Ecology

IPCC Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).Sindelar, A. J. et al. Winter oilseed production for biofuel in the US Corn Belt: opportunities and limitations. GCB Bioenergy 9, 508–524 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stöckle, C. O. et al. Evaluating opportunities for an increased role of winter crops as adaptation to climate change in dryland cropping systems of the U.S. Inland Pacific Northwest. Clim. Change 146, 247–261 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Williams, C. M., Henry, H. A. L. & Sinclair, B. J. Cold truths: how winter drives responses of terrestrial organisms to climate change. Biol. Rev. 90, 214–235 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Seifert, C. A., Azzari, G. & Lobell, D. B. Satellite detection of cover crops and their effects on crop yield in the Midwestern United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 064033 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Marcillo, G. S. & Miguez, F. E. Corn yield response to winter cover crops: an updated meta-analysis. J. Soil Water Conserv. 72, 226–239 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Zhu, L., Ives, A. R., Zhang, C., Guo, Y. & Radeloff, V. C. Climate change causes functionally colder winters for snow cover-dependent organisms. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 886–893 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Mankin, J. S. & Diffenbaugh, N. S. Influence of temperature and precipitation variability on near-term snow trends. Clim. Dynam. 45, 1099–1116 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Zhu, L., Radeloff, V. C. & Ives, A. R. Characterizing global patterns of frozen ground with and without snow cover using microwave and MODIS satellite data products. Remote Sens. Environ. 191, 168–178 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Huning, L. S. & AghaKouchak, A. Global snow drought hot spots and characteristics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19753–19759 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Qin, Y. et al. Agricultural risks from changing snowmelt. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 459–465 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Trnka, M. et al. Adverse weather conditions for European wheat production will become more frequent with climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 637–643 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Li, D., Wrzesien, M. L., Durand, M., Adam, J. & Lettenmaier, D. P. How much runoff originates as snow in the western United States, and how will that change in the future? Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 6163–6172 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Biemans, H. et al. Importance of snow and glacier meltwater for agriculture on the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Nat. Sustain. 2, 594–601 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Acevedo, E., Silva, P. & Silva, H. in Bread Wheat: Improvement and Production (eds Curtis, B. C. et al.) 39–70 (FAO Plant Production and Protection, 2002).Baker, J. T., Pinter, P. J., Reginato, R. J. & Kanemasu, E. T. Effects of temperature on leaf appearance in spring and winter wheat cultivars. Agron. J. 78, 605–613 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Tack, J., Barkley, A. & Nalley, L. L. Effect of warming temperatures on US wheat yields. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 6931–6936 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Müller, C. et al. Global gridded crop model evaluation: benchmarking, skills, deficiencies and implications. Geosci. Model Dev. 10, 1403–1422 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Talukder, A. S. M. H. M., McDonald, G. K. & Gill, G. S. Effect of short-term heat stress prior to flowering and early grain set on the grain yield of wheat. Field Crops Res. 160, 54–63 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Farooq, M., Bramley, H., Palta, J. A. & Siddique, K. H. M. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 30, 491–507 (2011).Cuadra, S. V., Kimball, B. A., Boote, K. J., Suyker, A. E. & Pickering, N. Energy balance in the DSSAT-CSM-CROPGRO model. Agric. For. Meteorol. 297, 108241 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Harder, P., Helgason, W. D. & Pomeroy, J. W. Modeling the snowpack energy balance during melt under exposed crop stubble. J. Hydrometeorol. 19, 1191–1214 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Barlow, K. M., Christy, B. P., O’Leary, G. J., Riffkin, P. A. & Nuttall, J. G. Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: a review. Field Crops Res. 171, 109–119 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Wang, W. et al. Evaluation of air–soil temperature relationships simulated by land surface models during winter across the permafrost region. Cryosphere 10, 1721–1737 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Seifert, C. A. & Lobell, D. B. Response of double cropping suitability to climate change in the United States. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 024002 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Pullens, J. W. M. et al. Risk factors for European winter oilseed rape production under climate change. Agric. For. Meteorol. 272–273, 30–39 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Chopra, R. et al. Identification and stacking of crucial traits required for the domestication of pennycress. Nat. Food 1, 84–91 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Crews, T. E., Carton, W. & Olsson, L. Is the future of agriculture perennial? Imperatives and opportunities to reinvent agriculture by shifting from annual monocultures to perennial polycultures. Glob. Sustain. 1, e11 (2018).Harkness, C. et al. Adverse weather conditions for UK wheat production under climate change. Agric. Meteorol. 282–283, 107862 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Schierhorn, F., Hofmann, M., Gagalyuk, T., Ostapchuk, I. & Müller, D. Machine learning reveals complex effects of climatic means and weather extremes on wheat yields during different plant developmental stages. Clim. Change 169, 39 (2021).Michel, S. et al. Improving and maintaining winter hardiness and frost tolerance in bread wheat by genomic selection. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1195 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Mahfoozi, S., Limin, A. E. & Fowler, D. B. Influence of vernalization and photoperiod responses on cold hardiness in winter cereals. Crop Sci. 41, 1006–1011 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Dutra, E. et al. An improved snow scheme for the ECMWF land surface model: description and offline validation. J. Hydrometeorol. 11, 899–916 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Ge, Y. & Gong, G. Land surface insulation response to snow depth variability. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 115, 8107 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Hunt, J. R. et al. Early sowing systems can boost Australian wheat yields despite recent climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 244–247 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Sloat, L. L. et al. Climate adaptation by crop migration. Nat. Commun. 11, 1243 (2020) .Ainsworth, E. A. & Long, S. P. 30 years of free-air carbon dioxide enrichment (FACE): what have we learned about future crop productivity and its potential for adaptation? Glob. Change Biol. 27, 27–49 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Shimoda, S. et al. Effects of snow compaction ‘yuki-fumi’ on soil frost depth and volunteer potato control in potato–wheat rotation system in Hokkaido. Plant Prod. Sci. 24, 186–197 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Luojus, K. et al. GlobSnow v3.0 Northern Hemisphere snow water equivalent dataset. Sci. Data 8, 163 (2021)..IMS Daily Northern Hemisphere Snow and Ice Analysis at 1 km, 4 km, and 24 km Resolutions Version 1 (NSIDC, 2008).Jing, Q. et al. Assessing the options to improve regional wheat yield in Eastern Canada using the CSM–CERES–wheat model. Agron. J. 109, 510–523 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Vogel, F. A. & Bange, G. A. Understanding USDA Crop Forecasts (USDA, 1999).Daly, C. et al. Physiographically sensitive mapping of climatological temperature and precipitation across the conterminous United States. Int. J. Climatol. 28, 2031–2064 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Brown, R. D. & Brasnett, B. Daily Snow Depth Analysis Data Version 1 (Canadian Meteorological Centre, 2010).Brasnett, B. A global analysis of snow depth for numerical weather prediction. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 38, 726–740 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Toure, A. M., Reichle, R. H., Forman, B. A., Getirana, A. & De Lannoy, G. J. M. Assimilation of MODIS snow cover fraction observations into the NASA catchment land surface model. Remote Sens. 10, 316 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Snauffer, A. M., Hsieh, W. W. & Cannon, A. J. Comparison of gridded snow water equivalent products with in situ measurements in British Columbia, Canada. J. Hydrol. 541, 714–726 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Census of Agriculture (USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2017).Skinner, D. Z. & Mackey, B. Freezing tolerance of winter wheat plants frozen in saturated soil. Field Crops Res. 113, 335–341 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Lollato, R. P. et al. Climate-risk assessment for winter wheat using long-term weather data. Agron. J. 112, 2132–2151 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Siebers, M. H. et al. Heat waves imposed during early pod development in soybean (Glycine max) cause significant yield loss despite a rapid recovery from oxidative stress. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3114–3125 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Çakir, R. Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Res. 89, 1–16 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Lobell, D. B. et al. The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 497–501 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Chen, M., Griffis, T. J., Baker, J., Wood, J. D. & Xiao, K. Simulating crop phenology in the Community Land Model and its impact on energy and carbon fluxes. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 120, 310–325 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Larson, K. M. & Small, E. E. Daily Snow Depth and SWE from GPS Signal-to-Noise Ratios Version 1 (NSIDC, 2017).Sturm, M. et al. Estimating snow water equivalent using snow depth data and climate classes. J. Hydrometeorol. 11, 1380–1394 (2010).
Google Scholar 
McCabe, G. J. & Wolock, D. M. Recent declines in western U.S. snowpack in the context of twentieth-century climate variability. Earth Interact. 13, 1–15 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Wu, X. et al. Uneven winter snow influence on tree growth across temperate China. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 144–154 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Qiao, S. et al. Robust negative impacts of climate change on African agriculture. Environ. Res. Lett. 5, 014010 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. & Costa-Roberts, J. Climate trends and global crop production since 1980. Science 333, 616–620 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Xie, Y., Gibbs, H. K. & Lark, T. J. Landsat-based Irrigation Dataset (LANID): 30 m resolution maps of irrigation distribution, frequency, and change for the US, 1997–2017. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 13, 5689–5710 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Mueller, N. D. et al. Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management. Nature 490, 254–257 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Friedman, J., Hastie, T. & Tibshirani, R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Elliott, J. et al. The global gridded crop model intercomparison: data and modeling protocols for phase 1 (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 8, 261–277 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Li, X., Shen, Z., Harri, A. & Coble, K. H. Comparing survey-based and programme-based yield data: implications for the U.S. Agricultural Risk Coverage-County programme. Geneva Pap. Risk Insur. Issues Pract. 45, 184–202 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Hawkins, E., Osborne, T. M., Ho, C. K. & Challinor, A. J. Calibration and bias correction of climate projections for crop modelling: an idealised case study over Europe. Agric. Meteorol. 170, 19–31 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Ho, C. K., Stephenson, D. B., Collins, M., Ferro, C. A. T. & Brown, S. J. Calibration strategies: a source of additional uncertainty in climate change projections. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 93, 21–26 (2012).
Google Scholar  More

Zhang, N. et al. Members of the Fusarium solani species complex that cause infections in both humans and plants are common in the environment. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 2186–2190 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, K. et al. Molecular Phylogenetic Diversity, Multilocus Haplotype Nomenclature, and In Vitro antifungal resistance within the Fusarium solani species complex. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 2477–2490 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schroers, H. J. et al. Epitypification of Fusisporium (Fusarium) solani and its assignment to a common phylogenetic species in the Fusarium solani species complex. Mycologia 108, 806–819 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, K. Molecular phylogeny of the Nectria haematococca-Fusarium solani species complex. Mycologia 92, 919–938 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Gleason, F., Allerstorfer, M. & Lilje, O. Newly emerging diseases of marine turtles, especially sea turtle egg fusariosis (SEFT), caused by species in the Fusarium solani complex (FSSC). Mycology 11, 184–194 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fernando, N. et al. Fatal Fusarium solani species complex infections in elasmobranchs: the first case report for black spotted stingray (Taeniura melanopsila) and a literature review. Mycoses 58, 422–431 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sarmiento-Ramírez, J. M. et al. Global distribution of two fungal pathogens threatening endangered Sea Turtles. PLoS ONE 9, e85853 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mayayo, E., Pujol, I. & Guarro, J. Experimental pathogenicity of four opportunist Fusarium species in a murine model. J. Med. Microbiol. 48, 363–366 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Muhvich, A. G., Reimschuessel, R., Lipsky, M. M. & Bennett, R. O. Fusarium solani isolated from newborn bonnethead sharks, Sphyrna tiburo (L.). J. Fish Dis. 12, 57–62 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Crow, G. L., Brock, J. A. & Kaiser, S. Fusarium solani fungal infection of the lateral line canal system in captive scalloped hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna lewini) in Hawaii. J. Wildl. Dis. 31, 562–565 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cabañes, F. J. et al. Cutaneous hyalohyphomycosis caused by Fusarium solani in a loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta L.). J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 3343–3345 (1997).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cafarchia, C. et al. Fusarium spp. in Loggerhead Sea Turtles (Caretta caretta): From Colonization to Infection. Vet. Pathol. 57, 139–146 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Garcia-Hartmann, M., Hennequin, C., Catteau, S., Béatini, C. & Blanc, V. Cas groupés d’infection à Fusarium solani chez de jeunes tortues marines Caretta caretta nées en captivité. J. Mycol. Med. 28, 113–118 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Orós, J., Delgado, C., Fernández, L. & Jensen, H. E. Pulmonary hyalohyphomycosis caused by Fusarium spp in a Kemp’s ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempi): An immunohistochemical study. N. Z. Vet. J. 52, 150–152 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Candan, A. Y., Katılmış, Y. & Ergin, Ç. First report of Fusarium species occurrence in loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) nests and hatchling success in Iztuzu Beach, Turkey. Biologia (Bratisl). https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-020-00553-4 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sarmiento-Ramirez, J. M., van der Voort, M., Raaijmakers, J. M. & Diéguez-Uribeondo, J. Unravelling the Microbiome of eggs of the endangered Sea Turtle Eretmochelys imbricata identifies bacteria with activity against the emerging pathogen Fusarium falciforme. PLoS ONE 9, e95206 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sarmiento-Ramírez, J. M. et al. Fusarium solani is responsible for mass mortalities in nests of loggerhead sea turtle, Caretta caretta, in Boavista, Cape Verde. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 312, 192–200 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sarmiento-Ramirez, J. M., Sim, J., Van West, P. & Dieguez-Uribeondo, J. Isolation of fungal pathogens from eggs of the endangered sea turtle species Chelonia mydas in Ascension Island. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. United Kingdom 97, 661–667 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hoh, D., Lin, Y., Liu, W., Sidique, S. & Tsai, I. Nest microbiota and pathogen abundance in sea turtle hatcheries. Fungal Ecol. 47, 100964 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Güçlü, Ö., Bıyık, H. & Şahiner, A. Mycoflora identified from loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) egg shells and nest sand at Fethiye beach, Turkey. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 4, 408–413 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Gambino, D. et al. First data on microflora of loggerhead sea turtle (Caretta caretta) nests from the coastlines of Sicily. Biol. Open 9, bio045252 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bailey, J. B., Lamb, M., Walker, M., Weed, C. & Craven, K. S. Detection of potential fungal pathogens Fusarium falciforme and F. keratoplasticum in unhatched loggerhead turtle eggs using a molecular approach. Endanger. Species Res. 36, 111–119 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Summerbell, R. C. & Schroers, H.-J. Analysis of Phylogenetic Relationship of Cylindrocarpon lichenicola and Acremonium falciforme to the Fusarium solani Species Complex and a Review of similarities in the spectrum of opportunistic infections caused by these fungi. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 2866–2875 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nel, R., Punt, A. E. & Hughes, G. R. Are coastal protected areas always effective in achieving population recovery for nesting sea turtles?. PLoS ONE 8, e63525 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Branch, G. & Branch, M. Living Shores. (Pippa Parker, 2018).Fuller, M. S., Fowles, B. E. & Mclaughlin, D. J. Isolation and pure culture study of marine phycomycetes. Mycologia 56, 745–756 (1964).
Google Scholar 
Greeff, M. R., Christison, K. W. & Macey, B. M. Development and preliminary evaluation of a real-time PCR assay for Halioticida noduliformans in abalone tissues. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 99, 103–117 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sandoval-Denis, M., Lombard, L. & Crous, P. W. Back to the roots: a reappraisal of Neocosmospora. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 43, 90–185 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, K., Cigelnik, E. & Nirenberg, H. I. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 90, 465–493 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Geiser, D. M. et al. FUSARIUM-ID v. 1. 0: A DNA sequence database for identifying Fusarium. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 110, 473–479 (2004).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, K. et al. Phylogenetic diversity of insecticolous fusaria inferred from multilocus DNA sequence data and their molecular identification via FUSARIUM-ID and FUSARIUM MLST. Mycologia 104, 427–445 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chehri, K., Salleh, B. & Zakaria, L. Morphological and phylogenetic analysis of Fusarium solani species complex in Malaysia. Microb. Ecol. 69, 457–471 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lanfear, R., Frandsen, P., Wright, A., Senfeld, T. & Calcott, B. PartionFinder 2: new methods for selecting partioned models of evolution for molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw260 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ronquist, F. et al. Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model selection across a large model space. Syst. Biol. 61, 539–542 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Leslie, J. F. & Summerell, B. A. The Fusarium Laboratory manual (Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken, 2006).
Google Scholar 
Fisher, N. L., Burgess, L. W., Toussoun, T. A. & Nelson, P. E. Carnation leaves as a substrate and for preserving cultures of Fusarium species. Phytopathology 72, 151 (1982).
Google Scholar 
Smyth, C. W. et al. Unraveling the ecology and epidemiology of an emerging fungal disease, sea turtle egg fusariosis (STEF). PLOS Pathog. 15, e1007682 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rachowicz, L. J. et al. The novel and endemic pathogen hypotheses: Competing explanations for the origin of emerging infectious diseases of wildlife. Conserv. Biol. 19, 1441–1448 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Lombard, L., Sandoval-Denis, M., Cai, L. & Crous, P. W. Changing the game: resolving systematic issues in key Fusarium species complexes. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 43, i–ii (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Short, D. P. G., Donnell, K. O., Zhang, N., Juba, J. H. & Geiser, D. M. Widespread occurrence of diverse human pathogenic types of the fungus Fusarium detected in plumbing drains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, 4264–4272 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
White, T. J., Burns, T., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and direct identification of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications (eds Innis, M. A. et al.) 315–322 (Academic Press, San Diego, 1990).
Google Scholar 
Sekimoto, S., Hatai, K. & Honda, D. Molecular phylogeny of an unidentified Haliphthoros-like marine oomycete and Haliphthoros milfordensis inferred from nuclear-encoded small- and large-subunit rRNA genes and mitochondrial-encoded cox2 gene. Mycoscience 48, 212–221 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Petersen, A. B. & Rosendahl, S. Ø. Phylogeny of the Peronosporomycetes (Oomycota) based on partial sequences of the large ribosomal subunit (LSU rDNA). Mycol. Res. 104, 1295–1303 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
O’Donnell, K. et al. Phylogenetic diversity and microsphere array-based genotyping of human pathogenic fusaria, including isolates from the multistate contact lens-associated U.S. keratitis outbreaks of 2005 and 2006. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 2235–2248 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Migheli, Q. et al. Molecular Phylogenetic diversity of dermatologic and other human pathogenic fusarial isolates from hospitals in Northern and Central Italy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 1076–1084 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

The MiDAS global consortium was established in 2018 to coordinate the sampling and collection of metadata from WWTPs across the globe (Supplementary Data 1). Samples were obtained in duplicates from 740 WWTPs in 425 cities, 31 countries on six continents (Fig. 1a). The majority of the WWTPs were configured with the activated sludge process (69.7%) (Fig. 1b), and these were the main focus of the subsequent analyses. Nevertheless, WWTPs based on biofilters, moving bed bioreactors (MBBR), membrane bioreactors (MBR), and granular sludge were also sampled to cover the microbial diversity in other types of WWTPs. The activated sludge plants were designed for carbon removal only (C; 22.1%), carbon removal with nitrification (C,N; 9.5%), carbon removal with nitrification and denitrification (C,N,DN; 40.9%), and carbon removal with nitrogen removal and enhanced biological phosphorus removal, EBPR (C,N,DN,P; 21.7%) (Fig. 1c). The first type represents the simplest design whereas the latter represents the most advanced process type with varying oxic and anoxic stages or compartments.Fig. 1: Sampling of WWTPs across the world.a Geographical distribution of WWTPs included in the study and their process configuration. b Distribution of plant types. MBBR moving bed bioreactor, MBR membrane bioreactor. c Distribution of process types for the activated sludge plants. C carbon removal, C,N carbon removal with nitrification, C,N,DN carbon removal with nitrification and denitrification, C,N,DN,P carbon removal with nitrogen removal and enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). The values next to the bars are the number of WWTPs in each group.Full size imageMiDAS 4: a global 16S rRNA gene catalogue and taxonomy for WWTPsMicrobial community profiling at high taxonomic resolution (genus- and species-level) using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing requires a reference database with high-identity reference sequences (≥99% sequence identity) for the majority of the bacteria in the samples and a complete seven-rank taxonomy (domain to species) for all reference sequences16,20. To create such a database for bacteria in WWTPs globally, we applied synthetic long-read full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing20,21 on samples from all WWTPs included in this study.More than 5.2 million full-length 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained after quality filtering and primer trimming. The sequences were processed with AutoTax20 to yield 80,557 full-length 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variant (FL-ASVs). These reference sequences were added to our previous MiDAS 3 database16, providing a combined database (MiDAS 4) with a total of 90,164 unique, chimera-free FL-ASV reference sequences. The absence of detectable chimeric sequences is a unique feature of the database and is achieved due to the attachment of unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) to each end of the original template molecules before any PCR amplification steps21. This allows filtering of true biological sequences from chimera already in the synthetic long-read assembly20,21. The novelty of the FL-ASVs were determined based on the percent identity shared with their closest relatives in the SILVA 138 SSURef NR99 database and the threshold for each taxonomic rank proposed by Yarza et al.22. Out of all FL-ASVs, 88% had relatives above the genus-level threshold (≥94.5% identity) and 56% above the species-level threshold (≥98.7% identity) (Fig. 2 and Table 1).Fig. 2: Novel sequences and de novo taxa defined in the MiDAS 4 reference database.The phylogenetic trees are based on a multiple alignment of all MiDAS 4 reference sequences, which were first aligned against the global SILVA 138 alignment using the SINA aligner, and subsequently pruned according to the ssuref:bacteria positional variability by parsimony filter in ARB to remove hypervariable regions. The eight phyla with most FL-ASVs are highlighted in different colours. Sequence novelty was determined by the percent identity between each FL-ASV and their closest relative in the SILVA_138_SSURef_Nr99 database according to Usearch mapping and the taxonomic thresholds proposed by Yarza et al.22 shown in Table 1. Taxonomy novelty was defined based on the assignment of de novo taxa by AutoTax20.Full size imageTable 1 Novel sequences and de novo taxa observed in the MiDAS 4 reference database.Full size tableMiDAS 4 provides placeholder names for many environmental taxaAlthough only a small percentage of the reference sequences in MiDAS 4 represented new putative taxa at higher ranks (phylum, class, or order) according to the sequence identity thresholds proposed by Yarza et al.22, a large number of sequences lacked lower-rank taxonomic classifications and was assigned de novo placeholder names by AutoTax20 (Fig. 2 and Table 1). In total, de novo taxonomic names were generated by AutoTax for 26 phyla (30.6% of observed), 83 classes (37.2% of observed), 297 orders (46.8% of observed), and more than 8000 genera (86.3% of observed). Without the de novo taxonomy we would not be able to discuss these taxa across studies to unveil their potential role in wastewater treatment systems.Phylum-specific phylogenetic trees were created to determine if the FL-ASV reference sequences that were assigned to de novo phyla were actual phyla or simply artifacts related to the naive sequence identity-based assignment of de novo placeholder taxonomies (Supplementary Fig. 1a). The majority (65 FL-ASVs) created deep branches from within the Alphaproteobacteria together with 16S rRNA gene sequences from mitochondria, suggesting they represented divergent mitochondrial genes rather than true novel phyla. We also observed several FL-ASVs assigned to de novo phyla that branched from the classes Parcubacteria (3 FL-ASVs) and Microgenomatis (22 FL-ASVs) within the Patescibacteria phylum. These two classes were originally proposed as superphyla due to an unusually high rate of evolution of their 16S rRNA genes23,24. It is, therefore, likely that these de novo phyla are also artefacts due to the simple taxonomy assignment approach, which does not take different evolutionary rates into account20. Most of the class- and order-level novelty was found within the Patescibacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Planctomycetota and Verrucomicrobiota. (Supplementary Fig. 1b). At the family- and genus-level, we also observed many de novo taxa affiliated to Bacteroidota, Bdellovibrionota and Chloroflexi.MiDAS 4 provides a common taxonomy for the fieldThe performance of the MiDAS 4 database was evaluated based on an independent amplicon dataset from the Global Water Microbiome Consortium (GWMC) project2, which covers ~1200 samples from 269 WWTPs. The raw GWMC amplicon data of the 16S rRNA gene V4 region was resolved into ASVs, and the percent identity to their best hits in MiDAS 4 and other reference databases was calculated (Fig. 3). The MiDAS 4 database had high-identity hits (≥99% identity) for 72.0 ± 9.5% (mean ± SD) of GWMC ASVs with ≥0.01% relative abundance, compared to 57.9 ± 8.5% for the SILVA 138 SSURef NR99 database, which was the best of the universal reference databases (Fig. 3). The relative abundance cutoff selects taxa that likely have a quantitative impact on the ecosystem while filtering out the rare biosphere which includes many bacteria introduced with the influent wastewaters25. Similar analyses of ASVs obtained from the samples included in this study showed, not surprisingly, even better performance with high-identity hits for 90.7 ± 7.9% of V1–V3 ASVs and 90.0 ± 6.6% of V4 ASVs with ≥0.01% relative abundance, compared to 60.6 ± 11.9% and 73.9 ± 10.3% for SILVA (Supplementary Fig. 2a). Although the sampling of WWTPs was focused towards activated sludge plants, the MiDAS 4 database also includes high-identity references for most ASVs in other plant types (granules, biofilters, etc.) (Supplementary Fig. 2b). This suggests that most taxa were shared across plant types, although often present in other relative abundances.Fig. 3: Database evaluation based on amplicon data from the Global Water Microbiome Consortium project.Raw amplicon data from the Global Water Microbiome Consortium project2 was processed to resolve ASVs of the 16S rRNA gene V4 region. The ASVs for each of the samples were filtered based on their relative abundance (only ASVs with ≥0.01% relative abundance were kept) before the analyses. The percentage of the microbial community represented by the remaining ASVs after the filtering was 88.35 ± 2.98% (mean ± SD) across samples. High-identity (≥99%) hits were determined by the stringent mapping of ASVs to each reference database. Classification of ASVs was done using the SINTAX classifier. The violin and box plots represent the distribution of percent of ASVs with high-identity hits or genus/species-level classifications for each database across n = 1165 biologically independent samples. Box plots indicate median (middle line), 25th, 75th percentile (box) and the min and max values after removing outliers based on 1.5x interquartile range (whiskers). Outliers have been removed from the box plots to ease visualisation. Different colours are used to distinguish the different databases.Full size imageUsing MiDAS 4 with the SINTAX classifier, it was possible to obtain genus-level classifications for 75.0 ± 6.9% of the GWMC ASVs with ≥0.01% relative abundance (Fig. 3). In comparison, SILVA 138 SSURef NR99, which was the best of the universal reference databases, could only classify 31.4 ± 4.2% of the ASVs to genus-level. When MiDAS 4 was used to classify amplicons from this study, we obtained genus-level classification for 92.0 ± 4.0% of V1–V3 ASVs and 84.8 ± 3.6% of V4 ASVs (Supplementary Fig. 2a). This is close to the theoretical limit set by the phylogenetic signal provided by each amplicon region analyzed20. Improved classifications were also observed for archaeal V4 ASVs (93.3 ± 10.6% for MiDAS 4 vs 69.3 ± 21.3% for SILVA), although no additional archaeal reference sequences were added to the MiDAS database in this study.MiDAS 4 was also able to assign species-level classifications to 40.8 ± 7.1% of the GWMC ASVs. In contrast, the 16S rRNA gene reference database obtained from GTDB SSU r89, which is the only universal reference database that contains a comprehensive species-level taxonomy, only classified 9.9 ± 2.0% of the ASVs (Fig. 3). For the ASVs created in this study, MiDAS 4 provided a species-level classification for 68.4 ± 6.1% of the V1–V3 and 48.5 ± 6.0% of the V4 ASVs (Supplementary Fig. 2a).Based on the large number of WWTPs sampled, their diversity, and the independent evaluation based on the GWMC dataset2, we expect that the MiDAS 4 reference database essentially covers the large majority of bacteria in WWTPs worldwide. Therefore, the MiDAS 4 taxonomy should act as a shared vocabulary for wastewater treatment microbiologists, providing opportunities for cross-study comparisons and ecological studies at high taxonomic resolution.Comparison of the V1–V3 and V4 primer sets for community profiling of WWTPsBefore investigating what factors shape the activated sludge microbiota, we compared short-read amplicon data created for all activated sludge samples belonging to the four main process types (C; C,N; C,N,DN and C,N,DN,P) collected in the Global MiDAS project using two commonly used primer sets that target the V1–V3 or V4 variable region of the 16S rRNA gene. The V1–V3 primers were chosen because the corresponding region of the 16S rRNA gene provides the highest taxonomic resolution of common short-read amplicons20,26, and these primers have previously shown great correspondence with metagenomic data and quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) results for wastewater treatment systems17. The V4 region has a lower phylogenetic signal, but the primers used for amplification have better theoretical coverage of the bacterial diversity in the SILVA database20,26.The majority of genera (62%) showed less than twofold difference in relative abundances between the two primer sets, and the rest were preferentially detected with either the V1–V3 or the V4 primer (19% for both) (Fig. 4). We observed that several genera of known importance detected in high abundance by V1–V3 were hardly observed by V4, including Acidovorax, Rhodoferax, Ca. Villigracilis, Sphaerotilus and Leptothrix. Similarly, we observed genera abundant with V4 but strongly underestimated by V1–V3, such as Acinetobacter and Prosthecobacter. A complete list of differentially detected genera (Supplementary Data 2) serves as a valuable tool in combination with in silico primer evaluation for deciding which primer pair to use for targeted studies of specific taxa.Fig. 4: Comparison of relative genus abundance based on V1–V3 and V4 region 16S rRNA gene amplicon data.a Mean relative abundance was calculated based on 709 activated sludge samples. Genera present at ≥0.001% relative abundance in V1–V3 and/or V4 datasets are considered. Genera with less than twofold difference in relative abundance between the two primer sets are shown with gray circles, and those that are overrepresented by at least twofold with one of the primer sets are shown in red (V4) and blue (V1–V3). The twofold difference is an arbitrary choice; however, it relates to the uncertainty we usually encounter in amplicon data. Genus names are shown for all taxa present at a minimum of 0.1% mean relative abundance (excluding those with de novo names). b Heatmaps of the most abundant genera with more than twofold relative abundance difference between the two primer sets.Full size imageBecause the V1–V3 primers provide better classification rates at the genus- and species-level (Supplementary Fig. 2a), we primarily focused on this dataset for the following analyses. It should be noted that the V1–V3 primer set performs poorly on anammox bacteria27,28 and does not target archaea at all. To determine the importance of these groups, we estimated their relative read abundance using the V4 amplicon data. Ca. Brocadia and Ca. Anammoximicrobium were the only anammox genera detected, and the latter was never more than 0.6% abundant. Ca. Brocadia was observed in MBBR reactors and granular sludge in anammox reactors with relative read abundances reaching 29%, but it was below 0.1% relative abundance in all but two of the activated sludge samples investigated. For archaea, the relative read abundance was generally low (median = 0.18%), but for a few WWTPs high (up to 11.7%), so archaea should not be neglected in these cases.Process and environmental factors affecting the activated sludge microbiotaAlpha diversity analysis revealed that the rarefied (10,000 read per sample) richness and diversity in activated sludge plants were most strongly affected by process type, industrial load and continent (Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 1). The richness and diversity increased with the complexity of the treatment process, as found in other studies, reflecting the increased number of niches29. In contrast, it decreased with high industrial loads, presumably because industrial wastewater often is less complex and therefore promotes the growth of fewer specialised species7. The effect of continents is presumably caused by the necessary unbalanced sampling of WWTPs and confounded by the effects of plant types and industrial loads.Distance decay relationship (DDR) analyses were used to determine the effect of geographic distance on the microbial community similarity of activated sludge plants with the four main process types (Supplementary Fig. 4 and Supplementary Note 2). We found that distance decay was only effective within shorter geographical distances (2500 km) at the ASV-level, but higher similarities with OTUs clustered at 97% and even more at the genus-level. This suggests that many ASVs are geographically restricted and functionally redundant in the activated sludge microbiota, so different strains or species from the same genus across the world may provide similar functions.To gain a deeper understanding of the factors that shape the activated sludge microbiota, we examined the genus-level taxonomic beta-diversity using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) analyses (Fig. 5 and Supplementary Note 3). We have chosen taxonomic diversity instead of phylogenetic diversity (UniFrac) because many of the important traits are categorical (yes/no) and only conserved at lower taxonomic ranks (genus/species). The analysis was made at the genus-level due to the high classification rate achieved with MiDAS 4 and because genera were less affected by DDR compared to ASVs. We found that the overall microbial community was most strongly affected by continent and temperature in the WWTPs. However, process type, industrial load and the climate zone also had significant impacts. The percentage of total variation explained by each parameter was generally low, indicating that the global WWTPs microbiota represents a continuous distribution rather than distinct states, as observed for the human gut microbiota30.Fig. 5: Effects of process and environmental factors on the activated sludge microbial community structure. Principal coordinate analyses of Bray–Curtis and Soerensen beta-diversity for genera based on V1–V3 amplicon data. Samples are coloured based on metadata.The fraction of variation in the microbial community explained by each variable in isolation was determined by PERMANOVA (Adonis R2-values). Exact P values 0.1% relative abundance in 80% (strict core), 50% (general core) and 20% (loose core) of all activated sludge plants (Fig. 6a).Fig. 6: Identification of core and conditionally rare or abundant taxa based on V1–V3 amplicon data.a Identification of strict, general and loose core genera based on how often a given genus was observed at a relative abundance above 0.1% in WWTPs. b Identification of conditionally rare or abundant (CRAT) genera based on whether a given genus was observed at a relative abundance above 1% in at least one WWTP. The cumulative genus abundance is based on all ASVs classified at the genus-level. All core genera were removed before identification of the CRAT genera. c, d Number of genera and species, respectively, and their abundance in different process types across the global WWTPs. Values for genera and species are divided into strict core, general core, loose core, CRAT, other taxa and unclassified ASVs. The relative abundance of different groups was calculated based on the mean relative abundance of individual genera or species across samples. C carbon removal, C,N carbon removal with nitrification, C,N,DN carbon removal with nitrification and denitrification, C,N,DN,P carbon removal with nitrogen removal and enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR).Full size imageIn addition to the core taxa, we also identified conditionally rare or abundant taxa (CRAT)32 (Fig. 6b). These are taxa typically present in low abundance but occasionally become prevalent, including taxa related to process disturbances, such as bacteria causing activated sludge foaming or those associated with the degradation of specific residues in industrial wastewater. CRAT have only been studied in a single WWTP treating brewery wastewater, despite their potential effect on performance32,33. CRAT are here defined as taxa which are not part of the core, but present in at least one WWTP with a relative abundance above 1%.Core taxa and CRAT were identified for both the V1–V3 and V4 amplicon data to ensure that critical taxa were not missed due to primer bias. We identified 250 core genera (15 strict, 65 general and 170 loose) and 715 CRAT genera (Supplementary Data 4). The strict core genera (Fig. 7) mainly contained genera with versatile metabolisms found in several environments, including Flavobacterium, Novosphingobium and Haliangium. The general core (Fig. 7) included many known bacteria associated with nitrification (Nitrosomonas and Nitrospira), polyphosphate accumulation (Tetrasphaera, Ca. Accumulibacter) and glycogen accumulation (Ca. Competibacter). The loose core contained well-known filamentous bacteria (Ca. Microthrix, Ca. Promineofilum, Ca. Sarcinithrix, Gordonia, Kouleothrix and Thiothrix), but also Nitrotoga, a less common nitrifier in WWTPs.Fig. 7: Percent relative abundance of strict and general core taxa across process types.The taxonomy for the core genera indicates phylum and genus. For general core species, genus names are also provided. De novo taxa in the core are highlighted in red. C carbon removal, C,N carbon removal with nitrification, C,N,DN carbon removal with nitrification and denitrification, C,N,DN,P carbon removal with nitrogen removal and enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR).Full size imageBecause MiDAS 4 allowed for species-level classification, we also identified core and CRAT species based on the same criteria as for genera (Supplementary Fig. 7 and Supplementary Data 4). This revealed 113 core species (0 strict, 9 general and 104 loose). The general core species (Fig. 7) included Nitrospira defluvii and Tetrasphaera midas_s_5, a common nitrifier and PAO, respectively. Arcobacter midas_s_2255, a potential pathogen commonly abundant in the influent wastewater, was also part of the general core34. The loose core contained additional species associated with nitrification (Nitrosomonas midas_s_139 and Nitrospira nitrosa), polyphosphate accumulation (Ca. Accumulibacter phosphatis, Dechloromonas midas_s_173, Tetrasphaera midas_s_45), as well as known filamentous species (Ca. Microthrix parvicella and midas_s_2 (recently named Ca. M. subdominans35), Ca. Villigracilis midas_s_471 and midas_s_9223, Leptothrix midas_s_884). In addition to the core species, we identified 1417 CRAT species. As CRAT taxa are generally found in low abundance and the current study does not include time series or influent data, we cannot say anything conclusive about their general implications for the ecosystem. However, they may be present due to short-term mass immigration25 or specific operational conditions36 and in both cases, potentially affect the plant operation. They should therefore be considered important target for further investigations together with the core taxa.Many core taxa and CRAT can only be identified with MiDAS 4The core taxa and CRAT included a large proportion of MiDAS 4 de novo taxa. At the genus-level, 106/250 (42%) of the core genera and 500/715 (70%) of the CRAT genera had MiDAS placeholder names. At the species-level, the proportion was even higher. Here placeholder names were assigned to 101/113 (89%) of the core species and 1352/1417 (95%) CRAT species. This highlights the importance of a comprehensive taxonomy that includes the uncultured environmental taxa.The core and CRAT taxa cover the majority of the global activated sludge microbiotaAlthough the core taxa and CRAT represent a small fraction of the total diversity observed in the MiDAS 4 reference database, they accounted for the majority of the observed global activated sludge microbiota (Fig. 6c, d). Accumulated read abundance estimates ranged from 57–68% for the core genera and 11–13% for the CRAT, and combined they accounted for 68–79% of total read abundance in the WWTPs depending on process types. The core taxa represented a larger proportion of the activated sludge microbiota for the more advanced process types, which likely reflects the requirement of more versatile bacteria associated with the alternating redox conditions in these types of WWTPs. The remaining fraction, 21–32%, consisted of 6–8% unclassified genera and genera present in very low abundance, presumably with minor importance for the plant performance. The species-level core taxa and CRAT represented 11–24% and 24–33% accumulated read abundance, respectively. Combined, they accounted for almost 50% of the observed microbiota.Global diversity within important functional guildsThe general change from simple to advanced WWTPs with nutrient removal and the transition to water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) requires increased knowledge about the bacteria responsible for the removal and recovery of nutrients, so we examined the global diversity of well-described nitrifiers, denitrifiers, PAOs and GAOs (Fig. 8). GAOs were included because they may compete with the PAOs for nutrients and thereby interfere with the biological recovery of phosphorus37. Because MiDAS 4 provided species-level resolution for a large proportion of activated sludge microbiota, we also investigated the species-level diversity within genera affiliated with the functional guilds. A complete overview of species in all genera detected in this global study is provided in the MiDAS field guide (https://www.midasfieldguide.org/guide).Fig. 8: Global diversity of genera belonging to major functional groups.The percent relative abundance represents the mean abundance for each country considering only WWTPs with the relevant process types. Countries are grouped based on continent (shifting colour).Full size imageNitrosomonas and potential comammox Nitrospira were the only abundant (≥0.1% average relative abundance) genera found among ammonia-oxidising bacteria (AOBs), whereas both Nitrospira and Nitrotoga were abundant among the nitrite oxidisers (NOBs), with Nitrospira being the most abundant across all countries (Fig. 8). Nitrobacter was not detected, and Nitrosospira was detected in only a few plants in very low abundance (≤0.01% average relative abundance). At the species-level, each genus had 2–5 abundant species (Supplementary Fig. 8). The most abundant and widespread Nitrosomonas species was midas_s_139. However, midas_s_11707 and midas_s_11733 were dominating in a few countries. For Nitrospira, the most abundant species in nearly all countries was N. defluvii. ASVs classified as the comammox N. nitrosa38,39 was also common in many countries across the world. However, because the comammox trait is not phylogenetically conserved at the 16S rRNA gene level38,39, we cannot conclude that these ASVs represent true comammox bacteria. For Nitrotoga, only two species were detected with notable abundance, midas_s_181 and midas_s_9575. Ammonia-oxidising archaea (AOAs) were not detected with MiDAS 4 due to the lack of reference sequences, and because AOAs are not targeted by the V1–V3 primer pair. However, analyses of our V4 amplicon dataset classified with the SILVA database revealed a considerable relative read abundance of AOAs in Malaysia and the Philippines, but absence or low abundance of AOAs in other countries (Supplementary Fig. 9). Other studies have occasionally found AOAs across the world, but generally in lower abundance than AOBs40,41,42. To ensure detection of AOAs with MiDAS 4, we anticipate adding external reference sequences for AOAs in a future release of the database.Denitrifying bacteria are very common in advanced activated sludge plants, but are generally poorly described. Among the known genera, Rhodoferax, Zoogloea and Thauera were most abundant (Fig. 8). Zoogloea and Thauera are well-known floc formers, sometimes causing unwanted slime formation43. Rhodoferax was the most common denitrifier in Europe, whereas Thauera dominated in Asia. Many denitrifiers could not be classified at the species-level (Supplementary Fig. 10), likely due to highly conserved 16S rRNA genes. An exception was Zoogloea, where midas_s_1080 and Z. caeni and were the most abundant species worldwide.EBPR is performed by PAOs, with three genera recognised as important in full-scale WWTPs: Tetrasphaera, Dechloromonas and Ca. Accumulibacter13. According to relative read abundance, all three were found in EBPR plants globally, with Tetrasphaera as the most prevalent (Fig. 8). Dechloromonas was also abundant in nitrifying and denitrifying plants without EBPR, indicating a more diverse ecology. Four recognised GAOs were found globally: Ca. Competibacter, Defluviicoccus, Propionivibrio and Micropruina, with Ca. Competibacter being the most abundant (Fig. 8). Only a few species (2–6 species) in each genus were dominant across the world for both PAOs (Supplementary Fig. 11) and GAOs (Supplementary Fig. 12), except for Ca. Competibacter, which covered ~20 abundant but country-specific species. Among PAOs, the abundant species were Tetrasphaera midas_s_5, Dechloromonas midas_s_173, (recently named D. phosphorivorans) Ca. Accumulibacter midas_s_315, Ca. A. phosphatis and Ca. A. aalborgensis. Interestingly, some of the most abundant PAOs and GAOs were also abundant in the simple process design with C-removal, indicating more versatile metabolisms.Global diversity of filamentous bacteriaFilamentous bacteria are essential for creating strong activated sludge flocs. However, in large numbers, they can also lead to loose flocs and poor settling properties. This is known as bulking, a major operational problem in many WWTPs. Many can also form foam on top of process tanks due to hydrophobic surfaces. Presently, approximately 20 genera are known to contain filamentous species44, and among those, the most abundant are Ca. Microthrix, Leptothrix, Ca. Villigracilis, Trichococcus and Sphaerotilus (Fig. 9). They are all well-known from studies on mitigation of poor settling properties in WWTPs. Interestingly, Leptothrix, Sphaerotilus and Ca. Villigracilis belong to the genera where abundance-estimation depended strongly on primers, with V4 underestimating their abundance (Fig. 3). Ca. Microthrix and Leptothrix were strongly associated with continents, most common in Europe and less in Asia and North America (Fig. 9).Fig. 9: Global diversity of known filamentous organisms.The percent relative abundance represents the mean abundance for each country across all process types. Countries are grouped based on the continent (shifting colour).Full size imageMany of the filamentous bacteria were linked to specific process types (Supplementary Fig. 13), e.g. Ca. Microthrix were not observed in WWTPs with carbon removal only, and Ca. Amarolinea were only abundant in plants with nutrient removal. The number of abundant species within the genera were generally low, with one species in Trichococcus, two in Ca. Microthrix and approximately five in Leptothrix and Ca. Villigracilis (Supplementary Fig. 14). Only five abundant species were observed for Sphaerotilus. However, a substantial fraction of unclassified ASVs was also observed, demonstrating that certain species within this genus are poorly resolved based on the 16S rRNA gene. Ca. Promineofilum was also poorly resolved at the species-level (Supplementary Fig. 15).Conclusion and perspectivesWe present a worldwide collaborative effort to produce MiDAS 4, an ASV-resolved full-length 16S rRNA gene reference database, which covers more than 31,000 species and enables genus- to species-level resolution in microbial community profiling studies. MiDAS 4 covers the vast majority of WWTP bacteria globally and provides a strongly needed common taxonomy for the field, which provides the foundation for comprehensive linking of microbial taxa in the ecosystem with their functional traits. Presently, hundreds of studies are undertaken to combine engineering and microbial aspects of full-scale WWTPs. However, most ASVs or OTUs in these studies are classified at poor taxonomic resolution (family-level or above) due to the use of incomplete universal reference databases. Because many important functional traits are only conserved at high taxonomic resolution (genus- or species-level), this strongly hampers our ability to transfer taxa-specific knowledge from one study to another. This will change with MiDAS 4, and we expect that reprocessing of data from earlier studies may reveal new perspectives into wastewater treatment microbiology. Our online Global MiDAS Field Guide presents the data generated in this study and summarises present knowledge about all taxa. We encourage researchers within the field to contribute new knowledge to MiDAS using the contact link in the MiDAS website (https://www.midasfieldguide.org/guide/contact).The global microbiota of activated sludge plants has been predicted to harbour a massive diversity with up to one billion species2. However, most of these occur at very low abundance and are of little importance for the treatment process. By focusing only on the abundant taxa, we can see that this number is much smaller, i.e., ~1000 genera and 1500 species. We consider these taxa functionally the most important globally, representing a “most wanted list” for future studies. Some taxa are abundant in most WWTPs (core taxa), and others are occasionally abundant in fewer plants (CRAT). The CRAT have received little attention in the field of wastewater treatment, but they can be of profound importance for WWTP performance. Both groups have a high fraction of poorly characterised species. The high taxonomic resolution provided by MiDAS 4 enables us to identify samples where these important core taxa occur in high abundance. This provides an ideal starting point for obtaining high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), isolation of pure cultures, in addition to targeted culture-independent studies to uncover their physiological and ecological roles.Among the known functional guilds, such as nitrifiers or polyphosphate-accumulating organisms, the same genera were found worldwide, with only a few abundant species in each genus. There were differences in the community structure, and the abundance of dominant species was mainly shaped by process type, temperature, and in some cases, continent. This discovery sends an important message to the field: relatively few species are abundant worldwide, so research or operational results can reliably be transferred from one geographical region to another, stimulating the transition from WWTPs to more sustainable WRRFs.The relatively low number of uncharacterised abundant species also shows that it is within our reach to describe them all in terms of identity, physiology, ecology and dynamics, providing the necessary knowledge for informed process optimisation and management. The number of poorly described genera (i.e. those with only a MiDAS placeholder genus name) was 88 among the 250 core genera (35%) and more than 89% at the species-level, so there is still some work to do to link their identities and function. An important step in this direction is the visualisation of the populations. With the comprehensive set of FL-ASVs, it is possible to design highly specific FISH probes, and to critically evaluate the old probes. In the Danish WWTPs, we have successfully done this for groups in the Acidobacteriota42 based on the MiDAS 3 database18. Our recent retrieval of more than 1000 high-quality MAGs from Danish WWTPs with advanced process design is also an important step to link identity to function43. The HQ-MAGs can be linked directly to MiDAS 4 as they contain complete 16S rRNA genes. They cover 62% (156/250) of the core genera and 61% (69/113) of the core species identified in this study. These MAGs may also form the basis for further studies to link identity and function, e.g. by applying metatranscriptomics44 and other in situ techniques such as FISH combined with Raman45,46, guided by the “most wanted” list provided in this study. We expect that MiDAS 4 will have significant implications for future microbial ecology studies in wastewater treatment systems. More

Previous studies have used number of species threats6,7, countryside species-area relationship1,3,17, and potentially disappeared fraction of species4 to quantify biodiversity loss. We introduce the non-normalised Species Threat Abatement and Restoration (nSTAR) metric as the quantifiable representation of biodiversity loss in our analysis, a unit-less, species-centred metric which relies on detailed information curated in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species11. On its own, this metric can be used to support production-based accounting of the extinction risk of species and identify the most significant threats at a specific location to inform direct interventions26. However, once manipulated into a structure that allows it to be appended to a multi-region input–output (MRIO) table, an environmentally-extended MRIO can be created. This unlocks the power of consumption-based accounting of this extinction risk, connecting the direct environmental impact with the consumption which ultimately induces it.IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesThe IUCN Red List version 2020–211 provided information on extinction risk for over 122,000 species and details of the threats acting on those species, including the threat classification, scope, timing, and severity. The species scope was limited to comprehensively assessed terrestrial species, ensuring that only species which have been assessed across all countries were included, and thus eliminating any geographical bias introduced by incomplete assessments27. Species with an extinction risk category of Near Threatened (NT), Vulnerable (VU), Endangered (EN), or Critically Endangered (CR) were included. Three species were excluded to avoid double counting where two different extinction risk categories were provided for the same species, leaving 5295 amphibian, mammal, and bird species in scope.The information contained in the IUCN Red List regarding the threats facing each species is crucial, since many of these threats are attributable to economic activity28,29. Specialist assessors are required to assign one or more of 118 different threat classes to each species’ record, with additional documentation of the severity, scope and timing of each threat recommended, based on the impact of that threat on the species’ population30. To connect this threat information to economic sectors, a key requirement for input–output analysis, background information on threat classes was sourced from the IUCN Threats Classification Scheme version 3.229. Each threat was assessed for connection to each of the 6357 economic sectors classified in the UN Statistics Division Central Product Classification Standard31, based on the likelihood that activity associated with each sector directly contributes to the threat being assessed. As an example, the economic sectors associated with rice cultivation were allocated to the threats grouped under IUCN Threat Class 2.1—Annual & perennial non-timber crops. A total of 55 out of 118 threats were allocated to at least one economic sector, with higher-level threat classes excluded from this allocation if information was available for the associated lower-level threat classes to avoid double counting. Species threats driven by activity that cannot be attributed to an economic sector, such as invasive species, were not allocated to any sectors and as a result, the extinction-risk footprint does not necessarily represent the full magnitude of extinction risk for each species. While not all threats were allocated to an economic sector, all economic sectors were allocated to at least one threat. Further details on the connection of economic sectors to threats are available in Supplementary Note S5, which includes a link to the detailed 6357 × 118 binary concordance matrix used to execute these sector-threat allocations.The IUCN Red List also requires inclusion of a range map and habitat classification, which were combined with remote sensed land cover and elevation data to generate a high-resolution area of habitat (AOH) map for each in-scope species32,33. These maps, reapplied from Strassburg et al.34, were used to calculate the percentage of each species’ AOH present in each country.Quantifying biodiversity loss: the nSTAR metricThis detailed information from the IUCN Red List was used to calculate the nSTAR metric, which quantifies each threat’s impact, rather than just its presence, on each species. Adapted from the newly developed Species Threat Abatement and Restoration metric (STAR)26 by removing the normalisation step, the nSTAR metric, which has no units, was calculated for each species in two stages.First, a numeric representation of each species’ extinction risk category (Wi) was determined, following the equal steps methodology introduced by Butchart et al.35. Extinction risk categories of Data Deficient (DD) and Least Concern (LC) were assigned Wi = 0, Near Threatened (NT) was assigned Wi = 1, Vulnerable (VU) was assigned Wi = 2, Endangered (EN) was assigned Wi = 3, and Critically Endangered (CR) was assigned Wi = 4.Next, a Threat Impact score (TSij) for each threat (j) acting on a species (i) was determined based on the scope and severity information recorded for that threat, according to the values set out in Table 1, which are adapted from those proposed by Garnett et al.36. Reapplying the methodology of the STAR metric, where no value was recorded for the scope or severity of a threat, the median possible value for these were used, and only threats noted as Ongoing or Future were included. Further details on these methodological choices and sensitivity analyses to support them are available in Mair et al.26.Table 1 Numeric representation of threat information.Full size tableThe numeric nSTAR value for each species-threat combination (ij) was calculated by multiplying the value representing the species’ extinction risk category (Wi) by the Threat Impact score (TSij) for that threat:$${text{nSTAR}}_{ij} = W_{i} *TS_{ij}$$
(1)
The total nSTAR for species (i) can be calculated by multiplying the extinction risk category value (Wi) for that species by the sum of all Threat Impact scores for the species:$${text{nSTAR}}_{i} = W_{i} *(TS_{i1} + TS_{i2} + TS_{i3} + cdots + TS_{ij} )$$
(2)
Once calculated according to Eq. (1), the nSTARij value for each species-threat combination was allocated to economic sectors using the 6357 × 118 sector-threat concordance (available in Supplementary Note S5), which was normalised based on the economic size of each sector. Finally these nSTAR values, derived for each species-sector combination, were allocated to each country based on the country’s share of the AOH for that species, calculated from the intersection of the species’ AOH map with each country’s borders34.The nSTAR metric introduced here differs from the STAR metric from which it is adapted in that the normalisation step executed at this point in the STAR methodology is omitted. This ensures that the nSTAR metric is both additive and independent across all three dimensions of species, country, and economic sector, a necessary condition for use in input–output analysis. The STAR metric normalises the total value calculated in Eq. (2) to ensure that the total STAR value for any species is equal to Wi * 100, resulting in all species with the same extinction risk category being allocated the same STAR value regardless of the number of threats acting on them26. This normalisation facilitates the aggregation of the STAR metric by species taxonomy however it is problematic when aggregating the STAR metric by threat, since the STAR value attributed to each species-threat combination will be dependent not only on the characteristics of that threat, but also on the number and characteristics of other threats acting on the species. This dependence on more than one variable in the calculation of the STAR value for each species-threat combination means that it is not suitable for aggregation by threat and, by extension, economic sectors once the threat to sector allocation has been carried out.In order to provide a metric which can be aggregated and disaggregated across species, sector, and country hierarchies the nSTAR methodology excludes this normalisation step. Consistent with the STAR methodology, the nSTAR metric is calculated using numeric values only and therefore has no unit of measure26.Input–output analysisOnce calculated, the nSTAR metric was partnered with the global supply-chain data available in the 2013 Eora MRIO, chosen for its extensive coverage of 190 regions (189 countries and one ‘rest of world’ region) and between 26 and 1022 economic sectors in each country, depending on the level of detail in each country’s publicly available National Accounts12.A satellite block, or Q matrix, was created using the nSTAR values for 5295 species across 6357 economic sectors for 190 regions. This satellite block was then aggregated to match the sectoral structure of the Eora MRIO, a total of 14,839 country-sector combinations. A process flow diagram to illustrate the stages of data manipulation required to convert the IUCN Red List data to a satellite block ready for use with the Eora MRIO is included in Supplementary Fig. S5.The Eora MRIO provided the intermediate transaction matrix T, the final demand matrix Y, and the value-added matrix V. Consumption based footprints were calculated by connecting the nSTAR value captured in the satellite block Q to the final demand matrix Y following Leontief’s methodology9,10. Central to this methodology is the Leontief Inverse L, a concise mathematical representation of the interdependencies across all economic sectors, which is expressed as:$${mathbf{L}} = left( {{mathbf{I}}{-}{mathbf{A}}} right)^{{ – {1}}}$$
(3)
where I is an identity matrix with dimensions equal to the those of the intermediate transaction matrix T, and A is the direct requirements matrix, derived from the T matrix in a number of stages. First the total output vector x is calculated, then diagonalised, and the inverse calculated to derive ({widehat{mathbf{X}}}^{-1}), which returns the direct requirements matrix A when multiplied by T.Next the satellite block was converted into an intensity matrix q by multiplying Q by ({widehat{mathbf{X}}}^{-1}) to calculate the nSTAR value attributable to each dollar of total output produced by each sector. Once the q, L and Y matrices are available, the consumption extinction-risk footprint for a sector k (fk) can be calculated using Eq. (4):$${mathbf{f}}_{k} = {mathbf{q}}*{mathbf{L}}*{mathbf{Y}}_{k}$$
(4)
where Yk represents the final demand for that sector. Consumption extinction-risk footprint values were generated for each species-sector-country combination, a total of more than 78 million datapoints.Further matrix manipulation was used to calculate the country-level imported, exported, and domestic extinction-risk footprints. For each country the final demand matrix, Y, was separated into two matrices, Ydom, representing demand from that country for the economic sectors in that country, and Yoth, representing demand from all other countries for the economic sectors in that country. Next, the intensity matrix, q, was separated into two matrices, qdom, representing the nSTAR intensity for each of the species within that country’s borders, and qoth, representing the nSTAR intensity for all remaining species. The three sub-footprints for each country were calculated using Eqs. (5), (6) & (7). A simplified illustration of this methodology is included in Supplementary Fig. S3.$${mathbf{f}}_{dom} = {mathbf{q}}_{dom} *{mathbf{L}}*{mathbf{Y}}_{dom}$$
(5)
$${mathbf{f}}_{exp} = {mathbf{q}}_{dom} *{mathbf{L}}*{mathbf{Y}}_{oth}$$
(6)
$${mathbf{f}}_{imp} = {mathbf{q}}_{oth} *{mathbf{L}}*{mathbf{Y}}_{dom}$$
(7)
Imported, exported, and domestic extinction-risk footprints were calculated for 188 countries.LimitationsWhile very powerful in unravelling the intricacies of the global economy, there are limitations to the effectiveness of input–output analysis. Since it relies on National Accounts data, only activity which can be directly connected into reported economic activity is captured. This means that any activities that are not transacted within the boundaries of the formal economy, such as subsistence hunting and illegal logging, will be excluded unless they have been incorporated into the relevant country’s National Accounts data. The exclusion of threats due to their timing or non-economic classification (such as geological events, disease, and invasive species) resulted in a zero nSTAR value for 519 species, leaving 4776 species with a material nSTAR value. In addition, any limitations in the sector categorisations, their spatial and technological homogeneity, or assumptions included in the allocation of economic activity to sectors within the National Accounts data in each country will be propagated through to the footprint calculations. These limitations are common to consumption-based analyses5,6,7,17,25 and we do not further address them here.Further limitations exist with the use of the scope and severity data for each threat captured in the IUCN Red List, since this does not take into account interaction between threats, or between the severity and scope of an individual threat36. As a result, the impact from a single threat acting on a species may be overstated, and higher nSTAR values attributed to that species than would otherwise be warranted. In addition, any variations in the location, scope, or severity of threats acting across a species’ distribution range are not captured and thus the impact of different economic sectors may be over or under-represented26.There is a temporal displacement between the economic activity and the extinction risk used in this analysis. The extinction risk category assigned to each species is due to the cumulative sum of current and historical impacts acting on it, while the value of economic interactions used to trace this extinction risk through the global economy is based on one year of activity. This is typical of related approaches1,6, and may not introduce much uncertainty given that current economic activity is higher than at any time in history37. Nevertheless, there is no doubt that some current extinction risk is due to past economic activity and development of methods to incorporate this temporal dimension would be a valuable research avenue. More

Hall, M. J., Burns, A. L., Martin, J. M. & Hochuli, D. F. Flight initiation distance changes across landscapes and habitats in a successful urban coloniser. Urban Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00969-5 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Møller, A. P., Samia, D. S. M., Weston, M. A., Guay, P. J. & Blumstein, D. T. Flight initiation distances in relation to sexual dichromatism and body size in birds from three continents. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 117, 823–831 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Morelli, F. et al. Contagious fear: Escape behavior increases with flock size in European gregarious birds. Ecol. Evol. 9, 6096–6104 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Samia, D. S. M. et al. Rural-urban differences in escape behavior of European birds across a latitudinal gradient. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 66 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Blumstein, D. T. Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: How life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim. Behav. 71, 389–399 (2006).
Google Scholar 
McFarland, D. Oxford companion to animal behavior. (Oxford University Press, 1987).Stankowich, T. & Blumstein, D. T. Fear in animals: A meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 2627–2634 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Lima, S. L. Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee. Oecologia 66, 60–67 (1985).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sol, D. et al. Risk-taking behavior, urbanization and the pace of life in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, 59 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Lockwood, R., Swaddle, J. P. & Rayner, J. M. V. Avian Wingtip Shape Reconsidered: Wingtip Shape Indices and Morphological Adaptations to Migration. J. Avian Biol. 29, 273–292 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Møller, A. P. Birds. in Escaping from predators: An integrative view of escape decisions and refuge use (eds. Cooper, W. E. J. & Blumstein, D. T.) 88–112 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Møller, A. P. Flight distance of urban birds, predation and selection for urban life. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 63–75 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Fernández-Juricic, E. et al. Relationships of anti-predator escape and post-escape responses with body mass and morphology: a comparative avian study. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 731–752 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Weston, M. A., Mcleod, E. M., Blumstein, D. T. & Guay, P. J. A review of flight-initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu 112, 269–286 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Hemmingsen, A. The relation of shyness (flushing distance) to body size. Spolia Zool Musei Hauniensis 11, 74–76 (1951).
Google Scholar 
Blumstein, D. T. Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J. Wildl. Manage. 67, 852–857 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Glover, H. K., Weston, M. A., Maguire, G. S., Miller, K. K. & Christie, B. A. Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffers: Response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance. Landsc. Urban Plan. 103, 326–334 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Geist, C., Liao, J., Libby, S. & Blumstein, D. T. Does intruder group size and orientation affect flight initiation distance in birds?. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 69–73 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Mikula, P. Pedestrian density influences flight distances of urban birds. Ardea 102, 53–60 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Piratelli, A. J., Favoretto, G. R. & de Almeida Maximiano, M. F. Factors affecting escape distance in birds. Zoologia 32, 438–444 (2015).Burger, J. & Gochfeld, M. Human activity influence and diurnal and nocturnal foraging of Sanderlings (Calidris alba). Condor 93, 259–265 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Møller, A. P. & Garamszegi, L. Z. Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences. Behav. Ecol. 23, 843–853 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Ferguson, S. M., Gilson, L. N. & Bateman, P. W. Look at the time: diel variation in the flight initiation distance of a nectarivorous bird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 147 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Garamszegi, L. Z. & Møller, A. P. Partitioning within-species variance in behaviour to within- and between-population components for understanding evolution. Ecol. Lett. 20, 599–608 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dufour, P. et al. Reconstructing the geographic and climatic origins of long-distance bird migrations. J. Biogeogr. 47, 155–166 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sol, D. et al. Evolutionary divergence in brain size between migratory and resident birds. PLoS ONE 5, e9617 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bonnet-Lebrun, A. S., Somveille, M., Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Manica, A. Exploring intraspecific variation in migratory destinations to investigate the drivers of migration. Oikos 130, 187–196 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Zurell, D., Gallien, L., Graham, C. H. & Zimmermann, N. E. Do long-distance migratory birds track their niche through seasons?. J. Biogeogr. 45, 1459–1468 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Samia, D. S. M., Nakagawa, S., Nomura, F., Rangel, T. F. & Blumstein, D. T. Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife. Nat. Commun. 6, 8877 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv. Study Behav. 16, 229–249 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Cooper, W. E. J. & Blumstein, D. T. Escape behavior: importance, scope, and variables. in Escaping from predators: An integrative view of escape decisions (eds. Cooper, W. E. J. & Blumstein, D. T.) 3–14 (Cambridge University Press, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447189.002.Sayol, F., Sol, D. & Pigot, A. L. Brain size and life history interact to predict urban tolerance in birds. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 58 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sayol, F., Downing, P. A., Iwaniuk, A. N., Maspons, J. & Sol, D. Predictable evolution towards larger brains in birds colonizing oceanic islands. Nat. Commun. 9, 2820 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tobias, J. A. & Pigot, A. L. Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20190012 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Kamilar, J. M. & Cooper, N. Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20120341–22012034 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Machado, J. P., Antunes, A., Borges, R., Gomes, C. & Rocha, A. P. Measuring phylogenetic signal between categorical traits and phylogenies. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty800 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ericson, P. G. P. et al. Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biol. Lett. 2, 543–547 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Revell, L. J. & Chamberlain, S. A. Rphylip: An R interface for PHYLIP R package. (2014).Blomberg, S. P. & Garland, T. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 899–910 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Keck, F., Rimet, F., Bouchez, A. & Franc, A. Phylosignal: An R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal. Ecol. Evol. 6, 2774–2780 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Münkemüller, T. et al. How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 743–756 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Kot, M. Adaptation: Statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39, 227–241 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. J. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution (N. Y.) 57, 717–745 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. Generalized Linear Models. (Chapman and Hall, 1989).Pinheiro, J. et al. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-140. 1–117 (2019).Nakazawa, M. ‘fmsb’ Functions for Medical Statistics Book with some Demographic Data – R package version 0.6.1. (2017).R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2021).Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S. (Springer, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2. More

Mack, R. N. et al. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10(3), 689–710 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Pimentel, D. Biological invasionseconomic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species. No. 577.18 B5/2011. 2011.Jackson, T. Addressing the economic costs of invasive alien species: Some methodological and empirical issues. Int. J. Sustain. Soc. 7(3), 221–240 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Walker, B. H. & Steffen, W. L. Interactive and integrated effects of global change on terrestrial ecosystems. In The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change. Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems, Synthesis Volume. International Geosphere-Biosphere Program Book Series 4 (eds Walker, B. et al.) 329–375 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Google Scholar 
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A. & Losos, E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48(8), 607–615 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Robinson, T. W. Introduction, Spread and Areal Extent of Saltcedar [Tamarix] in the Western States (No. 491) (US Government Printing Office, 1965).
Google Scholar 
Marlin, D., Newete, S. W., Mayonde, S. G., Smit, E. R. & Byrne, M. J. Invasive Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) in South Africa: Current research and the potential for biological control. Biol. Invasions 19(10), 2971–2992 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Pearce, C. M. & Smith, D. G. Saltcedar: Distribution, abundance, and dispersal mechanisms, northern Montana, USA. Wetlands 23(2), 215–228 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Newete, S. W., Mayonde, S. & Byrne, M. J. Distribution and abundance of invasive Tamarix genotypes in South Africa. Weed Res. 59(3), 191–200 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chew, M. K. The monstering of tamarisk: How scientists made a plant into a problem. J. Hist. Biol. 42(2), 231–266 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, D. M., Macdonald, I. A. W., Hoffmann, J. H. & Henderson, L. Alienplantinvasions. In The Vegetation of Southern Africa (eds Cowling, R. M. et al.) 535–570 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Google Scholar 
Ehrenfeld, J. G. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6(6), 503–523 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haubensak, K. A., D’Antonio, C. M. & Alexander, J. Effects of nitrogen-fixing shrubs in Washington and Coastal California1. Weed Technol. 18(sp1), 1475–1479 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Hawkes, C. V., Wren, I. F., Herman, D. J. & Firestone, M. K. Plant invasion alters nitrogen cycling by modifying the soil nitrifying community. Ecol. Lett. 8(9), 976–985 (2005).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kourtev, P. S., Ehrenfeld, J. G. & Häggblom, M. Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology 83(11), 3152–3166 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Saggar, S., McIntosh, P. D., Hedley, C. B. & Knicker, H. Changes in soil microbial biomass, metabolic quotient, and organic matter turnover under Hieracium (H. pilosella L.). Biol. Fertility Soils 30(3), 232–238 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dudley, T. L., DeLoach, C. J., Levich, J. E. & Carruthers, R. I. Saltcedar invasion of western riparian areas: Impacts and new prospects for control. Trans. N. Am. Wildlife Nat. Resources Conf. 65, 345–381 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Algotsson, E. Biological diversity. In Environmental Management in South Africa 2nd edn (eds Strydom, H. A. & King, N. D.) 97–125 (Juta Cape Town, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Mayonde, S. G., Cron, G. V., Gaskin, J. F. & Byrne, M. J. Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) hybrids: The dominant invasive genotype in Southern Africa. Biol. Invasions 18(12), 3575–3594 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Corbin, J. D. & D’Antonio, C. M. Effects of exotic species on soil nitrogen cycling: Implications for restoration1. Weed Technol. 18(sp1), 1464–1468 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Marchante, E., Kjøller, A., Struwe, S. & Freitas, H. Soil recovery after removal of the N 2-fixing invasive Acacia longifolia: Consequences for ecosystem restoration. Biol. Invasions 11(4), 813–823 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Magadlela, D. & Mdzeke, N. Social benefits in the Working for Water programme as a public works initiative: Working for water. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100(1–2), 94–96 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Yelenik, S. G., Stock, W. D. & Richardson, D. M. Ecosystem level impacts of invasive Acacia saligna in the South African fynbos. Restor. Ecol. 12(1), 44–51 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Malcolm, G. M., Bush, D. S. & Rice, S. K. Soil nitrogen conditions approach preinvasion levels following restoration of nitrogen-fixing black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) stands in a Pine-Oak Ecosystem. Restor. Ecol. 16(1), 70–78 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Maron, J. L. & Jefferies, R. L. Bush lupine mortality, altered resource availability, and alternative vegetation states. Ecology 80(2), 443–454 (1999).
Google Scholar 
AgriLASA (Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa). 2004. Soil handbook.Okalebo, J.R., Gathua, K.W. & Woomer, P.L. (2002). Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A working manual second edition. Sacred Africa, Nairobi, 21.LECO. 2003. Truspec CN Carbon/Nitrogen Determinator Instructions Manual. LECO Corporation, St Joseph, USA.Suarez, D. L., Wood, J. D. & Lesch, S. M. Effect of SAR on water infiltration under a sequential rain–irrigation management system. Agric. Water Manag. 86(1–2), 150–164 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Dane, J.H., and Hopmans, JW. (2002). Water retention and storage. GC Method of soil analysis. SSSA book series. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 1692, 671–720.Blakemore, L.C., Searle, P.L. and Daly, B.K. (1987). Methods for chemical analysis of soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific, Report 80. New Zealand, Lower Hutt: New Zealand Society of Soil Science, 103.Buckham, L.E. (2011). Contrasting growth traits and insect interactions of two Tamarix species and a hybrid (Tamaricaceae) used for mine rehabilitation in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation).Ladenburger, C. G., Hild, A. L., Kazmer, D. J. & Munn, L. C. Soil salinity patterns in Tamarix invasions in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA. J. Arid Environ. 65(1), 111–128 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Beukes, P. C. & Ellis, F. Soil and vegetation changes across a Succulent Karoo grazing gradient. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 20(1), 11–19 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Liu, M. et al. Monitoring the invasion of Spartina alterniflora using multi-source high-resolution imagery in the Zhangjiang Estuary, China. Remote Sensing 9(6), 539 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Newete, S. W., Abd Elbasit, M. A. & Araya, T. Soil salinity and moisture content under non-native Tamarix species. Int. J. Phytorem. 22(9), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2020.1774503 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitford, W. G., Anderson, J. & Rice, P. M. Stemflow contribution to the ’fertile island’effect in creosotebush, Larrea tridentata. J. Arid Environ. 35(3), 451–457 (1997).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Li, C., Li, Y. & Ma, J. Spatial heterogeneity of soil chemical properties at fine scales induced by Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae) plants in a sandy desert. Ecol. Res. 26(2), 385–394 (2011).MathSciNet 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sookbirsingh, R., Karina, C., Thomas, E.G. & Rusell, RC. (2010). Salt separation processes in the saltcedar Tamarix ramosissima (Lebed.). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 41(10), 1271–1281.Newete, S.W., Allem, S.M., Venter, N. and Byrne, M.J. Tamarix efficiency in salt excretion and physiological tolerance to salt-induced stress in South Africa. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 1–7 (2019).Di Tomaso, J. M. Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol. 12(2), 326–336 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Smith, S. D., Devitt, D. A., Sala, A., Cleverly, J. R. & Busch, D. E. Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions. Wetlands 18(4), 687–696 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Lesica, P. & DeLuca, T. H. Is tamarisk allelopathic?. Plant Soil 267(1–2), 357–365 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bagstad, K. J., Lite, S. J. & Stromberg, J. C. Vegetation, soils, and hydrogeomorphology of riparian patch types of a dryland river. Western N. Am. Naturalist 66(1), 23–45 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Lehnhoff, E. A., Rew, L. J., Zabinski, C. A. & Menalled, F. D. Reduced impacts or a longer lag phase? Tamarix in the northwestern USA. Wetlands 32(3), 497–508 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Ye, W., Wang, H. X., Gao, J., Liu, H. J. & Yan, L. Simulation of salt ion migration in soil under reclaimed water irrigation. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 33(5), 1007–1015 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang, S. C. et al. Characterization of soil salinization based on canonical correspondence analysis method in Gansu Yellow River irrigation district of Northwest China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 47(1), 100–110 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. H., Chen, P. H., Li, J., Chen, X. B. & Feng, Y. Distribution of soil salt ions around Tamarix chinensis individuals in the Yellow River Delta. Acta Ecol. Sin. 36(18), 5741–5749 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, T., Zhan, X., He, J., Feng, H. & Kang, Y. Salt characteristics and soluble cations redistribution in an impermeable calcareous saline-sodic soil reclaimed with an improved drip irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 197, 91–99 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Yin, C. H., Feng, G. U., Zhang, F., Tian, C. Y. & Tang, C. Enrichment of soil fertility and salinity by tamarisk in saline soils on the northern edge of the Taklamakan Desert. Agric. Water Manag. 97(12), 1978–1986 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Chaudhari, P. R., Ahire, D. V., Ahire, V. D., Chkravarty, M. & Maity, S. Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore soil. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 3(2), 1–8 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tanveera, A., Kanth, T. A., Tali, P. A. & Naikoo, M. Relation of soil bulk density with texture, total organic matter content and porosity in the soils of Kandi Area of Kashmir valley, India. Int. Res. J. Earth Sci. 4(1), 1–6 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Sharma, B. & Bhattacharya, S. Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, moisture content, Ph, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, organic matter content and available macro nutrients of Pandoga sub watershed, Una District of HP (India). Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 13(12), 72–76 (2017).
Google Scholar  More

Milner-Gulland, E. J. & Bennett, E. L. Wild meat: The bigger picture. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 351–357 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Van Vliet, N. et al. Bushmeat and human health: Assessing the evidence in tropical and sub-tropical forests. Ethnobio. Conserv. 6, 3. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2017-04-6.3-1-45 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ingram, D. J. et al. Wild meat is still on the menu: Progress in wild meat research, policy, and practice from 2002 to 2020. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 221–254. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-041020-063132 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Golden, C. D., Fernald, L. C. H., Brashares, J. S., Rasolofoniaina, B. J. R. & Kremen, C. Benefits of wildlife consumption to child nutrition in a biodiversity hotspot. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 19653–19656 (2011).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Roe, D. et al. Beyond banning wildlife trade: COVID-19, conservation and development. World Dev. 136, 105121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105121 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, W., Orrick, K., Lim, A. & Dove, M. Reframing conservation and development perspectives on bushmeat. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 011001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3db1 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cawthorn, D.-M. & Hoffman, L. C. The bushmeat and food security nexus: A global account of the contributions, conundrums and ethical collisions. Food Res. Int. 76, 906–925 (2015).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Antunes, A. P. et al. A conspiracy of silence: Subsistence hunting rights in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 84, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Friant, S. et al. Eating bushmeat improves food security in a biodiversity and infectious disease “Hotspot”. EcoHealth 17, 125–138 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fa, J. E., Currie, D. & Meeuwig, J. Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: Linkages between wildlife and people’s future. Environ. Conserv. 30, 71–78 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Borgerson, C., Razafindrapaoly, B., Rajaona, D., Rasolofoniaina, B. J. R. & Golden, C. D. Food insecurity and the unsustainable hunting of wildlife in a UNESCO world heritage site. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00099 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Booth, H. et al. Investigating the risks of removing wild meat from global food systems. Curr. Biol. 31, 1788–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.079 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van Vliet, N., Nebesse, C. & Nasi, R. Bushmeat consumption among rural and urban children from Province Orientale, Democratic Republic of Congo. Oryx 49, 165–174 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Sirén, A. & Machoa, J. Fish, wildlife, and human nutrition in tropical forests: A fat gap?. Interciencia 33, 186–193 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Sarti, F. M. et al. Beyond protein intake: Bushmeat as source of micronutrients in the Amazon. E&S 20, 22 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Hoffman, L. C. What is the role and contribution of meat from wildlife in providing high quality protein for consumption?. Anim. Front. 2, 15 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Fa, J. E. et al. Disentangling the relative effects of bushmeat availability on human nutrition in central Africa. Sci. Rep. 5, 8168. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08168 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Castro, T. G., Baraldi, L. G., Muniz, P. T. & Cardoso, M. A. Dietary practices and nutritional status of 0–24-month-old children from Brazilian Amazonia. Public Health Nutr. 12, 2335–2342 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mintz, S. W. & Du Bois, C. M. The anthropology of food and eating. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 31, 99–119 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Lokossou, Y. U. A., Tambe, A. B., Azandjèmè, C. & Mbhenyane, X. Socio-cultural beliefs influence feeding practices of mothers and their children in Grand Popo, Benin. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 40, 33 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, S. P. & Allen, L. H. Nutritional importance of animal source foods. J. Nutr. 133, 3932S-3935S (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, C. G. et al. Animal source foods improve dietary quality, micronutrient status, growth and cognitive function in Kenyan School Children: Background, study design and baseline findings. J. Nutr. 133, 3941S-3949S (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Desalegn, A., Mossie, A. & Gedefaw, L. Nutritional iron deficiency anemia: Magnitude and its predictors among school age children, Southwest Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 9, e114059 (2014).ADS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Safiri, S. et al. Burden of anemia and its underlying causes in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J. Hematol. Oncol. 14, 185 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vos, T. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1545–1602 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Investing in the future: a united call to action on vitamin and mineral deficiencies: global report, 2009. (Micronutrient Initiative, 2009).Walker, S. P. et al. Child development: Risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet 369, 145–157 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Saloojee, H. & Pettifor, J. M. Iron deficiency and impaired child development: The relation may be causal, but it may not be a priority for intervention. BMJ 323, 1377–1378 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, C., Harris, D. M. & Rogers, L. M. Contribution of animal source foods in improving diet quality and function in children in the developing world. Nutr. Res. 22, 193–220 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haileselassie, M. et al. Why are animal source foods rarely consumed by 6–23 months old children in rural communities of Northern Ethiopia? A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 15, e0225707 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Victor, R., Baines, S. K., Agho, K. E. & Dibley, M. J. Factors associated with inappropriate complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 months in Tanzania: Complementary feeding practices in Tanzania. Matern. Child Nutr. 10, 545–561 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morsello, C. et al. Cultural attitudes are stronger predictors of bushmeat consumption and preference than economic factors among urban Amazonians from Brazil and Colombia. E&S 20, 21 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Parry, L., Barlow, J. & Pereira, H. Wildlife Harvest and Consumption in Amazonia’s Urbanized Wilderness: Wildlife consumption in urbanized Amazonia. Conserv. Lett. 7, 565–574 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Wilkie, D. S., Monroe, M. C. & Sieving, K. E. Market access and wild meat consumption in the central Amazon, Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 212, 240–248 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Dufour, D. L., Piperata, B. A., Murrieta, R. S. S., Wilson, W. M. & Williams, D. D. Amazonian foods and implications for human biology. Ann. Hum. Biol. 43, 330–348 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Piperata, B. A. Nutritional status of Ribeirinhos in Brazil and the nutrition transition. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 133, 868–878 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Garcia, M. T., Granado, F. S. & Cardoso, M. A. Alimentação complementar e estado nutricional de crianças menores de dois anos atendidas no Programa Saúde da Família em Acrelândia, Acre, Amazônia Ocidental Brasileira. Cad. Saúde Pública 27, 305–316 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marques, R. C., Bernardi, J. V. E., Dorea, C. C. & Dórea, J. G. Intestinal parasites, anemia and nutritional status in young children from transitioning Western Amazon. IJERPH 17, 577 (2020).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Granado, F. S., Augusto, R. A., Muniz, P. T. & Cardoso, M. A. Team, the A. S. Anaemia and iron deficiency between 2003 and 2007 in Amazonian children under 2 years of age: Trends and associated factors. Public Health Nutr. 16, 1751–1759 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nogueira-de-Almeida, C. A. et al. Prevalence of childhood anaemia in Brazil: Still a serious health problem: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 24, 6450–6465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002100286X (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
de Souza, A. A., Mingoti, S. A., Paes-Sousa, R. & Heller, L. Combination of conditional cash transfer program and environmental health interventions reduces child mortality: An ecological study of Brazilian municipalities. BMC Public Health 21, 627 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ferreira, H. S. et al. Prevalence of anaemia in Brazilian children in different epidemiological scenarios: An updated meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 24, 2171–2184 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Leite, M. S. et al. Prevalence of anemia and associated factors among indigenous children in Brazil: Results from the First National Survey of Indigenous People’s Health and Nutrition. Nutr. 12, 69 (2013).
Google Scholar 
WHO, W. H. O. Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6–59 months (%). https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-children-under-5-years-(-) (2021).Schreiner, M. A Poverty Probability Index (PPI®) for Brazil (2008). (2010).Walzer, C. COVID-19 and the curse of piecemeal perspectives. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 582983 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Carignano, T. P., Morsello, C. & Parry, L. Rural-urban mobility influences wildmeat access and consumption in the Brazilian Amazon. Oryx (In press).Ferreira, M. U. et al. Anemia and iron deficiency in school children, adolescents, and adults: A community-based study in Rural Amazonia. Am. J. Public Health 97, 237–239 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
de Castro, T. G., Silva-Nunes, M., Conde, W. L., Muniz, P. T. & Cardoso, M. A. Anemia e deficiência de ferro em pré-escolares da Amazônia Ocidental brasileira: Prevalência e fatores associados. Cad. Saúde Pública 27, 131–142 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cotta, R. M. M. et al. Social and biological determinants of iron deficiency anemia. Cad. Saúde Pública 27, s309–s320 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Valle, D., Tavares, A. S., Morcatty, T. Q. & Wilcove, D. S. Impacts of rural to urban migration, urbanization, and generational change on consumption of wild animals in the Amazon. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13663 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
El Bizri, H. R. et al. Urban wild meat consumption and trade in central Amazonia. Conserv. Biol. 34, 438–448 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Valle, D., Tavares, A. S., von Mühlen, E. M. & Wilcove, D. S. Investigating illegal activities that affect biodiversity: The case of wildlife consumption in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02402. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2402 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Monroe, M. C. & Sieving, K. E. Wild meat trade and consumption in the Central Amazon, Brazil. Hum. Ecol. 47, 733–746 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ohl-Schacherer, J. et al. The sustainability of subsistence hunting by matsigenka native communities in Manu National Park, Peru. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1174–1185 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shaffer, C. A., Yukuma, C., Marawanaru, E. & Suse, P. Assessing the sustainability of Waiwai subsistence hunting in Guyana by comparison of static indices and spatially explicit, biodemographic models. Anim. Conserv. 21, 148–158 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares, 2008–2009. (IBGE, 2010).Aguiar, J. P. L. Tabela de composição de alimentos da Amazônia. Acta Amaz 26, 121–126 (1996).
Google Scholar 
de Bruyn, J. et al. Food composition tables in resource-poor settings: exploring current limitations and opportunities, with a focus on animal-source foods in sub-Saharan Africa. Br. J. Nutr. 116, 1709–1719 (2016).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
World Bank. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of Fortune. (World Bank, 2020).Coad, L. M. et al. Toward a Sustainable, Participatory and Inclusive Wild Meat Sector. (Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007046 (2019).Cowlishaw, G., Mendelson, S. & Rowcliffe, J. M. Evidence for post-depletion sustainability in a mature bushmeat market. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 460–468 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Carignano Torres, P., Morsello, C., Parry, L. & Pardini, R. Forest cover and social relations are more important than economic factors in driving hunting and bushmeat consumption in post-frontier Amazonia. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108823 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nunes, A. V., Oliveira-Santos, L. G. R., Santos, B. A., Peres, C. A. & Fischer, E. Socioeconomic drivers of hunting efficiency and use of space by traditional Amazonians. Hum. Ecol. 48, 307–315 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Freitas, C. T. et al. Co-management of culturally important species: A tool to promote biodiversity conservation and human well-being. People Nat. 2, 61–81 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Campos-Silva, J. V., Peres, C. A., Antunes, A. P., Valsecchi, J. & Pezzuti, J. Community-based population recovery of overexploited Amazonian wildlife. PECON 15, 266–270 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Nunes, A. V., Peres, C. A., de Constantino, P. A. L., Santos, B. A. & Fischer, E. Irreplaceable socioeconomic value of wild meat extraction to local food security in rural Amazonia. Biol. Conserv. 236, 171–179 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Balarajan, Y., Ramakrishnan, U., Özaltin, E., Shankar, A. H. & Subramanian, S. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 378, 2123–2135 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mendes, M. M. et al. Association between iron deficiency anaemia and complementary feeding in children under 2 years assisted by a Conditional Cash Transfer programme. Public Health Nutr. 24, 4080–4090 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brondízio, E. S., de Lima, A. C. B., Schramski, S. & Adams, C. Social and health dimensions of climate change in the Amazon. Ann. Hum. Biol. 43, 405–414 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ingram, D. J. Wild meat in changing times. J. Ethnobiol. 40, 117 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Nunes, A. V., Guariento, R. D., Santos, B. A. & Fischer, E. Wild meat sharing among non-indigenous people in the southwestern Amazon. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 26 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Parry, L. et al. Social vulnerability to climatic shocks is shaped by urban accessibility. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108, 125–143 (2018).
Google Scholar 
IBGE, I. B. de G. e E. Censo Demográfico 2010. (2010).IBGE, I. B. de G. e E. Estimativas da população residente para os municípios e para as unidades da federação com data de referência em 1o de julho de 2019. (2019).Cardoso, M. A., Scopel, K. K. G., Muniz, P. T., Villamor, E. & Ferreira, M. U. Underlying factors associated with anemia in amazonian children: A population-based cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE 7, e36341 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mattiello, V. et al. Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency in children with or without anemia: consensus recommendations of the SPOG Pediatric Hematology Working Group. Eur. J. Pediatr. 179, 527–545 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: The R project for statistical computing. (2015).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6.Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Devereux, S. Social Protection for Rural Poverty Reduction. Rural Transformations Technical Series 1 (2016).Barton, K. Mu-MIn: Multi-model Inference. R Package Version 0.12.2/r18. (2009).Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Burnham, K. P. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Berti, P. R. Intrahousehold distribution of food: A review of the literature and discussion of the implications for food fortification programs. Food Nutr. Bull. 33, S163–S169 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Piperata, B. A., Schmeer, K. K., Hadley, C. & Ritchie-Ewing, G. Dietary inequalities of mother–child pairs in the rural Amazon: Evidence of maternal-child buffering?. Soc. Sci. Med. 96, 183–191 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Templeton, T. J., Martinsen, E., Kaewthamasorn, M. & Kaneko, O. The rediscovery of malaria parasites of ungulates. Parasitology 143, 1501–1508. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182016001141 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sheather, A. A malaria parasite in the blood of a buffalo. J. Comp. Pathol. Ther. 32, 80026–80027 (1919).Article 

Google Scholar 
Templeton, T. J. et al. Ungulate malaria parasites. Sci. Rep. 6, 23230. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23230 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kandel, R. C. et al. First report of malaria parasites in water buffalo in Nepal. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 18, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vprsr.2019.100348 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garnham, P. & Edeson, J. Two new malaria parasites of the Malayan mousedeer. Riv. Malariol. 41, 1–8 (1962).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hoo, C. & Sandosham, A. The early forms of Hepatocystis fieldi and Plasmodium traguli in the Malayan mouse-deer Tragulus javanicus. Med. J. Malays. 22, 299–301 (1968).
Google Scholar 
de Mello, F.d., Paes, S. Sur une plasmodiae du sang des chèvres. Cr. Séanc. Soc. Biol. 88, 829–830 (1923).Kaewthamasorn, M. et al. Genetic homogeneity of goat malaria parasites in Asia and Africa suggests their expansion with domestic goat host. Sci. Rep. 8, 5827. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24048-0 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rattanarithikul, R. H., Bruce, A., Harbach, R. E., Panthusiri, P. & Coleman, R. E. Illustrated keys to the mosquitoes of Thailand IV. Anopheles. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 37 (2006).Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit. 2021. Systematic catalogue of Culicidae. http://mosquitocatalog.org. Last accessed on 20/09/2021.Sinka, M. E. et al. The dominant Anopheles vectors of human malaria in the Asia-Pacific region: occurrence data, distribution maps and bionomic précis. Parasit. Vectors. 4, 89. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-4-89 (2011).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Syafruddin, D. et al. Malaria prevalence in Nias District, North Sumatra Province, Indonesia. Malar. J. 6, 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-6-116 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vantaux, A. et al. Anopheles ecology, genetics and malaria transmission in northern Cambodia. Sci. Rep. 11, 6458. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85628-1 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Manguin, S., Garros, C., Dusfour, I., Harbach, R. & Coosemans, M. Bionomics, taxonomy, and distribution of the major malaria vector taxa of Anopheles subgenus Cellia in Southeast Asia: An updated review. Infect. Genet. Evol. 8, 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2007.11.004 (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Paredes-Esquivel, C., Donnelly, M. J., Harbach, R. E. & Townson, H. A molecular phylogeny of mosquitoes in the Anopheles barbirostris Subgroup reveals cryptic species: implications for identification of disease vectors. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 50, 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.10.011 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sungvornyothin, S., Garros, C., Chareonviriyaphap, T. & Manguin, S. How reliable is the humeral pale spot for identification of cryptic species of the Minimus Complex?. J. Am. Mosq. Control. Assoc. 22, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.2987/8756-971X(2006)22[185:HRITHP]2.0.CO;2 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brosseau, L. et al. A multiplex PCR assay for the identification of five species of the Anopheles barbirostris complex in Thailand. Parasite. Vectors. 12, 223. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3494-8 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taai, K. & Harbach, R. E. Systematics of the Anopheles barbirostris species complex (Diptera: Culicidae: Anophelinae) in Thailand. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 174, 244–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12236 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dahan-Moss, Y. et al. Member species of the Anopheles gambiae complex can be misidentified as Anopheles leesoni. Malar. J. 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-020-03168-x (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
De Ang, J. X., Yaman, K., Kadir, K. A., Matusop, A. & Singh, B. New vectors that are early feeders for Plasmodium knowlesi and other simian malaria parasites in Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86107-3 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Bortel, W. et al. Confirmation of Anopheles varuna in Vietnam, previously misidentified and mistargeted as the malaria vector Anopheles minimus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65, 729–732. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2001.65.729 (2001).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wharton, R., Eyles, D. E., Warren, M., Moorhouse, D. & Sandosham, A. Investigations leading to the identification of members of the Anopheles umbrosus group as the probable vectors of mouse deer malaria. Bull. World. Health. Organ. 29, 357 (1963).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Boundenga, L. et al. Haemosporidian parasites of antelopes and other vertebrates from Gabon, Central Africa. PLoS ONE 11, e0148958. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148958 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martinsen, E. S. et al. Hidden in plain sight: Cryptic and endemic malaria parasites in North American white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus). Sci. Adv. 2, e1501486. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501486 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Garnham, P. C. C. Malaria Parasites and Other Haemosporidia (Blackwell Sci. Pub, 1966).
Google Scholar 
Nguyen, A. H. L., Tiawsirisup, S. & Kaewthamasorn, M. Low level of genetic diversity and high occurrence of vector-borne protozoa in water buffaloes in Thailand based on 18S ribosomal RNA and mitochondrial cytochrome b genes. Infect. Genet. Evol. 82, 104304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104304 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hebert, P. D., Cywinska, A. & Ball, S. L. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 270, 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2218 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cywinska, A., Hunter, F. & Hebert, P. D. Identifying Canadian mosquito species through DNA barcodes. Med. Vet. Entomol. 20, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2915.2006.00653.x (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ogola, E. O., Chepkorir, E., Sang, R. & Tchouassi, D. P. A previously unreported potential malaria vector in a dry ecology of Kenya. Parasites Vectors 12, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-019-3332-z (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Maquart, P.-O., Fontenille, D., Rahola, N., Yean, S. & Boyer, S. Checklist of the mosquito fauna (Diptera, Culicidae) of Cambodia. Parasite 28, 60. https://doi.org/10.1051/parasite/2021056 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Saeung, A. et al. Geographic distribution and genetic compatibility among six karyotypic forms of Anopheles peditaeniatus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand. Trop. Biomed. 29, 613–625 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Tainchum, K., Kongmee, M., Manguin, S., Bangs, M. J. & Chareonviriyaphap, T. Anopheles species diversity and distribution of the malaria vectors of Thailand. Trends Parasitol. 31, 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2015.01.004 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chookaew, S. et al. Anopheles species composition in malaria high-risk areas in Ranong Province. Dis. Cont. J. 46, 483–493. https://doi.org/10.14456/dcj.2020.45 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Reid, J. A. The Anopheles barbirostris group (Diptera, Culicidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 53, 1–57 (1962).Article 

Google Scholar 
Harrison, B. A. & Scanlon, J. E. Medical entomology studies–II. The subgenus Anopheles in Thailand (Diptera: Culicidae). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute (Ann Arbor) 12 (1): iv + 1–iv 307 (1975).Wang, Y., Xu, J. & Ma, Y. Molecular characterization of cryptic species of Anopheles barbirostris van der Wulp in China. Parasite Vectors 7, 592. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-014-0592-5 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, G. et al. An evaluation of the suitability of COI and COII gene variation for reconstructing the phylogeny of, and identifying cryptic species in, anopheline mosquitoes (Diptera Culicidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A. 28, 769–777. https://doi.org/10.1080/24701394.2016.1186665 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Davidson, J. R. et al. Molecular analysis reveals a high diversity of Anopheles species in Karama, West Sulawesi, Indonesia. Parasite Vectors https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04252-6 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beebe, N. W. DNA barcoding mosquitoes: advice for potential prospectors. Parasitology 145(5), 622–633. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182018000343 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gunathilaka, N. Illustrated key to the adult female Anopheles (Diptera: Culicidae) mosquitoes of Sri Lanka. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 52, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13355-016-0455-y (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
WHO. Pictorial identification key of important disease vectors in the WHO South-East Asia Region. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332202 (accessed 20 August 2021).Rigg, C. A., Hurtado, L. A., Calzada, J. E. & Chaves, L. F. Malaria infection rates in Anopheles albimanus (Diptera: Culicidae) at Ipetí-Guna, a village within a region targeted for malaria elimination in Panamá. Infect. Genet. Evol. 69, 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meegid.2019.02.003 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Torres-Cosme, R. et al. Natural malaria infection in anophelines vectors and their incrimination in local malaria transmission in Darién, Panama. PLoS ONE 16, e0250059. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250059 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Beebe, N. W. & Saul, A. Discrimination of all Members of the Anopheles punctulatus complex by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 53, 478–481. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1995.53.478 (1995).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Perkins, S. L. & Schall, J. J. A molecular phylogeny of malaria parasites recovered from cytochrome b gene sequences. J. Parasitol. 88, 972–978. https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088[0972:AMPOMP]2.0.CO;2 (2002).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Snounou, G. et al. High sensitivity of detection of human malaria parasites by the use of nested polymerase chain reaction. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 61, 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-6851(93)90077-b (1993).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hall, T. A. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic. Acids. Symp. Ser. 41, 95–98 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schoener, E. et al. Avian Plasmodium in Eastern Austrian mosquitoes. Malar. J. 16, 389. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-017-2035-1 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ventim, R. et al. Avian malaria infections in western European mosquitoes. Parasitol. Res. 111, 637–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-012-2880-3 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huelsenbeck, J. P. & Ronquist, F. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17, 754–755 (2001).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rambaut, A., Drummond, A. J., Xie, D., Baele, G. & Suchard, M. A. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using tracer 1.7. Syst. Biol. 67, 901–904 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More