Ecology

EthicsNo ethics approval was required for this study. Our study was conducted in a state-owned industrial oil palm plantation where we established a cooperation with the estate owner to access the site and collect data. No endangered or protected species were sampled. Research permits were obtained from the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, and sample collection and sample export permits were obtained from the Ministry of Environment and Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia.Study area and experimental designOur study was conducted in a state-owned industrial oil palm plantation (PTPN VI) located in Jambi, Indonesia (1.719° S, 103.398° E, 73 m above sea level). Initial planting of oil palms within the 2,025 ha plantation area started in 1998 and ended in 2002; planting density was 142 palms ha−1, spaced 8 m apart in each row and between rows, and palms were ≥16 years old during our study period of 2016–2020. The study sites have a mean annual temperature of 27.0 ± 0.2 °C and a mean annual precipitation of 2,103 ± 445 mm (2008–2017, Sultan Thaha Airport, Jambi). The management practices in large-scale oil palm plantations typically result in three contrasting management zones: (1) a 2 m radius around the base of the palm that was weeded (four times a year) and raked before fertilizer application, hereafter called the ‘palm circle’; (2) an area occurring every second inter-row, where pruned senesced palm fronds were piled up, hereafter called ‘frond piles’; and (3) the remaining area of the plantation where less weeding (two times a year) and no fertilizer were applied, hereafter called ‘inter-rows’.Within this oil palm plantation, we established a management experiment in November 2016 with full factorial treatments of two fertilization rates × two weeding practices: conventional fertilization rates at PTPN VI and other large-scale plantations (260 kg N–50 kg P–220 kg K ha−1 yr−1), reduced fertilization rates based on quantified nutrient export by harvest (136 kg N–17 kg P ha−1 yr−1–187 kg K ha−1 yr−1), herbicide and mechanical weeding15. The reduced fertilization treatment was based on quantified nutrient export from fruit harvest, calculated by multiplying the nutrient content of fruit bunches with the long-term yield data of the plantation. Fertilizers were applied yearly in April and October following weeding and raking of the palm circle. The common practice at PTPN VI and other large-scale plantations on acidic Acrisol soils is to apply lime and micronutrients, and these were unchanged in our management experiment. Before each N–P–K fertilizer application, dolomite and micronutrients were applied to the palm circle in all treatment plots using the common rates)52: 426 kg ha−1 yr−1 dolomite and 142 kg Micro-Mag ha−1 yr−1 (containing 0.5% B2O3, 0.5% CuO, 0.25% Fe2O3, 0.15% ZnO, 0.1% MnO and 18% MgO). Herbicide treatment was carried out using glyphosate in the palm circle (1.50 l ha−1 yr−1, split into four applications per year) and in the inter-rows (0.75 l ha−1 yr−1, split into two applications per year). Mechanical weeding was done using a brush cutter in the same management zones and at the same frequency as the herbicide treatment.The 22 factorial design resulted in four treatment combinations: conventional fertilization with herbicide treatment, reduced fertilization with herbicide treatment, conventional fertilization with mechanical weeding and reduced fertilization with mechanical weeding. The four treatments were randomly assigned on 50 m × 50 m plots replicated in four blocks, totalling 16 plots. The effective measurement area was the inner 30 m × 30 m area within each replicate plot to avoid any possible edge effects. For indicators (below) that were measured within subplots, these subplots were distributed randomly within the inner 30 m × 30 m of a plot. All replicate plots were located on flat terrain and on an Acrisol soil with a sandy clay loam texture.Ecosystem functions and multifunctionalityOur study included multiple indicators for each of the eight ecosystem functions23, described in details below (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). All the parameters were expressed at the plot level by taking the means of the subplots (that is, biological parameters) or the area-weighted average of the three management zones per plot (that is, soil parameters). (1) Greenhouse gas (GHG) regulation was indicated by NEP, soil organic C (SOC) and soil GHG fluxes. (2) Erosion prevention was signified by the understory vegetation cover during the four-year measurements. (3) Organic matter decomposition was indicated by leaf litter decomposition and soil animal decomposer activity. (4) Soil fertility was signified by gross N mineralization rate, effective cation exchange capacity (ECEC), base saturation and microbial biomass N. (5) Pollination potential was designated by pan-trapped arthropod abundance and nectar-feeding bird activity. As such, it does not quantify the pollination potential for oil palm, which is mainly pollinated by a single weevil species, but rather as a proxy for a general pollination potential for other co-occurring plants. (6) Water filtration (the capacity to provide clean water) was indicated by leaching losses of the major elements. (7) Plant refugium (the capacity to provide a suitable habitat for plants) as signified by the percentage ground cover of invasive plants to the total ground cover of understory vegetation during the four-year measurements. (8) Biological control (the regulation of herbivores via predation) was indicated by insectivorous bird and bat activities and the soil arthropod predator activity.All the ecosystem functions were merged into a multifunctionality index using the established average and threshold approaches12. For average multifunctionality, we first averaged the z-standardized values (Statistics) of indicators for each ecosystem function and calculated the mean of the eight ecosystem functions for each plot. For threshold multifunctionality, this was calculated from the number of functions that exceeds a set threshold, which is a percentage of the maximum performance level of each function12; we investigated the range of thresholds from 10% to 90% to have a complete overview. The maximum performance was taken as the average of the three highest values for each indicator per ecosystem function across all plots to reduce effect of potential outliers. For each plot, we counted the number of indicators that exceeded a given threshold for each function and divided by the number of indicators for each function12.Indicators of GHG regulationWe calculated annual NEP for each plot as: net ecosystem C exchange – harvested fruit biomass C (ref. 16), whereby net ecosystem C exchange = Cout (or heterotrophic respiration) – Cin (or net primary productivity)53. The net primary productivity of oil palms in each plot was the sum of aboveground biomass production (aboveground biomass C + frond litter biomass C input + fruit biomass C) and belowground biomass production. Aboveground biomass production was estimated using allometric equations developed for oil palm plantations in Indonesia54, using the height of palms measured yearly from 2019 to 2020. Annual frond litter biomass input was calculated from the number and dry mass of fronds pruned during harvesting events of an entire year in each plot and was averaged for 2019 and 2020. Aboveground biomass production was converted to C based on C concentrations in wood and leaf litter55. Annual fruit biomass C production (which is also the harvest export) was calculated from the average annual yield in 2019 and 2020 and the measured C concentrations of fruit bunches. Belowground root biomass and litter C production were taken from previous work in our study area55, and it was assumed constant for each plot. Heterotrophic respiration was estimated for each plot as: annual soil CO2 C emission (below) × 0.7 (based on 30% root respiration contribution to soil respiration from a tropical forest in Sulawesi, Indonesia56) + annual frond litter biomass C input × 0.8 (~80% of frond litter is decomposed within a year in this oil palm plantation8). SOC was measured in March 2018 from composite samples collected from two subplots in each of the three management zones per plot down to 50 cm depth. Soil samples were air dried, finely ground and analysed for SOC using a CN analyser (Vario EL Cube, Elementar Analysis Systems). SOC stocks were calculated using the measured bulk density in each management zone, and values for each plot were the area-weighted average of the three management zones (18% for palm circle, 15% for frond piles and 67% for inter-rows)15,22.From July 2019 to June 2020, we conducted monthly measurements of soil CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes using vented, static chambers permanently installed in the three management zones within two subplots per plot11,57. Annual soil CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes were trapezoidal interpolations between measurement periods for the whole year, and values for each plot were the area-weighted average of the three management zones (above).Indicators of erosion preventionDiversity and abundance of vascular plants were assessed once a year from 2016 to 2020 before weeding in September–November. In five subplots per plot, we recorded the occurrence of all vascular plant species and estimated the percent cover of the understory vegetation. The percentage cover and plant species richness of each measurement year were expressed in ratio to that of 2016 to account for initial differences among the plots before the start of the experiment. For example, percentage cover in 2017 was:$$mathrm{Cover}_{2017} = frac{{left( {mathrm{Cover}_{2017} – mathrm{Cover}_{2016}} right)}}{{mathrm{Cover}_{2016}}}$$The values from five subplots were averaged to represent each plot.Indicators of organic matter decompositionLeaf litter decomposition was determined using litter bags (20 cm × 20 cm with 4 mm mesh size) containing 10 g of dry oil palm leaf litter8. Three litter bags per plot were placed on the edge of the frond piles in December 2016. After eight months of incubation in the field, we calculated leaf litter decomposition as the difference between initial litter dry mass and litter dry mass following incubation. Soil animal decomposer activity is described below (Soil arthropods).Indicators of soil fertilityAll these indicators were measured in February–March 2018 in the three management zones within two subplots per plot22. Gross N mineralization rate in the soil was measured in the top 5 cm depth on intact soil cores incubated in situ using the 15N pool dilution technique58. ECEC and base saturation were measured in the top 5 cm depth as this is the depth that reacts fast to changes in management22. The exchangeable cation concentrations (Ca, Mg, K, Na, Al, Fe, Mn) were determined by percolating the soil with 1 mol l−1 of unbuffered NH4Cl, followed by analysis of the percolates using an inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometer (ICP-AES; iCAP 6300 Duo view ICP Spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Base saturation was calculated as the percentage exchangeable bases (Mg, Ca, K and Na) on ECEC. Microbial biomass N was measured from fresh soil samples using the fumigation-extraction method59. The values for each plot were the mean of the two subplots that were the area-weighted average of the three management zones (above)15,22.Indicators of general pollination potentialFluorescent yellow pan traps were used to sample aboveground arthropods (to determine pollinator communities60) in November 2016, September 2017 and June 2018. The traps were attached to a platform at the height of the surrounding vegetation within a 2 × 3 grid centred in the inter-rows of each plot in six clusters of three traps, totalling 18 traps per plot. Traps were exposed in the field for 48 h. We stored all trapped arthropods in 70% ethanol and later counted and identified to order and species level. The abundance of trapped arthropods in 2017 and 2018 were calculated as the ratio to the abundance in 2016 to account for initial differences among the plots before the start of the experiment. The activity of nectar-feeding birds is described below (Birds and bats).Indicators of water filtrationElement leaching losses were determined from analyses of soil-pore water sampled monthly at 1.5 m depth using suction cup lysimeters (P80 ceramic, maximum pore size 1 μm; CeramTec) over the course of one year (2017–2018)15. Lysimeters were installed in the three management zones within two subplots per plot. Dissolved N was analysed using continuous flow injection colorimetry (SEAL Analytical AA3, SEAL Analytical), whereas these other elements were determined using ICP-AES. The values for each plot were the mean of the two subplots that were the area-weighted average of the three management zones15,22.Indicators of plant refugiumIn five subplots per plot, the percentage cover and species richness of invasive understory plant species were assessed once a year from 2016 to 2020 before weeding in September–November. We defined invasive species as those plants non-native to Sumatra61 and among the ten dominant species (excluding oil palm) in the plantation for each year. The percentage cover of invasive understory plant species of each measurement year was expressed in a ratio to that of 2016 to account for initial differences among the plots before the start of the experiment. The values for each plot were represented by the average of five subplots.Indicators of biological controlThe activities of insectivorous birds and bats are described below (Birds and bats). In five subplots per plot, soil invertebrates were collected (Soil arthropods), counted, identified to taxonomic order level and subsequently classified according to their trophic groups that include predators60. The values from five subplots were average to represent each plot.BiodiversityBiodiversity was measured by the taxonomic richness of seven multitrophic groups, described in details below (Supplementary Tables 1 and 2).Understory plant species richnessThe method is described above (Indicators of erosion prevention), using the number of species as an indicator (Supplementary Table 2).Soil microorganism richnessThis was determined in May 2017 by co-extracting RNA and DNA from three soil cores (5 cm diameter, 7 cm depth) in five subplots per plot62. While DNA extraction describes the entire microbial community, RNA represents the active community. The v3–v4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified and sequenced with a MiSeq sequencer (Illumina). Taxonomic classification was done by mapping curated sequences against the SILVA small subunit (SSU) 138 non-redundant (NR) database63 with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTN)64.Soil arthropod order richnessFor determination of soil arthropods, we collected soil samples (16 cm × 16 cm, 5 cm depth) in five subplots per plot in October–November 2017. We extracted the animals from the soil using a heat-gradient extractor65, collected them in dimethyleneglycol-water solution (1:1) and stored in 80% ethanol. The extracted animals were counted and identified to taxonomic order level61. They were also assigned to the trophic groups decomposers, herbivores and predators based on the predominant food resources recorded in previous reviews and a local study66,67. Orders with diverse feeding habits were divided into several feeding groups, for example, Coleoptera were divided into mostly predatory families (Staphylinidae, Carabidae), herbivorous families (for example, Curculionidae) and decomposer families (for example, Tenebrionidae). The total number of individuals per taxonomic group in each subplot was multiplied by the group-specific metabolic rate, which were summed to calculate soil animal decomposer activity. The values from five subplots were average to represent each plot.Aboveground arthropod order and insect family richnessIn addition to the fluorescent yellow pan traps described above (Indicators of general pollination potential), sweep net and Malaise trap samplings were conducted in June 2018, which targeted the general flying and understory dwelling arthropod communities. Sweep net sampling was conducted within the understory vegetation along two 10 m long transects per plot, with ten sweeping strokes performed per transect. In each plot, we installed a single Malaise trap between two randomly chosen palms and exposed it for 24 h. Arthropods were counted, identified to taxonomic order level and the insects to taxonomic family level and values from the three methods were summed to represent each plot.Birds and batsBirds and bats passing at each replicate plot were sampled in September 2017 using SM2Bat + sound recorders (Wildlife Acoustics) with two microphones (SMX-II and SMX-US) placed at a height of 1.5 m in the middle of each plot68. We assigned the bird vocalization to species with Xeno-Canto69 and the Macaulay library70. Insectivorous bat species richness was computed by dividing them into morphospecies based on the characteristics of their call (call frequency, duration, shape). In addition, we gathered information on proportional diet preferences of the bird species using the EltonTrait database71. We defined birds feeding on invertebrates (potential biocontrol agents) as the species with a diet of at least 80% invertebrates and feeding on nectar (potential pollinators), if the diet included at least 20% of nectar.Economic indicatorsWe used six indicators linked to the level and stability of yield and profit: yield, lower fifth quantile of the yield per palm per plot, shortfall probability, management costs, profit and relative gross margin. We assessed fruit yield by weighing the harvested fruit bunches from each palm within the inner 30 m × 30 m area of each plot. The harvest followed the schedule and standard practices of the plantation company: each palm was harvested approximately every ten days and the lower fronds were pruned. For each plot, we calculated the average fruit yield per palm and scaled up to a hectare, considering the planting density of 142 palms per ha. Because the palms in each plot have different fruiting cycles and were harvested continuously, the calculation of an annual yield may lead to misleading differences between treatments. Therefore, we calculated the cumulative yield from the beginning of the experiment to four years (2017–2020), which should account for the inter- and intra-annual variations in fruit production of the palms in the plots and thus allowing for comparison among treatments. As effects of management practices on yield may be delayed46, we also calculated the cumulative yield during two consecutive years (2017–2018 and 2019–2020) and checked for treatment effects on yield and profit indicators separately for these two periods.We computed risk indicators on the cumulative yield and on the yield between the two periods. We used the lowest fifth quantile of the yield per palm per plot (left side of the distribution) to indicate the production of the palms with lowest performance. Also, we determined the yield shortfall probability (lower partial moment 0th order), defined as the share of palms that fell below a predefined threshold of yield; the thresholds chosen were 630 kg−1 per palm for cumulative yield and 300 kg−1 per palm per year for the two-year yield, which corresponded to 75% of the average yield.Revenues and costs were calculated as cumulative values during four years of the experiment (2017–2020) using the same prices and costs for all the years. This was because we were interested in assessing the economic consequences of different management treatments, and they might be difficult to interpret when changes in prices and costs between calendar years are included, which are driven by external market powers rather than the field-management practices. For the same reason, we abstained from discounting profits. Given the usually high discount rates applied to the study area, slight differences in harvesting activities between calendar years or months might lead to high systematic differences between the management treatments, which are associated with the variation in work schedule within the plantation rather than the actual difference among management treatments. Revenues were calculated from the yield and the average price of the fruit bunches in 2016 and 201761. Material costs were the sum of the costs of fertilizers, herbicide and gasoline for the brush cutter. Labour costs were calculated from the minimum wage in Jambi and the time (in labour hours) needed for the harvesting, fertilizing and weeding operations, which were recorded in 2017 for each plot. The weeding labour included the labour for raking the palm circle before fertilization, which was equal in all treatments, and the weeding in the palm circle and inter-rows either with herbicide or brush cutter. In addition, we included the time to remove C. hirta, which must be removed mechanically from all plots once a year, calculated from the average weed-removal time in the palm circle and the percentage cover of C. hirta in each plot for each year. We then calculated the profit as the difference between revenues and the total management costs and the relative gross margin as the gross profit proportion of the revenues.StatisticsTo test for differences among management treatments for each ecosystem function and across indicators of biodiversity, the plot-level value of each indicator was first z standardized (z = (actual value − mean value across plots) / standard deviation)4. This prevents the dominance of one or few indicators over the others, and z standardization allows several distinct indicators to best characterize an ecosystem function or biodiversity4. Standardized values were inverted (multiplied by −1) for indicators of which high values signify undesirable effect (that is, NEP, soil N2O and CH4 fluxes, element leaching losses, invasive plant cover, yield shortfall, management costs) for intuitive interpretations. For a specific ecosystem function (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2) and across indicators of biodiversity (Fig. 2), linear mixed-effects (LME) models were used to assess differences among management treatments (fertilization, weeding and their interaction) as fixed effects with replicate plots and indicators (Supplementary Tables 2 and 3) as random effects. The significance of the fixed effects was evaluated using ANOVA72. The LME model performance was assessed using diagnostic residual plots73. As indicator variables may systematically differ in their responses to management treatments, we also tested the interaction between indicator and treatment (Table 1). For testing the differences among management treatments across ecosystem functions (that is, multifunctionality; Fig. 1), we used for each replicate plot the average of z-standardized indicators of each ecosystem function and ranges of thresholds (that is, number of functions that exceeds a set percentage of the maximum performance of each function12; Supplementary Fig. 3). The LME models had management treatments (fertilization, weeding and their interaction) as fixed effects and replicate plots and ecosystem functions as random effects; the interaction between ecosystem function and treatment were also tested to assess if there were systematic differences in their responses to management treatments (Table 1). As we expected that the type of weeding will influence ground vegetation, we tested for differences in ground cover of understory vegetation, measured from 2016 to 2020, using LME with management treatments as fixed effect and replicate plots and year as random effects. Differences among management treatments (fertilization, weeding and their interaction) in yield and profit indicators, which were cumulative values over four years (Fig. 3) or for two separate periods (2017–2018 and 2019–2020; Supplementary Fig. 4), were assessed using linear model ANOVA (Table 1). For clear visual comparison among management treatments across ecosystem functions, multitrophic groups for biodiversity, and yield and profit indicators, the fifth and 95th percentiles of their z-standardized values were presented in a petal diagram (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 5). Data were analysed using R (version 4.0.4), using the R packages ‘nlme’ and ‘influence.ME’73.Reporting summaryFurther information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article. More

Wajnberg, É. et al. (eds) Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications 1st edn. (Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2008).
Google Scholar 
Godfray, H. C. J. Parasitoids: Behavioral and Evolutionary Ecology (Princeton University Press, 1994).Book 

Google Scholar 
Morris, R. J., Lewis, O. T. & Godfray, H. C. J. Apparent competition and insect community structure: Towards a spatial perspective. Annales Zoologica Fennici 42, 1–14 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Forbes, A. A., Bagley, R. K., Beer, M. A., Hippee, A. C. & Widmayer, H. A. Quantifying the unquantifiable: Why Hymenoptera, not Coleoptera, is the most speciose animal order. BMC Ecol. 18, 1–11 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hassell, M. P. & Waage, J. K. Host–parasitoid population interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 29, 89–114 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
Lafferty, K. D. et al. Parasites in food webs: The ultimate missing links. Ecol. Lett. 11, 533–546 (2008).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Van Veen, F. J. F., Van Holland, P. D. & Godfray, H. C. J. Stable coexistence in insect communities due to density- and trait-mediated indirect effects. Ecology 86, 3182–3189 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schmidt, M. H. et al. Relative importance of predators and parasitoids for cereal aphid control. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Series B Biol. Sci. 270, 1905–1909 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mills, N. J. & Wajnberg, É. Optimal foraging behavior and efficient biological control methods. In Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to Field Applications 1st edn (eds Wajnberg, É. et al.) 1–30 (Blackwell Publishing, 2008).
Google Scholar 
Vinson, S. B. Host suitability for insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 25, 397–419 (1980).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benrey, B. & Denno, R. F. The slow-growth-high-mortality hypothesis: A test using the cabbage butterfly. Ecology 78, 987–999 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Chau, A. & Mackauer, M. Host-instar selection in the aphid parasitoid Monoctonus paulensis (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Aphidiinae): Assessing costs and benefits. Can. Entomol. 133, 549–564 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Strand, M. R. & Obrycki, J. J. Host specificity of insect parasitoids and predators. Bioscience 46, 422–429 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vinson, S. B. Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 21, 109–133 (1976).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. G. & Messing, R. H. Fitness consequences of body-size-dependent host species selection in a generalist ectoparasitoid. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 56, 513–522 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Liu, Z., Xu, B., Li, L. & Sun, J. Host-size mediated trade-off in a parasitoid Sclerodermus harmandi. PLoS ONE 6, e23260 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Wang, X. Y., Yang, Z. Q., Wu, H. & Gould, J. R. Effects of host size on the sex ratio, clutch size, and size of adult Spathius agrili, an ectoparasitoid of emerald ash borer. Biol. Control 44, 7–12 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hardy, I. C. W., Griffiths, N. T. & Godfray, H. C. J. Clutch size in a parasitoid wasp: A manipulation experiment. J. Anim. Ecol. 61, 121–129 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scriber, J. M. & Slansky, F. The nutritional ecology of immature insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26, 183–211 (1981).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moreau, J., Benrey, B. & Thiery, D. Assessing larval food quality for phytophagous insects: Are the facts as simple as they appear?. Funct. Ecol. 20, 592–600 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Davidowitz, G., D’Amico, L. J. & Nijhout, H. F. The effects of environmental variation on a mechanism that controls insect body size. Evolut. Ecol. Res. 6, 49–62 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Williams, I. S. Slow-growth, high-mortality-a general hypothesis, or is it?. Ecol. Entomol. 24, 490–495 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chen, K. & Chen, Y. Slow-growth high-mortality: A meta-analysis for insects. Insect Sci. 25, 337–351 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Waldbauer, G. P. The consumption and utilization of food by insects. Adv. Insect Physiol. 5, 229–288 (1968).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hochuli, D. F. Insect herbivory and ontogeny: How do growth and development influence feeding behaviour, morphology and host use?. Austral. Ecol. 26, 563–570 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Holmes, L. A., Nelson, W. A. & Lougheed, S. C. Food quality effects on instar-specific life histories of a holometabolous insect. Ecol. Evol. 10, 626–637 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kagata, H. & Ohgushi, T. Bottom-up trophic cascades and material transfer in terrestrial food webs. Ecol. Res. 21, 26–34 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
Scherber, C. et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468, 553–556 (2010).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vidal, M. C. & Murphy, S. M. Bottom-up vs top-down effects on terrestrial insect herbivores: A meta-analysis. Ecol. Lett. 21, 138–150 (2018).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Harvey, J. A. Factors affecting the evolution of development strategies in parasitoid wasps: The importance of functional constraints and incorporating complexity. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 117, 1–13 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Charnov, E. L., Los-den Hartogh, R. L., Jones, W. T. & van den Assem, J. Sex ratio evolution in a variable environment. Nature 289, 27–33 (1981).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Larson, A. O. The bean weevil and the southern Cowpea weevil in California. United States Department of Agriculture. Technical Bulletin No. 593, Washington, D. C. (1938).Askew, R. R. & Shaw, M. R. Parasitoid communities: their size, structure and development in Insect Parasitoids: 13th Symposium of Royal Entomological Society of London (eds. Waage, J.K. & Greathead, D.J. 225–264 (1986).Holmes, L. A., Nelson, W. A., Dyck, M. & Lougheed, S. C. Enhancing the usefulness of artificial seeds in seed beetle model systems research. Methods Ecol. Evol. 11, 1701–1706 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ellers, J., Van Alphen, J. J. M. & Sevenster, J. G. A field study of size-fitness relationships in the parasitoid Asobara tabida. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 318–324 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Stable and efficient multiple smoothing parameter estimation for generalized additive models. J. Am. Stat. 99, 673–686 (2004).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R 2nd edn. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N. Thin-plate regression splines. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B 65, 95–114 (2003).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ (2020). Accessed 3 April 2020.Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretical Approach 2nd edn. (Springer-Verlag, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Wood, S. N., Pya, N. & Saefken, B. Smoothing parameter and model selection for general smooth models (with discussion). J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 111, 1548–1575 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Bolker, B., & R Development Core Team Tools for general maximum likelihood estimation. Version 1.0.20. (2017). Accessed 4 April 2020.Hothorn, T., Bretz, F. & Westfall, P. Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometical. J. 50, 346–363 (2008).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Rose, N. L., Yang, H., Turner, S. D. & Simpson, G. L. An assessment of the mechanisms for the transfer of lead and mercury from atmospherically contaminated organic soils to lake sediments with particular reference to Scotland, UK. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 82, 113–135 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Holmes, L. A., Nelson, W. A. & Lougheed, S. C. Data from: Food quality effects on instar-specific life histories of a holometabolous insect. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d7wm37px7 (2020).Therneau, T. A Package for Survival Analysis in R. R package version 3.2-13. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival. (2021). Accessed 3 April 2020.Efron, B. The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1982).Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Awmack, C. S. & Leather, S. R. Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 817–844 (2002).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Clancy, K. M. & Price, P. W. Rapid herbivore growth enhances enemy attack: Sublethal plant defenses remain a paradox. Ecology 68, 733–737 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
Loader, C. & Damman, H. Nitrogen content of food plants and vulnerability of Pieris rapae to natural enemies. Ecology 72, 1586–1590 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Uesugi, A. The slow-growth high-mortality hypothesis: Direct experimental support in a leafmining fly. Ecol. Entomol. 40, 221–228 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Feeny, P. Plant apparency and chemical defense. in Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects. 1–40 (Springer, 1976).Teder, T. & Tammaru, T. Cascading effects of variation in plant vigor on the relative performance of insect herbivores and their parasitoids. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 94–104 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kagata, H., Nakamura, M. & Ohgushi, T. Bottom-up cascade in a tri-trophic system: Different impacts of host-plant regeneration on performance of a willow leaf beetle and its natural enemy. Ecol. Entomol. 30, 58–62 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J. & Cardé, R. T. Parasitoid foraging and learning. In Chemical Ecology of Insects 2 (eds Cardé, R. T. & Bell, W. J.) 65–101 (Springer, 1995).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Ishii, Y. & Shimada, M. Learning predator promotes coexistence of prey species in host-parasitoid systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 5116–5120 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ode, P. J. & Hardy, I. C. Parasitoid sex ratios and biological control. Behavioral ecology of insect parasitoids. In Behavioral Ecology of Insect Parasitoids: From Theoretical Approaches to field applications (eds Wajnberg, E. et al.) 253–291 (Wiley, 2008).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Xiaoyi, W. & Zhongqi, Y. Behavioral mechanisms of parasitic wasps for searching concealed insect hosts. Acta Ecol. Sin. 28, 1257–1269 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Otten, H., Wäckers, F., Battini, M. & Dorn, S. Efficiency of vibrational sounding in the parasitoid Pimpla turionellae is affected by female size. Anim. Behav. 61, 671–677 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
Kaplan, I., Carrillo, J., Garvey, M. & Ode, P. J. Indirect plant-parasitoid interactions mediated by changes in herbivore physiology. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 14, 112–119 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ode, P. J. Plant toxins and parasitoid trophic ecology. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 32, 118–123 (2019).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Barbosa, P., Gross, P. & Kemper, J. Influence of plant allelochemicals on the tobacco hornworm and its parasitoid, Cotesia congregate. Ecology 72, 1567–1575 (1991).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Barbosa, P. Natural enemies and herbivore–plant interactions: Influence of plant allelochemicals and host specificity. In Novel Aspects of Insect–Plant Interactions (eds Barbosa, P. & Letourneau, L. D. K.) 201–230 (Wiley, 1988).
Google Scholar 
Ode, P. J. Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: Effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 163–185 (2006).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Terraces are a land type that is defined by its shape. They have a distinct morphological structure and edge features that distinguish them from other land types. In this study, we define terraces as agricultural land with strip or wavy sections built on slopes greater than 2° along the contour direction. Figure 1 depicts Google Maps satellite images of terraces in the Loess Plateau region. Terraces can be distinguished from other features in remote sensing images based on their colour, morphology, texture, and structure. Terraces can be distinguished from construction land, water, glaciers, and deserts by their colours. Figure 1b–d shows terraces that are primarily green and yellow. Furthermore, terraces are generally distributed along the contour direction, and can therefore be identified based on their morphology. Terraced field ridges curve downward and resemble strips in Fig. 1b,d or circles or ovals in Fig. 1c rather than a neat grid-like distribution. These features differ in morphology from the flat land shown in Fig. 1h. Based on texture and structure, the field area of terraces can be identified based on their strong edge features, as shown in Fig. 1b–d. The edges of terraces have dark stripes caused by oblique illumination received from the sun, and the field ridge of terraces often intercepts part of the sunlight due to their height. Sloping cultivated land, as shown in Fig. 1g, has no evident terraced wall. The outline of sloping cultivated land in the high-resolution image is curved, with no prominent edge features. These findings are critical differences distinguishing terraces and sloping land in high-resolution images.Fig. 1The spatial location of the Loess Plateau and images of various types of cultivated land. (a) The spatial location of the Loess Plateau and Spatial distribution of various cultivated land types images, (b) wide strip-mounted terraces in Longxi, (c) circular wide terraces in central Yulin, (d) high resolution image of Zhuanglang County in July 2019, (e) Zhuanglang County in February 2020, (f) narrow terraces in Shangbao, Chongyi, Jiangxi Province, (g) sloping cropland in Zhenjiang Town, Laibin, Guangxi, and (h) horizontal cropland in the North China Plain.Full size imageDeep learning-based terrace extraction modelThe DLTEM is a terrace extraction model that uses deep learning algorithms and other supplementary information. Initially, a preliminary terrace distribution map was obtained using a deep learning algorithm. It was then combined with the spectral and digital elevation model (DEM) elevation information to fine-tune the results. The final spatial distribution of the terraces was produced by manual correction (Fig. 2). Traditional land classification models or methods typically superimpose spectral, elevation, and morphological texture information from remote sensing images together for training, such as random forest, which is easily ignored in training since morphological texture information accounts for a relatively small amount of the total information. This leads to significant errors while identifying land classes with textural characteristics. In contrast, the DLTEM focuses on morphological texture information from remote sensing images and classifies it into land classes, followed by auxiliary correction through additional information. Thus, this method is more suitable to extract terraces enriched with texture structure information.Fig. 2Flow chart of the deep learning-based terrace extraction model.Full size imageThe UNet++ network is a classic deep learning algorithm that is uniquely unrivaled in extracting colour, morphology, texture, and structure features from images and applying them for classification. In comparison with other Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) classification models (e.g., Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN)), it has high classification accuracy, fast computation speed, strong robustness, and provides variable importance metrics. Therefore, in this study, the UNet++ network was adopted as the network framework for deep learning; the primary data source used was high-resolution satellite imagery from 2019. DEM (SRTM v4.1) data were used to obtain the elevation information and GlobeLand30 data were used to obtain the spectral information. The results were corrected to construct the final map of the distribution of terraces in the Loess Plateau.Study areaThe Loess Plateau, one of China’s four major plateaus, is located in northern central China (34°–40° N and 103°–114° E) (Fig. 1). It is covered by a thick loess layer that ranges in thickness from 50 to 80 m, and is the world’s largest loess deposition area, covering 648,700 km2. The altitude of the Loess Plateau ranges from 800 to 3,000 m, its average annual temperature is 6–14 °C, and its average annual precipitation is 200–700 mm. Since ancient times, the Loess Plateau has been used for agriculture because of its fine grains, fluffy soil texture, and rich soluble mineral nutrients, all of which are conducive to crop cultivation. However, long-term unsustainable land use caused the degradation of the vegetation cover in the Loess Plateau. Moreover, the land is degrading due to considerable nutrient loss caused by long-term water erosion in conjunction with natural conditions, such as arid climate, loose soil, concentrated and heavy rainfall. The fragmented ground in the region has made it susceptible to soil erosion. It has also become the primary source of Yellow River sediment as a result of the massive flow of eroded sediment into the Yellow River, posing a serious threat to the economic and social development of the lower Yellow River basin.Terracing is one of the main measures used to enhance crop yield and conserve soil and water in the region. Since the 1980s, the Chinese government has implemented many large-scale slope-to-terrace projects in the Loess Plateau. Especially in recent years, the outline of the comprehensive management plan for the Loess Plateau area (2010–2030) has been promulgated with a planned area of 2.608 million hectares for slope to terrace conversion, making it the core area of slope to terrace conversion projects in the country.Data preparationAlthough high-resolution satellite images can be an important data source for the spatial distribution of terraces on the Loess Plateau, they are not ideal for terraces classification. On the one hand, a higher resolution image requires more storage space. On the other hand, it reduces the efficiency, prolongs the interpretation time, and increases the noise in the image, affecting the interpretation accuracy. Most of the terraces on the Loess Plateau are wider than 7 m (Fig. 1b–d). These are wide terraces in comparison with the narrow terraces of southern China (Fig. 1f), which are less than 2 m wide. Furthermore, it is also easy to mistake the fish-scale pits constructed for soil and water conservation for terraces because of their similarity in form. However, as the width of their field surface is less than 1.5 m, remote sensing images with a 2 m resolution can effectively prevent the false extraction of such features. Based on the actual situation of this study area, we chose a high-resolution image with a spatial resolution of 1.89 m from Google Maps 16 level as the data source. The colour, texture, and morphological features of terraces in the images show seasonal variations. In autumn and winter, the weather is dry, and the vegetation is less shaded in the Loess Plateau. During this time, even the edge features become more visible and easier to identify. As a result, we selected images from October 2018 to February 2019 whenever possible (Fig. 1c,d).Deep learning network selectionLand classification is the extraction of land types from remote sensing images using image segmentation techniques. As the key technology of image segmentation, the Fully Convolutional Network (FCN) classifies images at the pixel level. FCN follows the network structure pattern of encoding and decoding, which adopts AlexNet as the encoder of the network and then employs transposed convolution to up-sample the feature map output from the final convolutional layer of the encoder to the resolution of the input image to achieve pixel-level image segmentation. However, due to the large error in image pixel boundary localization, Ronneberger et al.29 improved the FCN structure in 2015 by expanding the capacity of the network decoder by adding a contracting path to the encoding and decoding modules to achieve more accurate pixel boundary localisation29. The U-Net network is commonly used in medical image processing because it requires a small number of training samples and is effective in classifying objects with a fixed structure and limited semantic information. This network is comparable to natural image semantic segmentation such as Deeplab v3+, which has a smaller number of model parameters and the same effect.Since the texture and morphological features of terraces and human organs have certain similarities, they are primarily manifested by simple semantic information contained within the terrace images themselves. Thus, high-level semantic information and low-level features of such images become more important. However, high-resolution images are more complicated and variable than medical image patterns, and errors in terrace extraction edge identification using the U-Net network, such as boundary segmentation of terraces and flatlands, still occur. To fully utilize the semantic information of the network, we adopted a nested U-Net architecture, namely the UNet++ network proposed by Zhou et al.28. The network integrates long-connected and short-connected architectures to capture features at different levels by adding a shallower U-Net structure and integrates them via feature superposition to make the scale difference of feature maps smaller when fused to enhance the correct rate of image segmentation edges. However, because the U-Net++ network increases the number of model parameters, this study adopted the sparse matrix approach to accelerate model training and decrease the number of parameters.Data pre-processingData pre-processing is a prerequisite for UNet++ network training, that is, valid input according to the standard format annotation before training can be performed. Since the UNet++ network proposed by Zhou et al.28. is primarily used for medical images, which have characteristics such as fixed image structure, no spatial information, and less pattern variation, labelling medical images is comparatively easier using this method. In contrast, high-resolution remote sensing images have a large number of rasters, many pattern changes, irregular image structure, and spatial information. Therefore, determining how to better annotate high-resolution remote sensing images and reduce the annotation workload becomes critical. First, we vectorized the training sample area and generated the terrace vector dataset using ArcGIS with a high-resolution remote sensing image as the primitive map. Second, we converted the terrace vector dataset into raster data. The information of the raster had to be identical to that of the primitive map, including the size of the raster, its processing range, and its coordinate system. The output was converted to TIFF format to complete the image annotation. Since the raster size input to UNet++ network training is a fixed size, it is much smaller than the original image. To simplify the process of inputting the original image and its annotation information, we added an image import module to DLTEM, which was a sliding window of 400*400, and read the image automatically by setting the corresponding judgement conditions. Finally, the entire high-resolution image was processed automatically into the model in accordance with the established rules for training.The goal of the data enhancement was to improve the universality and robustness of the UNet++ network training results. As mentioned above, the high-resolution images taken simultaneously often included clouds or other anomalies in some areas, as the images were stitched together using multiple sources of data fusion. This can easily form evident stitching traces (Fig. 1c,d) due to the different shooting times and image quality of various data sources, i.e., brightness, saturation, and colour contrast of the images. Thus, the model trained on the original image data has strong limitations, and in many scenes, there are notable matrix-type misclassification regions due to image differences, making extraction work challenging. Therefore, in this study, we first adjusted the brightness, grayscale, and contrast of the training data after input to enhance its colour feature recognition ability. We then altered the scaling of the image, and rotated and transformed the training image from 0° to 360° to enhance morphological feature recognition and the accuracy of the training network in terrace extraction.Parameter settingThe network parameter setting is the most critical hyperparameter for UNet++ network training. They are mainly divided into input image size, batch size, learning rate, number of iterations, objective function, gradient descent strategy, momentum, decay rate, and activation function. Among them, we set the image size to 400*400 pixels based on the actual situation of the terraced area, where the UNet++ network has four scaling times, and the image size must be a multiple of 16. The batch size primarily affects the convergence of the model. If the batch limit is set to one, the model is easily affected by the random perturbation phenomenon and cannot converge to find the optimal solution. Since the batch size is determined by the size of the video memory, the value of the batch is limited by equipment constraints. The model in this study used a 2080Ti video card with 11 GB of video memory, and the batch was set to 8. The learning rate, gradient descent strategy, and objective function play a role in whether the network can find the best classification model better and faster. The learning rate was set to 0.001 for the first 500 generations, with the goal of achieving fast convergence to the target region. The learning rate was then set to 0.0001 for 500–1,000 generations, and the model was fine-tuned by choosing a smaller learning rate to find the model with the highest classification accuracy. Adam was chosen for the gradient descent strategy. The momentum and adaptive learning rate were used to increase the convergence rate. The cross-entropy classification loss function was chosen as the objective function to improve the differentiation between terraced and non-terraced areas. Momentum, decay rate, and activation function were all adopted from the previous default settings of the UNet++ network.Data correctionIn this study, we primarily used high-resolution images from Google Earth as the data source to extract the distribution of terraces on the Loess Plateau. Because this image source only contains a large amount of texture structure information and no vegetation information, it is easy to misjudge and misclassify features with the same morphological structure and edge features, such as permanent snow and ice, water bodies, bare land, and artificial surfaces. Vegetation information was generally processed based on waveband data from multispectral/hyperspectral images. It requires topographic correction, atmospheric correction, radiometric calibration, de-clouding, and other operational processes, which are extremely sophisticated30.GlobeLand30 is a 30 m spatial resolution global surface coverage dataset developed by the National Geomatics Center of China. The most recent GlobeLand30 dataset (v2020) has been updated with data sources from 2017 to the present. Its extensive data sources enable effective reduction of the impacts of cloud cover, with an overall accuracy of 85.72%. The classification accuracy of permanent snow and ice, water bodies, bare land, and artificial surfaces of this dataset is as high as 75.79%, 84.70%, 81.76%, and 86.70%, respectively. Since the update time of v2020 data is similar to that of high-resolution images, it can be used as correction data for vegetation information31.Since the training image data are two-dimensional planar data with no elevation or slope information (Fig. 1g), certain flat fields with visible field bumps are easily misclassified as terraces. The Space Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM v4.1) DEM has a spatial resolution of 30 m and ranges from 60° N to 56° S, completely covering the Loess Plateau32,33. In this study, these data were treated as terrain correction data. The amendment standard corrects the areas that have been extracted as terraces below 2° to non-terraced areas according to the requirements of the Ministry of Natural Resources of China.The spatial resolution of our extracted terraces is 1.89 m, whereas the spatial resolution of GlobeLand30 and DEM as correction data sources is 30 m, which is difficult to meet the requirements of data processing. Hence, we up-sample the two correction data sources, and then used multi-source data fusion. First, we extracted and up-sampled the terraced areas of glaciers, rivers, and deserts from GlobeLand30 to a spatial resolution of 1.89 m. Secondly, we up-sampled the DEM to 1.89 m using spatial interpolation for its raster centre as the true value of the region and performed a slope calculation for the up-sampled DEM. Further, the spatial distribution maps of glaciers, rivers, deserts, and slope maps of the Loess Plateau with the same resolution as the spatial distribution maps of terraces were available. Finally, we superimposed these images, used the terrace range in the TDMLP as a mask, and assessed the pixels in the mask area one by one. If a pixel belonged to permanent snow and ice, a water body, bare land, or an artificial surface, or had a slope less than 2°, it was modified to the background value. Otherwise, the original value was retained.We made artificial corrections to the data based on the extracted results for the arid areas of the Loess Plateau as well as for the flatter basins, given that these areas do not feature terraces.Training and validation dataFor supervised classification, the selection of sample areas and sample features is crucial. The focus and core of any land classification work is representative and effective training sample selection. To obtain a better sample area selection, we considered the selection of sample areas from three perspectives, i.e., colour texture features, topographic features, and spatial distance of the training samples. First, the terraces in this study are in agricultural land, including cultivated land, woodland, grassland, and other types of land; thus, different types of land will present different texture details. At the same time, high-resolution images from Google Earth are mosaicked. Because of the different acquisition times, the same region and land type will have visible colour differences and stitching traces, which is more common in the Loess Plateau region. Therefore, these factors should be considered in the selection of training samples as much as possible to improve the generability of the model and the correct rate of its extraction. Second, the state of the terraces varies according to topographic features. Among them, gradient, direction, altitude, and climate are the most significant factors. Terraces can be categorised as shallow-slope or steep-slope terraces. Based on slope aspect, altitude, and climate characteristics, they can also be categorised as either easy to identify or hard to identify. Thus, the sample should be inclusive of these types of terraces. According to the first law of geography, terraces in different spatial locations have different morphologies. Therefore, the spatial location of the samples should also be at a certain distance.In summary, we selected one county in each region based on the geomorphic zoning characteristics of the Loess Plateau. In addition, we added one more in the area where the density of terraces may be higher. Finally, we selected the whole area of seven counties (Fig. 3) as the training sample area distribution, covering 2.18% of the overall Loess Plateau area. The colour morphological features, topographic features, spatial location, and imaging quality of terrace images in these regions are highly representative. This method was unique from other classification methods. Most of the traditional methods are based on the single-pixel information of feature layers such as random forests, which tend to ignore the neighbouring information around the point, and thus are subject to misclassification and under classification for land types with outstanding texture information. In our study, we adopted the visual interpretation of the whole domain, which can cover the neighbourhood information of each pixel point more comprehensively. To ensure the uniformity and correctness of visual interpretation, the terraces in the training area were visually interpreted by seven interpreters after uniform professional training. For the disputed and uncertain areas, the seven interpreters carried out interactive interpretation and scoring according to the interpretation results. Finally, two other interpretation experts made the final review and corrections. The interpretation results of the training area were re-examined and revised based on the results of the later interpretations.Fig. 3Distribution of training sample areas and validation sites in terraces on the Loess Plateau.Full size imageTo better assess and compare the validity and correctness of the terraced agricultural area datasets on the Loess Plateau in quantitatively, the validation dataset was divided into two parts: a per-pixel point-based validation set and a field validation dataset of terraces with location information. The extracted datasets were comprehensively evaluated in terms of both pixel scale and field validation.We constructed a single-pixel validation point that evaluates the TDMLP. We applied the Icosahedral Snyder Equal Area Discrete Global Grid created by ArcGIS. Based on this strategy, the study area was partitioned into 972 regions (Fig. 3). To better validate the terrace classification results (excluding non-terrace classes), we placed more validation points within the grid where the terrace distribution is more concentrated. First, we calculated the proportion of terraces in each hexagonal grid to the total area of the hexagonal grid. Second, we separated the terraces into four levels according to the proportion of terraces to the whole grid area as 0–20%, 20–50%, 50–80%, and 80–100% and the number of validation points was 10, 20, 40, and 50, respectively.Since the proportion of the extracted terraced area to the total area was only 14%, direct random point deployment would have led to fewer terraced validation sets and thus would have affected the final data evaluation. Therefore, in the deployment strategy, we ensured that the validation points distributed in the extracted terraces in each grid account for at least one-fifth of the total number of validation points, but for the grid with a smaller proportion of terraces or even 0, this practice was meaningless. Hence, we stipulated that in the grid with a proportion of terraces ≤1%, direct random scattering was to be performed. The final scattered verification points in the terraced and non-terraced areas were 5,194 and 6,226, respectively, with a ratio close to 1:1 for easy verification. The spatial distribution is shown in Fig. 3.We validated the spatial distribution map of terraces on the Loess Plateau from 14 April 2021 to 1 May 2021 and constructed a field validation dataset of terraces with location information. Considering the longitudinal, latitudinal, and vertical heterogeneities of the Loess Plateau, the verification route was divided into two sections, north to south and east to west, to more comprehensively cover all regions of the Loess Plateau. The verification route started at Hohhot in the northeast of the Loess Plateau. It passed through the Datong Basin, followed the Yellow River to the south and the Weihe Plain, and then travelled westward through Mount Liupan to the westernmost part of the Loess Plateau. The route was through 54 counties/districts in 16 cities and six provinces on the Loess Plateau, with a total distance of 3,680 km, covering 15.8% of the counties on the Loess Plateau (total of 341 counties). We also surveyed and sampled the verification points approximately every 5 km along the route and collected data from a total of 815 sample points, covering various types of terraces on the Loess Plateau. The results are shown in Fig. 3. More

A hippo swims in Colombia’s Magdalena River, near where Pablo Escobar’s compound was located.Credit: Fernando Vergara/AP/Shutterstock

Colombian environment minister Susana Muhamad has triggered fear among researchers that she will protect, rather than reduce, a growing population of invasive hippos that threaten the country’s natural ecosystems and biodiversity. Although she did not directly mention the hippos — a contentious issue in Colombia — Muhamad said during a speech in late January that her ministry would create policies that prioritize animal well-being, including the creation of a new division of animal protection.
Landmark Colombian bird study repeated to right colonial-era wrongs
The hippos escaped from drug-cartel leader Pablo Escobar’s estate after he died in 1993. Left alone, the male and three females that Escobar had illegally imported from a US zoo established themselves in Colombia’s Magdalena River and some small lakes nearby — part of the country’s main watershed. After years of breeding, the ‘cocaine hippos’ have multiplied to about 150 individuals, scientists estimate.Given that the hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius) — considered the largest invasive animal in the world — have no natural predators in Colombia and have been mating at a steady rate, their population could reach 1,500 in 16 years, according to a modelling study published in 20211. “I do not understand what the government is waiting for to act,” says Nataly Castelblanco Martínez, a Colombian conservation biologist at the Autonomous University of Quintana Roo in Chetumal, Mexico, and co-author of the study. “If we don’t do anything, 20 years from now the problem will have no solution.”Researchers have called for a strict management plan that would eventually reduce the wild population to zero, through a combination of culling some animals and capturing others, then relocating them to facilities such as zoos. But the subject of what to do with the hippos has polarized the country, with some enamoured by the animals’ charisma and value as a tourist attraction and others concerned about the threat they pose to the environment and local fishing communities.‘A bit surreal’Several studies and observations suggest how destructive it could be to allow the Colombian hippo population to explode. A 2019 paper2, for example, showed that, compared with lakes without hippos, those where the animals have taken up residence contain more nutrients and organic matter that favour the growth of cyanobacteria — aquatic microbes associated with toxic algal blooms. These blooms can reduce water quality and cause mass fish deaths, affecting local fishing communities.

A sign near Doradal, Colombia, warns passersby of the danger of invasive hippos.Credit: Juancho Torres/Anadolu Agency via Getty

Other scientists have predicted that the hippos could displace endangered species that are native to the Magdalena River, such as the Antillean manatee (Trichechus manatus manatus), by outcompeting them for food and space. They caution that traffic accidents and attacks on people caused by the hippos will become more common. And they warn that wildlife traffickers are already taking advantage of the situation by illegally selling baby hippos — a trend that could intensify.“It’s a bit surreal,” says Jorge Moreno Bernal, a vertebrate palaeontologist at the University of the North in Barranquilla, Colombia. “This is just a taste of what may come.”When Colombian authorities first recognized the speed at which the hippo population was growing, during the 2000s, they acted to reduce their numbers. But in 2009, when photos appeared online after soldiers gunned down Pepe, Escobar’s fugitive male hippo, the outcry from animal-rights activists and others plunged the environment ministry into an “institutional paralysis”, says Sebastián Restrepo Calle, an ecologist at Javeriana University in Bogotá.Researchers say that the hippos don’t belong in Colombia — they are native to sub-Saharan Africa. Simulations run by Castelblanco Martínez and her colleagues suggest that to reduce the population to zero by 2033, about 30 hippos would need to be removed from the wild population per year1. No other course of action, including sterilization or castration, would eradicate them, according to the modelling of various management scenarios, says Castelblanco Martínez.The cost of inactionThe worry now is that, instead of basing decisions on evidence and expertise in conservation, the government is listening to popular opinion, says Restrepo Calle. Neither Muhamad nor representatives of the environment ministry replied to Nature’s requests for comment.
Ancient stone tools suggest early humans dined on hippo
“Why prioritize one species over our own ecosystems?” — especially a species that isn’t native, asks Alejandra Echeverri, a Colombian conservation scientist at Stanford University in California. Along with her colleagues, Echeverri published a study last month showing that Colombia has few policies governing invasive species compared with its overall number of biodiversity policies3.Animals-rights advocates, meanwhile, argue that they aren’t ignoring environmental concerns. Luis Domingo Gómez Maldonado, an animal-rights activist and specialist in animal law at Saint Thomas University in Bogotá, says “It’s not about saving the hippos on a whim,” but rather about solving the issue while also giving the hippos justice. “My indisputable position is: let’s save as many individuals as possible, let’s do it ethically.”Researchers, too, say they have the animals’ best interests at heart. “Even if [advocates] don’t see it, we care about the hippos,” Castelblanco Martínez says. “The more time that passes, the more hippos will either have to be culled, castrated or captured.”The question is whether environmental authorities will act swiftly to draft and enforce a management plan that is both ethical and effective. Should they sit on the issue for too long, Castelblanco Martínez warns, rural communities that are most affected by the hippos might take matters into their own hands.If the government doesn’t cull them, she says, people will use shotguns to do it. More

Test organisms and exposuresIn this study, we used test organisms and reagents according to the Acute Toxicity Test Method of Daphnia magna Straus(Cladocera, Crustacea); ES 04704.1b29. Daphnia magna were fostered at the National Institute of Environmental Research and were adopted. During the test, adult female Daphnia magna over two weeks of age, cultured over several generations, were transferred to a freshly prepared container the day before the test. Daphnia magna are neonates for less than 24 h after birth29. To maintain the sensitivity of the organism, young individuals less than 24 h old that reproduced the following day were used. Individuals of a similar size were selected for the test. Daphnia magna was fed YCT, which is a mixture of green algae in Chlorella sp., yeast, Cerophy II(R), and trout chow. Sufficient amounts of prey were supplied 2 h before the test to minimize the effects of prey during the test. The test medium was prepared by dissolving KCl (8 mg/L), (text {MgSO}_4) (120 mg/L), (text {CaSO}_4 cdot 2 text {H}_2 text {O} ) (120 mg/L), and (text {NaHCO}_3) (192 mg/L) in deionized water.Automatic high-throughput Daphnia magna tracking systemTo build an automatic high-throughput Daphnia magna tracking system, we equipped the system with a video analysis algorithm as well as flow cells (Fig. 1). In the tracking system, six flow cells filled with culture medium were installed in the device. Each flow cell contained 10 Daphnia magna. Subsequently, to automatically measure the state of Daphnia magna, the six flow cells were photographed at 15 frames per second using a camera (Industrial Development Systems imaging) equipped with a CMOSIS sensor capable of infrared imaging. A red light close to the infrared spectrum was placed at the back of the flow cells for uniform illumination and to minimize stress on Daphnia magna. To capture the size and movement of the Daphnia magna as accurately as possible, the camera was set to a frame rate of 15 fps and a resolution of 2048 (times ) 1088 (2.23 MB), using a 12 mm lens. The distance between the flow cell and the camera was set to 16 cm. To measure the number of mobile Daphnia magna, their lethality, and swimming inhibition automatically and simultaneously, one camera for every two cells was used to collect the status data of Daphnia magna. For assessing ecotoxicity, the video analysis system used images obtained from the six flow cells to track each Daphnia magna and estimate key statistics such as the number of mobile individuals, average distance, and radius of activity.Figure 1New automatic high-throughput video tracking system for behavioral analysis using Daphnia magna as a model organismFull size imageThe automatic high-throughput video tracking system in the ecotoxicity measuring device was designed to continuously measure the ecotoxicity of Daphnia magna (Fig. 2). Daphnia magna moves faster at high temperatures and is less active at low temperatures. Thus, a constant temperature module that can be set to an appropriate Daphnia magna habitat temperature (20 ± 2 (^{circ })C) was added to create a suitable culture environment for Daphnia magna29. Natural pseudo-light ((lambda >590) nm, 3000 k) was installed on the upper part of the detector for proper habitat light intensity (500 Lux–1000 Lux). The size of the flow cell was set as small as possible while observing the movement of the Daphnia magna. An automatic feeding system was installed so that food could be injected during the replacement cycle. The six independent multi-flow cells were designed with an automatic dilution injection module; therefore, these flow cells were diluted to six different concentrations (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, and 0%).Figure 2Schematic representation of the automatic high-throughput video tracking systemFull size imageAutomatic tracking algorithmThe CPU used for Daphnia magna tracking was Intel i5-9300H @ 2.40 GHz, with 8 GB of memory and Windows 10 Pro 64-bit operating system. In this experiment, the algorithms were trained using 12 Daphnia magna videos and tested using an additional four Daphnia magna videos. Subsequently, the detection and tracking methods were compared. The videos, each of which had a duration of 30 s, were captured at a rate of 15 frames per second. Generally, for long-time or real-time videos, the following factors must be considered in tracking Daphnia magna: automatic binarization between the object and background, effective classification of Daphnia magna or noise, and the speed of the algorithm. Therefore, to develop an efficient tracking algorithm, we propose the following tracking process (Fig. 3A). In this process, each frame is initially converted into an image and the background is identified from the obtained video (Fig. 3B). The background is the average of the frames over the previous 20 s, and the tracking system takes 20 s to capture the first background image. The background is subtracted from the image for object detection (Fig. 3C). The objects include Daphnia magna and noise such as droplets and sediment. The difference between the background and frame images is binarized, and each area of the binarized values is regarded as an object. Conventionally, the binarized values are manually generated using specific thresholds. In this study, the images are automatically binarized using k-means clustering to select the threshold value. After binarization, several machine learning methods are used to classify the objects as Daphnia magna or noise (Fig. 3D). For a faster tracking algorithm, we use simple machine learning methods such as random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM). The predicted Daphnia magna are tracked using SORT24, which is a fast and highly accurate tracking algorithm (Fig. 3E). Finally, based on the tracked results, statistics for assessing ecotoxicity, such as the number of mobile individuals, average distance, and radius of activity, are estimated to evaluate the toxicity of the aquatic environment.Figure 3Automatic Daphnia magna tracking algorithm process. (A) Overview of automatic tracking algorithm process. (B) Image extraction step. (C) Background subtraction step. (D) Daphnia magna detection step. (E) Daphnia magna tracking step.Full size imagek-means clustering for automatic background subtractionMany tracking algorithms assume that the background is fixed. With fixed backgrounds, the difference between the frame and background can be used to identify objects. However, automatically selecting the precise threshold value for image pixel binarization becomes one of the key problems in identifying objects. The proposed method applies k-means clustering to the pixel values of the subtracted image30, and the center value of each calculated cluster mean is selected as the threshold value (Fig. 4). In the k-means clustering method, grouping is repeatedly performed using the distance between data points31. For binarization, two groups are formed. Let (mu _1 (t)) be the mean of pixels less than the threshold and (mu _2(t)) be the mean of pixels greater than the threshold. At first, (mu _1(t), mu _2(t)) are randomly initialized. Subsequently, each pixel is grouped into a closer mean of each group. The above steps are repeated several times until the group experiences a few changes. Finally, the threshold is calculated as an average of the two means.Figure 4Example of automatic threshold value setting for binarization between objects and background using k-means clusteringFull size imageClassification methodsObject detection based solely on the subtraction between the background and frame images may have low accuracy. As the background in the proposed process is the average value of the frame images, noise may occur. Although this noise is removed by threshold selection in binarization, using only the threshold selection is not efficient for long or real-time videos. Therefore, additional noise must be classified and removed using machine learning models, requiring the construction of a database. In the database, the obtained objects are manually labeled as noise or Daphnia magna and are called ground truth. For classification, the resized 8 (times ) 8 image of each object is stored in the database. The resized image is transformed into a feature using the Sobel edge detection algorithm32 and entered as inputs to the classification models. In this study, classification models such as RF33 SVM34 were used.RF is a model that integrates several decision tree models35. All training data are sampled with a replacement for training each decision tree model. The decision tree model is trained to split intervals of each independent variable by minimizing the gini index (Eq. 1) or entropy index (Eq. 2). The gini index and entropy index denote the impurity within the intervals.$$begin{aligned} G= & {} 1- sum _{i=1}^{c} p_i ^2 end{aligned}$$
(1)
$$begin{aligned} E= & {} – sum _{i=1}^{c} p_i log_2 p_i end{aligned}$$
(2)
where (p_i) is a probability within i-th interval, and c is the number of intervals. For better performance, the RF selects independent variables of training data randomly. This step serves to reduce the correlation of each model. If predictions of each decision tree are uncorrelated, then the variance of an integrated prediction of models is smaller than the variance of each model. RF integrates several model predictions using the voting method. An advantage of the RF method is that it avoids overfitting because the model uses the average of many predictions.SVM is a model designed to search for a hyperplane to maximize the distance, or margin, between support vectors. The hyperplane refers to the plane that divides two different groups, and the support vector represents the closest vector to the hyperplane. Let (D=({textbf{x}}_i, y_i), i=1, ldots , n, {textbf{x}}_i in {mathbb {R}}^p, y_n in { -1,1 }) be training data. Suppose that the training data are completely separated linearly by a hyperplane; then, the hyperplane is expressed as Eq. 3.$$begin{aligned} {textbf{w}}^T {textbf{x}} + b = 0, end{aligned}$$
(3)
where ({textbf{w}}) is a weight vector of the hyperplane, and b is a bias. The weight vector is updated by minimizing Eq. 4.$$begin{aligned} L = {1 over 2} {textbf{w}}^T {textbf{w}} text { subject to } y_i ({textbf{w}}^T {textbf{x}} + b) ge 1 end{aligned}$$
(4)
We can transform Eqs. 4 to  5 by using the Lagrange multiplier method.$$begin{aligned} L^* = {1 over 2} {textbf{w}}^T {textbf{w}} – sum _{i=1}^n a_i { y_i ({textbf{w}}^T x_i + {-}) – 1 }, end{aligned}$$
(5)
where (a_i) is the Lagrange multiplier. We can efficiently solve Eq. 5 using a dual form. Furthermore, Eq. 5 can be solved in a case where it is not completely separated using a slack variable and a kernel trick can be used to estimate the nonlinear hyperplane.SORT trackerSORT, one of the frameworks for solving the multiple object tracking (MOT) problem, aims to achieve efficient real-time tracking24. The SORT method framework is created by combining the estimation step and the association step. The estimation step forecasts the next position of each predicted Daphnia magna. The association step matches the forecasting position and next true position of each predicted Daphnia magna. In the estimation step, the SORT framework uses the Kalman filter to forecast the position of the predicted Daphnia magna in the next frame. The position of each predicted Daphnia magna is expressed as Eq. 6.$$begin{aligned} {textbf{x}} = [u,v,s,r,{dot{u}}, {dot{v}}, {dot{s}}]^T end{aligned}$$
(6)
where u and v are the center positions of each predicted Daphnia magna, s is the scale size of the bounding box, and r is the aspect ratio of the bounding box. ({dot{u}}), ({dot{v}}), and ({dot{s}}) are the amounts of change in each variable. In the association step, to associate the forecasting position and true position, the framework adopts the intersection-over-union (IOU)36 as the association metric. The Hungarian algorithm is loaded into the SORT framework to perform fast and efficient Daphnia magna association prediction. In this study, a mixed metric of IOU36 and Euclidean distance37 was used instead of only the IOU that is used in SORT (Eq. 7) for more efficient association.$$begin{aligned} C_{ij} = (1-lambda ) {max_d – d_{ij} over max_d} + lambda cdot IOU_{ij} end{aligned}$$
(7)
where (d_{ij}) is the Euclidean distance between the i-th predicted Daphnia magna in the before frame and the j-th predicted Daphnia magna in the next frame, and (lambda ) is the weight of (IOU_{ij}). (IOU_{ij}) is the IOU between the i-th predicted Daphnia magna in the before-frame and the j-th predicted Daphnia magna in the next frame.MetricsThe binary confusion matrix consists of true positive (TP), true negative (TN), false positive (FP), and false negative (FN)38. TP is the number of cases where the predicted Daphnia magna matches the actual Daphnia magna, TN is the number of cases where the objects predicted as noise are actual noise, FP is the number of cases where the predicted Daphnia magna differs from the actual Daphnia magna, and FN is the number of cases where the objects predicted as noise are not actual noise. In this study, accuracy, recall, precision, and F1 scores (Eq. 8) were used as the metrics for comparing the machine learning methods.$$begin{aligned} begin{aligned} Accuracy&= {TP + FP over TP + TN + FP + FN} \ Recall&= {TP over TP + TN} \ Precision&= {TP over TP + FP} \ F1 score&= 2 times {Precision times Recall over Precision + Recall} end{aligned} end{aligned}$$
(8)
Standard MOT metrics to evaluate tracking performance include multi-object tracking accuracy (MOTA) and multi-object tracking precision (MOTP). An important task of MOT is to identify and track the same object across two frames. Identification (ID) precision (IDP), ID recall (IDR), ID F1 measure (IDF1), and ID switches (IDs) may be used as measures for evaluating the identification and tracking of the same objects39,40.Data analysisThe toxicity test using Daphnia magna was performed following the Korean official Acute Toxicity Test Method29. The test medium was prepared by dissolving KCl (8 mg/L), (text {MgSO}_4) (120 mg/L), (text {CaSO}_4 cdot 2 text {H}_2 text {O} ) (120 mg/L), and (text {NaHCO}_3) (192 mg/L) in deionized water. Considering that Daphnia magna are neonates for less than 24 h after birth29, five neonates were exposed to 50 mL of different concentrations of heavy metals such as Potassium dichromate, Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate, and Lead(II) sulfate (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100%) and 50 mL of culture media. Potassium dichromate is a common inorganic reagent used as an oxidizing agent in chemical industries. Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate is a trace material widely used in industrial processes and agriculture. A significant amount of copper is emitted in semiconductor manufacturing processes, which adversely impacts the aquatic ecosystem. When present as an ion in water, copper can be acutely toxic to aquatic organisms such as Daphnia magna. Lead(II) sulfate is another nonessential and nonbiodegradable heavy metal. It is highly toxic to numerous organisms even at low concentrations and can accumulate in aquatic ecosystems41. Twenty Daphnia magna (four replicates of five each) were exposed to each test solution for 24 h. The term “immobility” means that the Daphnia magna remains stationary after exposure to chemicals such as Potassium dichromate, Copper(II) sulfate pentahydrate, and Lead(II) sulfate. In this study, immobility was used as an endpoint identifier, and the number of mobile Daphnia magna were counted to evaluate the EC50 values for the samples using the ToxCalc 5.0 program (Tidepoll Software, USA).The locomotory responses of Daphnia magna were tested after 0, 12, 18, and 24 h of exposure at different concentrations. Potassium dichromate ((text {K}_2text {Cr}_2text {O}_7)) at 2 mg/L was connected to the Daphnia magna tracking system, and standard toxic substances were automatically diluted to 100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, and 6.25%. The automatic high-throughput Daphnia magna tracking system automatically measured the tracking results of a 1-minute-long video at hourly intervals. The average moving distance for 20 s of each Daphnia magna in each chamber was analyzed using a repeated measures ANOVA (RMANOVA). RMANOVA was used for the analysis of data obtained by repeatedly measuring the same Daphnia magna42. It analyzes the concentration effect excluding the time effect at each hour. The time effect means the change in average distance per 20 s. RMANOVA was implemented using the agricolae package of the R 4.0.4 program43. To remove the noise affecting RMANOVA, the Daphnia magna that remained stationary for 20 s or more were removed from the observations. In this study, we used the significance level at 5%. More

Réale, D. et al. Personality and the emergence of the pace-of-life syndrome concept at the population level. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 365, 4051–4063 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gosling, S. D. From mice to men: What can we learn about personality from animal research?. Psychol. Bull. 127, 45 (2001).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Dingemanse, N. J., Class, B. & Holtmann, B. Nonrandom mating for behavior in the wild?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 36, 177–179 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Croft, D. P. et al. Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: Patterns and implications. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 1495–1503 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Morton, F. B., Weiss, A., Buchanan-Smith, H. M. & Lee, P. C. Capuchin monkeys with similar personalities have higher-quality relationships independent of age, sex, kinship and rank. Anim. Behav. 105, 163–171 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Su, X. et al. Agonistic behaviour and energy metabolism of bold and shy swimming crabs Portunus trituberculatus. J. Exp. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.188706 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jolles, J. W., King, A. J. & Killen, S. S. The role of individual heterogeneity in collective animal behaviour. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 278–291 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J. & Laskowski, K. L. The repeatability of behaviour: A meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 77, 771–783 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Frost, A. J., Winrow-Giffen, A., Ashley, P. J. & Sneddon, L. U. Plasticity in animal personality traits: Does prior experience alter the degree of boldness?. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 274, 333–339 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Krause, J., James, R. & Croft, D. P. Personality in the context of social networks. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 365, 4099 (2010).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
David, M., Auclair, Y. & Cézilly, F. Personality predicts social dominance in female zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, in a feeding context. Anim. Behav. 81, 219–224 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Favati, A., Leimar, O. & Løvlie, H. Personality predicts social dominance in male domestic fowl. PLoS ONE 9, e103535 (2014).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
McGhee, K. E. & Travis, J. Repeatable behavioural type and stable dominance rank in the Bluefin killifish. Anim. Behav. 79, 497–507 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Krause, J., Croft, D. P. & James, R. Social network theory in the behavioural sciences: Potential applications. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 15–27 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Flack, J. C., Girvan, M., de Waal, F. & Krakauer, D. C. Policing stabilizes construction of social niches in primates. Nature 439, 426–429 (2006).Article 
ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Croft, D. P., James, R. & Krause, J. Exploring Animal Social Networks (Princeton University Press, 2008).Book 

Google Scholar 
Patriquin, K. J., Leonard, M. L., Broders, H. G. & Garroway, C. J. Do social networks of female northern long-eared bats vary with reproductive period and age?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 899–913 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gomes, A. C. R., Beltrão, P., Boogert, N. J. & Cardoso, G. C. Familiarity, dominance, sex and season shape common waxbill social networks. Behav. Ecol. 33, 526–540 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Croft, D. P., Krause, J. & James, R. Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 271, S516–S519 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pike, T. W., Samanta, M., Lindström, J. & Royle, N. J. Behavioural phenotype affects social interactions in an animal network. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 275, 2515–2520 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Aplin, L. M. et al. Individual personalities predict social behaviour in wild networks of great tits (Parus major). Ecol. Lett. 16, 1365–1372 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Massen, J. J. & Koski, S. E. Chimps of a feather sit together: Chimpanzee friendships are based on homophily in personality. Evol. Hum. Behav. 35, 1–8 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rault, J.-L. Friends with benefits: Social support and its relevance for farm animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 136, 1–14 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schneider, G. & Krueger, K. Third-party interventions keep social partners from exchanging affiliative interactions with others. Anim. Behav. 83, 377–387 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fraser, O. N. & Bugnyar, T. Do ravens show consolation? Responses to distressed others. PLoS ONE 5, e10605 (2010).Article 
ADS 

Google Scholar 
Rose, P. & Croft, D. The potential of social network analysis as a tool for the management of zoo animals. Anim. Welf. 24, 123–138 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Clark, F. E. Space to choose: network analysis of social preferences in a captive chimpanzee community, and implications for management. Am. J. Primatol. 73, 748–757 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Corner, L., Pfeiffer, D. & Morris, R. Social-network analysis of Mycobacterium bovis transmission among captive brushtail possums (Trichosurus vulpecula). Prev. Vet. Med. 59, 147–167 (2003).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hansen, H., McDonald, D. B., Groves, P., Maier, J. A. & Ben-David, M. Social networks and the formation and maintenance of river otter groups. Ethology 115, 384–396 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Radosevich, L. M., Jaffe, K. E. & Minier, D. E. The utility of social network analysis for informing zoo management: Changing network dynamics of a group of captive hamadryas baboons (Papio hamadryas) following an introduction of two young males. Zoo Biol. 40, 503–516 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pacheco, X. P. & Madden, J. R. Does the social network structure of wild animal populations differ from that of animals in captivity?. Behav. Processes 190, 104446 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Watters, J. V. & Powell, D. M. Measuring animal personality for use in population management in zoos: Suggested methods and rationale. Zoo Biol. 31, 1–12 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Koski, S. E. Social personality traits in chimpanzees: temporal stability and structure of behaviourally assessed personality traits in three captive populations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 2161–2174 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Račevska, E. & Hill, C. M. Personality and social dynamics of zoo-housed western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). J. Zoo Aqua. Res. 5, 116–122 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Stoinski, T. S., Jaicks, H. F. & Drayton, L. A. Visitor effects on the behavior of captive western lowland gorillas: The importance of individual differences in examining welfare. Zoo Biol. 31, 586–599 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Wielebnowski, N. C. Behavioral differences as predictors of breeding status in captive cheetahs. Zoo Biol. 18, 335–349 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Barrett, L. P. et al. Personality assessment of headstart Texas horned lizards (Phrynosoma cornutum) in human care prior to release. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 254, 105690 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rose, P. E., Brereton, J. E. & Croft, D. P. Measuring welfare in captive flamingos: Activity patterns and exhibit usage in zoo-housed birds. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 205, 115–125 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rose, P. E. & Croft, D. P. Social bonds in a flock bird: Species differences and seasonality in social structure in captive flamingo flocks over a 12-month period. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 193, 87–97 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rose, P. E. & Croft, D. P. Quantifying the social structure of a large captive flock of greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus): Potential implications for management in captivity. Behav. Processes 150, 66–74 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rose, P. E., Croft, D. P. & Lee, R. A review of captive flamingo (Phoenicopteridae) welfare: A synthesis of current knowledge and future directions. Intern. Zoo Yearb. 48, 139–155 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rose, P. E. & Croft, D. P. Evaluating the social networks of four flocks of captive flamingos over a five-year period: Temporal, environmental, group and health influences on assortment. Behav. Processes 175, 104118 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Munson, A. A., Jones, C., Schraft, H. & Sih, A. You’re just my type: Mate choice and behavioral types. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 823–833 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Schuett, W., Tregenza, T. & Dall, S. R. Sexual selection and animal personality. Biol. Rev. 85, 217–246 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jackson, W. M. Why do winners keep winning?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28, 271–276 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dammhahn, M. & Almeling, L. Is risk taking during foraging a personality trait? A field test for cross-context consistency in boldness. Anim. Behav. 84, 1131–1139 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Van Oers, K., Drent, P. J., De Goede, P. & Van Noordwijk, A. J. Realized heritability and repeatability of risk-taking behaviour in relation to avian personalities. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 271, 65–73 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hinton, M. G. et al. Patterns of aggression among captive American flamingos (Phoenicopterus ruber). Zoo Biol. 32, 445–453 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Royer, E. A. & Anderson, M. J. Evidence of a dominance hierarchy in captive Caribbean flamingos and its relation to pair bonding and physiological measures of health. Behav. Processes 105, 60–70 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
Carere, C., Drent, P. J., Privitera, L., Koolhaas, J. M. & Groothuis, T. G. Personalities in great tits, Parus major: Stability and consistency. Anim. Behav. 70, 795–805 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Jouventin, P., Lequette, B. & Dobson, F. S. Age-related mate choice in the wandering albatross. Anim. Behav. 57, 1099–1106 (1999).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Black, J. M. Partnerships in Birds: The Study of Monogamy (Oxford University Press, USA, 1996).
Google Scholar 
Estevez, I., Andersen, I.-L. & Nævdal, E. Group size, density and social dynamics in farm animals. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 103, 185–204 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pickering, S. The comparative breeding biology of flamingos Phoenicopteridae at the Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust Centre, Slimbridge. Intern. Zoo Yearbook 31, 139–146 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitehead, H. Analyzing Animal Societies: Quantitative Methods for Vertebrate Social Analysis (University of Chicago Press, 2008).Book 

Google Scholar 
Wilson, A. D., Krause, S., Dingemanse, N. J. & Krause, J. Network position: A key component in the characterization of social personality types. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67, 163–173 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Renner, M. J. & Kelly, A. L. Behavioral decisions for managing social distance and aggression in captive polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci. 9, 233–239 (2006).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Stevens, E. F. & Pickett, C. Managing the social environments of flamingos for reproductive success. Zoo Biol. 13, 501–507 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
Franks, D. W., Ruxton, G. D. & James, R. Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 64, 493–503 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Haddadi, H. et al. Determining association networks in social animals: Choosing spatial–temporal criteria and sampling rates. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65, 1659–1668 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitehead, H. & Dufault, S. Techniques for analyzing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals. Adv. Stud. Behav. 28, 33–74 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
Borgatti, S.P., M., E., G., & C., F.L. UCINET for windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies: Harvard, MA (2002).Borgatti, S. P. NetDraw: graph visualization software (Analytic Technologies, 2002).
Google Scholar 
Bejder, L., Fletcher, D. & Bräger, S. A method for testing association patterns of social animals. Anim. Behav. 56, 719–725 (1998).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Farine, D. R. & Whitehead, H. Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 84, 1144–1163 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
Perdue, B. M., Gaalema, D. E., Martin, A. L., Dampier, S. M. & Maple, T. L. Factors affecting aggression in a captive flock of Chilean flamingos (Phoenicopterus chilensis). Zoo Biol. 30, 59–64 (2011).
Google Scholar 
IBMCorp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. IBM Corp: Armonk, NY (2012).Clarke, K.R. & Gorley, R.N. PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth. (2006).Kassambara, A. & Mundt, F. factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. (2020).RCoreTeam. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. (2021).Budaev, S. V. Using principal components and factor analysis in animal behaviour research: Caveats and guidelines. Ethology 116, 472–480 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitehead, H. SOCPROG programs: Analysing animal social structures. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 765–778 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Whitehead, H. SOCPROG: Programs for analyzing social structure: Whitehead Lab (2019).Hanneman, R.A. & Riddle, M., Chapter 18: Some Statistical Tools. In: Introduction to Social Network Methods. (University of California, Riverside 2005). http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/.(2005) More

Global biodiversity has been dramatically declining over the last decades1,2,3,4. The current biodiversity crisis is primarily driven by human-induced factors, the most serious of which are land-use change, habitat fragmentation, and climate change5. While global public awareness of climate change matters is high6,7, public recognition of biodiversity loss has, historically, been low8. The understanding of biodiversity concepts highly varies among countries and social groups9,10,11: in Nigeria, the biodiversity concept was known of 20.5% of non-professional Nigerians (with basic education or no formal training) while among 88.8% of professionals with tertiary education, it reached 88.8%; 60% of participants in a study in Switzerland had never heard the term biodiversity and Chinese farmers in another pilot study have never heard about biodiversity. In the European Union, the global leader of the environmental movement on both the political and discursive levels12,13, in 2018, 71% of EU citizens had heard of biodiversity, but only around 41% of these knew what biodiversity meant14. This illiteracy is a significant constraint for conservation strategies because the development and success of actions to halt and reverse biodiversity loss strongly rely on public support15.If general awareness of biodiversity loss is low, knowledge about plant diversity is even lower16. Plants have traditionally been overlooked, and expressions such as “plant blindness”, defined as a human tendency to ignore plant species17, perfectly illustrate the situation in terms of plant conservation. And yet, current estimates suggest that two out of five plant species are threatened with extinction18. Moreover, plants play a crucial role in the world ecosystems by providing habitat, shelter, oxygen, and food, including for humans19. Local community support boosts the effectiveness of biodiversity conservation actions20,21,22. However, how biodiversity is perceived and the benefits it provides to local populations have a significant influence on this support23. Therefore, stopping the loss of plant biodiversity and the impact it has on ecosystem health and human well-being must also strive to raise public awareness on the importance of plant conservation24.A big challenge, however, is to engage people with conservation. Nowadays, in a world where a large part of the human population lives in urban areas, the contact of people with nature is declining. This is a trend that will be even more accentuated in the future25. Perhaps society’s interest in plants is decreasing because of limited exposure to plants in daily lives, schools, and work. However, by critically examining our roles as plant scientists and educators, we realize that there are probably things we could, and should, do differently. New strategies to connect people to nature are required to spark people’s interest in and knowledge of plants. Citizen science programs and mobile applications (apps) are noteworthy initiatives that are helping to achieve this goal.Citizen science is defined as the general public involvement in scientific research activities and currently is a mainstream approach to collect information and data on a wide range of scientific subjects26,27. The development of mobile technologies and the widespread use of smartphones have boosted citizen science and enabled the development of mobile apps, which are digital tools that integrate, in real-time, data from multiple sources28.The goal of this article is to show how citizen science and mobile apps can be used as educational tools to raise awareness about plant biodiversity and conservation among the general public. We focused on formal education activities, at the Bachelor of Science (BSc) level, that were designed to collect data on various aspects of plant community and functional ecology. We also present the outcomes of two informal education initiatives that used citizen science to gather data on the distribution of plant diversity. We discuss these activities and results in light of their potential to engage the public into biodiversity conservation, and as educational and outreach tools.Formal education: UniversityDuring the COVID-19 pandemic (2021), Ecology practical classes of the Bologna Bachelor Degree in Biology (Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon) had to be adapted to remote learning. Fortunately, during the States of Emergency imposed by the Portuguese Government, citizens were allowed to take brief walks. Taking advantage of citizen’s ability to briefly travel outdoors, we created three activities for students, as alternatives to those typically carried out in the classroom/campus, which we describe below.Activity 1—Analysis of the impact of disturbance on plant diversity in grasslandsThe objective of this activity was for students to explore the impact of disturbance and site attributes (such as soil type) on the diversity of the herbaceous plant community and its associated pollinators. This was undertaken in grasslands located near their homes, within walking distance (due to COVID lockdown movement restrictions). To achieve this goal, we developed a comprehensive sampling protocol that included methods for (i) selecting and characterizing sampling sites based on the level of human perturbation, (ii) soil characterization, (iii) sampling, identifying, and registering plants using the iNaturalist/Biodiversity4All platform and Flora-on web (Box 1), and (iv) pollinator sampling (Supplementary Data 1). To ensure accurate plant and pollinators identification, all observations were verified by professors responsible for each topic.First, each student chose one sampling site and teachers, using photographs, classified all sites regarding their perturbation level (low, medium, and high). Then, using the sampling protocol, students were invited to study different aspects of their sampling site, in loco or at their homes. Soil samples were analysed using simple methods and available household instruments (such as plastic cups, kitchen scale, and oven). Students were introduced to soil biodiversity as well as soil parameters (humidity, texture, structure, infiltration and draining) during the remote classes. Plants were sampled using a home-made 1 m2 quadrat. All species within were counted and identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible, using the mentioned apps and website. Before plant sampling, students were also asked to count and identify pollinators within their quadrats (broad taxonomic groups, bees, butterflies, flies, beetles) for 5 min, again using the apps to aid identification.Following field sampling, students were asked to calculate two taxonomic indices of plant communities. These included species richness, which measures the number of different species that occur in a sample, and the Simpson Diversity Index, which evaluates the probability that two individuals randomly selected from a sample will belong to the same species. Students also calculated functional diversity indices such as Functional Richness and Functional Dissimilarity, since functional diversity explores functional differences between species and how these differences reflect and affect the interactions with the environment and with other species29. Then, students assessed the relation between these indices and perturbation level. They analysed several functional traits of plants that are likely to respond to local perturbation (e.g., height, leaf size). Finally, they attempted to relate plant indices with the occurrence of pollinators.Overall, students sampled 147 grasslands that were affected by low (n = 17); medium (n = 86) and high (n = 40) levels of perturbation, scattered across mainland Portugal (Fig. 1a). In total, 3015 observations corresponding to 543 species of plant and 88 of insects (Fig. 1b) were registered in the iNaturalist/Biodiversity4All project Ecologia2_FCUL, created specifically to record all of the diversity data associated with this activity. Other registered taxa included six species of molluscs and 13 of arachnids, and other occasional soil macrofauna.Fig. 1: Analysis of the impact of disturbance on plant diversity in grasslands.a Location of grasslands sampled; b Banner and overview of main results of the project created in the platform iNaturalist/Biodiversity4All to register the sampled species; c Boxplots include data of the taxonomic diversity indices (plant species richness and Simpson Diversity Index) of sampled grasslands at three different perturbation levels: low, medium and high. Central lines represent median values, box limits indicate the upper and lower quartiles, whiskers correspond to 1.5 × the interquartile range above and below the upper and lower quartiles and points are the outliers. Boxplots with different letters indicate statistically significant differences among perturbation levels based on multiple pairwise comparisons.Full size imageThe results showed that the number of species (richness) decreased consistently with the level of perturbation. Simpson Diversity Index values increased, indicating low diversity values in highly perturbed herbaceous plant communities (Fig. 1c). Results revealed a trend towards an increase in the proportion of species with lower stature as perturbation increased. However, with no clear relationship with either biodiversity or perturbation. Finally, results indicated no clear relation of pollinator abundance or richness with plant richness and diversity, although field records relate a lower number of pollinators as wind intensity increased. In fact, pollinator sampling is extremely weather sensitive, which may have contributed to the lack of consistent relationships between pollinator diversity and perturbation.Box 1 Citizen science platforms and apps used for formal and informal educational activitiesiNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/home): is a social network of naturalists, citizen scientists, and biologists that is based on mapping and sharing biodiversity observations. They describe themselves as “an online social network of people sharing biodiversity information in order to help each other learn about nature”. iNaturalist may be accessed via website or mobile app. Records are validated by the iNaturalist community. Observations reached approximately 110 million as of July 2022. This app allows the development of both open-access and registration-restricted projects. BioDiversity4All (https://www.biodiversity4all.org/) is a Portuguese biodiversity citizen science platform created by the Biodiversity for All Association. This platform was founded in 2010 and is currently linked to the “iNaturalist” network43. All the projects presented in this article were developed on the Biodiversity4All platform.Flora-on (https://flora-on.pt/): this portal contains occurrence data of vascular plants from the Portuguese flora collected by project collaborators (over 575,000 records as of July 2022). Flora-on was created by the Botanical Society of Portugal (SPBotânica), a Portuguese association devoted to the promotion and study of botany in Portugal. Botanists and naturalists provide most of the data, but occasional contributors are welcomed. Records are supervised by the portal editors, ensuring the dataset’s quality level. The portal includes stunning images of leaves, flowers, fruits, and other plant parts for 2299 of the 3300 taxa occurring in Portugal44. Additionally, the portal includes a powerful search engine that allows geographical, morphological, and taxonomical searches.LeafBite (https://zoegp.science/leafbyte): is a free, open-source iPhone app that measures total leaf area as well as consumed leaf area when herbivory is present45.Leaf-IT is a free and simple Android app created for scientific purposes. It was designed to measure leaf area under challenging field conditions. It has simple features for area calculation and data output, and can be used for ecological research and education46.Activity 2—Leaf trait assessment of shrub and tree speciesStudents were asked to assess three leaf traits Specific leaf area (SLA), Specific leaf mass (LMA), and Leaf Water Content (LWC) of two or three shrub or tree species. Each species should ideally fall into one of three functional groups known for their water adaptations, namely Hydrophytes, Mesophytes and Xerophytes. Students were challenged to choose charismatic Mediterranean species that grew nearby, such as Olea europaea, Nerium oleander or Phillyrea angustifolia. Alternatively, they could take the “Quercus challenge”, which involved ranking the Portuguese oak species based on their drought tolerance. A detailed protocol was developed to assist students for this purpose (Supplementary Data 2). In this protocol was demonstrated how to calculate the leaf area using the LeafBite and Leaf-IT apps (Box 1).The students calculated the SLA, LMA, and LWC of a total of 104 species (Supplementary Data 3) belonging to the main functional groups under study. Regarding the “Quercus challenge”, they were able to classify the six most representative oak species in Portugal and confirm the relationship among these indices and their tolerance to drought (Fig. 2).Fig. 2: Leaf trait assessment of shrub and tree species: Quercus challenge.Classification of Portuguese oak species regarding their drought tolerance (higher tolerance, left-up, lower tolerance right-down).Full size imageOne of the students, accomplished to present his own learning experience related to these activities at the XXIII Conference of the Environmental Research Network of Portuguese-speaking Nations – REALP, under the title “Plant Ecology during Confinement – A Digital Approach”.Activity 3—Evaluating the impact on the biodiversity of lawn management at the University of Lisbon campusAlthough, after the lockdown, practical classes returned to the laboratories and the field in 2021/22, we continued to use the iNaturalist/Biodiversity4All platform and the Flora-on website for biodiversity registering and identification, because of the success of the activities, as evidenced by the positive comments we received from students.The goal of this activity was to study the impact of lawn management on plant diversity and pollination on the University of Lisbon campus. To accomplish this, the students described the herbaceous communities and pollinators on four lawns (named C8, RL, RR, and TT) that had different management practices (mowing and irrigation). A comprehensive document with sampling guidelines was developed (Supplementary Data 4).The project Ecologia 2 Relvados 2022 registered 100 plant and 17 pollinator species (Fig. 3a). Given that the sampling took place during a cold and rainy week, which limited pollinator activity, the low number of pollinators registered was expectable (Lawson and Rands 2019). Following these analyses, the TT lawn (Fig. 3b), which had low levels of mowing and no watering, showed a significantly higher value of diversity, indicating it had the best management strategy for these systems (Fig. 3c), if the goal is to increase biodiversity.Fig. 3: Evaluating the impact on the biodiversity of lawn management at the University of Lisbon campus.a Banner and overview of main results of the project Ecologia 2 Relvados created in the platform iNaturalist/BioDiversity4All to register the sampled species; b Location of the lawns sampled in the Campus of the University of Lisbon; c Boxplots include data of the taxonomic diversity indices (plant species richness and Simpson Diversity Index) of sampled grasslands. Central lines represent median values, box limits indicate the upper and lower quartiles, whiskers correspond to 1.5 × the interquartile range above and below the upper and lower quartiles and points are the outliers. Boxplots with different letters indicate statistically significant differences among lawns based on multiple pairwise comparisons.Full size imageInformal education: BioBlitzesIntense biological surveys known as “BioBlitz” are carried out to record all organisms found in certain locations, such as cities, protected areas, or even entire countries. They are being used all over the world to collect and share georeferenced biodiversity data30. We developed two Plant Bioblitzes based on the BioDiversity4All/iNaturalist and Flora-on platforms. Social media, such as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter, were used to promote these events and engage citizens (Fig. 4). The BioBlitzes were developed by SPBotânica in collaboration with BioDiversity4All.Fig. 4: Bioblitz I & II – Flora of Portugal.Posters created for the promotion of the two Flora of Portugal Bioblitzes.Full size imageBioblitz I & II – Flora of PortugalThe celebration of Fascination of Plants Day (18th of May) served as the backdrop for the organization of two-weekend Bioblitzes: Bioblitz Flora of Portugal I and Bioblitz Flora of Portugal II.In 2021, the Bioblitz was solely focused on project members, which meant that only those who had voluntarily joined the initiative could participate. In total, the 119 project members registered 4234 observations of 890 plant species. In contrast, the 2022 Bioblitz was an open project (no registration required). In total, the 323 observers made 6547 records of 1198 species. To evaluate the impact of the Bioblitz events, we compared the data registered in BioDiverstiy4All during the weekends of both events (2021 and 2022) with (i) the data registered in the platform during the equivalent weekends of 2019 and 2020 and (ii) also during the weekends before both Bioblitzes. The number of species, observations, and observers increased significantly from 2019 to 2020, 2021, and 2022, but, when comparing values from 2020 with 2021 and 2022, this rise was only verified during the Bioblitz weekends, proving the importance of Bioblitzes in this increase (Fig. 5).Fig. 5: Number of observations, species and observers registered on the BioDiversity4All/iNaturalist platform over equivalent weekends in 2019, 2020, 2021, and 2022.Numbers for 2021 and 2022 correspond to the weekends in which Bioblitzes I & II – Flora of Portugal were conducted, as well as previous ones.Full size image More

Bell, A. M. Behavioural differences between individuals and two populations of stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). J. Evol. Biol. 18, 464–473 (2005).Article 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dochtermann, N. A. & Jenkins, S. H. Behavioural syndromes in Merriam’s kangaroo rats (Dipodomys merriami): A test of competing hypotheses. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274, 2343–2349 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Tremmel, M. & Müller, C. Insect personality depends on environmental conditions. Behav. Ecol. 24, 386–392 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Zidar, J. et al. A comparison of animal personality and coping styles in the red junglefowl. Anim. Behav. 130, 209–220 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sih, A., Bell, A. & Johnson, J. C. Behavioral syndromes: An ecological and evolutionary overview. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 372–378 (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Réale, D. & Dingemanse, N. J. Personality and individual social specialization. In Social behaviour: Genes, ecology and evolution (eds Székely, T. et al.) 417–441 (Cambridge University Press, 2010).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
Dingemanse, N. J. & Dochtermann, N. A. Quantifying individual variation in behaviour. Mixed-effect modelling approaches. J. Anim. Ecol. 82, 39–54 (2013).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Dingemanse, N. J., Kazem, A. J. N., Reale, D. & Wright, J. Behavioural reaction norms: Animal personality meets individual plasticity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 81–89 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S. & Weissing, F. J. Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 15825–15830 (2008).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ólafsdóttir, G. Á. & Magellan, K. Interactions between boldness, foraging performance and behavioural plasticity across social contexts. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70, 1879–1889 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Mathot, K. J., Wright, J., Kempenaers, B. & Dingemanse, N. J. Adaptive strategies for managing uncertainty may explain personality-related differences in behavioural plasticity. Oikos 121(7), 1009–1020 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T. & Dingemanse, N. J. Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution. Biol. Rev. 82, 291–318 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Coppens, C. M., de Boer, S. F. & Koolhaas, J. M. Coping styles and behavioural flexibility: Towards underlying mechanisms. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 4021–4028 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Benus, R. F., Daas, S. D., Koolhaas, J. M. & van Oortmerssen, G. A. Routine formation and flexibility in social and non-social behaviour of aggressive and non-aggressive male mice. Behaviour 112, 176–193 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dall, S. R., Houston, A. I. & McNamara, J. M. The behavioural ecology of personality: Consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol. Lett. 7, 734–739 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Mitchell, D. J. & Biro, P. A. Is behavioural plasticity consistent across different environmental gradients and through time?. Proc. R. Soc. B. 284(1860), 20170893 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Stamps, J. A. Individual differences in behavioural plasticities. Biol. Rev. 91, 534–567 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Stamps, J. A. & Biro, P. A. Personality and individual differences in plasticity. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 12, 18–23 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dingemanse, N. J., Both, C., Drent, P. J. & Tinbergen, J. M. Fitness consequences of avian personalities in a fluctuating environment. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 271, 847 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
Smith, B. R. & Blumstein, D. T. Fitness consequences of personality: a meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. 19, 448–455 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
Dingemanse, N. J. & Réale, D. Natural selection and animal personality. Behaviour 142, 1159–1184 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Duque-Wilckens, N., Trainor, B. C. & Marler, C. A. Aggression and territoriality. In Encyclopedia of animal behavior (ed. Choe, J. C.) 539–546 (Elsevier, 2019).Chapter 

Google Scholar 
AmphibiaWeb. AmphibiaWeb: Information on amphibian biology and conservation. Available at https://amphibiaweb.org (2022).Ringler, M. et al. Acoustic ranging in poison frogs—It is not about signal amplitude alone. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 114 (2017).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ringler, M., Ursprung, E. & Hödl, W. Site fidelity and patterns of short- and long-term movement in the brilliant-thighed poison frog Allobates femoralis (Aromobatidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 63, 1281–1293 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ringler, M., Ringler, E., Magaña Mendoza, D. & Hödl, W. Intrusion experiments to measure territory size: Development of the method, tests through simulations, and application in the frog Allobates femoralis. PLoS ONE 6, e25844 (2011).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ringler, E., Ringler, M., Jehle, R. & Hödl, W. The female perspective of mating in A. femoralis, a territorial frog with paternal care—A spatial and genetic analysis. PLoS ONE 7, e40237 (2012).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Ursprung, E., Ringler, M., Jehle, R. & Hödl, W. Strong male/male competition allows for nonchoosy females: High levels of polygynandry in a territorial frog with paternal care. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1759–1771 (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Pröhl, H. Territorial behavior in dendrobatid frogs. J Herpetol 39, 354–365 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
Peignier, M. et al. Exploring links between personality traits and their social and non-social environments in wild poison frogs. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 76, 93 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Chaloupka, S. et al. Repeatable territorial aggression in a Neotropical poison frog. Front. Ecol. Evol. 10, 398 (2022).Article 

Google Scholar 
Amézquita Torres, A. et al. Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system in the Amazonian dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Evolution 60, 1874–1887 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Rodríguez López, C., Amézquita Torres, A., Ringler, M., Pašukonis, A. & Hödl, W. Calling amplitude flexibility and acoustic spacing in the territorial frog Allobates femoralis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 74, 1–10 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Asab. Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim. Behav. 159, 1–11 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Du Percie Sert, N. et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 18, e3000410 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
Ringler, E., Mangione, R. & Ringler, M. Where have all the tadpoles gone? Individual genetic tracking of amphibian larvae until adulthood. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 737–746 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ringler, M. et al. High-resolution forest mapping for behavioural studies in the Nature Reserve ‘Les Nouragues’, French Guiana. J. Maps 12, 26–32 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
Keith, D. A. et al. A function-based typology for Earth’s ecosystems. Nature 610, 513–518 (2022).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kaefer, I. L., Montanarin, A., da Costa, R. S. & Lima, P. A. Temporal patterns of reproductive activity and site attachment of the brilliant-thighed frog Allobates femoralis from central Amazonia. J. Herpetol. 46, 549–554 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Rasband, W. S. ImageJ (U. S. National Institutes of Health, 1997–2021).Bolger, D. T., Morrison, T. A., Vance, B., Lee, D. & Farid, H. A computer-assisted system for photographic mark–recapture analysis. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 813–822 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
Narins, P. M., Hödl, W. & Grabul, D. S. Bimodal signal requisite for agonistic behavior in a dart-poison frog, Epipedobates femoralis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 577–580 (2003).Article 
ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gasser, H., Amézquita Torres, A. & Hödl, W. Who is calling? Intraspecific call variation in the aromobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Ethology 115, 596–607 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Hödl, W. Dendrobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae): a handy fellow for frog bioacoustics in Proceedings of the 4th Ordinary General meeting of the Societas Europaea Herpetologica, (ed.van Gelder, J. J., Strijbosch, H. & Bergers, P.) (1987).Ursprung, E., Ringler, M. & Hödl, W. Phonotactic approach pattern in the neotropical frog Allobates femoralis: A spatial and temporal analysis. Behaviour 146, 153–170 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
Sonnleitner, R., Ringler, M., Loretto, M.-C. & Ringler, E. Experience shapes accuracy in territorial decision-making in a poison frog. Biol. Lett. 16, 20200094 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hödl, W. Phyllobates femoralis (Dendrobatidae): Rufverhalten und akustische Orientierung der Männchen (Freilandaufnahmen) in Bundesstaatliche Hauptstelle für Wissenschaftliche Kinematographie (1983).Tumulty, J. P. et al. Brilliant-thighed poison frogs do not use acoustic identity information to treat territorial neighbours as dear enemies. Anim. Behav. 141, 203–220 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fernandes, I. Y. et al. Unlinking the speciation steps: Geographical factors drive changes in sexual signals of an Amazonian Nurse-Frog through body size variation. Evol. Biol. 48, 81–93 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
Garcia, M. J. et al. Dueling frogs: do male green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea) eavesdrop on and assess nearby calling competitors?. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 73(2), 1041 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gingras, B., Böckle, M., Herbst, C. T. & Fitch, W. T. Call acoustics reflect body size across four clades of anurans. J Zool 289(2), 143–150 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
Stoffel, M. A., Nakagawa, S. & Schielzeth, H. rptR: Repeatability estimation and variance decomposition by generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 1639–1644 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Fox, J. et al. Package ‘sem’: Structural Equation Models. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sem (2022).Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach 2nd edn. (Springer, 2002).MATH 

Google Scholar 
Hertel, A. G., Niemelä, P. T., Dingemanse, N. J. & Mueller, T. A guide for studying among-individual behavioral variation from movement data in the wild. Mov. Ecol. 8, 30 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Hadfield, J. D. MCMC methods for multi-response generalized linear mixed models: The MCMCglmmR package. J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1–22 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bürkner, P.-C. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
Gelman, A., Hwang, J. & Vehtari, A. Understanding predictive information criteria for Bayesian models. Stat. Comput. 24, 997–1016 (2014).Article 
MathSciNet 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Whalen, A. & Hoppitt, W. J. E. Bayesian model selection with network based diffusion analysis. Front. Psychol. 7, 409 (2016).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Ryan, M. J., Bartholomew, G. A. & Rand, A. S. Energetics of reproduction in a neotropical frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. Ecology 64, 1456–1462 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
Taigen, T. L. & Wells, K. D. Energetics of vocalization by an anuran amphibian (Hyla versicolor). J. Comp. Physiol. 155, 163–170 (1985).Article 

Google Scholar 
Pough, F. H. & Taigen, T. L. Metabolic correlates of the foraging and social behaviour of dart-poison frogs. Anim. Behav. 39, 145–155 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
Bell, A. M., Hankison, S. J. & Laskowski, K. L. The repeatability of behaviour: A meta-analysis. Anim. Behav. 77, 771–783 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Kelleher, S. R., Silla, A. J. & Byrne, P. G. Animal personality and behavioral syndromes in amphibians: A review of the evidence, experimental approaches, and implications for conservation. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 72, 10539 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
Moser-Purdy, C., MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A. & Mennill, D. J. Enemies are not always dear: Male song sparrows adjust dear enemy effect expression in response to female fertility. Anim. Behav. 126, 17–22 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar  More