More stories

  • in

    Freshwater unionid mussels threatened by predation of Round Goby (Neogobius melanostomus)

    Our research involved work with animal subjects (unionid mussels and Round Goby fishes) and was conducted following relevant regulations and standard procedures. The field collections were carried out under Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission permits (# 2018-01-0136 and 2019-01-0026). The experimental protocols were approved by Penn State University’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC# 201646941 and 201646962). All new DNA sequencing data are made publicly available in GenBank (with accession numbers provided in Table 1) and a BioProject (# PRJNA813547) of the National Center for Biotechnology Information40.Propensity of Round Goby to consume unionid mussels in a controlled lab settingStream table setupWe conducted lab experiments to observe the potential predation of juvenile freshwater mussels by the Round Goby, following standard research protocols for work with animal subjects (IACUC# 201646962, Penn State University). We constructed four artificial stream tables in an aquatic laboratory, each measuring 3 × 2 m and featuring two run and two pool sections (each 0.63 × 0.56 × 0.46 m). Water flow was produced using eight Homsay 920 GPH submersible water pumps, which pumped water from a central reservoir tub into each table at the start of each run section. The water flow direction was clockwise for stream tables 1 and 3, and counterclockwise for stream tables 2 and 4. Water pumped into the stream tables exited via two drains located medially of each run section, where it flowed back to the central reservoir tub. Each stream table was filled with a 6 mm layer of substrate consisting of a mixture of sand, gravel (4–6 mm), and crushed stone (size 2B, with an average size of ~ 19 mm). The day before each experiment, field technicians traveled to local streams and collected macroinvertebrates using one minute D-frame kick net samples for each of the four stream tables. The macroinvertebrates and associated substrate were transported back to the facility and were introduced into each stream table system.Preferential feeding experimentsBefore each experiment commenced, juvenile Plain Pocketbook mussels (Lampsillis cardium) were introduced into each stream table (with 165 mussel specimens for experiment 1 and 100 mussels for experiments 2 and 3). This  widespread and abundant species is not imperiled in Pennsylvania, and mussels were provided for this study by the White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery located in southeast West Virgina. The mussels were allowed to acclimate in the stream tables for 2 h before commencing each experiment. Ten Round Gobies were introduced into each stream system (stream tables 1 and 2 for experiment 1, and all tables for experiments 2 and 3). The total length (from nose tip to caudal tip) of each fish was measured prior to introduction and after the termination of experiments 2 and 3. Experiment 1 was conducted for 3 weeks, while experiments 2 and 3 were conducted for 8 days. During these experiments, Round Gobies were allowed to exist in the systems and feed preferentially, on the mussels and macroinvertebrates, for the allotted time before each investigation concluded. We acknowledge that in these experiments, the mussel abundances are higher and macroinvertebrate densities lower and less rich than commonly occur in the natural stream environment. Further, the Round Goby fish densities used are much higher than currently in the French Creek watershed, though are comparable to what is currently seen in parts of the Great Lakes basin. Nonetheless, the experiment scenarios allowed us to observe if Round Gobies would consume the mussels when given the choice to feed on a variety of food items.Evaluation of unionids consumed by fishRound Gobies were removed from the stream tables upon completion of each experiment. They were euthanized using  > 250 mg/L buffered (pH ~ 7) tricaine-S (MS222) solution. The fish were submerged for 10 min beyond the cessation of opercular movement to ensure proper euthanasia, and tissues were collected after we confirmed complete euthanasia—compliant with AVMA guidelines and approved by the IACUC protocol. The Round Gobies were placed in a 10% solution of formalin for preservation, and after 2 weeks, they were rinsed with clean water and were placed in 70% ethanol for long-term storage. After fish were removed from the system, the water was drained, and the substrate was sifted to recover the remaining mussels. Mussels were counted, and live individuals were returned to holding tanks for use in subsequent experiments. To further assess whether Round Gobies had consumed mussels during the investigation, Round Gobies were x-rayed using a Bruker Skyscan 1176 micro-CT scanner. After that, the stomachs of each fish were excised, and the contents examined using a Leica CME dissection scope to confirm the identity of Plain Pocketbook mussels. Contents posterior to the stomach were not analyzed because they could not be reliably counted and identified.DNA metabarcoding to identify mussel species consumed by Round Goby in a stream settingFish and mussel sample acquisitionWe collected 39 Round Gobies directly from streams within the French Creek watershed—their newly invaded natural stream habitats—in June 2018. We aimed to quantify which species, if any, of unionid mussels they consumed. Fish collection locations included LeBoeuf Creek at Moore Road and 100 m below the confluence of French Creek and LeBoeuf Creek. The unionid mussel populations and the environmental field settings at these locations are detailed by Clark et al.19. A team of field technicians collected fish by kick seining (3 m × 1 m × 9.5 mm nylon mesh) while moving downstream. Seining was the sampling method of choice compared to electrofishing to avoid possible regurgitation of food items prior to excision of fishes’ stomachs. The stream reaches sampled at each location were between 100 and 200 m in length and included riffle, run, and pool habitats. In addition to fish samples, unionid mussel samples from French Creek were also collected for analysis (under Pennsylvania Fish & Boat Commission collectors permits # 2018-01-0136 and 2019-01-0026). Following standard research protocols (under IACUC# 201646941, Penn State University), the Round Gobies collected were euthanized using buffered Tricaine-S (MS222) solution; and stomachs were excised using sterilized utensils before being placed in sterilized tubes filled with 97% ethanol. After excision of stomachs, fishes were placed in a 10% formalin solution for preservation. After 2 weeks, fishes were rinsed with clean water and transferred to 70% ethanol for storage. The stomach samples were immediately placed in ethanol and on ice in the field. Samples were stored in a freezer before being shipped to the US Geological Survey’s Eastern Ecological Science Center for various molecular ecology analyses. Once the fish and mussel samples arrived at this lab, they were recorded and stored at four °C until analysis.Primer developmentSpecific primers targeting a moderately conserved region of the mitochondrial COI gene for 25 species of unionids inhabiting French Creek were designed. Previously a PCR-based amplification method utilizing restriction enzyme digests was used to identify genetic fingerprints of 25 unionid species inhabiting French Creek41. Here, we designed a new degenerate PCR primer set modified with sequencing overhangs to facilitate compatibility with a MiSeq amplicon sequencing method previously designed for 16S Amplicon sequencing. We targeted the locus of the mitochondrial COI gene of unionids known to inhabit the Atlantic Slope Drainage. Consensus sequences were derived using Multalin analysis and a tiling method to identify conserved primer binding regions flanking an ~ 300 bp region of the COI gene. This gene was targeted in part due to the availability of partial or complete sequences representing these target species in the NCBI reference database40. Cytochrome oxidase sequences were downloaded for the 25 unionid mussel species of interest. However, a COI sequence for the Rabbitsfoot (Theliderma cylindrica) mussel was absent from the NCBI database, which required us to sequence this region for an in-house reference (which is described later in the paper). We designed a degenerate primer cocktail specific to all mussel species of interest that amplified a ~ 289 bp product, with forward and reverse primers used for the amplification of unionid specific COI presented as supplemental information (see Table S-230. We evaluated the suitability of the primers using samples from field identified mussels. For primer optimization, PCR was run across a gradient of annealing temperatures to determine suitability. In addition, we used Round Goby DNA as a template to evaluate specificity. In addition to Round Goby stomach samples, mussel samples of several species collected from French Creek were included as positive controls.DNA extraction from tissue samplesFollowing the manufacturer’s protocols, tissue samples (including fish stomach and mussel tissue) were extracted with the Zymo Research ZymoBIOMICS 96 MagBead DNA Kit (San Diego, CA). Random samples of DNA extracts were analyzed on an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using a high-sensitivity assay kit. Fragments in the target amplicon range were apparent (albeit not known to be of mussel origin). All samples were stored at − 20 °C until PCR was performed. DNA from both the T. cylindrica and L. complanata samples were analyzed for DNA quality.Rolling circle amplification of mitochondrial genomesTo acquire COI sequences for T. cylindrica and L. complanata, we subjected archived DNA samples to rolling circle amplification (RCA) followed by amplicon sequencing on the MiSeq. In short, 2 µl of DNA template was added to 2 µl Equiphi29 DNA polymerase reaction buffer containing 1 µl of Exonuclease-resistant random primers (ThermoFisher). Samples were denatured by heating to 95 °C for 3 min followed immediately by cooling on ice for more than 5 min. A volume of 5 µl was added to an RCA master mix containing 1.5 µl of 10 × Equiphi29 DNA polymerase reaction buffer, 0.2 µl of 100 mM dithiothreitol, 8 µl of 2.5 mM dNTPs, 1 µl of Eqiphi29 DNA polymerase (10U) and 4.3 µl of nuclease-free water. The samples were heated to 45 °C for 3 h and then 65 °C for 10 min. Samples were then placed in ice and then frozen at − 20 °C. All RCA products were normalized to 0.2 ng/µl in 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 8.5. Normalized RCA product was utilized as a template for an Illumina Nextera XT library preparation. Sequencing libraries were prepared following the Nextera XT Library Preparation Reference Guide (CT# 15031942 v01) using the Nextera XT Library Preparation Kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Final libraries were analyzed for size and quality using the Agilent BioAnalyzer with the accompanying DNA 1000 Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). Libraries were quantified using the Qubit H.S. Assay Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and normalized to 4 nM using 10 mM Tris, pH 8.5. Libraries were pooled and run on the Illumina MiSeq at a concentration of 10 pM with a 5% PhiX spike with run parameters of 1 × 150. Bioinformatic processing of this data is outlined below.Amplification of the cytochrome oxidase 1 geneExtracted genomic DNA was used as template for end-point PCR. Samples evaluated were from mussels and round gobies (see supporting Table S-330). The ~ 289 bp COI region was amplified with the mussel primers as follows. The amplification reaction contained 0.15 µM of each primer, 1 µL of the initial amplification product, and Promega Go Taq Green Master Mix following manufacturer recommendations for a 25 µL reaction. The thermocycler program consisted of an initial denaturing step of 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 52 °C, and 1 min at 72 °C. Products were subjected to a final extension of 72 °C for 5 min then held until collection at 12 °C. An appropriately sized amplification product was confirmed for each reaction by electrophoresis of 5 µL of the reaction product through a 1.5% I.D. N.A. agarose gel (FMC Bioproducts) at 100 V for 45 min. PCR products were cleaned with the Qiagen Qiaquick PCR purification kit (Valencia, CA) and quantified using the Qubit dsDNA H.S. Assay Kit (Thermofisher Scientific, Grand Island, NY). Samples were diluted in 10 mM Tris buffer (pH 8.5) to a final concentration of 5 ng/µL.Generation of mock mussel samplesTo better understand and minimize sources of error or bias in the taxonomic assignment, we created a mock extraction by mixing sequences from known mussel taxa at defined concentrations. For each mussel, approximately 25-mg of tissue was extracted with the ZymoBIOMICS 96 MagBead DNA Kit (San Diego, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The COI sequence was amplified from each species using the same primer-protocol combination described above. A total of 5 PCR products were mixed at equal concentration (mass/volume) to generate the mock sample (“Mock” hereafter). To confirm the identity of these inputs, each COI region was amplified and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq during the same run as the Mock and samples.Sequencing library preparation and quality assessmentNext-generation sequencing was performed on the Illumina MiSeq platform to observe species-specific sequences and determine the diet of the Round Goby. Inclusion of the overhangs on the amplification primers allowed us to utilize the Illumina 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation protocol42. Amplicon libraries were prepared following the same manufacturer’s protocol. All samples were indexed using the Illumina Nextera XT multiplex library indices. DNA read size spectra were determined with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer using the Agilent DNA 1000 Kit (Santa Clara, Calif.). Libraries were quantified with the Qubit dsDNA H.S. Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Grand Island, N.Y.) and normalized to 4 nM (nM) using 10 mM (mM) Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane buffer pH 8.5. A final concentration of 10 picomolar library with a 6.5% PhiX control spike was created with the combined pool of all indexed libraries. All bioinformatic operations were completed on CLC Genomic Workbench v20 (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.).Read filtering, trimming, and RNAseq metabarcoding assemblyFASTQ files from the sequencing runs were imported as paired-end reads into CLC Genomics Workbench v20.0.4 (Qiagen Bioinformatics, Redwood City, Calif.) for initial filtering of exogenous sequence adaptors and poor-quality base calls. The trimmed overlapping paired-end reads were mapped to the 25 target unionid sequences specific for the species of interest. Several mapping iterations were run using different levels of stringency. We utilized + 2/− 3 match-mismatch scoring and set the length fraction to 0.90. Analyses were iterated using different similarity fractions ranging from 0.90 to 0.99. Reads were annotated, and relative abundance was determined using a curated reference library (see supporting Datasets S-1 and S-230). More

  • in

    Nepotistic colony fission in dense colony aggregations of an Australian paper wasp

    Hughes, W. O. H., Oldroyd, B. P., Beekman, M. & Ratnieks, F. L. W. Ancestral monogamy shows kin selection is key to the evolution of eusociality. Science 320, 1213–1216 (2008).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ross, K. G. & Matthews, R. W. The Social Biology of Wasps (Cornell University Press, 1991).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Itô, Y. & Higashi, S. Spring behaviour of Ropalidia plebeiana (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) within a huge aggregation of nests. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 22, 519–527 (1987).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Saito, F. & Kojima, J.-I. Colony cycle in the south-eastern coastal populations of Ropalidia plebeiana, the only Ropalidia wasp occurring in temperate Australia. Entomol. Sci. 8, 263–275 (2005).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Richards, O. W. The Australian social wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Aust. J. Zool. Suppl. Ser. 26, 1–132 (1978).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Makino, S., Yamane, S., Itô, Y. & Spradbery, J. P. Process of comb division of reused nests in the Australian paper wasp Ropalidia plebeinana (Hymenoptera, Vespidae). Ins. Soc. 41, 411–422 (1994).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Goodnight, K. F. & Queller, D. C. Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers. Mol. Ecol. 8, 1231–1234 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Evanno, G., Regnaut, S. & Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 14, 2611–2620 (2005).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Crochet, P.-A. Genetic structure of avian populations—Allozymes revisited. Mol. Ecol. 9, 1463–1469 (2000).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meirmans, P. G. & Hedrick, P. W. Assessing population structure: FST and related measures. Mol. Ecol. Res. 11, 5–18 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hedrick, P. W. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution 59, 1633–1638 (2005).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Itô, Y., Yamane, S. & Spradbery, J. P. Population consequences of huge nesting aggregations of Ropalidia plebeiana (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Res. Popul. Ecol. 30, 279–295 (1988).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Boomsma, J. J. & d’Ettorre, P. Nice to kin and nasty to non-kin: revisiting Hamilton’s early insights on eusociality. Biol. Lett. 9, 20130444 (2013).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hannonen, M. & Sundström, L. Worker nepotism among polygynous ants. Nature 421, 910 (2003).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Parsons, P. J., Grinsted, L. & Field, J. Partner choice correlates with fine scale kin structuring in the paper wasp Polistes dominula. PLoS ONE 14, e0221701 (2019).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Strassmann, J. E., Queller, D. C., Solis, C. R. & Hughes, C. R. Relatedness and queen number in the Neotropical wasp, Parachartergus colobopterus. Anim. Behav. 42, 461–470 (1991).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Leadbeater, E., Carruthers, J. M., Green, J. P., Rosser, N. S. & Field, J. Nest inheritance is the missing source of direct fitness in a primitively eusocial insect. Science 333, 874–876 (2011).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Field, J. & Leadbeater, E. Cooperation between non-relatives in a primitively eusocial paper wasp, Polistes dominula. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150093 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bhadra, A. & Gadagkar, R. We know that the wasps “know”: cryptic successors to the queen in Ropalidia marginata. Biol. Lett. 4, 634–637 (2008).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bang, A. & Gadagkar, R. Reproductive queue without overt conflict in the primitively eusocial wasp Ropalidia marginata. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14494–14499 (2012).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Frank, S. A. Hierarchical selection theory and sex ratios. II. On applying the theory, and a test with fig wasps. Evolution 39, 949–964 (1985).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Silk, J. B. & Brown, G. R. Local resource competition and local resource enhancement shape primate birth sex ratios. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 275, 1761–1765 (2008).
    Google Scholar 
    Schwarz, M. P. Local resource enhancement and sex ratios in a primitively social bee. Nature 331, 346–348 (1988).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cronin, A. L. & Schwarz, M. P. Sex ratios, local fitness enhancement and eusociality in the allodapine bee Exoneura richardsoni. Evol. Ecol. 11, 567–577 (1997).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schwarz, M. P., Bull, N. J. & Hogendoorn, K. Evolution of sociality in the allodapine bees: A review of sex allocation, ecology and evolution. Ins. Soc. 45, 349–368 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gamboa, G. J., Wacker, T. L., Duffy, K. G., Dobson, S. W. & Fishwild, T. G. Defence against intraspecific usurpation by paper wasp cofoundresses (Polistes fuscatus, Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Can J. Zool. 70, 2369–2372 (1992).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Katada, S. & Iwahashi, O. Characteristics of usurped colonies in the subtropical paper wasp, Ropalidia fasciata (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Ins. Soc. 43, 247–253 (1996).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yamane, S. Ecological factors influencing the colony cycle of Polistes wasps. in Natural History and Evolution of Paper-Wasps (Turillazzi, S. & West-Eberhard, M. J. eds.). 75–97. (Oxford University Press, 1996).Clouse, R. Some effects of group size on the output of beginning nests of Mischocyttarus mexicanus (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Flor. Entomol. 84, 418–425 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Strassmann, J. E. Female-biased sex ratios in social insects lacking morphological castes. Evolution 38, 256–266 (1984).PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Suzuki, T. Production schedule of males and reproductive females, investment sex ratios, and worker-queen conflict in paper wasps. Am. Nat. 128, 366–378 (1986).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tsuchida, K. & Suzuki, T. Conflict over sex ratio and male production in paper wasps. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 43, 468–480 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Ohtsuki, H. & Tsuji, K. Adaptive reproduction schedule as a cause of worker policing in social Hymenoptera: A dynamic game analysis. Am. Nat. 173, 747–758 (2009).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Walsh, P. S., Metzger, D. A. & Higuchi, R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10, 506–513 (1991).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bassam, B. J., Caetano-Anolles, G. & Gresshoff, P. M. Fast and sensitive silver staining of DNA in polyacrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 196, 80–83 (1991).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Oosterhout, C., Hutchinson, W. F., Wills, D. P. M. & Shipley, P. MICRO-CHECHER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 4, 535–538 (2004).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Peakall, R. & Smouse, P. E. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 6, 288–295 (2006).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Raymond, M. & Rousset, F. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J. Hered. 86, 248–249 (1995).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meirmans, P. G. GenoDive version 3.0: Easy-to-use software for the analysis of genetic data of diploids and polyploids. Mol. Ecol. Res. 20, 1126–1131 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Michalakis, Y. & Excoffier, L. A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics 142, 1061–1064 (1996).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M. & Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945–959 (2000).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Earl, D. & vonHoldt, B. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Res. 4, 359–361 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kopelman, N. M., Mayzel, J., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A. & Mayrose, I. Clumpak: A program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol. Ecol. Res. 15, 1179–1191 (2015).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Goodnight, K. F. Relatedness 4.2c Release (Rice University, 1996).
    Google Scholar 
    Queller, D. C. A method for detecting kin discrimination within natural colonies of social insects. Anim. Behav. 47, 569–576 (1994).Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Understanding the spatial distribution and hot spots of collared Bornean elephants in a multi-use landscape

    By pooling the results of the entire known range analysis of 14 GPS-collared elephants living in the Kinabatangan, our study suggests that this populations range covers at least 628 km2 (Table 3). Nine different locations were identified as hot spots, representing 266.9 km2 or 43% of this range, suggesting that just under half is highly used and/or frequented (Fig. 1). We found that the size of individual’s hot spots was positively related to the size of the entire range, meaning the larger the entire range the larger the summed area of an elephants hot spots. On average, hot spots represented a relatively small percent of an animal’s entire range (ranging from 4 to 20%, averaging 12%, Table 3). However, time spent within these hot spots ranged from 10 to 60% (averaging 34% across elephants, Table 5), with time spent in hot spots being related to the overall size of the hot spots (the larger the hot spot the more time elephants spent in them).Identifying the location of these hot spots is essential in designing appropriate management practices in collaboration with land users and identifying the best location for elephant corridors. In the last 25 years, forest cover in the Lower Kinabatangan has been drastically reduced and fragmented46, eroding the biodiversity value of this landscape. Today, this region has little remaining forests, and what is left is insufficient for sustaining the local elephant population10. Moreover, forests are highly fragmented along the Kinabatangan River, with a number of bottlenecks constraining elephant movements9. The situation in this landscape is getting worse because of further land clearances for agriculture, namely oil palm; as well as for the highly controversial Sukau Bridge and new road/highway that is planned for the region.Our analyses revealed a highly significant difference between the average proportions of protected area, unprotected forest, and oil palm estate extents within the elephant’s entire range; and a substantive, but not significant, difference across these land use/land cover types within hot spots (Table SI 4). At the individual level, there was a highly significant negative relationship between the proportion of protected areas and oil palm estates both within the elephant’s entire range and within the hot spots.At the pooled level, we found that around 45% of the entire known range and hot spots were within forested environments (280.44 km2 and 120.29 km2 respectively). Our results showed strong fidelity of certain elephants to these forested habitats. Our k-means cluster analysis found that within elephant entire ranges and hot spots, two out of the three cluster groups had high or very high usage of forests. Both cluster 1, for the entire range, and cluster 1 for hot spots extents, had five females that on average used forest environments 90% of their time, with protected areas being used 64% and 59%, and unprotected forested being used on average 26% and 31%, respectively (Table 7).Individuals in cluster 2, for the entire range analysis, on average, spent 73% of their time in forests (57% of this in protected areas and 16% in unprotected forests; Table 7). For the hot spot analysis, the individuals in cluster 2 spent on average 65% of their time in forests (52% of this in the unprotected forests and 13% in protected forests; Table 7). Elephants within these clusters were all females. Our results suggest that forest may be of particular importance for females as they had forest as their dominant land cover type within their entire range, hot spot extents and time spent analyses (Fig. 3, Table 5). Several studies have shown that adult females influence and guide the movement patterns and habitat utilization for their family group and that females in family units tend to inhabit less risky areas, such as within natural forest habitat60,61,62.However, the unprotected forest is at risk. We identified about 8% (or 49 km2) of forest identified within the pooled entire known range were not protected, with half potentially being on state land, and the remaining half on land titles of various types (Table SI 4). For the pooled hot spot areas, unprotected forest was proportionally higher, comprising of 11% (or 29 km2) of the total extent, with 54% being potentially on State land and 46% on land titles (Table SI 4). Protecting these forests would be an essential and efficient way to secure key elephant habitat since all collared individuals were using these forest fragments in their entire range (averaging 11%, and ranging from 8 to 18%), and hot spot extents (averaging 20%, and ranging from 0 to 53%) (Table SI 4, Fig. 3). On average, 24% of time was spent in unprotected forests within hot spots, though this varied widely from 0% (for the male elephant known as Gading) to 61% (for the female matriarch named Jasmine) (Table 5). In fact, five females had large proportions of their hot spot extents (24–53%) in unprotected forests, spending substantial periods of their time (33–61%) within these threatened areas.Our findings show that unprotected forests around the villages of Bilit and Sukau, were of particular significance (Figs. 1, 2). These unprotected forests largely consist of lowland dry forest, seasonally flooded swamp forest, and swamp forest, which are considered important habitats for elephants for feeding, resting and moving47,63. Within these forests, and along the forest margins and river banks there are also natural open grasslands that consist of Phragmites karka and Dinochloa scabrida that provide essential forage, mainly in the riparian areas for elephants9,21,23. Forested environments are also considered to be important in providing natural refugee from human activities and disturbance. For example, elephants have been documented to form significantly larger group sizes, as well as engaging in significantly more social interactions, in natural forest habitat compared to, for example, oil palm landscapes63. Adult females, generally, avoid areas considered unsafe for their respective social units, are more selective in the resources they use, and require regular access to water because of the presence of young64,65,66. This may be why our results, strongly suggest that forest habitats seem to be most important for adult females.Another significant issue faced by these elephants is the threat from the controversial planned Sukau bridge and road/highway that is set out in the Sabah Structure Plan, an overarching policy document for the State58. Currently, a new road/highway is under construction on the northern bank of the village of Sukau, and this has already cleared areas of unprotected forest. This public road could link to a potential new bridge that would cross over the Kinabatangan River, cutting through unprotected forest and a protected area (Lower Kinabatangan Wildlife Sanctuary), before going through oil palm estates then through another protected area to the south and through the Tabin elephant population range. For the Kinabatangan, creating a public highway will cut the elephant population range into two parts (Figs. 2, 3). All collared elephants use this area, as it is a key bottleneck and the only alternative option to pass around Sukau village9. We found that nine elephants have hot spots that intersect or meet up with the current road (which will be up-graded and get considerably busier) and/or the planned road/highway alignment (Figs. SI 1 and 2). For these elephants, we calculated that they spent from 2 to 44% (average 14%) of their time within these hot spots (Table 4). Our statistical analyses suggest that if the road/highway goes ahead it will have a significant impact on the elephants’ behaviour with respect to time spent in the hot spots. Indeed, this infrastructure project could have dire consequences for these elephants and their family groups, by disrupting their ranging patterns and segmenting the entire elephant range into two (Figs. 2, 4). The existing road in Batu Putih has already proven to be an impassable barrier for this elephant population, as no elephants have been observed crossing this road since the early 2000s14. For elephants that do try and cross, vehicle collisions may become a significant threat to elephants and drivers alike67, and potentially increasing human–elephant conflict in the nearby villages, as well as in plantations14,68,69, exacerbating an already difficult situation for this small and fragmented population.Results from the pooled analysis show that about 53% of the entire known population range is within oil palm estates; and 51% for the pooled hot spots (Fig. 3, Table SI 4). Our k-means clustering analysis grouped 6 elephants into cluster 3 that on average spent 57% of time in oil palm estates; and 7 elephants into cluster 2 within the hot spot analysis that on average spent 73% of their time in oil palm estates (Table 6). All the males, were clustered within these groups (Table 5). In fact, the three collared males were amongst the highest users of oil palm estates (Fig. 3, Table SI4, and 5). This could be related to a ‘‘high risk, high gain’’ strategy, often adopted by males to increase body size and enhance reproductive success32,33,60. However, it is interesting to see that three females (Ita, Ratu and Koyah) and their respective social units, also seemed to have high levels of oil palm use, while other individuals had zero or very little use of oil palm (e.g. Aqeela, Jasmin, Sandi, Kasih; Table SI 4, Fig. 3). Differential choices may result from differences in individual knowledge and experience with people during past encounters, for example70,71.We identified that collared elephants were ranging in 11 known oil palm estates, with the five most regularly used being Melangking Oil Palm Plantation (with 12 elephants entire range overlapping with this estate and six hot spots), IOI Corporation (with 11 overlapping entire ranges, and eight hot spots), Genting Plantations (14 and seven, respectively), Sime Darby Plantation (five and two, respectively), and Karangan Agriculture (8 and 2, respectively) (Table 6; Fig. 4). Presence of bottlenecks and barriers (e.g. electric fences) may explain hot spot occurrences in these estates, as well as feeding opportunities, management strategies of specific estates, and historical and seasonal ranges.Linear features like major highways, electric fences and drainage ditches hamper elephant movements within the Lower Kinabatangan9. A previous study identified 20 bottlenecks in the Lower Kinabatangan with the two main ones (of 9 km and 6.5 km in length) found around the village of Sukau9. In addition, the unplanned and chaotic erection of electric fences by large estates and smallholdings has disrupted significantly elephant movement patterns and resulted in artificial hot spots for certain individuals (e.g. Liun, Ita, Gading and Sejati)35,72. Electric fences have widely been used to mitigate human–elephant conflicts. The establishment of fences rarely consider the traditional elephant routes nor the location of existing fences in neighbouring estates. If elephants manage to enter such areas, they often become trapped and experience difficulties in returning to nearby forests, exacerbating conflicts with people35.Certain estates such as Melangking Oil Palm Plantation have allowed elephants to roam freely in their estate (Muhammad Al-Shafieq, personal communication). Since 2017, this plantation has shown a drastic reduction in damages to their oil palms following the removal of their permanent electric fences surrounding their entire estate. Instead, this plantation is using a temporary electric fencing regime around newly planted palm areas. Concurrently, they now do not push elephants out of their estate, which can explain why Melangking Oil Palm Plantation is a significant hotspot in the region.Another reason why elephant ranges incorporate oil palm estates is to move between forest patches that are becoming completely isolated following forest conversion, as is the case close to Sukau (Fig. SI1 and SI2; Fig. 1). Unlike other elephant species that increase their speed of movement rates in highly disturbed areas27,30,66, the Bornean elephant has been observed doing the opposite, which may explain some of the hot spots within oil palm estates. This movement strategy may allow for better vigilance as seen on a few occasions when elephants spent 2–5 days in the Bukit Melapi-Yu Kwang Corridor, near the village of Sukau, before leaving the area (Othman, personal observation).Hot spots in the oil palm landscape can also be explained by feeding opportunities, since elephants feed on palm shoots, leaves and hearts73. Elephants are known to eat the shoots of newly planted oil palms, often killing the palms and causing significant economic damages35. Since 2010, many estates located in the Lower Kinabatangan have started a new palm rotation. Palms are replanted every 25 years. A new rotation includes land clearing, bole and root mass removal, and the shredding or chipping of felled palms. Elephants are attracted to the shredded palm hearts since it gives them easy access to one of their favourite food72. This particular behaviour does not cause economic damage, and some estate managers allow the elephants to stay and forage in the chipping areas. This was documented for several collared elephants, whose hot spots and time spent were particularly high within oil palm (e.g. Gading and Sandy, two males; and Ratu and Ita, two females). Once the shredded palms have dried, however, elephants will leave these areas and move elsewhere. Within oil palm estates, some elephants have been found to travel more directly and rapidly suggesting ‘exploratory’ behaviour, which could be associated with searching for young palms or areas of palm felling and chipping of palm hearts15.Lastly, elephants may still be using their historical range that used to be covered with forest before conversion to oil palm. Other factors potentially explaining the relatively high use of oil palm estates include seasonal variations of ranging patterns. Indeed events of drought or floods limit the access to various parts of the floodplain and will tend to confine the animals in some areas9,63.In Sabah the state authorities have recorded at least 200 elephant deaths from the year 2010 to 2021 and most of these have occurred on, or near, oil palm estates14,74,75,76. Deaths from non-natural causes are largely due to poisoning (both accidental and intentional), gunshot wounds, poaching for tusks and other body parts, and snares35. Stopping killing and enabling a safe coexistence between people and elephants within multiple-use landscapes that are dominated by oil palm is one of the key strategies developed in the Bornean Elephant Action Plan for Sabah (2020–2029), which was endorsed by the State14. Based on our results in Lower Kinabatangan, a series of recommendations are proposed.This study underscores the importance of remaining forested areas for the Lower Kinabatangan elephant population. Full protection of all forest fragments left in the Lower Kinabatangan is urgently needed. Several official mechanisms are available to fulfil this request that has been proposed for the past 20 years by various organizations46.The current network of forests available in the Lower Kinabatangan is too small and fragmented to sustain a viable elephant population. Forest corridors must be created across the landscape through reforestation exercises, whilst concurrently undertaking enrichment planting of native understory forage within forested areas as this may minimize the need for elephants to search for easily accessible food in high-risk oil palm landscapes21,22,23.Current governmental plans to build a road bridge and public road/highway linking the southern bank of the Kinabatangan River to Tabin Wildlife Reserve to the south will irreversibly impact the Lower Kinabatangan elephant population by cutting the current range into two isolated parts. This will impact the elephants ranging patterns, potentially even fragmenting the already small population into two groups, and potentially leading to elephant deaths by vehicle collisions (which is becoming increasingly common in Peninsular Malaysia), and increase the risk of poaching activities, all resulting in a decrease in the genetic diversity of the, already small and isolated, population14,67.Eventually, the future of the Kinabatangan elephant population resides in improving land use and management practices within oil palm estates currently used by elephants. We recommend that priority should be given at improving elephant movements in oil palm estates by removing unnecessary man-made barriers and only cautiously installing temporary electric fences to protect sensitive areas. For example, the use of electric fences around mature oil palm and areas whereby palms are being removed and chipped could be prohibited, and electric fences permitted solely for protecting oil palm nurseries, new plantings and young oil palms (e.g. up to 7–8 years old), and staff and office quarters. This would greatly allow for landscape permeability for elephants, and other species that need to cross the landscape for their ecological and biological needs14.A handful of guidelines exist to assist oil palm managers and staff in managing elephant populations in their respective estates72,77. However, there is a need for a more comprehensive set of guidelines, which delineate better practices with the aim to increase the protection of people and elephants outside protected areas. Guidelines should specify “do’s” and “don’ts” (based on best available data and knowledge) of actions needed before, during and after elephants visit oil palm estates and smallholdings.Sabah now is in an interesting transition within their palm oil sector. On the 21st October 2015, the Sabah State Cabinet committed to produce 100% certified sustainable palm oil, by 2025, under the Roundtable for Sustainable palm Oil (RSPO) Jurisdictional Certification approach. Under this approach, areas of High Conservation Value and areas identified within the High Carbon Stock Approach need specific management and monitoring, in order to comply with RSPO principles and criteria78,79,80. Sabah government can use this platform to build an integrated landscape level approach to better manage landscapes within known elephant ranges (which is considered a High Conservation Value species) to allow for a safe and permeable movement through the landscape.Eventually, long-term survival of the Bornean elephant will mainly depend on how people and elephants can co-exist. It is our hope that this study illustrates the importance of protecting all forested habitat and effectively managing areas outside of protected areas to allow for long-term elephant coexistence with humans in this landscape. More

  • in

    Limited acclimation of early life stages of the coral Seriatopora hystrix from mesophotic depth to shallow reefs

    Hughes, T. P. et al. Global warming and recurrent mass bleaching of corals. Nature 543, 373–377 (2017).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Glynn, P. W. Coral reef bleaching: facts, hypotheses and implications. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2, 495–509 (1996).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Riegl, B. & Piller, W. E. Possible refugia for reefs in times of environmental stress. Int. J. Earth Sci. 92, 520–531 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hinderstein, L. M. et al. Theme section on ‘Mesophotic Coral Ecosystems: Characterization, Ecology, and Management’. Coral Reefs 29, 247–251 (2010).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bongaerts, P., Ridgway, T., Sampayo, E. M. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Assessing the ‘deep reef refugia’ hypothesis: Focus on Caribbean reefs. Coral Reefs 29, 309–327 (2010).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Smith, T. B. et al. Caribbean mesophotic coral ecosystems are unlikely climate change refugia. Global Change Biol. 22, 2756–2765 (2016).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Frade, P. R. et al. Deep reefs of the Great Barrier Reef offer limited thermal refuge during mass coral bleaching. Nat. Commun. 9, 3447 (2018).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Holstein, D. M., Paris, C. B., Vaz, A. C. & Smith, T. B. Modeling vertical coral connectivity and mesophotic refugia. Coral Reefs 35, 23–37 (2016).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Prasetia, R., Sinniger, F., Hashizume, K. & Harii, S. Reproductive biology of the deep brooding coral Seriatopora hystrix: Implications for shallow reef recovery. PLoS ONE 12, e0177034 (2017).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Shlesinger, T., Grinblat, M., Rapuano, H., Amit, T. & Loya, Y. Can mesophotic reefs replenish shallow reefs? Reduced coral reproductive performance casts a doubt. Ecology 99, 421–437 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gleason, D. F. & Hofmann, D. K. Coral larvae: From gametes to recruits. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 408, 42–57 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hughes, T. P. & Tanner, J. E. Recruitment failure, life histories, and long-term decline of Caribbean corals. Ecology 81, 2250–2263 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bongaerts, P. et al. Deep reefs are not universal refuges: Reseeding potential varies among coral species. Sci. Adv. 3, e1602373 (2017).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Oppen, M. J. H., Bongaerts, P., Underwood, J. N., Peplow, L. M. & Cooper, T. F. The role of deep reefs in shallow reef recovery: An assessment of vertical connectivity in a brooding coral from west and east Australia. Mol. Ecol. 20, 1647–1660 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cohen, I. & Dubinsky, Z. Long term photoacclimation responses of the coral Stylophora pistillata to reciprocal deep to shallow transplantation: Photosynthesis and calcification. Front. Mar. Sci. 2, 45 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Eyal, G. et al. Euphyllia paradivisa, a successful mesophotic coral in the northern Gulf of Eilat/Aqaba, Red Sea. Coral Reefs 35, 91–102 (2016).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ben-Zvi, O. et al. Photophysiology of a mesophotic coral 3 years after transplantation to a shallow environment. Coral Reefs 39, 903–913 (2020).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Murata, N., Takahashi, S., Nishiyama, Y. & Allakhverdiev, S. I. Photoinhibition of photosystem II under environmental stress. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Bioenerget. 1767, 414–421 (2007).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Takahashi, S. & Murata, N. How do environmental stresses accelerate photoinhibition?. Trends Plant Sci. 13, 178–182 (2008).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cumbo, V. R., Baird, A. H. & van Oppen, M. J. H. The promiscuous larvae: Flexibility in the establishment of symbiosis in corals. Coral Reefs 32, 111–120 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Little, A. F., Van Oppen, M. J. H. & Willis, B. L. Flexibility in algal endosymbioses shapes growth in reef corals. Science 304, 1492–1494 (2004).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sinniger, F., Morita, R. & Harii, S. ‘Locally extinct’ coral species Seriatopora hystrix found at upper mesophotic depths in Okinawa. Coral Reefs 32, 153 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sinniger, F. et al. Overview of the mesophotic coral ecosystems around Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan. Galaxea J. Coral Reef Stud. 24, 69–76 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Loya, Y. et al. Coral bleaching: the winners and the losers. Ecol. Lett. 4, 122–131 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Woesik, R., Sakai, K., Ganase, A. & Loya, Y. Revisiting the winners and the losers a decade after coral bleaching. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 434, 67–76 (2011).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sinniger, F., Prasetia, R., Yorifuji, M., Bongaerts, P. & Harii, S. Seriatopora diversity preserved in upper mesophotic coral ecosystems in Southern Japan. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 155 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Atoda, K. The larva and postlarval development of some reef-building corals. V. Seriatopora hystrix. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. 19, 33–39 (1951).
    Google Scholar 
    Hata, T. et al. Coral larvae are poor swimmers and require fine-scale reef structure to settle. Sci. Rep. 7, 2249 (2017).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Harii, S. & Kayanne, H. Larval dispersal, recruitment, and adult distribution of the brooding stony octocoral Heliopora coerulea on Ishigaki Island, southwest Japan. Coral Reefs 22, 188–196 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mulla, A. J., Lin, C. H., Takahashi, S. & Nozawa, Y. Photo-movement of coral larvae influences vertical positioning in the ocean. Coral Reefs 40, 1297–1306 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Figueiredo, J., Baird, A. H., Harii, S. & Connolly, S. R. Increased local retention of reef coral larvae as a result of ocean warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 4, 498–502 (2014).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shanks, A. L., Largier, J., Brink, L., Brubaker, J. & Hooff, R. Demonstration of the onshore transport of larval invertebrates by the shoreward movement of an upwelling front. Limnol. Oceanogr. 45, 230–236 (2000).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Singh, T. et al. Long-term trends and seasonal variations in environmental conditions in Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan. Galaxea J. Coral Reef Stud. 24, 121–133 (2022).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Roth, M. S., Fan, T.-Y. & Deheyn, D. D. Life history changes in coral fluorescence and the effects of light intensity on larval physiology and settlement in Seriatopora hystrix. PLoS ONE 8, e59476 (2013).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mundy, C. N. & Babcock, R. C. Role of light intensity and spectral quality in coral settlement: Implications for depth-dependent settlement?. J. Exp. Mar. Bio. Ecol. 223, 235–255 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nesa, B., Baird, A. H., Harii, S., Yakovleva, I. & Hidaka, M. Algal symbionts increase DNA damage in coral planulae exposed to sunlight. Zool. Stud. 51, 12–17 (2012).CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Cunning, R. & Baker, A. C. Excess algal symbionts increase the susceptibility of reef corals to bleaching. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 259–262 (2013).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nakamura, T. Mass coral bleaching event in Sekisei lagoon observed in the summer of 2016. J. Jpn. Coral Reef Soc. 19, 29–40 (2017).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sakai, K., Singh, T. & Iguchi, A. Bleaching and post-bleaching mortality of Acropora corals on a heat-susceptible reef in 2016. PeerJ 7, e8138 (2019).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Edmunds, P. J., Gates, R. D. & Gleason, D. F. The biology of larvae from the reef coral Porites astreoides, and their response to temperature disturbances. Mar. Biol. 139, 981–989 (2001).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Baker, A. C. Reef corals bleach to survive change. Nature 411, 765–766 (2001).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bongaerts, P. et al. Adaptive divergence in a scleractinian coral: Physiological adaptation of Seriatopora hystrix to shallow and deep reef habitats. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 303 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Einbinder, S. et al. Novel adaptive photosynthetic characteristics of mesophotic symbiotic microalgae within the reef-building coral, Stylophora pistillata. Front. Mar. Sci. 3, 195 (2016).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rogers, C. S., Fitz, H. C., Gilnack, M., Beets, J. & Hardin, J. Scleractinian coral recruitment patterns at Salt River submarine canyon, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 3, 69–76 (1984).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Maida, M., Collb, J. C. & Sammarco, P. W. Shedding new light on scleractinian coral recruitment. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 180, 189–202 (1994).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sato, M. Mortality and growth of juvenile coral Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus). Coral Reefs 4, 27–33 (1985).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nozawa, Y. Micro-crevice structure enhances coral spat survivorship. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 367, 127–130 (2008).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gleason, D. F. & Wellington, G. M. Ultraviolet radiation and coral bleaching. Nature 365, 836–838 (1993).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shlesinger, T. & Loya, Y. Depth-dependent parental effects create invisible barriers to coral dispersal. Commun. Biol. 4, 1–10 (2021).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Groves, S. H. et al. Growth rates of Porites astreoides and Orbicella franksi in mesophotic habitats surrounding St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands. Coral Reefs 37, 345–354 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Al-Horani, F. A., Al-Moghrabi, S. M. & De Beer, D. The mechanism of calcification and its relation to photosynthesis and respiration in the scleractinian coral Galaxea fascicularis. Mar. Biol. 142, 419–426 (2003).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jiang, L. et al. Increased temperature mitigates the effects of ocean acidification on the calcification of juvenile Pocillopora damicornis, but at a cost. Coral Reefs 37, 71–79 (2018).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jurriaans, S. & Hoogenboom, M. O. Thermal performance of scleractinian corals along a latitudinal gradient on the Great Barrier Reef. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20180546 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Brown, B. E. et al. Diurnal changes in photochemical efficiency and xanthophyll concentrations in shallow water reef corals: evidence for photoinhibition and photoprotection. Coral Reefs 18, 99–105 (1999).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Salih, A., Larkum, A., Cox, G., Kühl, M. & Hoegh-Guldberg, O. Fluorescent pigments in corals are photoprotective. Nature 408, 850–853 (2000).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Matz, M. V., Marshall, N. J. & Vorobyev, M. Are corals colorful?. Photochem. Photobiol. 82, 345–350 (2006).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Haddock, S. H. D. & Dunn, C. W. Fluorescent proteins function as a prey attractant: Experimental evidence from the hydromedusa Olindias formosus and other marine organisms. Biol. Open 4, 1094–1104 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Eyal, G. et al. Spectral diversity and regulation of coral fluorescence in a mesophotic reef habitat in the Red Sea. PLoS ONE 10, 1–19 (2015).Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Ben-Zvi, O., Eyal, G. & Loya, Y. Light-dependent fluorescence in the coral Galaxea fascicularis. Hydrobiologia 759, 15–26 (2015).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Roth, M. et al. Fluorescent proteins in dominant mesophotic reef-building corals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 521, 63–79 (2015).ADS 
    CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ben-Zvi, O., Eyal, G. & Loya, Y. Response of fluorescence morphs of the mesophotic coral Euphyllia paradivisa to ultra-violet radiation. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–9 (2019).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hughes, T. P. et al. Coral reefs in the Anthropocene. Nature 546, 82–90 (2017).ADS 
    CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Oliver, E. C. J. et al. Longer and more frequent marine heatwaves over the past century. Nat. Commun. 9, 1324 (2018).ADS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Nakamura, T., van Woesik, R. & Yamasaki, H. Photoinhibition of photosynthesis is reduced by water flow in the reef-building coral Acropora digitifera. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 301, 109–118 (2005).ADS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    Pupal size as a proxy for fat content in laboratory-reared and field-collected Drosophila species

    Parker, J. & Johnston, L. A. The proximate determinants of insect size. J. Biol. 5, 15 (2006).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Honěk, A. Intraspecific variation in body size and fecundity in insects: A general relationship. Oikos 66, 483 (1993).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kingsolver, J. G. & Huey, R. B. Size, temperature, and fitness: Three rules. Evol. Ecol. Res. 10, 251–268 (2008).
    Google Scholar 
    Beukeboom, L. W. Size matters in insects—An introduction. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 166, 2–3 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    West, S. A., Flanagan, K. E. & Godfray, H. C. J. The relationship between parasitoid size and fitness in the field, a study of Achrysocharoides zwoelferi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 65, 631–639 (1996).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sagarra, L. A., Vincent, C. & Stewart, R. K. Body size as an indicator of parasitoid quality in male and female Anagyrus kamali (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). Bull. Entomol. Res. 91, 363–367 (2001).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellers, J., Alphen, J. J. M. V. & Sevenster, J. G. A field study of size–fitness relationships in the parasitoid Asobara tabida. J. Anim. Ecol. 67, 318–324 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Armbruster, P. & Hutchinson, R. A. Pupal mass and wing length as indicators of fecundity in Aedes albopictus and Aedes geniculatus (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 39, 699–704 (2002).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tantawy, A. O. & Vetukhiv, M. O. Effects of size on fecundity, longevity and viability in populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 94, 395–403 (1960).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lefranc, A. & Bundgaard, J. The influence of male and female body size on copulation duration and fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster. Hereditas 132, 243–247 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Atkinson, D. Temperature and organism size: A biological law for ectotherms? Adv. Ecol. Res. 25, 1–58 (1994).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Poças, G. M., Crosbie, A. E. & Mirth, C. K. When does diet matter? The roles of larval and adult nutrition in regulating adult size traits in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 139, 104051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2020.104051 (2020).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Tammaru, T. Determination of adult size in a folivorous moth: constraints at instar level? Ecol. Entomol. 23, 80–89 (1998).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Miller, R. S. & Thomas, J. L. The effects of larval crowding and body size on the longevity of adult Drosophila melanogaster. Ecology 39, 118–125 (1958).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nijhout, H. F. The control of body size in insects. Dev. Biol. 261, 1–9 (2003).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shingleton, A. W., Mirth, C. K. & Bates, P. W. Developmental model of static allometry in holometabolous insects. Proc. R. Soc. B 275, 1875–1885 (2008).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Koenraadt, C. J. M. Pupal dimensions as predictors of adult size in fitness studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). J. Med. Entomol. 45, 331–336 (2008).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Stillwell, R. C., Dworkin, I., Shingleton, A. W. & Frankino, W. A. Experimental manipulation of body size to estimate morphological scaling relationships in Drosophila. JoVE 56, 3162. https://doi.org/10.3791/3162 (2011).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shin, S.-M., Akram, W. & Lee, J.-J. Effect of body size on energy reserves in Culex pipiens pallens females (Diptera: Culicidae). Entomol. Res. 42, 163–167 (2012).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mirth, C. K. & Riddiford, L. M. Size assessment and growth control: How adult size is determined in insects. BioEssays 29, 344–355 (2007).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chown, S. L. & Gaston, K. J. Body size variation in insects: A macroecological perspective. Biol. Rev. 85, 139–169 (2010).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Beadle, G. W., Tatum, E. L. & Clancy, C. W. Food level in relation to rate of development and eye pigmentation in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Bull. 75, 447–462 (1938).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gayon, J. History of the concept of allometry1. Am. Zool. 40, 748–758 (2000).
    Google Scholar 
    Takken, W. et al. Larval nutrition differentially affects adult fitness and Plasmodium development in the malaria vectors Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi. Parasit. Vectors 6, 345 (2013).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Briegel, H. Metabolic relationship between female body size, reserves, and fecundity of Aedes aegypti. J. Insect Physiol. 36, 165–172 (1990).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ellers, J. Fat and eggs: An alternative method to measure the trade-off between survival and reproduction in insect parasitoids. Neth. J. Zool. 3, 227–235 (1996).
    Google Scholar 
    González-Tokman, D. et al. Energy storage, body size and immune response of herbivore beetles at two different elevations in Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop. 67, 608–620 (2019).
    Google Scholar 
    Timmermann, S. E. & Briegel, H. Larval growth and biosynthesis of reserves in mosquitoes. J. Insect Physiol. 45, 461–470 (1999).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Strohm, E. Factors affecting body size and fat content in a digger wasp. Oecologia 123, 184–191 (2000).PubMed 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Lease, H. M. & Wolf, B. O. Lipid content of terrestrial arthropods in relation to body size, phylogeny, ontogeny and sex. Physiol. Entomol. 36, 29–38 (2011).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Arrese, E. L. & Soulages, J. L. Insect fat body: Energy, metabolism, and regulation. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 55, 207–225 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kühnlein, R. P. Lipid droplet-based storage fat metabolism in Drosophila. J. Lipid Res. 53, 1430–1436 (2012).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Church, R. B. & Robertson, F. W. A biochemical study of the growth of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Exp. Zool. 162, 337–351 (1966).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Merkey, A. B., Wong, C. K., Hoshizaki, D. K. & Gibbs, A. G. Energetics of metamorphosis in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 57, 1437–1445 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nestel, D., Tolmasky, D., Rabossi, A. & Quesada-Allué, L. A. Lipid, carbohydrates and protein patterns during metamorphosis of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 96, 237–244 (2003).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lee, K. P. & Jang, T. Exploring the nutritional basis of starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Funct. Ecol. 28, 1144–1155 (2014).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hahn, D. A. & Denlinger, D. L. Meeting the energetic demands of insect diapause: Nutrient storage and utilization. J. Insect Physiol. 53, 760–773 (2007).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tejeda, M. T. et al. Effects of size, sex and teneral resources on the resistance to hydric stress in the tephritid fruit fly Anastrepha ludens. J. Insect Physiol. 70, 73–80 (2014).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hoffmann, A. A., Hallas, R., Anderson, A. R. & Telonis-Scott, M. Evidence for a robust sex-specific trade-off between cold resistance and starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 18, 804–810 (2005).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Alaux, C., Ducloz, F., Crauser, D. & Le Conte, Y. Diet effects on honeybee immunocompetence. Biol. Lett. 6, 562–565 (2010).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bryk, B., Hahn, K., Cohen, S. M. & Teleman, A. A. MAP4K3 regulates body size and metabolism in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 344, 150–157 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gasser, M., Kaiser, M., Berrigan, D. & Stearns, S. C. Life-history correlates of evolution under high and low adult mortality. Evolution 54, 1260–1272 (2000).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chippindale, A. K., Chu, T. J. F. & Rose, M. R. Complex trade-offs and the evolution of starvation resistance in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50, 753 (1996).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kristensen, T. N., Overgaard, J., Loeschcke, V. & Mayntz, D. Dietary protein content affects evolution for body size, body fat and viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Biol. Lett. 7, 269–272 (2011).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Juarez-Carreño, S. et al. Body-fat sensor triggers ribosome maturation in the steroidogenic gland to initiate sexual maturation in Drosophila. Cell Rep. 37, 109830 (2021).PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Markow, T. A. The secret lives of Drosophila flies. Elife 4, e06793 (2015).PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Choma, M. A., Suter, M. J., Vakoc, B. J., Bouma, B. E. & Tearney, G. J. Physiological homology between Drosophila melanogaster and vertebrate cardiovascular systems. Dis. Model. Mech. 4, 411–420 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Morgan, T. H., Sturtevant, A. H., Muller, H. J. & Bridges, C. B. The Mechanism of Mendelian Heredity (H. Holt, 1923).
    Google Scholar 
    Dobzhansky, T. The influence of the quantity and quality of chromosomal material on the size of the cells in Drosophila melanogaster. Wilhelm Roux Arch. Entwickl Mech. Org. 115, 363–379 (1929).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Musselman, L. P. & Kühnlein, R. P. Drosophila as a model to study obesity and metabolic disease. J. Exp. Biol. 221, 163881 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    DiAngelo, J. R. & Birnbaum, M. J. Regulation of fat cell mass by insulin in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 6341–6352 (2009).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rovenko, B. M. et al. High sucrose consumption promotes obesity whereas its low consumption induces oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 79, 42–54 (2015).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hardy, C. M. et al. Obesity-associated cardiac dysfunction in starvation-selected Drosophila melanogaster. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Compar. Physiol. 309, R658–R667 (2015).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hardy, C. M. et al. Genome-wide analysis of starvation-selected Drosophila melanogaster—A genetic model of obesity. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 50–65 (2018).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Musselman, L. P. et al. A high-sugar diet produces obesity and insulin resistance in wild-type Drosophila. Dis. Model. Mech. 4, 842–849 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Henry, Y., Renault, D. & Colinet, H. Hormesis-like effect of mild larval crowding on thermotolerance in Drosophila flies. J. Exp. Biol. 221, 169342 (2018).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bulletin, E. P. P. O. Drosophila suzukii. EPPO Bull. 43, 417–424 (2013).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bächli, G., Vilela, C. R., Escher, S. A. & Saura, A. The Drosophilidae (Diptera) of Fennoscandia and Denmark (Brill Academic Publishers, 2004).Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Markow, T. A. & O’Grady, P. M. Drosophila: A Guide to Species Identification and Use (Elsevier, 2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Visser, B. et al. Variation in lipid synthesis, but genetic homogeneity, among Leptopilina parasitic wasp populations. Ecol. Evol. 8, 7355–7364 (2018).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Williams, C. M., Thomas, R. H., MacMillan, H. A., Marshall, K. E. & Sinclair, B. J. Triacylglyceride measurement in small quantities of homogenised insect tissue: Comparisons and caveats. J. Insect Physiol. 57, 1602–1613 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2020).Fox, J. & Weisberg, S. An R Companion to Applied Regression 2nd edn. (Sage, 2011).
    Google Scholar 
    Lenth, R., Singmann, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P. & Herve, M. Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R Package Version 1, 3 (2018).
    Google Scholar 
    Burnham, K. P. & Anderson, D. R. A practical information-theoretic approach. In Model Selection and Multimodel Inference (ed. Burnham, K. P.) (Springer, 2002).MATH 

    Google Scholar 
    Crawley, M. J. The R Book (Wiley, 2007).MATH 
    Book 

    Google Scholar 
    Borash, D. J. & Ho, G. T. Patterns of selection: Stress resistance and energy storage in density-dependent populations of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 47, 1349–1356 (2001).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Klepsatel, P., Procházka, E. & Gáliková, M. Crowding of Drosophila larvae affects lifespan and other life-history traits via reduced availability of dietary yeast. Exp. Gerontol. 110, 298–308 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Henry, Y., Overgaard, J. & Colinet, H. Dietary nutrient balance shapes phenotypic traits of Drosophila melanogaster in interaction with gut microbiota. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A: Mol. Integr. Physiol. 241, 110626 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ireland, S. & Turner, B. The effects of larval crowding and food type on the size and development of the blowfly, Calliphora vomitoria. Forensic Sci. Int. 159, 175–181 (2006).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Saunders, D. S. & Bee, A. Effects of larval crowding on size and fecundity of the blow fly, Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae). EJE 92, 615–622 (2013).
    Google Scholar 
    Ziegler, R. Changes in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism during starvation in adult Manduca sexta. J. Comp. Physiol. B 161, 125–131 (1991).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ojeda-Avila, T., Arthur Woods, H. & Raguso, R. A. Effects of dietary variation on growth, composition, and maturation of Manduca sexta (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera). J. Insect Physiol. 49, 293–306 (2003).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Borash, D. J., Gibbs, A. G., Joshi, A. & Mueller, L. D. A genetic polymorphism maintained by natural selection in a temporally varying environment. Am. Nat. 151, 148. https://doi.org/10.1086/286108 (1998).CAS 
    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Klepsatel, P., Knoblochová, D., Girish, T. N., Dircksen, H. & Gáliková, M. The influence of developmental diet on reproduction and metabolism in Drosophila. BMC Evol. Biol. 20, 93 (2020).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Matzkin, L. M., Johnson, S., Paight, C., Bozinovic, G. & Markow, T. A. Dietary protein and sugar differentially affect development and metabolic pools in ecologically diverse Drosophila. J. Nutr. 141, 1127–1133 (2011).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Musselman, L. P. et al. Role of fat body lipogenesis in protection against the effects of caloric overload in Drosophila. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 8028–8042 (2013).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Reeve, M. W., Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. Increased body size confers greater fitness at lower experimental temperature in male Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 836–844 (2000).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lounibos, L. P. et al. Does temperature affect the outcome of larval competition between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus?. J. Vector Ecol. 27, 86–95 (2002).CAS 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Bergland, A. O., Genissel, A., Nuzhdin, S. V. & Tatar, M. Quantitative trait loci affecting phenotypic plasticity and the allometric relationship of ovariole number and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 180, 567–582 (2008).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Holm, S. et al. A comparative perspective on longevity: The effect of body size dominates over ecology in moths. J. Evol. Biol. 29, 2422–2435 (2016).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nunney, L. The response to selection for fast larval development in Drosophila melanogaster and its effect on adult weight: An example of a fitness trade-off. Evolution 50, 1193–1204 (1996).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Partridge, L. & Farquhar, M. Lifetime mating success of male fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster) is related to their size. Anim. Behav. 31, 871–877 (1983).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Markow, T. A. & Ricker, J. P. Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of three Drosophila species. Heredity 69, 122–127 (1992).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wikelski, M. & Romero, L. M. Body size, performance and fitness in galapagos marine iguanas. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43, 376–386 (2003).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    van Buskirk, J. & Crowder, L. B. Life-history variation in marine turtles. Copeia 1994, 66–81 (1994).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Broderick, A. C., Glen, F., Godley, B. J. & Hays, G. C. Variation in reproductive output of marine turtles. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 288, 95–109 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wauters, L. A. et al. Effects of spatio-temporal variation in food supply on red squirrel Sciurus vulgaris body size and body mass and its consequences for some fitness components. Ecography 30, 51–65 (2007).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lindström, J. Early development and fitness in birds and mammals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 343–348 (1999).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Reim, C., Teuschl, Y. & Blanckenhorn, W. U. Size-dependent effects of temperature and food stress on energy reserves and starvation resistance in yellow dung flies. Evol. Ecol. Res. 8, 1215–1234 (2006).
    Google Scholar 
    Kölliker-Ott, U. M., Blows, M. W. & Hoffmann, A. A. Are wing size, wing shape and asymmetry related to field fitness of Trichogramma egg parasitoids? Oikos 100, 563–573 (2003).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Knapp, M. Relative importance of sex, pre-starvation body mass and structural body size in the determination of exceptional starvation resistance of Anchomenus dorsalis (Coleoptera: Carabidae). PLoS ONE 11, e0151459 (2016).PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Lue, C.-H. et al. DROP: Molecular voucher database for identification of Drosophila parasitoids. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 2437–2454 (2021).CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Visser, B. et al. Loss of lipid synthesis as an evolutionary consequence of a parasitic lifestyle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 8677–8682 (2010).CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    ADS 

    Google Scholar 
    Visser B et al. Why do
    many parasitoids lack adult triglyceride accumulation, despite functioning fatty acid biosynthesis machinery? EcoEvoRxiv:
    https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/zpf4jArakawa, R., Miura, M. & Fujita, M. Effects of host species on the body size, fecundity, and longevity of Trissolcus mitsukurii (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a solitary egg parasitoid of stink bugs. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39, 177–181 (2004).Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Visser, B., Alborn, H.T., Rondeaux, S. et al. Phenotypic plasticity explains apparent reverse evolution of fat synthesis in parasitic
    wasps. Sci Rep 11, 7751 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86736-8.Krüger, A. P. et al. Effects of irradiation dose on sterility induction and quality parameters of Drosophila suzukii (Diptera: Drosophilidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 111, 741–746 (2018).PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nikolouli, K. et al. Sterile insect technique and Wolbachia symbiosis as potential tools for the control of the invasive species Drosophila suzukii. J. Pest Sci. 91, 1–15 (2017).
    Google Scholar 
    Nikolouli, K., Sassù, F., Mouton, L., Stauffer, C. & Bourtzis, K. Combining sterile and incompatible insect techniques for the population suppression of Drosophila suzukii. J. Pest Sci. 93, 647–661 (2020).CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Calkins, C. O. & Parker, A. G. Sterile insect quality. In Sterile Insect Technique (eds Dyck, V. A. et al.) 269–296 (Springer, 2005).Chapter 

    Google Scholar  More

  • in

    The response of wheat and its microbiome to contemporary and historical water stress in a field experiment

    IPCC. Summary for policymakers. In: Climate change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors S L, Péan C, Berger S, et al. Editors. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.Zhang J, Zhang S, Cheng M, Jiang H, Zhang X, Peng C, et al. Effect of drought on agronomic traits of rice and wheat: a meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:839.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    FAO. Global agriculture towards 2050, high-level expert forum, how to feed the world 2050. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of United Nations FAO. 2009.Agoussar A, Yergeau E. Engineering the plant microbiota in the context of the theory of ecological communities. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2021;70:220–5.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Quiza L, St-Arnaud M, Yergeau E. Harnessing phytomicrobiome signaling for rhizosphere microbiome engineering. Front Plant Sci. 2015;6:507.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mitter B, Pfaffenbichler N, Flavell R, Compant S, Antonielli L, Petric A, et al. A new approach to modify plant microbiomes and traits by introducing beneficial bacteria at flowering into progeny seeds. Front Microbiol. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00011.Li X, Jousset A, de Boer W, Carrión VJ, Zhang T, Wang X, et al. Legacy of land use history determines reprogramming of plant physiology by soil microbiome. ISME J. 2019;13:738–51.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Nelson EB, Simoneau P, Barret M, Mitter B, Compant S. Editorial special issue: the soil, the seed, the microbes and the plant. Plant Soil. 2018;422:1–5.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:607–21.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Moroenyane I, Tremblay J, Yergeau E. Soybean microbiome recovery after disruption is modulated by the seed and not the soil microbiome. Phytobiomes J. 2021;5:418–31.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Xiong C, Zhu Y-G, Wang J-T, Singh B, Han L-L, Shen J-P, et al. Host selection shapes crop microbiome assembly and network complexity. New Phytol. 2021;229:1091–104.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schimel J, Balser TC, Wallenstein M. Microbial stress-response physiology and its implications for ecosystem function. Ecology. 2007;88:1386–94.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Allison SD, Martiny JBH. Resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:11512–9.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bouskill NJ, Lim HC, Borglin S, Salve R, Wood TE, Silver WL, et al. Pre-exposure to drought increases the resistance of tropical forest soil bacterial communities to extended drought. ISME J. 2013;7:384–94.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Evans SE, Wallenstein MD. Soil microbial community response to drying and rewetting stress: does historical precipitation regime matter? Biogeochemistry. 2012;109:101–16.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meisner A, Snoek BL, Nesme J, Dent E, Jacquiod S, Classen AT, et al. Soil microbial legacies differ following drying-rewetting and freezing-thawing cycles. ISME J. 2021;15:1207–21.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Azarbad H, Constant P, Giard-Laliberté C, Bainard LD, Yergeau E. Water stress history and wheat genotype modulate rhizosphere microbial response to drought. Soil Biol Biochem. 2018;126:228–36.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Jones DL, Nguyen C, Finlay RD. Carbon flow in the rhizosphere: carbon trading at the soil–root interface. Plant Soil. 2009;321:5–33.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Sasse J, Martinoia E, Northen T. Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends Plant Sci. 2018;23:25–41.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Holz M, Zarebanadkouki M, Kuzyakov Y, Pausch J, Carminati A. Root hairs increase rhizosphere extension and carbon input to soil. Ann Bot. 2018;121:61–9.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Marasco R, Rolli E, Ettoumi B, Vigani G, Mapelli F, Borin S, et al. A drought resistance-promoting microbiome is selected by root system under desert farming. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e48479.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Moroenyane I, Mendes L, Tremblay J, Tripathi B, Yergeau É. Plant compartments and developmental stages modulate the balance between niche-based and neutral processes in soybean Microbiome. Microb Ecol. 2021;82:416–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-021-01688-w.Chaparro JM, Badri DV, Vivanco JM. Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development. ISME J. 2014;8:790–803.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Azarbad H, Tremblay J, Giard-Laliberté C, Bainard LD, Yergeau E. Four decades of soil water stress history together with host genotype constrain the response of the wheat microbiome to soil moisture. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2020;96. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaa098.Chen S, Cade-Menun BJ, Bainard LD, St. Luce M, Hu Y, Chen Q. The influence of long-term N and P fertilization on soil P forms and cycling in a wheat/fallow cropping system. Geoderma. 2021;404:115274.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Smith EG, Zentner RP, Campbell CA, Lemke R, Brandt K. Long-term crop rotation effects on production, grain quality, profitability, and risk in the northern great plains. Agron J. 2017;109:957–67.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, Walker S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 2015;67:1–48.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 2017;82:1–26.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Yang S. otuSummary: summarizing OTU table regarding the composition, abundance and beta diversity of abundant and rare biospheres. 2018.Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, et al. vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. 2019. Available online at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Wagner MR, Lundberg DS, del Rio TG, Tringe SG, Dangl JL, Mitchell-Olds T. Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12151.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hardoim PR, Hardoim CCP, Overbeek LS, van, Elsas JD. Dynamics of seed-borne rice endophytes on early plant growth stages. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e30438.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Grady KL, Sorensen JW, Stopnisek N, Guittar J, Shade A. Assembly and seasonality of core phyllosphere microbiota on perennial biofuel crops. Nat Commun. 2019;10:4135.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Walsh CM, Becker-Uncapher I, Carlson M, Fierer N. Variable influences of soil and seed-associated bacterial communities on the assembly of seedling microbiomes. ISME J. 2021;15:2748–62.Morales Moreira ZP, Helgason BL, Germida JJ Environment has a Stronger Effect than Host Plant Genotype in Shaping Spring Brassica napus Seed Microbiomes. Phytobiomes J. 2021:PBIOMES-08-20-0059-R.Abdullaeva Y, Ambika Manirajan B, Honermeier B, Schnell S, Cardinale M. Domestication affects the composition, diversity, and co-occurrence of the cereal seed microbiota. J Adv Res. 2021;31:75–86.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Chandrasekaran M, Chanratana M, Kim K, Seshadri S, Sa T. Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis, water status, and gas exchange of plants under salt stress–a meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00457.Begum N, Qin C, Ahanger MA, Raza S, Khan MI, Ashraf M, et al. Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01068.Rashid MI, Mujawar LH, Shahzad T, Almeelbi T, Ismail IMI, Oves M. Bacteria and fungi can contribute to nutrients bioavailability and aggregate formation in degraded soils. Microbiol Res. 2016;183:26–41.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Crowther TW, Thomas SM, Maynard DS, Baldrian P, Covey K, Frey SD, et al. Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:7033–8.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Evans SE, Wallenstein MD. Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. Ecol Lett. 2014;17:155–64.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Santos-Medellín C, Edwards J, Liechty Z, Nguyen B, Sundaresan V. Drought stress results in a compartment-specific restructuring of the rice root-associated microbiomes. mBio. 2017;8:e00764–17.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Naylor D, Coleman-Derr D. Drought stress and root-associated bacterial communities. Front Plant Sci. 2018;8:2223.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhou C, Ma Z, Zhu L, Xiao X, Xie Y, Zhu J, et al. Rhizobacterial Strain Bacillus megaterium BOFC15 induces cellular polyamine changes that improve plant growth and drought resistance. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17:E976.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bokhari A, Essack M, Lafi FF, Andres-Barrao C, Jalal R, Alamoudi S, et al. Bioprospecting desert plant Bacillus endophytic strains for their potential to enhance plant stress tolerance. Sci Rep. 2019;9:18154.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Xu L, Naylor D, Dong Z, Simmons T, Pierroz G, Hixson KK, et al. Drought delays development of the sorghum root microbiome and enriches for monoderm bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:E4284–93.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar 
    Na X, Cao X, Ma C, Ma S, Xu P, Liu S, et al. Plant stage, not drought stress, determines the effect of cultivars on bacterial community diversity in the rhizosphere of broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.). Front Microbiol. 2019;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00828. More

  • in

    Best practices for instrumenting honey bees

    Experiment 1To study the acceptance and tag retention rates of honey bees under different introduction conditions, we set up three two-frame observation hives with (sim 1500) adult bees and a queen. Observation hives were set up in a shed, with an entrance tube that connected to the outside 4 ft above the ground so bees could freely forage in the surrounding fields (Fig. 1A). We put emerging brood from healthy source colonies in an incubator ((33.5^{circ }) C, (ge 55)% RH) and tagged individuals that emerged overnight. Each hive had two vent holes (1” Dia.) through which we could introduce bees (Fig. 1A).Figure 1(A) Observation hive with introduction holes (red), through which bees were introduced via funnel or introduction cage. (B) Plastic tags, silicon tags, and sucrose spray. (C) Photograph of a tagged bee foraging (Photo by Greg Yauney).Full size imageIn our initial experiment, there were seven treatment groups with 20 bees each per colony (n = 420 bees total). The seven treatments were: Control (C), No Sucrose (NS), Plastic (P), Wood Glue (WG), Not Incubated (NI), No Cage (NC), and Day (D). The Control treatment was designed to be a positive control, where we applied all the techniques we thought might increase acceptance of bees into a colony and tag retention rates. All other treatments had a single difference in the tag, tagging process, or introduction process to distinguish it from the control group, as detailed in Table 1. We glued a tag to the thorax of each bee (Fig. 1B) and marked the abdomen with a paint pen (Posca) to distinguish among treatment groups. In order to glue tags on, we picked each bee up, placed a small amount of glue on the thorax, and placed a tag on top of the glue with a pair of forceps (see Video 1 which details the tagging process). All bees except those in the Plastic group were tagged with 1.7 mm(^2) silicon tags (3.4 mm area). Silicon was chosen because it is a material representative of ASICs, which you would expect in a custom chip designed to track bee foraging flights. Plastic tags were 3 mm Dia. plastic discs (7.07 mm area), which are the commercially available bee tags commonly used in honey bee tracking and behavior experiments (Betterbee). All tags were glued on with shellac glue, the glue that comes with commerical honey bee marking kits (Betterbee), except for in the wood glue group, where they were glued on with wood glue (Titebond III). Next, bees were placed in a container with a bit of honey and stored until they were ready to be introduced. All bees except those in the Not Incubated group were placed in the incubator ((33.5^{circ }) C, (ge 55)% RH). The Not Incubated group was stored in a room environment, with variation between 21–27(^{circ }) C and 35–42% RH until introduction. Bees in the Day treatment spent 5 h in the incubator and then were sprayed with a light sucrose syrup (1 sucrose: 1 water (v/v)) and introduced at 4pm while the hives were still actively foraging. The rest of the bees spent between 5 and 8 h in the incubator or room environment before being introduced at 10:30 pm, after foraging had concluded. All except the No Sucrose group were sprayed with a light sucrose syrup before being introduced. The No Cage bees were rapidly introduced through one of the vent holes on the top of the hive using a funnel. The rest of the bees were placed in a cage together, which we connected to the introduction holes at the top of the colony, allowing them to move freely between the cage and the hive.Table 1 Experimental design used for preparation and introduction of treatment groups.Full size tableBeginning on day 2 (07/09/2020), we observed each hive in the morning on days 2-4 and 6-9 to see how many bees per group were present, hereinafter referred to as presence, and how many bees per group were present with tags, hereinafter referred to as success. We selected a random order in which to observe the three hives and a random order in which to observe the treatment groups for each hive. Each side of each hive had a grid drawn on it that divided it into nine squares. We scanned each side of each colony by eye for each treatment, starting with the lower left square of the grid on the first side, moving across the row, and then moving up to the next row, counting presence and success, using a tally counter when needed. We then moved rapidly to the other side and started at the top left of the grid, scanning row by row until we had observed each square in the grid. After an initial scan for each treatment, we placed the covers on the hives and shook for 10s to encourage bees to move around in the hive, and then waited for at least 15 minutes before a second observation. The maximum presence and success from the two daily observations were used for each treatment group and hive for analysis. Since we collected data by scanning each colony, we sometimes found more bees from a group in an observation hive than we had found in the same hive on previous day(s), even though more time had passed. Over the course of the experiment, our hives grew in size, and we believed we were seeing less tagged bees in part because they made up a smaller proportion of the hive population, and so decided to do a destructive sampling before the tagged bees reached foraging age. After dark on day 14 (7/21/2020), we made sure no tagged bees were dead on the bottom of the hives. We blocked the entrances, vacuumed all bees at the entrances into containers, and froze vacuumed bees and the three colonies, so that we could do a destructive sampling of all 3 colonies. This allowed us to get a final count of the presence and success for each of the seven treatment groups. We dissected each frozen colony, removing and inspecting each dead bee, and recorded the presence and success of each treatment group.Experiments 2 and 3We set up three two-frame observation hives in the same shed used for experiment 1 to conduct follow-up experiments in August 2020. The goal of experiment 2 was to compare Gorillaglue gel, an easily accessible Superglue (SG), to Titebond III, a readily accessible Wood Glue (WG2) used in experiment 1. We placed frames of capped brood in an incubator overnight to produce one day old nurse bees. We picked up each bee, placed a small dot of either superglue or wood glue on the thorax, and then placed 1.7 mm(^2) silicon tags on top of the glue. Bees were stored in the incubator with honey for 5–6 h until after dark. Then, we sprayed the bees with a light sucrose syrup and connected their cages to the vent holes at the top of the observation hives, allowing the bees to freely move between their cage and the hives. These details are summarized in Table 1.Some honey bee tagging projects may benefit from tagging foragers as opposed to nurse bees, because nurse bees are the youngest workers and if you tag them you must wait for them to reach foraging age, during which time they may lose their tags. Specifically, tagging foragers as opposed to nurses will be advantageous when the tag price is extremely high or the project is very time constrained, and knowing the exact age of tagged bees is not important for the project goals. Since foragers are older workers that have already acquired the colony scent and learned to navigate the area surrounding their hive, the optimal methods for introducing nurses and foragers may differ. It is not easy to use bees from a source colony, because if they are within foraging range of their maternal colony, they will attempt to fly back home. The goal of experiment 3 was to apply a treatment that had high success with nurse bees (Experiment 1: WG) to foragers, and compare with releasing foragers near their colony and allowing them to return freely. We call these treatments Hive Introduced (HI) and Natural Release (NR), respectively. All foragers for this experiment were collected from the observation hives and were introduced back to the same observation hive after tagging, either through the vent holes at the top of the hive or by releasing the bees near the entrance of the hive. We collected foragers from each colony entrance into a cage with an insect vacuum (Hand-Held DC Vac/Aspirator, Bioquip), specifically aspirating bees that were arriving from foraging trips or had nectar loads, and placed them in the fridge to anesthetize them. We then selected those with intact wings, placed a dot of wood glue on their thoraxes, and placed silicon tags on top of the glue. Both treatment groups were stored in the incubator ((33.5^{circ }) C, (ge 55)% RH) and given honey to feed on. After 2 h in the incubator, the containers with NR bees were sprayed with a light sucrose syrup and placed on the ground 5 ft in front of their respective hive entrances and opened, allowing the bees to fly back to their hives unaided. At 10PM, when it was dark and foraging had concluded, the HI bees were sprayed with a light sucrose syrup. Their cages were then connected to the vent holes at the top of the observation hives, allowing them to freely move between their cage and the hives.Experiments 2 and 3 were conducted in the same hives simultaneously, but were considered separate experiments because experiment 2 was conducted with nurses of known age and experiment 3 was conducted with foragers of unknown age. Nurses and foragers typically have an age difference and experience different levels of risk due to the behaviors they engage in, and so we analyzed these data separately in order to not confound our results. Beginning on day two (08/26/2020), we observed each hive on days 2–11 and 15–21 to determine introduction presence and success for experiment 2 and experiment 3. Forager observations (experiment 3) were always done early in the morning, before foraging activity commenced. As in experiment 1, we randomized observation order, scanned colonies for each treatment group before and after shaking, and used the maximum presence and success from the two observations for analysis. Since we collected data on multiple days by scanning each colony, we occasionally found more bees in a group than we had found on previous day(s), even though more time had passed.Statistical methodsStatistical analyses were performed in R 4.0.520. To determine which preparation and introduction techniques were associated with the highest presence and success, we built generalized linear mixed-effects models (glmms)21 for the proportion of present and success bees to introduced bees respectively, with treatment and sampling day as fixed effects, and colony as a random effect. For experiment 1, treatment was a categorical variable, where the Control bees were the reference group. We assessed the significance of the full models using Wald likelihood ratio chi-square tests on each glmm (‘Anova’ function in the ‘car’ package with test set to ‘Chisq’)22. In all statistical tests, (alpha) was set to 0.05. The destructive data from experiment 1 were analyzed separately from hive observation data. We ran a correlation test to determine the relationship between hive observation data from the final observation day, day 9, and the destructive sampling on day 14 using the ggpubr package23. More

  • in

    Applying the concept of liquid biopsy to monitor the microbial biodiversity of marine coastal ecosystems

    Brierley AS, Kingsford MJ. Impacts of climate change on marine organisms and ecosystems. Curr Biol. 2009;19:R602–R614.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gissi E, Manea E, Mazaris AD, Fraschetti S, Almpanidou V, Bevilacqua S, et al. A review of the combined effects of climate change and other local human stressors on the marine environment. Sci Total Environ. 2021;755:142564.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Carella F, Antuofermo E, Farina S, Salati F, Mandas D, Prado P, et al. In the wake of the ongoing mass mortality events: co-occurrence of Mycobacterium, Haplosporidium and other pathogens in Pinna nobilis collected in Italy and Spain (Mediterranean Sea). Front Mar Sci. 2020;7:48.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Seuront L, Nicastro KR, Zardi GI, Goberville E. Decreased thermal tolerance under recurrent heat stress conditions explains summer mass mortality of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis. Sci Rep. 2019;9:17498.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fey SB, Siepielski AM, Nussle S, Cervantes-Yoshida K, Hwan JL, Huber ER, et al. Recent shifts in the occurrence, cause, and magnitude of animal mass mortality events. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:1083–8.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Scarpa F, Sanna D, Azzena I, Mugetti D, Cerruti F, Hosseini S, et al. Multiple non-species-specific pathogens possibly triggered the mass mortality in Pinna nobilis. Life. 2020;10:238.CAS 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Bradley M, Kutz SJ, Jenkins E, O’Hara TM. The potential impact of climate change on infectious diseases of Arctic fauna. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2005;64:468–77.PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Beyer J, Green NW, Brooks S, Allan IJ, Ruus A, Gomes T, et al. Blue mussels (Mytilus edulis spp.) as sentinel organisms in coastal pollution monitoring: a review. Mar Environ Res. 2017;130:338–65.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Siravegna G, Marsoni S, Siena S, Bardelli A. Integrating liquid biopsies into the management of cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14:531–48.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wan JCM, Massie C, Garcia-Corbacho J, Mouliere F, Brenton JD, Caldas C, et al. Liquid biopsies come of age: towards implementation of circulating tumour DNA. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:223–38.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mandel P, Metais P. Nuclear acids in human blood plasma. Comptes Rendus Séances Soc Biol Filiales. 1948;142:241–3.CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Bronkhorst AJ, Ungerer V, Holdenrieder S. The emerging role of cell-free DNA as a molecular marker for cancer management. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2019;17:100087.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ignatiadis M, Sledge GW, Jeffrey SS. Liquid biopsy enters the clinic – implementation issues and future challenges. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:297–312.PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lo YM, Corbetta N, Chamberlain PF, Rai V, Sargent IL, Redman CW, et al. Presence of fetal DNA in maternal plasma and serum. Lancet. 1997;350:485–7.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Moufarrej MN, Wong RJ, Shaw GM, Stevenson DK, Quake SR. Investigating pregnancy and its complications using circulating cell-free RNA in women’s blood during gestation. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:605219.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Oellerich M, Sherwood K, Keown P, Schutz E, Beck J, Stegbauer J, et al. Liquid biopsies: donor-derived cell-free DNA for the detection of kidney allograft injury. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2021;17:591–603.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wong FC, Lo YM. Prenatal diagnosis innovation: genome sequencing of maternal plasma. Annu Rev Med. 2016;67:419–32.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Gu W, Deng X, Lee M, Sucu YD, Arevalo S, Stryke D, et al. Rapid pathogen detection by metagenomic next-generation sequencing of infected body fluids. Nat Med. 2021;27:115–24.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Huang YF, Chen YJ, Fan TC, Chang NC, Chen YJ, Midha MK, et al. Analysis of microbial sequences in plasma cell-free DNA for early-onset breast cancer patients and healthy females. BMC Med Genom. 2018;11:16.Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Goggs R, Jeffery U, LeVine DN, Li RHL. Neutrophil-extracellular traps, cell-free DNA, and immunothrombosis in companion animals: a review. Vet Pathol. 2020;57:6–23.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kowarsky M, De Vlaminck I, Okamoto J, Neff NF, LeBreton M, Nwobegabay J, et al. Cell-free DNA reveals potential zoonotic reservoirs in non-human primates. BioRxiv. 2018;481093.Caza F, Bernet E, Veyrier FJ, Betoulle S, St-Pierre Y. Hemocytes released in seawater act as Trojan horses for spreading of bacterial infections in mussels. Sci Rep. 2020;10:19696.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Andrew S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc.Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Magoč T, Salzberg SL. FLASH: fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2957–63.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Morgulis A, Gertz EM, Schäffer AA, Agarwala R. A fast and symmetric DUST implementation to mask low-complexity DNA sequences. Comput Biol. 2006;13:1028–40.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31:1674–6.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wood DE, Salzberg SL. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 2014;15:R46.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cuccuru G, Orsini M, Pinna A, Sbardellati A, Soranzo N, Travaglione A, et al. Orione, a web-based framework for NGS analysis in microbiology. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1928–9.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a Web browser. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:385.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Lüskow F, Riisgård H. In situ filtration rates of blue mussels (Mytilus edulis) measured by an open-top chamber method. OJMS. 2018;8:395–406.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Szpechcinski A, Struniawska R, Zaleska J, Chabowski M, Orlowski T, Roszkowski K, et al. Evaluation of fluorescence-based methods for total vs. amplifiable DNA quantification in plasma of lung cancer patients. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;59:675–81.PubMed 

    Google Scholar 
    Tissot C, Toffart AC, Villar S, Souquet PJ, Merle P, Moro-Sibilot D, et al. Circulating free DNA concentration is an independent prognostic biomarker in lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:1773–80.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kustanovich A, Schwartz R, Peretz T, Grinshpun A. Life and death of circulating cell-free DNA. Cancer Biol Ther. 2019;20:1057–67.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Prouteau A, Denis JA, De Fornel P, Cadieu E, Derrien T, Kergal C, et al. Circulating tumor DNA is detectable in canine histiocytic sarcoma, oral malignant melanoma, and multicentric lymphoma. Sci Rep. 2021;11:877.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Vandewoestyne M, Van Hoofstat D, Franssen A, Van Nieuwerburgh F, Deforce D. Presence and potential of cell free DNA in different types of forensic samples. For Sci Int Genet. 2013;7:316–20.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kowarsky M, Camunas-Soler J, Kertesz M, De Vlaminck I, Koh W, Pan W, et al. Numerous uncharacterized and highly divergent microbes which colonize humans are revealed by circulating cell-free DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:9623–8.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Meddeb R, Dache ZAA, Thezenas S, Otandault A, Tanos R, Pastor B, et al. Quantifying circulating cell-free DNA in humans. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5220.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Li YF, Yang N, Liang X, Yoshida A, Osatomi K, Power D, et al. Elevated seawater temperatures decrease microbial diversity in the gut of Mytilus coruscus. Front Physiol. 2018;9:839.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Musella M, Wathsala R, Tavella T, Rampelli S, Barone M, Palladino G, et al. Tissue-scale microbiota of the Mediterranean mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and its relationship with the environment. Sci Total Environ. 2020;717:137209.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thompson JR, Randa MA, Marcelino LA, Tomita-Mitchell A, Lim E, Polz MF. Diversity and dynamics of a north atlantic coastal Vibrio community. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70:4103–10.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Pfister CA, Meyer F, Antonopoulos DA. Metagenomic profiling of a microbial assemblage associated with the California mussel: a node in networks of carbon and nitrogen cycling. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10518.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Galand PE, Casamayor EO, Kirchman DL, Potvin M, Lovejoy C. Unique archaeal assemblages in the Arctic Ocean unveiled by massively parallel tag sequencing. ISME J. 2009;3:860–9.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Korzhenkov AA, Toshchakov SV, Bargiela R, Gibbard H, Ferrer M, Teplyuk AV, et al. Archaea dominate the microbial community in an ecosystem with low-to-moderate temperature and extreme acidity. Microbiome. 2019;7:11.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Spain EA, Johnson SC, Hutton B, Whittaker JM, Lucieer V, Watson SJ, et al. Shallow seafloor gas emissions near Heard and McDonald Islands on the Kerguelen Plateau, southern Indian Ocean. Earth Space Sci. 2020;7:e2019EA000695.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Farías L, Florez-Leiva L, Besoain V, Sarthou G, Fernández C. Dissolved greenhouse gases (nitrous oxide and methane) associated with the naturally iron-fertilized Kerguelen region (KEOPS 2 cruise) in the Southern Ocean. Biogeosciences. 2015;12:1925–40.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Legendre M, Bartoli J, Shmakova L, Jeudy S, Labadie K, Adrait A, et al. Thirty-thousand-year-old distant relative of giant icosahedral DNA viruses with a pandoravirus morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:4274–9.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Levasseur A, Andreani J, Delerce J, Bou Khalil J, Robert C, La Scola B, et al. Comparison of a modern and fossil pithovirus reveals its genetic conservation and evolution. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8:2333–9.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Kelley JL, Brown AP, Therkildsen NO, Foote AD. The life aquatic: advances in marine vertebrate genomics. Nat Rev Genet. 2016;17:523–34.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Colmer SF, Luethy D, Abraham M, Stefanovski D, Hurcombe SD. Utility of cell-free DNA concentrations and illness severity scores to predict survival in critically ill neonatal foals. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0242635.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rushton JG, Ertl R, Klein D, Tichy A, Nell B. Circulating cell-free DNA does not harbour a diagnostic benefit in cats with feline diffuse iris melanomas. J Feline Med Surg. 2019;21:124–32.PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Tagawa M, Shimbo G, Inokuma H, Miyahara K. Quantification of plasma cell-free DNA levels in dogs with various tumors. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2019;31:836–43.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Shi J, Zhang R, Li J, Zhang R. Size profile of cell-free DNA: a beacon guiding the practice and innovation of clinical testing. Theranostics. 2020;10:4737–48.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fernando MR, Jiang C, Krzyzanowski GD, Ryan WL. Analysis of human blood plasma cell-free DNA fragment size distribution using EvaGreen chemistry based droplet digital PCR assays. Clin Chim Acta. 2018;483:39–47.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Findlay AJ. Microbial impact on polysulfide dynamics in the environment. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016;363:fnw103.PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Jørgensen BB, Findlay AJ, Pellerin A. The biogeochemical sulfur cycle of marine sediments. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:849.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Teske A, Brinkhoff T, Muyzer G, Moser DP, Rethmeier J, Jannasch HW. Diversity of thiosulfate-oxidizing bacteria from marine sediments and hydrothermal vents. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:3125–33.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Zhang X, Du Z, Zheng R, Luan Z, Qi F, Cheng K, et al. Development of a new deep-sea hybrid Raman insertion probe and its application to the geochemistry of hydrothermal vent and cold seep fluids. Deep Sea Res Part I Oceanogr Res Pap. 2017;123:1–12.Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Egger M, Riedinger N, Mogollón JM, Jørgensen BB. Global diffusive fluxes of methane in marine sediments. Nat Geosci. 2018;11:421–5.CAS 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Ansorge R, Romano S, Sayavedra L, Kupczok A, Tegetmeyer HE, Dubilier N, et al. Functional diversity enables multiple symbiont strains to coexist in deep-sea mussels. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4:2487–97.PubMed 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Russell SL, Pepper-Tunick E, Svedberg J, Byrne A, Ruelas Castillo J, Vollmers C, et al. Horizontal transmission and recombination maintain forever young bacterial symbiont genomes. PLoS Genet. 2020;16:e1008935.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Angly FE, Felts B, Breitbart M, Salamon P, Edwards RA, Carlson C, et al. The marine viromes of four oceanic regions. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e368.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Li Z, Pan D, Wei G, Pi W, Zhang C, Wang JH, et al. Deep sea sediments associated with cold seeps are a subsurface reservoir of viral diversity. ISME J. 2021;15:2366–78.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Thongsripong P, Chandler JA, Kittayapong P, Wilcox BA, Kapan DD, Bennett SN. Metagenomic shotgun sequencing reveals host species as an important driver of virome composition in mosquitoes. Sci Rep. 2021;11:8448.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Koonin EV, Krupovic M, Agol VI. The Baltimore classification of viruses 50 years later: how does it stand in the light of virus evolution? Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2021;85:e0005321.PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Koonin EV, Dolja VV, Krupovic M, Varsani A, Wolf YI, Yutin N, et al. Global organization and proposed megataxonomy of the virus world. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2020;84:e00061–19.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Breitbach S, Tug S, Simon P. Circulating cell-free DNA: an up-coming molecular marker in exercise physiology. Sports Med. 2012;42:565–86.PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Preissner KT, Herwald H. Extracellular nucleic acids in immunity and cardiovascular responses: between alert and disease. Thromb Haemost. 2017;117:1272–82.PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Schwarzenbach H. Circulating nucleic acids as biomarkers in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:211.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Murphy DJ. Freezing resistance in intertidal invertebrates. Annu Rev Physiol. 1983;45:289–99.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Robledo JAF, Yadavalli R, Allam B, Espinosa EP, Gerdol M, Greco S, et al. From the raw bar to the bench: bivalves as models for human health. Dev Comp Immunol. 2019;92:260–82.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cowart DA, Murphy KR, Cheng CC. Metagenomic sequencing of environmental DNA reveals marine faunal assemblages from the West Antarctic Peninsula. Mar Genom. 2018;37:148–60.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Parducci L, Bennett KD, Ficetola GF, Alsos IG, Suyama Y, Wood JR, et al. Ancient plant DNA in lake sediments. New Phytol. 2017;214:924–42.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Mariani S, Baillie C, Giuliano C, Riesgo A. Sponges as natural environmental DNA samplers. Curr Biol. 2019;29:R401–R402.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Weber S, Brink L, Wörner M, Künzel S, Veith M, Teubner D, et al. Molecular diet analysis in zebra and quagga mussels (Dreissena spp.) and an assessment of the utility of aquatic filter feeders as biological eDNA filters. BioRxiv. 2021; 432951.Caza F, Joly de Boissel PG, Villemur R, Betoulle S, St-Pierre Y. Liquid biopsies for omics-based analysis in sentinel mussels. Plos One. 2019;14:e0223525.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Hunter ME, Ferrante JA, Meigs-Friend G, Ulmer A. Improving eDNA yield and inhibitor reduction through increased water volumes and multi-filter isolation techniques. Sci Rep. 2019;9:5259.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar 
    Burkhardt W III, Calci KR. Selective accumulation may account for shellfish-associated viral illness. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66:1375–8.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Di Girolamo R, Liston J, Matches J. Ionic bonding, the mechanism of viral uptake by shellfish mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1977;33:19–25.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Metzger MJ, Reinisch C, Sherry J, Goff SP. Horizontal transmission of clonal cancer cells causes leukemia in soft-shell clams. Cell. 2015;161:255–63.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Metzger MJ, Villalba A, Carballal MJ, Iglesias D, Sherry J, Reinisch C, et al. Widespread transmission of independent cancer lineages within multiple bivalve species. Nature. 2016;534:705–9.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Canesi L, Gallo G, Gavioli M, Pruzzo C. Bacteria–hemocyte interactions and phagocytosis in marine bivalves. Microsc Res Tech. 2002;57:469–76.PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Andruszkiewicz EA, Koseff JR, Fringer OB, Ouellette NT, Lowe AB, Edwards CA, et al. Modeling environmental DNA transport in the coastal ocean using Lagrangian particle tracking. Front Mar Sci. 2019;6:477.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Wood ZT, Lacoursière-Roussel A, LeBlanc F, Trudel M, Kinnison MT, Garry McBrine C, et al. Spatial heterogeneity of eDNA transport improves stream assessment of threatened salmon presence, abundance, and location. Front Ecol Evol. 2021;9:650717.Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Rand AC, Jain M, Eizenga JM, Musselman-Brown A, Olsen HE, Akeson M, et al. Mapping DNA methylation with high-throughput nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods. 2017;14:411–3.CAS 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Simpson JT, Workman RE, Zuzarte PC, David M, Dursi LJ, Timp W. Detecting DNA cytosine methylation using nanopore sequencing. Nat Methods. 2017;14:407–10.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Cavalli G, Heard E. Advances in epigenetics link genetics to the environment and disease. Nature. 2019;571:489–99.CAS 
    PubMed 
    Article 

    Google Scholar 
    Fan G, Song Y, Yang L, Huang X, Zhang S, Zhang M, et al. Initial data release and announcement of the 10,000 Fish Genomes Project (Fish10K). Gigascience. 2020;9:giaa080.PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    Article 

    Google Scholar  More