Ecology

1.
Bradbury, J. & Vehrencamp, S. Principles of Animal Communication (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 1998).
Google Scholar 
2.
McGregor, P. K. & Peake, T. M. Communication networks: social environments for receiving and signalling behaviour. Acta Ethologica 2(2), 71–81 (2000).
Google Scholar 

3.
Fichtel, C. & Manser, M. Vocal communication in social groups. In Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. 29–54 (Springer, 2010).

4.
Snijders, L. & Naguib, M. Communication in animal social networks: a missing link? In Advances in the Study of Behavior (eds Naguib, M. et al.) 297–359 (Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, 2017).
Google Scholar 

5.
McGregor, P. Animal Communication Networks (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).
Google Scholar 

6.
Seyfarth, R. M. & Cheney, D. L. Signalers and receivers in animal communication. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 54(1), 145–173 (2003).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

7.
Mitani, M. Voiceprint identification and its application to sociological studies of wild Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata yakui). Primates 27(4), 397–412 (1986).
Google Scholar 

8.
Kulahci, I. G., Rubenstein, D. I. & Ghazanfar, A. A. Lemurs groom-at-a-distance through vocal networks. Anim. Behav. 110, 179–186 (2015).
Google Scholar 

9.
Sugiura, H. Temporal and acoustic correlates in vocal exchange of coo calls in Japanese macaques. Behaviour 124(3–4), 207–225 (1993).
Google Scholar 

10.
Stoeger-Horwath, A. S. et al. Call repertoire of infant African elephants: first insights into the early vocal ontogeny. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121(6), 3922–3931 (2007).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

11.
Soltis, J., Leong, K. & Savage, A. African elephant vocal communication I: antiphonal calling behaviour among affiliated females. Anim. Behav. 70(3), 579–587 (2005).
Google Scholar 

12.
Nakahara, F. & Miyazaki, N. Vocal exchanges of signature whistles in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J. Ethol. 29(2), 309–320 (2011).
Google Scholar 

13.
Sugiura, H. Vocal exchange of coo calls in Japanese macaques. In Primate Origins of Human Cognition and Behavior (ed. Matsuzawa, T.) 135–154 (Springer, Tokyo, 2008).
Google Scholar 

14.
Greeno, N. C. & Semple, S. Sex differences in vocal communication among adult rhesus macaques. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30(2), 141–145 (2009).
Google Scholar 

15.
Sayigh, L. S. et al. Individual recognition in wild bottlenose dolphins: a field test using playback experiments. Anim. Behav. 57(1), 41–50 (1999).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

16.
Bauers, K. A. A functional analysis of staccato grunt vocalizations in the stumptailed macaque (Macaca arctoides). Ethology 94(2), 147–161 (1993).
Google Scholar 

17.
De Waal, F. B. & Bauers, K. “ Coo” vocalizations in stumptailed macaques: a controlled functional analysis. Behaviour 119(1–2), 143–160 (1991).
Google Scholar 

18.
Silk, J. B., Kaldor, E. & Boyd, R. Cheap talk when interests conflict. Anim. Behav. 59(2), 423–432 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

19.
Cheney, D. L. & Seyfarth, R. M. Reconciliatory grunts by dominant female baboons influence victims’ behaviour. Anim. Behav. 54(2), 409–418 (1997).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

20.
Faragó, T., Townsend, S. & F. Range. The information content of wolf (and dog) social communication. In Biocommunication of Animals. 41–62 (Springer, 2014).

21.
Bradbury, J. & Vehrencamp, S. Communication networks. In Principles of Animal Communication. 611–651 (2015).

22.
Farine, D. R. & Whitehead, H. Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 84(5), 1144–1163 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

23.
Darwin, C. The Descent of Man: and Selection in Relation to Sex (John Murray, Albemarle Street, 1888).
Google Scholar 

24.
Andersson, M. Sexual Selection Vol. 72 (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1994).
Google Scholar 

25.
Bene, J. & Zuberbueler, K. Sex differences in the use of vocalizations in wild olive Colobus monkeys. Eur. J. Sci. Res. 25(2), 266–279 (2009).
Google Scholar 

26.
Lemasson, A. et al. Age-and sex-dependent contact call usage in Japanese macaques. Primates 54(3), 283–291 (2013).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

27.
Wright, S. L. & Brown, R. E. Sex differences in ultrasonic vocalizations and coordinated movement in the California mouse (Peromyscus californicus). Behav. Proc. 65(2), 155–162 (2004).
Google Scholar 

28.
Warren, M. R. et al. Sex differences in vocal communication of freely interacting adult mice depend upon behavioral context. PLoS ONE 13(9), e0204527 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

29.
Bouchet, H. et al. Sex differences in the vocal repertoire of adult red-capped mangabeys (Cercocebus torquatus): a multi-level acoustic analysis. Am. J. Primatol. 72(4), 360–375 (2010).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

30.
Bouchet, H., Blois-Heulin, C. & Lemasson, A. Age-and sex-specific patterns of vocal behavior in De Brazza’s monkeys (Cercopithecus neglectus). Am. J. Primatol. 74(1), 12–28 (2012).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

31.
Green, S. M. Sex differences and age gradations in vocalizations of Japanese and lion-tailed monkeys (Macaca fuscata and Macaca silenus). Am. Zool. 21(1), 165–183 (1981).
Google Scholar 

32.
Bowyer, R. T. & Kitchen, D. W. Sex and age-class differences in vocalizations of Roosevelt elk during rut. Am. Midl. Nat. 118(2), 225–235 (1987).
Google Scholar 

33.
Fernandez-Vargas, M. & Johnston, R. E. Ultrasonic vocalizations in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) reveal modest sex differences and nonlinear signals of sexual motivation. PLoS ONE 10(2), e0116789 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

34.
Shimizu, M. Vocalizations of feral cats: sexual differences in the breeding season. Mamm. Study 26(2), 85–92 (2001).
Google Scholar 

35.
Rendall, D. et al. Sex differences in the acoustic structure of vowel-like grunt vocalizations in baboons and their perceptual discrimination by baboon listeners. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 115(1), 411–421 (2004).
ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36.
Smith, A. S. et al. Production and perception of sex differences in vocalizations of Wied’s black-tufted-ear marmosets (Callithrix kuhlii). Am. J. Primatol. 71(4), 324–332 (2009).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

37.
Miller, C. T., Scarl, J. & Hauser, M. D. Sensory biases underlie sex differences in tamarin long call structure. Anim. Behav. 68(4), 713–720 (2004).
Google Scholar 

38.
Grilliot, M. E., Burnett, S. C. & Mendonça, M. T. Sexual dimorphism in big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) ultrasonic vocalizations is context dependent. J. Mammal. 90(1), 203–209 (2009).
Google Scholar 

39.
Baotic, A. & Stoeger, A. S. Sexual dimorphism in African elephant social rumbles. PLoS ONE 12(5), e0177411 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

40.
Marler, P. & Dufty, A. Pickert R (1986) Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: II. Is a sender sensitive to the presence and nature of a receiver?. Anim. Behav. 34, 194–198 (1986).
Google Scholar 

41.
Bell, M. B. Receiver identity modifies begging intensity independent of need in banded mongoose (Mungos mungo) pups. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19(6), 1087–1094 (2008).
Google Scholar 

42.
Leighty, K. A. et al. Rumble vocalizations mediate interpartner distance in African elephant Loxodonta africana. Anim. Behav. 76(5), 1601–1608 (2008).
Google Scholar 

43.
Fedurek, P. et al. Pant hoot chorusing and social bonds in male chimpanzees. Anim. Behav. 86(1), 189–196 (2013).
Google Scholar 

44.
Giacoma, C. et al. Sex differences in the song of Indri indri. Int. J. Primatol. 31(4), 539–551 (2010).
Google Scholar 

45.
Emslie, R. Ceratotherium simum. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2012 (2012).

46.
Owen-Smith, R. N. The Behavioural Ecology of the White Rhinoceros (University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, 1973).
Google Scholar 

47.
Estes, R.D. Rhinoceroses—Family Rhinocerotidae. In The Behavior Guide to African Mammals—Including Hoofed Mammals, Carnivores, Primates. 228–235 (University of California Press Berkeley, 1991).

48.
Penny, M. Rhinos: Endangered Species (Christopher Helm Publishers, London, 1987).
Google Scholar 

49.
Pienaar, D. Social organization and behaviour of the white rhinoceros. In Rhinos as Game Ranch Animals. Proceedings of a Symposium. Onderstepoort, Republic of South Africa: South African Veterinary Association. p. (1994).

50.
Owen-Smith, R. N. Territoriality in the white rhinoceros (Ceratotherium simum). Nat. Commun. 231(5301), 294–296 (1971).
CAS  Google Scholar 

51.
Shrader, A. M. & Owen-Smith, R. N. The role of companionship in the dispersal of white rhinoceroses (Ceratotherium simum). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 52(3), 255–261 (2002).
Google Scholar 

52.
Policht, R. et al. The vocal repertoire in northern white rhinoceros Ceratotherium simum cottoni as recorded in the last surviving herd. Bioacoustics 18(1), 69–96 (2008).
Google Scholar 

53.
Linn, S. N., Boeer, M. & Scheumann, M. First insights into the vocal repertoire of infant and juvenile Southern white rhinoceros. PLoS ONE 13(3), e0192166 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54.
Croft, D. P., James, R. & Krause, J. Exploring Animal Social Networks (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2008).
Google Scholar 

55.
Castles, M. et al. Social networks created with different techniques are not comparable. Anim. Behav. 96, 59–67 (2014).
Google Scholar 

56.
Altmann, J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49(3), 227–266 (1974).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

57.
Noldus, L. The observer: a software system for collection and analysis of observational data. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 23(3), 415–429 (1991).
Google Scholar 

58.
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics 33(2), 363–374 (1977).
CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

59.
Team, R. RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio Inc, Boston, MA 42, 14 (2015).
Google Scholar 

60.
Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In Third international AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2009).

61.
Wey, T. et al. Social network analysis of animal behaviour: a promising tool for the study of sociality. Anim. Beahv. 75(2), 333–344 (2008).
Google Scholar 

62.
Bradbury, J.W. & Vehrencamp, S.L. Communication networks. In Principles of Animal Communication 612–650 (Sinauer Associates, Inc., 2011).

63.
Cinková, I. & Policht, R. Contact calls of the northern and southern white rhinoceros allow for individual and species identification. PLoS ONE 9(6), e98475 (2014).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

64.
Cinková, I. & Policht, R. Sex and species recognition by wild male southern white rhinoceros using contact pant calls. Anim. Cognit. 19(2), 375–386 (2016).
Google Scholar 

65.
Neumann, C. et al. Loud calls in male crested macaques, Macaca nigra: a signal of dominance in a tolerant species. Anim. Behav. 79(1), 187–193 (2010).
Google Scholar 

66.
Herrera, E. A. & Macdonald, D. W. Aggression, dominance, and mating success among capybara males (Hydrochaeris hydrochaeris). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 4(2), 114–119 (1993).
Google Scholar 

67.
East, M. L. & Hofer, H. Loud calling in a female-dominated mammalian society: II. Behavioural contexts and functions of whooping of spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta. Anim. Behav. 42(4), 651–669 (1991).
Google Scholar 

68.
Kitchen, D. M. et al. Loud calls as indicators of dominance in male baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 53(6), 374–384 (2003).
Google Scholar 

69.
Hasiniaina, A. F. et al. High frequency/ultrasonic communication in a critically endangered nocturnal primate, Claire’s mouse lemur (Microcebus mamiratra). Am. J. Primatol. 80(6), e22866 (2018).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

70.
Pasch, B. et al. Androgen-dependent male vocal performance influences female preference in Neotropical singing mice. Anim. Behav. 82(2), 177–183 (2011).
Google Scholar 

71.
Zimmermann, E. Castration affects the emission of an ultrasonic vocalization in a nocturnal primate, the grey mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). Physiol. Behav. 60(3), 693–697 (1996).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

72.
Leong, K. et al. The use of low-frequency vocalizations in African elephant (Loxodonta africana) reproductive strategies. Horm. Behav. 43(4), 433–443 (2003).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

73.
Lindburg, D., Czekala, N. & Swaisgood, R. R. Hormonal and behavioral relationships during estrus in the giant panda. Zoo Biol. 20(6), 537–543 (2001).
CAS  Google Scholar 

74.
Wielebnowski, N. & Brown, J. L. Behavioral correlates of physiological estrus in cheetahs. Zoo Biol. 17(3), 193–209 (1998).
Google Scholar 

75.
Cinková, I. & Bičík, V. Social and reproductive behaviour of critically endangered northern white rhinoceros in a zoological garden. Mamm. Biol. 78(1), 50–54 (2013).
Google Scholar 

76.
Patton, F., Campbell, P. & Genade, A. The development of White Rhino social organisation at Ziwa Rhino Sanctuary. Pachyderm 57, 112–113 (2018).
Google Scholar 

77.
Owen-Smith, R. N. The social ethology of the white rhinoceros ceratotberium simum (Burchell 1817). Ethology 38(4), 337–384 (1975).
Google Scholar  More

1.
Maginnis, T. L. The cost of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research. Behav. Ecol. 17, 857–872. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl010 (2006).
Article  Google Scholar 
2.
Arnold, E. N. Evolutionary aspects of tail shedding in lizards and their relatives. J. Nat. Hist. 18, 127–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938400770131 (2007).
Article  Google Scholar 

3.
Oji, T. Is predation intensity reduced with increasing depth? Evidence from the west Atlantic stalked crinoids Endoxocrinus parrae (Gervais) and implications for the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology 22, 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300016328 (1996).
Article  Google Scholar 

4.
Donovan, S. K. & Pawson, D. L. Proximal growth of the column in bathycrinid crinoids (Echinodermata) following decapitation. Bull. Mar. Sci. 61, 571–579 (1997).
Google Scholar 

5.
Wilkie, I. C. Autotomy as a prelude to regeneration in echinoderms. Microsc. Res. Tech. 55, 369–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1185 (2001).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6.
Baumiller, T. K. Crinoid ecological morphology. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 36, 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.36.031207.124116 (2008).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

7.
Wilkie, I. C., Barbaglio, A., Maclaren, W. M. & Candia Carnevali, M. D. Physiological and immunocytochemical evidence that glutamatergic neurotransmission is involved in the activation of arm autotomy in the featherstar Antedon mediterranea (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2104–2115. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.039578 (2010).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.
Meyer, D. L. Crinoids as renewable resources: rapid regeneration of the visceral mass in a tropical reef-dwelling crinoid from Australia. In Echinoderm biology (eds Burke, D. R., Mladenov, D. P., Lambert, P. & Parsley, L. R.) 519–522 (Balkema, Rotterdam, 1998).
Google Scholar 

9.
Shibata, T. F. & Oji, T. Autotomy and arm number increase in Oxycomanthus japonicus (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). Invertebr. Biol. 122, 375–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7410.2003.tb00101.x (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

10.
Mozzi, D., Dolmatov, I. Y., Bonasoro, F. & Candia Carnevali, M. D. Visceral regeneration in the crinoid Antedon mediterranea: basic mechanisms, tissues and cells involved in gutre growth. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 1, 609–635 (2006).
Google Scholar 

11.
Gahn, F. J. & Baumiller, T. K. Arm regeneration in Mississippian crinoids: evidence of intense predation pressure in the Paleozoic? Paleobiology 31, 151–164. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373(2005)0312.0.CO;2 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

12.
Kitazawa, K. & Oji, T. Particle selection by the sea lily Metacrinus rotundus Carpenter 1884 (Echinodermata, Crinoidea). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 395, 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2010.08.018 (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

13.
Kitazawa, K. & Oji, T. Active feeding behavior of and current modification by the sealily Metacrinus rotundus Carpenter 1884 (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 453, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2013.12.017 (2014).
Article  Google Scholar 

14.
Brom, K. R., Oguri, K., Oji, T., Salamon, M. A. & Gorzelak, P. Experimental neoichnology of crawling stalked crinoids. Swiss J. Palaeontol. 137, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-018-0158-9 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

15.
Holland, N. D. & Grimmer, J. C. Fine structure of syzygia articulations before and after arm autotomy in Florometra serratissima (Echinodermata: Crinoidea). Zoomorphology 98, 169–183 (1981).
Article  Google Scholar 

16.
Oji, T. & Okamoto, T. Arm autotomy and arm branching pattern as anti-predatory adaptations in stalked and stalkless crinoids. Paleobiology 20, 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0094837300011118 (1994).
Article  Google Scholar 

17.
Saucède, T., Vennin, F., Fara, E., Olivier, N. & The Paris Biota Team. A new holocrinid (Articulata) from the Paris Biota (Bear Lake County, Idaho, USA) highlights the high diversity of Early Triassic crinoids. Geobios 54, 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geobios.2019.04.003 (2019).
Article  Google Scholar 

18.
Brayard, A. et al. Unexpected Early Triassic marine ecosystem and the rise of the Modern evolutionary fauna. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602159 (2017).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

19.
Bassler, U. A movement generated in the peripheral nervous system: rhythmic flexion by autotomized legs of the stick insect Cunicuuna impigra. J. Exp. Biol. 111, 191–199 (1984).
Google Scholar 

20.
Dial, B. E. & Fitzpatrick, L. C. The energetic costs of tail autotomy to reproduction in the lizard Coleonyx brevis (Sauria: Gekkonidae). Oecologia 51, 310–317 (1981).
ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

21.
Wilkie, C. Arm autotomy in brittlestars (Echinodermata : Ophiuroidea). J. Zool. Lond. 186, 311–330 (1978).
Article  Google Scholar 

22.
Norman, M. D. & Finn, J. Revision of the Octopus horridus species-group, including erection of a new subgenus and description of two member species from the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Invertebr. Tax. 15, 13–35 (2001).
Article  Google Scholar 

23.
Neto de Carvalho, C. et al. Running crabs, walking crinoids, grazing gastropods: behavioral diversity and evolutionary implications of the Cabeço da Ladeira Lagerstätte (Middle Jurassic, Portugal). Comun. Geol. 103, 39–54 (2016).
Google Scholar 

24.
Dzik, J. Behavioral and anatomical unity of the earliest burrowing animals and the cause of the ‘Cambrian explosion’. Paleobiology 31, 507–525. https://doi.org/10.1666/0094-8373 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

25.
Niedźwiedzki, G., Szrek, P., Narkiewicz, K., Narkiewicz, M. & Ahlberg, P. E. Tetrapod trackways from the early Middle Devonian of Poland. Nature 463, 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08623 (2010).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

26.
Plotnick, R. E. Behavioral biology of trace fossils. Paleobiology 38, 459–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/41684612 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

27.
Gahn, F. J. & Baumiller, T. K. Evolutionary History of regeneration in crinoids (Echinodermata). Integr. Comp. Biol. 50, 514a–514m (2010).
Article  Google Scholar 

28.
Veitch, M. A. & Baumiller, T. K. Low predation intensity on the stalked crinoid Democrinus sp. (Echinodermata) in Roatán, Honduras reveals deep water as likely predation refuge. Bull. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2020.0024 (2020).
Article  Google Scholar 

29.
Baumiller, T. K. & Gahn, F. J. Testing predation-driven evolution using Mid-Paleozoic crinoid arm regeneration. Science 305, 1453–1455. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101009 (2004).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

30.
Oji, T. Fossil record of echinoderm regeneration with special regard to crinoids. Microsc. Res. Tech. 55, 397–402. https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.1186 (2001).
CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31.
Foote, M. Morphological diversification of Paleozoic crinoids. Paleobiology 21, 272–299 (1995).
Article  Google Scholar 

32.
Twitchett, R. J. & Oji, T. Early Triassic recovery of echinoderms. C. R. Palevol 4, 531–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2005.02.006 (2005).
Article  Google Scholar 

33.
Simms, M. J. Systematics, phylogeny and evolutionary history. In Fossil crinoids (eds Hess, H., Ausich, W. I., Brett, E. C. & Simms, J. M.) 31–40 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
Google Scholar 

34.
Simms, M. J. & Sevastopulo, G. D. The origin of articulate crinoids. Palaeontology 36, 91–109 (1993).
Google Scholar 

35.
Baumiller, T. K. & Messing, C. G. Stalked crinoid locomotion and its ecological and evolutionary implications. Palaeontol. Electron. 10, 2A (2007).
Google Scholar 

36.
Baumiller, T. K., Mooi, R. & Messing, C. G. Urchins in a meadow: paleobiologial and evolutionaryimplications of cidaroidpredation on crinoids. Paleobiology 34, 22–34. https://doi.org/10.1666/07031.1 (2008).
Article  Google Scholar 

37.
Baumiller, T. K. et al. Post-Paleozoic crinoid radiation in response to benthic predation preceded the Mesozoic marine revolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 5893–5896. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914199107 (2010).
ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

38.
Hagdorn, H. Triassic: the crucial period of post Palaeozoic crinoid diversification. Swiss J. Palaeontol. 130, 91–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13358-010-0009-9 (2011).
Article  Google Scholar 

39.
Salamon, M. A., Niedźwiedzki, R., Gorzelak, P., Lach, R. & Surmik, D. Bromalites from the Middle Triassic of Poland and the rise of the Mesozoic marine revolution. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 321–322, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2012.01.029 (2012).
Article  Google Scholar 

40.
Salamon, M. A., Gorzelak, P., Hanken, N. M., Riise, H. E. & Ferré, B. Crinoids from Svalbard in the aftermath of the end−Permian mass extinction. Pol. Polar Res. 36, 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1515/popore−2015−0015 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar 

41.
Baumiller, T. K. & Hagdorn, H. Taphonomy as a guide to functional morphology of Holocrinus, the first post-Paleozoic crinoid. Lethaia 28, 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.1995.tb01425.x (1995).
Article  Google Scholar 

42.
Gorzelak, P. Microstructural evidence for stalk autotomy in Holocrinus—the oldest stem-group isocrinid. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 506, 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.12.012 (2018).
Article  Google Scholar 

43.
Gorzelak, P. & Salamon, M. A. Holocrinus—The oldest stem-group isocrinid with stalk shedding and crawling abilities: evidence from taphonomy, microstructure and trace fossils. In 11th North American Paleontological Conference Program with Abstracts (eds Droser, M., Hughes, N., Bonuso, N., Bottjer, D., Eernisse, D., Gaines, R., Hendy, A., et al.) 153–154 (2019).

44.
Rasmussen, H. W. Articulata (eds Moore, C. R. & Teichert, C.) T813–T928 (Boulder and Lawrence, 1978).

45.
Vitt, L. J., Congdom, J. D. & Dickson, N. A. Adaptive strategies and energetics of tail autotomy in lizards. Ecology 58, 326–337 (1977).
Article  Google Scholar 

46.
Daniels, C. B., Flaherty, S. P. & Simbotwe, M. P. Tail size and effectiveness of autotomy in a lizard. J. Herpetol. 20, 93–96 (1986).
Article  Google Scholar 

47.
Dial, B. E. & Fitzpatrick, L. C. Lizard tail autotomy: Function and energetics of postautotomy tail movement in Scincella lateralis. Science 219, 391–393 (1983).
ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

48.
Medel, R. G., Jiminez, J. E., Fox, S. F. & Jaksic, F. M. Experimental evidence that high-population frequencies of lizard tail autotomy indicates inefficient predation. Oikos 53, 321–324 (1988).
Article  Google Scholar 

49.
Pafilis, P., Foufopoulos, J., Poulakakis, N., Lymberakis, P. & Valakos, E. D. Tail shedding in island lizards [Lacertidae, Reptilia]: decline of antipredator defenses in relaxed predation environments. Evolution 63, 1262–1278 (2009).
Article  Google Scholar 

50.
Pianka, E. R. Notes on the biology of Varanus caudolineatus and Varanus gilleni. West. Aust. Nat. 11, 76–82 (1969).
Google Scholar 

51.
Arnold, E. N. Caudal autotomy as a defense. In Biology of the Reptilia Vol. 16 (eds Gans, C. & Huey, R. B.) 236–273 (Alan Liss, New York, 1988).
Google Scholar 

52.
Scheyer, T. M., Romano, C., Jenks, J. & Bucher, H. Early Triassic marine biotic recovery: the predators perspective. PLoS ONE 9, e88987. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0088987 (2014).
ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

53.
Brachaniec, T. et al. Coprolites of marine vertebrate predators from the Lower Triassic of southern Poland. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 435, 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.06.005 (2015).
Article  Google Scholar  More

Data collection and potential selection bias
We conducted two joint surveys from July to September 2017 in Kabwe: the Kabwe Household Socioeconomic Survey (KHSS) 2017 conducted by the Central Statistical Office of Zambia and University of Zambia under the supervision of the authors, and a BLL survey performed by the authors. The surveys were approved by the University of Zambia Research Ethics Committee (UNZAREC; REF. No. 012-04-16). Further approvals were granted by the Ministry of Health through the Zambia National Health Research Ethics Board and the Kabwe District Medical Office. The data were collected in accordance to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the informed consent was obtained from all the study participants including the parents/legal guardian of the minor subjects for participating in the study.
The two surveys were designed consistently and targeted the same sample households selected in the following two-step approach. In the first step, utilising the Zambia’s national census frame which divides the Kabwe district into 384 standard enumeration areas (SEAs), we randomly selected 40 SEAs across the entire district. In the second step, we randomly selected 25 households (and a few replacements) from each sampled SEA. The sampling weights were generated to account for population differences across the SEAs.
The KHSS 2017 conducted interviews with 895 households (4,900 individuals) at houses and collected data on socioeconomic, demographic and geographic information. The response rate was 88.2%, and we could regard the data adjusted by the sampling weights as representative of the entire Kabwe population (for more details of the survey, see the report33).
To obtain BLL data, we conducted a blood sampling survey concurrently with the KHSS 2017. For hygiene and ethical considerations, we selected 13 local clinics to perform the blood sampling, instead of collecting blood at houses. We invited up to four members (two children aged 10 years or younger and their parents or guardians) from each sample household for the blood sampling. We prioritised young children over children older than 10 years old. The invitations were made sequentially. We assigned identical venues and dates for households from the same SEAs. The typical assigned dates had a 3-day window from the day after the invitation. However, we allowed for some flexibility and sampled the blood of those who visited the clinic even after the assigned time window, as long as the clinic was operational for households from other SEAs. Therefore, the window for blood sampling was effectively the number of days from the day after the invitation until the pre-set blood sampling period in each clinic was over, which had a substantial variation across households from 3 days to a month. We revisit this feature of the survey window when setting up our econometric model later. A total of 372 households (41.6%) participated in the blood sampling and, on average, 2.2 members from the participating households provided blood samples.
We performed blood digestion and metal extraction as described by our previous study34 with minor modifications and measured BLLs using an Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer (ICP-MS). In addition, we also measured BLLs with a portable analyser, LeadCare II, to obtain quick results22. However, we in this study focus on the ICP-MS data, considering their general accuracy. See the Supplementary Material Section S1 for details on the methods used to measure BLLs and the difference in the data between the two analysers.
Regardless of the accuracy of the techniques, however, we further need to account for the risk of selection bias in the BLL data. In the absence of formal and compulsory testing mechanisms, we relied on individuals’ voluntary (self-selected) visits to the clinics. However, the participants in blood sampling could have traits leading to higher or lower BLLs than the population. Such traits can include education, gender, age and living standards. The survey design did not prioritise children aged 11 years or older, and this could also contribute to the deviation of characteristics, although a small number of such children attended clinics. Moreover, certain unobservable characteristics affecting BLLs can further differ between the participants and non-participants. For example, those with greater preferences for health possibly had low BLLs but tended to participate in the blood sampling surveys, whereas those with a high innate physiological capacity for lead excretion possibly tended not to participate because they had low BLLs and did not perceive symptoms of lead poisoning. These issues can lead to selection bias, and the raw data observed from the voluntary participants can fail to illustrate the lead poisoning conditions of the population.
BLL estimation approach
To correct for potential selection bias, we first estimated the equations to explain BLLs of children aged 0–10 years and adults aged 19 years or above. Then, using the estimated equations, we calculated BLLs for all individuals, including children aged 11–18 years and those in the other age groups who did not participate in the blood sampling.
BLLs generally depend on the ambient pollution level, the opportunities of exposure to pollution, the physiological capacity of lead absorption and excretion, and the knowledge and technologies used to prevent lead poisoning. We controlled for ambient pollution levels by including the distance, direction, and altitude of household location—the first two variables are with respect to the mine waste dumping site (Black Mountain). The remaining factors were measured by age and various other individual and household characteristics denoted by ({{varvec{X}}}_{i}). Data for these variables are available regardless of participation in blood sampling. We assumed the following equation for BLL:

$$begin{aligned} log BLL_{i} & = beta_{dis} log distance_{i} + beta_{dir1} direction_{i} + beta_{dir2} direction_{i}^{2} \ & quad + beta_{alt} altitude_{i} + fleft( {age_{i} } right) + {varvec{X}}_{i} user2{gamma^{prime}} + varepsilon_{i}. hfill \ end{aligned}$$
(1)

The logarithmic form for BLL adjusts its distribution to approximately normal—BLL is bounded from below and has a skewed distribution—and allows the factors on the right-hand side to have proportional effects rather than level effects. ({varepsilon }_{i}) is the independent and identically distributed error term that captures noise, such as casual fluctuations and measurement errors in BLLs, and the effects of unobservable factors. While we presented a single equation above, we assumed different equations for children aged 0–10 years and adults aged 19 years or above.
Below, we discuss our specification in detail.
Geographic factors
Existing studies have examined the relationship between the geographic location and ambient pollution level12,13,14. Since lead is transported from the mine waste dumping site through the flow of wind and water, the distance from the site is negatively correlated with ambient lead levels. The soil lead contamination spreads to the western side of the site, particularly towards the west-northwest (WNW), which corresponds to the direction of the prevailing local wind. The contamination also slightly extends to the low-elevation south-eastern side, reflecting pollution transported by water. The northern and southern sides are the least contaminated.
We defined (distanc{e}_{i}) as the distance between the mine waste dumping site and the location of (i)’s household, with ({beta }_{dis} More

1.
Hutchinson, G. E. Homage to Santa Rosalia or why are there so many kinds of animals?. Am. Nat. 93, 145–159 (1959).
Google Scholar 
2.
Navarro, J. et al. Ecological segregation in space, time and trophic niche of sympatric planktivorous petrels. PLoS ONE 8, e622897 (2013).
Google Scholar 

3.
Dehnhard, N. et al. High inter- and intraspecific niche overlap among three sympatrically breeding, closely related seabird species: generalist foraging as an adaptation to a highly variable environment?. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 104–119 (2020).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

4.
Longhurst, A. R. & Pauly, D. Ecology of Tropical Oceans (Academic Press, New York, 1987).
Google Scholar 

5.
Weimerskirch, H. Are seabirds foraging for unpredictable resources?. Deep Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 54, 211–223 (2007).
ADS  Google Scholar 

6.
McDuie, F., Weeks, S. J. & Congdon, B. C. Oceanographic drivers of near-colony seabird foraging site use in tropical marine systems. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 589, 209–225 (2018).
ADS  Google Scholar 

7.
Grémillet, D. et al. Irreplaceable area extends marine conservation hotspot off Tunisia: insights from GPS-tracking Scopoli’s shearwaters from the largest seabird colony in the Mediterranean. Mar. Biol. 161, 2669–2680 (2014).
Google Scholar 

8.
Weimerskirch, H. et al. At-sea movements of wedge-tailed shearwaters during and outside the breeding season from four colonies in New Caledonia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 663, 225–238 (2020).
ADS  Google Scholar 

9.
de Grissac, S., Börger, L., Guitteaud, A. & Weimerskirch, H. Contrasting movement strategies among juvenile albatrosses and petrels. Sci. Rep. 6, 26103 (2016).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

10.
Mott, R. & Clarke, R. H. Systematic review of geographic biases in the collection of at-sea distribution data for seabirds. Emu 118, 235–246 (2018).
Google Scholar 

11.
Cherel, Y. et al. Resource partitioning within a tropical seabird community: new information from stable isotopes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 366, 281–291 (2008).
ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

12.
France, R. L. & Peters, R. H. Ecosystem differences in the trophic enrichment of13C in aquatic food webs. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 54, 1255–1258 (1997).
Google Scholar 

13.
Minagawa, M. & Wada, E. Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: further evidence and the relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 48, 1135–1140 (1984).
ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

14.
Newsome, S. D., Martinez del Rio, C., Bearhop, S. & Phillips, D. L. A niche for isotope ecology. Front. Ecol. Environ. 5, 429–436 (2007).
Google Scholar 

15.
Bearhop, S., Adams, C. E., Waldron, S., Fuller, R. A. & Macleod, H. Determining trophic niche width: a novel approach using stable isotope analysis. J. Anim. Ecol. 73, 1007–10012 (2004).
Google Scholar 

16.
Bolnick, D. I., Svanbäck, R., Araújo, M. S. & Persson, L. Comparative support for the niche variation hypothesis that more generalized populations also are more heterogeneous. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10075–10079 (2007).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

17.
Symondson, W. O. C. Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Mol. Ecol. 11, 627–641 (2002).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

18.
Komura, T., Ando, H., Horikoshi, K., Suzuki, H. & Isagi, Y. DNA barcoding reveals seasonal shifts in diet and consumption of deep-sea fishes in wedge-tailed shearwaters. PLoS ONE 13, e0195385 (2018).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

19.
Carreiro, A. R. et al. Metabarcoding, stables isotopes, and tracking: unraveling the trophic ecology of a winter-breeding storm petrel (Hydrobates castro) with a multimethod approach. Mar. Biol. 167, 1–13 (2020).
Google Scholar 

20.
Alonso, H. et al. An holistic ecological analysis of the diet of Cory’s shearwaters using prey morphological characters and DNA barcoding. Mol. Ecol. 23, 3719–3733 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21.
del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. & Sargatal, J. Handbook of the Birds of the World. Ostrich to Ducks Vol. 1 (Lynx Editions, Barcelona, 1992).
Google Scholar 

22.
Brooke, M. Albatrosses and Petrels Across the World (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2004).
Google Scholar 

23.
McDuie, F., Weeks, S. J., Miller, M. G. R. & Congdon, B. C. Breeding tropical shearwaters use distant foraging sites when self-provisioning. Mar. Ornithol. 43, 123–129 (2015).
Google Scholar 

24.
Congdon, B. C., Krockenberger, A. K. & Smithers, B. V. Dual-foraging and co-ordinated provisioning in a tropical Procellariiform, the wedge-tailed shearwater. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 301, 293–301 (2005).
ADS  Google Scholar 

25.
Furness, R. W. & Birkhead, T. R. Seabird colony distributions suggest competition for food supplies during the breeding season. Nature 311, 655–656 (1984).
ADS  Google Scholar 

26.
Lewis, S., Sherratt, T. N., Hamer, K. C. & Wanless, S. Evidence of intra-specific competition for food in a pelagic seabird. Nature 412, 816–819 (2001).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27.
Baduini, C. L. Parental provisioning patterns of wedge-tailed shearwaters and their relation to chick body condition. Condor 104, 823 (2002).
Google Scholar 

28.
Cecere, J. G., Calabrese, L., Rocamora, G. & Catoni, C. Movement patterns and habitat selection of wedge-tailed shearwaters (Puffinus pacificus) breeding at Aride Island, Seychelles. Waterbirds 36, 432–437 (2013).
Google Scholar 

29.
Peck, D. R. & Congdon, B. C. Colony-specific foraging behaviour and co-ordinated divergence of chick development in the wedge-tailed shearwater Puffinus pacificus. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 299, 289–296 (2005).
ADS  Google Scholar 

30.
Jaquemet, S., Le Corre, M. & Weimerskirch, H. Seabird community structure in a coastal tropical environment: importance of natural factors and fish aggregating devices (FADs). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 268, 281–292 (2004).
ADS  Google Scholar 

31.
Miller, M. G. R., Carlile, N., Phillips, J. S., Mcduie, F. & Congdon, B. C. Importance of tropical tuna for seabird foraging over a marine productivity gradient. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 586, 233–249 (2018).
ADS  Google Scholar 

32.
Spear, L. B., Ainley, D. G. & Walker, W. A. Foraging dynamics of seabirds in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Stud. Avian Biol. 35, 1–99 (2007).
Google Scholar 

33.
Burger, A. E. Diving depths of shearwaters. Auk 118, 755–759 (2001).
Google Scholar 

34.
Peck, D. R. & Congdon, B. C. Sex-specific chick provisioning and diving behaviour in the wedge-tailed shearwater Puffinus pacificus. J. Avian Biol. 37, 245–251 (2006).
Google Scholar 

35.
IUCN 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020-1. https://www.iucnredlist.org. Downloaded on 19 March 2020.

36.
Villard, P., Dano, S. & Bretagnolle, V. Morphometrics and the breeding biology of the Tahiti petrel Pseudobulweria rostrata. Ibis 148, 285–291 (2006).
Google Scholar 

37.
Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Anim. Behav. (2020).

38.
Menkes, C. E. et al. Seasonal oceanography from physics to micronekton in the south-west pacific. Deep Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 113, 125–144 (2015).
ADS  Google Scholar 

39.
Bretagnolle, V. Le Pétrel de la Chaîne Pterodroma (leucoptera) caledonica: Statut et Menaces. Unpubl. Rep. Prov. Sud, Nouméa, New Caledonia (2001).

40.
Pandolfi, M. & Bretagnolle, V. Seabirds of the Southern Lagoon of New Caledonia; distribution, abundance and threats. Waterbirds 25, 202–214 (2002).
Google Scholar 

41.
QGIS Development Team. QGIS geographic information system. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project (2018).

42.
Phillips, R. A., Xavier, J. C. & Croxall, J. P. Effects of satellite transmitters on albatrosses and petrels. Auk 120, 1082–1090 (2003).
Google Scholar 

43.
Vandenabeele, S. P. et al. Excess baggage for birds: inappropriate placement of tags on gannets changes flight patterns. PLoS ONE 9, e92657 (2014).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

44.
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, Berlin, 2016).
Google Scholar 

45.
Michael, A., Sumner, D., Luque, S. & Fischbach, A. Trip : Tools for the Analysis of Animal Track Data. R package version 1.5.0. (2016).

46.
Garriga, J., Palmer, J. R. B., Oltra, A. & Bartumeus, F. Expectation–maximization binary clustering for behavioural annotation. PLoS ONE 11, e0151984 (2016).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

47.
de Grissac, S., Bartumeus, F., Cox, S. L. & Weimerskirch, H. Early-life foraging: behavioral responses of newly fledged albatrosses to environmental conditions. Ecol. Evol. 7, 6766–6778 (2017).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

48.
Bennison, A. et al. Search and foraging behaviors from movement data: a comparison of methods. Ecol. Evol. 8, 13–24 (2018).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

49.
Clay, T. A. et al. Divergent foraging strategies during incubation of an unusually wide-ranging seabird, the Murphy’s petrel. Mar. Biol. 166, 8 (2019).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

50.
Mendez, L., Prudor, A. & Weimerskirch, H. Ontogeny of foraging behaviour in juvenile red-footed boobies (Sula sula). Sci. Rep. 7, 13886 (2017).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

51.
Ravache, A. et al. Flying to the moon: lunar cycle influences trip duration and nocturnal foraging behavior of the wedge-tailed shearwater Ardenna pacifica. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 525, 151322 (2020).
Google Scholar 

52.
Lund, U. et al. R package ‘circular’: circular Statistics (version 0.4-93). R Packag (2017).

53.
Calenge, C. The package ‘adehabitat’ for the R software: a tool for the analysis of space and habitat use by animals. Ecol. Modell. 197, 516–519 (2006).
Google Scholar 

54.
Hedd, A. et al. Foraging areas, offshore habitat use and colony overlap by incubating leach’s storm-petrels Oceanodroma leucorhoa in the Northwest Atlantic. PLoS ONE 13, 1–18 (2018).
Google Scholar 

55.
Bivand, R. & Rundel, C. Interface to Geometry Engine – Open Source (‘GEOS’) (2018).

56.
Hobson, K. A. & Clark, R. G. Turnover of 13 C in cellular and plasma fractions of blood: implications for nondestructive sampling in avian dietary studies. Auk 110, 638–641 (1993).
Google Scholar 

57.
Jaeger, A., Lecomte, V. J., Weimerskirch, H., Richard, P. & Cherel, Y. Seabird satellite tracking validates the use of latitudinal isoscapes to depict predators’ foraging areas in the Southern Ocean. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 24, 3456–3460 (2010).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

58.
Oksanen, J. et al. Package vegan. R Packag ver (2013).

59.
Jackson, A. L., Inger, R., Parnell, A. C. & Bearhop, S. Comparing isotopic niche widths among and within communities: SIBER – stable isotope Bayesian ellipses in R. J. Anim. Ecol. 80, 595–602 (2011).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

60.
Ceia, F. R., Paiva, V. H., Garthe, S., Marques, J. C. & Ramos, J. A. Can variations in the spatial distribution at sea and isotopic niche width be associated with consistency in the isotopic niche of a pelagic seabird species?. Mar. Biol. 161, 1861–1872 (2014).
Google Scholar 

61.
Votier, S. C. et al. Individual responses of seabirds to commercial fisheries revealed using GPS tracking, stable isotopes and vessel monitoring systems. J. Appl. Ecol. 47, 487–497 (2010).
Google Scholar 

62.
Bearhop, S. et al. Stable isotopes indicate sex-specific and longer-term individual foraging specialisation in diving seabirds. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 311, 157–164 (2006).
ADS  Google Scholar 

63.
Miya, M. et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 150088 (2015).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

64.
Jarman, S. N., Redd, K. S. & Gales, N. J. Group-specific primers for amplifying DNA sequences that identify Amphipoda, Cephalopoda, Echinodermata, Gastropoda, Isopoda, Ostracoda and Thoracica. Mol. Ecol. Notes 6, 268–271 (2006).
CAS  Google Scholar 

65.
Braley, M., Goldsworthy, S. D., Page, B., Steer, M. & Austin, J. J. Assessing morphological and DNA-based diet analysis techniques in a generalist predator, the arrow squid Nototodarus gouldi. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10, 466–474 (2010).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

66.
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

67.
Boyer, F. et al. obitools: A unix-inspired software package for DNA metabarcoding. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 16, 176–182 (2016).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

68.
De Barba, M. et al. DNA metabarcoding multiplexing and validation of data accuracy for diet assessment: application to omnivorous diet. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 306–323 (2014).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

69.
Froese, R. & Pauly, D. Fishbase. World Wide Web electronic publication. FishBase (2019).

70.
Palomares, M. L. D. & Pauly, D. SeaLifeBase. World Wide Web Electronic Publication. www.sealifebase.org, version (2014).

71.
Wickham, H. tidyverse: Easily Install and Load ‘Tidyverse’ Packages. R package version 1.0.0 (2016).

72.
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2018).
Google Scholar 

73.
Baduini, C. L. & Hyrenbach, K. D. Biogeography of procellariiform foraging strategies: does ocean productivity influence provisioning?. Mar. Ornithol. 31, 101–112 (2003).
Google Scholar 

74.
Weimerskirch, H. et al. Alternate long and short foraging trips in pelagic seabird parents. Anim. Behav. 47, 472–476 (1994).
Google Scholar 

75.
Granadeiro, J., Nunes, M., Silva, M. & Furness, R. Flexible foraging strategy of Cory’s shearwater, Calonectris diomedea, during the chick-rearing period. Anim. Behav. 56, 1169–1176 (1998).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

76.
Kareiva, P. & Odell, G. Swarms of predators exhibit ‘preytaxis’ if individual predators use area-restricted search. Am. Nat. 130, 233–270 (1987).
Google Scholar 

77.
Jennings, S., Pinnegar, J. K., Polunin, N. V. C. & Warr, K. J. Linking size-based and trophic analyses of benthic community structure. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 226, 77–85 (2002).
ADS  Google Scholar 

78.
Clua, É & Grosvalet, F. Mixed-species feeding aggregation of dolphins, large tunas and seabirds in the Azores. Aquat. Living Resour. 14, 11–18 (2001).
Google Scholar 

79.
Roger, C. Relationships among yellowfin and skipjack tuna, their prey-fish and plankton. Fish. Oceanogr. 3, 133–141 (1994).
Google Scholar 

80.
Choy, C. A., Popp, B. N., Hannides, C. C. S. & Drazen, J. C. Trophic structure and food resources of epipelagic and mesopelagic fishes in the north pacific subtropical Gyre ecosystem inferred from nitrogen isotopic compositions. Limnol. Oceanogr. 60, 1156–1171 (2015).
ADS  Google Scholar 

81.
Lipinski, M. R. & Jackson, S. Surface-feeding on cephalopods by procellariiform seabirds in the southern Benguela region, South Africa. J. Zool. 218, 549–563 (1989).
Google Scholar 

82.
Spear, L. B. & Ainley, D. G. Morphological differences relative to ecological segregation in petrels (family: Procellariidae) of the Southern Ocean And Tropical Pacific. Auk 115, 1017–1033 (1998).
Google Scholar 

83.
Keenan, S. W. & DeBruyn, J. M. Changes to vertebrate tissue stable isotope (δ15N) composition during decomposition. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–12 (2019).
Google Scholar 

84.
Bolnick, D. I. et al. The ecology of individuals: Incidence and implications of individual specialization. Am. Nat. 161, 1–28 (2003).
MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

85.
Mendez, L., Cotté, C., Prudor, A. & Weimerskirch, H. Variability in foraging behaviour of red-footed boobies nesting on Europa Island. Acta Oecol. 72, 87–97 (2016).
ADS  Google Scholar  More

Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Cunningham AA (2006) Is MHC enough for understanding wildlife immunogenetics? Trends Ecol Evolution 21:433–438
Google Scholar 

Adriaensen F, Chardon JP, De Blust G, Swinnen E, Villalba S, Gulinck H et al. (2003) The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model. Landsc Urban Plan 64:233–247
Google Scholar 

Aguilar R, Quesada M, Ashworth L, Herrerias‐Diego Y, Lobo J (2008) Genetic consequences of habitat fragmentation in plant populations: susceptible signals in plant traits and methodological approaches. Mol Ecol 17:5177–5188
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alcaide M, Edwards SV (2011) Molecular evolution of the toll-like receptor multigene family in birds. Mol Biol Evolution 28:1703–1715
CAS  Google Scholar 

Allendorf FW, Luikart G, Aitken SN (2013) Conservation and the genetics of populations, second edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, West Sussex
Google Scholar 

Altizer S, Harvell D, Friedle E (2003) Rapid evolutionary dynamics and disease threats to biodiversity. Trends Ecol Evolution 18:589–596
Google Scholar 

Areal H, Abrantes J, Esteves PJ (2011) Signatures of positive selection in toll-like receptor (TLR) genes in mammals. BMC Evolut Biol 11:368
CAS  Google Scholar 

Arnoux E, Eraud C, Navarro N, Tougard C, Thomas A, Cavallo F et al. (2014) Morphology and genetics reveal an intriguing pattern of differentiation at a very small geographic scale in a bird species, the forest thrush Turdus lherminieri. Heredity 113:514–525
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bateson ZW, Whittingham LA, Johnson JA, Dunn PO (2015) Contrasting patterns of selection and drift between two categories of immune genes in prairie-chickens. Mol Ecol 24:6095–6106
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Becker DJ, Albery GF, Kessler MK, Lunn TJ, Falvo CA, Czirják GÁ et al. (2020) Macroimmunology: the drivers and consequences of spatial patterns in wildlife immune defence. J Anim Ecol 89:972–995
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Belasen AM, Bletz MC, Leite D, da S, Toledo LF, James TY (2019) Long-term habitat fragmentation is associated with reduced MHC IIB diversity and increased infections in amphibian hosts. Front Ecol Evol 6:236
Google Scholar 

Bernatchez L, Landry C (2003) MHC studies in nonmodel vertebrates: what have we learned about natural selection in 15 years? J Evolut Biol 16:363–377
CAS  Google Scholar 

Bertrand JAM, Bourgeois YXC, Delahaie B, Duval T, García-Jiménez R, Cornuault J et al. (2014) Extremely reduced dispersal and gene flow in an island bird. Heredity 112:190–196
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Biedrzycka A, Radwan J (2008) Population fragmentation and major histocompatibility complex variation in the spotted suslik, Spermophilus suslicus. Mol Ecol 17:4801–4811
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Binetruy F, Buysse M, Barosi R, Duron O (2020a) Novel Rickettsia genotypes in ticks in French Guiana, South America. Sci Rep 10:1–11
Google Scholar 

Binetruy F, Chevillon C, de Thoisy B, Garnier S, Duron O (2019) Survey of ticks in French Guiana. Ticks Tick Borne Dis 10:77–85
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Binetruy F, Garnier S, Boulanger N, Talagrand-Reboul É, Loire E, Faivre B et al. (2020b) A novel Borrelia species, intermediate between Lyme disease and relapsing fever groups, in neotropical passerine-associated ticks. Sci Rep. 10:10596
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blake JG, Loiselle BA (2012) Temporal and spatial patterns in abundance of the wedge-billed woodcreeper (Glyphorynchus spirurus) in Lowland Ecuador. Wilson J Ornithol 124:436–445
Google Scholar 

Bollmer JL, Dunn PO, Whittingham LA, Wimpee C (2010) Extensive MHC class II B gene duplication in a passerine, the common yellowthroat (Geothlypis trichas). J Hered 101:448–460
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bollmer JL, Ruder EA, Johnson JA, Eimes JA, Dunn PO (2011) Drift and selection influence geographic variation at immune loci of prairie-chickens. Mol Ecol 20:4695–4706
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Breitbart M, Rohwer F (2005) Here a virus, there a virus, everywhere the same virus? Trends Microbiol 13:278–284
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brown LM, Ramey RR, Tamburini B, Gavin TA (2004) Population structure and mitochondrial DNA variation in sedentary Neotropical birds isolated by forest fragmentation. Conserv Genet 5:743–757
CAS  Google Scholar 

Calmont A (2012) La forêt guyanaise, entre valorisation et protection des ressources écosystémiques. VertigO – la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement. Hors-série 14. http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/12402

Cavaillon J-M (2017) Pathogen-associated molecular patterns. In: Inflammation: from molecular and cellular mechanisms to the clinic. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim, p 17–56

Collinge SK (2009) Ecology of fragmented landscapes. JHU Press, Baltimore

Colwell DD, Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D (2011) Vector-borne parasitic zoonoses: emerging scenarios and new perspectives. Vet Parasitol 182:14–21
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cormican P, Lloyd AT, Downing T, Connell SJ, Bradley D, O’Farrelly C (2009) The avian toll-Like receptor pathway-subtle differences amidst general conformity. Dev Comp Immunol 33:967–973
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Daszak P (2000) Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife—threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287:443–449
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dawson DA, Ball AD, Spurgin LG, Martín-Gálvez D, Stewart IRK, Horsburgh GJ et al. (2013) High-utility conserved avian microsatellite markers enable parentage and population studies across a wide range of species. BMC Genomics 14:176
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dawson DA, Horsburgh GJ, Küpper C, Stewart IRK, Ball AD, Durrant KL et al. (2010) New methods to identify conserved microsatellite loci and develop primer sets of high cross-species utility—as demonstrated for birds. Mol Ecol Resour 10:475–494
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DIREN Guyane (2007) Atlas des paysages de Guyane. DIREN Guyane, Cayenne

Dirzo R, Young HS, Galetti M, Ceballos G, Isaac NJB, Collen B (2014) Defaunation in the Anthropocene. Science 345:401–406
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Downing T, Lloyd AT, O’Farrelly C, Bradley DG (2010) The differential evolutionary dynamics of avian cytokine and TLR gene classes. J Immunol 184:6993–7000
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Driscoll DA, Weir T (2005) Beetle responses to habitat fragmentation depend on ecological traits, habitat condition, and remnant size. Conserv Biol 19:182–194
Google Scholar 

Eckert CG, Samis KE, Lougheed SC (2008) Genetic variation across species’ geographical ranges: the central–marginal hypothesis and beyond. Mol Ecol 17:1170–1188
CAS  Google Scholar 

Eizaguirre C, Lenz TL, Kalbe M, Milinski M (2012) Rapid and adaptive evolution of MHC genes under parasite selection in experimental vertebrate populations. Nat Commun 3:1–6
Google Scholar 

Evans ML, Neff BD, Heath DD (2010) MHC genetic structure and divergence across populations of Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Heredity 104:449–459
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 34:487–515
Google Scholar 

Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164:1567–1587
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

FAO (2001) Global forest resources assessment 2000. Main report, FAO, Rome

FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Main report, FAO, Rome

Fischer MC, Rellstab C, Leuzinger M, Roumet M, Gugerli F, Shimizu KK et al. (2017) Estimating genomic diversity and population differentiation—an empirical comparison of microsatellite and SNP variation in Arabidopsis halleri. BMC Genomics 18:69
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2010) Introduction to conservation genetics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Google Scholar 

Frankham R, Ballou JD, Ralls K, Eldridge M, Dudash MR, Fenster CB et al. (2017) Genetic management of fragmented animal and plant populations. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

Fraser DJ, Debes PV, Bernatchez L, Hutchings JA (2014) Population size, habitat fragmentation, and the nature of adaptive variation in a stream fish. Proc R Soc B 281:20140370
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Galetti M, Guevara R, Neves CL, Rodarte RR, Bovendorp RS, Moreira M et al. (2015) Defaunation affects the populations and diets of rodents in Neotropical rainforests. Biol Conserv 190:2–7
Google Scholar 

Galochet M, Morel V (2015) La biodiversité dans l’aménagement du territoire en Guyane française. VertigO – la revue électronique en sciences de l’environnement, Volume 15 Numéro 1. http://journals.openedition.org/vertigo/16069

Garnier S, Alibert P, Audiot P, Prieur B, Rasplus J-Y (2004) Isolation by distance and sharp discontinuities in gene frequencies: implications for the phylogeography of an alpine insect species, Carabus solieri. Mol Ecol 13:1883–1897
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Garrick RC, Sunnucks P, Dyer RJ (2010) Nuclear gene phylogeography using PHASE: dealing with unresolved genotypes, lost alleles, and systematic bias in parameter estimation. BMC Evol Biol 10:118
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gavan MK, Oliver MK, Douglas A, Piertney SB (2015) Gene dynamics of toll-like receptor 4 through a population bottleneck in an insular population of water voles (Arvicola amphibius). Conserv Genet 16:1181–1193
CAS  Google Scholar 

Gonzalez-Quevedo C, Davies RG, Phillips KP, Spurgin LG, Richardson DS (2016) Landscape-scale variation in an anthropogenic factor shapes immune gene variation within a wild population. Mol Ecol 25:4234–4246
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gonzalez-Quevedo C, Spurgin LG, Illera JC, Richardson DS (2015) Drift, not selection, shapes toll-like receptor variation among oceanic island populations. Mol Ecol 24:5852–5863
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gottdenker NL, Streicker DG, Faust CL, Carroll CR (2014) Anthropogenic land use change and infectious diseases: a review of the evidence. EcoHealth 11:619–632
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grueber CE, Knafler GJ, King TM, Senior AM, Grosser S, Robertson B et al. (2015) Toll-like receptor diversity in 10 threatened bird species: relationship with microsatellite heterozygosity. Conserv Genet 16:595–611
CAS  Google Scholar 

Grueber CE, Wallis GP, Jamieson IG (2013) Genetic drift outweighs natural selection at toll-like receptor (TLR) immunity loci in a re-introduced population of a threatened species. Mol Ecol 22:4470–4482
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grueber CE, Wallis GP, Jamieson IG (2014) Episodic positive selection in the evolution of avian toll-like receptor innate immunity genes. PLoS ONE 9:e89632
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Grueber CE, Wallis GP, King TM, Jamieson IG (2012) Variation at innate immunity toll-like receptor genes in a bottlenecked population of a New Zealand Robin. PLoS ONE 7:e45011
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guglielmone AA, Robbins RG, Apanaskevich DA, Petney TN, Estrada-Peña A, Horak IG (2014) The hard ticks of the world. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht
Google Scholar 

Haddad NM, Brudvig LA, Clobert J, Davies KF, Gonzalez A, Holt RD et al. (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A et al. (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:850–853
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harrisson KA, Pavlova A, Amos JN, Takeuchi N, Lill A, Radford JQ et al. (2013) Disrupted fine-scale population processes in fragmented landscapes despite large-scale genetic connectivity for a widespread and common cooperative breeder: the superb fairy-wren (Malurus cyaneus). J Anim Ecol 82:322–333
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hedrick PW (2005) A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59:1633–1638
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK (eds) (1996) Molecular systematics, 2nd ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts

Holderegger R, Kamm U, Gugerli F (2006) Adaptive vs. neutral genetic diversity: implications for landscape genetics. Landsc Ecol 21:797–807
Google Scholar 

Hubisz MJ, Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2009) Inferring weak population structure with the assistance of sample group information. Mol Ecol Resour 9:1322–1332
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

INSEE (2019) La population guyanaise à l’horizon 2050 : vers un doublement de la population? INSEE Antilles-Guyane, Pointe-à-pitre

Jones KE, Patel NG, Levy MA, Storeygard A, Balk D, Gittleman JL et al. (2008) Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 451:990–993
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jongejan F, Uilenberg G (2004) The global importance of ticks. Parasitology 129(Suppl):S3–S14
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kawai T, Akira S (2006) Innate immune recognition of viral infection. Nat Immunol 7:131–137
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S et al. (2012) Geneious basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28:1647–1649
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Keesing F, Brunner J, Duerr S, Killilea M, LoGiudice K, Schmidt K et al. (2009) Hosts as ecological traps for the vector of Lyme disease. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 276:3911–3919
CAS  Google Scholar 

Keestra AM, de Zoete MR, Bouwman LI, Vaezirad MM, van Putten JPM (2013) Unique features of chicken toll-like receptors. Dev Comp Immunol 41:316–323
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Keyghobadi N (2007) The genetic implications of habitat fragmentation for animals. Can J Zool 85:1049–1064
Google Scholar 

Khimoun A, Arnoux E, Martel G, Pot A, Eraud C, Condé B et al. (2016b) Contrasted patterns of genetic differentiation across eight bird species in the Lesser Antilles. Genetica 144:125–138
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khimoun A, Eraud C, Ollivier A, Arnoux E, Rocheteau V, Bely M et al. (2016a) Habitat specialization predicts genetic response to fragmentation in tropical birds. Mol Ecol 25:3831–3844
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khimoun A, Ollivier A, Faivre B, Garnier S (2017) Level of genetic differentiation affects relative performances of expressed sequence tag and genomic SSRs. Mol Ecol Resour 17:893–903
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knafler GJ, Grueber CE, Sutton JT, Jamieson IG (2017) Differential patterns of diversity at microsatellite, MHC, and TLR loci in bottlenecked South Island saddleback populations. NZ J Ecol 41:98–106
Google Scholar 

Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K, Battistuzzi FU (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lehmann T (1993) Ectoparasites: direct impact on host fitness. Parasitol Today 9:8–13
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol 9:753–760
Google Scholar 

Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451–1452
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lindenmayer DB, Fischer J (2013) Habitat fragmentation and landscape change: an ecological and conservation synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

Lindsay DL, Barr KR, Lance RF, Tweddale SA, Hayden TJ, Leberg PL (2008) Habitat fragmentation and genetic diversity of an endangered, migratory songbird, the golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia). Mol Ecol 17:2122–2133
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Losos JB, Ricklefs RE (2009) The theory of island biogeography revisited. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Marantz CA, Aleixo A, Bevier LR, Patten MA, Christie DA (2019) wedge-billed woodcreeper (Glyphorynchus spirurus). In: Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona

McKay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evolution 17:285–291
Google Scholar 

Milá B, Bardeleben C (2005) Isolation of polymorphic tetranucleotide microsatellite markers for the wedge-billed woodcreeper Glyphorynchus spirurus. Mol Ecol Notes 5:844–845
Google Scholar 

Minias P, Pikus E, Whittingham LA, Dunn PO (2018) A global analysis of selection at the avian MHC. Evolution 72:1278–1293
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Murrell B, Moola S, Mabona A, Weighill T, Sheward D, Pond K et al. (2013) FUBAR: a fast, unconstrained bayesian approximation for inferring selection. Mol Biol Evol 30:1196–1205
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, O’hara RB, Simpson GL et al. (2019) Vegan: community ecology package, vol 2. R package version, p 5–6

Oliveira CJF, Carvalho WA, Garcia GR, Gutierrez FRS, de Miranda Santos IKF, Silva JS et al. (2010) Tick saliva induces regulatory dendritic cells: MAP-kinases and toll-like receptor-2 expression as potential targets. Vet Parasitol 167:288–297
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

ONF (2017) Occupation du sol 2015 sur la bande littorale de Guyane et son evolution entre 2005 et 2015. Direction Régionale ONF Guyane, Cayenne

Ostfeld RS, Keesing F, Eviner VT (2010) Infectious disease ecology: effects of ecosystems on disease and of disease on ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

Palumbi SR (2001) Humans as the world’s greatest evolutionary force. Science 293:1786–1790
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Parham P (2003) Innate immunity: the unsung heroes. Nature 423:20

Patz JA, Graczyk TK, Geller N, Vittor AY (2000) Effects of environmental change on emerging parasitic diseases. Int J Parasitol 30:1395–1405
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pearson SK, Bull CM, Gardner MG (2018) Selection outweighs drift at a fine scale: lack of MHC differentiation within a family living lizard across geographically close but disconnected rocky outcrops. Mol Ecol 27:2204–2214
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pond SLK, Frost SDW (2005) Datamonkey: rapid detection of selective pressure on individual sites of codon alignments. Bioinformatics 21:2531–2533
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Porlier M, Garant D, Perret P, Charmantier A (2012) Habitat-linked population genetic differentiation in the blue tit Cyanistes caeruleus. J Hered 103:781–791
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Quéméré E, Hessenauer P, Galan M, Fernandez M, Merlet J, Chaval Y et al. (2018) Fluctuating pathogen-mediated selection favours the maintenance of innate immune gene polymorphism in a widespread wild ungulate. bioRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/458216

R Core Team (2020) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, R Core Team, Vienna

Radwan J, Kuduk K, Levy E, LeBas N, Babik W (2014) Parasite load and MHC diversity in undisturbed and agriculturally modified habitats of the ornate dragon lizard. Mol Ecol 23:5966–5978
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Richardson JL, Urban MC, Bolnick DI, Skelly DK (2014) Microgeographic adaptation and the spatial scale of evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 29:165–176
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rivera-Ortíz FA, Aguilar R, Arizmendi MDC, Quesada M, Oyama K (2015) Habitat fragmentation and genetic variability of tetrapod populations: fragmentation and genetic variability. Anim Conserv 18:249–258
Google Scholar 

Rousset F (2008) genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8:103–106
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sagonas K, Runemark A, Antoniou A, Lymberakis P, Pafilis P, Valakos ED et al. (2019) Selection, drift, and introgression shape MHC polymorphism in lizards. Heredity 122:468–484
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sano E, Carlson S, Wegley L, Rohwer F (2004) Movement of viruses between biomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:5842–5846
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Santonastaso T, Lighten J, van Oosterhout C, Jones KL, Foufopoulos J, Anthony NM (2017) The effects of historical fragmentation on major histocompatibility complex class II β and microsatellite variation in the Aegean island reptile, Podarcis erhardii. Ecol Evol 7:4568–4581
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schleicher A, Biedermann R, Kleyer M (2011) Dispersal traits determine plant response to habitat connectivity in an urban landscape. Landsc Ecol 26:529–540
Google Scholar 

Schuelke M (2000) An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat Biotechnol 18:233–234
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Seutin G, White BN, Boag PT (1991) Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Can J Zool 69:82–90
CAS  Google Scholar 

Slatkin M (1987) Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science 236:787–792
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spielman D, Brook BW, Frankham R (2004) Most species are not driven to extinction before genetic factors impact them. PNAS 101:15261–15264
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spurgin LG, Richardson DS (2010) How pathogens drive genetic diversity: MHC, mechanisms and misunderstandings. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 277:979–988
CAS  Google Scholar 

Stephens M, Donnelly P (2003) A comparison of bayesian methods for haplotype reconstruction from population genotype data. Am J Hum Genet 73:1162–1169
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stephens M, Smith NJ, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. Am J Hum Genet 68:978–989
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Strand TM, Segelbacher G, Quintela M, Xiao L, Axelsson T, Höglund J (2012) Can balancing selection on MHC loci counteract genetic drift in small fragmented populations of black grouse? Ecol Evol 2:341–353
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sunnucks P (2011) Towards modelling persistence of woodland birds: the role of genetics. Emu 111:19–39
Google Scholar 

Szpiech ZA, Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA (2008) ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations. Bioinformatics 24:2498–2504
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Tschirren B (2015) Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato infection pressure shapes innate immune gene evolution in natural rodent populations across Europe. Biol Lett 11:20150263
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Väli U, Einarsson A, Waits L, Ellegren H (2008) To what extent do microsatellite markers reflect genome-wide genetic diversity in natural populations? Mol Ecol 17:3808–3817
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Van Etten J (2017) R package gdistance: distances and routes on geographical grids. J Stat Softw 76:1–21
Google Scholar 

Van Houtan KS, Pimm SL, Halley JM, Bierregaard RO, Lovejoy TE (2007) Dispersal of Amazonian birds in continuous and fragmented forest. Ecol Lett 10:219–229
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vilas A, Pérez-Figueroa A, Quesada H, Caballero A (2015) Allelic diversity for neutral markers retains a higher adaptive potential for quantitative traits than expected heterozygosity. Mol Ecol 24:4419–4432
PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vinkler M, Albrecht T (2009) The question waiting to be asked: innate immunity receptors in the perspective of zoological research. Folia Zool 58:15
Google Scholar 

Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984) Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38:1358–1370
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wlasiuk G, Nachman MW (2010) Adaptation and constraint at toll-like receptors in primates. Mol Biol Evol 27:2172–2186
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Woltmann S, Kreiser BR, Sherry TW (2012) Fine-scale genetic population structure of an understory rainforest bird in Costa Rica. Conserv Genet 13:925–935
Google Scholar 

Yilmaz A, Shen S, Adelson DL, Xavier S, Zhu JJ (2005) Identification and sequence analysis of chicken toll-like receptors. Immunogenetics 56:743–753
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Young HS, McCauley DJ, Dirzo R, Goheen JR, Agwanda B, Brook C et al. (2015) Context-dependent effects of large-wildlife declines on small-mammal communities in central Kenya. Ecol Appl 25:348–360
PubMed  Google Scholar  More

Field N2O flux measurements
At seven different semi-arid and arid savanna regions in Kenya (Fig. 1, Supplementary Fig. 9), N2O measurements from soils at 46 boma sites and 22 adjacent reference sites (undisturbed savanna) were carried out. At each boma and control site, 3–7 plots were chosen randomly for flux measurements. Local members of the pastoral communities, including herders and/or community elders were interviewed for information on the time since abandonment of each boma.
N2O fluxes from bomas were measured using the fast-box chamber method15, deploying an ultra-portable greenhouse gas analyzer of ABB-Los Gatos Research Inc. (Modell 909–0041). A gas-tight, vented chamber (0.3 × 0.2 × 0.15 m) was pressed against the ground on foam frames for 4–7 min, during which time sample air was pumped from the headspace of the chamber to the analyzer and returned to the chamber thereafter. In this way, changes in headspace N2O concentrations were continuously measured over the sample period, with a running average of every 5 s. Linear regression over the sample period was used to calculate fluxes. The detection limit for N2O fluxes was More

1.
Hoegh-Guldberg O. Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world’s coral reefs. Mar Freshw Res. 1999;50:839–66.
Google Scholar 
2.
Hoegh-Guldberg O, Poloczanska ES, Skirving W, Dove S. Coral reef ecosystems under climate change and ocean acidification. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:158.
Google Scholar 

3.
Kenkel CD, Goodbody-Gringley G, Caillaud D, Davies SW, Bartels E, Matz MV. Evidence for a host role in thermotolerance divergence between populations of the mustard hill coral (Porites astreoides) from different reef environments. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:4335–48.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

4.
Bay RA, Palumbi SR. Multilocus adaptation associated with heat resistance in reef-building corals. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2952–6.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

5.
Dixon GB, Davies SW, Aglyamova GV, Meyer E, Bay LK, Matz MV. Genomic determinants of coral heat tolerance across latitudes. Science. 2015;348:1460.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

6.
Howells EJ, Abrego D, Meyer E, Kirk NL, Burt JA. Host adaptation and unexpected symbiont partners enable reef-building corals to tolerate extreme temperatures. Glob Change Biol. 2016;22:2702–14.
Google Scholar 

7.
Morikawa MK, Palumbi SR. Using naturally occurring climate resilient corals to construct bleaching-resistant nurseries. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:10586.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

8.
Berkelmans R, van Oppen MJH. The role of zooxanthellae in the thermal tolerance of corals: a ‘nugget of hope’ for coral reefs in an era of climate change. Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273:2305–12.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

9.
Sampayo EM, Ridgway T, Bongaerts P, Hoegh-Guldberg O. Bleaching susceptibility and mortality of corals are determined by fine-scale differences in symbiont type. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:10444.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

10.
LaJeunesse TC, Smith RT, Finney J, Oxenford H. Outbreak and persistence of opportunistic symbiotic dinoflagellates during the 2005 Caribbean mass coral ‘bleaching’ event. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2009;276:4139–48.
Google Scholar 

11.
Howells EJ, Beltran VH, Larsen NW, Bay LK, Willis BL, van Oppen MJH. Coral thermal tolerance shaped by local adaptation of photosymbionts. Nat Clim Change. 2011;2:116.
Google Scholar 

12.
LaJeunesse TC, Parkinson JE, Gabrielson PW, Jeong HJ, Reimer JD, Voolstra CR, et al. Systematic revision of Symbiodiniaceae highlights the antiquity and diversity of coral endosymbionts. Curr Biol. 2018;28:2570–.e6.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

13.
Bellantuono AJ, Granados-Cifuentes C, Miller DJ, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Rodriguez-Lanetty M. Coral thermal tolerance: tuning gene expression to resist thermal stress. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e50685.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

14.
Palumbi SR, Barshis DJ, Traylor-Knowles N, Bay RA. Mechanisms of reef coral resistance to future climate change. Science. 2014;344:895.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

15.
Sawall Y, Al-Sofyani A, Hohn S, Banguera-Hinestroza E, Voolstra CR, Wahl M. Extensive phenotypic plasticity of a Red Sea coral over a strong latitudinal temperature gradient suggests limited acclimatization potential to warming. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8940.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

16.
Torda G, Donelson JM, Aranda M, Barshis DJ, Bay L, Berumen ML, et al. Rapid adaptive responses to climate change in corals. Nat Clim Change. 2017;7:627.
Google Scholar 

17.
Baker AC. Flexibility and specificity in coral-algal symbiosis: diversity, ecology, and biogeography of Symbiodinium. Annu Rev Ecol, Evolution, Syst. 2003;34:661–89.
Google Scholar 

18.
Boulotte NM, Dalton SJ, Carroll AG, Harrison PL, Putnam HM, Peplow LM, et al. Exploring the Symbiodinium rare biosphere provides evidence for symbiont switching in reef-building corals. ISME J. 2016;10:2693–701.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

19.
Cunning R, Silverstein RN, Baker AC. Symbiont shuffling linked to differential photochemical dynamics of Symbiodinium in three Caribbean reef corals. Coral Reefs. 2018;37:145–52.
Google Scholar 

20.
Stat M, Loh WKW, LaJeunesse TC, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Carter DA. Stability of coral–endosymbiont associations during and after a thermal stress event in the southern Great Barrier Reef. Coral Reefs. 2009;28:709–13.
Google Scholar 

21.
Putnam HM, Stat M, Pochon X, Gates RG. Endosymbiotic flexibility associates with environmental sensitivity in scleractinian corals. Proc R Soc B: Biol Sci. 2012;279:4352–61.
Google Scholar 

22.
Stat M, Morris E, Gates RD. Functional diversity in coral–dinoflagellate symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:9256.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

23.
Starzak DE, Quinnell RG, Nitschke MR, Davy SK. The influence of symbiont type on photosynthetic carbon flux in a model cnidarian–dinoflagellate symbiosis. Mar Biol. 2014;161:711–24.
CAS  Google Scholar 

24.
Gabay Y, Weis VM, Davy SK. Symbiont identity influences patterns of symbiosis establishment, host growth, and asexual reproduction in a model cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Biol Bull. 2018;234:1–10.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

25.
Quigley KM, Bay LK, Willis BL. Temperature and water quality-related patterns in sediment-associated Symbiodinium communities impact symbiont uptake and fitness of juveniles in the genus acropora. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:401.
Google Scholar 

26.
Cumbo VR, vanOppen MJH, Baird AH. Temperature and Symbiodinium physiology affect the establishment and development of symbiosis in corals. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2018;587:117–27.
CAS  Google Scholar 

27.
Ali A, Kriefall NG, Emery LE, Kenkel CD, Matz MV, Davies SW. Recruit symbiosis establishment and Symbiodiniaceae composition influenced by adult corals and reef sediment. Coral Reefs. 2019;38:405–15.
Google Scholar 

28.
McIlroy SE, Cunning R, Baker AC, Coffroth MA. Competition and succession among coral endosymbionts. Ecol Evolution. 2019;9:12767–78.
Google Scholar 

29.
Abrego D, Willis BL, van Oppen MJH. Impact of light and temperature on the uptake of algal symbionts by coral juveniles. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e50311.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

30.
Schnitzler CE, Hollingsworth LL, Krupp DA, Weis VM. Elevated temperature impairs onset of symbiosis and reduces survivorship in larvae of the Hawaiian coral, Fungia scutaria. Mar Biol. 2012;159:633–42.
Google Scholar 

31.
Hawkins TD, Hagemeyer JCG, Warner ME. Temperature moderates the infectiousness of two conspecific Symbiodinium strains isolated from the same host population. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18:5204–17.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

32.
Swain TD, Chandler J, Backman V, Marcelino L. Consensus thermotolerance ranking for 110 Symbiodinium phylotypes: an exemplar utilization of a novel iterative partial-rank aggregation tool with broad application potential. Funct Ecol. 2017;31:172–83.
Google Scholar 

33.
Gabay Y, Parkinson JE, Wilkinson SP, Weis VM, Davy SK. Inter-partner specificity limits the acquisition of thermotolerant symbionts in a model cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. ISME J. 2019;13:2489–99.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

34.
Poland DM, Coffroth MA. Trans-generational specificity within a cnidarian–algal symbiosis. Coral Reefs. 2017;36:119–29.
Google Scholar 

35.
Fraune S, Bosch TCG. Long-term maintenance of species-specific bacterial microbiota in the basal metazoan Hydra. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:13146.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

36.
Herrera M, Ziegler M, Voolstra CR, Aranda M. Laboratory-cultured strains of the sea anemone exaiptasia reveal distinct bacterial communities. Front Mar Sci. 2017;4:115.
Google Scholar 

37.
Grajales A, Rodríguez E. Morphological revision of the genus Aiptasia and the family Aiptasiidae (Cnidaria, Actinaria, Metridioidea). Zootaxa. 2014;3826:55–100.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

38.
Xiang T, Hambleton EA, DeNofrio JC, Pringle JR, Grossman AR. Isolation of clonal axenic strains of the symbiotic dinoflagellate Symbiodinium and their growth and host specificity. J Phycol. 2013;49:447–58.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

39.
Bieri T, Onishi M, Xiang T, Grossman AR, Pringle JR. Relative contributions of various cellular mechanisms to loss of algae during cnidarian bleaching. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152693.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

40.
Sunagawa S, Wilson EC, Thaler M, Smith ML, Caruso C, Pringle JR, et al. Generation and analysis of transcriptomic resources for a model system on the rise: the sea anemone Aiptasia pallida and its dinoflagellate endosymbiont. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:258.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

41.
Cziesielski MJ, Liew YJ, Cui G, Schmidt-Roach S, Campana S, Marondedze C, et al. Multi-omics analysis of thermal stress response in a zooxanthellate cnidarian reveals the importance of associating with thermotolerant symbionts. Proc Biol Sci. 2018;285:20172654.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

42.
Belda-Baillie CA, Baillie BK, Maruyama T. Specificity of a model cnidarian-dinoflagellate symbiosis. Biol Bull. 2002;202:74–85.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

43.
Rodriguez-Lanetty M, Chang S-J, Song J-I. Specificity of two temperate dinoflagellate–anthozoan associations from the north-western Pacific Ocean. Mar Biol. 2003;143:1193–9.
Google Scholar 

44.
Cziesielski MJ, Schmidt-Roach S, Aranda M. The past, present, and future of coral heat stress studies. Ecol Evolution. 2019;9:10055–66.
Google Scholar 

45.
Lehnert EM, Mouchka ME, Burriesci MS, Gallo ND, Schwarz JA, Pringle JR. Extensive differences in gene expression between symbiotic and aposymbiotic cnidarians. G3 (Bethesda). 2014;4:277–95.
CAS  Google Scholar 

46.
Gegner HM, Ziegler M, Rädecker N, Buitrago-López C, Aranda M, Voolstra CR. High salinity conveys thermotolerance in the coral model Aiptasia. Biol Open. 2017;6:1943.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

47.
Cui G, Liew YJ, Li Y, Kharbatia N, Zahran NI, Emwas A-H, et al. Host-dependent nitrogen recycling as a mechanism of symbiont control in Aiptasia. PLoS Genet. 2019;15:e1008189.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

48.
Röthig T, Costa RM, Simona F, Baumgarten S, Torres AF, Radhakrishnan A, et al. Distinct bacterial communities associated with the coral model aiptasia in aposymbiotic and symbiotic states with symbiodinium. Front Mar Sci. 2016;3:234.
Google Scholar 

49.
Matthews JL, Sproles AE, Oakley CA, Grossman AR, Weis VM, Davy SK. Menthol-induced bleaching rapidly and effectively provides experimental aposymbiotic sea anemones (Aiptasia sp.) for symbiosis investigations. J Exp Biol. 2016;219:306.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

50.
Hume BCC, Ziegler M, Poulain J, Pochon X, Romac S, Boissin E, et al. An improved primer set and amplification protocol with increased specificity and sensitivity targeting the Symbiodinium ITS2 region. PeerJ. 2018;6:e4816.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

51.
Hume BCC, Smith EG, Ziegler M, Warrington HJM, Burt JA, LaJeunesse TC, et al. SymPortal: a novel analytical framework and platform for coral algal symbiont next-generation sequencing ITS2 profiling. Mol Ecol Resour. 2019;19:1063–80.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

52.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing; 2018.

53.
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. Community Ecology Package. 2019.

54.
Anderson MJ. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 2001;26:32–46.
Google Scholar 

55.
Anderson MJ. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. American Cancer Society; 2017. p. 1–15.

56.
Anderson MJ, Willis TJ. Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology. 2003;84:511–25.
Google Scholar 

57.
Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

58.
IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 22.0). Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corporation; 2013.

59.
Robison JD, Warner ME. Differential impacts of photoacclimation and thermal stress on the photobiology of four different phylotypes of Symbiodinium (Pyrrhophyta). J Phycol. 2006;42:568–79.
CAS  Google Scholar 

60.
McGinty ES, Pieczonka J, Mydlarz LD. Variations in reactive oxygen release and antioxidant activity in multiple Symbiodinium types in response to elevated temperature. Microb Ecol. 2012;64:1000–7.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

61.
Grégoire V, Schmacka F, Coffroth MA, Karsten U. Photophysiological and thermal tolerance of various genotypes of the coral endosymbiont Symbiodinium sp. (Dinophyceae). J Appl Phycol. 2017;29:1893–905.
Google Scholar 

62.
Lesser MP. Phylogenetic signature of light and thermal stress for the endosymbiotic dinoflagellates of corals (Family Symbiodiniaceae). Limnol Oceanogr. 2019;64:1852–63.
Google Scholar 

63.
Hambleton EA, Guse A, Pringle JR. Similar specificities of symbiont uptake by adults and larvae in an anemone model system for coral biology. J Exp Biol. 2014;217:1613.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

64.
Wolfowicz I, Baumgarten S, Voss PA, Hambleton EA, Voolstra CR, Hatta M, et al. Aiptasia sp. larvae as a model to reveal mechanisms of symbiont selection in cnidarians. Sci Rep. 2016;6:32366.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

65.
Thornhill DJ, Xiang Y, Pettay DT, Zhong M, Santos SR. Population genetic data of a model symbiotic cnidarian system reveal remarkable symbiotic specificity and vectored introductions across ocean basins. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:4499–515.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

66.
Little AF, van Oppen MJH, Willis BL. Flexibility in algal endosymbioses shapes growth in reef corals. Science. 2004;304:1492.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

67.
Pettay DT, Wham DC, Smith RT, Iglesias-Prieto R, LaJeunesse TC. Microbial invasion of the Caribbean by an Indo-Pacific coral zooxanthella. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:7513.
PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

68.
Baums IB, Devlin-Durante MK, LaJeunesse TC. New insights into the dynamics between reef corals and their associated dinoflagellate endosymbionts from population genetic studies. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:4203–15.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

69.
Nyamukondiwa C, Terblanche JS. Thermal tolerance in adult Mediterranean and Natal fruit flies (Ceratitis capitata and Ceratitis rosa): effects of age, gender and feeding status. J Therm Biol. 2009;34:406–14.
Google Scholar 

70.
Dowd WW, King FA, Denny MW. Thermal variation, thermal extremes and the physiological performance of individuals. J Exp Biol. 2015;218:1956.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

71.
Chidawanyika F, Nyamukondiwa C, Strathie L, Fischer K. Effects of thermal regimes, starvation and age on heat tolerance of the Parthenium Beetle Zygogramma bicolorata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) following dynamic and static protocols. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0169371.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

72.
Hoadley KD, Lewis AM, Wham DC, Pettay DT, Grasso C, Smith R, et al. Host–symbiont combinations dictate the photo-physiological response of reef-building corals to thermal stress. Sci Rep. 2019;9:9985.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

73.
Rädecker N, Raina J-B, Pernice M, Perna G, Guagliardo P, Kilburn MR, et al. Using aiptasia as a model to study metabolic interactions in cnidarian-symbiodinium symbioses. Front Physiol. 2018;9:214–214.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

74.
Osman EO, Smith DJ, Ziegler M, Kürten B, Conrad C, El-Haddad KM, et al. Thermal refugia against coral bleaching throughout the northern Red Sea. Glob Change Biol. 2018;24:e474–84.
Google Scholar 

75.
Berumen ML, Voolstra CR, Daffonchio D, Agusti S, Aranda M, Irigoien X, et al. The Red Sea: environmental gradients shape a natural laboratory in a nascent ocean. In: Voolstra CR, Berumen ML, editors. Coral Reefs of the Red Sea. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 1–10.

76.
Hawkins TD, Hagemeyer JCG, Hoadley KD, Marsh AG, Warner ME. Partitioning of respiration in an animal-algal symbiosis: implications for different aerobic capacity between Symbiodinium spp. Front Physiol. 2016;7:128.
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

77.
Hoadley KD, Rollison D, Pettay DT, Warner ME. Differential carbon utilization and asexual reproduction under elevated pCO2 conditions in the model anemone, Exaiptasia pallida, hosting different symbionts. Limnol Oceanogr. 2015;60:2108–20.
CAS  Google Scholar 

78.
Borell EM, Yuliantri AR, Bischof K, Richter C. The effect of heterotrophy on photosynthesis and tissue composition of two scleractinian corals under elevated temperature. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2008;364:116–23.
Google Scholar 

79.
Ferrier-Pagès C, Rottier C, Beraud E, Levy O. Experimental assessment of the feeding effort of three scleractinian coral species during a thermal stress: effect on the rates of photosynthesis. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol. 2010;390:118–24.
Google Scholar 

80.
Connolly SR, Lopez-Yglesias MA, Anthony KRN. Food availability promotes rapid recovery from thermal stress in a scleractinian coral. Coral Reefs. 2012;31:951–60.
Google Scholar 

81.
Lyndby NH, Holm JB, Wangpraseurt D, Grover R, Rottier C, Kühl M, et al. Effect of feeding and thermal stress on photosynthesis, respiration and the carbon budget of the scleractinian coral Pocillopora damicornis. bioRxiv. 2018:378059.

82.
Borell EM, Bischof K. Feeding sustains photosynthetic quantum yield of a scleractinian coral during thermal stress. Oecologia. 2008;157:593.
PubMed  Google Scholar 

83.
Weng L-C, Pasaribu B, Ping Lin I, Tsai C-H, Chen C-S, Jiang P-L. Nitrogen deprivation induces lipid droplet accumulation and alters fatty acid metabolism in symbiotic dinoflagellates isolated from aiptasia pulchella. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5777.
PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

84.
Fitt W, Cook C. The effects of feeding or addition of dissolved inorganic nutrients in maintaining the symbiosis between dinoflagellates and a tropical marine cnidarian. Mar Biol. 2001;139:507–17.
Google Scholar 

85.
Ferrier-Pagès C, Witting J, Tambutté E, Sebens KP. Effect of natural zooplankton feeding on the tissue and skeletal growth of the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata. Coral Reefs. 2003;22:229–40.
Google Scholar 

86.
van der Merwe R, Röthig T, Voolstra CR, Ochsenkühn MA, Lattemann S, Amy GL. High salinity tolerance of the Red Sea coral Fungia granulosa under desalination concentrate discharge conditions: an in situ photophysiology experiment. Front Mar Sci. 2014;1:58.
Google Scholar  More

1.
Lefebvre, L., Reader, S. M. & Sol, D. Brains, innovations and evolution in birds and primates. Brain Behav. Evol. 63, 233–246 (2004).
PubMed  Google Scholar 
2.
Sayol, F. et al. Environmental variation and the evolution of large brains in birds. Nat. Commun. 7, 13971 (2016).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

3.
Schuck-Paim, C., Alonso, W. J. & Ottoni, E. B. Cognition in an ever-changing world: climatic variability is associated with brain size in neotropical parrots. Brain Behav. Evol. 71, 200–215 (2008).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

4.
Reader, S. M. & MacDonald, K. in Animal Innovation (eds Reader, S. M. & Laland, K. N.) 83–116 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2003).

5.
Navarrete, A. F., Reader, S. M., Street, S. E., Whalen, A. & Laland, K. N. The coevolution of innovation and technical intelligence in primates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150186 (2016).
Google Scholar 

6.
Street, S. E., Navarrete, A. F., Reader, S. M. & Laland, K. N. Coevolution of cultural intelligence, extended life history, sociality, and brain size in primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7908–7914 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7.
Sol, D., Duncan, R. P., Blackburn, T. M., Cassey, P. & Lefebvre, L. Big brains, enhanced cognition, and response of birds to novel environments. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 5460–5465 (2005).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.
Reader, S. M. & Laland, K. N. Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 99, 4436–4441 (2002).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9.
Sol, D., Timmermans, S. & Lefebvre, L. Behavioural flexibility and invasion success in birds. Anim. Behav. 63, 495–502 (2002).
Google Scholar 

10.
Melin, A. D., Young, H. C., Mosdossy, K. N. & Fedigan, L. M. Seasonality, extractive foraging and the evolution of primate sensorimotor intelligence. J. Hum. Evol. 71, 77–86 (2014).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

11.
Kummer, H. & Goodall, J. Conditions of innovative behaviour in primates. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 308, 203–214 (1985).
ADS  Google Scholar 

12.
MacDonald, K. in Archaeological Informatics (ed. Burenhult, G.) 105–112 (ArcheoPress, 2002).

13.
Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. in The Evolution of Cognition (eds Heyes, C. & Huber, L.) 329–345 (MIT Press, 2000).

14.
Reed, K. E. Early hominid evolution and ecological change through the African Plio-Pleistocene. J. Hum. Evol. 32, 289–322 (1997).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15.
deMenocal, P. B. African climate change and faunal evolution during the Pliocene–Pleistocene. Earth Planet. Sci Lett. 220, 3–24 (2004).
ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

16.
Roberts, P. & Stewart, B. A. Defining the ‘generalist specialist’ niche for Pleistocene Homo sapiens. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 542–550 (2018).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

17.
Vrba, E. S. Turnover-pulses, the Red Queen, and related topics. Am. J. Sci. 293, 418–452 (1993).
ADS  Google Scholar 

18.
Foley, R. The adaptive legacy of human evolution: a search for the environment of evolutionary adaptedness. Evol. Anthropol. 4, 194–203 (1995).
Google Scholar 

19.
Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. Is the “Savanna hypothesis” a dead concept for explaining the emergence of the earliest hominins? Curr. Anthropol. 55, 59–81 (2014).
Google Scholar 

20.
Potts, R. Environmental hypotheses of hominin evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 107, 93–136 (1998).
Google Scholar 

21.
Cerling, T. E. et al. Woody cover and hominin environments in the past 6 million years. Nature 476, 51–56 (2011).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22.
Potts, R. Evolution and climate variability. Science 273, 922–923 (1996).
ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

23.
Antón, S. C., Potts, R. & Aiello, L. C. Evolution of early Homo: an integrated biological perspective. Science 345, 1236828 (2014).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

24.
McGrew, W. C. In search of the last common ancestor: new findings on wild chimpanzees. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 3267–3276 (2010).
CAS  Google Scholar 

25.
Pruetz, J. & Bertolani, P. Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes verus) behavioral responses to stresses associated with living in a savanna-mosaic environment: implications for hominin adaptations to open habitats. PaleoAnthropology https://doi.org/10.4207/PA.2009.ART33 (2009).

26.
Prado-Martinez, J. et al. Great ape genetic diversity and population history. Nature 499, 471–475 (2013).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

27.
Kühl, H. S. et al. Human impact erodes chimpanzee behavioral diversity. Science 363, 1453–1455 (2019).
ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

28.
Whiten, A. Culture extends the scope of evolutionary biology in the great apes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 7790–7797 (2017).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

29.
Boesch, C. Wild Cultures: A Comparison between Chimpanzee and Human Cultures (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).

30.
Whiten, A. et al. Cultures in chimpanzees. Nature 399, 682–685 (1999).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31.
Lycett, S. J., Collard, M. & McGrew, W. C. Cladistic analyses of behavioural variation in wild Pan troglodytes: exploring the chimpanzee culture hypothesis. J. Hum. Evol. 57, 337–349 (2009).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

32.
Lee, P. C. in Primate Responses to Environmental Change (ed. Box, H. O.) 39–56 (Chapman and Hall, 1991).

33.
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Google Scholar 

34.
Reed, K. E. & Fleagle, J. G. Geographic and climatic control of primate diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 7874–7876 (1995).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

35.
Kay, R. F., Madden, R. H., Schaik, C. V. & Higdon, D. Primate species richness is determined by plant productivity: implications for conservation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 13023–13027 (1997).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36.
Macho, G. A. From rainforests to savannas and back: the impact of abiotic factors on non-human primate and hominin life histories. Quatern. Int. 448, 5–13 (2017).
Google Scholar 

37.
Wessling, E. G. et al. Seasonal variation in physiology challenges the notion of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) as a forest-adapted species. Front. Ecol. Evol. 6, 60 (2018).
Google Scholar 

38.
van Leeuwen, K. L., Hill, R. A. & Korstjens, A. H. Classifying chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) landscapes across large-scale environmental gradients in Africa. Int. J. Primatol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-020-00164-5 (2020).

39.
Maley, J. The African rain forest—main characteristics of changes in vegetation and climate from the Upper Cretaceous to the Quaternary. Proc. R. Soc. Edin. B 104, 31–73 (1996).
Google Scholar 

40.
Mayr, E. & O’Hara, R. J. The biogeographic evidence supporting the Pleistocene forest refuge hypothesis. Evolution 40, 55–67 (1986).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

41.
Plana, V. Mechanisms and tempo of evolution in the African Guineo–Congolian rainforest. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 359, 1585–1594 (2004).
Google Scholar 

42.
Hewitt, G. M. The structure of biodiversity – insights from molecular phylogeography. Front. Zool. 1, 4 (2004).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

43.
Moritz, C., Patton, J. L., Schneider, C. J. & Smith, T. B. Diversification of rainforest faunas: ān integrated molecular approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 31, 533–563 (2000).
Google Scholar 

44.
Gonder, M. K. et al. Evidence from Cameroon reveals differences in the genetic structure and histories of chimpanzee populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4766–4771 (2011).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

45.
Chown, S. L. & Gaston, K. J. Areas, cradles and museums: the latitudinal gradient in species richness. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 311–315 (2000).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

46.
Stenseth, N. C. The tropics: cradle or museum? Oikos 43, 417–420 (1984).
Google Scholar 

47.
Rangel, T. F. et al. Modeling the ecology and evolution of biodiversity: biogeographical cradles, museums, and graves. Science 361, eaar5452 (2018).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

48.
Huntley, J. W., Keith, K. D., Castellanos, A. A., Musher, L. J. & Voelker, G. Underestimated and cryptic diversification patterns across Afro-tropical lowland forests. J. Biogeogr. 46, 381–391 (2019).
Google Scholar 

49.
Boesch, C. et al. Chimpanzees routinely fish for algae with tools during the dry season in Bakoun, Guinea. Am. J. Primatol. 79, e22613 (2017).
Google Scholar 

50.
Koops, K., Schöning, C., Isaji, M. & Hashimoto, C. Cultural differences in ant-dipping tool length between neighbouring chimpanzee communities at Kalinzu, Uganda. Sci. Rep. 5, 12456 (2015).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

51.
Möbius, Y., Boesch, C., Koops, K., Matsuzawa, T. & Humle, T. Cultural differences in army ant predation by West African chimpanzees? A comparative study of microecological variables. Anim. Behav. 76, 37–45 (2008).
Google Scholar 

52.
Yamakoshi, G. & Sugiyama, Y. Pestle-pounding behavior of wild chimpanzees at Bossou, Guinea: a newly observed tool-using behavior. Primates 36, 489–500 (1995).

53.
Boesch, C. & Boesch-Achermann, H. The Chimpanzees of the Taï Forest: Behavioural Ecology and Evolution (Oxford Univ. Press, 2000).

54.
Luncz, L. V., Mundry, R. & Boesch, C. Evidence for cultural differences between neighboring chimpanzee communities. Curr. Biol. 22, 922–926 (2012).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

55.
Pruetz, J. D. et al. New evidence on the tool-assisted hunting exhibited by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) in a savannah habitat at Fongoli, Sénégal. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2, 140507 (2015).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56.
Günther, M. M. & Boesch, C. in Hands of Primates (eds Preuschoft, H. & Chivers, D. J.) 109–129 (Springer, 1993).

57.
Sanderson, E. W. et al. The Human Footprint and the Last of the WildThe human footprint is a global map of human influence on the land surface, which suggests that human beings are stewards of nature, whether we like it or not. BioScience 52, 891–904 (2002).
Google Scholar 

58.
Laland, K. N., Odling‐Smee, J. & Feldman, M. W. Cultural niche construction and human evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 22–33 (2001).
CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

59.
Lorenzen, E. D., Masembe, C., Arctander, P. & Siegismund, H. R. A long-standing Pleistocene refugium in southern Africa and a mosaic of refugia in East Africa: insights from mtDNA and the common eland antelope. J. Biogeogr. 37, 571–581 (2010).
Google Scholar 

60.
Mitchell, M. W., Locatelli, S., Sesink Clee, P. R., Thomassen, H. A. & Gonder, M. K. Environmental variation and rivers govern the structure of chimpanzee genetic diversity in a biodiversity hotspot. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 1 (2015).
CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

61.
Fünfstück, T. et al. The sampling scheme matters: Pan troglodytes troglodytes and P. t. schweinfurthii are characterized by clinal genetic variation rather than a strong subspecies break. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 156, 181–191 (2015).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

62.
Hockings, K. J. et al. Apes in the Anthropocene: flexibility and survival. Trends Ecol. Evol. 30, 215–222 (2015).
PubMed  Google Scholar 

63.
Thuiller, W. et al. Vulnerability of African mammals to anthropogenic climate change under conservative land transformation assumptions. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 424–440 (2006).
ADS  Google Scholar 

64.
Karl, T. R. & Trenberth, K. E. Modern global climate change. Science 302, 1719–1723 (2003).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

65.
Keith, S. A. & Bull, J. W. Animal culture impacts species’ capacity to realise climate-driven range shifts. Ecography 40, 296–304 (2017).
Google Scholar 

66.
Brakes, P. et al. Animal cultures matter for conservation. Science 363, 1032–1034 (2019).
ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

67.
Kühl, H. S. et al. The Critically Endangered western chimpanzee declines by 80%. Am. J. Primatol. 79, e22681 (2017).
Google Scholar 

68.
Sesink Clee, P. R. et al. Chimpanzee population structure in Cameroon and Nigeria is associated with habitat variation that may be lost under climate change. BMC Evol. Biol. 15, 2 (2015).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

69.
Zinner, D., Wertheimer, J., Liedigk, R., Groeneveld, L. F. & Roos, C. Baboon phylogeny as inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 150, 133–140 (2013).
PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

70.
Jolly, C. J. A proper study for mankind: analogies from the Papionin monkeys and their implications for human evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 116, 177–204 (2001).
Google Scholar 

71.
Wildlife Conservation Society, Center for International Earth Science Information Network & Columbia University. Last of the Wild Project, version 2: global human footprint dataset (geographic). SEDAC https://doi.org/10.7927/H4M61H5F (2005).

72.
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C. & Tily, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lang. 68, 255–278 (2013).
Google Scholar 

73.
Schielzeth, H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol. Evol. 1, 103–113 (2010).
Google Scholar 

74.
McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking: A Bayesian Course with Examples in R and Stan (CRC, 2016).

75.
Bürkner, P.-C. brms: an R package for bayesian multilevel models using stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).
Google Scholar 

76.
Gelman, A. et al. Bayesian Data Analysis 3rd edn (CRC, 2014).

77.
Humle, T., Maisels, F., Oates, J. F., Plumptre, A. & Williamson, E. A. Pan troglodytes. The IUCN red list of threatened species. IUCN https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-2.RLTS.T15933A17964454.en (2018). More