Ecology

1.Ramganesh, S., Timothy, S., Sudharshan, S. & Willem, A. J. N. Industrial effluents harbor a unique diversity of fungal community structures as revealed by high-throughput sequencing analysis. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 28(4), 2353–2362. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/90791 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Hailemariam, A. A. et al. Diversity, co-occurrence and implications of fungal communities in wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Rep. 9, 14056. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50624-z (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Maza-Márquez, P., Lee, M. D. & Bebout, B. M. The abundance and diversity of fungi in a hypersaline microbial mat from Guerrero Negro, Baja California, México. J. Fungi 7, 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7030210 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Ma, X., Baron, J. L., Vikram, A., Stout, J. E. & Bibby, K. Fungal diversity and presence of potentially pathogenic fungi in a hospital hot water system treated with on-site monochloramine. Water Res. 71, 197–206 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Wei, Z. et al. The divergence between fungal and bacterial communities in seasonal and spatial variations of wastewater treatment plants. Sci. Total Environ. 628, 969–978 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Ekowati, Y. et al. Clinically relevant fungi in water and on surfaces in an indoor swimming pool facility. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health. 220, 1152–1160 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Manoharachary, C., Kunwar, I. K. & Reddy, S. V. Biodiversity, phylogeny and evolution of fungi. In Nature at Work: Ongoing Saga of Evolution (ed. Sharma, V. P.) (Springer, New Delhi, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-8489-992-4_10.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
8.Raja, H. A., Miller, A. N., Pearce, C. J. & Oberlies, N. H. Fungal identification using molecular tools: A primer for the natural products research community. J. Nat. Prod. 80, 756–770. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b01085 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Liu, J., Li, J., Tao, Y., Sellamuthu, B. & Walsh, R. Analysis of bacterial, fungal and archaeal populations from a municipal wastewater treatment plant developing an innovative aerobic granular sludge process. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33, 14 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Simeos, M. F. et al. Soil and rhizosphere associated fungi in gray Mangroves (Avicennia marina) from the Red Sea—A metagenomic approach. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. 13, 310–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2015.07.002 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Helal, G. A., Mostafa, M. H. & El-Said, M. A. Fungi in the sewage-treatment Zeinein plant, Cairo, Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Mycol. 2(2011), 69–82 (2011).
Google Scholar 
12.Mishra, S. & Mishra, A. To study the diversity of fungal species in sewage water of Durg district. IOSR J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 1(6), 45–49 (2015).
Google Scholar 
13.Das, S., Dash, H. R., Mangwani, N., Chakraborty, J. & Kumari, S. Understanding molecular identification and polyphasic taxonomic approaches for genetic relatedness and phylogenetic relationships of microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Methods 103, 80–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.05.013 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
14.Yin, G., Zhang, Y., Pennerman, K. K., Wu, G. & Hua, S. S. T. Characterization of Blue Mold Penicillium Species isolated from stored fruits using multiple highly conserved loci. J. Fungi. 3, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof3010012 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Rajeshkumar, K. C., Yilmaz, N. & Marathe, S. D. Morphology and multigene phylogeny of Talaromyces amyrossmaniae, a new synnematous species belonging to the section Trachyspermi from India. Mycokeys 45, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.45.32549 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Adeniyi, M. et al. Molecular identification of some wild Nigerian mushrooms using internal transcribed spacer: Polymerase chain reaction. AMB Express 8, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0661-9 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Houbraken, J. & Samson, R. A. Phylogeny of Penicillium and the segregation of Trichocomaceae into three families. Stud. Mycol. 70, 1–51. https://doi.org/10.3114/sim.2011.70.01 (2011).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Visagie, C. M. et al. Studies in mycology. Stud. Mycol. 78, 343–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.09.001 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
19.Asan, A., Kolanlarli, T. K., Sen, B. & Okten, S. Biodiversity of Penicillium species isolated from Edirne Söğütlük Forest soil (Turkey ). Nisan 10, 26–39 (2019).
Google Scholar 
20.De Carvalho, M. J. A. et al. Functional and genetic characterization of calmodulin from the dimorphic and pathogenic fungus Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Fungal Genet. Biol. 39, 204–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1087-1845(03)00044-6 (2003).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
21.De Cassia Garcia Simao, R. & Gomes, S. L. Structure, expression, and functional analysis of the gene coding for calmodulin in the chytridiomycete Blastocladiella emersonii. J. Bacteriol. 183, 2280–2288. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.183.7.2280-2288.2001 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Gerber, A., Ito, K., Chu, C. N. & Roeder, R. G. Induced RPB1 depletion reveals a direct gene-specific control of RNA Polymerase III function by RNA Polymerase II. Mol. Cell 78, 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.03.023 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Malkus, A. et al. RNA polymerase II gene (RPB2) encoding the second largest protein subunit in Phaeosphaeria nodorum and P. avenaria. Mycol. Res. 110, 1152–1164 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Vetrovsky, T., Kolarik, M., Zifcakova, L., Zelenka, T. & Baldrian, P. The rpb2 gene represents a viable alternative molecular marker for the analysis of environmental fungal communities. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12456 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
25.Machido, D. A., Ezeonuegbu, B. A. & Yakubu, S. E. Resistance to some heavy metals among fungal flora of raw refinery effluent. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 18, 623–627. https://doi.org/10.4314/jasem.v18i4.10 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Ezeonuegbu, B. A., Machido, D. A. & Yakubu, S. E. Resistance of some heavy metals among fungal flora of raw refinery effluent. J. Appl. Sci. Environ. Manag. 18, 623–627 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
27.Barnett, H. L. & Hunter, B. B. Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi 4th edn. (Prentice Hall, 1999).
Google Scholar 
28.Hakeem, A. S. & Bhatnagar, B. Heavy metal reduction of pulp and paper mill effluent by indigenous microbes. Asian J. Exp. Biol. Sci. 1, 203–210 (2010).
Google Scholar 
29.Viegas, C., Sabino, R., Botelho, D., Santos, M. & Gomes, A. Q. Assessment of exposure to Penicillium glabrum complex in cork industry using complementing methods. Arch. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 66, 203–207. https://doi.org/10.1515/aiht-2015-66-2614 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Khandavilli, R., Meena, R. & Bd, S. Fungal phylogenetic diversity in estuarine sediments of Gautami. Curr. Res. Environ. Appl. Mycol. 6, 268–276. https://doi.org/10.5943/cream/6/4/4 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Houbraken, J., Frisvad, J. C. & Samson, R. A. Sex in penicillium series roqueforti. IMA Fungus 1, 171–180 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Goujon, M. et al. A new bioinformatics analysis tools framework at EMBL_EBI. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, W695–W699 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA 7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Sidiq, F., Hoostal, M. & Rogers, S. O. Rapid identification of fungi in culture – negative clinical blood and respiratory samples by DNA sequence analyses. BMC. Res. Notes 9, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2097-0 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Oyebanji, E. O., Adekunle, A. A., Coker, H. A. B. & Adebami, G. E. Mycotic loads’ determination of non-sterile pharmaceuticals in lagos state and 16s rdna identification of the fungal isolates. J. Appl. Pharm. Res. 6, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.18231/2348-0335.2018.0007 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Tiwari, P., Kumar, B., Kaur, G. & Kaur, H. Phytochemical screening and extraction: A review. Int. Pharm. Sci. 1, 98–106 (2011).
Google Scholar 
37.Ozdil, S., Asan, A., Sen, B. & Okten, S. Biodiversity of Airborne Fungi in the Indoor Environment of Refrigerators Used in Houses. J. Fungus. 8, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.15318/fungus.2017.41 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Ashtiani, N. M., Kachuei, R., Yalfani, R. & Harchegani, A. B. Identification of Aspergillus sections Flavi, Nigri, and Fumigati and their differentiation using specific primers. Infez. Med. 2, 127–132 (2017).
Google Scholar 
39.Eulalia, M. M., Agnieszka, F. & Zalewska, E. D. Aspergillus penicillioides Speg. Implicated in Keratomycosis. Pol. J. Microbiol. 67, 407–416 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Kamarudin, N. A. & Zakaria, L. Characterization of two xerophilic Aspergillus spp. from peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) Nur. Malays. J. Microbiol. 14, 41–48 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
41.Samson, R. A. et al. Phylogeny, identification and nomenclature of the genus Aspergillus. Stud. Mycol. 78, 141–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.004 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Wolski, E. A., Barrera, V., Castellari, C. & Gonzalez, J. F. Biodegradation of phenol in static cultures by Penicillium chrysogenum EK1: catalytic abilities and residual photo toxicity. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 44, 113–121 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

1.Rosenbloom, D. & Markard, J. A COVID-19 recovery for climate. Science 368, 447 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
2.European Commission. Towards an EU Research and Innovation policy agenda for nature-based solutions and renaturing cities. Final Report of the Horizon 2020 expert group on nature-based solutions and re-naturing cities, (European Commission, Brussels, 2015).3.Cohen-Shacham, E. et al. Core principles for successfully implementing and upscaling nature-based solutions. Environ. Sci. Policy 98, 20–29 (2019).
Google Scholar 
4.Seddon, N., Turner, B., Berry, P., Chausson, A. & Girardin, C. A. J. Grounding nature-based climate solutions in sound biodiversity science. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 84–87 (2019).
Google Scholar 
5.Keeler, B. L. et al. Social-ecological and technological factors moderate the value of urban nature. Nat. Sustain 2, 29–38 (2019).
Google Scholar 
6.Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y., Sanesi, G. & Lafortezza, R. Urban forests, ecosystem services, green infrastructure and nature-based solutions: Nexus or evolving metaphors? Urban For. Urban Greening 37, 3–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 
7.Pan, H., Page, J., Cong, C., Barthel, S. & Kalantari, Z. How ecosystems services drive urban growth: Integrating nature-based solutions. Anthropocene 35, 100297 (2021).
Google Scholar 
8.Keesstra, S. et al. The superior effect of nature based solutions in land management for enhancing ecosystem services. Sci. Total Environ. 610-611, 997–1009 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Hack, J. & Schröter, B. Nature-based solutions for river restoration in metropolitan areas. Brears, R. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Futures. 1–10 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2021).10.Lam, D. P. M. et al. Scaling the impact of sustainability initiatives: a typology of amplification processes. Urban Transform 2, 3 (2020).
Google Scholar 
11.Seddon, N. et al. Global recognition of the importance of nature-based solutions to the impacts of climate change. Glob. Sustain 3, e15 (2020).
Google Scholar 
12.Faivre, N., Fritz, M., Freitas, T., de Boissezon, B. & Vandewoestijne, S. Nature-based solutions in the EU: innovating with nature to address social, economic and environmental challenges. Environ. Res. 159, 509–518 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.Sabel, C. F. & Zeitlin, J. Experimentalist Governance. Levi-Faur, D. The Oxford Handbook of Governance. 169–183 (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2012).14.Kern, K. Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Environ. Polit. 28, 125–145 (2019).
Google Scholar 
15.Díaz, S. et al. Pervasive human-driven decline of life on Earth points to the need for transformative change. Science 366, eaax3100 (2019).
Google Scholar 
16.Chini, C. M., Canning, J. F., Schreiber, K. L., Peschel, J. M. & Stillwell, A. S. The green experiment: cities, green stormwater infrastructure, and sustainability. Sustainability 9 (2017).17.McPhearson, T. et al. Radical changes are needed for transformations to a good Anthropocene. npj Urban Sustain. 1, 5 (2021).
Google Scholar 
18.Scoones, I. et al. Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 42, 65–75 (2020).
Google Scholar 
19.Han, S. & Kuhlicke, C. Reducing hydro-meteorological risk by nature-based solutions: what do we know about people’s perceptions? Water 11, 2599 (2019).
Google Scholar 
20.Albert, C. et al. Planning nature-based solutions: principles, steps, and insights. Ambio, 1446–1461 (2020).21.Matthews, T., Lo, A. Y. & Byrne, J. A. Reconceptualizing green infrastructure for climate change adaptation: barriers to adoption and drivers for uptake by spatial planners. Landsc. Urban Planning 138, 155–163 (2015).
Google Scholar 
22.Myllyvirta, L. China’s CO2 emissions have surged back from the coronavirus lockdown, rising by 4-5% year-on-year in May, analysis of new government data shows. https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-chinas-co2-emissions-surged-past-pre-coronavirus-levels-in-may (2020).23.Samuelsson, K., Barthel, S., Colding, J., Macassa, G. & Giusti, M. Urban nature as a source of resilience during social distancing amidst the coronavirus pandemic. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/3wx5a (2020).24.Mahoney, J. Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory Soc. 29, 507–548 (2000).
Google Scholar 
25.Davies, C. & Lafortezza, R. Transitional path to the adoption of nature-based solutions. Land Use Policy 80, 406–409 (2019).
Google Scholar 
26.Kuzemko, C. et al. Covid-19 and the politics of sustainable energy transitions. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68, 101685 (2020).
Google Scholar 
27.Kanda, W. & Kivimaa, P. What opportunities could the COVID-19 outbreak offer for sustainability transitions research on electricity and mobility? Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 68, 101666 (2020).
Google Scholar 
28.Cohen, M. J. Does the COVID-19 outbreak mark the onset of a sustainable consumption transition? Sustain.: Sci. Pract. Policy 16, 1–3 (2020).
Google Scholar 
29.Pearson, R. M., Sievers, M., McClure, E. C., Turschwell, M. P. & Connolly, R. M. COVID-19 recovery can benefit biodiversity. Science 368, 838 (2020).
Google Scholar 
30.Everard, M., Johnston, P., Santillo, D. & Staddon, C. The role of ecosystems in mitigation and management of Covid-19 and other zoonoses. Environ. Sci. Policy 111, 7–17 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Kavousi, J., Goudarzi, F., Izadi, M. & Gardner, C. J. Conservation needs to evolve to survive in the post-pandemic world. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4651–4653 (2020).
Google Scholar 
32.Lal, R. Home gardening and urban agriculture for advancing food and nutritional security in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Food Sec., 1–6 (2020).33.Khetan, A. K. COVID-19: why declining biodiversity puts us at greater risk for emerging infectious diseases, and what we can do. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 35, 2746–2747 (2020).
Google Scholar 
34.Sugiyama, T. et al. Four Recommendations for Greener, Healthier Cities in the Post-Pandemic. https://www.thenatureofcities.com/2020/06/30/four-recommendations-for-greener-healthier-cities-in-the-post-pandemic/ (2020).35.Thorslund, J. et al. Wetlands as large-scale nature-based solutions: status and challenges for research, engineering and management. Ecol. Eng. 108, 489–497 (2017).
Google Scholar 
36.Albert, C. et al. Addressing societal challenges through nature-based solutions: how can landscape planning and governance research contribute? Landsc.Urban Plan. 182, 12–21 (2019).
Google Scholar 
37.Albert, C., Von Haaren, C., Othengrafen, F., Krätzig, S. & Saathoff, W. Scaling policy conflicts in ecosystem services governance: a framework for spatial. Analysis. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 19, 574–592 (2017).
Google Scholar 
38.Hutchins, M. G. et al. Why scale is vital to plan optimal nature-based solutions for resilient cities. Environ. Res. Lett. 16, 044008 (2021).
Google Scholar 
39.Raška, P., Slavíková, L. & Sheehan, J. in Nature-Based Flood Risk Management on Private Land: Disciplinary Perspectives on a Multidisciplinary Challenge 9–20 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).40.Frantzeskaki, N. et al. Nature-based solutions for urban climate change adaptation: linking science, policy, and practice communities for evidence-based decision-making. BioScience 69, 455–466 (2019).
Google Scholar 
41.Watkin, L. J., Ruangpan, L., Vojinovic, Z., Weesakul, S. & Torres, A. S. A framework for assessing benefits of implemented nature-based solutions. Sustainability 11, 6788 (2019).
Google Scholar 
42.Wurzel, R. K. W., Liefferink, D. & Torney, D. Pioneers, leaders and followers in multilevel and polycentric climate governance. Environ. Polit. 28, 1–21 (2019).
Google Scholar 
43.Frantzeskaki, N. et al. Examining the policy needs for implementing nature-based solutions in cities: findings from city-wide transdisciplinary experiences in Glasgow (UK), Genk (Belgium) and Poznań (Poland). Land Use Policy 96, 104688 (2020).
Google Scholar 
44.Zingraff-Hamed, A. et al. Governance models for nature-based solutions: cases from Germany. Ambio 50, 1610–1627 (2020).
Google Scholar 
45.Toxopeus, H. et al. How ‘just’ is hybrid governance of urban nature-based solutions? Cities 105, 102839 (2020).
Google Scholar 
46.Wamsler, C. et al. Environmental and climate policy integration: targeted strategies for overcoming barriers to nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. J. Clean. Prod. 247, 119154 (2020).
Google Scholar 
47.Pérez Rubi, M. & Hack, J. Co-design of experimental nature-based solutions for decentralized dry-weather runoff treatment retrofitted in a densely urbanized area in Central America. Ambio 50, 1498–1513 (2021).
Google Scholar 
48.Chapa, F., Pérez, M. & Hack, J. Experimenting transition to sustainable urban drainage systems—identifying constraints and unintended processes in a tropical highly urbanized. Watershed. Water 12, 3554 (2020).
Google Scholar 
49.Chen, V., Bonilla Brenes, J. R., Chapa, F. & Hack, J. Development and modelling of realistic retrofitted Nature-based Solution scenarios to reduce flood occurrence at the catchment scale. Ambio 50, 1462–1476 (2021).
Google Scholar 
50.Hüesker, F. & Moss, T. The politics of multi-scalar action in river basin management: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Land Use Policy 42, 38–47 (2015).
Google Scholar 
51.WBCSD. Incentives for Natural Infrastructure: review of existing policies, incentives and barriers related to permitting, finance and insurance of natural infrastructure. (World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva, 2017).52.Nesshöver, C. et al. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: an interdisciplinary perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 579, 1215–1227 (2017).
Google Scholar 
53.Toxopeus, H. S. Taking Action for Urban Nature: Business Model Catalogue, NATURVATION Guide (2019).54.Duraiappah, A. K. et al. Managing the mismatches to provide ecosystem services for human well-being: a conceptual framework for understanding the New Commons. Curr. Opin.Environ. Sustain 7, 94–100 (2014).
Google Scholar 
55.Young, O. R. Vertical interplay among scale-dependent environmental and resource regimes. Ecol. Soc. 11, 27 (2006).
Google Scholar 
56.Cumming, G. S., Cumming, D. H. M. & Redman, C. L. Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol. Soc. 11, 14 (2006).
Google Scholar 
57.Naidoo, R. & Fisher, B. Sustainable development goals: pandemic reset. Nature 583, 198–201 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Fyfe, J. C. et al. Quantifying the influence of short-term emission reductions on climate. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf7133 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
59.Linnér, B.-O. & Wibeck, V. Conceptualising variations in societal transformations towards sustainability. Environ. Sci.Pol. 106, 221–227 (2020).
Google Scholar 
60.Harrabin, R. Coronavirus: Lockdown ‘could boost wild flowers’. https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-52215273 (2020).61.Bratman, G. N. et al. Nature and mental health: an ecosystem service perspective. Sci. Adv. 5, eaax0903 (2019).
Google Scholar 
62.Honey-Rosés, J. et al. The impact of COVID-19 on public space: an early review of the emerging questions—design, perceptions and inequities. Cities & Health, 1-17(2020).63.Sanyé-Mengual, E., Anguelovski, I., Oliver-Solà, J., Montero, J. I. & Rieradevall, J. Resolving differing stakeholder perceptions of urban rooftop farming in Mediterranean cities: promoting food production as a driver for innovative forms of urban agriculture. Agric. Human Values 33, 101–120 (2016).
Google Scholar 
64.PIANC. Guide for applying Working with Nature to navigation infrastructure projects. (Brussels, Belgium, 2018).65.Rijke, J., van Herk, S., Zevenbergen, C. & Ashley, R. Room for the River: delivering integrated river basin management in the Netherlands. Int. J. River Basin Manage. 10, 369–382 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2012.739173.66.Li, H., Ding, L., Ren, M., Li, C. & Wang, H. Sponge City Construction in China: A Survey of the Challenges and Opportunities. Water (Australia) 9, 594 (2017).67.Kurth, A.-M. & Schirmer, M. Thirty years of river restoration in Switzerland: implemented measures and lessons learned. Environ. Earth Sci. 72, 2065–2079 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3115-y.68.Petty, K. Wildflowers on road verges: an uplifting sight during the coronavirus lockdown. (2020). https://www.plantlife.org.uk/uk/blog/wildflowers-on-road-verges-an-uplifting-sight-during-the-coronavirus-lockdown. More

1.Lefébure, R. et al. Impacts of elevated terrestrial nutrient loads and temperature on pelagic food-web efficiency and fish production. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 1358–1372 (2013).ADS 

Google Scholar 
2.Roussel, J.-M. et al. Stable isotope analyses on archived fish scales reveal the long-term effect of nitrogen loads on carbon cycling in rivers. Glob. Change Biol. 20, 523–530 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
3.Creed, I. F. et al. Global change-driven effects on dissolved organic matter composition: Implications for food webs of northern lakes. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 3692–3714 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
4.Screen, J. A. & Simmonds, I. The central role of diminishing sea ice in recent Arctic temperature amplification. Nature 464, 1334–1337 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Kumar, A., Yadav, J. & Mohan, R. Spatio-temporal change and variability of Barents-Kara sea ice, in the Arctic: Ocean and atmospheric implications. Sci. Total Environ. 753, 142046 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
6.Vincent, W. F., Laurion, I., Pienitz, R. & Walter Anthony, K. M. Climate Impacts on Arctic Lake Ecosystems. In Climatic Change and Global Warming of Inland Waters (eds Goldman, C. R. et al.) 27–42 (Wiley, 2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118470596.ch2.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
7.Kim, K.-Y. et al. Vertical feedback mechanism of winter Arctic amplification and sea ice loss. Sci. Rep. 9, 1184 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Shaver, G. R. & Chapin, F. S. Response to fertilization by various plant growth forms in an Alaskan tundra: Nutrient accumulation and growth. Ecology 61, 662–675 (1980).CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.Meunier, C. L., Gundale, M. J., Sánchez, I. S. & Liess, A. Impact of nitrogen deposition on forest and lake food webs in nitrogen-limited environments. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 164–179 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
10.Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Arctic climate impact assessment (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
Google Scholar 
11.Hay, W. W. The accelerating rate of global change. Rendiconti Lincei 25, 29–48 (2014).
Google Scholar 
12.Prowse, T. D. et al. Climate change effects on hydroecology of Arctic freshwater ecosystems. AMBIO J. Hum. Environ. 35, 347–358 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.Post, E. et al. Ecological dynamics across the Arctic associated with recent climate change. Science 325, 1355–1358 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
14.Ward, R. D. Carbon sequestration and storage in Norwegian Arctic coastal wetlands: Impacts of climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 748, 141343 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
15.Lin, J., Huang, J., Prell, C. & Bryan, B. A. Changes in supply and demand mediate the effects of land-use change on freshwater ecosystem services flows. Sci. Total Environ. 763, 143012 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
16.Bintanja, R. & Andry, O. Towards a rain-dominated Arctic. Nat. Clim. Change 7, 263–267 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
17.Box, J. E. et al. Key indicators of Arctic climate change: 1971–2017. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 045010 (2019).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
18.St. Pierre, K. A. et al. Contemporary limnology of the rapidly changing glacierized watershed of the world’s largest High Arctic lake. Sci. Rep. 9, 4447 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
19.Woelders, L. et al. Recent climate warming drives ecological change in a remote high-Arctic lake. Sci. Rep. 8, 6858 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Blaen, P. J., Milner, A. M., Hannah, D. M., Brittain, J. E. & Brown, L. E. Impact of changing hydrology on nutrient uptake in high Arctic rivers: Nutrient uptake in Arctic rivers. River Res. Appl. 30, 1073–1083 (2014).
Google Scholar 
21.Szkokan-Emilson, E. J. et al. Dry conditions disrupt terrestrial-aquatic linkages in northern catchments. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 117–126 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
22.Thackeray, S. J. et al. Food web de-synchronization in England’s largest lake: An assessment based on multiple phenological metrics. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 3568–3580 (2013).ADS 

Google Scholar 
23.Pacheco, J. P. et al. Small-sized omnivorous fish induce stronger effects on food webs than warming and eutrophication in experimental shallow lakes. Sci. Total Environ. 797, 148998 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
24.Kuijper, D. P. J., Ubels, R. & Loonen, M. J. J. E. Density-dependent switches in diet: A likely mechanism for negative feedbacks on goose population increase?. Polar Biol. 32, 1789–1803 (2009).
Google Scholar 
25.Sjögersten, S., van der Wal, R., Loonen, M. J. J. E. & Woodin, S. J. Recovery of ecosystem carbon fluxes and storage from herbivory. Biogeochemistry 106, 357–370 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Buij, R., Melman, T. C. P., Loonen, M. J. J. E. & Fox, A. D. Balancing ecosystem function, services and disservices resulting from expanding goose populations. Ambio 46, 301–318 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Nishizawa, K. et al. Long-term consequences of goose exclusion on nutrient cycles and plant communities in the high-Arctic. Polar Sci. 27, 100631 (2021).
Google Scholar 
28.Bjerke, J. W., Tombre, I. M., Hanssen, M. & Olsen, A. K. B. Springtime grazing by Arctic-breeding geese reduces first- and second-harvest yields on sub-Arctic agricultural grasslands. Sci. Total Environ. 793, 148619 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
29.Van Geest, G. J. et al. Goose-mediated nutrient enrichment and planktonic grazer control in Arctic freshwater ponds. Oecologia 153, 653–662 (2007).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
30.Calizza, E., Rossi, L. & Costantini, M. L. Predators and resources influence phosphorus transfer along an invertebrate food web through changes in prey behaviour. PLoS ONE 8, e65186 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Rossi, L., di Lascio, A., Carlino, P., Calizza, E. & Costantini, M. L. Predator and detritivore niche width helps to explain biocomplexity of experimental detritus-based food webs in four aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Ecol. Complex. 23, 14–24 (2015).
Google Scholar 
32.Caputi, S. S. et al. Seasonal food web dynamics in the Antarctic benthos of Tethys Bay (Ross Sea): Implications for biodiversity persistence under different seasonal sea-ice coverage. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 594454 (2020).
Google Scholar 
33.Careddu, G., Calizza, E., Costantini, M. L. & Rossi, L. Isotopic determination of the trophic ecology of a ubiquitous key species—The crab Liocarcinus depurator (Brachyura: Portunidae). Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 191, 106–114 (2017).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
34.Careddu, G. et al. Diet composition of the Italian crested newt (Triturus carnifex) in structurally different artificial ponds based on stomach contents and stable isotope analyses. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 30, 1505–1520 (2020).
Google Scholar 
35.Zhao, Q., De Laender, F. & Van den Brink, P. J. Community composition modifies direct and indirect effects of pesticides in freshwater food webs. Sci. Total Environ. 739, 139531 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
36.Rossi, L., Costantini, M. L., Carlino, P., di Lascio, A. & Rossi, D. Autochthonous and allochthonous plant contributions to coastal benthic detritus deposits: A dual-stable isotope study in a volcanic lake. Aquat. Sci. 72, 227–236 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
37.Rossi, L. et al. Antarctic food web architecture under varying dynamics of sea ice cover. Sci. Rep. 9, 12454 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Careddu, G. et al. Effects of terrestrial input on macrobenthic food webs of coastal sea are detected by stable isotope analysis in Gaeta Gulf. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 154, 158–168 (2015).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
39.Careddu, G. et al. Gaining insight into the assimilated diet of small bear populations by stable isotope analysis. Sci. Rep. 11, 14118 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.Blais, J. M. Arctic seabirds transport marine-derived contaminants. Science 309, 445–445 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
41.Bentivoglio, F. et al. Site-scale isotopic variations along a river course help localize drainage basin influence on river food webs. Hydrobiologia 770, 257–272 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
42.Rossi, L. et al. Space-time monitoring of coastal pollution in the Gulf of Gaeta, Italy, using δ15N values of Ulva lactuca, landscape hydromorphology, and Bayesian Kriging modelling. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 126, 479–487 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
43.Calizza, E. et al. Isotopic biomonitoring of N pollution in rivers embedded in complex human landscapes. Sci. Total Environ. 706, 136081 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
44.Post, D. M. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods, and assumptions. Ecology 83, 703–718 (2002).
Google Scholar 
45.Mansouri, F. et al. Evidence of multi-decadal behavior and ecosystem-level changes revealed by reconstructed lifetime stable isotope profiles of baleen whale earplugs. Sci. Total Environ. 757, 143985 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
46.Hawley, K. L., Rosten, C. M., Christensen, G. & Lucas, M. C. Fine-scale behavioural differences distinguish resource use by ecomorphs in a closed ecosystem. Sci. Rep. 6, 24369 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Michener, R. H. & Lajtha, K. Stable Isotopes in Ecology and Environmental Science (Blackwell Publication, 2007).
Google Scholar 
48.Cicala, D. et al. Spatial variation in the feeding strategies of Mediterranean fish: Flatfish and mullet in the Gulf of Gaeta (Italy). Aquat. Ecol. 53, 529–541 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
49.Calizza, E. et al. Stable isotopes and digital elevation models to study nutrient inputs in high-Arctic lakes. Rendiconti Lincei 27, 191–199 (2016).
Google Scholar 
50.Calizza, E., Careddu, G., Sporta Caputi, S., Rossi, L. & Costantini, M. L. Time- and depth-wise trophic niche shifts in Antarctic benthos. PLoS ONE 13, e0194796 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Mehlum, F. Svalbards fugler og pattedyr (Norsk polarinstitutt, 1989).
Google Scholar 
52.Christoffersen, K. Predation on Daphnia pulex by Lepidurus arcticus. Hydrobiologia 442, 223–229 (2001).
Google Scholar 
53.Lakka, H.-K. The ecology of a freshwater crustacean: Lepidurus arcticus (Brachiopoda; Notostraca) in a High Arctic region. Dissertation, University of Helsinky (2013).54.Westergaard-Nielsen, A. et al. Transitions in high-Arctic vegetation growth patterns and ecosystem productivity tracked with automated cameras from 2000 to 2013. Ambio 46, 39–52 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R. & Charnov, E. L. Optimal foraging: A selective review of theory and tests. Q. Rev. Biol. 52, 137–154 (1977).
Google Scholar 
56.Kondoh, M. & Ninomiya, K. Food-chain length and adaptive foraging. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 276, 3113–3121 (2009).
Google Scholar 
57.Calizza, E., Costantini, M. L., Rossi, D., Carlino, P. & Rossi, L. Effects of disturbance on an urban river food web: Disturbance of a river food web. Freshw. Biol. 57, 2613–2628 (2012).
Google Scholar 
58.McMeans, B. C., McCann, K. S., Humphries, M., Rooney, N. & Fisk, A. T. Food web structure in temporally-forced ecosystems. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 662–672 (2015).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
59.Pimm, S. L. & Lawton, J. H. Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature 268, 329–331 (1977).ADS 

Google Scholar 
60.Elser, J. J. et al. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 408, 578–580 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
61.Hall, S. R. Stoichiometrically explicit food webs: Feedbacks between resource supply, elemental constraints, and species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 503–528 (2009).
Google Scholar 
62.Hessen, D. O., Ågren, G. I., Anderson, T. R., Elser, J. J. & de Ruiter, P. C. Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: The role of stoichiometry. Ecology 85, 1179–1192 (2004).
Google Scholar 
63.Stow, D. A. et al. Remote sensing of vegetation and land-cover change in Arctic Tundra Ecosystems. Remote Sens. Environ. 89, 281–308 (2004).ADS 

Google Scholar 
64.Maher, A. I., Treitz, P. M. & Ferguson, M. A. D. Can Landsat data detect variations in snow cover within habitats of Arctic ungulates?. Wildl. Biol. 18, 75–87 (2012).
Google Scholar 
65.Raynolds, M. K., Walker, D. A., Verbyla, D. & Munger, C. A. Patterns of change within a tundra landscape: 22-year Landsat NDVI trends in an area of the Northern Foothills of the Brooks Range, Alaska. Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res. 45, 249–260 (2013).
Google Scholar 
66.Bokhorst, S. et al. Changing Arctic snow cover: A review of recent developments and assessment of future needs for observations, modelling, and impacts. Ambio 45, 516–537 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Härer, S., Bernhardt, M., Siebers, M. & Schulz, K. On the need for a time- and location-dependent estimation of the NDSI threshold value for reducing existing uncertainties in snow cover maps at different scales. Cryosphere 12, 1629–1642 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
68.Karlsen, S. R., Anderson, H. B., van der Wal, R. & Hansen, B. B. A new NDVI measure that overcomes data sparsity in cloud-covered regions predicts annual variation in ground-based estimates of high Arctic plant productivity. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 025011 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
69.Karlsen, S. R., et al. Sentinel satellite-based mapping of plant productivity in relation to snow duration and time of green-up. https://zenodo.org/record/4704361. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4704361 (2020).70.Beamish, A. et al. Recent trends and remaining challenges for optical remote sensing of Arctic tundra vegetation: A review and outlook. Remote Sens. Environ. 246, 111872 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
71.Layton-Matthews, K., Hansen, B. B., Grøtan, V., Fuglei, E. & Loonen, M. J. J. E. Contrasting consequences of climate change for migratory geese: Predation, density dependence and carryover effects offset benefits of high-Arctic warming. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 642–657 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
72.Owen, M. The selection of feeding site by White-fronted geese in winter. J. Appl. Ecol. 8, 905 (1971).
Google Scholar 
73.Ydenberg, R. C. & Prins, H. HTh. Spring grazing and the manipulation of food quality by Barnacle geese. J. Appl. Ecol. 18, 443 (1981).
Google Scholar 
74.Bos, D. et al. Utilisation of Wadden Sea salt marshes by geese in relation to livestock grazing. J. Nat. Conserv. 13, 1–15 (2005).
Google Scholar 
75.Barrio, I. C. et al. Developing common protocols to measure tundra herbivory across spatial scales. Arct. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1139/as-2020-0020 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Jensen, T. C. et al. Changes in trophic state and aquatic communities in high Arctic ponds in response to increasing goose populations. Freshw. Biol. 64, 1241–1254 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
77.Bartoli, M. et al. Denitrification, nitrogen uptake, and organic matter quality undergo different seasonality in sandy and muddy sediments of a turbid estuary. Front. Microbiol. 11, 612700 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.van der Wal, R., van Lieshout, S. M. J. & Loonen, M. J. J. E. Herbivore impact on moss depth, soil temperature and Arctic plant growth. Polar Biol. 24, 29–32 (2001).
Google Scholar 
79.Wookey, P. A. et al. Differential growth, allocation and photosynthetic responses of Polygonum viviparum to simulated environmental change at a high Arctic polar semi-desert. Oikos 70, 131 (1994).
Google Scholar 
80.Wookey, P. A. et al. Environmental constraints on the growth, photosynthesis and reproductive development of Dryas octopetala at a high Arctic polar semi-desert, Svalbard. Oecologia 102, 478–489 (1995).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
81.Jefferies, R. L. Agricultural food subsidies, migratory connectivity and large-scale disturbance in arctic coastal systems: A case study. Integr. Comp. Biol. 44, 130–139 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
82.Hik, D. S. & Jefferies, R. L. Increases in the net above-ground primary production of a salt-marsh forage grass: A test of the predictions of the herbivore-optimization model. J. Ecol. 78, 180 (1990).
Google Scholar 
83.Rautio, M., Mariash, H. & Forsström, L. Seasonal shifts between autochthonous and allochthonous carbon contributions to zooplankton diets in a subarctic lake. Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 1513–1524 (2011).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
84.Crump, B. C., Kling, G. W., Bahr, M. & Hobbie, J. E. Bacterioplankton community shifts in an Arctic lake correlate with seasonal changes in organic matter source. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 2253–2268 (2003).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
85.Berggren, M., Ziegler, S. E., St-Gelais, N. F., Beisner, B. E. & del Giorgio, P. A. Contrasting patterns of allochthony among three major groups of crustacean zooplankton in boreal and temperate lakes. Ecology 95, 1947–1959 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
86.Stasko, A. D., Gunn, J. M. & Johnston, T. A. Role of ambient light in structuring north-temperate fish communities: Potential effects of increasing dissolved organic carbon concentration with a changing climate. Environ. Rev. 20, 173–190 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
87.Milardi, M., Käkelä, R., Weckström, J. & Kahilainen, K. K. Terrestrial prey fuels the fish population of a small, high-latitude lake. Aquat. Sci. 78, 695–706 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
88.Vincent, W. F. & Laybourn-Parry, J. Polar Lakes and Rivers (Oxford University Press, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199213887.001.0001.Book 

Google Scholar 
89.Calizza, E., Costantini, M. L., Careddu, G. & Rossi, L. Effect of habitat degradation on competition, carrying capacity, and species assemblage stability. Ecol. Evol. 7, 5784–5796 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Van der Velden, S., Dempson, J. B., Evans, M. S., Muir, D. C. G. & Power, M. Basal mercury concentrations and biomagnification rates in freshwater and marine food webs: Effects on Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus) from eastern Canada. Sci. Total Environ. 444, 531–542 (2013).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
91.Kozak, N. et al. Environmental and biological factors are joint drivers of mercury biomagnification in subarctic lake food webs along a climate and productivity gradient. Sci. Total Environ. 779, 146261 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
92.Longhurst, A. R. A review of the Notostraca. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. 3, 1–57 (1955).
Google Scholar 
93.King, J. L. & Hanner, R. Cryptic species in a “living fossil” lineage: Taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships within the genus Lepidurus (Crustacea: Notostraca) in North America. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 10, 23–36 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
94.Hessen, D. O., Rueness, E. K. & Stabell, M. Circumpolar analysis of morphological and genetic diversity in the Notostracan Lepidurus arcticus. Hydrobiologia 519, 73–84 (2004).
Google Scholar 
95.Pasquali, V., Calizza, E., Setini, A., Hazlerigg, D. & Christoffersen, K. S. Preliminary observations on the effect of light and temperature on the hatching success and rate of Lepidurus arcticus eggs. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 31, 348–357 (2019).
Google Scholar 
96.Tanentzap, A. J. et al. Climate warming restructures an aquatic food web over 28 years. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 6852–6866 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
97.Polvani, L. M., Previdi, M., England, M. R., Chiodo, G. & Smith, K. L. Substantial twentieth-century Arctic warming caused by ozone-depleting substances. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 130–133 (2020).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
98.di Lascio, A. et al. Stable isotope variation in macroinvertebrates indicates anthropogenic disturbance along an urban stretch of the river Tiber (Rome, Italy). Ecol. Indic. 28, 107–114 (2013).
Google Scholar 
99.Moore, I. D., Grayson, R. B. & Ladson, A. R. Digital terrain modelling: A review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol. Process. 5, 3–30 (1991).ADS 

Google Scholar 
100.Vaze, J., Teng, J. & Spencer, G. Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices. Environ. Model. Softw. 25, 1086–1098 (2010).
Google Scholar 
101.Johansen, B. E., Karlsen, S. R. & Tømmervik, H. Vegetation mapping of Svalbard utilising Landsat TM/ETM+ data. Polar Rec. 48, 47–63 (2012).
Google Scholar 
102.Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A. & Salomonson, V. V. Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data. Remote Sens. Environ. 54, 127–140 (1995).ADS 

Google Scholar 
103.Vogel, S. W. Usage of high-resolution Landsat 7 band 8 for single-band snow-cover classification. Ann. Glaciol. 34, 53–57 (2002).ADS 

Google Scholar 
104.Tucker, C. J. Red and photographic infrared linear combinations for monitoring vegetation. Remote Sens. Environ. 8, 127–150 (1979).ADS 

Google Scholar 
105.Dozier, J. Spectral signature of alpine snow cover from the landsat thematic mapper. Remote Sens. Environ. 28, 9–22 (1989).ADS 

Google Scholar 
106.Jensen, J. R. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective (Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007).
Google Scholar 
107.Gascoin, S., Grizonnet, M., Bouchet, M., Salgues, G. & Hagolle, O. Theia Snow collection: High-resolution operational snow cover maps from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 11, 493–514 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
108.Simon, G., Manuel, G., Tristan, K. & Germain, S. Algorithm Theoretical basis documentation for an operational snow cover product from Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 data (let-it-snow) (2018). https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.1414452.109.Stahl, J. & Loonen, M. J. Effects of predation risk on site selection of barnacle geese during brood-rearing. In Research on Arctic Geese, 91 (1998).110.McCutchan, J. H., Lewis, W. M., Kendall, C. & McGrath, C. C. Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. Oikos 102, 378–390 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
111.Calizza, E., Rossi, L., Careddu, G., Sporta Caputi, S. & Costantini, M. L. Species richness and vulnerability to disturbance propagation in real food webs. Sci. Rep. 9, 19331 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
112.Mantel, N. & Valand, R. S. A technique of nonparametric multivariate analysis. Biometrics 26, 547 (1970).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
113.Signa, G. et al. Horizontal and vertical food web structure drives trace element trophic transfer in Terra Nova Bay, Antarctica. Environ. Pollut. 246, 772–781 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

1.West-Eberhard, M. J. Developmental plasticity and evolution. (Oxford University Press, 2003).2.de Jong, G. Evolution of phenotypic plasticity: patterns of plasticity and the emergence of ecotypes. N. Phytologist 166, 101–118 (2005).
Google Scholar 
3.Ezard, T. H. G., Prizak, R. & Hoyle, R. B. The fitness costs of adaptation via phenotypic plasticity and maternal effects. Funct. Ecol. 28, 693–701 (2014).
Google Scholar 
4.Williams, C. M. et al. Understanding evolutionary impacts of seasonality: an introduction to the symposium. Integr. Comp. Biol. 57, 921–933 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Murren, C. J. et al. Constraints on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity: limits and costs of phenotype and plasticity. Heredity 115, 293–301 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Sommer, R. J. Phenotypic plasticity: from theory and genetics to current and future challenges. Genetics 215, 1–13 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Beldade, P., Mateus, A. R. A. & Keller, R. A. Evolution and molecular mechanisms of adaptive developmental plasticity. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1347–1363 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Lafuente, E. & Beldade, P. Genomics of developmental plasticity in animals. Front. Genet. 10, (2019).9.Marden, J. H. Quantitative and evolutionary biology of alternative splicing: how changing the mix of alternative transcripts affects phenotypic plasticity and reaction norms. Heredity 100, 111–120 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Baralle, F. E. & Giudice, J. Alternative splicing as a regulator of development and tissue identity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 437–451 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Bush, S. J., Chen, L., Tovar-Corona, J. M. & Urrutia, A. O. Alternative splicing and the evolution of phenotypic novelty. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 372, 20150474 (2017).
Google Scholar 
12.Marden, J. H. & Cobb, J. R. Territorial and mating success of dragonflies that vary in muscle power output and presence of gregarine gut parasites. Anim. Behav. 68, 857–865 (2004).
Google Scholar 
13.Kijimoto, T., Moczek, A. P. & Andrews, J. Diversification of doublesex function underlies morph-, sex-, and species-specific development of beetle horns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 20526–20531 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Bear, A., Prudic, K. L. & Monteiro, A. Steroid hormone signaling during development has a latent effect on adult male sexual behavior in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. PLoS ONE 12, e0174403 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Martin Anduaga, A. et al. Thermosensitive alternative splicing senses and mediates temperature adaptation in Drosophila. eLife 8, e44642 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Deshmukh, R., Lakhe, D. & Kunte, K. Tissue-specific developmental regulation and isoform usage underlie the role of doublesex in sex differentiation and mimicry in Papilio swallowtails. R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 200792 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
17.Grantham, M. E. & Brisson, J. A. Extensive differential splicing underlies phenotypically plastic aphid morphs. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1934–1946 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Price, J. et al. Alternative splicing associated with phenotypic plasticity in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. Mol. Ecol. 27, 1036–1043 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
19.Lees, J. G., Ranea, J. A. & Orengo, C. A. Identifying and characterising key alternative splicing events in Drosophila development. BMC Genomics 16, 608 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Jakšić, A. M. & Schlötterer, C. The interplay of temperature and genotype on patterns of alternative splicing in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 204, 315–325 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Healy, T. M. & Schulte, P. M. Patterns of alternative splicing in response to cold acclimation in fish. J. Exp. Biol. 222, jeb193516 (2019).22.Signor, S. & Nuzhdin, S. Dynamic changes in gene expression and alternative splicing mediate the response to acute alcohol exposure in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 121, 342–360 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Lang, A. S., Austin, S. H., Harris, R. M., Calisi, R. M. & MacManes, M. D. Stress-mediated convergence of splicing landscapes in male and female rock doves. BMC Genomics 21, 251 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Suresh, S., Crease, T. J., Cristescu, M. E. & Chain, F. J. J. Alternative splicing is highly variable among Daphnia pulex lineages in response to acute copper exposure. BMC Genomics 21, 433 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Thorstensen, M. J., Baerwald, M. R. & Jeffries, K. M. RNA sequencing describes both population structure and plasticity-selection dynamics in a non-model fish. BMC Genomics 22, 273 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Singh, A. & Agrawal, A. F. Sexual dimorphism in gene expression: coincidence and population genomics of two forms of differential expression in Drosophila melanogaster. bioRxiv (2021) https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.08.429268.27.Rogers, T. F., Palmer, D. H. & Wright, A. E. Sex-specific selection drives the evolution of alternative splicing in birds. Mol. Biol. Evolution 38, 519–530 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
28.Fox, R. J., Donelson, J. M., Schunter, C., Ravasi, T. & Gaitán-Espitia, J. D. Beyond buying time: the role of plasticity in phenotypic adaptation to rapid environmental change. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 374, 20180174 (2019).
Google Scholar 
29.Kelly, M. Adaptation to climate change through genetic accommodation and assimilation of plastic phenotypes. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 374, 20180176 (2019).
Google Scholar 
30.Oostra, V., Saastamoinen, M., Zwaan, B. J. & Wheat, C. W. Strong phenotypic plasticity limits potential for evolutionary responses to climate change. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–11 (2018).CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Wang, Y. et al. Mechanism of alternative splicing and its regulation (Review). Biomed. Rep. 3, 152–158 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
32.Ule, J. & Blencowe, B. J. Alternative splicing regulatory networks: functions, mechanisms, and evolution. Mol. Cell 76, 329–345 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
33.McManus, C. J., Coolon, J. D., Eipper-Mains, J., Wittkopp, P. J. & Graveley, B. R. Evolution of splicing regulatory networks in Drosophila. Genome Res. 24, 786–796 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Gao, Q., Sun, W., Ballegeer, M., Libert, C. & Chen, W. Predominant contribution of cis-regulatory divergence in the evolution of mouse alternative splicing. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 816 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Barbosa-Morais, N. L. et al. The evolutionary landscape of alternative splicing in vertebrate species. Science 338, 1587–1593 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
36.Wang, X. et al. Cis-regulated alternative splicing divergence and its potential contribution to environmental responses in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 97, 555–570 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
37.Huang, Y., Lack, J. B., Hoppel, G. T. & Pool, J. E. Parallel and population-specific gene regulatory evolution in cold-adapted fly populations. bioRxiv (2021) https://doi.org/10.1101/795716.38.Lewis, J. J., Van Belleghem, S. M., Papa, R., Danko, C. G. & Reed, R. D. Many functionally connected loci foster adaptive diversification along a neotropical hybrid zone. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb8617 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Lewis, J. J. & Reed, R. D. Genome-wide regulatory adaptation shapes population-level genomic landscapes in Heliconius. Mol. Biol. Evol. 36, 159–173 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Martin, S. H. et al. Natural selection and genetic diversity in the butterfly Heliconius melpomene. Genetics 203, 525–541 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Brakefield, P. M., Beldade, P. & Zwaan, B. J. The African Butterfly Bicyclus anynana: a model for evolutionary genetics and evolutionary developmental biology. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2009, pdb.emo122 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
42.Mateus, A. R. A. et al. Adaptive developmental plasticity: compartmentalized responses to environmental cues and to corresponding internal signals provide phenotypic flexibility. BMC Biol. 12, 97 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Oostra, V. et al. Ecdysteroid hormones link the juvenile environment to alternative adult life histories in a seasonal insect. Am. Naturalist 184, E79–E92 (2014).
Google Scholar 
44.van Bergen, E. et al. Conserved patterns of integrated developmental plasticity in a group of polyphenic tropical butterflies. BMC Evolut. Biol. 17, 59 (2017).
Google Scholar 
45.Singh, P. et al. Complex multi-trait responses to multivariate environmental cues in a seasonal butterfly. Evol. Ecol. (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-020-10062-0.46.Prudic, K. L., Jeon, C., Cao, H. & Monteiro, A. Developmental plasticity in sexual roles of butterfly species drives mutual sexual ornamentation. Science 331, 73–75 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
47.Chen, L., Bush, S. J., Tovar-Corona, J. M., Castillo-Morales, A. & Urrutia, A. O. Correcting for differential transcript coverage reveals a strong relationship between alternative splicing and organism complexity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1402–1413 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Hamid, F. M. & Makeyev, E. V. Emerging functions of alternative splicing coupled with nonsense-mediated decay. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 42, 1168–1173 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
49.Tabrez, S. S., Sharma, R. D., Jain, V., Siddiqui, A. A. & Mukhopadhyay, A. Differential alternative splicing coupled to nonsense-mediated decay of mRNA ensures dietary restriction-induced longevity. Nat. Commun. 8, 306 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
50.Uller, T., Moczek, A. P., Watson, R. A., Brakefield, P. M. & Laland, K. N. Developmental bias and evolution: a regulatory network perspective. Genetics 209, 949–966 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Nijhout, H. F. To plasticity and back again. eLife 4, e06995 (2015).PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Helanterä, H. & Uller, T. Neutral and adaptive explanations for an association between caste-biased gene expression and rate of sequence evolution. Front. Genet. 5, 297 (2014).53.Pespeni, M. H., Ladner, J. T. & Moczek, A. P. Signals of selection in conditionally expressed genes in the diversification of three horned beetle species. J. Evolut. Biol. 30, 1644–1657 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
54.Plass, M. & Eyras, E. Differentiated evolutionary rates in alternative exons and the implications for splicing regulation. BMC Evol. Biol. 6, 50 (2006).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Chen, F.-C., Pan, C.-L. & Lin, H.-Y. Independent effects of alternative splicing and structural constraint on the evolution of mammalian coding exons. Mol. Biol. Evolution 29, 187–193 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
56.Peña, C., Nylin, S. & Wahlberg, N. The radiation of Satyrini butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a challenge for phylogenetic methods. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 161, 64–87 (2011).
Google Scholar 
57.Bhardwaj, S. et al. Origin of the mechanism of phenotypic plasticity in satyrid butterfly eyespots. eLife 9, e49544 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Lewis, B. P., Green, R. E. & Brenner, S. E. Evidence for the widespread coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans. PNAS 100, 189–192 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
59.Akerman, M. & Mandel-Gutfreund, Y. Alternative splicing regulation at tandem 3′ splice sites. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 23–31 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Moran, N. A. The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. Am. Naturalist 139, 971–989 (1992).
Google Scholar 
61.Nijhout, H. F. Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evolution Dev. 5, 9–18 (2003).
Google Scholar 
62.Mank, J. E. The transcriptional architecture of phenotypic dimorphism. Nat. Ecol. Evolution 1, 1–7 (2017).
Google Scholar 
63.Scheiner, S. M., Barfield, M. & Holt, R. D. The genetics of phenotypic plasticity. XVII. Response to climate change. Evolut. Appl. 13, 388–399 (2020).
Google Scholar 
64.Osada, N., Miyagi, R. & Takahashi, A. Cis- and trans-regulatory effects on gene expression in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 206, 2139–2148 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
65.Cooper, R. D. & Shaffer, H. B. Allele-specific expression and gene regulation help explain transgressive thermal tolerance in non-native hybrids of the endangered California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense). Mol. Ecol. 30, 987–1004 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
66.Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Baruzzo, G. et al. Simulation-based comprehensive benchmarking of RNA-seq aligners. Nat. Methods 14, 135–139 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
68.Schuierer, S. et al. A comprehensive assessment of RNA-seq protocols for degraded and low-quantity samples. BMC Genomics 18, 442 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Broad Institute. Picard toolkit. (2019).70.Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. The R package Rsubread is easier, faster, cheaper and better for alignment and quantification of RNA sequencing reads. Nucleic Acids Res 47, e47–e47 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
72.Chen, Y., Lun, A. T. L. & Smyth, G. K. From reads to genes to pathways: differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments using Rsubread and the edgeR quasi-likelihood pipeline. F1000Res 5, 1438 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).74.Shen, L. GeneOverlap: Test and visualize gene overlaps. (2020).75.Gu, Z., Eils, R. & Schlesner, M. Complex heatmaps reveal patterns and correlations in multidimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 32, 2847–2849 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
76.Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. eggNOG 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 47, D309–D314 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
77.Alexa, A. & Rahnenfuhrer, J. topGO: Enrichment analysis for Gene Ontology. (2016).78.Larsson, J. et al. eulerr: Area-Proportional Euler and Venn Diagrams with Ellipses. (2021).79.Supek, F., Bošnjak, M., Škunca, N. & Šmuc, T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE 6, e21800 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
80.Gu, Z. & Hübschmann, D. simplifyEnrichment: an R/Bioconductor package for Clustering and Visualizing Functional Enrichment Results. 2020.10.27.312116 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.27.312116.81.Gu, Z. simplifyEnrichment: Simplify Functional Enrichment Results. (Bioconductor version: Release (3.13), 2021). https://doi.org/10.18129/B9.bioc.simplifyEnrichment.82.de Jong, M. A., Wahlberg, N., Eijk, M., van, Brakefield, P. M. & Zwaan, B. J. Mitochondrial DNA signature for range-wide populations of Bicyclus anynana suggests a rapid expansion from recent Refugia. PLoS ONE 6, e21385 (2011).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
83.de Jong, M. A., Collins, S., Beldade, P., Brakefield, P. M. & Zwaan, B. J. Footprints of selection in wild populations of Bicyclus anynana along a latitudinal cline. Mol. Ecol. 22, 341–353 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
84.Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet. J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar 
85.Joshi, N. & Fass, J. Sickle: A sliding-window, adaptive, quality-based trimming tool for FastQ files.86.Li, H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv:1303.3997 [q-bio] (2013).87.Korneliussen, T. S., Albrechtsen, A. & Nielsen, R. ANGSD: analysis of next generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinforma. 15, 356 (2014).
Google Scholar 
88.Nowell, R. W. et al. A high-coverage draft genome of the mycalesine butterfly Bicyclus anynana. GigaScience 6, (2017).89.Xu, L. et al. OrthoVenn2: a web server for whole-genome comparison and annotation of orthologous clusters across multiple species. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W52–W58 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Ranwez, V., Harispe, S., Delsuc, F. & Douzery, E. J. P. MACSE: multiple alignment of coding SEquences accounting for frameshifts and stop codons. PLoS ONE 6, e22594 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
91.Lucaci, A. G., Wisotsky, S. R., Shank, S. D., Weaver, S. & Kosakovsky Pond, S. L. Extra base hits: widespread empirical support for instantaneous multiple-nucleotide changes. PLoS One 16, e0248337 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
92.Buerkner, P.-C. brms: An R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).
Google Scholar 
93.Buerkner, P.-C. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R Package brms. R. J. 10, 395–411 (2018).
Google Scholar 
94.Kassambara, A. rstatix: Pipe-Friendly Framework for Basic Statistical Tests. (2021).95.Shen, S. et al. rMATS: Robust and flexible detection of differential alternative splicing from replicate RNA-Seq data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, E5593–E5601 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
96.Alamancos, G. P., Pagès, A., Trincado, J. L., Bellora, N. & Eyras, E. Leveraging transcript quantification for fast computation of alternative splicing profiles. RNA 21, 1521–1531 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
97.Wang, Q. & Rio, D. C. JUM is a computational method for comprehensive annotation-free analysis of alternative pre-mRNA splicing patterns. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA115, E8181–E8190 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
98.Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
99.Kassambara, A. ggpubr” ‘ggplot2’ based publication-ready plots. (2020).100.Bivand, R. & Rundel, C. rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine – Open Source (‘GEOS’). (2021).101.South, A. afrilearndata: Small Africa Map Datasets for Learning. (2021).102.Inkscape Project. Inkscape. (2021).103.Steward, R. A., Oostra, V. & Wheat, C. W. B_anynana_differentialSplicing Github. zenodo.org https://zenodo.org/badge/latestdoi/255903232 (2021). More

1.Dynowska, M., Meissner, W. & Pacyńska, J. Mallard duck (Anas platyrhynchos) as a potential link in the epidemiological chain mycoses originating from water reservoirs. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy 57, 323–328 (2013).
Google Scholar 
2.Georgopoulou, I. & Tsiouris, V. The potential role of migratory birds in the transmission of zoonoses. Vet. Ital. 44, 671–677 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
3.Hubálek, Z. An annotated checklist of pathogenic microorganisms associated with migratory birds. J. Wildl. Dis. 40, 639–659 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
4.Korniłłowicz, T. K. I. Diversity of fungi in nests and pellets of Montagu’s harrier (Circus pygargus) from eastern Poland—Importance of chemical and ecological factors. Ecol. Chem. Eng. 16, 453–471 (2009).
Google Scholar 
5.Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T. & Kitowski, I. Aspergillus fumigatus and other thermophilic fungi in nests of wetland birds. Mycopathologia 175, 43–56 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
6.Kiziewicz B. The occurrence fungi and zoosporic fungi-like organisms on feathers of birds Corvidae. in Corvids of Poland (ed. Jerzak, L.). 147–154. (Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe Poznan, 2005).7.Kasprzykowski, Z. Habitat preferences of foraging Rooks Corvus frugilegus during the breeding period in the agricultural landscape of eastern Poland. Acta Ornithol. 38, 27–31 (2003).
Google Scholar 
8.Czarnecka, J. & Kitowski, I. Seed dispersal by the rook Corvus frugilegus l. In agricultural landscape—Mechanisms and ecological importance. Polish J. Ecol. 58, 511–523 (2010).
Google Scholar 
9.Czarnecka, J. et al. Seed dispersal in urban green space—Does the rook Corvus frugilegus L. contribute to urban flora homogenization?. Urban For. Urban Green. 12, 359–366 (2013).
Google Scholar 
10.Gromadzka, J. Food composition and food consumption of the Rook Corvus frugilegus in agrocoenoses in Poland. Acta Ornithol. 17, 11 (1980).
Google Scholar 
11.Green, A. J., Elmberg, J. & Lovas-Kiss, Á. Beyond scatter-hoarding and frugivory: European corvids as overlooked vectors for a broad range of plants. Front. Ecol. Evolut. 7, 133 (2019).
Google Scholar 
12.Jędrzejewski, S., Majewska, A., Zduniak, P. & Graczyk, T. Parasites of Polish corvids—Knowledge and potential risk for human. in Corvids of Poland (eds. Jerzak, L., Kavanagh, B. P. & Trojanowski, P.). 137–145. (Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 2005).13.Kiziewicz, B. The occurrenceof fungy and zoosporic fungus like organisms on feathers of birds Corvids. in Corvids in Poland. (eds. Jerzak, L., Kavanagh, B. P. & Trojanowski, P.). 147–154. (Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe, 2005).14.Camin, A. M., Chabasse, D. & Guiguen, C. Keratinophilic fungi associated with starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in Brittany, France. Mycopathologia 143, 9–12 (1998).
Google Scholar 
15.Hubálek, Z. Keratinophilic fungi associated with free-living mammals and birds. Biol. Dermatophytes Keratinophilic Fungi 93, 1036 (2000).
Google Scholar 
16.Mandeel, Q., Nardoni, S. & Mancianti, F. Keratinophilic fungi on feathers of common clinically healthy birds in Bahrain. Mycoses 54, 71–77 (2011).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
17.Ciesielska, A., Kawa, A., Kanarek, K., Soboń, A. & Szewczyk, R. Metabolomic analysis of Trichophyton rubrum and Microsporum canis during keratin degradation. Sci. Rep. 11, 1–10 (2021).
Google Scholar 
18.Leibner-Ciszak, J., Dobrowolska, A., Krawczyk, B., Kaszuba, A. & Sta̧czek, P. Evaluation of a PCR melting profile method for intraspecies differentiation of Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton interdigitale. J. Med. Microbiol. 59, 185–192 (2010).19.Ciesielska, A., Oleksak, B. & Stączek, P. Reference genes for accurate evaluation of expression levels in Trichophyton interdigitale grown under different carbon sources, pH levels and phosphate levels. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
20.Calvo, A., Vidal, M. & Guarro, J. Keratinophilic fungi from urban soils of Barcelona, Spain. Mycopathologia 85, 145–147 (1984).
Google Scholar 
21.R.S/, C. Taxonomy of the Onygenales: Arthrodermataceae, Gymnoasceae, Myxotrichaceae and Onygenaceae. Mycotaxon 24, 1–216 (1985).22.Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T. Studies on the decomposition of keratin wastes by saprotrophic microfungi. P. I. Criteria for evaluating keratinolytic activity. Acta Mycol. 175, 43–56 (1997).
Google Scholar 
23.van Oorschot, C. A. N. A revision of Chrysosporium and allied genera. Stud. Mycol. 20, 1–89 (1980).
Google Scholar 
24.Domsch, K. H. & Gams, W. A. T. H. Compedium of Soil Fungi (Academic, 1980).
Google Scholar 
25.Gan, G. G. et al. Non-sporulating Chrysosporium: An opportunistic fungal infection in a neutropenic patient. Med. J. Malaysia 57, 118–122 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
26.de Hoog, G. S., Guarro, J. & Gene, J. Atlas of clinical fungi. Int. Microbiol 2, 51–52 (2001).
Google Scholar 
27.Manzano-Gayosso, P. et al. Onychomycosis incidence in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Mycopathologia 166, 41–45 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
28.Palma, M. A. G., Espín, L. A. & Pérez, A. F. Invasine sinusal mycosis due to Chrysosporium tropicum. Acta Otorrinolaringol. Esp. 58, 164–166 (2007).
Google Scholar 
29.Stillwell, W. T. & Rubin, B. O. Chrysosporium, a new causative agent in osteomycelitis. Clin. Orthopaed. Relat. Res. 184, 190–192 (1984).
Google Scholar 
30.Gueho, E. V. J. G. R. A new human case of Anixiopsis stercomia mycosis: Discussion of its taxonomy and pathogenicity. Mycoses 28, 430–436 (1985).CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Nieuwenhuis, B. P. S. & James, T. Y. The frequency of sex in fungi. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 371, 0540 (2016).
Google Scholar 
32.Neubauer, G. & Sikora, A. C. T. Monitoring populacji ptaków Polski w latach 2008–2009. Biuletyn Monitoringu Przyrody 8, 1–40 (2011).
Google Scholar 
33.Jackson, C. J., Barton, R. C. & Evans, E. G. V. Species identification and strain differentiation of dermatophyte fungi by analysis of ribosomal-DNA intergenic spacer regions. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37, 931–936 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Mochizuki, T. et al. Restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of ribosomal DNA intergenic regions is useful for differentiating strains of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 4583–4588 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Garg, A. P., Gandotra, S., Mukerji, K. G. & Pugh, G. J. F. Ecology of keratinophilic fungi. Proc. Plant Sci. 94, 149–163 (1985).
Google Scholar 
36.Abulreesh, H. H., Goulder, R. & Scott, G. W. Wild birds and human pathogens in the context of ringing and migration. Ringing Migr. 23, 193–200 (2007).
Google Scholar 
37.Prinzinger, R., Preßmar, A. & Schleucher, E. Body temperature in birds. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Physiol. 99, 499–506 (1991).
Google Scholar 
38.Summerbell, R. C. Form and function in the evolution of dermatophytes. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 44, 30–43 (2000).
Google Scholar 
39.Warwick, A., Ferrieri, P., Burke, B. & Blazar, B. R. Presumptive invasive Chrysosporium infection in a bone marrow transplant recipient. Bone Marrow Transplant 8, 319–322 (1991).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Kitowski, I., Ciesielska, A., Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T., Bohacz, J., & Świetlicki, M. Estimation of Chrysosporium keratinophilum Dispersal by the Rook Corvus frugilegus in Chełm (East Poland) in Urban Fauna-Animal, Man, and the City—Interactions and Relationships. (Indykiewicz, P. & Böhner, J. eds). 263–269. (Art Studio, 2014)41.Gopal, K. A., Kalaivani, V. & Anandan, H. Pulmonary infection by Chrysosporium species in a preexisting tuberculous cavity. Int. J. Appl. Basic Med. Res. 10, 62 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Krawczyk, B., Samet, A., Leibner, J., Śledzińska, A. & Kur, J. Evaluation of a PCR melting profile technique for bacterial strain differentiation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 44, 2327–2332 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Ciesielska, A. et al. Application of microsatellite-primed PCR (MSP-PCR) and PCR melting profile (PCR-MP) method for intraspecies differentiation of dermatophytes. Pol. J. Microbiol. 63, 283–290 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
44.Orłowski, G. & Czapulak, A. Different extinction risks of the breeding colonies of rooks Corvus frugilegus in rural and urban areas of SW Poland. Acta Ornithologica 42, 145–155 (2007).
Google Scholar 
45.Bohacz, J. & Korniłłowicz-Kowalska, T. Species diversity of keratinophilic fungi in various soil types. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 7, 259–266 (2012).
Google Scholar 
46.Papini, R., Mancianti, F., Grassotti, G. & Cardini, G. Survey of keratinophilic fungi isolated from city park soils of Pisa, Italy. Mycopathologia 143, 17–23 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
47.Singh, I. K. R. Dermatophytes and related keratinophilic fungi in soil of parks and agricultural fields of Uttar Pradesh, India. Indian J. Dermatol. 55, 306–308 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Gungnani, H. C., Sharma, S. & Gupta, B. Keratinophilic fungi recovered from feathers of different species of birds in St Kitts and Nevis. West Indian Med. J. 61, 912–915 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
49.Jadczyk P, J. Z. Wintering of rooks Corvus frugilegus in Poland. in Corvids of Poland (ed. Jerzak, L.). 541–556. (Bogucki Wydawnictwo Naukowe Poznan, 2005).50.Wilk, T., Chodkiewicz, T., Sikora, A., Chylarecki, P. & Kuczyński, L. Red List of Polish Birds. (OTOP, 2020).51.Oke, T.R. The heat island of the urban boundary layer: Characteristics, causes and effects. in eWind Climate in Cities. NATO ASI Series E (ed. JE, C.). 81–107. (Kluwer Academy, 1995).52.Vidal, P., de Vinuesa, M., Los, A., Sánchez-Puelles, J. M. & Guarro, J. Phylogeny of the anamorphic genus Chrysosporium and related taxa based on rDNA internal transcribed spacer sequences. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 17, 22–29 (2000).
Google Scholar 
53.Korniłłowicz, T. Studies on mycoflora colonizing raw keratin wastes in arable soil. Mycologica 27, 231–245 (1991).
Google Scholar 
54.Orłowski, G., Kasprzykowski, Z., Zawada, Z. & Kopij, G. Stomach content and grit ingestion by rook Corvus frugilegus nestlings. Ornis Fennica 86, 117–122 (2009).
Google Scholar 
55.Luniak, M. Consumption and digestion of food in the rook, Corvus frugilegus, in the condition of an aviary. Acta Ornithol. 16, 213–234 (1977).
Google Scholar 
56.Liu, D., Coloe, S., Baird, R. & Pedersen, J. Rapid mini-preparation of fungal DNA for PCR [5]. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 471 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
57.Hunter, P. R. & Gaston, M. A. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: An application of Simpson’s index of diversity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 26, 2465–2466 (1988).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Greenwell, J. R. Introduction to biostatistics, 2nd edn. By R. R. Sokal and F. J. Rohlf. pp. 363. F. H. Freeman and Co., 1987. £44.99 hardback. ISBN 0 7167 18057. Exp. Physiol. 80, 681 (1995) More

1.Reiter, P. & Sprenger, D. The used tire trade: a mechanism for the worldwide dispersal of container breeding mosquitoes. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 3, 494–501 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
2.Kraemer, M. U. G. et al. The global compendium of Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus occurrence. Sci. Data 2, 150035 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Kraemer, M. et al. Past and future spread of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 854–863 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Bonizzoni, M., Gasperi, G., Chen, X. & James, A. A. The invasive mosquito species Aedes albopictus: Current knowledge and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 29, 460–468 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Sprenger, D. & Wuithiranyagool, T. The discovery and distribution of Aedes albopictus in Harris County, Texas. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 2, 217–219 (1986).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
6.Yee, D. A. Thirty years of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in America: An introduction to current perspectives and future challenges. J. Med. Entomol. 53, 989–991 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
7.Hahn, M. B. et al. Reported Distribution of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus in the United States, 1995–2016 (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 53, 1169–1175 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Hahn, M. B. et al. Reported distribution of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus in the United States, 1995–2016. J. Med. Entomol. 54, 1420–1424 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Egizi, A., Healy, S. P. & Fonseca, D. M. Rapid blood meal scoring in anthropophilic Aedes albopictus and application of PCR blocking to avoid pseudogenes. Infect. Genet. Evol. 16, 122–128 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Paupy, C., Delatte, H., Bagny, L., Corbel, V. & Fontenille, D. Aedes albopictus, an arbovirus vector: From the darkness to the light. Microbes Infect. 11, 1177–1185 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
11.Grard, G. et al. Zika virus in Gabon (Central Africa)—2007: A new threat from Aedes albopictus?. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e2681 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.McKenzie, B. A., Wilson, A. E. & Zohdy, S. Aedes albopictus is a competent vector of Zika virus: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14, e0216794 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Claborn, D. M., Poiry, M., Famutimi, O. D., Duitsman, D. & Thompson, K. R. A survey of mosquitoes in southern and western missouri. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 34, 131–133 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
14.Janousek, T. E., Plagge, J. & Kramer, W. L. Record of Aedes albopictus in Nebraska with notes on its biology. J. Am. Mosq. Cont. Control Assoc. 17, 265–267 (2001).CAS 

Google Scholar 
15.Richards, T. et al. First detection of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and expansion of Aedes japonicus japonicus in Wisconsin, United States. J. Med. Entomol. 56, 291–296 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
16.Stone, C. M. et al. Spatial, temporal, and genetic invasion dynamics of Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in Illinois. J. Med. Entomol. 57, 1488–1500 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
17.Dunphy, B. M., Rowley, W. A. & Bartholomay, L. C. A taxonomic checklist of the mosquitoes of Iowa. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 30, 119–121 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
18.Johnson, T. L. et al. Modeling the environmental suitability for Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti and Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in the contiguous United States. J. Med. Entomol. 54, 1605–1614 (2017).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
19.Kovach, K. B. & Smith, R. C. Surveillance of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in southern Iowa, 2016. J. Med. Entomol. 55, 1341–1345 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
20.Braks, M. A. H., Honório, N. A., Lourenço-De-Oliveira, R., Juliano, S. A. & Lounibos, L. P. Convergent habitat segregation of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Brazil and Florida. J. Med. Entomol. 40, 785–794 (2003).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
21.Delatte, H. et al. Evidence of habitat structuring Aedes albopictus populations in Réunion Island. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, e2111 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Zhong, D. et al. Genetic analysis of invasive Aedes albopictus populations in Los Angeles County, California and its potential public health impact. PLoS ONE 8, e68586 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Lee, E. J. et al. Geographical genetic variation and sources of Korean Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations. J. Med. Entomol. 57, 1057–1068 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
24.Nawrocki, S. J. & Hawley, W. A. Estimation of the northern limits of distribution of Aedes albopictus in North America. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 3, 314–317 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
25.Moore, C. G. Aedes albopictus in the United States: Current status and prospects for further spread. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 15, 221–227 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
26.Armstrong, P. M., Andreadis, T. G., Shepard, J. J. & Thomas, M. C. Northern range expansion of the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus): Analysis of mosquito data from Connecticut, USA. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 11, e0005623 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Rochlin, I., Ninivaggi, D. V., Hutchinson, M. L. & Farajollahi, A. Climate change and range expansion of the Asian tiger mosquito (Aedes albopictus) in Northeastern USA: Implications for public health practitioners. PLoS ONE 8, e60874 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Hanson, S. M. & Craig, G. B. Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) eggs: Field survivorship during northern Indiana winters. J. Med. Entomol. 32, 599–604 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
29.Zhao, L., Lee, X., Smith, R. B. & Oleson, K. Strong contributions of local background climate to urban heat islands. Nature 511, 216–219 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
30.Yang, J. & Bou-Zeid, E. Should cities embrace their heat islands as shields from extreme cold?. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 57, 1309–1320 (2018).ADS 

Google Scholar 
31.Macintyre, H. L., Heaviside, C., Cai, X. & Phalkey, R. Comparing temperature-related mortality impacts of cool roofs in winter and summer in a highly urbanized European region for present and future climate. Environ. Int. 154, 106606 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Ward, T. B. Influence of an Urban Heat Island on Mosquito Development and Survey of Biting Midge Species Associated with White-Tailed Deer Farms (Oklahoma State University, 2011).
Google Scholar 
33.Dunphy, B. M. et al. Long-term surveillance defines spatial and temporal patterns implicating Culex tarsalis as the primary vector of West Nile virus. Sci. Rep. 9, 6637 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Paupy, C., Girod, R., Salvan, M., Rodhain, F. & Failloux, A. B. Population structure of Aedes albopictus from La Réunion Island (Indian Ocean) with respect to susceptibility to a dengue virus. Heredity 87, 273–283 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
35.Vazeille, M. et al. Population genetic structure and competence as a vector for dengue type 2 virus of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from Madagascar. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65, 491–497 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
36.Chouin-Carneiro, T. et al. Differential susceptibilities of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from the Americas to Zika virus. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10, e0004543 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Faraji, A. & Unlu, I. The eye of the tiger, the thrill of the fight: Effective larval and adult control measures against the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae), North America. J. Med. Entomol. 53, 1029–1047 (2016).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
38.Lambrechts, L., Scott, T. W. & Gubler, D. J. Consequences of the expanding global distribution of Aedes albopictus for dengue virus transmission. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 4, e646 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Vega-Rua, A., Zouache, K., Girod, R., Failloux, A.-B. & Lourenco-de-Oliveira, R. High level of vector competence of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from ten American countries as a crucial factor in the spread of chikungunya virus. J. Virol. 88, 6294–6306 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.Vega-Rúa, A. et al. Chikungunya virus transmission potential by local Aedes mosquitoes in the Americas and Europe. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 9, e0003780 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Fikrig, K. & Harrington, L. C. Understanding and interpreting mosquito blood feeding studies: The case of Aedes albopictus. Trends Parasitol. 37, 959–975 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
42.Gerhardt, R. R. et al. First isolation of La Crosse virus from naturally infected Aedes albopictus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7, 807–811 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Sardelis, M. R., Turell, M. J., O’Guinn, M. L., Andre, R. G. & Roberts, D. R. Vector competence of three North American strains of Aedes albopictus for West Nile virus. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 18, 284–289 (2002).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
44.Eiras, A. E., Buhagiar, T. S. & Ritchie, S. A. Development of the gravid Aedes trap for the capture of adult female container-exploiting mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 51, 200–209 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
45.Maciel-de-Freitas, R., Eiras, Á. E. & Lourenço-de-Oliveira, R. Field evaluation of effectiveness of the BG-Sentinel, a new trap for capturing adult Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 101, 321–325 (2006).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
46.Farajollahi, A. et al. Field efficacy of BG-Sentinel and industry-standard traps for Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and West Nile virus surveillance. J. Med. Entomol. 46, 919–925 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
47.Meeraus, W. H., Armistead, J. S. & Arias, J. R. Field comparison of novel and gold standard traps for collecting Aedes albopictus in Northern Virginia. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 24, 244–248 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
48.Johnson, B. J. et al. Field comparisons of the Gravid Aedes Trap (GAT) and BG-Sentinel Trap for Monitoring Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) populations and notes on indoor GAT collections in Vietnam. J. Med. Entomol. 54, 340–348 (2018).
Google Scholar 
49.Darsie, R. & Ward, R. Identification and Geographical Distribution of the Mosquitoes of North America (North of Mexico. University Press of Florida, 2005).
Google Scholar 
50.Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium. NLCD 2016 Land Cover (CONUS).51.Bonnet, D. D. & Worcester, D. J. The dispersal of Aedes albopictus in the territory of Hawaii. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 26, 465–476 (1946).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
52.Niebylski, M. L. & Craig, G. B. Dispersal and survival of Aedes albopictus at a scrap tire yard in Missouri. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc. 10, 339–343 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
53.Verdonschot, P. F. M. & Besse-Lototskaya, A. A. Flight distance of mosquitoes (Culicidae): A metadata analysis to support the management of barrier zones around rewetted and newly constructed wetlands. Limnologica 45, 69–79 (2014).
Google Scholar 
54.Post, R. J., Flook, P. K. & Millest, A. L. Methods for the preservation of insects for DNA studies. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 21, 85–92 (1993).CAS 

Google Scholar 
55.Field, E. N., Gehrke, E. J., Ruden, R. M., Adelman, J. S. & Smith, R. C. An improved multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay for the identification of mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) blood meals. J. Med. Entomol. 57, 557–562 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
56.Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3299–3302 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
57.Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. POPART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).
Google Scholar 
58.Ogden, R., Shuttleworth, C., McEwing, R. & Cesarini, S. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Conserv. Genet. 6, 37–48 (2005).
Google Scholar  More

Evidence for biological and chemical isoprene consumption in coastal seawaterThe time course of isoprene concentration in coastal seawater samples incubated in closed glass bottles at the in situ temperature and in the dark demonstrated sustained loss for at least 45 h (Fig. 1a). Enclosure without headspace prevented isoprene loss by ventilation, and darkness was assumed to arrest all or most of the biological production25 and any photochemical production15 or degradation. Thus, the measured loss was considered the result of microbial degradation and chemical oxidation. In most cases an exponential function fitted better the decay than a linear function (Supplementary Table 1), indicating first-order (concentration-dependent) kinetics for isoprene loss.Fig. 1: Isoprene loss in dark incubations of coastal seawater.a Time course of isoprene concentration in 2 L dark incubations of non-filtered seawater samples from the back-reef lagoon of Mo’orea in April (blue) and the coastal Mediterranean in March (red) and May (green). Filled and open symbols correspond to duplicate incubations. Exponential fits to the data are shown by lines. See Supplementary Table 1 for fit equations and metrics, water temperatures and chlorophyll a concentrations. b Time course of isoprene concentration in series of 30 mL dark incubations of coastal Mediterranean seawater. Dark blue: non-filtered; red: filtered through 0.2 µm; green: filtered + 10 µmol L−1 H2O2; purple: filtered + 0.0025 units mL−1 bromoperoxidase (BrPO); light blue: filtered + H2O2 + BrPO. Exponential fit results in Supplementary Table 2.Full size imageIncubation of microorganism-devoid (filtered through 0.2 µm) coastal seawater sampled next to seaweeds showed an isoprene loss (0.12 d−1) that was half the loss in non-filtered water (0.20 d−1; Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 2), implying that chemical oxidation accounted for half the total loss. Oxidation by OH·, the fastest amongst isoprene reactions with oxidative transients for which reaction rate data exist19, could account for the observed chemical loss. However, the possibility of oxidation by hitherto overlooked, pervasive oxidants like H2O2 deserved consideration. The addition of unrealistically high concentrations of either H2O2 or the enzyme bromoperoxidase (BrPO), substantially speeded up the chemical loss (0.91 d−1 with 10 µmol H2O2 L−1, 0.31 d−1 with 0.0025 units BrPO mL−1; Fig. 1b and Supplementary Table 2). Isoprene could have reacted with H2O2 in seawater as it does in acidic aerosols26. Besides, should dissolved27 BrPOs from seaweeds or outer-membrane-bound28 BrPOs from phytoplankton occur, they would have reacted with added H2O2 to produce hypobromous acid (HOBr), a strong oxidant29 that would further remove isoprene. Indeed, the addition of BrPO consumed isoprene because it produced HOBr by reaction with the naturally occurring H2O2. Confirming this interpretation, large HOBr production by simultaneous addition of BrPO and H2O2 caused complete isoprene removal in less than 4 h (Fig. 1b). Therefore, the results shown in Fig. 1b indicate that isoprene is reactive to pervasive H2O2 either directly or through the formation of enzymatically derived HOBr. All in all, first-order total isoprene loss (Fig. 1a) is expected to depend on photochemically-produced oxidants30 like H2O2, OH· and 1O2 as well as on microbiota through (a) microbial uptake and catabolism11 and (b) reaction with biologically produced oxidants26,31,32 like HOBr, H2O2 or superoxide.Variability of isoprene loss rate constants in the open oceanTen of the eleven offshore experimental sites were located in the open ocean, and one was located on the Southwestern Atlantic Shelf. Altogether they covered wide ranges of latitude (40°N–61°S), sea surface temperature (−0.8–28.6 °C), daily-averaged wind speed (3–12 m s−1), fluorometric chlorophyll-a (chla) concentration (0.1–5.8 mg m−3), and isoprene concentration (4–104 nmol m−3) (Fig. 2, Table 1 and Supplementary Table 3). Unfiltered seawater samples from the surface ocean were incubated in glass bottles for 24 h, at the in situ temperature and in the dark, and first-order loss rate constants were determined from initial and final isoprene concentrations (see Methods). Note that loss was determined under the assumption that isoprene production was arrested in the dark25. There is published evidence that residual isoprene production may occur in the dark33, but in our incubations, it was insufficient to counteract loss. Thus, isoprene losses caused by processes other than ventilation may have been underestimated.Fig. 2: Geographical distribution of the offshore experiments.Location of the sampling and incubation sites are shown by circles, coloured for isoprene concentration.Full size imageTable 1 Measured biological variables and isoprene process rate constants.Full size tableLoss rate constants (kloss = kbio + kchem) varied over an order of magnitude, ranging 0.03–0.64 d−1 with a median of 0.08 d−1 (Table 1). They did not show any significant relationship to sea surface temperature (SST) (Supplementary Fig. 1) but showed proportionality to the chla concentration (Fig. 3a) that was best described by the following linear regression equation:$${k}_{{{{{{rm{loss}}}}}}}=0.10; (pm 0.01),{{{{{rm{x}}}}}}, [{{{{{rm{chl}}}}}}a]+0.05; (pm 0.01)$$
(1)
Fig. 3: Isoprene processes and their main drivers.a Rate constant of isoprene loss in dark incubations (kloss, considered to be microbial and chemical consumption) vs. chlorophyll-a concentration. The linear regression equation is kloss = 0.10 × [chla] + 0.05 (R2 = 0.96, p = 10−7, n = 11). The standard error of the slope is 0.01 L mg−1 d−1, and the standard error of the intercept is 0.01 d−1. Error bars represent the experimentally determined standard error of kloss. The colour scale of the circles indicates bacterial abundances. b Specific (chla-normalised) rate of isoprene production vs seawater temperature (SST) across the sample series. The dashed line is the general smoothed trend. The blue line is the exponential adjustment at SST , 1000)$$
(2)
Substitution in Eq. (1) results in:$${k}_{{{{{{rm{loss}}}}}}}=0.14,{{{{{rm{x}}}}}}, {[{{{{{rm{chl}}}}}}{a}_{{{{{{rm{sat}}}}}}}]}^{1.28}+0.05$$
(3)
which is our recommended equation for kloss prediction from satellite chla. Note that only the variable term (kbio) changes from Eq. (1), while the intercept (kchem) is maintained at 0.05 d−1.Comparison of isoprene sinks and total turnover timeThe change of isoprene concentration ([iso]) in the surface mixed layer over time can be described as the budget of sources and sinks:$$varDelta [{{{{{rm{iso}}}}}}]/varDelta {{{{{rm{t}}}}}}=[{{{{{rm{iso}}}}}}]cdot ({k}_{{{{{{rm{prod}}}}}}} – {k}_{{{{{{rm{loss}}}}}}} – {k}_{{{{{{rm{vent}}}}}}} – {k}_{{{{{{rm{mix}}}}}}})$$
(4)
where kprod, kvent and kmix are the rate constants of isoprene production, ventilation to the atmosphere and vertical downward mixing by turbulent diffusion, respectively.We calculated kvent from our sampling sites over a period of 24 h (Table 1). Ventilation has been considered the main isoprene sink from the upper mixed layer of the ocean18. In our sampling sites, kloss was 0.4 to 10 times the kvent (median factor: 1.2). That is, loss through microbial + chemical consumption was of the same order as ventilation, sometimes considerably faster. Vertical mixing, kmix, was estimated to be one order of magnitude lower than the other process rates (Table 1), and in all cases but one it was calculated or assumed not to be a loss term but an import term into the mixed layer, because vertical profiles generally show maximum isoprene concentrations below the mixed layer and turbulent diffusion causes upward transport14,17. Altogether, the microbial, chemical, ventilation, and, where relevant, mixing losses resulted in total turnover times (1/(kloss + kvent + kmix)) of isoprene between 1.4 and 16 days, median 5 days (Table 1).Isoprene productionAssuming steady-state for isoprene concentrations over 24 h (Supplementary Fig. 2), i.e. Δ[iso]/Δt = 0 in Eq. (4), the sum of the daily rate constants of all sinks (kloss + kvent) equals the rate constant of isoprene production (kprod), with kmix adding to either side depending on whether it is an import to or an export from the mixed layer (Table 1). Note that kprod was the highest coinciding with higher [chla]. This is consistent with a recent study44 where measurement of the net biological isoprene production (i.e. production — consumption rates) across seasons in the open ocean was attempted; net production rates increased in May, coinciding with a large increase in [chla] and phytoplankton cell abundance.The product of kprod by the isoprene concentration gives the daily isoprene production rate, which can be normalised by dividing it by the chla concentration. In our study, this specific isoprene production rate varied between 1 and 38 nmol (mg chla)−1 d−1 (Table 1), median 8 nmol (mg chla)−1 d−1. These values are within the broad range reported across phytoplankton taxa from laboratory studies with monocultures41,45 (0.3–32, median 3 nmol (mg chla)−1 d−1, n = 124). Five of the eleven sites gave values >13 nmol (mg chla)−1 d−1, i.e. in the higher end of the laboratory data range. This is not unexpected, since measurements in monoculture experiments are typically conducted before reaching nutrient limitation, below light saturation and in the absence of UV radiation, to mention three stressors commonly occurring in the surface open ocean. If isoprene biosynthesis and release is enhanced by any of these stressors, as is the case in vascular plants7,10, then monoculture-derived results will easily render underestimates of isoprene production in the open ocean. Production by heterotrophic bacteria46 could have also contributed to increase apparent specific isoprene production rates, but the occurrence and importance of this process in the marine environment is unknown.When plotted against the SST, which was also the temperature of the incubations, specific isoprene production rates increased exponentially between −0.8 and 23 °C and dropped drastically at higher SST (Fig. 3b). Several studies with phytoplankton monocultures have reported positive dependence of specific isoprene production rates on temperature45,47,48,49,50. One of these studies45 described that the increase with temperature reaches an optimum for production that varies among phytoplankton strains and with light intensity, but falls around 23–26 °C. The most detailed study47 was conducted with a Prochlorococcus strain; remarkably, the shape of the specific production rate vs. temperature curve for this cyanobacterium strain was almost identical to that of Fig. 3b, with an exponential increase until 23 °C and a drop thereafter. This is the canonical curve type of enzymatic activities, but the thermal behaviour of the enzymes for isoprene synthesis in marine unicellular algae has not yet been characterised12.Revising the magnitude and players of the marine isoprene cycleOur results allow redrawing the isoprene cycle in the surface mixed layer of the ocean. Figure 4 sketches the magnitude of the rate constants for production and sinks presented in Table 1, averaged according to a chla concentration threshold: the blue and green arrows correspond to the experiments in waters with [chla] lower and higher than 0.4 mg m−3, respectively. Isoprene production in productive (chla-richer) waters is faster than in oligotrophic (chla-poorer) waters. Vertical mixing is assumed to majorly constitute an input into the mixed layer, yet very small. Photochemical production and emission from surfactants15 in the surface microlayer of productive waters is depicted as uncertain. Among sinks, the microbiota-dependent consumption is much faster in productive waters; actually, the statistical uncertainty of Eq. (1) and the uneven distribution of incubation results along the [chla] axis hamper resolving kbio in phytoplankton-poor waters ( More

1.Cowen, R. K. & Sponaugle, S. Larval dispersal and marine population connectivity. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 1, 443–466 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
2.Hellberg, M. E. Gene flow and isolation among populations of marine animals. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 40, 291–310 (2009).
Google Scholar 
3.Selkoe, K. A. et al. Taking the chaos out of genetic patchiness: Seascape genetics reveals ecological and oceanographic drivers of genetic patterns in three temperate reef species. Mol. Ecol. 19, 3708–3726 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
4.Guo, X. et al. Phylogeography of the rock shell Thais clavigera (Mollusca): Evidence for long-distance dispersal in the Northwestern Pacific. PLoS ONE 10, e0129715 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Hoffman, J. I., Clarke, A., Linse, K. & Peck, L. S. Effects of brooding and broadcasting reproductive modes on the population genetic structure of two Antarctic gastropod molluscs. Mar. Biol. 158, 287–296 (2011).
Google Scholar 
6.Modica, M. V., Russini, V., Fassio, G. & Oliverio, M. Do larval types affect genetic connectivity at sea? Testing hypothesis in two sibling marine gastropods with contrasting larval development. Mar. Environ. Res. 127, 92–101 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
7.Je Lee, H. & Boulding, E. G. Spatial and temporal population genetic structure of four northeastern Pacific littorinid gastropods: The effect of mode of larval development on variation at one mitochondrial and two nuclear DNA markers. Mol. Ecol. 18, 2165–2184 (2009).
Google Scholar 
8.Barbosa, S. S., Klanten, S. O., Puritz, J. B., Toonen, R. J. & Byrne, M. Very fine-scale population genetic structure of sympatric asterinid sea stars with benthic and pelagic larvae: Influence of mating system and dispersal potential. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 108, 821–833 (2013).
Google Scholar 
9.Shanks, A. L. Pelagic larval duration and dispersal distance revisited. Biol. Bull. 216, 373–385 (2009).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Riginos, C., Buckley, Y. M., Blomberg, S. P. & Treml, E. A. Dispersal capacity predicts both population genetic structure and species richness in reef fishes. Am. Nat. 184, 52–64 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
11.Wort, E. J. G. et al. Contrasting genetic structure of sympatric congeneric gastropods: Do differences in habitat preference, abundance and distribution matter?. J. Biogeogr. 46, 369–380 (2019).
Google Scholar 
12.Ayre, D. J., Minchinton, T. E. & Perrin, C. Does life history predict past and current connectivity for rocky intertidal invertebrates across a marine biogeographic barrier?. Mol. Ecol. 18, 1887–1903 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
13.Meyer, C. P., Geller, J. B. & Paulay, G. Fine scale endemism on coral reefs: Archipelagic differentiation in turbinid gastropods. Evolution (N. Y.) 59, 113–125 (2005).
Google Scholar 
14.White, C. et al. Ocean currents help explain population genetic structure. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 1685–1694 (2010).
Google Scholar 
15.Marko, P. B. ‘What’s larvae got to do with it?’ Disparate patterns of post-glacial population structure in two benthic marine gastropods with identical dispersal potential. Mol. Ecol. 13, 597–611 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
16.Edmands, S. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10, 1743–1750 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
17.Ni, G., Li, Q., Kong, L. & Yu, H. Comparative phylogeography in marginal seas of the northwestern Pacific. Mol. Ecol. 23, 534–548 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
18.Vendrami, D. L. J. et al. RAD sequencing sheds new light on the genetic structure and local adaptation of European scallops and resolves their demographic histories. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
19.Sandoval-Castillo, J., Robinson, N. A., Hart, A. M., Strain, L. W. S. & Beheregaray, L. B. Seascape genomics reveals adaptive divergence in a connected and commercially important mollusc, the greenlip abalone (Haliotis laevigata), along a longitudinal environmental gradient. Mol. Ecol. 27, 1603–1620 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
20.Hirai, J. Insights into reproductive isolation within the pelagic copepod Pleuromamma abdominalis with high genetic diversity using genome-wide SNP data. Mar. Biol. 167, 1–6 (2020).CAS 

Google Scholar 
21.Hosoya, S. et al. Random PCR-based genotyping by sequencing technology GRAS-Di (genotyping by random amplicon sequencing, direct) reveals genetic structure of mangrove fishes. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 1153–1163 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
22.Losos, J. B. & Ricklefs, R. E. Adaptation and diversification on islands. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07893 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
23.Savolainen, V. et al. Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04566 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
24.Parent, C. E. & Crespi, B. J. Ecological opportunity in adaptive radiation of Galápagos endemic land snails. Am. Nat. https://doi.org/10.1086/646604 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
25.Chiba, S. & Cowie, R. H. Evolution and extinction of land snails on oceanic islands. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 47, 123–141 (2016).
Google Scholar 
26.Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin’s finches. Science (80-.) 296, 707–711 (2002).CAS 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
27.Scheltema, R. The relevance of passive dispersal for the biogeography of Caribbean mollusks. Am. Malacol. Bull. 11, 95–115 (1995).
Google Scholar 
28.Bernardi, G. et al. Darwin’s fishes: Phylogeography of Galápagos Islands reef fishes. Bull. Mar. Sci. 90, 533–549 (2014).
Google Scholar 
29.Eble, J. A., Toonen, R. J. & Bowen, B. W. Endemism and dispersal: Comparative phylogeography of three surgeonfishes across the Hawaiian Archipelago. Mar. Biol. 156, 689–698 (2009).
Google Scholar 
30.Tomokuni, M. M. Aquatic and Semiaquatic Insects of the Bonin Islands (including the Volcano Islands). Mem. Natl. Sci. Museum (1978).31.Sugawara, T., Watanabe, K., Kato, H. & Yasuda, K. Dioecy in Wikstroemia pseudoretusa (Thymelaeaceae) endemic to the Bonin (Ogasawara) islands. APG Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. https://doi.org/10.18942/apg.KJ00004622804 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Chiba, S. Species diversity and conservation of Mandarina, an endemic land snail of the Ogasawara Islands. In Restoring the Oceanic Island Ecosystem: Impact and Management of Invasive Alien Species in the Bonin Islands (eds Kawakami, K. & Okochi, I.) 117–125 (Springer, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53859-2_18.Chapter 

Google Scholar 
33.Mukai, T., Nakamura, S., Suzuki, T. & Nishida, M. Mitochondrial DNA divergence in yoshinobori gobies (Rhinogobius species complex) between the Bonin Islands and the Japan-Ryukyu Archipelago. Ichthyol. Res. 52, 410–413 (2005).
Google Scholar 
34.Shih, H. T., Komai, T. & Liu, M. Y. A new species of fiddler crab from the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands, Japan, separated from the widely-distributed sister species Uca (Paraleptuca) crassipes (White, 1847) (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Ocypodidae). Zootaxa 3746, 175–193 (2013).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
35.Yamazaki, D. et al. Genetic diversification of intertidal gastropoda in an archipelago: The effects of islands, oceanic currents, and ecology. Mar. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-017-3207-9 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Nakano, T., Takahashi, K. & Ozawa, T. Description of an endangered new species of Lunella (Gastropoda:Turbinidae) from the Ogasawara Islands, Japan. Venus J. Malacol. Soc. Japan 66, 1–10 (2007).
Google Scholar 
37.Nakano, T., Yazaki, I., Kurokawa, M., Yamaguchi, K. & Kuwasawa, K. The origin of the endemic patellogastropod limpets of the Ogasawara Islands in the northwestern Pacific. J. Molluscan Stud. 75, 87–90 (2009).
Google Scholar 
38.González-Wevar, C. A., Nakano, T., Palma, A. & Poulin, E. Biogeography in cellana (patellogastropoda, nacellidae) with special emphasis on the relationships of southern hemisphere oceanic island species. PLoS ONE 12, 1–16 (2017).
Google Scholar 
39.Tenggardjaja, K. A., Bowen, B. W. & Bernardi, G. Reef fish dispersal in the Hawaiian Archipelago: Comparative phylogeography of three endemic damselfishes. J. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3251814 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Tenggardjaja, K. A., Bowen, B. W. & Bernardi, G. Comparative phylogeography of widespread and endemic damselfishes in the Hawaiian Archipelago. Mar. Biol. 165, 1–21 (2018).
Google Scholar 
41.Kurozumi, T. & Asakura, A. Marine molluscs from the northern Mariana Islands, Micronesia. Nat. Hist. Res. Spec. Issue 1, 121–168 (1994).
Google Scholar 
42.Nakano, D. & Makoto, N. Age structure and growth in a population of Monodonta labio (Linnaeus) at Shima Peninsula, Japan. Venus J. Malacol. Soc. Japan 40, 34–40 (1981).
Google Scholar 
43.Hashino, T. & Tomiyama, K. Life history of Monodonta labio confusa Tapprone-Canefri, 1874 in Kagoshima Bay, Kyushu, Japan and age estimation based on annual ring analysis of shell. Nat. Kagoshima 39, 143–155 (2013).
Google Scholar 
44.Yoh, A. & Sakurai, I. Reproductive cycle and food habits of the herbivorous snail Monodonta confusa off the coast of Suttsu Bay in southwestern Hokkaido, Japan. Proc. Sch. Biol. Sci. Tokai Univ. 6, 17–23 (2017).
Google Scholar 
45.Sasaki, R. Larval identification and occurrence of ezo abalone, Haliotis discus hannai, in the adjacent waters of Kesennuma Bay, Miyagi Prefecture. Suisan Zoushoku 32, 199–206 (1985).
Google Scholar 
46.Yamazaki, D., Miura, O., Uchida, S., Ikeda, M. & Chiba, S. Comparative seascape genetics of co-distributed intertidal snails Monodonta spp. in the Japanese and Ryukyu archipelagoes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 657, 135–146 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
47.Ballard, J. W. O. & Whitlock, M. C. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13, 729–744 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
48.Parham, J. F. et al. Genetic introgression and hybridization in Antillean freshwater turtles (Trachemys) revealed by coalescent analyses of mitochondrial and cloned nuclear markers. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 67, 176–187 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
49.Hirano, T. et al. Enigmatic incongruence between mtDNA and nDNA revealed by multi-locus phylogenomic analyses in freshwater snails. Sci. Rep. 9, 6223 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
50.Funk, D. J. & Omland, K. E. Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 397–423 (2003).
Google Scholar 
51.Toews, D. P. L. & Brelsford, A. The biogeography of mitochondrial and nuclear discordance in animals. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3907–3930 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
52.Hirase, S. et al. Integrative genomic phylogeography reveals signs of mitonuclear incompatibility in a natural hybrid goby population. Evolution (N.Y.) 75, 176–194 (2021).
Google Scholar 
53.Zhao, D., Li, Q., Kong, L. & Yu, H. Cryptic diversity of marine gastropod Monodonta labio (Trochidae): Did the early Pleistocene glacial isolation and sea surface temperature gradient jointly drive diversification of sister species and/or subspecies in the Northwestern Pacific?. Mar. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12443 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Mukai, T., Nakamura, S. & Nishida, M. Genetic population structure of a reef goby, Bathygobius cocosensis, in the northwestern Pacific. Ichthyol. Res. 56, 380–387 (2009).
Google Scholar 
55.Keith, S. A., Herbert, R. J. H., Norton, P. A., Hawkins, S. J. & Newton, A. C. Individualistic species limitations of climate-induced range expansions generated by meso-scale dispersal barriers. Divers. Distrib. 17, 275–286 (2011).
Google Scholar 
56.Faurby, S. & Barber, P. H. Theoretical limits to the correlation between pelagic larval duration and population genetic structure. Mol. Ecol. 21, 3419–3432 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
57.Funk, W. C. et al. Adaptive divergence despite strong genetic drift: Genomic analysis of the evolutionary mechanisms causing genetic differentiation in the island fox (Urocyon littoralis). Mol. Ecol. 25, 2176–2194 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Whiteley, A. R. et al. Genetic variation and effective population size in isolated populations of coastal cutthroat trout. Conserv. Genet. 11, 1929–1943 (2010).
Google Scholar 
59.Riginos, C., Douglas, K. E., Jin, Y., Shanahan, D. F. & Treml, E. A. Effects of geography and life history traits on genetic differentiation in benthic marine fishes. Ecography (Cop.) 34, 566–575 (2011).
Google Scholar 
60.Kuriiwa, K., Chiba, S. N., Motomura, H. & Matsuura, K. Phylogeography of Blacktip Grouper, Epinephelus fasciatus (Perciformes: Serranidae), and influence of the Kuroshio Current on cryptic lineages and genetic population structure. Ichthyol. Res. 61, 361–374 (2014).
Google Scholar 
61.Tachikawa, H. Nature profile of the isolated oceanic island, the Bonin Islands. Midoriishi 5, 27–29 (1994).
Google Scholar 
62.Setsuko, S. et al. Genetic diversity, structure, and demography of Pandanus boninensis (Pandanaceae) with sea drifted seeds, endemic to the Ogasawara Islands of Japan: Comparison between young and old islands. Mol. Ecol. 29, 1050–1068 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
63.Asakura, A. & Nishihama, S. Studies on the biology and ecology of the intertidal animals of Chichijima Island in the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands III: Description, form and habitat of the trochid snail, Monodonta perplexa boninensis n. subsp. in comparison with those in Monodonta perpl. Venus J. Malacol. Soc. Japan 46, 194–201 (1987).
Google Scholar 
64.Nakano, T. & Minato, R. Marine organisms in the intertidal zone of Nishinoshima Island. Ogasawara Res. 46, 109–121 (2019).
Google Scholar 
65.Sasaki, T. & Horikoshi, K. Marine animals of Minami-Iw-To lsland. Ogasawara Res. 33, 155–171 (2008).
Google Scholar 
66.Williams, S., Apte, D., Ozawa, T., Kaligis, F. & Nakano, T. Speciation and dispersal along continental coastlines and island arcs in the indo-west pacific turbinid gastropod genus lunella. Evolution (N. Y.) 65, 1752–1771 (2011).
Google Scholar 
67.Siddall, M. et al. Sea-level fluctuations during the last glacial cycle. Nature 423, 853–858 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
68.Setsuko, S. et al. Genetic variation of pantropical Terminalia catappa plants with sea-drifted seeds in the Bonin Islands: Suggestions for transplantation guidelines. Plant Species Biol. 32, 13–24 (2017).
Google Scholar 
69.Hedgecock, D. Is gene flow from pelagic larval dispersal important in the adaptation and evolution of marine invertebrates?. Bull. Mar. Sci. 39, 550–564 (1986).
Google Scholar 
70.Parsons, K. E. The genetic effects of larval dispersal depend on spatial scale and habitat characteristics. Mar. Biol. 126, 403–414 (1996).CAS 

Google Scholar 
71.Pechenik, J. A. On the advantages and disadvantages of larval stages in benthic marine invertebrate life cycles. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 177, 269–297 (1999).ADS 

Google Scholar 
72.Scheltema, R. S. Larval dispersal as a means of genetic exchange between geographically separated populations of shallow-water benthic marine gastropods. Biol. Bull. 140, 284–322 (1971).
Google Scholar 
73.Wright, L. I., Tregenza, T. & Hosken, D. J. Inbreeding, inbreeding depression and extinction. Conserv. Genet. 9, 833–843 (2008).
Google Scholar 
74.Caley, M. J. et al. Recruitment and the local dynamics of open marine populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 477–500 (1996).
Google Scholar 
75.Johannesson, K. The paradox of Rockall: Why is a brooding gastropod (Littorina saxatilis) more widespread than one having a planktonic larval dispersal stage (L. littorea)?. Mar. Biol. 99, 507–513 (1988).
Google Scholar 
76.Nakajima, Y., Nishikawa, A., Iguchi, A. & Sakai, K. Regional genetic differentiation among northern high-latitude island populations of a broadcast-spawning coral. Coral Reefs 31, 1125–1133 (2012).ADS 

Google Scholar 
77.Bowen, B. W. et al. Comparative phylogeography of the ocean planet. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 113, 7962–7969 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.Funk, W. C., McKay, J. K., Hohenlohe, P. A. & Allendorf, F. W. Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 489–496 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Palumbi, S. R. Population genetics, demographic connectivity, and the design of marine reserves. Ecol. Appl. 13, 146–158 (2003).
Google Scholar 
80.Jones, G., Srinivasan, M. & Almany, G. Population connectivity and conservation of marine biodiversity. Oceanography 20, 100–111 (2007).
Google Scholar 
81.Colgan, D. J., Ponder, W. F., Beacham, E. & Macaranas, J. M. Gastropod phylogeny based on six segments from four genes representing coding or non-coding and mitochondrial or nuclear DNA. Molluscan Res. https://doi.org/10.1071/MR03002 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Griekspoor, A. & Groothuis, T. 4peaks. Ver. 1.7.1. http://nucleobytes.com/4peaks/ (2005).83.Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 (1994).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
84.Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkh340 (2004).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
85.Excoffier, L. & Lischer, H. E. L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 564–567 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
86.Excoffier, L., Smouse, P. E. & Quattro, J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131, 479–491 (1992).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
87.Bandelt, H., Forster, P. & Röhl, A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16, 37–48 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
88.Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. POPART: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).
Google Scholar 
89.Peterson, B. K., Weber, J. N., Kay, E. H., Fisher, H. S. & Hoekstra, H. E. Double digest RADseq: An inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS ONE 7, e37135 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
90.Eaton, D. A. R. & Overcast, I. ipyrad: Interactive assembly and analysis of RADseq datasets. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz966 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
91.Meirmans, P. G. & Van Tienderen, P. H. genotype and genodive: Two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4, 792–794 (2004).
Google Scholar 
92.Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4, 9 (2001).
Google Scholar 
93.Mussmann, S. M., Douglas, M. R., Chafin, T. K. & Douglas, M. E. BA3-SNPs: Contemporary migration reconfigured in BayesAss for next-generation sequence data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1808–1813 (2019).
Google Scholar 
94.Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. Tracer v1.6. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/tracer/ (2013).95.Excoffier, L., Dupanloup, I., Huerta-Sánchez, E., Sousa, V. C. & Foll, M. Robust demographic inference from genomic and SNP data. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003905 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More