Ecology

Lipkind, D. et al. Stepwise acquisition of vocal combinatorial capacity in songbirds and human infants. Nature 498, 104–108 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Goldstein, M., King, A. P. & West, M. J. Social interaction shapes babbling: testing parallels between birdsong and speech. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 8030–8035 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fehér, O., Ljubičić, I., Suzuki, K., Okanoya, K. & Tchernichovski, O. Statistical learning in songbirds: from self-tutoring to song culture. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160053 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tchernichovski, O., Lints, T., Mitra, P. P. & Nottebohm, F. Vocal imitation in zebra finches is inversely related to model abundance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12901–12904 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tchernichovski, O. Dynamics of the vocal imitation process: how a zebra finch learns its song. Science 291, 2564–2569 (2001).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fehér, O., Wang, H., Saar, S., Mitra, P. P. & Tchernichovski, O. De novo establishment of wild-type song culture in the zebra finch. Nature 459, 564–568 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, D. et al. The developmental dynamics of marmoset monkey vocal production. Science 349, 734–738 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Takahashi, D. Y., Liao, D. A. & Ghazanfar, A. A. Vocal learning via social reinforcement by infant marmoset monkeys. Curr. Biol. 27, 1844–1852.E6 (2017).Takahashi, D. Y., Fenley, A. R. & Ghazanfar, A. A. Early development of turn-taking with parents shapes vocal acoustics in infant marmoset monkeys. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150370 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gultekin, Y. B. & Hage, S. R. Limiting parental interaction during vocal development affects acoustic call structure in marmoset monkeys. Sci. Adv. 4, eaar4012 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gultekin, Y. B. & Hage, S. R. Limiting parental feedback disrupts vocal development in marmoset monkeys. Nat. Commun. 8, 14046 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jarvis, E. D. Evolution of vocal learning and spoken language. Science 366, 50–54 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Snowdon, C. T. Learning from monkey “talk”. Science 355, 1120–1122 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Malik, K. Rights and wrongs. Nature 406, 675–676 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Wise, S. M. & Goodall, J. Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals (Da Capo Press, 2017).Grayson, L. Animals in Research: For and Against (British Library, 2000).Nater, A. et al. Morphometric, behavioral, and genomic evidence for a new orangutan species. Curr. Biol. 27, 3487–3498.E10 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Estrada, A. et al. Impending extinction crisis of the world’s primates: why primates matter. Sci. Adv. 3, e1600946 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ross, S. et al. Inappropriate use and portrayal of chimpanzees. Science 319, 1487 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wich, S. A. et al. Land-cover changes predict steep declines for the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo abelii). Sci. Adv. 2, e1500789 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wich, S. A. et al. Understanding the impacts of land-use policies on a threatened species: is there a future for the Bornean orangutan? PLoS ONE 7, e49142 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wich, S. A. et al. Will oil palm’s homecoming spell doom for Africa’s great apes? Curr. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.077 (2014).Fitch, T. W. Empirical approaches to the study of language evolution. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 24, 3–33 (2017).Hauser, M. D. et al. The mystery of language evolution. Front. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00401 (2014)Corballis, M. C. Crossing the Rubicon: behaviorism, language, and evolutionary continuity. Front. Psychol. 11, 653 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Berwick, R. C. & Chomsky, N. All or nothing: no half-merge and the evolution of syntax. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000539 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bolhuis, J. J. & Wynne, C. D. Can evolution explain how minds work? Nature 458, 832–833 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hayes, K. J. & Hayes, C. The intellectual development of a home-raised chimpanzee. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 95, 105–109 (1951).
Google Scholar 
Premack, D. Language in chimpanzee? Science 172, 808–822 (1971).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Terrace, H., Petitto, L., Sanders, R. & Bever, T. Can an ape create a sentence? Science 206, 891–902 (1979).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Patterson, F. & Linden, E. The Education of Koko (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1981).Leavens, D. A., Bard, K. A. & Hopkins, W. D. BIZARRE chimpanzees do not represent “the chimpanzee”. Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 100–101 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. Bidding evidence for primate vocal learning and the cultural substrates for speech evolution. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 83, 429–439 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. et al. Speech-like rhythm in a voiced and voiceless orangutan call. PLoS ONE 10, e116136 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. & Shumaker, R. W. Orangutans show active voicing through a membranophone. Sci. Rep. 9, 12289 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R., Hardus, M. E., Mielke, A., Wich, S. A. & Shumaker, R. W. Vocal fold control beyond the species-specific repertoire in an orangutan. Sci. Rep. 6, 30315 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. et al. Orangutan (Pongo spp.) whistling and implications for the emergence of an open-ended call repertoire: a replication and extension. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 134, 2326–2335 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Perlman, M. & Clark, N. Learned vocal and breathing behavior in an enculturated gorilla. Anim. Cogn. 18, 1165–1179 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Wich, S. et al. A case of spontaneous acquisition of a human sound by an orangutan. Primates 50, 56–64 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R., Maddieson, I. & Zuberbuhler, K. Primate feedstock for the evolution of consonants. Trends Cogn. Sci. 18, 60–62 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. The forgotten role of consonant-like calls in theories of speech evolution. Behav. Brain Sci. 37, 559–560 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Boë, L.-J. et al. Which way to the dawn of speech? Reanalyzing half a century of debates and data in light of speech science. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw3916 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Boë, L. J. et al. Evidence of a vocalic proto-system in the baboon (Papio papio) suggests pre-hominin speech precursors. PLoS ONE 12, e0169321 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fitch, T. W., Boer, B., Mathur, N. & Ghazanfar, A. A. Monkey vocal tracts are speech-ready. Sci. Adv. 2, e1600723 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pereira, A. S., Kavanagh, E., Hobaiter, C., Slocombe, K. E. & Lameira, A. R. Chimpanzee lip-smacks confirm primate continuity for speech-rhythm evolution. Biol. Lett. 16, 20200232 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. et al. Proto-consonants were information-dense via identical bioacoustic tags to proto-vowels. Nat. Hum. Behav. 1, 0044 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. et al. Orangutan information broadcast via consonant-like and vowel-like calls breaches mathematical models of linguistic evolution. Biol. Lett. 17, 20210302 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Watson, S. K. et al. Nonadjacent dependency processing in monkeys, apes, and humans. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb0725 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. & Call, J. Time-space–displaced responses in the orangutan vocal system. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau3401 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Belyk, M. & Brown, S. The origins of the vocal brain in humans. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 77, 177–193 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Crockford, C., Wittig, R. M. & Zuberbuhler, K. Vocalizing in chimpanzees is influenced by social-cognitive processes. Sci. Adv. 3, e1701742 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Taglialatela, J. P., Reamer, L., Schapiro, S. J. & Hopkins, W. D. Social learning of a communicative signal in captive chimpanzees. Biol. Lett. 8, 498–501 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Russell, J. L., Joseph, M., Hopkins, W. D. & Taglialatela, J. P. Vocal learning of a communicative signal in captive chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Brain Lang. 127, 520–525 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hopkins, W. D. et al. Genetic factors and orofacial motor learning selectively influence variability in central sulcus morphology in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J. Neurosci. 37, 5475–5483 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Staes, N. et al. FOXP2 variation in great ape populations offers insight into the evolution of communication skills. Sci. Rep. 7, 16866 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martins, P. T. & Boeckx, C. Vocal learning: beyond the continuum. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000672 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Watson, S. K. et al. Vocal learning in the functionally referential food grunts of chimpanzees. Curr. Biol. 25, 495–499 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hopkins, W. D., Taglialatela, J. P. & Leavens, D. A. Chimpanzees differentially produce novel vocalizations to capture the attention of a human. Anim. Behav. 73, 281–286 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bianchi, S., Reyes, L. D., Hopkins, W. D., Taglialatela, J. P. & Sherwood, C. C. Neocortical grey matter distribution underlying voluntary, flexible vocalizations in chimpanzees. Sci. Rep. 6, 34733 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wich, S. A. et al. Call cultures in orangutans? PLoS ONE 7, e36180 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Crockford, C., Herbinger, I., Vigilant, L. & Boesch, C. Wild chimpanzees produce group-specific calls: a case for vocal learning? Ethology 110, 221–243 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Whiten, A. et al. Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399, 682–685 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
van Schaik, C. P. et al. Orangutan cultures and the evolution of material culture. Science 299, 102–105 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Whiten, A. Culture extends the scope of evolutionary biology in the great apes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7790–7797 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Koops, K., Visalberghi, E. & van Schaik, C. The ecology of primate material culture. Biol. Lett. 10, 20140508 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kalan, A. K. et al. Chimpanzees use tree species with a resonant timbre for accumulative stone throwing. Biol. Lett. 15, 20190747 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hardus, M., Lameira, A. R., Van Schaik, C. P. & Wich, S. A. Tool use in wild orangutans modifies sound production: a functionally deceptive innovation? Proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2009.1027 (2009).Lameira, A. R. et al. Population-specific use of the same tool-assisted alarm call between two wild orangutan populations (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) indicates functional arbitrariness. PLoS ONE 8, e69749 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hohmann, G. & Fruth, B. Culture in bonobos? Between‐species and within‐species variation in behavior. Curr. Anthropol. 44, 563–571 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Robbins, M. M. et al. Behavioral variation in gorillas: evidence of potential cultural traits. PLoS ONE 11, e0160483 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kühl, H. S. et al. Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity. Science 363, 1453–1455 (2019).
Google Scholar 
van Schaik, C. P. Fragility of Traditions: the disturbance hypothesis for the loss of local traditions in orangutans. Int. J. Primatol. 23, 527–538 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Delgado, R. A. & van Schaik, C. P. The behavioral ecology and conservation of the orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus): a tale of two islands. Evol. Anthropol. 9, 201–218 (2000).
Google Scholar 
van Schaik, C. The socioecology of fission–fusion sociality in orangutans. Primates 40, 69–86 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Nater, A. et al. Sex-biased dispersal and volcanic activities shaped phylogeographic patterns of extant orangutans (genus: Pongo). Mol. Biol. 28, 2275–2288 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Arora, N. et al. Parentage-based pedigree reconstruction reveals female matrilineal clusters and male-biased dispersal in nongregarious Asian great apes, the Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus). Mol. Ecol. 21, 3352–3362 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Kavanagh, E. et al. Dominance style is a key predictor of vocal use and evolution across nonhuman primates. R. Soc. Open Sci. 8, 210873 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Husson, S. et al. in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation (eds Wich, S. et al.) Ch. 6 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).van Noordwijk, M. A. et al. in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation (eds Wich, S. et al.) Ch. 12 (Oxford Univ Press, 2009).Singleton, I., Knott, C., Morrogh-Bernard, H., Wich, S. & van Schaik, C. P. in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation (eds Wich, S. et al.) Ch. 13 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).Wich, S. et al. Life history of wild Sumatran orangutans (Pongo abelii). J. Hum. Evol. 47, 385–398 (2004).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Wich, S. et al. in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation (eds Wich, S. et al.) Ch. 5 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).Shumaker, R. W., Wich, S. A. & Perkins, L. Reproductive life history traits of female orangutans (Pongo spp.). Primate Reprod. Aging 36, 147–161 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Freund, C., Rahman, E. & Knott, C. Ten years of orangutan-related wildlife crime investigation in West Kalimantan, Indonesia. Am. J. Primatol. 79, 22620 (2016).
Google Scholar 
van Noordwijk, M. A. & van Schaik, C. P. Development of ecological competence in Sumatran orangutans. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 127, 79–94 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Knot, C. D. et al. The Gunung Palung Orangutan Project: Twenty-five years at the intersection of research and conservation in a critical landscape in Indonesia. Biol. Conserv. 255, 108856 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Guillermo, S.-B., Gershenson, C. & Fernández, N. A package for measuring emergence, self-organization, and complexity based on shannon entropy. Front. Robot. AI 4, 174102 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Santamaría-Bonfil, G., Fernández, N. & Gershenson, C. Measuring the complexity of continuous distributions. Entropy 18, 72 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Kalan, A. K., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. Wild chimpanzees modify food call structure with respect to tree size for a particular fruit species. Anim. Behav. 101, 1–9 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Fedurek, P. & Slocombe, K. E. The social function of food-associated calls in male chimpanzees. Am. J. Primatol. 75, 726–739 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Luef, E., Breuer, T. & Pika, S. Food-associated calling in gorillas (Gorilla g. gorilla) in the wild. PLoS ONE 11, e0144197 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Clay, Z. & Zuberbuhler, K. Food-associated calling sequences in bonobos. Anim. Behav. 77, 1387–1396 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Hardus, M. E. et al. in Orangutans: Geographic Variation in Behavioral Ecology and Conservation (eds Wich, S. et al.) Ch. 4 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2009).Wich, S. A. et al. Forest fruit production is higher on Sumatra than on Borneo. PLoS ONE 6, e21278 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. & Wich, S. Orangutan long call degradation and individuality over distance: a playback approach. Int. J. Primatol. 29, 615–625 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R., Delgado, R. & Wich, S. Review of geographic variation in terrestrial mammalian acoustic signals: human speech variation in a comparative perspective. J. Evolut. Psychol. 8, 309–332 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Lameira, A. R. et al. Predator guild does not influence orangutan alarm call rates and combinations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67, 519–528 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Derex, M. & Mesoudi, A. Cumulative cultural evolution within evolving population structures. Trends Cogn. Sci. 24, 654–667 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Scerri, E. M. et al. Did our species evolve in subdivided populations across Africa, and why does it matter? Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 582–594 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kaya, F. et al. The rise and fall of the Old World savannah fauna and the origins of the African savannah biome. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 241–246 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bobe, R. The expansion of grassland ecosystems in Africa in relation to mammalian evolution and the origin of the genus Homo. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 207, 399–420 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Zhu, D., Galbraith, E. D., Reyes-García, V. & Ciais, P. Global hunter-gatherer population densities constrained by influence of seasonality on diet composition. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 5, 1536–1545 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
DeCasien, A. R., Williams, S. A. & Higham, J. P. Primate brain size is predicted by diet but not sociality. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0112 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Mauricio, G.-F. & Gardner, A. Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution. Nature 557, 554–557 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Lindenfors, P., Wartel, A. & Lind, J. ‘Dunbar’s number’ deconstructed. Biol. Lett. 17, 20210158 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schuppli, C., van Noordwijk, M., Atmoko, S. U. & van Schaik, C. Early sociability fosters later exploratory tendency in wild immature orangutans. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaw2685 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schuppli, C. et al. Observational social learning and socially induced practice of routine skills in immature wild orangutans. Anim. Behav. 119, 87–98 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Jaeggi, A. V. et al. Social learning of diet and foraging skills by wild immature Bornean orangutans: implications for culture. Am. J. Primatol. 72, 62–71 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schuppli, C. et al. The effects of sociability on exploratory tendency and innovation repertoires in wild Sumatran and Bornean orangutans. Sci. Rep. 7, 15464 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ehmann, B. et al. Immature wild orangutans acquire relevant ecological knowledge through sex-specific attentional biases during social learning. PLoS Biol. 19, e3001173 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Meijaard, E. et al. Declining orangutan encounter rates from Wallace to the present suggest the species was once more abundant. PLoS ONE 5, e12042 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Marshall, A. J. et al. The blowgun is mightier than the chainsaw in determining population density of Bornean orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus morio) in the forests of East Kalimantan. Biol. Conserv. 129, 566–578 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Gail, C.-S., Miran, C.-S., Singleton, I. & Linkie, M. Raiders of the lost bark: orangutan foraging strategies in a degraded landscape. PLoS ONE 6, e20962 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Schuppli, C. & van Schaik, C. P. Animal cultures: how we’ve only seen the tip of the iceberg. Evol. Hum. Sci. 1, e2 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Langergraber, K. E. et al. Vigilant, generation times in wild chimpanzees and gorillas suggest earlier divergence times in great ape and human evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 15716–15721 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fernández, N., Maldonado, C. & Gershenson, C. in Guided Self-Organization: Inception (ed Prokopenko, M.) 19–51 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014).JAST Team, JASP (Univ. of Amsterdam, 2020).R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013).Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer-Verlag, 2009).Auguie, B. gridExtra: Functions in grid graphics. R version 0.9.1 (2012).Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57, 289–300 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Korthauer, K. et al. A practical guide to methods controlling false discoveries in computational biology. Genome Biol. 20, 118 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

Pimm, S. L. et al. Emerging technologies to conserve biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 685–696 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Marvin, D. C. et al. Integrating technologies for scalable ecology and conservation. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 7, 262–275 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wall, J., Wittemyer, G., Klinkenberg, B. & Douglas-Hamilton, I. Novel opportunities for wildlife conservation and research with real-time monitoring. Ecol. Appl. 24, 593–601 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Snaddon, J., Petrokofsky, G., Jepson, P. & Willis, K. J. Biodiversity technologies: tools as change agents. Biol. Lett. 9, 20121029 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pettorelli, N., Safi, K., Turner, W. Satellite remote sensing, biodiversity research and conservation of the future. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 369, 20130190 (2014).Ripperger, S. P. et al. Thinking small: Next-generation sensor networks close the size gap in vertebrate biologging. PLOS Biol. 18, e3000655 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Xu, H., Wang, K., Vayanos, P. & Tambe, M. Strategic coordination of human patrollers and mobile sensors with signaling for security games. 8 (2018).Liu, Y. et al. AI for Earth: Rainforest conservation by acoustic surveillance. 2 (2019).Joppa, L. N. Technology for nature conservation: an industry perspective. Ambio 44, 522–526 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koh, L. P. & Wich, S. A. Dawn of drone ecology: low-cost autonomous aerial vehicles for conservation. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 5, 121–132 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hahn, N. et al. Unmanned aerial vehicles mitigate human–elephant conflict on the borders of Tanzanian Parks: a case study. Oryx 51, 513–516 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pomerantz, A. et al. Real-time DNA barcoding in a rainforest using nanopore sequencing: opportunities for rapid biodiversity assessments and local capacity building. GigaScience 7, (2018).Van Doren, B. M. & Horton, K. G. A continental system for forecasting bird migration. Science 361, 1115–1118 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Howson, P. Building trust and equity in marine conservation and fisheries supply chain management with blockchain. Mar. Policy 115, 103873 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Speaker, T. et al. A global community-sourced assessment of the state of conservation technology. Conserv. Biol. cobi. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13871 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pearce, J. M. Building research equipment with free Open-Source Hardware. Science 337, 1303–1304 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gibb, R., Browning, E., Glover-Kapfer, P. & Jones, K. E. Emerging opportunities and challenges for passive acoustics in ecological assessment and monitoring. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 169–185 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
current constraints and future priorities for development. Glover-Kapfer, P., Soto-Navarro, C. A. & Wearn, O. R. Camera-trapping version 3.0. Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 5, 209–223 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Norouzzadeh, M. S. et al. Automatically identifying, counting, and describing wild animals in camera-trap images with deep learning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 115, E5716–E5725 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Berger-Tal, O. & Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. Conservation technology: the next generation. Conserv. Lett. 11, 1–6 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hill, A. P. et al. AudioMoth: Evaluation of a smart open acoustic device for monitoring biodiversity and the environment. Methods Ecol. Evol. 9, 1199–1211 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Kubizňák, P., Šindelář, J. & Hlaváč, V. Smart nest box: a tool and methodology for monitoring of cavity-dwelling animals. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 483–492 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kalmár, G. et al. Animal-Borne Anti-Poaching System. in Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services 91–102 (ACM, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3307334.3326080.Weise, F. J. et al. Lions at the gates: Trans-disciplinary design of an early warning system to improve human-lion coexistence. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 242 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Beery, S., Van Horn, G. & Perona, P. Recognition in Terra Incognita. in Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) (eds. Ferrari, V., Hebert, M., Sminchisescu, C. & Weiss, Y.) 472–489 (Springer International Publishing, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01270-0_28.Crego, R. D., Masolele, M. M., Connette, G. & Stabach, J. A. Enhancing animal movement analyses: spatiotemporal matching of animal positions with remotely sensed data using google earth engine and R. Remote Sens. 13, 4154 (2021).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gorelick, N. et al. Google earth engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sens. Environ. 202, 18–27 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Vulcan. EarthRanger. https://earthranger.com.Ahumada, J. A. et al. Wildlife insights: A platform to maximize the potential of camera trap and other passive sensor wildlife data for the planet. Environ. Conserv. 47, 1–6 (2020).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Lahoz-Monfort, J. J. et al. A call for international leadership and coordination to realize the potential of conservation technology. Bioscience 69, 823–832 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Group Gets – AudioMoth. https://groupgets.com/manufacturers/open-acoustic-devices/products/audiomoth.Kulits, P., Wall, J., Bedetti, A., Henley, M. & Beery, S. ElephantBook: A semi-automated human-in-the-loop system for elephant re-identification. in ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies (COMPASS) 88–98 (ACM, 2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3460112.3471947.Pardo, L. E. et al. Snapshot Safari: A large-scale collaborative to monitor Africa’s remarkable biodiversity. South Afr. J. Sci. 117, (2021).Iacona, G. et al. Identifying technology solutions to bring conservation into the innovation era. Front. Ecol. Environ. 17, 591–598 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Cooper, R. G. What’s next?: After stage-gate. Res.-Technol. Manag. 57, 20–31 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Cooper, R. G. The drivers of success in new-product development. Ind. Mark. Manag. 76, 36–47 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pearce, J. M. The case for open source appropriate technology. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 14, 425–431 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mair, J., Battilana, J. & Cardenas, J. Organizing for society: A typology of social entrepreneuring models. J. Bus. Ethics 111, 353–373 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Meissner, D. Public-private partnership models for science, technology, and innovation cooperation. J. Knowl. Econ. 10, 1341–1361 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Likert, R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 22, 1–55.Mayer, A. L. & Wellstead, A. M. Questionable survey methods generate a questionable list of recommended articles. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1336–1337 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Archie, K. M., Dilling, L., Milford, J. B. & Pampel, F. C. Climate Change and Western Public Lands: a Survey of U.S. Federal Land Managers on the Status of Adaptation Efforts. Ecol. Soc. 17 (2012).Jimenez, M. F. et al. Underrepresented faculty play a disproportionate role in advancing diversity and inclusion. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1030–1033 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Christensen, R. ordinal – Regression Models for Ordinal Data. R package version 2019.12-10. (2019).R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (2020).Arnold, T. W. Uninformative parameters and model selection using Akaike’s information criterion. J. Wildl. Manag. 74, 1175–1178 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
QSR International Pty Ltd. Nvivo 12 Pro. (2020).Glesne, C. Making words fly: Developing understanding through interviewing. Becom. Qual. Res. Introd. 3, (2006).Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (Sage publications 2017). More

Balami, S., Vašutová, M., Godbold, D., Kotas, P. & Cudlín, P. Soil fungal communities across land use types. Forest Biogeosci. For. 13, 548–558 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Deacon, J. Fungal Biology (Wiley, 2009).
Google Scholar 
Ruiz-Almenara, C., Gándara, E. & Gómez-Hernández, M. Comparison of diversity and composition of macrofungal species between intensive mushroom harvesting and non-harvesting areas in Oaxaca, Mexico. PeerJ 7, e8325 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moore, J. C. et al. Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 7, 584–600 (2004).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Egli, S. Mycorrhizal mushroom diversity and productivity—an indicator of forest health?. Ann. For. Sci. 68, 81–88 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Westover, K. M. & Bever, J. D. Mechanisms of plant species coexistence: Roles of rhizosphere bacteria and root fungal pathogens. Ecology 82, 3285–3294 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Deacon, J. Fungal Biology (Wiley, 2006).
Google Scholar 
Fernandez, C. W., Nguyen, N. H. U. H., Stefanski, A. & Han, Y. Ectomycorrhizal fungal response to warming is linked to poor host performance at the boreal-temperate ecotone. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 1598–1609 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Heilmann-Clausen, J. et al. A fungal perspective on conservation biology. Conserv. Biol. 29, 61–68 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Shay, P.-E., Winder, R. S. & Trofymow, J. A. Nutrient-cycling microbes in coastal Douglas-fir forests: Regional-scale correlation between communities, in situ climate, and other factors. Front. Microbiol. 6, 5897 (2015).
Google Scholar 
van der Heijden, M. G. A., Bardgett, R. D. & van Straalen, N. M. The unseen majority: Soil microbes as drivers of plant diversity and productivity in terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 11, 296–310 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Richter, A., Schöning, I., Kahl, T., Bauhus, J. & Ruess, L. Regional environmental conditions shape microbial community structure stronger than local forest management intensity. For. Ecol. Manag. 409, 250–259 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Monkai, J., Hyde, K. D., Xu, J. & Mortimer, P. E. Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities in rubber plantations. Fungal Biol. Rev. 31, 1–11 (2017).
Google Scholar 
White, F. Vegetation of Africa—a descriptive memoir to accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO vegetation map of Africa, Natural Resources Research Report XX. U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris (1983).Aynekulu, E. et al. Plant diversity and regeneration in a disturbed isolated dry Afromontane forest in northern Ethiopia. Folia Geobot. 51, 115–127 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Wassie, A., Sterck, F. J. & Bongers, F. Species and structural diversity of church forests in a fragmented Ethiopian Highland landscape. J. Veg. Sci. 21, 938–948 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Alem, D., Dejene, T., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A. & Martín-Pinto, P. Survey of macrofungal diversity and analysis of edaphic factors influencing the fungal community of church forests in Dry Afromontane areas of Northern Ethiopia. For. Ecol. Manag. 496, 119391 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Aerts, R. et al. Conservation of the Ethiopian church forests: Threats, opportunities and implications for their management. Sci. Total Environ. 551–552, 404–414 (2016).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wassie, A., Teketay, D. & Powell, N. Church forests in North Gonder administrative zone, Northern Ethiopia. For. Trees Livelihoods 15, 349–373 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Wsaaie, A., Teketay, D. & Powell, N. Church forests in North Gondar Administative Zone, Northern Ethioopia. For. Trees Livelihoods 15, 349–373 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Lemenih, M. & Bongers, F. Dry forests of Ethiopia and their silviculture. In Silviculture in the Tropics, Tropical Forestry 8 (ed. S. G€unter et al.) 261–272 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19986-8_17.Fernández, A., Sánchez, S., García, P. & Sánchez, J. Macrofungal diversity in an isolated and fragmented Mediterranean Forest ecosystem. Plant Biosyst. Int. J. Deal. Asp. Plant Biol. 154, 139–148 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Peay, K. G. & Bruns, T. D. Spore dispersal of basidiomycete fungi at the landscape scale is driven by stochastic and deterministic processes and generates variability in plant-fungal interactions. New Phytol. 204, 180–191 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Burgess, N. D., Hales, J. D. A., Ricketts, T. H. & Dinerstein, E. Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity prioritisation across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands. Biol. Conserv. 127, 383–401 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Dejene, T., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A. & Martín-Pinto, P. Fungal community succession and sporocarp production following fire occurrence in Dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. For. Ecol. Manag. 398, 37–47 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Větrovský, T. et al. GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Sci. Data 7, 1–14 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Tedersoo, L. et al. Global diversity and geography of soil fungi. Science (80-. ). 346 (2014).Hawksworth, D. L. Global species numbers of fungi: are tropical studies and molecular approaches contributing to a more robust estimate?. Biodivers. Conserv. 21, 2425–2433 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Crous, P. W. et al. How many species of fungi are there at the tip of Africa?. Stud. Mycol. 55, 13–33 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Martínez, M. L. et al. Effects of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical montane cloud forests of Mexico. For. Ecol. Manag. 258, 1856–1863 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Phillips, H. et al. The effects of global change on soil faunal communities: a meta-analytic approach. Res. Ideas Outcomes 5 (2019).Riutta, T. et al. Experimental evidence for the interacting effects of forest edge, moisture and soil macrofauna on leaf litter decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 49, 124–131 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Rantalainen, M., Haimi, J., Fritze, H., Pennanen, T. & Setala, T. Soil decomposer community as a model system in studying the effects of habitat fragmentation and habitat corridors. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 853–863 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Newsham, K. K. et al. Relationship between soil fungal diversity and temperature in the maritime Antarctic. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 182–186 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bahram, M., Põlme, S., Kõljalg, U., Zarre, S. & Tedersoo, L. Regional and local patterns of ectomycorrhizal fungal diversity and community structure along an altitudinal gradient in the Hyrcanian forests of northern Iran. New Phytol. 193, 465–473 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rousk, J. et al. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 4, 1340–1351 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Krüger, C. et al. Plant communities rather than soil properties structure arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities along primary succession on a mine spoil. Front. Microbiol. 8, 1–16 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Bahram, M., Peay, K. G. & Tedersoo, L. Local-scale biogeography and spatiotemporal variability in communities of mycorrhizal fungi. New Phytol. 205, 1454–1463 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Li, P. et al. Spatial variation in soil fungal communities across paddy fields in Subtropical China. mSystems 5 (2020).Grilli, G., Urcelay, C. & Galetto, L. Forest fragment size and nutrient availability: Complex responses of mycorrhizal fungi in native–exotic hosts. Plant Ecol. 213, 155–165 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Fernández, C., Vega, J. A. & Fonturbel, T. Shrub Resprouting Response After Fuel Reduction Treatments: Comparison of Prescribed Burning, Clearing and Mastication (Elsevier, 2013).
Google Scholar 
Tedersoo, L., Sadam, A., Zambrano, M., Valencia, R. & Bahram, M. Low diversity and high host preference of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Western Amazonia, a neotropical biodiversity hotspot. ISME J. 4, 465–471 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Glassman, S. I., Wang, I. J. & Bruns, T. D. Environmental filtering by pH and soil nutrients drives community assembly in fungi at fine spatial scales. Mol. Ecol. 26, 6960–6973 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Colwell, R. K. EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s Guide and application published at: http://purl.oclc.org/estimates (2013).Purvis, A. & Hector, A. Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature 405, 212–219 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pan, W. et al. DNA polymerase preference determines PCR priming efficiency. BMC Biotechnol. 14, 10 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kirk, P. M., Cannon, P. F., Minter, D. W. & J.A, S. Dictionary of the Fungi (The Centre for Agriculture and Bioscience International (CABI), 2008).Rossman, A., Samuel, G., Rogerson, C. & Lowen, R. Genera of bionectriaceae, hypocreaceae and nectriaceae (hypocreales, ascomycetes). Stud. Mycol. 42, 1–260 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Samuels, G. Trichoderma: A review of biology and systematics of the genus. Mycol. Res. 923–935 (1996).Alem, D. et al. Soil fungal communities and succession following wildfire in Ethiopian dry Afromontane forests, a highly diverse underexplored ecosystem. For. Ecol. Manag. 474, 118328 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Muleta, D., Woyessa, D. & Teferi, Y. Mushroom consumption habits of Wacha Kebele residents, southwestern Ethiopia. Glob. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 4, 6–16 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Dejene, T., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A. & Martín-Pinto, P. Edible wild mushrooms of Ethiopia: Neglected non-timber forest products. Rev. Fitotec. Mex. 40, 391–397 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Tedersoo, L. et al. Disentangling global soil fungal diversity. Science (80-) 346, 1052–1053 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Dejene, T., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A. & Martín-Pinto, P. Fungal community succession and sporocarp production following fire occurrence in Dry Afromontane forests of Ethiopia. For. Ecol. Manag. 398 (2017).Dang, P. et al. Changes in soil fungal communities and vegetation following afforestation with Pinus tabulaeformis on the Loess Plateau. Ecosphere 9 (2018).Gilbert, G. S., Ferrer, A. & Carranza, J. Polypore fungal diversity and host density in a moist tropical forest. Biodivers. Conserv. 11, 947–957 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Kottke, I., Beck, A., Oberwinkler, F., Homeier, J. & Neill, D. Arbuscular endomycorrhizas are dominant in the organic soil of a neotropical montane cloud forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 20, 125–129 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Barnes, C. J., Van der Gast, C. J., Burns, C. A., McNamara, N. P. & Bending, G. D. Temporally variable geographical distance effects contribute to the assembly of root-associated fungal communities. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1–13 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Tian, J. et al. Environmental factors driving fungal distribution in freshwater lake sediments across the Headwater Region of the Yellow River, China. Sci. Rep. 8, 4–11 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Rosales-Castillo, J. et al. Fungal community and ligninolytic enzyme activities in Quercus deserticola Trel. litter from forest fragments with increasing levels of disturbance. Forests 9, 11 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Kuhar, F., Barroetaveña, C. & Rajchenberg, M. New species of Tomentella (Thelephorales) from the Patagonian Andes forests. Mycologia 108, 780–790 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Alem, D., Dejene, T., Oria-de-Rueda, J. A., Geml, J. & Martín-Pinto, P. Soil fungal communities under Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham. Plantation forests of different ages in Ethiopia. Forests 11, 1109 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Tedersoo, L. et al. Terrestrial and lignicolous macrofungi. ISME J. 10, 1228–1239 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Ruiz, R., Decock, C., Saikawa, M., Gene, J. & Guarro, J. Polyschema obclaviformis sp. Nov., and some new records of hyphomycetes from Cuba. Cryptogam. Mycol. 21, 215–220 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Kaygusuz, O. New locality records of Trichoglossum hirsutum (Geoglossales: Geoglossaceae) based on molecular analyses, and prediction of its potential distribution in Turkey. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 10, 443–456 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Mayer, P. M. Ecosystem and decomposer effects on litter dynamics along an old field to old-growth forest successional gradient. Acta Oecol. 33, 222–230 (2008).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Krishna, M. P. & Mohan, M. Litter decomposition in forest ecosystems: A review. Energy Ecol. Environ. 2, 236–249 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Kirschbaum, M. U. F. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition, and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 753–760 (1995).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mayer, P. M., Tunnell, S. J., Engle, D. M., Jorgensen, E. E. & Nunn, P. Invasive grass alters litter decomposition by influencing macrodetritivores. Ecosystems 8, 200–209 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Epstein, H. E., Burke, I. C. & Lauenroth, W. K. Regional patterns of decomposition and primary production rates in the U.S. great plains. Ecology 83, 320 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Sharon, R., Degani, G. & Warburg, M. Comparing the soil macro-fauna in two oak-wood forests: Does community structure differ under similar ambient conditions?. Pedobiologia (Jena). 45, 355–366 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Clocchiatti, A., Hannula, S. E., van den Berg, M., Korthals, G. & de Boer, W. The hidden potential of saprotrophic fungi in arable soil: Patterns of short-term stimulation by organic amendments. Appl. Soil Ecol. 147, 103434 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Drenovsky, R., Vo, D., Graham, K. & Scow, K. Soil water content and organic carbon availability are major determinants of soil microbial community composition. Microb. Ecol. 48, 424–430 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lauber, C., Hamady, M., Knigh, R. & Fierer, N. Pyrosequencing based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 5111–5120 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ullah, S. et al. The response of soil fungal diversity and community composition to long-term fertilization. Appl. Soil Ecol. 140, 35–41 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Bååth, E. & Anderson, T.-H. Comparison of soil fungal/bacterial ratios in a pH gradient using physiological and PLFA-based techniques. Soil Biol. Biochem. 35, 955–963 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, T., Wang, N.-F., Liu, H.-Y., Zhang, Y.-Q. & Yu, L.-Y. Soil pH is a key determinant of soil fungal community composition in the Ny-Ålesund Region, Svalbard (high arctic). Front. Microbiol. 7 (2016).Tian, D. et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition on soil microbial communities in temperate and subtropical forests in China. Sci. Total Environ. 607–608, 1367–1375 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Zhao, A. et al. Influences of canopy nitrogen and water addition on am fungal biodiversity and community composition in a mixed deciduous forest of China. Front. Plant Sci. 9 (2018).He, J. et al. Greater diversity of soil fungal communities and distinguishable seasonal variation in temperate deciduous forests compared with subtropical evergreen forests of eastern China. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 93, 1–12 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Shi, L. et al. Variation in forest soil fungal diversity along a latitudinal gradient. Fungal Divers. 64, 305–315 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Gebeyehu, G., Soromessa, T., Bekele, T. & Teketay, D. Plant diversity and communities along environmental, harvesting and grazing gradients in dry afromontane forests of Awi Zone, northwestern Ethiopia. Taiwania 64, 307–320 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Zegeye, H., Teketay, D. & Kelbessa, E. Diversity and regeneration status of woody species in Tara Gedam and Abebaye forests, northwestern Ethiopia. J. For. Res. 22, 315–328 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Abere, F., Belete, Y., Kefalew, A. & Soromessa, T. Carbon stock of Banja forest in Banja district, Amhara region, Ethiopia: An implication for climate change mitigation. J. Sustain. For. 36, 604–622 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Masresha, G., Soromessa, T. & Kelbessa, E. Status and species diversity of Alemsaga Forest, Northwestern Ethiopia 14 (2015).Rudolph, S., Maciá-Vicente, J. G., Lotz-Winter, H., Schleuning, M. & Piepenbring, M. Temporal variation of fungal diversity in a mosaic landscape in Germany. Stud. Mycol. 89, 95–104 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
De la Varga, H., Águeda, B., Martínez-Peña, F., Parladé, J. & Pera, J. Quantification of extraradical soil mycelium and ectomycorrhizas of Boletus edulis in a Scots pine forest with variable sporocarp productivity. Mycorrhiza 22, 59–68 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Voříšková, J. & Baldrian, P. Fungal community on decomposing leaf litter undergoes rapid successional changes. ISME J. 7, 477–486 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Reeuwijk, L. Procedures for Soil Analysis (International Soil Reference and Information Centre, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. An examination of the digestion method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 34, 29–38 (1934).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Kim, J., Kreller, C. R. & Greenberg, M. M. Preparation and analysis of oligonucleotides containing the C4’-oxidized abasic site and related mechanistic probes. J. Org. Chem. 70, 8122–8129 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kim, H. T. Soil sampling, preparation and analysis. 139–145 (1996).Bouyoucos, G. H. A reclamation of the hydrometer for making mechanical analysis. Soil. Agro. J. 43, 434–438 (1951).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Ihrmark, K., Bödeker, I. & Cruz-Martinez, K. New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region—evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 82, 666–677 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
White, T. ., Bruns, S., Lee, S. & Taylor, J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (eds. Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J. & White, T. J.) 315–322 (Academic Press, 1990).Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.journal 17, 10 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kõljalg, U. et al. Towards a unified paradigm for sequence-based identification of fungi. Mol. Ecol. 22, 5271–5277 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Põlme, S. et al. FungalTraits: a user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles. Fungal Divers. 105 (2020).Hedberg, I. & Edwards, S. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritria (1989).Collins, C. G., Stajich, J. E., Weber, S. E., Pombubpa, N. & Diez, J. M. Shrub range expansion alters diversity and distribution of soil fungal communities across an alpine elevation gradient. Mol. Ecol. 27, 2461–2476 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Schön, M. E., Nieselt, K. & Garnica, S. Belowground fungal community diversity and composition associated with Norway spruce along an altitudinal gradient. PLoS ONE 13, e0208493 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Castaño, C. et al. Changes in fungal diversity and composition along a chronosequence of Eucalyptus grandis plantations in Ethiopia. Fungal Ecol. 39, 328–335 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, 1949).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Kent, M. & Coker, P. Vegetation Description and Analysis: A Practical Approach (Belhaven Press, 1993).
Google Scholar 
Magurran, A. E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement (Princeton University Press, 1988).
Google Scholar 
Jost, L., Chao, A. & Chazdon, R. Compositional similarity and β (beta) diversity. in Biological Diversity. Frontiers in Measurement and Assessment (eds. A.E., Magurran & B.J., M.) 66–84 (Oxford University Press, 2011).Kindt, R. & Coe, R. Tree diversity analysis. A manual and software for common statistical methods for ecological and biodiversity studies. (World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), 2005).R Core Team. A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020).Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & Team, R. C. Nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R Package Version 3.1-128. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (2016).Tóthmérész, B. Comparison of different methods for diversity ordering. J. Veg. Sci. 6, 283–290 (1995).
Google Scholar 
Clarke, K. R., Gorley, R. N., Somerfield, P. J. & Warwick, R. M. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. (PRIMER-E, Plymouth, 2014).Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 9 (2001).
Google Scholar  More

Of which at the third instar, the external morphology of larvae is quite similar; thus, the morphological identification used to differentiate between its genera or species, generally includes cephalophalyngeal skeleton, anterior spiracle, and posterior spiracles. The morphology of the posterior spiracle is one of the important characteristics for identification. A typical morphology of the posterior spiracle of third stage larvae was shown in Fig. 2. Based on studying under light microscopy, the posterior spiracle of M. domestica was clearly distinguished from the others. On the other hand, the morphology of the posterior spiracle of C. megacephala and A. rufifacies was quite similar. For C. megacephala and C. rufifacies, the peritreme, a structure encircling the three spiracular openings (slits), was incomplete and slits were straight as shown Fig. 2A,B, respectively. The complete peritreme encircling three slits was found in L. cuprina and M. domestica as shown in Fig. 2C,D, respectively. However, only the slits of M. domestica were sinuous like the M-letter (Fig. 2D). Their morphological characteristics found in this study were like the descriptions in the previous reports23,24,25.Figure 2Morphology of posterior spiracles of four different fly species after inverting the image colors; (A) Chrysomya (Achoetandrus) ruffifacies, (B) Chrysomya megacephala, (C) Lucilia cuprina, (D) Musca domestica.Full size imageFor model training, four of the CNN models used for species-level identification of fly maggots provided 100% accuracy rates and 0% loss. Number of parameter (#Params), model speed, model size, macro precision, macro recall, f1-score, and support value were also presented in Table 1. The result demonstrated that the AlexNet model provided the best performance in all indicators when compared among four models. The AlexNet model used the least number of parameters while the Resnet101 model used the most. For model speed, the AlexNet model provided the fastest speed, while the Densenet161 model provided the slowest speed. For the model size, the AlexNet model was the smallest, while the Resnet101 model was the largest which corresponded to the number of parameters used. Macro precision, macro recall, f1-score and support value of all models were the same.Table 1 Comparison of model size, speed, and performances of each studied model (The text in bold indicates the best value in each category).Full size tableAs the training results presented in the supplementary data (Fig. S1), all models provided 100% accuracy and 0% loss in the early stage of training ( More

Hill, L. et al. The£ 15 billion cost of ash dieback in Britain. Curr. Biol. 29(9), R315–R316 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pliûra, A. & Heuertz, M. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for Genetic Conservation and Use for Common Ash (Fraxinus excelsior) (Bioversity International, 2003).
Google Scholar 
Dufour, S. & Piégay, H. Geomorphological controls of Fraxinus excelsior growth and regeneration in floodplain forests. Ecology 89(1), 205–215 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell, R. J. et al. Ash dieback in the UK: a review of the ecological and conservation implications and potential management options. Biol. Conserv. 175, 95–109 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Przybył, K. Fungi associated with necrotic apical parts of Fraxinus excelsior shoots. For. Pathol. 32(6), 387–394 (2002).
Google Scholar 
Vasaitis, R., & Enderle, R. Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.)-consequences and guidelines for sustainable management. Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.). Report on COST Action FP1103 FRAXBACK. ISBN978-91-576-8696-1. (SLU Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2017).Børja, I. et al. Ash dieback in Norway-current situation. In Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management (eds Vasaitis, R. & Enderle, R.) 166–175 (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Ghelardini, L. et al. From the Alps to the Apennines: Possible spread of ash dieback in Mediterranean areas. In Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management (eds Vasaitis, R. & Enderle, R.) 140–149 (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Marçais, B., Husson, C., Godart, L. & Cael, O. Influence of site and stand factors on Hymenoscyphus fraxineus-induced basal lesions. Plant. Pathol. 65(9), 1452–1461 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Queloz, V., Hopf, S., Schoebel, C. N., Rigling, D. & Gross, A. Ash dieback in Switzerland: History and scientific achievements. In Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management (eds Vasaitis, R. & Enderle, R.) 68–78 (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Orton, E. S. et al. Population structure of the ash dieback pathogen, Hymenoscyphus fraxineus, in relation to its mode of arrival in the UK. Plant. Pathol. 67(2), 255–264 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Enderle, R., Stenlid, J. & Vasaitis, R. An overview of ash (Fraxinus spp.) and the ash dieback disease in Europe. CAB Rev. 14, 1–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Heinze, B., Tiefenbacher, H., Litschauer, R. & Kirisits, T. Ash dieback in Austria: History, current situation and outlook. in Dieback of European Ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management, 33–52 (2017).Coker, T. L. et al. Estimating mortality rates of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior) under the ash dieback (Hymenoscyphus fraxineus) epidemic. Plants People Planet 1(1), 48–58 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Cleary, M., Nguyen, D., Stener, L. G., Stenlid, J., & Skovsgaard, J. P. Ash and ash dieback in Sweden: A review of disease history, current status, pathogen and host dynamics, host tolerance and management options in forests and landscapes. Dieback of European Ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management, 195–208 (2017).Stocks, J. J., Buggs, R. J. & Lee, S. J. A first assessment of Fraxinus excelsior (common ash) susceptibility to Hymenoscyphus fraxineus (ash dieback) throughout the British Isles. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–7 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Díaz-Yáñez, O. et al. The invasive forest pathogen Hymenoscyphus fraxineus boosts mortality and triggers niche replacement of European ash (Fraxinus excelsior). Sci. Rep. 10(1), 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Enderle, R., Metzler, B., Riemer, U. & Kändler, G. Ash dieback on sample points of the national forest inventory in south-western Germany. Forests 9(1), 25 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Klesse, S. et al. Spread and severity of ash dieback in Switzerland: Tree characteristics and landscape features explain varying mortality probability. Front. For. Glob. Change 4, 18 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Timmermann, V., Potočić, N., Ognjenović, M. & Kirchner, T. Tree crown condition in 2020. In Forest Condition in Europe: The 2021 Assessment ICP Forests Technical Report under the UNECE Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution (Air Convention) (eds Michel, A. et al.) (Thünen Institute, 2021).
Google Scholar 
Chumanová, E. et al. Predicting ash dieback severity and environmental suitability for the disease in forest stands. Scand. J. For. Res. 34(4), 254–266 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Solheim, H. & Hietala, A. M. Spread of ash dieback in Norway. Balt. For. 23(1), 1–6 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Kjær, E. D. et al. Genetics of ash dieback resistance in a restoration context: Experiences from Denmark. In Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management (eds Vasaitis, R. & Enderle, R.) 106–114 (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Madsen, C. L. et al. Combined progress in symptoms caused by Hymenoscyphus fraxineus and Armillaria species, and corresponding mortality in young and old ash trees. For. Ecol. Manage. 491, 119177 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Trapiello, E., Schoebel, C. N. & Rigling, D. Fungal community in symptomatic ash leaves in Spain. Balt. For. 23(1), 68–73 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Grosdidier, M., Ioos, R. & Marçais, B. Do higher summer temperatures restrict the dissemination of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus in France?. For. Pathol. 48(4), e12426. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12426 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stroheker, S., Queloz, V. & Nemesio-Gorriz, M. First report of Hymenoscyphus fraxineus causing ash dieback in Spain. New Dis. Rep. 44(2), e12054 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Chandelier, A., Gerarts, F., San Martin, G., Herman, M. & Delahaye, L. Temporal evolution of collar lesions associated with ash dieback and the occurrence of Armillaria in Belgian forests. For. Pathol. 46(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12258 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gross, A., Holdenrieder, O., Pautasso, M., Queloz, V. & Sieber, T. N. H ymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus, the causal agent of E uropean ash dieback. Mol. Plant Pathol. 15(1), 5–21 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Clark, J. & Webber, J. The ash resource and the response to ash dieback in Great Britain. In Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management (eds Vasaitis, R. & Enderle, R.) 228–237 (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Dandy, N., Marzano, M., Porth, E. F., Urquhart, J. & Potter, C. Who has a stake in ash dieback? A conceptual framework for the identification and categorisation of tree health stakeholders. In Dieback of European ash (Fraxinus spp.): Consequences and Guidelines for Sustainable Management (eds Vasaitis, R. & Enderle, R.) 15–26 (Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2017).
Google Scholar 
Kjær, E. D., McKinney, L. V., Nielsen, L. R., Hansen, L. N. & Hansen, J. K. Adaptive potential of ash (Fraxinus excelsior) populations against the novel emerging pathogen Hymenoscyphus pseudoalbidus. Evol. Appl. 5(3), 219–228 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Plumb, W. J. et al. The viability of a breeding programme for ash in the British Isles in the face of ash dieback. Plants People Planet 2(1), 29–40 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Evans, M. R. Will natural resistance result in populations of ash trees remaining in British woodlands after a century of ash dieback disease?. R. Soc. Open Sci. 6(8), 190908 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Buggs, R. J. A. Changing perceptions of tree resistance research. Plants People Planet 2, 2–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10089 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Tomlinson, I. & Potter, C. ‘Too little, too late’? Science, policy and Dutch Elm Disease in the UK. J. Hist. Geogr. 36(2), 121–131 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Kelly, L. J. et al. Convergent molecular evolution among ash species resistant to the emerald ash borer. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1116–1128. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1209-3 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sollars, E. S. et al. Genome sequence and genetic diversity of European ash trees. Nature 541(7636), 212–216 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stocks, J. J. et al. Genomic basis of European ash tree resistance to ash dieback fungus. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3(12), 1686–1696 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Volkovitsh, M. G., Bieńkowski, A. O. & Orlova-Bienkowskaja, M. J. Emerald ash borer approaches the borders of the european union and kazakhstan and is confirmed to infest European ash. Forests 12(6), 691 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Eichhorn, J. et al. Part IV: Visual Assessment of Crown Condition and Damaging Agents. in Manual on Methods and Criteria for Harmonized Sampling, Assessment, Monitoring and Analysis of the Effects of Air Pollution on Forests. (Thünen Institute of Forest Ecosystems, 2016). Annex http://www.icp-forests.org/manual.htm.Koontz, M. J., Latimer, A. M., Mortenson, L. A., Fettig, C. J. & North, M. P. Cross-scale interaction of host tree size and climatic water deficit governs bark beetle-induced tree mortality. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 1–13 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Taccoen, A. et al. Climate change impact on tree mortality differs with tree social status. For. Ecol. Manage. 489, 119048 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Therneau, T. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/survival/vignettes/survival.pdf. Accessed 26 May 2021Godaert, L. et al. Prognostic factors of inhospital death in elderly patients: A time-to-event analysis of a cohort study in Martinique (French West Indies). BMJ Open 8(1), e018838 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Sargeran, K., Murtomaa, H., Safavi, S. M. R., Vehkalahti, M. M. & Teronen, O. Survival after diagnosis of cancer of the oral cavity. Br. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 46(3), 187–191 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cox, D. R. Regression models and life-tables. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 34(2), 187–202 (1972).MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Aalen, O. O. A linear regression model for the analysis of life times. Stat. Med. 8(8), 907–925 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Therneau, T. M., & Grambsch, P. M. The cox model. In Modeling survival data: extending the Cox model, pp. 39–77. (Springer, 2000).Neumann, M., Mues, V., Moreno, A., Hasenauer, H. & Seidl, R. Climate variability drives recent tree mortality in Europe. Glob. Change Biol. 23(11), 4788–4797 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Senf, C., Buras, A., Zang, C. S., Rammig, A. & Seidl, R. Excess forest mortality is consistently linked to drought across Europe. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 1–8 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Haylock, M. R. et al. A European daily high-resolution gridded data set of surface temperature and precipitation for 1950–2006. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 113, D20 (2008).
Google Scholar 
R Development Core Team. RStudio, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Development Core Team, 2017).Holt, C. C. Forecasting Trends and Season-Als by Exponentially Weighted Averages. (Carnegie Institute of Technology, Pittsburgh ONR memorandum no. 52, 1957)Hyndman, R. J. & Khandakar, Y. Automatic time series forecasting: the forecast package for R. J. Stat. Softw. 27(3), 1–22 (2008).
Google Scholar  More

Kim, J. K., Choi, M. B. & Moon, T. Y. Occurrence of Vespa velutina Lepeletier from Korea, and a revised key for Korean Vespa species (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Entomol. Res. 36, 112–115 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Choi, M. B., Martin, S. J. & Lee, J. W. Distribution, spread, and impact of the invasive hornet Vespa velutina in South Korea. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 15, 473–477 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Do, Y. et al. Quantitative analysis of research topics and public concern on V. velutina as invasive species in Asian and European countries. Entomol. Res. 49, 456–461 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Kwon, O. & Choi, M. B. Interspecific hierarchies from aggressiveness and body size among the invasive alien hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax, and five native hornets in South Korea. PLoS ONE 15, e0226934 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Choi, M. B. Foraging behavior of an invasive alien hornet (Vespa velutina) at Apis mellifera hives in Korea: Foraging duration and success. Entomol. Res. 51, 143–148 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Turchi, L. & Derijard, B. Options for the biological and physical control of Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hym.: Vespidae) in Europe: A review. J. Appl. Entomol. 142, 553–562 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bessa, A. S., Carvalho, J., Gomes, A. & Santarém, F. Climate and land-use drivers of invasion: Predicting the expansion of Vespa velutina nigrithorax into the Iberian Peninsula. Insect Conserv. Divers. 9, 27–37 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Rodríguez-Flores, M. S., Seijo-Rodríguez, A., Escuredo, O. & del Carmen Seijo-Coello, M. Spreading of Vespa velutina in northwestern Spain: Influence of elevation and meteorological factors and effect of bait trapping on target and non-target living organisms. J. Pest Sci. 92, 557–565 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Robinet, C., Darrouzet, E. & Suppo, C. Spread modelling: A suitable tool to explore the role of human-mediated dispersal in the range expansion of the yellow-legged hornet in Europe. Int. J. Pest Manag. 65, 258–267 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Margules, C. R. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conserv. Biol. 5, 18–32 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Ellstrand, N. C. & Elam, D. R. Population genetic consequences of small population size: Implications for plant conservation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 24, 217–242 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Young, A., Boyle, T. & Brown, T. The population genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation for plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 413–418 (1996).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hughes, A. R. & Stachowicz, J. J. Genetic diversity enhances the resistance of a seagrass ecosystem to disturbance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 8998–9002 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Dudley, R. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution (Princeton University Press, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Porporato, M., Manino, A., Laurino, D. & Demichelis, D. Vespa velutina Lepeletier (Hymenoptera Vespidae): A first assessment 2 years after its arrival in Italy. Redia 97, 189–194 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Sauvard, D., Imbault, V. & Darrouzet, É. Flight capacities of yellow-legged hornet (Vespa velutina nigrithorax, Hymenoptera: Vespidae) workers from an invasive population in Europe. PLoS ONE 13, e0198597 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Monceau, K., Bonnard, O., Moreau, J. & Thiéry, D. Spatial distribution of Vespa velutina individuals hunting at domestic honeybee hives: Heterogeneity at a local scale. Insect Sci. 21, 765–774 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Choi, M. B., Lee, S. A., Suk, H. Y. & Lee, J. W. Microsatellite variation in colonizing populations of yellow-legged Asian hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax, South Korea. Entomol. Res. 43, 208–214 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Jeong, J. S. et al. Tracing the invasion characteristics of the yellow-legged hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), in Korea using newly detected variable mitochondrial DNA sequences. J. Asia-Pac. Entomol. 24(2), 135–147 (2021).MathSciNet 

Google Scholar 
Villemant, C. et al. Predicting the invasion risk by the alien bee-hawking Yellow-legged hornet Vespa velutina nigrithorax across Europe and other continents with niche models. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2142–2150 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Kishi, S. & Goka, K. Review of the invasive yellow-legged hornet, Vespa velutina nigrithorax (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), in Japan and its possible chemical control. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 52, 361–368 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Arca, M. et al. Development of microsatellite markers for the yellow-legged Asian hornet, Vespa velutina, a major threat for European bees. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 283–286 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Rousset, F. genepop’007: A complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol. Ecol. Res. 8, 103–106 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Peakall, P. & Smouse, R. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—An update. Bioinformatics 28, 2537 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 9 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Oksanen, J. et al. The vegan package. 10, 719 (2007).Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, S. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Earl, D. A. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Jombart, T., Devillard, S. & Balloux, F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: A new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 11, 94 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jombart, T. Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Waraniak, J. M., Fisher, J. D., Purcell, K., Mushet, D. M. & Stockwell, C. A. Landscape genetics reveal broad and fine-scale population structure due to landscape features and climate history in the northern leopard frog (Rana pipiens) in North Dakota. Ecol. Evol. 9, 1041–1060 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Rohlf, F. J. tpsDig, version 2.10. http://life.bio.sunysb.edu/morph/index.html (2006).Zimmermann, G. et al. Geometric morphometrics of carapace of Macrobrachium australe (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) from Reunion Island. Acta Zool. 93, 492–500 (2012).
Google Scholar  More

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript. More

Mikusiński, G., Roberge, J. M. & Fuller, R. J. Ecology and Conservation of Forest Birds (Cambridge University Press, 2018).Book 

Google Scholar 
Newton, I. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole-nesting birds: a review. Biol. Conserv. 70, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(94)90172-4 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korpimäki, E. & Hakkarainen, H. The Boreal Owl: Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation of a Forest-Dwelling Predator (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Book 

Google Scholar 
Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N. & Bauer, K. M. Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 9. (Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, 1980).Newton, I. Population Limitation in Birds (Academic press, 1998).
Google Scholar 
Moning, C. & Müller, J. Environmental key factors and their thresholds for the avifauna of temperate montane forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 256, 1198–1208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.018 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Walankiewicz, W., Czeszczewik, D., Stański, T., Sahel, M. & Ruczyński, I. Tree cavity resources in spruce-pine managed and protected stands of the Białowieża Forest, Poland. Nat. Areas J. 34, 423–428. https://doi.org/10.3375/043.034.0404 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambrechts, M. M. et al. The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: a review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases. Acta Ornithol. 45, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.3161/000164510X516047 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lambrechts, M. M. et al. Nest box design for the study of diurnal raptors and owls is still an overlooked point in ecological, evolutionary and conservation studies: a review. J. Ornithol. 153, 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-011-0720-3 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Kubizňák, P., Šindelář, J. & Hlaváč, V. Smart nest box: a tool and methodology for monitoring of cavity-dwelling animals. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 483–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12509 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kubizňák, P. et al. Designing network-connected systems for ecological research and education. Ecosphere 10(6), e02761. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.2761 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mänd, R., Tilgar, V., Lõhmus, A. & Leivits, A. Providing nest boxes for hole-nesting birds—Does habitat matter?. Biodivers. Conserv. 14, 1823–1840. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-004-1039-7 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
König, C. & Weick, F. Owls of the World 2nd ed. (Christopher Helm, 2008).
Google Scholar 
Morelli, F., Benedetti, Y., Møller, A. P. & Fuller, R. A. Measuring avian specialization. Ecol. Evol. 9, 8378–8386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5419 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ševčík, R., Riegert, J., Šťastný, K., Zárybnický, J. & Zárybnická, M. The effect of environmental variables on owl distribution in Central Europe: A case study from the Czech Republic. Ecol. Inform. 64, 101375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101375 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Brambilla, M. et al. Species interactions and climate change: How the disruption of species co-occurrence will impact on an avian forest guild. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 1212–1224. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14953 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hayward, G. D., Hayward, P. H. & Garton, E. O. Ecology of boreal owl in the northern Rocky-Mountains, USA. Wildl. Monogr. 124, 3–59 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J. & Šťastný, K. The role of Apodemus mice and Microtus voles in the diet of the Tengmalm’s owl in Central Europe. Popul. Ecol. 55, 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-013-0367-4 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Sedláček, O., Salo, P., Šťastný, K. & Korpimäki, E. Reproductive responses of temperate and boreal Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus populations to spatial and temporal variation in prey availability. Ibis 157, 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12244 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mossop, D. H. The importance of old growth refugia in the Yukon boreal forest to cavity-nesting owls in Biology and Conservation of Owls of the Northern Hemisphere (eds. Duncan, J. R., Johnson, D. H. & Nicholls, T. H.) 584–586 (Forest Service General Technical Report GTR-NC-190, 1997).Domahidi, Z., Nielsen, S., Bayne, E. & Spence, J. Boreal owl (Aegolius funereus) and northern saw-whet owl (Aegolius acadicus) breeding records in managed boreal forests. Can. Field-Nat. 134, 125–131. https://doi.org/10.22621/cfn.v134i2.2146 (2020).Whitman, J. S. Diets of nesting boreal owls, Aegolius funereus, in western interior Alaska. Can. Field-Nat. 115, 476–479 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Whitman, J. S. Post-fledging estimation of annual productivity in boreal owls based on prey detritus mass. J. Raptor Res. 42, 58–60. https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-06-88.1 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, A. G. Wildfire impacts on nest provisioning and survival of Alaskan boreal owls. Master thesis, Miami University, Ohio (2017).Hayward, G. D., Steinhorst, R. K. & Hayward, P. H. Monitoring boreal owl populations with nest boxes: sample size and cost. J. Wildl. Manage. 56, 777–785. https://doi.org/10.2307/3809473 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koopman, M. E., McDonald, D. B. & Hayward, G. D. Microsatellite analysis reveals genetic monogamy among female boreal owls. J. Raptor Res. 41, 314–318. https://doi.org/10.3356/0892-1016(2007)41[314:MARGMA]2.0.CO;2 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fang, Y., Tang, S.-H., Gu, Y. & Sun, Y.-H. Conservation of Tengmalm’s owl and Sichuan wood owl in Lianhuashan Mountain, Gansu, China. Ardea 97, 649–649. https://doi.org/10.5253/078.097.0437 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Löfgren, O., Hörnfeldt, B. & Carlsson, B. Site tenacity and nomadism in Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus (L.)) in relation to cyclic food production. Oecologia 69, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377051 (1986).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hörnfeldt, B. & Nyholm, N. E. I. Breeding performance of Tengmalm’s owl in a heavy metal pollution gradient. J. Appl. Ecol. 33, 377–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2404759 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hipkiss, T., Hörnfeldt, B., Eklund, U. & Berlin, S. Year-dependent sex-biased mortality in supplementary-fed Tengmalm’s owl nestlings. J. Anim. Ecol. 71, 693–699. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2002.t01-1-00635.x (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hipkiss, T., Gustafsson, J., Eklund, U. & Hörnfeldt, B. Is the long-term decline of boreal owls in Sweden caused by avoidance of old boxes?. J. Raptor Res. 47, 15–20. https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-11-91.1 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korpimäki, E. Selection for nest-hole shift and tactics of breeding dispersal in Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus. J. Anim. Ecol. 56, 185–196. https://doi.org/10.2307/4808 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Drdáková-Zárybnická, M. Breeding biology of the Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) in air-pollution damaged areas of the Krušné hory Mts. Sylvia 39, 35–51 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J., Kloubec, B. & Obuch, J. The effect of elevation and habitat cover on nest box occupancy and diet composition of boreal owls Aegolius funereus. Bird Study 64, 222–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2017.1316236 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Kloubec, B., Obuch, J. & Riegert, J. Fledgling productivity in relation to diet composition of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus in Central Europe. Ardeola 62, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.13157/arla.62.1.2015.163 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kloubec, B. Breeding of Tengmalm’s owls (Aegolius funereus) in nest-boxes in Šumava Mts.: a summary from the years 1978–2002. Buteo 13, 75–86 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Flousek, J. Ochrana sov v Krkonošském národním parku in Sovy 1986 (eds. Sitko, J. & Trpák, P.) 33–34 (Státní ústav památkové péče a ochrany přírody, Přerov, 1988).Ravussin, P.-A. et al. Quel avenir pour la Chouette de Tengmalm Aegolius funereus dans le massif du Jura? Bilan de trente années de suivi. Nos Oiseaux 62, 5–28 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Schelper, W. Zur Brutbiologie, Ernährung und Populationsdynamik des Rauhfusskauzes Aegolius funereus im Kaufunger Wald (Südniedersachsen). Vogelkundliche Berichte aus Niedersachsen 21, 33–53 (1989).
Google Scholar 
Schwerdtfeger, O. The dispersion dynamics of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus in Central Europe in Raptor Conservation Today (eds. Meyburg, B. U. & Chancellor, R. C.) 543–550 (World Working Group on Birds of Prey and Pica Press, 1994).Hunke, W. Versuch eine Population des Raufußkauzes Aegolius funereus durch Anbringen von Nistkästen in den Jahren 1980 bis 2010 zu fördern. Charadrius 47, 93–101 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Mezzavilla, F. & Lombardo, S. Indagini sulla biologia riproduttiva della civetta capogrosso Aegolius funereus: anni 1987–2012 in Atti Secondo Convegno Italiano Rapaci Diurni e Notturni Vol. 3 (eds. Mezzavilla, F. & Scarton, F.) 261–270 (Associazione Faunisti Veneti, Quaderni Faunistici, 2013).Rajković, D. Diet composition and prey diversity of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus (Linnaeus, 1758; Aves: Strigidae) in central Serbia during breeding. Turk. J. Zool. 42, 346–351. https://doi.org/10.3906/zoo-1709-28 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J. & Šťastný, K. Non-native spruce plantations represent a suitable habitat for Tengmalm’s owl (Aegolius funereus) in the Czech Republic, Central Europe. J. Ornithol. 156, 457–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-014-1145-6 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kopáček, J. & Veselý, J. Sulfur and nitrogen emissions in the Czech Republic and Slovakia from 1850 till 2000. Atmos. Environ. 39, 2179–2188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.01.002 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kloubec, B., Hora, J. & Šťastný, K. (eds.). Ptáci jižních Čech (Jihočeský kraj, 2015).Ševčík, R., Riegert, J., Šindelář, J. & Zárybnická, M. Vocal activity of the Central European boreal owl population in relation to varying environmental conditions. Ornis Fenn. 96, 1–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Savický, J. AM Services – Play Spectrogram Screens v. 4v7 (Czech Republic, 2009).Korpimäki, E. Diet of breeding Tengmalm’s owls Aegolius funereus: long-term changes and year-to-year variation under cyclic food conditions. Ornis Fenn. 65, 21–30 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Kouba, M. et al. Home range size of Tengmalm’s owl during breeding in Central Europe is determined by prey abundance. PLoS ONE 12, e0177314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177314 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Sedláček, O. & Korpimäki, E. Do Tengmalm’s owls alter parental feeding effort under varying conditions of main prey availability?. J. Ornithol. 150, 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-008-0342-6 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2020).ter Braak, C. & Šmilauer, P. Canoco Reference Manual and User’s Guide: Software for Ordination, version 5.10. (Microcomputer Power, 2018).Kosiński, Z. & Kempa, M. Density, distribution and nest-sites of woodpeckers Picidae, in a managed forest of Western Poland. Pol. J. Ecol. 55, 519–533 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Miller, K. E. Nest-site limitation of secondary cavity-nesting birds in even-age southern pine forests. Wilson J. Ornithol. 122, 126–134. https://doi.org/10.1676/07-130.1 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonerud, G. A. Nest hole shift in Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus as defence against nest predation involving long-term memory in the predator. J. Anim. Ecol. 54, 179–192. https://doi.org/10.2307/4629 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonerud, G. A. Reduced predation by pine martens on nests of Tengmalm’s owl in relocated boxes. Anim. Behav. 37, 332–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90122-X (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonerud, G. A. Win – and stay, but not too long: cavity selection by boreal owls to minimize nest predation by pine marten. J. Ornithol. 162, 839–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-021-01876-y (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Korpimäki, E. Does nest-hole quality, poor breeding success or food depletion drive the breeding dispersal of Tengmalm’s owls?. J. Anim. Ecol. 62, 606–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/5382 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hruška, F. The boreal owl (Aegolius funereus) – breeding distribution, numbers, ringing results and notes on the breeding biology and feeding ecology of this species in the central part of the Jihlavské vrchy Hills. Crex 38, 112–150 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Broughton, R. et al. Nest-site competition between bumblebees (Bombidae), social wasps (Vespidae) and cavity-nesting birds in Britain and the Western Palearctic. Bird Study 62, 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2015.1046811 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pawlikowski, T. & Pawlikowski, K. Nesting interactions of the social wasp Dolichovespula saxonica [F.] (Hymenoptera: Vespinae) in wooden nest boxes for birds in the forest reserve „Las Piwnicki” in the Chełmno Land (Northern Poland). Ecol. Quest. 13, 67–72. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10090-010-0017-9 (2010).Langowska, A., Ekner-Grzyb, A., Skórka, P., Tobółka, M. & Tryjanowski, P. Nest-site tenacity and dispersal patterns of Vespa crabro colonies located in bird nest-boxes. Sociobiology 56, 375–382 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Meyer, W. Mit welchem Erfolg nutzt der Rauhfusskauz Aegolius funereus (L.) Natruhölen und Nistkästen zur Brut. Vogelwelt 124, 325–331 (2003).
Google Scholar 
López, B. C. et al. Nest-box use by boreal owls (Aegolius funereus) in the Pyrenees Mountains in Spain. J. Raptor Res. 44, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.3356/JRR-09-32.1 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M., Riegert, J. & Kouba, M. Indirect food web interactions affect predation of Tengmalm’s owls Aegolius funereus nests by pine martens Martes martes according to the alternative prey hypothesis. Ibis 157, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1111/ibi.12265 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zárybnická, M. & Vojar, J. Effect of male provisioning on the parental behavior of female boreal owls Aegolius funereus. Zool. Stud. 52, 36. https://doi.org/10.1186/1810-522X-52-36 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Llambías, P. & Fernandez, G. Effects of nestboxes on the breeding biology of southern house wrens Troglodytes aedon bonariae in the southern temperate zone. Ibis 151, 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2008.00868.x (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vrezec, A. Breeding density and altitudinal distribution of the Ural, tawny, and boreal owls in North Dinaric Alps (Central Slovenia). J. Raptor Res. 37, 55–62 (2003).
Google Scholar  More