Ecology

1.Wright, J., Both, C., Cotton, P. A. & Bryant, D. Quality vs. quantity: energetic and nutritional trade-offs in parental provisioning. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 620–634 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Naef-Daenzer, B. & Keller, L. F. The foraging performance of great and blue tits (Parus major and P. caeruleus) in relation to caterpillar development, and its consequences for nestling growth and fledging weight. J. Anim. Ecol. 68, 708–718 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Perrins, C. M. & McCleery, R. H. The effect of fledging mass on the lives of Great Tits Parus major. Ardea 89, 142 (2001).
Google Scholar 
4.van Oort, H. & Otter, K. A. Natal nutrition and the habitat distributions of male and female black-capped chickadees. Can. J. Zool. 83, 1495–1501 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Metcalfe, N. B. & Monaghan, P. Growth versus lifespan: Perspectives from evolutionary ecology. Exp. Gerontol. 38, 935–940 (2003).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Tinbergen, J. M. & Boerlijst, M. C. Nestling weight and survival in individual great tits (Parus major). J. Anim. Ecol. 59, 1113 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Perrins, C. M. Tits and their caterpillar food supply. Ibis (Lond. 1859). 133, 49–54 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Schwagmeyer, P. L. & Mock, D. W. Parental provisioning and offspring fitness: size matters. Anim. Behav. 75, 291–298 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Naef-Daenzer, L., Naef-Daenzer, B. & Nager, R. G. Prey selection and foraging performance of breeding Great Tits Parus major in relation to food availability. J. Avian Biol. 31, 206–214 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Williams, T. D. Physiological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2012).Book 

Google Scholar 
11.Williams, T. D. & Fowler, M. A. Individual variation in workload during parental care: can we detect a physiological signature of quality or cost of reproduction?. J. Ornithol. 156, 441–451 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Dawson, R. D. & Bortolotti, G. R. Parental effort of American kestrels: the role of variation in brood size. Can. J. Zool. 81, 852–860 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Ringsby, T. H., Berge, T., Saether, B. E. & Jensen, H. Reproductive success and individual variation in feeding frequency of House Sparrows (Passer domesticus). J. Ornithol. 150, 469–481 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Mariette, M. M. et al. Using an Electronic Monitoring System to Link Offspring Provisioning and Foraging Behavior of a Wild Passerine. Auk 128, 26–35 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.García-Navas, V., Ferrer, E. S. & Sanz, J. J. Prey selectivity and parental feeding rates of Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus in relation to nestling age. Bird Study 59, 236–242 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Lifjeld, J. T. et al. Effects of energy costs on the optimal diet: an experiment with pied flycatchers Ficedula hypoleuca feeding nestlings. Ornis Scand. 19, 111–118 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Love, O. P. & Williams, T. D. The adaptive value of stress-induced phenotypes: effects of maternally derived corticosterone on sex-biased investment, cost of reproduction, and maternal fitness. Am. Nat. 172, 135–149 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Stodola, K. W. et al. Relative influence of male and female care in determining nestling mass in a migratory songbird. J. Avian Biol. 41, 515–522 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Mägi, M. et al. Low reproductive success of great tits in the preferred habitat: a role of food low reproductive success of great tits in the preferred habitat: a role of food availability. Ecoscience 16, 145–157 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Fowler, M. A. & Williams, T. D. Individual variation in parental workload and breeding productivity in female European starlings: Is the effort worth it?. Ecol. Evol. 5, 3585–3599 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Cornelius Ruhs, E., Vézina, F., Walker, M. A. & Karasov, W. H. Who pays the bill? The effects of altered brood size on parental and nestling physiology. J. Ornithol. 161, 275–288 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Bridge, E. S. & Bonter, D. N. A low-cost radio frequency identification device for ornithological research. J. Field. Ornithol. 82, 52–59 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Major, R. E. Stomach flushing of an insectivorous bird: an assessment of differential digestibility of prey and the risk to birds. Aust. Wildl. Res. 17, 647–657 (1990).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Harris, M. P. & Wanless, S. The diet of shags phalacrocorax aristotelis during the chick-rearing period assessed by three methods. Bird Study 40, 135–139 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Sánchez-Bayo, F., Ward, R. & Beasley, H. A new technique to measure bird’s dietary exposure to pesticides. Anal. Chim. Acta 399, 173–183 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Tsipoura, N. & Burger, J. Shorebird diet during spring migration stopover on Delaware Bay. Condor 101, 635–644 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Neves, V. C., Bolton, M. & Monteiro, L. R. Validation of the water offloading technique for diet assessment: an experimental study with Cory’s shearwaters (Calonectris diomedea). J. Ornithol. 147, 474–478 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Goldsworthy, B., Young, M. J., Seddon, P. J. & van Heezik, Y. Stomach flushing does not affect apparent adult survival, chick hatching, or fledging success in yellow-eyed penguins (Megadyptes antipodes). Biol. Conserv. 196, 115–123 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Vézina, F., Love, O. P., Lessard, M. & Williams, T. D. Shifts in metabolic demands in growing altricial nestlings illustrate context-specific relationships between basal metabolic rate and body composition. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 82, 248–257 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Malmqvist, B. & Sjöström, P. The microdistribution of some lotic insect predators in relation to their prey and to abiotic factors. Freshw. Biol. 14, 649–656 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.van Noordwijk, A. J., McCleery, R. H. & Perrins, C. M. Selection for the timing of great tit breeding in relation to caterpillar growth and temperature. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 451 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Bale, J. S. Insects and low temperatures: From molecular biology to distributions and abundance. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 357, 849–862 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Hansson, L. A. et al. Experimental evidence for a mismatch between insect emergence and waterfowl hatching under increased spring temperatures. Ecosphere 5, 1–9 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. Lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–21. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (2019)35.Hothorn, T., Zeilis, A., Farebrother, R.W., Cummins, C., Millo, G. & Mitchell, D. lmtest: Testing linear regression models. R package version 0.9–37. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmtest (2019)36.Kuznetsova, A., Brockoff, P.B., & R. H. Christensen. LmerTest: Tests for Random and Fixed Effects for Linear Mixed Effect Models (lmer objects of lme4 package). R package version 2.0-3. https://CRANR-projectorg/package=lmerTest (2019)37.Lenth, R. V., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner. P. & Herve, M. emmeans: Estimated marginal means. R package version 1.4.6. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html (2019)38.Ricklefs, R. E. Preliminary models for growth rates in altricial birds. Ecology 50, 1031–1039 (1969).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Drent, R. H. & Daan, S. The prudent parent: energetic adjustments in avian breeding. Ardea 68, 225–252 (1980).
Google Scholar 
40.Killpack, T. L. & Karasov, W. H. Growth and development of house sparrows (Passer domesticus) in response to chronic food restriction throughout the nestling period. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 1806–1815 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
41.Verboven, N. & Visser, M. E. Seasonal variation in local recruitment of great tits: the importance of being early. Oikos 81, 511 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Visser, M. E. et al. Variable responses to large-scale climate change in European Parus populations. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 270, 367–372 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Visser, M. E., Holleman, L. J. M. & Gienapp, P. Shifts in caterpillar biomass phenology due to climate change and its impact on the breeding biology of an insectivorous bird. Oecologia 147, 164–172 (2006).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.García-navas, V. & Sanz, J. J. Seasonal decline in provisioning effort and nestling mass of Blue Tits Cyanistes caeruleus: Experimental support for the parent quality hypothesis. Ibis (Lond. 1859). 153, 59–69 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.García-Navas, V. & Sanz, J. J. The importance of a main dish: Nestling diet and foraging behaviour in Mediterranean blue tits in relation to prey phenology. Oecologia 165, 639–649 (2011).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Boyce, M. S. & Perrins, C. M. Optimizing great tit clutch size in a fluctuating environment. Ecology 68, 142–153 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Wilkin, T. A., King, L. E. & Sheldon, B. C. Habitat quality, nestling diet, and provisioning behaviour in great tits Parus major. J. Avian Biol. 40, 135–145 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Stalwick, J. A. & Wiebe, K. L. Delivery rates and prey use of mountain bluebirds in grassland and clear-cut habitats. Avian Conserv. Ecol. 14, 1–11 (2019).
Google Scholar 
49.Kadin, M., Olsson, O., Hentati-Sundberg, J., Ehrning, E. W. & Blenckner, T. Common Guillemot Uria aalge parents adjust provisioning rates to compensate for low food quality. Ibis (Lond. 1859). 158, 167–178 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Stauss, M. J., Burkhardt, J. F. & Tomiuk, J. Foraging flight distances as a measure of parental effort in blue tits Parus caeruleus differ with environmental conditions. J. Avian Biol. 36, 47–56 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Killpack, T. L., Tie, D. N. & Karasov, W. H. Compensatory growth in nestling Zebra Finches impacts body composition but not adaptive immune function. Auk 131, 396–406 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Geluso, K. & Hayes, J. P. Effects of dietary quality on basal metabolic rate and internal morphology of European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Physiol. Biochem. Zool. Ecol. Evol. Approaches 72, 189–197 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Williams, J. B. & Tieleman, B. I. Flexibility in basal metabolic rate and evaporative water loss among hoopoe larks exposed to different environmental temperatures. J. Exp. Biol. 203, 3153–3159 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.Barceló, G., Love, O. P. & Vézina, F. Uncoupling basal and summit metabolic rates in white-throated Sparrows: digestive demand drives maintenance costs, but changes in muscle mass are not needed to improve thermogenic capacity. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 90, 153–165 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Cotton, P. A., Kacelnik, A. & Wright, J. Chick begging as a signal: are nestlings honest?. Behav. Ecol. 7, 178–182 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Royle, N. J., Hartley, I. R. & Parker, G. A. Begging for control: when are offspring solicitation behaviours honest?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 434–440 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Kilner, R. & Johnstone, R. A. Begging the question: are offspring solicitation behaviours signals of need?. Tree 12, 11–15 (1997).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.Macnair, M. R. & Parker, G. A. Models of parent-offspring conflict III. Intra-brood conflict. Anim. Behav. 27, 1202–1209 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Hamer, K. C., Lynnes, A. S. & Hill, J. K. Parent-offspring interactions in food provisioning of Manx shearwaters: Implications for nestling obesity. Anim. Behav. 57, 627–631 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Godfray, H. C. J. & Johnstone, R. A. Begging and bleating: the evolution of parent-offspring signalling. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 355, 1581–1591 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Leonard, M. L. & Horn, A. G. Acoustic signalling of hunger and thermal state by nestling tree swallows. Anim. Behav. 61, 87–93 (2001).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Leonard, M. L. & Horn, A. G. Ambient noise and the design of begging signals. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272, 651–656 (2005).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Sacchi, R., Saino, N. & Galeotti, P. Features of begging calls reveal general condition and need of food of barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) nestlings. Behav. Ecol. 13, 268–273 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Marques, P. A. M., Vicente, L. & Márquez, R. Iberian azure-winged magpie cyanopica (cyana) cooki nestlings begging calls: call characterization and hunger signalling. Bioacoustics 18, 133–149 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Marques, P. A. M., Vicente, L. & Márquez, R. Nestling begging call structure and bout variation honestly signal need but not condition in Spanish sparrows. Zool. Stud. 48, 587–595 (2009).
Google Scholar 
66.Klenova, A. V. Chick begging calls reflect degree of hunger in three auk species (Charadriiformes: Alcidae). PLoS ONE 10, 4–6 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
67.Williams, T. D. Physiology, activity and costs of parental care in birds. J. Exp. Biol. 221, 1–8 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Fukami, T. Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 1–23 (2015).
Google Scholar 
2.Tylianakis, J. M., Martínez-García, L. B., Richardson, S. J., Peltzer, D. A. & Dickie, I. A. Symmetric assembly and disassembly processes in an ecological network. Ecol. Lett. 21, 896–904 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Chase, J. M., Blowes, S. A., Knight, T. M., Gerstner, K. & May, F. Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss. Nature 584, 238–243 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Vellend, M. The Theory of Ecological Communities (MPB-57) (Princeton Univ. Press, 2016).5.Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals? Am. Nat. 93, 145–159 (1959).
Google Scholar 
6.Tilman, D. Resource Competition and Community Structure (Princeton Univ. Press, 1982).7.Barbier, M., Arnoldi, J.-F., Bunin, G. & Loreau, M. Generic assembly patterns in complex ecological communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 2156–2161 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Serván, C. A., Capitán, J. A., Grilli, J., Morrison, K. E. & Allesina, S. Coexistence of many species in random ecosystems. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2, 1237–1242 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.MacArthur, R. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1, 1–11 (1970).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Medeiros, L. P., Boege, K., del Val, E., Zaldivar-Riverón, A. & Saavedra, S. Observed ecological communities are formed by species combinations that are among the most likely to persist under changing environments. Am. Nat. https://doi.org/10.1086/711663 (2020).11.Barabás, G., D’Andrea, R. & Stump, S. M. Chesson’s coexistence theory. Ecol. Monogr. 88, 277–303 (2018).
Google Scholar 
12.Grainger, T. N. & Gilbert, J. M. L. B. The invasion criterion: a common currency for ecological research. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 925–935 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
13.Alberch, P. The logic of monsters: evidence for internal constraint in development and evolution. Geobios 22, 21–57 (1989).
Google Scholar 
14.Clements, F. E. Nature and structure of the climax. J. Ecol. 24, 252–284 (1936).
Google Scholar 
15.Odum, E. P. & Barrett, G. W. Fundamentals of Ecology 5th edn (Thomson Brooks/Cole, 2005).16.Friedman, J., Higgins, L. M. & Gore, J. Community structure follows simple assembly rules in microbial microcosms. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0109 (2017).
Google Scholar 
17.Chesson, P. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000).
Google Scholar 
18.Drake, J. A. Community-assembly mechanics and the structure of an experimental species ensemble. Am. Nat. 137, 1–26 (1991).
Google Scholar 
19.Warren, P. H., Law, R. & Weatherby, A. J. Mapping the assembly of protist communities in microcosms. Ecology 84, 1001–1011 (2003).
Google Scholar 
20.Schreiber, S. J. & Rittenhouse, S. From simple rules to cycling in community assembly. Oikos 105, 349–358 (2004).
Google Scholar 
21.Chase, J. M. & Leibold, M. A. Ecological Niches: Linking Classical and Contemporary Approaches (Univ. Chicago Press, 2003).22.Kraft, N. J. et al. Community assembly, coexistence and the environmental filtering metaphor. Funct. Ecol. 29, 592–599 (2015).
Google Scholar 
23.Moore, R., Robinson, W., Lovette, I. & Robinson, T. Experimental evidence for extreme dispersal limitation in tropical forest birds. Ecol. Lett. 11, 960–968 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Maherali, H. & Klironomos, J. N. Influence of phylogeny on fungal community assembly and ecosystem functioning. Science 316, 1746–1748 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Serván, C. & Allesina, S. Tractable models of ecological assembly. Ecol. Lett. 24, 1029–1037 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Rosindell, J., Hubbell, S. P. & Etienne, R. S. The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 340–348 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Case, T. J. Surprising behavior from a familiar model and implications for competition theory. Am. Nat. 146, 961–966 (1995).
Google Scholar 
28.Saavedra, S. et al. A structural approach for understanding multispecies coexistence. Ecol. Monogr. 87, 470–486 (2017).
Google Scholar 
29.Tilman, D. Resources: a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and predation. Am. Nat. 116, 362–393 (1980).
Google Scholar 
30.May, R. M. & Leonard, W. J. Nonlinear aspects of competition between three species. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29, 243–253 (1975).
Google Scholar 
31.Dean, A. M. A simple model of mutualism. Am. Nat. 121, 409–417 (1983).
Google Scholar 
32.Song, C., Ahn, S. V., Rohr, R. P. & Saavedra, S. Towards a probabilistic understanding about the context-dependency of species interactions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 384–396 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Saavedra, S., Medeiros, L. P. & AlAdwani, M. Structural forecasting of species persistence under changing environments. Ecol. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13582 (2020).34.Law, R. & Blackford, J. C. Self-assembling food webs: a global viewpoint of coexistence of species in Lotka–Volterra communities. Ecology 73, 567–578 (1992).
Google Scholar 
35.Sigmuiud, K. Darwin’s ‘circles of complexity’: assembling ecological communities. Complexity 1, 40–44 (1995).
Google Scholar 
36.Law, R. & Morton, R. D. Permanence and the assembly of ecological communities. Ecology 77, 762–775 (1996).
Google Scholar 
37.Wilson, J. B., Spijkerman, E. & Huisman, J. Is there really insufficient support for Tilman’s R* concept? A comment on Miller et al. Am. Nat. 169, 700–706 (2007).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.May, R. M. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261, 459–467 (1976).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Cenci, S., Song, C. & Saavedra, S. Rethinking the importance of the structure of ecological networks under an environment-dependent framework. Ecol. Evol. 8, 6852–6859 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.O’Dwyer, J. P. Whence Lotka-Volterra? Theor. Ecol. 11, 441–452 (2018).
Google Scholar 
41.Levine, J. M., Bascompte, J., Adler, P. B. & Allesina, S.Beyond pairwise mechanisms of species coexistence in complex communities. Nature 546, 56–64 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Vandermeer, J. H. The competitive structure of communities: an experimental approach with protozoa. Ecology 50, 362–371 (1969).
Google Scholar 
43.Stein, R. R. et al. Ecological modeling from time-series inference: insight into dynamics and stability of intestinal microbiota. PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003388 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Venturelli, O. S. et al. Deciphering microbial interactions in synthetic human gut microbiome communities. Mol. Syst. Biol. 14, e8157 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Bucci, V. et al. MDSINE: Microbial Dynamical Systems Inference Engine for microbiome time-series analyses. Genome Biol. 17, 121 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Turelli, M. A reexamination of stability in randomly varying versus deterministic environments with comments on the stochastic theory of limiting similarity. Theor. Popul. Biol. 13, 244–267 (1978).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.May, R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, 2019).48.Allesina, S. & Tang, S. The stability–complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspective. Popul. Ecol. 57, 63–75 (2015).
Google Scholar 
49.Allesina, S. & Tang, S. Stability criteria for complex ecosystems. Nature 483, 205–208 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
50.Grilli, J., Rogers, T. & Allesina, S. Modularity and stability in ecological communities. Nat. Commun. 7, 12031 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Hoek, T. A. et al. Resource availability modulates the cooperative and competitive nature of a microbial cross-feeding mutualism. PLoS Biol. 14, e1002540 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Case, T. J. An Illustrated Guide to Theoretical Ecology (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).53.Freedman, H. & So, J.-H. Global stability and persistence of simple food chains. Math. Biosci. 76, 69–86 (1985).
Google Scholar 
54.Posfai, A., Taillefumier, T. & Wingreen, N. S. Metabolic trade-offs promote diversity in a model ecosystem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 028103 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Gould, A. L. et al. Microbiome interactions shape host fitness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11951–E11960 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
56.Kehe, J. et al. Massively parallel screening of synthetic microbial communities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 12804–12809 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
57.Xiao, Y. et al. Mapping the ecological networks of microbial communities. Nat. Commun. 8, 2042 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
58.AlAdwani, M. & Saavedra, S. Is the addition of higher-order interactions in ecological models increasing the understanding of ecological dynamics? Math. Biosci. 315, 108222 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.Weibel, C. A. in History of Topology (ed. James, I.) 797–836 (North-Holland, 1999).60.Carlsson, G. Topology and data. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 46, 255–308 (2009).
Google Scholar 
61.Rabadán, R. & Blumberg, A. J. Topological Data Analysis for Genomics and Evolution: Topology in Biology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2019).62.Sizemore, A. E., Phillips-Cremins, J. E., Ghrist, R. & Bassett, D. S. The importance of the whole: topological data analysis for the network neuroscientist. Netw. Neurosci. 3, 656–673 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Sugihara, G. Graph theory, homology and food webs. In Proc. Symposia in Applied Mathematics 30, 83–101 (American Mathematical Society, 1984).64.Singh, G., Mémoli, F. & Carlsson, G. E. Topological methods for the analysis of high dimensional data sets and 3D object recognition. In Symposium on Point Based Graphics 91–100 (The Eurographics Association, 2007).65.Giusti, C., Ghrist, R. & Bassett, D. S. Two’s company, three (or more) is a simplex. J. Comput. Neurosci. 41, 1–14 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Bauer, U. Ripser: efficient computation of Vietoris–Rips persistence barcodes. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.02518 (2019).67.Fort, H. On predicting species yields in multispecies communities: quantifying the accuracy of the linear Lotka–Volterra generalized model. Ecol. Model. 387, 154–162 (2018).
Google Scholar 
68.Halty, V., Valdés, M., Tejera, M., Picasso, V. & Fort, H. Modeling plant interspecific interactions from experiments with perennial crop mixtures to predict optimal combinations. Ecol. Appl. 27, 2277–2289 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
69.Tabi, A. et al. Species multidimensional effects explain idiosyncratic responses of communities to environmental change. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1036–1043 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Jansen, W. A permanence theorem for replicator and Lotka–Volterra systems. J. Math. Biol. 25, 411–422 (1987).
Google Scholar 
71.Schreiber, S. J. Criteria for Cr robust permanence. J. Differ. Equ. 162, 400–426 (2000).
Google Scholar 
72.Angulo, M. T., Moreno, J. A., Lippner, G., Barabási, A.-L. & Liu, Y.-Y. Fundamental limitations of network reconstruction from temporal data. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20160966 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

1.Altieri, A. H. et al. Tropical dead zones and mass mortalities on coral reefs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114, 3660–3665 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
2.Lehrter, J. C., Ko, D. S., Lowe, L. L. & Penta, B. Predicted effects of climate change on northern Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. In Modeling coastal hypoxia 173–214 (Springer, 2017).3.Breitburg, D. et al. Declining oxygen in the global ocean and coastal waters. Science 359, eaam7240 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Nelson, H. R. & Altieri, A. H. Oxygen: The universal currency on coral reefs. Coral Reefs 38, 177–198 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Hughes, D. J. et al. Coral reef survival under accelerating ocean deoxygenation. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 1–12 (2020).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Murphy, J. W. & Richmond, R. H. Changes to coral health and metabolic activity under oxygen deprivation. PeerJ 4, e1956 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
7.Harborne, A. R., Rogers, A., Bozec, Y.-M. & Mumby, P. J. Multiple stressors and the functioning of coral reefs. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9, 5.1-5.24 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Van Oppen, M. J. et al. Shifting paradigms in restoration of the world’s coral reefs. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 3437–3448 (2017).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Montagna, P. A. & Ritter, C. Direct and indirect effects of hypoxia on benthos in Corpus Christi Bay, Texas, USA. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 330, 119–131 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Pollock, M., Clarke, L. & Dubé, M. The effects of hypoxia on fishes: from ecological relevance to physiological effects. Environ. Rev. 15, 1–14 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Seitz, R. D., Dauer, D. M., Llansó, R. J. & Long, W. C. Broad-scale effects of hypoxia on benthic community structure in Chesapeake Bay, USA. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 381, S4–S12 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Diaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Marine benthic hypoxia: A review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev. 33, 245–203 (1995).
Google Scholar 
13.Dean, T. L. & Richardson, J. Responses of seven species of native freshwater fish and a shrimp to low levels of dissolved oxygen. NZ J. Mar. Freshw. Res. 33, 99–106 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Wannamaker, C. M. & Rice, J. A. Effects of hypoxia on movements and behavior of selected estuarine organisms from the southeastern United States. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 249, 145–163 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Richardson, J., Williams, E. K. & Hickey, C. W. Avoidance behaviour of freshwater fish and shrimp exposed to ammonia and low dissolved oxygen separately and in combination. NZ J. Mar. Freshwat. Res. 35, 625–633 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.McAllen, R., Davenport, J., Bredendieck, K. & Dunne, D. Seasonal structuring of a benthic community exposed to regular hypoxic events. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 368, 67–74 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Ogino, T. & Toyohara, H. Identification of possible hypoxia sensor for behavioral responses in a marine annelid. Capitella teleta. Biol. Open 8, bio37630 (2019).
Google Scholar 
18.Lenihan, H. S. & Peterson, C. H. How habitat degradation through fishery disturbance enhances impacts of hypoxia on oyster reefs. Ecol. Appl. 8, 128–140 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Li, F.-G., Chen, J., Jiang, X.-Y. & Zou, S.-M. Transcriptome analysis of blunt snout bream (Megalobrama amblycephala) reveals putative differential expression genes related to growth and hypoxia. PLoS ONE 10, e0142801 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
20.Sahlmann, A., Wolf, R., Holth, T. F., Titelman, J. & Hylland, K. Baseline and oxidative DNA damage in marine invertebrates. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 80, 807–819 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Zoccola, D. et al. Structural and functional analysis of coral Hypoxia Inducible Factor. PLoS ONE 12, e0186262 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
22.Díaz, R. J. & Rosenberg, R. Marine benthic hypoxia: A review of its ecological effects and the behavioural responses of benthic macrofauna. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 33, 245–303 (1995).
Google Scholar 
23.Bodamer, B. L. & Bridgeman, T. B. Experimental dead zones: two designs for creating oxygen gradients in aquatic ecological studies. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 12, 441–454 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Vaquer-Sunyer, R. & Duarte, C. M. Thresholds of hypoxia for marine biodiversity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 15452–15457. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803833105 (2008).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Branco, P. et al. Potamodromous fish movements under multiple stressors: Connectivity reduction and oxygen depletion. Sci. Total Environ. 572, 520–525 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Hayes, D. S., Branco, P., Santos, J. M. & Ferreira, T. Oxygen depletion affects kinematics and shoaling cohesion of cyprinid fish. Water 11, 642 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Grimes, C. J., Capps, C., Petersen, L. H. & Schulze, A. Oxygen consumption during and post hypoxia exposure in bearded fireworms (Annelida: Amphinomidae). J. Comp. Physiol. B 190, 681–689 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Semenza, G. L. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) pathway. Sci. Stke 407, 1–3 (2007).29.Taylor, C. T. & McElwain, J. C. Ancient atmospheres and the evolution of oxygen sensing via the hypoxia-inducible factor in metazoans. Physiology 25, 272–279 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Wang, G. L., Jiang, B.-H., Rue, E. A. & Semenza, G. L. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92, 5510–5514 (1995).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Kaelin, W. G. Jr. & Ratcliffe, P. J. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol. Cell 30, 393–402 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Marques, I. J. et al. Transcriptome analysis of the response to chronic constant hypoxia in zebrafish hearts. J. Comp. Physiol. B. 178, 77–92 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Schulze, A., Grimes, C. J. & Rudek, T. E. Tough, armed and omnivorous: Hermodice carunculata (Annelida: Amphinomidae) is prepared for ecological challenges. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK. 97,1–6 (2017).34.Witman, J. D. Effects of predation by the fireworm Hermodice carunculata on milleporid hydrocorals. Bull. Mar. Sci. 42, 446–458 (1988).
Google Scholar 
35.Vreeland, H. & Lasker, H. Selective feeding of the polychaete Hermodice carunculata Pallas on Caribbean gorgonians. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 129, 265–277 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Vargas-Ángel, B., Thomas, J. D. & Hoke, S. M. High-latitude Acropora cervicornis thickets off Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA. Coral Reefs 22, 465–473 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Miller, M., Marmet, C., Cameron, C. & Williams, D. Prevalence, consequences, and mitigation of fireworm predation on endangered staghorn coral. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 516, 187–194 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Lucey, N. M., Collins, M. & Collin, R. Oxygen‐mediated plasticity confers hypoxia tolerance in a corallivorous polychaete. Ecol. Evol. 10, 1145–1157 (2019).39.Grimes, C. J., Paiva, P. C., Petersen, L. H. & Schulze, A. Rapid plastic responses to chronic hypoxia in the bearded fireworm, Hermodice carunculata (Annelida: Amphinomidae). Mar. Biol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-020-03756-0 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Yáñez-Rivera, B. & Salazar-Vallejo, S. I. Revision of Hermodice Kinberg, 1857 (Polychaeta: Amphinomidae). Sci. Mar. 75, 251–262 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Ahrens, J. B. et al. The curious case of Hermodice carunculata (Annelida: Amphinomidae): Evidence for genetic homogeneity throughout the Atlantic Ocean and adjacent basins. Mol. Ecol. 22, 2280–2291 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Gorr, T. A., Cahn, J. D., Yamagata, H. & Bunn, H. F. Hypoxia-induced synthesis of hemoglobin in the crustacean Daphnia magna is hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 36038–36047 (2004).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Li, T. & Brouwer, M. Hypoxia-inducible factor, gsHIF, of the grass shrimp Palaemonetes pugio: Molecular characterization and response to hypoxia. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B: Biochem. Mol. Biol. 147, 11–19 (2007).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
44.Soñanez-Organis, J. G. et al. Molecular characterization of hypoxia inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) from the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and tissue-specific expression under hypoxia. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 150, 395–405 (2009).
Google Scholar 
45.Wei, L. et al. Comparative studies of hemolymph physiology response and HIF-1 expression in different strains of Litopenaeus vannamei under acute hypoxia. Chemosphere 153, 198–204 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Giannetto, A. et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor α and Hif-prolyl hydroxylase characterization and gene expression in short-time air-exposed Mytilus galloprovincialis. Mar. Biotechnol. 17, 768–781 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Philipp, E. E. et al. Gene expression and physiological changes of different populations of the long-lived bivalve Arctica islandica under low oxygen conditions. PLoS ONE 7, e44621 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Sussarellu, R., Fabioux, C., Le Moullac, G., Fleury, E. & Moraga, D. Transcriptomic response of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas to hypoxia. Mar. Genom. 3, 133–143 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Woo, S. et al. Expressions of oxidative stress-related genes and antioxidant enzyme activities in Mytilus galloprovincialis (Bivalvia, Mollusca) exposed to hypoxia. Zool. Stud. 52, 15 (2013).ADS 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
50.Burgeot, T. et al. Oyster summer morality risks associated with environmental stress. Summer Mortality of Pacific Oyster Crassostrea Gigas. The Morest Project. Éd. Ifremer/Quæ, 107–151 (2008).51.David, E., Tanguy, A., Pichavant, K. & Moraga, D. Response of the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas to hypoxia exposure under experimental conditions. FEBS J. 272, 5635–5652 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Hourdez, S. et al. Gas transfer system in Alvinella pompejana (Annelida polychaeta, Terebellida): Functional properties of intracellular and extracellular hemoglobins. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 73, 365–373 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Boutet, I., Jollivet, D., Shillito, B., Moraga, D. & Tanguy, A. Molecular identification of differentially regulated genes in the hydrothermal-vent species Bathymodiolus thermophilus and Paralvinella pandorae in response to temperature. BMC Genom. 10, 222 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
54.Eyre, B. D., Andersson, A. J. & Cyronak, T. Benthic coral reef calcium carbonate dissolution in an acidifying ocean. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 969–976 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Huggett, J. & Griffiths, C. Some relationships between elevation, physico-chemical variables and biota of intertidal rock pools. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 29, 189–197 (1986).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Kinsey, D. & Kinsey, E. Diurnal changes in oxygen content of the water over the coral reef platform at Heron I. Mar. Freshw. Res. 18, 23–34 (1967).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Helly, J. J. & Levin, L. A. Global distribution of naturally occurring marine hypoxia on continental margins. Deep Sea Res. Part I 51, 1159–1168 (2004).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Levin, L. A., Gage, J. D., Martin, C. & Lamont, P. A. Macrobenthic community structure within and beneath the oxygen minimum zone, NW Arabian Sea. Deep Sea Res. Part II 47, 189–226 (2000).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Gallardo, V. et al. Macrobenthic zonation caused by the oxygen minimum zone on the shelf and slope off central Chile. Deep Sea Res. Part II 51, 2475–2490 (2004).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Gooday, A. et al. Faunal responses to oxygen gradients on the Pakistan margin: a comparison of foraminiferans, macrofauna and megafauna. Deep Sea Res. Part II 56, 488–502 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Prabhakar, N. R. & Semenza, G. L. Adaptive and maladaptive cardiorespiratory responses to continuous and intermittent hypoxia mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2. Physiol. Rev. 92, 967–1003 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Du, S. N., Mahalingam, S., Borowiec, B. G. & Scott, G. R. Mitochondrial physiology and reactive oxygen species production are altered by hypoxia acclimation in killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus). J. Exp. Biol. 219, 1130–1138 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
63.Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Bryant, D. M. et al. A tissue-mapped axolotl de novo transcriptome enables identification of limb regeneration factors. Cell Rep. 18, 762–776 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Bray, N. L., Pimentel, H., Melsted, P. & Pachter, L. Near-optimal probabilistic RNA-seq quantification. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 525 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Soneson, C., Love, M. I. & Robinson, M. D. Differential analyses for RNA-seq: transcript-level estimates improve gene-level inferences. F1000Research 4, 1–19 (2015).68.Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: A Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Conesa, A., Nueda, M. J., Ferrer, A. & Talón, M. maSigPro: A method to identify significantly differential expression profiles in time-course microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 22, 1096–1102 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
70.Nueda, M.J., Tarazona, S., & Conesa, A. Next maSigPro: updating maSigPro bioconductor package for RNA-seq time series. Bioinformatics, 30, 2598–2602. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu333 (2014).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
71.OmicsBox. Bioinformatics Made Easy, BioBam Bioinformatics. https://www.biobam.com/omicsbox (2019).72.Costa-Paiva, E. M., Schrago, C. G., Coates, C. J. & Halanych, K. M. Discovery of novel hemocyanin-like genes in Metazoans. Biol. Bull. 235, 134–151 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.Kanaoka, Y. & Urade, Y. Hematopoietic prostaglandin D synthase. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 69, 163–167 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
74.Altun, M. et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 19 (USP19) regulates hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) during hypoxia. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 1962–1969 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
75.Ogawa, M. et al. 17β-estradiol represses myogenic differentiation by increasing ubiquitin-specific peptidase 19 through estrogen receptor α. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 41455–41465 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Isaacs, J. S. et al. Hsp90 regulates a von Hippel Lindau-independent hypoxia-inducible factor-1α-degradative pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 29936–29944 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Nallapalli, R. K. et al. Targeting filamin A reduces K-RAS–induced lung adenocarcinomas and endothelial response to tumor growth in mice. Mol. Cancer 11, 1–11 (2012).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
78.Feng, Y. et al. Filamin A (FLNA) is required for cell–cell contact in vascular development and cardiac morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 103, 19836–19841 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Muñoz-Chápuli, R. Evolution of angiogenesis. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 55, 345–351 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
80.Kim, S., Lee, M. & Choi, Y. K. The role of a neurovascular signaling pathway involving hypoxia-inducible factor and notch in the function of the central nervous system. Biomol. Ther. 28, 45 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Nie, H., Wang, H., Jiang, K. & Yan, X. Transcriptome analysis reveals differential immune related genes expression in Ruditapes philippinarum under hypoxia stress: potential HIF and NF-κB crosstalk in immune responses in clam. BMC Genom. 21, 1–16 (2020).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar  More

1.Trigger, B. G. Sociocultural Evolution: Calculation and Contingency (Blackwell, 1998).2.Morgan, L. H. Ancient Society (Charles Kerr, 1877).3.Spencer, H. The Evolution of Society: Selections from Herbert Spencer’s Principles of Sociology (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1967).4.White, L. A. Energy and the evolution of culture. Am. Anthropol. 45, 335–356 (1943).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Childe, V. G. The urban revolution. Town Plan. Rev. 21, 3–17 (1950).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Adams, R. M. The Evolution of Urban Society: Early Mesopotamia and Prehispanic Mexico (Aldine, 1966).7.Wittfogel, K. A. Oriental Despotism: A Comparative Study of Total Power (Yale Univ. Press, 1957).8.Geertz, C. Agricultural Involution (Univ. of California Press, 1963).9.Boserup, E. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: the Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure (Aldine, 1965).10.Wolf, E. R. Peasants (Prentice-Hall, 1966).11.Binford, L. R. in New Perspectives in Archaeology (eds Binford, S. R. & Binford, L. R.) 421–449 (Aldine, 1968).12.Flannery, K. V. in The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals (eds Ucko, P. J. & Dimbleby, G. W.) 73–100 (Aldine, 1969).13.Sahlins, M. Stone Age Economics (Routledge, 2017).14.Cohen, M. N. The Food Crisis in Prehistory: Overpopulation and the Origins of Agriculture (Yale Univ. Press, 1977).15.Renfrew, C. in An Island Polity: the Archaeology of Exploitation in Melos (eds Renfrew, C. & Wagstaff, M.) 264–290 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1982).16.Diamond, J. Guns, Germs, and Steel: the Fates of Human Societies (Norton, 1997).17.Johnson, A. W. & Earle, T. K. The Evolution of Human Societies: From Foraging Group to Agrarian State 2nd edn (Stanford Univ. Press, 2000).18.Trigger, B. G. Understanding Early Civilizations: a Comparative Study (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003).19.Wenke, R. J. & Olszewski, D. I. Patterns in Prehistory: Humankind’s First Three Million Years 5th edn (Oxford Univ. Press, 2007).20.Scott, J. C. Against the Grain: a Deep History of the Earliest States (Yale Univ. Press, 2017).21.Hawkes, K., Kaplan, H., Hill, K. & Hurtado, A. M. Ache at the settlement: contrasts between farming and foraging. Hum. Ecol. 15, 133–161 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Piperno, D. R. & Pearsall, D. M. The Origins of Agriculture in the Lowland Neotropics (Academic Press, 1998).23.Bronson, B. C. in Population Growth: Anthropological Implications (ed. Spooner, B.) 190–218 (MIT Press, 1972).24.Hunt, R. C. Labor productivity and agricultural development: Boserup revisited. Hum. Ecol. 28, 251–277 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Bowles, S. Cultivation of cereals by the first farmers was not more productive than foraging. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4760–4765 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Clark, C. & Haswell, M. The Economics of Subsistence Agriculture 4th edn (Macmillan, 1970).27.Netting, R. Smallholders, Householders: Farm Families and the Ecology of Intensive, Sustainable Agriculture (Stanford Univ. Press, 1993).28.Kirch, P. V. The Wet and the Dry: Irrigation and Agricultural Intensification in Polynesia (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1994).29.Stone, G. D. Settlement Ecology: the Social and Spatial Organization of Kofyar Agriculture (Univ. of Arizona Press, 1996).30.Logan, M. & Sanders, W. T. in The Valley of Mexico: Studies in Pre-Hispanic Ecology and Society (ed. Wolf, E.) 31–58 (Univ. of New Mexico Press, 1976).31.Sanders, W. T., Parsons, J. R. & Santley, R. S. The Basin of Mexico: the Evolution of a Civilization (Academic Press, 1979).32.Pimentel, D. & Pimentel, M. H. Food, Energy, and Society 3rd edn (CRC Press, 2007).33.Smil, V. Energy and Civilization: A History (MIT Press, 2017).34.Turgot, A. R. J. The Turgot Collection: Writings, Speeches, and Letters of Anne Robert Jacques Turgot, Baron de Laune (Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2011).35.Mill, J. S. The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill (Univ. of Toronto Press, 1963).36.Barkley, A. & Barkley, P. W. Principles of Agricultural Economics (Routledge, 2013).37.Naroll, R. A preliminary index of social development. Am. Anthropol. 58, 687–715 (1956).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Carneiro, R. L. On the relationship between size of population and complexity of social organization. Southwest. J. Anthropol. 23, 234–243 (1967).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Bettencourt, L. M., Samaniego, H. & Youn, H. Professional diversity and the productivity of cities. Sci. Rep. 4, 5393 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Hanson, J. W., Ortman, S. G. & Lobo, J. Urbanism and the division of labour in the Roman Empire. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 20170367 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Ortman, S. & Lobo, J. Smithian growth in a nonindustrial society. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba5694 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Sandeford, D. S. Organizational complexity and demographic scale in primary states. R. Soc. Open Sci. 5, 171137 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Adams, R. M. Heartland of Cities: Surveys of Ancient Settlement and Land Use on the Central Floodplain at the Euphrates (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1981).44.O’Brien, M., Mason, R. D., Lewarch, D. E. & Neely, J. A. Late Formative Irrigation Settlement below Monte Albán: Survey and Excavation on the Xoxocotlán Piedmont, Oaxaca, Mexico (Univ. of Texas Press, 1982).45.Billman, B. R. Irrigation and the origins of the southern Moche state on the north coast of Peru. Lat. Am. Antiq. 13, 371–400 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Bandy, M. S. Energetic efficiency and political expediency in Titicaca Basin raised field agriculture. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 24, 271–296 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Liu, L. & Chen, X. The Archaeology of China: From the Late Paleolithic to the Early Bronze Age (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).48.Allen, R. C. Economic structure and agricultural productivity in Europe, 1300–1800. Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 4, 1–26 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Hamilton, M. J., Walker, R. S., Buchanan, B. & Sandeford, D. S. Scaling human sociopolitical complexity. PLoS ONE 15, e0234615 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Ortman, S. G., Lobo, J. & Smith, M. E. Cities: complexity, theory, and history. PLoS ONE 15, e0243621 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Fujita, M., Krugman, P. & Mori, T. On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems. Eur. Econ. Rev. 43, 209–251 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Bettencourt, L. M. The origins of scaling in cities. Science 340, 1438–1441 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Samaniego, H. & Moses, M. E. Cities as organisms: allometric scaling of urban road networks. J. Transp. Land Use 1, 21–39 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Smith, B. D. A cultural niche construction theory of initial domestication. Biol. Theory 6, 260–271 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Winterhalder, B. & Smith, E. A. Analyzing adaptive strategies: human behavioral ecology at twenty-five. Evol. Anthropol. 9, 51–72 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Kennett, D. J. & Winterhalder, B. (eds) Behavioral Ecology and the Transition to Agriculture (Univ. of California Press, 2006).57.Odling-Smee, J. F., Laland, K. N. & Feldman, M. W. Niche construction: the neglected process in evolution. Monographs in Population Biology No. 37 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2003).58.Mokyr, J. The Lever of Riches: Technological Creativity and Economic Progress (Oxford Univ. Press, 1992).59.Smith, B. D. General patterns of niche construction and the management of ‘wild’ plant and animal resources by small-scale pre-industrial societies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 836–848 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Turchin, P. in Cultural Evolution: Society, Technology, Language, and Religion (eds Richerson, P. J. & Christiansen, M. H.) 61–73 (MIT Press, 2013).61.Henrich, J. The Secret of Our Success: How Culture Is Driving Human Evolution, Domesticating Our Species, and Making Us Smarter (Princeton Univ. Press, 2016).62.Diamond, J. & Bellwood, P. Farmers and their languages: the first expansions. Science 300, 597–603 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Bellwood, P. First Farmers: the Origins of Agricultural Societies (Blackwell, 2005).64.Murdock, G. P. et al. Ethnographic Atlas. World Cult. 10, 24–136 (1999).
Google Scholar 
65.Bocquet-Appel, J.-P. & Bar-Yosef, O. (eds) The Neolithic Demographic Transition and Its Consequences (Springer, 2008).66.Lesure, R. G., Martin, L. S., Bishop, K. J., Jackson, B. & Chykerda, C. M. The Neolithic demographic transition in Mesoamerica. Curr. Anthropol. 55, 654–664 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Cohen, J. E. Population growth and Earth’s human carrying capacity. Science 269, 341–346 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.DeLong, J. P. & Burger, O. Socio-economic instability and the scaling of energy use with population size. PLoS ONE 10, e0130547 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
69.Tuzin, D. Social Complexity in the Making: a Case Study among the Arapesh of New Guinea (Routledge, 2001).70.Boserup, E. Population and Technological Change: a Study of Long-Term Trends (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1981).71.Bettencourt, L. M., Lobo, J. & Strumsky, D. Invention in the city: increasing returns to patenting as a scaling function of metropolitan size. Res. Policy 36, 107–120 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Rowley-Conwy, P. & Layton, R. Foraging and farming as niche construction: stable and unstable adaptations. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 366, 849–862 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Boivin, N. L. et al. Ecological consequences of human niche construction: examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6388–6396 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Ullah, I. I., Chang, C. & Tourtellotte, P. Water, dust, and agro-pastoralism: modeling socio-ecological co-evolution of landscapes, farming, and human society in southeast Kazakhstan during the mid to late Holocene. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 55, 101067 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Turner, B. L. & Doolittle, W. E. The concept and measure of agricultural intensity. Prof. Geogr. 30, 297–301 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Binford, L. R. Constructing Frames of Reference: an Analytical Method for Archaeological Theory Building Using Ethnographic and Environmental Data Sets (Univ. of California Press, 2001).77.Abrams, E. M. How the Maya Built Their World: Energetics and Ancient Architecture (Univ. of Texas Press, 1994).78.Erasmus, C. J. Monument building: some field experiments. Southwest. J. Anthropol. 21, 277–301 (1965).Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Durrenberger, E. P. Agricultural Production and Household Budgets in a Shan Peasant Village in Northwestern Thailand: a Quantitative Description (Ohio Univ. Center for International Studies, 1978).80.Grimes, W., Hodges, J., Nichols, R. & Tapp, J. A Study of Farm Organization in Central Kansas United States Department of Agriculture Bulletin No. 1296 (Government Printing Office, 1925).81.Barker, R., Herdt, R. & Rose, B. The Rice Economy of Asia (Resources for the Future, 1985).82.Cane, S. Australian aboriginal subsistence in the western desert. Hum. Ecol. 15, 391–434 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Ortman, S. G., Cabaniss, A. H., Sturm, J. O. & Bettencourt, L. M. The pre-history of urban scaling. PLoS ONE 9, e87902 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
84.R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).85.Geddes, W. R. The Land Dayaks of Sarawak Colonial Research Studies No. 14 (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1954).86.Freeman, J. D. Iban Agriculture: a Report on the Shifting Cultivation of Hill Rice by the Iban of Sarawak Colonial Research Studies No. 18 (Her Majesty’s Stationary Office, 1955).87.Conklin, H. C. Hanunóo Agriculture: a Report on an Integral System of Shifting Cultivation in the Philippines (Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 1957).88.Moerman, M. Agricultural Change and Peasant Choice in a Thai Village (Univ. of California Press, 1968).89.Durrenberger, E. P. Rice production in a Lisu village. J. Southeast Asian Stud. 10, 139–145 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Annual Report (International Rice Research Institute, 1966).91.Janlekha, K. A Study of the Economy of a Rice Growing Village in Central Thailand. PhD dissertation, Cornell Univ., 1955.92.Conelly, W. T. Agricultural intensification in a Philippine frontier community: impact on labor efficiency and farm diversity. Hum. Ecol. 20, 203–223 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Chin, S. C. Agriculture and Subsistence in a Lowland Rainforest Kenyah Community. PhD dissertation, Yale Univ., 1984.94.Cramb, R. The use and productivity of labour in shifting cultivation: an East Malaysian case study. Agric. Syst. 29, 97–115 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Hastorf, C. A. Agriculture and the Onset of Political Inequality before the Inka (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1993).96.Carter, W. E. New Lands and Old Traditions (Univ. of Florida Press, 1969).97.Truman, K. in Food and Farm: Current Debates and Policies Monographs in Economic Anthropology No. 7 (eds Gladwin, C. H. & Truman, K.) 161–178 (Univ. Press of America, 1989).98.Kirkby, A. Use of Land and Water Resources in the Past and Present Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico Memoirs of the University of Michigan Museum of Anthropology No. 5 (Museum of Anthropology, Univ. of Michigan, 1973).99.Lewis, O. Life in a Mexican Village: Tepoztlán Restudied (Univ. of Illinois Press, 1963).100.Tax, S. Penny Capitalism: a Guatemalan Indian Community (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1963).101.Cancian, F. Change and Uncertainty in a Peasant Economy: The Maya Corn Farmers of Zinacantan (Stanford Univ. Press, 1972).102.Stadelman, R. Maize Cultivation in Northwestern Guatemala Contributions to American Anthropology and History No. 33 (Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1940).103.Steggerda, M. Maya Indians of Yucatan (Carnegie Institution of Washington, 1941).104.Kelly, I. & Palerm, A. The Tajin Totonac: Part 1. History, Subsistence, Shelter and Technology Smithsonian Institution Institute of Social Anthropology No. 13 (United States Government Printing Office, 1952).105.Rappoport, R. Pigs for the Ancestors (Yale Univ. Press, 1968).106.Couture, M. D., Ricks, M. F. & Housley, L. Foraging behavior of a contemporary northern Great Basin population. J. Calif. Gt Basin Anthropol. 8, 150–160 (1986).
Google Scholar 
107.Noss, A. J. The economic importance of communal net hunting among the BaAka of the Central African Republic. Hum. Ecol. 25, 71–89 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
108.Hawkes, K., O’Connell, F. & Jones, N. B. Hadza children’s foraging: juvenile dependency, social arrangements, and mobility among hunter-gatherers. Curr. Anthropol. 36, 688–700 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
109.Lupo, K. D. & Schmitt, D. N. Small prey hunting technology and zooarchaeological measures of taxonomic diversity and abundance: ethnoarchaeological evidence from Central African forest foragers. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 24, 335–353 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
110.Bliege Bird, R. & Bird, D. W. Why women hunt: risk and contemporary foraging in a Western Desert aboriginal community. Curr. Anthropol. 49, 655–693 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
111.O’Connell, J. F. & Hawkes, K. Food choice and foraging sites among the Alyawara. J. Anthropol. Res. 40, 504–535 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
112.Greaves, R. D. Ethnoarchaeological Investigation of Subsistence Mobility, Resource Targeting, and Technological Organization among Pume Foragers of Venezuela. PhD dissertation, Univ. of New Mexico, 1998.113.Eder, J. F. The caloric returns to food collecting: disruption and change among the Batak of the Philippine tropical forest. Hum. Ecol. 6, 55–69 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
114.O’Connell, J. F. & Hawkes, K. in Hunter-Gatherer Foraging Strategies: Ethnographic and Archaeological Analyses (eds Winterhalder, B. & Smith, E. A.) 99–125 (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1981).115.Jones, N. B., Hawkes, K. & Draper, P. Foraging returns of !Kung adults and children: why didn’t !Kung children forage? J. Anthropol. Res. 50, 217–248 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
116.Lee, R. B. in Man the Hunter (eds Lee, R. B. & DeVore, I.) 30–48 (Aldine, 1968).117.Hames, R. B. A comparison of the efficiencies of the shotgun and the bow in neotropical forest hunting. Hum. Ecol. 7, 219–252 (1979).Article 

Google Scholar 
118.Hawkes, K., Hill, K. & O’Connell, J. F. Why hunters gather: optimal foraging and the Ache of eastern Paraguay. Am. Ethnol. 9, 379–398 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
119.Ichikawa, M. An examination of the hunting-dependent life of the Mbuti. Afr. Study Monogr. 4, 55–76 (1983).
Google Scholar 
120.Terashima, H. Hunting life of the Bambote: an anthropological study of hunter-gatherers in a wooded savanna. Senri Ethnol. Stud. 6, 223–268 (1980).
Google Scholar 
121.Terashima, H. Mota and other hunting activities of the Mbuti archers: a socio-ecological study of subsistence technology. Afr. Study Monogr. 3, 71–85 (1983).
Google Scholar 
122.Arsdale, P. W. Activity patterns of Asmat hunter-gatherers: a time budget analysis. Aust. J. Anthropol. 11, 453–60 (1978).Article 

Google Scholar 
123.Baldwin, K. D. S. The Niger Agricultural Project, an Experiment in African Development (Blackwell, 1957).124.Stone, G. D., Netting, R. M. & Stone, M. P. Seasonality, labor scheduling, and agricultural intensification in the Nigerian savanna. Am. Anthropol. 92, 7–23 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
125.Panter-Brick, C. Motherhood and subsistence work: the Tamang of rural Nepal. Hum. Ecol. 17, 205–228 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
126.Clark, G. A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World Vol. 25 (Princeton Univ. Press, 2008).127.Pospisil, L. J. Kapauku Papuan Economy (Dept of Anthropology, Yale Univ., 1963).128.Slicher Van Bath, B. H. The Agrarian History of Western Europe, AD 500–1850 (Edward Arnold, 1963).129.Goodell, G. Agricultural production in a traditional village of northern Khuzestan. Marbg. Geogr. Schriften 64, 243–289 (1975).
Google Scholar 
130.Cleave, J. H. African Farmers: Labor Use in the Development of Smallholder Agriculture (Praeger, 1974). More

Seawater surface pH (total scale), Ωarag and temperatures (SST) showed a strong gradient at the entrance into the bay (Fig. 2a, b, e) and the seawater pH range (7.65–8.02) observed within the bay was equivalent to the ocean pH value from present to the value expected by the end of this century (IPCC 2013, RCP 8.5)29. The mean daytime seawater temperature within the bay was significantly warmer (31.8 ± 0.6 °C, mean ± S.D.) and had lower pH (7.83 ± 0.06), lower Ωarag, (2.44 ± 0.34) and higher pCO2 (619 ± 104 μatm) compared to parameters outside the bay (30.4 ± 0.1 °C, 8.02 ± 0.02, 391 ± 31 μatm, 3.63 ± 0.14, Wilcoxon-test, p  More

1.Gamow, G. Biography of Physics (Harper, 1961).2.Cang, Z., Mu, L. & Wei, G.-W. PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005929 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Reimann, M. W. et al. Front. Comput. Neurosci. 11, 48 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Angulo, M. T., Kelley, A., Montejano, L., Song, C. & Saavedra, S. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01462-8 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Ghrist, R. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 45, 61–75 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Chesson, P. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 343–366 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Friedman, J., Higgins, L. M. & Gore, J. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0109 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Grilli, J., Barabás, G., Michalska-Smith, M. J. & Allesina, S. Nature 548, 210–213 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Grainger, T. N., Levine, J. M. & Gilbert, B. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 925–935 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Gould, A. L. et al. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E11951–E11960 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Letten, A. D. & Stouffer, D. B. Ecol. Lett. 22, 423–436 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Fukami, T. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 46, 1–23 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Fitzsimmons, K. M., Gonzalez-Alanis, P. & Martinez-Garcia, R. Why tilapia is becoming the most important food fish on the planet? In Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on tilapia in Aquaculture, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai, China, 22-24 April 2011 8–16 (2011).2.FAO. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture. Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome. Licence. CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (Food and Agriculture Organisation, 2018).3.ADB. An impact evaluation of the development of genetically improved farmed tilapia and their dissemination in selected countries. The Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines 90 (Asian Development Bank, 2004).4.Macaranas, J. M., Taniguchi, N., Pante, M. J. R., Capili, J. B. & Pullin, R. S. V. Electrophoretic evidence for extensive hybrid gene introgression into commercial Oreochromis niloticus (L.) stocks in the Philippines. Aquac. Res. 17, 249–258 (1986).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.ADB. An impact evaluation of the development of genetically improved farmed tilapia and their dissemination in selected countries. The Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines 137 (Asian Development Bank, 2005).6.Bradbeer, S. J. et al. Limited hybridization between introduced and critically endangered indigenous tilapia fishes in Northern Tanzania. University of Bristol. Hydrobiologia https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-018-3572-5b (2018).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Shechonge, A. et al. Losing cichlid fish biodiversity: Genetic and morphological homogenization of tilapia following colonization by introduced species. Conserv. Genet. 19(5), 1199–1209 (2018).8.Gupta, M. V & Acosta, B. O. A review of global tilapia farming practices. Aquac. Asia 9, 7–12 (2004). 9.Eknath, A., Dey, M. M., Rye, M. & Gjerde, B. Selective breeding of Nile tilapia for Asia. In Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, Australia, University of New England. 27, 89–96 (1998).10.Ponzoni, R. W. et al. Genetic improvement of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) with special reference to the work conducted by the WorldFish Center with the GIFT strain. Rev. Aquac. 3, 27–41 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.WorldFish. Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT). Key facts ongoing and future research. FactSheet. https://digitalarchive.worldfishcenter.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12348/66/3880_2015-31.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (2015).
12.Bolivar, R. Estimation of response to within-family selection for growth in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). PhD. Dissertation, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. Canada. 166 (1998).13.Tayamen, M. M. Nationwide dissemination of GET-EXCEL tilapia in the Philippines. In Proceeding of the Sixth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Manila, Philippines, and American Tilapia Association, Charles Town, West Virginia (ed. Bolivar, R,B., Mair, G.C and Fitzsimmons, K.) 74–85 (2004).14.Zimmerman, S. & Natividad, J. M. Comparative pond performance evaluation of GenoMar Supreme Tilapia GST 1 and GST 3 groups. In Proceeding of the Sixth International Symposium on Tilapia in Aquaculture. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Manila, Philippines, and American Tilapia Association, Charles Town, West Virginia (ed. Bolivar, R.B., Mair, G.C and Fitzsimmons, K.) 89 (2004).
15.Thodesen, J. et al. Genetic improvement of tilapias in China: Genetic parameters and selection responses in growth, survival and external color traits of red tilapia (Oreochromis spp.) after four generations of multi-trait selection. Aquaculture 416–417, 354–366 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Ansah, Y. B., Frimpong, E. A. & Hallerman, E. M. Genetically-improved tilapia strains in Africa: Potential benefits and negative impacts. Sustain. 6, 3697–3721 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Charo-karisa, H. Selection for growth of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) in low-input environments. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands (2006). 18.Kohinoor, A. H. M., Modak, P. C. & Hussain, M. G. Growth and production performance of red tilapia and Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) under low-input culture system. Bangladesh J. Fish Res. 3, 11–17 (1999).
Google Scholar 
19.Vadhel, N. et al. Red Tilapia: A candidate euryhaline species for aqua farming in Gujarat. J. Fish. 11(1), 048–050 (2017).
Google Scholar 
20.Felix, E., Avwemoya, F. E. & Abah, A. Some methods of monosex tilapia production: A review. Int. j. fish. aquat. res. 4(2), 42–49 (2019). 21.Fuentes-silva, C., Soto-zarazúa, G. M., Torres-pacheco, I. & Flores-rangel, A. Male tilapia production techniques: A mini-review. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 12, 5496–5502 (2013).
Google Scholar 
22.Wohlfarth, G. W. The unexploited potential of tilapia hybrids in aquaculture. Aquacult Fish Manage, 25, 781–788 (1994).23.Lahav, M. & Lahav, E. The development of all-male tilapia hybrids in Nir David. Bamidgeh. Isr. J. Aquac. 42, 58–61 (1990).
Google Scholar 
24.Siddiqui, A. Q. & Al-harbi, A. H. Evaluation of three species of tilapia, red tilapia and a hybrid tilapia as culture species in Saudi Arabia. Aquaculture 8486, 145–157 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Gjerde, B. et al. Growth and survival in two complete diallele crosses with five stocks of Rohu carp (Labeo rohita). Aquaculture 209, 103–115 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Mbiru, M. et al. Comparative performance of mixed-sex and hormonal sex-reversed Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus and hybrids (Oreochromis niloticus × Oreochromis urolepis hornorum) cultured in concrete tanks. Aquac. Int. 24, 557–566 (2015).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
27.Marengoni, N. G. et al. Morphological traits and growth performance of monosex male tilapia GIFT strain and Saint Peter®. Semin. Agrar. 36, 3399–3410 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Eknath, A. E. & Acosta, B. O. Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias (GIFT) project: Final report, March to December 1997. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management (ICLARM), Makati City, Philippines 75 (1988). 29.Dan, N. C. & Little, D. C. The culture performance of monosex and mixed-sex new-season and overwintered fry in three strains of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in northern Vietnam. Aquaculture 184, 221–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00329-4 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Kohinoor, A. H. M., Rahman, M. & Islam, S. Upgradation of genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT) strain by family selection in Bangladesh. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 4, 650–654 (2016).
Google Scholar 
31.Ridha, M. Preliminary study on growth, feed conversion and production in non-improved and improved strains of the Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus. Fisheries and Marine Environment Department, Kuwait Institute for scientific Research, Salmiyah 22017, Kuwait (2016).32.Santos, B., Mareco, E. & Silva, M. Growth curves of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) strains cultivated at different temperatures. Acta Sci. Anim. Sci. 35, 235–242 (2013).
Google Scholar 
33.Eknath, A. E. et al. Genetic improvement of farmed tilapias: Composition and genetic parameters of a synthetic base population of Oreochromis niloticus for selective breeding. Aquaculture 273, 1–14 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Sukmanomon, S. et al. Genetic changes, intra- and inter-specific introgression in farmed Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Thailand. Aquaculture 324–325, 44–54 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Anane-taabeah, G., Frimpong, E. A. & Hallerman, E. Aquaculture-mediated invasion of the Genetically Improved Farmed Tilapia (GIFT) into the Lower Volta Basin of Ghana. Diversity (Basel) 11, 188 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Trinh, T. Q., Agyakwah, S. K., Khaw, H. L., Benzie, J. A. H. & Attipoe, F. K. Y. Performance evaluation of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) improved strains in Ghana. Aquaculture 530, 735938 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Canonico, G., Oceanic, N. & Arthington, A. H. The effects of introduced tilapias on native biodiversity. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 15, 463–483 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Lind, C. E., Brummett, R. E. & Ponzoni, R. W. Exploitation and conservation of fish genetic resources in Africa: Issues and priorities for aquaculture development and research. Rev. Aquac. 4, 125–141 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.URT. Ministry Livestock and Fisheries.Annual Report, Dodoma, Tanzania (United Republic of Tanzania, 2019).40.URT. Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries. Annual Report, Dodoma, Tanzania (United Republic of Tanzania, 2018).41.Mbiru, M. et al. Characterizing the genetic structure of introduced Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) strains in Tanzania using double digest RAD sequencing. Int. Aquac. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10499-019-00472-5 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Kajungiro, R. A. et al. Population structure and genetic diversity of Nile Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) strains cultured in Tanzania. Front. Genet. 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2019.01269 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Rothuis, A. et al. Aquaculture in East Africa: A regional approach. Wageningen, LEI Wageningen UR (University & Research Centre), LEI Report. IMARES C153/14| LEI. 14–120 (2014).44.URT. Vice President’s Office, Division of Environment: National Adaptation Programme of Action(NAPA, 2007).45.ATLAS. Climate change in Tanzania: Country risk profile. Task Order No. AID-OAA-I-14-00013 1–5 (Climate Change Adaptation, Thought Leadership and Assessments, 2018).46.Kassambara, A. ggpubr: ‘ggplot2’ Based Publication Ready Plot. 2019. https://rdrr.io/cran/ggpubr 2020/03/24 (2019).47.Shapiro, S. S. & Wilk, M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611 (1965).MathSciNet 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Evans, J. Straightforward Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1996).
Google Scholar 
49.Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edn. (Routledge, 1988).MATH 

Google Scholar 
50.Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. car: Companion to Applied Regression. Third Edition, Sage. Version 3.0–7 (2019). 51.Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R Package version 3.5.3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans, https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1980.10483031. (2020).52.Dey, M. M. et al. Performance and nature of genetically improved farmed tilapia: A bioeconomic analysis. Aquac. Econ. Manag. 4, 1–2 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Sifa, L., Chenhong, L. & Dey, M. Cold tolerance of three strains of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, in China. Aquaculture 213, 123–129 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Cnaani, A., Gall, G. A. E. & Hulata, G. Cold tolerance of tilapia species and hybrids. Aquac. Int. 8, 289–298 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Nandlal, S., Morris, C. W., Lagibalavu, M. & Ledua, E. A comparative evaluation of two tilapia strains in Fiji, 35–41. In Proceeding of the Fish Genetics Research in Member Countries and Institutions of the International Network on Genetics in Aquaculture. ICLARM Conf. Proc, 2-5 March 1999, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (eds. Gupta, M. V. & Acosta, B. O.) 64, (179), 35–42 (2001).56.Hussain, M. G. et al. Genetic evaluation of GIFT and existing strains of nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus L., under on-station and on-farm conditions in Bangladesh. Asian Fish. Sci. 13, 117–126 (2000).
Google Scholar 
57.Hopkins, K. Reporting fish growth: A review of the basics. J. World Aquac. Soc. 33, 173–179 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Bhujel, R. C. On-farm feed management practices for Nile tilapia in Thailand. In On-Farm Feeding and Feed Management in Aquaculture. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper No. 583. Rome. (ed. Hasan, M. R. & New, M. B.) 159–189 (2013).59.Volpato, G. & Fernandes, M. Social control of growth in fish. Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 27, 797–810 (1994).
Google Scholar 
60.Enquist, M. & Jakobsson, S. Decision making and assessment in the fighting behaviour of Nannacara anomala (Cichlidae, Pisces). Ethology 72, 143–153 (1986).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Boscolo, C. N. P., Morais, R. N. & Freitas, E. G. Same-sized fish groups increase aggressive interaction of sex-reversed males Nile tilapia GIFT strain. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 135, 154–159 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Ebtehag Kamel, A. R. Evaluation of reproductive performance of tilapia strains and some of their crosses. J. Arab. Aquac. Soc. 6, 119–138 (2011).
Google Scholar 
63.Thoa, N. P., Ninh, N. H., Hoa, N. T., Knibb, W. & Diep, N. H. Additive genetic and heterotic effects in a 4 × 4 complete diallel cross-population of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linnaeus, 1758) reared in different water temperature environments in different water temperature environments in Northern Viet. Aquac. Res. 47, 708–720 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
64.Ridha, M. T. Comparative study of growth performance of three strains of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, L., at two stocking densities. Aquac. Res. 37, 172–179 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Khan, S., Hossain, M. & Science, P. Production and economics of GIFT strain of tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in small seasonal ponds. Progress. Agric. 19(1), 97–104 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Alam, M. B., Islam, M. A., Marine, S. S., Rashid, A. & Hossain, M. A. Growth performances of GIFT tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Cage culture at the Old Brahmaputra river using different densities. J. SylhetAgril. Univ. 1(2), 265–271 (2014).
Google Scholar 
67.Matthew, M. T. et al. Growth performance evaluation of four wild strains and one current farmed strain of Nile tilapia in Uganda. Int. J. Fish. Aquat. Stud. 4, 594–598 (2016).
Google Scholar 
68.Shoko, A. P., Limbu, S. M., Mrosso, H. D. J., Mkenda, A. F. & Mgaya, Y. D. Effect of stocking density on growth, production and economic benefits of mixed sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) and African sharptooth catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in polyculture and monoculture. Aquac. Res. https://doi.org/10.1111/are.12463 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Hasan, S. J., Mian, S., Rashid, A. H. & Rahmatullah, S. M. Effects of stocking density on growth and production of GIFT Tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Bangladesh. Fish. Res. 14, 45–53 (2010).
Google Scholar 
70.Rahman, M. M., Mondal, D. K., Amin, M. R. & Muktadir, M. G. Impact of stocking density on growth and production performance of monosex tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in ponds. Asian J. Med. Biol. Res. 2, 471–476 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Li, S. et al. Improving growth performance and caudal fin stripe pattern in selected F6–F8 generations of GIFT Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) using mass selection. Aquac. Res. 37, 1165–1171 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Dos Santos, B., Vander Silva, V. V., De, M. V., Mareco, E. A. & Salomão, R. A. S. Performance of Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus strains in Brazil: A comparison with Philippine strain. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 47, 72–78 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Reis Neto, V. et al. Genetic parameters and trends of morphometric traits of GIFT tilapia under selection for weight gain. Sci. Agric. 71, 259–265 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Gilbert, H. R. & Gregory, P. W. Some features of growth and development of Hereford cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 11, 3–16 (1952).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Russell, W. S. T. The growth of Ayrshire cattle: An analysis of linear body measurements. J. Anim. Sci. 21, 217–226 (1975).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Montoya-lópez, A., Moreno-arias, C., Tarazona-morales, A., Olivera-Angel, M. & Betancur, J. Body shape variation between farms of tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) in Colombian Andes using landmark based geometric morphometrics. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 47, 194–200 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Bœuf, G. & Payan, P. How should salinity influence fish growth?. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 130(4), 411–423 (2001).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
78.Azevedo, R. V. et al. Responses of Nile tilapia to different levels of water salinity Rafael. Lat. Am. J. Aquat. Res. 43, 828–835 (2015).
Google Scholar 
79.Nguyen, H. N., Khaw, L. H., Ponzoni, R. W., Hamzah, A. & Kamaruzzaman, N. Can sexual dimorphism and body shape be altered in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) by genetic means?. Aquaculture 272S1, S38–S46 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Imre, I., McLaughlin, R. L. & Noakes, D. L. G. Phenotypic plasticity in brook charr: Changes in caudal fin induced by water flow. J. Fish Biol. 61, 1171–1181 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Costa, C. et al. Genetic and environmental influences on shape variation in the European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 101, 427–436 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Vehanen, T. & Huusko, A. Brown trout Salmo trutta express different morphometrics due to divergence in the rearing environment. J. Fish Biol. 79, 1167–1181 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Ndiwa, T. C., Nyingi, D. W., Claude, J. & Agnèse, J.-F. Morphological variations of wild populations of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) living in extreme environmental conditions in the Kenyan Rift-Valley. Environ. Biol. Fishes. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10641-016-0492-y (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Khaw, L. H., Ponzoni, R. W., Hamzah, A., Abu-bakar, K. R. & Bijma, P. Genotype by production environment interaction in the GIFT strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquaculture 326–329, 53–60 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Kosai, P., Sathavorasmith, P., Jiraungkoorskul, K. & Jiraungkoorskul, W. Morphometric characters of Nile Tilapia
(Oreochromis niloticus) in Thailand. Walailak Jour. Sci. and Tech. 11(10), 857–863 (2014). More

1.Ellis, B. J., Figueredo, A. J., Brumbach, B. H. & Schlomer, G. L. Fundamental dimensions of environmental risk—The impact of harsh versus unpredictable environments on the evolution and development of life history strategies. Hum. Nat. 20, 204–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-009-9063-7 (2009).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
2.Reznick, D. A., Bryga, H. & Endler, J. A. Experimentally induced life-history evolution in a natural population. Nature 346, 357–359. https://doi.org/10.1038/346357a0 (1990).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Pianka, E. R. On r- and K-selection. Am. Nat. 104, 592–597. https://doi.org/10.1086/282697 (1970).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Stearns, S. C. Life-history tactics: A review of the ideas. Q. Rev. Biol. 51, 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1086/409052 (1976).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
5.Flegr, J. Two distinct types of natural selection in turbidostat-like and chemostat-like ecosystems. J. Theor. Biol. 188, 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1997.0458 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Bowyer, R. T., Person, D. K. & Pierce, B. M. Detecting top-down versus bottom-up regulation of ungulates by large carnivores: Implications for conservation of biodiversity. In Large Carnivores and the Conservation of Biodiversity (eds. Ray, J. C et al.) 342–361 (Island Press, 2005).7.Jones, M. E. et al. Life-history change in disease-ravaged Tasmanian devil populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10023–10027. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0711236105 (2008).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
8.Scheele, B. C. et al. Disease-associated change in an amphibian life-history trait. Oecologia 184, 825–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-017-3911-7 (2017).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
9.Thornhill, J. A., Jones, J. T. & Kusel, J. R. Increased oviposition and growth in immature Biomphalaria glabrata after exposure to Schistosoma mansoni. Parasitology 93, 443–450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031182000081166 (1986).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
10.Polak, M. & Starmer, W. T. Parasite-induced risk of mortality elevates reproductive effort in male Drosophila. Proc. R. Soc. B 265, 2197–2201. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1998.0559 (1998).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
11.Chadwick, W. & Little, T. J. A parasite-mediated life-history shift in Daphnia magna. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 505–509. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2959 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
12.Schwanz, L. E. Chronic parasitic infection alters reproductive output in deer mice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 62, 1351–1358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0563-y (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Promislow, D. E. L. & Harvey, P. H. Living fast and dying young: A comparative analysis of life-history variation among mammals. J. Zool. 220, 417–437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb04316.x (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Hill, K. Life history theory and evolutionary anthropology. Evol. Anthropol. 2, 78–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.1360020303 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Charlesworth, B. Evolution in Age-Structured Populations 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, 1994).Book 

Google Scholar 
16.Nettle, D. & Frankenhuis, W. E. Life-history theory in psychology and evolutionary biology: One research programme or two?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 375, 9. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0490 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Del Giudice, M. Rethinking the fast-slow continuum of individual differences. Evol. Hum. Behav. 41, 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.05.004 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Lammers, C., Ireland, M., Resnick, M. & Blum, R. Influences on adolescents’ decision to postpone onset of sexual intercourse: A survival analysis of virginity among youths aged 13 to 18 years. J. Adolesc. Health 26, 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(99)00041-5 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
19.Wilson, M. & Daly, M. Life expectancy, economic inequality, homicide, and reproductive timing in Chicago neighbourhoods. BMJ 314, 1271–1274 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Bereczkei, T. & Csanaky, A. Stressful family environment, mortality, and child socialisation: Life-history strategies among adolescents and adults from unfavourable social circumstances. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 25, 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000573 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Nettle, D. Dying young and living fast: Variation in life history across English neighborhoods. Behav. Ecol. 21, 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp202 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Griskevicius, V., Delton, A. W., Robertson, T. E. & Tybur, J. M. Environmental contingency in life history strategies: The influence of mortality and socioeconomic status on reproductive timing. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 241–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021082 (2011).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Sheppard, P., Pearce, M. S. & Sear, R. How does childhood socioeconomic hardship affect reproductive strategy? Pathways of development. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 28, 356–363. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22793 (2016).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
24.Belsky, J., Steinberg, L. & Draper, P. Childhood experience, interpersonal development, and reproductive strategy: An evolutionary theory of socialization. Child Dev. 62, 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1991.tb01558.x (1991).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
25.Rickard, I. J., Frankenhuis, W. E. & Nettle, D. Why are childhood family factors associated with timing of maturation? A role for internal prediction. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 9, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613513467 (2014).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
26.Chua, K. J., Lukaszewski, A. W., Grant, D. M. & Sng, O. Human life history strategies: Calibrated to external or internal cues?. Evol. Psychol. 15, 1474704916677342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916677342 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
27.Adamo, S. A. Evidence for adaptive changes in egg laying in crickets exposed to bacteria and parasites. Anim. Behav. 57, 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1998.0999 (1999).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
28.Giehr, J., Grasse, A. V., Cremer, S., Heinze, J. & Schrempf, A. Ant queens increase their reproductive efforts after pathogen infection. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170547. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170547 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Sorci, G., Clobert, J. & Michalakis, Y. Cost of reproduction and cost of parasitism in the common lizard, Lacerta vivipara. Oikos 76, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545754 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Oppliger, A., Christe, P. & Richner, H. Clutch size and malarial parasites in female great tits. Behav. Ecol. 8, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/8.2.148 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Sanz, J. J., Arriero, E., Moreno, J. & Merino, S. Interactions between hemoparasite status and female age in the primary reproductive output of pied flycatchers. Oecologia 126, 339–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420000530 (2001).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
32.Westendorp, R. G. J. & Kirkwood, T. B. L. Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success. Nature 396, 743–746. https://doi.org/10.1038/25519 (1998).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
33.Thomas, F., Teriokhin, A. T., Renaud, F., De Meeus, T. & Guégan, J. F. Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success: Evidence from global data. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1420-9101.2000.00190.x (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Figueredo, A. J., Vasquez, G., Brumbach, B. H. & Schneider, S. M. R. The heritability of life history strategy: The K-factor, covitality, and personality. Soc. Biol. 51, 121–143 (2004).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
35.Figueredo, A. J., Vasquez, G., Brumbach, B. H. & Schneider, S. M. R. The K-factor, covitality, and personality—A psychometric test of life history theory. Hum. Nat. 18, 47–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02820846 (2007).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
36.Hill, S. E., Boehm, G. W. & Prokosch, M. L. Vulnerability to disease as a predictor of faster life history strategies. Adapt. Hum. Behav. Physiol. 2, 116–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-015-0040-6 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Uggla, C. & Mace, R. Local ecology influences reproductive timing in Northern Ireland independently of individual wealth. Behav. Ecol. 27, 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv133 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Waynforth, D. Life-history theory, chronic childhood illness and the timing of first reproduction in a British birth cohort. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 2998–3002. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0220 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
39.Mace, R. Evolutionary ecology of human life history. Anim. Behav. 59, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1287 (2000).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
40.Low, B. S., Simon, C. P. & Anderson, K. G. An evolutionary ecological perspective on demographic transitions: Modeling multiple currencies. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14, 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.10043 (2002).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
41.Galor, O. The demographic transition: Causes and consequences. Cliometrica 6, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-011-0062-7 (2012).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Protsiv, M., Ley, C., Lankester, J., Hastie, T. & Parsonnet, J. Decreasing human body temperature in the United States since the industrial revolution. Elife 9, e49555. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.49555 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Novotná, M. et al. Toxoplasma and reaction time: Role of toxoplasmosis in the origin, preservation and geographical distribution of Rh blood group polymorphism. Parasitology 135, 1253–1261. https://doi.org/10.1017/s003118200800485x (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
44.Flegr, J., Novotná, M., Lindová, J. & Havlíček, J. Neurophysiological effect of the Rh factor. Protective role of the RhD molecule against Toxoplasma-induced impairment of reaction times in women. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 29, 475–481 (2008).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
45.Flegr, J., Preiss, M. & Klose, J. Toxoplasmosis-associated difference in intelligence and personality in men depends on their Rhesus blood group but not ABO blood group. PLoS One 8, e61272. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061272 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Flegr, J., Šebánková, B., Příplatová, L., Chvátalová, V. & Kaňková, Š. Lower performance of Toxoplasma-infected, Rh-negative subjects in the weight holding and hand-grip tests. PLoS One 13, e0200346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200346 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Flegr, J., Klose, J., Novotná, M., Berenreitterová, M. & Havlíček, J. Increased incidence of traffic accidents in Toxoplasma-infected military drivers and protective effect RhD molecule revealed by a large-scale prospective cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-9-72 (2009).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Flegr, J., Geryk, J., Volný, J., Klose, J. & Černochová, D. Rhesus factor modulation of effects of smoking and age on psychomotor performance, intelligence, personality profile, and health in Czech soldiers. PLoS One 7, e4947810. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049478 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Flegr, J., Hoffmann, R. & Dammann, M. Worse health status and higher incidence of health disorders in Rhesus negative subjects. PLoS One 10, e0141362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141362 (2015).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
50.Flegr, J. Heterozygote advantage probably maintains Rhesus factor blood group polymorphism: Ecological regression study. PLoS One 11, e0147955. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147955 (2016).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Flegr, J., Kuba, R. & Kopecký, R. Rhesus-minus phenotype as a predictor of sexual desire and behavior, wellbeing, mental health, and fecundity. PLoS One 15, e0236134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236134 (2020).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Kaňková, Š., Flegr, J., Toman, J. & Calda, P. Maternal RhD heterozygous genotype is associated with male biased secondary sex ratio. Early Hum. Dev. 140, 104864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2019.104864 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
53.Flegr, J. & Dama, M. Does the prevalence of latent toxoplasmosis and frequency of Rhesus-negative subjects correlate with the nationwide rate of traffic accidents?. Folia Parasitol. 61, 485–494 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Halmin, M. et al. Length of storage of red blood cells and patient survival after blood transfusion: A binational cohort study. Ann. Intern. Med. 166, 248–256. https://doi.org/10.7326/m16-1415 (2017).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
55.Jacobsen, B. K., Oda, K., Knutsen, S. F. & Fraser, G. E. Age at menarche, total mortality and mortality from ischaemic heart disease and stroke: The Adventist Health Study, 1976–88. Int. J. Epidemiol. 38, 245–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyn251 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
56.Lakshman, R. et al. Early age at menarche associated with cardiovascular disease and mortality. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 4953–4960. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1789 (2009).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
57.Canoy, D. et al. Age at menarche and risks of coronary heart and other vascular diseases in a large UK cohort. Circulation 131, 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.114.010070 (2015).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
58.Macsali, F. et al. Early age at menarche, lung function, and adult asthma. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 183, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200912-1886OC (2011).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
59.Stöckl, D. et al. Age at menarche is associated with prediabetes and diabetes in women (aged 32–81 years) from the general population: The KORA F4 Study. Diabetologia 55, 681–688. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-011-2410-3 (2012).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
60.Brinton, L. A., Schairer, C., Hoover, R. N. & Fraumeni, J. F. Menstrual factors and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Investig. 6, 245–254. https://doi.org/10.3109/07357908809080645 (1988).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Kvale, G. & Heuch, I. Menstrual factors and breast cancer risk. Cancer 62, 1625–1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19881015)62:8%3c1625::aid-cncr2820620828%3e3.0.co;2-k (1988).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
62.Adair, L. S. Size at birth predicts age at menarche. Pediatrics 107, e59. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.107.4.e59 (2001).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
63.Romundstad, P. R. et al. Birth size in relation to age at menarche and adolescent body size: Implications for breast cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer 105, 400–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.11103 (2003).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
64.Sloboda, D. M., Hart, R., Doherty, D. A., Pennell, C. E. & Hickey, M. Age at menarche: Influences of prenatal and postnatal growth. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92, 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-1378 (2007).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
65.Rich-Edwards, J. W. et al. Birth weight and risk of cardiovascular disease in a cohort of women followed up since 1976. BMJ 315, 396–400. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7105.396 (1997).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Andersen, A. M. N. & Osler, M. Birth dimensions, parental mortality, and mortality in early adult age: A cohort study of Danish men born in 1953. Int. J. Epidemiol. 33, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyg195 (2004).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
67.Gluckman, P. D. & Hanson, M. A. Evolution, development and timing of puberty. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 17, 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2005.11.006 (2006).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
68.Kulin, H. E., Bwibo, N., Mutie, D. & Santner, S. J. The effect of chronic childhood malnutrition on pubertal growth and development. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 36, 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/36.3.527 (1982).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
69.Khan, A. D., Schroeder, D. G., Martorell, R., Haas, J. D. & Rivera, J. Early childhood determinants of age at menarche in rural Guatemala. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 8, 717–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1520-6300(1996)8:6%3c717::aid-ajhb3%3e3.0.co;2-q (1996).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
70.Leenstra, T. et al. Prevalence and severity of malnutrition and age at menarche; cross-sectional studies in adolescent schoolgirls in western Kenya. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59, 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602031 (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
71.Walker, R. et al. Growth rates and life histories in twenty-two small-scale societies. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 18, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20510 (2006).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
72.Idler, E. L. & Kasl, S. V. Self-ratings of health: Do they also predict change in functional ability. J. Gerontol. B 50, S344–S353. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/50B.6.S344 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.O’Sullivan, L. F. & Byers, E. S. College students’ incorporation of initiator and restrictor roles in sexual dating interactions. J. Sex Res. 29, 435–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499209551658 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Smith, C. A. Factors associated with early sexual activity among urban adolescents. Soc. Work 42, 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/42.4.334 (1997).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
75.Mercer, C. H. et al. Changes in sexual attitudes and lifestyles in Britain through the life course and over time: findings from the National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal). Lancet 382, 1781–1794. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(13)62035-8 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
76.Kalick, S. M., Zebrowitz, L. A., Langlois, J. H. & Johnson, R. M. Does human facial attractiveness honestly advertise health? Longitudinal data on an evolutionary question. Psychol. Sci. 9, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00002 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Jones, B. C. et al. Facial symmetry and judgements of apparent health: Support for a “good genes” explanation of the attractiveness-symmetry relationship. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 417–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1090-5138(01)00083-6 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Woodley of Menie, M. A. et al. Slow and steady wins the race: K positively predicts fertility in the USA and Sweden. Evol. Psychol. Sci. 3, 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0077-1 (2017).79.Kington, R., Lillard, L. & Rogowski, J. Reproductive history, socioeconomic status, and self-reported health status of women aged 50 years or older. Am. J. Public Health 87, 33–37. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.87.1.33 (1997).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
80.Doblhammer, G. & Oeppen, J. Reproduction and longevity among the British peerage: The effect of frailty and health selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 270, 1541–1547. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2003.2400 (2003).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
81.Lawlor, D. A. et al. Is the association between parity and coronary heart disease due to biological effects of pregnancy or adverse lifestyle risk factors associated with child-rearing? Findings from the British women’s heart and health study and the British regional heart study. Circulation 107, 1260–1264. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000053441.43495.1a (2003).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
82.Parikh, N. I. et al. Parity and risk of later-life maternal cardiovascular disease. Am. Heart J. 159, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2009.11.017 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
83.Ryan, C. P. et al. Reproduction predicts shorter telomeres and epigenetic age acceleration among young adult women. Sci. Rep. 8, 11100. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29486-4 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
84.Kaňková, Š., Šulc, J. & Flegr, J. Increased pregnancy weight gain in women with latent toxoplasmosis and RhD-positivity protection against this effect. Parasitology 137, 1773–1779. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0031182010000661 (2010).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
85.Case, A., Fertig, A. & Paxson, C. The lasting impact of childhood health and circumstance. J. Health Econ. 24, 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.09.008 (2005).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
86.Kuh, D. J. L. & Wadsworth, M. E. J. Physical health-status at 36 years in a British national birth cohort. Soc. Sci. Med. 37, 905–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(93)90145-t (1993).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
87.Eide, E. R. & Showalter, M. H. Estimating the relation between health and education: What do we know and what do we need to know?. Econ. Educ. Rev. 30, 778–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.03.009 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Behrman, J. R. & Rosenzweig, M. R. Returns to birthweight. Rev. Econ. Stat. 86, 586–601. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323031139 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Black, S. E., Devereux, P. J. & Salvanes, K. G. From the cradle to the labor market? The effect of birth weight on adult outcomes. Q. J. Econ. 122, 409–439. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.122.1.409 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Almond, D. Is the 1918 influenza pandemic over? Long-term effects of in utero influenza exposure in the post-1940 US population. J. Polit. Econ. 114, 672–712. https://doi.org/10.1086/507154 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Almond, D., Edlund, L. & Palme, M. Chernobyl’s subclinical legacy: Prenatal exposure to radioactive fallout and school outcomes in Sweden. Q. J. Econ. 124, 1729–1772. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1729 (2009).Article 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
92.Nilsson, J. P. The Long-Term Effects of Early Childhood Lead Exposure: Evidence from the Phase-Out of Leaded Gasoline. (Uppsala University and Institute for Labor Market Policy Evaluation (IFAU), 2009).93.Bleakley, H. Disease and development: Evidence from hookworm eradication in the American South. Q. J. Econ. 122, 73–117. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.121.1.73 (2007).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
94.Rees, D. I. & Sabia, J. J. The effect of migraine headache on educational attainment. J. Hum. Resour. 46, 317–332 (2011).
Google Scholar 
95.Kessler, R. C., Foster, C. L., Saunders, W. B. & Stang, P. E. Social consequences of psychiatric disorders, I. Educational attainment. Am. J. Psychiatry 152, 1026–1032 (1995).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Miech, R. A., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Wright, B. R. E. & Silva, P. A. Low socioeconomic status and mental disorders: A longitudinal study of selection and causation during young adulthood. Am. J. Sociol. 104, 1096–1131. https://doi.org/10.1086/210137 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
97.Flegr, J. & Horáček, J. Negative effects of latent toxoplasmosis on mental health. Front. Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.01012 (2020).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
98.Kopecký, R., Boschetti, S. & Flegr, J. Effect of being religious on wellbeing in a predominantly atheist country: Explorative study on wellbeing, fitness, physical and mental health. PsyArXiv https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3kr6n (2019).99.Flegr, J. & Horáček, J. Toxoplasma-infected subjects report an obsessive-compulsive disorder diagnosis more often and score higher in obsessive-compulsive inventory. Eur. Psychiatry. 40, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.09.001 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
100.Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Revised edn. (Academic Press, 1977).101.Armelagos, G. J., Goodman, A. H. & Jacobs, K. H. The origins of agriculture: Population growth during a period of declining health. Popul. Environ. 13, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01256568 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Lallo, J. W., Armelagos, G. J. & Mensforth, R. P. The role of diet, disease, and physiology in the origin of porotic hyperostosis. Hum. Biol. 49, 471–483 (1977).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
103.Goodman, A. H., Armelagos, G. J. & Rose, J. C. Enamel hypoplasias as indicators of stress in three prehistoric populations from Illinois. Hum. Biol. 52, 515–528 (1980).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
104.Angel, J. L. Porotic hyperostosis, anemias, malarias, and marshes in the prehistoric Eastern Mediterranean. Science 153, 760–763 (1966).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
105.Eaton, S. B., Eaton, S. B. & Konner, M. J. Paleolithic nutrition revisited: A twelve-year retrospective on its nature and implications. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 51, 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600389 (1997).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
106.Flegr, J. & Kuba, R. The relation of Toxoplasma infection and sexual attraction to fear, danger, pain, and submissiveness. Evol. Psychol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916659746 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
107.Penke, L. & Asendorpf, J. B. Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 95, 1113–1135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1113 (2008).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
108.Sýkorová, K. & Flegr, J. Dataset to the study ‘Faster life history strategy manifests itself by lower age at menarche, higher sexual desire, and earlier reproduction in people with worse health’. igshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.12100623.v1 (2020).109.R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed September 2018. (2019).110.Rosseel, Y. lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 48, 1–36 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
111.Epskamp, S. semPlot: Unified visualizations of structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Model. 22, 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.937847 (2015).MathSciNet 
Article 

Google Scholar  More