Ecology

Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, accessed 2021); www.protectedplanet.netVenter, O. et al. Bias in protected-area location and its effects on long-term aspirations of biodiversity conventions. Conserv. Biol. 32, 127–134 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ward, M. et al. Just ten percent of the global terrestrial protected area network is structurally connected via intact land. Nat. Commun. 11, 4563 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Adams, W. M. Against Extinction: The Story of Conservation (Earthscan, 2004).Watson, J. E. M. Dudley, Segan, N. & Hockings, D. B. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Shortfalls and solutions for meeting national and global conservation area targets. Conserv. Lett. 8, 329–337 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stolton, S. et al. The Futures of Privately Protected Areas (IUCN, 2014).Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, accessed November 2018); www.protectedplanet.netBingham, H. et al. Privately protected areas: advances and challenges in guidance, policy and documentation. Parks 23, 13–28 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gallo, J., Pasquini, L., Reyers, B. & Cowling, R. M. The role of private conservation areas in biodiversity representation and target achievement within the Little Karoo region, South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 142, 446–454 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schutz, J. Creating an integrated protected area network in Chile: a GIS assessment of ecoregion representation and the role of private protected areas. Environ. Conserv. 45, 269–277 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ielyzaveta, I. M. & Cook, C. N. The role of privately protected areas in achieving biodiversity representation within a national protected area network. Conserv. Sci. Pract. 2, e307 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Graves, R. A., Williamson, M. A., Belote, R. T. & Brandt, J. S. Quantifying the contribution of conservation easements to large‐landscape conservation. Biol. Conserv. 232, 83–96 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Vos, A. & Cumming, G. S. The contribution of land tenure diversity to the spatial resilience of protected area networks. People Nat. 1, 331–346 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Olson, D. M. et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth: a new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience 51, 933–938 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., Da Fonseca, G. A. B. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403, 853–858 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Borrini-Feyerabend, G. et al. Governance of Protected Areas: From Understanding to Action (IUCN, 2013).Lee, A. & Schultz, K. A. Comparing British and French colonial legacies: a discontinuity analysis of Cameroon. Q. J. Polit. Sci. 7, 365–410 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. & Robinson, J. A. The colonial origins of comparative development: an empirical investigation. Am. Econ. Rev. 91, 1369–1401 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
De Vos, A., Clements, H. S., Biggs, D. & Cumming, G. S. The dynamics of proclaimed privately protected areas in South Africa over 83 years. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12644 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Conservation Programs (USDA, accessed 21 October 2021); https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/conservation-programs/Zimmer, H. C., Mavromihalis, J., Turner, V. B., Moxham, C. & Liu, C. Native grasslands in the PlainsTender incentive scheme: conservation value, management and monitoring. Rangel. J. 32, 205–214 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
A Global Standard for the Identification of Key Biodiversity Area (IUCN, 2021); https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/Rep-2016-005.pdfVenter, O. et al. Last of the Wild Project, Version 3 (LWP-3): 2009 Human Footprint, 2018 Release (SEDAC, 2021); https://doi.org/10.7927/H46T0JQ4Hoekstra, J. M., Boucher, T. M., Ricketts, T. H. & Roberts, C. Confronting a biome crisis: global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecol. Lett. 8, 23–29 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Newbold, T. et al. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353, 288–291 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Bengtsson, J. et al. Grasslands—more important for ecosystem services than you might think. Ecosphere 10, e02582 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Working Together for Grasslands. How Ranchers and the WWF Help Protect the Northern Great Plains (WWF, 2021); https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/working-together-for-grasslandsHenderson, K. A. et al. Landowner perceptions of the value of natural forest and natural grassland in a mosaic ecosystem in southern Brazil. Sustain. Sci. 11, 321–330 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kamal, S., Grodzinska-Jurczak, M. & Brown, G. Conservation on private land: a review of global strategies with a proposed classification system. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 58, 576–597 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Williamson, M. A., Schwartz, M. W. & Lubell, M. N. Spatially explicit analytical models for social–ecological systems. BioScience 68, 885–895 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Watson, J. E. M. et al. Persistent disparities between recent rates of habitat conversion and protection and implications for future global conservation targets. Conserv. Lett. 9, 413–421 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Di Marco, M. et al. Quantifying the relative irreplaceability of important bird and biodiversity areas. Conserv. Biol. 30, 392–402 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jones, K. R. et al. One-third of global protected land is under intense human pressure. Science 360, 788–791 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sanderson, E. W. et al. The human footprint and the last of the wild: the human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience 52, 891–904 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clements, H. S., Kerley, G. I. H., Cumming, G. S., De Vos, A. & Cook, C. N. Privately protected areas provide key opportunities for the regional persistence of large‐ and medium‐sized mammals. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 537–546 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Song, P., Kim, G., Mayer, A., He, R. & Tian, G. Assessing the ecosystem services of various types of urban green spaces based on i-Tree Eco. Sustainability 12, 1630 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Trzyna, T. Urban Protected Areas: Profiles and Best Practice Guidelines (IUCN, 2014).Li, E. et al. (2019) An urban biodiversity assessment framework that combines an urban habitat classification scheme and citizen science data. Front. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00277 (2019).Venter, O. et al. Global terrestrial Human Footprint maps for 1993 and 2009. Sci. Data 3, 160067 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rissman, A. R. & Merenlender, A. M. The conservation contributions of conservation easements: analysis of the San Francisco Bay Area protected lands spatial database. Ecol. Soc. 13, 25 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020, Including Aichi Biodiversity Targets (CBD, 2011); https://www.cbd.int/sp/Saura, S., Bastin, L., Battistella, L., Mandrici, A. & Dubois, G. Protected areas in the world’s ecoregions: how well connected are they? Ecol. Indic. 76, 144–158 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
World Database of Key Biodiversity Areas (BirdLife International, accessed September 2020); http://www.keybiodiversityareas.org/site/requestgisSaura, S. & Torné, J. Conefor Sensinode 2.2: a software package for quantifying the importance of habitat patches for landscape connectivity. Environ. Model. Softw. 24, 135–139 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2014). http://www.R-Project.org/Milam, A. et al. in Protected Areas: Are They Safeguarding Biodiversity? (eds Joppa, L. et al.) 81–101 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2016).Mason, C. et al. Telemetry reveals existing marine protected areas are worse than random for protecting the foraging habitat of threatened shy albatross. Divers. Distrib. 24, 1744–1755 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lewis, E. et al. Dynamics in the global protected-area estate since 2004. Conserv. Biol. 33, 570–579 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Venter, O. et al. Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation. Nat. Commun. 7, 12558 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schleicher, J., Peres, C. A., Amano, T., Llactayo, W. & Leader-Williams, N. Conservation performance of different conservation governance regimes in the Peruvian Amazon. Nature 7, 113–118 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Shumba, T. et al. Effectiveness of private land conservation areas in maintaining natural land cover and biodiversity intactness. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 22, e00935 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Goergen, G., Kumar, P. L., Sankung, S. B., Togola, A. & Tamo, M. First Report of Outbreaks of the Fall Armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae), a New Alien Invasive Pest in West and Central Africa. PLoS ONE 11, e0165632 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cock, M. J. W., Beseh, P. K., Buddie, A. G., Cafa, G. & Crozier, J. Molecular methods to detect Spodoptera frugiperda in Ghana, and implications for monitoring the spread of invasive species in developing countries. Sci. Rep. 7, 4103 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N. et al. Comparative molecular analyses of invasive fall armyworm in Togo reveal strong similarities to populations from the eastern United States and the Greater Antilles. PLoS ONE 12, e0181982 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jacobs, A., van Vuuren, A. & Rong, I. H. Characterisation of the fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from South Africa. Afr. Entomol. 26, 45–49 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Otim, M. H. et al. Detection of sister-species in invasive populations of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Uganda. PLoS ONE 13, e0194571 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
FAO. Briefing note on FAO actions on fall armyworm in Africa, (2018).FAO. Briefing note on FAO actions on fall armyworm, (2019).Ganiger, P. C. et al. Occurrence of the new invasive pest, fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (JE Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), in the maize fields of Karnataka, India. Curr. Sci. India 115, 621–623 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sharanabasappa, D. et al. First report of the fall Armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J E Smith) (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) an Alien invasive pest on Maize in India. Pest Manag. Horticultural Ecosyst. 24, 23–29 (2018).
Google Scholar 
FAO. in FAO Regional Conference for Asia and the Pacific, 35th Session 7 (Thimphu, Bhutan, 2019).EPPO. First report of Spodoptera frugiperda in Thailand. (2019).Tay, W. T. & Gordon, K. H. J. Going global – genomic insights into insect invasions. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 31, 123–130 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. et al. Molecular identification of invasive fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda in Yunnan Province. Plant Prot. 45, 19–24 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Wu, Q., Jian, Y. & K, W. Analysis of migration routes of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) form Myanmar to China. Plant Prot. 45, 1–6 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
USDA. Fall armyworm damages corn and threatens other crops in Vietnam. United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, Report Number: VM2019-0017 (2019).FAO. Report of first detection of fall armyworm (FAW) in the Republic of the Philippines. Report No. PHL-02/1, (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Plant Protection Convention, 2019).Navasero, M. V. et al. Detection of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) using larval mrophological characters, and observations on its current local distribution in the Philippines. Philipp. Ent 33, 171–184 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Vennila, S. et al. in International Workshop on Facilitating International Research Collaboration on Transboundary Plant Pests. (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan, 2019).FAO. First detection of fall armyworm in China. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Plant Protection Convention, 2019).Silver, A. Caterpillar’s devastating march across China spurs hunt for native predator. Nature 570, 286–287 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Song, X. P. et al. Intrusion of Fall Armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Sugarcane and Its Control by Drone in China. Sugar Tech. 22, 734–737 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Czepak, C. et al. Especial Spodoptera: Migração acelerada. Cultivar Gd. Culturas 244, 26–29 (2019).
Google Scholar 
FAO. First detection of Fall armyworm in Torres Strait of Australia. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Plant Protection Convention, 2020).Queensland Government, D. o. A. a. F. First mainland detection of fall armyworm, accessed 13 March 2020 (2020).Wild, S. Invasive pest hits Africa. Nature 543, 13–14 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Porter, J. E. & Hughes, J. H. Insect eggs transported on the outer surface of airplanes. J. Economic Entomol. 43, 555–557 (1950).
Google Scholar 
Jeger, M. et al. Pest categorisation of Spodoptera frugiperda. Efsa J. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4927 (2017).Early, R., Gonzalez-Moreno, P., Murphy, S. T. & Day, R. Forecasting the global extent of invasion of the cereal pest Spodoptera frugiperda, the fall armyworm. Neobiota https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.40.28165 (2018).FAO. Fall armyworm likely to spread from India to other parts of Asia with South East Asia and South China most at risk. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nation, 2018).Gouin, A. et al. Two genomes of highly polyphagous lepidopteran pests (Spodoptera frugiperda, Noctuidae) with different host-plant ranges. Sci. Rep. 7, 11816 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. et al. Genetic structure and insecticide resistance characteristics of fall armyworm populations invading China. Mol. Ecol. Resour. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13219 (2020).Westbrook, J., Fleischer, S., Jairam, S., Meagher, R. & Nagoshi, R. Multigenerational migration of fall armyworm, a pest insect. Ecosphere 10, e02919 (2019).
Google Scholar 
du Plessis, H., van den Berg, J., Ota, N. & Kriticos, D. J. Spodoptera frugiperda (Fall Armyworm). in CSIRO-InSTePP Pest Geography. June, 2018 (2018).FAO. First detection report of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepdioptera: Noctuidae) on maize in Myanmar. (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, International Plant Protection Convention, 2019).Sun, X.-X. et al. Case study on the first immigration of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda invading into China. J. Integr. Agriculture 18, 2–10 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Day, R. et al. Fall armyworm: impacts and implications for Africa. Outlooks Pest Manag. 28, 196–201 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Assefa, F. & Ayalew, D. Status and control measures of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) infestations in maize fields in Ethiopia: a review. Cogent Food Agr. 5, 1641902 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Hurska, A. J. Fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) management by smallholders. CAB Rev. 14, 11 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Firake, D. M. & Behere, G. T. Natural mortality of invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J. E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize agroecosystems of northeast India. Biol. Control 148, 104303 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Guan, F. et al. Whole-genome sequencing to detect mutations associated with resistance to insecticides and Bt proteins in Spodoptera frugiperda. Insect Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7917.12838 (2020).Dumas, P. et al. Phylogenetic molecular species delimitations unravel potential new species in the pest genus Spodoptera Guenee, 1852 (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). PLoS ONE 10, e0122407 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dumas, P. et al. Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) host-plant variants: two host strains or two distinct species? Genetica 143, 305–316 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N. et al. Genetic characterization of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda) in Ecuador and comparisons with regional populations identify likely migratory relationships. PLoS ONE 14, e0222332 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jing, D. P. et al. Initial detections and spread of invasive Spodoptera frugiperda in China and comparisons with other noctuid larvae in cornfields using molecular techniques. Insect Sci. 27, 780–790 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N. et al. Southeastern Asia fall armyworms are closely related to populations in Africa and India, consistent with common origin and recent migration. Sci. Rep. 10, 1421 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mahadeva, S. H. M. et al. Prevalence of “R” strain and molecular diversity of fall army worm Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in India. Indian J. Entomol. 80, 544–553 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Murua, M. G. et al. Demonstration using field collections that Argentina fall armyworm populations exhibit strain-specific host plant preferences. J. Econ. Entomol. 108, 2305–2315 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N. The fall armyworm triose phosphate isomerase (Tpi) gene as a marker of strain identity and interstrain mating. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 103, 283–292 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N., Goergen, G., Plessis, H. D., van den Berg, J. & Meagher, R. Jr. Genetic comparisons of fall armyworm populations from 11 countries spanning sub-Saharan Africa provide insights into strain composition and migratory behaviors. Sci. Rep. 9, 8311 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Czepak, C., Albernaz, C., Vivan, L. M., Guimarães, H. O. & Carvalhais, T. First reported occurrence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. Pesq. Agropec. Trop., Goia.̂nia 43, 110–113 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Arnemann, J. A. et al. Multiple incursion pathways for Helicoverpa armigera in Brazil show its genetic diversity spreading in a connected world. Sci. Rep. 9, 19380 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tay, W. T. et al. A brave new world for an old world pest: Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. PLoS ONE 8, e80134 (2013).Tay, W. T. et al. Mitochondrial DNA and trade data support multiple origins of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) in Brazil. Sci. Rep. 7, 45302 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Behere, G. T. et al. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of field populations of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and of its relationship to H. zea. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 117 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pearce, S. L. et al. Erratum to: Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species. BMC Biol. 15, 69 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pearce, S. L. et al. Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species. BMC Biol. 15, 63 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Guillemaud, T., Ciosi, M., Lombaert, E. & Estoup, A. Biological invasions in agricultural settings: insights from evolutionary biology and population genetics. Cr Biol. 334, 237–246 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Elfekih, S. et al. Genome-wide analyses of the Bemisia tabaci species complex reveal contrasting patterns of admixture and complex demographic histories. PLoS ONE 13, e0190555 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, C. J., Tay, W. T., McGaughran, A., Gordon, K. & Walsh, T. K. Population structure and gene flow in the global pest, Helicoverpa armigera. Mol. Ecol. 25, 5296–5311 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, C. J. et al. Hybridization and gene flow in the mega-pest lineage of moth, Helicoverpa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 5034–5039 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N., Meagher, R. L. & Hay-Roe, M. Inferring the annual migration patterns of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in the United States from mitochondrial haplotypes. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1458–1467 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wright, S. The interpretation of population-structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution 19, 395–420 (1965).
Google Scholar 
Luikart, G. & Cornuet, J. M. Empirical evaluation of a test for identifying recently bottlenecked populations from allele frequency data. Conserv. Biol. 12, 228–237 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N. et al. Genetic characterization of fall armyworm infesting South Africa and India indicate recent introduction from a common source population. PLoS ONE 14, e0217755 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N. et al. Analysis of strain distribution, migratory potential, and invasion history of fall armyworm populations in northern Sub-Saharan Africa. Sci. Rep.-Uk 8, 3710 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Arias, O. et al. Population genetic structure and demographic history of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): implications for insect resistance management programs. Pest Manag. Sci. 75, 2948–2957 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nguyen, T. K. O. & Vu, T. P. Checklist of turfgrass insect pests, morphology, biology and population fluctuation of Herpetograma phaeopteralis (Guenee) (Lepidopera: Pyralidae) in Ha Noi, in Spring-Summer 2008. in The 3rd National Conference of Ecology and Natural Resources, Ha Noi. 1490–1498.Pham, V. L. On time to recognise first potential Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Vietnam and its Vietnamese name. in Plant Protection Magazine No. 4/2019 (Plant Protection Research Institute of Vietnam, July, 2019).Vu, T. P. Insect pests of turf grass, biology, ecology and the control of Herpetogramma phaeoptralis (Guenée) in Hà Nội in Spring Summer 2008 MSc. Thesis, Hà Nội Agriculture University, Vietnam (2008).Nguyen, V. D., Ha, Q. H. & Nguyen, T. T. C. in Vietnam Insects and Pests. (ed. V. L. Pham) (2012).Gilligan, T. M. & Passoa, S. C. LepIntercept, An identification resource for intercepted Lepidoptera larvae. Identification Technology Program (ITP), (2014).Gui, F. R. et al. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis unveils population evolution and development of pesticide resistance in fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. Protein Cell https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-020-00795-7 (2020).Stokstad, E. FOOD SECURITY New crop pest takes Africa at lightning speed. Science 356, 473–474 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Baloch, M. N., Fan, J. Y., Haseeb, M. & Zhang, R. Z. Mapping potential distribution of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Central Asia. Insects 11, 172 (2020).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Juarez, M. L. et al. Population structure of Spodoptera frugiperda maize and rice host forms in South America: are they host strains? Entomol. Exp. Appl. 152, 182–199 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Groot, A. T. et al. Evolution of reproductive isolation of Spodoptera frugiperda. Pheromone Communication in Moths: Evolution, Behavior, and Application, 291–300 (2016).Nagoshi, R. N., Meagher, R. L., Nuessly, G. & Hall, D. G. Effects of fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) interstrain mating in wild populations. Environ. Entomol. 35, 561–568 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Haenniger, S. et al. Sexual communication of Spodoptera frugiperda from West Africa: adaptation of an invasive species and implications for pest management. Sci. Rep. 10, 2892 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Orsucci, M. et al. Transcriptional plasticity evolution in two strains of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) feeding on alternative host-plants. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/263186 (2018).Lopes-da-Silva, M., Sanches, M. M., Stancioli, A. R., Alves, G. & Sugayama, R. The role of natural and human-mediated pathways for invasive agricultural pests: a historical analysis of cases from Brazil. Agric. Sci. 5, 634–646 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Nagoshi, R. N. et al. Haplotype profile comparisons between Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) populations from Mexico with those from Puerto Rico, South America, and the United States and their implications to migratory behavior. J. Economic Entomol. 108, 135–144 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tembrock, L. R., Timm, A. E., Zink, F. A. & Gilligan, T. M. Phylogeography of the recent expansion of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in South America and the Caribbean basin. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 112, 388–401 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lombaert, E. et al. Bridgehead effect in the worldwide invasion of the biocontrol harlequin ladybird. PLoS ONE 5, e9743 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Desneux, N., Luna, M. G., Guillemaud, T. & Urbaneja, A. The invasive South American tomato pinworm, Tuta absoluta, continues to spread in Afro-Eurasia and beyond: the new threat to tomato world production. J. Pest Sci. 84, 403–408 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Valencia-Montoya, W. A. et al. Adaptive introgression across semipermeable species boundaries between local Helicoverpa zea and invasive Helicoverpa armigera moths. Mol. Biol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msaa108 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Walsh, T. K. et al. Multiple recombination events between two cytochrome P450 loci contribute to global pyrethroid resistance in Helicoverpa armigera. PLoS ONE 13, e0197760 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Liu, X. et al. Risks of biological invasion on the belt and road. Curr. Biol. 29, 499–505.e494 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gimenez, S. et al. Adaptation by copy number variation increases insecticide resistance in the fall armyworm. Preprint at Commun Biol. 664, https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-01382-6 (2020).Yainna, S. et al. Genomic balancing selection is key to the invasive success of the fall armyworm. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.06.17.154880 (2020).Tay, W. T. et al. Novel molecular approach to define pest species status and tritrophic interactions from historical Bemisia specimens. Sci. Rep.-Uk 7, ARTN 429 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Walsh, T. K. et al. Mitochondrial DNA genomes of five major Helicoverpa pest species from the Old and New Worlds (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ecol. Evol. 9, 2933–2944 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bernt, M. et al. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69, 313–319 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Villesen, P. FaBox: an online toolbox for FASTA sequences. Mol. Ecol. Notes 7, 965–968 (2007).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nam, K. et al. Divergent selection causes whole genome differentiation without physical linkage among the targets in Spodoptera frugiperda (Noctuidae). Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/452870 (2018).Liu, H. et al. Chromosome level draft genomes of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), an alien invasive pest in China. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/671560 (2019).Xiao, H. et al. The genetic adaptations of fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda facilitated its rapid global dispersal and invasion. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 20, 1050–1068 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.3997 (2013).Bushnell, B. BBMap: A Fast, Accurate, Splice-Aware Aligner. (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. 2014).Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Trifinopoulos, J., Nguyen, L. T., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. W-IQ-TREE: a fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W232–W235 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lewis, P. O. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50, 913–925 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Minh, B. Q., Nguyen, M. A. & von Haeseler, A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1188–1195 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Huson, D. H. & Scornavacca, C. Dendroscope 3: an interactive tool for rooted phylogenetic trees and networks. Syst. Biol. 61, 1061–1067 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hellenthal, G. et al. A genetic atlas of human admixture history. Science 343, 747–751 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Catchen, J., Hohenlohe, P. A., Bassham, S., Amores, A. & Cresko, W. A. Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Mol. Ecol. 22, 3124–3140 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jombart, T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jombart, T. & Ahmed, I. adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27, 3070–3071 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Chang, C. C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tajima, F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fu, Y. X. & Li, W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133, 693–709 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pfeifer, B., Wittelsburger, U., Ramos-Onsins, S. E. & Lercher, M. J. PopGenome: an efficient Swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1929–1936 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wright, S. The genetical structure of populations. Ann. Eugen. 15, 323–354 (1951).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. Genepop (Version-1.2) – population-genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19, 1655–1664 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Neuditschko, M., Khatkar, M. S. & Raadsma, H. W. NetView: a high-definition network-visualization approach to detect fine-scale population structures from genome-wide patterns of variation. PLoS ONE 7, e48375 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Steinig, E. J., Neuditschko, M., Khatkar, M. S., Raadsma, H. W. & Zenger, K. R. netview p: a network visualization tool to unravel complex population structure using genome-wide SNPs. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 216–227 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Paradis, E. & Schliep, K. ape 5.0: an environment for modern phylogenetics and evolutionary analyses in R. Bioinformatics 35, 526–528 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodohl, P. A. diveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 782–788 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Sundqvist, L., Keenan, K., Zackrisson, M., Prodohl, P. & Kleinhans, D. Directional genetic differentiation and relative migration. Ecol. Evol. 6, 3461–3475 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. in International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2009).Tay, T. et al. Global FAW population genomic signature supports complex introduction events across the Old World. v1. CSIRO. Data Collection. https://doi.org/10.25919/y3nd-2903 (2021).Nei, M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 70, 3321–3323 (1973).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nei, M. & Chesser, R. K. Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann. Hum. Genet. 47, 253–259 (1983).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

ColoniesColony setup occurred prior to initiation of the study, between March and May 2017, in Mississippi, USA. Using established methods, queenless colony divisions, obtained from a large commercial beekeeping operation, were equalised to an average calculated population size of ~ 7000 workers112, and housed in 10-frame Langstroth hives (Table S1). After acclimatisation for 24–48 h, they each received an imminently emerging queen cell, containing a queen from one of two stocks, added to the same worker baseline. The stocks used consisted of an Italian ‘Commercial’ stock, propagated from collaborator established breeder queens, and thus representative of the industry standard, and the Varroa-resistant ‘Pol-line’ stock54. To ensure consistency, all queens were reared in the same ‘cell builder’ colonies, based at the USDA Honey Bee Breeding, Genetics and Physiology Laboratory, in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA. Colonies from each stock were held in independent apiaries, 80 km apart to maintain physical isolation; and to control genetic fidelity, virgin queens were open mated to drones of the same stock via drone saturation. Fourteen days after queen emergence, colonies were inspected, and mated queens were marked with paint on the thorax, to assist with identification, with white corresponding to Commercial, and blue to Pol-line. Colonies were allowed to acclimatise for six weeks before sampling began, and those that failed to achieve mating success, or had unacceptably high [≥ 3.0 ‘mites per hundred bees’ (MPHB)] Varroa levels, were removed, normalising the average between-stock Varroa difference to  More

Canadell JG, Monteiro PMS, Costa, MH, Cotrim da Cunha L, Cox PM, Eliseev AV, et al. Global carbon and other biogeochemical cycles and feedbacks. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, et al. editors. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press; 2021, in press.Rosentreter JA, Borges AV, Deemer BR, Holgerson MA, Liu S, Song C, et al. Half of global methane emissions come from highly variable aquatic ecosystem sources. Nat Geosci. 2021;14:225–30.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Saunois M, Stavert AR, Poulter B, Bousquet P, Canadell JG, Jackson RB, et al. The global methane budget 2000 – 2017. Earth Syst. Sci Data. 2020;12:1561–623.
Google Scholar 
Lamentowicz M, Gałka M, Pawlyta J, Lamentowicz Ł, Goslar T, Miotk-Szpiganowicz G. Climate change and human impact in the southern Baltic during the last millennium reconstructed from an ombrotrophic bog archive. Stud Quat. 2011;28:3–16.
Google Scholar 
Davidson NC. How much wetland has the world lost? Long-term and recent trends in global wetland area. Mar Freshw Res. 2014;65:934–41.
Google Scholar 
Oertel C, Matschullat J, Zurba K, Zimmermann F, Erasmi S. Greenhouse gas emissions from soils – a review. Geochemistry. 2016;76:327–52.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Liesack W, Schnell S, Revsbech NP. Microbiology of flooded rice paddies. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2000;24:625–45.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Conrad R. The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009;1:285–92.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lyu Z, Shao N, Akinyemi T, Whitman WB. Methanogenesis. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R727–R732.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kurth JM, Nobu MK, Tamaki H, de Jonge N, Berger S, Jetten MSM, et al. Methanogenic archaea use a bacteria-like methyltransferase system to demethoxylate aromatic compounds. ISME J. 2021;15:3549–65.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mayumi D, Mochimaru H, Tamaki H, Yamamoto K, Yoshioka H, Suzuki Y, et al. Methane production from coal by a single methanogen. Science. 2016;354:222–6.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bridgham SD, Cadillo-Quiroz H, Keller JK, Zhuang Q. Methane emissions from wetlands: Biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob Chang Biol. 2013;19:1325–46.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Narrowe AB, Borton MA, Hoyt DW, Smith GJ, Daly RA, Angle JC, et al. Uncovering the diversity and activity of methylotrophic methanogens in freshwater wetland soils. mSystems. 2019;4:e00320–19.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zalman CA, Meade N, Chanton J, Kostka JE, Bridgham SD, Keller JK. Methylotrophic methanogenesis in Sphagnum-dominated peatland soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;118:156–60.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knief C. Diversity and habitat preferences of cultivated and uncultivated aerobic methanotrophic bacteria evaluated based on pmoA as molecular marker. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1346.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Le Mer J, Roger P. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol. 2001;37:25–50.
Google Scholar 
Wieczorek AS, Drake HL, Kolb S. Organic acids and ethanol inhibit the oxidation of methane by mire methanotrophs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;77:28–39.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Welte CU, Rasigraf O, Vaksmaa A, Versantvoort W, Arshad A, Op den Camp HJM, et al. Nitrate- and nitrite-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2016;8:941–55.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cui M, Ma A, Qi H, Zhuang X, Zhuang G. Anaerobic oxidation of methane: An ‘active’ microbial process. Microbiol Open. 2015;4:1–11.
Google Scholar 
Ettwig KF, Zhu B, Speth D, Keltjens JT, Jetten MSM, Kartal B. Archaea catalyze iron-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016;113:12792–6.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stiehl-Braun PA, Hartmann AA, Kandeler E, Buchmann N, Niklaus PA. Interactive effects of drought and N fertilization on the spatial distribution of methane assimilation in grassland soils. Glob Chang Biol 2011;17:2629–39.
Google Scholar 
Bodelier PLE, Meima-Franke M, Hordijk CA, Steenbergh AK, Hefting MM, Bodrossy L, et al. Microbial minorities modulate methane consumption through niche partitioning. ISME J. 2013;7:2214–28.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Karbin S, Hagedorn F, Dawes MA, Niklaus PA. Treeline soil warming does not affect soil methane fluxes and the spatial micro-distribution of methanotrophic bacteria. Soil Biol Biochem. 2015;86:164–71.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stiehl-Braun PA, Powlson DS, Poulton PR, Niklaus PA. Effects of N fertilizers and liming on the micro-scale distribution of soil methane assimilation in the long-term Park Grass experiment at Rothamsted. Soil Biol Biochem. 2011;43:1034–41.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Menyailo OV, Hungate BA, Abraham WR, Conrad R. Changing land use reduces soil CH4 uptake by altering biomass and activity but not composition of high-affinity methanotrophs. Glob Chang Biol. 2008;14:2405–19.
Google Scholar 
Ciais P, Sabine C, Bala G, Bopp L, Brovkin V, Canadell J, et al. Carbon and Other Biogeochemical Cycles. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, et al. editors. Climate Change 2013 the Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2013, 465–570.Täumer J, Kolb S, Boeddinghaus RS, Wang H, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, et al. Divergent drivers of the microbial methane sink in temperate forest and grassland soils. Glob Chang Biol. 2021;27:929–40.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kolb S. The quest for atmospheric methane oxidizers in forest soils. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2009;1:336–46.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kolb S, Horn MA. Microbial CH4 and N2O consumption in acidic wetlands. Front Microbiol. 2012;3:78.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Cai Y, Zheng Y, Bodelier PLE, Conrad R, Jia Z. Conventional methanotrophs are responsible for atmospheric methane oxidation in paddy soils. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11728.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dean JF, Middelburg JJ, Röckmann T, Aerts R, Blauw LG, Egger M, et al. Methane feedbacks to the global climate system in a warmer world. Rev Geophys. 2018;56:207–50.
Google Scholar 
Levy-Booth DJ, Giesbrecht IJW, Kellogg CTE, Heger TJ, D’Amore DV, Keeling PJ, et al. Seasonal and ecohydrological regulation of active microbial populations involved in DOC, CO2, and CH4 fluxes in temperate rainforest soil. ISME J. 2019;13:950–63.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lombard N, Prestat E, van Elsas JD, Simonet P. Soil-specific limitations for access and analysis of soil microbial communities by metagenomics. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2011;78:31–49.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Carini P, Marsden PJ, Leff JW, Morgan EE, Strickland MS, Fierer N. Relic DNA is abundant in soil and obscures estimates of soil microbial diversity. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16242.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Blazewicz SJ, Barnard RL, Daly RA, Firestone MK. Evaluating rRNA as an indicator of microbial activity in environmental communities: limitations and uses. ISME J. 2013;7:2061–8.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sukenik A, Kaplan-Levy RN, Welch JM, Post AF. Massive multiplication of genome and ribosomes in dormant cells (akinetes) of Aphanizomenon ovalisporum (Cyanobacteria). ISME J. 2012;6:670–9.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schwartz E, Hayer M, Hungate BA, Koch BJ, McHugh TA, Mercurio W, et al. Stable isotope probing with 18O-water to investigate microbial growth and death in environmental samples. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2016;41:14–18.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Angel R, Conrad R. Elucidating the microbial resuscitation cascade in biological soil crusts following a simulated rain event. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15:2799–815.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Papp K, Mau RL, Hayer M, Koch BJ, Hungate BA, Schwartz E. Quantitative stable isotope probing with H218O reveals that most bacterial taxa in soil synthesize new ribosomal RNA. ISME J. 2018;12:3043–5.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Urich T, Lanzén A, Qi J, Huson DH, Schleper C, Schuster SC. Simultaneous assessment of soil microbial community structure and function through analysis of the meta-transcriptome. PLoS One. 2008;3:e2527.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Peng J, Wegner CE, Liesack W. Short-term exposure of paddy soil microbial communities to salt stress triggers different transcriptional responses of key taxonomic groups. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:400.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Peng J, Wegner CE, Bei Q, Liu P, Liesack W. Metatranscriptomics reveals a differential temperature effect on the structural and functional organization of the anaerobic food web in rice field soil. Microbiome. 2018;6:169.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Abdallah RZ, Wegner CE, Liesack W. Community transcriptomics reveals drainage effects on paddy soil microbiome across all three domains of life. Soil Biol Biochem. 2019;132:131–42.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gloor GB, Macklaim JM, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ. Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2224.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moran MA, Satinsky B, Gifford SM, Luo H, Rivers A, Chan LK, et al. Sizing up metatranscriptomics. ISME J. 2013;7:237–43.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Gifford SM, Sharma S, Rinta-Kanto JM, Moran MA. Quantitative analysis of a deeply sequenced marine microbial metatranscriptome. ISME J. 2011;5:461–72.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Söllinger A, Tveit AT, Poulsen M, Noel SJ, Bengtsson M, Bernhardt J, et al. Holistic assessment of rumen microbiome dynamics through quantitative metatranscriptomics reveals multifunctional redundancy during key steps of anaerobic feed degradation. mSystems 2018;3:e00038–18.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fischer M, Bossdorf O, Gockel S, Hänsel F, Hemp A, Hessenmöller D, et al. Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: the biodiversity exploratories. Basic Appl Ecol. 2010;11:473–85.
Google Scholar 
IUSS Working Group WRB. World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015 international soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resour Reports No 106. Rome: FAO; 2015.Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem. 1987;19:703–7.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Joergensen RG, Mueller T. The fumigation-extraction method to estimate soil microbial biomass: calibaration of the kEN value. Soil Biol Biochem. 1996;28:33–37.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem. 1985;17:837–42.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bamminger C, Zaiser N, Zinsser P, Lamers M, Kammann C, Marhan S. Effects of biochar, earthworms, and litter addition on soil microbial activity and abundance in a temperate agricultural soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2014;50:1189–1200.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E. Seasonal and diurnal net methane emissions from organic soils of the Eastern Alps, Austria: Effects of soil temperature, water balance, and plant biomass. Arct Antarct Alp Res. 2007;39:438–48.
Google Scholar 
Tveit AT, Urich T, Svenning MM. Metatranscriptomic analysis of arctic peat soil microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:5761–72.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–63.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:863–4.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: Fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3211–7.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:2460–1.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lanzén A, Jørgensen SL, Huson DH, Gorfer M, Grindhaug SH, Jonassen I, et al. CREST – Classification resources for environmental sequence tags. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49334.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Huson DH, Beier S, Flade I, Górska A, El-Hadidi M, Mitra S, et al. MEGAN community edition – interactive exploration and analysis of large-scale microbiome sequencing data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016;12:e1004957.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2014;12:59–60.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dumont MG, Lüke C, Deng Y, Frenzel P. Classification of pmoA amplicon pyrosequences using BLAST and the lowest common ancestor method in MEGAN. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:34.PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2018.Oksanen J, Blanchet f. G, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: Community ecology package. 2020. R package version 2.5-7. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Graves S, Piepho H-P, Selzer L. multcompView: Visualizations of paired comparisons. 2019. R package version 0.1-8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=multcompView.Günther A, Barthelmes A, Huth V, Joosten H, Jurasinski G, Koebsch F, et al. Prompt rewetting of drained peatlands reduces climate warming despite methane emissions. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1644.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
IPCC Task Force on National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Methodological guidance on lands with wet and drained soilds, and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment. 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands. 2014.Tiemeyer B, Albiac Borraz E, Augustin J, Bechtold M, Beetz S, Beyer C, et al. High emissions of greenhouse gases from grasslands on peat and other organic soils. Glob Chang Biol. 2016;22:4134–49.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kirschbaum MUF. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol Biochem. 1995;27:753–60.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Knorr W, Prentice IC, House JI, Holland EA. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature 2005;433:298–301.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dutaur L, Verchot LV. A global inventory of the soil CH4 sink. Glob Biogeochem Cycles. 2007;21:GB4013.
Google Scholar 
McDaniel MD, Saha D, Dumont MG, Hernández M, Adams MA. The effect of land-use change on soil CH4 and N2O fluxes: A global meta-analysis. Ecosystems. 2019;22:1424–43.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gulledge J, Schimel JP. Moisture control over atmospheric CH4 consumption and CO2 production in diverse Alaskan soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 1998;30:1127–32.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tveit AT, Urich T, Frenzel P, Svenning MM. Metabolic and trophic interactions modulate methane production by Arctic peat microbiota in response to warming. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:E2507–E2516.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Conrad R. Methane production in soil environments – anaerobic biogeochemistry and microbial life between flooding and desiccation. Microorganisms 2020;8:881.CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lyu Z, Lu Y. Metabolic shift at the class level sheds light on adaptation of methanogens to oxidative environments. ISME J. 2018;12:411–23.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Smith KS, Ingram-Smith C. Methanosaeta, the forgotten methanogen? Trends Microbiol. 2007;15:150–5.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Whitman WB, Bowen TL, Boone DR. The methanogenic bacteria. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong EF, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F editors. The prokaryotes: other major lineages of bacteria and the archaea. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2014, pp 123–63.Conrad R. Importance of hydrogenotrophic, aceticlastic and methylotrophic methanogenesis for methane production in terrestrial, aquatic and other anoxic environments: a mini review. Pedosphere. 2020;30:25–39.
Google Scholar 
Söllinger A, Urich T. Methylotrophic methanogens everywhere – physiology and ecology of novel players in global methane cycling. Biochem Soc Trans. 2019;47:1895–907.PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Yang S, Liebner S, Winkel M, Alawi M, Horn F, Dörfer C, et al. In-depth analysis of core methanogenic communities from high elevation permafrost-affected wetlands. Soil Biol Biochem. 2017;111:66–77.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Weil M, Wang H, Bengtsson M, Köhn D, Günther A, Jurasinski G, et al. Long-term rewetting of three formerly drained peatlands drives congruent compositional changes in pro- and eukaryotic soil microbiomes through environmental filtering. Microorganisms. 2020;8:550.CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Söllinger A, Seneca J, Dahl MB, Motleleng LL, Prommer J, Verbruggen E, et al. Down-regulation of the microbial protein biosynthesis machinery in response to weeks, years, and decades of soil warming. Sci Adv. 2022;8:eabm3230.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Luesken FA, Wu ML, Op den Camp HJM, Keltjens JT, Stunnenberg H, Francoijs KJ, et al. Effect of oxygen on the anaerobic methanotroph ‘Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera’: Kinetic and transcriptional analysis. Environ Microbiol. 2012;14:1024–34.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Baani M, Liesack W. Two isozymes of particulate methane monooxygenase with different methane oxidation kinetics are found in Methylocystis sp. strain SC2. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2008;105:10203–8.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Yimga MT, Dunfield PF, Ricke P, Heyer J, Liesack W. Wide distribution of a novel pmoA-like gene copy among type II methanotrophs, and its expression in Methylocystis strain SC2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003;69:5593–602.CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tveit AT, Hestnes AG, Robinson SL, Schintlmeister A, Dedysh SN, Jehmlich N, et al. Widespread soil bacterium that oxidizes atmospheric methane. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:8515–24.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Freitag TE, Toet S, Ineson P, Prosser JI. Links between methane flux and transcriptional activities of methanogens and methane oxidizers in a blanket peat bog. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2010;73:157–65.CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Qin H, Tang Y, Shen J, Wang C, Chen C, Yang J, et al. Abundance of transcripts of functional gene reflects the inverse relationship between CH4 and N2O emissions during mid-season drainage in acidic paddy soil. Biol Fertil Soils. 2018;54:885–95.
Google Scholar  More

Boere, G. C., Galbraith, C. A., Stroud, D. & Thompson, D. B. A. The conservation of waterbirds around the world in Waterbirds Around the World (ed. Boere, G. C., Galbraith, C. A. & Stroud, D. A.) 32–45 (The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK, 2007).Butchart, S. H. M. et al. Global biodiversity: Indicators of recent declines. Science 328, 1164–1168. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512,Pubmed:20430971 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nebel, S., Porter, J. L. & Kingsford, R. T. Long-term trends of shorebird populations in eastern Australia and impacts of freshwater extraction. Biol. Conserv. 141, 971–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.01.017 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
MacKinnon, J., Verkuil, Y. I. & Murray, N. IUCN situation analysis on east and Southeast Asian intertidal habitats, with particular reference to the Yellow Sea (including the Bohai Sea). Occas. Pap. IUCN Species Surviv. Comm. 047, 70.Li, X. et al. Assessing changes of habitat quality for shorebirds in stopover sites: A case study in Yellow River Delta, China. Wetlands 39, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-018-1075-9 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Murray, N. J., Clemens, R. S., Phinn, S. R., Possingham, H. P. & Fuller, R. A. Tracking the rapid loss of tidal wetlands in the Yellow Sea. Front. Ecol. Environ. 12, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1890/130260 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Green, J. M. H., Sripanomyom, S., Giam, X. & Wilcove, D. S. The ecology and economics of shorebird conservation in a tropical human-modified landscape. J. Appl. Ecol. 52, 1483–1491. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12508 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Toral, G. M. & Figuerola, J. Unraveling the importance of rice fields for waterbird populations in Europe. Biodivers. Conserv. 19, 3459–3469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-010-9907-9 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Masero, J. A. Assessing alternative anthropogenic habitats for conserving waterbirds: salinas as buffer areas against the impact of natural habitat loss for shorebirds. Biodivers. Conserv. 12, 1157–1173. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023021320448 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Athearn, N. D. et al. Variability in habitat value of commercial salt production ponds: implications for waterbird management and tidal marsh restoration planning. Hydrobiologia 697, 139–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1177-y (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Navedo, J. G. et al. Agroecosystems and conservation of migratory waterbirds: Importance of coastal pastures and factors influencing their use by wintering shorebirds. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 1895–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0516-2 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Navedo, J. G., Fernández, G., Valdivia, N., Drever, M. C. & Masero, J. A. Identifying management actions to increase foraging opportunities for shorebirds at semi-intensive shrimp farms. J. Appl. Ecol. 54, 567–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12735 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lawler, S. P. Rice fields as temporary wetlands: A review. Isr. J. Zool. 47, 513–528. https://doi.org/10.1560/X7K3-9JG8-MH2J-XGX1 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fasola, M. & Ruiz, X. The value of rice fields as substitutes for natural wetlands for waterbirds in the Mediterranean region. Waterbirds 19, 122–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521955 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elphick, C. S. Why study birds in rice fields?. Waterbirds 33, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.033.s101 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lourenço, P. M. & Piersma, T. Stopover ecology of Black-tailed Godwits Limosa limosa limosa in Portuguese rice fields: A guide on where to feed in winter. Bird Study 55, 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063650809461522 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elphick, C. S. & Oring, L. W. Conservation implications of flooding rice fields on winter waterbird communities. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 94, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00022-1 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Maeda, T. Patterns of bird abundance and habitat use in rice fields of the Kanto Plain, central Japan. Ecol. Res. 16, 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00418.x (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choi, S. H., Nam, H. K. & Yoo, J. C. Characteristics of population dynamics and habitat use of shorebirds in rice fields during spring migration. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 33, 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2014.33.4.334 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Shuford, W. D., Humphrey, J. M. & Nur, N. Breeding status of the Black tern in California. West. Birds 32, 189–217 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Sánchez-Guzmán, J. M. et al. Identifying new buffer areas for conserving waterbirds in the Mediterranean basin: The importance of the rice fields in Extremadura, Spain. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 3333–3344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-006-9018-9 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rendón, M. A., Green, A. J., Aguilera, E. & Almaraz, P. Status, distribution and long-term changes in the waterbird community wintering in Doñana, south–west Spain. Biol. Conserv. 141, 1371–1388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.03.006 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ibáñez, C., Curcó, A., Riera, X., Ripoll, I. & Sánchez, C. Influence on birds of rice field management practices during the growing season: A review and an experiment. Waterbirds 33, 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.033.s113 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pierluissi, S. Breeding waterbirds in rice fields: A global review. Waterbirds 33, 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.033.0117 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Day, J. H. & Colwell, M. A. Waterbird communities in rice fields subjected to different post-harvest treatments. Waterbirds 21, 185–197. https://doi.org/10.2307/1521905 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Elphick, C. S. & Oring, L. W. Winter management of Californian rice fields for waterbirds. J. Appl. Ecol. 35, 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.1998.00274.x (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Manley, S. W., Kaminski, R. M., Reinecke, K. J. & Gerard, P. D. Waterbird foods in winter-managed ricefields in Mississippi. J. Wildl. Manag. 68, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2004)068[0074:WFIWRI]2.0.CO;2 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pernollet, C. A., Cavallo, F., Simpson, D., Gauthier-Clerc, M. & Guillemain, M. Seed density and waterfowl use of rice fields in Camargue, France. Jour. Wild. Mgmt 81, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/jwmg.21167 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nam, H. K., Choi, S. H. & Yoo, J. C. Influence of foraging behaviors of shorebirds on habitat use in rice fields during spring migration. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 34, 178–185. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2015.34.3.35 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nam, H. K., Choi, S. H., Choi, Y. S. & Yoo, J. C. Patterns of waterbirds abundance and habitat use in rice fields. Korean J. Environ. Agr. 31, 359–367. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2012.31.4.359 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nam, H. K., Choi, Y. S., Choi, S. H. & Yoo, J. C. Distribution of waterbirds in rice fields and their use of foraging habitats. Waterbirds 38, 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1675/063.038.0206 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hua, N., Tan, K., Chen, Y. & Ma, Z. Key research issues concerning the conservation of migratory shorebirds in the Yellow Sea region. Bird Conserv. Int. 25, 38–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959270914000380 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stroud, D. A. et al. The conservation and population status of the world’s waders at the turn of the millennium in. Waterbirds Around the World Conference 643–648 (The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK, 2006).Taft, O. W. & Haig, S. M. The value of agricultural wetlands as invertebrate resources for wintering shorebirds. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 110, 249–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2005.04.012 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strum, K. M. et al. Winter management of California’s rice fields to maximize waterbird habitat and minimize water use. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 179, 116–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.08.003 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dias, R. A., Blanco, D. E., Goijman, A. P. & Zaccagnini, M. E. Density, habitat use, and opportunities for conservation of shorebirds in rice fields in southeastern South America. Condor Ornithol. Appl. 116, 384–393. https://doi.org/10.1650/CONDOR-13-160.1 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Golet, G. H. et al. Using ricelands to provide temporary shorebird habitat during migration. Ecol. Appl. 28, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1658,Pubmed:29205645 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Choi, G., Nam, H. K., Son, S. J., Do, M. S. & Yoo, J. C. The impact of agricultural activities on habitat use by the Wood sandpiper and Common greenshank in rice fields. Ornithol. Sci. 20, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.20.27 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Choi, S. H. & Nam, H. K. Flexible behavior of the Black-tailed godwit Limosa limosa is key to successful refueling during staging at rice paddy fields in Midwestern Korea. Zool. Sci. 37, 255–262. https://doi.org/10.2108/zs190120,Pubmed:32549539 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cole, M. L., Leslie, D. M. Jr. & Fisher, W. L. Habitat use by shorebirds at a stopover site in the southern Great Plains. Southwest. Nat. 47, 372–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/3672495 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rundle, W. D. & Fredrickson, L. H. Managing seasonally flooded impoundments for migrant rails and shorebirds. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 80–87 (1981).Taylor, D. M. & Trost, C. H. Use of lakes and reservoirs by migrating shorebirds in Idaho. Gr Basin Nat. 52, 179–184 (1992).
Google Scholar 
Hands, H. M., Ryan, M. R. & Smith, J. W. Migrant shorebird use of marsh, Moist-Soil, and flooded agricultural habitats. Wildl. Soc. Bull. 1973–2006(19), 457–464 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Skagen, S. K. & Knopf, F. L. Migrating shorebirds and habitat dynamics at a prairie wetland complex. Wilson Bull., 91–105 (1994).Weber, L. M. & Haig, S. M. Shorebird use of South Carolina managed and natural coastal wetlands. J. Wildl. Manag. 60, 73–82. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802042 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Collazo, J. A., O’Harra, D. A. & Kelly, C. A. Accessible habitat for shorebirds: factors influencing its availability and conservation implications. Waterbirds, 13–24 (2002).Helmers, D.L. Shorebird Management Manual. Western Hemisphere Shorebird Reserve Network (Manomet Cntr for Conservation Sciences, Manomet, MA, 1992).Verkuil, Y., Koolhaas, A. & Van Der Winden, J. Wind effects on prey availability: how northward migrating waders use brackish and hypersaline lagoons in the Sivash, Ukraine. Neth. J. Sea Res. 31, 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/0077-7579(93)90053-U (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davis, C. A. & Smith, L. M. Ecology and management of migrant shorebirds in the Playa Lakes Region of Texas. Wildl. Monogr., 3–45 (1998).Barter, M. Shorebirds of the Yellow Sea: Importance, threats and conservation status in Wetlands Int. Global Ser. Oceania 9, 5–13.Katayama, N., Baba, Y. G., Kusumoto, Y. & Tanaka, K. A review of post-war changes in rice farming and biodiversity in Japan. Agric. Syst. 132, 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.09.001 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mukherjee, A. Adaptiveness of cattle egret’s (Bubulcus ibis) foraging. Zoos Print J. 15, 331–333 (2000). https://doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.15.10.331-3.Choi, Y. S., Kim, S. S. & Yoo, J. C. Feeding activity of cattle egrets and intermediate egrets at different stages of rice culture in Korea. J. Ecol. Environ. 33, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2010.33.2.149 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Katayama, N., Amano, T., Fujita, G. & Higuchi, H. Spatial overlap between the intermediate egret Egretta intermedia and its aquatic prey at two spatiotemporal scales in a rice paddy landscape. Zool. Stud. 51, 1105–1112 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Sebastián-González, E. & Green, A. J. Reduction of avian diversity in created versus natural and restored wetlands. Ecography 39, 1176–1184. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01736 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walton, M. E. M. et al. A model for the future: ecosystem services provided by the aquaculture activities of Veta La Palma, Southern Spain. Aquaculture 448, 382–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2015.06.017 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2014).Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lüdecke, D. sjPlot: data visualization for statistics in social science. R package version 1.6.9. org/Package=sjPlot > (2016). http://CRAN.Rproject. More

Hall, M. J., Burns, A. L., Martin, J. M. & Hochuli, D. F. Flight initiation distance changes across landscapes and habitats in a successful urban coloniser. Urban Ecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-020-00969-5 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Møller, A. P., Samia, D. S. M., Weston, M. A., Guay, P. J. & Blumstein, D. T. Flight initiation distances in relation to sexual dichromatism and body size in birds from three continents. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 117, 823–831 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Morelli, F. et al. Contagious fear: Escape behavior increases with flock size in European gregarious birds. Ecol. Evol. 9, 6096–6104 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Samia, D. S. M. et al. Rural-urban differences in escape behavior of European birds across a latitudinal gradient. Front. Ecol. Evol. 5, 66 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Blumstein, D. T. Developing an evolutionary ecology of fear: How life history and natural history traits affect disturbance tolerance in birds. Anim. Behav. 71, 389–399 (2006).
Google Scholar 
McFarland, D. Oxford companion to animal behavior. (Oxford University Press, 1987).Stankowich, T. & Blumstein, D. T. Fear in animals: A meta-analysis and review of risk assessment. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 2627–2634 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Lima, S. L. Maximizing feeding efficiency and minimizing time exposed to predators: a trade-off in the black-capped chickadee. Oecologia 66, 60–67 (1985).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sol, D. et al. Risk-taking behavior, urbanization and the pace of life in birds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, 59 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Lockwood, R., Swaddle, J. P. & Rayner, J. M. V. Avian Wingtip Shape Reconsidered: Wingtip Shape Indices and Morphological Adaptations to Migration. J. Avian Biol. 29, 273–292 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Møller, A. P. Birds. in Escaping from predators: An integrative view of escape decisions and refuge use (eds. Cooper, W. E. J. & Blumstein, D. T.) 88–112 (Cambridge University Press, 2015).Møller, A. P. Flight distance of urban birds, predation and selection for urban life. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 63–75 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Fernández-Juricic, E. et al. Relationships of anti-predator escape and post-escape responses with body mass and morphology: a comparative avian study. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 731–752 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Weston, M. A., Mcleod, E. M., Blumstein, D. T. & Guay, P. J. A review of flight-initiation distances and their application to managing disturbance to Australian birds. Emu 112, 269–286 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Hemmingsen, A. The relation of shyness (flushing distance) to body size. Spolia Zool Musei Hauniensis 11, 74–76 (1951).
Google Scholar 
Blumstein, D. T. Flight-initiation distance in birds is dependent on intruder starting distance. J. Wildl. Manage. 67, 852–857 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Glover, H. K., Weston, M. A., Maguire, G. S., Miller, K. K. & Christie, B. A. Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffers: Response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance. Landsc. Urban Plan. 103, 326–334 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Geist, C., Liao, J., Libby, S. & Blumstein, D. T. Does intruder group size and orientation affect flight initiation distance in birds?. Anim. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 69–73 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Mikula, P. Pedestrian density influences flight distances of urban birds. Ardea 102, 53–60 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Piratelli, A. J., Favoretto, G. R. & de Almeida Maximiano, M. F. Factors affecting escape distance in birds. Zoologia 32, 438–444 (2015).Burger, J. & Gochfeld, M. Human activity influence and diurnal and nocturnal foraging of Sanderlings (Calidris alba). Condor 93, 259–265 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Møller, A. P. & Garamszegi, L. Z. Between individual variation in risk-taking behavior and its life history consequences. Behav. Ecol. 23, 843–853 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Ferguson, S. M., Gilson, L. N. & Bateman, P. W. Look at the time: diel variation in the flight initiation distance of a nectarivorous bird. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 147 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Garamszegi, L. Z. & Møller, A. P. Partitioning within-species variance in behaviour to within- and between-population components for understanding evolution. Ecol. Lett. 20, 599–608 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Bauer, S. & Hoye, B. J. Migratory animals couple biodiversity and ecosystem functioning worldwide. Science 344, 1242552 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dufour, P. et al. Reconstructing the geographic and climatic origins of long-distance bird migrations. J. Biogeogr. 47, 155–166 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sol, D. et al. Evolutionary divergence in brain size between migratory and resident birds. PLoS ONE 5, e9617 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bonnet-Lebrun, A. S., Somveille, M., Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Manica, A. Exploring intraspecific variation in migratory destinations to investigate the drivers of migration. Oikos 130, 187–196 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Zurell, D., Gallien, L., Graham, C. H. & Zimmermann, N. E. Do long-distance migratory birds track their niche through seasons?. J. Biogeogr. 45, 1459–1468 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Samia, D. S. M., Nakagawa, S., Nomura, F., Rangel, T. F. & Blumstein, D. T. Increased tolerance to humans among disturbed wildlife. Nat. Commun. 6, 8877 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ydenberg, R. C. & Dill, L. M. The economics of fleeing from predators. Adv. Study Behav. 16, 229–249 (1986).
Google Scholar 
Cooper, W. E. J. & Blumstein, D. T. Escape behavior: importance, scope, and variables. in Escaping from predators: An integrative view of escape decisions (eds. Cooper, W. E. J. & Blumstein, D. T.) 3–14 (Cambridge University Press, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107447189.002.Sayol, F., Sol, D. & Pigot, A. L. Brain size and life history interact to predict urban tolerance in birds. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 58 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Sayol, F., Downing, P. A., Iwaniuk, A. N., Maspons, J. & Sol, D. Predictable evolution towards larger brains in birds colonizing oceanic islands. Nat. Commun. 9, 2820 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tobias, J. A. & Pigot, A. L. Integrating behaviour and ecology into global biodiversity conservation strategies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20190012 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Wilman, H. et al. EltonTraits 1.0: Species-level foraging attributes of the world’s birds and mammals. Ecology 95, 2027 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Kamilar, J. M. & Cooper, N. Phylogenetic signal in primate behaviour, ecology and life history. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 368, 20120341–22012034 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Machado, J. P., Antunes, A., Borges, R., Gomes, C. & Rocha, A. P. Measuring phylogenetic signal between categorical traits and phylogenies. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty800 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ericson, P. G. P. et al. Diversification of Neoaves: integration of molecular sequence data and fossils. Biol. Lett. 2, 543–547 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Schliep, K. P. phangorn: phylogenetic analysis in R. Bioinformatics 27, 592–593 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Revell, L. J. & Chamberlain, S. A. Rphylip: An R interface for PHYLIP R package. (2014).Blomberg, S. P. & Garland, T. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15, 899–910 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Keck, F., Rimet, F., Bouchez, A. & Franc, A. Phylosignal: An R package to measure, test, and explore the phylogenetic signal. Ecol. Evol. 6, 2774–2780 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Münkemüller, T. et al. How to measure and test phylogenetic signal. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 743–756 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Kot, M. Adaptation: Statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39, 227–241 (1990).
Google Scholar 
Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. J. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution (N. Y.) 57, 717–745 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Pagel, M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J. A. Generalized Linear Models. (Chapman and Hall, 1989).Pinheiro, J. et al. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-140. 1–117 (2019).Nakazawa, M. ‘fmsb’ Functions for Medical Statistics Book with some Demographic Data – R package version 0.6.1. (2017).R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2021).Venables, W. N. & Ripley, B. D. Modern Applied Statistics with S. (Springer, 2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2. More

Mack, R. N. et al. Biotic invasions: Causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol. Appl. 10(3), 689–710 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Pimentel, D. Biological invasionseconomic and environmental costs of alien plant, animal, and microbe species. No. 577.18 B5/2011. 2011.Jackson, T. Addressing the economic costs of invasive alien species: Some methodological and empirical issues. Int. J. Sustain. Soc. 7(3), 221–240 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Walker, B. H. & Steffen, W. L. Interactive and integrated effects of global change on terrestrial ecosystems. In The Terrestrial Biosphere and Global Change. Implications for Natural and Managed Ecosystems, Synthesis Volume. International Geosphere-Biosphere Program Book Series 4 (eds Walker, B. et al.) 329–375 (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Google Scholar 
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A. & Losos, E. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48(8), 607–615 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Robinson, T. W. Introduction, Spread and Areal Extent of Saltcedar [Tamarix] in the Western States (No. 491) (US Government Printing Office, 1965).
Google Scholar 
Marlin, D., Newete, S. W., Mayonde, S. G., Smit, E. R. & Byrne, M. J. Invasive Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) in South Africa: Current research and the potential for biological control. Biol. Invasions 19(10), 2971–2992 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Pearce, C. M. & Smith, D. G. Saltcedar: Distribution, abundance, and dispersal mechanisms, northern Montana, USA. Wetlands 23(2), 215–228 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Newete, S. W., Mayonde, S. & Byrne, M. J. Distribution and abundance of invasive Tamarix genotypes in South Africa. Weed Res. 59(3), 191–200 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chew, M. K. The monstering of tamarisk: How scientists made a plant into a problem. J. Hist. Biol. 42(2), 231–266 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richardson, D. M., Macdonald, I. A. W., Hoffmann, J. H. & Henderson, L. Alienplantinvasions. In The Vegetation of Southern Africa (eds Cowling, R. M. et al.) 535–570 (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
Google Scholar 
Ehrenfeld, J. G. Effects of exotic plant invasions on soil nutrient cycling processes. Ecosystems 6(6), 503–523 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haubensak, K. A., D’Antonio, C. M. & Alexander, J. Effects of nitrogen-fixing shrubs in Washington and Coastal California1. Weed Technol. 18(sp1), 1475–1479 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Hawkes, C. V., Wren, I. F., Herman, D. J. & Firestone, M. K. Plant invasion alters nitrogen cycling by modifying the soil nitrifying community. Ecol. Lett. 8(9), 976–985 (2005).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kourtev, P. S., Ehrenfeld, J. G. & Häggblom, M. Exotic plant species alter the microbial community structure and function in the soil. Ecology 83(11), 3152–3166 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Saggar, S., McIntosh, P. D., Hedley, C. B. & Knicker, H. Changes in soil microbial biomass, metabolic quotient, and organic matter turnover under Hieracium (H. pilosella L.). Biol. Fertility Soils 30(3), 232–238 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dudley, T. L., DeLoach, C. J., Levich, J. E. & Carruthers, R. I. Saltcedar invasion of western riparian areas: Impacts and new prospects for control. Trans. N. Am. Wildlife Nat. Resources Conf. 65, 345–381 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Algotsson, E. Biological diversity. In Environmental Management in South Africa 2nd edn (eds Strydom, H. A. & King, N. D.) 97–125 (Juta Cape Town, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Mayonde, S. G., Cron, G. V., Gaskin, J. F. & Byrne, M. J. Tamarix (Tamaricaceae) hybrids: The dominant invasive genotype in Southern Africa. Biol. Invasions 18(12), 3575–3594 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Corbin, J. D. & D’Antonio, C. M. Effects of exotic species on soil nitrogen cycling: Implications for restoration1. Weed Technol. 18(sp1), 1464–1468 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Marchante, E., Kjøller, A., Struwe, S. & Freitas, H. Soil recovery after removal of the N 2-fixing invasive Acacia longifolia: Consequences for ecosystem restoration. Biol. Invasions 11(4), 813–823 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Magadlela, D. & Mdzeke, N. Social benefits in the Working for Water programme as a public works initiative: Working for water. S. Afr. J. Sci. 100(1–2), 94–96 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Yelenik, S. G., Stock, W. D. & Richardson, D. M. Ecosystem level impacts of invasive Acacia saligna in the South African fynbos. Restor. Ecol. 12(1), 44–51 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Malcolm, G. M., Bush, D. S. & Rice, S. K. Soil nitrogen conditions approach preinvasion levels following restoration of nitrogen-fixing black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) stands in a Pine-Oak Ecosystem. Restor. Ecol. 16(1), 70–78 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Maron, J. L. & Jefferies, R. L. Bush lupine mortality, altered resource availability, and alternative vegetation states. Ecology 80(2), 443–454 (1999).
Google Scholar 
AgriLASA (Agri Laboratory Association of Southern Africa). 2004. Soil handbook.Okalebo, J.R., Gathua, K.W. & Woomer, P.L. (2002). Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A working manual second edition. Sacred Africa, Nairobi, 21.LECO. 2003. Truspec CN Carbon/Nitrogen Determinator Instructions Manual. LECO Corporation, St Joseph, USA.Suarez, D. L., Wood, J. D. & Lesch, S. M. Effect of SAR on water infiltration under a sequential rain–irrigation management system. Agric. Water Manag. 86(1–2), 150–164 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Dane, J.H., and Hopmans, JW. (2002). Water retention and storage. GC Method of soil analysis. SSSA book series. Madison, Wisconsin, USA. 1692, 671–720.Blakemore, L.C., Searle, P.L. and Daly, B.K. (1987). Methods for chemical analysis of soils. New Zealand Soil Bureau Scientific, Report 80. New Zealand, Lower Hutt: New Zealand Society of Soil Science, 103.Buckham, L.E. (2011). Contrasting growth traits and insect interactions of two Tamarix species and a hybrid (Tamaricaceae) used for mine rehabilitation in South Africa (Doctoral dissertation).Ladenburger, C. G., Hild, A. L., Kazmer, D. J. & Munn, L. C. Soil salinity patterns in Tamarix invasions in the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, USA. J. Arid Environ. 65(1), 111–128 (2006).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Beukes, P. C. & Ellis, F. Soil and vegetation changes across a Succulent Karoo grazing gradient. Afr. J. Range Forage Sci. 20(1), 11–19 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Liu, M. et al. Monitoring the invasion of Spartina alterniflora using multi-source high-resolution imagery in the Zhangjiang Estuary, China. Remote Sensing 9(6), 539 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Newete, S. W., Abd Elbasit, M. A. & Araya, T. Soil salinity and moisture content under non-native Tamarix species. Int. J. Phytorem. 22(9), 931–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2020.1774503 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitford, W. G., Anderson, J. & Rice, P. M. Stemflow contribution to the ’fertile island’effect in creosotebush, Larrea tridentata. J. Arid Environ. 35(3), 451–457 (1997).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Li, C., Li, Y. & Ma, J. Spatial heterogeneity of soil chemical properties at fine scales induced by Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae) plants in a sandy desert. Ecol. Res. 26(2), 385–394 (2011).MathSciNet 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Sookbirsingh, R., Karina, C., Thomas, E.G. & Rusell, RC. (2010). Salt separation processes in the saltcedar Tamarix ramosissima (Lebed.). Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 41(10), 1271–1281.Newete, S.W., Allem, S.M., Venter, N. and Byrne, M.J. Tamarix efficiency in salt excretion and physiological tolerance to salt-induced stress in South Africa. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 1–7 (2019).Di Tomaso, J. M. Impact, biology, and ecology of saltcedar (Tamarix spp.) in the southwestern United States. Weed Technol. 12(2), 326–336 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Smith, S. D., Devitt, D. A., Sala, A., Cleverly, J. R. & Busch, D. E. Water relations of riparian plants from warm desert regions. Wetlands 18(4), 687–696 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Lesica, P. & DeLuca, T. H. Is tamarisk allelopathic?. Plant Soil 267(1–2), 357–365 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bagstad, K. J., Lite, S. J. & Stromberg, J. C. Vegetation, soils, and hydrogeomorphology of riparian patch types of a dryland river. Western N. Am. Naturalist 66(1), 23–45 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Lehnhoff, E. A., Rew, L. J., Zabinski, C. A. & Menalled, F. D. Reduced impacts or a longer lag phase? Tamarix in the northwestern USA. Wetlands 32(3), 497–508 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Ye, W., Wang, H. X., Gao, J., Liu, H. J. & Yan, L. Simulation of salt ion migration in soil under reclaimed water irrigation. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 33(5), 1007–1015 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Yang, S. C. et al. Characterization of soil salinization based on canonical correspondence analysis method in Gansu Yellow River irrigation district of Northwest China. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 47(1), 100–110 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, L. H., Chen, P. H., Li, J., Chen, X. B. & Feng, Y. Distribution of soil salt ions around Tamarix chinensis individuals in the Yellow River Delta. Acta Ecol. Sin. 36(18), 5741–5749 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Zhang, T., Zhan, X., He, J., Feng, H. & Kang, Y. Salt characteristics and soluble cations redistribution in an impermeable calcareous saline-sodic soil reclaimed with an improved drip irrigation. Agric. Water Manag. 197, 91–99 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Yin, C. H., Feng, G. U., Zhang, F., Tian, C. Y. & Tang, C. Enrichment of soil fertility and salinity by tamarisk in saline soils on the northern edge of the Taklamakan Desert. Agric. Water Manag. 97(12), 1978–1986 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Chaudhari, P. R., Ahire, D. V., Ahire, V. D., Chkravarty, M. & Maity, S. Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, organic matter content and available total nutrients of Coimbatore soil. Int. J. Sci. Res. Publ. 3(2), 1–8 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Tanveera, A., Kanth, T. A., Tali, P. A. & Naikoo, M. Relation of soil bulk density with texture, total organic matter content and porosity in the soils of Kandi Area of Kashmir valley, India. Int. Res. J. Earth Sci. 4(1), 1–6 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Sharma, B. & Bhattacharya, S. Soil bulk density as related to soil texture, moisture content, Ph, electrical conductivity, organic carbon, organic matter content and available macro nutrients of Pandoga sub watershed, Una District of HP (India). Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev. 13(12), 72–76 (2017).
Google Scholar  More

Milner-Gulland, E. J. & Bennett, E. L. Wild meat: The bigger picture. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 351–357 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Van Vliet, N. et al. Bushmeat and human health: Assessing the evidence in tropical and sub-tropical forests. Ethnobio. Conserv. 6, 3. https://doi.org/10.15451/ec2017-04-6.3-1-45 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ingram, D. J. et al. Wild meat is still on the menu: Progress in wild meat research, policy, and practice from 2002 to 2020. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 46, 221–254. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-041020-063132 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Golden, C. D., Fernald, L. C. H., Brashares, J. S., Rasolofoniaina, B. J. R. & Kremen, C. Benefits of wildlife consumption to child nutrition in a biodiversity hotspot. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 19653–19656 (2011).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Roe, D. et al. Beyond banning wildlife trade: COVID-19, conservation and development. World Dev. 136, 105121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105121 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zhou, W., Orrick, K., Lim, A. & Dove, M. Reframing conservation and development perspectives on bushmeat. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 011001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac3db1 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cawthorn, D.-M. & Hoffman, L. C. The bushmeat and food security nexus: A global account of the contributions, conundrums and ethical collisions. Food Res. Int. 76, 906–925 (2015).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Antunes, A. P. et al. A conspiracy of silence: Subsistence hunting rights in the Brazilian Amazon. Land Use Policy 84, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Friant, S. et al. Eating bushmeat improves food security in a biodiversity and infectious disease “Hotspot”. EcoHealth 17, 125–138 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Fa, J. E., Currie, D. & Meeuwig, J. Bushmeat and food security in the Congo Basin: Linkages between wildlife and people’s future. Environ. Conserv. 30, 71–78 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Borgerson, C., Razafindrapaoly, B., Rajaona, D., Rasolofoniaina, B. J. R. & Golden, C. D. Food insecurity and the unsustainable hunting of wildlife in a UNESCO world heritage site. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 3, 99. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00099 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Booth, H. et al. Investigating the risks of removing wild meat from global food systems. Curr. Biol. 31, 1788–1797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.079 (2021).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
van Vliet, N., Nebesse, C. & Nasi, R. Bushmeat consumption among rural and urban children from Province Orientale, Democratic Republic of Congo. Oryx 49, 165–174 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Sirén, A. & Machoa, J. Fish, wildlife, and human nutrition in tropical forests: A fat gap?. Interciencia 33, 186–193 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Sarti, F. M. et al. Beyond protein intake: Bushmeat as source of micronutrients in the Amazon. E&S 20, 22 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Hoffman, L. C. What is the role and contribution of meat from wildlife in providing high quality protein for consumption?. Anim. Front. 2, 15 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Fa, J. E. et al. Disentangling the relative effects of bushmeat availability on human nutrition in central Africa. Sci. Rep. 5, 8168. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08168 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Castro, T. G., Baraldi, L. G., Muniz, P. T. & Cardoso, M. A. Dietary practices and nutritional status of 0–24-month-old children from Brazilian Amazonia. Public Health Nutr. 12, 2335–2342 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mintz, S. W. & Du Bois, C. M. The anthropology of food and eating. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 31, 99–119 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Lokossou, Y. U. A., Tambe, A. B., Azandjèmè, C. & Mbhenyane, X. Socio-cultural beliefs influence feeding practices of mothers and their children in Grand Popo, Benin. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 40, 33 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Murphy, S. P. & Allen, L. H. Nutritional importance of animal source foods. J. Nutr. 133, 3932S-3935S (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, C. G. et al. Animal source foods improve dietary quality, micronutrient status, growth and cognitive function in Kenyan School Children: Background, study design and baseline findings. J. Nutr. 133, 3941S-3949S (2003).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Desalegn, A., Mossie, A. & Gedefaw, L. Nutritional iron deficiency anemia: Magnitude and its predictors among school age children, Southwest Ethiopia: A community based cross-sectional study. PLoS ONE 9, e114059 (2014).ADS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Safiri, S. et al. Burden of anemia and its underlying causes in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. J. Hematol. Oncol. 14, 185 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vos, T. et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 388, 1545–1602 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Investing in the future: a united call to action on vitamin and mineral deficiencies: global report, 2009. (Micronutrient Initiative, 2009).Walker, S. P. et al. Child development: Risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet 369, 145–157 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Saloojee, H. & Pettifor, J. M. Iron deficiency and impaired child development: The relation may be causal, but it may not be a priority for intervention. BMJ 323, 1377–1378 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Neumann, C., Harris, D. M. & Rogers, L. M. Contribution of animal source foods in improving diet quality and function in children in the developing world. Nutr. Res. 22, 193–220 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Haileselassie, M. et al. Why are animal source foods rarely consumed by 6–23 months old children in rural communities of Northern Ethiopia? A qualitative study. PLoS ONE 15, e0225707 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Victor, R., Baines, S. K., Agho, K. E. & Dibley, M. J. Factors associated with inappropriate complementary feeding practices among children aged 6–23 months in Tanzania: Complementary feeding practices in Tanzania. Matern. Child Nutr. 10, 545–561 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morsello, C. et al. Cultural attitudes are stronger predictors of bushmeat consumption and preference than economic factors among urban Amazonians from Brazil and Colombia. E&S 20, 21 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Parry, L., Barlow, J. & Pereira, H. Wildlife Harvest and Consumption in Amazonia’s Urbanized Wilderness: Wildlife consumption in urbanized Amazonia. Conserv. Lett. 7, 565–574 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Wilkie, D. S., Monroe, M. C. & Sieving, K. E. Market access and wild meat consumption in the central Amazon, Brazil. Biol. Conserv. 212, 240–248 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Dufour, D. L., Piperata, B. A., Murrieta, R. S. S., Wilson, W. M. & Williams, D. D. Amazonian foods and implications for human biology. Ann. Hum. Biol. 43, 330–348 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Piperata, B. A. Nutritional status of Ribeirinhos in Brazil and the nutrition transition. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 133, 868–878 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Garcia, M. T., Granado, F. S. & Cardoso, M. A. Alimentação complementar e estado nutricional de crianças menores de dois anos atendidas no Programa Saúde da Família em Acrelândia, Acre, Amazônia Ocidental Brasileira. Cad. Saúde Pública 27, 305–316 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marques, R. C., Bernardi, J. V. E., Dorea, C. C. & Dórea, J. G. Intestinal parasites, anemia and nutritional status in young children from transitioning Western Amazon. IJERPH 17, 577 (2020).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Granado, F. S., Augusto, R. A., Muniz, P. T. & Cardoso, M. A. Team, the A. S. Anaemia and iron deficiency between 2003 and 2007 in Amazonian children under 2 years of age: Trends and associated factors. Public Health Nutr. 16, 1751–1759 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Nogueira-de-Almeida, C. A. et al. Prevalence of childhood anaemia in Brazil: Still a serious health problem: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 24, 6450–6465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002100286X (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
de Souza, A. A., Mingoti, S. A., Paes-Sousa, R. & Heller, L. Combination of conditional cash transfer program and environmental health interventions reduces child mortality: An ecological study of Brazilian municipalities. BMC Public Health 21, 627 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ferreira, H. S. et al. Prevalence of anaemia in Brazilian children in different epidemiological scenarios: An updated meta-analysis. Public Health Nutr. 24, 2171–2184 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Leite, M. S. et al. Prevalence of anemia and associated factors among indigenous children in Brazil: Results from the First National Survey of Indigenous People’s Health and Nutrition. Nutr. 12, 69 (2013).
Google Scholar 
WHO, W. H. O. Prevalence of anaemia in children aged 6–59 months (%). https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/prevalence-of-anaemia-in-children-under-5-years-(-) (2021).Schreiner, M. A Poverty Probability Index (PPI®) for Brazil (2008). (2010).Walzer, C. COVID-19 and the curse of piecemeal perspectives. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, 582983 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Carignano, T. P., Morsello, C. & Parry, L. Rural-urban mobility influences wildmeat access and consumption in the Brazilian Amazon. Oryx (In press).Ferreira, M. U. et al. Anemia and iron deficiency in school children, adolescents, and adults: A community-based study in Rural Amazonia. Am. J. Public Health 97, 237–239 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
de Castro, T. G., Silva-Nunes, M., Conde, W. L., Muniz, P. T. & Cardoso, M. A. Anemia e deficiência de ferro em pré-escolares da Amazônia Ocidental brasileira: Prevalência e fatores associados. Cad. Saúde Pública 27, 131–142 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cotta, R. M. M. et al. Social and biological determinants of iron deficiency anemia. Cad. Saúde Pública 27, s309–s320 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Valle, D., Tavares, A. S., Morcatty, T. Q. & Wilcove, D. S. Impacts of rural to urban migration, urbanization, and generational change on consumption of wild animals in the Amazon. Conserv. Biol. 35, 1186–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13663 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
El Bizri, H. R. et al. Urban wild meat consumption and trade in central Amazonia. Conserv. Biol. 34, 438–448 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Valle, D., Tavares, A. S., von Mühlen, E. M. & Wilcove, D. S. Investigating illegal activities that affect biodiversity: The case of wildlife consumption in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecol. Appl. 31, e02402. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2402 (2021).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Chaves, W. A., Monroe, M. C. & Sieving, K. E. Wild meat trade and consumption in the Central Amazon, Brazil. Hum. Ecol. 47, 733–746 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ohl-Schacherer, J. et al. The sustainability of subsistence hunting by matsigenka native communities in Manu National Park, Peru. Conserv. Biol. 21, 1174–1185 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shaffer, C. A., Yukuma, C., Marawanaru, E. & Suse, P. Assessing the sustainability of Waiwai subsistence hunting in Guyana by comparison of static indices and spatially explicit, biodemographic models. Anim. Conserv. 21, 148–158 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Pesquisa de orçamentos familiares, 2008–2009. (IBGE, 2010).Aguiar, J. P. L. Tabela de composição de alimentos da Amazônia. Acta Amaz 26, 121–126 (1996).
Google Scholar 
de Bruyn, J. et al. Food composition tables in resource-poor settings: exploring current limitations and opportunities, with a focus on animal-source foods in sub-Saharan Africa. Br. J. Nutr. 116, 1709–1719 (2016).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
World Bank. Poverty and Shared Prosperity 2020: Reversals of Fortune. (World Bank, 2020).Coad, L. M. et al. Toward a Sustainable, Participatory and Inclusive Wild Meat Sector. (Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/007046 (2019).Cowlishaw, G., Mendelson, S. & Rowcliffe, J. M. Evidence for post-depletion sustainability in a mature bushmeat market. J. Appl. Ecol. 42, 460–468 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Carignano Torres, P., Morsello, C., Parry, L. & Pardini, R. Forest cover and social relations are more important than economic factors in driving hunting and bushmeat consumption in post-frontier Amazonia. Biol. Conserv. 253, 108823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108823 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Nunes, A. V., Oliveira-Santos, L. G. R., Santos, B. A., Peres, C. A. & Fischer, E. Socioeconomic drivers of hunting efficiency and use of space by traditional Amazonians. Hum. Ecol. 48, 307–315 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Freitas, C. T. et al. Co-management of culturally important species: A tool to promote biodiversity conservation and human well-being. People Nat. 2, 61–81 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Campos-Silva, J. V., Peres, C. A., Antunes, A. P., Valsecchi, J. & Pezzuti, J. Community-based population recovery of overexploited Amazonian wildlife. PECON 15, 266–270 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Nunes, A. V., Peres, C. A., de Constantino, P. A. L., Santos, B. A. & Fischer, E. Irreplaceable socioeconomic value of wild meat extraction to local food security in rural Amazonia. Biol. Conserv. 236, 171–179 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Balarajan, Y., Ramakrishnan, U., Özaltin, E., Shankar, A. H. & Subramanian, S. Anaemia in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 378, 2123–2135 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mendes, M. M. et al. Association between iron deficiency anaemia and complementary feeding in children under 2 years assisted by a Conditional Cash Transfer programme. Public Health Nutr. 24, 4080–4090 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Brondízio, E. S., de Lima, A. C. B., Schramski, S. & Adams, C. Social and health dimensions of climate change in the Amazon. Ann. Hum. Biol. 43, 405–414 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ingram, D. J. Wild meat in changing times. J. Ethnobiol. 40, 117 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Nunes, A. V., Guariento, R. D., Santos, B. A. & Fischer, E. Wild meat sharing among non-indigenous people in the southwestern Amazon. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73, 26 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Parry, L. et al. Social vulnerability to climatic shocks is shaped by urban accessibility. Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr. 108, 125–143 (2018).
Google Scholar 
IBGE, I. B. de G. e E. Censo Demográfico 2010. (2010).IBGE, I. B. de G. e E. Estimativas da população residente para os municípios e para as unidades da federação com data de referência em 1o de julho de 2019. (2019).Cardoso, M. A., Scopel, K. K. G., Muniz, P. T., Villamor, E. & Ferreira, M. U. Underlying factors associated with anemia in amazonian children: A population-based cross-sectional study. PLOS ONE 7, e36341 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mattiello, V. et al. Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency in children with or without anemia: consensus recommendations of the SPOG Pediatric Hematology Working Group. Eur. J. Pediatr. 179, 527–545 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: The R project for statistical computing. (2015).Zuur, A. F., Ieno, E. N., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. A. & Smith, G. M. Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R (Springer, 2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6.Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Devereux, S. Social Protection for Rural Poverty Reduction. Rural Transformations Technical Series 1 (2016).Barton, K. Mu-MIn: Multi-model Inference. R Package Version 0.12.2/r18. (2009).Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R. & Burnham, K. P. Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Berti, P. R. Intrahousehold distribution of food: A review of the literature and discussion of the implications for food fortification programs. Food Nutr. Bull. 33, S163–S169 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Piperata, B. A., Schmeer, K. K., Hadley, C. & Ritchie-Ewing, G. Dietary inequalities of mother–child pairs in the rural Amazon: Evidence of maternal-child buffering?. Soc. Sci. Med. 96, 183–191 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More