Ecology

Bacterial density and growth potential in the rearing water were related to the microbial carrying capacityQuantifying the bacterial density in each tank verified that we obtained a higher bacterial load in the systems with added organic material. The bacterial density was, on average, 7.8× higher in the systems with high compared to low bacterial carrying capacity. This difference was particularly evident at 2 (34.8×, Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.0008) and 9 DPH (9.1×, Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.0007) (Fig. 1). The bacterial density increased throughout the experiment for the tanks with low microbial carrying capacity (treatment group MMS−, FTS−), reflecting increased larval feeding and defecation. Contrastingly, the bacterial density was relatively stable over time in the MMS+ treatment and even decreased over time in the FTS+ treatment. When averaging the densities at 11 and 15 DPH within each rearing treatment, we observed that the ‘MMS+ to FTS+’ had a considerable difference in the bacterial density between incoming and rearing water (24.2×). In contrast, this difference was below 8.2× in all other treatment tanks. Such differences in density indicated that some communities were below the microbial carrying capacity of the systems. We thus investigated the growth potential to determine if carrying capacity was reached in the rearing water.Figure 1Bacterial density (million bacterial cells mL−1) at various days post-hatching (DPH) in incoming and rearing tank water. Note that the y-axis is log scaled. Colours indicate the rearing treatment, and shape signifies rearing (filled circle) and incoming water (filled triangle).Full size imageThe bacterial net growth potential in the intake and rearing water was quantified as the number of cell doublings after incubation for 3 days11. Generally, the FTS− and MMS− rearing water had net growth potential with an average of 0.2 and 0.1, respectively (Supplementary Fig. 2). In contrast, the rearing water of the FTS+ and MMS+ had a negative net growth potential with averages of −0.2 and −0.06, respectively. In the case of negative net growth potential, the bacterial density decreased during the incubation. A negative net growth potential suggested that the rearing water bacterial communities were at the tank’s microbial carrying capacity at the time of sampling. Thus, the bacterial communities were at the carrying capacity of the high (+) carrying capacity systems and below in the low (−) systems. To gain a deeper understanding of the bacterial community characteristics the 16S rRNA gene of the bacterial community was sequenced at 1 and 9 DPH.Initial rearing condition did not leave a legacy effect on bacterial α-diversityThe bacterial α-diversity of the rearing water was investigated at 1 and 12 DPH (Fig. 2). At 1 DPH, the richness was comparable between the FTS−, FTS+ and MMS+ treatments, but on average, 1.5× higher for the MMS− treatment (307 vs 205 ASVs, Tukey’s test p  More

G.M., L.O.A., L.V.G. and L.E.O.C.A. thank the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for funding (grants 2019/25701-8, 2020/08916-8, 2016/02018-2 and 2020/15230-5, respectively). L.O.A. and L.E.O.C.A. thank the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for funding (grants 314473/2020-3 and 314416/2020-0, respectively). G.d.O. thanks the University of South Alabama Faculty Development Council Grant for funding (grant 279600-2022). More

Using a robust recent dataset, our analyses show that cocoa production is significantly affected by the maximum magnitude of ENSO phase during the current and previous purchase years (Fig. 2). The instantaneous effect is negative, followed by delayed positive effects in the two following years and negative in the third following year, combining to give a picture of multi-year fluctuations in cocoa production as a result of El Niño/La Niña events. Using a 70-year dataset, we show significant changes in these instantaneous and delayed ENSO-production relationships between recent and past time periods (Fig. 3). Using ERA5 data for the cocoa production area of Ghana, summarised at the same temporal resolution as the production data, we demonstrate significant relationships between ENSO phase and climate, with significant changes in mean climate and in ENSO-climate relationships (Fig. 4) between recent and past time periods. This agrees with prior work suggesting that ENSO may impact West Africa5,15, despite no current evidence of teleconnections between ENSO phase and West African climate17.Our 70-year production dataset represents a temporal extent unmatched by other research, however was aggregated to fewer replicates than the 21-year analysis (6 regions vs 68 districts). While this may represent reduced power, results from the overlapping time period of the two datasets strongly agree. The computation of yield, a more comparable metric between different-sized areas than total production, was not possible because data on area under production (AUP) were not available. However, the detrending process employed successfully eliminated variation between districts or regions (of which AUP is likely a substantial component) and long-term technological trends that would otherwise confound our ability to isolate the ENSO signal (Supplementary results).Perennial crops have multi-year growing patterns, with allocation of resources to growth, development and reproduction driven by climate in ways that are not fully understood29. ENSO generally peaks between October and December, also the busiest cocoa purchase period: thus we observe a relatively instantaneous apparent effect of ENSO phase on cocoa production. This reduction in cocoa production under El Niño inis consistent with results from farm monitoring8 and large-scale farm surveys30 evidencing production declines in from other regions (where teleconnections are understood), and with analyses of production data from West Africa31. During the main cocoa purchase period, coinciding with the minor wet and major dry seasons, we observe increases in water deficit during El Niño, leading to drought stress conditions. In small-scale cocoa studies, drought stress is correlated with reduction in pod production and increased tree mortality8,32, and in similar studies of other tree crops drought is directly linked to reduction in fruit or nut production33, although in all cases the mechanisms are unclear. Drought may generally create unfavourable conditions for growth and reproduction through reduced availability of water for vital processes, or more specifically by promoting disease incidence and pod rot8, increasing the chance of fire, increasing competition for soil moisture32, and/or reducing pollinator populations34. Alternatively, cocoa may respond to reduced water availability by reallocation of resources away from energetically expensive reproduction: rainfall exclusion experiments suggest that in the medium term, while bean production drops, vegetative growth is not significantly reduced during drought32.The significant increases in mean temperature and average drought stress we observed in some seasons over time is such that the climate experienced during El Niño events in recent decades represent novel extreme conditions for Ghana’s cocoa agriculture. This causes significant changes in the responses of cocoa production to ENSO phase over the same time period. One explanation for this may be that the warm, dry El Niño conditions in Ghana in the past were within the environmental tolerance of cocoa, leading to allocation of resources to reproduction in response to drought, increasing cocoa bean production and resulting in less severe instantaneous and delayed responses to ENSO phase (Fig. 3a–d) However, in recent decades this level or greater drought stress has become the norm (Fig. 4i–l), with El Niño conditions apparently triggering a different response mode, allocating resources away from reproduction in the short term and creating oscillating resource allocation over the following years.However, understanding the delayed responses of cocoa is challenging, especially as these represent a novel finding. There is little research that explores multi-annual physiological or ecological responses of cocoa to drought, and the explanation is likely to be a combination of both residual/delayed climatic responses to ENSO phase, and of life history strategies. The observed increase in production during the two years following El Niño may be explained by post-drought reallocation of resources to reproduction as remediation for lost reproductive output in the instantaneous response, or a shift to a ‘faster’ strategy by allocating resources to reproduction over the longer term, becoming evident in the data in subsequent years. Alternatively, this may be explained by favourable climatic conditions occurring during an El Niño event that impact the following years’ crop. March and April is a crucial time for cocoa pod development in Ghana and in recent years El Niño appears to bring greater rainfall during these months. Given the 6–9 months development of cocoa beans, the effects of this increased rainfall and reduced water deficit on cocoa production will be seen in the delayed response. We see evidence of this in the climate-change driven reversal of March–April rainfall patterns: while in the past El Niño has consistently resulted in drought stress, this reversal provides a respite from drought, buffering trees from reduced rainfall during the major wet season and giving sufficient resources for improved production in the following year.The robustness of our results provide evidence that may aid development of resilience strategies for ENSO-driven cocoa production variation in Ghana, but we may also consider whether these results can be generalised to the production of cocoa and/or perennial tree crops globally. The climatic impact of ENSO observed in Ghana is broadly consistent with many regions of the tropics2, the instantaneous cocoa production responses to El Niño are consistent with findings in these regions, and so we may expect these regions to see a similar pattern of multi-annual cocoa production variation in response to ENSO phase. However, there is considerable variation in ENSO responses among and within other perennial tree crops in regions where climatic responses to ENSO are similar to Ghana. Oil palm yields have been negatively associated with ENSO phase in Malaysia9, as have olive yields in Morocco (delayed by a year)33. Conversely, apple yields have been positively associated with ENSO phase in China10, as have coffee yields in Brazil35; however, no effect at all is seen in coffee in India over a 35-year time series7. Most of these analyses considered only a single ENSO phase (usually El Niño), and most considered only instantaneous impacts. However, it is clear that most of these crops do respond to ENSO, and given the shared biology it is reasonable to assume that delayed effects of ENSO phase are likely and should be considered to understand the full picture of ENSO impacts on perennial tree crops.The larger body of research into ENSO impacts on annual crops includes many studies using long time series, reporting high heterogeneity in space and among crops11,36,37. However, there appears to be little examination of changes in the direction and magnitude of ENSO responses over time; thus our findings are timely and signal that further research is needed to examine how changing climates may force novel extreme climatic conditions and shift response patterns to ENSO phase. Given that perennial tree crops are generally cash crops, and the utility of these crops to farmers are to a greater or lesser extent mediated by market forces, there is a need for improved forecasting of yield in response to changing climate and ENSO patterns to withstand production fluctuations. The low perishability of many perennial tree crops means that with accurate forecasting, supply may be managed or even exploited to ensure consistency of income both for farmers and those whose livelihoods depend on related food manufacturing industries.Our approach to understanding the responses of a perennial tree crop to ENSO phase and anthropogenic climate change exploited existing global, national and subnational datasets for climate and production with appropriate spatial and temporal resolution. We use freely available geographic and climate data, and employ highly replicable methods: a simple pipeline of climate data aggregation and summary computation, coupled with standard detrending and straightforward analytical methods with a relatively small computational requirement. This “big data” approach to agriculture-climate research demonstrates a relatively straightforward framework for understanding responses of agricultural productivity to climate and identifying temporal changes in these relationships. While small-scale studies examine the mechanisms of climate impacts through the interacting effects of agricultural practices, abiotic conditions, disease incidence and multi-trophic interactions, large-scale studies across regions and over time scales encompassing many ENSO oscillations are required to understand the global picture of perennial tree crop production security. Combined with local context-specific studies on governance arrangements16, such approaches could be crucial for reducing future vulnerability of these industries to increasing volatility under anthropogenic climate change. The main barrier to this research is the availability of production data from state or commercial entities. More

Bardgett, R. D. et al. Combatting global grassland degradation. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 2, 720–735 (2021)Reichstein, M. et al. Climate extremes and the carbon cycle. Nature 500, 287–295 (2013).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Seneviratne, S. I. et al. Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. In Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge University Press, 2021).Pretty, J. et al. Global assessment of agricultural system redesign for sustainable intensification. Nat. Sustain 1, 441–446 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Allan, E. et al. Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol. Lett. 18, 834–843 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bardgett, R. D. & Cook, R. Functional aspects of soil animal diversity in agricultural grasslands. Appl. Soil Ecol. 10, 263–276 (1998).
Google Scholar 
Postma-Blaauw, M. B., de Goede, R. G. M., Bloem, J., Faber, J. H. & Brussaard, L. Soil biota community structure and abundance under agricultural intensification and extensification. Ecology 91, 460–473 (2010).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vályi, K., Rillig, M. C. & Hempel, S. Land-use intensity and host plant identity interactively shape communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in roots of grassland plants. N. Phytologist 205, 1577–1586 (2015).
Google Scholar 
de Vries, F. T., Hoffland, E., van Eekeren, N., Brussaard, L. & Bloem, J. Fungal/bacterial ratios in grasslands with contrasting nitrogen management. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 2092–2103 (2006).
Google Scholar 
de Vries, F. T. et al. Extensive Management Promotes Plant and Microbial Nitrogen Retention in Temperate Grassland. PLoS ONE 7, e51201 (2012).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
de Vries, F. T., van Groenigen, J. W., Hoffland, E. & Bloem, J. Nitrogen losses from two grassland soils with different fungal biomass. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 997–1005 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Malik, A. A. et al. Soil fungal: bacterial ratios are linked to altered carbon cycling. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1247 (2016).Bardgett, R. D., Streeter, T. C. & Bol, R. Soil Microbes Compete Effectively with Plants for Organic-Nitrogen Inputs to Temperate Grasslands. Ecology 84, 1277–1287 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Bardgett, R. D. & McAlister, E. The measurement of soil fungal:bacterial biomass ratios as an indicator of ecosystem self-regulation in temperate meadow grasslands. Biol. Fertil. Soils 29, 282–290 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Gordon, H., Haygarth, P. M. & Bardgett, R. D. Drying and rewetting effects on soil microbial community composition and nutrient leaching. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40, 302–311 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Duffy, J. E. et al. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: incorporating trophic complexity. Ecol. Lett. 10, 522–538 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, S. & Brose, U. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in food webs: the vertical diversity hypothesis. Ecol. Lett. 21, 9–20 (2018).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ruf, A., Kuzyakov, Y. & Lopatovskaya, O. Carbon fluxes in soil food webs of increasing complexity revealed by C-14 labelling and C-13 natural abundance. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 2390–2400 (2006).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Pollierer, M. M., Langel, R., Koerner, C., Maraun, M. & Scheu, S. The underestimated importance of belowground carbon input for forest soil animal food webs. Ecol. Lett. 10, 729–736 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Eissfeller, V. et al. Incorporation of plant carbon and microbial nitrogen into the rhizosphere food web of beech and ash. Soil Biol. Biochem. 62, 76–81 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Gilbert, K. J. et al. Exploring carbon flow through the root channel in a temperate forest soil food web. Soil Biol. Biochem. 76, 45–52 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Goncharov, A. A., Tsurikov, S. M., Potapov, A. M. & Tiunov, A. V. Short-term incorporation of freshly fixed plant carbon into the soil animal food web: field study in a spruce forest. Ecol. Res. 31, 923–933 (2016).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chomel, M. et al. Drought decreases incorporation of recent plant photosynthate into soil food webs regardless of their trophic complexity. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 3549–3561 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Moore, J. C., de Ruiter, P. C. & Hunt, H. W. Influence of productivity on the stability of real and model ecosystems. Science 261, 906–908 (1993).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
de Ruiter, P. C., Neutel, A.-M. & Moore, J. C. Energetics, Patterns of Interaction Strengths, and Stability in Real Ecosystems. Science 269, 1257–1260 (1995).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rooney, N., McCann, K., Gellner, G. & Moore, J. C. Structural asymmetry and the stability of diverse food webs. Nature 442, 265–269 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rooney, N. & McCann, K. S. Integrating food web diversity, structure and stability. Trends Ecol. Evolution 27, 40–46 (2012).
Google Scholar 
de Vries, F. T. et al. Land use alters the resistance and resilience of soil food webs to drought. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 276 (2012).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ingrisch, J. et al. Land Use Alters the Drought Responses of Productivity and CO2 Fluxes in Mountain Grassland. Ecosystems 21, 689–703 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Karlowsky, S. et al. Land use in mountain grasslands alters drought response and recovery of carbon allocation and plant‐microbial interactions. J. Ecol. 106, 1230–1243 (2017).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Vilonen, L., Ross, M. & Smith, M. D. What happens after drought ends: synthesizing terms and definitions. N. Phytologist 235, 420–431 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Ingrisch, J., Karlowsky, S., Hasibeder, R., Gleixner, G. & Bahn, M. Drought and recovery effects on belowground respiration dynamics and the partitioning of recent carbon in managed and abandoned grassland. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 4366–4378 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ward, S. E. et al. Legacy effects of grassland management on soil carbon to depth. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2929–2938 (2016).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Henry, C. et al. A stomatal safety-efficiency trade-off constrains responses to leaf dehydration. Nat. Commun. 10, 3398 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Baptist, F. et al. 13C and 15N allocations of two alpine species from early and late snowmelt locations reflect their different growth strategies. J. Exp. Bot. 60, 2725–2735 (2009).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bergmann, J. et al. The fungal collaboration gradient dominates the root economics space in plants. Sci. Adv. 6, eaba3756 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Williams, A. et al. Root functional traits explain root exudation rate and composition across a range of grassland species. J. Ecol. 110, 21–33 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Deyn, G. B. D., Quirk, H., Oakley, S., Ostle, N. J. & Bartgett, R. D. Rapid transfer of photosynthetic carbon through the plant-soil system in differently managed species-rich grasslands. Biogeosciences 8, 1131–1139 (2011).Pausch, J. et al. Small but active – pool size does not matter for carbon incorporation in below‐ground food webs.Functional Ecol. 30, 479–489 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Morriën, E. et al. Soil networks become more connected and take up more carbon as nature restoration progresses. Nat. Commun. 8, 14349 (2017).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Li, Z. et al. The flux of root-derived carbon via fungi and bacteria into soil microarthropods (Collembola) differs markedly between cropping systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 160, 108336 (2021).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Joergensen, R. Ergosterol and microbial biomass in the rhizosphere of grassland soils. Soil Biol. Biogeochemistry 32, 647–652 (2000).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Staddon, P. L., Ramsey, C. B., Ostle, N., Ineson, P. & Fitter, A. H. Rapid Turnover of Hyphae of Mycorrhizal Fungi Determined by AMS Microanalysis of 14C. Science 300, 1138–1140 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, D., Leake, J. R., Ostle, N., Ineson, P. & Read, D. J. In situ 13CO2 pulse-labelling of upland grassland demonstrates a rapid pathway of carbon flux from arbuscular mycorrhizal mycelia to the soil. N. Phytologist 153, 327–334 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Johnson, D., Leake, J. R. & Read, D. J. Transfer of recent photosynthate into mycorrhizal mycelium of an upland grassland: short-term respiratory losses and accumulation of C-14. Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1521–1524 (2002).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Schimel, J., Balser, T. C. & Wallenstein, M. Microbial Stress-Response Physiology and Its Implications for Ecosystem Function. Ecology 88, 1386–1394 (2007).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Strickland, M. S. & Rousk, J. Considering fungal:bacterial dominance in soils – Methods, controls, and ecosystem implications. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 1385–1395 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Manzoni, S., Schimel, J. P. & Porporato, A. Responses of soil microbial communities to water stress: results from a meta-analysis. Ecology 93, 930–938 (2012).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Holden, S. R. & Treseder, K. K. A meta-analysis of soil microbial biomass responses to forest disturbances. Front Microbiol 4, 163 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Guhr, A., Borken, W., Spohn, M. & Matzner, E. Redistribution of soil water by a saprotrophic fungus enhances carbon mineralization. PNAS 112, 14647–14651 (2015).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
de Vries, F. T. et al. Soil bacterial networks are less stable under drought than fungal networks. Nat. Commun. 9, 3033 (2018).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Allen, M. F. Mycorrhizal Fungi: Highways for Water and Nutrients in Arid Soils. Vadose Zone J. 6, 291–297 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Kakouridis, A. et al. Routes to roots: direct evidence of water transport by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to host plants. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.21.305409 (2020).Leake, J. R., Ostle, N. J., Rangel-Castro, J. I. & Johnson, D. Carbon fluxes from plants through soil organisms determined by field 13CO2 pulse-labelling in an upland grassland. Appl. Soil Ecol. 33, 152–175 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Maaß, S., Migliorini, M., Rillig, M. C. & Caruso, T. Disturbance, neutral theory, and patterns of beta diversity in soil communities. Ecol. Evolution 4, 4766–4774 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Barnard, R. L., Osborne, C. A. & Firestone, M. K. Changing precipitation pattern alters soil microbial community response to wet-up under a Mediterranean-type climate. ISME J. 9, 946–957 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lennon, J. T. & Jones, S. E. Microbial seed banks: the ecological and evolutionary implications of dormancy. Nat. Rev. Microbiol 9, 119–130 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Meisner, A., Bååth, E. & Rousk, J. Microbial growth responses upon rewetting soil dried for four days or one year. Soil Biol. Biochem. 66, 188–192 (2013).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Meisner, A., Rousk, J. & Bååth, E. Prolonged drought changes the bacterial growth response to rewetting. Soil Biol. Biochem. 88, 314–322 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Blazewicz, S. J., Schwartz, E. & Firestone, M. K. Growth and death of bacteria and fungi underlie rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses from seasonally dried soil. Ecology 95, 1162–1172 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Butterbach-Bahl, K., Baggs, E. M., Dannenmann, M., Kiese, R. & Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 368, 20130122 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Baggs, E. M., Rees, R. M., Smith, K. A. & Vinten, A. J. A. Nitrous oxide emission from soils after incorporating crop residues. Soil Use & Manag. 16, 82–87 (2000).
Google Scholar 
Le Roux, X., Bardy, M., Loiseau, P. & Louault, F. Stimulation of soil nitrification and denitrification by grazing in grasslands: do changes in plant species composition matter? Oecologia 137, 417–425 (2003).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Morley, N. & Baggs, E. M. Carbon and oxygen controls on N2O and N2 production during nitrate reduction. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42, 1864–1871 (2010).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Davidson, E. A. & Kanter, D. Inventories and scenarios of nitrous oxide emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 9, 105012 (2014).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Bateman, E. J. & Baggs, E. M. Contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions from soils at different water-filled pore space. Biol. Fertil. Soils 41, 379–388 (2005).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Lehmann, J., Bossio, D. A., Kögel-Knabner, I. & Rillig, M. C. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nat. Rev. Earth Environ. 1, 544–553 (2020).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Knapp, A. K. et al. Pushing precipitation to the extremes in distributed experiments: recommendations for simulating wet and dry years. Glob. Change Biol. 23, 1774–1782 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Cole, A. J. et al. Grassland biodiversity restoration increases resistance of carbon fluxes to drought. J. Appl. Ecol. 56, 1806–1816 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Fuchslueger, L., Bahn, M., Fritz, K., Hasibeder, R. & Richter, A. Experimental drought reduces the transfer of recently fixed plant carbon to soil microbes and alters the bacterial community composition in a mountain meadow. N. Phytologist 201, 916–927 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Buyer, J. S. & Sasser, M. High throughput phospholipid fatty acid analysis of soils. Appl. Soil Ecol. 61, 127–130 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Frostegård, Å., Bååth, E. & Tunlio, A. Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25, 723–730 (1993).
Google Scholar 
Olsson, P. A., Thingstrup, I., Jakobsen, I. & Bååth, E. Estimation of the biomass of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a linseed field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1879–1887 (1999).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Hopkin, S. P. A key to the Collembola (springtails) of Britain and Ireland (FSC, 2007).Krantz, G. W. & Walter, D. E. A manual of acarology (Texas Tech Universty Press, 2009).Caruso, T. & Migliorini, M. Euclidean geometry explains why lengths allow precise body mass estimates in terrestrial invertebrates: The case of oribatid mites. J. Theor. Biol. 256, 436–440 (2009).ADS 
MathSciNet 
CAS 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Ganihar, S. R. Biomass estimates of terrestrial arthropods based on body length. J. Biosci. 22, 219–224 (1997).
Google Scholar 
Johnson, D., Vachon, J., Britton, A. J. & Helliwell, R. C. Drought alters carbon fluxes in alpine snowbed ecosystems through contrasting impacts on graminoids and forbs. N. Phytologist 190, 740–749 (2011).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Legendre, P. & Gallagher, E. D. Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129, 271–280 (2001).ADS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Anderson, M. J. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26, 32–46 (2001).
Google Scholar 
Anderson, M. J. Distance-Based Tests for Homogeneity of Multivariate Dispersions. Biometrics 62, 245–253 (2006).MathSciNet 
PubMed 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Zuur, A., Ieno, E., Walker, N., Saveliev, A. & Smith, G. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. (Springer, 2009). More

Barbier, E. B. Marine ecosystem services. Curr. Biol. 27, R507–R510 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Liquete, C., Piroddi, C., Macías, D., Druon, J.-N. & Zulian, G. Ecosystem services sustainability in the Mediterranean Sea: Assessment of status and trends using multiple modelling approaches. Sci. Rep. 6, 34162 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Halpern, B. S. et al. Recent pace of change in human impact on the world’s ocean. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–8 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Duarte, C. M. et al. Rebuilding marine life. Nature 580, 39–51 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Long, R. D., Charles, A. & Stephenson, R. L. Key principles of marine ecosystem-based management. Mar. Policy 57, 53–60 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Link, J. S. & Browman, H. I. Operationalizing and implementing ecosystem-based management. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 74, 379–381 (2017).
Google Scholar 
EC. A Farm to Fork Strategy for a Fair, Healthy and Environmentally-Friendly Food System. Brussels: European Commission. (2020).EC. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, “Pathway to a healthy planet for all” with the sub-title “EU action Plan: ’Towards zero pollution for air, water and soil, COM (2021) 400. (2021).EC. The European Green Deal. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM (2019) 640. (2019).Alexander, K. & Haward, M. The human side of marine ecosystem-based management (EBM): ‘Sectoral interplay’ as a challenge to implementing EBM. Mar. Policy 101, 33–38 (2019).
Google Scholar 
EC. The EU Blue Economy Report 2021. (2021).Ostlaender, N. et al. Modelling Inventory and Knowledge Man-agement System of the European Commission (MIDAS) (Publications Office of the European Union, 2019).
Google Scholar 
Friedland, R. et al. Effects of nutrient management scenarios on marine eutrophication indicators: A Pan-European, multi-model assessment in support of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 596126 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Piroddi, C. et al. Effects of nutrient management scenarios on marine food webs: A Pan-European Assessment in support of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 179 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Corrales, X. et al. Multi-zone marine protected areas: Assessment of ecosystem and fisheries benefits using multiple ecosystem models. Ocean Coast. Manag. 193, 105232 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Bentley, J. W. et al. Refining fisheries advice with stock-specific ecosystem information. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 602072 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Steenbeek, J. et al. Making spatial-temporal marine ecosystem modelling better—A perspective. Environ. Model. Softw. 145, 105209 (2021).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Heymans, J. J. et al. The ocean decade: A true ecosystem modelling challenge. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 554573 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Hernvann, P.-Y. et al. The Celtic sea through time and space: Ecosystem modeling to unravel fishing and climate change impacts on food-web structure and dynamics. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1018 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Christensen, V. & Walters, C. J. Ecopath with Ecosim: Methods, capabilities and limitations. Ecol. Model. 172, 109–139 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Steenbeek, J. et al. Bridging the gap between ecosystem modeling tools and geographic information systems: Driving a food web model with external spatial–temporal data. Ecol. Model. 263, 139–151 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Christensen, V. et al. Representing variable habitat quality in a spatial food web model. Ecosystems 17, 1397–1412 (2014).CAS 

Google Scholar 
de Mutsert, K., Lewis, K., Milroy, S., Buszowski, J. & Steenbeek, J. Using ecosystem modeling to evaluate trade-offs in coastal management: Effects of large-scale river diversions on fish and fisheries. Ecol. Model. 360, 14–26 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Serpetti, N. et al. Modelling small scale impacts of Multi-Purpose Platforms: An ecosystem approach. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 778 (2021).
Google Scholar 
DFO. Technical review of Roberts Bank Terminal 2 environmental assessment: section 10.3—assessing ecosystem productivity. DFO Can. Sci. Advis. Sec. Sci. Resp. 2016/050 (2016).Coll, M., Pennino, M. G., Steenbeek, J., Solé, J. & Bellido, J. M. Predicting marine species distributions: Complementarity of food-web and Bayesian hierarchical modelling approaches. Ecol. Model. 405, 86–101 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Coll, M. et al. The biodiversity of the Mediterranean Sea: Estimates, patterns, and threats. PLoS One 5, e11842 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Coll, M. et al. The Mediterranean Sea under siege: Spatial overlap between marine biodiversity, cumulative threats and marine reserves. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 21, 465–480 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Micheli, F. et al. Cumulative human impacts on mediterranean and black sea marine ecosystems: Assessing current pressures and opportunities. PLoS One 8, e79889 (2013).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Piroddi, C., Colloca, F. & Tsikliras, A. C. The living marine resources in the Mediterranean Sea large marine ecosystem. Environ. Dev. 36, 100555 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Barale, V. & Gade, M. Remote Sensing of the European Seas. (Springer, 2008).Siokou-Frangou, I. et al. Plankton in the open Mediterranean Sea: A review. Biogeosciences 7, 1543–1586 (2010).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Spalding, M. D. et al. Marine ecoregions of the world: A bioregionalization of coastal and shelf areas. Bioscience 57, 573–583 (2007).
Google Scholar 
Bianchi, C. N. et al. In Life in the Mediterranean Sea: A Look at Habitat Changes, vol. 1 55 (2012).Danovaro, R. et al. Deep-sea biodiversity in the Mediterranean Sea: The known, the unknown, and the unknowable. PLoS One 5, e11832 (2010).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Moullec, F. et al. Capturing the big picture of Mediterranean marine biodiversity with an end-to-end model of climate and fishing impacts. Prog. Oceanogr. 178, 102179 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Macias, D., Garcia-Gorriz, E., Piroddi, C. & Stips, A. Biogeochemical control of marine productivity in the Mediterranean Sea during the last 50 years. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 28, 897–907 (2014).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Piroddi, C. et al. Historical changes of the Mediterranean Sea ecosystem: Modelling the role and impact of primary productivity and fisheries changes over time. Sci. Rep. 7, 44491 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Lotze, H. K. et al. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 312, 1806–1809 (2006).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Lotze, H. K., Coll, M. & Dunne, J. A. Historical changes in marine resources, food-web structure and ecosystem functioning in the Adriatic Sea, Mediterranean. Ecosystems 14, 198–222 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Macias, D., Huertas, I. E., Garcia-Gorriz, E. & Stips, A. Non-Redfieldian dynamics driven by phytoplankton phosphate frugality explain nutrient and chlorophyll patterns in model simulations for the Mediterranean Sea. Prog. Oceanogr. 173, 37–50 (2019).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Spedicato, M. T. et al. The MEDITS trawl survey specifications in an ecosystem approach to fishery management. Sci. Mar. 83, 9–20 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Corrales, X. et al. Hindcasting the dynamics of an Eastern Mediterranean marine ecosystem under the impacts of multiple stressors. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 580, 17–36 (2017).ADS 

Google Scholar 
FAO. The State of the Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries (General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCM), 2020).Ferrà, C. et al. Mapping change in bottom trawling activity in the Mediterranean Sea through AIS data. Mar. Policy 94, 275–281 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Russo, T. et al. Trends in effort and yield of trawl fisheries: A case study from the Mediterranean Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 6, 153 (2019).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Ramírez, F., Coll, M., Navarro, J., Bustamante, J. & Green, A. J. Spatial congruence between multiple stressors in the Mediterranean Sea may reduce its resilience to climate impacts. Sci. Rep. 8, 1–8 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Coll, M., Steenbeek, J., Ben Rais Lasram, F., Mouillot, D. & Cury, P. ‘Low-hanging fruit’ for conservation of marine vertebrate species at risk in the Mediterranean Sea. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 24, 226–239 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Ruiz, J. et al. “Strengthening regional cooperation in the area of large pelagic fishery data collection (RECOLAPE)”, Annex III “Biological data collection for fisheries on highly migratory species” (2019).Boerder, K., Schiller, L. & Worm, B. Not all who wander are lost: Improving spatial protection for large pelagic fishes. Mar. Policy 105, 80–90 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Giakoumi, S. et al. Conserving European biodiversity across realms. Conserv. Lett. 12, e12586 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Gascuel, D. & Cheung, W. W. In Predicting Future Oceans 79–85 (Elsevier, 2019).Macias, D., Garcia-Gorriz, E. & Stips, A. Major fertilization sources and mechanisms for Mediterranean Sea coastal ecosystems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 63, 897–914 (2018).ADS 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Alvarez-Berastegui, D., Tugores, M., Ottmann, D., Martín-Quetglas, M. & Reglero, P. Bluefin tuna larval indices in the Western Mediterranean, ecological and analytical sources of uncertainty. Collect. Vol. Sci. Pap. ICCAT. 77, 289–311 (2020).
Google Scholar 
ICCAT. 2020 SCRS Advice to the Commission (Madrid, Spain, 2020).Clavel-Henry, M., Piroddi, C., Quattrocchi, F., Macias, D. & Christensen, V. Spatial distribution and abundance of mesopelagic fish biomass in the Mediterranean Sea. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 1136 (2020).
Google Scholar 
García-Ruiz, C. et al. Spatio-temporal patterns of macrourid fish species in the northern Mediterranean Sea. Sci. Mar. 83, 117–127 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Ainsworth, C. Quantifying species abundance trends in the Northern Gulf of California using local ecological knowledge. Mar. Coast. Fish. 3, 190–218 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Morris, E. K. et al. Choosing and using diversity indices: Insights for ecological applications from the German Biodiversity Exploratories. Ecol. Evol. 4, 3514–3524 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Coll, M. et al. Ecological indicators to capture the effects of fishing on biodiversity and conservation status of marine ecosystems. Ecol. Ind. 60, 947–962 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Swartz, W., Sala, E., Tracey, S., Watson, R. & Pauly, D. The spatial expansion and ecological footprint of fisheries (1950 to present). PLoS One 5, e15143 (2010).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Damasio, L. M., Peninno, M. G. & Lopes, P. F. Small changes, big impacts: Geographic expansion in small-scale fisheries. Fish. Res. 226, 105533 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Coll, M. et al. Assessing fishing and marine biodiversity changes using fishers’ perceptions: The Spanish Mediterranean and Gulf of Cadiz case study. PLoS One 9, e85670 (2014).ADS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tsikliras, A. C., Dinouli, A., Tsiros, V.-Z. & Tsalkou, E. The Mediterranean and Black Sea fisheries at risk from overexploitation. PLoS ONE 10, e0121188 (2015).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pittman, S. et al. Seascape ecology: Identifying research priorities for an emerging ocean sustainability science. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 663, 1–29 (2021).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Kritzer, J. P. & Liu, O. R. In Stock Identification Methods 29–57 (Elsevier, 2014).Piroddi, C., Heymans, J. J., Macias, D., Gregoire, M. & Townsend, H. Editorial: Using ecological models to support and shape environmental policy decisions. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.815313 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Macias, D. et al. JRC marine modelling framework in support of the marine strategy framework directive: Inventory of models, basin configurations and datasets. Update 2018. (2018).Piante, C. & Ody, D. Blue Growth in the Mediterranean Sea: The Challenge of Good Environmental Status. 192 (France, 2015).Borja, A. et al. Past and future grand challenges in marine ecosystem ecology. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 362 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Claudet, J., Loiseau, C., Sostres, M. & Zupan, M. Underprotected marine protected areas in a global biodiversity hotspot. One Earth 2, 380–384 (2020).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Piroddi, C., Coll, M., Steenbeek, J., Moy, D. M. & Christensen, V. Modelling the Mediterranean marine ecosystem as a whole: Addressing the challenge of complexity. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 533, 47–65 (2015).ADS 

Google Scholar 
Walters, C., Pauly, D. & Christensen, V. Ecospace: Prediction of mesoscale spatial patterns in trophic relationships of exploited ecosystems, with emphasis on the impacts of marine protected areas. Ecosystems 2, 539–554 (1999).
Google Scholar 
Christensen, V., Walters, C., Pauly, D. & Forrest, R. Ecopath with Ecosim 6: A User’s Guide (University of British Columbia, 2008).
Google Scholar 
Kaschner, K. et al. AquaMaps: Predicted range maps for aquatic species. In World Wide Web Electronic Publication, www.aquamaps.org, Version, vol. 8, 2016 (2016).De Mutsert, K., Lewis, K. A., White, E. D. & Buszowski, J. End-to-End modeling reveals species-specific effects of large-scale coastal restoration on living resources facing climate change. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 104 (2021).
Google Scholar 
Coll, M. et al. Advancing global ecological modeling capabilities to simulate future trajectories of change in marine ecosystems. Front. Mar. Sci. 741, 567877 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Shannon, C. & Weaver, W. (Univ. Illinois Press, 1949).Ainsworth, C. H. & Pitcher, T. J. Modifying Kempton’s species diversity index for use with ecosystem simulation models. Ecol. Ind. 6, 623–630 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Coll, M. & Steenbeek, J. Standardized ecological indicators to assess aquatic food webs: The ECOIND software plug-in for Ecopath with Ecosim models. Environ. Model. Softw. 89, 120–130 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Taconet, M., Kroodsma, D. & Fernandes, J. Global Atlas of AIS-Based Fishing Activity—Challenges and Opportunities (2021). More

Notwithstanding constraints on the amount of hard data, according to our integrated analysis, the developmental environment and ecology of reef communities have an important impact on the appearance of reefs.Analysis of environmental conditions for reef developmentSettings of reef developmentThe F/F extinction event in Late Devonian caused the complete recession of the reef-building communities based on stromatoporoid-coral assemblages7,17. The Carboniferous is generally considered to be a sub-optimal period for the development of framed reefs. After the biological mass extinction, microorganisms and algae rebuilt new reef-building ecosystems18,19. Some short-term biological frame reefs developed with low diversity, limited reef-building organisms, small sizes, and restricted distribution20. Harsh climate and marine conditions occurred in the Mississippian, including extensive marine hypoxia, repeated glacial and interglacial climate changes, and frequent changes of sea level and seawater surface temperature, potentially hindering the recovery of Early Carboniferous metazoan reefs7,21.Metazoans gradually began to participate in reef building in Early Viséan. A large number of biogenic structures formed by corals and bryozoans began to appear, including a small number of sponge reefs/mounds in the middle and late stage of Viséan. The richness and biodiversity of the Mississippian post-zoobenthic reefs flourished in the late Viséan during which corals, bryozoans, sponges, calcareous microorganisms, and some calcareous algae became the main builders3 and large-scale reefs could also be seen in some areas although most of the Viséan metazoan reefs were tabular or laminar. Thus, the metazoan skeletal reefs in the middle to late Viséan were considered to have been resurrected due to relatively warm climatic conditions and higher sea levels after a period of complete disintegration at the end of the Devonian and recession at the beginning of the Carboniferous7.Consequently, the coral reefs in the study area were the products of shallow benthic communities thriving in relatively favourable conditions of Late Viséan-Serpukhovian, which was common for reef development at that time7. Thus, it is expected that more synchronous reefs would to be identified in southern China, or even in the study area in the future.Paleogeography of reefsLangping is located in Dian-Qian-Gui Basin22 regionally (Fig. 2), in the eastern end of Tethys tectonic domain and at the interjunction of Tethys and Pacific structure globally. The Carboniferous Dian-Qian-Gui Basin is adjacent to the Tethys Basin. During the Early Carboniferous, the continent of Gondwana was close to the equator but was separated from the northern continent by the Tethys, where the tropical currents flowed freely from east to west. The benthic warm-water organisms were distributed widely with high abundance and diversity on both sides of the shallow shelf of Tethys.Figure 2Paleogeographic map of southern China in Viséan-Serpukhovian (modified from Feng23, Yao8, and Maillet24). This figure was obtained from articles by Feng23, Yao8 and Maillet24 respectively. The author modified the picture with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/). QG Qian-Gui Basin, DQGX Dian-Qian-Gui-Xiang platform.Full size imageViséan-Serpukhovian ecosystems experienced dramatic climate changes and widespread glaciation25. However, the Viséan was also a key layer for a variety of biological structures, with abundant coral reefs and a high diversity of shallow benthic communities, peaking in the late Viséan. Newly discovered post-faunal reefs in Tianlin were mainly formed in the late Viséan-Serpukhovian period, which coincided with frequent sea level fluctuations and possible glacial changes. It seems counterintuitive that tropical coral communities developed during glacial period. However, recent studies suggest that the persistent warm ocean currents on the platform helped some coral species survive from Carboniferous glacial events24. While other areas of symbiotic reefs were poorly developed, Tianlin may provide an ecological sanctuary for corals associated with ocean currents26.Sedimentation of reef developmentAccording to the regional geological structure, the slope model for Langping paleocarbonate platform was obviously different from that of steep slope platform margin, which could be directly affected by waves. Langping palaeo-platform could be regarded as one of the small blocks (block fault barrier) separated from a large platform (continental margin sea basin)13. The relative positions of these blocks were crucial for the emergence and growth of reefs.In situ development of mud-crystalline tuffs and muddy tuffs with weak hydrodynamic conditions is common in the Langping area, and evaporites are poorly developed. There were patch reefs and reef layers in different sizes in the wide intraclast beach, where obviously developed reef beach complexes were rare. The fragments of carbonate base broken by storm in the clastic beach haven’t been observed. The study area is considered to be gentle-slope open platform27,28 based on sedimentary characteristics. It suggests that the study area was far away from the margin of steep-slope platform that directly affected by waves, and more consistent with less energetic internal environments of gentle-slope platform.On the vast platform of Langping gentle slop, deep water lead to low water energy. While in the coastal area, the water energy was relatively strong, thus coarse-grained bioclastic beach and a small amount of point reef could be developed. The beaches were irregular-shaped due to long term transportation and reformation effects of waves and water flow, showing low and gentle slope angles. Dispersed reef-beach complexes at the platform margin slightly impacted inner-platform seawater and the water flows smoothly29.Therefore, it can be assumed that Langping reefs developed along the intertidal shallows of the terrace. The seawater around Langping carbonate platform in Late Viséan-Serpukhovian was relatively shallow while the water flow was strong. Remains of crinoids, brachiopods, a few foraminifera, and solitary corals were likely broken by strong currents, and deposited in situ with a small amount of gravels and lime-mud (Fig. 3). The clastic beach was unstable, suggesting large-scale wave-resistant structures could not be formed quickly30 due to insufficient cohesive and consolidating organisms. In addition, the circumferential impact of water in extensive terraces leads to mud-lime deposition, which is detrimental to most benthic organisms. However, bondstone was more likely to be formed by some binding algaes in the platform (Fig. 4). Therefore, neither the surrounding or the inner region of the platform could provide favourable living conditions for coral reefs to develop over for a long term. The gently sloping terrace environment of Lanping resulted in significant differences in growth size, wave resistance and reef-building capacity between corals in the study area and those on the edge of the steeply sloping terrace.Figure 3Clastic beaches in the Langping. Various clastic beaches developed in the study area. Diverse composition, fragmentation degree and sorting of the clast indicate different water conditions of formation. This figure is modified by the author from field photos with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/).Full size imageFigure 4Algal bondstone in the Langping. Bondstone formed by various algaes living in still water. Morphology of bondstone correlates water environment and deposition of mud. Vast algal bondstones indicate deep water and high deposition rate. This figure is modified by the author from field photos with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/).Full size imageAt the same time, the warm climate of the late Viséan-Serpukhovian, the good circulation of seawater around the Langping platform, and the abundant supply of oxygen and nutrients were a series of favourable conditions that facilitated the growth of reef-building corals, which led to uplifts being formed on clastic beach, including patch reefs and reef layers with certain sizes. These uplifts impeded waves and provided a protected nearshore environment, though they were much smaller than those developed at the steep-slope platform margin. The inhabitants on the beach could not resist strong waves. These rises were therefore known as reef-beach complexes and could only persist where waves and currents were mild28. They were essentially different from the framework coral reefs which developed on steep-slope platform margin that reflected changed hydrodynamic conditions, nutrient sources, reef sizes, and growth rates.Another potentially favourable factor in the study area could be the deeper water area in the gentle-slope sedimentary environment, which could provide more stable conditions and reduce the damaging effects of global glacial events and large scale sea level fluctuations on reef-building communities25. The frequent fault activities in Dian-Qian-Gui Basin caused the rise and fall of equivalent sea level. More influence of sea-level fluctuations and hydrodynamic conditions would be exerted on Langping platform due to its small size. Furthermore, reef growth promoted by reef-building communities would be frequently disturbed. The sediments displaying evidence of multicycle sedimentation, different components, and diversely fragile clasts in the study area provided direct evidence of frequently changing environment.Alternatively, the sedimentary environment of Langping platform provided conditions favorable for reef-building communities to develop and reefs to grow rapidly. These factors directly or indirectly determined the ecology of reef-building communities and the general appearance of reef development in the study area.Overall, the environmental factor is the primary factor affecting the overall development trend of reefs.Inferred ecological characteristics of reef communitiesResponse of reef-building corals to hydrodynamic conditionsHydrodynamic conditions are very important factors for reef development, which directly determine the abundance and distribution of each reef-building population and are key factors influencing sedimentation and reef growth, and was particularly evident at Langping. Evidence from the fossils suggested the reef-building corals were also changed in response (Table 1). The hydrodynamic condition changes during the development of reefs are inferred based on analysis of the vertical sediments and microfacies changes of coral reefs in the study area31. How these ancient reef-building corals adapted to hydrodynamic conditions was reconstructed combining the evolution of reef-building communities with the study.Table.1 General situation of reef-building coral population in Langping.Full size tableThe Xiadong coral reef started with colonization and expansion of Diphyphyllum on the bioclastic hard substrates32,33. They grew vertically into upright clusters (Fig. 5A) and were insensitive to more sediment in a relatively calm, turbid water environment34. The relatively dense clumped Siphonodendron and massive Lithostrotion (Fig. 5B) were better suited to the turbulent water environment, becoming dominant over time, with Diphyphyllum subordinate with the continuous increase of the water energy, as indicated by the characteristics of sediment particles from fine to coarse. After flourishing for a period, the Siphonodendron–Lithostrotion assemblage eventually waned, likely due to the failure to adapt to the increasing hydrodynamic conditions. Diphyphyllum had persisted combined with Syringopora, to maintain the growth of the reef. However, this assemblage subsequently declined as a result of strong hydrodynamic conditions and finally died out in response to continuous falling of sea level. Consequently, the reefs stopped developing.Figure 5Sketch of coral cluster with upright growing morphology. Most reef-building corals in Langping grow vertically into cluster colonies. This type of morphology is very favourable for corals to get more living space and is important to reef-building. (A) Cluster coral individuals grow uprightly with certain distance between each other. (B) Polygonal columnar coral individuals grow closely to resist strong water flow. This figure is made by the author with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/).Full size imageThe Longjiangdong multi-layer reef was composed of three relatively independent, flat reef layers, suggesting three distinct periods of reef development. Diverse species were identified in the reef, with colonial coral Diphyphyllum contributing greatly to reef growth. Diphyphyllum clusters colonized in patchy form on substrates composed of bioclasts or lithic gravels (Fig. 6A). The first reef-building process was brief, ending under high-energy water conditions after a period of growing (Fig. 6B). Subsequently the hydrodynamic conditions became weaker and favorable. Then Diphyphyllum once again flourished. Diphyphyllum clumps in the unit grew closely together in strong currents, with larger and more sparse individuals than in the lower units. A relatively low energy environment was formed between the Diphyphyllum clusters (Fig. 6C). Subsequently, Diphyphyllum could only grow in a limited area of suitability due to the disturbance of high-energy water brought about by short-term sea-level rise and fall. Afterwards, the environment became more favourable and Diphyphyllum expanded rapidly. As a result, the upper unit of Longjiangdong coral reef was formed, in which Diphyphyllum individuals were slightly larger than those in the first two units. Finally, because the kinetic energy of the water continued to weaken, the plaster deposition forced the whole coral reef to stop growing (Fig. 6D).Figure 6Micrographs of sediments in different positions of reef. (A) Calcareous bioclastic limestone, with biological particles accounting for about 70% of the debris. Abundant and diverse organisms indicate a medium-energy environment of the subtidal zone. Samples were taken from the bioclastic beach at the reef base. (B) Slightly larger bioclastics but lower biologic content than that in (A) suggest an increasing water energy. (C) Various bioclastic particles account for about 80% of the clastic particles contained in the calcareous bio-granular rock. The obviously small benthos indicate a low-energy environment in the subtidal zone barriered by the Diphyphyllum clusters. (D) Bioclastic grainstone is mainly composed of marl, with fine clastic particles (about 30%) and bedding. Low biomass indicates a low-energy environment of the subtidal zone. This figure is modified by the author with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/). Meaning of the letters in the figure: C crinoids, BF brachiopods, F foraminifera, B bryozoan, P pelletoid, MF mollusk shell fragment.Full size imageLongjiangdong patch reef started to develop in a relatively deep water environment. Diphyphyllum initially colonized and expanded in favorable conditions with the increase of water energy. Then the reef-builders transitioned from a single coral species to an assemblage of Diphyphyllum–Caninia–Lithostrotionella. These three coral species grew independently and contribute almost equally to the structure of the reef. However, the structure and function of the coral community were not yet stable enough. It was easily influenced by the weakening hydrodynamics and the increasing sedimentation, resulting in only small patch reefs.The Xinzhai layer reef was initialized by colonization and expansion of Lonsdaleia on bioclastic beach. Large coral clusters were formed in the presence of turbulent water. With the weakening of hydrodynamic conditions, an unknown branchlike organism and Antheria communities continued to develop separately in this area. Slender branchlike organisms expanded rapidly in these low-energy water environments until they were replaced by some individual corals as hydrodynamic energy increased. Each builder was short-lived in this layer reef, departing from the reef just at the beginning of colonization and expansion, due to rapidly changed hydrodynamic conditions.The evolution of reef-building corals in these four reefs indicated that both the coral assemblages and coral individuals would constantly adapt to the changing hydrodynamic conditions in Langping as sea level rose and fell. Although this was a reactive adjustment of coral populations in response to long-term environmental impacts, it was clearly positive for the building and development of coral reefs.Impact of disturbance on reef communitiesDisturbance is a relatively discontinuous event, which is ubiquitous in nature. It may indirectly affect the composition and population structure of reef communities by changing the environmental conditions, thus affect the structure and function of reef communities, even the evolution of the reef35. The major disturbances evident in these Mississippian framework reefs were associated with frequent changes of water flow, and drastic changes of climate and weather. These seem to be most obvious in the Langping platform due to its small size, with more frequent environmental influence evident on the reef communities in the study area.The most direct effect of disturbance events on coral reefs is the disruption of continuously evolving reef communities, which is common in coral reef studies. After the interruption caused by disturbances, some communities gradually recover due to the absence of continuous disturbance, or the dominant biota may be substituted by invading communities. The winner after interruption is decided by random factors to a large extent, in a ‘Competitive lottery’36. The conditions for the emergence of ‘Competitive lottery’ also include the need for species in a community to have similar abilities to invade discontinuities and to tolerate environmental conditions.Certainly, low-intensity disturbance does not necessarily produce discontinuity, but medium-intensity disturbance without discontinuity could directly impact on community species diversity. According to the ‘Moderate disturbance hypothesis’, moderate disturbance is conducive to a higher level of community diversity37. In environmental conditions with moderate intensity of disturbance, most species will not disappear entirely. The dominant pioneer species will also be restrained by disturbance to a certain extent, so large number of species can coexist, attaining the highest diversity35.The reef-builders in Langping are diverse compared with the Late Carboniferous reefs in Ziyun County10, which also developed in Dian-Qian-Gui Basin. More than 4 reef-building corals are identified in Xiadong reef, while 4 and 3 are in Xinzhai layer reef, Longjiangdong patch reef respectively. These reef-building corals, mostly Diphyphyllum, Lithostrotion, Siphonodendron and Lonsdaleia, were distributed irregularly in the reefs. Their ecological niche and function were likely similar and none of them was obviously dominant in the community (Fig. 7). This is in line with ‘Competitive lottery’ theory and the ‘Moderate disturbance hypothesis’.Figure 7Different species occupied the discontinuity surface irregularly. (A) Different reef-builders colonized and grew on the same hard substrate. (B) and (C) show detailed morphology of colony corals of (A). (D) Colony corals and a large number of individual corals grew together in a limited area, indicating equal colonization on the newly formed discontinuity surface. This figure is modified by the author from field photos with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/).Full size imageThe stability of a classical reef ecosystem includes the ability to withstand external disturbances and the ability to return to its original state once the disturbance is removed37,38. It is generally accepted that communities with high diversity are always more stable although ecosystem stability is not absolutely correlated to biodiversity35.There have been no reef-building corals with strong resistance and rapid recovery ability in the communities in Langping. None of these corals succeeded in developing into dominant species that can build reef shelves, which made the reefs in Langping mostly appear in the form of small patch reefs or reef layers. However, formation of the large reef in Xiadong Village, patch reef in Longjiangdong Village, and layer reef in Xinzhai Village were all related to their relatively high diversity of reef-building corals. Compared with the situation where only one reef-building organism dominated the Bianping large coral reef, Wengdao large phylloid algal reef and Ivanovia cf. manchurica patch reefs in Ziyun County10, Guizhou province, the different coral assemblages in Langping area could effectively adapt to changing hydrodynamic conditions and maintain reef growth.Species diversity increased by disturbance stabilized the ecosystemas shown during the construction of coral reefs in Langping.Effects of non-reef-builders on reef-building coralsBesides reef-building corals, there were a large number of reef-dwellers and off-reef organisms in the study area. Reef-dwellers referred to the species that didn’t directly contribute to reef growth in the community, mainly including various benthos and algaes39. Off-reef organisms are not part of the reef-building community, but also play an important role in participating in energy flow and providing organic matter to the reef ecosystem40.Common reef-dwelling organisms include crinoids, brachiopods, gastropods, various algae, foraminifera, bryozoans and individual corals. Crinoids were overwhelmingly dominant in numbers in the reef samples studied here.Carboniferous echinodermata in Guangxi Province reached its peak in Middle-to-Late Mississippian. In terms of amount and distribution, thick limestone with echinodermata debris in the carbonate platform were often dominated by crinoids41,42,43,44,45,46. The large number of crinoids in Langping excluded other metazoans and restricted the development of benthic reef-builders in Late Viséan-Serpukhovian in Langping, leading to poorly developed reef-building communities.Microorganisms and algaes had limited success in stablishing on the moving clastic beach in frequently disturbed water. There has not been obvious evidence of extensive “algal turf” in the coastal area of Langping platform. Only a few corals bonded by algal mats were observed47 (Fig. 8). In addition to their significant contribution to primary productivity, macroalgae were considered to play an important role in two aspects of coral reef ecosystems. One was to promote reef construction by its own binding and consolidation48,49. The other was to create a good condition for zoobenthos larvae to dwell and develop, thereby improving species diversity50. The limited productivity of algae in Langping constrained coral reef trophic inputs, which may then have limited populations of dependent metazoans. As a result, algaes and other metazoans were unable to achieve a variety of reef-building patterns, such as bonding, bounding, entanglement51,52. The reef framework in the study area was not stable in the presence of strong water flow, and the biological communities could not deal with frequent environmental changes, which were directly related to poor development of calcareous algae.Figure 8Micrographs of microbes and algaes. (A) Encrustations (indicated by black arrows) with distinct thickness around coral clusters formed by microbe and algal mats through bonding mud. The encrustations were formed before the clastic deposition (indicated by white arrows), showing the corals were living then. Microbes and algaes inside of the dense coral clusters had little impact on corals. (B) Single polarized micrograph showed clear and smooth boundaries of coral individuals without encrustation or drilling hole made by microbes or algaes. Few corals surrounded by bonding algaes could be observed in Langping, indicating that algaes were poorly developed between coral clusters. This figure is modified by the author from field photos with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/).Full size imageInfluence of coral morphology on reef developmentThe accumulation of reef structure had obvious impact on communities. Large reef structures could support abundance and diverse biota by modifying local environments and creating diverse conditions. Consequently the reef-building communities thrived between disturbances, stabilizing reef construction. In terms of large reef, the framework-building corals would play a key role in reef construction regardless of which kind of patterns was adopted. Therefore, reef-building corals with large size, rapid growth vertically, and strong resistance would become the biggest contributors to reef frame construction.The main reef-building corals in Langping were composed of Diphyphyllum, Lithostrotion, Siphonodendron, and Lonsdaleia, etc., being the dominant builders. These corals were similar in morphology such as cluster colony, thick and strong skeleton, and densely packed individuals (Fig. 9), which enabled them to resist water flow. At the same time, the upright colonies were adaptable to relatively calm water, being insensitive to mud deposition. The ecological characteristics of the Langping corals matched the gently sloping environment, the deep water environment and the rapidly changing energy of the currents. These cluster corals were able to colonize hard substrates and expand rapidly, thus altering the surrounding environment. The visible carbonate uplifts were formed with a large amount of benthos grouped into reef-building communities. These distinct uplifts constructed by coral clusters in different water conditions are composed of coral reefs of different sizes and appearance in the study area.Figure 9Main reef-building corals in the study area. (A) Diphyphyllum, (B) Lithostrotion, (C) Siphonodendron, (D) Lonsdaleia. (A) Rapidly grew clusters of main reef-building corals. The strong individuals are packed tightly when growing to support each other. This figure is modified by the author from field photos with CorelDRAW (version 2022, and the URL link: https://www.coreldraw.com/cn/).Full size imageThe complex and diverse local environments formed by large coral reefs can significantly increase benthic populations and improve reef species diversity. As a result, the nutrient flow in the community becomes complicated, and nutrients could be recycled effectively by reducing loss caused by water flow. Therefore, the overall productivity of large coral reef communities was always high. Complex trophic structure satisfied most of the benthos in the community with sufficient nutrients and inorganic salts.The morphology of reef-building corals in Langping enabled them to become predominant species in various water environments, which promoted the continued domed growth of coral reefs and facilitates the development of reef-building communities that form a variety of reefs. It suggests that the morphology of reef-building corals was a key prerequisite for reef development.In conclusion, coral reef communities are always constrained and influenced by environmental conditions. However, the ecology of the inhabitants is also an important factor in the formation of coral reefs. More

Chen, X. L. et al. Effects of Meloidogyne incognitaon the fungal community in tobaccorhizosphere. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Solo. 46, e0210127 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, S. X. et al. Research progresses on continuous cropping obstacles of tobacco. Soils 47(5), 823–829 (2015).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Luo, J. Y. et al. Effects of soil salinity onrhizosphere soil microbes in transgenic Bt cotton fields. J. Integr. Agric. 16, 1624–1633 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Chaparro, J. M. et al. Manipulating the soil microbiome to increase soil health and plant fertility. Biol. Fertil. Soils 48, 489–499 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Newton, A., Begg, G. & Swanston, J. Deployment of diversity for enhanced crop function. Ann. Appl. Biol. 154, 309–322 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Li, X. G. et al. Effects of intercropping with Atractylodeslancea and application of bio-organic fertiliser on soil invertebrates, disease control and peanut productivity in continuouspeanut cropping field in subtropical China. Agrofor. Syst. 88, 41–52 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Ahmed, W. et al. Ralstonia solanacearum, a deadly pathogen: Revisiting the bacterial wilt biocontrol practices in tobacco and other Solanaceae. Rhizosphere 21, 100479 (2022).
Google Scholar 
Gómez-Rodrıguez, O., Zavaleta-Mejıa, E., Gonzalez-Hernandez, V., Livera-Munoz, M. & Cárdenas-Soriano, E. Allelopathyand microclimatic modification of intercropping with marigold on tomato early blight disease development. Field Crops Res. 83, 27–34 (2003).
Google Scholar 
Weidenhamer, J. D., Montgomery, T. M., Cipollini, D. F., Weston, P. A. & Mohney, B. K. Plandensity and rhizosphere chemistry: Does marigold root exudate composition respond to intra-and interspecific competition?. J. Chem. Ecol. 45(5–6), 525–533 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Ploeg, A. T. Effects of selected marigold varieties on root-knot nematodes and tomato and melon yields. Plant Dis. 86(5), 505–508 (2002).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Hooks, C. R., Wang, K. H., Ploeg, A. & McSorley, R. Using marigold (Tagetes spp.) as a cover crop to protect crops fromplant-parasitic nematodes. Appl. Soil Ecol. 46, 307–320 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Li, W., Xu, J., Chen, H. & Qi, Y. Phytochemicals and their biological activities of plants in tagetes l.-sciencedirect. Chin. Herbal Med. 4(2), 103–117 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Weidenhamer, J. D., Mohney, B. K., Shihada, N. & Rupasinghe, M. Spatial and temporal dynamics of root exudation: How important is heterogeneity in allelopathic interactions?. J. Chem. Ecol. 40(8), 940–952 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Marotti, I. et al. Thiophene occurrence in different tagetes species: Agricultural biomasses as sources ofbiocidal substances. J. Sci. Food Agric. 90(7), 1210–1217 (2010).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Barto, E. K. et al. The fungal fastlane: Common mycorrhizal networks extendbioactive zones of allelochemicals in soils. PLoS ONE 6, e27195 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Evenhuis, A., Korthals, G. & Molendijk, L. Tagetes patula as an effective catch crop forlong-term control of Pratylenchus penetrans. Nematology 6, 877–881 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Wu, W. T. et al. Effects of marigold-tobacco rotation on soil nematode community composition. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 32(2), 342–348 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Reynolds, L. B., Potter, J. W. & Ball-Coelho, B. R. Crop rotation with sp. is an alternative to chemical fumigation for control of root-lesion nematodes. Agron. J. 92(5), 957–966 (2000).
Google Scholar 
El-Hamawi, M., Youssef, M. & Zawam, H. S. Management of Meloidogyne incognita, the root-knot nematode, on soybean asaffected by marigold and sea ambrosia (damsisa) plants. J. Pest Sci. 77, 95–98 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Kumar, N., Krishnappa, K., Reddy, B., Ravichandra, N. & Karuna, K. Intercropping for the management of root-knotnematode, Meloidogyne incognitain vegetable-based cropping systems. Indian J. Nematol. 35, 46–49 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Zhang, J. et al. Crop rotation with marigold promotes soil bacterial structure to assist in mitigating clubroot Incidence in Chinese Cabbage. Plants 11(17), 2295 (2022).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Xia, T. Y. et al. Microbial diversity of tobacco rhizospheresoil in different growth stages of marigold-tobacco intercropping system. Southwest China J. Agric. Sci. 31(4), 680–686 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Wei, H. Y. et al. Effects of marigold diversified cropping with angelica on fungal community in soils. Plant Prot. 41(5), 69–74 (2015).MathSciNet 
CAS 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y. et al. Intercropping with marigold promotes soil health and microbialstructure to assist in mitigating tobacco bacterial wilt. J. Plant Pathol. 102, 731–742 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Caporaso, J. G. et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 108, 4516–4522 (2011).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Edgar, R. C. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10, 996–998 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Q., Garrity, G. M., Tiedje, J. M. & Cole, J. R. Naive bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. MicroBiol. 73, 5261–5267 (2007).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Irikiin, I. et al. Rhizobacterial community-level, sole carbon source utilization pattern aff ects the delay in the bacterial wilt of tomato grown in rhizobacterial community model system. Appl. Soil Ecol. 34(1), 27–32 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Wu, M. N. et al. Soil fungistasis and its relations to soil microbial composition and diversity: A case study of a series of soils with different fungistasis. J. Environ. Sci. 20(7), 871–877 (2008).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Mendes, L. W. et al. Soil-Borne microbiome: Linking diversity to function. Microb. Ecol. 70(1), 255–265 (2015).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Jaiswal, A. K. et al. Linking the belowground microbial composition, diversity and activity to soilborne disease suppression and growth promotion of tomato amended with biochar. Sci. Rep. 7, 44382 (2017).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Raaijmakers, J. M. & Mazzola, M. Soil immune responses soil microbiomes may be harnessed for plant health. Science 352, 1392–1393 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kušlienė, G., Rasmussen, J., Kuzyakov, Y. & Eriksen, J. Medium-term response of microbial community to rhizodeposits of white clover and ryegrass and tracing of active processes induced by 13C and 15N labelled exudates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 76, 22–33 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Mohammadi, K. Soil microbial activity and biomass as influenced by tillage and fertilization in wheat production. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 10, 330–337 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Wang, G. H. et al. Research progress of Acidobacteria ecology in soils. Biotechnol. Bull. 32(2), 14–20 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Wei, H., Wang, L., Hassan, M. & Xie, B. Succession of the functional microbial communities and the metabolic functions in maize straw composting process. Bioresour. Technol. 256, 333–341 (2018).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Wang, Y., Liu, L., Yang, J., Duan, Y. & Zhao, Z. The diversity of microbial community and function varied in response to different agricultural residues composting. Sci. Total Environ. 715, 136983 (2020).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Glass, N. L., Schmoll, M., Cate, J. H. & Coradetti, S. Plant cell wall deconstruction by ascomycete fungi. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 477–498 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Li, Y. et al. Linking soil fungal community structure and function to soil organic carbon chemical composition in intensively managed subtropical bamboo forests. Soil Biol. Biochem. 107, 19–31 (2017).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Martins, L. F., Kolling, D., Camassola, M., Dillon, A. J. & Ramos, L. P. Comparison of Penicillium echinulatumand Trichoderma reeseicellulases in relation to their activity against various cellulosic substrates. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 1417–1424 (2008).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar  More

Gandhi, K. J. K. & Herms, D. A. Direct and indirect effects of alien insect herbivores on ecological processes and interactions in forests of eastern North America. Biol. Invasions 12, 389–405 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Desurmont, G. A. et al. Alien interference: disruption of infochemical networks by invasive insect herbivores. Plant. Cell Environ. 37, 1854–1865 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Kenis, M. et al. Ecological effects of invasive alien insects. Biol. Invasions 11, 21–45 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Paini, D. R. et al. Global threat to agriculture from invasive species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 7575–7579 (2016).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Bradshaw, C. J. A. et al. Massive yet grossly underestimated global costs of invasive insects. Nat. Commun. 7, 1–8 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Sherpa, S. et al. Unravelling the invasion history of the Asian tiger mosquito in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 28, 2360–2377 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sherpa, S. et al. Landscape does matter: Disentangling founder effects from natural and human-aided post-introduction dispersal during an ongoing biological invasion. J. Anim. Ecol. 89, 2027–2042 (2020).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Sherpa, S. & Després, L. The evolutionary dynamics of biological invasions: A multi‐approach perspective. Evol. Appl. (2021).North, H. L., McGaughran, A. & Jiggins, C. Insights into invasive species from whole-genome resequencing. Mol. Ecol. (2021).Ma, L. et al. Rapid and strong population genetic differentiation and genomic signatures of climatic adaptation in an invasive mealybug. Divers. Distrib. 26, 610–622 (2020).
Google Scholar 
Ortego, J., Céspedes, V., Millán, A. & Green, A. J. Genomic data support multiple introductions and explosive demographic expansions in a highly invasive aquatic insect. Mol. Ecol. 30, 4189–4203 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Varone, L., Logarzo, G., Briano, J., Hight, S. & Carpenter, J. Cactoblastis cactorum (Berg) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) use of Opuntia host species in Argentina. Biol. Invasions 16, 2367–2380 (2014).
Google Scholar 
Singer, M. C., Ng, D. & Moore, R. A. Genetic variation in oviposition preference between butterfly populations. J. Insect Behav. 4, 531–535 (1991).
Google Scholar 
Forister, M. L. Oviposition preference and larval performance within a diverging lineage of lycaenid butterflies. Ecol. Entomol. 29, 264–272 (2004).
Google Scholar 
Wiklund, C. The concept of oligophagy and the natural habitats and host plants of Papilio machaon L. Fennoscandia. Insect Syst. Evol. 5, 151–160 (1974).
Google Scholar 
Courtney, S. P. & Forsberg, J. Host use by two pierid butterflies varies with host density. Funct. Ecol. 2, 67–75 (1988).
Google Scholar 
Franklin, J. Species distribution models in conservation biogeography: developments and challenges. Divers. Distrib. 19, 1217–1223 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Peterson, A. et al. Ecological niches and geographic distributions. Monographs in Population Biology vol. 49 (2011).Alvarado-Serrano, D. F. & Knowles, L. L. Ecological niche models in phylogeographic studies: Applications, advances and precautions. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 14, 233–248 (2014).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Carrera-Martínez, R., Aponte-Díaz, L. A., Ruiz-Arocho, J., Lorenzo-Ramos, A. & Jenkins, D. A. The effects of the invasive Harrisia cactus mealybug (Hypogeococcus sp.) and exotic lianas (Jasminum fluminense) on Puerto Rican native cacti survival and reproduction. Biol. Invasions 21, 3269–3284 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Acevedo-Rodríguez, P. & Strong, M. T. Catalogue of seed plants of the West Indies. Smithson. Contrib. to Bot. 98, 1–1192 (2012).
Google Scholar 
Carrera-Martínez, R., Aponte-Díaz, L., Ruiz-Arocho, J. & Jenkins, D. A. Symptomatology of infestation by Hypogeococcus pungens: Contrasts between host species. Haseltonia 2015, 14–18 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Aponte-Díaz, L., Ruiz-Arocho, J., Carrera-Martínez, R. & Ee, B. Contrasting effects of the invasive Hypogeococcus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) infestation on seed germination of Pilosocereus royenii (Cactaceae), a Puerto Rican native cactus. Caribb. J. Sci. 50, 212–218 (2020).
Google Scholar 
California Department of Food and Agriculture. Harrisia Cactus Mealybug | Hypogeococcus pungens | Pest rating proposals and final ratings. https://blogs.cdfa.ca.gov/Section3162/?p=5881 (2018).Poveda-Martínez, D. et al. Species complex diversification by host plant use in an herbivorous insect: The source of Puerto Rican cactus mealybug pest and implications for biological control. Ecol. Evol. 10, 10463–10480 (2020).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Segarra-Carmona, A. E., Ramírez-Lluch, A., Cabrera-Asencio, I. & Jiménez-López, A. N. First report of a new invasive mealybug, the Harrisia cactus mealybug Hypogeococcus pungens (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico 94, 183–187 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Poveda-Martínez, D. et al. Untangling the Hypogeococcus pungens species complex (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) for Argentina, Australia, and Puerto Rico based on host plant associations and genetic evidence. PLoS ONE 14, e0220366 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
McKenzie, H. L. Mealybugs of California. (Univ of California Press, 1967).Hamon, A. B. A cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus festerianus (Lizer y Trelles). Florida (Homoptera Coccoidea Pseudococcidae). Entomol. Circ. Div. Plant Ind. Florida Dep. Agric. Consum. Serv. 263, 2 (1984).Hodges, A. & Hodges, G. Hypogeococcus pungens Granara de Willink (Insecta: Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae), a mealybug. EDIS 2009, (2009).Halbert, S. Entomology section. Triology 35, 2–4 (1996).
Google Scholar 
Aguirre, M. B. et al. Analysis of biological traits of Anagyrus cachamai and Anagyrus lapachosus to assess their potential as biological control candidate agents against Harrisia cactus mealybug pest in Puerto Rico. Biocontrol 64, 539–551 (2019).CAS 

Google Scholar 
Aguirre, M. B. et al. Influence of competition and intraguild predation between two candidate biocontrol parasitoids on their potential impact against Harrisia cactus mealybug, Hypogeococcus sp. (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae). Sci. Rep. 11, 13377 (2021).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Eaton, D. A. R. & Overcast, I. ipyrad: Interactive assembly and analysis of RADseq datasets. Bioinformatics 36, 2592–2594 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Poveda-Martínez, D., Salinas, N., Aguirre, M. B., Sánchez-Restrepo, A. F. & Hight, S., Diaz-Soltero, H. Dataset generated in Genomic and ecological evidence shed light on the recent demographic history of two related invasive insects. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15167082.v2 (2022).Frichot, E., Mathieu, F., Trouillon, T., Bouchard, G. & François, O. Fast and efficient estimation of individual ancestry coefficients. Genetics 196, 973–983 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Excoffier, L., Dupanloup, I., Huerta-Sánchez, E., Sousa, V. C. & Foll, M. Robust demographic inference from genomic and SNP data. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003905 (2013).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Gattepaille, L. M., Jakobsson, M. & Blum, M. G. B. Inferring population size changes with sequence and SNP data: Lessons from human bottlenecks. Heredity (Edinb). 110, 409–419 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Born‐Schmidt, G. et al. The implementation of the mexican strategy on invasive species: How far have we come? Invasive Alien Species Obs. Issues from Around World 4, 153–164 (2021).
Google Scholar 
McFadyen, R. E. & Tomley, A. J. Preliminary indications of success in the biological control of Harrisia cactus (Eriocereus martinii Lab.) in Queensland. In Proceedings of the First Conference of the Council of Australian Weed Science Societies held at National Science Centre, Parkville, Victoria, Australia, 12–14 April 1978 108–112 (Council of Australian Weed Science Societies, 1978).McFadyen, R. E. & Tomley, A. J. The successful biological control of Harrisia cactus (Eriocereus martinii) in Queensland. In Proceedings of the Sixth Australian Weeds Conference, Volume 1, City of Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia, 13–18 September, 1981 139–143 (Queensland Weed Society, 1981).Paterson, I. D. et al. Biological control of Cactaceae in South Africa. African Entomol. 19, 230–246 (2011).
Google Scholar 
Sutton, G. F., Klein, H. & Paterson, I. D. Evaluating the efficacy of Hypogeococcus sp. as a biological control agent of the cactaceous weed Cereus jamacaru in South Africa. Biocontrol 63, 493–503 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Paterson, I. D. et al. Biological control of Cactaceae in South Africa. African Entomol. 29, 713–734 (2021).
Google Scholar 
McFadyen, R. E. Harrisia (Eriocereus) martinii (Labour.) Britton—Harrisia cactus Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Hummelink—sword pear. (ed. Julien, M., McFadyen, R., & Cullen, J.), Biological control of weeds in Australia 274– 281. (CSIRO Publishing, 2012).Julien, M. H. & Griffiths, M. Biological control of weeds: A world catalogue of agents and their target weeds. (Cab International, 1998).Houston, W. A. & Elder, R. Biocontrol of Harrisia cactus Harrisia martinii by the mealybug Hypogeococcus festerianus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in salt-influenced habitats in Australia. Austral Entomol. 58, 696–703 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Hofmeister, N., Werner, S. & Lovette, I. Environmental correlates of genetic variation in the invasive European starling in North America. Mol. Ecol. 30, 1251–1263 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Driscoe, A. L. et al. Host plant associations and geography interact to shape diversification in a specialist insect herbivore. Mol. Ecol. 28, 4197–4211 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Vidal, M. C., Quinn, T. W., Stireman, J. O. 3rd., Tinghitella, R. M. & Murphy, S. M. Geography is more important than host plant use for the population genetic structure of a generalist insect herbivore. Mol. Ecol. 28, 4317–4334 (2019).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Poveda-Martínez, D. et al. Spatial and host related genomic variation in partially sympatric cactophagous moth species. Mol. Ecol. 31, 356–371 (2021).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cao, L., Wei, S., Hoffmann, A. A., Wen, J. & Chen, M. Rapid genetic structuring of populations of the invasive fall webworm in relation to spatial expansion and control campaigns. Divers. Distrib. 22, 1276–1287 (2016).
Google Scholar 
Sih, A. et al. Predator–prey naïveté, antipredator behavior, and the ecology of predator invasions. Oikos 119, 610–621 (2010).
Google Scholar 
Yang, Q.-Q. et al. Introgressive hybridization between two non-native apple snails in China: Widespread hybridization and homogenization in egg morphology. Pest Manag. Sci. 76, 4231–4239 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cordeiro, E. M. G. et al. Hybridization and introgression between Helicoverpa armigera and H zea: An adaptational bridge. BMC Evol. Biol. 20, 61 (2020).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Pardo-Diaz, C. et al. Adaptive introgression across species boundaries in Heliconius butterflies. PLOS Genet. 8, e1002752 (2012).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Caltagirone, L. E. Landmark examples in classical biological control. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 26, 213–232 (1981).
Google Scholar 
Goldson, S. L., Phillips, C. B. & Barlow, N. D. The value of parasitoids in biological control. New Zeal. J. Zool. 21, 91–96 (1994).
Google Scholar 
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Shi, M., Huang, J. & Chen, X. Parasitoid wasps as effective biological control agents. J. Integr. Agric. 18, 705–715 (2019).
Google Scholar 
Miller, G., & Lugo. A. E. Guide to the ecological systems of Puerto Rico. IITF-GTR-35 (2009).Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: A flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Andrews, S. FastQC: A Quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. (2010).Ewels, P., Magnusson, M., Lundin, S. & Käller, M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics 32, 3047–3048 (2016).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Danecek, P. et al. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27, 2156–2158 (2011).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Foll, M. & Gaggiotti, O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: A Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180, 977–993 (2008).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Linck, E. & Battey, C. J. Minor allele frequency thresholds strongly affect population structure inference with genomic data sets. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 19, 639–647 (2019).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Keenan, K., McGinnity, P., Cross, T. F., Crozier, W. W. & Prodöhl, P. A. diveRsity: An R package for the estimation and exploration of population genetics parameters and their associated errors. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 782–788 (2013).
Google Scholar 
Goudet, J. Hierfstat, a package for R to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes 5, 184–186 (2005).
Google Scholar 
Kamvar, Z. N., Tabima, J. F. & Grünwald, N. J. Poppr: An R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ 2, e281 (2014).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Tajima, F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 597–601 (1989).CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Frichot, E. & François, O. LEA: An R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 925–929 (2015).
Google Scholar 
Pembleton, L. W., Cogan, N. O. I. & Forster, J. W. St AMPP: An R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 13, 946–952 (2013).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Cockerham, C. C. Drift and mutation with a finite number of allelic states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81, 530–534 (1984).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 
PubMed Central 
MATH 

Google Scholar 
Lynch, M. & Conery, J. S. The origins of genome complexity. Science 302, 1401–1404 (2003).ADS 
CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Rozas, J. et al. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 3299–3302 (2017).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Keightley, P. D., Ness, R. W., Halligan, D. L. & Haddrill, P. R. Estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate per nucleotide site in a Drosophila melanogaster full-sib family. Genetics 196, 313–320 (2014).CAS 
PubMed 

Google Scholar 
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2021).Neu, C. W., Byers, C. R. & Peek, J. M. A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J. Wildl. Manage. 38, 541–545 (1974).
Google Scholar 
Soberón, J. & Peterson, A. Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodivers. Informatics 2, 1-10 (2005).Jorge, S. & Miguel, N. Niches and distributional areas: Concepts, methods, and assumptions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106, 19644–19650 (2009).
Google Scholar 
Phillips, S. J., Anderson, R. P. & Schapire, R. E. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Modell. 190, 231–259 (2006).
Google Scholar 
Cobos, M. E., Peterson, A., Barve, N. & Osorio-Olvera, L. Kuenm: An R package for detailed development of ecological niche models using Maxent. PeerJ 7, e6281 (2019).PubMed 
PubMed Central 

Google Scholar 
Fick, S. E. & Hijmans, R. J. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 37, 4302–4315 (2017).
Google Scholar 
Title, P. O. & Bemmels, J. B. ENVIREM: An expanded set of bioclimatic and topographic variables increases flexibility and improves performance of ecological niche modeling. Ecography (Cop.) 41, 291–307 (2018).
Google Scholar 
Warren, B. H. et al. Evaluating alternative explanations for an association of extinction risk and evolutionary uniqueness in multiple insular lineages. Evolution 72, 2005–2024 (2018).PubMed 

Google Scholar 
Warren, D. L., Glor, R. E. & Turelli, M. Environmental niche equivalency versus conservatism: Quantitative approaches to niche evolution. Evol. Int. J. Org. Evol. 62, 2868–2883 (2008).
Google Scholar 
Schoener, T. W. The anolis lizards of Bimini: Resource partitioning in a complex fauna. Ecology 49, 704–726 (1968).
Google Scholar 
Van der Vaart, A. W. Asymptotic Statistics (UK Cam, 1998).MATH 

Google Scholar  More