecology 89, 371–379 (2008).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arora, V. K. et al. Biogeosciences 17, 4173–4222 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    IPCC. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Masson-Delmotte, V. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2021).
    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Potential of microbiome-based solutions for agrifood systems

    German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle–Jena–Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyStephanie D. Jurburg, Nico Eisenhauer, François Buscot, Antonis Chatzinotas, Narendrakumar M. Chaudhari, Anna Heintz-Buschart, Kirsten Küsel & Rine C. ReubenInstitute of Biology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, GermanyStephanie D. Jurburg, Nico Eisenhauer, Antonis Chatzinotas & Rine C. ReubenDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Leipzig, GermanyStephanie D. Jurburg, Antonis Chatzinotas, Rene Kallies, Susann Müller & Ulisses Nunes da RochaDepartment of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research–UFZ, Halle, GermanyFrançois Buscot & Anna Heintz-BuschartAquatic Geomicrobiology, Institute of Biodiversity, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, GermanyNarendrakumar M. Chaudhari & Kirsten KüselSwammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the NetherlandsAnna Heintz-BuschartKellogg Biological Station, Michigan State University, Hickory Corners, MI, USAElena LitchmanEcology, Evolution and Behavior Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USAElena LitchmanDepartment of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, CA, USAElena LitchmanHawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, New South Wales, AustraliaCatriona A. Macdonald & Brajesh K. SinghLeibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology—Hans Knöll Institute, Jena, GermanyGianni PanagiotouThe State Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, The University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaGianni PanagiotouDepartment of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, ChinaGianni PanagiotouInstitut für Biologie, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, GermanyMatthias C. RilligBerlin-Brandenburg Institute of Advanced Biodiversity Research, Berlin, GermanyMatthias C. RilligGlobal Centre for Land-Based Innovation, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, AustraliaBrajesh K. SinghB.K.S. conceived the idea in consultation with N.E. and S.J., and led the discussion which was attended by all authors. S.J. and B.K.S. wrote the manuscript and all contributed to refine it. More

  • in

    Boreal forest on the move

    Settele, J. et al. in Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects (eds Field, C. et al.) 271–360 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2015).
    Google Scholar 
    Rees, W. G. et al. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3965–3977 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Anderson, L. L., Hu, F. S., Nelson, D. S., Petit, R. J. & Paige, K. N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 12447–12450 (2006).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Clark, J. S., Lewis, M. & Horvath, L. Am. Nat. 157, 537–554 (2001).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Edwards, M., Hamilton, T. D., Elias, S. A., Bigelow, N. H. & Krumhardt, A. P. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 35, 460–468 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    The early arrival of spring doesn’t boost annual tree growth

    Dow, C. et al. Nature 608, 552–557 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Friedlingstein, P. et al. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 3269–3340 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Menzel, A. & Fabian, P. Nature 397, 659 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Piao, S. et al. Nature Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 14–27 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cuny, H. E. et al. Nature Plants 1, 15160 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Körner, C. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 25, 107–114 (2015).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gessler, A. & Treydte, K. New Phytol. 209, 1338–1340 (2016).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hilty, J., Muller, B., Pantin, F. & Leuzinger, S. New Phytol. 232, 25–41 (2021).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jiang, M. et al. Nature 580, 227–231 (2020).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Guillemot, J. et al. New Phytol. 214, 180–193 (2017).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fatichi, S., Pappas, C., Zscheischler, J. & Leuzinger, S. New Phytol. 221, 652–668 (2019).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Friend, A. D. et al. Annu. For. Sci. 76, 49 (2019).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zuidema, P. A., Poulter, B. & Frank, D. C. Trends Plant Sci. 23, 1006–1015 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Martínez-Sancho, E., Treydte, K., Lehmann, M. M., Rigling, A. & Fonti, P. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.18224 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar  More