Ecology

1.Vigne, J.-D. Early domestication and farming: What should we know or do for a better understanding?. Anthropozoologica 50(2), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.5252/az2015n2a5 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Zeder, M. A. Animal domestication in the Zagros: An update and directions for future research. MOM Édit. 49(1), 243–277 (2008).
Google Scholar 
3.Sponenberg, D. P. & Bixby, D. E. Managing Breeds for a Secure Future: Strategies for Breeders and Breed Associations (ALBC, 2007).
Google Scholar 
4.Taberlet, P. et al. Are cattle, sheep, and goats endangered species?. Mol. Ecol. 17(1), 275–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03475.x (2008).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
5.Berihulay, H., Abied, A., He, X., Jiang, L. & Ma, Y. Adaptation mechanisms of small ruminants to environmental heat stress. Anim. Open Access J. MDPI 9(3), 75. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9030075 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Leroy, G., Baumung, R., Boettcher, P., Scherf, B. & Hoffmann, I. Review: Sustainability of crossbreeding in developing countries; definitely not like crossing a meadow…. Animal 10(2), 262–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175173111500213X (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
7.Edea, Z., Dadi, H., Dessie, T. & Kim, K.-S. Genomic signatures of high-altitude adaptation in Ethiopian sheep populations. Genes Genomics 41(8), 973–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-019-00820-y (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Wei, C. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals adaptation to high altitudes in Tibetan sheep. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 26770. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26770 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Yang, J. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of native sheep provides insights into rapid adaptations to extreme environments. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33(10), 2576–2592. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw129 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Kim, E. S. et al. Multiple genomic signatures of selection in goats and sheep indigenous to a hot arid environment. Heredity 116(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2015.94 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
11.Ciani, E. et al. On the origin of European sheep as revealed by the diversity of the Balkan breeds and by optimizing population-genetic analysis tools. Genet. Sel. Evol. GSE 52, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-020-00545-7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Colli, L. et al. Genome-wide SNP profiling of worldwide goat populations reveals strong partitioning of diversity and highlights post-domestication migration routes. Genet. Sel. Evol. GSE 50, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0422-x (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Kijas, J. W. et al. A genome wide survey of SNP variation reveals the genetic structure of sheep breeds. PLoS ONE 4(3), e4668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0004668 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Brisebarre, A. Races ovines, systèmes d’élevage et représentations des éleveurs. in Développement rural, environnement et enjeux territoriaux. Regards croisés Oriental marocain et Sud-Est tunisien (dir. Bonte, P., Elloumi, M., Guillaume, H. & Mahdi, M.) 63–78 (Cérès Ed., 2009).15.Hall, S. J. G. Livestock biodiversity as interface between people, landscapes and nature. People Nat. 1(3), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.23 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Caballero, R. et al. Grazing Systems and Biodiversity in Mediterranean Areas: Spain, Italy and Greece (Pastos, 2011).
Google Scholar 
17.Collantes, F. The demise of European Mountain Pastoralism: Spain 1500–2000. Nomadic People 13(2), 124–145 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Luu, K., Bazin, E. & Blum, M. G. B. pcadapt: An R package to perform genome scans for selection based on principal component analysis. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12592 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
19.Frichot, E., Schoville, S. D., Bouchard, G. & François, O. Testing for associations between loci and environmental gradients using latent factor mixed models. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30(7), 1687–1699. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst063 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.FAO. The State of the World’s Animal Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, edited by B. Rischkowsky & D. Pilling. Rome. (2007).21.François, O. Running Structure-Like Population Genetic Analyses with R. R Tutorials in Population Genetics 1–9 (U. Grenoble-Alpes, 2016).
Google Scholar 
22.Dalongeville, A., Benestan, L., Mouillot, D., Lobreaux, S. & Manel, S. Combining six genome scan methods to detect candidate genes to salinity in the Mediterranean striped red mullet (Mullus surmuletus). BMC Genomics 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4579-z (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.De Kort, H., Vandepitte, K., Mergeay, J., Mijnsbrugge, K. V. & Honnay, O. The population genomic signature of environmental selection in the widespread insect-pollinated tree species Frangula alnus at different geographical scales. Heredity 115(5), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2015.41 (2015).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Capblancq, T., Luu, K., Blum, M. G. B. & Bazin, E. Evaluation of redundancy analysis to identify signatures of local adaptation. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 18(6), 1223–1233. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12906 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
25.Bertolini, F. et al. Signatures of selection and environmental adaptation across the goat genome post-domestication. Genet. Sel. Evol. 50(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0421-y (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Fariello, M.-I. et al. Selection signatures in worldwide sheep populations. PLoS ONE 9(8), e103813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0103813 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Manunza, A. et al. Population structure of eleven Spanish ovine breeds and detection of selective sweeps with BayeScan and hapFLK. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep27296 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Oget, C., Servin, B. & Palhière, I. Genetic diversity analysis of French goat populations reveals selective sweeps involved in their differentiation. Anim. Genet. 50(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12752 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
29.Rochus, C. M. et al. Revealing the selection history of adaptive loci using genome-wide scans for selection: An example from domestic sheep. BMC Genomics 19(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4447-x (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Ruiz-Larrañaga, O. et al. Genomic selection signatures in sheep from the Western Pyrenees. Genet. Sel. Evol. GSE 50, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0378-x (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Wang, Q., Wang, D., Yan, G., Sun, L. & Tang, C. TRPC6 is required for hypoxia-induced basal intracellular calcium concentration elevation, and for the proliferation and migration of rat distal pulmonary venous smooth muscle cells. Mol. Med. Rep. 13(2), 1577–1585. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.4750 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
32.Wang, X. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of eight goat populations for the detection of selection signatures underlying production and adaptive traits. Sci. Rep. 6, 38932. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep38932 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Graae, B. et al. On the use of weather data in ecological studies along altitudinal and latitudinal gradients. Oikos 121, 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19694.x (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Rellstab, C., Gugerli, F., Eckert, A. J., Hancock, A. M. & Holderegger, R. A practical guide to environmental association analysis in landscape genomics. Mol. Ecol. 24(17), 4348–4370. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13322 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
35.Qi, X. et al. The transcriptomic landscape of yaks reveals molecular pathways for high altitude adaptation. Genome Biol. Evol. 11(1), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evy264 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
36.Yang, F., Wang, Q., Wang, M., He, K. & Pan, Y. Associations between gene polymorphisms in two crucial metabolic pathways and growth traits in pigs. Chin. Sci. Bull. 57(21), 2733–2740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-012-5328-3 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Schmidt, H. et al. Hypoxia tolerance, longevity and cancer-resistance in the mole rat Spalax—A liver transcriptomics approach. Sci. Rep. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13905-z (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Tian, R. et al. Adaptive evolution of energy metabolism-related genes in hypoxia-tolerant mammals. Front. Genet. 8, 205. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00205 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Cheng, A. H. et al. SOX2-dependent transcription in clock neurons promotes the robustness of the central circadian pacemaker. Cell Rep. 26(12), 3191-3202.e8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.068 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Bai, L. et al. Hypoxic and cold adaptation insights from the Himalayan Marmot Genome. IScience 11, 519–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2018.11.034 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
41.Stronen, A. V., Pertoldi, C., Iacolina, L., Kadarmideen, H. N. & Kristensen, T. N. Genomic analyses suggest adaptive differentiation of northern European native cattle breeds. Evol. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1111/eva.12783 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Lan, D. et al. Genetic diversity, molecular phylogeny, and selection evidence of Jinchuan Yak revealed by whole-genome resequencing. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 8(3), 945–952. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.118.300572 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Chen, J. et al. Deletion of TRPC6 attenuates NMDA receptor-mediated Ca2+ entry and Ca2+-induced neurotoxicity following cerebral ischemia and oxygen-glucose deprivation. Front. Neurosci. 11, 138. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00138 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Munsch, T., Freichel, M., Flockerzi, V. & Pape, H.-C. Contribution of transient receptor potential channels to the control of GABA release from dendrites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100(26), 16065–16070. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2535311100 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Duan, J. et al. Structure of the mouse TRPC4 ion channel. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1101/282715 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Malczyk, M. et al. The role of transient receptor potential channel 6 channels in the pulmonary vasculature. Front. Immunol. 8, 707. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00707 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Li, S. et al. Crucial role of TRPC6 in maintaining the stability of HIF-1α in glioma cells under hypoxia. J. Cell Sci. 128(17), 3317–3329. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.173161 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
48.Xu, L. et al. Chronic hypoxia increases TRPC6 expression and basal intracellular Ca2+ concentration in rat distal pulmonary venous smooth muscle. PLoS ONE 9(11), e112007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0112007 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Deng, L. et al. Prioritizing natural-selection signals from the deep-sequencing genomic data suggests multi-variant adaptation in Tibetan highlanders. Natl. Sci. Rev. 6(6), 1201–1222. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwz108 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
50.Howard, J. T. et al. Beef cattle body temperature during climatic stress: A genome-wide association study. Int. J. Biometeorol. 58, 1665–1672. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-013-0773-5 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
51.Kijas, J. W. et al. Genome-wide analysis of the world’s sheep breeds reveals high levels of historic mixture and strong recent selection. PLoS Biol. 10(2), e1001258. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001258 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Wei, C. et al. Genome-wide analysis reveals population structure and selection in Chinese indigenous sheep breeds. BMC Genomics 16(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1384-9 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Chen, M. et al. Genome-wide detection of selection signatures in Chinese indigenous Laiwu pigs revealed candidate genes regulating fat deposition in muscle. BMC Genet. 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-018-0622-y (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Chen, C. et al. Copy number variation in the MSRB3 gene enlarges porcine ear size through a mechanism involving miR-584-5p. Genet. Sel. Evol. GSE 50, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-018-0442-6 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Webster, M. T. et al. Linked genetic variants on chromosome 10 control ear morphology and body mass among dog breeds. BMC Genomics 16, 474. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1702-2 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
56.Mastrangelo, S. et al. Novel and known signals of selection for fat deposition in domestic sheep breeds from Africa and Eurasia. PLoS ONE 14(6), e0209632. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209632 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
57.Xi, Y. et al. HMGA2 promotes adipogenesis by activating C/EBPβ-mediated expression of PPARγ. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 472(4), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.015 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
58.Gou, X. et al. Whole-genome sequencing of six dog breeds from continuous altitudes reveals adaptation to high-altitude hypoxia. Genome Res. 24(8), 1308–1315. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.171876.113 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Yuan, Z. et al. Selection signature analysis reveals genes associated with tail type in Chinese indigenous sheep. Anim. Genet. 48(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12477 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
60.Zhu, C. et al. GWAS and Post-GWAS to Identification of Genes Associated with Sheep Tail Fat Deposition. Retrieved from https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201906.0093/v1 (2019).61.Allais-Bonnet, A. et al. Novel insights into the bovine polled phenotype and horn ontogenesis in Bovidae. PLoS ONE 8(5), e63512. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063512 (2013).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Johnston, S. E. et al. Genome-wide association mapping identifies the genetic basis of discrete and quantitative variation in sexual weaponry in a wild sheep population. Mol. Ecol. 20(12), 2555–2566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05076.x (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
63.Oksenberg, N., Stevison, L., Wall, J. D. & Ahituv, N. Function and regulation of AUTS2, a gene implicated in autism and human evolution. PLoS Genet. 9(1), e1003221. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1003221 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Hayashi, S. & Takeichi, M. Emerging roles of protocadherins: From self-avoidance to enhancement of motility. J. Cell Sci. 128(8), 1455–1464. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.166306 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
65.Seong, E., Yuan, L. & Arikkath, J. Cadherins and catenins in dendrite and synapse morphogenesis. Cell Adhes. Migr. 9(3), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.4161/19336918.2014.994919 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Shin, D.-H. et al. Deleted copy number variation of Hanwoo and Holstein using next generation sequencing at the population level. BMC Genomics 15(1), 240. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-15-240 (2014).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Zeng, X. Angus Cattle at High Altitude: Pulmonary Arterial Pressure, Estimated Breeding Value and Genome-Wide Association Study (PhD thesis). (Colorado State University, 2017).68.Benjelloun, B. Diversité des génomes et adaptation locale des petits ruminants d’un pays méditerranéen : le Maroc (PhD thesis) (Université Grenoble Alpes, France, 2015).69.Onzima, R. B. et al. Genome-wide characterization of selection signatures and runs of homozygosity in Ugandan Goat Breeds. Front. Genet. 9, 318. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00318 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Farzana, F. et al. Neurobeachin regulates glutamate- and GABA-receptor targeting to synapses via distinct pathways. Mol. Neurobiol. 53(4), 2112–2123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-015-9164-8 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
71.Nair, R. et al. Neurobeachin regulates neurotransmitter receptor trafficking to synapses. J. Cell Biol. 200(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201207113 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
72.Alberto, F. J. et al. Convergent genomic signatures of domestication in sheep and goats. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03206-y (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Iranmehr, A. et al. Novel insight into the genetic basis of high-altitude pulmonary hypertension in Kyrgyz highlanders. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. EJHG 27(1), 150–159. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0270-8 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
74.Newman, J. H. et al. High-altitude pulmonary hypertension in cattle (Brisket disease): Candidate genes and gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Pulmon. Circ. 1(4), 462–469. https://doi.org/10.4103/2045-8932.93545 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Yang, X., Kong, Q., Zhao, C., Cai, Z., & Wang, M. New pathogenic variant of BMPR2 in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Cardiology in the Young, 29(4), 462–466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951119000015 (2019).76.Anderson, L. et al. Bmp2 and Bmp4 exert opposing effects in hypoxic pulmonary hypertension. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 298(3), R833–R842. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpregu.00534.2009 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Ciani, E. et al. Genome-wide analysis of Italian sheep diversity reveals a strong geographic pattern and cryptic relationships between breeds. Anim. Genet. 45(2), 256–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/age.12106 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
78.ESRI. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2011).
Google Scholar 
79.Ruiz, M. & Ruiz, J. P. Ecological history of transhumance in Spain. Biol. Conserv. 37, 73–86 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Jarvis, A., Reuter, H. I., Nelson, A. & Guevara, E. Hole-filled seamless SRTM dataV4, International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT). Available from https://srtm.csi.cgiar.org (2008).82.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018). https://www.R-project.org.83.Brenning, A. Statistical geocomputing combining R and SAGA: The example of landslide susceptibility analysis with generalized additive models. In Hamburger Beitraege zur Physischen Geographie und Landschaftsoekologie (eds Böhner, J. et al.) 23–32 (SAGA, 2008).
Google Scholar 
84.Bivand, R. S., Pebesma, E. & Gomez-Rubio, V. Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R 2nd edn (Springer, 2013). http://www.asdar-book.org/.85.Pebesma, E. J. & Bivand, R. S. Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5(2), 9–13. https://CRAN.R-project.org/doc/Rnews/ (2005).86.Keitt, T. H., Bivand, R., Pebesma, E. & Rowlingson, B. rgdal: Bindings for the geospatial data abstraction library. Copy at http://www.tinyurl.com/h8w8n29 (2010).87.Le, S., Josse, J. & Husson, F. FactoMineR: An R package for multivariate analysis. J. Stat. Softw 25(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v025.i01 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27(15), 2156–2158. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr330 (2011).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
89.Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81(3), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1086/519795 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Frichot, E. & François, O. LEA: An R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6(8), 925–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12382 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Cattell, R. B. The Scree plot test for the number of factors. Multivar. Behav. Res. 1, 140–161 (1966).
Google Scholar 
92.Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 100, 9440–9445. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1530509100 (2003).ADS 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
93.Lee, D. D. & Seung, H. S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401(6755), 788–791 (1999).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Ablondi, M., Viklund, Å., Lindgren, G., Eriksson, S. & Mikko, S. Signatures of selection in the genome of Swedish warmblood horses selected for sport performance. BMC Genomics 20(1), 717. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-019-6079-1 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
95.Avila, F., Mickelson, J. R., Schaefer, R. J. & McCue, M. E. Genome-wide signatures of selection reveal genes associated with performance in American Quarter Horse subpopulations. Front. Genet. 9, 249. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00249 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
96.Chen, M. et al. Identification of selective sweeps reveals divergent selection between Chinese Holstein and Simmental cattle populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 48(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-016-0254-5 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
97.Cheruiyot, E. K. et al. Signatures of selection in admixed dairy cattle in Tanzania. Front. Genet. 9, 607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00607 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
98.López, M. E. et al. Multiple selection signatures in farmed Atlantic Salmon adapted to different environments across hemispheres. Front. Genet. 10, 901. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.00901 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
99.Alexander, D. H., Novembre, J. & Lange, K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 19(9), 1655–1664. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.094052.109 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
100.Alexander, D. H. & Lange, K. Enhancements to the ADMIXTURE algorithm for individual ancestry estimation. BMC Bioinform. 12, 246 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
101.Frichot, E., Mathieu, F., Trouillon, T., Bouchard, G. & Francois, O. Fast and efficient estimation of individual ancestry coefficients. Genetics 196, 973–983 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Kopelman, N. M., Mayzel, J., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A. & Mayrose, I. Clumpak: A program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15(5), 1179–1191. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12387 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
103.Jombart, T. Adegenet: A R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24, 1403–1405 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

NEWS
01 November 2021

Scientists say Australian plan to cull up to 10,000 wild horses doesn’t go far enough

A fast-growing population of feral horses in an alpine national park needs to be substantially reduced in number, researchers argue.

Bianca Nogrady

0

Bianca Nogrady

Bianca Nogrady is a freelance science journalist based in Sydney, Australia.

View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed
 Google Scholar

Share on Twitter
Share on Twitter

Share on Facebook
Share on Facebook

Share via E-Mail
Share via E-Mail

Brumbies roam a wintry landscape near Yarangobilly in Australia’s Kosciuszko National Park.Credit: Perry Duffin/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Up to 10,000 feral horses might be killed or removed from Australia’s largest alpine national park under a draft plan to control the rapidly growing population of non-native animals. Scientists have welcomed the idea of removing them, but are alarmed that the plan still allows for thousands to remain, threatening endangered species and habitats.The proposed cull, in Kosciuszko National Park, New South Wales (NSW), contrasts with a ban on lethal control measures in the United States, where large populations of wild horses known as mustangs also cause problems.
Australian scientists call for ‘feral horse’ culls in alpine national park
The draft plan, released last month, recommends reducing the park’s population of wild horses, known in Australia as brumbies, from an estimated 14,000 to about 3,000 through a combination of mostly ground-based shooting, as well as rounding up and rehoming.But the Australian Academy of Science argues that the number of horses should be rapidly reduced below 3,000. In an open letter with 69 signatories including scientists and institutions sent to the NSW environment minister on Friday, they note that “alpine wetlands continue to degrade even with very small numbers of feral horses. Kosciusko cannot begin to recover from drought, extensive bushfires and overgrazing if, as currently proposed, 3,000 feral horses remain.”Capitulating to lobby groupsResearchers say the draft plan capitulates to a small but vocal group that has lobbied the government to protect horses because of the animals’ heritage value. The plan would allow the remaining brumbies to roam over one-third of the park. That would include threatened alpine sphagnum bogs and the habitats of endangered and vulnerable species such as a fish called the stocky galaxias (Galaxias tantangara), the alpine tree frog (Litoria verreauxii alpina) and the broad-toothed rat (Mastacomys fuscus).Australia has no native mammals with hard hooves, and so horses do more damage to delicate vegetation and soils than soft-footed species, such as kangaroos and wallabies, as well as creating problems through over-grazing.
Ancient DNA points to origins of modern domestic horses
David Watson, an ecologist at Charles Sturt University in Albury–Wodonga — which straddles NSW and the neighbouring state of Victoria — says the NSW government “couldn’t have picked a worse place” to allow feral horses to roam. He makes the point that Australia’s alpine environment covers just 1% of the continent and has many endemic and threatened species that are found nowhere else.“These areas are just too fragile to have large herbivores trampling around in them,” adds Don Driscoll, an ecologist at Deakin University in Melbourne.Management of feral horses has been a long-running issue in Australia’s mountainous alpine region, which extends across three states. The Australian Capital Territory, which shares a border with Kosciuszko National Park, has a zero-tolerance approach to feral horses and uses methods including aerial shooting.Victoria also shares an alpine border with New South Wales, but its latest management plan, released on 1 November, recommends using culling and other measures to remove all feral horses in the most delicate alpine environments, and the steady reduction of numbers elsewhere.Brumbies and mustangsThe NSW state government had previously tried to control the brumbies by rehoming them on private land, but was never able to find a place for more than a few hundred horses a year, rehoming only about 1,000 since 2002. Jamie Pittock, an environmental scientist at the Australian National University in Canberra, says that the government’s acknowledgement that the exponentially growing population cannot be managed with rehoming alone is at least “a step forward”.But Watson says that 3,000 horses would breed rapidly enough that 1,000 would still need to be removed or killed every few years, meaning that even a small population will create a continuing headache in terms of damage to the park and removal requirements.
Ancient horses went dark to hide in forests
A spokesperson for the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service said the proposed target of 3,000 horses would maintain the “environmental values of the park” and that removing horses from two thirds of the park would provide “effective protection” for threatened species. They did not respond to Nature’s specific questions about scientists’ criticisms of the draft plan.The United States is grappling with similar issues with mustangs in national parks, says ecosystem scientist John Derek Scasta at the University of Wyoming in Laramie. “The goal is to get within an agreed-upon number of horses that are sustainable,” he says, but not everybody agrees on what that number is.Because legislation bans culling, the US Bureau of Land Management instead relies on rounding up, sterilization, rehoming or paying to keep the horses on either private or federal holdings. But Scasta says rising numbers, and the costs of looking after them, might mean the United States has to face its own reckoning with wild horses in the not-too-distant future.

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02977-7

Related Articles

Australian scientists call for ‘feral horse’ culls in alpine national park

Ancient DNA points to origins of modern domestic horses

Ancient horses went dark to hide in forests

Subjects

Government

Policy

Environmental sciences

Conservation biology

Latest on:

Government

Scientists’ fears of racial bias surge amid US crackdown on China ties
News 29 OCT 21

Why hundreds of scientists are weighing in on a high-stakes US abortion case
News 26 OCT 21

Brazil’s scientists face 90% budget cut
Correspondence 25 OCT 21

Policy

UK research funding to grow slower than hoped
News 28 OCT 21

The advocacy frontier
Outlook 27 OCT 21

The fluoride wars rage on
Outlook 27 OCT 21

Environmental sciences

Machine learning enables global solar-panel detection
News & Views 27 OCT 21

Air quality: WHO guidelines could deepen inequities
Correspondence 26 OCT 21

Marine urban sprawl is gobbling up Earth’s coastlines
Research Highlight 26 OCT 21

Jobs

Epidemiologist / Postdoc

German Cancer Research Center in the Helmholtz Association (DKFZ)
Heidelberg, Germany

PhD Student in Liquid Biopsy

German Cancer Research Center in the Helmholtz Association (DKFZ)
Germany

PhD (f/m/d) Data-driven Continuum Modelling of Infected Cell Dynamics on the Tissue Scale / Master’s degree in physics, computer science, bioinformatics, computational biology, data science, machine learning or relevant discipline / …

Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR)
Görlitz, Germany

PhD (f/m/d) Generative Machine Learning of Time-Lapse Virological Imaging Data / Master’s degree in Computer science, Bioinformatics, Computational biology, Data science, Machine learning or relevant discipline / Engage with our …

Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR)
Görlitz, Germany More

1.Pérez, J., Moraleda-Muñoz, A., Marcos-Torres, F. J. & Muñoz-Dorado, J. Bacterial predation: 75 years and counting!. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 766–779 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Linares-Otoya, L. et al. Diversity and antimicrobial potential of predatory bacteria from the Peruvian coastline. Mar. Drugs. 15, E308. https://doi.org/10.3390/md15100308 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Pasternak, Z. et al. By their genes ye shall know them: Genomic signatures of predatory bacteria. ISME J. 7, 756–769 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Sockett, R. E. Predatory lifestyle of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. Ann. Rev. Microbiol. 63, 523–539 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Korp, J., Vela Gurovic, M. S. & Nett, M. Antibiotics from predatory bacteria. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 12, 594–607 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Johnke, J., Fraune, S., Bosch, T. C. G., Hentschel, U. & Schulenburg, H. Bdellovibrio and like organisms are predictors of microbiome diversity in distinct host groups. Microb. Ecol. 79, 252–257 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Vila, J., Moreno-Morales, J. & Ballesté-Delpierre, C. Current landscape in the discovery of novel antibacterial agents. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2019.09.015 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Hobley, L. et al. Dual predation by bacteriophage and Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus can eradicate Escherichia coli prey in situations where single predation cannot. J. Bacteriol. 202, e00629-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/JB.00629-19 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.El-Shibiny, A., Connerton, P. L. & Connerton, I. F. Enumeration and diversity of campylobacters and bacteriophages isolated during the rearing cycles of free-range and organic chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 1259–1266 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Wilkinson, D. A. et al. Updating the genomic taxonomy and epidemiology of Campylobacter hyointestinalis. Sci. Rep. 8, 2393. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20889-x (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Lee, M. D. GToTree: A user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics 35, 4162–4164 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Eddy, S. R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1002195 (2011).MathSciNet 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: A multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinform. 5, 113 (2004).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
14.Capella-Gutiérrez, S., Silla-Martínez, J. M. & Gabaldón, T. TrimAl: A tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics 25, 1972–1973 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
15.Hyatt, D., LoCascio, P. F., Hauser, L. J. & Uberbacher, E. C. Gene and translation initiation site prediction in metagenomic sequences. Bioinformatics 28, 2223–2230 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Shen, W. & Xiong, J. TaxonKit: A cross-platform and efficient NCBI taxonomy toolkit. bioRxiv. (Accessed 1 June 2021); https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/513523v1 (2019).
17.Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S. & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2—Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5, e9490 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
18.Tange, O. GNU Parallel. (Accessed 1 June 2021); https://zenodo.org/record/1146014#.YOHaiJhKiUk (2018).19.Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Czech, L. et al. Role of the extremolytes ectoine and hydroxyectoine as stress protectants and nutrients: Genetics, phylogenomics, biochemistry, and structural Analysis. Genes (Basel). 9, E177. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes9040177 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Gregson, B. H., Metodieva, G., Metodiev, M. V., Golyshin, P. N. & McKew, B. A. Differential protein expression during growth on medium versus long-chain alkanes in the obligate marine hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium Thalassolituus oleivorans MIL-1. Front. Microbiol. 9, 3130 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Pasternak, Z., Ben Sasson, T., Cohen, Y., Segev, E. & Jurkevitch, E. A new comparative-genomics approach for defining phenotype-specific indicators reveals specific genetic markers in predatory bacteria. PLoS One. 10, e0142933. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142933 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Yakimov, M. M. et al. Thalassolituus oleivorans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine bacterium that obligately utilizes hydrocarbons. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 141–148 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Wang, Y., Yu, M., Liu, Y., Yang, X. & Zhang, X. H. Bacterioplanoides pacificum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater of South Pacific Gyre. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 5010–5015 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Bowditch, R. D., Baumann, L. & Baumann, P. Description of Oceanospirillum kriegii sp. nov. and O. jannaschii sp. nov. and assignment of two species of Alteromonas to this genus as O. commune comb. nov. and O. vagum comb. nov. Curr. Microbiol. 10, 221–229 (1984).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Dong, C., Chen, X., Xie, Y., Lai, Q. & Shao, Z. Complete genome sequence of Thalassolituus oleivorans R6-15, an obligate hydrocarbonoclastic marine bacterium from the Arctic Ocean. Stand Genom. Sci. 9, 893–901 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Choi, A. & Cho, J.-C. Thalassolituus marinus sp. nov., a hydrocarbon utilizing marine bacterium. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 2234–2238 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Alain, K., Harder, J., Widdel, F. & Zengler, K. Anaerobic utilization of toluene by marine alpha- and gammaproteobacteria reducing nitrate. Microbiology 158, 2946–2957 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Liu, J., Wu, W., Chen, C., Sun, F. & Chen, Y. Prokaryotic diversity, composition structure, and phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities in leachate sediment ecosystems. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91, 1659–1675 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Yakimov, M. M., Timmis, K. N. & Golyshin, P. N. Obligate oil-degrading marine bacteria. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18, 257–266 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.McKew, B. A. et al. Efficacy of intervention strategies for bioremediation of crude oil in marine systems and effects on indigenous hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1562–1571 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Satomi, M., Kimura, B., Hamada, T., Harayama, S. & Fujii, T. Phylogenetic study of the genus Oceanospirillum based on 16S rRNA and gyrB genes: emended description of the genus Oceanospirillum, description of Pseudospirillum gen. nov., Oceanobacter gen. nov. and Terasakiella gen. nov. and transfer of Oceanospirillum jannaschii and Pseudomonas stanieri to Marinobacterium as Marinobacterium jannaschii comb. nov. and Marinobacterium stanieri comb. no. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 739–747 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Qin, Q. L. et al. A proposed genus boundary for the prokaryotes based on genomic insights. J. Bacteriol. 196, 2210–2215 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
34.Nicholson, A. C. et al. Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: Observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus Epilithonimonas, eleven species to the genus Kaistella, and three species to the genus Halpernia gen. nov., with description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. derived from clinical specimens. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70, 4432–4450 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Yarza, P. et al. Uniting the classification of cultured and uncultured bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene sequences. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 635–645 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Barco, R. A. et al. A genus definition for Bacteria and Archaea based on a standard genome relatedness index. MBio 11, e02475-192020. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02475-19 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Andersson, J. O. & Andersson, S. G. Insights into the evolutionary process of genome degradation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9, 664–671 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Wall, D. & Kaiser, D. Type IV pili and cell motility. Mol. Microbiol. 32, 1–10 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Jenal, U. & Malone, J. Mechanisms of cyclic-di-GMP signaling in bacteria. Ann. Rev. Genet. 40, 385–407 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.Dow, J. M., Fouhy, Y., Lucey, J. F. & Ryan, R. P. The HD-GYP domain, cyclic di-GMP signaling, and bacterial virulence to plants. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19, 1378–1384 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Hobley, L. et al. Discrete cyclic di-GMP-dependent control of bacterial predation versus axenic growth in Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002493. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002493 (2012).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Seccareccia, I., Kovács, Á. T., Gallegos-Monterrosa, R. & Nett, M. Unraveling the predator-prey relationship of Cupriavidus necator and Bacillus subtilis. Microbiol. Res. 192, 231–238 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Mu, D. S. et al. Bradymonabacteria, a novel bacterial predator group with versatile survival strategies in saline environments. Microbiome 8, 1262020 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Zepeda, V. K. et al. Terasakiispira papahanaumokuakeensis gen. nov., sp. nov., a gammaproteobacterium from Pearl and Hermes Atoll, Northwestern Hawaiian Islands. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 65, 3609–3617 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Terasaki, Y. Transfer of five species and two subspecies of Spirillum to other genera (Aquaspirillum and Oceanospirillum), with emended descriptions of the species and subspecies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 29, 130–144 (1979).
Google Scholar 
46.Baker, D. A. & Park, R. W. Changes in morphology and cell wall structure that occur during growth of Vibrio sp. NCTC4716 in batch culture. J. Gen. Microbiol. 86, 12–28 (1975).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Ng, L. K., Sherburne, R., Taylor, D. E. & Stiles, M. E. Morphological forms and viability of Campylobacter species studied by electron microscopy. J. Bacteriol. 164, 338–343 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Reshetnyak, V. I. & Reshetnyak, T. M. Significance of dormant forms of Helicobacter pylori in ulcerogenesis. World J. Gastroenterol. 23, 4867–4878 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Loc Carrillo, C. et al. Bacteriophage therapy to reduce Campylobacter jejuni colonization of broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 6554–6563 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline M26-A. Clin. Lab. Stand. Inst. 19, 7 (1999).
Google Scholar 
51.Legat, A., Gruber, C., Zangger, K., Wanner, G. & Stan-Lotter, H. Identification of polyhydroxyalkanoates in Halococcus and other haloarchaeal species. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 1119–1127 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Tamura, K. & Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10, 512–526 (1993).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.Felsenstein, J. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791 (1985).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Rodriguez-R, L. M. & Konstantinidis, K. T. Bypassing cultivation to identify bacterial species. Microbe 9, 111–118 (2014).
Google Scholar 
56.Huerta-Cepas, J. et al. Fast genome-wide functional annotation through orthology assignment by eggNOG-mapper. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2115–2122 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Nesshöver, C. et al. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: an interdisciplinary perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 579, 1215–1227 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Chausson, A. et al. Mapping the effectiveness of nature-based solutions for climate change adaptation. Glob. Chang. Biol. 26, 6134–6155 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Pires, J. C. M. Negative emissions technologies: a complementary solution for climate change mitigation. Sci. Total Environ. 672, 502–514 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.McLaren, D. A comparative global assessment of potential negative emissions technologies. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 90, 489–500 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Anderson, K. & Peters, G. The trouble with negative emissions. Science 354, 182–183 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Nellemann, C. et al. Blue Carbon — The Role of Healthy Oceans in Binding Carbon (UN Environment, 2009).7.Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Himes-Cornell, A., Grose, S. O. & Pendleton, L. Mangrove ecosystem service values and methodological approaches to valuation: where do we stand? Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 376 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Friess, D. A. et al. in Oceanography and Marine Biology Vol. 58 Ch. 3 (CRC, 2020).10.Lovelock, C. E. & Duarte, C. M. Dimensions of blue carbon and emerging perspectives. Biol. Lett. 15 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2018.0781 (2019).11.Duarte, C. M., Losada, I. J., Hendriks, I. E., Mazarrasa, I. & Marbà, N. The role of coastal plant communities for climate change mitigation and adaptation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3, 961–968 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Duarte, C. M., Middelburg, J. J. & Caraco, N. Major role of marine vegetation on the oceanic carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 2, 1–8 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Mcleod, E. et al. A blueprint for blue carbon: toward an improved understanding of the role of vegetated coastal habitats in sequestering CO2. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 552–560 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Krause-Jensen, D. & Duarte, C. M. Substantial role of macroalgae in marine carbon sequestration. Nat. Geosci. 9, 737–742 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Macreadie, P. I. et al. Vulnerability of seagrass blue carbon to microbial attack following exposure to warming and oxygen. Sci. Total Environ. 686, 264–275 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Sippo, J. Z., Lovelock, C. E., Santos, I. R., Sanders, C. J. & Maher, D. T. Mangrove mortality in a changing climate: an overview. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 215, 241–249 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Lovelock, C. E. et al. Assessing the risk of carbon dioxide emissions from blue carbon ecosystems. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 257–265 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Zhao, Q. et al. Where marine protected areas would best represent 30% of ocean biodiversity. Biol. Conserv. 244, 108536 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Duarte, C. M. et al. Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580, 39–51 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Bayraktarov, E. et al. The cost and feasibility of marine coastal restoration. Ecol. Appl. 26, 1055–1074 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Van, T. T. et al. Changes in mangrove vegetation area and character in a war and land use change affected region of Vietnam (Mui Ca Mau) over six decades. Acta Oecol. 63, 71–81 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Dung, L. V., Tue, N. T., Nhuan, M. T. & Omori, K. Carbon storage in a restored mangrove forest in Can Gio Mangrove Forest Park, Mekong Delta, Vietnam. For. Ecol. Manage. 380, 31–40 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Nam, V. N., Sasmito, S. D., Murdiyarso, D., Purbopuspito, J. & MacKenzie, R. A. Carbon stocks in artificially and naturally regenerated mangrove ecosystems in the Mekong Delta. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 24, 231–244 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Reynolds, L. K., Waycott, M., McGlathery, K. J. & Orth, R. J. Ecosystem services returned through seagrass restoration. Restor. Ecol. 24, 583–588 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Das, S. Ecological restoration and livelihood: contribution of planted mangroves as nursery and habitat for artisanal and commercial fishery. World Dev. 94, 492–502 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Kiesel, J. et al. Effective design of managed realignment schemes can reduce coastal flood risks. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 242, 106844 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.McNally, C. G., Uchida, E. & Gold, A. J. The effect of a protected area on the tradeoffs between short-run and long-run benefits from mangrove ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13945–13950 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Chow, J. Mangrove management for climate change adaptation and sustainable development in coastal zones. J. Sustain. For. 37, 139–156 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Dasgupta, S., Islam, M. S., Huq, M., Huque Khan, Z. & Hasib, M. R. Quantifying the protective capacity of mangroves from storm surges in coastal Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 14, e0214079 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Sutton-Grier, A. E. & Moore, A. Leveraging carbon services of coastal ecosystems for habitat protection and restoration. Coast. Manag. 44, 259–277 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Owuor, M. A., Mulwa, R., Otieno, P., Icely, J. & Newton, A. Valuing mangrove biodiversity and ecosystem services: a deliberative choice experiment in Mida Creek, Kenya. Ecosyst. Serv. 40, 101040 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Mcowen, C. J. et al. A global map of saltmarshes. Biodivers. Data J. 5, e11764 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Bunting, P. et al. The global mangrove watch — a new 2010 global baseline of mangrove extent. Remote Sens. 10, 1669 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Jayathilake, D. R. M. & Costello, M. J. A modelled global distribution of the seagrass biome. Biol. Conserv. 226, 120–126 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.McKenzie, L. J. et al. The global distribution of seagrass meadows. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 74041 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Trumbore, S. E. Potential responses of soil organic carbon to global environmental change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 8284–8291 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Hamilton, S. E. & Friess, D. A. Global carbon stocks and potential emissions due to mangrove deforestation from 2000 to 2012. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 240–244 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Ouyang, X. & Lee, S. Y. Improved estimates on global carbon stock and carbon pools in tidal wetlands. Nat. Commun. 11, 317 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Kauffman, J. B. et al. Total ecosystem carbon stocks of mangroves across broad global environmental and physical gradients. Ecol. Monogr. 90, e01405 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Simard, M. et al. Mangrove canopy height globally related to precipitation, temperature and cyclone frequency. Nat. Geosci. 12, 40–45 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Hutchison, J., Manica, A., Swetnam, R., Balmford, A. & Spalding, M. Predicting global patterns in mangrove forest biomass. Conserv. Lett. 7, 233–240 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Atwood, T. B. et al. Global patterns in mangrove soil carbon stocks and losses. Nat. Clim. Chang. 7, 523–528 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Sanderman, J. et al. A global map of mangrove forest soil carbon at 30 m spatial resolution. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 55002 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Traganos, D. et al. Towards global-scale seagrass mapping and monitoring using Sentinel-2 on Google Earth Engine: the case study of the Aegean and Ionian Seas. Remote Sens. 10, 1227 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Hossain, M. S. & Hashim, M. Potential of Earth Observation (EO) technologies for seagrass ecosystem service assessments. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 77, 15–29 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Atwood, T. B., Witt, A., Mayorga, J., Hammill, E. & Sala, E. Global patterns in marine sediment carbon stocks. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 165 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Coastal carbon atlas. Coastal Carbon Research Coordination Network. CCRCN https://ccrcn.shinyapps.io/CoastalCarbonAtlas/_w_8595a9b5/#tab-6425-6 (2019).48.UNEP-WCMC. Ocean data viewer: global distribution of seagrasses. UNEP https://doi.org/10.34892/x6r3-d211 (2018).49.Hammerstrom, K. K., Kenworthy, W. J., Fonseca, M. S. & Whitfield, P. E. Seed bank, biomass, and productivity of Halophila decipiens, a deep water seagrass on the west Florida continental shelf. Aquat. Bot. 84, 110–120 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Pergent-Martini, C. et al. Descriptors of Posidonia oceanica meadows: use and application. Ecol. Indic. 5, 213–230 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Esteban, N., Unsworth, R. K. F., Gourlay, J. B. Q. & Hays, G. C. The discovery of deep-water seagrass meadows in a pristine Indian Ocean wilderness revealed by tracking green turtles. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 134, 99–105 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.York, P. H. et al. Dynamics of a deep-water seagrass population on the Great Barrier Reef: annual occurrence and response to a major dredging program. Sci. Rep. 5, 13167 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Serrano, O. et al. Australian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation. Nat. Commun. 10, 4313 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Chmura, G. L., Anisfeld, S. C., Cahoon, D. R. & Lynch, J. C. Global carbon sequestration in tidal, saline wetland soils. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 17, 1111 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Hengl, T. et al. SoilGrids250m: global gridded soil information based on machine learning. PLoS ONE 12, e0169748 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Rogers, K. et al. Wetland carbon storage controlled by millennial-scale variation in relative sea-level rise. Nature 567, 91–95 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Rovai, A. S. et al. Global controls on carbon storage in mangrove soils. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 534–538 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Worthington, T. A. et al. A global biophysical typology of mangroves and its relevance for ecosystem structure and deforestation. Sci. Rep. 10, 14652 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Maher, D. T., Call, M., Santos, I. R. & Sanders, C. J. Beyond burial: lateral exchange is a significant atmospheric carbon sink in mangrove forests. Biol. Lett. 14, 20180200 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Santos, I. R., Maher, D. T., Larkin, R., Webb, J. R. & Sanders, C. J. Carbon outwelling and outgassing vs. burial in an estuarine tidal creek surrounded by mangrove and saltmarsh wetlands. Limnol. Ocean 64, 996–1013 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Kelleway, J. J. et al. A national approach to greenhouse gas abatement through blue carbon management. Glob. Environ. Chang. 63, 102083 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Goldberg, L., Lagomasino, D., Thomas, N. & Fatoyinbo, T. Global declines in human-driven mangrove loss. Glob. Chang. Biol. 68, 5844–5855 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Richards, D. R. & Friess, D. A. Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 344–349 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Thomas, N. et al. Distribution and drivers of global mangrove forest change, 1996–2010. PLoS ONE 12, e0179302 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Worthington, T. & Spalding, M. Mangrove restoration potential: a global map highlighting a critical opportunity (OECD, 2018).66.Kearney, M. S., Riter, J. C. A. & Turner, R. E. Freshwater river diversions for marsh restoration in Louisiana: twenty-six years of changing vegetative cover and marsh area. Geophys. Res. Lett. 38, 16405 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Lee, S. Y., Hamilton, S., Barbier, E. B., Primavera, J. & Lewis, R. R. Better restoration policies are needed to conserve mangrove ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 870–872 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Lovelock, C. E. & Brown, B. M. Land tenure considerations are key to successful mangrove restoration. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1135 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Herr, D., Blum, J., Himes-Cornell, A. & Sutton-Grier, A. An analysis of the potential positive and negative livelihood impacts of coastal carbon offset projects. J. Environ. Manag. 235, 463–479 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Mojica Vélez, J. M., Barrasa García, S. & Espinoza Tenorio, A. Policies in coastal wetlands: key challenges. Environ. Sci. Policy 88, 72–82 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Zeng, Y. et al. Economic and social constraints on reforestation for climate mitigation in Southeast Asia. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 842–844 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.van Katwijk, M. M. et al. Global analysis of seagrass restoration: the importance of large-scale planting. J. Appl. Ecol. 53, 567–578 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Waycott, M. et al. Accelerating loss of seagrasses across the globe threatens coastal ecosystems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 12377–12381 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Orth, R. J. et al. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56, 987–996 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Tan, Y. M. et al. Seagrass restoration is possible: insights and lessons from Australia and New Zealand. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 617 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Greiner, J. T., McGlathery, K. J., Gunnell, J. & McKee, B. A. Seagrass restoration enhances ‘blue carbon’ sequestration in coastal waters. PLoS ONE 8, e72469 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Orth, R. J. et al. Restoration of seagrass habitat leads to rapid recovery of coastal ecosystem services. Sci. Adv. 6, eabc6434 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Cunha, A. H. et al. Changing paradigms in seagrass restoration. Restor. Ecol. 20, 427–430 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Rezek, R. J., Furman, B. T., Jung, R. P., Hall, M. O. & Bell, S. S. Long-term performance of seagrass restoration projects in Florida, USA. Sci. Rep. 9, 15514 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Worthington, T. A. et al. Harnessing big data to support the conservation and rehabilitation of mangrove forests globally. One Earth 2, 429–443 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Kandus, P. et al. Remote sensing of wetlands in South America: status and challenges. Int. J. Remote Sens. 39, 993–1016 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Gallant, A. L. The challenges of remote monitoring of wetlands. Remote Sens. 7, 10938–10950 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Unsworth, R. K. F. et al. Sowing the seeds of seagrass recovery using hessian bags. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 311 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Duarte, C. M., Dennison, W. C., Orth, R. J. W. & Carruthers, T. J. B. The charisma of coastal ecosystems: addressing the imbalance. Estuaries Coasts 31, 233–238 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
85.de los Santos, C. B. et al. Recent trend reversal for declining European seagrass meadows. Nat. Commun. 10, 3356 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Hamilton, S. E. & Casey, D. Creation of a high spatio-temporal resolution global database of continuous mangrove forest cover for the 21st century (CGMFC-21). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 729–738 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Pendleton, L. et al. Estimating global “blue carbon” emissions from conversion and degradation of vegetated coastal ecosystems. PLoS ONE 7, e43542 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Deegan, L. A. et al. Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature 490, 388–392 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Cardoso, P. G., Raffaelli, D. & Pardal, M. A. The impact of extreme weather events on the seagrass Zostera noltii and related Hydrobia ulvae population. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 56, 483–492 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Rogers, K. Accommodation space as a framework for assessing the response of mangroves to relative sea-level rise. Singap. J. Trop. Geogr. 42, 163–183 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Marbà, N. & Duarte, C. M. Mediterranean warming triggers seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) shoot mortality. Glob. Chang. Biol. 16, 2366–2375 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Lefcheck, J. S., Wilcox, D. J., Murphy, R. R., Marion, S. R. & Orth, R. J. Multiple stressors threaten the imperiled coastal foundation species eelgrass (Zostera marina) in Chesapeake Bay, USA. Glob. Chang. Biol. 23, 3474–3483 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Arias-Ortiz, A. et al. A marine heatwave drives massive losses from the world’s largest seagrass carbon stocks. Nat. Clim. Chang. 8, 338–344 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Kendrick, G. A. et al. A systematic review of how multiple stressors from an extreme event drove ecosystem-wide loss of resilience in an iconic seagrass community. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 455 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Duke, N. C. et al. Large-scale dieback of mangroves in Australia’s Gulf of Carpentaria: a severe ecosystem response, coincidental with an unusually extreme weather event. Mar. Freshw. Res. 68, 1816–1829 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Taillie, P. J. et al. Widespread mangrove damage resulting from the 2017 Atlantic mega hurricane season. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 64010 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
97.Asbridge, E., Lucas, R., Rogers, K. & Accad, A. The extent of mangrove change and potential for recovery following severe Tropical Cyclone Yasi, Hinchinbrook Island, Queensland, Australia. Ecol. Evol. 8, 10416–10434 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
98.Hickey, S. M. et al. Is climate change shifting the poleward limit of mangroves? Estuaries Coasts 40, 1215–1226 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
99.Saintilan, N., Wilson, N. C., Rogers, K., Rajkaran, A. & Krauss, K. W. Mangrove expansion and salt marsh decline at mangrove poleward limits. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 147–157 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Whitt, A. A. et al. March of the mangroves: drivers of encroachment into southern temperate saltmarsh. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 240, 106776 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
101.Cavanaugh, K. C. et al. Sensitivity of mangrove range limits to climate variability. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 925–935 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Cavanaugh, K. C. et al. Poleward expansion of mangroves is a threshold response to decreased frequency of extreme cold events. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 723–727 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
103.Coldren, G. A., Langley, J. A., Feller, I. C. & Chapman, S. K. Warming accelerates mangrove expansion and surface elevation gain in a subtropical wetland. J. Ecol. 107, 79–90 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
104.Yando, E. S. et al. Salt marsh–mangrove ecotones: using structural gradients to investigate the effects of woody plant encroachment on plant–soil interactions and ecosystem carbon pools. J. Ecol. 104, 1020–1031 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
105.Doughty, C. L. et al. Mangrove range expansion rapidly increases coastal wetland carbon storage. Estuaries Coasts 39, 385–396 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
106.Lovelock, C. E. et al. Sea level and turbidity controls on mangrove soil surface elevation change. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 153, 1–9 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
107.Woodroffe, C. D. et al. Mangrove sedimentation and response to relative sea-level rise. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8, 243–266 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
108.Lovelock, C. E. & Reef, R. Variable impacts of climate change on blue carbon. One Earth 3, 195–211 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
109.Saintilan, N. et al. Thresholds of mangrove survival under rapid sea level rise. Science 368, 1118–1121 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
110.Nicholls, R. J. Coastal flooding and wetland loss in the 21st century: changes under the SRES climate and socio-economic scenarios. Glob. Environ. Chang. 14, 69–86 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
111.Schuerch, M. et al. Future response of global coastal wetlands to sea-level rise. Nature 561, 231–234 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
112.Adame, M. F. et al. Future carbon emissions from global mangrove forest loss. Glob. Chang. Biol. 27, 2856–2866 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
113.Griscom, B. W. et al. Natural climate solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11645–11650 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
114.Friedlingstein, P. et al. Global Carbon Budget 2020. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 12, 3269–3340 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
115.Morris, R. L., Boxshall, A. & Swearer, S. E. Climate-resilient coasts require diverse defence solutions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 485–487 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
116.Macreadie, P. I. et al. The future of blue carbon science. Nat. Commun. 10, 3998 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
117.Wylie, L., Sutton-Grier, A. E. & Moore, A. Keys to successful blue carbon projects: lessons learned from global case studies. Mar. Policy 65, 76–84 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
118.Howard, J. F. et al. Clarifying the role of coastal and marine systems in climate mitigation. Front. Ecol. Environ. 15, 42–50 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
119.Lenihan, H. S. & Peterson, C. H. How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances impacts of hypoxia on oysters reefs. Ecol. Appl. 8, 128–140 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
120.Ellison, A. M., Felson, A. J. & Friess, D. A. Mangrove rehabilitation and restoration as experimental adaptive management. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 327 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
121.Lester, S. E., Dubel, A. K., Hernan, G., McHenry, J. & Rassweiler, A. Spatial planning principles for marine ecosystem restoration. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 328 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
122.Herr, D. & Landis, E. Coastal blue carbon ecosystems: opportunities for nationally determined contributions. Policy brief (IUCN, 2016).123.Apple Newsroom. Conserving mangroves, a lifeline for the world. Apple (22 April 2019) https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/04/conserving-mangroves-a-lifeline-for-the-world124.Hochard, J. P., Hamilton, S. & Barbier, E. B. Mangroves shelter coastal economic activity from cyclones. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12232–12237 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
125.Herr, D., von Unger, M., Laffoley, D. & McGivern, A. Pathways for implementation of blue carbon initiatives. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 27, 116–129 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Friess, D. A. et al. in Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People Ch. 14 (eds Katila, P. et al.) 445–481 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).127.Waltham, N. J. et al. UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021–2030 — what chance for success in restoring coastal ecosystems? Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 71 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
128.Convention on Biological Diversity. Conference of the Parties Decision X/2: strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020. CBD https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268 (2011).129.United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (UN, 2015).130.Brander, L. M. et al. The global costs and benefits of expanding marine protected areas. Mar. Policy 116, 103953 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
131.Howard, J. F. et al. The potential to integrate blue carbon into MPA design and management. Aquat. Conserv. 27, 100–115 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
132.Needelman, B. A. et al. The science and policy of the Verified Carbon Standard methodology for tidal wetland and seagrass restoration. Estuaries Coasts 41, 2159–2171 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
133.Michaelowa, A., Hermwille, L., Obergassel, W. & Butzengeiger, S. Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement. Clim. Policy 19, 1211–1224 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
134.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories: wetlands (IPCC, 2014).135.United Nations Environment Programme. Out of the blue: the value of seagrasses to the environment and to people (UNEP, 2020).136.Murdiyarso, D. et al. The potential of Indonesian mangrove forests for global climate change mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 1089–1092 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
137.Jones, T. et al. Madagascar’s mangroves: quantifying nation-wide and ecosystem specific dynamics, and detailed contemporary mapping of distinct ecosystems. Remote Sens. 8, 106 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
138.Holmquist, J. R. et al. Uncertainty in United States coastal wetland greenhouse gas inventorying. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 115005 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
139.Maher, D. T., Drexl, M., Tait, D. R., Johnston, S. G. & Jeffrey, L. C. iAMES: an inexpensive, automated methane ebullition sensor. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 6420–6426 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
140.Primavera, J. H. & Esteban, J. M. A. A review of mangrove rehabilitation in the Philippines: successes, failures and future prospects. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 16, 345–358 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
141.Silliman, B. R. et al. Facilitation shifts paradigms and can amplify coastal restoration efforts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14295–14300 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
142.Enwright, N. M., Griffith, K. T. & Osland, M. J. Barriers to and opportunities for landward migration of coastal wetlands with sea-level rise. Front. Ecol. Environ. 14, 307–316 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
143.Burkholz, C., Garcias-Bonet, N. & Duarte, C. M. Warming enhances carbon dioxide and methane fluxes from Red Sea seagrass (Halophila stipulacea) sediments. Biogeosciences 17, 1717–1730 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
144.Bianchi, T. S. et al. Historical reconstruction of mangrove expansion in the Gulf of Mexico: linking climate change with carbon sequestration in coastal wetlands. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 119, 7–16 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
145.Apostolaki, E. T. et al. Exotic Halophila stipulacea is an introduced carbon sink for the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Rep. 9, 9643 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
146.Bell, J. & Lovelock, C. E. Insuring mangrove forests for their role in mitigating coastal erosion and storm-surge: an Australian case study. Wetlands 33, 279–289 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
147.Reguero, B. G. et al. Financing coastal resilience by combining nature-based risk reduction with insurance. Ecol. Econ. 169, 106487 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
148.Thomas, S. Blue carbon: knowledge gaps, critical issues, and novel approaches. Ecol. Econ. 107, 22–38 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
149.International Partnership for Blue Carbon. Blue carbon partnership. IPBC https://bluecarbonpartnership.org (2017).150.Boon, P. I. & Prahalad, V. Ecologists, economics and politics: problems and contradictions in applying neoliberal ideology to nature conservation in Australia. Pac. Conserv. Biol. 23, 115–132 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
151.Adame, M. F. et al. The undervalued contribution of mangrove protection in Mexico to carbon emission targets. Conserv. Lett. 11, e12445 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
152.Bell-James, J. & Lovelock, C. E. Legal barriers and enablers for reintroducing tides: an Australian case study in reconverting ponded pasture for climate change mitigation. Land Use Policy 88, 104192 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
153.Gattuso, J.-P. et al. Ocean solutions to address climate change and its effects on marine ecosystems. Front. Mar. Sci. 5, 337 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
154.Saderne, V. et al. Role of carbonate burial in blue carbon budgets. Nat. Commun. 10, 1106 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
155.Duarte, C. M., Wu, J., Xiao, X., Bruhn, A. & Krause-Jensen, D. Can seaweed farming play a role in climate change mitigation and adaptation? Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 100 (2017).
Google Scholar 
156.Froehlich, H. E., Afflerbach, J. C., Frazier, M. & Halpern, B. S. Blue growth potential to mitigate climate change through seaweed offsetting. Curr. Biol. 29, 3087–3093.e3 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
157.Ritchie, H. & Roser, M. CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. Our World in Data https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-other-greenhouse-gas-emissions (2017).158.Smith, S. V. Marine macrophytes as a global carbon sink. Science 211, 838–840 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
159.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate (IPCC, 2019).160.Verified Carbon Standard. VM0007 REDD+ methodology framework (REDD+MF) (VCS, 2020).161.Carnell, P. E. et al. Mapping ocean wealth Australia: the value of coastal wetlands to people and nature. The Nature Conservancy https://doi.org/10.21153/carnell2019mapping (2019).162.Jänes, H. et al. Stable isotopes infer the value of Australia’s coastal vegetated ecosystems from fisheries. Fish Fish. 21, 80–90 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
163.Jänes, H. et al. Quantifying fisheries enhancement from coastal vegetated ecosystems. Ecosyst. Serv. 43, 101105 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
164.Huang, B. et al. Quantifying welfare gains of coastal and estuarine ecosystem rehabilitation for recreational fisheries. Sci. Total Environ. 710, 134680 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Vilà, M. et al. Ecological impacts of invasive alien plants: a meta-analysis of their effects on species, communities and ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 14, 702–708 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Vitousek, P. M., DAntonio, C. M., Loope, L. L., Westbrooks, R. & D’Antonio, C. M. Biological invasions as global environmental change. Am. Sci. 84, 468–478 (1996).ADS 

Google Scholar 
3.Pejchar, L. & Mooney, H. A. Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 497–504 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Ehrenfeld, J. G. Ecosystem consequences of biological invasions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 41, 59–80 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Doherty, T. S., Glen, A. S., Nimmo, D. G., Ritchie, E. G. & Dickman, C. R. Invasive predators and global biodiversity loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 11261–11265 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Gallardo, B., Clavero, M., Sánchez, M. I. & Vilà, M. Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 151–163 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Didham, R. K., Tylianakis, J. M., Hutchison, M. A., Ewers, R. M. & Gemmell, N. J. Are invasive species the drivers of ecological change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 470–474 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Simberloff, D. How common are invasion-induced ecosystem impacts? Biol. Invasions 13, 1255–1268 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Guy-Haim, T. et al. Diverse effects of invasive ecosystem engineers on marine biodiversity and ecosystem functions: a global review and meta-analysis. Glob. Change Biol. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14007 (2018).10.Vander Zanden, M. J., Casselman, J. M. & Rasmussen, J. B. Stable isotope evidence for the food web consequences of species invasions in lakes. Nature 401, 464–467 (1999).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
11.Bartomeus, I., Vilà, M. & Santamaría, L. Contrasting effects of invasive plants in plant-pollinator networks. Oecologia 155, 761–770 (2008).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Aizen, M. A., Morales, C. L. & Morales, J. M. Invasive mutualists erode native pollination webs. PLoS Biol. 6, 0396–0403 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Olesen, J. M., Eskildsen, L. I. & Venkatasamy, S. Invasion of pollination networks on oceanic islands: importance of invader complexes and endemic super generalists. Divers. Distrib. 8, 181–192 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Carvalheiro, L. G., Barbosa, E. R. M. & Memmott, J. Pollinator networks, alien species and the conservation of rare plants: Trinia glauca as a case study. J. Appl. Ecol. 45, 1419–1427 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Anderson, C. B., Griffith, C. R., Rosemond, A. D., Rozzi, R. & Dollenz, O. The effects of invasive North American beavers on riparian plant communities in Cape Horn, Chile. Biol. Conserv. 128, 467–474 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Walsh, J. R., Carpenter, S. R. & Vander Zanden, M. J. Invasive species triggers a massive loss of ecosystem services through a trophic cascade. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 201600366 (2016).
Google Scholar 
17.Wiles, G. J., Bart, J., Beck, R. E. & Aguon, C. F. Impacts of the Brown Tree Snake: patterns of decline and species persistence in Guam’s Avifauna. Conserv. Biol. 17, 1350–1360 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Ludyanskiy, M., McDonald, D. & MacNeill, D. Impact of the Zebra Mussei, a Bivalve Invader. BioScience 43, 533–544 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Byrnes, J. E., Reynolds, P. L. & Stachowicz, J. J. Invasions and extinctions reshape coastal marine food webs. PLoS ONE 2, 1–7 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Bruno, J. F., Stachowicz, J. J. & Bertness, M. D. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 119–125 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Stachowicz, J. J. Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. BioScience 51, 235 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Berkelmans, R. & van Oppen, M. J. H. The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: a ‘nugget of hope’ for coral reefs in an era of climate change. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 273, 2305–2312 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Bulleri, F., Bruno, J. F., Silliman, B. R. & Stachowicz, J. J. Facilitation and the niche: implications for coexistence, range shifts and ecosystem functioning. Funct. Ecol. 30, 70–78 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Angelini, C. et al. Foundation species’ overlap enhances biodiversity and multifunctionality from the patch to landscape scale in southeastern United States salt marshes. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 282, 20150421 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Anthelme, F., Cavieres, L. A. & Dangles, O. Facilitation among plants in alpine environments in the face of climate change. Front. Plant Sci. 5 (2014).26.Angelini, C. & Silliman, B. R. Secondary foundation species as drivers of trophic and functional diversity: evidence from a tree-epiphyte system. Ecology 95, 185–196 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.van der Heide, T. et al. A three-stage symbiosis forms the foundation of seagrass ecosystems. Science 336, 1432–1434 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Nummi, P. & Holopainen, S. Whole-community facilitation by beaver: ecosystem engineer increases waterbird diversity: ecosystem engineer increases waterbird diversity. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 24, 623–633 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Rosell, F., Bozser, O., Collen, P. & Parker, H. Ecological impact of beavers Castor fiber and Castor canadensis and their ability to modify ecosystems. Mammal. Rev. 35, 248–276 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.He, Q., Bertness, M. D. & Altieri, A. H. Global shifts towards positive species interactions with increasing environmental stress. Ecol. Lett. 16, 695–706 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Schuerch, M. et al. Future response of global coastal wetlands to sea-level rise. Nature 561, 231–234 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Jackson, J. B. et al. Historical overfishing and the recent collapse of coastal ecosystems. Science 293, 629–637 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Walther, G.-R. et al. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416, 389–395 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Lotze, H. K. et al. Depletion, degredation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312, 1806–1809 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Grosholz, E. Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 22–27 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Syvitski, J. P. M. et al. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat. Geosci. 2, 681–686 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.He, Q. & Silliman, B. R. Climate change, human impacts, and coastal ecosystems in the anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 29, R1021–R1035 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Barbier, E. B. et al. The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol. Monogr. 81, 169–193 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Costanza, R. et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387, 253–260 (1997).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Angelini, C. et al. A keystone mutualism underpins resilience of a coastal ecosystem to drought. Nat. Commun. 7, 12473 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Bruno, J. F. & Bertness, M. D. Habitat modification and facilitation in benthic marine communities. in Marine Community Ecology (eds Bertness, M. D., Gaines, S. & Hay, M.) 201–216 (Sinauer, 2001).42.De Fouw, J. et al. Drought, mutualism breakdown, and landscape-scale degradation of seagrass beds. Curr. Biol. 26, 1051–1056 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
43.Ellison, A. M., Farnsworth, E. J. & Twilley, R. R. Facultative mutualism between red mangroves and root‐fouling sponges in belizean mangal. Ecology https://doi.org/10.2307/2265744 (1996).44.Arkema, K. K. et al. Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 913–918 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.McKee, K. L., Mendelssohn, I. A. & Materne, M. D. Acute salt marsh dieback in the Mississippi River deltaic plain: a drought-induced phenomenon? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 13, 65–73 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Alber, M., Swenson, E. M., Adamowicz, S. C. & Mendelssohn, I. A. Salt Marsh Dieback: an overview of recent events in the US. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 80, 1–11 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Wang, H., Fu, R., Kumar, A. & Li, W. Intensification of summer rainfall variability in the southeastern United States during recent decades. J. Hydrometeorol. 11, 1007–1018 (2010).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Stiven, A. E. & Gardner, S. A. Population processes in the ribbed mussel Geukensia demissa (Dillwyn) in a North Carolina salt marsh tidal gradient: spatial pattern, predation, growth and mortality. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 160, 81–102 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Angelini, C. & Silliman, B. R. Patch size-dependent community recovery after massive disturbance. Ecology 93, 101–110 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Mendelssohn, I. & Morris, J. Ecophysiological controls on the productivity of Spartina alterniflora. in Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology (eds Weinstein, M. & Kreeger, D.) 59–80 (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999).51.Bertness, M. D. Ribbed mussels and Spartina alterniflora production in a New England marsh. Ecology 65, 1794–1807 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Siemann, E., Carrillo, J. A., Gabler, C. A., Zipp, R. & Rogers, W. E. Experimental test of the impacts of feral hogs on forest dynamics and processes in the southeastern US. Ecol. Manag. 258, 546–553 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Campbell, T. A. & Long, D. B. Feral swine damage and damage management in forested ecosystems. Ecol. Manag. 257, 2319–2326 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Barrios-Garcia, M. N. & Ballari, S. A. Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: a review. Biol. Invasions 14, 2283–2300 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Graves, H. B. Behavior and ecology of wild and feral swine (Sus-Scrofa). J. Anim. Sci. 58, 482–492 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Wood, G. W. & Roark, N. D. Food habits of feral hogs in coastal South Carolina. J. Wildl. Manag. 44, 506–511 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Sharp, S. J. & Angelini, C. The role of landscape composition and disturbance type in mediating salt marsh resilience to feral hog invasion. Biol. Invasions https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-019-02018-5 (2019).58.Crotty, S. M. et al. Foundation species patch configuration mediates salt marsh biodiversity, stability and multifunctionality. Ecol. Lett. 21, 1681–1692 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Zhu, Z. et al. Historic storms and the hidden value of coastal wetlands for nature-based flood defence. Nat. Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0556-z (2020).60.Thomsen, M. S. et al. Habitat cascades: the conceptual context and global relevance of facilitation cascades via habitat formation and modification. Integr. Comp. Biol. 50, 158–175 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Silliman, B. R. et al. Facilitation shifts paradigms and can amplify coastal restoration efforts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 14295–14300 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Silliman, B. R. et al. Field experiments and meta-analysis reveal wetland vegetation as a crucial element in the coastal protection paradigm. Curr. Biol. 29, 1800–1806 (2019). e3.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Neumann, B., Vafeidis, A. T., Zimmermann, J. & Nicholls, R. J. Future coastal population growth and exposure to sea-level rise and coastal flooding—a global assessment. PLoS ONE 10, e0118571 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
64.Rogers, K. et al. Wetland carbon storage controlled by millennial-scale variation in relative sea-level rise. Nature 567, 91–95 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
65.Rogers, H. S. et al. Effects of an invasive predator cascade to plants via mutualism disruption. Nat. Commun. 8, 14557 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Albins, M. & Hixon, M. Invasive Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans reduce recruitment of Atlantic coral-reef fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 367, 233–238 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Albins, M. Invasive Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans reduce abundance and species richness of native Bahamian coral-reef fishes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 522, 231–243 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Ling, S. D. Range expansion of a habitat-modifying species leads to loss of taxonomic diversity: a new and impoverished reef state. Oecologia 156, 883–894 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Johnson, C. R. et al. Climate change cascades: shifts in oceanography, species’ ranges and subtidal marine community dynamics in eastern Tasmania. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 400, 17–32 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Ling, S. D., Johnson, C. R., Frusher, S. D. & Ridgway, K. R. Overfishing reduces resilience of kelp beds to climate-driven catastrophic phase shift. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 22341–22345 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Persico, E. P., Sharp, S. J. & Angelini, C. Feral hog disturbance alters carbon dynamics in southeastern US salt marshes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 580, 57–68 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Shaffer, G. P. et al. System response, nutria herbivory, and vegetation recovery of a wetland receiving secondarily-treated effluent in coastal Louisiana. Ecol. Eng. 79, 120–131 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Fleming, P. A. et al. Is the loss of Australian digging mammals contributing to a deterioration in ecosystem function?: loss of Australian digging mammals and ecosystem function. Mammal. Rev. 44, 94–108 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Woinarski, J. C. Z., Burbidge, A. A. & Harrison, P. L. Ongoing unraveling of a continental fauna: decline and extinction of Australian mammals since European settlement. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4531–4540 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Croll, D. A. Introduced predators transform subarctic islands from grassland to tundra. Science 307, 1959–1961 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
76.Siero, E. et al. Grazing away the resilience of patterned ecosystems. Am. Nat. 193, 472–480 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Crotty, S. M. & Angelini, C. Geomorphology and species interactions control facilitation cascades in a salt marsh ecosystem. Curr. Biol. 30, 1562–1571.e4 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.Geisser, H. & Reyer, H.-U. Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. J. Wildl. Manag. 68, 939–946 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Engeman, R. M. et al. Feral swine management for conservation of an imperiled wetland habitat: Florida’s vanishing seepage slopes. Biol. Conserv. 134, 440–446 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Bevins, S. N., Pedersen, K., Lutman, M. W., Gidlewski, T. & Deliberto, T. J. Consequences associated with the recent range expansion of nonnative feral swine. BioScience 64, 291–299 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.McClure, M. L. et al. Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States. PLoS ONE 10, 1–17 (2015).
Google Scholar 
82.Oldfield, C. A. & Evans, J. P. Twelve years of repeated wild hog activity promotes population maintenance of an invasive clonal plant in a coastal dune ecosystem. Ecol. Evol. 6, 2569–2578 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Ford, M. A. & Grace, J. B. Effects of vertebrate herbivores on soil processes, plant biomass, litter accumulation and soil elevation changes in a coastal marsh. J. Ecol. 86, 974–982 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Hensel, M. J. S. & Silliman, B. R. Consumer diversity across kingdoms supports multiple functions in a coastal ecosystem. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20621–20626 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Silliman, B. R. et al. Are the ghosts of nature’s past haunting ecology today? Curr. Biol. 28, R532–R537 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
86.Morse, N. B. et al. Novel ecosystems in the Anthropocene: a revision of the novel ecosystem concept for pragmatic applications. Ecol. Soc. 19, art12 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Goigel Turner, M. Effects of grazing by feral horses, clipping, trampling, and burning on a Georgia salt marsh. Estuaries. 10, 54–60 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Hartig, F. DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level/Mixed) Regression Models. R package version 0.4.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa (2021).89.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2017).90.Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest Package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
92.AgiSoft PhotoScan Professional. (AgiSoft, 2016).93.Rasband, W. S. ImageJ. (U.S. National Institutes of Health, 1997).94.Kuenzler, E. J. Structure and energy flow of a mussel population in a Georgia salt marsh. Limnol. Oceanogr. 6, 191–204 (1961).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Length, R. V. emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.7.0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans (2021).96.Guichard, F., Halpin, P. M., Allison, G. W., Lubchenco, J. & Menge, B. A. Mussel disturbance dynamics: signatures of oceanographic forcing from local interactions. Am. Nat. 161, 889–904 (2003).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
97.Silliman, B. R., van de Koppel, J., Bertness, M. D., Stanton, L. E. & Mendelssohn, I. A. Drought, snails, and large-scale die-off of southern U.S. salt marshes. Science 310, 1803–1806 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

1.Pyron M. Characterizing communities. Nat Educ Knowl. 2010;3:39.
Google Scholar 
2.Hatton IA, Heneghan RF, Bar-On YM, Galbraith ED The global ocean size-spectrum from bacteria to whales. bioRxiv 2021; 2021.04.03.438320.3.Karsenti E, Acinas SG, Bork P, Bowler C, De Vargas C, Raes J, et al. A holistic approach to marine Eco-systems biology. PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001177.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
4.Mora C, Tittensor DP, Adl S, Simpson AGB, Worm B. How many species are there on Earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol. 2011;9:e1001127.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
5.de Vargas C, Audic S, Henry N, Decelle J, Mahé F, Logares R, et al. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science. 2015;348:1–12.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
6.Lejzerowicz F, Gooday AJ, Barrenechea Angeles I, Cordier, T, Morard, R, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, et al. Eukaryotic biodiversity and spatial patterns in the Clarion-Clipperton zone and other abyssal regions: insights from sediment DNA and RNA metabarcoding. Front Mar Sci. 2021;8:1–23.Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Mahé F, de Vargas C, Bass D, Czech L, Stamatakis A, Lara E, et al. Parasites dominate hyperdiverse soil protist communities in Neotropical rainforests. Nat Ecol Evol. 2017;1:1–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Pawlowski J, Kelly-Quinn M, Altermatt F, Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L, Beja P, Boggero A, et al. The future of biotic indices in the ecogenomic era: Integrating (e)DNA metabarcoding in biological assessment of aquatic ecosystems. Sci Total Environ. 2018;637–638:1295–310.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Ruppert KM, Kline RJ, Rahman MS. Past, present, and future perspectives of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding: A systematic review in methods, monitoring, and applications of global eDNA. Glob Ecol Conserv. 2019;17:e00547.Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Zinger L, Bonin A, Alsos IG, Bálint M, Bik H, Boyer F, et al. DNA metabarcoding—Need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:1857–62.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Lamb PD, Hunter E, Pinnegar JK, Creer S, Davies RG, Taylor MI. How quantitative is metabarcoding: A meta-analytical approach. Mol Ecol. 2019;28:420–30.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.del Campo J, Kolisko M, Boscaro V, Santoferrara LF, Nenarokov S, Massana R, et al. EukRef: Phylogenetic curation of ribosomal RNA to enhance understanding of eukaryotic diversity and distribution. PLoS Biol. 2018;16:e2005849.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.Guillou L, Bachar D, Audic S, Bass D, Berney C, Bittner L, et al. The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D597–D604.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Godhe A, Asplund ME, Härnström K, Saravanan V, Tyagi A, Karunasagar I. Quantification of diatom and dinoflagellate biomasses in coastal marine seawater samples by real-time PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:7174–82.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
15.Gong J, Dong J, Liu X, Massana R. Extremely high copy numbers and polymorphisms of the rDNA operon estimated from single cell analysis of oligotrich and peritrich ciliates. Protist. 2013;164:369–79.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.Rodríguez-Martínez R, Labrenz M, del Campo J, Forn I, Jürgens K, Massana R. Distribution of the uncultured protist MAST-4 in the Indian Ocean, Drake Passage and Mediterranean Sea assessed by real-time quantitative PCR. Environ Microbiol. 2009;11:397–408.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
17.Zhu F, Massana R, Not F, Marie D, Vaulot D. Mapping of picoeucaryotes in marine ecosystems with quantitative PCR of the 18S rRNA gene. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005;52:79–92.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Wang Y, Jiang Y, Liu Y, Li Y, Katz LA, Gao F, et al. Comparative studies on the polymorphism and copy number variation of mtSSU rDNA in ciliates (Protista, ciliophora): Implications for phylogenetic, environmental, and ecological research. Microorganisms. 2020;8:316.PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
19.Dunthorn M, Stoeck T, Clamp J, Warren A, Mahé F. Ciliates and the rare biosphere: A review. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2014;61:404–9.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Gong W, Marchetti A. Estimation of 18S gene copy number in marine eukaryotic plankton using a next-generation sequencing approach. Front Mar Sci. 2019;6:1–5.Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Kucera M. Chapter six planktonic foraminifera as tracers of past oceanic environments. Dev Mar Geol. 2007;1:213–62.
Google Scholar 
22.Morard R, Escarguel G, Weiner AK, André A, Douady CJ, Wade CM, et al. Nomenclature for the nameless: a proposal for an integrative molecular taxonomy of cryptic diversity exemplified by planktonic foraminifera. Syst Biol. 2016;65:925–40.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Darling KF, Wade CM. The genetic diversity of planktic foraminifera and the global distribution of ribosomal RNA genotypes. Mar Micropaleontol. 2008;67:216–38.Article 

Google Scholar 
24.André A, Quillévéré F, Morard R, Ujiié Y, Escarguel G, de Vargas C, et al. SSU rDNA divergence in planktonic foraminifera: molecular taxonomy and biogeographic implications. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e104641.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
25.Morard R, Garet-Delmas MJ, Mahé F, Romac S, Poulain J, Kucera M, et al. Surface ocean metabarcoding confirms limited diversity in planktonic foraminifera but reveals unknown hyper-abundant lineages. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1–10. 2539Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
26.Morard R, Vollmar NM, Greco M, Kucera M. Unassigned diversity of planktonic foraminifera from environmental sequencing revealed as known but neglected species. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0213936.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
27.Lecroq B, Lejzerowicz F, Bachar D, Christen R, Esling P, Baerlocher L, et al. Ultra-deep sequencing of foraminiferal microbarcodes unveils hidden richness of early monothalamous lineages in deep-sea sediments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:13177–82.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Lejzerowicz F, Esling P, Pawlowski J. Patchiness of deep-sea benthic Foraminifera across the Southern Ocean: Insights from high-throughput DNA sequencing. Deep Sea Res Part II Top Stud Oceanogr. 2014;108:17–26.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
29.Shi J, Lei Y, Li Q, Lyu M, Li T. Molecular diversity and spatial distribution of benthic foraminifera of the seamounts and adjacent abyssal plains in the tropical Western Pacific Ocean. Mar Micropaleontol. 2020;156:101850.Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Li Q, Lei Y, Morard R, Li T, Wang B. Diversity hotspot and unique community structure of foraminifera in the world’s deepest marine blue hole—Sansha Yongle Blue Hole. Sci Rep. 2020;10:10257.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Cordier T, Barrenechea I, Lejzerowicz F, Reo E, Pawlowski J. Benthic foraminiferal DNA metabarcodes significantly vary along a gradient from abyssal to hadal depths and between each side of the Kuril-Kamchatka trench. Prog Oceanogr. 2019;178:102175.Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Weber AA-T, Pawlowski J. Can Abundance of Protists Be Inferred from Sequence Data: A Case Study of Foraminifera. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56739.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
33.Jonkers L, Meilland J, Rillo MC, de Garidel-Thoron T, Kitchener JA, Kucera M. Linking zooplankton time series to the fossil record. ICES J Mar Sci. 2021:1–8.34.Weiner AKM, Morard R, Weinkauf MFG, Darling KF, André A, Quillévéré F, et al. Methodology for single-cell genetic analysis of planktonic foraminifera for studies of protist diversity and evolution. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:1–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Arya M, Shergill IS, Williamson M, Gommersall L, Arya N, Patel HR. Basic principles of real-time quantitative PCR. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2005;5:209–19.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Barrenechea Angeles I, Lejzerowicz F, Cordier T, Scheplitz J, Kucera M, Ariztegui D, et al. Planktonic foraminifera eDNA signature deposited on the seafloor remains preserved after burial in marine sediments. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1–12.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
37.Morard R, Darling KF, Mahé F, Audic S, Ujiié Y, Weiner AK, et al. PFR2: a curated database of planktonic foraminifera 18S ribosomal DNA as a resource for studies of plankton ecology, biogeography and evolution. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015;15:1472–85.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/.39.Wickham H ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. 2009. Springer-Verlag, New York.40.Wickham H, Averick M, Bryan J, Chang W, McGowan L, François R, et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J Open Source Softw. 2019;4:1686.Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Debode F, Marien A, Janssen É, Bragard C, Berben G. The influence of amplicon length on real-time PCR results. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 2017;21:3–11.CAS 

Google Scholar 
42.Bé AWH, Lott L. Shell growth and structure of planktonic foraminifera. Science. 1964;145:2–3.Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Caromel AGM, Schmidt DN, Fletcher I, Rayfield EJ Morphological change during the ontogeny of the planktic foraminifera. J Micropalaeontology. 2015; 2014–017.44.Darling KF, Kucera M, Kroon D, Wade CM. A resolution for the coiling direction paradox in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma. Paleoceanography. 2006;21:PA2011–n/a.Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Parfrey LW, Lahr DJG, Katz LA. The dynamic nature of eukaryotic genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2008;25:787–94.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Parfrey LW, Katz LA. Dynamic genomes of eukaryotes and the maintenance of genomic integrity. Microbe. 2010;5:156–63.
Google Scholar 
47.Parfrey LW, Katz LA. Genome dynamics are influenced by food source in Allogromia laticollaris strain CSH (Foraminifera). Genome Biol Evol. 2010;2:678–85.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Finkel ZV, Beardall J, Flynn KJ, Quigg A, Rees TAV, Raven JA. Phytoplankton in a changing world: Cell size and elemental stoichiometry. J Plankton Res. 2010;32:119–37.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
49.Goldstein ST. Gametogenesis and the antiquity of reproductive pattern in the Foraminiferida. J Foraminifer Res. 1997;27:319–28.Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Davis CV, Livsey CM, Palmer HM, Hull PM, Thomas E, Hill TM, et al. Extensive morphological variability in asexually produced planktic foraminifera. Sci Adv. 2020;6:1–8.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
51.Takagi H, Kurasawa A, Kimoto K. Observation of asexual reproduction with symbiont transmission in planktonic foraminifera. J Plankton Res. 2020;42:403–10.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
52.Lessa D, Morard R, Jonkers L, Venancio IM, Reuter R, Baumeister A, et al. Distribution of planktonic foraminifera in the subtropical South Atlantic: Depth hierarchy of controlling factors. Biogeosciences. 2020;17:4313–42.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
53.Kucera M, Michael S, Raphaël M, Lukas J, Christiane S, Philipp M, et al. Scales of Population Dynamics, Ecology and Diversity of Planktonic Foraminifera and their Relationship to Particle Flux in the Eastern Tropical Atlantic: Cruise No. M140, 11.8.2017-5.9.2017, Mindelo (Cabo Verde)-Las Palmas (Spain) – FORAMFLUX. 2019. Bonn.54.Schiebel R. Planktic foraminiferal sedimentation and the marine calcite budget. Global Biogeochem Cycles. 2002;16:3-1–3–21.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
55.Meilland J, Schiebel R, Lo Monaco C, Sanchez S, Howa H. Abundances and test weights of living planktic foraminifers across the Southwest Indian Ocean: implications for carbon fluxes. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2018;131:27–40.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
56.Pierella Karlusich JJ, Pelletier E, Lombard F, Carsique M, Dvorak E, Colin S, et al. Global distribution patterns of marine nitrogen-fixers by imaging and molecular methods. Nat Commun. 2021;12:4160.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

Adamack AT, Gruber B (2014) PopGenReport: simplifying basic population genetic analyses in R. Methods Ecol Evol 5:384–387Article 

Google Scholar 
Allendorf FW (2017) Genetics and the conservation of natural populations: allozymes to genomes. Mol Ecol 26:420–430CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Asch B, Pinheiro R, Pereira R, Alves C, Pereira V, Pereira F et al. (2010) A framework for the development of STR genotyping in domestic animal species: characterization and population study of 12 canine X‐chromosome loci. Electrophoresis 31:303–308PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S, Bojesen RH, Singmann H et al. (2014) Package Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen andS4. R package version 1.1-10Blaszczynski JS (1997) Landform characterization with Geographic Information Systems. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens 63:183–191
Google Scholar 
Bolnick DI, Fitzpatrick BM (2007) Sympatric Speciation: Models and Empirical Evidence. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 38:459–487Article 

Google Scholar 
Cadena CD, Kozak KH, Gomez JP, Parra JL, McCain CM, Bowie RC et al. (2012) Latitude, elevational climatic zonation and speciation in New World vertebrates. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 279:194–201
Google Scholar 
Caro LM, Caycedo‐Rosales PC, Bowie RCK, Slabbekoorn H, Cadena CD (2013) Ecological speciation along an elevational gradient in a tropical passerine bird? J Evol Biol 26:357–374CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Clarke RT, Rothery P, Raybould AF (2002) Confidence limits for regression relationships between distance matrices: estimating gene flow with distance. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 7:361–372Article 

Google Scholar 
Crandall KA, Bininda-Emonds OR, Mace GM, Wayne RK (2000) Considering evolutionary processes in conservation biology. Trends Ecol Evol 15:290–295CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Cushman SA, McKelvey KS, Hayden J, Schwartz MK (2006) Gene flow in complex landscapes: testing multiple hypotheses with causal modeling. Am Nat 168:486–499PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Do C, Waples RS, Peel D, Macbeth GM, Tillett BJ, Ovenden JR (2014) NeEstimator v2: re‐implementation of software for the estimation of contemporary effective population size (Ne) from genetic data. Mol Ecol Resour 14:209–214CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G et al. (2012) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46Article 

Google Scholar 
Dreher CE, Cummings ME, Pröhl H (2015) An analysis of predator selection to affect aposematic coloration in a poison frog species. PloS One 10:e0130571PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dugas MB, Halbrook SR, Killius AM, Sol JF, Richards‐Zawacki CL (2015) Colour and escape behaviour in polymorphic populations of an aposematic poison frog. Ethology 121:813–822Article 

Google Scholar 
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361Article 

Google Scholar 
Ebersbach J, Posso-Terranova A, Bogdanowicz S, Gómez‐Díaz M, García‐González MX, Bolívar‐García W et al. (2020) Complex patterns of differentiation and gene flow underly the divergence of aposematic phenotypes in Oophaga poison frogs. Mol Ecol 29:1944–1956CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Farr TG, Kobrick M (2000) Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data. Eos 81:583–585Article 

Google Scholar 
Funk WC, Murphy MA (2010) Testing evolutionary hypotheses for phenotypic divergence using landscape genetics. Mol Ecol 19:427–430PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Funk WC, McKay JK, Hohenlohe PA, Allendorf FW (2012) Harnessing genomics for delineating conservation units. Trends Ecol Evol 27:489–496PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Funk WC, Murphy MA, Hoke KL, Muths E, Amburgey SM, Lemmon EM et al. (2016) Elevational speciation in action? Restricted gene flow associated with adaptive divergence across an altitudinal gradient. J Evol Biol 29:241–252CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Funk WC, Blouin MS, Corn PS, Maxell BA, Pilliod DS, Amish S, Allendorf FW (2005) Population structure of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) is strongly affected by the landscape. Mol Ecol 14:483–496CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Galeano SP, Harms KE (2016) Coloration in the polymorphic frog Oophaga pumilio associates with level of aggressiveness in intraspecific and interspecific behavioral interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:83–97Article 

Google Scholar 
García-Rodríguez A, Guarnizo CE, Crawford AJ, Garda AA, Costa GC (2021) Idiosyncratic responses to drivers of genetic differentiation in the complex landscapes of Isthmian Central America. Heredity 126:251–265PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Gessler PE, Moore ID, McKenzie NJ, Ryan PJ (1995) Soil-landscape modeling and spatial prediction of soil attributes. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 9:421–432Article 

Google Scholar 
Graham CH, Ron SR, Santos JC, Schneider CJ, Moritz C (2004) Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58:1781–1793PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Guarnizo CE, Cannatella DC (2013) Genetic divergence within frog species is greater in topographically more complex regions. J Zool Syst Evol Res 51:333–340Article 

Google Scholar 
Guarnizo CE, Amézquita A, Bermingham E (2009) The relative roles of vicariance versus elevational gradients in the genetic differentiation of the high Andean tree frog, Dendropsophus labialis. Mol Phylogenet Evol 50:84–92CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Hansen MC, Townshend JRG, DeFries RS, Carroll M (2005) Estimation of tree cover using MODIS data at global, continental and regional/local scales. Int J Remote Sens 26:4359–4380Article 

Google Scholar 
Harvey MG, Aleixo A, Ribas CC, Brumfield RT (2017) Habitat association predicts genetic diversity and population divergence in Amazonian birds. Am Nat 190:631–648PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surface for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978Article 

Google Scholar 
Hoffman AA, Sgrò CM (2011) Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature 470:479–485Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Holleley CE, Geerts PG (2009) Multiplex Manager 1.0: a cross-platform computer program that plans and optimizes multiplex PCR. Biotechniques 46:511–517CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Huete A, Didan K, Miura T, Rodriguez EP, Gao X, Ferreira LG (2002) Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sens Environ 83:195–213Article 

Google Scholar 
Hutter CR, Lambert SM, Wiens JJ (2017) Rapid diversification and time explain amphibian richness at different scales in the Tropical Andes, Earth’s most biodiverse hotspot. Am Nat 190:828–843PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Jombart T (2008) Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics 24:1403–1405CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kalinowski ST (2005) hp‐rare 1.0: a computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes 5:187–189CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Kawecki TJ, Ebert D (2004) Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol Lett 7:1225–1241Article 

Google Scholar 
Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S et al. (2012) Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Keller I, Seehausen O (2012) Thermal adaptation and ecological speciation. Mol Ecol 21:782–799CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Keller I, Alexander JM, Holderegger R, Edwards PJ (2013) Widespread phenotypic and genetic divergence along altitudinal gradients in animals. J Evol Biol 26:2527–2543CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Leinonen T, Cano JM, Mäkinen H, Merilä J (2006) Contrasting patterns of body shape and neutral genetic divergence in marine and lake populations of threespine sticklebacks. J Evol Biol 19:1803–1812CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lowe WH, McPeek MA, Likens GE, Cosentino BJ (2012) Decoupling of genetic and phenotypic divergence in a headwater landscape. Mol Ecol 21:2399–2409PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lynch JD, Duellman WE (1997) Frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus (Leptodactylidae) in western Ecuador: systematics, ecology and biogeography. University of Kansas, Natural History Museum. Special Publication No. 23. University of Kansas Printing Service, Lawrence, KansasMaan ME, Cummings ME (2009) Sexual dimorphism and directional sexual selection on aposematic signals in a poison frog. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:19072–19077CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Márquez R, Linderoth TP, Mejía-Vargas D, Nielsen R, Amézquita A, Kronforst MR (2020) Divergence, gene flow and the origin of leapfrog geographic distributions: The history of color pattern variation in Phyllobates poison-dart frogs. Mol Ecol 29:3702–3719PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Mayr E (1963) Animal Species and Evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MABook 

Google Scholar 
McCune B, Keon D (2002) Equations for potential annual direct incident radiation and heat load index. J Veg Sci 13:603–606Article 

Google Scholar 
McKay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:285–291Article 

Google Scholar 
McRae BH (2006) Isolation by resistance. Evolution 60:1551–1561PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB (2008) Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology and conservation. Ecology 10:2712–2724Article 

Google Scholar 
Moore ID, Gessler PE, Nielsen GA, Petersen GA (1993) Terrain attributes: estimation methods and scale effects. In: Jakeman AJ, Beck MB, McAleer M (eds) Modeling Change in Environmental Systems. Wiley, London, p 189–214
Google Scholar 
Morrison C, Hero JM (2003) Geographic variation in life‐history characteristics of amphibians: a review. J Anim Ecol 72:270–279Article 

Google Scholar 
Muir AP, Biek R, Thomas R, Mable BK (2014) Local adaptation with high gene flow: temperature parameters drive adaptation to altitude in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Mol Ecol 23:561–574CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Naimi B, Hamm NA, Groen TA, Skidmore AK, Toxopeus AG (2014) Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling. Ecography 37:191–203Article 

Google Scholar 
Nali RC, Becker CG, Zamudio KR, Prado CP (2020) Topography, more than land cover, explains genetic diversity in a Neotropical savanna tree frog. Divers Distrib 26:1798–1812Article 

Google Scholar 
Noonan BP, Comeault AA (2009) The role of predator selection on polymorphic aposematic poison frogs. Biol Lett 5:51–54PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Nosil P (2008) Speciation with gene flow could be common. Mol Ecol 17:2103–2106PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO‐CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4:535–538Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Orr MR, Smith TB (1998) Ecology and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 13:502–506CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Páez-Vacas MI, Oleas NH (2019) Isolation and characterization of 12 microsatellite loci in Epipedobates anthonyi (Amphibia: Anura: Dendrobatidae) for population genetic analysis. Mol Biol Rep. 46:3519–3522PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pfennig DW, Wund MA, Snell-Rood EC, Cruickshank T, Schlichting CD, Moczek AP (2010) Phenotypic plasticity’s impacts on diversification and speciation. Trends Ecol Evol 25:459–467PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pilliod DS, Peterson CR, Ritson PI (2002) Seasonal migration of Columbia spotted frogs (Rana luteiventris) among complementary resources in a high mountain basin. CAN J ZOOL 80:1849–1862Article 

Google Scholar 
Pinho C, Hey J (2010) Divergence with gene flow: models and data. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Systs 41:215–230Article 

Google Scholar 
Pintanel P, Tejedo M, Ron SR, Llorente GA, Merino‐Viteri A (2019) Elevational and microclimatic drivers of thermal tolerance in Andean Pristimantis frogs. J Biogeogr 46:1664–1675Article 

Google Scholar 
Polato NR, Gill BA, Shah AA, Gray MM, Casner KL, Barthelet A et al. (2018) Narrow thermal tolerance and low dispersal drive higher speciation in tropical mountains. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:12471–12476CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Posso-Terranova A, Andrés JA (2016) Complex niche divergence underlies lineage diversification in Oophaga poison frogs. J Biogeogr 43:2002–2015Article 

Google Scholar 
Prates I, Paz A, Brown JL, Carnaval AC (2019) Links between prey assemblages and poison frog toxins: a landscape ecology approach to assess how biotic interactions affect species phenotypes. Ecol Evol 9:14317–14329PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Räsänen K, Hendry AP (2008) Disentangling interactions between adaptive divergence and gene flow when ecology drives diversification. Ecol Lett 11:624–636PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) GENEPOP (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 83:248–249Article 

Google Scholar 
Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Richards‐Zawacki CL (2009) Effects of slope and riparian habitat connectivity on gene flow in an endangered Panamanian frog, Atelopus varius. Divers Distrib 15:796–806Article 

Google Scholar 
Richter-Boix A, Quintela M, Kierczak M, Franch M, Laurila A (2013) Fine-grained adaptive divergence in an amphibian: genetic basis of phenotypic divergence and the role of nonrandom gene flow in restricting effective migration among wetlands. Mol Ecol 22:1322–1340CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Robertson JM, Murphy MA, Pearl CA, Adams MJ, Páez‐Vacas MI, Haig SM, Funk WC (2018) Regional variation in drivers of connectivity for two frog species (Rana pretiosa and R. luteiventris) from the US Pacific Northwest. Mol Ecol 27:3242–3256Article 

Google Scholar 
Rojas D, Lima AP, Momigliano P, Simões PI, Dudaniec RY, De Avila-Pires TCS et al. (2020) The evolution of polymorphism in the warning coloration of the Amazonian poison frog Adelphobates galactonotus. Heredity 124:439–456CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Roland AB, Santos JC, Carriker BC, Caty SN, Tapia EE, Coloma LA et al. (2017) Radiation of the polymorphic Little Devil poison frog (Oophaga sylvatica) in Ecuador. Ecol Evol 7:9750–9762PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Row JR, Knick ST, Oyler‐McCance SJ, Lougheed SC, Fedy BC (2017) Developing approaches for linear mixed modeling in landscape genetics through landscape directed dispersal simulations. Ecol Evol 7:3751–3761PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Rundle HD, Nosil P (2005) Ecological speciation. Ecol Lett 8:336–352Article 

Google Scholar 
Santos JC, Cannatella DC (2011) Phenotypic integration emerges from aposematism and scale in poison frogs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:6175–6180CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Savolainen O, Lascoux M, Merilä J (2013) Ecological genomics of local adaptation. Nat Rev Genet 14:807–820CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schluter D (2009) Evidence for ecological speciation and its alternative. Science 323:737–741CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Servedio MR, Van Doorn GS, Kopp M, Frame AM, Nosil P (2011) Magic traits in speciation: ‘magic’ but not rare? Trends Ecol Evol 26:389–397PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Sexton JP, Hangartner SB, Hoffmann AA (2014) Genetic isolation by environment or distance: which pattern of gene flow is most common? Evolution 68:1–15CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Shafer AB, Wolf JBW, Alves PC, Bergström L, Bruford MW, Brännström I et al. (2015) Genomics and the challenging translation into conservation practice. Trends Ecol Evol 30:78–87PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Stevens M, Hopkins E, Hinde W, Adcock A, Connolly Y, Troscianko T et al. (2007) Field experiments on the effectiveness of ‘eyespots’ as predator deterrents. Anim Behav 74:1215–1227Article 

Google Scholar 
Storfer A, Patton A, Fraik AK (2018) Navigating the interface between landscape genetics and landscape genomics. Front Genet 9:68PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Van Strien MJ, Keller D, Holderegger R (2012) A new analytical approach to landscape genetic modelling: least-cost transect analysis and linear mixed models. Mol Ecol 21:4010–4023Article 

Google Scholar 
Summers K, Symula R, Clough M, Cronin T (1999) Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:2141–2145CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Tarvin RD, Powell EA, Santos JC, Ron SR, Cannatella DC (2017) The birth of aposematism: High phenotypic divergence and low genetic diversity in a young clade of poison frogs. Mol Phylogenet Evol 109:283–295PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Thomé MTC, Carstens BC, Rodrigues MT, Galetti Jr PM, Alexandrino J, Haddad CF (2021) A role of asynchrony of seasons in explaining genetic differentiation in a Neotropical toad. Heredity 2021:1–10
Google Scholar 
Twomey E, Vestergaard JS, Venegas PJ, Summers K (2016) Mimetic Divergence and the Speciation Continuum in the Mimic Poison Frog Ranitomeya imitator. Am Nat 187:205–224PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang IJ, Summers K (2010) Genetic structure is correlated with phenotypic divergence rather than geographic isolation in the highly polymorphic strawberry poison‐dart frog. Mol Ecol 19:447–458PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Warren DL, Glor RE, Turelli M (2010) ENMTools: a toolbox for comparative studies of environmental niche models. Ecography 33:607–611Article 

Google Scholar 
Willink B, García‐Rodríguez A, Bolaños F, Pröhl H (2014) The interplay between multiple predators and prey colour divergence. Biol J Linn Soc Lond 113:580–589Article 

Google Scholar 
Womack MC, Bell RC (2020) Two‐hundred million years of anuran body‐size evolution in relation to geography, ecology and life history. J Evol Biol 33:1–16Article 

Google Scholar 
Wright S (1943) Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114–138CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
Zamudio KR, Bell RC, Mason NA (2016) Phenotypes in phylogeography: Species’ traits, environmental variation, and vertebrate diversification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:8041–8048CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Stephenson, C., Handmer, J. & Robyn, B. Estimating the economic, social and environmental impacts of wildfires in Australia. Environ. Hazards 12, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/17477891.2012.703490 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Doerr, S. H. & Santín, C. Global trends in wildfire and its impacts: Perceptions versus realities in a changing world. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Biol. Sci 371(1696), 20150345. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0345 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Dusaeva, GKh., Kalmykova, O. G. & Dusaeva, N. V. Fire influence on dynamics of above-ground phytomass in steppe plant communities in the Burtinskaya Steppe (Orenburg State Nature Reserve, Russia). Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(Suppl. 1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.050 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Koltz, A. M. et al. Global change and the importance of fire for the ecology and evolution of insects. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 29, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2018.07.015 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
5.Malevsky-Malevich, S. P., Molkentin, E. K., Nadyozhina, E. D. & Shklyarevich, O. B. An assessment of potential change in wildfire activity in the Russian boreal forest zone induced by climate warming during the twenty-first century. Clim. Change 86, 463–474 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Anisimov, O. A. & Sherstiukov, A. B. Evaluating the effect of environmental factors on permafrost in Russia. Earth’s Cryosphere 20(2), 90–99 (2016) (in Russian).
Google Scholar 
7.Aleinikov, A. A. The fire history in pine forests of the plain area in the Pechora-Ilych Nature Biosphere Reserve (Russia) before 1942: Possible anthropogenic causes and long-term effects. Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(Suppl. 1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.033 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Rozhkov, Yu. F. & Kondakova, MYu. Assessment of the post-fire forest restoration dynamics in the Olekminsky State Nature Reserve (Russia) according to data of Landsat satellite images. Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(Suppl. 1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.2418/ncr.2019.014 (2019) (in Russian).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Shvetsov, E. G. & Ponomarev, E. I. Postfire effects in Siberian larch stands on multispectral satellite data. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 13(1), 104–112 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Shvetsov, E. G., Kukavskaya, E. A. & Buryak, L. V. Satellite monitoring of the state of forest vegetation after fire impacts in the Zabaikal Region. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 9(6), 702–710 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
11Kazeev, KSh. et al. Post-fire changes in the biological properties of the brown soils in the Utrish State Nature Reserve (Russia). Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(Suppl. 1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.055 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
12Kopoteva, T. A. & Kuptsova, V. A. Effects of pyrogenic factor on wetlands of Petrovskaya Pad’ (Jewish Autonomous Region, Russia). Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(Suppl. 1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.034 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Lebedinskii, A. A., Noskova, O. S. & Dmitriev, A. I. Post-fire recovery of terrestrial vertebrates in the Kerzhensky State Nature Biosphere Reserve (Central Volga Region, Russia). Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(Suppl. 1), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.049 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Shinkarenko, S. S., Ivanov, N. M. & Berdengalieva, A. N. Spatio-temporal dynamics of burnt areas in federal Protected Areas in the south-east of European Russia. Nat. Conserv. Res. 6(3), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.035 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Hoffmann, B. D. Responses of ant communities to experimental fire regimes on rangelands in the Victoria River District of the Northern Territory. Aust. Ecol. 28, 182–195 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Murphy, S. M., Richards, L. A. & Wimp, G. M. Editorial: Arthropod interactions and responses to disturbance in a changing world. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 93. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.00093 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Turner, M. G. Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology 91, 2833–2849. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0097.1 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
18.Gandhi, K. J. K., Spence, J. R., Langor, D. W. & Morgantini, L. E. Fire residuals as habitat reserves for epigaeic beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae and Staphylinidae). Oikos 120, 26–37 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Buckingham, S., Murphy, N. & Gibb, H. Effects of fire severity on the composition and functional traits of litter-dwelling macroinvertebrates in a temperate forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 434, 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.030 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Niklasson, M. & Granström, A. Numbers and sizes of fires, long-term spatially explicit fire history in a Swedish boreal landscape. Ecology 81, 1484–1499. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[1484:NASOFL]2.0.CO;2 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Wikars, L.-O. Immediate effects offire-severity on soil invertebrates in cut and uncut pine forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 141, 189–200 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Egorov, L. V., Podshivalina, V. N. & Kurulenko, D. Yu. Postpyrogenic changes in the fauna of arthropods-herpetobionts on the territory of the Prisursky State Nature Reserve. Long-term processes in natural complexes of reserves in Russia. Velikie Luki, 245–249. (in Russian) (2012).23.Gongalsky, K. B. & Persson, T. Recovery of soil macrofauna after wildfires in boreal forests. Soil Biol. Biochem. 57, 182–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.07.005 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24Ruchin, A. B., Alekseev, S. K. & Khapugin, A. A. Post-fire fauna of carabid beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in forests of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve (Russia). Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(Suppl. 1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.009 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Certini, G. Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: A review. Oecologia 143(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8 (2005).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
26.Buddlea, C. M., Langorb, D. W., Pohlb, G. R. & Spencec, J. R. Arthropod responses to harvesting and wildfire: Implications for emulation of natural disturbance in forest management. Biol. Cons. 128, 346–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.002 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Gongalsky, K. B., Wikars, L.-O. & Persson, T. Ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) responses to a forest wildfire in northern Europe. Russ. Entomol. J. 17(3), 273–282 (2008).
Google Scholar 
28.Gongalsky, K. B. The spatial distribution of large soil invertebrates on burned areas in xerophilous ecosystems of the Black Sea coast of the Caucasus. Arid. Ecosyst. 17(4), 260–266. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079096111040068 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Muona, J. & Rutanen, I. The short-term impact offire on the beetle fauna in boreal coniferous forest. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 31, 109–121 (1994).
Google Scholar 
30.Boulanger, Y. & Sirois, L. Postfire succession of saproxylic arthropods, with emphasis on Coleoptera, in the north boreal forest of Quebec. Environ. Entomol. 36(1), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-36.1.128 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Azeria, E. T., Ibarzabal, J. & Hébert, C. Effects of habitat characteristics and interspecific interactions on co-occurrence patterns of saproxylic beetles breeding in tree boles after forest fire: Null model analyses. Oecologia 168, 1123–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-011-2180-0 (2012).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Atchison, R. A., Hulcr, J. & Lucky, A. Managed fire frequency significantly influences the litter arthropod community in longleaf pine Flatwoods. Environ. Entomol. 47, 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvy038 (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Ulyshen, M. D., Lucky, A. & Work, T. T. Effects of prescribed fire and social insects on saproxylic beetles in a subtropical forest. Sci. Rep. 10, 9630. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66752-w (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Delettre, Y. R. Fire disturbance of a chironomid (Diptera) community on Heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 31(3), 560–570 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Swengel, A. B. & Swengel, S. R. Benefit of permanent non-fire refugia for Lepidoptera conservation in fire-managed sites. J. Insect Conserv. 11, 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9042-9 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Sánchez, M. Á. C., Asís, J. D., Gayubo, S. F., Tormos, J. & González, J. A. The effects of wildfire on Spheciformes wasp community structure: The importance of local habitat conditions. J. Insect Conserv. 15(4), 487–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9322-2 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Elia, M., Lafortezza, R., Tarasco, E., Colangelo, G. & Sanesia, G. The spatial and temporal effects of fire on insect abundance in Mediterranean forest ecosystems. For. Ecol. Manag. 263, 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.034 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Bogusch, P., Blažej, L., Trýzna, M. & Heneberg, P. Forgotten role of fires in Central European forests: Critical importance of early post-fire successional stages for bees and wasps (Hymenoptera: Aculeata). Eur. J. Forest Res. 134(1), 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-014-0840-4 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Durska, E. Effects of fire on scuttle flies (Diptera: Phoridae) in a pine forest in Poland. Entomologica Fennica. 26, 181–193 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Pons, P. Delayed effects of fire and logging on cicada nymph abundance. J. Insect Conserv. 19, 601–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-015-9781-6 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Lazarina, M. et al. The effect of fire history in shaping diversity patterns of flower-visiting insects in post-fire Mediterranean pine forests. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1228-1 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
42Ruchin, A. B. & Khapugin, A. A. Red data book invertebrates in a protected area of European Russia. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae. 65(4), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.17109/AZH.65.4.349.2019 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Khapugin, A. A. & Silaeva, T. B. The arrangement of threatened plants in Mordovia: The role of biodiversity research centers. Écoscience. 27(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.2020.1753293 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Tereshkin, I. S. & Tereshkina, L. V. Vegetation of the Mordovia Reserve. Successive series of the successions. Proc. Mordovia State Nat. Reserve. 7, 186–287 (2006) (In Russian).
Google Scholar 
45.Bayanov, N. G. Climate changes of the northwest of Mordovia during the period of existence of the Mordovia Reserve according to the meteorological observations in Temnikov. Proc. Mordovia State Nat. Reserve. 14, 212–219 (2015) (In Russian).
Google Scholar 
46.Sieber, A. et al. Landsat-based mapping of post-Soviet land-use change to assess the effectiveness of the Oksky and Mordovsky protected areas in European Russia. Remote Sens. Environ. 133, 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.01.021 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Novenko, E. Y. et al. Vegetation dynamics and fire history at the southern boundary of the forest vegetation zone in European Russia during the middle and late Holocene. Holocene 28(2), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683617721331 (2018).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Kharitonova, A. O. & Kharitonova, T. I. The effect of landscape pattern on the 2010 wildfire spread in the Mordovia State Nature Reserve, Russia. Nat. Conserv. Res. 6(2), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2021.022 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Khapugin, A. A., Vargot, E. V. & Chugunov, G. G. Vegetation recovery in fire-damaged forests: A case study at the southern boundary of the taiga zone. For. Stud. 64, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2016-0003 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Egorov, L. V., Ruchin, A. B., Semenov, V. B., Semionenkov, O. I. & Semishin, G. B. Checklist of the Coleoptera of Mordovia State Nature Reserve, Russia. ZooKeys. 962, 13–122. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.962.54477 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Bousquet, Y. Litteratura Coleopterologica (1758–1900): A guide to selected books related to the taxonomy of Coleoptera with publication dates and notes. ZooKeys. 583, 1–776. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.583.7084 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
52Ruchin, A. B., Egorov, L. V., Khapugin, A. A., Vikhrev, N. E. & Esin, M. N. The use of simple crown traps for the insects collection. Nat. Conserv. Res. 5(1), 87–108. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2020.008 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Ryan, K. C. Dynamic interactions between forest structure and fire behavior in boreal ecosystems. Silva Fennica. 36, 13–39 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Turner, M. G., Hargrove, W. W., Gardner, R. H. & Romme, W. H. Effects of fire on landscape heterogeneity in Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. J. Veg. Sci. 5, 731–742. https://doi.org/10.2307/3235886 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.BC Wildfire Service. 2020. Wildfire Rank. In: Province of British Columbia. Accessed from: https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/safety/wildfire-status/about-bcws/wildfire-response/fire-characteristics/rank.56.Margalef, R. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3, 36–71 (1958).
Google Scholar 
57Shannon, C. E. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst. Techn. J. 27, 379–423 (1948).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Magurran, A. E. Ecological Diversity and Its Measurement 179 (Chapman & Hall, 1996).
Google Scholar 
59.Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T. & Ryan, P. D. PAST: Paleontological statistics soft-ware package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 4(1), 9 (2001).
Google Scholar 
60Makarkin, V. N. & Ruchin, A. B. New data on Neuroptera and Raphidioptera of Mordovia (Russia). Kavkazskij Entomologiceskij Bulleten. 15(1), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.23885/181433262019151-147157 (2019) (in Russian).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Czechowska, W. A comparative analysis of the structure of Neuropteroidea communities of tree canopies in linden-oak-hornbeam forests, light oak forests, mixed coniferous forests and pine forests. Fragm. Faun. 40, 127–168 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Volkovich, T. A. Green lacewings (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae) of the «Forest on the Vorskla River» Nature Reserve (Belgorod Province): Fauna and ecology. Entomol. Rev. 81, 884–894 (2001).
Google Scholar 
63.Duelli, P., Obrist, M. K. & Flückiger, P. F. Forest edges are biodiversity hotspots: Also for Neuroptera. Acta Zoologica Hungarica. 48(Suppl. 2), 75–87 (2002).
Google Scholar 
64Ruchin, A. B. & Makarkin, N. V. Neuroptera and raphidioptera in the mordovia state nature reserve. Nat. Conserv. Res. 2(2), 38–46. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2017.001 (2017) (in Russian).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Aspöck, H. & Aspöck, U. Raphidioptera: Kamelhalsfliegen. Ein Überblick zum Einstieg. Entomologica Austriaca. 16, 53–72 (2009).
Google Scholar 
66.Aspöck, H., Aspöck, U. & Rausch, H. Raphidiopteren-Larven als Bodenbewohner (Insecta, Neuropteroidea) (Mit Beschreibungen der Larven von Ornatoraphidia, Parvoraphidia und Superboraphidia). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Zoologie. 62, 361–375 (1975).
Google Scholar 
67.Aspöck, H., Aspöck, U. & Hölzel, H. Die Neuropteren Europas. Eine zusammenfassende Darstellung der Systematik, Ökologie und Chorologie der Neuropteroidea (Megaloptera, Raphidioptera, Planipennia) Europas. Vols 1 & 2, Goecke and Evers, Krefeld, pp. 495–455 (1980).68.Kurochkin, A. S. Fauna and bionomy of sap beetles (Coleoptera, Nitidulidae) and kateretid beetles (Coleoptera, Kateretidae) of Krasnosamarskoe forestry farm (Samara Region, Russia): Vestnik of Samara University. Nat. Sci. Ser. 8(58), 120–128 (2007) (in Russian).
Google Scholar 
69.Oude, J. E. Naamlijst van de glanskevers van Nederland en het omliggende gebied (Coleoptera: Nitidulidae and Brachypteridae). Nederlandse Faunistische Mededelinge. 8, 11–32 (1999).
Google Scholar 
70.Alekseev, V. I. & Nikitsky, N. B. Rare and new for the fauna of the Baltic States beetles (Coleoptera) from the Kaliningrad Region. Acta Zoologica Lituanica. 18(4), 254–259 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Lasoń, A. & Holly, M. Glischrochilus grandis Tournier, 1872: New species of beetle for the Polish fauna and new data on the occurrence of genus Glischrochilus Reitter, 1873 (Cole-optera: Nitidulidae: Cryptarchinae). Acta entomologica silesiana. 23, 1–4 (2015).
Google Scholar 
72.Nikitsky, N. B., Osipov, I. N., Chemeris, M. V., Semenov, V. B. & Gusakov, A. A. The beetles of the Prioksko-Terrasny Biosphere Reserve: Xylobiontes, mycetobiontes and Scarabaeidae. Arch. Zool. Museum Moscow State Univ. XXXVI, 1–197 (1996) (in Russian).
Google Scholar 
73.Tauzin, P. Ethologie et chorologie de Protaetia (Liocola) lugubris Herbst, 1786 sur le territoire français (Coleoptera, Cetoniidae, Cetoniinae, Cetoniini). Cetoniimania. 3(1+2), 4–38 (2006).
Google Scholar 
74.Oleksa, A., Chybicki, I. J., Gawronski, R., Svensson, G. P. & Burczyk, J. Isolation by distance in saproxylic beetles may increase with niche specialization. J. Insects Conserv. 17, 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9499-7 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Urban, P. & Schulze, W. Ein aktueller Nachweis des Marmorierten Rosenkäfers Protaetia marmorata (Fabricius, 1792) in der Senne (Nordrhein-Westfalen) (Mitteilungen zur Insektenfauna Westfalens XXII). Mitteilungen der Arbeitsgemeinschaft westfälischer Entomologen. 33(1), 15–19 (2017).
Google Scholar 
76Ruchin, A. B., Egorov, L. V. & Khapugin, A. A. Seasonal activity of Coleoptera attracted by fermental crown traps in forest ecosystems of Central Russia. Ecol. Questions. 32(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.12775/EQ.2021.004 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Oleksa, A., Ulrich, W. & Gawronski, R. Occurrence of the marbled rose-chafer (Protaetia lugubris Herbst, Coleoptera, Cetoniidae) in rural avenues in northern Poland. J. Insects Conserv. 10, 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-005-4830-1 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Nikitsky, N. B. & Vlasov, D. V. Family Scarabaeidae Latreille, 1802. In: Nikitsky N.B. The beetles (Insecta, Coleoptera) of the Moscow oblast. Part. 1. Direct MEDIA. pp. 643–679 (2016) (in Russian).79.Ruchin, A. B., Egorov, L. V., Sazhnev, A. S., Polumordvinov, O. A. & Ishin, R. N. Present distribution of Protaetia fieberi (Kraatz, 1880) (Insecta, Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae) in the European part of Russia. Biharean Biologist. 13(1), 12–16 (2019).
Google Scholar 
80.Tauzin, P. Chorologie et éco-éthologie de Protaetia (Potosia) fieberi Kraatz 1880 en France (Coleoptera, Cetoniinae, Cetoniini). Cetoniimania. 3(4), 115–146 (2007).
Google Scholar 
81Bílý, S. & Mehl, O. Longhorn Beetles (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) of Fennoscandia and Denmark 200 (Brill, 1989).
Google Scholar 
82.Gutowski, J. M., Ługowoj, J. & Maciejewski, K. H. Leptura thoracica Creutzer, 1799 (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Poland. Wiad. Entomol. 13(3), 157–165 (1994) (in Polish).
Google Scholar 
83.Sama, G. Atlas of the Cerambycidae of Europe and the Mediterranean Area. Vol. 1. Northern, Western, Central and Eastern Europe British Isles and Continental Europe from France (excl. Corsica) to Scandinavia and Urals. Kabourek, Zlín, p. 173 (2002).84.Karpiński, L., Szczepański, W. T., Boldgiv, B. & Walczak, M. New data on the longhorn beetles of Mongolia with particular emphasis on the genus Eodorcadion Breuning, 1947 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). ZooKeys. 739, 107–150. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.739.23675 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Danilevsky, M. L., Ruchin, A. B. & Egorov, L. V. Mass collection of two rare longicorn-species (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) in Central Russia. Humanity space. 8(9), 1179–1183 (2019).
Google Scholar 
86Ruchin, A. B. & Egorov, L. V. Fauna of longicorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) of Mordovia. Russ. Entomol. J. 27(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.27.2.07 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Ruchin, A. B., Egorov, L. V. & Khapugin, A. A. Usage of fermental traps for studying the species diversity of Coleoptera. Insects. 12, 407. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12050407 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
88.Cherepanov, A. I. The Longhorn Beetles of Northern Asia (Prioninae, Disteniinae, Lepturinae, Aseminae) 472 (Nauka Publ, 1979).
Google Scholar 
89Starzyk, J. R. & Partyka, M. Study on the morphology, biology and distribution of Obrium cantharinum (L.) (Col., Cerambycidae). J. Appl. Entomol. 116(1–5), 333–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0418.1993.tb01205.x (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Lindhe, A., Jeppsson, T. & Ehnstrom, B. Longhorn beetles in Sweden changes in distribution and abundance over the last two hundred years. Entomologisk Tidskrift. 131(4), 241–508 (2010).
Google Scholar 
91.Egorov, L. V. & Sysoletina, L. G. On the anthophilic longhorn beetles of the Chuvash ASSR. Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, pp. 92–104 (1986) (in Russian).92.Moretti, M. & Barbalat, S. The effects of wildfires on wood-eating beetles in deciduous forests on the southern slope of the Swiss Alps. For. Ecol. Manag. 187(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00314-1 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Brodie, B. S. et al. Non-lethal monitoring of longicorn beetle communities using generic pheromone lures and occupancy models. Ecol. Ind. 101, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.038 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Grundel, R., Pavlovic, N. B. & Sulzman, C. L. Habitat use by the endangered Karner blue butterfly in oak woodlands: The influence of canopy cover. Biol. Cons. 85, 47–53 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Huntzinger, M. Effects of fire management practices on butterfly diversity in the forested western United States. Biol. Cons. 113(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00356-7 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
96Elia, M., Lafortezza, R., Tarasco, E., Colangelo, G. & Sanesi, G. Influenza degli incendi boschivi sulla biodiversità dell’entomofauna: Un caso di studio in Puglia. Forest 8, 13–21 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
97.Vogel, J. A., Koford, R. R. & Debinski, D. M. Direct and indirect responses of tallgrass prairie butterflies to prescribed burning. J. Insect Conserv. 14, 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9295-1 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
98.Swengel, A. B. Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biol. Cons. 76, 73–85 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
99Ruchin, A. & Antropov, A. Wasp fauna (Hymenoptera: Bethylidae, Chrysididae, Dryinidae, Tiphiidae, Mutllidae, Scoliidae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Crabronidae & Trigonalyidae) of Mordovia State Nature Reserve and its surroundings in Russia. J. Threatened Taxa. 11(2), 13195–13250. https://doi.org/10.11609/jot.4216.11.2.13195-13250 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Dvořák, L. Social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) trapped with beer in European forest ecosystems. Acta Mus. Morav. Sci. Biol. (Brno) 92, 181–204 (2007).
Google Scholar 
101Sorvari, J. Social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) beer trapping in Finland 2008–2012: A German surprise. Entomologica Fennica. 24(3), 156–164. https://doi.org/10.33338/ef.8983 (2013).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
102Pesson, P. & Louveaux, J. Pollinisation et productions végétales 663 (INRA, 1984).
Google Scholar 
103.Richter, M. R. Social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) foraging behavior. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45(1), 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.121 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
104.Kasper, M. L., Reeson, A. F., Mackay, D. A. & Austin, A. D. Environmental factors influencing daily foraging activity of Vespula germanica (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) in Mediterranean Australia. Insectes Soc. 55, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00040-008-1004-7 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
105Clemente, M. A. et al. Impacts of fire in social wasps community in an area of regenerating brazilian savanna. Sociobiology 66(4), 582–591. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v66i4.3590 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
106.Raveret-Richter, M. Social wasp (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) foraging behavior. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45, 121–150. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.121 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
107.Jeanne, R. L. The adaptiveness of social wasp nest architecture. Q. Rev. Biol. 50, 267–287 (1975).Article 

Google Scholar 
108Wenzel, J. W. Evolution of nest architecture. In The Social Biology of Wasps (eds Ross, K. G. & Matthews, R. W.) 480–519 (Cornell University Press, 1991).
Google Scholar 
109Dvořák, L., Dvořáková, K., Oboňa, J. & Ruchin, A. B. Selected Diptera families caught with beer traps in the Republic of Mordovia (Russia). Nat. Conserv. Res. 5(4), 65–77. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2020.057 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
110Krivosheina, N. P. Family Anisopodidae. In Manual of Palaearctic Diptera (eds Papp, L. & Darvas, B.) 239–248 (Science Herald, 1997).
Google Scholar 
111.Rotheray, G. E. Development sites, feeding modes and early stages of seven European Palloptera species (Diptera, Pallopteridae). Zootaxa 3900(1), 50–76 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
112Ruchin, A. B., Carr, J. F., Dvořák, L., Esin, M. N. & Khapugin, A. A. Pseudotephritis millepunctata (Hennig, 1939) (Diptera Ulidiidae): New species in European fauna. REDIA. 103, 25–27. https://doi.org/10.19263/REDIA-103.20.05 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
113Krivosheina, N. P. & Krivosheina, M. G. Saproxylic Diptera (Insecta) of the Lazovsky State Nature Reserve (Russia). Nat. Conserv. Res. 4(3), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2019.052 (2019) (in Russian).Article 

Google Scholar 
114.Bächli, G. & Rocha Pité, M. T. Family Drosophilidae. P. 186–220. In: Catalogue of Palaearctic Diptera. Vol. 10. Clusiidae–Chloropidae. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest (1984).115.Gornostaev, N. G. A review of drosophilid flies (Diptera, Drosophilidae) of Middle Asia and Kazakhstan. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie. 74(1), 214–223 (1995).
Google Scholar 
116.Gornostaev, N. G. Addition to the fauna of drosophilid flies (Diptera, Drosophilidae) of Russia. Russ. Entomol. J. 6(1–2), 113–118 (1997).
Google Scholar 
117.Gornostaev, N. G. Ecological classification of drosophilid flies (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie. 75(3), 698–705 (1996).
Google Scholar 
118.Máca, J. Revision of Palaearctic species of Amiota subg. Phortica (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Acta ent. bohemoslov. 74, 115–130 (1977).
Google Scholar 
119.Bächli, G. & Thunes, K. Leucophenga quinquemaculata Strobl (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from Norway. Fauna Norvegica. 39(2), 81–84 (1992).
Google Scholar 
120.Jonsell, M., Nordlander, G. & Jonsson, M. Colonization patterns of insects breeding in wood-decaying fungi. J. Insect Conserv. 3, 145–161 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
121.Edwards, F. W. Amiota alboguttata Wahlb. in Dorset (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Entomologist. 69, 218 (1936).
Google Scholar 
122.Kovalev, V. G. Faunistic and ecological material on flies of the genus Lonchaea (Diptera, Lonchaeidae) from Tuva. Entomologicheskoe Obozrenie. 55, 934–945 (1976).
Google Scholar 
123.MacGowan, I. & Rotheray, G. E. British Lonchaeidae. Diptera, Cyclorrhapha, Acalyptratae. Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects, 10 (15). Royal Entomological Society, London (2008).124.Godfrey, A. Lonchaea carpathica Kovalev (Diptera, Lonchaeidae) new to Britain and other Diptera from Cherkley Wood, Leatherhead. Surrey. Dipterists Digest (Second Series) 24, 153–155 (2017) ([in Russian]).
Google Scholar 
125.MacGowan, I., Vikhrev, N. E., Krivosheina, M. G., Ruchin, A. B. & Esin, M. N. New records of Diptera from the Republic of Mordovia. Russ. Far Eastern Entomol. 423, 9–20. https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.423.3 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Gaponov, S. P. & Panteleeva, NYu. New data of saprobiont larval feeding habits of Brachycera (Diptera) in the Middle Podonye: III: Superfamilies Muscoidea and Oestroidea. Proc. Voronezh State Univ Ser. Chem. Biol. Pharm. 1, 49–56 (2017) (in Russian).
Google Scholar 
127Vikhrev, N. E. & Erofeeva, E. A. Review of the Phaonia pallida group (Diptera: Muscidae). Russ. Entomol. J. 27, 315–322. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.27.3.14 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
128.Gisondi, S., Rognes, K., Badano, D., Pape, T. & Cerretti, P. The world Polleniidae (Diptera, Oestroidea): Key to genera and checklist of species. ZooKeys. 971, 105–155. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.971.51283 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
129.Duelli, P., Obrist, M. K. & Wermelinger, B. Windthrow induces changes of faunistic biodiversity in alpine spruce forests. For. Snow Landsc. Res. 77(1/2), 117–131 (2002).
Google Scholar 
130.Moretti, M., Duelli, P. & Obrist, M. K. Biodiversity and resilience of arthropod communities after fire disturbance in temperate forests. Oecologia 149(2), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0450-z (2006).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
131.Campbell, J. W. et al. Response of beetles (Coleoptera) to repeated applications of prescribed fire and other fuel reduction techniques in the southern Appalachian Mountains. For. Ecol. Manag. 429, 294–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.07.022 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
132Chen, Z. Z. et al. Response of Chrysoperla nipponensis (Okamoto) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) Under Long and Short Photoperiods. J. Insect Sci. 17(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iex005 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
133.Swengel, A. B. A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation managements of open habitat. Biodivers. Conserv. 10, 1141–1169. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016683807033 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
134Gongalsky, K. B. Perfugia as a mechanism for the recovery of soil fauna after ecosystem disturbances. Russ. J. Ecosyst. Ecol. 2(4), 1. https://doi.org/10.21685/2500-0578-2017-4-3 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
135.Hjältén, J. et al. Forest restoration by burning and gap cutting of voluntary set-asides yield distinct immediate effects on saproxylic beetles. Biodivers. Conserv. 26, 1623–1640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1321-0 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
136.Gutowski, J. M. et al. Post-fire beetle succession in a biodiversity hotspot: Białowieża Primeval Forest. For. Ecol. Manag. 461, 117893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2020.117893 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More