Spalding, M. D. et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: a bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. BioScience 57, 573–583 (2007).
Google Scholar
Awad, A. A., Griffiths, C. L. & Turpie, J. K. Distribution of South African marine benthic invertebrates applied to the selection of priority conservation areas. Divers. Distrib. 8, 129–145 (2002).
Google Scholar
Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai9214 (2017).
Sunday, J. M., Bates, A. E. & Dulvy, N. K. Thermal tolerance and the global redistribution of animals. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 686–690 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wallace, A. R. The Geographical Distribution of Animals, with a Study of the Relations of Living and Extinct Faunas as Elucidating the Past Changes of the Earth’s Surface (Macmillan, 1876).
Holt, B. G. et al. An update of Wallace’s zoogeographic regions of the world. Science 339, 74–78 (2013).
Google Scholar
Ficetola, G. F., Mazel, F. & Thuiller, W. Global determinants of zoogeographical boundaries. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 1, 89 (2017).
Google Scholar
Kocsis, A. T., Reddin, C. J. & Kiessling, W. The stability of coastal benthic biogeography over the last 10 million years. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1106–1120 (2018).
Google Scholar
Zaffosa, A., Finnegan, S. & Peters, S. E. Plate tectonic regulation of global marine animal diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 5653–5658 (2017).
Google Scholar
Costello, M. J. et al. Marine biogeographic realms and species endemicity. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01121-2 (2017).
Beck, J. et al. What’s on the horizon for macroecology? Ecography 35, 673–683 (2012).
Google Scholar
Sunagawa, S. et al. Ocean plankton: structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359 (2015).
Google Scholar
Shade, A. et al. Macroecology to unite all life, large and small. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 731–744 (2018).
Google Scholar
Djurhuus, A. et al. Environmental DNA reveals seasonal shifts and potential interactions in a marine community. Nat. Commun. 11, 254 (2020).
Google Scholar
Richter, D. J. et al. Genomic evidence for global ocean plankton biogeography shaped by large-scale current systems. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/867739 (2019).
Naeem, S., Duffy, J. E. & Zavaleta, E. The functions of biological diversity in an age of extinction. Science 336, 1401–1406 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tilman, D., Isbell, F. & Cowles, J. M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 471–493 (2014).
Google Scholar
Finderup Nielsen, T., Sand-Jensen, K., Dornelas, M. & Bruun, H. H. More is less: net gain in species richness, but biotic homogenization over 140 years. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1650–1657 (2019).
Google Scholar
Blowes, S. A. et al. The geography of biodiversity change in marine and terrestrial assemblages. Science 366, 339–345 (2019).
Google Scholar
Dornelas, M. et al. Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344, 296–299 (2014).
Google Scholar
Olden, J. D. & Rooney, T. P. On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 15, 113–120 (2006).
Google Scholar
Stuart-Smith, R. D. et al. Integrating abundance and functional traits reveals new global hotspots of fish diversity. Nature 501, 539–542 (2013).
Google Scholar
Mouillot, D. et al. Rare species support vulnerable functions in high-diversity ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001569 (2013).
Google Scholar
Bernardo-Madrid, R. et al. Human activity is altering the world’s zoogeographical regions. Ecol. Lett. 22, 1297–1305 (2019).
Google Scholar
Capinha, C., Essl, F., Seebens, H., Moser, D. & Pereira, H. M. The dispersal of alien species redefines biogeography in the Anthropocene. Science 348, 1248–1251 (2015).
Google Scholar
Azam, F. & Malfatti, F. Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 782–791 (2007).
Google Scholar
Deiner, K. et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: transforming how we survey animal and plant communities. Mol. Ecol. 26, 5872–5895 (2017).
Google Scholar
Emanuel, B. P., Bustamante, R. H., Branch, G. M., Eekhout, S. & Odendaal, F. J. A zoogeographic and functional approach to the selection of marine reserves on the west coast of South Africa. South Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 12, 341–354 (1992).
Google Scholar
Griffiths, C. L., Robinson, T. B., Lange, L. & Mead, A. Marine biodiversity in South Africa: an evaluation of current states of knowledge. PLoS ONE 5, e12008 (2010).
Google Scholar
Griffiths, C. L. et al. Impacts of human activities on marine animal life in the Benguela: a historical overview. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 42, 303–392 (2004).
Kaluza, P., Kolzsch, A., Gastner, M. T. & Blasius, B. The complex network of global cargo ship movements. J. R. Soc. Interface 7, 1093–1103 (2010).
Google Scholar
Rapacciuolo, G., Beman, J. M., Schiebelhut, L. M. & Dawson, M. N. Microbes and macro-invertebrates show parallel β-diversity but contrasting α-diversity patterns in a marine natural experiment. Proc. R. Soc. B 286, 20190999 (2019).
Google Scholar
Astorga, A. et al. Distance decay of similarity in freshwater communities: do macro- and microorganisms follow the same rules? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 365–375 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wang, J. et al. Patterns of elevational beta diversity in micro- and macroorganisms. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 743–750 (2012).
Google Scholar
Tittensor, D. P. et al. Global patterns and predictors of marine biodiversity across taxa. Nature 466, 1098–U1107 (2010).
Google Scholar
Herlemann, D. P. et al. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5, 1571–1579 (2011).
Google Scholar
Broman, E. et al. Salinity drives meiofaunal community structure dynamics across the Baltic ecosystem. Mol. Ecol. 28, 3813–3829 (2019).
Google Scholar
Shochat, E., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., McIntyre, N. E. & Hope, D. From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 186–191 (2006).
Google Scholar
Halpern, B. S. et al. Recent pace of change in human impact on the world’s ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 11609 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kelly, R. P. et al. Genetic signatures of ecological diversity along an urbanization gradient. PeerJ 4, e2444 (2016).
Google Scholar
Blouin, D., Pellerin, S. & Poulin, M. Increase in non-native species richness leads to biotic homogenization in vacant lots of a highly urbanized landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 22, 879–892 (2019).
Google Scholar
Holman, L. E. et al. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water. Sci. Rep. 9, 11559 (2019).
Google Scholar
Lima-Mendez, G. et al. Determinants of community structure in the global plankton interactome. Science 348, 1262073 (2015).
Google Scholar
Baas-Becking, L. G. M. Geobiologie; of inleiding tot de milieukunde (WP Van Stockum & Zoon NV, 1934).
Hanson, C. A., Fuhrman, J. A., Horner-Devine, M. C. & Martiny, J. B. Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 497–506 (2012).
Google Scholar
Farjalla, V. F. et al. Ecological determinism increases with organism size. Ecology 93, 1752–1759 (2012).
Google Scholar
Wu, W. X. et al. Contrasting the relative importance of species sorting and dispersal limitation in shaping marine bacterial versus protist communities. ISME J. 12, 485–494 (2018).
Google Scholar
Hellweger, F. L., van Sebille, E. & Fredrick, N. D. Biogeographic patterns in ocean microbes emerge in a neutral agent-based model. Science 345, 1346–1349 (2014).
Google Scholar
Balint, M. et al. Environmental DNA time series in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 945–957 (2018).
Google Scholar
He, K. S. et al. Will remote sensing shape the next generation of species distribution models? Remote Sens. Ecol. Conserv. 1, 4–18 (2015).
Google Scholar
Rius, M. et al. Range expansions across ecoregions: interactions of climate change, physiology and genetic diversity. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 23, 76–88 (2014).
Google Scholar
Spens, J. et al. Comparison of capture and storage methods for aqueous macrobial eDNA using an optimized extraction protocol: advantage of enclosed filter. Methods Ecol. Evol. 8, 635–645 (2017).
Google Scholar
Leray, M. et al. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents. Front. Zool. 10, 34 (2013).
Google Scholar
Zhan, A. et al. High sensitivity of 454 pyrosequencing for detection of rare species in aquatic communities. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 558–565 (2013).
Google Scholar
Takahashi, S., Tomita, J., Nishioka, K., Hisada, T. & Nishijima, M. Development of a prokaryotic universal primer for simultaneous analysis of Bacteria and Archaea using next-generation sequencing. PLoS ONE 9, e105592 (2014).
Google Scholar
Martin, M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J. 17, 10–12 (2011).
Google Scholar
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13, 581–583 (2016).
Google Scholar
R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing v.3.6.1 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019).
Frøslev, T. G. et al. Algorithm for post-clustering curation of DNA amplicon data yields reliable biodiversity estimates. Nat. Commun. 8, 1188 (2017).
Google Scholar
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).
Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. & Hajibabaei, M. Automated high throughput animal CO1 metabarcode classification. Sci. Rep. 8, 4226 (2018).
Google Scholar
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. Updating the 97% identity threshold for 16S ribosomal RNA OTUs. Bioinformatics 34, 2371–2375 (2018).
Google Scholar
Burki, F., Roger, A. J., Brown, M. W. & Simpson, A. G. The new tree of eukaryotes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 35, 43–55 (2020).
Google Scholar
GHRSST Level 4 G1SST Global Foundation Sea Surface Temperature Analysis (JPL_OurOceanProject, 2010); https://doi.org/10.5067/GHG1S-4FP01
Zweng, M. M. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2018, Volume 2: Salinity NOAA Atlas NESDIS 82 (ed. Mishinov, A.) (NESDIS/US Department of Commerce, NOAA, 2019).
Ocean Colour Climate Change Initiative Dataset Version 4.2 (European Space Agency, 2020).
Anderson, M. J. in Wiley Stats Ref: Statistics Reference Online (eds Balakrishnan, N. et al.) 1–15 (John Wiley & Sons, 2014).
Oksanen, J. et al. Vegan: Community ecology package. R package version 2.5–6 (2011).
Kreft, H. & Jetz, W. A framework for delineating biogeographical regions based on species distributions. J. Biogeogr. 37, 2029–2053 (2010).
Google Scholar
Salazar, G. EcolUtils: Utilities for community ecology analysis. R package version 0.1 (2018).
Anderson, M. J. Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62, 245–253 (2006).
Google Scholar
Crabot, J., Clappe, S., Dray, S. & Datry, T. Testing the Mantel statistic with a spatially-constrained permutation procedure. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 532–540 (2019).
Google Scholar
McArdle, B. H. & Anderson, M. J. Fitting multivariate models to community data: a comment on distance-based redundancy analysis. Ecology 82, 290–297 (2001).
Google Scholar
Source: Ecology - nature.com
