Ecology

1.Faith, D. P. et al. Evosystem services: an evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust. 2, 66–74 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Cámara-Leret, R. et al. Fundamental species traits explain provisioning services of tropical American palms. Nat. Plants 3, 16220 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Oka, C., Aiba, M. & Nakashizuka, T. Phylogenetic clustering in beneficial attributes of tree species directly linked to provisioning, regulating and cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 96, 477–495 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Faith, D. P. Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity. Biol. Conserv. 61, 1–10 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Vane-Wright, R. I., Humphries, C. J. & Williams, P. H. What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 55, 235–254 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Crozier, R. H. Genetic diversity and the agony of choice. Biol. Conserv. 61, 11–15 (1992).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Tucker, C. M. et al. Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history. Biol. Rev. 94, 1740–1760 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Owen, N. R., Gumbs, R., Gray, C. L. & Faith, D. P. Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity. Nat. Commun. 10, 859 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Mazel, F. et al. Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably. Nat. Commun. 9, 2888 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Mazel, F. et al. Reply to: ‘Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity’. Nat. Commun. 10, 858 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Forest, F. et al. Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445, 757–760 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Cook, F. E. M. Economic Botany Data Collection Standard (International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences, Royal Botanic Gardens, UK, 1995).13.Smith, S. A. & Brown, J. W. Constructing a broadly inclusive seed plant phylogeny. Am. J. Bot. 105, 302–314 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Jin, Y. & Qian, H. V. PhyloMaker: an R package that can generate very large phylogenies for vascular plants. Ecography 42, 1353–1359 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Mabberley, D. J. Mabberley’s Plant-book: A Portable Dictionary of Plants, Their Classification and Uses 4th edn (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2017).16.Cox, P. A. Will tribal knowledge survive the millennium? Science 287, 44–45 (2000).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Cámara-Leret, R., Paniagua-Zambrana, N., Balslev, H. & Macía, M. J. Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America. PLoS ONE 9, e85794 (2014).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Cámara-Leret, R. & Dennehy, Z. Information gaps in indigenous and local knowledge for science-policy assessments. Nat. Sustain. 2, 736–741 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Novotny, V. et al. Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest. Nature 416, 841–844 (2002).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Gilbert, G. S., Magarey, R., Suiter, K. & Webb, C. O. Evolutionary tools for phytosanitary risk analysis: phylogenetic signal as a predictor of host range of plant pests and pathogens. Evol. Appl. 5, 869–878 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Calatayud, J. et al. Geography and major host evolutionary transitions shape the resource use of plant parasites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 9840–9845 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eai9214 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Lehmann, P. et al. Complex responses of global insect pests to climate warming. Front. Ecol. Environ. 18, 141–150 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.de Lucena, R. F. P. et al. The ecological apparency hypothesis and the importance of useful plants in rural communities from Northeastern Brazil: an assessment based on use value. J. Environ. Manag. 96, 106–115 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Menendez-Baceta, G. et al. The importance of cultural factors in the distribution of medicinal plant knowledge: a case study in four Basque regions. J. Ethnopharmacol. 161, 116–127 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Webb, C. O., Ackerly, D. D., McPeek, M. A. & Donoghue, M. J. Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 475–505 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Global Information on Scoping for the Thematic Assessment of Sustainable Use of Wild Species (Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, 2018); https://ipbes.net/sustainable-use-wild-species-assessment28.Karki, M., Senaratna Sellamuttu, S., Okayasu, S. & Suzuki, W. (eds) Regional Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Asia and the Pacific (Secretariat of the IPBES, 2018).29.Pardo-de-Santayana, M. & Macía, M. The benefits of traditional knowledge. Nature 518, 487–488 (2015).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Díaz, S. et al. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science 359, 270–272 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Antonelli, A. et al. State of the World’s Plants and Fungi 2020 (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2020).32.Ulian, T. et al. Unlocking plant resources to support food security and promote sustainable agriculture. Plants People Planet 2, 421–445 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Plants of the World Online (Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 2021); http://www.plantsoftheworldonline.org/34.Zanne, A. E. et al. Three keys to the radiation of angiosperms into freezing environments. Nature 506, 89–92 (2014).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.The Plant List, version 1.1 (The Plant List, 2013); http://www.theplantlist.org/36.Rangel, T. F. et al. Phylogenetic uncertainty revisited: implications for ecological analyses. Evolution 69, 1301–1312 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Federhen, S. The NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D136–D143 (2012).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Hörandl, E. & Stuessy, T. F. Paraphyletic groups as natural units of biological classification. Taxon 59, 1641–1653 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Revell, L. J. phytools: an R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Rodrigues, A. S. L. & Gaston, K. J. Maximising phylogenetic diversity in the selection of networks of conservation areas. Biol. Conserv. 105, 103–111 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Bordewich, M., Rodrigo, A. G. & Semple, C. Selecting taxa to save or sequence: desirable criteria and a greedy solution. Syst. Biol. 57, 825–834 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Pielou, E. C. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J. Theor. Biol. 13, 131–144 (1966).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Kembel, S. W. Disentangling niche and neutral influences on community assembly: assessing the performance of community phylogenetic structure tests. Ecol. Lett. 12, 949–960 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).45.Kembel, S. W. et al. Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463–1464 (2010).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Brummitt, R. K. World Geographical Scheme for Recording Plant Distributions 2nd edn (International Working Group on Taxonomic Databases for Plant Sciences, 2001).47.Baselga, A. Partitioning the turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 134–143 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Gurarie, E., Andrews, R. D. & Laidre, K. L. A novel method for identifying behavioural changes in animal movement data. Ecol. Lett. 12, 395–408 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Block, B. A. et al. Tracking apex marine predator movements in a dynamic ocean. Nature 475, 86–90 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Dulau, V. et al. Continuous movement behavior of humpback whales during the breeding season in the southwest Indian Ocean: on the road again!. Mov. Ecol. 5, 11 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Glaudas, X. & Alexander, G. J. Food supplementation affects the foraging ecology of a low-energy, ambush-foraging snake. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 71, 5 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Moorter, B. V., Rolandsen, C. M., Basille, M. & Gaillard, J.-M. Movement is the glue connecting home ranges and habitat selection. J. Anim. Ecol. 85, 21–31 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Sodhi, N. S., Koh, L. P., Brook, B. W. & Ng, P. K. L. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 654–660 (2004).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Laurance, W. F., Sayer, J. & Cassman, K. G. Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 107–116 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Schneider, A. et al. A new urban landscape in East-Southeast Asia, 2000–2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 034002 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Böhm, M. et al. Correlates of extinction risk in squamate reptiles: the relative importance of biology, geography, threat and range size—extinction risk correlates in squamate reptiles. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 25, 391–405 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Ditchkoff, S. S., Saalfeld, S. T. & Gibson, C. J. Animal behavior in urban ecosystems: Modifications due to human-induced stress. Urban Ecosyst. 9, 5–12 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Shamoon, H., Maor, R., Saltz, D. & Dayan, T. Increased mammal nocturnality in agricultural landscapes results in fragmentation due to cascading effects. Biol. Conserv. 226, 32–41 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Shine, R. & Fitzgerald, M. Large snakes in a mosaic rural landscape: the ecology of carpet pythons Morelia spilota (Serpentes: Pythonidae) in coastal eastern Australia. Large Snakes Mosaic Rural Landsc. Ecol. Carpet Pythons Morelia Spilota Serpentes Pythonidae Coast. East. Aust. 76, 113–122 (1996).13.Charles, K. E. & Linklater, W. L. Dietary breadth as a predictor of potential native avian–human conflict in urban landscapes. Wildl. Res. 40, 482 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Soulsbury, C. D. & White, P. C. L. Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildl. Res. 42, 541 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Gibbon, J. W. et al. The global decline of reptiles Déjà Vu Amphibians. BioScience 50, 653 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Todd, B., Willson, J. & Gibbons, J. The Global Status of Reptiles and Causes of Their Decline. in Ecotoxicology of Amphibians and Reptiles, Second Edition (eds. Sparling, D., Linder, G., Bishop, C. & Krest, S.) 47–67 (CRC Press, 2010). https://doi.org/10.1201/EBK1420064162-c3.17.Böhm, M. et al. The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 157, 372–385 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Barker, D. G. & Barker, T. M. The distribution of the burmese python, python molurus bivittatus. Bull. Chic. Herpetol. Soc. 43, 33–38 (2008).
Google Scholar 
19.Rahman, S. C., Jenkins, C. L., Trageser, S. J. & Rashid, S. M. A. Radio-telemetry study of Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus) and elongated tortoise (Indotestudo elongata) in Lawachara National Park, Bangladesh: a prelimiary observation. Khan MAR Ali MS Feeroz MM Naser MN Ed. Festschr. 50th Anniversary IUCN Red List Threat. Species 54–62 (2014).20.Bhupathy, S., Ramesh, C. & Bahuguna, A. Feeding habits of Indian rock pythons in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur India. Herpetol. J. 24, 59–64 (2014).
Google Scholar 
21.Shine, R., Harlow, P. S., Keogh, J. S. & Boeadi. The influence of sex and body size on food habits of a giant tropical snake, Python reticulatus. Funct. Ecol. 12, 248–258 (1998).22.Dorcas, M. E. et al. Severe mammal declines coincide with proliferation of invasive Burmese pythons in Everglades National Park. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 2418–2422 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Dove, C. J., Snow, R. W., Rochford, M. R. & Mazzotti, F. J. Birds Consumed by the Invasive Burmese Python (Python molurus bivittatus) in Everglades National Park, Florida, USA. Wilson J. Ornithol. 123, 126–131 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Stuart, B. et al. Python bivittatus (errata version published in 2019). https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2012-1.RLTS.T193451A151341916.en. (2019).25.Goodyear, N. C. Python molurus bivittatus (Burmese python) Movements. Herpetol. Rev. 25, 71–72 (1994).
Google Scholar 
26.You, C.-W. et al. Return of the pythons: first formal records, with a special note on recovery of the Burmese python in the demilitarized Kinmen islands. Zool. Stud. 52, 8 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Miranda, E. B. P., Ribeiro, R. P. & Strüssmann, C. The ecology of human-anaconda conflict: a study using internet videos. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 9, 43–77 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Nóbrega Alves, R. R. et al. A zoological catalogue of hunted reptiles in the semiarid region of Brazil. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 8, 27 (2012).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Orzechowski, S. C. M., Frederick, P. C., Dorazio, R. M. & Hunter, M. E. Environmental DNA sampling reveals high occupancy rates of invasive Burmese pythons at wading bird breeding aggregations in the central Everglades. PLoS ONE 14, e0213943 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Marshall, B. M. et al. No room to roam: King Cobras reduce movement in agriculture. Mov. Ecol. 8, 33 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Reed, R. N. & Rodda, G. H. Giant constrictors: biological and management profiles and an establishment risk assessment for nine large species of pythons, anacondas, and the boa constrictor: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report. (2009).32.Reinert, H. K. & Cundall, D. An Improved Surgical Implantation Method for Radio-Tracking Snakes. Copeia 1982, 702–705 (1982).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing.34.R Studio Team. RStudio: integrated development environment for R.35.Silva, I., Crane, M., Suwanwaree, P., Strine, C. & Goode, M. Using dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models to identify home range size and movement patterns in king cobras. PLoS ONE 13, e0203449 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
36.Silva, I., Crane, M., Marshall, B. M. & Strine, C. T. Reptiles on the wrong track? Moving beyond traditional estimators with dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models. Mov. Ecol. 8, 43 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Kranstauber, B., Kays, R., LaPoint, S. D., Wikelski, M. & Safi, K. A dynamic Brownian bridge movement model to estimate utilization distributions for heterogeneous animal movement. J. Anim. Ecol. 81, 738–746 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Kranstauber, B., Smolla, M. & Scharf, A. K. move: Visualizing and Analyzing Animal Track Data. (2020).39.Calenge, C. The package adehabitat for the R software: tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol. Model. 197, 1035 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Bivand, R. & Rundel, C. rgeos: Interface to Geometry Engine – Open Source (‘GEOS’). (2020).41.Bracis, C., Bildstein, K. L. & Mueller, T. Revisitation analysis uncovers spatio-temporal patterns in animal movement data. Ecography https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.03618 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Berger-Tal, O. & Bar-David, S. Recursive movement patterns: review and synthesis across species. Ecosphere 6, art149 (2015).43.Avgar, T., Potts, J. R., Lewis, M. A. & Boyce, M. S. Integrated step selection analysis: bridging the gap between resource selection and animal movement. Methods Ecol. Evol. 7, 619–630 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Signer, J., Fieberg, J. & Avgar, T. Animal movement tools ( amt ): R package for managing tracking data and conducting habitat selection analyses. Ecol. Evol. 9, 880–890 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Marshall, B. M. et al. Data set and code supporting Marshall et al. 2020. No room to roam: King Cobras reduce movement in agriculture. (Version 1.1) . (2020).46.Thurfjell, H., Ciuti, S. & Boyce, M. S. Applications of step-selection functions in ecology and conservation. Mov. Ecol. 2, 4 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Muff, S., Signer, J. & Fieberg, J. Accounting for individual-specific variation in habitat-selection studies: efficient estimation of mixed-effects models using Bayesian or frequentist computation. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 80–92 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Rue, H., Martino, S. & Chopin, N. Approximate Bayesian inference for latent Gaussian models by using integrated nested Laplace approximations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 71, 319–392 (2009).49.Hart, K. M. et al. Home range, habitat use, and movement patterns of non-native Burmese pythons in Everglades National Park, Florida, USA. Anim. Biotelemetry 3, 8 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Tucker, M. A. et al. Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science 359, 466–469 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Rettie, W. J. & Messier, F. Range use and movement rates of woodland caribou in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Zool. 79, 1933–1940 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Doherty, T. S., Fist, C. N. & Driscoll, D. A. Animal movement varies with resource availability, landscape configuration and body size: a conceptual model and empirical example. Landsc. Ecol. 34, 603–614 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Young, L. I., Dickman, C. R., Addison, J. & Pavey, C. R. Spatial ecology and shelter resources of a threatened desert rodent (Pseudomys australis) in refuge habitat. J. Mammal. 98, 1604–1614 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Ross, C. T. & Winterhalder, B. Sit-and-wait versus active-search hunting: A behavioral ecological model of optimal search mode. J. Theor. Biol. 387, 76–87 (2015).MathSciNet 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Krysko, K., Nifong, J., Mazzotti, F., Snow, R. & Enge, K. Reproduction of the Burmese python (Python molurus bivittatus) in southern Florida. Appl. Herpetol. 5, 93–95 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Smith, B. J. et al. Betrayal: radio-tagged Burmese pythons reveal locations of conspecifics in Everglades National Park. Biol. Invasions 18, 3239–3250 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Hunter, M. E. et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) Sampling Improves Occurrence and Detection Estimates of Invasive Burmese Pythons. PLoS ONE 10, e0121655 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Frishkoff, L. O., Hadly, E. A. & Daily, G. C. Thermal niche predicts tolerance to habitat conversion in tropical amphibians and reptiles. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3901–3916 (2015).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Fujioka, M., Don Lee, S. & Kurechi, M. Bird use of Rice Fields in Korea and Japan. Waterbirds 33, 8 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Marshall, B. M. et al. Space fit for a king: spatial ecology of king cobras (Ophiophagus hannah) in Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve, Northeastern Thailand. Amphib.-Reptil. 40, 163–178 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Barua, M., Bhagwat, S. A. & Jadhav, S. The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costs. Biol. Conserv. 157, 309–316 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Crane, M. et al. A report of a Malayan Krait Snake Bungarus Candidus Mortality as By-Catch in a Local Fish Trap from Nakhon Ratchasima Thailand. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 9, 313–320 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Marshall, B. M. et al. Hits close to home: repeated persecution of King Cobras ( Ophiophagus hannah ) in Northeastern Thailand. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 11, 194008291881840 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
64.Webster, M. M. & Rutz, C. How strange are your study animals?. Nature 582, 337–340 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Mutascio, H. E., Pittman, S. E., Zollner, P. A. & D’Acunto, L. E. Modeling relative habitat suitability of southern Florida for invasive Burmese pythons (Python molurus bivittatus). Landsc. Ecol. 33, 257–274 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Steen, D. A. Snakes in the grass: secretive natural histories defy both conventional and progressive statistics. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 5, 183 (2010).
Google Scholar  More

1.Beer, C. et al. Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate. Science 329, 834–838 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Pan, Y. et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science 333, 988–993 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Mitchard, E. T. A. The tropical forest carbon cycle and climate change. Nature 559, 527–534 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Lutz, J. A. et al. Global importance of large-diameter trees. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 849–864 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Meakem, V. et al. Role of tree size in moist tropical forest carbon cycling and water deficit responses. New Phytol. 219, 947–958 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
6.Hubau, W. et al. Asynchronous carbon sink saturation in African and Amazonian tropical forests. Nature 579, 80–87 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.McDowell, N. et al. Drivers and mechanisms of tree mortality in moist tropical forests. New Phytol. 219, 851–869 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Camac, J. S. et al. Partitioning mortality into growth-dependent and growth-independent hazards across 203 tropical tree species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 12459 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. Mortality rates of 205 neotropical tree and shrub species and the impact of a severe drought. Ecol. Monogr. 65, 419–439 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.McDowell, N. G. et al. Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science 368, eaaz9463 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Stephenson, N. L. et al. Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature 507, 90–93 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Forrester, D. I. Does individual-tree biomass growth increase continuously with tree size? For. Ecol. Manag. 481, 118717 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Sheil, D. et al. Does biomass growth increase in the largest trees? Flaws, fallacies and alternative analyses. Funct. Ecol. 31, 568–581 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Condit, R., Pérez, R., Lao, S., Aguilar, S. & Hubbell, S. P. Demographic trends and climate over 35 years in the Barro Colorado 50 ha plot. For. Ecosyst. 4, 17 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.McMahon, S. M., Arellano, G. & Davies, S. J. The importance and challenges of detecting changes in forest mortality rates. Ecosphere 10, e02615 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Aleixo, I. et al. Amazonian rainforest tree mortality driven by climate and functional traits. Nat. Clim. Change 9, 384–388 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Parlato, B., Gora, E. M. & Yanoviak, S. P. Lightning damage facilitates beetle colonization of tropical trees. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 113, 447–451 (2020).
Google Scholar 
18.Franklin, J. F., Shugart, H. H. & Harmon, M. E. Tree death as an ecological process. Bioscience 37, 550–556 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Gale, N. & Hall, P. Factors determining the modes of tree death in three Bornean rain forests. J. Veg. Sci. 12, 337–348 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Fontes, C. G., Chambers, J. Q. & Higuchi, N. Revealing the causes and temporal distribution of tree mortality in Central Amazonia. For. Ecol. Manag. 424, 177–183 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.de Toledo, J. J., Magnusson, W. E. & Castilho, C. V. Competition, exogenous disturbances and senescence shape tree size distribution in tropical forest: evidence from tree mode of death in Central Amazonia. J. Veg. Sci. 24, 651–663 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Bennett, A. C., McDowell, N. G., Allen, C. D. & Anderson-Teixeira, K. J. Larger trees suffer most during drought in forests worldwide. Nat. Plants 1, 15139 (2015).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Yanoviak, S. P. et al. Lightning is a major cause of large tropical tree mortality in a lowland neotropical forest. New Phytol. 225, 1936–1944 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Rifai, S. W. et al. Landscape-scale consequences of differential tree mortality from catastrophic wind disturbance in the Amazon. Ecol. Appl. 26, 2225–2237 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
25.McDowell, N. G. & Allen, C. D. Darcy’s law predicts widespread forest mortality under climate warming. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 669–672 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Williams, A. P. et al. Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 292–297 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Sperry, J. S. & Love, D. M. What plant hydraulics can tell us about responses to climate-change droughts. New Phytol. 207, 14–27 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Roberts, J., Osvaldo, M. R. C. & De Aguiar, L. F. Stomatal and boundary-layer conductances in an Amazonian terra firme rain forest. J. Appl. Ecol. 27, 336–353 (1990).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Olson, M. E. et al. Plant height and hydraulic vulnerability to drought and cold. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7551–7556 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
30.McGregor, I. R. et al. Tree height and leaf drought tolerance traits shape growth responses across droughts in a temperate broadleaf forest. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16996 (2020).31.Mencuccini, M. et al. Size-mediated ageing reduces vigour in trees. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1183–1190 (2005).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.McDowell, N. G. et al. The interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26, 523–532 (2011).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Phillips, O. L. et al. Drought–mortality relationships for tropical forests. New Phytol. 187, 631–646 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Nepstad, D. C., Tohver, I. M., Ray, D., Moutinho, P. & Cardinot, G. Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an Amazon forest. Ecology 88, 2259–2269 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
35.da Costa, A. C. L. et al. Effect of 7 yr of experimental drought on vegetation dynamics and biomass storage of an eastern Amazonian rainforest. New Phytol. 187, 579–591 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Rowland, L. et al. Death from drought in tropical forests is triggered by hydraulics not carbon starvation. Nature 528, 119–122 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Bartholomew, D. C. et al. Small tropical forest trees have a greater capacity to adjust carbon metabolism to long-term drought than large canopy trees. Plant Cell Environ. 43, 2380–2393 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Fauset, S. et al. Drought-induced shifts in the floristic and functional composition of tropical forests in Ghana. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1120–1129 (2012).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Zuleta, D., Duque, A., Cardenas, D., Muller-Landau, H. C. & Davies, S. J. Drought-induced mortality patterns and rapid biomass recovery in a terra firme forest in the Colombian Amazon. Ecology 98, 2538–2546 (2017).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.van der Meer, P. J. & Bongers, F. Patterns of tree-fall and branch-fall in a tropical rain forest in French Guiana. J. Ecol. 84, 19–29 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Parker, G. G. in Forest canopies (eds Lowman, M. D. & Nadkarni, N. M.) 73–106 (Academic Press, 1995).42.Terborgh, J., Huanca Nuñez, N., Feeley, K. & Beck, H. Gaps present a trade-off between dispersal and establishment that nourishes species diversity. Ecology 101, e02996 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Ribeiro, G. H. P. M. et al. Mechanical vulnerability and resistance to snapping and uprooting for Central Amazon tree species. For. Ecol. Manag. 380, 1–10 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Peterson, C. J. et al. Critical wind speeds suggest wind could be an important disturbance agent in Amazonian forests. Forestry 92, 444–459 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Uriarte, M., Thompson, J. & Zimmerman, J. K. Hurricane María tripled stem breaks and doubled tree mortality relative to other major storms. Nat. Commun. 10, 1362 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
46.Silvério, D. V. et al. Fire, fragmentation, and windstorms: a recipe for tropical forest degradation. J. Ecol. 107, 656–667 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.van Wilgen, B. W., Biggs, H. C., Mare, N. & O’Regan, S. P. A fire history of the savanna ecosystems in the Kruger National Park, South Africa, between 1941 and 1996. S. Afr. J. Sci. 96, 167–178 (2000).
Google Scholar 
48.Tutin, C. E. G., White, L. J. T. & Mackanga-Missandzou, A. Lightning strike burns large forest tree in the Lope Reserve, Gabon. Glob. Ecol. Biogeog. Lett. 5, 36–41 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
49.Magnusson, W. E., Lima, A. P. & de Lima, O. Group lightning mortality of trees in a Neotropical forest. J. Trop. Ecol. 12, 899–903 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Anderson, J. A. R. Observations on climatic damage in peat swamp forest in Sarawak. Commonw. Forestry Rev. 43, 145–158 (1964).
Google Scholar 
51.Gora, E. M., Burchfield, J. C., Muller-Landau, H. C., Bitzer, P. M. & Yanoviak, S. P. Pantropical geography of lightning-caused disturbance and its implications for tropical forests. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 5017–5026 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Gora, E. M. et al. A mechanistic and empirically-supported lightning risk model for forest trees. J. Ecol. 108, 1956–1966 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Alencar, A., Nepstad, D. & Diaz, M. C. V. Forest understory fire in the Brazilian Amazon in ENSO and non-ENSO years: area burned and committed carbon emissions. Earth Interact. 10, 1–17 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Brando, P. M. et al. Droughts, wildfires, and forest carbon cycling: A pantropical synthesis. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 47, 555–581 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Cochrane, M. A. Fire science for rainforests. Nature 421, 913–919 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Kauffman, J. B. & Uhl, C. in Fire in the Tropical Biota. Ecological Studies (Analysis and Synthesis) Vol. 84 (ed. Goldammer, J. G.) (Springer, 1990).57.Pfeiffer, M., Spessa, A. & Kaplan, J. O. A model for global biomass burning in preindustrial time: LPJ-LMfire (v1.0). Geosci. Model Dev. 6, 643–685 (2013).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
58.Nepstad, D. C. et al. Large-scale impoverishment of Amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398, 505–508 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
59.Ray, D., Nepstad, D. & Moutinho, P. Micrometeorological and canopy controls of fire susceptibility in a forested Amazon landscape. Ecol. Appl. 15, 1664–1678 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Brando, P. M. et al. Fire-induced tree mortality in a neotropical forest: the roles of bark traits, tree size, wood density and fire behavior. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 630–641 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Barlow, J., Peres, C. A., Lagan, B. O. & Haugaasen, T. Large tree mortality and the decline of forest biomass following Amazonian wildfires. Ecol. Lett. 6, 6–8 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Liebhold, A. M., MacDonald, W. L., Bergdahl, D. & Mastro, V. C. Invasion by Exotic Forest Pests: A Threat to Forest Ecosystems Forest Science Monographs 30 (Society of American Foresters, 1995).63.McGregor, I. R. et al. Tree height and leaf drought tolerance traits shape growth responses across droughts in a temperate broadleaf forest. New Phytol. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.16996 (2020).64.Gilbert, G. S. & Hubbell, S. P. Plant diseases and the conservation of tropical forests. BioScience 46, 98–106 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Liu, X. et al. Dilution effect of plant diversity on infectious diseases: latitudinal trend and biological context dependence. Oikos 129, 457–465 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
66.Chen, L. et al. Differential soil fungus accumulation and density dependence of trees in a subtropical forest. Science 366, 124 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
67.Bell, T., Freckleton, R. P. & Lewis, O. T. Plant pathogens drive density-dependent seedling mortality in a tropical tree. Ecol. Lett. 9, 569–574 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
68.Peters, H. A. Neighbour-regulated mortality: the influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species-rich tropical forests. Ecol. Lett. 6, 757–765 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Gilbert, G. S., Foster, R. B. & Hubbell, S. P. Density and distance-to-adult effects of a canker disease of trees in a moist tropical forest. Oecologia 98, 100–108 (1994).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
70.Coley, P. D. & Barone, J. A. Herbivory and plant defenses in tropical forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27, 305–335 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Suresh, H. S., Dattaraja, H. S. & Sukumar, R. Relationship between annual rainfall and tree mortality in a tropical dry forest: results of a 19-year study at Mudumalai, southern India. For. Ecol. Manag. 259, 762–769 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Forrister, D. L., Endara, M.-J., Younkin, G. C., Coley, P. D. & Kursar, T. A. Herbivores as drivers of negative density dependence in tropical forest saplings. Science 363, 1213 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Stephenson, N. L., Das, A. J., Ampersee, N. J., Bulaon, B. M. & Yee, J. L. Which trees die during drought? The key role of insect host-tree selection. J. Ecol. 107, 2383–2401 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Wing, L. D. & Buss, I. O. Elephants and forests. Wildl. Monogr. 19, 3–92 (1970).75.Berzaghi, F. et al. Carbon stocks in central African forests enhanced by elephant disturbance. Nat. Geosci. 12, 725–729 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Muller-Landau, H. C. et al. Testing metabolic ecology theory for allometric scaling of tree size, growth and mortality in tropical forests. Ecol. Lett. 9, 575–588 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
77.Rüger, N. et al. Beyond the fast–slow continuum: demographic dimensions structuring a tropical tree community. Ecol. Lett. 7, 1075–1084 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
78.Montgomery, R. A. & Chazdon, R. L. Forest structure, canopy architecture, and light transmittance in old-growth and secondgrowth tropical rain forests. Ecology 82, 2707–2718 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
79.Kobe, R. K. Carbohydrate allocation to storage as a basis of interspecific variation in sapling survivorship and growth. Oikos 80, 226–233 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
80.Waring, B. G. & Powers, J. S. Overlooking what is underground: root:shoot ratios and coarse root allometric equations for tropical forests. For. Ecol. Manag. 385, 10–15 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
81.Poorter, H. et al. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 193, 30–50 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Casper, B. B. & Jackson, R. B. Plant competition underground. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 545–570 (1997).Article 

Google Scholar 
83.Coomes, D. A., Duncan, R. P., Allen, R. B. & Truscott, J. Disturbances prevent stem size–density distributions in natural forests from following scaling relationships. Ecol. Lett. 6, 980–989 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
84.Pillet, M. et al. Disentangling competitive vs. climatic drivers of tropical forest mortality. J. Ecol. 106, 1165–1179 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Rozendaal, D. M. A. et al. Competition influences tree growth, but not mortality, across environmental gradients in Amazonia and tropical Africa. Ecology 101, e03052 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
86.Rodríguez-Ronderos, M. E., Bohrer, G., Sanchez-Azofeifa, A., Powers, J. S. & Schnitzer, S. A. Contribution of lianas to plant area index and canopy structure in a Panamanian forest. Ecology 97, 3271–3277 (2016).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
87.Schnitzer, S. A., Kuzee, M. E. & Bongers, F. Disentangling above- and below-ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest. J. Ecol. 93, 1115–1125 (2005).Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Putz, F. E. The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65, 1713–1724 (1984).Article 

Google Scholar 
89.van der Heijden, G. M. F., Powers, J. S. & Schnitzer, S. A. Lianas reduce carbon accumulation and storage in tropical forests. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 13267–13271 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
90.Visser, M. D. et al. Tree species vary widely in their tolerance for liana infestation: A case study of differential host response to generalist parasites. J. Ecol. 106, 781–794 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
91.Schnitzer, S. A. & Bongers, F. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 223–230 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
92.García León, M. M., Martínez Izquierdo, L., Mello, F. N. A., Powers, J. S. & Schnitzer, S. A. Lianas reduce community-level canopy tree reproduction in a Panamanian forest. J. Ecol. 106, 737–745 (2018).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
93.Reis, S. M. et al. Causes and consequences of liana infestation in Southern Amazonia. J. Ecol. 108, 2184–2197 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
94.Sheil, D., Salim, A., Chave, J., Vanclay, J. & Hawthorne, W. D. Illumination–size relationships of 109 coexisting tropical forest tree species. J. Ecol. 94, 494–507 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
95.Myers, J. A. & Kitajima, K. Carbohydrate storage enhances seedling shade and stress tolerance in a neotropical forest. J. Ecol. 95, 383–395 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
96.Hartmann, H. & Trumbore, S. Understanding the roles of nonstructural carbohydrates in forest trees—from what we can measure to what we want to know. New Phytol. 211, 386–403 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
97.Enquist, B. J., West, G. B., Charnov, E. L. & Brown, J. H. Allometric scaling of production and life-history variation in vascular plants. Nature 401, 907–911 (1999).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
98.Hubau, W. et al. The persistence of carbon in the African forest understory. Nat. Plants 5, 133–140 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
99.Chambers, J. Q., Higuchi, N. & Schimel, J. P. Ancient trees in Amazonia. Nature 391, 135–136 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
100.Poorter, L. & Kitajima, K. Carbohydrate storage and light requirements of tropical moist and dry forest tree species. Ecology 88, 1000–1011 (2007).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
101.Conrath, U. et al. Priming: getting ready for battle. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19, 1062–1071 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
102.Arellano, G., Medina, N. G., Tan, S., Mohamad, M. & Davies, S. J. Crown damage and the mortality of tropical trees. New Phytol. 221, 169–179 (2018).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
103.Zhang, Y.-J. et al. Size‐dependent mortality in a Neotropical savanna tree: the role of height‐related adjustments in hydraulic architecture and carbon allocation. Plant Cell Environ. 32, 1456–1466 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
104.Feldpausch, T. R. et al. Amazon forest response to repeated droughts. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 30, 964–982 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
105.Phillips, O. L. et al. Drought sensitivity of the Amazon rainforest. Science 323, 1344–1347 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
106.Harel, M. & Price, C. Thunderstorm trends over Africa. J. Clim. 33, 2741–2755 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
107.IPCC Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).108.Fu, Z. et al. Recovery time and state change of terrestrial carbon cycle after disturbance. Environ. Res. Lett. 12, 104004 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
109.Poorter, L. et al. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature 530, 211–214 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
110.Cook-Patton, S. C. et al. Mapping carbon accumulation potential from global natural forest regrowth. Nature 585, 545–550 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
111.Esquivel-Muelbert, A. et al. Compositional response of Amazon forests to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 39–56 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
112.Hirota, M., Holmgren, M., Van Nes, E. H. & Scheffer, M. Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions. Science 334, 232–235 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
113.Banin, L. et al. What controls tropical forest architecture? Testing environmental, structural and floristic drivers. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 1179–1190 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
114.Brando, P. et al. Effects of partial throughfall exclusion on the phenology of Coussarea racemosa (Rubiaceae) in an east-central Amazon rainforest. Oecologia 150, 181–189 (2006).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
115.Lugo, A. E. & Scatena, F. N. Background and catastrophic tree mortality in tropical moist, wet, and rain forests. Biotropica 28, 585–599 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
116.Feeley, K. J., Bravo-Avila., Fadrique, B., Perez, T. M. & Zuleta, D. Climate-driven changes in the composition of New World plant communities. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 965–970 (2020).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
117.Brienen, R. J. W. et al. Forest carbon sink neutralized by pervasive growth–lifespan trade-offs. Nat. Commun. 11, 4241 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
118.Bugmann, H. et al. Tree mortality submodels drive simulated long-term forest dynamics: assessing 15 models from the stand to global scale. Ecosphere 10, e02616 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
119.Arellano, G., Zuleta, D. & Davies, S. J. Tree death and damage: A standardized protocol for frequent surveys in tropical forests. J. Veg. Sci. 32, e12981 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
120.Chan, K.-J., Phillips, O. L., Monteagudo, A., Torres-Lezama, A. & Vásquez Martínez, R. How do trees die? Mode of death in northern Amazonia. J. Veg. Sci. 20, 260–268 (2009).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J. & Kastner, T. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 055003 (2019).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Zhang, Q. et al. J. Clean. Prod. 250, 119503 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Hoang, N. T. & Kanemoto, K. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01417-z (2021).5.Hansen, M. C. et al. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
6.System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012—Experimental Ecosystem Accounting (United Nations, European Commission, Food and Agriculture Organization, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development & World Bank, 2014).7.Wilting, H. C., Schipper, A. M., Ivanova, O., Ivanova, D. & Huijbregts, M. A. J. J. Ind. Ecol. 25, 79–94 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Bruckner, M. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 11302–11312 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES, 2019). More

1.Vitousek, P. M., Mooney, H. A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J. M. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277, 494–499 (1997).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Paerl, H. W. & Huisman, J. Blooms like it hot. Science 320, 57–58 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
3.Dudgeon, D. Multiple threats imperil freshwater biodiversity in the Anthropocene. Curr. Biol. 29, R960–R967 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
4.Müller-Navarra, D. C., Brett, M. T., Liston, A. M. & Goldman, C. R. A highly unsaturated fatty acid predicts carbon transfer between primary producers and consumers. Nature 403, 74 (2000).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
5.von Elert, E., Martin-Creuzburg, D. & Le Coz, J. R. Absence of sterols constrains carbon transfer between cyanobacteria and a freshwater herbivore (Daphnia galeata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 270, 1209–1214 (2003).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
6.Wilson, A. E., Sarnelle, O. & Tillmanns, A. R. Effects of cyanobacterial toxicity and morphology on the population growth of freshwater zooplankton: Meta-analyses of laboratory experiments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 1915–1924 (2006).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Martin-Creuzburg, D., von Elert, E. & Hoffmann, K. H. Nutritional constraints at the cyanobacteria—Daphnia magna interface: the role of sterols. Limnol. Oceanogr. 53, 456–468 (2008).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Gustafsson, S. & Hansson, L.-A. Development of tolerance against toxic cyanobacteria in Daphnia. Aquat. Ecol. 38, 37–44 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Paerl, H. W. & Fulton, R. S. in Ecology of harmful algae 95–109 (Springer, 2006).10.Schaffner, L. R. et al. Consumer-resource dynamics is an eco-evolutionary process in a natural plankton community. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 1351–1358 (2019).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
11.Kerfoot, W. C., Robbins, J. A. & Weider, L. J. A new approach to historical reconstruction: combining descriptive and experimental paleolimnology. Limnol. Oceanogr. 44, 1232–1247 (1999).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Hairston, N. G. Jr. et al. Lake ecosystems: rapid evolution revealed by dormant eggs. Nature 401, 446 (1999).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Hairston, N. G. Jr. et al. Natural selection for grazer resistance to toxic cyanobacteria: evolution of phenotypic plasticity? Evolution 55, 2203–2214 (2001).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
14.Jochimsen, M. C., Kümmerlin, R. & Straile, D. Compensatory dynamics and the stability of phytoplankton biomass during four decades of eutrophication and oligotrophication. Ecol. Lett. 16, 81–89 (2013).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
15.Güde, H. & Straile, D. Bodensee: Ökologie und anthropogene Belastungen eines tiefen Voralpensees (Schweizerbart, 2016).16.Wallace, A. R. On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. III Tendency Var. Depart Indefinitely Orig. Type J Proc Linn Soc Lond. (1858).17.Darwin, C. The Origin of Species and the Descent of Man (Modern Library, 1859).18.Lahti, D. C. et al. Relaxed selection in the wild. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24, 487–496 (2009).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
19.Hendry, A. P., Farrugia, T. J. & Kinnison, M. T. Human influences on rates of phenotypic change in wild animal populations. Mol. Ecol. 17, 20–29 (2008).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
20.Fong, D. W., Kane, T. C. & Culver, D. C. Vestigialization and loss of nonfunctional characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 249–268 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Levinton, J. S. et al. Rapid loss of genetically based resistance to metals after the cleanup of a Superfund site. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 100, 9889–9891 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.Turko, P., Sigg, L., Hollender, J. & Spaak, P. Rapid evolutionary loss of metal resistance revealed by hatching decades-old eggs: rapid loss of lead resistance. Evolution 70, 398–407 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
23.Schwander, T., Crespi, B. J., Gries, R. & Gries, G. Neutral and selection-driven decay of sexual traits in asexual stick insects. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 280, 20130823 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Kettlewell, H. B. D. Further selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 10, 287–301 (1956).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Hairston, N. G. & Dillon, T. A. Fluctuating selection and response in a population of freshwater copepods. Evolution 44, 1796–1805 (1990).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
26.Grant, P. R. & Grant, B. R. Evolution of character displacement in Darwin’s Finches. Science 313, 224–226 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Straile, D. & Geller, W. Crustacean zooplankton in Lake Constance from 1920 to 1995: response to eutrophication and re-oligotrophication. Adv. Limnol. 53, 255–274 (1998).28.Hairston, N. G. Jr. & Kearns, C. M. Temporal dispersal: ecological and evolutionary aspects of zooplankton egg banks and the role of sediment mixing. Integr. Comp. Biol. 42, 481–491 (2002).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
29.Ghalambor, C. K., McKAY, J. K., Carroll, S. P. & Reznick, D. N. Adaptive versus non-adaptive phenotypic plasticity and the potential for contemporary adaptation in new environments. Funct. Ecol. 21, 394–407 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Conover, D. O., Duffy, T. A. & Hice, L. A. The covariance between genetic and environmental influences across ecological gradients: reassessing the evolutionary significance of countergradient and cogradient variation. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1168, 100–129 (2009).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
31.Conover, D. O. & Schultz, E. T. Phenotypic similarity and the evolutionary significance of countergradient variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 248–252 (1995).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
32.Merilä, J., Kruuk, L. E. B. & Sheldon, B. C. Cryptic evolution in a wild bird population. Nature 412, 76–79 (2001).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Garant, D., Kruuk, L. E. B., McCleery, R. H. & Sheldon, B. C. Evolution in a changing environment: a case study with Great Tit fledging mass. Am. Nat. 164, E115–E129 (2004).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Ellegren, H. & Sheldon, B. C. Genetic basis of fitness differences in natural populations. Nature 452, 169–175 (2008).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Yoshida, T., Hairston, N. G. Jr. & Ellner, S. P. Evolutionary trade–off between defence against grazing and competitive ability in a simple unicellular alga, Chlorella vulgaris. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 271, 1947–1953 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
36.Kümmerlin, R. E. Taxonomical response of the phytoplankton community of Upper Lake Constance (Bodensee-Obersee) to eutrophication and re-oligotrophication. Arch. Hydrobiol. Spec. Issues Adv. Limnol. 53, 109–117 (1998).
Google Scholar 
37.Spaak, P., Fox, J. & Hairston, N. G. Jr. Modes and mechanisms of a Daphnia invasion. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 279, 2936–2944 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
38.Brede, N. et al. The impact of human-made ecological changes on the genetic architecture of Daphnia species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 106, 4758–4763 (2009).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
39.Straile, D. Zooplankton biomass dynamics in oligotrophic versus eutrophic conditions: a test of the PEG model. Freshw. Biol. 60, 174–183 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Carroll, S. P. et al. Applying evolutionary biology to address global challenges. Science 346, 1245993–1245993 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
41.Güde, H., Rossknecht, H. & Wagner, G. Anthropogenic impacts on the trophic state of Lake Constance during the 20 super (th) century. Adv. Limnol. Stuttg. 53, 85–108 (1998).42.Isanta Navarro, J., Kowarik, C., Wessels, M., Straile, D. & Martin‐Creuzburg, D. Resilience to changes in lake trophic state: Nutrient allocation into Daphnia resting eggs. Ecol. Evol. 9, 12813–12825 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.IGKB, I. G. für den B. Jahresbericht der Internationalen Gewässerschutzkommission für den Bodensee: Limnologischer Zustand des Bodensees Nr. 42 (2016-2017). (2018).44.De Stasio, B. T. The seed bank of a freshwater crustacean: copepodology for the plant ecologist. Ecology 70, 1377–1389 (1989).Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Cáceres, C. E. & Hairston, N. G. Jr. Benthic-pelagic coupling in planktonic crustaceans: the role of the benthos. Arch. Hydrobiol. 52, 163–174 (1998).
Google Scholar 
46.Brendonck, L. & De Meester, L. Egg banks in freshwater zooplankton: evolutionary and ecological archives in the sediment. Hydrobiologia 491, 65–84 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Hairston, N. G. Jr. & De Meester, L. Daphnia paleogenetics and environmental change: deconstructing the evolution of plasticity. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol. 93, 578–592 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Frisch, D. et al. A millennial-scale chronicle of evolutionary responses to cultural eutrophication in. Daphnia. Ecol. Lett. 17, 360–368 (2014).PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Fox, J. A. Hatching timing of Daphnia mendotae diapausing eggs of different ages. Fundam. Appl. Limnol./Arch. Hydrobiol. 168, 19–26 (2007).Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Jankowski, T. & Straile, D. A comparison of egg-bank and long-term plankton dynamics of two Daphnia species, D. hyalina and D. galeata: Potentials and limits of reconstruction. Limnol. Oceanogr. 48, 1948–1955 (2003).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Keller, B. & Spaak, P. Nonrandom sexual reproduction and diapausing egg production in a Daphnia hybrid species complex. Limnol. Oceanogr. 49, 1393–1400 (2004).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Wessels, M., Mohaupt, K., Kümmerlin, R. & Lenhard, A. Reconstructing past eutrophication trends from diatoms and biogenic silica in the sediment and the pelagic zone of Lake Constance, Germany. J. Paleolimnol. 21, 171–192 (1999).ADS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Wessels, M., Lenhard, A., Giovanoli, F. & Bollhöfer, A. High resolution time series of lead and zinc in sediments of Lake Constance. Aquat. Sci. 57, 291–304 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Alric, B. et al. Local human pressures influence gene flow in a hybridizing Daphnia species complex. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 720–735 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
55.Brede, N. et al. Microsatellite markers for European. Daphnia. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 536–539 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Belkhir, K., Borsa, P., Chikhi, L., Raufaste, N. & Bonhomme, F. GENETIX 4.05, logiciel sous Windows TM pour la ge ́ne ́tique des populations. (1996).57.Jüttner, F., Leonhardt, J. & Möhren, S. Environmental factors affecting the formation of mesityloxide, dimethylallylic alcohol and other volatile compounds excreted by Anabaena cylindrica. J. Gen. Microbiol. 129, 407–412 (1983).
Google Scholar  More

1.Record, N. R. et al. Copepod diapause and the biogeography of the marine lipidscape. J. Biogeogr. 45, 2238–2251 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Conover, R. J. & Corner, E. D. S. Respiration and nitrogen excretion by some marine zooplankton in relation to their life cycles. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 48, 49–75 (1968).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Kattner, G. et al. Perspectives on marine zooplankton lipids. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 64, 1628–1639 (2007).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Beaugrand, G., Brander, K. M., Lindley, J. A., Souissi, S. & Reid, P. C. Plankton effect on cod recruitment in the North Sea. Nature 426, 661–664 (2003).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Coyle, K. et al. Climate change in the southeastern Bering Sea: impacts on pollock stocks and implications for the oscillating control hypothesis. Fish. Oceanogr. 20, 139–156 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Liu, H., Bi, H. & Peterson, W. T. Large-scale forcing of environmental conditions on subarctic copepods in the northern California Current system. Prog. Oceanogr. 134, 404–412 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Peterson, W. T. et al. The pelagic ecosystem in the Northern California Current off Oregon during the 2014–2016 warm anomalies within the context of the past 20 years. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 122, 7267–7290 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
8.Bi, H., Peterson, W. T., Lamb, J. & Casillas, E. Copepods and salmon: characterizing the spatial distribution of juvenile salmon along the Washington and Oregon coast, USA. Fish. Oceanogr. 20, 125–138 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Kirby, R. R. & Beaugrand, G. Trophic amplification of climate warming. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 4095–4103 (2009).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Hirche, H.-J. Temperature and plankton II. Effect on respiration and swimming activity in copepods from the Greenland Sea. Mar. Biol. 94, 347–356 (1987).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Mahara, N., Pakhomov, E. A., Jackson, J. M. & Hunt, B. P. Seasonal zooplankton development in a temperate semi-enclosed basin: two years with different spring bloom timing. J. Plankton Res. 41, 309–328 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Hooff, R. C. & Peterson, W. T. Copepod biodiversity as an indicator of changes in ocean and climate conditions of the northern California current ecosystem. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2607–2620 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
13.Keister, J. E., Di Lorenzo, E., Morgan, C., Combes, V. & Peterson, W. Zooplankton species composition is linked to ocean transport in the Northern California Current. Glob. Change Biol. 17, 2498–2511 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Johnson, C. L. et al. Characteristics of Calanus finmarchicus dormancy patterns in the Northwest Atlantic. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65, 339–350 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Ji, R. B., Edwards, M., Mackas, D. L., Runge, J. A. & Thomas, A. C. Marine plankton phenology and life history in a changing climate: current research and future directions. J. Plankton Res. 32, 1355–1368 (2010).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Weydmann, A., Walczowski, W., Carstensen, J. & Kwaśniewski, S. Warming of Subarctic waters accelerates development of a key marine zooplankton Calanus finmarchicus. Glob. Change Biol. 24, 172–183 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Niehoff, B., Madsen, S., Hansen, B. & Nielsen, T. Reproductive cycles of three dominant Calanus species in Disko Bay, West Greenland. Mar. Biol. 140, 567–576 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Meise, C. J. & O’Reilly, J. E. Spatial and seasonal patterns in abundance and age-composition of Calanus finmarchicus in the Gulf of Maine and on Georges Bank: 1977–1987. Deep-Sea Res. II 43, 1473–1501 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
19.Fiksen, Ø. The adaptive timing of diapause–a search for evolutionarily robust strategies in Calanus finmarchicus. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 1825–1833 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
20.Miller, C. B., Crain, J. A. & Morgan, C. A. Oil storage variability in Calanus finmarchicus. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 57, 1786–1799 (2000).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Miller, C. B., Cowles, T. J., Wiebe, P. H., Copley, N. J. & Grigg, H. Phenology in Calanus finmarchicus – Hypotheses about control mechanisms. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 72, 79–91 (1991).Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Speirs, D. C. et al. Ocean-scale modelling of the distribution, abundance, and seasonal dynamics of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 313, 173–192 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Tarrant, A. M. et al. Transcriptional profiling of metabolic transitions during development and diapause preparation in the copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Integr. Comp. Biol. 56, 1157–1169 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Baumgartner, M. F. & Tarrant, A. M. The physiology and ecology of diapause in marine copepods. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9, 387–411 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.Wilson, R. J., Banas, N. S., Heath, M. R. & Speirs, D. C. Projected impacts of 21st century climate change on diapause in Calanus finmarchicus. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 3332–3340 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Jónasdóttir, S. H., Visser, A. W., Richardson, K. & Heath, M. R. Seasonal copepod lipid pump promotes carbon sequestration in the deep North Atlantic. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 112, 12122–12126 (2015).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
27.Jónasdóttir, S. H., Wilson, R. J., Gislason, A. & Heath, M. R. Lipid content in overwintering Calanus finmarchicus across the Subpolar Eastern North Atlantic Ocean. Limnol. Oceanogr. 64, 2029–2043 (2019).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
28.Varpe, Ø. Fitness and phenology: annual routines and zooplankton adaptations to seasonal cycles. J. Plankton Res. 34, 267–276 (2012).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Denlinger, D. L., Yocum, G. D. & Rinehart, J. P. in Insect Endocrinology (ed Gilbert, L. I.) 430–463 (Academic Press, 2012).30.Hirche, H. J. Diapause in the marine copepod, Calanus finmarchicus – a review. Ophelia 44, 129–143 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Häfker, N. S. et al. Calanus finmarchicus seasonal cycle and diapause in relation to gene expression, physiology, and endogenous clocks. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 2815–2838 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Roncalli, V. et al. Physiological characterization of the emergence from diapause: a transcriptomics approach. Sci. Rep. 8, 12577 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
33.Roncalli, V., Cieslak, M. C., Hopcroft, R. R. & Lenz, P. H. Capital breeding in a diapausing copepod: a transcriptomics analysis. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 56 (2020).Article 

Google Scholar 
34.MacRae, T. H. Gene expression, metabolic regulation and stress tolerance during diapause. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67, 2405–2424 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
35.Poelchau, M. F., Reynolds, J. A., Elsik, C. G., Denlinger, D. L. & Armbruster, P. A. Deep sequencing reveals complex mechanisms of diapause preparation in the invasive mosquito, Aedes albopictus. Proc. R. Soc. B 280 (2013).36.Ragland, G. J. & Keep, E. Comparative transcriptomics support evolutionary convergence of diapause responses across Insecta. Physiol. Entomol. 42, 246–256 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Koštál, V. Eco-physiological phases of insect diapause. J. Insect Physiol. 52, 113–127 (2006).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Tarrant, A. M. et al. Transcriptional profiling of reproductive development, lipid storage and molting throughout the last juvenile stage of the marine copepod Calanus finmarchicus. Front. Zool. 11, 1 (2014).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
39.Jensen, L. K. et al. A multi-generation Calanus finmarchicus culturing system for use in long-term oil exposure experiments. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 333, 71–78 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
40.Cieslak, M. C., Castelfranco, A. M., Roncalli, V., Lenz, P. H. & Hartline, D. K. t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE): a tool for eco-physiological transcriptomic analysis. Mar. Genomics 51, 100723 (2020).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.van der Maaten, L. & Hinton, G. Visualizing data using t-SNE. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 9, 2579–2605 (2008).
Google Scholar 
42.Roncalli, V., Cieslak, M. C., Germano, M., Hopcroft, R. R. & Lenz, P. H. Regional heterogeneity impacts gene expression in the sub-arctic zooplankter Neocalanus flemingeri in the northern Gulf of Alaska. Commun. Biol. 2, 1–13 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Johnson, K. M., Wong, J. M., Hoshijima, U., Sugano, C. S. & Hofmann, G. E. Seasonal transcriptomes of the Antarctic pteropod Limacina helicina antarctica. Mar. Env. Res. 143, 49–59 (2019).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
44.Denlinger, D. L. Regulation of diapause. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 47, 93–122 (2002).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
45.Denlinger, D. L. & Armbruster, P. A. Mosquito diapause. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 59, 73–93 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
46.Hahn, D. A. & Denlinger, D. L. Energetics of insect diapause. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 56, 103–121 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
47.Sim, C. & Denlinger, D. L. Transcription profiling and regulation of fat metabolism genes in diapausing adults of the mosquito Culex pipiens. Physiol. Genomics 39, 202–209 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
48.Sim, C. & Denlinger, D. L. Insulin signaling and the regulation of insect diapause. Front. Physiol. 4, 189 (2013).49.Andrews, T. S. & Hemberg, M. Identifying cell populations with scRNASeq. Mol. Asp. Med. 59, 114–122 (2018).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
50.Habib, N. et al. Div-Seq: single-nucleus RNA-Seq reveals dynamics of rare adult newborn neurons. Science 353, 925–928 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
51.Arrese, E. L. & Soulages, J. L. Insect fat body: energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 207–225 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
52.Hahn, D. A. & Denlinger, D. L. Meeting the energetic demands of insect diapause: nutrient storage and utilization. J. Insect Physiol. 53, 760–773 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
53.Lee, R. F., Hagen, W. & Kattner, G. Lipid storage in marine zooplankton. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 307, 273–306 (2006).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
54.Kattner, G. & Hagen, W. Polar herbivorous copepods–different pathways in lipid biosynthesis. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 52, 329–335 (1995).Article 

Google Scholar 
55.Miller, C. B., Morgan, C. A., Prahl, F. G. & Sparrow, M. A. Storage lipids of the copepod Calanus finmarchicus from Georges Bank and the Gulf of Maine. Limnol. Oceanogr. 43, 488–497 (1998).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
56.Hirche, H. J. & Niehoff, B. Reproduction of the Arctic copepod Calanus hyperboreus in the Greenland Sea-field and laboratory observations. Pol. Biol. 16, 209–219 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
57.Niehoff, B. & Hirche, H.-J. Oogenesis and gonad maturation in the copepod Calanus finmarchicus and the prediction of egg production from preserved samples. Pol. Biol. 16, 601–612 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
58.Koštál, V., Štětina, T., Poupardin, R., Korbelová, J. & Bruce, A. W. Conceptual framework of the eco-physiological phases of insect diapause development justified by transcriptomic profiling. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 114, 8532–8537 (2017).PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
59.Aruda, A. M., Baumgartner, M. F., Reitzel, A. M. & Tarrant, A. M. Heat shock protein expression during stress and diapause in the marine copepod Calanus finmarchicus. J. Insect Physiol. 57, 665–675 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
60.Unal, E., Bucklin, A., Lenz, P. H. & Towle, D. W. Gene expression of the marine copepod Calanus finmarchicus: responses to small-scale environmental variation in the Gulf of Maine (NW Atlantic Ocean). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 446, 76–85 (2013).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
61.Ning, J., Wang, M. X., Li, C. L. & Sun, S. Transcriptome sequencing and de novo analysis of the copepod Calanus sinicus using 454 GS FLX. PLoS ONE 8, e63741 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
62.Zhang, Q., Lu, Y.-X. & Xu, W.-H. Proteomic and metabolomic profiles of larval hemolymph associated with diapause in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. BMC Genomics 14, 751 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
63.Hansen, M. et al. A role for autophagy in the extension of lifespan by dietary restriction in C. elegans. PLoS Genet. 4, e24 (2008).64.Qiu, Z. & MacRae, T. H. ArHsp21, a developmentally regulated small heat-shock protein synthesized in diapausing embryos of Artemia franciscana. Biochem. J. 411, 605–611 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
65.Lu, M.-X. et al. Diapause, signal and molecular characteristics of overwintering Chilo suppressalis (Insecta: Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Sci. Rep. 3, 1–9 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
66.Forreryd, A., Johansson, H., Albrekt, A.-S. & Lindstedt, M. Evaluation of high throughput gene expression platforms using a genomic biomarker signature for prediction of skin sensitization. BMC Genomics 15, 379 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
67.Lenz, P. H. et al. De novo assembly of a transcriptome for Calanus finmarchicus (Crustacea, Copepoda)–the dominant zooplankter of the North Atlantic Ocean. PLoS ONE 9, e88589 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
68.Roncalli, V., Cieslak, M. C. & Lenz, P. H. Transcriptomic responses of the calanoid copepod Calanus finmarchicus to the saxitoxin producing dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense. Sci. Rep. 6, 25708 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
69.Roncalli, V., Cieslak, M. C. & Lenz, P. H. Data from: Transcriptomic responses of the calanoid copepod Calanus finmarchicus to the saxitoxin producing dinoflagellate Alexandrium fundyense. Dryad, Dataset (2016).70.Choquet, M. et al. Genetics redraws pelagic biogeography of Calanus. Biol. Lett. 13, 20170588 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
71.Choquet, M. et al. Can morphology reliably distinguish between the copepods Calanus finmarchicus and C. glacialis, or is DNA the only way? Limnol. Oceanogr.: Methods 16, 237–252 (2018).Article 

Google Scholar 
72.Skottene, E. et al. A crude awakening: effects of crude oil on lipid metabolism in calanoid copepods terminating diapause. Biol. Bull. 237, 90–110 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
73.Melle, W. & Skjoldal, H. R. Reproduction and development of Calanus finmarchicus, C. glacialis and C. hyperboreus in the Barents Sea. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 169, 211–228 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
74.Weydmann, A. et al. Mitochondrial genomes of the key zooplankton copepods Arctic Calanus glacialis and North Atlantic Calanus finmarchicus with the longest crustacean non-coding regions. Sci. Rep. 7, 1–11 (2017).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
75.Lenz, P. H., Lieberman, B., Cieslak, M. C., Roncalli, V. & Hartline, D. K. Transcriptomics and metatranscriptomics in zooplankton: wave of the future? J. Plankton Res. 43, 3–9 (2021).Article 

Google Scholar 
76.Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/Gb-2009-10-3-R25 (2009).77.Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L. & Wold, B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat. Methods 5, 621 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
78.van der Maaten, L. Accelerating t-SNE using tree-based algorithms. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 15, 3221–3245 (2014).
Google Scholar 
79.Krijthe, J. H. Rtsne: t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding using a Barnes-Hut implementation, version 0.13. (2015).80.Ester, M., Kriegel, H.-P., Sander, J. & Xu, X. A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. Proc. Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-96) 96, 226–231 (1996).81.Dunn, J. C. Well-separated clusters and optimal fuzzy partitions. J. Cybern. 4, 95–104 (1974).Article 

Google Scholar 
82.Hahsler, M. & Piekenbrock, M. Dbscan: density based clustering of applications with noise (DBSCAN) and related algorithms. R. package version 1, 1–3 (2018).
Google Scholar 
83.Desgraupes, B. ClusterCrit: Clustering Indices. R package version 1.2.8. (2018).84.Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
85.Langfelder, P. & Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinforma. 9, 559 (2008).Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
86.Zhang, B. & Horvath, S. A general framework for weighted gene co-expression network analysis. Stat. Appl. Genet. Mol. 4, 17 (2005).87.Supek, F., Bošnjak, M., Škunca, N. & Šmuc, T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS ONE 6, e21800 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
88.Alexa, A. & Rahnenfuhrer, J. topGO: enrichment analysis for gene ontology. R. package version 2, 2010 (2010).
Google Scholar 
89.Galili, T., O’Callaghan, A., Sidi, J. & Sievert, C. heatmaply: an R package for creating interactive cluster heatmaps for online publishing. Bioinformatics 34, 1600–1602 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
90.Lenz, P. H. et al. Diapause vs. reproductive programs: transcriptional phenotypes in Calanus finmarchicus. Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.12jm63xw7 (2021). More

1.Calderone, N. W. Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992–2009. PLoS ONE 7(5), e37235 (2012).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
2.Stern, R. et al. Sequential introduction of honeybee colonies increases cross-pollination, fruit-set and yield of ‘Spadona’pear (Pyrus communis L.). J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 79(4), 652–658 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
3.Sabbahi, R., DeOliveira, D. & Marceau, J. Influence of honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) density on the production of canola (Crucifera: Brassicacae). J. Econ. Entomol. 98(2), 367–372 (2005).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
4.Stern, R., Eisikowitch, D. & Dag, A. Sequential introduction of honeybee colonies and doubling their density increases cross-pollination, fruit-set and yield in ‘Red Delicious’ apple. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol. 76(1), 17–23 (2001).Article 

Google Scholar 
5.Walters, S. A. & Taylor, B. H. Effects of honey bee pollination on pumpkin fruit and seed yield. HortScience 41(2), 370–373 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
6.Aras, P., De Oliveira, D. & Savoie, L. Effect of a Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Gradient on the Pollination and Yield of Lowbush Blueberry. J. Econ. Entomol. 89(5), 1080–1083 (1996).Article 

Google Scholar 
7.Steinhauer, N., et al., Drivers of colony losses. Curr. Opin. Insect Sci. 2018.8.Aizen, M. A. & Harder, L. D. The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower then agricultural demand for pollination. Curr. Biol. 19(11), 915–918 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
9.Kulhanek, K. et al. A national survey of managed honey bee 2015–2016 annual colony losses in the USA. J. Apic. Res. 56, 328–340 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
10.Neumann, P. & Carreck, N. L. Honey bee colony losses. J. Apic. Res. 49(1), 1–6 (2010).Article 

Google Scholar 
11.Kang, Y. et al. Disease dynamics of honeybees with Varroa destructor as parasite and virus vector. Math. Biosci. 275, 71–92 (2016).MathSciNet 
PubMed 
MATH 
Article 

Google Scholar 
12.Ruffinengo, S. et al. Integrated Pest Management to control Varroa destructor and its implications to Apis mellifera colonies. Zootec. Trop. 32(2), 149–168 (2015).
Google Scholar 
13.Rosenkranz, P., Aumeier, P. & Ziegelmann, B. Biology and control of Varroa destructor. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 103(Suppl 1), S96-119 (2010).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
14.Boecking, O. & Genersch, E. Varroosis–the ongoing crisis in bee keeping. J. Verbr. Lebensm. 3(2), 221–228 (2008).Article 

Google Scholar 
15.Ramsey, S. D. et al. Varroa destructor feeds primarily on honey bee fat body tissue and not hemolymph. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116(5), 1792–1801 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
16.Yang, X. & Cox-Foster, D. Effects of parasitization by Varroa destructor on survivorship and physiological traits of Apis mellifera in correlation with viral incidence and microbial challenge. Parasitology 134(3), 405–412 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
17.Francis, R. M., Nielsen, S. L. & Kryger, P. Varroa-virus interaction in collapsing honey bee colonies. PLoS ONE 8(3), e57540 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
18.Traynor, K. S. et al. Multiyear survey targeting disease incidence in US honey bees. Apidologie 23, 113–121 (2016).
Google Scholar 
19.Bee Informed, P. Managment Survey Results. 2019 [cited 2018 October 1, 2018].20.Giacobino, A. et al. Risk factors associated with failures of Varroa treatments in honey bee colonies without broodless period. Apidologie 46, 573–582 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
21.Haber, A. I., Steinhauer, N. A. & van Engelsdorp, D. Use of chemical and nonchemical methods for the control of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) and associated winter colony losses in U.S. beekeeping operations. J. Econ. Entomol. 112, 1509–1525 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
22.Thoms, C. A. et al. Beekeeper stewardship, colony loss, and Varroa destructor management. Ambio 48, 1209–1218 (2018).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
23.Wilkinson, D. & Smith, G. C. A model of the mite parasite, Varroa destructor, on honeybees (Apis mellifera) to investigate parameters important to mite population growth. Ecol. Model. 148(3), 263–275 (2002).Article 

Google Scholar 
24.Harris, J. W. et al. Variable population growth of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) in colonies of honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) during a 10-year period. Environ. Entomol. 32(6), 1305–1312 (2003).Article 

Google Scholar 
25.DeGrandi-Hoffman, G. & Curry, R. A mathematical model of Varroa mite (Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman) and honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) population dynamics. Int. J. Acarol. 30(3), 259–274 (2004).Article 

Google Scholar 
26.Pfeiffer, K. J. & Crailsheim, K. Drifting of honeybees. Insectes Soc. 45(2), 151–167 (1998).Article 

Google Scholar 
27.Goodwin, R. M. et al. Drift of Varroa destructor-infested worker honey bees to neighbouring colonies. J. Apic. Res. 45(3), 155–156 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
28.Nolan, M. P. & Delaplane, K. S. Distance between honey bee Apis mellifera colonies regulates populations of Varroa destructor at a landscape scale. Apidologie 48(1), 8–16 (2017).Article 

Google Scholar 
29.Seeley, T. D. & Smith, M. L. Crowding honeybee colonies in apiaries can increase their vulnerability to the deadly ectoparasite Varroa destructor. Apidologie 46(6), 716–727 (2015).Article 

Google Scholar 
30.Frey, E., Schnell, H. & Rosenkranz, P. Invasion of Varroa destructor mites into mite-free honey bee colonies under the controlled conditions of a military training area. J. Apic. Res. 50(2), 138–144 (2011).Article 

Google Scholar 
31.Frey, E. & Rosenkranz, P. Autumn invasion rates of Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) into honey bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) colonies and the resulting increase in mite populations. J. Econ. Entomol. 107(2), 508–515 (2014).PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
32.Kralj, J. & Fuchs, S. Parasitic Varroa destructor mites influence flight duration and homing ability of infested Apis mellifera foragers. Apidologie 37(5), 577–587 (2006).Article 

Google Scholar 
33.Peck, D. T. & Seeley, T. D. Mite bombs or robber lures? The roles of drifting and robbing in Varroa destructor transmission from collapsing honey bee colonies to their neighbors. PLoS ONE 14(6), e0218392 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
34.Forfert, N. et al. Parasites and pathogens of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) and their influence on inter-colonial transmission. PLoS ONE 10(10), e0140337 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
35.Steinhauer, N. & Saegerman, C. Prioritizing changes in management practices associated with reduced winter honey bee colony losses for US beekeepers. Sci. Total Environ. 753, 141629 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 
Article 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
36.DeGrandi-Hoffman, G. et al. Population growth of Varroa destructor (Acari: Varroidae) in honey bee colonies is affected by the number of foragers with mites. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 69(1), 21–34 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
Article 

Google Scholar 
37.Hagler, J. et al. A method for distinctly marking honey bees, Apis mellifera, originating from multiple apiary locations. J. Insect Sci. 11(1), 143 (2011).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
38.Delaplane, K. S., van der Steen, J. & Guzman-Novoa, E. Standard methods for estimating strength parameters of Apis mellifera colonies. J. Apic. Res. 52(1), 1–12 (2013).Article 

Google Scholar 
39.Winston, M. The Biology of the Honey Bee 281 (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987).
Google Scholar 
40.Nazzi, F. & Le Conte, Y. Ecology of Varroa destructor, the major ectoparasite of the western honey bee, Apis mellifera. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 61, 417–432 (2016).CAS 
Article 

Google Scholar 
41.Geffre, A. C. et al. Honey bee virus causes context-dependent changes in host social behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 117(19), 10406–10413 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
Article 

Google Scholar 
42.Rosenkranz, P. Honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) tolerance to Varroa jacobsoni Oud, South America. Apidologie 30(2/3), 159–172 (1999).Article 

Google Scholar 
43.Locke, B. Natural Varroa mite-surviving Apis mellifera honeybee populations. Apidologie 47(3), 467–482 (2016).Article 

Google Scholar  More

1.Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Phillips, O. L. & Jackson, R. B. The structure, distribution, and biomass of the world’s forests. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 593–622 (2013).
Google Scholar 
2.UN FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How Are the World’s Forests Changing? (FAO Interdepartmental Working Group, 2016).3.Douglas, I. in Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene (eds Dellasala, D. A. & Goldstein, M. I.) 185–197 (Elsevier, 2018); https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.09206-54.Hassan, R., Scholes, R. & Ash, N. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends (Island Press, 2005).5.Giri, C. et al. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 20, 154–159 (2011).
Google Scholar 
6.Sievers, M. et al. The role of vegetated coastal wetlands for marine megafauna conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 34, 807–817 (2019).
Google Scholar 
7.Houghton, R. A. The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990. Tellus B 51, 298–313 (1999).
Google Scholar 
8.Giam, X. Global biodiversity loss from tropical deforestation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5775–5777 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
9.D’Almeida, C. et al. The effects of deforestation on the hydrological cycle in Amazonia: a review on scale and resolution. Int. J. Climatol. 27, 633–647 (2007).
Google Scholar 
10.Laurance, W. F. et al. Ecosystem decay of amazonian forest fragments: a 22-year investigation. Conserv. Biol. 16, 605–618 (2002).
Google Scholar 
11.Qin, Y. et al. Improved estimates of forest cover and loss in the Brazilian Amazon in 2000–2017. Nat. Sustain. 2, 764–772 (2019).
Google Scholar 
12.Take action to stop Amazon burning. Nature 573, 163 (2019)13.Karstensen, J., Peters, G. P. & Andrew, R. M. Attribution of CO2 emissions from Brazilian deforestation to consumers between 1990 and 2010. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 024005 (2013).
Google Scholar 
14.Godar, J., Tizado, E. J. & Pokorny, B. Who is responsible for deforestation in the Amazon? A spatially explicit analysis along the Transamazon Highway in Brazil. For. Ecol. Manag. 267, 58–73 (2012).
Google Scholar 
15.Seymour, F. & Harris, N. L. Reducing tropical deforestation. Science 365, 756 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
16.de Area Leão Pereira, E. J., de Santana Ribeiro, L. C., da Silva Freitas, L. F. & de Barros Pereira, H. B. Brazilian policy and agribusiness damage the Amazon rainforest. Land Use Policy 92, 104491 (2020).
Google Scholar 
17.Escobar, H. Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon is still rising sharply. Science 369, 613 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
18.Pendrill, F. et al. Agricultural and forestry trade drives large share of tropical deforestation emissions. Glob. Environ. Change 56, 1–10 (2019).
Google Scholar 
19.Pendrill, F., Persson, U. M., Godar, J. & Kastner, T. Deforestation displaced: trade in forest-risk commodities and the prospects for a global forest transition. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 055003 (2019).
Google Scholar 
20.Hosonuma, N. et al. An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries. Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 044009 (2012).
Google Scholar 
21.Jha, S. & Bawa, K. S. Population growth, human development, and deforestation in biodiversity hotspots. Conserv. Biol. 20, 906–912 (2006).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
22.DeFries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M. & Hansen, M. Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nat. Geosci. 3, 178–181 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
23.Gibbs, H. K. et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16732–16737 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
24.Henders, S., Persson, U. M. & Kastner, T. Trading forests: land-use change and carbon emissions embodied in production and exports of forest-risk commodities. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 125012 (2015).
Google Scholar 
25.Lambin, E. F. et al. The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 109–116 (2018).
Google Scholar 
26.Curtis, P. G., Slay, C. M., Harris, N. L., Tyukavina, A. & Hansen, M. C. Classifying drivers of global forest loss. Science 361, 1108–1111 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
27.Chen, C. et al. China and India lead in greening of the world through land-use management. Nat. Sustain. 2, 122–129 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
28.Saikku, L., Soimakallio, S. & Pingoud, K. Attributing land-use change carbon emissions to exported biomass. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 37, 47–54 (2012).
Google Scholar 
29.Beckman, J., Sands, R. D., Riddle, A. A., Lee, T. & Walloga, J. M. International Trade and Deforestation: Potential Policy Effects via a Global Economic Model (USDA, 2017); https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersrr/262185.html30.Cuypers, D. et al. The Impact of EU Consumption on Deforestation: Comprehensive Analysis of the Impact of EU consumption on Deforestation (European Commission, 2013).31.Zhang, Q. et al. Global timber harvest footprints of nations and virtual timber trade flows. J. Clean. Prod. 250, 119503 (2020).
Google Scholar 
32.Hansen, M. C. et al. High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342, 850–853 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
33.Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Geschke, A. Mapping the structure of the world economy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 8374–8381 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
34.Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K. & Geschke, A. Building Eora: a global multi-region input–output database at high country and sector resolution. Econ. Syst. Res. 25, 20–49 (2013).
Google Scholar 
35.Chazdon, R. L. et al. When is a forest a forest? Forest concepts and definitions in the era of forest and landscape restoration. Ambio 45, 538–550 (2016).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
36.Tropek, R. et al. Comment on ‘High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change’. Science 344, 981 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
37.Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Identifying species threat hotspots from global supply chains. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 0023 (2017).
Google Scholar 
38.Forest Fact Book 2017–2018 (Government of Canada Publications, 2017).39.Crowther, T. W. et al. Mapping tree density at a global scale. Nature 525, 201–205 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
40.Ericsson, K. & Werner, S. The introduction and expansion of biomass use in Swedish district heating systems. Biomass. Bioenergy 94, 57–65 (2016).
Google Scholar 
41.Kennedy, C. & Southwood, T. The number of species of insects associated with British trees: a re-analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 53, 455–478 (1984).
Google Scholar 
42.Braun, A. C. H. et al. Assessing the impact of plantation forestry on plant biodiversity: a comparison of sites in Central Chile and Chilean Patagonia. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 159–172 (2017).
Google Scholar 
43.Kang, D., Wang, X., Li, S. & Li, J. Comparing the plant diversity between artificial forest and nature growth forest in a giant panda habitat. Sci. Rep. 7, 3561 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
44.Gamfeldt, L. et al. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat. Commun. 4, 1340 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
45.Erwin, T. L. Tropical forests: their richness in Coleoptera and other arthropod species. Coleopt. Bull. 36, 74–75 (1982).
Google Scholar 
46.Gibson, L. et al. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478, 378–381 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
47.Dirzo, R. & Raven, P. H. Global state of biodiversity and loss. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 28, 137–167 (2003).
Google Scholar 
48.Bradford, M. & Murphy, H. T. The importance of large-diameter trees in the wet tropical rainforests of Australia. PLoS ONE 14, e0208377 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
49.Lenzen, M. et al. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486, 109–112 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
50.Chaudhary, A. & Kastner, T. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Glob. Environ. Change 38, 195–204 (2016).
Google Scholar 
51.Wilting, H. C., Schipper, A. M., Bakkenes, M., Meijer, J. R. & Huijbregts, M. A. J. Quantifying biodiversity losses due to human consumption: a global-scale footprint analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 3298–3306 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
52.Weinzettel, J., Vačkář, D. & Medková, H. Human footprint in biodiversity hotspots. Front. Ecol. Environ. 16, 447–452 (2018).
Google Scholar 
53.Marques, A. et al. Increasing impacts of land use on biodiversity and carbon sequestration driven by population and economic growth. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 628–637 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
54.Godar, J., Persson, U. M., Tizado, E. J. & Meyfroidt, P. Towards more accurate and policy relevant footprint analyses: tracing fine-scale socio-environmental impacts of production to consumption. Ecol. Econ. 112, 25–35 (2015).
Google Scholar 
55.Furumo, P. R. & Lambin, E. F. Scaling up zero-deforestation initiatives through public-private partnerships: a look inside post-conflict Colombia. Glob. Environ. Change 62, 102055 (2020).
Google Scholar 
56.Garrett, R. D. et al. Criteria for effective zero-deforestation commitments. Glob. Environ. Change 54, 135–147 (2019).
Google Scholar 
57.Blackman, A., Goff, L. & Rivera Planter, M. Does eco-certification stem tropical deforestation? Forest stewardship council certification in mexico. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 89, 306–333 (2018).
Google Scholar 
58.Protecting and Restoring Forests: A Story of Large Commitments yet Limited Progress. New York Declaration on Forests Five-Year Assessment Report (NYDF Assessment Partners, 2019).59.Meijer, K. S. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of four supply chain initiatives to reduce deforestation. Trop. Conserv. Sci. 8, 583–597 (2015).
Google Scholar 
60.Carvalho, W. D. et al. Deforestation control in the brazilian amazon: a conservation struggle being lost as agreements and regulations are subverted and bypassed. Perspect. Ecol. Conserv. 17, 122–130 (2019).
Google Scholar 
61.Green, J. M. H. et al. Linking global drivers of agricultural trade to on-the-ground impacts on biodiversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 23202–23208 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
62.Nolte, C., le Polain de Waroux, Y., Munger, J., Reis, T. N. P. & Lambin, E. F. Conditions influencing the adoption of effective anti-deforestation policies in South America’s commodity frontiers. Glob. Environ. Change 43, 1–14 (2017).
Google Scholar 
63.Godar, J., Gardner, T. A., Tizado, E. J. & Pacheco, P. Actor-specific contributions to the deforestation slowdown in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 15591–15596 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
64.Alix-Garcia, J. M., Sims, K. R. E. & Yañez-Pagans, P. Only one tree from each seed? Environmental effectiveness and poverty alleviation in Mexico’s payments for ecosystem services program. Am. Econ. J.: Econ. Policy 7, 1–40 (2015).
Google Scholar 
65.Alix-Garcia, J. M. et al. Payments for environmental services supported social capital while increasing land management. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7016–7021 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
66.Börner, J. et al. The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Dev. 96, 359–374 (2017).
Google Scholar 
67.Jayachandran, S. et al. Cash for carbon: a randomized trial of payments for ecosystem services to reduce deforestation. Science 357, 267–273 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
68.Annual Review 2017 (PEFC, 2017).69.Higgins, V. & Richards, C. Framing sustainability: alternative standards schemes for sustainable palm oil and South–South trade. J. Rural Stud. 65, 126–134 (2019).
Google Scholar 
70.Gibbs, H. K. et al. Brazil’s soy moratorium. Science 347, 377–378 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
71.World Countries (ArcGIS, 2020); https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=d974d9c6bc924ae0a2ffea0a46d71e3d72.Hansen, M. et al. Response to comment on ‘High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change’. Science 344, 981 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
73.Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M., Peters, G. P., Moran, D. D. & Geschke, A. Frameworks for comparing emissions associated with production, consumption, and international trade. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 172–179 (2012).CAS 

Google Scholar 
74.Moran, D. & Kanemoto, K. Tracing global supply chains to air pollution hotspots. Environ. Res. Lett. 11, 094017 (2016).
Google Scholar 
75.Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. & Hertwich, E. G. Mapping the carbon footprint of nations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50, 10512–10517 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
76.Yang, Y. et al. Mapping global carbon footprint in China. Nat. Commun. 11, 2237 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
77.Sun, Z., Scherer, L., Tukker, A. & Behrens, P. Linking global crop and livestock consumption to local production hotspots. Glob. Food Sec. 25, 100323 (2020).
Google Scholar 
78.Global Forest Resource Assessment 2000 FAO Forestry Paper 140 (FAO, 2001).79.Sasaki, N. & Putz, F. E. Critical need for new definitions of ‘forest’ and ‘forest degradation’ in global climate change agreements. Conserv. Lett. 2, 226–232 (2009).
Google Scholar 
80.Ceccherini, G. et al. Abrupt increase in harvested forest area over Europe after 2015. Nature 583, 72–77 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
81.Lenzen, M. et al. The Global MRIO Lab – charting the world economy. Econ. Syst. Res. 29, 158–186 (2017).
Google Scholar 
82.Moran, D., Giljum, S., Kanemoto, K. & Godar, J. From satellite to supply chain: new approaches connect earth observation to economic decisions. One Earth 3, 5–8 (2020).
Google Scholar 
83.You, L., Wood, S., Wood-Sichra, U. & Wu, W. Generating global crop distribution maps: from census to grid. Agric. Syst. 127, 53–60 (2014).
Google Scholar  More