Ecology

Scheffers, B. R. et al. The broad footprint of climate change from genes to biomes to people. Science 354, aaf7671 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
IPBES. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Service. Debating Nature’s Value (IPBES, 2019).Harrison, S. Plant community diversity will decline more than increase under climatic warming. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 375, 20190106 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science (80-.). 1327, eaax3100 (2019).Chapin, F. S. et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales. Nature 546, 65–72 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Craven, D. et al. Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity–stability relationship. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1579–1587 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hautier, Y. et al. Anthropogenic environmental changes affect ecosystem stability via biodiversity. Science (80-.). 348, 336–340 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S., Fargione, J., Chapin, F. S. & Tilman, D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol. 4, e277 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pennekamp, F. et al. Biodiversity increases and decreases ecosystem stability. Nature 563, 109–112 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Valencia, E. et al. Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 24345–24351 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Y. et al. Global evidence of positive biodiversity effects on spatial ecosystem stability in natural grasslands. Nat. Commun. 10, 1–9 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Poorter, L. et al. Diversity enhances carbon storage in tropical forests. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1314–1328 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Schnabel, F. et al. Drivers of productivity and its temporal stability in a tropical tree diversity experiment. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 4257–4272 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Mahecha, M. D., Kattge, J. & Baldocchi, D. D. Linking plant and ecosystem functional biogeography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13697–13702 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S. Advancing nature-based approaches to address the biodiversity and climate emergency. Ecol. Lett. 23, 1729–1732 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mazzochini, G. G. et al. Plant phylogenetic diversity stabilizes large-scale ecosystem productivity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 1430–1439 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Manhães, A. P., Mazzochini, G. G., Oliveira-Filho, A. T., Ganade, G. & Carvalho, A. R. Spatial associations of ecosystem services and biodiversity as a baseline for systematic conservation planning. Divers. Distrib. 22, 932–943 (2016).
Google Scholar 
García-Palacios, P., Gross, N., Gaitán, J. & Maestre, F. T. Climate mediates the biodiversity–ecosystem stability relationship globally. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8400–8405 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
De Keersmaecker, W. et al. A model quantifying global vegetation resistance and resilience to short-term climate anomalies and their relationship with vegetation cover. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 539–548 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Seddon, A. W. R., Macias-Fauria, M., Long, P. R., Benz, D. & Willis, K. J. Sensitivity of global terrestrial ecosystems to climate variability. Nature 531, 229–232 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Linscheid, N. et al. Towards a global understanding of vegetation-climate dynamics at multiple timescales. Biogeosciences 17, 945–962 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Nemani, R. R. et al. Climate-driven increases in global terrestrial net primary production from 1982 to 1999. Science (80-.). 300, 1560–1563 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Quetin, G. R. & Swann, A. L. S. Empirically derived sensitivity of vegetation to climate across global gradients of temperature and precipitation. J. Clim. 30, 5835–5849 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Cavender-bares, J. et al. The role of diversification in community assembly of the oaks (Quercus L.) across the continental U. S. Am. J. Bot. 105, 565–586 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Woodward, F. I., Lomas, M. R. & Kelly, C. K. Global climate and the distribution of plant biomes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 359, 1465–1476 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Maurer, G. E., Hallmark, A. J., Brown, R. F., Sala, O. E. & Collins, S. L. Sensitivity of primary production to precipitation across the United States. Ecol. Lett. 23, 527–536 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cavender-Bares, J., Ackerly, D. D., Hobbie, S. E. & Townsend, P. A. Evolutionary legacy effects on ecosystems: biogeographic origins, plant traits, and implications for management in the era of global change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 433–462 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Harrison, S., Spasojevic, M. J. & Li, D. Climate and plant community diversity in space and time. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 4464–4470 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Šímová, I. et al. Spatial patterns and climate relationships of major plant traits in the New World differ between woody and herbaceous species. J. Biogeogr. 45, 895–916 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Lamanna, C. et al. Functional trait space and the latitudinal diversity gradient. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 13745–13750 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Craven, D. et al. A cross-scale assessment of productivity–diversity relationships. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 29, 1940–1955 (2020).
Google Scholar 
White, H. J. et al. Ecosystem stability at the landscape scale is primarily associated with climatic history. Funct. Ecol. 1–13 https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13957 (2021).Enquist, B. J. et al. Scaling from Traits to Ecosystems: Developing a General Trait Driver Theory via Integrating Trait-Based and Metabolic Scaling Theories. Advances in Ecological Research. Vol. 52 (Elsevier Ltd., 2015).Gonzalez, A. et al. Scaling-up biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research. Ecol. Lett. 23, 757–776 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Barry, K. E. et al. A graphical null model for scaling biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. J. Ecol. 109, 1549–1560 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S., Furukawa, T. & Sasaki, T. Response diversity determines the resilience of ecosystems to environmental change. Biol. Rev. 88, 349–364 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tilman, D., Reich, P. B. & Knops, J. M. H. Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment. Nature 441, 629–632 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Isbell, F. et al. Quantifying effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning across times and places. Ecol. Lett. 21, 763–778 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bond, E. M. & Chase, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning at local and regional spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 5, 467–470 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Delsol, R., Loreau, M. & Haegeman, B. The relationship between the spatial scaling of biodiversity and ecosystem stability. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 439–449 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Price, G. R. The nature of selection. J. Theor. Biol. 175, 389-396 (1995).Fonseca, C. R. & Ganade, G. Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J. Ecol. 89, 118–125 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Le Bagousse-Pinguet, Y. et al. Phylogenetic, functional, and taxonomic richness have both positive and negative effects on ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 8419–8424 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M., Dinnage, R. & Tilman, D. Phylogenetic diversity promotes ecosytem stability. Ecology 93, S223–S233 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Veron, S., Davies, T. J., Cadotte, M. W., Clergeau, P. & Pavoine, S. Predicting loss of evolutionary history: Where are we? Biol. Rev. 92, 271–291 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tucker, C. M., Davies, T. J., Cadotte, M. W. & Pearse, W. D. On the relationship between phylogenetic diversity and trait diversity. Ecology 99, 1473–1479 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Faith, D. P. Systematics and conservation: on predicting the feature diversity of subsets of taxa. Cladistics 8, 361–373 (1992).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hisano, M., Searle, E. B. & Chen, H. Y. H. Biodiversity as a solution to mitigate climate change impacts on the functioning of forest ecosystems. Biol. Rev. 93, 439–456 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Flynn, D. F. B., Mirotchnick, N., Jain, M., Palmer, M. I. & Naeem, S. Functional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity–ecosystem-function relationships. Ecology 92, 1573–1581 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J. & Oakley, T. H. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 17012–17017 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Venail, P. et al. Species richness, but not phylogenetic diversity, influences community biomass production and temporal stability in a re-examination of 16 grassland biodiversity studies. Funct. Ecol. 29, 615–626 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Enquist, B., Condit, R., Peet, R., Schildhauer, M. & Thiers, B. Cyberinfrastructure for an integrated botanical information network to investigate the ecological impacts of global climate change on plant biodiversity. PeerJ Prepr. 4, e2615v2 (2016).Maitner, B. S. et al. The bien R package: a tool to access the Botanical Information and Ecology Network (BIEN) database. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 373–379 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S. Resilience in the studies of biodiversity–ecosystem functioning. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 87–89 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Holling, C. S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4, 1–23 (1973).
Google Scholar 
Oliver, T. H. et al. Biodiversity and resilience of ecosystem functions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 673–684 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huete, A., Chris, J. & Leeuwen, W. Van. MODIS vegetation index (MOD 13). Algorithm theoretical basis document vol. 3 https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_mod13.pdf (1999).Abatzoglou, J. T., Dobrowski, S. Z., Parks, S. A. & Hegewisch, K. C. TerraClimate, a high-resolution global dataset of monthly climate and climatic water balance from 1958–2015. Sci. Data 5, 170191 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
MacIas-Fauria, M., Forbes, B. C., Zetterberg, P. & Kumpula, T. Eurasian Arctic greening reveals teleconnections and the potential for structurally novel ecosystems. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2, 613–618 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Garcia, R. A., Cabeza, M., Rahbek, C. & Araújo, M. B. Multiple dimensions of climate change and their implications for biodiversity. Science (80-.). 344, 1247579 (2014).Zhang, Y. et al. Precipitation and carbon-water coupling jointly control the interannual variability of global land gross primary production. Sci. Rep. 6, 39748 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Poulter, B. et al. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature 509, 600–603 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. Bioscience 51, 933 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Srivastava, D. S. et al. Phylogenetic diversity and the functioning of ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 15, 637–648 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Parker, I. M. et al. Phylogenetic structure and host abundance drive disease pressure in communities. Nature 520, 542–544 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Díaz, S. et al. The global spectrum of plant form and function. Nature 529, 167–171 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brun, P. et al. Plant community impact on productivity: Trait diversity or key(stone) species effects? Ecol. Lett. 25, 913–925 (2022).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Aubin, I. et al. Traits to stay, traits to move: a review of functional traits to assess sensitivity and adaptive capacity of temperate and boreal trees to climate change. Environ. Rev. 24, 164–186 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Reichstein, M., Bahn, M., Mahecha, M. D., Kattge, J. & Baldocchi, D. D. Linking plant and ecosystem functional biogeography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1216065111 (2014).Díaz, S. & Cabido, M. Vive la différence: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 646–655 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Poorter, L. et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211–214 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ye, J. S., Pei, J. Y. & Fang, C. Under which climate and soil conditions the plant productivity–precipitation relationship is linear or nonlinear? Sci. Total Environ. 616–617, 1174–1180 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Allan, E. et al. More diverse plant communities have higher functioning over time due to turnover in complementary dominant species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108, 17034–17039 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hurlbert, A. H. & Jetz, W. Species richness, hotspots, and the scale dependence of range maps in ecology and conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 104, 13384–13389 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mori, A. S. et al. Biodiversity–productivity relationships are key to nature-based climate solutions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 11, 543–550 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Kattge, J. et al. TRY plant trait database–enhanced coverage and open access. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 119–188 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Feeley, K. J., Bravo-Avila, C., Fadrique, B., Perez, T. M. & Zuleta, D. Climate-driven changes in the composition of New World plant communities. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 965–970 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, D., Miller, J. E. D. & Harrison, S. Climate drives loss of phylogenetic diversity in a grassland community. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 19989–19994 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Madani, N. et al. Future global productivity will be affected by plant trait response to climate. Sci. Rep. 8, 2870 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing Version 3.5.2. (R Core Team, 2018).Ammer, C. Diversity and forest productivity in a changing climate. N. Phytol. 221, 50–66 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Hooper, D. U. et al. A global synthesis reveals biodiversity loss as a major driver of ecosystem change. Nature 486, 105–108 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Larue, E. A., Hardiman, B. S., Elliott, J. M. & Fei, S. Structural diversity as a predictor of ecosystem function. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 114011 (2019).Phillips, S. J. & Dudìk, M. Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography (Cop.). 31, 161–175 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. & Bini, L. M. Modelling geographical patterns in species richness using eigenvector-based spatial filters. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 14, 177–185 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Merow, C., Smith, M. J. & Silander, J. a. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography (Cop.). 36, 1058–1069 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Merow, C. BIEN range methods description. http://bien.nceas.ucsb.edu/bien/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/BIEN3RangeMethodsSummary.pdf (2017).Schrodt, F. et al. BHPMF-a hierarchical Bayesian approach to gap-filling and trait prediction for macroecology and functional biogeography. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 1510–1521 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Bruelheide, H. et al. Global trait–environment relationships of plant communities. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1906–1917 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Guo, W. Y. et al. Half of the world’s tree biodiversity is unprotected and is increasingly threatened by human activities. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.21.052464 (2020).Guo, W., Serra-diaz, J. M., Schrodt, F. & Eiserhardt, W. L. Paleoclimate and current climate collectively shape the phylogenetic and functional diversity of trees worldwide. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.02.128975 (2020).Diniz-Filho, J. A. F. et al. On the selection of phylogenetic eigenvectors for ecological analyses. Ecography (Cop.). 35, 239–249 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Penone, C. et al. Imputation of missing data in life-history trait datasets: which approach performs the best? Methods Ecol. Evol. 5, 961–970 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Santos, T. PVR: Phylogenetic eigenvectors regression and phylogentic signal-representation curve. R package version 0.3. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=PVR (2018).Brum, F. T. et al. Global priorities for conservation across multiple dimensions of mammalian diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7641–7646 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gerhold, P., Cahill, J. F., Winter, M., Bartish, I. V. & Prinzing, A. Phylogenetic patterns are not proxies of community assembly mechanisms (they are far better). Funct. Ecol. 29, 600–614 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Kendall, M. & Stuart, A. The Advanced Theory of Statistics (Macmillan, 1983).Pavoine, S. & Bonsall, M. B. Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 86, 792–812 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tucker, C. M. et al. A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol. Rev. 92, 698–715 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cornwell, W. K., Schwilk, L. D. W. & Ackerly, D. D. A trait-based test for habitat filtering: convex hull volume. Ecology 87, 1465–1471 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Villéger, S., Maire, E. & Leprieur, F. On the risks of using dendrograms to measure functional diversity and multidimensional spaces to measure phylogenetic diversity: a comment on Sobral et al. (2016). Ecol. Lett. 20, 554–557 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Laliberté, E., Legendre, P. & Shipley, B. FD: measuring functional diversity from multiple traits, an other tools for functional ecology. R package version 1.0-12 (Comprehensive R Archive Network, Vienna, Austria, 2015).Podani, J. & Schmera, D. On dendrogram-based measures of functional diversity. Oikos 115, 179–185 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Poos, M. S., Walker, S. C. & Jackson, D. A. Functional-diversity indices can be driven by methodological choices and species richness. Ecology 90, 341–347 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gotelli, N. J. & Graves, G. R. Null Models in Ecology (Smithsonian Institution Press, 1996).Swenson, N. G. Functional and Phylogenetic Ecology in R. (Springer, 2014).Dormann, C. F. et al. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography (Cop.). 30, 609–628 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Kissling, W. D. & Carl, G. Spatial autocorrelation and the selection of simultaneous autoregressive models. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 17, 59–71 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Bivand, R. spatialreg: Spatial Regression Analysis (R package version 1.1-5, 2019). More

Vitousek, P. M., Porder, S., Houlton, B. Z. & Chadwick, O. A. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol. Appl. 20, 5–15 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hou, E. Q. et al. Global meta-analysis shows pervasive phosphorus limitation of aboveground plant production in natural terrestrial ecosystems. Nat. Commun. 11, 637 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cordell, D., Drangert, J.-O. & White, S. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 292–305 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Newbold, T. et al. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520, 45–50 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. L., Chen, H. Y. H., Searle, E. B., Chen, C. & Reich, P. B. Negative to positive shifts in diversity effects on soil nitrogen over time. Nat. Sustain. 4, 225–234 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Oelmann, Y. et al. Plant diversity effects on aboveground and belowground N pools in temperate grassland ecosystems: development in the first 5 years after establishment. Glob. Biogeochem. Cy. 25, GB2014 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fornara, D. A. et al. Plant effects on soil N mineralization are mediated by the composition of multiple soil organic fractions. Ecol. Res. 26, 201–208 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright, A. J., Wardle, D. A., Callaway, R. & Gaxiola, A. The overlooked role of facilitation in biodiversity experiments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 32, 383–390 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Oelmann, Y. et al. Above- and belowground biodiversity jointly tighten the P cycle in agricultural grasslands. Nat. Commun. 12, 4431 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, L. et al. Diversity enhances agricultural productivity via rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 11192–11196 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Li, L., Tilman, D., Lambers, H. & Zhang, F. S. Plant diversity and overyielding: insights from belowground facilitation of intercropping in agriculture. New Phytol. 203, 63–69 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hacker, N. et al. Plant diversity shapes microbe–rhizosphere effects on P mobilisation from organic matter in soil. Ecol. Lett. 18, 1356–1365 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vance, C. P., Uhde-Stone, C. & Allan, D. L. Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol. 157, 423–447 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, J. et al. Long-term nitrogen loading alleviates phosphorus limitation in terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5077–5086 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hinsinger, P. et al. P for two, sharing a scarce resource: soil phosphorus acquisition in the rhizosphere of intercropped species. Plant Physiol. 156, 1078–1086 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, X. J. et al. Plant diversity and species turnover co-regulate soil nitrogen and phosphorus availability in Dinghushan forests, southern China. Plant Soil 464, 257–272 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hooper, D. U. & Vitousek, P. M. Effects of plant composition and diversity on nutrient cycling. Ecol. Monogr. 68, 121–149 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alberti, G. et al. Tree functional diversity influences belowground ecosystem functioning. Appl. Soil Ecol. 120, 160–168 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maddhesiya, P. K., Singh, K. & Singh, R. P. Effects of perennial aromatic grass species richness and microbial consortium on soil properties of marginal lands and on biomass production. Land Degrad. Dev. 32, 1008–1021 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, C. B. et al. Effects of plant diversity on nutrient retention and enzyme activities in a full-scale constructed wetland. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 1686–1692 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Štursová, M. & Baldrian, P. Effects of soil properties and management on the activity of soil organic matter transforming enzymes and the quantification of soil-bound and free activity. Plant Soil 338, 99–110 (2011).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wu, H. et al. Linkage between tree species richness and soil microbial diversity improves phosphorus bioavailability. Funct. Ecol. 33, 1549–1560 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steinauer, K. et al. Plant diversity effects on soil microbial functions and enzymes are stronger than warming in a grassland experiment. Ecology 96, 99–112 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, D. S. et al. Increased soil phosphorus availability induced by faba bean root exudation stimulates root growth and phosphorus uptake in neighbouring maize. New Phytol. 209, 823–831 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berendse, F., van Ruijven, J., Jongejans, E. & Keesstra, S. Loss of plant species diversity reduces soil erosion resistance. Ecosystems 18, 881–888 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Forrester, D. I. & Bauhus, J. A review of processes behind diversity–productivity relationships in forests. Curr. Rep. 2, 45–61 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Batterman, S. A. et al. Phosphatase activity and nitrogen fixation reflect species differences, not nutrient trading or nutrient balance, across tropical rainforest trees. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1486–1495 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, C., Chen, H. Y. H., Chen, X. & Huang, Z. Meta-analysis shows positive effects of plant diversity on microbial biomass and respiration. Nat. Commun. 10, 1332 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hisano, M., Chen, H. Y. H., Searle, E. B. & Reich, P. B. Species-rich boreal forests grew more and suffered less mortality than species-poor forests under the environmental change of the past half-century. Ecol. Lett. 22, 999–1008 (2019).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. & Chen, H. Y. H. Plant diversity loss reduces soil respiration across terrestrial ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1482–1492 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. & Chen, H. Y. H. Plant mixture balances terrestrial ecosystem C:N:P stoichiometry. Nat. Commun. 12, 4562 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Reich, P. B. et al. Species and functional group diversity independently influence biomass accumulation and its response to CO2 and N. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 10101–10106 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. et al. Effects of plant diversity on soil carbon in diverse ecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Biol. Rev. 95, 167–183 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y., Chen, H. Y. H. & Reich, P. B. Forest productivity increases with evenness, species richness and trait variation: a global meta-analysis. J. Ecol. 100, 742–749 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alewell, C. et al. Global phosphorus shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 11, 4546 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mueller, K. E., Tilman, D., Fornara, D. A. & Hobbie, S. E. Root depth distribution and the diversity–productivity relationship in a long-term grassland experiment. Ecology 94, 787–793 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tang, X. Y. et al. Intercropping legumes and cereals increases phosphorus use efficiency; a meta-analysis. Plant Soil 460, 89–104 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Karanika, E. D., Alifragis, D. A., Mamolos, A. P. & Veresoglou, D. S. Differentiation between responses of primary productivity and phosphorus exploitation to species richness. Plant Soil 297, 69–81 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bünemann, E. K., Prusisz, B. & Ehlers, K. in Phosphorus in Action: Biological Processes in Soil Phosphorus Cycling (eds Bünemann, E. et al.) 37–57 (Springer, 2011).Ma, Z. L. & Chen, H. Y. H. Effects of species diversity on fine root productivity in diverse ecosystems: a global meta-analysis. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 1387–1396 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mellado-Vazquez, P. G. et al. Plant diversity generates enhanced soil microbial access to recently photosynthesized carbon in the rhizosphere. Soil Biol. Biochem. 94, 122–132 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Qin, Y. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus differentially regulates P mobilizing bacterial community and abundance in rhizosphere and hyphosphere. Appl. Soil Ecol. 170, 104294 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rojo, M. J., Carcedo, S. G. & Mateos, M. P. Distribution and characterization of phosphatase and organic phosphorus in soil fractions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 169–174 (1990).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrow, N. The effects of pH on phosphate uptake from the soil. Plant Soil 410, 401–410 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Button, K. S. et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365–376 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Yu, R. P., Li, X. X., Xiao, Z. H., Lambers, H. & Li, L. Phosphorus facilitation and covariation of root traits in steppe species. New Phytol. 226, 1285–1298 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine 6, e1000097 (2009).Jenkins, D. G. & Quintana-Ascencio, P. F. A solution to minimum sample size for regressions. PLoS ONE 15, e0229345 (2020)..Rohatgi, A. WebPlotDigitizer v.4.5 (Automeris, 2021); https://automeris.io/WebPlotDigitizerJobbagy, E. G. & Jackson, R. B. The distribution of soil nutrients with depth:global patterns and the imprint of plants. Biogeochemistry 53, 51–77 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trabucco, A. & Zomer, R. Global Aridity Index (Global-Aridity) and Global Potential Evapo-Transpiration (Global-PET) Geospatial Database (CGIAR, 2009); http://www.cgiar-csi.org/data/global-aridity-and-pet-databaseBridgham, S. D., Pastor, J., Mcclaugherty, C. A. & Richardson, C. J. Nutrient-use efficiency: a litterfall index, a model, and a test along a nutrient-availability gradient in North Carolina peatlands. Am. Nat. 145, 1–21 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loreau, M. & Hector, A. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412, 72–76 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517, 365–368 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D. et al. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-10 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html (2017).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N. & Elphick, C. S. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 3–14 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, J. B. & Omland, K. S. Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 101–108 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.42.1 (2018).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, 2009).Koricheva, J., Gurevitch, J. & Mengersen, K. Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution (Princeton Univ. Press, 2013).Graham, M. H. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. Ecology 84, 2809–2815 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modelling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Long, J. A. Interactions: comprehensive, user-friendly toolkit for probing interactions. R package version 1.1.5 https://cran.r-project.org/package=interactions (2021).Adams, D. C., Gurevitch, J. & Rosenberg, M. S. Resampling tests for meta-analysis of ecological data. Ecology 78, 1277–1283 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2021). More

Chuine, I. Why does phenology drive species distribution? Philos. Trans. 365, 3149–3160 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Chuine, I. & Beaubien, E. G. Phenology is a major determinant of tree species range. Ecol. Lett. 4, 500–510 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Richardson, D. A. et al. Climate change, phenology, and phenological control of vegetation feedbacks to the climate system. Agric. For. Meteorol. 169, 156–173 (2013).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Tang, J. et al. Emerging opportunities and challenges in phenology: a review. Ecosphere 7, e01436 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 1922–1940 (2019).ADS 
MathSciNet 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Three times greater weight of daytime than of night‐time temperature on leaf unfolding phenology in temperate trees. N. Phytol. 212, 590–597 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Menzel, A. et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Glob. Chang. Biol. 12, 1969–1976 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Piao, S. et al. Leaf onset in the northern hemisphere triggered by daytime temperature. Nat. Commun. 6, 6911 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Penuelas, J., Rutishauser, T. & Filella, I. Phenology feedbacks on climate change. Science 324, 887–888 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. H. et al. Declining global warming effects on the phenology of spring leaf unfolding. Nature 526, 104–107 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lang, G. A. Dormancy: a new universal terminology. HortScience 22, 817–820 (1987).
Google Scholar 
Perry, T. O. Dormancy of trees in winter. Science 171, 29–36 (1971).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huang, J. et al. Intra-annual wood formation of subtropical Chinese red pine shows better growth in dry season than wet season. Tree Physiol. 38, 1225–1236 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Knowles, J. F. et al. Montane forest productivity across a semi-arid climatic gradient. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 6945–6958 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richard, S., Kjellsen, T. D., Schaberg, P. G. & Murakami, P. F. Dynamics of low-temperature acclimation in temperate and boreal conifer foliage in a mild winter climate. Tree Physiol. 28, 1365–1374 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Roxas, A. A., Orozco, J., Guzmán-Delgado, P. & Zwieniecki, M. A. Spring phenology is affected by fall non-structural carbohydrate concentration and winter sugar redistribution in three Mediterranean nut tree species. Tree Physiol. 41, 1425–1438 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Palacio, S., Martínez, M. M. & Montserrat-Martí, G. Seasonal dynamics of non-structural carbohydrates in two species of mediterranean sub-shrubs with different leaf phenology. Environ. Exp. Bot. 59, 34–42 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fierravanti, A., Rossi, S., Kneeshaw, D., Grandpré, L. D. & Deslauriers, A. Low non-structural carbon accumulation in spring reduces growth and increases mortality in conifers defoliated by spruce budworm. Front. For. Glob. Change. 2, 1–13 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Oberhuber, W., Gruber, A., Lethaus, G., Winkler, A. & Wieser, G. Stem girdling indicates prioritized carbon allocation to the root system at the expense of radial stem growth in Norway spruce under drought conditions. Environ. Exp. Bot. 138, 109–118 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pérez-de-Lis, G., Rossi, S., Vázquez-Ruiz, R. A., Rozas, V. & García-González, I. Do changes in spring phenology affect earlywood vessels? Perspective from the xylogenesis monitoring of two sympatric ring-porous oaks. N. Phytol. 209, 521–530 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Weber, R., Gessler, A. & Hoch, G. High carbon storage in carbon-limited trees. N. Phytol. 222, 171–182 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zani, D., Crowther, T. W., Lidong, M., Renner, S. S. & Zohner, C. M. Increased growing-season productivity drives earlier autumn leaf senescence in temperate trees. Science 370, 1066–1071 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dusenge, M. E., Duarte, A. G. & Way, D. A. Plant carbon metabolism and climate change: elevated CO2 and temperature impacts on photosynthesis, photorespiration and respiration. N. Phytol. 221, 32–49 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lin, Y.-S., Medlyn, B. E. & Ellsworth, D. Temperature responses of leaf net photosynthesis: the role of component processes. Tree Physiol. 32, 219–231 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huang, M. et al. Air temperature optima of vegetation productivity across global biomes. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 772–779 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Terashima, I. & Hikosaka, K. Comparative ecophysiology of leaf and canopy photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 1111–1128 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Liang, J., Xia, J., Liu, L. & Wan, S. Global patterns of the responses of leaf-level photosynthesis and respiration in terrestrial plants to experimental warming. J. Plant. Ecol. 6, 437–447 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Duffy, K. A. et al. How close are we to the temperature tipping point of the terrestrial biosphere? Sci. Adv. 7, eaay1052 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Güsewell, S., Furrer, R., Gehrig, R. & Pietragalla, B. Changes in temperature sensitivity of spring phenology with recent climate warming in Switzerland are related to shifts of the preseason. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 5189–5202 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, T. F., Richardson, A. D. & Hufkens, K. On quantifying the apparent temperature sensitivity of plant phenology. N. Phytol. 225, 1033–1040 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Klein, T., Vitasse, Y. & Hoch, G. Coordination between growth, phenology and carbon storage in three coexisting deciduous tree species in a temperate forest. Tree Physiol. 36, 847–855 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kagawa, A., Sugimoto, A. & Maximov, T. C. Seasonal course of translocation, storage and remobilization of 13C pulse-labeled photoassimilate in naturally growing Larix gmelinii saplings. N. Phytol. 171, 793–804 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Rinne, K. T. et al. Examining the response of needle carbohydrates from Siberian larch trees to climate using compound-specific δ(13) C and concentration analyses. Plant Cell Environ. 38, 2340–2352 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schädel, C., Blöchl, A., Richter, A. & Hoch, G. Short-term dynamics of nonstructural carbohydrates and hemicelluloses in young branches of temperate forest trees during bud break. Tree Physiol. 29, 901–911 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kaurin, A., Junttila, O. & Hanson, J. Seasonal changes in frost hardiness in cloudberry (Rubus chamaemorus) in relation to carbohydrate content with special reference to sucrose. Physiol. Plant. 52, 310–314 (1981).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Shahba, M. A., Qian, Y. L., Hughes, H. G., Koski, A. J. & Christensen, D. Relationships of soluble carbohydrates and freeze tolerance in saltgrass. Crop Sci. 43, 2148–2153 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, J. et al. Contrasting temporal variations in responses of leaf unfolding to daytime and nighttime warming. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 5084–5093 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marchand, L. J. et al. Inter-individual variability in spring phenology of temperate deciduous trees depends on species, tree size and previous year autumn phenology. Agric Meteorol. 290, 108031 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Shen, M. et al. Can changes in autumn phenology facilitate earlier green-up date of northern vegetation? Agric Meteorol. 291, 108077 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Chen, L. et al. Long-term changes in the impacts of global warming on leaf phenology of four temperate tree species. Glob. Chang. Biol. 25, 997–1004 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hanninen, H. Boreal and temperate trees in a changing climate: modelling the ecophysiology of seasonality. (Springer, 2016).Dreyer, E., Le Roux, X., Montpied, P., Daudet, F. A. & Masson, F. Temperature response of leaf photosynthetic capacity in seedlings from seven temperate tree species. Tree Physiol. 21, 223–232 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Devi, A. F. & Garkoti, S. C. Variation in evergreen and deciduous species leaf phenology in Assam. India Trees 27, 985–997 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Bai, K., He, C., Wan, X. & Jiang, D. Leaf economics of evergreen and deciduous tree species along an elevational gradient in a subtropical mountain. AoB PLANTS 7, plv064 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Qi, J., Fan, Z., Fu, P., Zhang, Y. & Sterck, F. Differential determinants of growth rates in subtropical evergreen and deciduous juvenile trees: carbon gain, hydraulics and nutrient-use efficiencies. Tree Physiol. 41, 12–23 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fyllas, N. M. et al. Functional trait variation among and within species and plant functional types in mountainous mediterranean forests. Front. Plant Sci. 11, 1–18 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Templ, B. et al. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. Int J. Biometeorol. 62, 1109–1113 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P. & Licata, L. Detecting outliers: do not use standard deviation around the mean, use absolute deviation around the median. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 49, 764–766 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. D. et al. Tracking vegetation phenology across diverse North American biomes using PhenoCam imagery. Sci. Data. 5, 180028 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Klosterman, S. et al. Evaluating remote sensing of deciduous forest phenology at multiple spatial scales using PhenoCam imagery. Biogeosciences 11, 4305–4320 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Y. et al. Seasonal and interannual changes in vegetation activity of tropical forests in Southeast Asia. Agric. For. Meteorol. 224, 1–10 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Pinzon, J. E. & Tucker, C. J. A non-stationary 1981–2012 AVHRR NDVI3g time series. Remote Sens. 6, 6929–6960 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. No trends in spring and autumn phenology during the global warming hiatus. Nat. Commun. 10, 2389 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. Validation of MODIS-GPP product at 10 flux sites in northern China. Int. J. Remote Sens. 34, 587–599 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Julien, Y. & Sobrino, J. Global land surface phenology trends from GIMMS database. Int J. Remote Sens. 30, 3495–3513 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Monitoring vegetation phenology using MODIS. Remote Sens Environ. 84, 471–475 (2003).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Dinerstein, E. et al. An ecoregion-based approach to protecting half the terrestrial realm. Bioscience 67, 534–545 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pastorello, G. et al. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Sci. Data. 7, 1–27 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Huang, K. et al. Enhanced peak growth of global vegetation and its key mechanisms. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1897–1905 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tang, Y., Xu, X., Zhou, Z., Qu, Y. & Sun, Y. Estimating global maximum gross primary productivity of vegetation based on the combination of MODIS greenness and temperature data. Ecol. Inform. 63, 101307 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Xia, J. et al. Joint control of terrestrial gross primary productivity by plant phenology and physiology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 2788–2793 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kalman, D. A singularly valuable decomposition: The SVD of a matrix. Coll. Math. J. 27, 2–23 (1996).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Biriukova, K. et al. Performance of singular spectrum analysis in separating seasonal and fast physiological dynamics of solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence and PRI optical signals. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 126, e2020JG006158 (2021).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, A. D. et al. Influence of spring and autumn phenological transitions on forest ecosystem productivity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 365, 3227–3246 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wu, C. et al. Interannual variability of net carbon exchange is related to the lag between the end-dates of net carbon uptake and photosynthesis: Evidence from long records at two contrasting forest stands. Agric. For. Meteorol. 164, 29–38 (2012).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Cornes, R., der Schrier, G. V., den Besselaar, E. J. M. V. & Jones, P. An ensemble version of the E-OBS temperature and precipitation data sets. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 123, 9391–9409 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Hijmans, R. J. et al. raster: Geographic data analysis and modeling. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster. R package version 3.5-15 (2022).R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2021).Erb, I. Partial correlations in compositional data analysis. Comput. Geosci. 6, 100026 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Vitasse, Y., Signarbieux, C. & Fu, Y. H. Global warming leads to more uniform spring phenology across elevations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 1004–1008 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kim, S. ppcor: Partial and semi-partial (part) correlation. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ppcor. R package version 1.1 (2015).Lefcheck, J. S. piecewiseSEM: piecewise structural equation modeling in R for ecology, evolution, and systematics. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 573–579 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 45, 5–32 (2001).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Valavi, R., Elith, J., Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. & Guillera-Arroita, G. Modelling species presence-only data with random forests. Ecography 44, 1731–1742 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Freeman, E. A., Moisen, G. G., Coulston, J. W. & Wilson, B. T. Random forests and stochastic gradient boosting for predicting tree canopy cover: comparing tuning processes and model performance. Can. J. For. Res. 46, 323–339 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Liaw, A. & Wiener, M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R. N. 2, 18–22 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Cutler, D. et al. Random forests for classification in ecology. Ecology 88, 2783–2792 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.This is a summary of: Liu, Y. et al. A genome and gene catalog of glacier microbiomes. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-022-01367-2 (2022). More

Rockström, J. et al. Sustainable intensification of agriculture for human prosperity and global sustainability. Ambio 46, 4–17 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Steffen, W. et al. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347, 1259855 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Campbell, B. M. et al. Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecol. Soc. 22, 8 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hazell, P. & Wood, S. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 495–515 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lehmann, P. et al. Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 141–150 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Foley, J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 478, 337–342 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Springmann, M. et al. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562, 519–525 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hunter, M. C., Smith, R. G., Schipanski, M. E., Atwood, L. W. & Mortensen, D. A. Agriculture in 2050: recalibrating targets for sustainable intensification. Bioscience 67, 386–391 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment, 2005); http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdfBommarco, R., Kleijn, D. & Potts, S. G. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 230–238 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kleijn, D. et al. Ecological intensification: bridging the gap between science and practice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 154–166 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pingali, P. L. Green revolution: impacts, limits, and the path ahead. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 12302–12308 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wezel, A. et al. Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. Sustain. Agric. 2, 27–43 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Garnett, T. et al. Sustainable intensification in agriculture: premises and policies. Science 341, 33–34 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lipper, L. et al. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 1068–1072 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittonell, P. Ecological intensification of agriculture—sustainable by nature. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 8, 53–61 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jenkinson, D. S. The impact of humans on the nitrogen cycle, with focus on temperate arable agriculture. Plant Soil 228, 3–15 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Verheijen, F. G. A., Jones, R. J. A., Rickson, R. J. & Smith, C. J. Tolerable versus actual soil erosion rates in Europe. Earth Sci. Rev. 94, 23–38 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peoples, M. B. et al. in Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality (eds Lemaire, G. et al.) 123–142 (Academic Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00008-XStorkey, J., Bruce, T., McMillan, V. & Neve, P. in Agroecosystem Diversity: Reconciling Contemporary Agriculture and Environmental Quality (eds Lemaire, G. et al.) 199–209 (Academic Press, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811050-8.00012-1Schröder, J. Revisiting the agronomic benefits of manure: a correct assessment and exploitation of its fertilizer value spares the environment. Bioresour. Technol. 96, 253–261 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mhlanga, B., Ercoli, L., Pellegrino, E., Onofri, A. & Thierfelder, C. The crucial role of mulch to enhance the stability and resilience of cropping systems in southern Africa. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 41, 29–43 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrett, C. B. & Bevis, L. E. M. The self-reinforcing feedback between low soil fertility and chronic poverty. Nat. Geosci. 8, 907–912 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tittonell, P. & Giller, K. E. When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res. 143, 76–90 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sandén, T. et al. European long-term field experiments: knowledge gained about alternative management practices. Soil Use Manage. 34, 167–176 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storkey, J. et al. The unique contribution of Rothamsted to ecological research at large temporal scales. Adv. Ecol. Res. 55, 3–42 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Johnston, A. E. & Poulton, P. R. The importance of long-term experiments in agriculture: their management to ensure continued crop production and soil fertility; the Rothamsted experience. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 69, 113–125 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bowles, T. M. et al. Long-term evidence shows that crop-rotation diversification increases agricultural resilience to adverse growing conditions in North America. One Earth 2, 284–293 (2020).Marini, L. et al. Crop rotations sustain cereal yields under a changing climate. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 124011 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lal, R. Carbon emission from farm operations. Environ. Int. 30, 981–990 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cordell, D., Drangert, J. O. & White, S. The story of phosphorus: global food security and food for thought. Glob. Environ. Change 19, 292–305 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lechenet, M., Dessaint, F., Py, G., Makowski, D. & Munier-Jolain, N. Reducing pesticide use while preserving crop productivity and profitability on arable farms. Nat. Plants 3, 17008 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bedoussac, L. et al. Ecological principles underlying the increase of productivity achieved by cereal-grain legume intercrops in organic farming. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 35, 911–935 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Storkey, J., Mead, A., Addy, J. & MacDonald, A. J. Agricultural intensification and climate change have increased the threat from weeds. Glob. Change Biol. 27, 2416–2425 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vanlauwe, B. et al. in Integrated Plant Nutrient Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: From Concept to Practice (eds Vanlauwe, B. et al.) 173–184 (CABI, 2002).Hijbeek, R. et al. Do organic inputs matter—a meta-analysis of additional yield effects for arable crops in Europe. Plant Soil 411, 293–303 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thierfelder, C. & Wall, P. C. Effects of conservation agriculture techniques on infiltration and soil water content in Zambia and Zimbabwe. Soil Tillage Res. 105, 217–227 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gentile, R., Vanlauwe, B., Chivenge, P. & Six, J. Interactive effects from combining fertilizer and organic residue inputs on nitrogen transformations. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 2375–2384 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mupangwa, W. et al. Maize yields from rotation and intercropping systems with different legumes under conservation agriculture in contrasting agro-ecologies. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 306, 107170 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. Productivity limits and potentials of the principles of conservation agriculture. Nature 517, 365–368 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Steward, P. R. et al. The adaptive capacity of maize-based conservation agriculture systems to climate stress in tropical and subtropical environments: a meta-regression of yields. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 251, 194–202 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pittelkow, C. M. et al. When does no-till yield more? A global meta-analysis. Field Crops Res. 183, 156–168 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sun, W. et al. Climate drives global soil carbon sequestration and crop yield changes under conservation agriculture. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 3325–3335 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kirkegaard, J. A. et al. Sense and nonsense in conservation agriculture: principles, pragmatism and productivity in Australian mixed farming systems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 187, 133–145 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Thierfelder, C. et al. Complementary practices supporting conservation agriculture in southern Africa. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 38, 16–37 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Alignier, A. et al. Configurational crop heterogeneity increases within-field plant diversity. J. Appl. Ecol. 57, 654–663 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liebman, M. et al. Ecologically sustainable weed management: how do we get from proof-of-concept to adoption? Ecol. Appl. 26, 1352–1369 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Giller, K. E. The food security conundrum of sub-Saharan Africa. Glob. Food Sec. 26, 100431 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Addy, J. W. G., Ellis, R. H., Macdonald, A. J., Semenov, M. A. & Mead, A. Changes in agricultural climate in South-Eastern England from 1892 to 2016 and differences in cereal and permanent grassland yield. Agric. For. Meteorol. 308–309, 108560 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S. & Baayen, H. Parsimonious mixed models. Preprint at https://arXiv.org/abs/1506.04967v2 (2018).MacLaren, C., Glendining, M., Poulton, P., Macdonald, A. & Clark, S. Woburn Ley-Arable Experiment: Yields of Wheat as First Test Crop, 1976–2018 (e-RA Rothamsted, 2022); https://doi.org/10.23637/wrn3-wheat7618-01 .Lenth, R. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means: R package version 1.7.2 https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2020).Viechtbauer, W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. J. Stat. Softw. 36, 1–48 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lajeunesse, M. J. On the meta-analysis of response ratios for studies with correlated and multi-group designs. Ecology 92, 2049–2055 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2016).Crain, C. M., Kroeker, K. & Halpern, B. S. Interactive and cumulative effects of multiple human stressors in marine systems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 1304–1315 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Forest complexity increases hydrological resistance to disturbancesIn general, natural forests, old forests, forests with high coverage, and forests located in low aridity regions (P/PET ≥ 1) are characterized by higher ecosystem complexity than planted forests, young forests, forests with low coverage, and forests located in arid regions (P/PET  More

Zhu, C. et al. Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels this century will alter the protein, micronutrients, and vitamin content of rice grains with potential health consequences for the poorest rice-dependent countries. Sci. Adv. 4, eaaq1012 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Alexandratos, N. & Bruinsma, J. World Agriculture Towards 2030/2050: The 2012 Revision (FAO Agricultural Development Economics Division, 2012).Arunrat, N., Pumijumnong, N., Sereenonchai, S., Chareonwong, U. & Wang, C. Assessment of climate change impact on rice yield and water footprint of large-scale and individual farming in Thailand. Sci. Total Environ. 726, 137864 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lafferty, D. C. et al. Statistically bias-corrected and downscaled climate models underestimate the adverse effects of extreme heat on U.S. maize yields. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 196 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Davis, K. F., Downs, S. & Gephart, J. A. Towards food supply chain resilience to environmental shocks. Nat. Food. 2, 54–65 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Wang, X. et al. Emergent constraint on crop yield response to warmer temperature from field experiments. Nat. Sustain. 3, 908–916 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sun, T. et al. Current rice models underestimate yield losses from short-term heat stresses. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 402–416 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Challinor, A. J. et al. A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 287–291 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Iizumi, T. & Ramankutty, N. Changes in yield variability of major crops for 1981–2010 explained by climate change. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 034003 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C. & Foley, J. A. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat. Commun. 3, 1293 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Amelung, W. et al. Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 494, 390 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chen, X. et al. Producing more grain with lower environmental costs. Nature 514, 486–489 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528, 51–59 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Guo, J. et al. Significant acidification in major Chinese croplands. Science 327, 1008–1010 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Galloway, J. et al. Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions. Science 320, 889–892 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xia, L., Lam, S. K., Yan, X. & Chen, D. How does recycling of livestock manure in agroecosystems affect crop productivity, reactive nitrogen losses, and soil carbon balance? Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 7450–7457 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, T. et al. Replacing synthetic fertilizer by manure requires adjusted technology and incentives: A farm survey across China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 168, 105301 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Bi, L. et al. Long-term effects of organic amendments on the rice yields for double rice cropping systems in subtropical China. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 129, 534–541 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Du, Y. et al. Effects of manure fertilizer on crop yield and soil properties in China: A meta-analysis. Catena 193, 104617 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, K., Zhang, X. & Ervin, E. Antioxidative responses in roots and shoots of creeping bentgrass under high temperature: Effects of nitrogen and cytokinin. J. Plant Physiol. 169, 492–500 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Jespersen, D. & Huang, B. Proteins associated with heat‐induced leaf senescence in creeping bentgrass as affected by foliar application of nitrogen, cytokinins, and an ethylene inhibitor. Proteomics. 15, 798–812 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xi, Y. et al. Exogenous phosphite application alleviates the adverse effects of heat stress and improves thermotolerance of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) seedlings. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 190, 110048 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Waraich, E. A., Ahmad, R., Halim, A. & Aziz, T. Alleviation of temperature stress by nutrient management in crop plants: a review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nut. 12, 221–244 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Yamori, W., Noguchi, K., Hikosaka, K. & Terashima, I. Phenotypic plasticity in photosynthetic temperature acclimation among crop species with different cold tolerances. Plant Physiol. 152, 388–399 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends. Plant Sci. 7, 405–410 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q., Chen, J., He, N. & Guo, F. Metabolic reprogramming in chloroplasts under heat stress in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 849 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Cheng, Q. et al. An alternatively spliced heat shock transcription factor, OsHSFA2dI, functions in the heat stress-induced unfolded protein response in rice. Plant Biol. 17, 419–429 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Miura, K. et al. SIZ1-mediated sumoylation of ICE1 controls CBF3/DREB1A expression and freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 19, 1403–1414 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xie, G., Kato, H., Sasaki, K. & Imai, R. A cold-induced thioredoxin h of rice, OsTrx23, negatively regulates kinase activities of OsMPK3 and OsMPK6 in vitro. FEBS Lett. 583, 2734–2738 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M. A. & Fujita, M. Nitric oxide modulates antioxidant defense and the methylglyoxal detoxification system and reduces salinity-induced damage of wheat seedlings. Plant Biotechnol. Rep. 5, 353 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Uchida, A., Jagendorf, A. T., Hibino, T., Takabe, T. & Takabe, T. Effects of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide on both salt and heat stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 163, 515–523 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Khan, S. et al. Plants mechanisms and adaptation strategies to improve heat tolerance in rice. A review. Plants 8, 508 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y., Gao, Y., Xu, X., Shen, Q. & Guo, S. Light-saturated photosynthetic rate in high-nitrogen rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaves is related to chloroplastic CO2 concentration. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2351–2360 (2009).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xiong, D. et al. Rapid responses of mesophyll conductance to changes of CO2 concentration, temperature, and irradiance are affected by N supplements in rice. Plant. Cell Environ. 38, 2541–2550 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Waraich, E. A., Ahmad, R., Ashraf, M. Y., Saifullah & Ahmad, M. Improving agricultural water use effciency by nutrient management in crop plants. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect.-B Soil. Plant Sci. 61, 291–304 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dias, A. S. & Lidon, F. C. Bread and durum wheat tolerance under heat stress: A synoptical overview. Emir. J. Food Agric. 22, 412–436 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Meshah, E. A. E. Effect of irrigation regimes and foliar spraying of potassium on yield, yield components and water use efficiency of wheat in sandy soils. World J. Agric. Sci. 5, 662–669 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Huang, G., Zhang, Q., Wei, X., Peng, S. & Li, Y. Nitrogen can alleviate the inhibition of photosynthesis caused by high temperature stress under both steady-state and flecked irradiance. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 945 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Zhou, Y. et al. High nitrogen input reduces yield loss from low temperature during the seedling stage in early-season rice. Field Crop. Res. 228, 68–75 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Hou, L. et al. Effects of different phosphate fertilizer application on permeability of membrane and antioxidative enzymes in rice under low temperature stress. Acta Agriculturae. Boreali-Sinica 27, 118–123 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Dong, W. et al. Effect of different fertilizer application on the soil fertility of paddy soils in red soil region of southern China. PLoS One 7, e44504 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bertollo, A. M. et al. Precrops alleviate soil physical limitations for soybean root growth in an Oxisol from southern Brazil. Soil Till. Res. 206, 104820 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Ren, Y. et al. Functional compensation dominates plant rhizosphere microbiota assembly of plant rhizospheric bacterial community. Soil Biol. Biochem. 150, 107968 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Oka, Y. Mechanisms of nematode suppression by organic soil amendments—a review. Appl. Soil Ecol. 44, 101–115 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Rose, M. T. et al. A meta-analysis and review of plant-growth response to humic substances: Practical implications for agriculture. Adv. Agron 124, 37–89 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
García, A. C. et al. Vermicompost humic acids modulate the accumulation and metabolism of ROS in rice plants. J. Plant Physiol. 192, 56–63 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Dieleman, W. I. et al. Simple additive effects are rare: A quantitative review of plant biomass and soil process responses to combined manipulations of CO2 and temperature. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 2681–2693 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Muhammad, Q. et al. Yield sustainability, soil organic carbon sequestration, and nutrients balance under long-term combined application of manure and inorganic fertilizers in acidic paddy soil. Soil Till. Res. 198, 104509 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Benefits and trade-offs of replacing synthetic fertilizers by animal manures in crop production in China: A meta‐analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 888–900 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, X. et al. Significant residual effects of wheat fertilization on greenhouse gas emissions in succeeding soybean growing season. Soil Till. Res. 169, 7–15 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Latare, A. M., Kumar, O., Singh, S. K. & Gupta, A. Direct and residual effect of sewage sludge on yield, heavy metals content and soil fertility under rice–wheat system. Ecol. Eng. 69, 17–24 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. et al. Long-term straw incorporation increases rice yield stability under high fertilization level conditions in the rice–wheat system. Crop J. 9, 1191–1197 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Pachauri, R. K. et al. Climate change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2014).Choi, W. J., Lee, M. S., Choi, J. E., Yoon, S. & Kim, H. Y. How do weather extremes affect rice productivity in a changing climate? An answer to episodic lack of sunshine. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 1300–1310 (2013).
Google Scholar 
FAO. FAOSTAT Online Statistical Service. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RFN, (FAO, 2016).Carlson, K. M. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions intensity of global croplands. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 63–68 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sheldrick, W., Syers, J. K. & Lingard, J. Contribution of livestock excreta to nutrient balances. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst. 66, 119–131 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Thangarajan, R., Bolan, N. S., Tian, G., Naidu, R. & Kunhikrishnan, A. Role of organic amendment application on greenhouse gas emission from soil. Sci. Total Environ. 465, 72–96 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Aryal, J. P. et al. Factors affecting farmers’ use of organic and inorganic fertilizers in South Asia. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 51480–51496 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, Q. et al. Targeting hotspots to achieve sustainable nitrogen management in China’s smallholder-dominated cereal production. Agronomy 11, 557 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Tyagi, V. K. et al. Anaerobic co-digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW): Progress and challenges. Renewable Sustain. Energy Rev. 93, 380–399 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Schlesinger, W. H. Carbon sequestration in soils: Some cautions amidst optimism. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 82, 121–127 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Potter, P., Ramankutty, N., Bennett, E. M. & Donner, S. D. Characterizing the spatial patterns of global fertilizer application and manure production. Earth Interact. 14, 1–22 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Zhao, F., Yang, L., Chen, L., Li, S. & Sun, L. Bioaccumulation of antibiotics in crops under long-term manure application: Occurrence, biomass response, and human exposure. Chemosphere 219, 882–895 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chadwick, D. R. et al. Strategies to reduce nutrient pollution from manure management in China. Front. Agr. Sci. Eng. 7, 45–55 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Jin, S. et al. Decoupling livestock and crop production at the household level in China. Nat. Sustain 4, 48–55 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Chen, D., Yuan, L., Liu, Y., Ji, J. & Hou, H. Long-term application of manures plus chemical fertilizers sustained high rice yield and improved soil chemical and bacterial properties. Eur. J. Agron. 90, 34–42 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Siddik, M. A. et al. Responses of indica rice yield and quality to extreme high and low temperatures during the reproductive period. Eur. J. Agron. 106, 30–38 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. & Teare, I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39, 205–207 (1973).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. & Dennis, R. K. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 Chemical Methods (ed Page, A. L.) (Soil Science Society of America, 1982).Black, C. A. Methods of Soil Analysis Part II. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (ed Norman, A. G.) (American Society of Agriculture, 1965).Murphy, J. & Riley, J. P. A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 27, 31–36 (1962).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knudsen, D., Peterson, G. A. & Pratt, P. F. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties (ed Page, A. L.) (American Society of Agriculture, 1982).Olsen, S. R. Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate (United States Department of Agriculture Circular, 1954).Lewis, S. L., Brando, P. M., Phillips, O. L., Van Der Heijden, G. M. F. & Nepstad, D. The 2010 amazon drought. Science 331, 554–554 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J. & Curtis, P. S. The meta‐analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80, 1150–1156 (1999).
Google Scholar 
van Groenigen, K. J., Van Kessel, C. & Hungate, B. A. Increased greenhouse-gas intensity of rice production under future atmospheric conditions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 288–291 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N. & Foley, J. A. Farming the planet: 2. Geographic distribution of crop areas, yields, physiological types, and net primary production in the year 2000. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, GB1022 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Laborte, A. G. et al. RiceAtlas, a spatial database of global rice calendars and production. Sci. Data 4, 170074 (2017).
Google Scholar  More

Pettorelli, N. et al. J. Appl. Ecol. 58, 2384–2393 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
CBD High-Level Panel Resourcing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets: An Assessment of Benefits, Investments and Resource Needs for Implementing the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2014).Schmitz, O. J. et al. Science 362, eaar3213 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krause, T. & Nielsen, M. R. Forests 10, 344 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jørgensen, D. BioScience 63, 719–720 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berzaghi, F., Chami, R., Cosimano, T. & Fullenkamp, C. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2120426119 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A. & Scholtens, B. J. Bus. Ethics 138, 525–533 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W. & Wang, X. Finance Res. Lett. 38, 101716 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Joos, F., Meyer, R., Bruno, M. & Leuenberger, M. Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 1437–1440 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, F. et al. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108913 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sullivan, S. Antipode 45, 198–217 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kamilaris, A., Cole, I. R. & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X., in Food Technology Disruptions (ed. Galanakis, C. M.) 247–284 (Academic Press, 2021).O’Donnell, E. & Talbot-Jones, J. Ecol. Soc. 23, 7 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, K. & Peters, G. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berzaghi, F. et al. Nat. Geosci. 12, 725–729 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mariani, G. et al. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4848 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Martin, A. H., Pearson, H. C., Saba, G. K. & Olsen, E. M. One Earth 4, 680–693 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Durfort, A., Mariani, G., Troussellier, M., Tulloch, V. & Mouillot, D. Preprint at Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-92037/v1 (2021).Norris, K., Terry, A., Hansford, J. P. & Turvey, S. T. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 919–926 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Berzaghi, F. et al. Ecography 41, 1934–1954 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar  More