Effects of family planning on fertility behaviour across the demographic transition
1.Becker, G. S. & Lewis, H. G. On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy 81(2, pt2), s279–s288 (1973).Article
Google Scholar
2.Bulatao, R. A. & Lee, R. D. Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries (Academic Press, 1983).
Google Scholar
3.Caldwell, J. C. The mechanisms of demographic change in historical perspective. Popul. Stud. 35(1), 1–27 (1981).Article
Google Scholar
4.Carlsson, G. The decline of fertility: innovation or adjustment process. Popul. Stud. 20(2), 149–174 (1966).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
5.Easterlin, R. A. & Crimmins, E. M. The Fertility Revolution (University of Chicago Press, 1985).
Google Scholar
6.Winterhalder, B. & Leslie, P. Risk-sensitive fertility: The variance compensation hypothesis. Evol. Hum. Behav. 23(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00089-7 (2002).Article
Google Scholar
7.Sear, R., Lawson, D. W., Kaplan, H. & Shenk, M. K. Understanding Variation in Human Fertility: What Can We Learn from Evolutionary Demography? (The Royal Society, 2016).
Google Scholar
8.Wood, J. W. Dynamics of Human Reproduction (Aldine de Gruyter, 1994).
Google Scholar
9.Hruschka, D. J. & Burger, O. How does variance in fertility change over the demographic transition?. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150155. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0155 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
10.Henry, L. Some data on natural fertility. Eugen. Q. 8(2), 81–91 (1961).CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
11.Campbell, K. L. & Wood, J. W. Fertility in traditional societies. In Natural Human Fertility Social and Biological Determinants (eds Diggory, P. et al.) 39–61 (MacMillan Press, 1988).
Google Scholar
12.Ellison, P. T. On Fertile Ground (Harvard University Press, 2001).
Google Scholar
13.Colleran, H., Jasienska, G., Nenko, I., Galbarczyk, A. & Mace, R. 2015 Fertility decline and the changing dynamics of wealth, status and inequality. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 282, 20150287 (1806).Article
Google Scholar
14.Colleran, H. The cultural evolution of fertility decline. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 371(1692), 20150152 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
15.Knight, F. H. Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit (Houghton Mifflin, 1921).
Google Scholar
16.Ellison, P. T. Energetics and reproductive effort. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 15, 342–351 (2003).PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
17.Jasienska, G. & Ellison, P. Energetic factors and seasonal changes in ovarian function in women from rural Poland. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 16, 563–580 (2004).PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
18.Jasienska, G. & Ellison, P. T. Physical work causes suppression of ovarian function in women. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265, 1847–1851 (1998).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
19.Kramer, K. L. & McMillan, G. P. The effect of labor saving technology on longitudinal fertility changes. Curr. Anthropol. 47(1), 165–172 (2006).Article
Google Scholar
20.Panter-Brick, C. Lactation, birth spacing and maternal workloads among two cases in rural Nepal. J. Biosoc. Sci. 23, 137–154 (1991).CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
21.Sear, R., Steele, F., McGregor, I. A. & Mace, R. The effects of kin on child mortality in Gambia. Demography 39(1), 43–63 (2002).PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
22.Valeggia, C. R. & Ellison, P. T. Lactation, energetics, and postpartum fecundity. In Reproductive Ecology and Human Evolution (ed. Ellison, P. T.) 85–105 (Aldine de Gruyter, 2001).
Google Scholar
23.Gibson, M. & Mace, R. An energy-saving development initiative increases birth rate and childhood malnutrition in rural Ethiopia. PloS Med. 3, 476–484 (2006).Article
Google Scholar
24.Kramer, K. L. & McMillan, G. P. Women’s labor, fertility, and the introduction of modern technology in a rural Maya village. J. Anthropol. Res. 55(4), 499–520 (1999).CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
25.Low, B., Simon, C. & Anderson, K. An evolutionary ecological perspective on demographic transitions: modeling multiple currencies. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14(2), 149–167 (2002).PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
26.Low, B. S., Simon, C. S. & Anderson, K. G. The biodemography of modern women: tradeoffs when resources become limiting. In The Biodemography of Human Reproduction and Fertility (ed. Rodgers, J. L.) 105–134 (Kuwer Academic Publishers, 2003).
Google Scholar
27.Dyson, T. & Murphy, M. The onset of fertility transition. Popul. Dev. Rev. 11(3), 399–440 (1985).Article
Google Scholar
28.Early, J. & Headland, T. N. Population Dynamics of a Philippine Rain Forest People (University of Florida Press, 1998).
Google Scholar
29.Hill, K. & Hurtado, A. M. Ache Life History (Aldine de Gruyter, 1996).
Google Scholar
30.Kramer, K. L. & Greaves, R. D. Changing patterns of infant mortality and fertility among Pumé foragers and horticulturalists. Am. Anthropol. 109(4), 713–726 (2007).Article
Google Scholar
31.Goldstein, J. R. & Klüsener, S. Spatial analysis of the causes of fertility decline in Prussia. Popul. Dev. Rev. 40(3), 497–525 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
32.Montgomery, M. R. & Casterline, J. B. The diffusion of fertility control in Taiwan: Evidence from pooled cross-section time-series models. Popul. Stud. 47(3), 457–479 (1993).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
33.Schmertmann, C. P., Assunção, R. M. & Potter, J. E. Knox meets Cox: Adapting epidemiological space-time statistics to demographic studies. Demography 47(3), 629–650 (2010).PubMed
PubMed Central
Article
Google Scholar
34.Galloway, P. R., Hammel, E. A. & Lee, R. D. Fertility decline in Prussia, 1875–1910: A pooled cross-section time series analysis. Popul. Stud. 48(1), 135–158 (1994).CAS
Article
Google Scholar
35.Schmertmann C. P., Potter J. E. & Assunção R. M. 2011 An innovative methodology for space-time analysis with an application to the 1960–2000 Brazilian mortality transition. In Navigating Time and Space in Population Studies 19–36 (Dordrecht, 2011).36.Bongaarts, J., Cleland, J., Townsend, J. W., Bertrand, J. T. & Gupta, M. D. Family Planning Programs for the 21st Century (Population Council, 2012).
Google Scholar
37.Casterline J. B. Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Introduction. In Diffusion processes and fertility transition: Selected perspectives (ed. Population N.R.C.C.o.) (National Academies Press, US, 2011).38.Cleland, J. The effects of improved survival on fertility: A reassessment. In Global Fertility Transitions Population and Development Review Supplement to Vol 27 (eds. Bulatao R.A., Casterline J.B.) (Population Council, 2001).39.Cleland, J. & Wilson, C. Demand theories of the fertility transition: an iconoclastic view. Popul. Stud. 41(1), 5–30 (1987).Article
Google Scholar
40.Montgomery, M. R. & Casterline, J. B. Social learning, social influence, and new models of fertility. Popul. Dev. Rev. 22, 151–175 (1996).Article
Google Scholar
41.Sear, R. Evolutionary contributions to the study of human fertility. Popul. Stud. 69(sup1), S39–S55 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
42.Knodel, J. & Van de Walle, E. Lessons from the past: Policy implications of historical fertility studies. Popul. Dev. Rev. 5(2), 217–245 (1979).Article
Google Scholar
43.Watkins, S. C. From local to national communities: The transformation of demographic regimes in Western Europe, 1870–1960. Popul. Dev. Rev. 16(2), 241–272 (1990).Article
Google Scholar
44.Bongaarts, J. & Watkins, S. C. Social interactions and contemporary fertility transitions. Popul. Dev. Rev. 22(4), 639–682 (1996).Article
Google Scholar
45.Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. Culture and the Evolutionary Process (Univ. Press, 1985).
Google Scholar
46.Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach (Princeton University Press, 1981).MATH
Google Scholar
47.Colleran, H., Jasienska, G., Nenko, I., Galbarczyk, A. & Mace, R. Community-level education accelerates the cultural evolution of fertility decline. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2732 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
48.Conrad, C., Lechner, M. & Werner, W. East German fertility after unification: crisis or adaptation?. Popul. Dev. Rev. 22(2), 331–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/2137438 (1996).Article
Google Scholar
49.Easterlin, R. A. Towards a socio-economic theory of fertility: a survey of recent research on economic factors in American fertility. In Fertility and Family Planning: A World View (ed. Behrman, S. J.) 127–156 (University of Michigan Press, 1969).
Google Scholar
50.Easterlin, R. A. An economic framework for fertility analysis. Stud. Fam. Plann. 6, 54–63 (1975).CAS
PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
51.Galloway, P. R., Lee, R. D. & Hammel, E. A. Infant mortality and the fertility transition: Macro evidence from Europe and new findings from Prussia. In From Death to Birth Mortality Decline and Reproductive Change (eds Montgomery, M. R. & Cohen, B.) 182–226 (National Academy Press, 1998).
Google Scholar
52.Kaplan, H. A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 39, 91–135 (1996).Article
Google Scholar
53.Lee, R. D. & Bulatao, R. A. The demand for children: a critical essay. In Determinants of Fertility in Developing Countries (eds Bulatao, R. A. & Lee, R. D.) 233–287 (Academic Press, 1983).
Google Scholar
54.Lesthaeghe R. & Wilson C. Modes of production secularization and the pace of the fertility decline in Western Europe 1870–1930 (1986).55.Turke, P. Evolution and demand for children. Popul. Dev. Rev. 15(1), 61–90 (1989).MathSciNet
Article
Google Scholar
56.Colleran, H. Farming in transition: land and property inheritance in a rural Polish population. Soc. Biol. Hum. Aff. 78, 7–19 (2014).
Google Scholar
57.González-Bailón, S. & Murphy, T. E. The effects of social interactions on fertility decline in nineteenth-century France: an agent-based simulation experiment. Popul. Stud. 67(2), 135–155 (2013).Article
Google Scholar
58.Shenk, M. K., Towner, M. C., Kress, H. C. & Alam, N. A model comparison approach shows stronger support for economic models of fertility decline. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110(20), 8045–8050. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217029110 (2013).ADS
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
59.Alvergne, A., Gurmu, E., Gibson, M. A. & Mace, R. Social transmission and the spread of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia. PLoS ONE 6, e22515. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022515 (2011).ADS
CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
60.Mace, R. & Colleran, H. Kin influence on the decision to start using modern contraception: a longitudinal study from rural Gambia. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 21, 472–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.20940 (2009).Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
61.Montgomery, M., Casterline, J. B. & Heiland, F. Social Networks and the Diffusion of Fertility Control (Population Council, 1998).Book
Google Scholar
62.Veile, A. & Kramer, K. L. Pregnancy, birth and babies: motherhood and modernization in a Yucatec village. In Maternal Health, Pregnancy-Related Morbidity and Death among Indigenous Women of Mexico & Central America (ed. Schwartz, D.) 205–224 (Springer, Berlin, 2018).
Google Scholar
63.Snopkowski, K., Towner, M. C., Shenk, M. K. & Colleran, H. Pathways from education to fertility decline: a multi-site comparative study. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 371(1692), 20150156 (2016).Article
Google Scholar
64.Schultz T. P. The Fertility Transition: Economic Explanations. Economic Growth Center Discussion Paper No. 833. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=286291 (2001).65.Becker, S. O., Cinnirella, F. & Woessmann, L. Does women’s education affect fertility? Evidence from pre-demographic transition Prussia. Eur. Rev. Econ. Hist. 17(1), 24–44 (2013).Article
Google Scholar
66.Gandrud, C. simPH: an R package for illustrating estimates from cox proportional hazard models including for interactive and nonlinear effects. J. Stat. Softw. 65(3), 1–20 (2015).Article
Google Scholar
67.Seiber, E. E., Bertrand, J. T. & Sullivan, T. M. Changes in contraceptive method mix in developing countries. Int. Fam. Plan. Perspect. 33(3), 117–123 (2007).PubMed
Article
Google Scholar
68.Leite, I. D. C., Gupta, N. & Rodrigues, R. D. Female sterilization in Latin America: cross-national perspectives. J. Biosoc. Sci. 36(6), 683 (2004).Article
Google Scholar
69.Bertrand, J. T., Sullivan, T. M., Knowles, E. A., Zeeshan, M. F. & Shelton, J. D. Contraceptive method skew and shifts in method mix in low-and middle-income countries. Int. Perspect. Sexual Reprod. Health 40(3), 144–153 (2014).Article
Google Scholar
70.Leslie, P. & Winterhalder, B. Demographic consequences of unpredictability in fertility outcomes. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 14(2), 168–183 (2002).PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
71.Gibson, M. & Mace, R. Labor-saving technology and fertility increase in rural Africa. Curr. Anthropol. 43(4), 631–637 (2002).PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
72.Alvergne, A., Lawson, D. W., Clarke, P. M. R., Gurmu, E. & Mace, R. Fertility, parental investment, and the early adoption of modern contraception in rural Ethiopia. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 25(1), 107–115 (2013).PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
73.Mace, R., Allal, N., Sear, R. & Prentice, A. M. The uptake of modern contraception in a Gambian community: the diffusion of an innovation over 25 years. In Social Information Transmission and Human Biology (eds Wells, J. C. K. et al.) 191–206 (Taylor & Francis Group, 2006).
Google Scholar
74.Lerner, I.M. Heredity, evolution and society. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman (1968)75.Lewontin, R. C. & Levins, R. Biology Under the Influence (Monthly Review Press, 2007).
Google Scholar
76.Donaldson-Matasci, M. C., Lachmann, M. & Bergstrom, C. T. Phenotypic diversity as an adaptation to environmental uncertainty. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10(4), 493–515 (2008).
Google Scholar
77.Meyers, L. A. & Bull, J. J. Fighting change with change: adaptive variation in an uncertain world. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17(12), 551–557 (2002).Article
Google Scholar
78.Sermonti, G. The butterfly and the lion. In Organisms, Genes and Evolution: Evolutionary Theory at the Crossroads; Proceedings of the 7th International Senckenberg Conference (eds Peters, S. T. & Weingarten, M.) 103 (Franz Steiner Verlag, 2000).
Google Scholar
79.Boone, J. L. & Kessler, K. L. More status or more children? Social status, fertility reduction and long-term fitness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20, 257–277 (1999).Article
Google Scholar
80.Nolin, D. A. & Ziker, J. P. Reproductive responses to economic uncertainty. Hum. Nat. 27(4), 351–371 (2016).PubMed
Article
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
81.Jensen, R. The (perceived) returns to education and the demand for schooling. Q. J. Econ. 125(2), 515–548 (2010).Article
Google Scholar
82.Borgerhoff, M. M. The demographic transition: are we any closer to an evolutionary explanation?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 266–270 (1998).Article
Google Scholar
83.Skirbekk, V. Fertility trends by social status. Demogr. Res. 18, 145–180 (2008).Article
Google Scholar
84.Vining, D. R. J. Social verses reproductive success: the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology. Behav. Brain Sci. 9(167), 216 (1986).
Google Scholar
85.Kramer, K. L. Maya Children: Helpers at the Farm (Harvard University Press, 2005).
Google Scholar
86.Kramer, K. L. & Boone, J. L. Why intensive agriculturalists have higher fertility: a household labor budget approach to subsistence intensification and fertility rates. Curr. Anthropol. 43(3), 511–517 (2002).Article
Google Scholar
87.Lee, R. D. & Kramer, K. L. Children’s economic roles in the Maya family life cycle: Cain, Caldwell and Chayanov revisited. Popul. Dev. Rev. 28(3), 475–499 (2002).Article
Google Scholar
88.Kramer, K. L. Reconsidering the cost of childbearing: the timing of children’s helping behavior across the life cycle of Maya families. In SocioEconomic Aspects of Human Behavioral Ecology (ed. Alvard, M.) 335–353 (Elsevier, 2004).
Google Scholar
89.Kramer, K. L., Veile, A. & Otárola-Castillo, E. Sibling competition, growth tradeoffs. Biological vs. statistical significance. PLoS ONE 11(3), e0150126. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150126 (2016).CAS
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
90.Veile, A. & Kramer, K. L. Shifting weanling’s optimum: breastfeeding ecology and infant health in Yucatan. In Anthropology and Breastfeeding (eds Tomori, C. et al.) Chapter 12 (Routledge Press, 2018).
Google Scholar
91.Feltz, C. J. & Miller, G. E. An asymptotic test for the equality of coefficients of variation from k populations. Stat. Med. 15(6), 647–658 (1996).Article
Google Scholar
92.Marwick, B. & Krishnamoorthy. K. Cvequality: Tests for the Equality of Coefficients of Variation from Multiple Groups. R software package version 0.1.3 (2019). Retrieved from https://github.com/benmarwick/cvequality, on 05/01/2019.93.Cahoy, D. O. A bootstrap test for equality of variances. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 54(10), 2306–2316 (2010).MathSciNet
MATH
Article
Google Scholar
94.Therneau, T. A Package for Survival Analysis in S. version 2.38 (2015), https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival. More