Ecology

1.Fletcher, R. J. et al. Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity? Biol. Conserv. 226, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.022 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Feranec, J. et al. (eds) European Landscape Dynamics: CORINE Land Cover Data (CRC Press, 2016).
Google Scholar 
3.Deák, B. et al. Fragmented dry grasslands preserve unique components of species and phylogenetic diversity in agricultural landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02066-7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Fekete, R. et al. Roadside verges and cemeteries: Comparative analysis of anthropogenic orchid habitats in the Eastern Mediterranean. Ecol. Evol. 9, 6655–6664. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5245 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Batáry, P. et al. Biologia Futura: Landscape perspectives on farmland biodiversity conservation. Biol. Fut. 71, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42977-020-00015-7 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Deák, B. et al. Landscape and habitat filters jointly drive richness and abundance of grassland specialist plants in terrestrial habitat islands. Landsc. Ecol. 33, 1117–1132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0660-x (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Seibold, S. et al. Arthropod decline in grasslands and forests is associated with landscape-level drivers. Nature 574(7780), 671–674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1684-3 (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Hallmann, C. A. et al. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12, e0185809. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185809 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Vanbergen, A. J. & Initiative, T. I. P. Threats to an ecosystem service: Pressures on pollinators. Front. Ecol. Environ. 11(5), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1890/120126 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Tscharntke, T. et al. Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes: Eight hypotheses. Biol. Rev. 87(3), 661–685. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
11.Seastedt, T. R. The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29(1), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.29.010184.000325 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Deák, B. et al. Habitat islands outside nature reserves: Threatened biodiversity hotspots of grassland specialist plant and arthropod species. Biol. Conserv. 241, 108254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108254 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Tews, J. et al. Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: The importance of keystone structures. J. Biogeogr. 31(1), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Margules, C. R. Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conserv. Biol. 5, 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00384.x (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Kuussaari, M. et al. Extinction debt: A challenge for biodiversity conservation. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 24, 564–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.04.011 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
16.Gazol, A. et al. Landscape and small-scale determinants of grassland species diversity: Direct and indirect influences. Ecography 35, 944–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07627.x (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Deák, B. et al. Linking environmental heterogeneity and plant diversity: The ecological role of small natural features in homogeneous landscapes. Sci. Total Env. 763, 144199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144199 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Haddad, N. M. et al. Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Science 1(2), e1500052. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500052 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Bolger, D. T., Suarez, A. V., Crooks, K. R., Morrison, S. A. & Case, T. J. Arthropods in urban habitat fragments in southern California: Area, age, and edge effects. Ecol. Appl. 10(4), 1230–1248. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1230:AIUHFI]2.0.CO;2 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Bommarco, R., Lindborg, R., Marini, L. & Öckinger, E. Extinction debt for plants and flower-visiting insects in landscapes with contrasting land use history. Divers. Distrib. 20(5), 591–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12187 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Marques, L. Collapse of terrestrial biodiversity. In Capitalism and Environmental Collapse 247–273 (Springer, 2020).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
22.Biró, M., Bölöni, J. & Molnár, Z. Use of long-term data to evaluate loss and endangerment status of Natura 2000 habitats and effects of protected areas. Conserv. Biol. 32(3), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13038 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
23.Dembicz, I. et al. Steppe islands in a sea of fields: Where island biogeography meets the reality of a severely transformed landscape. J. Veg. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12930 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Deák, B. et al. Cultural monuments and nature conservation: A review of the role of kurgans in the conservation and restoration of steppe vegetation. Biodivers. Conserv. 25(12), 2473–2490. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1081-2 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Dembicz, I. et al. Isolation and patch size drive specialist plant species density within steppe islands: A case study of kurgans in southern Ukraine. Biodivers. Conserv. 25(12), 2289–2307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-016-1077-y (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Tóth, C. A. et al. Iron age burial mounds as refugia for steppe specialist plants and invertebrates: Case study from the Zsolca mounds (NE Hungary). Hacquetia 18(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.2478/hacq-2019-0009 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Lisetskii, F. N., Goleusov, P. V., Moysiyenko, I. I. & Sudnik-Wójcikowska, B. Microzonal distribution of soils and plants along the catenas of mound structures. Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 7(3), 282–293. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425514030111 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Deák, B. et al. The effects of micro-habitats and grazing intensity on the vegetation of burial mounds in the Kazakh steppes. Plant Ecol. Divers. 10(5–6), 509–520. https://doi.org/10.1080/17550874.2018.1430871 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Marcolin, F., Lakatos, T., Gallé, R. & Batáry, P. Fragment connectivity shapes bird communities through functional trait filtering in two types of grasslands. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 28, e01687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01687 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Crist, T. O. Biodiversity, species interactions, and functional roles of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in fragmented landscapes: A review. Myrmecol. News. 12, 3–13 (2009).
Google Scholar 
31.Sobrinho, T. G., Schoereder, J. H., Sperber, C. F. & Madureira, M. S. Does fragmentation alter species composition in ant communities (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)?. Sociobiology 42, 329–342 (2003).
Google Scholar 
32.Underwood, E. C. & Fisher, B. L. The role of ants in conservation monitoring: If, when, and how. Biol. Conserv. 132(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.03.022 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Hölldobler, B. & Wilson, E. O. The Ants 732 (Belknap of Harvard University Press, 1990).Book 

Google Scholar 
34.Konečná, et al. Anthills as habitat islands in a sea of temperate pasture. Biodivers. Conserv. 30, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02134-6 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Philpott, S. M., Perfecto, I., Armbrecht, I. & Parr, C. L. Ant diversity and function in disturbed and changing habitats. In Ant Ecology (eds Lach, L. et al.) 37–156 (Oxford University Press, 2010).
Google Scholar 
36.Stadler, B. & Dixon, T. Mutualism Ants and Their Insect Partners (Cambridge University Press, 2008).Book 

Google Scholar 
37.Frouz, J. & Jilková, V. The effect of ants on soil properties and processes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 11(11), 191–199 (2008).
Google Scholar 
38.Folgarait, P. J. Ant biodiversity and its relationship to ecosystem functioning: A review. Biodivers. Conserv. 7(9), 1221–1244. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008891901953 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Azcárate, F. M., Alameda-Martín, A., Escudero, A. & Sánchez, A. M. Ant communities resist even in small and isolated gypsum habitat remnants in a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Front. Ecol. Evol. 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.619215 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Bátori, Z. et al. Karst dolines provide diverse microhabitats for different functional groups in multiple phyla. Sci. Rep. 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43603-x (2019).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Hoffmann, B. D. & Andersen, A. N. Responses of ants to disturbance in Australia, with particular reference to functional groups. Austral. Ecol. 28(4), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-9993.2003.01301.x (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Csősz, S. et al. The myrmecofauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of Hungary: Survey of ant species with an annotated synonymic inventory. Insects 12(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects12010078 (2021).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Dröse, W., Podgaiski, L. R., Dias, C. F. & Mendonca, M. D. S. Jr. Local and regional drivers of ant communities in forest-grassland ecotones in South Brazil: A taxonomic and phylogenetic approach. PLoS ONE 14(4), e0215310. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215310 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Bátori, Z. et al. Managing climate change microrefugia for vascular plants in forested karst landscapes. For. Ecol. Manag. 496, 119446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119446 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Mata, L. et al. Conserving herbivorous and predatory insects in urban green spaces. Sci. Rep. 7, 40970. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40970 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.King, J. R., Warren, R. J., Maynard, D. S. & Bradford, M. A. Ants: Ecology and impacts in Dead Wood. In Saproxylic Insects. Zoological Monographs Vol. 1 (ed. Ulyshen, M.) (Springer, 2018).
Google Scholar 
47.Tölgyesi, C. et al. Underground deserts below fertility islands? Woody species desiccate lower soil layers in sandy drylands. Ecography 43, 848–859. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04906 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Vítková, M., Müllerová, J., Sádlo, J., Pergl, J. & Pyšek, P. Black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) beloved and despised: A story of an invasive tree in Central Europe. Forest Ecol. Manag. 384, 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.10.057 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Pacheco, R., Vasconcelos, H. L., Groc, S., Camacho, G. P. & Frizzo, T. L. The importance of remnants of natural vegetation for maintaining ant diversity in Brazilian agricultural landscapes. Biodivers. Conserv. 22, 983–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-013-0463-y (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Pihlgren, A., Lenoir, L. & Dahms, H. Ant and plant species richness in relation to grazing, fertilisation and topography. J. Nat. Conserv. 18(2), 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2009.06.002 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Bátori, Z. et al. Karstic microrefugia host functionally specific ant assemblages. Front. Ecol. Evol. 8, 482. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.613738 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37(12), 4302–4315. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Seifert, B. The Ants of Central and North Europe 408( – lutra Verlags – und Vertriebsgesellschaft, 2018).54.Czechowski, W., Radchenko, A., Czechowska, W. & Vepsäläinen, K. The Ants of Poland with Reference to the Myrmecofauna of Europe 496 (Natura optima dux Foundation, 2012).55.EOTR (Uniform National Mapping System of Hungary) 1:10,000 Scale Topographic Maps. FÖMI (Institute of Geodesy, Cartography and Remote Sensing).56.Ministry of Agriculture. Ökoszisztéma Alaptérkép és Adatmodell Kialakítása. (Ecosystem Basemap and Datamodel Design). https://doi.org/10.34811/osz.alapterkep (2019).57.Lanan, M. Spatiotemporal resource distribution and foraging strategies of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol. News 20, 53 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.QGIS Development Team. QGIS Geographic Information System, Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. http://qgis.osgeo.org (2020).59.Faraway, J. J. Linear Models with R 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, London, 2014).MATH 

Google Scholar 
60.Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.4-3. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2016).61.Laliberté, E. & Legendre, P. A distance-based framework for measuring functional diversity from multiple traits. Ecology 91(1), 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-2244.1 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
62.Galipaud, M., Gillingham, M. A. & Dechaume-Moncharmont, F. X. A farewell to the sum of Akaike weights: The benefits of alternative metrics for variable importance estimations in model selection. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8(12), 1668–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12835 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Hegyi, G. & Garamszegi, L. Z. Using information theory as a substitute for stepwise regression in ecology and behavior. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-1036-7 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020). https://www.R-project.org/. More

1.Simó, R. Production of atmospheric sulfur by oceanic plankton: biogeochemical, ecological and evolutionary links. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 287–294 (2001).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O. & Warren, S. G. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326, 655–661 (1987).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Wang, S., Maltrud, M. E., Burrows, S. M., Elliott, S. M. & Cameron-Smith, P. Impacts of shifts in phytoplankton community on clouds and climate via the sulfur cycle. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 32, 1005–1026 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
4.Wolfe, G. V., Steinke, M. & Kirst, G. O. Grazing-activated chemical defence in a unicellular marine alga. Nature 387, 894–897 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Seymour, J., Simó, R., Ahmed, T. & Stocker, R. Chemoattraction to dimethylsulfoniopropionate throughout the marine microbial food web. Science 329, 342–345 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Alcolombri, U. et al. Identification of the algal dimethyl sulfide-releasing enzyme: a missing link in the marine sulfur cycle. Science 348, 1466–1469 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Alcolombri, U., Lei, L., Meltzer, D., Vardi, A. & Tawfik, D. S. Assigning the algal source of dimethylsulfide using a selective lyase inhibitor. ACS Chem. Biol. 12, 41–46 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Kettle, A. J. & Andreae, M. O. Flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans: a comparison of updated data sets and flux models. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 105, 26793–26808 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Carpenter, L. J., Archer, S. D. & Beale, R. Ocean–atmosphere trace gas exchange. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6473–6506 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Franklin, D. J., Steinke, M., Young, J., Probert, I. & Malin, G. Dimethylsulphoniopropionate (DMSP), DMSP-lyase activity (DLA) and dimethylsulphide (DMS) in 10 species of coccolithophore. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 410, 13–23 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Keller, M. D. Dimethyl sulfide production and marine phytoplankton: the importance of species composition and cell size. Biol. Oceanogr. 6, 375–382 (1989).
Google Scholar 
12.Curson, A. R. J. et al. DSYB catalyses the key step of dimethylsulfoniopropionate biosynthesis in many phytoplankton. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 430–439 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Sunda, W., Kieber, D. J., Kiene, R. P. & Huntsman, S. An antioxidant function for DMSP and DMS in marine algae. Nature 418, 317–320 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Kirst, G. O. in Biological and Environmental Chemistry of DMSP and Related Sulfonium Compounds (eds Kiene, R. P. et al.) 121−129 (Springer, 1996).15.Darroch, L. et al. Effect of short-term light- and UV-stress on DMSP, DMS, and DMSP lyase activity in Emiliania huxleyi. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 74, 173–185 (2015).16.Barak-Gavish, N. et al. Bacterial virulence against an oceanic bloom-forming phytoplankter is mediated by algal DMSP. Sci. Adv. 4, eaau5716 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Amin, S. A. et al. Interaction and signalling between a cosmopolitan phytoplankton and associated bacteria. Nature 522, 98–101 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Garcés, E., Alacid, E., Reñé, A., Petrou, K. & Simó, R. Host-released dimethylsulphide activates the dinoflagellate parasitoid Parvilucifera sinerae. ISME J. 7, 1065–1068 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
19.Steinke, M., Stefels, J. & Stamhuis, E. Dimethyl sulfide triggers search behavior in copepods. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 1925–1930 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Breckels, M., Bode, N., Codling, E. & Steinke, M. Effect of grazing-mediated dimethyl sulfide (DMS) production on the swimming behavior of the copepod Calanus helgolandicus. Mar. Drugs 11, 2486 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
21.Procter, J., Hopkins, F. E., Fileman, E. S. & Lindeque, P. K. Smells good enough to eat: dimethyl sulfide (DMS) enhances copepod ingestion of microplastics. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 138, 1–6 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Foretich, M. A., Paris, C. B., Grosell, M., Stieglitz, J. D. & Benetti, D. D. Dimethyl sulfide is a chemical attractant for reef fish larvae. Sci. Rep. 7, 2498 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
23.Savoca, M. S. & Nevitt, G. A. Evidence that dimethyl sulfide facilitates a tritrophic mutualism between marine primary producers and top predators. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 4157–4161 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Wright, K. L. B., Pichegru, L. & Ryan, P. G. Penguins are attracted to dimethyl sulphide at sea. J. Exp. Biol. 214, 2509–2511 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Owen, K. et al. Natural dimethyl sulfide gradients would lead marine predators to higher prey biomass. Commun. Biol. 4, 149 (2021).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Wolfe, G. V. & Steinke, M. Grazing-activated production of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) by two clones of Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceanogr. 41, 1151–1160 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Simó, R. et al. The quantitative role of microzooplankton grazing in dimethylsulfide (DMS) production in the NW Mediterranean. Biogeochemistry 141, 125–142 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Evans, C., Kadner, S. V. & Darroch, L. J. The relative significance of viral lysis and microzooplankton grazing as pathways of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) cleavage: an Emiliania huxleyi culture study. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 1036–1045 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Kiene, R. P. Dimethyl sulfide production from dimethylsulfoniopropionate in coastal seawater samples and bacterial cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 3292–3297 (1990).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Bullock, H. A., Luo, H. & Whitman, W. B. Evolution of dimethylsulfoniopropionate metabolism in marine phytoplankton and bacteria. Front. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00637 (2017).31.Strom, S. et al. Chemical defense in the microplankton I: feeding and growth rates of heterotrophic protists on the DMS-producing phytoplankter Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 217–229 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Calbet, A. & Landry, M. R. Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton grazing, and carbon cycling in marine systems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 51–57 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Schmoker, C., Hernández-León, S. & Calbet, A. Microzooplankton grazing in the oceans: impacts, data variability, knowledge gaps and future directions. J. Plankton Res. 35, 691–706 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Steinke, M., Wolfe, G. V. & Kirst, G. O. Partial characterisation of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) lyase isozymes in 6 strains of Emiliania huxleyi. Mar. Ecol. 175, 215–225 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Breckels, M. N., Roberts, E. C., Archer, S. D., Malin, G. & Steinke, M. The role of dissolved infochemicals in mediating predator–prey interactions in the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina. J. Plankton Res. 33, 629–639 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Saló, V., Simó, R., Vila-Costa, M. & Calbet, A. Sulfur assimilation by Oxyrrhis marina feeding on a 35S-DMSP-labelled prey. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 3063–3072 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Raina, J. B. et al. Subcellular tracking reveals the location of dimethylsulfoniopropionate in microalgae and visualises its uptake by marine bacteria. eLife 6, e23008 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Franklin, D. J. et al. Identification of senescence and death in Emiliania huxleyi and Thalassiosira pseudonana: cell staining, chlorophyll alterations, and dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) metabolism. Limnol. Oceanogr. 57, 305–317 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Kettles, N. L., Kopriva, S. & Malin, G. Insights into the regulation of DMSP synthesis in the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana through APR activity, proteomics and gene expression analyses on cells acclimating to changes in salinity, light and nitrogen. PLoS ONE 9, e94795 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
40.Poulsen, N., Chesley, P. M. & Kröger, N. Molecular genetic manipulation of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana (bacillariophyceae). J. Phycol. 42, 1059–1065 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Armbrust, E. V. et al. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira pseudonana: ecology, evolution, and metabolism. Science 306, 79–86 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Malviya, S. et al. Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1516–E1525 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Apt, K. E. et al. In vivo characterization of diatom multipartite plastid targeting signals. J. Cell Sci. 115, 4061–4069 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.McParland, E. L., Wright, A., Art, K., He, M. & Levine, N. M. Evidence for contrasting roles of dimethylsulfoniopropionate production in Emiliania huxleyi and Thalassiosira oceanica. New Phytol. 226, 396–409 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Keeling, P. J. et al. The Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP): illuminating the functional diversity of eukaryotic life in the oceans through transcriptome sequencing. PLoS Biol. 12, e1001889 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
46.Olson, M. B. & Strom, S. L. Phytoplankton growth, microzooplankton herbivory and community structure in the southeast Bering Sea: insight into the formation and temporal persistence of an Emiliania huxleyi bloom. Deep-Sea Res. II 49, 5969–5990 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Challenger, F. & Simpson, M. I. Studies on biological methylation; a precursor of the dimethyl sulphide evolved by Polysiphonia fastigiata; dimethyl-2-carboxyethylsulphonium hydroxide and its salts. J. Chem. Soc. 3, 1591–1597 (1948).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Haas, P. The liberation of methyl sulphide by seaweed. Biochem. J. 29, 1297–1299 (1935).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Stefels, J. & Dijkhuizen, L. Characteristics of DMSP-lyase in Phaeocystis sp. (Prymnesiophyceae). Mar. Ecol. 131, 307–313 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Wolfe, G. V., Sherr, E. B. & Sherr, B. F. Release and consumption of DMSP from Emiliania huxleyi during grazing by Oxyrrhis marina. Mar. Ecol. 111, 111–119 (1994).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Reisch, C. R., Moran, M. A. & Whitman, W. B. Bacterial catabolism of dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). Front. Microbiol. 2, 172 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.von Dassow, P. et al. Transcriptome analysis of functional differentiation between haploid and diploid cells of Emiliania huxleyi, a globally significant photosynthetic calcifying cell. Genome Biol. 10, R114 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
53.Strom, S., Wolfe, G., Slajer, A., Lambert, S. & Clough, J. Chemical defense in the microplankton II: inhibition of protist feeding by β-dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP). Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 230–237 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Li, W. Eat-me signals: keys to molecular phagocyte biology and “appetite” control. J. Cell. Physiol. 227, 1291–1297 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Tyssebotn, I. M. B. et al. Concentrations, biological uptake, and respiration of dissolved acrylate and dimethylsulfoxide in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 1198–1218 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Curson, A. R. J., Todd, J. D., Sullivan, M. J. & Johnston, A. W. B. Catabolism of dimethylsulphoniopropionate: microorganisms, enzymes and genes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 849–859 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
57.Spiese, C. E., Le, T., Zimmer, R. L. & Kieber, D. J. Dimethylsulfide membrane permeability, cellular concentrations and implications for physiological functions in marine algae. J. Plankton Res. 38, 41–54 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Hatton, A. D., Shenoy, D. M., Hart, M. C., Mogg, A. & Green, D. H. Metabolism of DMSP, DMS and DMSO by the cultivable bacterial community associated with the DMSP-producing dinoflagellate Scrippsiella trochoidea. Biogeochemistry 110, 131–146 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Laber, C. P. et al. Coccolithovirus facilitation of carbon export in the North Atlantic. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 537–547 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Endres, C. S. & Lohmann, K. J. Perception of dimethyl sulfide (DMS) by loggerhead sea turtles: a possible mechanism for locating high-productivity oceanic regions for foraging. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 3535–3538 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Savoca, M. S. Chemoattraction to dimethyl sulfide links the sulfur, iron, and carbon cycles in high-latitude oceans. Biogeochemistry 138, 1–21 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Steinke, M., Malin, G. & Liss, P. Trophic interactions in the sea: an ecological role for climate relevant volatiles? J. Phycol. 38, 630–638 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Pohnert, G., Steinke, M. & Tollrian, R. Chemical cues, defence metabolites and the shaping of pelagic interspecific interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 198–204 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Lewis, N. et al. Grazing-induced production of DMS can stabilize food-web dynamics and promote the formation of phytoplankton blooms in a multitrophic plankton model. Biogeochemistry 110, 303–313 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Lewis, N. D., Breckels, M. N., Steinke, M. & Codling, E. A. Role of infochemical mediated zooplankton grazing in a phytoplankton competition model. Ecol. Complex. 16, 41–50 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Hansen, F. C., Reckermann, M., Breteler, W. C. M. K. & Riegman, R. Phaeocystis blooming enhanced by copepod predation on protozoa: evidence from incubation experiments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 102, 51–57 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Levasseur, M. et al. Production of DMSP and DMS during a mesocosm study of an Emiliania huxleyi bloom: influence of bacteria and Calanus finmarchicus grazing. Mar. Biol. 126, 609–618 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Guillard, R. R. & Ryther, J. H. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms. I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (cleve) Gran. Can. J. Microbiol. 8, 229–239 (1962).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Parada, A. E., Needham, D. M. & Fuhrman, J. A. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1403–1414 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Apprill, A., McNally, S., Parsons, R. & Weber, L. Minor revision to V4 region SSU rRNA 806R gene primer greatly increases detection of SAR11 bacterioplankton. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01753 (2015).71.Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Frost, B. W. Effects of size and concentration of food particles on the feeding and behavior of the marine planktonic copepod Calanus pacificus. Limnol. Oceanogr. 17, 805–815 (1972).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Johnson, M. D., Michelle, R. & Stoecker, D. K. Microzooplankton grazing on Prorocentrum minimum and Karlodinium micrum in Chesapeake Bay. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 238–248 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Stoeck, T. et al. Multiple marker parallel tag environmental DNA sequencing reveals a highly complex eukaryotic community in marine anoxic water. Mol. Ecol. 19, 21–31 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Piredda, R. et al. Diversity and temporal patterns of planktonic protist assemblages at a Mediterranean Long Term Ecological Research site. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiw200 (2017).78.Guillou, L. et al. The Protist Ribosomal Reference database (PR2): a catalog of unicellular eukaryote small sub-unit rRNA sequences with curated taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D597–D604 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Slamovits, C. H., Saldarriaga, J. F., Larocque, A. & Keeling, P. J. The highly reduced and fragmented mitochondrial genome of the early-branching dinoflagellate Oxyrrhis marina shares characteristics with both apicomplexan and dinoflagellate mitochondrial genomes. J. Mol. Biol. 372, 356–368 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
80.Untergasser, A. et al. Primer3Plus, an enhanced web interface to Primer3. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W71–W74 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Dagg, M. J., Jackson, G. A. & Checkley, D. M. The distribution and vertical flux of fecal pellets from large zooplankton in Monterey Bay and coastal California. Deep-Sea Res. I 94, 72–86 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Boyd PW. Toward quantifying the response of the oceans’ biological pump to climate change. Front Mar Sci. 2015. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00077.2.Charlson RJ, Lovelock JE, Andreae MO, Warren SG. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulphur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature. 1987;326:655–61.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Falkowski PG, Barber RT, Smetacek V. Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science (80-). 1998;281:200–6.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Arrigo KR. Marine microorganisms and global nutrient cycles. Nature. 2005;437:349–55.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Sanders R, Henson SA, Koski M, De La Rocha CL, Painter SC, Poulton AJ, et al. The biological carbon pump in the North Atlantic. Prog Oceanogr e-pub print. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2014.05.005.Article 

Google Scholar 
6.De Vargas C, Audic S, Henry N, Decelle J, Mahé F, Logares R, et al. Eukaryotic plankton diversity in the sunlit ocean. Science. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261605.7.Moore CM, Mills MM, Arrigo KR, Berman-Frank I, Bopp L, Boyd PW, et al. Processes and patterns of oceanic nutrient limitation. Nat Geosci. 2013;6:701–10.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Tyrrell T. The relative influences of nitrogen and phosohorus on oceanic primary production. Nature. 1999;400:525–31.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Dos Santos PC, Fang Z, Mason SW, Setubal JC, Dixon R. Distribution of nitrogen fixation and nitrogenase-like sequences amongst microbial genomes. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:162.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Zehr JP, Capone DG. Changing perspectives in marine nitrogen fixation. Science. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9514.11.Zehr JP, Jenkins BD, Short SM, Steward GF. Nitrogenase gene diversity and microbial community structure: a cross-system comparison. Env Microbiol. 2003;5:539–54.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, et al. Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future. Biogeochemistry. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0.13.Carpenter EJ, Capone DG, Rueter JG. Marine pelagic cyanobacteria: trichodesmium and other diazotrophs. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1992.14.Carpenter EJ, Romans K. Major role of the cyanobacterium trichodesmium in nutrient cycling in the north atlantic ocean. Science. 1991;254:1356–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Karl D, Letelier R, Tupas L, Dore J, Christian J, Hebel D. The role of nitrogen fixation in biogeochemical cycling in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature. 1997;388:533–8.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Capone DG. Trichodesmium, a globally significant marine cyanobacterium. Science (80-). 1997;276:1221–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Dyhrman ST, Chappell PD, Haley ST, Moffett JW, Orchard ED, Waterbury JB, et al. Phosphonate utilization by the globally important marine diazotroph. Trichodesmium Nat. 2006;439:68–71.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Pierella Karlusich JJ, Pelletier E, Lombard F, Carsique M, Dvorak E, Colin S, et al. Global distribution patterns of marine nitrogen-fixers by imaging and molecular methods. Nat Commun 2021 121. 2021;12:1–18.
Google Scholar 
19.Gómez F, Furuya K, Takeda S. Distribution of the cyanobacterium Richelia intracellularis as an epiphyte of the diatom Chaetoceros compressus in the western Pacific Ocean. J Plankton Res. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbi007.20.Hilton JA, Foster RA, James Tripp H, Carter BJ, Zehr JP, Villareal TA. Genomic deletions disrupt nitrogen metabolism pathways of a cyanobacterial diatom symbiont. Nat Commun. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2748.21.Martínez-Pérez C, Mohr W, Löscher CR, Dekaezemacker J, Littmann S, Yilmaz P, et al. The small unicellular diazotrophic symbiont, UCYN-A, is a key player in the marine nitrogen cycle. Nat Microbiol 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.163.Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
22.Tripp HJ, Bench SR, Turk KA, Foster RA, Desany BA, Niazi F, et al. Metabolic streamlining in an open-ocean nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium. Nature. 2010;464:90–94.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Moisander PH, Beinart RA, Hewson I, White AE, Johnson KS, Carlson CA, et al. (2010). Unicellular cyanobacterial distributions broaden the oceanic N2 fixation domain. Science (80-). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185468.24.Montoya JP, Holl CM, Zehr JP, Hansen A, Villareal TA, Capone DG (2004). High rates of N2 fixation by unicellular diazotrophs in the oligotrophic Pacific Ocean. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02824.25.Church MJ, Short CM, Jenkins BD, Karl DM, Zehr JP. Temporal patterns of nitrogenase gene (nifH) expression in the oligotrophic North Pacific Ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:5362–70.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Church MJ, Björkman KM, Karl DM, Saito MA, Zehr JP. Regional distributions of nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the Pacific Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr. 2008;53:63–77.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Zehr JP, Montoya JP, Jenkins BD, Hewson I, Mondragon E, Short CM, et al. Experiments linking nitrogenase gene expression to nitrogen fixation in the North Pacific subtropical gyre. Limnology and Oceanography. 2007;52:169–83.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Fong AA, Karl DM, Lukas R, Letelier RM, Zehr JP, Church MJ. Nitrogen fixation in an anticyclonic eddy in the oligotrophic North Pacific Ocean. ISME J. 2008;2:663–76.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Moisander PH, Beinart RA, Voss M, Zehr JP. Diversity and abundance of diazotrophic microorganisms in the South China Sea during intermonsoon. ISME J. 2008;251:954–67.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
30.Man-Aharonovich D, Kress N, Zeev EB, Berman-Frank I, Béjà O. Molecular ecology of nifH genes and transcripts in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Environ Microbiol. 2007;9:2354–63.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Benavides M, Moisander PH, Daley MC, Bode A, Arístegui J (2016). Longitudinal variability of diazotroph abundances in the subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. J Plankton Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbv121.32.Langlois RJ, LaRoche J, Raab PA (2005). Diazotrophic diversity and distribution in the tropical and subtropical Atlantic Ocean. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.12.7910-7919.2005.33.Bombar D, Paerl RW, Riemann L. Marine non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs: moving beyond molecular detection. Trends Microbiol. 2016;24:916–27.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Farnelid H, Andersson AF, Bertilsson S, Al-Soud WA, Hansen LH, Sørensen S, et al. Nitrogenase gene amplicons from global marine surface waters are dominated by genes of non-cyanobacteria. PLoS One 6. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019223.35.Riemann L, Farnelid H, Steward GF. Nitrogenase genes in non-cyanobacterial plankton: prevalence, diversity and regulation in marine waters. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2010;61:235–47.Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Moisander PH, Benavides M, Bonnet S, Berman-Frank I, White AE, Riemann L. Chasing after non-cyanobacterial nitrogen fixation in marine pelagic environments. Front Microbiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01736.37.Moreira-Coello V, Mouriño-Carballido B, Marañón E, Fernández-Carrera A, Bode A, Sintes E, et al. Temporal variability of diazotroph community composition in the upwelling region off NW Iberia. Sci Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39586-4.38.Luo YW, Doney SC, Anderson LA, Benavides M, Berman-Frank I, Bode A, et al. Database of diazotrophs in global ocean: abundance, biomass and nitrogen fixation rates. Earth Syst Sci Data. 2012. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-4-47-2012.39.Delmont TO, Quince C, Shaiber A, Esen ÖC, Lee ST, Rappé MS, et al. Nitrogen-fixing populations of Planctomycetes and Proteobacteria are abundant in surface ocean metagenomes. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:804–13.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Salazar G, Paoli L, Alberti A, Huerta-Cepas J, Ruscheweyh HJ, Cuenca M, et al. Gene expression changes and community turnover differentially shape the global ocean metatranscriptome. Cell. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.014.41.Sunagawa S, Acinas SG, Bork P, Bowler C, Eveillard D, Gorsky G, et al. Tara Oceans: towards global ocean ecosystems biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:428–45CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Delmont TO, Gaia M, Hinsinger DD, Fremont P, Fernandez Guerra A, Murat et al. Functional repertoire convergence of distantly related eukaryotic plankton lineages revealed by genome-resolved metagenomics. bioRxiv. 2020. 2020.10.15.341214.43.Eren AM, Esen ÖC, Quince C, Vineis JH, Morrison HG, Sogin ML, et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ‘omics data. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1319.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Eren AM, Kiefl E, Shaiber A, Veseli I, Miller SE, Schechter MS, et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat Microbiol 2020;6:3–6.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
45.Gaby JC, Buckley DH (2012). A comprehensive evaluation of PCR primers to amplify the nifH gene of nitrogenase. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042149.46.Turk-Kubo KA, Karamchandani M, Capone DG, Zehr JP. The paradox of marine heterotrophic nitrogen fixation: abundances of heterotrophic diazotrophs do not account for nitrogen fixation rates in the Eastern Tropical South Pacific. Environ Microbiol. 2014;16:3095–114.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Zehr JP, Turner PJ. Nitrogen fixation: nitrogenase genes and gene expression. METHODS Microbiol. 2001;30:271–86.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Galperin MY, Wolf YI, Makarova KS, Vera Alvarez R, Landsman D, Koonin EV. COG database update: focus on microbial diversity, model organisms, and widespread pathogens. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkaa1018.49.Aramaki T, Blanc-Mathieu R, Endo H, Ohkubo K, Kanehisa M, Goto S, et al. KofamKOALA: KEGG Ortholog assignment based on profile HMM and adaptive score threshold. Bioinformatics. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz859.50.Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Tanabe M, Sato Y, Morishima K. KEGG: New perspectives on genomes, pathways, diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw1092.51.Pesant S, Not F, Picheral M, Kandels-Lewis S, Le Bescot N, Gorsky G, et al. Open science resources for the discovery and analysis of Tara Oceans data. Sci Data 2015 21. 2015;2:1–16.
Google Scholar 
52.Farnelid H, Tarangkoon W, Hansen G, Hansen PJ, Riemann L. Putative N2-fixing heterotrophic bacteria associated with dinoflagellate-cyanobacteria consortia in the low-nitrogen Indian Ocean. Aquat Microb Ecol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01440.53.Farnelid H, Turk-Kubo K, Ploug H, Ossolinski JE, Collins JR, Van Mooy BAS, et al. Diverse diazotrophs are present on sinking particles in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre. ISME J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-018-0259-x.54.Foster RA, Carpenter EJ, Bergman B. Unicellular cyanobionts in open ocean dinoflagellates, radiolarians, and tintinnids: ultrastructural characterization and immuno-localization of phycoerythrin and nitrogenase. J Phycol. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00206.x.55.Scavotto RE, Dziallas C, Bentzon-Tilia M, Riemann L, Moisander PH. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with copepods in coastal waters of the North Atlantic Ocean. Environ Microbiol. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12777.56.Zani S, Mellon MT, Collier JL, Zehr JP. Expression of nifH genes in natural microbial assemblages in Lake George, New York, detected by reverse transcriptase PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:3119–24.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Geisler E, Bogler A, Rahav E, Bar-Zeev E. Direct Detection of Heterotrophic Diazotrophs Associated with Planktonic Aggregates. Sci Rep. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45505-4.58.Martínez-Pérez C, Mohr W, Schwedt A, Dürschlag J, Callbeck CM, Schunck H, et al. Metabolic versatility of a novel N2-fixing Alphaproteobacterium isolated from a marine oxygen minimum zone. Environ Microbiol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14008.59.Rahav E, Bar-Zeev E, Ohayon S, Elifantz H, Belkin N, Herut B, et al. Dinitrogen fixation in aphotic oxygenated marine environments. Front Microbiol. 2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00227.60.Bentzon-Tilia M, Severin I, Hansen LH, Riemann L. Genomics and ecophysiology of heterotrophic nitrogen-fixing bacteria isolated from estuarine surface water. MBio 6. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00929-15.61.Cornejo-Castillo FM, Zehr JP. Intriguing size distribution of the uncultured and globally widespread marine non-cyanobacterial diazotroph Gamma-A. ISME J. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00765-1.62.Carradec Q, Pelletier E, Da Silva C, Alberti A, Seeleuthner Y, Blanc-Mathieu R, et al. A global ocean atlas of eukaryotic genes. Nat Commun. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02342-1.63.Güell M, Yus E, Lluch-Senar M, Serrano L. Bacterial transcriptomics: what is beyond the RNA horiz-ome? Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro2620.64.Cornejo-Castillo FM, Cabello AM, Salazar G, Sánchez-Baracaldo P, Lima-Mendez G, Hingamp P, et al. Cyanobacterial symbionts diverged in the late Cretaceous towards lineage-specific nitrogen fixation factories in single-celled phytoplankton. Nat Commun. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11071.65.Needoba JA, Foster RA, Sakamoto C, Zehr JP, Johnson KS. Nitrogen fixation by unicellular diazotrophic cyanobacteria in the temperate oligotrophic North Pacific Ocean. Limnol Oceanogr. 2007. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2007.52.4.1317.66.Foster RA, Paytan A, Zehr JP. Seasonality of N2 fixation and nifH gene diversity in the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Limnol Oceanogr. 2009. https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0219.67.Thompson AW, Foster RA, Krupke A, Carter BJ, Musat N, Vaulot D, et al. Unicellular cyanobacterium symbiotic with a single-celled eukaryotic alga. Science. 2012;337:1546–50.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Zehr JP, Waterbury JB, Turner PJ, Montoya JP, Omoregie E, Steward GF, et al. Unicellular cyanobacteria fix N2 in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Nature. 2001;412:635–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Ohki K, Zehr JP, Fujita Y. Trichodesmium: establishment of culture and characteristics of N2- fixation. Mar pelagic cyanobacteria. 1992. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-7977-3_20.70.Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2014;31:1674–6.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
71.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, Locascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:119.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
72.Eddy SR. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7:e1002195.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–60.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
75.Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1144–6.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Delmont TO, Eren AM. Identifying contamination with advanced visualization and analysis practices: metagenomic approaches for eukaryotic genome assemblies. PeerJ. 2016;4:e1839.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
77.Delcher AL, Phillippy A, Carlton J, Salzberg SL. Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:2478–83.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Chaumeil PA, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. GTDB-Tk: A toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848.80.Bateman A, Birney E, Durbin R, Eddy SR, Howe KL, Sonnhammer ELL. The Pfam protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:263–6.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Zdobnov EM, Apweiler R. InterProScan – an integration platform for the signature-recognition methods in InterPro. Bioinformatics. 2001;17:847–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Haft DH, Selengut JD, White O. The TIGRFAMs database of protein families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:371–3.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, et al. The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:75.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
84.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol. 1990;215:403–10.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Darling AE, Jospin G, Lowe E, Matsen FA, Bik HM, Eisen JA. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ. 2014;2:e243.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. FastTree 2 — Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One. 2010;5:e9490.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

Culture maintenance and growthTwelve strains of Thalassiosira spp. were obtained from the Provasoli-Guillard National Centre of Marine Phytoplankton (NCMA, https://ncma.bigelow.org/), and one strain from the Australian National Culture Collection, representing 7 species in total (Supplementary Table 1). Cultures were maintained in polystyrene tissue culture flasks in artificial seawater with f/2 media [37] at 20 °C, with 60 µmolm−2s−1 of light on a 12:12 light cycle.Three strains originally identified as Thalassiosira sp. in the NCMA collection were further classified to the species level using sequencing of the ITS2 gene region (Supplementary Table 1): CCMP1055 as T. auguste-lineata (84.64% similarity; [38]) and CCMP2929 as T. weisflogii (98.37% similarity to Strain 1587 used in our study; [39]). Strain CCMP1059 was tentatively identified as Cyclotella striata (94.17% identity match to clone ZX28-3-40; [40]) also from order Thalassiosirales, but this assignment requires further investigation.Experimental set upExperimental cultures (200 mL) were grown in 250 mL polystyrene tissue culture flasks in triplicate, at a starting concentration of 2500 cells ml−1. All 13 strains were grown in a “standard” environment (identical to maintenance conditions) with 9 phenotypic traits measured to describe the initial trait-scape. Five strains (1010, 1059, 2929, 3264, and 3367) were grown in two additional environments in triplicate: a high temperature and light treatment (HT: 30 °C, 200 µmol photons m−2s−1 of light, 12:12 light:dark), and a low nutrient treatment (LN: f/400 media with an adjusted N:P ratio of 10:1 achieved by reducing the nitrate concentration from 4.4 to 1.8 µM, 60 µmol photons m−2s−1 of light, 12:12 light:dark). Cultures for the two additional treatments were inoculated with 10,000 cells ml−1 (LN) and 5,000 cells ml−1 (HT) in anticipation of limited growth.Growth was tracked daily using in vivo fluorescence as a proxy for cell density [41]. One mL aliquots of experimental cultures were measured for chlorophyll-a fluorescence using a plate reader (TECAN Infinite M1000 Pro, Männedorf, Switzerland) using 455/680 nm excitation/emission spectra. Phenotypic traits were measured at mid-late exponential phase, assessed by visually examining in vivo fluorescence growth curves. In the case of the low nutrient treatment, where growth was limited to 3–5 days, cultures were harvested in early stationary phase. Duration of growth for each experiment is summarised in Supplementary Table 2.Phenotypic trait measurement methodsPhenotypic traits were selected to capture different commonly measured base physiological functions, and to include traits that are used in biogeochemical models. We also selected traits that demonstrated independence and orthogonality (i.e., not all co-varying), based on pilot studies, in order to successfully define the multivariate trait-scape [42].Growth rateGrowth rates for each time step were calculated from the daily in vivo fluorescence measurements according to the calculation:$$mu = frac{{{{{{{{{mathrm{ln}}}}}}}}left( {F_2} right)-{{{{{{{mathrm{ln}}}}}}}}left( {F_1} right)}}{{t_2 – t_1}}$$Maximum growth rates were determined by the average growth over 2–4 consecutive steps depending on the duration of exponential growth.Flow cytometry traitsFor flow cytometry trait measures (growth rate, size, chlorophyll a content, lipid content), 1 mL aliquots of experimental culture were fixed with EM grade paraformaldehyde (0.8% final concentration, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Ft Washington, PA) in 1.6 mL cryopreservation tubes (CryoPure, Sarstedt), frozen in liquid nitrogen, then stored at −80 °C prior to analysis. All measures were performed using a Cytoflex LX (Beckman Coulter, CA, USA).Cell counts and sizeCell counts were done by gating the diatom population using chlorophyll a (488 nm excitation, 690/50 nm detector) and forward scatter channel thresholds. Cell size was estimated using forward scatter values calibrated against spherical beads (2, 4, 6, 10, 15 µM diameters; Invitrogen, CA). This resulted in a conversion equation of equivalent spherical diameter (ESD) = (FSC + 194636)/75775, which was used to assess relative changes in cell size [43].Chlorophyll a contentChlorophyll a (Chl-a) fluorescence of the gated diatom population was quantified using 488 nm excitation, 690/50 nm detection. A standard bead (Cytoflex Daily QC Fluorospheres; Beckman Coulter) was used to calibrate the performance of the instrument and ensure comparable measures across samples. Chlorophyll values were divided by ESD to account for cell size differences.Side scatter/granularitySide scatter is an indicator of the internal complexity of a cell or “granularity”. This trait is measured in tandem with other flow cytometry measures and was included as a phenotypic trait. The interpretation of this trait is not straight forward, but is independent of other flow cytometry traits measured and has been used in other flow cytometry studies of microalgae [44]. This trait was divided by ESD to account for cell size differences.Neutral lipidsRelative neutral lipid content was determined using the fluorescent stain BODIPY™ 505/515 (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) which is commonly used to assess neutral lipid content in phytoplankton [45,46,47]. Background fluorescence (488 nm excitation, 525/40 nm detector) of PFA-fixed cells was measured in tandem with the size, chlorophyll a, and side scatter. After this, 10 µL of BODIPY stain (2 mg mL−1 in DMSO) was added to each sample, resulting in a final BODIPY concentration of 2 μg mL−1. Samples were incubated for 10 min in the dark before being read again on the flow cytometer. Neutral lipid content was defined as the difference in median fluorescence per cell between the pre- and post-stained sample. This value was then divided by the ESD size to account for size-related effects.Photophysiological traitsPhotophysiological measures were taken by conducting a rapid light curve [48] with a water PAM (Water-PAM; Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) using 1 mL of experimental culture diluted in artificial seawater. The rapid light curve protocol exposes the culture to 8 steps of increasing irradiance for 10 seconds each, measuring the photophysiological response at each step. Maximum electron transport rate (ETRmax), Ik (half saturation irradience), and alpha (the photosynthetic rate during the light-limited linear region) were calculated using the regression fit function in the PAM WinControl software. Photophysiology measurements were taken between 4–5 h after the start of the photoperiod.Reactive oxygen speciesThe development of reactive oxygen species (ROS) was measured using the fluorescent probe 2’,7’-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA; Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) which has been used in a number of phytoplankton studies [49,50,51]. Two 1 mL aliquots of experimental culture were transferred to a 48 well tissue culture plate; 2 µL of stain (2.5 mg mL−1 H2DCFDA was made in DMSO) was added to one aliquot, with the other acting as a blank. The plates were sealed (Breathe-Easy, Diversified Biotech) and incubated in the dark at growth temperature (20 or 30 °C) for 2 h. Incubation was done in the dark because of the effects of light on the dye itself, therefore the effects of the excess light treatment were not captured in this trait. Fluorescence of H2DCFDA was read using a plate reader with 488 nm excitation 525 nm emission (TECAN Infinite M1000 Pro, Männedorf, Switzerland). ROS concentration was estimated as the difference in fluorescence units per cell between the stained and unstained aliquots of each culture. This metric was also divided by ESD size to account for size effects.Taxonomic confirmation of strainsDNA from stock cultures (10 mL) was extracted using a DNeasy PowerSoil kit (QIAGEN Inc., CA, USA) and checked for quality with a NanopDrop™ 2000 (ThermoFIsher Scientific, MA, USA), before amplification and sequencing at the Australian Genome Research Facility (AGRF, Sydney, Australia). PCR conditions and primers used were those developed by Chappell et al. [52] for the ITS region: forward primer: 5ʹ-RCGAAYTGCAGAACCTCG-3ʹ, reverse primer: 5ʹ-TACTYAATCTGAGATYCA-3ʹ.Bioinformatics processing was conducted using Geneious Prime (Version 2020.0.5; Biomatters Ltd.). Strain sequences were compared to GenBank using the BLAST function to confirm species identity. Nucleotide sequences were aligned using the MUSCLE alignment [53], followed by Bayesian inference analysis using MrBayes [54] to generate a phylogenetic tree. The out-group for the tree was a strain of Chaetoceros atlanticus isolate TPV2 1146 obtained from GenBank. Percentage similarity between strains according to the alignment was used as a metric of genetic relatedness.Statistical analysisWe assessed the multivariate phenotypes for the Thalassiosira strains using principal component analysis (PCA). The input variables were the 9 independent trait measurements made on each replicate culture (n = 36, 3 biological replicates per strain). Trait data was standardized (mean = 0, SD = 1) for each trait prior to PCA analysis to account for differences in the units and scale of measurements. The resulting PCA plot was defined as the ‘trait-scape’.Hierarchical clustering analysis was performed on the 9-trait dataset used to assess similarity in multivariate phenotypes between each replicate for each strain (n = 3 per strain).To compare genetic vs. phenotypic similarity, percentage similarity between strains was correlated against the distance between strain centroids (multivariate means) within the trait-scape. Distances between multivariate means (centroids) were calculated using the equation:$${{{{{{{mathrm{distance}}}}}}}} = sqrt {left( {{{{{{{{mathrm{{Delta}}}}}}}PC}}1.{{{{{{{mathrm{a}}}}}}}}} right)^2,+,left( {{{{{{{{mathrm{{Delta}}}}}}}PC}}2.{{{{{{{mathrm{b}}}}}}}}} right)^2}$$ΔPC1 is the difference in PC1 co-ordinates between the two strains, a is the % variance explained by PC1, ΔPC2 is the difference in PC2 co-ordinates between the two strains, b is the % variance explained by PC2.To assess whether a trait-scape generated using fewer input traits (4 rather than 9) was representative of the full, 9-trait plot, we conducted PCA using 4 input traits, and then assessed whether the inter-strain distances (distances between centroids) within the plot were correlated using linear regression. This provided a quantitative assessment of whether the strains were in the same relative positions to each other within the trait-scape.Covariation of traitsTo compare the pairwise relationships between traits across the strains, correlation matrices were made using data collected in the standard environment, and for the HT and LN environments.Phenotypic plasticityThe change in phenotypes in the new environments were assessed firstly by conducting PCA on the full dataset, including trait data from the 13 strains grown in the standard environment, plus the 5 strains grown in the two additional environments. This generated an “expanded trait-scape”. In addition, correlation matrices were generated for the new environments’ trait dataset to assess differences in trait-trait relationships between the ‘standard’ and “expanded” datasets.Relative changes in trait values for each trait in the new environments were calculated as follows:$$ {{{{{{{mathrm{Relative}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{change}}}}}}}} \ = frac{{{{{{{{{mathrm{trait}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{value}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{new}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{environment}}}}}}}} – overline {{{{{{{mathrm{x}}}}}}}} ,,{{{{{{{mathrm{trait}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{value}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{standard}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{environment}}}}}}}}}}{{overline {{{{{{{mathrm{x}}}}}}}} ,,{{{{{{{mathrm{trait}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{value}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{standard}}}}}}}},{{{{{{{mathrm{environment}}}}}}}}}}$$We used PCA to assess whether the relative changes in trait values were consistent between strains in the two different environments. i.e., was the relative change in whole phenotype consistent. If the changes were consistent across strains, we expected to see clustering in the PCA based on treatment.Statistical softwareStatistical analyses were performed in R [55], Matlab, and Microsoft Excel. Hierarchical clustering analysis with multiscale bootstrap resampling (1000 replicates) on trait values from biological replicates was done with the ‘pvclust’ package in R [56] using Euclidean distance and the average (UPGMA) method. Principal component analysis was used to generate the multivariate trait-scape was done using the “vegan package” in R [57]. The contributions of each trait to the PC axes (loadings) were extracted using the “factoextra” package in R [58]. Trait correlation matrices were generated using the “corrplot” package in R [59]. More

1.Yang, J. W. et al. Predator and prey biodiversity relationship and its consequences on marine ecosystem functioning-interplay between nanoflagellates and bacterioplankton. ISME J. 12, 1532–1542 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Zan, J. et al. A microbial factory for defensive kahalalides in a tripartite marine symbiosis. Science 364, eaaw6732 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Yoch, D. C. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate: its sources, role in the marine food web, and biological degradation to dimethylsulfide. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 5804–5815 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Bullock, H. A., Luo, H. & Whitman, W. B. Evolution of dimethylsulfoniopropionate metabolism in marine phytoplankton and bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 8, 637 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Curson, A. R. J. et al. DSYB catalyses the key step of dimethylsulfoniopropionate biosynthesis in many phytoplankton. Nat. Microbiol. 3, 430–439 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Curson, A. et al. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate biosynthesis in marine bacteria and identification of the key gene in this process. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17009 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Williams, B. T. et al. Bacteria are important dimethylsulfoniopropionate producers in coastal sediments. Nat. Microbiol. 4, 1815–1825 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Zhang, X. H. et al. Biogenic production of DMSP and its degradation to DMS—their roles in the global sulfur cycle. Sci. China Life. Sci. 62, 1296–1319 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Alstyne, K. L. V., Wolfe, G. V., Freidenburg, T. L., Neill, A. & Hicken, C. Activated defense systems in marine macroalgae: evidence for an ecological role for DMSP cleavage. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 213, 53–65 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Paul, V. J. & Van Alstyne, K. L. Activation of chemical defenses in the tropical green algae Halimeda spp. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 160, 191–203 (1992).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Strom, S. et al. Chemical defense in the microplankton I: feeding and growth rates of heterotrophic protists on the DMS-producing phytoplankter Emiliania huxleyi. Limnol. Oceangr. 48, 217–229 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Wolfe, G. V., Steinke, M. & Kirst, G. O. Grazing-activated chemical defence in a unicellular marine alga. Nature 387, 894–897 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Liu, C. et al. Puniceibacterium antarcticum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from seawater. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 64, 1566–1572 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Aronson, D. E., Costantini, L. M. & Snapp, E. L. Superfolder GFP is fluorescent in oxidizing environments when targeted via the Sec translocon. Traffic 12, 543–548 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Coppellotti Krupa, O. & Vannucci, D. Citrate synthase from Antarctic ciliates: adaptation to low temperatures and comparison with temperate ciliates. Polar Biol. 26, 452–457 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Asher, E. C., Dacey, J. W. H., Stukel, M., Long, M. C. & Tortell, P. D. Processes driving seasonal variability in DMS, DMSP, and DMSO concentrations and turnover in coastal Antarctic waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 62, 104–124 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Ahmed, M., Stal, L. J. & Hasnain, S. DTAF: an efficient probe to study cyanobacterial-plant interaction using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38, 249–255 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Hojo, F. et al. Ciliates expel environmental Legionella-laden pellets to stockpile food. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 5247–5257 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Seymour, J. R., Simo, R., Ahmed, T. & Stocker, R. Chemoattraction to dimethylsulfoniopropionate throughout the marine microbial food web. Science 329, 342–345 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Shemi, A. et al. Dimethyl sulfide acts as eat-me signal during microbial predator–prey interactions in the ocean. Research Square https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-139243/v1 (2021).21.Chen, I. A. et al. IMG/M v.5.0: an integrated data management and comparative analysis system for microbial genomes and microbiomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D666–D677 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Wang, P. et al. Structural and molecular basis for the novel catalytic mechanism and evolution of DddP, an abundant peptidase-like bacterial dimethylsulfoniopropionate lyase: a new enzyme from an old fold. Mol. Microbiol. 98, 289–301 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Li, C. Y. et al. Molecular insight into bacterial cleavage of oceanic dimethylsulfoniopropionate into dimethyl sulfide. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 1026–1031 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.González, J. M., Whitman, W. B., Hodson, R. E. & Moran, M. A. Identifying numerically abundant culturable bacteria from complex communities: an example from a lignin enrichment culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 4433–4440 (1996).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Freier, D., Mothershed, C. P. & Wiegel, J. Characterization of Clostridium thermocellum JW20. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 204–JW211 (1988).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Wang, P. et al. Development of an efficient conjugation-based genetic manipulation system for Pseudoalteromonas. Microb. Cell Fact. 14, 11 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
27.Obranic, S., Babic, F. & Maravic-Vlahovicek, G. Improvement of pBBR1MCS plasmids, a very useful series of broad-host-range cloning vectors. Plasmid 70, 263–267 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Dinh, T. & Bernhardt, T. G. Using superfolder green fluorescent protein for periplasmic protein localization studies. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4984–4987 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Yu, Z. C. et al. Development of a genetic system for the deep-sea psychrophilic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. SM9913. Microb. Cell Fact. 13, 13 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
30.Walker, J. M. The bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay for protein quantitation. Methods Mol. Biol. 32, 5–8 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Ansede, J. H., Pellechia, P. J. & Yoch, D. C. Metabolism of acrylate to beta-hydroxypropionate and its role in dimethylsulfoniopropionate lyase induction by a salt marsh sediment bacterium, Alcaligenes faecalis M3A. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 5075–5081 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Liu, J. et al. Novel insights into bacterial dimethylsulfoniopropionate catabolism in the East China Sea. Front. Microbiol. 9, 3206–3206 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Shao, X. et al. Mechanistic insight into 3-methylmercaptopropionate metabolism and kinetical regulation of demethylation pathway in marine dimethylsulfoniopropionate-catabolizing bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 111, 1057–1073 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Dumon-Seignovert, L., Cariot, G. & Vuillard, L. The toxicity of recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli: a comparison of overexpression in BL21(DE3), C41(DE3), and C43(DE3). Protein Expr. Purif. 37, 203–206 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Yamashita, A., Singh, S. K., Kawate, T., Jin, Y. & Gouaux, E. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of Na+/Cl−-dependent neurotransmitter transporters. Nature 437, 215–223 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Barek, J., Pumera, M., Muck, A., Kadeřabkova, M. & Zima, J. Polarographic and voltammetric determination of selected nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Anal. Chim. Acta 393, 141–146 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Sherr, B. F., Sherr, E. B. & Fallon, R. D. Use of monodispersed, fluorescently labeled bacteria to estimate in situ protozoan bacterivory. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 958–965 (1987).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Perez-Uz, B. Bacterial preferences and growth kinetic variation in Uronema marinum and Uronema nigricans (Ciliophora: Scuticociliatida). Microb. Ecol. 31, 189–198 (1996).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Siegmund, L., Schweikert, M., Fischer, M. S. & Wostemeyer, J. Bacterial surface traits influence digestion by Tetrahymena pyriformis and alter opportunity to escape from food vacuoles. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 65, 600–611 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.Christaki, U. et al. Optimized routine flow cytometric enumeration of heterotrophic flagellates using SYBR Green I. Limnol. Oceanogr. Meth. 9, 329–339 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Headland, S. E., Jones, H. R., D’Sa, A. S., Perretti, M. & Norling, L. V. Cutting-edge analysis of extracellular microparticles using ImageStream(X) imaging flow cytometry. Sci. Rep. 4, 5237 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Hayduk, W. & Laudie, H. Prediction of diffusion coefficients for nonelectrolytes in dilute aqueous solutions. AIChE J. 20, 611–615 (1974).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Schotte, W. Prediction of the molar volume at the normal boiling point. Chem. Eng. J. 48, 167–172 (1992).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Carrión, O. et al. A novel pathway producing dimethylsulphide in bacteria is widespread in soil environments. Nat. Commun. 6, 6579 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Zhang, W. et al. Marine biofilms constitute a bank of hidden microbial diversity and functional potential. Nat. Commun. 10, 517 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Bailey, T. L. & Elkan, C. Fitting a mixture model by expectation maximization to discover motifs in biopolymers. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 2, 28–36 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Hoffman, K. & Stoffel, W. TMbase—a database of membrane spanning proteins segments. Biol. Chem. Hoppe-Seyler 374, 166 (1993).
Google Scholar 
48.Bansal, M. S., Alm, E. J. & Kellis, M. Efficient algorithms for the reconciliation problem with gene duplication, horizontal transfer and loss. Bioinformatics 28, i283–i291 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T. & Falkowski, P. Science 281, 237–240 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Lewis, K. M., Van Duken, G. L. & Arrigo, K. R. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay8380 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Charlson, R. J., Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O. & Warren, S. G. Nature 326, 655–661 (1987).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Seymour, J. R., Simó, R., Ahmed, T. & Stocker, R. Science 329, 342–345 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Shemi, A. et al. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00971-3 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Teng, Z.-J. et al. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-021-00981-1 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Sieburth, J. M. Science 132, 676–677 (1960).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Strom, S., Wolfe, G., Holmes, J., Stecher, H., Shimeneck, C. & Sarah, L. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 217–229 (2003).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Wolfe, G. V., Steinke, M. & Kirst, G. O. Nature 387, 894–897 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Curson, A. R. J. et al. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 17009 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Filkins LM, Hampton TH, Gifford AH, Gross MJ, Hogan DA, Sogin ML, et al. Prevalence of Streptococci and increased polymicrobial diversity associated with cystic fibrosis patient stability. J Bacteriol. 2012;194:4709–17.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Fodor AA, Klem ER, Gilpin DF, Elborn JS, Boucher RC, Tunney MM, et al. The adult cystic fibrosis airway microbiota is stable over time and infection type, and highly resilient to antibiotic treatment of exacerbations. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45001.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Goddard AF, Staudinger BJ, Dowd SE, Joshi-Datar A, Wolcott RD, Aitken ML, et al. Direct sampling of cystic fibrosis lungs indicates that DNA-based analyses of upper-airway specimens can misrepresent lung microbiota. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:13769–74.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Guss AM, Roeselers G, Newton IL, Young CR, Klepac-Ceraj V, Lory S, et al. Phylogenetic and metabolic diversity of bacteria associated with cystic fibrosis. ISME J. 2011;5:20–9.Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Harris JK, De Groote MA, Sagel SD, Zemanick ET, Kapsner R, Penvari C, et al. Molecular identification of bacteria in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from children with cystic fibrosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:20529–33.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Brown PS, Pope CE, Marsh RL, Qin X, McNamara S, Gibson R, et al. Directly sampling the lung of a young child with cystic fibrosis reveals diverse microbiota. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014;11:1049–55.Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Jorth P, Staudinger BJ, Wu X, Hisert KB, Hayden H, Garudathri J, et al. Regional isolation drives bacterial diversification within cystic fibrosis lungs. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18:307–19.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Sibley CD, Parkins MD, Rabin HR, Duan K, Norgaard JC, Surette MG. A polymicrobial perspective of pulmonary infections exposes an enigmatic pathogen in cystic fibrosis patients. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:15070–5.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.van der Gast CJ, Walker AW, Stressmann FA, Rogers GB, Scott P, Daniels TW, et al. Partitioning core and satellite taxa from within cystic fibrosis lung bacterial communities. ISME J. 2011;5:780–91.Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Zhao J, Carmody LA, Kalikin LM, Li J, Petrosino JF, Schloss PD, et al. Impact of enhanced Staphylococcus DNA extraction on microbial community measures in cystic fibrosis sputum. PLoS One. 2012;7:e33127.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Carmody LA, Zhao J, Schloss PD, Petrosino JF, Murray S, Young VB, et al. Changes in cystic fibrosis airway microbiota at pulmonary exacerbation. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2013;10:179–87.Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Cox MJ, Allgaier M, Taylor B, Baek MS, Huang YJ, Daly RA, et al. Airway microbiota and pathogen abundance in age-stratified cystic fibrosis patients. PLoS One. 2010;5:e11044.Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Stressmann FA, Rogers GB, van der Gast CJ, Marsh P, Vermeer LS, Carroll MP, et al. Long-term cultivation-independent microbial diversity analysis demonstrates that bacterial communities infecting the adult cystic fibrosis lung show stability and resilience. Thorax. 2012;67:867–73.Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Zhao J, Schloss PD, Kalikin LM, Carmody LA, Foster BK, Petrosino JF, et al. Decade-long bacterial community dynamics in cystic fibrosis airways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:5809–14.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Rogers GB, Bruce KD, Hoffman LR. How can the cystic fibrosis respiratory microbiome influence our clinical decision-making? Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2017;23:536–43.Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Widder S, Knapp S. Microbial metabolites in cystic fibrosis: a target for future therapy? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2019;61:132–3.17.Mahboubi MA, Carmody LA, Foster BK, Kalikin LM, VanDevanter DR, LiPuma JJ. Culture-based and culture-independent bacteriologic analysis of cystic fibrosis respiratory specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:613–9.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Carmody LA, Caverly LJ, Foster BK, Rogers MAM, Kalikin LM, Simon RH, et al. Fluctuations in airway bacterial communities associated with clinical states and disease stages in cystic fibrosis. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0194060.Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Zhao J, Li J, Schloss PD, Kalikin LM, Raymond TA, Petrosino JF, et al. Effect of sample storage conditions on cultureindependent bacterial community measures in cystic fibrosis sputum specimens. J Clin Microbiol 2011;49:3717–8.20.Hnizdo E, Yu L, Freyder L, Attfield M, Lefante J & Glindmeyer HW. The precision of longitudinal lung function measurements: Monitoring and interpretation. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:695–701.21.Konstan MW, Wagener JS, VanDevanter DR. Characterizing aggressiveness and predicting future progression of CF lung disease. J Cyst Fibros. 2009;8:S15–19.Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL. Reducing the effects of PCR amplification and sequencing artifacts on 16s rRNA-based studies. PLoS One. 2011;6:e27310.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75:7537–41.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Cole JR, Wang Q, Cardenas E, Fish J, Chai B, Farris RJ, et al. The ribosomal database project: Improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D141–145.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Sung J, Kim S, Cabatbat JJT, Jang S, Jin YS, Jung GY, et al. Global metabolic interaction network of the human gut microbiota for context-specific community-scale analysis. Nat Commun 2017;8:15393.26.Friedman J, Alm EJ. Inferring correlation networks from genomic survey data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8:e1002687.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Holmes I, Harris K, Quince C. Dirichlet multinomial mixtures: generative models for microbial metagenomics. PLoS One. 2012;7:e30126.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Ding T, Schloss PD. Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body. Nature. 2014;509:357–60.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Price KE, Hampton TH, Gifford AH, Dolben EL, Hogan DA, Morrison HG, et al. Unique microbial communities persist in individual cystic fibrosis patients throughout a clinical exacerbation. Microbiome 2013;1:27.30.Carmody LA, Zhao J, Kalikin LM, LeBar W, Simon RH, Venkataraman A, et al. The daily dynamics of cystic fibrosis airway microbiota during clinical stability and at exacerbation. Microbiome 2015;3:12.31.de Dios Caballero J, Vida R, Cobo M, Maiz L, Suarez L, Galeano J, et al. Individual patterns of complexity in cystic fibrosis lung microbiota, including predator bacteria, over a 1-year period. mBio 2017;8::e00959–17.32.Whelan, FJ, Heirali AA, Rossi L, Rabin HR, Parkins MD, & Surette MG. Longitudinal sampling of the lung microbiota in individuals with cystic fibrosis. PLoS One 2017:12:e0172811.33.Noecker C, Eng A, Srinivasan S, Theriot CM, Young VB, Jansson JK, et al. Metabolic model-based integration of microbiome taxonomic and metabolomic profiles elucidates mechanistic links between ecological and metabolic variation. mSystems 2016;1.34.Douglas, GM, Maffei, VJ, Zaneveld, JR, Yurgel, SN, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. Nat Biotechnol 2020;38:685–8.35.Caspi R, Billington R, Fulcher CA, Keseler IM, Kothari A, Krummenacker M, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res 2018;46:D633–D639.36.Quinn RA, Comstock W, Zhang T, Morton JT, da Silva R, Tran A, et al. Niche partitioning of a pathogenic microbiome driven by chemical gradients. Sci Adv 2018;4:eaau1908.37.Quinn RA, Whiteson K, Lim YW, Zhao J, Conrad D, LiPuma JJ, et al. Ecological networking of cystic fibrosis lung infections. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2:4.Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Pradeu T, Vivier E. The discontinuity theory of immunity. Sci Immunol. 2016;1:AAG0479.39.Flynn JM, Niccum D, Dunitz JM, Hunter RC. Evidence and role for bacterial mucin degradation in cystic fibrosis airway disease. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005846.Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Adamowicz EM, Flynn J, Hunter RC, Harcombe WR. Cross-feeding modulates antibiotic tolerance in bacterial communities. ISME J. 2018;12:2723–35.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Rose MC & Voynow JA. Respiratory tract mucin genes and mucin glycoproteins in health and disease. Physiol Rev 2006;86:245–78.42.Tailford LE, Crost EH, Kavanaugh D. & Juge N. Mucin glycan foraging in the human gut microbiome. Front Genet 2015;6:81.43.Wheeler KM, Carcamo-Oyarce G, Turner BS, Dellos-Nolan S, Co JY, Lehoux S, et al. Mucin glycans attenuate the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in infection. Nat Microbiol 2019;4:2146–54.44.Twomey KB, O’Connell OJ, McCarthy Y, Dow JM, O’Toole GA, Plant BJ, et al. Bacterial cis-2-unsaturated fatty acids found in the cystic fibrosis airway modulate virulence and persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISME J 2012;6:939–50.45.Zemanick ET, Wagner BD, Robertson CE, Ahrens RC, Chmiel JF, Clancy JP, et al. Airway microbiota across age and disease spectrum in cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2017;50:1700832.46.Lu J, Carmody LA, Opron K, Simon RH, Kalikin LM, Caverly LJ, et al. Parallel analysis of cystic fibrosis sputum and saliva’reveals overlapping communities and an opportunity for sample decontamination. mSystems 2020;5.47.Jones KL, Hegab AH, Hillman BC, Simpson KL, Jinkins PA, Grisham MB, et al. Elevation of nitrotyrosine and nitrate concentrations in cystic fibrosis sputum. Pediatr Pulmonol 2000;30:79–85.48.Quinn RA, Lim YW, Maughan H, Conrad D, Rohwer F, Whiteson KL. Biogeochemical forces shape the composition and physiology of polymicrobial communities in the cystic fibrosis lung. mBio. 2014;5:e00956–00913.Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Mirkovic B, Murray MA, Lavelle GM, Molloy K, Azim AA, Gunaratnam C, et al. The role of short-chain fatty acids, produced by anaerobic bacteria, in the cystic fibrosis airway. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192:1314–24.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Trompette A, Gollwitzer ES, Pattaroni C, Lopez-Mejia IC, Riva E, Pernot J, et al. Dietary fiber confers protection against flu by shaping Ly6c(-) patrolling monocyte hematopoiesis and CD8(+) t cell metabolism. Immunity. 2018;48:992–1005.e1008.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Flynn JM, Phan C, Hunter RC. Genome-wide survey of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14 reveals a role for the glyoxylate pathway and extracellular proteases in the utilization of mucin. Infect Immun. 2017;85:e00182–17.52.Jorth P, Ehsan Z, Rezayat A, Caldwell E, Pope C, Brewington JJ, et al. Direct lung sampling indicates that established pathogens dominate early infections in children with cystic fibrosis. Cell Rep. 2019;27:1190–204.e1193.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Charalampous T, Kay GL, Richardson H, Aydin A, Baldan R, Jeanes C, et al. Nanopore metagenomics enables rapid clinical diagnosis of bacterial lower respiratory infection. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:783–92.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Cowley ES, Kopf SH, LaRiviere A, Ziebis W, Newman DK. Pediatric cystic fibrosis sputum can be chemically dynamic, anoxic, and extremely reduced due to hydrogen sulfide formation. mBio. 2015;6:e00767.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Cuthbertson L, Walker AW, Oliver AE, Rogers GB, Rivett DW, Hampton TH, et al. Lung function and microbiota diversity in cystic fibrosis. Microbiome 2020;8:45. More

1.Collins, M. et al. SPM6 Extremes, abrupt changes and managing risks. In: IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate (eds. Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) 589-655 (In press, 2019).2.Hegerl, G. C., Hanlon, H. & Beierkuhnlein, C. Elusive extremes. Nat. Geosci. 4, 142–143 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Bérard, A., Ben Sassi, M., Renault, P. & Gros, R. Severe drought-induced community tolerance to heat wave. An experimental study on soil microbial processes. J. Soils Sediment. 12, 513–518 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Schimel, J., Balser, T. C. & Wallenstein, M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88, 1386–1394 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.Acosta-Martínez, V. et al. Predominant bacterial and fungal assemblages in agricultural soils during a record drought/heat wave and linkages to enzyme activities of biogeochemical cycling. Appl. Soil Ecol. 84, 69–82 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Hobday, A. J. et al. A hierarchical approach to defining marine heatwaves. Prog. Oceanogr. 141, 227–238 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Frölicher, T. L. & Laufkötter, C. Emerging risks from marine heat waves. Nat. Commun. 9, 650 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
8.Garrabou, J. et al. Mass mortality in Northwestern Mediterranean rocky benthic communities: effects of the 2003 heat wave. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 1090–1103 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Wernberg, T. et al. An extreme climatic event alters marine ecosystem structure in a global biodiversity hotspot. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 78–82 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Bond, N. A., Cronin, M. F., Freeland, H. & Mantua, N. Causes and impacts of the 2014 warm anomaly in the NE Pacific. Geophys. Res. Lett. 9, 3414–3420 (2015).11.Freeland, H. & Ross, T. ‘The Blob’—or, how unusual were ocean temperatures in the Northeast Pacific during 2014-2018? Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanographic Res. Pap. 150, 103061 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Lorenzo, E. D. & Mantua, N. Multi-year persistence of the 2014/15 North Pacific marine heatwave. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 1042–1047 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Peña, M. A., Nemcek, N. & Robert, M. Phytoplankton responses to the 2014–2016 warming anomaly in the northeast subarctic Pacific Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 515–525 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Yang, B., Emerson, S. R. & Peña, M. A. The effect of the 2013–2016 high temperature anomaly in the subarctic Northeast Pacific (the “Blob”) on net community production. Biogeosciences 15, 6747–6759 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Cavole, L. et al. Biological impacts of the 2013–2015 warm-water anomaly in the Northeast Pacific: winners, losers, and the future. Oceanography 29, 273–285 (2016).16.Azam, F. et al. The ecological role of water-column microbes in the sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 10, 257–263 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Sarmento, Hugo, Montoya, JoséM., Vázquez-Domínguez, Evaristo, Vaqué, Dolors & Gasol, JosepM. Warming effects on marine microbial food web processes: how far can we go when it comes to predictions? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365, 2137–2149 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Joint, I. & Smale, D. A. Marine heatwaves and optimal temperatures for microbial assemblage activity. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 93, fiw243 (2017).19.Deschaseaux, E. O., Brien, J., Siboni, N., Petrou, K. & Seymour, J. R. Shifts in dimethylated sulfur concentrations and microbiome composition in the red-tide causing dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum during a simulated marine heatwave. Biogeosciences 16, 4377–4391 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Hawley, A. K. et al. Diverse Marinimicrobia bacteria may mediate coupled biogeochemical cycles along eco-thermodynamic gradients. Nat. Commun. 8, 1507 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
21.Allers, E. et al. Diversity and population structure of Marine Group A bacteria in the Northeast subarctic Pacific Ocean. ISME J. 7, 256–268 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Roux, S. et al. Ecology and evolution of viruses infecting uncultivated SUP05 bacteria as revealed by single-cell- and meta-genomics. eLife 3, e03125 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Wright, J. J. et al. Genomic properties of Marine Group A bacteria indicate a role in the marine sulfur cycle. ISME J. 8, 455–468 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Sherry, N. D., Boyd, P. W., Sugimoto, K. & Harrison, P. J. Seasonal and spatial patterns of heterotrophic bacterial production, respiration, and biomass in the subarctic NE Pacific. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 46, 2557–2578 (1999).25.Harrison, P. J. Station Papa Time Series: insights into ecosystem dynamics. J. Oceanogr. 58, 259–264 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Mende, D. R. et al. Environmental drivers of a microbial genomic transition zone in the ocean’s interior. Nat. Microbiol. 2, 1367–1373 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Pommier, T. et al. Global patterns of diversity and community structure in marine bacterioplankton. Mol. Ecol. 16, 867–880 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Cram, J. A. et al. Seasonal and interannual variability of the marine bacterioplankton community throughout the water column over ten years. ISME J. 9, 563–580 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Freeland, H. J. Evidence of change in the winter mixed layer in the Northeast Pacific Ocean: a problem revisited. Atmos. Ocean 51, 126–133 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Stevens, H. & Ulloa, O. Bacterial diversity in the oxygen minimum zone of the eastern tropical South Pacific. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 1244–1259 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Bryant, J. A., Stewart, F. J., Eppley, J. M. & DeLong, E. F. Microbial community phylogenetic and trait diversity declines with depth in a marine oxygen minimum zone. Ecology 93, 1659–1673 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Muck, S. et al. Niche differentiation of aerobic and anaerobic ammonia oxidizers in a high latitude deep oxygen minimum zone. Front. Microbiol. 10, 2141 (2019).33.Medina Faull, L., Mara, P., Taylor, G. T. & Edgcomb, V. P. Imprint of trace dissolved oxygen on prokaryoplankton community structure in an oxygen minimum zone. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 360 (2020).34.Reji, L., Tolar, B. B., Chavez, F. P. & Francis, C. A. Depth-differentiation and seasonality of planktonic microbial assemblages in the monterey bay upwelling system. Front. Microbiol. 11, 1075 (2020).35.Wright, J. J., Konwar, K. M. & Hallam, S. J. Microbial ecology of expanding oxygen minimum zones. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 381–394 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Tsementzi, D. et al. SAR11 bacteria linked to ocean anoxia and nitrogen loss. Nature 536, 179–183 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Choi, D. H., Karen, Selph & Noh, J. H. Niche partitioning of picocyanobacterial lineages in the oligotrophic northwestern Pacific Ocean. ALGAE 30, 223–232 (2015).38.Johnson, Z. I. et al. Niche partitioning among prochlorococcus ecotypes along ocean-scale environmental gradients. Science 311, 1737–1740 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Sohm, J. A. et al. Co-occurring Synechococcus ecotypes occupy four major oceanic regimes defined by temperature, macronutrients and iron. ISME J. 10, 333–345 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Not, F. et al. in Advances in Botanical Research (ed. Piganeau, G.) vol. 64, 1–53 (Academic Press, 2012).41.Lutz, M., Dunbar, R. & Caldeira, K. Regional variability in the vertical flux of particulate organic carbon in the ocean interior. Glob. Biogeochemical Cycles 16, 11-1–11–18 (2002).
Google Scholar 
42.Richardson, T. L., Jackson, G. A., Ducklow, H. W. & Roman, M. R. Carbon fluxes through food webs of the eastern equatorial Pacific: an inverse approach. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanographic Res. Pap. 51, 1245–1274 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Michaels, A. F. & Silver, M. W. Primary production, sinking fluxes and the microbial food web. Deep Sea Res. Part A. Oceanographic Res. Pap. 35, 473–490 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Dufrêne, M. & Legendre, P. Species assemblages and indicator species:the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol. Monogr. 67, 345–366 (1997).
Google Scholar 
45.Cáceres, M. D., Legendre, P. & Moretti, M. Improving indicator species analysis by combining groups of sites. Oikos 119, 1674–1684 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Shade, A. et al. Conditionally rare taxa disproportionately contribute to temporal changes in microbial diversity. mBio 5, e01371-14 (2014).47.Thrash, J. C. et al. Metabolic Roles of Uncultivated Bacterioplankton lineages in the Northern Gulf of Mexico “Dead Zone”. mBio 8, e01017-17 (2017).48.Kirchman, D. L. The ecology of Cytophaga–Flavobacteria in aquatic environments. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 39, 91–100 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
49.Alonso, C., Warnecke, F., Amann, R. & Pernthaler, J. High local and global diversity of Flavobacteria in marine plankton. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1253–1266 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Teeling, H. et al. Recurring patterns in bacterioplankton dynamics during coastal spring algae blooms. eLife 5, e11888 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Selje, N., Simon, M. & Brinkhoff, T. A newly discovered Roseobacter cluster in temperate and polar oceans. Nature 427, 445 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Buchan, A., González, J. M. & Moran, M. A. Overview of the marine Roseobacter lineage. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 5665–5677 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Luo, H. & Moran, M. A. Evolutionary ecology of the marine roseobacter clade. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 573–587 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Simon, M. et al. Phylogenomics of Rhodobacteraceae reveals evolutionary adaptation to marine and non-marine habitats. ISME J. 11, 1483–1499 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Sato, S. et al. Genome-enabled phylogenetic and functional reconstruction of an araphid pennate diatom Plagiostriata sp. CCMP470, previously assigned as a radial centric diatom, and its bacterial commensal. Sci. Rep. 10, 9449 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Sañudo-Wilhelmy, S. A., Gómez-Consarnau, L., Suffridge, C. & Webb, E. A. The role of B vitamins in marine biogeochemistry. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 6, 339–367 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Landa, M. et al. Sulfur metabolites that facilitate oceanic phytoplankton–bacteria carbon flux. ISME J. 13, 2536–2550 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Georges, A. A., El-Swais, H., Craig, S. E., Li, W. K. & Walsh, D. A. Metaproteomic analysis of a winter to spring succession in coastal northwest Atlantic Ocean microbial plankton. ISME J. 8, 1301–1313 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Baker, B. J., Lazar, C. S., Teske, A. P. & Dick, G. J. Genomic resolution of linkages in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling among widespread estuary sediment bacteria. Microbiome 3, 14 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Andrei, A.-Ş. et al. Niche-directed evolution modulates genome architecture in freshwater Planctomycetes. ISME J 13, 1056–1071 (2019).61.Fukunaga, Y. et al. Phycisphaera mikurensis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a marine alga, and proposal of Phycisphaeraceae fam. nov., Phycisphaerales ord. nov. and Phycisphaerae classis nov. in the phylum Planctomycetes. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 55, 267–275 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Gade, D., Stührmann, T., Reinhardt, R. & Rabus, R. Growth phase dependent regulation of protein composition in Rhodopirellula baltica. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1074–1084 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Luecker, S., Nowka, B., Rattei, T., Spieck, E. & Daims, H. The genome of nitrospina gracilis illuminates the metabolism and evolution of the major marine nitrite oxidizer. Front. Microbiol. 4, 27 (2013).64.Winder, M. & Schindler, D. E. Climate change uncouples trophic interactions in an aquatic ecosystem. Ecology 85, 2100–2106 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Brown, M. V. et al. Global biogeography of SAR11 marine bacteria. Mol. Syst. Biol. 8, 595 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
66.Haro‐Moreno, J. M. et al. Ecogenomics of the SAR11 clade. Environ. Microbiol 22, 1748–1763 (2020).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Grote, J. et al. Streamlining and core genome conservation among highly divergent members of the SAR11 clade. mBio 3, e00252–12 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Giovannoni, S. J. SAR11 Bacteria: The Most Abundant Plankton in the Oceans. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9, 231–255 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Getz, E. W., Tithi, S. S., Zhang, L. & Aylward, F. O. Parallel evolution of genome streamlining and cellular bioenergetics across the marine radiation of a bacterial phylum. mBio. 9, e01089-18 (2018).70.Aylward, F. O. & Santoro, A. E. Heterotrophic thaumarchaea with small genomes are widespread in the dark ocean. mSystems 5, e00415-20 (2020).71.Prosser, J. I. & Nicol, G. W. Relative contributions of archaea and bacteria to aerobic ammonia oxidation in the environment. Environ. Microbiol. 10, 2931–2941 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Santoro, A. E., Casciotti, K. L. & Francis, C. A. Activity, abundance and diversity of nitrifying archaea and bacteria in the central California Current. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1989–2006 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.Horak, R. E. A. et al. Ammonia oxidation kinetics and temperature sensitivity of a natural marine community dominated by Archaea. ISME J. 7, 2023–2033 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Qin, W. et al. Marine ammonia-oxidizing archaeal isolates display obligate mixotrophy and wide ecotypic variation. PNAS 111, 12504–12509 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Rinke, C. et al. A phylogenomic and ecological analysis of the globally abundant Marine Group II archaea (Ca. Poseidoniales ord. nov.). ISME J. 13, 663 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
76.Haro-Moreno, J. M., Rodriguez-Valera, F., López-García, P., Moreira, D. & Martin-Cuadrado, A.-B. New insights into marine group III Euryarchaeota, from dark to light. ISME J. 11, 1102–1117 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Orsi, W. D. et al. Diverse, uncultivated bacteria and archaea underlying the cycling of dissolved protein in the ocean. ISME J. 10, 2158–2173 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Orsi, W. D. et al. Ecophysiology of uncultivated marine euryarchaea is linked to particulate organic matter. ISME J. 9, 1747–1763 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
79.Hugoni, M. et al. Structure of the rare archaeal biosphere and seasonal dynamics of active ecotypes in surface coastal waters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6004–6009 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Matheus Carnevali, P. B. et al. Hydrogen-based metabolism as an ancestral trait in lineages sibling to the Cyanobacteria. Nat. Commun. 10, 463 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Saw, J. H. W. et al. Pangenomics analysis reveals diversification of enzyme families and niche specialization in globally abundant SAR202 bacteria. mBio 11, e02975-19 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Alonso‐Sáez, L., Díaz‐Pérez, L. & Morán, X. A. G. The hidden seasonality of the rare biosphere in coastal marine bacterioplankton. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 3766–3780 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
83.Lambert, S. et al. Rhythmicity of coastal marine picoeukaryotes, bacteria and archaea despite irregular environmental perturbations. ISME J. 13, 388–401 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
84.Mehrshad, M., Rodriguez-Valera, F., Amoozegar, M. A., López-García, P. & Ghai, R. The enigmatic SAR202 cluster up close: shedding light on a globally distributed dark ocean lineage involved in sulfur cycling. ISME J. 12, 655–668 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
85.Mullins, T. D., Britschgi, T. B., Krest, R. L. & Giovannoni, S. J. Genetic comparisons reveal the same unknown bacterial lineages in Atlantic and Pacific bacterioplankton communities. Limnol. Oceanogr. 40, 148–158 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Acinas, S. G., Antón, J. & Rodríguez-Valera, F. Diversity of free-living and attached bacteria in offshore western mediterranean waters as depicted by analysis of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 514–522 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Hoarfrost, A. et al. Global ecotypes in the ubiquitous marine clade SAR86. ISME J. 14, 178–188 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
88.Alonso-Sáez, L., Galand, P. E., Casamayor, E. O., Pedrós-Alió, C. & Bertilsson, S. High bicarbonate assimilation in the dark by Arctic bacteria. ISME J. 4, 1581–1590 (2010).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
89.Swan, B. K. et al. Potential for chemolithoautotrophy among ubiquitous bacteria lineages in the dark ocean. Science 333, 1296–1300 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Maldonado, M. T., Boyd, P. W., Harrison, P. J. & Price, N. M. Co-limitation of phytoplankton growth by light and Fe during winter in the NE subarctic Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr. 46, 2475–2485 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Peña, M. A. & Varela, D. E. Seasonal and interannual variability in phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics along Line P in the NE subarctic Pacific. Prog. Oceanogr. 75, 200–222 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
92.Whitney, F. A., Wong, C. S. & Boyd, P. W. Interannual variability in nitrate supply to surface waters of the Northeast Pacific Ocean. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 170, 15–23 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Crawford, W., Galbraith, J. & Bolingbroke, N. Line P ocean temperature and salinity, 1956–2005. Prog. Oceanogr. 75, 161–178 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Whitney, F. A. & Freeland, H. J. Variability in upper-ocean water properties in the NE Pacific Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr. 46, 2351–2370 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Whitney, F. A., Freeland, H. J. & Robert, M. Persistently declining oxygen levels in the interior waters of the eastern subarctic Pacific. Prog. Oceanogr. 75, 179–199 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Siegel, D. A. et al. Prediction of the Export and Fate of Global Ocean Net Primary Production: The EXPORTS Science Plan. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 030 (2016).97.Buesseler, K. O. et al. High-resolution spatial and temporal measurements of particulate organic carbon flux using thorium-234 in the northeast Pacific Ocean during the EXport Processes in the Ocean from RemoTe Sensing field campaign. Elementa: Sci. Anthrop. 8, (2020).98.Stephens, B. M. et al. Organic matter composition at ocean station papa affects its bioavailability, bacterioplankton growth efficiency and the responding taxa. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 590273 (2020).99.Mackinson, B. L., Moran, S. B., Lomas, M. W., Stewart, G. M. & Kelly, R. P. Estimates of micro-, nano-, and picoplankton contributions to particle export in the northeast Pacific. Biogeosciences 12, 3429–3446 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Fisher, J. et al. Copepod responses to, and recovery from, the recent marine heatwave in the Northeast Pacific. PICES Sci. 2019: Notes Sci. Board Chair 28, 65 (2020).
Google Scholar 
101.Batten, S. D. et al. Interannual variability in lower trophic levels on the Alaskan Shelf. Deep Sea Res. Part II: Topical Stud. Oceanogr. 147, 58–68 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Geider, R. & Roche, J. L. Redfield revisited: variability of C:N:P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. Eur. J. Phycol. 37, 1–17 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
103.Wohlers, J. et al. Changes in biogenic carbon flow in response to sea surface warming. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 7067–7072 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
104.Bif, M. B. & Hansell, D. A. Seasonality of dissolved organic carbon in the upper Northeast Pacific Ocean. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 33, 526–539 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
105.Ferrer-González, F. X. et al. Resource partitioning of phytoplankton metabolites that support bacterial heterotrophy. ISME J. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41396-020-00811-y. (2020).106.Gies, E. A., Konwar, K. M., Beatty, J. T. & Hallam, S. J. Illuminating microbial dark matter in meromictic Sakinaw Lake. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 6807–6818 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
107.Pachiadaki, M. G. et al. Charting the complexity of the marine microbiome through single-cell genomics. Cell 179, 1623–1635.e11 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
108.Fuhrman, J. A. et al. Annually reoccurring bacterial communities are predictable from ocean conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 13104–13109 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
109.Ono, T., Shiomoto, A. & Saino, T. Recent decrease of summer nutrients concentrations and future possible shrinkage of the subarctic North Pacific high-nutrient low-chlorophyll region. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 22, GB3027 (2008).110.Walsh, D. A., Zaikova, E. & Hallam, S. J. Small Volume (1-3L) Filtration of Coastal Seawater Samples. JoVE https://doi.org/10.3791/1163 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
111.Barwell-Clarke, J. & Whitney, F. Institute of Ocean Sciences nutrient Methods and Analysis. (1996).112.Zapata, M., Rodríguez, F. & Garrido, J. L. Separation of chlorophylls and carotenoids from marine phytoplankton: a new HPLC method using a reversed phase C8 column and pyridine-containing mobile phases. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 195, 29–45 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
113.Nemcek, N. & Peña, M. A. Institute of Ocean Sciences Protocols for Phytoplankton Pigment Analysis by HPLC. (2014).114.Wright, J. J., Lee, S., Zaikova, E., Walsh, D. A. & Hallam, S. J. DNA Extraction from 0.22 μM Sterivex Filters and Cesium Chloride Density Gradient Centrifugation. J. Vis. Exp. e1352, https://doi.org/10.3791/1352 (2009).115.Parada, A. E., Needham, D. M. & Fuhrman, J. A. Every base matters: assessing small subunit rRNA primers for marine microbiomes with mock communities, time series and global field samples. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1403–1414 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
116.Rivers, A. R. iTag amplicon sequencing for taxonomix identification at JGI. http://1ofdmq2n8tc36m6i46scovo2e.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/iTagger-methods-1.pdf (2016).117.Magoč, T. & Salzberg, S. L. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27, 2957–2963 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
118.Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
119.Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
120.Edgar, R. C., Haas, B. J., Clemente, J. C., Quince, C. & Knight, R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27, 2194–2200 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
121.Yilmaz, P. et al. The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D643–D648 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
122.Bolyen, E. et al. QIIME 2: Reproducible, interactive, scalable, and extensible microbiome data science. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).123.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018).124.Rstudio Team. Rstudio: Integrated Development Environment for R (Rstudio Inc, 2016).125.Faust, K. & Raes, J. CoNet app: inference of biological association networks using Cytoscape. F1000Res 5, 1519 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Shannon, P. et al. Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res 13, 2498–2504 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar  More