Ecology

1.Potts, R. Hominin evolution in settings of strong environmental variability. Quat. Sci. Rev. 73, 1–13 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Kingston, J. D. Shifting adaptive landscapes: progress and challenges in reconstructing early hominid environments. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 134, 20–58 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Levin, N. E. Environment and climate of early human evolution. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 43, 405–429 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Campisano, C. J. et al. The Hominin sites and Paleolakes Drilling Project: high-resolution paleoclimate records from the East African Rift system and their implications for understanding the environmental context of hominin evolution. PaleoAnthropology 2017, 1–43 (2017).
Google Scholar 
5.Lupien, R. L. et al. Vegetation change in the Baringo Basin, East Africa across the onset of Northern Hemisphere glaciation 3.3–2.6 Ma. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 570, 109426 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Yost, C. L. et al. Phytoliths, pollen, and microcharcoal from the Baringo Basin, Kenya reveal savanna dynamics during the Plio-Pleistocene transition. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 570, 109779 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Reed, K. E. Paleoecological patterns at the Hadar hominin site, Afar regional state, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Evol. 54, 743–768 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
8.Kovarovic, K., Su, D. F., Lintulaakso, K. in Methods in Paleoecology (eds Croft, D. A., Su. D. F. & Simpson, S. W.) 351–372 (Springer, 2018).9.Barr, W. A. in Methods in Paleoecology (eds Croft, D. A., Su. D. F. & Simpson, S. W.) 339–349 (Springer, 2018).10.Fortelius, M. et al. An ecometric analysis of the fossil mammal record of the Turkana Basin. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150232 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Polly, P. D. et al. History matters: ecometrics and integrative climate change biology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 278, 1131–1140 (2011).
Google Scholar 
12.Wang, Y. & Cerling, T. E. A model of fossil tooth enamel and bone diagenesis: implications for stable isotope studies and paleoenvironment reconstruction. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 107, 281–289 (1994).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Bocherens, H., Koch, P. L., Mariotti, A., Geraads, D. & Jaeger, J. J. Isotopic biogeochemistry (13C, 18O) of mammalian enamel from African Pleistocene hominid sites. Palaios 11, 306–318 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Schoeninger, M. J., Reeser, H. & Hallin, K. Paleoenvironment of Australopithecus anamensis at Allia Bay, East Turkana, Kenya: evidence from mammalian herbivore enamel stable isotopes. J. Anthropol. Archaeol. 22, 200–207 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Levin, N. E., Simpson, S. W., Quade, J., Cerling, T. E. & Frost, S. R. Herbivore enamel carbon isotopic composition and the environmental context of Ardipithecus at Gona, Ethiopia. The geology of early humans in the Horn of Africa. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 446, 215–234 (2008).
Google Scholar 
16.Levin, N. E., Haile-Selassie, Y., Frost, S. R. & Saylor, B. Z. Dietary change among hominins and cercopithecids in Ethiopia during the early Pliocene. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 12304–12309 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
17.Kingston, J. D. in Paleontology and Geology of Laetoli: Human Evolution in Context (ed. Harrison, T.) 293–328 (Springer, 2011).18.Cerling, T. E. et al. Dietary changes of large herbivores in the Turkana Basin, Kenya from 4 to 1 Ma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 11467–11472 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
19.Wynn, J. G. et al. Dietary flexibility of Australopithecus afarensis in the face of paleoecological change during the middle Pliocene: faunal evidence from Hadar, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Evol. 99, 93–106 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Robinson, J. R., Rowan, J., Campisano, C. J., Wynn, J. G. & Reed, K. E. Late Pliocene environmental change during the transition from Australopithecus to Homo. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0159 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Ambrose, S. H. & DeNiro, M. J. The isotopic ecology of East African mammals. Oecologia 69, 395–406 (1986).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Cerling, T. E. & Harris, J. M. Carbon isotope fractionation between diet and bioapatite in ungulate mammals and implications for ecological and paleoecological studies. Oecologia 120, 347–363 (1999).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Sponheimer, M. et al. Diets of southern African Bovidae: stable isotope evidence. J. Mammal. 84, 471–479 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Tieszen, L. L., Senyimba, M. M., Imbaba, S. K. & Troughton, J. H. The distribution of C3 and C4 grasses and carbon isotope discrimination along an altitudinal and moisture gradient in Kenya. Oecologia 37, 337–350 (1979).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Tiezsen, L. L., Boutton, T., Tesdahl, K. & Slade, N. Fractionation and turnover of stable carbon isotopes in animal tissues: implications for the 13C analysis of diet. Oecologia 57, 32–37 (1983).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.O’Leary, M. H. Carbon isotopes in photosynthesis. Bioscience 38, 328–336 (1988).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Kingdon, J. et al. Mammals of Africa Vol. 1 (A&C Black, 2013).28.Kingston, J. D. & Harrison, T. Isotopic dietary reconstructions of Pliocene herbivores at Laetoli: implications for early hominin paleoecology. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 243, 272–306 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Patterson, D. B. et al. Comparative isotopic evidence from East Turkana supports a dietary shift within the genus Homo. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1048–1056 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Sponheimer, M. & Lee-Thorp, J. A. Using carbon isotope data of fossil bovid communities for palaeoenvironmental reconstruction: research articles: human origins research in South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 99, 273–275 (2003).CAS 

Google Scholar 
31.Lee-Thorp, J. A., Sponheimer, M. & Luyt, J. Tracking changing environments using stable carbon isotopes in fossil tooth enamel: an example from the South African hominin sites. J. Hum. Evol. 53, 595–601 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Bedaso, Z., Wynn, J. G., Alemseged, Z. & Geraads, D. Paleoenvironmental reconstruction of the Asbole fauna (Busidima Formation, Afar, Ethiopia) using stable isotopes. Geobios 43, 165–177 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Bedaso, Z. K., Wynn, J. G., Alemseged, Z. & Geraads, D. Dietary and paleoenvironmental reconstruction using stable isotopes of herbivore tooth enamel from middle Pliocene Dikika, Ethiopia: implication for Australopithecus afarensis habitat and food resources. J. Hum. Evol. 64, 21–38 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Leichliter, J. N. et al. Small mammal insectivore carbon isotopes as environmental proxies in a South African savanna ecosystem. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 159, 206–207 (2016).
Google Scholar 
35.Codron, J. et al. Landscape-scale feeding patterns of African elephant inferred from carbon isotope analysis of feces. Oecologia 165, 89–99 (2011).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Marston, C. G. et al. ‘Remote’ behavioural ecology: do megaherbivores consume vegetation in proportion to its presence in the landscape? PeerJ 8, e8622 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Hernandez-Fernández, M. & Vrba, E. S. Plio-Pleistocene climatic change in the Turkana Basin (East Africa): evidence from large mammal faunas. J. Hum. Evol. 50, 595–626 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Lintulaakso, K. & Kovarovic, K. Diet and locomotion, but not body size, differentiate mammal communities in worldwide tropical ecosystems. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 454, 20–29 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Barr, W. A. Bovid locomotor functional trait distributions reflect land cover and annual precipitation in sub-Saharan Africa. Evol. Ecol. Res. 18, 253–269 (2017).
Google Scholar 
40.Eronen, J. T. et al. Precipitation and large herbivorous mammals I: estimates from present-day communities. Evol. Ecol. Res. 12, 217–233 (2010).
Google Scholar 
41.Eronen, J. T. et al. Precipitation and large herbivorous mammals II: application to fossil data. Evol. Ecol. Res. 12, 235–248 (2010).
Google Scholar 
42.Cerling, T. E. et al. Woody cover and hominin environments in the past 6 million years. Nature 476, 51–56 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.White, T. D. et al. Macrovertebrate paleontology and the Pliocene habitat of Ardipithecus ramidus. Science 326, 67–93 (2009).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
44.Venter, Z. S., Cramer, M. D. & Hawkins, H. J. Drivers of woody plant encroachment over Africa. Nat. Commun. 9, 2272 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Kohn, M. J. Carbon isotope compositions of terrestrial C3 plants as indicators of (paleo) ecology and (paleo) climate. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19691–19695 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Du, A., Robinson, J. R., Rowan, J., Lazagabaster, I. A. & Behrensmeyer, A. K. Stable carbon isotopes from paleosol carbonate and herbivore enamel document differing paleovegetation signals in the eastern African Plio-Pleistocene. Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 261, 41–52 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Brown, F. H., McDougall, I. & Gathogo, P. N. in The Paleobiology of Australopithecus (eds Reed, K. E. et al.) 7–20 (Springer, 2013).48.McDougall, I. et al. New single crystal 40Ar/39Ar ages improve time scale for deposition of the Omo Group, Omo–Turkana Basin, East Africa. J. Geol. Soc. 169, 213–226 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Herries, A. I. et al. in The Paleobiology of Australopithecus (eds Reed, K. E., Fleagle, J. G. & Leakey, R. E.) 21–40 (Springer, 2013).50.Pickering, R. et al. U–Pb-dated flowstones restrict South African early hominin record to dry climate phases. Nature 565, 226–229 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
51.Erena, M. G., Bekele, A. & Debella, H. J. Diet composition of forest inhabiting Cape buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer) in western Ethiopia. Int. J. Ecol. Environ. Sci. 45, 165–178 (2019).
Google Scholar 
52.Pianka, E. R. in Theoretical Ecology. Principles and Applications (ed. May, R. M.) 114–141 (Blackwell Scientific, 1976).53.Schoener, T. W. The controversy over interspecific competition: despite spirited criticism, competition continues to occupy a major domain in ecological thought. Am. Sci. 70, 586–595 (1982).
Google Scholar 
54.Gordon, I. J. & Prins, H. H. T. in The Ecology of Browsing and Grazing (eds Gordon, I. J. & Prins, H. H. T.) 309–321 (Springer, 2008).55.O’Kane, C. A., Duffy, K. J., Page, B. R. & Macdonald, D. W. Effects of resource limitation on habitat usage by the browser guild in Hluhluwe-iMfolozi Park, South Africa. J. Trop. Ecol. 29, 39–47 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Codron, J. et al. Taxonomic, anatomical, and spatio-temporal variations in the stable carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions of plants from an African savanna. J. Archaeol. Sci. 32, 1757–1772 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Codron, D., Codron, J., Lee-thorp, A. J., Sponheimer, M. & Brink, S. J. Dietary variation in impala Aepyceros melampus recorded by carbon isotope composition of feces. Acta Zool. Sin. 52, 1015–1025 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Uno, K. T. et al. High-resolution stable isotope profiles of modern elephant (Loxodonta africana) tusk dentin and tail hair from Kenya: implications for identifying seasonal variability in climate, ecology, and diet in ancient proboscideans. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 559, 109962 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Uno, K. T., Polissar, P. J., Jackson, K. E. & deMenocal, P. B. Neogene biomarker record of vegetation change in eastern Africa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 6355–6363 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Owen-Smith, R. N. Megaherbivores: The Influence of Very Large Body Size on Ecology (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1988).61.Uno, K. T. et al. Forward and inverse methods for extracting climate and diet information from stable isotope profiles in proboscidean molars. Quat. Intern. 557, 92–109 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.White, F. The Vegetation of Africa: A Descriptive Memoir to Accompany the UNESCO/AETFAT/UNSO Vegetation Map of Africa (3 plates), 1:5,000,000 (UNESCO, 1983).63.Uno, K. T. et al. A Pleistocene palaeovegetation record from plant wax biomarkers from the Nachukui Formation, West Turkana, Kenya. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 371, 20150235 (2016).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
64.Behrensmeyer, A. K., Kidwell, S. M. & Gastaldo, R. A. Taphonomy and paleobiology. Paleobiology 26, 103–147 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Faith, J. T., Du, A. & Rowan, J. Addressing the effects of sampling on ecometric-based paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol 528, 175–185 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Shorrocks, B. & Bates, W. The Biology of African Savannahs (Oxford Univ. Press, 2015).67.Tieszen, L. L. Natural variations in the carbon isotope values of plants: implications for archaeology, ecology, and paleoecology. J. Archaeol. Sci. 18, 227–248 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Cornwell, W. K. et al. Climate and soils together regulate photosynthetic carbon isotope discrimination within C3 plants worldwide. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1056–1067 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Luyt, J., Hare, V. J. & Sealy, J. The relationship of ungulate δ13C and environment in the temperate biome of southern Africa, and its palaeoclimatic application. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 514, 282–291 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Protected Planet: The World Database on Protected Areas (WDPA) (UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, 2020); www.protectedplanet.net71.ArcGIS Desktop Release 10 (Environmental Systems Research Institute, 2012).72.Ogutu, J. et al. Changing wildlife populations in Nairobi national park and adjoining Athi-Kaputiei plains: collapse of the migratory wildebeest. Open Conserv. Biol. J. 7, 11–26 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Forest Atlas of the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and World Resources Institute, 2020); https://www.wri.org/resources/maps/forest-atlas-democratic-republic-congo74.R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019); https://www.R-project.org/75.Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016). More

1.Bardgett, R. D. Plant-soil interactions in a changing world. F1000 Biol. Rep. 3, 16 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Faure, D., Vereecke, D. & Leveau, J. H. Molecular communication in the rhizosphere. Plant Soil 321, 279–303 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.de Zelicourt, A., Al-Yousif, M. & Hirt, H. Rhizosphere microbes as essential partners for plant stress tolerance. Mol. Plant 6, 242–245 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Reynolds, H. L., Packer, A., Bever, J. D. & Clay, K. Grassroots ecology: plant–microbe–soil interactions as drivers of plant community structure and dynamics. Ecology 84, 2281–2291 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Jones, P., Garcia, B., Furches, A., Tuskan, G. & Jacobson, D. Plant host-associated mechanisms for microbial selection. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 862 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.de Vries, F. T. et al. Changes in root‐exudate‐induced respiration reveal a novel mechanism through which drought affects ecosystem carbon cycling. N. Phytol. 224, 132–145 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
7.Dodd, I. C., Zinovkina, N. Y., Safronova, V. I. & Belimov, A. A. Rhizobacterial mediation of plant hormone status. Ann. Appl. Biol. 157, 361–379 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Egamberdieva, D., Wirth, S. J., Alqarawi, A. A., Abd-Allah, E. F. & Hashem, A. Phytohormones and beneficial microbes: essential components for plants to balance stress and fitness. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2104 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Xu, L. & Coleman-Derr, D. Causes and consequences of a conserved bacterial root microbiome response to drought stress. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 49, 1–6 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Naylor, D. & Coleman-Derr, D. Drought stress and root-associated bacterial communities. Front. Plant Sci. 8, 2223 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Wittenmeyer, L. & Merbach, W. Plant responses to drought and phosphorus deficiency: contribution of phytohormones in root-related processes. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 168, 531–540 (2005).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
12.Borghi, L., Kang, J., Ko, D., Lee, Y. & Martinoia, E. The role of ABCG-type ABC transporters in phytohormone transport. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 43, 924–930 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Gargallo-Garriga, A. et al. Root exudate metabolomes change under drought and show limited capacity for recovery. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–15 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Hamer, U. & Marschner, B. Priming effects in different soil types induced by fructose, alanine, oxalic acid and catechol additions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 37, 445–454 (2005).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Mondini, C., Cayuela, M. L., Sanchez-Monedero, M. A., Roig, A. & Brookes, P. C. Soil microbial biomass activation by trace amounts of readily available substrate. Biol. Fertil. Soils 42, 542–549 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Hu, L. et al. Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizosphere microbiota. Nat. Commun. 9, 1–13 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
17.Fahad, S. et al. Potential role of phytohormones and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in abiotic stresses: consequences for changing environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 22, 4907–4921 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Speirs, J., Binney, A., Collins, M., Edwards, E. & Loveys, B. Expression of ABA synthesis and metabolism genes under different irrigation strategies and atmospheric VPDs is associated with stomatal conductance in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv Cabernet Sauvignon). J. Exp. Bot. 64, 1907–1916 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
19.McAdam, S. A., Brodribb, T. J. & Ross, J. J. Shoot‐derived abscisic acid promotes root growth. Plant Cell Environ. 39, 652–659 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Ibort, P., Molina, S., Ruiz-Lozano, J. M. & Aroca, R. Molecular insights into the involvement of a never ripe receptor in the interaction between two beneficial soil bacteria and tomato plants under well-watered and drought conditions. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 31, 633–650 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Timmusk, S. et al. Bacterial distribution in the rhizosphere of wild barley under contrasting microclimates. PLoS ONE 6, e17968 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Ghosh, D., Gupta, A. & Mohapatra, S. Dynamics of endogenous hormone regulation in plants by phytohormone secreting rhizobacteria under water-stress. Symbiosis 77, 265–278 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Carvalhais, L. C., Dennis, P. G. & Schenk, P. M. Plant defence inducers rapidly influence the diversity of bacterial communities in a potting mix. Appl. Soil Ecol. 84, 1–5 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Olds, C. L., Glennon, E. K. & Luckhart, S. Abscisic acid: new perspectives on an ancient universal stress signaling molecule. Microbes Infect. 20, 484–492 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
25.Hartung, W., Sauter, A., Turner, N. C., Fillery, I. & Heilmeier, H. Abscisic acid in soils: what is its function and which factors and mechanisms influence its concentration? Plant Soil 184, 105–110 (1996).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Belimov, A. A. et al. Abscisic acid metabolizing rhizobacteria decrease ABA concentrations in planta and alter plant growth. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 74, 84–91 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Glick, B. R., Penrose, D. M. & Li, J. P. A model for the lowering of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J. Theor. Biol. 190, 63–68 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Kazan, K. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 219–229 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.de Ollas, C. & Dodd, I. C. Physiological impacts of ABA–JA interactions under water-limitation. Plant Mol. Biol. 91, 641–650 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
30.Carvalhais, L. C. et al. Linking jasmonic acid signaling, root exudates, and rhizosphere microbiomes. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 28, 1049–1058 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Ngumbi, E. & Kloepper, J. Bacterial-mediated drought tolerance: current and future prospects. Appl. Soil Ecol. 105, 109–125 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Vurukonda, S. S. K. P., Vardharajula, S., Shrivastava, M. & SkZ, A. Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol. Res. 184, 13–24 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Kudoyarova, G. et al. Phytohormone mediation of interactions between plants and non-symbiotic growth promoting bacteria under edaphic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 10, 1368 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Wallenstein, M. D. & Hall, E. K. A trait-based framework for predicting when and where microbial adaptation to climate change will affect ecosystem functioning. Biogeochemistry 109, 35–47 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Martiny, J. B. et al. Microbial legacies alter decomposition in response to simulated global change. ISME J. 11, 490–499 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Grime, J. P. et al. The response of two contrasting limestone grasslands to simulated climate change. Science 289, 762–765 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Fridley, J. D., Lynn, J. S., Grime, J. P. & Askew, A. P. Longer growing seasons shift grassland vegetation towards more-productive species. Nat. Clim. Change 6, 865–868 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Sayer, E. J. et al. Links between soil microbial communities and plant traits in a species‐rich grassland under long‐term climate change. Ecol. Evol. 7, 855–862 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Trinder, S., Askew, A. P. & Whitlock, R. Climate‐driven evolutionary change in reproductive and early‐acting life‐history traits in the perennial grass Festuca ovina. J. Ecol. 108, 1398–1410 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Fridley, J. D., Grime, J. P., Askew, A. P., Moser, B. & Stevens, C. J. Soil heterogeneity buffers community response to climate change in species‐rich grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2002–2011 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Schimel, J., Balser, T. C. & Wallenstein, M. Microbial stress‐response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology 88, 1386–1394 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Kuzyakov, Y., Friedel, J. K. & Stahr, K. Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol. Biochem. 32, 1485–1498 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Keiluweit, M. et al. Mineral protection of soil carbon counteracted by root exudates. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 588–595 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Chanclud, E. & Morel, J. B. Plant hormones: a fungal point of view. Mol. Plant Pathol. 17, 1289–1297 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Sembdner, G. A. P. B. & Parthier, B. The biochemistry and the physiological and molecular actions of jasmonates. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 44, 569–589 (1993).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Eng, F. et al. Jasmonic acid biosynthesis by fungi: derivatives, first evidence on biochemical pathways and culture conditions for production. PeerJ 9, e10873 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Fuchslueger, L. et al. Drought history affects grassland plant and microbial carbon turnover during and after a subsequent drought event. J. Ecol. 104, 1453–1465 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Schimel, J. P. Life in dry soils: effects of drought on soil microbial communities and processes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 49, 409–432 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Waring, B. G., Averill, C. & Hawkes, C. V. Differences in fungal and bacterial physiology alter soil carbon and nitrogen cycling: insights from meta-analysis and theoretical models. Ecol. Lett. 16, 887–894 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
50.Staddon, P. L. et al. Mycorrhizal fungal abundance is affected by long‐term climatic manipulations in the field. Glob. Change Biol. 9, 186–194 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Van Gestel, M., Merckx, R. & Vlassak, K. Microbial biomass responses to soil drying and rewetting: the fate of fast-and slow-growing microorganisms in soils from different climates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 109–123 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Belimov, A. A. et al. Rhizosphere bacteria containing ACC deaminase increase yield of plants grown in drying soil via both local and systemic hormone signalling. N. Phytol. 181, 413–423 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Lennon, J. T. & Jones, S. E. Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 119–130 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.Chodak, M., Gołębiewski, M., Morawska-Płoskonka, J., Kuduk, K. & Niklińska, M. Soil chemical properties affect the reaction of forest soil bacteria to drought and rewetting stress. Ann. Microbiol. 65, 1627–1637 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Kakumanu, M. L., Ma, L. & Williams, M. A. Drought-induced soil microbial amino acid and polysaccharide change and their implications for C-N cycles in a climate change world. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
56.Puertolas, J., Alcobendas, R., Alarcón, J. J. & Dodd, I. C. Long‐distance abscisic acid signalling under different vertical soil moisture gradients depends on bulk root water potential and average soil water content in the root zone. Plant Cell Environ. 36, 1465–1475 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
57.Axtell, C. A. & Beattie, G. A. Construction and characterization of a proU-gfp transcriptional fusion that measures water availability in a microbial habitat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 4604–4612 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Wesener, F. & Tietjen, B. Primed to be strong, primed to be fast: modeling benefits of microbial stress responses. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95, 114 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
59.Andrade‐Linares, D. R., Lehmann, A. & Rillig, M. C. Microbial stress priming: a meta‐analysis. Environ. Microbiol. 18, 1277–1288 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
60.Grime, J. P. et al. Long-term resistance to simulated climate change in an infertile grassland. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 10028–10032 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Giannetta, B., Plaza, C., Zaccone, C., Vischetti, C. & Rovira, P. Ecosystem type effects on the stabilization of organic matter in soils: combining size fractionation with sequential chemical extractions. Geoderma 353, 423–434 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Campbell, C. D., Chapman, S. J., Cameron, C. M., Davidson, M. S. & Potts, J. M. A rapid microtiter plate method to measure carbon dioxide evolved from carbon substrate amendments so as to determine the physiological profiles of soil microbial communities by using whole soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 3593–3599 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Tworkoski, T., Wisniewski, M. & Artlip, T. Application of BABA and s-ABA for drought resistance in apple. J. Appl. Hortic. 13, 95–90 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Rohwer, C. L. & Erwin, J. E. Horticultural applications of jasmonates: a review. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 83, 283–304 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Creamer, R. E. et al. An inter-laboratory comparison of multi-enzyme and multiple substrate-induced respiration assays to assess method consistency in soil monitoring. Biol. Fertil. Soils 45, 623–633 (2009).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Stott, D. E. Recommended Soil Health Indicators and Associated Laboratory Procedures. Soil Health Technical Note No. 450-03. (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, 2019).67.Buyer, J. S. & Sasser, M. High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 61, 127–130 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Bardgett, R. D. & McAlister, E. The measurement of soil fungal: bacterial biomass ratios as an indicator of ecosystem self-regulation in temperate meadow grasslands. Biol. Fertil. Soils 29, 282–290 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Bardgett, R. D., Hobbs, P. J. & Frostegård, Å. Changes in soil fungal: bacterial biomass ratios following reductions in the intensity of management of an upland grassland. Biol. Fertil. Soils 22, 261–264 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Zhu, Z. et al. Fate of rice shoot and root residues, rhizodeposits, and microbial assimilated carbon in paddy soil-part 2: turnover and microbial utilization. Plant Soil 416, 243–257 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org/ (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).72.Bates, D. M., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2014).
Google Scholar 
73.Cohen, J. The effect size index: d. Stat. Power Anal. Behav. Sci. 2, 284–288 (1988).
Google Scholar 
74.Anderson, T. H. & Domsch, A. K. The metabolic quotient for CO2 (qCO2) as a specific activity parameter to assess the effects of environmental conditions, such as pH, on the microbial biomass of forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 393–395 (1993).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Pinheiro, J.C., Bates, D.M. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS (Springer, 2000).76.Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 13 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Sayer, E. J. et al. Data from: Adaptation to chronic drought modifies soil microbial community responses to phytohormones. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.14130065 (2021). More

1.Andriamananjara, A. et al. Farmyard manure improves phosphorus use efficiency in weathered P deficient soil. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst. 115(3), 407–425 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Arora, N. K. & Mishra, J. Prospecting the roles of metabolites and additives in future bioformulations for sustainable agriculture. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 107, 405–407 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Bellakki, M. A. & Badanur, V. P. Long-term effect of integrated nutrient management on properties of Vertisol under dryland agriculture. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 45, 438–442 (1997).CAS 

Google Scholar 
4.Bowman, R. A. A rapid method to determine phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1301–1304 (1988).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Bulluck, L. R., Brosius, M., Evanylo, G. K. & Ristaino, J. B. Organic and synthetic fertility amendments influence soil microbial, physical and chemical properties on organic and conventional farms. Appl. Soil Ecol. 19(2), 147–160 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.CBD. Convention on Biological Diversity. Traditional knowledge and the Convention on Biological Diversity; Article 8(j) Traditional Knowledge, Innovations and Practices (2016).7.Das, B. B. & Dkhar, M. S. Rhizosphere microbial populations and physico chemical properties as affected by organic and inorganic farming practices. Am.-Eur. J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 10(2), 140–150 (2011).
Google Scholar 
8.De Oliveira Freitas, N., Yano-Melo, A.M., da Silva, F.S.B., de Melo, N.F., & Maia, L. C. Soil biochemistry and microbial activity in vineyards under conventional and organic management at Northeast Brazil. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.) 68(2), 223–229 (2011).9.Fabre, A., Pinay, G. & Ruffinoni, C. Seasonal changes in inorganic and organic phosphorus in the soil of a riparian forest. Biogeochem. 35, 419–432 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Gangopadhyay, S. K., Sarkar, D., Sahu, A. K. & Das, K. Forms and distribution of potassium in some soils of Ranchi Plateau. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 53(3), 413–416 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
11.Gupta, P. K. Soil, Plant, Water and Fertilizer Analysis (Agrobios, 2009).
Google Scholar 
12.Ishaq, M., Ibrahim, M. & Lal, R. Tillage effect on soil properties at different levels of fertilizer application in Punjab. Pak. Soil Tillage Res. 68, 93–99 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Jackson, M. L. Soil Chemical Analysis 111–203 (Prentice Hall India P Limited, 1967).
Google Scholar 
14.Jagadeesan, S., Kumar, M. D., & Sivamohan, M. V. K. (2016). Positive Externalities of Surface Irrigation on Farm Wells and Drinking Water Supplies in Large Water Systems: The Case of Sardar Sarovar Project. In: Rural Water Systems for Multiple Uses and Livelihood Security (pp. 229–252). Elsevier.15.Kamali, F. P., Borges, J. A., Meuwissen, M. P., de Boer, I. J. & Lansink, A. G. O. Sustainability assessment of agricultural systems: The validity of expert opinion and robustness of a multi-criteria analysis. Agric. Syst. 157, 118–128 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Kang, B. T. Nitrogennitrogen cycling in the multiple cropping systems. In Advances in Nitrogen Cycling in Agriculture Ecosystems (ed. Wilson, J. R.) 333–348 (CAB International, 1988).
Google Scholar 
17.Klerkx, L. & Rose, D. Dealing with the game-changing technologies of Agriculture 4.0: How do we manage diversity and responsibility in food system transition pathways?. Glob. Food Secur. 24, 100347 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Lawanprasert, A., Kunket, K., Arayarangsarit, L., and Prasertsak, A. Comparison between Conventional and Organic Paddy Fields in Irrigated Rice Ecosystem. 4th INWEPF Steering Meeting and Symposium, 2, 1–9 (2007).19.Maurya, D.M., Thakkar, M.G., Chamyal, L.S. Quaternary geology of the arid zone of Kachchh: Terra incognita. Proc. Ind. Nat. Sci. Acad. 69, A, No.2, March 03. pp. 123–135 (2003).20.McGrath, D. A., Comeford, N. B. & Duryea, M. L. Litter dynamics and monthly fluctuations in soil phosphorus availability in an Amazonian agroforest. Forest Ecol. Manag. 131, 167–181 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Mpai, T., Jaiswal, S.K., & Dakora, F.D. Accumulation of phosphorus and carbon and the dependency on biological N-2 fixation for nitrogen nutrition in Polhillia, Wiborgia and Wiborgiella species growing in natural stands in cape fynbos, South Africa. SYMBIOSIS (2020).22.NBSS and LUP circular. Guide to land use planning for kachchh and north Gujarat. National bureau of soil science and land use planning, western zone, Udaipur, 2005.23.Olsen, S. R., Cole, C, V., Watanabe, F. S., and Dean, L. A.. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. National Agricultural Society, USA. 939 (1954).24.Palekar, S. The Philosophy of Spiritual Farming. Zero Budget Natural Farming Research, Development & Extension Movement, Amravati (Maharashtra) (2006).25.Parry ML et al. (eds). Cross-chapter case studies. Indigenous knowledge for adaptation to climate change. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).26.Pasricha, N. S. Potassiumpotassium dynamics in soils in relation to crop nutrition. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 50, 333–334 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
27.Patidar, A. K., Maurya, D. M., Thakkar, M. G. & Chamyal, L. S. Fluvial geomorphology and neotectonic activity based on field and GPR data Katrol hill range, Kachchh, western India. Quaternary Int. 159(2007), 74–92 (2007).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Preparation of Soil Sampling Protocols: Sampling Techniques and Strategies, 1992. EPA/600/R-92/128 July.29.Reganold, J. P. et al. Fruit and soil quality of organic and conventional strawberry agroecosystems. PLoS ONE 5(9), e12346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012346 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Saxena, R. C., Chaudhary, S. L. & Nene, Y. L. A Textbook on Ancient History of Indian Agriculture, Asian Agri-History Foundation (AAHF) (Secunderabad; and Rajasthan chapter of AAHF, 2009).
Google Scholar 
31.Sharma S.B., and Gobi, T.A. Impact of drought on soil and microbial diversity in different agro ecosystems of the semi arid zones. In: Plant, Soil and Microbes – Interactions and Implications in Crop Science (Editors: Dr. Khalid Rehman Hakeem, Dr.MohdSayeedAkhtarandDr.Siti Nor Akmar Abdullah), Springer International Publishing Switzerland. (ISBN 978–3–319–27453–9 ISBN 978–3–319–27455–3 (eBook) DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27455-3) (2016).32.Sharma, S.B. The relevance of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) in agricultural sustainability of the semi arid tropics. In:Adaptive Soil Management: from theory to practices. (Rakshit A, Abhilash P. C., Singh H. B., Ghosh S.(Eds.). Springer nature, Singapore. ISBN 978–981–10–3637–8 ISBN 978–981–10–3638–5 (eBook) (2017a). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3638-533.Sharma S. B. Traditional Ecological Knowledge-Based Practices and Bio-formulations: Key to Agricultural Sustainability. In: Probiotics in Agroecosystem (Eds. Vivek Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Shivesh Sharma). Springer Nature. ISBN 978–981–10–4058–0 ISBN 978–981–10–4059–7 (eBook). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4059-7 (2017b)34.Sharma, S. B., Sayyed, R. Z., Trivedi, M. H. & Thivakaran, G. A. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: Sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. Springer Plus. 2, 587. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-587 (2013).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
35.Subbiah, B. V. & Asija, G. L. A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci. 25, 259–260 (1956).CAS 

Google Scholar 
36.Sugiyama, A., Vivanco, J. M., Jayanty, S. S. & Manter, D. K. Pyrosequencing assessment of soil microbial communities in organic and conventional potato farms. Plant. Dis. 94, 1329–1335 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Tandon, H. L. S.. Phosphorusphosphorus research and agriculture production in India. New Delhi: Fertilization Development and Consultation Organisation 160p (1987).38.The UN Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations, New York, 2015. Available at :http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/summit/.39.Topp, C. F., Watson, C. A., & Stockdale, E. Utilising the concept of nutrients as a currency within organic farming system. In Proceedings of the UK Organic Research 2002 Conference (pp. 157–160). Organic Centre Wales, Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales Aberystwyth (2002)..40.United Nations World Population Prospects, 2019. World Population Prospects (2019)41.Walkley, A. & Black, I. A. An examination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Sharma, S. B. & Thivakaran, G. A. Microbial dynamics in traditional eco-knowledge vis-à-vis chemical-intensive agri-amendment systems of stress prone semi-arid tropics. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 155, 103668 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar  More

Although Malar et al. “do not exclude the possibility that the genes identified by Mateus et al. are involved in mating,” they qualify the homology inference between genes differentially expressed in the co-inoculation treatment and genes involved in mating in other fungal species as “spurious evolutionary relationships” or “not the best ortholog”. Those statements imply that they attach no importance to the demonstrated sequence homology relationships identified in Mateus et al. Orthology does not necessarily imply conservation of gene function and genes with equivalent functions are not necessarily orthologs [3]. Therefore, it is misleading to assume that two genes have the same function when interpreting the role of a “best candidate ortholog” identified in silico. Moreover, relying only on an in silico search for exploring orthologs can lead to serious problems for inferring function as none of the search algorithms are free from bias if subfunctionalization or neofunctionalization events occurred among the homologs.Malar et al. have not considered, or have misunderstood, the experimental evidence on gene expression in interpreting their homology search. It is not surprising that their “best homologs” were not upregulated, because we already saw that those genes were not upregulated in the original dataset. Our approach comprised performing an experiment to identify genes that were specifically upregulated when two isolates coexisted in planta. We then identified their putative function by homology. We did not look at whether the genes were the closest orthologs. However, we discussed the limitations of an homology approach to identify gene function [2]. To our surprise, a consistent set of 20 genes was upregulated in the co-inoculation treatment in different host plants, and 9 of these 20 (upregulated in more than one host plant) shared the common feature of homology to genes involved in different steps of mating in other fungal species (Figs. 3 and 4 of Mateus et al.).Malar et al. claim the identification of hundreds of hits of the 18 genes differentially expressed in Mateus et al. “against the high-quality protein databases from the JGI Mycocosm Rhiir2” (referring to the protein database “Rhiir2” of R. irregularis). In fact, Malar et al. compared the 18 genes against “all protein gene catalogs of fungal species from the JGI fungal genomic resource” comprising 1318 taxa. The interpretation of the number of hits on a such large dataset is misleading because if a gene is highly conserved across the fungal kingdom, we would expect hundreds of hits in this database. In contrast, if an R. irregularis gene is highly specific to the Glomeromycotina taxa, we would expect very few hits (because there are less Glomeromycotina genomes in the database). Consequently, the number of hits in Table 1 from Malar et al. reflect the size of the database used and how conserved a given gene is, rather than whether a gene is from a large gene family. Malar et al. identified the so-called “closest ortholog” in R. irregularis of fungal mating genes from other fungal species by showing the “best hit” using OrthoMCL. However, differentiating paralogs from orthologs is a complicated task, in very distant species, especially if the organisms are highly paralogous. A more cautious analysis for each gene, including a confirmation that they are located in similar genomic locations, would lend more certitude that a given gene could be an ortholog. Consequently, the evaluation of RNA expression of their “best hit” remains incomplete in terms of the effort to find the best orthologs. More

The underpinning method employed to construct a STR may affect the shape, scaling exponent (w), and fit of the STR power function. Here we used three differing approaches to construct STRs; including, what we term in this study, the ‘every possible window’ (EPW) [10], ‘cumulative moving window’ (CMW) [8], and ‘moving window’ (MW) approaches. The differences in each method are extensively detailed in the Material and Methods. The STRs for the bacterial communities within each of the tree-hole islands were plotted, of which all relationships were significant (Fig. 1 and Table S1). Overall, the resulting STR power law exponents (w) were found to range from 0.048 to 0.350 (Fig. 1) and were typically within the exponent ranges observed from meta-analyses of STRs for a wide range of animals, plants, and microbial communities [9,10,11]. However, these values varied by the approach used to construct STRs (Fig. 2A). The EPW based w values ranged from 0.048 to 0.128, with a mean w of 0.088 ± 0.029 (mean ± SD). The CMW w values ranged from 0.073 to 0.150, with a mean w = 0.111 ± 0.029. Whereas, the MW minimum and maximum w values were 0.223 ± 0.350, with a mean of 0.289 ± 0.044 (Fig. 2A). The EPW and CMW w values were significantly lower than the MW w values (Fig. 2A). However, they were not significantly different from each other, despite that EPW values were uniformly lower (Fig. 2A).Fig. 1: Species-time relationships for the tree-hole bacterial communities.A, B, and C represent species–time relationships (STR) constructed using every possible window, cumulative moving window, and moving window approaches, respectively. Given in each instance is the tree-hole number (TH1–TH10) and the STR power law equation. All STRs were significant (P  More

1.Wilson DS, Yoshimura J. On the coexistence of specialists and generalists. Am Nat. 1994;144:692–707.Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Slatyer RA, Hirst M, Sexton JP. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecol Lett. 2013;16:1104–14.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Büchi L, Vuilleumier S. Coexistence of specialist and generalist species is shaped by dispersal and environmental factors. Am Nat. 2014;183:612–24.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Vellend M. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q Rev Biol. 2010;85:183–206.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Kassen R. The experimental evolution of specialists, generalists, and the maintenance of diversity. J Evol Biol. 2002;15:173–90.Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Devictor V, Julliard R, Jiguet F. Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation. Oikos. 2008;117:507–14.Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Clavel J, Julliard R, Devictor V. Worldwide decline of specialist species: toward a global functional homogenization? Front Ecol Environ. 2011;9:222–8.Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Marvier M, Kareiva P, Neubert MG. Habitat destruction, fragmentation, and disturbance promote invasion by habitat generalists in a multispecies metapopulation. Risk Anal Int J. 2004;24:869–78.Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Loehle C. Strategy space and the disturbance spectrum: a life-history model for tree species coexistence. Am Nat. 2000;156:14–33.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Székely AJ, Langenheder S. The importance of species sorting differs between habitat generalists and specialists in bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014;87:102–12.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
11.Mariadassou M, Pichon S, Ebert D. Microbial ecosystems are dominated by specialist taxa. Ecol Lett. 2015;18:974–82.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Carbonero F, Oakley BB, Purdy KJ. Metabolic flexibility as a major predictor of spatial distribution in microbial communities. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e85105.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
13.Nemergut DR, Schmidt SK, Fukami T, O’Neill SP, Bilinski TM, Stanish LF, et al. Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2013;77:342–56.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Wang J, Shen J, Wu Y, Tu C, Soininen J, Stegen JC, et al. Phylogenetic beta diversity in bacterial assemblages across ecosystems: Deterministic versus stochastic processes. ISME J. 2013;7:1310–21.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Caruso T, Chan Y, Lacap DC, Lau MCY, McKay CP, Pointing SB. Stochastic and deterministic processes interact in the assembly of desert microbial communities on a global scale. ISME J. 2011;5:1406.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Delgado-Baquerizo M, Oliverio AM, Brewer TE, Benavent-González A, Eldridge DJ, Bardgett RD, et al. A global atlas of the dominant bacteria found in soil. Science. 2018;359:320–5.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Sunagawa S, Coelho LP, Chaffron S, Kultima JR, Labadie K, Salazar G, et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science. 2015;348:1261359.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
18.Sriswasdi S, Yang C, Iwasaki W. Generalist species drive microbial dispersion and evolution. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1162.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
19.Nicholls DG, Ferguson S. Bioenergetics. Academic Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2013.20.Jones SE, Lennon JT. Dormancy contributes to the maintenance of microbial diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:5881–6.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Lennon JT, Jones SE. Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9:119–30.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Ji M, Greening C, Vanwonterghem I, Carere CR, Bay SK, Steen JA, et al. Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil. Nature. 2017;552:400–3.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Mußmann M, Pjevac P, Krüger K, Dyksma S. Genomic repertoire of the Woeseiaceae/JTB255, cosmopolitan and abundant core members of microbial communities in marine sediments. ISME J. 2017;11:1276.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
24.Tsementzi D, Wu J, Deutsch S, Nath S, Rodriguez-R LM, Burns AS, et al. SAR11 bacteria linked to ocean anoxia and nitrogen loss. Nature. 2016;536:179.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Carere CR, Hards K, Houghton KM, Power JF, McDonald B, Collet C, et al. Mixotrophy drives niche expansion of verrucomicrobial methanotrophs. ISME J. 2017;11:2599–610.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Greening C, Grinter R, Chiri E. Uncovering the metabolic strategies of the dormant microbial majority: towards integrative approaches. mSystems. 2019;4:e00107–19.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Rodriguez-r LM, Overholt WA, Hagan C, Huettel M, Kostka JE, Konstantinidis KT. Microbial community successional patterns in beach sands impacted by the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. ISME J. 2015;9:1928–40.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Herold M, Arbas SM, Narayanasamy S, Sheik AR, Kleine-Borgmann LAK, Lebrun LA, et al. Integration of time-series meta-omics data reveals how microbial ecosystems respond to disturbance. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1–14.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
29.Muller EEL. Determining microbial niche breadth in the environment for better ecosystem fate predictions. mSystems. 2019;4:e00080–19.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Huettel M, Berg P, Kostka JE. Benthic exchange and biogeochemical cycling in permeable sediments. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2014;6:23–51.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Boudreau BP, Huettel M, Forster S, Jahnke RA, McLachlan A, Middelburg JJ, et al. Permeable marine sediments: overturning an old paradigm. EOS, Trans Am Geophys Union. 2001;82:133–6.
Google Scholar 
32.Devol AH. Denitrification, anammox, and N2 production in marine sediments. Ann Rev Mar Sci. 2015;7:403–23.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Reimers CE, Stecher HA III, Taghon GL, Fuller CM, Huettel M, Rusch A, et al. In situ measurements of advective solute transport in permeable shelf sands. Cont Shelf Res. 2004;24:183–201.Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Santos IR, Eyre BD, Huettel M. The driving forces of porewater and groundwater flow in permeable coastal sediments: a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2012;98:1–15.Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Huettel M, Ziebis W, Forster S. Flow‐induced uptake of particulate matter in permeable sediments. Limnol Oceanogr. 1996;41:309–22.Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Cook PL, Frank W, Glud R, Felix J, Markus H. Benthic solute exchange and carbon mineralization in two shallow subtidal sandy sediments: Effect of advective pore‐water exchange. Limnol Oceanogr. 2007;52:1943–63.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Glud RN. Oxygen dynamics of marine sediments. Mar Biol Res. 2008;4:243–89.Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Gobet A, Böer SI, Huse SM, Van Beusekom JEE, Quince C, Sogin ML, et al. Diversity and dynamics of rare and of resident bacterial populations in coastal sands. ISME J. 2012;6:542.PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Böer SI, Arnosti C, Van Beusekom JEE, Boetius A. Temporal variations in microbial activities and carbon turnover in subtidal sandy sediments. Biogeosciences. 2009;6:1149–65.Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Hunter EM, Mills HJ, Kostka JE. Microbial community diversity associated with carbon and nitrogen cycling in permeable shelf sediments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5689–701.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Probandt D, Knittel K, Tegetmeyer HE, Ahmerkamp S, Holtappels M, Amann R. Permeability shapes bacterial communities in sublittoral surface sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2017;19:1584–99.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
42.Probandt D, Eickhorst T, Ellrott A, Amann R, Knittel K. Microbial life on a sand grain: from bulk sediment to single grains. ISME J. 2017;12:623–33.43.Kessler AJ, Chen Y-J, Waite DW, Hutchinson T, Koh S, Popa ME, et al. Bacterial fermentation and respiration processes are uncoupled in permeable sediments. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:1014–23.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Dyksma S, Pjevac P, Ovanesov K, Mussmann M. Evidence for H2 consumption by uncultured Desulfobacterales in coastal sediments. Environ Microbiol. 2018;20:450–61.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Bourke MF, Marriott PJ, Glud RN, Hasler-Sheetal H, Kamalanathan M, Beardall J, et al. Metabolism in anoxic permeable sediments is dominated by eukaryotic dark fermentation. Nat Geosci. 2017;10:30–35.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Canfield D, Kristensen E, Thamdrup B. Aquatic geomicrobiology. Academic Press; Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA; 2005.47.Bell TH, Bell T. Many roads to bacterial generalism. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2021; 97: fiaa240.48.Devictor V, Clavel J, Julliard R, Lavergne S, Mouillot D, Thuiller W, et al. Defining and measuring ecological specialization. J Appl Ecol. 2010;47:15–25.Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Lowe MK, Kennedy DM. Stability of artificial beaches in Port Phillip Bay, Victoria, Australia. J Coast Res. 2016;75:253–7.50.Paulin MM, Nicolaisen MH, Jacobsen CS, Gimsing AL, Sørensen J, Bælum J. Improving Griffith’s protocol for co-extraction of microbial DNA and RNA in adsorptive soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2013;63:37–49.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:4516–22.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Rognes T, Flouri T, Nichols B, Quince C, Mahé F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ. 2016;4:2584.Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Amir A, Daniel M, Navas-Molina JA, Kopylova E, Morton JT, Xu ZZ, et al. Deblur rapidly resolves single-nucleotide community sequence patterns. mSystems. 2017;2:e00191–16.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. 2019;37:852–7.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Davis NM, Proctor DM, Holmes SP, Relman DA, Callahan BJ. Simple statistical identification and removal of contaminant sequences in marker-gene and metagenomics data. Microbiome. 2018;6:226.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Waite DW, Rinke C, Skarshewski A, Chaumeil P-A, et al. A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:996–1004.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
57.McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e61217.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, et al. Vegan: community ecology package. R Packag Version. 2018;2:4–6.
Google Scholar 
59.Wickham H. ggplot2. WIREs Comp Stats. 2011;3:180–5.60.Lozupone C, Lladser ME, Knights D, Stombaugh J, Knight R. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 2011;5:169.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
61.Latombe G, Hui C, McGeoch MA. Multi‐site generalised dissimilarity modelling: using zeta diversity to differentiate drivers of turnover in rare and widespread species. Methods Ecol Evol. 2017;8:431–42.Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Lorenzen CJ. Determination of chlorophyll and pheo‐pigments: spectrophotometric equations 1. Limnol Oceanogr. 1967;12:343–6.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Li DH, Luo RB, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, et al. MEGAHIT v1.0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods. 2016;102:3–11.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, De Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, et al. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods. 2014;11:1144.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2015;32:605–7.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
67.Kang D, Li F, Kirton ES, Thomas A, Egan RS, An H, et al. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, et al. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol. 2018;3:836–43.69.Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J. 2017;11:2864.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25:1043–55.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Bowers RM, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Harmon-Smith M, Doud D, Reddy TBK, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35:725–31.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinforma. 2010;11:119.Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
73.Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nat Methods. 2014;12:59.PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
74.Greening C, Geier R, Wang C, Woods LC, Morales SE, McDonald MJ, et al. Diverse hydrogen production and consumption pathways influence methane production in ruminants. ISME J. 2019;13:2617–32.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Søndergaard D, Pedersen CNS, Greening C. HydDB: a web tool for hydrogenase classification and analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34212.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
76.Cordero PRF, Bayly K, Leung PM, Huang C, Islam ZF, Schittenhelm RB, et al. Atmospheric carbon monoxide oxidation is a widespread mechanism supporting microbial survival. ISME J. 2019;13:2868–81.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Darling AE, Jospin G, Lowe E, Matsen FA IV, Bik HM, Eisen JA. PhyloSift: phylogenetic analysis of genomes and metagenomes. PeerJ. 2014;2:e243.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Zhou Z, Tran P, Liu Y, Kieft K, Anantharaman K. METABOLIC: a scalable high-throughput metabolic and biogeochemical functional trait profiler based on microbial genomes. bioRxiv. 2019; 761643. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/761643v2.79.Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:2947–8.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2016;33:1870–4.81.Islam ZF, Cordero PRF, Feng J, Chen Y-J, Bay SK, Gleadow RM, et al. Two Chloroflexi classes independently evolved the ability to persist on atmospheric hydrogen and carbon monoxide. ISME J. 2019;13:1801–13.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Fonselius S, Dyrssen D, Yhlen B. Determination of hydrogen sulphide. Methods of Seawater Analysis. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim, Germany. Third Ed 2007. p. 91–100.83.Hui C, McGeoch MA. Zeta diversity as a concept and metric that unifies incidence-based biodiversity patterns. Am Nat. 2014;184:684–94.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
84.Bay SK, McGeoch MA, Gillor O, Wieler N, Palmer DJ, Baker DJ, et al. Soil bacterial communities exhibit strong biogeographic patterns at fine taxonomic resolution. mSystems. 2020;5:e00540–20.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Büchi L, Vuilleumier S. Ecological strategies in stable and disturbed environments depend on species specialisation. Oikos. 2016;125:1408–20.86.Walters W, Hyde ER, Berg-Lyons D, Ackermann G, Humphrey G, Parada A, et al. Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys. mSystems. 2016;1:e00009–15.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
87.Lencina AM, Ding Z, Schurig-Briccio LA, Gennis RB. Characterization of the type III sulfide: quinone oxidoreductase from Caldivirga maquilingensis and its membrane binding. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA)-Bioenerg. 2013;1827:266–75.CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Han Y, Perner M. Sulfide consumption in Sulfurimonas denitrificans and heterologous expression of its three sulfide-quinone reductase homologs. J Bacteriol. 2016;198:1260–7.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
89.Ramel F, Amrani A, Pieulle L, Lamrabet O, Voordouw G, Seddiki N, et al. Membrane-bound oxygen reductases of the anaerobic sulfate-reducing Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough: roles in oxygen defence and electron link with periplasmic hydrogen oxidation. Microbiology. 2013;159:2663–73.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
90.Ramel F, Brasseur G, Pieulle L, Valette O, Hirschler-Réa A, Fardeau ML, et al. Growth of the obligate anaerobe Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough under continuous low oxygen concentration sparging: impact of the membrane-bound oxygen reductases. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0123455.PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
91.Shibl AA, Isaac A, Ochsenkühn MA, Cárdenas A, Fei C, Behringer G, et al. Diatom modulation of select bacteria through use of two unique secondary metabolites. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2020;117:27445–55.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
92.Yurkov VV, Beatty JT. Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62:695–724.CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
93.Kamp A, de Beer D, Nitsch JL, Lavik G, Stief P. Diatoms respire nitrate to survive dark and anoxic conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:5649–54.CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Pianka ER. On r-and K-selection. Am Nat. 1970;104:592–7.Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Andrews JH, Harris RF. r-and K-selection and microbial ecology. Advances in microbial ecology. Springer; Berlin, Germany; 1986. p. 99–147.96.Shade A, Dunn RR, Blowes SA, Keil P, Bohannan BJM, Herrmann M, et al. Macroecology to unite all life, large and small. Trends Ecol Evol. 2018;33:731–44.PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
97.Algar CK, Vallino JJ. Predicting microbial nitrate reduction pathways in coastal sediments. Aquat Micro Ecol. 2014;71:223–38.Article 

Google Scholar 
98.Graham EB, Knelman JE, Schindlbacher A, Siciliano S, Breulmann M, Yannarell A, et al. Microbes as engines of ecosystem function: when does community structure enhance predictions of ecosystem processes? Front Microbiol. 2016;7:214.PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar  More

1.EU. Communication from the Commission. Ports: an engine for growth (2013).2.EU. Directive (EU) 2019/883 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019. 2019(March), 116–142 (2019).3.Chao, M. & Rodríguez, M. New trends in port managing: towards the e-port. J. Marit. Res. 3(2), 35–42 (2006).
Google Scholar 
4.Paiano, A., Crovella, T. & Lagioia, G. Managing sustainable practices in cruise tourism: the assessment of carbon footprint and waste of water and beverage packaging. Tour. Manag. 77(October 2019), 104016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104016 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Kovačić, M. & Silveira, L. Nautical tourism in Croatia and in Portugal in the late 2010’s: issues and perspectives. Pomorstvo 32(2), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.31217/p.32.2.13 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Pérez Labajos, C. & Blanco Rojo, B. Leisure ports planning. J. Marit. Res. 3(2), 67–82 (2006).
Google Scholar 
7.BOE. Real Decreto Legislativo 2/2011, de 5 de septiembre, por el que se aprueba el Texto Refundido de la Ley de Puertos del Estado y de la Marina Mercante. Span. Off. Bull. 255, 11. https://www.boe.es/buscar/pdf/2011/BOE-A-2011-16467-consolidado.pdf (2011).8.Gómez, A. G., Valdor, P. F., Ondiviela, B., Díaz, J. L. & Juanes, J. A. Mapping the environmental risk assessment of marinas on water quality: the Atlas of the Spanish coast. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 139(January), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.01.008 (2019).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
9.Sofiev, M. et al. Cleaner fuels for ships provide public health benefits with climate tradeoffs. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02774-9 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Chen, C., Saikawa, E., Comer, B., Mao, X. & Rutherford, D. Ship emission impacts on air quality and human health in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) Region, China, in 2015, with projections to 2030. GeoHealth 3(9), 284–306. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000183 (2019).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Mateos, M. R. Los puertos deportivos como infraestructuras de soporte de las actividades náuticas de recreo en Andalucía. Mar. Infrastruct. Supports Naut. Recreat. Act. Andal. 54, 335–360 (2010).
Google Scholar 
12.Nursey-Bray, M. et al. Vulnerabilities and adaptation of ports to climate change. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 56(7), 1021–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2012.716363 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Antequera, P. D., Jaime, D. & Abel, L. Tourism, transport and climate change: the carbon footprint of international air traffic on Islands. Sustainability 13(4), 1795. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041795 (2021).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Hadjikakou, M., Chenoweth, J. & Miller, G. Estimating the direct and indirect water use of tourism in the eastern Mediterranean. J. Environ. Manag. 114, 548–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.002 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Annis, G. M. et al. Designing coastal conservation to deliver ecosystem and human well-being benefits. PLoS ONE 12(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172458 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Kizielewicz, J. & Lukovic, T. The phenomenon of the marina development to support the European model of economic development. TransNav Int. J. Mar. Navig. Saf. Sea Transp. 7(3), 461–466. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.07.03.19 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Ridolfi, E., Pujol, D. S., Ippolito, A., Saradakou, E. & Salvati, L. An urban political ecology approach to local development in fast-growing, tourism-specialized coastal cities. Tourismos 12(1), 171–204 (2017).
Google Scholar 
18.Sevinç, F. & Güzel, T. Sustainable Yacht tourism practices. Manag. Mark. XV(1), 61–76 (2017).
Google Scholar 
19.Lam-González, Y. E., León, C. J. & González-Hernández, M. M. Determinants of the European Yachtsmen´s satisfaction with the ports of call of the Canary Islands (Spain). Études Caribéennes https://doi.org/10.4000/etudescaribeennes.10584 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Novales, A., Martínez Martín, M. I., Castro Núñez, R. B., Cazcarro Castellano, I. & Santero Sánchez, R. El impacto económico de la Náutica de Recreo 99 (Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2018).
Google Scholar 
21.Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Marsella. Náutica de recreo en el Mediterráneo 114 (Etinet, 2011).
Google Scholar 
22.Mensa, J. A., Vasallo, P. & Fabiano, M. JMarinas: a simple tool for the environmentally sound management of small marinas. J. Environ. Manag. 92, 67–77 (2011).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Benton, T. G. From castaways to throwaways: marine litter in the Pitcairn Islands. Biol. J. Lin. Soc. 56, 415–422 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Chainho, P. et al. Non-indigenous species in Portuguese coastal areas, coastal lagoons, estuaries and islands. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 167, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2015.06.019 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Styhre, L., Winnes, H., Black, J., Lee, J. & Le-Griffin, H. Greenhouse gas emissions from ships in ports: case studies in four continents. Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ. 54, 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.033 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Yang, Y. C. Operating strategies of CO2 reduction for a container terminal based on carbon footprint perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 141, 472–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.132 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Giunta, M., Bressi, S. & D’Angelo, G. Life cycle cost assessment of bitumen stabilised ballast: a novel maintenance strategy for railway track-bed. Constr. Build. Mater. 172, 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.020 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Hickmann, T. Voluntary global business initiatives and the international climate negotiations: a case study of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. J. Clean. Prod. 169, 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.183 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Garcia, R. & Freire, F. Carbon footprint of particleboard: a comparison between ISO/TS 14067, GHG protocol, PAS 2050 and climate declaration. J. Clean. Prod. 66, 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.073 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Ingrid, M.-M., Pablo, C.-M., Jose, V.-C. & Miguel Ángel, P.-G. Economic impact of a port on the hinterland: application to Santander’s port. Int. J. Shipp. Transp. Logist. 4, 235–249 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Abdul-azeez, I. A. Development of carbon dioxide emission assessment tool towards promoting sustainability in UTM Malaysia. Open J. Energy Effic. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojee.2018.72004 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Jeswani, H. K. & Azapagic, A. Water footprint: methodologies and a case study for assessing the impacts of water use. J. Clean. Prod. 19(12), 1288–1299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.003 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Zhuo, La., Mekonnen, M. M. & Hoekstra, A. Y. Consumptive water footprint and virtual water trade scenarios for China: with a focus on crop production, consumption and trade. Environ. Int. 94, 211–223 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Arto, I., Andreoni, V. & Rueda-Cantuche, J. M. Global use of water resources: a multiregional analysis of water use, water footprint and water trade balance. Water Resour. Econ. 15, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wre.2016.04.002 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Zhi, Y., Yang, Z., Yin, X., Hamilton, P. B. & Zhang, L. Using gray water footprint to verify economic sectors’ consumption of assimilative capacity in a river basin: model and a case study in the Haihe River Basin, China. J. Clean. Prod. 92, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.058 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Norén, A., Karlfeldt Fedje, K., Strömvall, A. M., Rauch, S. & Andersson-Sköld, Y. Integrated assessment of management strategies for metal-contaminated dredged sediments: what are the best approaches for ports, marinas and waterways?. Sci. Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135510 (2020).Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
37.Kenworthy, J. M., Rolland, G., Samadi, S. & Lejeusne, C. Local variation within marinas: effects of pollutants and implications for invasive species. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 133(March), 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.001 (2018).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
38.Veettil, A. V. & Mishra, A. K. Water security assessment using blue and green water footprint concepts. J. Hydrol. 542, 589–602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.09.032 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Gu, Y., Li, Y., Wang, H. & Li, F. Gray water footprint: taking quality, quantity, and time effect into consideration. Water Resour. Manag. 28(11), 3871–3874. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0695-y (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Duvat, V. K. E. et al. Trajectories of exposure and vulnerability of small islands to climate change. Rev. Clim. Change https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.478 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Millán, M. M. Extreme hydrometeorological events and climate change predictions in Europe. J. Hydrol. 518(PB), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.041 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Smith, J. B. et al. Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “‘reasons for concern’”. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106(11), 4133–4137. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0812355106 (2009).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.IPCC. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability (2014).44.Ciscar, J. C. et al. Physical and economic consequences of climate change in Europe. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108(7), 2678–2683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1011612108 (2011).ADS 
Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Melo, N., Santos, B. F. & Leandro, J. A prototype tool for dynamic pluvial-flood emergency planning. Urban Water J. 12(1), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062X.2014.975725 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Lazrus, H. Sea change: Island communities and climate change. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 41, 285–301. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145730 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Reid, S., Johnston, N. & Patiar, A. Coastal resorts setting the pace: an evaluation of sustainable hotel practices. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 33, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2017.07.001 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Vargas-Amelin, E. & Pindado, P. The challenge of climate change in Spain: water resources, agriculture and land. J. Hydrol. 518(PB), 243–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.035 (2014).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Fagerberg, J., Laestadius, S. & Martin, B. R. The triple challenge for Europe: the economy, climate change, and governance. Innov. Econ. Dev. Policy Sel. Essays 59(3), 384–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/05775132.2016.1171668 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.UNCTAD. Maritime transport in small island developing states. Rev. Marit. Transp. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Hinkey, L. M., Zaidi, B. R., Volson, B. & Rodriguez, N. J. Identifying sources and distributions of sediment contaminants at two US Virgin Islands marinas. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50, 1244–1250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.04.035 (2005).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
52.Marín, J. C. et al. Properties of particulate pollution in the port city of Valparaiso, Chile. Atmos. Environ. 171, 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.044 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Tóvar-Sánchez, A., Sánchez-Quiles, D. & Rodríguez-Romero, A. Massive coastal tourism influx to the Mediterranean Sea: the environmental risk of sunscreens. Sci. Total Environ. 656, 316–321 (2019).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Uche-Soria, M. & Rodríguez-Monroy, C. Solutions to marine pollution in Canary Islands’ ports: alternatives and optimization of energy management. Resources https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8020059 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Bosch, N. E., Gonçalves, J. M. S., Tuya, F. & Erzini, K. Marinas as habitats for nearshore fish assemblages: comparative analysis of underwater visual census, baited cameras and fish traps. Sci. Mar. 81(2), 159. https://doi.org/10.3989/scimar.04540.20a (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Di Franco, A. et al. Do small marinas drive habitat specific impacts? A case study from Mediterranean Sea. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 62, 926–933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.02.053 (2011).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
57.Pasetto, M. & Partl, M. N. in Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Asphalt Pavements & Environment (APE). http://www.springer.com/series/15087 (2020)58.Praticò, F. G., Giunta, M., Mistretta, M. & Gulotta, T. M. Energy and environmental life cycle assessment of sustainable pavement materials and technologies for urban roads. Sustainability (Switzerland) https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020704 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Hertwich, E. G. & Wood, R. The growing importance of scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions from industry. Environ. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aae19a (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Di Vaio, A., Varriale, L. & Alvino, F. Key performance indicators for developing environmentally sustainable and energy efficient ports: evidence from Italy. Energy Policy 122(July), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.046 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Corrigan, S., Kay, A., Ryan, M., Brazil, B. & Ward, M. E. Human factors & safety culture: challenges & opportunities for the port environment. Saf. Sci. 125, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.02.030 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Mali, M., Dell’Anna, M. M., Mastrorilli, P., Damiani, L. & Piccinni, A. F. Assessment and source identification of pollution risk for touristic ports: heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediments of 4 marinas of the Apulia region (Italy). Mar. Pollut. Bull. 114(2), 768–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.063 (2017).CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
63.Cutroneo, L., Reboa, A., Besio, G., Borgogno, F., Canesi, L., Canuto, S., Dara, M., Enrile, F., Forioso, I., Greco, G., Lenoble, V., Malatesta, A., Mounier, S., Petrillo, M., Rovetta, R., Stocchino, A., Tesan, J., Vagge, G., & Capello, M. Correction to: Microplastics in seawater: sampling strategies, laboratory methodologies, and identification techniques applied to port environment (Environmental Science and Pollution Research, (2020), 27, 9, (8938–8952), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-07783-8). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 27(16), 20571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08704-5 (2020)64.Kotowska, I. & Kubowicz, D. The role of ports in reduction of road transport pollution in port cities. Transp. Res. Procedia 39, 212–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.06.023 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Coronado Mondragon, A. E., Lalwani, C. S., Coronado Mondragon, E. S., Coronado Mondragon, C. E. & Pawar, K. S. Intelligent transport systems in multimodal logistics: a case of role and contribution through wireless vehicular networks in a sea port location. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 137, 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.11.006 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Caballini, C., Rebecchi, I. & Sacone, S. Combining multiple trips in a port environment for empty movements minimization. Transp. Res. Procedia 10, 694–703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.023 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Sifakis, N. & Tsoutsos, T. Planning zero-emissions ports through the nearly zero energy port concept. J. Clean. Prod. 286, 20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125448 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Karimpour, R., Ballini, F. & Ölcer, A. I. Circular economy approach to facilitate the transition of the port cities into self-sustainable energy ports: a case study in Copenhagen-Malmö Port (CMP). WMU J. Marit. Aff. 18(2), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-019-00170-2 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Babrowski, S., Heinrichs, H., Jochem, P. & Fichtner, W. Load shift potential of electric vehicles in Europe. J. Power Sources 255, 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.019 (2014).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Azarkamand, S., Ferré, G. & Darbra, R. M. Calculating the carbon footprint in ports by using a standardized tool. Sci. Total Environ. 734, 139407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139407 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
Article 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
71.Carballo-Penela, A., Mateo-Mantecón, I., Doménech, J. L. & Coto-Millán, P. From the motorways of the sea to the green corridors’ carbon footprint: the case of a port in Spain. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 55(6), 765–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.627422 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Paska, J. & Surma, T. Electricity generation from renewable energy sources in Poland. Renew. Energy 71, 286–294 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Trujillo-Baute, E., del Río, P. & Mir-Artigues, P. Analysing the impact of renewable energy regulation on retail electricity prices. Energy Policy 114, 153–164 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Ruiz-Romero, S., Colmenar-Santos, A., Gil-Ortego, R. & Molina-Bonilla, A. Distributed generation: the definitive boost for renewable energy in Spain. Renew. Energy 53, 354–364 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Burgos-Payán, M., Roldán-Fernández, J. M., Trigo-García, Á. L., Bermúdez-Ríos, J. M. & Riquelme-Santos, J. M. Costs and benefits of the renewable production of electricity in Spain. Energy Policy 56, 259–270 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Taliotis, C. et al. Renewable energy technology integration for the island of Cyprus: a cost-optimization approach. Energy 137(2017), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.015 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Deyà-Tortella, B., Garcia, C., Nilsson, W. & Tirado, D. The effect of the water tariff structures on the water consumption in Mallorcan hotels. Water Resour. Res. 52(8), 6386–6403. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018621 (2016).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Liu, J. et al. A global and spatially explicit assessment of climate change impacts on crop production and consumptive water use. PLoS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057750 (2013).Article 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
79.Hof, A. & Schmitt, T. Urban and tourist land use patterns and water consumption: evidence from Mallorca, Balearic Islands. Land Use Policy 28, 792–804 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Urban water consumption in the Balearic islands. The water portal: http://www.caib.es/sites/aigua/es/consumo_agua/81.García, C., Mestre-Runge, C., Morán-Tejeda, E., Lorenzo-Lacruz, J., Tirado, D. (2020). Impact of Cruise Activity on Freshwater Use in the Port of Palma (Mallorca, Spain): Water 12, 1088.82.Yves Tramblay, Aristeidis Koutroulis, Luis Samaniego, Sergio Vicente-Serrano, Florence Volaire, et al. Challenges for drought assessment in the Mediterranean region under future climate scenarios. EarthScience Reviews, Elsevier, 2020, 210, pp.103348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103348f More

1.Medic, G., Wille, M. & Hemels, M. Short- and long-term health consequences of sleep disruption. Nat. Sci. Sleep 9, 151–161 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Randazzo, A. C., Muehlbach, M. J., Schweitzer, P. K. & Walsh, J. K. Cognitive function following acute sleep restriction in children ages 10–14. Sleep 21, 861–868 (1998).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Stickgold, R. Sleep-dependent memory consolidation. Nature 437, 1272–1278 (2005).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Tononi, G. & Cirelli, C. Sleep and the price of plasticity: From synaptic and cellular homeostasis to memory consolidation and integration. Neuron 81, 12–34 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Marshall, L. & Born, J. The contribution of sleep to hippocampus-dependent memory consolidation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 442–450 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
6.Smith, C. Sleep states and memory processes in humans: Procedural versus declarative memory systems. Sleep Med. Rev. 5, 491–506 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
7.Johnston, T. D. In Selective Costs and Benefits in the Evolution of Learning. in Advances in the Study of Behavior (eds. Rosenblatt, J. S. et al.) 12, 65–106 (Academic Press, 1982).8.Hendricks, J. C. et al. Rest in Drosophila is a sleep-like state. Neuron 25, 129–138 (2000).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
9.Campbell, S. S. & Tobler, I. Animal sleep: A review of sleep duration across phylogeny. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 8, 269–300 (1984).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
10.Shaw, P. J. Correlates of sleep and waking in Drosophila melanogaster. Science (80-). 287, 1834–1837 (2000).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Hamblen, M. et al. Germ-line transformation involving DNA from the period locus in Drosophila melanogaster: Overlapping genomic fragments that restore circadian and ultradian rhythmicity to per 0 and per—mutants. J. Neurogenet. 3, 249–291 (1986).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
12.Kirszenblat, L. & van Swinderen, B. Sleep in Drosophila. In Handbook of Sleep Research, Vol. 30 (ed. Dringenberg, H. C.) 333–347 (Elsevier, 2019).13.Ly, S., Pack, A. I. & Naidoo, N. The neurobiological basis of sleep: Insights from Drosophila. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 87, 67–86 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Helfrich-Förster, C. Sleep in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 63, 69–86 (2018).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Le Glou, E., Seugnet, L., Shaw, P. J., Preat, T. & Goguel, V. Circadian modulation of consolidated memory retrieval following sleep deprivation in Drosophila. Sleep 35, 1377–1384 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Li, X., Yu, F. & Guo, A. Sleep deprivation specifically impairs short-term olfactory memory in Drosophila. Sleep 32, 1417–1424 (2009).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Rihel, J. & Bendor, D. Flies sleep on it, or Fuhgeddaboudit!. Cell 161, 1498–1500 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Geissmann, Q., Beckwith, E. J. & Gilestro, G. F. Most sleep does not serve a vital function: Evidence from Drosophila melanogaster. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau8253 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
19.Tougeron, K. & Abram, P. K. An ecological perspective on sleep disruption. Am. Nat. 190, E55–E66 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Aulsebrook, A. E., Jones, T. M., Rattenborg, N. C., Roth, T. C. & Lesku, J. A. Sleep ecophysiology: Integrating neuroscience and ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 590–599 (2016).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
21.Markow, T. A. Host use and host shifts in Drosophila. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 31, 139–145 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Badel, L., Ohta, K., Tsuchimoto, Y. & Kazama, H. Decoding of context-dependent olfactory behavior in Drosophila. Neuron 91, 155–167 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Knaden, M., Strutz, A., Ahsan, J., Sachse, S. & Hansson, B. S. Spatial representation of odorant valence in an insect brain. Cell Rep. 1, 392–399 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Hopkins, A. A discussion of C.G. Hewitt’s paper on ‘Insect Behavior’. J. Econ. Entomol. 10, 92–93 (1917).
Google Scholar 
25.Davis, J. M. & Stamps, J. A. The effect of natal experience on habitat preferences. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 411–416 (2004).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Barron, A. B. The life and death of Hopkins’ host selection principle. J. Insect Behav. 14, 725–737 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.van Emden, H. F. et al. Plant chemistry and aphid parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Imprinting and memory. Eur. J. Entomol. 105, 477–483 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Liu, S. S., Li, Y. H., Liu, Y. Q. & Zalucki, M. P. Experience-induced preference for oviposition repellents derived from a non-host plant by a specialist herbivore. Ecol. Lett. 8, 722–729 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Hamilton, C. E., Beresford, D. V. & Sutcliffe, J. F. Effects of natal habitat odour, reinforced by adult experience, on choice of oviposition site in the mosquito Aedes aegypti. Med. Vet. Entomol. 25, 428–435 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
30.Turlings, T. C. L., Wackers, F. L., Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J. & Tumlinson, J. H. Learning of Host-Finding Cues by Hymenopterous parasitoids. In Insect Learning (eds. Papaj, D. R. & Lewis, W. J.) 51–78 (Springer US, 1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2814-2_331.Jaenike, J. Induction of host preference in Drosophila melanogaster. Oecologia 58, 320–325 (1983).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Takemoto, H., Powell, W., Pickett, J., Kainoh, Y. & Takabayashi, J. Two-step learning involved in acquiring olfactory preferences for plant volatiles by parasitic wasps. Anim. Behav. 83, 1491–1496 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Andretic, R. & Shaw, P. J. Essentials of sleep recordings in Drosophila: Moving beyond sleep time. Methods Enzymol. 393, 759–772 (2005).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Garbe, D. S. et al. Context-specific comparison of sleep acquisition systems in Drosophila. Biol. Open 4, 1558–1568 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.Faraway, J. J. Extending the Linear Model with R (CRC Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1201/b21296.Book 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
36.Ho, K. S. & Sehgal, A. Drosophila melanogaster: An insect model for fundamental studies of sleep. Methods Enzymol. 393, 1834–1837 (2005).
Google Scholar 
37.Greenspan, R. J., Tononi, G., Cirelli, C. & Shaw, P. J. Sleep and the fruit fly. Trends Neurosci. 24, 142–145 (2001).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Killgore, W. D. S. Sleep deprivation and behavioral risk-taking. In Modulation of Sleep by Obesity, Diabetes, Age, and Diet 279–287 (Elsevier, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420168-2.00030-2.39.Revadi, S. et al. Olfactory responses of Drosophila suzukii females to host plant volatiles. Physiol. Entomol. 40, 54–64 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Cirelli, C. & Tononi, G. Is sleep essential?. PLoS Biol. 6, 1605–1611 (2008).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Bateson, M., Desire, S., Gartside, S. E. & Wright, G. A. Agitated honeybees exhibit pessimistic cognitive biases. Curr. Biol. 21, 1070–1073 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Wilkin, M. M., Waters, P., McCormick, C. M. & Menard, J. L. Intermittent physical stress during early- and mid-adolescence differentially alters rats’ anxiety- and depression-like behaviors in adulthood. Behav. Neurosci. 126, 344–360 (2012).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
43.Chaumet, G. et al. Confinement and sleep deprivation effects on propensity to take risks. Aviat. Space. Environ. Med. 80, 73–80 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Killgore, W. D. S. Effects of sleep deprivation and morningness-eveningness traits on risk-taking. Psychol. Rep. 100, 613–626 (2007).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Killgore, W. D. S. et al. Restoration of risk-propensity during sleep deprivation: Caffeine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil. Aviat. Space. Environ. Med. 79, 867–874 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
46.Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science (80-). 185, 1124–1131 (1974).ADS 
CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Spieth, H. T. Courtship behavior in Drosophila. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 19, 385–405 (1974).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
48.Bartelt, R. J., Schaner, A. M. & Jackson, L. L. cis-Vaccenyl acetate as an aggregation pheromone in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Chem. Ecol. 11, 1747–1756 (1985).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Cazalé-Debat, L., Houot, B., Farine, J. P., Everaerts, C. & Ferveur, J. F. Flying Drosophila show sex-specific attraction to fly-labelled food. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–13 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
50.Malek, H. L. & Long, T. A. F. On the use of private versus social information in oviposition site choice decisions by Drosophila melanogaster females. Behav. Ecol. 31, 739–749 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Inoue, I. et al. Impaired locomotor activity and exploratory behavior in mice lacking histamine H1 receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93, 13316–13320 (1996).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Daffner, K. R., Mesulam, M.-M., Cohen, L. G. & Scinto, L. F. M. Mechanisms underlying diminished novelty-seeking behavior in patients with probable Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol. Behav. Neurol. 12, 58–66 (1999).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
53.Lee, A. C. H., Rahman, S., Hodges, J. R., Sahakian, B. J. & Graham, K. S. Associative and recognition memory for novel objects in dementia: Implications for diagnosis. Eur. J. Neurosci. 18, 1660–1670 (2003).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.Ju, Y.-E.S., Lucey, B. P. & Holtzman, D. M. Sleep and Alzheimer disease pathology—A bidirectional relationship. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 10, 115–119 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Tabuchi, M. et al. Sleep interacts with aβ to modulate intrinsic neuronal excitability. Curr. Biol. 25, 702–712 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Dissel, S. et al. Enhanced sleep reverses memory deficits and underlying pathology in drosophila models of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Sleep Circadian Rhythm. 2, 15–26 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Takano-Shimizu-Kouno, T. KYOTO Stock Center—Department of Drosophila Genomics and Genetic Resources (Kyoto Institute of Technology, 2015).58.Shaw, P. J., Tortoni, G., Greenspan, R. J. & Robinson, D. F. Stress response genes protect against lethal effects of sleep deprivation in Drosophila. Nature 417, 287–291 (2002).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
59.https://www.arduino.cc/. Accessed 6 Jan 202160.https://processing.org/. Accessed 6 Jan 2021 More